RE: Attachment sending problem
The mailbox limit won't override the IMS. Let us know what happens when you disable the size limit on the IMS and restart it. Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:53 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem The IMS connector is set with 10MB limit but for my mailbox I have given 100MB. I have not restarted IMS as I didnot changed IMS settings. I however can change IMS setting to NO limit and then test the attachment. If I enable the log file will it be of any help in trouble shooting this problem. Anwar -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem That assumes properly configured and RFC compliant MTA's on the recipient end as well. Well, just to be sure, Anwar, did you stop and restart the IMS after making changes to the limits? William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Possibly. But if that's the case, wouldn't the reporting device be the remote MTA and not the local IMS (confusing with the domain name being ims as well!) I'm sure I've seen the local IMS report a similar error before, but hey, it's been a long week so far and I could easily be wrong here... :-) Neil -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem What are you on about, mate? Is it not the receiving end? William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Looks like the size restriction is set on your IMS. Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:04 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: Attachment sending problem I am trying to send a 8MB file to a client. I have checked at my end and dont see any problem but still this the attachments are not reaching the client. I have removed all mailbox size limits on Exchange 5.5 and don't know what else to do so that the attachment will reach client. I checked with the client and they said that they dont have any restriction at their end. Following is the NDR I am getting. I will appreciate if any one can give any suggestion how to trouble shoot this problem Anwar Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: #34 Travel Agent 03/02 tap. Sent: 5/1/2002 11:51 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/1/2002 11:52 AM The content length of the message is too long for the recipient to take delivery The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=ims;l=IMSMAIL-020501155056Z-341 MSEXCH:IMS:ims:mail:IMSMAIL 3903 (000B09AA) Message exceeds size limit List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This
RE: PST Bad - why?
PST=BAD is a bad equation. It should be PST=Usually Bad. Sometimes, you don't have any choice. For instance, when doing migrations or moving mailboxes. However, generally you shouldn't use them for permanent storage. They are actually very similar to the old MSMail format for storing mail which was also prone to failure. Kevin -Original Message- From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 May 2002 17:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PST Bad - why? Hello all sorry to ask a stupid question, but my pointy haired boss is looking at implementing PST's here and I know many people say pst's are not good, could you guys give me some ammo to argue why PST's aren't a good option and what problems will end up occurring if it is implemented. Thanks in advance. Michael Yurchuk, MCSE Systems Administrator direcTEL Saskatoon, SK 306-384-8600 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: PST Bad - why?
Title: RE: PST Bad - why? Please elaborate more on the issue. I'm also in a dilemma. My users are hard headed when it comes to mailbox size. One way is to go .PST. My disk space is now only 560k. TIA. -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? PST=BAD is a bad equation. It should be PST=Usually Bad. Sometimes, you don't have any choice. For instance, when doing migrations or moving mailboxes. However, generally you shouldn't use them for permanent storage. They are actually very similar to the old MSMail format for storing mail which was also prone to failure. Kevin -Original Message- From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 May 2002 17:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PST Bad - why? Hello all sorry to ask a stupid question, but my pointy haired boss is looking at implementing PST's here and I know many people say pst's are not good, could you guys give me some ammo to argue why PST's aren't a good option and what problems will end up occurring if it is implemented. Thanks in advance. Michael Yurchuk, MCSE Systems Administrator direcTEL Saskatoon, SK 306-384-8600 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: PST Bad - why?
Title: RE: PST Bad - why? Wally, Kumusta po kayo? The .pst will take up disk space. Some companies will have separate budgets for NT servers and Exchange servers so you end up with lots of disk space on home drives but no spare capacity in the Exchange server IS. A choice a lot of companies make in this scenario, is to go down the .pst route. The .psts are stored on home drives so get backed up. A certain large oil company I worked for deployed over 300,000 .psts in this way. Probably best not to START with that strategy but sometimes you've just got to run with whatever you're given! Sige! Kevin -Original Message-From: Lesaca, Wally R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 02 May 2002 08:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: PST Bad - why? Please elaborate more on the issue. I'm also in a dilemma. My users are hard headed when it comes to mailbox size. One way is to go .PST. My disk space is now only 560k. TIA. -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? PST=BAD is a bad equation. It should be PST=Usually Bad. Sometimes, you don't have any choice. For instance, when doing migrations or moving mailboxes. However, generally you shouldn't use them for permanent storage. They are actually very similar to the old MSMail format for storing mail which was also prone to failure. Kevin -Original Message- From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 May 2002 17:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PST Bad - why? Hello all sorry to ask a stupid question, but my pointy haired boss is looking at implementing PST's here and I know many people say pst's are not good, could you guys give me some ammo to argue why PST's aren't a good option and what problems will end up occurring if it is implemented. Thanks in advance. Michael Yurchuk, MCSE Systems Administrator direcTEL Saskatoon, SK 306-384-8600 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 16 GB Limit?
Title: Message Man (woman) does not live by e-mail alone. On the 7th day, God rested and looked back on what he (she) had done and saw that the world was almost perfect. Then Krispy Kreme sprang up next door to Starbucks and the world was perfect. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Rose, Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:37 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Have I joined the wrong list or something?? Is this an MS Exchange Issues list or what? What's all this Krispy Kreme business? :@/ List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of News Limited or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 16 GB Limit?
Title: Message okay, i have to ask... what or who is 'Krispy Kreme' ? -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Man (woman) does not live by e-mail alone. On the 7th day, God rested and looked back on what he (she) had done and saw that the world was almost perfect. Then Krispy Kreme sprang up next door to Starbucks and the world was perfect. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Rose, Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:37 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Have I joined the wrong list or something?? Is this an MS Exchange Issues list or what? What's all this Krispy Kreme business? :@/ List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of News Limited or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmThis email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScanservice. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service workingaround the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ** Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK This document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent written confirmation of its contents. Accordingly, United Co-op disclaims all responsibility and accept no liability (including in negligence) for the consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written confirmation. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited. United Coop has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as United Coop deem necessary in order to protect its information, its interest and its reputation. United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent its information systems from being used to view, store or forward sexually explicit, racist, sexist, sectarian, violent or otherwise offensive or discriminatory material. If this message contains such material please report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 16 GB Limit?
http://www.krispykreme.com/ -Original Message- From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 May 2002 12:24 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 16 GB Limit? Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? okay, i have to ask... what or who is 'Krispy Kreme' ? -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Man (woman) does not live by e-mail alone. On the 7th day, God rested and looked back on what he (she) had done and saw that the world was almost perfect. Then Krispy Kreme sprang up next door to Starbucks and the world was perfect. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rose, Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Have I joined the wrong list or something?? Is this an MS Exchange Issues list or what? What's all this Krispy Kreme business? :@/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of News Limited or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ** Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK This document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent written confirmation of its contents. Accordingly, United Co-op disclaims all responsibility and accept no liability (including in negligence) for the consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written confirmation. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited. United Coop has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as United Coop deem necessary in order to protect its information, its interest and its reputation. United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent its information systems from being used to view, store or forward sexually explicit, racist, sexist, sectarian, violent or otherwise offensive or discriminatory material. If this message contains such material please report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in
RE: 16 GB Limit?
wow.. looks nice, shame all we have round here is staniforths - they sell jam doughnuts but that's it. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? http://www.krispykreme.com/ -Original Message- From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 May 2002 12:24 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 16 GB Limit? Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? okay, i have to ask... what or who is 'Krispy Kreme' ? -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Man (woman) does not live by e-mail alone. On the 7th day, God rested and looked back on what he (she) had done and saw that the world was almost perfect. Then Krispy Kreme sprang up next door to Starbucks and the world was perfect. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rose, Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Have I joined the wrong list or something?? Is this an MS Exchange Issues list or what? What's all this Krispy Kreme business? :@/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of News Limited or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ** Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK This document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent written confirmation of its contents. Accordingly, United Co-op disclaims all responsibility and accept no liability (including in negligence) for the consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written confirmation. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited. United Coop has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as United Coop deem necessary in order to protect its information, its interest and its reputation. United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent its information systems from being used to view, store or forward sexually explicit, racist, sexist, sectarian, violent or otherwise offensive or discriminatory material. If this message contains such material please report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
AW: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords
The only thing I experienced with watchguard was that there are/had beenproblems with other mail servers if you use the standardEHLO-Command (ESMTP-Command).It seems to get an error at AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN probably causeit's an ESMTP-Keyword with spaces in between. After I checked the watchguard log and then decided to switch to HELO at the E2K server it worked fine! (No, I didn't like the solution...) Perhaps if one configures the watchguard firewall properly this wouldn't be an issue... Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Jonathan Schober [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2002 00:43An: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesBetreff: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords We use a watchguard firewall which, by default,removes all unkown SMTP headers and ESMTP keywords.The following is a list of 41 headers and keywordsthat have beenrejected by our firewall during the past week. I am consideringadding some of these to the firewall's list of known headers/keywords. I'm especially interested in the security ramifications of adding these (we use Exchange 2000). Does anyone know of a specific reasonTo/NotTo add these? Status Keyword/Header Number of Times Rejected removing unknown or denied header List-Unsubscribe 481 removing unknown or denied header Received 164 removing unknown or denied header content-class 139 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Index 138 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Topic 135 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-TNEF-Correlator 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-Has-Attach 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MimeOLE 63 removing unknown or denied header Reporting-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header Arrival-Date 57 removing unknown or denied header Received-From-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header X-DSNContext 56 removing unknown or denied header X-OriginalArrivalTime 56 removing unknown or denied header Return-Path 56 removing unknown or denied header X-Mailer 54 removing ESMTP keyword PIPELINING 53 removing ESMTP keyword OK 53 removing ESMTP keyword TURN 53 removing ESMTP keyword VRFY 53 removing ESMTP keyword XEXCH50 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-LINK2STATE 53 removing ESMTP keyword ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 53 removing ESMTP keyword ATRN 53 removing ESMTP keyword DSN 53 removing ESMTP keyword ETRN 53 removing ESMTP keyword CHUNKING 53 removing ESMTP keyword BINARYMIME 53 removing ESMTP keyword AUTH=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword AUTH 53 removing unknown or denied header Importance 50 removing unknown or denied header Disposition-Notification-To 10 removing unknown or denied header Organization 8 removing unknown or denied header Content-Location 3 removing unknown or denied header BANNED 2 removing unknown or denied header Errors-to 2 removing unknown or denied header ERROR 2 removing unknown or denied header Receipt-Requested-To 1 removing unknown or denied header Return-Receipt-To 1 removing unknown or denied header User-Agent 1 .+- @Aa 0 z[lpjo/Z\zm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 16 GB Limit?
Title: RE: 16 GB Limit? M, they melt in your mouth, especially when you walk into a store and they have someone handing out samples of freshly made, still warm, donuts... -Original Message- From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? wow.. looks nice, shame all we have round here is staniforths - they sell jam doughnuts but that's it. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? http://www.krispykreme.com/ -Original Message- From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 May 2002 12:24 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 16 GB Limit? Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? okay, i have to ask... what or who is 'Krispy Kreme' ? -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Man (woman) does not live by e-mail alone. On the 7th day, God rested and looked back on what he (she) had done and saw that the world was almost perfect. Then Krispy Kreme sprang up next door to Starbucks and the world was perfect. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rose, Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Have I joined the wrong list or something?? Is this an MS Exchange Issues list or what? What's all this Krispy Kreme business? :@/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of News Limited or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ** Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK This document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent written confirmation of its contents. Accordingly, United Co-op disclaims all responsibility and accept no liability (including in negligence) for the consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written confirmation. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited. United Coop has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as United Coop deem necessary in order to protect its information, its interest and its reputation. United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent its information systems from being used to view, store or forward sexually explicit, racist, sexist, sectarian, violent or otherwise offensive or discriminatory material. If this message contains such material please report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the
3rd Party Defrag
Are there any known issues I should be aware of concerning running a 3rd party defrag on an NT4 Exchange box? I.e. DiskKeeper, etc. NT4 SP6 Exch 5.5 SP4 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 3rd Party Defrag
Exclude everything related to Exchange. Only defrag the OS. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 3rd Party Defrag Are there any known issues I should be aware of concerning running a 3rd party defrag on an NT4 Exchange box? I.e. DiskKeeper, etc. NT4 SP6 Exch 5.5 SP4 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 16 GB Limit?
A viable alternative for those of us stranded up in the Northeast. Coffee's pretty good too. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ryan Gorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? What about dunkindonuts (although I like that Krisky can spell doughnuts correctly). -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] M, they melt in your mouth, especially when you walk into a store and they have someone handing out samples of freshly made, still warm, donuts... This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: PST Bad - why?
Title: RE: PST Bad - why? http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxf.htmtells all you need to know on the subject... - Original Message - From: Lesaca, Wally R. To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:48 AM Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? Please elaborate more on the issue. I'm also in a dilemma. My users are hard headed when it comes to mailbox size. One way is to go .PST. My disk space is now only 560k. TIA. -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? PST=BAD is a bad equation. It should be PST=Usually Bad. Sometimes, you don't have any choice. For instance, when doing migrations or moving mailboxes. However, generally you shouldn't use them for permanent storage. They are actually very similar to the old MSMail format for storing mail which was also prone to failure. Kevin -Original Message- From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 May 2002 17:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PST Bad - why? Hello all sorry to ask a stupid question, but my pointy haired boss is looking at implementing PST's here and I know many people say pst's are not good, could you guys give me some ammo to argue why PST's aren't a good option and what problems will end up occurring if it is implemented. Thanks in advance. Michael Yurchuk, MCSE Systems Administrator direcTEL Saskatoon, SK 306-384-8600 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Congestion
Title: Message Well, we'd love to help you sort this out, but there simply isn't enough information to run with here. Missy - Original Message - From: Steve Hart To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:59 PM Subject: Congestion I have 3 exchange 5.5 SP4 NT4.0 SP6a servers, each in it's own site. Two servers are working fine, all internet connectors seem to be fine. One server will not send or recieve mail from the others due to congestion. (Sorry, I haven't seen the actual error message.) Ideas? Steve List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
AW: Congestion
Title: Message There you're very right... But meanwhile he can search for "exchange congestion" and will receive some Q's in return... Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2002 15:14An: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesBetreff: Re: Congestion Well, we'd love to help you sort this out, but there simply isn't enough information to run with here. Missy - Original Message - From: Steve Hart To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:59 PM Subject: Congestion I have 3 exchange 5.5 SP4 NT4.0 SP6a servers, each in it's own site. Two servers are working fine, all internet connectors seem to be fine. One server will not send or recieve mail from the others due to congestion. (Sorry, I haven't seen the actual error message.) Ideas? Steve List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Congestion
Title: Message One would hope that was done before the list was ever asked about the question. - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:23 AM Subject: AW: Congestion There you're very right... But meanwhile he can search for "exchange congestion" and will receive some Q's in return... Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2002 15:14An: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesBetreff: Re: Congestion Well, we'd love to help you sort this out, but there simply isn't enough information to run with here. Missy - Original Message - From: Steve Hart To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:59 PM Subject: Congestion I have 3 exchange 5.5 SP4 NT4.0 SP6a servers, each in it's own site. Two servers are working fine, all internet connectors seem to be fine. One server will not send or recieve mail from the others due to congestion. (Sorry, I haven't seen the actual error message.) Ideas? Steve List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachment sending problem
I have changed the IMS connector from 10MB to NO limit and all attachments are going through fine. The 10MB limit was setup for past 6 months and doesnot had any problems. One of my user yesterday was trying to send 4MB attachment and was still getting the same message 'Message exceeds size limit'. After changing to No limits everything is working fine. I will try to put back 10MB limit on IMS connector later on just to see if it works this time Thanks everyone for your valuable feedback. Anwar -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem The mailbox limit won't override the IMS. Let us know what happens when you disable the size limit on the IMS and restart it. Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:53 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem The IMS connector is set with 10MB limit but for my mailbox I have given 100MB. I have not restarted IMS as I didnot changed IMS settings. I however can change IMS setting to NO limit and then test the attachment. If I enable the log file will it be of any help in trouble shooting this problem. Anwar -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem That assumes properly configured and RFC compliant MTA's on the recipient end as well. Well, just to be sure, Anwar, did you stop and restart the IMS after making changes to the limits? William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Possibly. But if that's the case, wouldn't the reporting device be the remote MTA and not the local IMS (confusing with the domain name being ims as well!) I'm sure I've seen the local IMS report a similar error before, but hey, it's been a long week so far and I could easily be wrong here... :-) Neil -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem What are you on about, mate? Is it not the receiving end? William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Looks like the size restriction is set on your IMS. Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:04 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: Attachment sending problem I am trying to send a 8MB file to a client. I have checked at my end and dont see any problem but still this the attachments are not reaching the client. I have removed all mailbox size limits on Exchange 5.5 and don't know what else to do so that the attachment will reach client. I checked with the client and they said that they dont have any restriction at their end. Following is the NDR I am getting. I will appreciate if any one can give any suggestion how to trouble shoot this problem Anwar Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: #34 Travel Agent 03/02 tap. Sent: 5/1/2002 11:51 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/1/2002 11:52 AM The content length of the message is too long for the recipient to take delivery The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=ims;l=IMSMAIL-020501155056Z-341 MSEXCH:IMS:ims:mail:IMSMAIL 3903 (000B09AA) Message exceeds size limit List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions
RE: Congestion
Title: Message Sure... You are a dreamer -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Congestion One would hope that was done before the list was ever asked about the question. - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:23 AM Subject: AW: Congestion There you're very right... But meanwhile he can search for exchange congestion and will receive some Q's in return... Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2002 15:14 An: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Betreff: Re: Congestion Well, we'd love to help you sort this out, but there simply isn't enough information to run with here. Missy - Original Message - From: Steve Hart To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:59 PM Subject: Congestion I have 3 exchange 5.5 SP4 NT4.0 SP6a servers, each in it's own site. Two servers are working fine, all internet connectors seem to be fine. One server will not send or recieve mail from the others due to congestion. (Sorry, I haven't seen the actual error message.) Ideas? Steve List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachment sending problem
Glad it's now working. Everyone who said it is the remote end is sacked! :-) Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 May 2002 14:32 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem I have changed the IMS connector from 10MB to NO limit and all attachments are going through fine. The 10MB limit was setup for past 6 months and doesnot had any problems. One of my user yesterday was trying to send 4MB attachment and was still getting the same message 'Message exceeds size limit'. After changing to No limits everything is working fine. I will try to put back 10MB limit on IMS connector later on just to see if it works this time Thanks everyone for your valuable feedback. Anwar -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem The mailbox limit won't override the IMS. Let us know what happens when you disable the size limit on the IMS and restart it. Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:53 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem The IMS connector is set with 10MB limit but for my mailbox I have given 100MB. I have not restarted IMS as I didnot changed IMS settings. I however can change IMS setting to NO limit and then test the attachment. If I enable the log file will it be of any help in trouble shooting this problem. Anwar -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem That assumes properly configured and RFC compliant MTA's on the recipient end as well. Well, just to be sure, Anwar, did you stop and restart the IMS after making changes to the limits? William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Possibly. But if that's the case, wouldn't the reporting device be the remote MTA and not the local IMS (confusing with the domain name being ims as well!) I'm sure I've seen the local IMS report a similar error before, but hey, it's been a long week so far and I could easily be wrong here... :-) Neil -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem What are you on about, mate? Is it not the receiving end? William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Looks like the size restriction is set on your IMS. Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:04 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: Attachment sending problem I am trying to send a 8MB file to a client. I have checked at my end and dont see any problem but still this the attachments are not reaching the client. I have removed all mailbox size limits on Exchange 5.5 and don't know what else to do so that the attachment will reach client. I checked with the client and they said that they dont have any restriction at their end. Following is the NDR I am getting. I will appreciate if any one can give any suggestion how to trouble shoot this problem Anwar Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: #34 Travel Agent 03/02 tap. Sent: 5/1/2002 11:51 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/1/2002 11:52 AM The content length of the message is too long for the recipient to take delivery The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=ims;l=IMSMAIL-020501155056Z-341 MSEXCH:IMS:ims:mail:IMSMAIL 3903 (000B09AA) Message exceeds size limit List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List
Fw: Norton AntiVirus detected and quarantined a virus in a message yo u sent.
If you recieve an email with this message in the subject line it is a virus. Do not open the attachment, and immediately scan your system for infections. regards, Maggie ---Original Message--- From: NAV for Microsoft Exchange-JHB3 Date: Thursday, May 02, 2002 07:37:12 AM To: 'siglets' Subject: Norton AntiVirus detected and quarantined a virus in a message yo u sent. Recipient of the infected attachment: Adeline Bob\InboxSubject of the message: VisibilityOne or more attachments were quarantined.Attachment search[3].scr was Quarantined for the following reasons:Virus was found. W32.Klez.gen@mmRecipient of the infected attachment: Adeline Bob\InboxSubject of the message: VisibilityOne or more attachments were quarantined.Attachment search[3].scr was Quarantined for the following reasons:Virus W32.Klez.gen@mm was found.This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and areintended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they areaddressed. This communication represents the originator's personal views andopinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of the operatingcompany of The Compass Group Southern Africa from whom it emanates. Further, Compass will not beheld responsible for its contents and/or attachments, if thecommunication contravenes the rules of the Group's emailThis email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and areintended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they areaddressed. This communication represents the originator's personal views andopinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of the operatingcompany of The Compass Group Southern Africa from whom it emanates. Further, Compass will not beheld responsible for its contents and/or attachments, if thecommunication contravenes the rules of the Group's email policy.The email may contain certain confidential, private or privileged information.If you are not the intended recipient, you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distributeor copy it or its attachments. We would be obliged if you would notify the sender of their mistakeimmediately by email, fax or telephone and destroy the originalemail and any attachments. IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Norton AntiVirus detected and quarantined a virus in a message yo u sent.
oh yeah that's nasty one. The subject line will change as will the payloaddepending on what is in the senders inbox. very sneaky very bad. Matt - Original Message - From: whitton To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:53 AM Subject: Fw: Norton AntiVirus detected and quarantined a virus in a message yo u sent. If you recieve an email with this message in the subject line it is a virus. Do not open the attachment, and immediately scan your system for infections. regards, Maggie ---Original Message--- From: NAV for Microsoft Exchange-JHB3 Date: Thursday, May 02, 2002 07:37:12 AM To: 'siglets' Subject: Norton AntiVirus detected and quarantined a virus in a message yo u sent. Recipient of the infected attachment: Adeline Bob\InboxSubject of the message: VisibilityOne or more attachments were quarantined.Attachment search[3].scr was Quarantined for the following reasons:Virus was found. W32.Klez.gen@mmRecipient of the infected attachment: Adeline Bob\InboxSubject of the message: VisibilityOne or more attachments were quarantined.Attachment search[3].scr was Quarantined for the following reasons:Virus W32.Klez.gen@mm was found.This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and areintended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they areaddressed. This communication represents the originator's personal views andopinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of the operatingcompany of The Compass Group Southern Africa from whom it emanates. Further, Compass will not beheld responsible for its contents and/or attachments, if thecommunication contravenes the rules of the Group's emailThis email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and areintended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they areaddressed. This communication represents the originator's personal views andopinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of the operatingcompany of The Compass Group Southern Africa from whom it emanates. Further, Compass will not beheld responsible for its contents and/or attachments, if thecommunication contravenes the rules of the Group's email policy.The email may contain certain confidential, private or privileged information.If you are not the intended recipient, you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distributeor copy it or its attachments. We would be obliged if you would notify the sender of their mistakeimmediately by email, fax or telephone and destroy the originalemail and any attachments. IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachment sending problem
Where do they collect their P45? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2002 14:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Glad it's now working. Everyone who said it is the remote end is sacked! :-) Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 May 2002 14:32 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem I have changed the IMS connector from 10MB to NO limit and all attachments are going through fine. The 10MB limit was setup for past 6 months and doesnot had any problems. One of my user yesterday was trying to send 4MB attachment and was still getting the same message 'Message exceeds size limit'. After changing to No limits everything is working fine. I will try to put back 10MB limit on IMS connector later on just to see if it works this time Thanks everyone for your valuable feedback. Anwar -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem The mailbox limit won't override the IMS. Let us know what happens when you disable the size limit on the IMS and restart it. Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:53 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem The IMS connector is set with 10MB limit but for my mailbox I have given 100MB. I have not restarted IMS as I didnot changed IMS settings. I however can change IMS setting to NO limit and then test the attachment. If I enable the log file will it be of any help in trouble shooting this problem. Anwar -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem That assumes properly configured and RFC compliant MTA's on the recipient end as well. Well, just to be sure, Anwar, did you stop and restart the IMS after making changes to the limits? William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Possibly. But if that's the case, wouldn't the reporting device be the remote MTA and not the local IMS (confusing with the domain name being ims as well!) I'm sure I've seen the local IMS report a similar error before, but hey, it's been a long week so far and I could easily be wrong here... :-) Neil -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem What are you on about, mate? Is it not the receiving end? William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Looks like the size restriction is set on your IMS. Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:04 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: Attachment sending problem I am trying to send a 8MB file to a client. I have checked at my end and dont see any problem but still this the attachments are not reaching the client. I have removed all mailbox size limits on Exchange 5.5 and don't know what else to do so that the attachment will reach client. I checked with the client and they said that they dont have any restriction at their end. Following is the NDR I am getting. I will appreciate if any one can give any suggestion how to trouble shoot this problem Anwar Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: #34 Travel Agent 03/02 tap. Sent: 5/1/2002 11:51 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/1/2002 11:52 AM The content length of the message is too long for the recipient to take delivery The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=ims;l=IMSMAIL-020501155056Z-341 MSEXCH:IMS:ims:mail:IMSMAIL 3903 (000B09AA) Message exceeds size limit List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36
RE: Attachment sending problem
Title: RE: Attachment sending problem Well, that initial message he was sending sure looked like it was the remote. Plus, I don't understand why 4 MB attachments were not passing through a 10 MB limit? Unless that email content was dammm long. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Glad it's now working. Everyone who said it is the remote end is sacked! :-) Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 May 2002 14:32 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem I have changed the IMS connector from 10MB to NO limit and all attachments are going through fine. The 10MB limit was setup for past 6 months and doesnot had any problems. One of my user yesterday was trying to send 4MB attachment and was still getting the same message 'Message exceeds size limit'. After changing to No limits everything is working fine. I will try to put back 10MB limit on IMS connector later on just to see if it works this time Thanks everyone for your valuable feedback. Anwar -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem The mailbox limit won't override the IMS. Let us know what happens when you disable the size limit on the IMS and restart it. Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:53 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem The IMS connector is set with 10MB limit but for my mailbox I have given 100MB. I have not restarted IMS as I didnot changed IMS settings. I however can change IMS setting to NO limit and then test the attachment. If I enable the log file will it be of any help in trouble shooting this problem. Anwar -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem That assumes properly configured and RFC compliant MTA's on the recipient end as well. Well, just to be sure, Anwar, did you stop and restart the IMS after making changes to the limits? William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Possibly. But if that's the case, wouldn't the reporting device be the remote MTA and not the local IMS (confusing with the domain name being ims as well!) I'm sure I've seen the local IMS report a similar error before, but hey, it's been a long week so far and I could easily be wrong here... :-) Neil -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem What are you on about, mate? Is it not the receiving end? William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Looks like the size restriction is set on your IMS. Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:04 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: Attachment sending problem I am trying to send a 8MB file to a client. I have checked at my end and dont see any problem but still this the attachments are not reaching the client. I have removed all mailbox size limits on Exchange 5.5 and don't know what else to do so that the attachment will reach client. I checked with the client and they said that they dont have any restriction at their end. Following is the NDR I am getting. I will appreciate if any one can give any suggestion how to trouble shoot this problem Anwar Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: #34 Travel Agent 03/02 tap. Sent: 5/1/2002 11:51 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/1/2002 11:52 AM The content length of the message is too long for the recipient to take delivery The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=ims;l=IMSMAIL-020501155056Z-341 MSEXCH:IMS:ims:mail:IMSMAIL 3903 (000B09AA) Message exceeds size limit List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or
RE: Attachment sending problem
I know what you mean; some NDRs are very misleading. I agree, the 4Mb problem does seem weird; even with a hefty 40% encoding on top, that doesn't make 10Mb. Mind you, I have seen some strange things recently with a customer who had a message storm caused by what was originally a 2k message being shown as a 2Mb message in the MTA queue. Neil -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 May 2002 15:12 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Well, that initial message he was sending sure looked like it was the remote. Plus, I don't understand why 4 MB attachments were not passing through a 10 MB limit? Unless that email content was dammm long. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Glad it's now working. Everyone who said it is the remote end is sacked! :-) Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 May 2002 14:32 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem I have changed the IMS connector from 10MB to NO limit and all attachments are going through fine. The 10MB limit was setup for past 6 months and doesnot had any problems. One of my user yesterday was trying to send 4MB attachment and was still getting the same message 'Message exceeds size limit'. After changing to No limits everything is working fine. I will try to put back 10MB limit on IMS connector later on just to see if it works this time Thanks everyone for your valuable feedback. Anwar -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem The mailbox limit won't override the IMS. Let us know what happens when you disable the size limit on the IMS and restart it. Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:53 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem The IMS connector is set with 10MB limit but for my mailbox I have given 100MB. I have not restarted IMS as I didnot changed IMS settings. I however can change IMS setting to NO limit and then test the attachment. If I enable the log file will it be of any help in trouble shooting this problem. Anwar -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem That assumes properly configured and RFC compliant MTA's on the recipient end as well. Well, just to be sure, Anwar, did you stop and restart the IMS after making changes to the limits? William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Possibly. But if that's the case, wouldn't the reporting device be the remote MTA and not the local IMS (confusing with the domain name being ims as well!) I'm sure I've seen the local IMS report a similar error before, but hey, it's been a long week so far and I could easily be wrong here... :-) Neil -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem What are you on about, mate? Is it not the receiving end? William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Looks like the size restriction is set on your IMS. Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:04 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: Attachment sending problem I am trying to send a 8MB file to a client. I have checked at my end and dont see any problem but still this the attachments are not reaching the client. I have removed all mailbox size limits on Exchange 5.5 and don't know what else to do so that the attachment will reach client. I checked with the client and they said that they dont have any restriction at their end. Following is the NDR I am getting. I will appreciate if any one can give any suggestion how to trouble shoot this problem Anwar Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: #34 Travel Agent 03/02 tap. Sent: 5/1/2002 11:51 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL
RE: 16 GB Limit?
Eat one doughnut and the taste will stay with you all day. The power of preservatives. ~ -K.Borndale IT Manager Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor Jeremiah Watson jwatson@composidTo: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] ie.com cc: Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 05/02/02 07:27 AM Please respond to MS-Exchange Admin Issues They're a famous donut company in the US. I believe they started down south and migrating up north.. -Original Message- From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? okay, i have to ask... what or who is 'Krispy Kreme' -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Man (woman) does not live by e-mail alone. On the 7th day, God rested and looked back on what he (she) had done and saw that the world was almost perfect. Then Krispy Kreme sprang up next door to Starbucks and the world was perfect. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rose, Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Have I joined the wrong list or something?? Is this an MS Exchange Issues list or what? What's all this Krispy Kremebusiness? :@/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of News Limited or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ** Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK This document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent written confirmation of its contents. Accordingly, United Co-op disclaims all responsibility and accept no liability (including in negligence) for the consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written confirmation. If you have received this E-mail message in
RE: Recovery server
N! Your receovery server has to exactly match your production server. Same OS same OS service packs same OS security patches. Same Version of Exchange and same exchange patches. I did this last week if you like I can send you step by step notes on how I did this. -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recovery server Yes I am...and they are there...this may sound REALLY dumb, but if the production server is Win2K, can the recovery server be WinNT? After I replay the logs, I get a 3355443730 error which goes backup to the inconsistent database reg key...Q200941. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recovery server I take it that you are attempting to replay the logs. Make sure they are all there and that you have the right high and low log numbers. -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Recovery server Before the restore? Or before starting the IS? Yes I did...that gives me a JET_errBadLogSignature error -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recovery server Have you run isinteg -patch before starting? -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Recovery server Hey there, I am in the process of setting up a recovery server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4.sp6. When I restore the IS, like all the TIDS say, I can never get the IS to start. The error I get is related to http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q200941. Basically I want to start the IS and then exmerge some data out. I am using arcserve 2k with sp3 and restoring to a non-production server with the same site ID and org names. The events I get are 1080 and 5000. Steve Ens List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Recovery server
Opps nevermind I see you already got it working. Good job. -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recovery server N! Your receovery server has to exactly match your production server. Same OS same OS service packs same OS security patches. Same Version of Exchange and same exchange patches. I did this last week if you like I can send you step by step notes on how I did this. -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recovery server Yes I am...and they are there...this may sound REALLY dumb, but if the production server is Win2K, can the recovery server be WinNT? After I replay the logs, I get a 3355443730 error which goes backup to the inconsistent database reg key...Q200941. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recovery server I take it that you are attempting to replay the logs. Make sure they are all there and that you have the right high and low log numbers. -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Recovery server Before the restore? Or before starting the IS? Yes I did...that gives me a JET_errBadLogSignature error -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recovery server Have you run isinteg -patch before starting? -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Recovery server Hey there, I am in the process of setting up a recovery server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4.sp6. When I restore the IS, like all the TIDS say, I can never get the IS to start. The error I get is related to http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q200941. Basically I want to start the IS and then exmerge some data out. I am using arcserve 2k with sp3 and restoring to a non-production server with the same site ID and org names. The events I get are 1080 and 5000. Steve Ens List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Recovery server
Yeah thanks...it works like a charm. I as just about to install Win2K, and then I thought to service pack it up again. Send the notes anyway, it's always nice to see someone elses method.. Steve -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recovery server Opps nevermind I see you already got it working. Good job. -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recovery server N! Your receovery server has to exactly match your production server. Same OS same OS service packs same OS security patches. Same Version of Exchange and same exchange patches. I did this last week if you like I can send you step by step notes on how I did this. -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recovery server Yes I am...and they are there...this may sound REALLY dumb, but if the production server is Win2K, can the recovery server be WinNT? After I replay the logs, I get a 3355443730 error which goes backup to the inconsistent database reg key...Q200941. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recovery server I take it that you are attempting to replay the logs. Make sure they are all there and that you have the right high and low log numbers. -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Recovery server Before the restore? Or before starting the IS? Yes I did...that gives me a JET_errBadLogSignature error -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recovery server Have you run isinteg -patch before starting? -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Recovery server Hey there, I am in the process of setting up a recovery server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4.sp6. When I restore the IS, like all the TIDS say, I can never get the IS to start. The error I get is related to http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q200941. Basically I want to start the IS and then exmerge some data out. I am using arcserve 2k with sp3 and restoring to a non-production server with the same site ID and org names. The events I get are 1080 and 5000. Steve Ens List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: PST Bad - why?
You do have several excellent credentials - but are you certified to beat someone senseless? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? Tell him I will drive over there beat him senseless, drug him, strip him naked, and toss him in the middle of a LAX game. Then tell both teams that he just slept with their mothers. Or see the FAQ http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxf.htm --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PST Bad - why? Hello all sorry to ask a stupid question, but my pointy haired boss is looking at implementing PST's here and I know many people say pst's are not good, could you guys give me some ammo to argue why PST's aren't a good option and what problems will end up occurring if it is implemented. Thanks in advance. Michael Yurchuk, MCSE Systems Administrator direcTEL Saskatoon, SK 306-384-8600 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: PST Bad - why?
Hell yes, I have Ninja Power.. Becarefull I might freak out all over. If you look all over you might even find a picture of me on there site now. http://www.realultimatepower.net --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? You do have several excellent credentials - but are you certified to beat someone senseless? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? Tell him I will drive over there beat him senseless, drug him, strip him naked, and toss him in the middle of a LAX game. Then tell both teams that he just slept with their mothers. Or see the FAQ http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxf.htm --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PST Bad - why? Hello all sorry to ask a stupid question, but my pointy haired boss is looking at implementing PST's here and I know many people say pst's are not good, could you guys give me some ammo to argue why PST's aren't a good option and what problems will end up occurring if it is implemented. Thanks in advance. Michael Yurchuk, MCSE Systems Administrator direcTEL Saskatoon, SK 306-384-8600 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: PST Bad - why?
Testify!! -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? Hell yes, I have Ninja Power.. Becarefull I might freak out all over. If you look all over you might even find a picture of me on there site now. http://www.realultimatepower.net --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? You do have several excellent credentials - but are you certified to beat someone senseless? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? Tell him I will drive over there beat him senseless, drug him, strip him naked, and toss him in the middle of a LAX game. Then tell both teams that he just slept with their mothers. Or see the FAQ http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxf.htm --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PST Bad - why? Hello all sorry to ask a stupid question, but my pointy haired boss is looking at implementing PST's here and I know many people say pst's are not good, could you guys give me some ammo to argue why PST's aren't a good option and what problems will end up occurring if it is implemented. Thanks in advance. Michael Yurchuk, MCSE Systems Administrator direcTEL Saskatoon, SK 306-384-8600 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: restore mails from transaction logs in Exchange 5.5
Hi Rodney, Thanks for the mail , I know the use of these logs but my question is should i copy the res1.log,res2.log,priv.pat pub.pat files also along with the edbxxx.log . Harshang shah (mcse,ccna) --- Rodney Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After you have restored your information store, the information store service will replay through any log files generated since the last online backup, and will recover all data. Now, if you have deleted any transaction logs since your last online backup, you are toast and you have lost all the data in the transaction logs. The key with transaction logs is that you shouldn't lose any since they are sequential. Since it seems that you have played around with doing the restore and the logs, you should have a backup of the original transaction logs at the time of the failure if you need to recover all the data. If you happen to have those logs, just restore your backup and you are set. The res1.log and res2.log are log files that are reserved if there isn't enough space... The .pat files are normally seen when backups are taking place... Rodney Li Hi All, My Exchange 5.5 server with 250 mailboxes had crashed 2 days back due to some scsi card problem , just 5 - 6 hours after the online backup was over .To prevent the downtime I did an online restore on another server , everyone can also access their mailboxes .Now the problem is that after the backup was over there are transaction log files of 300 mb which have not been committed to the database .I have these files on the old server.Users are complaining that their mails for this particular period are not there . Now I want to recovers the users mails from these log files . I know how to do a online restore of the database but am not much confident about restoring the log files .Infact I tried it but am not successful with it .There are events like the 5000,1180 1120 starting the information services after copying these log files ,I searched through TechNet also but it says something different only .I need help on the exact log files that I should copy besides the sequence thing ,should I also copy the res1.log, res2.log, priv.pat, pub.pat edb.log from the old server . Thanks Regards, Harshang Shah (mcse,ccna) __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: PST Bad - why?
LOL how to reduce helpdesk calls to zero yes, that's a tough one, sir - we'll have to escalate your call to Ninja status - someone will contact you shortly... -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? Hell yes, I have Ninja Power.. Becarefull I might freak out all over. If you look all over you might even find a picture of me on there site now. http://www.realultimatepower.net --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? You do have several excellent credentials - but are you certified to beat someone senseless? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: PST Bad - why? Tell him I will drive over there beat him senseless, drug him, strip him naked, and toss him in the middle of a LAX game. Then tell both teams that he just slept with their mothers. Or see the FAQ http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxf.htm --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PST Bad - why? Hello all sorry to ask a stupid question, but my pointy haired boss is looking at implementing PST's here and I know many people say pst's are not good, could you guys give me some ammo to argue why PST's aren't a good option and what problems will end up occurring if it is implemented. Thanks in advance. Michael Yurchuk, MCSE Systems Administrator direcTEL Saskatoon, SK 306-384-8600 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 16 GB Limit?
Why bother eating it. I just stick it under my belt. That's where it ends up anyway. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Eat one doughnut and the taste will stay with you all day. The power of preservatives. ~ -K.Borndale IT Manager Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor Jeremiah Watson jwatson@composidTo: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] ie.com cc: Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 05/02/02 07:27 AM Please respond to MS-Exchange Admin Issues They're a famous donut company in the US. I believe they started down south and migrating up north.. -Original Message- From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? okay, i have to ask... what or who is 'Krispy Kreme' -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Man (woman) does not live by e-mail alone. On the 7th day, God rested and looked back on what he (she) had done and saw that the world was almost perfect. Then Krispy Kreme sprang up next door to Starbucks and the world was perfect. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rose, Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Have I joined the wrong list or something?? Is this an MS Exchange Issues list or what? What's all this Krispy Kremebusiness? :@/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of News Limited or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ** Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK This document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent written confirmation of its contents. Accordingly, United Co-op disclaims all responsibility and accept no liability (including in negligence) for the consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written confirmation. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited. United Coop has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as United Coop deem necessary in order to protect its information, its interest and its reputation. United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent
print detail on gal
I am trying to export my gal to a file . How can I include the last logon to the mailbox in the .csv file? When I go into Servers,Server,Priv,Mailbox Resources it show that detail. The only way to get this info is to screen print it. Is there a way to capture this info. dave List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: print detail on gal
never mind i found it. dave -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: print detail on gal I am trying to export my gal to a file . How can I include the last logon to the mailbox in the .csv file? When I go into Servers,Server,Priv,Mailbox Resources it show that detail. The only way to get this info is to screen print it. Is there a way to capture this info. dave List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Recipient Update Service
I am running Exchange 2000. After I created a new mailbox account, it tooks long time (some time several days and I have to rebuilt GAL) to show up on Global Address List. I have setup Recipient Update Service(RUS) update interval as always run and domain controller is GC server. Any idea? Thank you very much List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 3rd Party Defrag
Title: Message If your server is dedicated to the messaging application Exchange, and is configured properly with store and logs in their respective drives/spindles/partitions, then I am of the opinion there is no true benefit to running such an application on your exchange server. If you must, exclude the drives/partitions with Exchange on it. It does nothing but totally slow your server down during the defrag and increases potential corruption in the store and logs should you apply it there. William -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:02 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 3rd Party Defrag Are there any known issues I should be aware of concerning running a 3rd party defrag on an NT4 Exchange box? I.e. DiskKeeper, etc. NT4 SP6 Exch 5.5 SP4List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachment sending problem
You'd think those Microsoft guys could write a decent NDR. ;) -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Glad it's now working. Everyone who said it is the remote end is sacked! :-) Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 May 2002 14:32 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem I have changed the IMS connector from 10MB to NO limit and all attachments are going through fine. The 10MB limit was setup for past 6 months and doesnot had any problems. One of my user yesterday was trying to send 4MB attachment and was still getting the same message 'Message exceeds size limit'. After changing to No limits everything is working fine. I will try to put back 10MB limit on IMS connector later on just to see if it works this time Thanks everyone for your valuable feedback. Anwar -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem The mailbox limit won't override the IMS. Let us know what happens when you disable the size limit on the IMS and restart it. Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:53 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem The IMS connector is set with 10MB limit but for my mailbox I have given 100MB. I have not restarted IMS as I didnot changed IMS settings. I however can change IMS setting to NO limit and then test the attachment. If I enable the log file will it be of any help in trouble shooting this problem. Anwar -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem That assumes properly configured and RFC compliant MTA's on the recipient end as well. Well, just to be sure, Anwar, did you stop and restart the IMS after making changes to the limits? William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Possibly. But if that's the case, wouldn't the reporting device be the remote MTA and not the local IMS (confusing with the domain name being ims as well!) I'm sure I've seen the local IMS report a similar error before, but hey, it's been a long week so far and I could easily be wrong here... :-) Neil -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem What are you on about, mate? Is it not the receiving end? William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem Looks like the size restriction is set on your IMS. Neil -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:04 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Attachment sending problem Subject: Attachment sending problem I am trying to send a 8MB file to a client. I have checked at my end and dont see any problem but still this the attachments are not reaching the client. I have removed all mailbox size limits on Exchange 5.5 and don't know what else to do so that the attachment will reach client. I checked with the client and they said that they dont have any restriction at their end. Following is the NDR I am getting. I will appreciate if any one can give any suggestion how to trouble shoot this problem Anwar Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: #34 Travel Agent 03/02 tap. Sent: 5/1/2002 11:51 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/1/2002 11:52 AM The content length of the message is too long for the recipient to take delivery The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=ims;l=IMSMAIL-020501155056Z-341 MSEXCH:IMS:ims:mail:IMSMAIL 3903 (000B09AA) Message exceeds size limit List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk
RE: Recipient Update Service
Title: Message Is this a single site? Single Exchange Server? How many DC's? All on the same LAN? If I make lots of changes, I will manually rebuild the RUS. It's just habit now. -Original Message-From: Feng, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:38 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Recipient Update Service I am running Exchange 2000. After I created a new mailbox account, it tooks long time (some time several days and I have to rebuilt GAL) to show up on Global Address List. I have setup Recipient Update Service(RUS) update interval as always run and domain controller is GC server. Any idea? Thank you very muchList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: print detail on gal
Title: RE: print detail on gal you dont want to share with us ? -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 13:25 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: print detail on gal never mind i found it. dave -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: print detail on gal I am trying to export my gal to a file . How can I include the last logon to the mailbox in the .csv file? When I go into Servers,Server,Priv,Mailbox Resources it show that detail. The only way to get this info is to screen print it. Is there a way to capture this info. dave List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: PST Bad - why?
Title: RE: PST Bad - why? nice thought ;) -Original Message- From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? LOL how to reduce helpdesk calls to zero yes, that's a tough one, sir - we'll have to escalate your call to Ninja status - someone will contact you shortly... -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? Hell yes, I have Ninja Power.. Becarefull I might freak out all over. If you look all over you might even find a picture of me on there site now. http://www.realultimatepower.net --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? You do have several excellent credentials - but are you certified to beat someone senseless? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? Tell him I will drive over there beat him senseless, drug him, strip him naked, and toss him in the middle of a LAX game. Then tell both teams that he just slept with their mothers. Or see the FAQ http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxf.htm --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PST Bad - why? Hello all sorry to ask a stupid question, but my pointy haired boss is looking at implementing PST's here and I know many people say pst's are not good, could you guys give me some ammo to argue why PST's aren't a good option and what problems will end up occurring if it is implemented. Thanks in advance. Michael Yurchuk, MCSE Systems Administrator direcTEL Saskatoon, SK 306-384-8600 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: PST Bad - why?
Title: RE: PST Bad - why? Kevin, you said it!! Wally, We use psts because our users are also hard headed. Oddly enough, I have only lost 2 psts completely (had to restore from backup) and had to repair 5 of them, out of 900 users on my site over 2 years. Yes, PSTs have a significant disadvantage but so does letting the users run your IS out of space! We have more problems with OWA only users running their mailbox out of space then with psts. BUT I would not advocate them for everyone, as you must be ready for the inevitable failure. You will have to sit down and figure out what is best for your company, where you have the space and what polices can you serious implement. (we had users using pst prior to our ok...) Hope this helps. Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Technician CCBC - Catonsville -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:21 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: PST Bad - why? Wally, Kumusta po kayo? The .pst will take up disk space. Some companies will have separate budgets for NT servers and Exchange servers so you end up with lots of disk space on home drives but no spare capacity in the Exchange server IS. A choice a lot of companies make in this scenario, is to go down the .pst route. The .psts are stored on home drives so get backed up. A certain large oil company I worked for deployed over 300,000 .psts in this way. Probably best not to START with that strategy but sometimes you've just got to run with whatever you're given! Sige! Kevin -Original Message-From: Lesaca, Wally R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 02 May 2002 08:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: PST Bad - why? Please elaborate more on the issue. I'm also in a dilemma. My users are hard headed when it comes to mailbox size. One way is to go .PST. My disk space is now only 560k. TIA. -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? PST=BAD is a bad equation. It should be PST=Usually Bad. Sometimes, you don't have any choice. For instance, when doing migrations or moving mailboxes. However, generally you shouldn't use them for permanent storage. They are actually very similar to the old MSMail format for storing mail which was also prone to failure. Kevin -Original Message- From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 May 2002 17:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PST Bad - why? Hello all sorry to ask a stupid question, but my pointy haired boss is looking at implementing PST's here and I know many people say pst's are not good, could you guys give me some ammo to argue why PST's aren't a good option and what problems will end up occurring if it is implemented. Thanks in advance. Michael Yurchuk, MCSE Systems Administrator direcTEL Saskatoon, SK 306-384-8600 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Recipient Update Service
Title: Message Would you say your little network is very busy? I have learned that patience is mandatory in Exchange2000 administration. -Original Message-From: Feng, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:31 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Recipient Update Service We have single site, two DCs and all on the same LAN. It looks like every time when I create new account (user or group) I have to rebuilt RUS. Otherwise it takes long time to show up. If I just update some attribute on exist account, that have no problem. -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Recipient Update Service Is this a single site? Single Exchange Server? How many DC's? All on the same LAN? If I make lots of changes, I will manually rebuild the RUS. It's just habit now. -Original Message-From: Feng, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:38 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Recipient Update Service I am running Exchange 2000. After I created a new mailbox account, it tooks long time (some time several days and I have to rebuilt GAL) to show up on Global Address List. I have setup Recipient Update Service(RUS) update interval as always run and domain controller is GC server. Any idea? Thank you very muchList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: PST Bad - why?
Title: Message That certain large oil company was nutz. I don't mind the .pst deployment, because I believe in openness in our company. An email to me is an email to everyone. Copy the .pst file off my pc? Sure. Go ahead! If you are using .pst's as your primary email storage, well, then you paid way too much for your mail server. William -Original Message-From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: PST Bad - why? Kevin, you said it!! Wally, We use psts because our users are also hard headed. Oddly enough, I have only lost 2 psts completely (had to restore from backup) and had to repair 5 of them, out of 900 users on my site over 2 years. Yes, PSTs have a significant disadvantage but so does letting the users run your IS out of space! We have more problems with OWA only users running their mailbox out of space then with psts. BUT I would not advocate them for everyone, as you must be ready for the inevitable failure. You will have to sit down and figure out what is best for your company, where you have the space and what polices can you serious implement. (we had users using pst prior to our ok...) Hope this helps. Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Technician CCBC - Catonsville -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:21 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: PST Bad - why? Wally, Kumusta po kayo? The .pst will take up disk space. Some companies will have separate budgets for NT servers and Exchange servers so you end up with lots of disk space on home drives but no spare capacity in the Exchange server IS. A choice a lot of companies make in this scenario, is to go down the .pst route. The .psts are stored on home drives so get backed up. A certain large oil company I worked for deployed over 300,000 .psts in this way. Probably best not to START with that strategy but sometimes you've just got to run with whatever you're given! Sige! Kevin -Original Message-From: Lesaca, Wally R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 02 May 2002 08:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: PST Bad - why? Please elaborate more on the issue. I'm also in a dilemma. My users are hard headed when it comes to mailbox size. One way is to go .PST. My disk space is now only 560k. TIA. -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? PST=BAD is a bad equation. It should be PST=Usually Bad. Sometimes, you don't have any choice. For instance, when doing migrations or moving mailboxes. However, generally you shouldn't use them for permanent storage. They are actually very similar to the old MSMail format for storing mail which was also prone to failure. Kevin -Original Message- From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 May 2002 17:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PST Bad - why? Hello all sorry to ask a stupid question, but my pointy haired boss is looking at implementing PST's here and I know many people say pst's are not good, could you guys give me some ammo to argue why PST's aren't a good option and what problems will end up occurring if it is implemented. Thanks in advance. Michael Yurchuk, MCSE Systems Administrator direcTEL Saskatoon, SK 306-384-8600 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Recipient Update Service
Title: Message We have single site, two DCs and all on the same LAN. It looks like every time when I create new account (user or group) I have to rebuilt RUS. Otherwise it takes long time to show up. If I just update some attribute on exist account, that have no problem. -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Recipient Update Service Is this a single site? Single Exchange Server? How many DC's? All on the same LAN? If I make lots of changes, I will manually rebuild the RUS. It's just habit now. -Original Message-From: Feng, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:38 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Recipient Update Service I am running Exchange 2000. After I created a new mailbox account, it tooks long time (some time several days and I have to rebuilt GAL) to show up on Global Address List. I have setup Recipient Update Service(RUS) update interval as always run and domain controller is GC server. Any idea? Thank you very muchList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: print detail on gal
Title: RE: print detail on gal No. Just the last time they physically logged into the Exchange server. If you want to look at the last access time, go to Logons and check the column Last Access Time. -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: print detail on gal Same place i used save window contents duh!! So is the last column Last logon time the last time that person opened their mailbox? dave -Original Message- From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: print detail on gal you dont want to share with us ? -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 13:25 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: print detail on gal never mind i found it. dave -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: print detail on gal I am trying to export my gal to a file . How can I include the last logon to the mailbox in the .csv file? When I go into Servers,Server,Priv,Mailbox Resources it show that detail. The only way to get this info is to screen print it. Is there a way to capture this info. dave List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
ADMIN TEST: Do not reply
ADMIN TEST: Do not reply List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange error message
Hello All, I having an error pop up in exchange adminstrator when I try to pull up someone's mailbox. The error message is: Extension'FUSEREXT' could not be loaded. The specified module could not be found Microsoft Windows NT ID no: 0xc002007e. We had just changed the service account password and this error had popped up after we did that. I can click ignore on the error, and it brings up the properties for the mailbox. Then I try to change the primary windows NT account for the mailbox and it says access denied. I then check the service account and it is locked. Any ideas would be helpful. 5.5SP4, NT4.0SP6a List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange error message
Do you use any 3rd party apps that integrate with Exchange? Fax server maybe? Could be a password problem with that Extension. -Original Message- From: Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange error message Hello All, I having an error pop up in exchange adminstrator when I try to pull up someone's mailbox. The error message is: Extension'FUSEREXT' could not be loaded. The specified module could not be found Microsoft Windows NT ID no: 0xc002007e. We had just changed the service account password and this error had popped up after we did that. I can click ignore on the error, and it brings up the properties for the mailbox. Then I try to change the primary windows NT account for the mailbox and it says access denied. I then check the service account and it is locked. Any ideas would be helpful. 5.5SP4, NT4.0SP6a List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange error message
yes we have software called faxination that integrates with exchange. that gives me a clue to check that. -Original Message- From: Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange error message Do you use any 3rd party apps that integrate with Exchange? Fax server maybe? Could be a password problem with that Extension. -Original Message- From: Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange error message Hello All, I having an error pop up in exchange adminstrator when I try to pull up someone's mailbox. The error message is: Extension'FUSEREXT' could not be loaded. The specified module could not be found Microsoft Windows NT ID no: 0xc002007e. We had just changed the service account password and this error had popped up after we did that. I can click ignore on the error, and it brings up the properties for the mailbox. Then I try to change the primary windows NT account for the mailbox and it says access denied. I then check the service account and it is locked. Any ideas would be helpful. 5.5SP4, NT4.0SP6a List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange error message
Did you change the password on all the services, too? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q157780 William -Original Message- From: Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange error message Hello All, I having an error pop up in exchange adminstrator when I try to pull up someone's mailbox. The error message is: Extension'FUSEREXT' could not be loaded. The specified module could not be found Microsoft Windows NT ID no: 0xc002007e. We had just changed the service account password and this error had popped up after we did that. I can click ignore on the error, and it brings up the properties for the mailbox. Then I try to change the primary windows NT account for the mailbox and it says access denied. I then check the service account and it is locked. Any ideas would be helpful. 5.5SP4, NT4.0SP6a List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords
Title: Message I have a theory on Watchguard firewalls. They SUCK! SUCK! SUCK!! SUCK I say! SUCK! I have gone to using the Filtered SMTP service for now instead of the Proxied SMTP service. You will notice other email problems down the road as well when using the SMTP proxy. Such as other internet providers being unable to send you mail. This is because the stupid a$$ SMTP proxy transforms the mail from 8bit to 7bit among other things. My new PIX's have arrived and I can't wait to get them into production and toss these POS Red boxes in the trash. Just my $.02 mind you, but the WG FW SUCKS!!! D -Original Message-From: Jonathan Schober [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords We use a watchguard firewall which, by default,removes all unkown SMTP headers and ESMTP keywords.The following is a list of 41 headers and keywordsthat have beenrejected by our firewall during the past week. I am consideringadding some of these to the firewall's list of known headers/keywords. I'm especially interested in the security ramifications of adding these (we use Exchange 2000). Does anyone know of a specific reasonTo/NotTo add these? Status Keyword/Header Number of Times Rejected removing unknown or denied header List-Unsubscribe 481 removing unknown or denied header Received 164 removing unknown or denied header content-class 139 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Index 138 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Topic 135 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-TNEF-Correlator 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-Has-Attach 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MimeOLE 63 removing unknown or denied header Reporting-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header Arrival-Date 57 removing unknown or denied header Received-From-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header X-DSNContext 56 removing unknown or denied header X-OriginalArrivalTime 56 removing unknown or denied header Return-Path 56 removing unknown or denied header X-Mailer 54 removing ESMTP keyword PIPELINING 53 removing ESMTP keyword OK 53 removing ESMTP keyword TURN 53 removing ESMTP keyword VRFY 53 removing ESMTP keyword XEXCH50 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-LINK2STATE 53 removing ESMTP keyword ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 53 removing ESMTP keyword ATRN 53 removing ESMTP keyword DSN 53 removing ESMTP keyword ETRN 53 removing ESMTP keyword CHUNKING 53 removing ESMTP keyword BINARYMIME 53 removing ESMTP keyword AUTH=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword AUTH 53 removing unknown or denied header Importance 50 removing unknown or denied header Disposition-Notification-To 10 removing unknown or denied header Organization 8 removing unknown or denied header Content-Location 3 removing unknown or denied header BANNED 2 removing unknown or denied header Errors-to 2 removing unknown or denied header ERROR 2 removing unknown or denied header Receipt-Requested-To 1 removing unknown or denied header Return-Receipt-To 1 removing unknown or denied header User-Agent 1 .+- @Aa 0 z[lpjo/Z\zm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange error message
yeah actually i had that same article and followed the steps. we do have a third part utility that integrates with exchange. i am checking that -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange error message Did you change the password on all the services, too? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q157780 William -Original Message- From: Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange error message Hello All, I having an error pop up in exchange adminstrator when I try to pull up someone's mailbox. The error message is: Extension'FUSEREXT' could not be loaded. The specified module could not be found Microsoft Windows NT ID no: 0xc002007e. We had just changed the service account password and this error had popped up after we did that. I can click ignore on the error, and it brings up the properties for the mailbox. Then I try to change the primary windows NT account for the mailbox and it says access denied. I then check the service account and it is locked. Any ideas would be helpful. 5.5SP4, NT4.0SP6a List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords
Title: Message Don't you just hate it when someone is wishy-washy and refuses to give an opinion? Bruce -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords I have a theory on Watchguard firewalls. They SUCK! SUCK! SUCK!! SUCK I say! SUCK! I have gone to using the Filtered SMTP service for now instead of the Proxied SMTP service. You will notice other email problems down the road as well when using the SMTP proxy. Such as other internet providers being unable to send you mail. This is because the stupid a$$ SMTP proxy transforms the mail from 8bit to 7bit among other things. My new PIX's have arrived and I can't wait to get them into production and toss these POS Red boxes in the trash. Just my $.02 mind you, but the WG FW SUCKS!!! D -Original Message-From: Jonathan Schober [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords We use a watchguard firewall which, by default,removes all unkown SMTP headers and ESMTP keywords.The following is a list of 41 headers and keywordsthat have beenrejected by our firewall during the past week. I am consideringadding some of these to the firewall's list of known headers/keywords. I'm especially interested in the security ramifications of adding these (we use Exchange 2000). Does anyone know of a specific reasonTo/NotTo add these? Status Keyword/Header Number of Times Rejected removing unknown or denied header List-Unsubscribe 481 removing unknown or denied header Received 164 removing unknown or denied header content-class 139 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Index 138 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Topic 135 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-TNEF-Correlator 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-Has-Attach 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MimeOLE 63 removing unknown or denied header Reporting-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header Arrival-Date 57 removing unknown or denied header Received-From-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header X-DSNContext 56 removing unknown or denied header X-OriginalArrivalTime 56 removing unknown or denied header Return-Path 56 removing unknown or denied header X-Mailer 54 removing ESMTP keyword PIPELINING 53 removing ESMTP keyword OK 53 removing ESMTP keyword TURN 53 removing ESMTP keyword VRFY 53 removing ESMTP keyword XEXCH50 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-LINK2STATE 53 removing ESMTP keyword ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 53 removing ESMTP keyword ATRN 53 removing ESMTP keyword DSN 53 removing ESMTP keyword ETRN 53 removing ESMTP keyword CHUNKING 53 removing ESMTP keyword BINARYMIME 53 removing ESMTP keyword AUTH=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword AUTH 53 removing unknown or denied header Importance 50 removing unknown or denied header Disposition-Notification-To 10 removing unknown or denied header Organization 8 removing unknown or denied header Content-Location 3 removing unknown or denied header BANNED 2 removing unknown or denied header Errors-to 2 removing unknown or denied header ERROR 2 removing unknown or denied header Receipt-Requested-To 1 removing unknown or denied header Return-Receipt-To 1 removing unknown or denied header User-Agent 1 .+- @Aa 0 z[lpjo/Z\zmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:
RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords
Title: Message Don, would you tell us how you really feel please? -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords I have a theory on Watchguard firewalls. They SUCK! SUCK! SUCK!! SUCK I say! SUCK! I have gone to using the Filtered SMTP service for now instead of the Proxied SMTP service. You will notice other email problems down the road as well when using the SMTP proxy. Such as other internet providers being unable to send you mail. This is because the stupid a$$ SMTP proxy transforms the mail from 8bit to 7bit among other things. My new PIX's have arrived and I can't wait to get them into production and toss these POS Red boxes in the trash. Just my $.02 mind you, but the WG FW SUCKS!!! D -Original Message-From: Jonathan Schober [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords We use a watchguard firewall which, by default,removes all unkown SMTP headers and ESMTP keywords.The following is a list of 41 headers and keywordsthat have beenrejected by our firewall during the past week. I am consideringadding some of these to the firewall's list of known headers/keywords. I'm especially interested in the security ramifications of adding these (we use Exchange 2000). Does anyone know of a specific reasonTo/NotTo add these? Status Keyword/Header Number of Times Rejected removing unknown or denied header List-Unsubscribe 481 removing unknown or denied header Received 164 removing unknown or denied header content-class 139 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Index 138 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Topic 135 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-TNEF-Correlator 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-Has-Attach 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MimeOLE 63 removing unknown or denied header Reporting-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header Arrival-Date 57 removing unknown or denied header Received-From-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header X-DSNContext 56 removing unknown or denied header X-OriginalArrivalTime 56 removing unknown or denied header Return-Path 56 removing unknown or denied header X-Mailer 54 removing ESMTP keyword PIPELINING 53 removing ESMTP keyword OK 53 removing ESMTP keyword TURN 53 removing ESMTP keyword VRFY 53 removing ESMTP keyword XEXCH50 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-LINK2STATE 53 removing ESMTP keyword ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 53 removing ESMTP keyword ATRN 53 removing ESMTP keyword DSN 53 removing ESMTP keyword ETRN 53 removing ESMTP keyword CHUNKING 53 removing ESMTP keyword BINARYMIME 53 removing ESMTP keyword AUTH=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword AUTH 53 removing unknown or denied header Importance 50 removing unknown or denied header Disposition-Notification-To 10 removing unknown or denied header Organization 8 removing unknown or denied header Content-Location 3 removing unknown or denied header BANNED 2 removing unknown or denied header Errors-to 2 removing
Outlook Team Calendars
Does anyone have experience working with Team Calendars in Outlook 2000? I have been instructed to implement Team Calendars, but the support at Microsoft doesn't give me much to go on for troubleshooting. I've gotten them to work on all W2K/Office 2K systems, but am having problems with about 1/2 of the W98 workstations I have. I get a CDO error which instructs me to install http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/outlctlx.cab /default.aspx?scid=http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/out lctlx.cab I have not had luck getting this to work. Does anyone have any suggestions? The Outlook Team Folders Wizard doesn't seem to be available any longer, or at least I haven't found it... Thanks in advance. [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Team Calendars
Title: RE: Outlook Team Calendars I know that you have to have CDO installed, but I have not worked with Team Calendar on 98. Only on 2K -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Team Calendars Does anyone have experience working with Team Calendars in Outlook 2000? I have been instructed to implement Team Calendars, but the support at Microsoft doesn't give me much to go on for troubleshooting. I've gotten them to work on all W2K/Office 2K systems, but am having problems with about 1/2 of the W98 workstations I have. I get a CDO error which instructs me to install http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/outlctlx.cab /default.aspx?scid=http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/out lctlx.cab I have not had luck getting this to work. Does anyone have any suggestions? The Outlook Team Folders Wizard doesn't seem to be available any longer, or at least I haven't found it... Thanks in advance. [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Personal Folders
That's alright Kevin, I think there were a few more people out there laughing. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Personal Folders I had to laugh. Then someone gave the answer I was going to give. So I just left the list with the laugher I got from the question.. I really do feel for that Admin. --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Personal Folders what a jack*ss ;) -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller Posted At: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:32 AM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: Personal Folders Subject: RE: Personal Folders Hahahahahahhahaha --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Pamela Gengler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Personal Folders I have a user who has set a password for personal folders and cannot remember the password. This is on a Macintosh running 8.6 with Outlook 8.2. Does anyone know of a way to override this? Pamela Gengler Systems Administrator 510 G Street Antioch, CA 94509 925-776-2091 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 4/19/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 4/19/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: print detail on gal
Title: RE: print detail on gal Why does it show people twice. Not everyone but most. dave -Original Message-From: Sweetman, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: print detail on gal No. Just the last time they physically logged into the Exchange server. If you want to look at the last access time, go to Logons and check the column Last Access Time. -Original Message-From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: print detail on gal Same place i used " save window contents" duh!! So is the last column Last logon time the last time that person opened their mailbox? dave -Original Message-From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: print detail on gal you dont want to share with us ? -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 13:25 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: print detail on gal never mind i found it. dave -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: print detail on gal I am trying to export my gal to a file . How can I include the last logon to the mailbox in the .csv file? When I go into Servers,Server,Priv,Mailbox Resources it show that detail. The only way to get this info is to screen print it. Is there a way to capture this info. dave List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: print detail on gal
Title: RE: print detail on gal They show as having logged on when they check public folders and other resources. - Original Message - From: Eldridge, Dave To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:48 PM Subject: RE: print detail on gal Why does it show people twice. Not everyone but most. dave -Original Message-From: Sweetman, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: print detail on gal No. Just the last time they physically logged into the Exchange server. If you want to look at the last access time, go to Logons and check the column Last Access Time. -Original Message-From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: print detail on gal Same place i used " save window contents" duh!! So is the last column Last logon time the last time that person opened their mailbox? dave -Original Message-From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: print detail on gal you dont want to share with us ? -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 13:25 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: print detail on gal never mind i found it. dave -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: print detail on gal I am trying to export my gal to a file . How can I include the last logon to the mailbox in the .csv file? When I go into Servers,Server,Priv,Mailbox Resources it show that detail. The only way to get this info is to screen print it. Is there a way to capture this info. dave List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Team Calendars
I've heard they suck - you might try outlook 4 teams (www.outlook4team.com) Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Team Calendars Does anyone have experience working with Team Calendars in Outlook 2000? I have been instructed to implement Team Calendars, but the support at Microsoft doesn't give me much to go on for troubleshooting. I've gotten them to work on all W2K/Office 2K systems, but am having problems with about 1/2 of the W98 workstations I have. I get a CDO error which instructs me to install http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/outlctlx.cab /default.aspx?scid=http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/out lctlx.cab I have not had luck getting this to work. Does anyone have any suggestions? The Outlook Team Folders Wizard doesn't seem to be available any longer, or at least I haven't found it... Thanks in advance. [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange error message
I guarantee you you've got another service out there using the same service account with the old password. It will keep locking out your account until you get it changed. My suggestion... change the password back to the old password and adjust the services you know about to get it back running. Then do a detailed search of your network to detect the offending service. I learned this the hardway. Don't use your exchange service account for other apps/services. -Original Message- From: Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange error message yeah actually i had that same article and followed the steps. we do have a third part utility that integrates with exchange. i am checking that -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange error message Did you change the password on all the services, too? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q157780 William -Original Message- From: Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange error message Hello All, I having an error pop up in exchange adminstrator when I try to pull up someone's mailbox. The error message is: Extension'FUSEREXT' could not be loaded. The specified module could not be found Microsoft Windows NT ID no: 0xc002007e. We had just changed the service account password and this error had popped up after we did that. I can click ignore on the error, and it brings up the properties for the mailbox. Then I try to change the primary windows NT account for the mailbox and it says access denied. I then check the service account and it is locked. Any ideas would be helpful. 5.5SP4, NT4.0SP6a List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
You cannot enter an Internet address here.
I have a user that claims that he could take an attachment out of outlook right click, select, Save As, in the save in addres bar, click the arrow select an ftp location. He calim he could do it before we upgraded to Windows 2000. When he tries it now he gets the following message. You cannot enter an Internet address here. Enter a path that points to a location on your computer on the network. The fnny thing is that I configure this ftp location to a unix box I can brouse it but can not save the file there any ideas. Exchange 5.5 Service Pack 4 Windows 2000 Sevice Pack 2 Outlook 2000 Thanks, for your help. Miguel List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: You cannot enter an Internet address here.
permissions on the unix-box? /reto - Original Message - From: Miguel Bosseloo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:27 PM Subject: You cannot enter an Internet address here. I have a user that claims that he could take an attachment out of outlook right click, select, Save As, in the save in addres bar, click the arrow select an ftp location. He calim he could do it before we upgraded to Windows 2000. When he tries it now he gets the following message. You cannot enter an Internet address here. Enter a path that points to a location on your computer on the network. The fnny thing is that I configure this ftp location to a unix box I can brouse it but can not save the file there any ideas. Exchange 5.5 Service Pack 4 Windows 2000 Sevice Pack 2 Outlook 2000 Thanks, for your help. Miguel List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Team Calendars
I figured that it would probably be too good to be true, something that would work that we wouldn't have to pay for. I had a design engineer introduce Team Calendars to VPEngineering, and he loved it, but, can't get them to work on his machine. VP, Well, it's working on Joe's machine, I need it now. I've already suggested the fact that it's not exactly a supported app, and we may need to purchase something that was built for our uses... Don't you all love those users who introduce things that you can't really provide? A Bit Frustrated... -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Team Calendars I've heard they suck - you might try outlook 4 teams (www.outlook4team.com) Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Team Calendars Does anyone have experience working with Team Calendars in Outlook 2000? I have been instructed to implement Team Calendars, but the support at Microsoft doesn't give me much to go on for troubleshooting. I've gotten them to work on all W2K/Office 2K systems, but am having problems with about 1/2 of the W98 workstations I have. I get a CDO error which instructs me to install http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/outlctlx.cab /default.aspx?scid=http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/out lctlx.cab I have not had luck getting this to work. Does anyone have any suggestions? The Outlook Team Folders Wizard doesn't seem to be available any longer, or at least I haven't found it... Thanks in advance. [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: You cannot enter an Internet address here.
No I tried it as root and get the same error. thanks anyway. -Original Message- From: Reto Inversini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: You cannot enter an Internet address here. permissions on the unix-box? /reto - Original Message - From: Miguel Bosseloo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:27 PM Subject: You cannot enter an Internet address here. I have a user that claims that he could take an attachment out of outlook right click, select, Save As, in the save in addres bar, click the arrow select an ftp location. He calim he could do it before we upgraded to Windows 2000. When he tries it now he gets the following message. You cannot enter an Internet address here. Enter a path that points to a location on your computer on the network. The fnny thing is that I configure this ftp location to a unix box I can brouse it but can not save the file there any ideas. Exchange 5.5 Service Pack 4 Windows 2000 Sevice Pack 2 Outlook 2000 Thanks, for your help. Miguel List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Team Calendars
See www.slipstick.com for more info. -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Team Calendars I figured that it would probably be too good to be true, something that would work that we wouldn't have to pay for. I had a design engineer introduce Team Calendars to VPEngineering, and he loved it, but, can't get them to work on his machine. VP, Well, it's working on Joe's machine, I need it now. I've already suggested the fact that it's not exactly a supported app, and we may need to purchase something that was built for our uses... Don't you all love those users who introduce things that you can't really provide? A Bit Frustrated... -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Team Calendars I've heard they suck - you might try outlook 4 teams (www.outlook4team.com) Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Team Calendars Does anyone have experience working with Team Calendars in Outlook 2000? I have been instructed to implement Team Calendars, but the support at Microsoft doesn't give me much to go on for troubleshooting. I've gotten them to work on all W2K/Office 2K systems, but am having problems with about 1/2 of the W98 workstations I have. I get a CDO error which instructs me to install http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/outlctlx.cab /default.aspx?scid=http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/out lctlx.cab I have not had luck getting this to work. Does anyone have any suggestions? The Outlook Team Folders Wizard doesn't seem to be available any longer, or at least I haven't found it... Thanks in advance. [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook XP, Rules
This only happens when you first open it correct?? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Adil Hindistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook XP, Rules I've a XP Pro at home and running Outlook 2002 on it. I've created several folders and rules. Problem is sometimes rules wizard does not work and messages pile at INBOX. There is nothing wrong with the rules because when this happens, I manually run the rules in the Inbox and messages are delivered to correct folders. Any idea why is this happening ? Adil Hindistan, CE-93, MCSA, MCSE ICQ : 26477783 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Team Calendars
I like the line - well it worked at my last company we'll, yes we did have notes, no we did not have exchange, yes we used PST's and POP mail Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Team Calendars I figured that it would probably be too good to be true, something that would work that we wouldn't have to pay for. I had a design engineer introduce Team Calendars to VPEngineering, and he loved it, but, can't get them to work on his machine. VP, Well, it's working on Joe's machine, I need it now. I've already suggested the fact that it's not exactly a supported app, and we may need to purchase something that was built for our uses... Don't you all love those users who introduce things that you can't really provide? A Bit Frustrated... -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Team Calendars I've heard they suck - you might try outlook 4 teams (www.outlook4team.com) Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Team Calendars Does anyone have experience working with Team Calendars in Outlook 2000? I have been instructed to implement Team Calendars, but the support at Microsoft doesn't give me much to go on for troubleshooting. I've gotten them to work on all W2K/Office 2K systems, but am having problems with about 1/2 of the W98 workstations I have. I get a CDO error which instructs me to install http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/outlctlx.cab /default.aspx?scid=http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/out lctlx.cab I have not had luck getting this to work. Does anyone have any suggestions? The Outlook Team Folders Wizard doesn't seem to be available any longer, or at least I haven't found it... Thanks in advance. [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords
Title: Message That would be way worse I'm afraid... ;o) -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords Don, would you tell us how you really feel please? -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords I have a theory on Watchguard firewalls. They SUCK! SUCK! SUCK!! SUCK I say! SUCK! I have gone to using the Filtered SMTP service for now instead of the Proxied SMTP service. You will notice other email problems down the road as well when using the SMTP proxy. Such as other internet providers being unable to send you mail. This is because the stupid a$$ SMTP proxy transforms the mail from 8bit to 7bit among other things. My new PIX's have arrived and I can't wait to get them into production and toss these POS Red boxes in the trash. Just my $.02 mind you, but the WG FW SUCKS!!! D -Original Message-From: Jonathan Schober [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords We use a watchguard firewall which, by default,removes all unkown SMTP headers and ESMTP keywords.The following is a list of 41 headers and keywordsthat have beenrejected by our firewall during the past week. I am consideringadding some of these to the firewall's list of known headers/keywords. I'm especially interested in the security ramifications of adding these (we use Exchange 2000). Does anyone know of a specific reasonTo/NotTo add these? Status Keyword/Header Number of Times Rejected removing unknown or denied header List-Unsubscribe 481 removing unknown or denied header Received 164 removing unknown or denied header content-class 139 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Index 138 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Topic 135 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-TNEF-Correlator 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-Has-Attach 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MimeOLE 63 removing unknown or denied header Reporting-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header Arrival-Date 57 removing unknown or denied header Received-From-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header X-DSNContext 56 removing unknown or denied header X-OriginalArrivalTime 56 removing unknown or denied header Return-Path 56 removing unknown or denied header X-Mailer 54 removing ESMTP keyword PIPELINING 53 removing ESMTP keyword OK 53 removing ESMTP keyword TURN 53 removing ESMTP keyword VRFY 53 removing ESMTP keyword XEXCH50 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-LINK2STATE 53 removing ESMTP keyword ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 53 removing ESMTP keyword ATRN 53 removing ESMTP keyword DSN 53 removing ESMTP keyword ETRN 53 removing ESMTP keyword CHUNKING 53 removing ESMTP keyword BINARYMIME 53 removing ESMTP keyword AUTH=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword AUTH 53 removing unknown or denied header Importance 50 removing unknown or denied header Disposition-Notification-To 10 removing unknown or denied header Organization 8
RE: Outlook XP, Rules
Title: RE: Outlook XP, Rules 'undocumented feature' a/k/a a bug I see every once and while. U have run the rules manually. -Original Message- From: Adil Hindistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 17:40 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook XP, Rules I've a XP Pro at home and running Outlook 2002 on it. I've created several folders and rules. Problem is sometimes rules wizard does not work and messages pile at INBOX. There is nothing wrong with the rules because when this happens, I manually run the rules in the Inbox and messages are delivered to correct folders. Any idea why is this happening ? Adil Hindistan, CE-93, MCSA, MCSE ICQ : 26477783 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Tool for automatically scanning for Exchange IS
Greetings folks! Has anyone heard of or worked with this product?Any feedback is greatly appreciated! http://www.goexchange.com/ John Kirkland MCSE List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Team Calendars
I found that in our environment: OL2K SR-1 and SP2, IE5, XCNG 5.5 These worked very well. The only problems were with folks that had: IE5.5 with NO SP's. CDO was not installed (never tested with 98) We were all supposed to be up to IE5.5 SP2. The one's who couldn't use it had a problem with not being up-to-date on the IE service packs. And CDO was supposed to be on all machines. This just uncovered a consistency problem with our clients... -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Team Calendars I like the line - well it worked at my last company we'll, yes we did have notes, no we did not have exchange, yes we used PST's and POP mail Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Team Calendars I figured that it would probably be too good to be true, something that would work that we wouldn't have to pay for. I had a design engineer introduce Team Calendars to VPEngineering, and he loved it, but, can't get them to work on his machine. VP, Well, it's working on Joe's machine, I need it now. I've already suggested the fact that it's not exactly a supported app, and we may need to purchase something that was built for our uses... Don't you all love those users who introduce things that you can't really provide? A Bit Frustrated... -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Team Calendars I've heard they suck - you might try outlook 4 teams (www.outlook4team.com) Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Team Calendars Does anyone have experience working with Team Calendars in Outlook 2000? I have been instructed to implement Team Calendars, but the support at Microsoft doesn't give me much to go on for troubleshooting. I've gotten them to work on all W2K/Office 2K systems, but am having problems with about 1/2 of the W98 workstations I have. I get a CDO error which instructs me to install http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/outlctlx.cab /default.aspx?scid=http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/out lctlx.cab I have not had luck getting this to work. Does anyone have any suggestions? The Outlook Team Folders Wizard doesn't seem to be available any longer, or at least I haven't found it... Thanks in advance. [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook 2000 hangs
Title: Outlook 2000 hangs Whats her largest email ? -Original Message-From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 15:25 To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Outlook 2000 hangs How much mail is in her mailbox? What happens if you re-create her profile? Missy - Original Message - From: HOLLIDAY, Eric To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:38 PM Subject: Outlook 2000 hangs Hello all, Environment: Exchange 5.5 (sp3) Enterprise, server OS: Win2000; client OS Win2000 Pro Here's my situation. I have a user who starts up her OL2K client normally (CW mode) after a few seconds, the app hangs. I get the same result on my system, logging into her account. It seems to happen faster if I click on any component (Contacts, Tasks, etc.). Suggestions, ideas? TIA, Eric Holliday Exchange Administrator Corporate Information Systems Logistics Management Institute voice: 703.917.7117 fax: 703.917.7596 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook 2000 hangs
Title: Outlook 2000 hangs check the sync log -Original Message-From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 13:38 To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook 2000 hangs Hello all, Environment: Exchange 5.5 (sp3) Enterprise, server OS: Win2000; client OS Win2000 Pro Here's my situation. I have a user who starts up her OL2K client normally (CW mode) after a few seconds, the app hangs. I get the same result on my system, logging into her account. It seems to happen faster if I click on any component (Contacts, Tasks, etc.). Suggestions, ideas? TIA, Eric Holliday Exchange Administrator Corporate Information Systems Logistics Management Institute voice: 703.917.7117 fax: 703.917.7596 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook XP, Rules
Title: Message Yep. No fix in SP1 either. -Original Message-From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook XP, Rules 'undocumented feature' a/k/a a bug I see every once and while. U have run the rules manually. -Original Message- From: Adil Hindistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 17:40 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook XP, Rules I've a XP Pro at home and running Outlook 2002 on it. I've created several folders and rules. Problem is sometimes rules wizard does not work and messages pile at INBOX. There is nothing wrong with the rules because when this happens, I manually run the rules in the Inbox and messages are delivered to correct folders. Any idea why is this happening ? Adil Hindistan, CE-93, MCSA, MCSE ICQ : 26477783 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook XP, Rules
Well, usually yes I am not sure if it's the only time, did not notice really. Adil Hindistan, CE-93, MCSA, MCSE ICQ : 26477783 -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook XP, Rules This only happens when you first open it correct?? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Adil Hindistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook XP, Rules I've a XP Pro at home and running Outlook 2002 on it. I've created several folders and rules. Problem is sometimes rules wizard does not work and messages pile at INBOX. There is nothing wrong with the rules because when this happens, I manually run the rules in the Inbox and messages are delivered to correct folders. Any idea why is this happening ? Adil Hindistan, CE-93, MCSA, MCSE ICQ : 26477783 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook XP, Rules
Happens to me all the time. Only after the Current folder highlight gets stuck and I have to close outlook. This was a feature in 98 and is back in 2002. Look for it to go away in the next version if we are lucky. It will only happen when you first open. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Adil Hindistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook XP, Rules Well, usually yes I am not sure if it's the only time, did not notice really. Adil Hindistan, CE-93, MCSA, MCSE ICQ : 26477783 -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook XP, Rules This only happens when you first open it correct?? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Adil Hindistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook XP, Rules I've a XP Pro at home and running Outlook 2002 on it. I've created several folders and rules. Problem is sometimes rules wizard does not work and messages pile at INBOX. There is nothing wrong with the rules because when this happens, I manually run the rules in the Inbox and messages are delivered to correct folders. Any idea why is this happening ? Adil Hindistan, CE-93, MCSA, MCSE ICQ : 26477783 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook 2000 hangs
Title: Outlook 2000 hangs Is the preview pane on? -Original Message-From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook 2000 hangs Whats her largest email ? -Original Message-From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 15:25 To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Outlook 2000 hangs How much mail is in her mailbox? What happens if you re-create her profile? Missy - Original Message - From: HOLLIDAY, Eric To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:38 PM Subject: Outlook 2000 hangs Hello all, Environment: Exchange 5.5 (sp3) Enterprise, server OS: Win2000; client OS Win2000 Pro Here's my situation. I have a user who starts up her OL2K client normally (CW mode) after a few seconds, the app hangs. I get the same result on my system, logging into her account. It seems to happen faster if I click on any component (Contacts, Tasks, etc.). Suggestions, ideas? TIA, Eric Holliday Exchange Administrator Corporate Information Systems Logistics Management Institute voice: 703.917.7117 fax: 703.917.7596 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange newbie
Title: Exchange newbie I am trying to upgrade an NT4.0 Exchange 5.5 sp6 server that is in use full time to a Windows 2000 Exchange 2000 machine. The exchange 5.5 server has been used for some 5 years with no problems. The old server was misconfigured to with a different netbios name from mx record, with aliases in the user mailboxes. I ran the exchange server migration wizard and migrated the messages to the new mailboxes without errors or warnings. What I have and would like to know... oldserver netbios = some_name dns = another_name.subnet.domain.edu mx = mail.subnet.domain.edu newserver netbios = newname dns = newname.subnet.domain.edu I would like to move the mx record and start getting the mail delievered to the new server...am I going to have problems? Is there a way to syncronize the 2 servers so that mail is delievered between to 2 servers to the old and new mailboxes? I am afraid that I might miss some messages durring the mx record changeover and will need to syncronize them. I am also worried about the mailbox rules people have defined. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
MS Exchange MDB Private and Public out of space
Title: MS Exchange MDB Private and Public out of space Please help me on what's the best thing to do. Running WINNT 4 sp5 MS Exchange 5.5 sp4. I only got 9 gb and it's now full. What's the best thing for me to do ? Please do help. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MS Exchange MDB Private and Public out of space
Title: MS Exchange MDB Private and Public out of space Clean out all files that you can. Figure out how much white space you have, if any (EventID 1221, IIRC) Report back to the list. -Original Message-From: Lesaca, Wally R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 17:15To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MS Exchange MDB Private and Public out of space Please help me on what's the best thing to do. Running WINNT 4 sp5 MS Exchange 5.5 sp4. I only got 9 gb and it's now full. What's the best thing for me to do ? Please do help. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MS Exchange MDB Private and Public out of space
Title: Message OK, How big is the Priv and Pub? What about log files? Are you using an Exchange aware backup program that will flush the logs? -Original Message-From: Lesaca, Wally R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MS Exchange MDB Private and Public out of space Please help me on what's the best thing to do. Running WINNT 4 sp5 MS Exchange 5.5 sp4. I only got 9 gb and it's now full. What's the best thing for me to do ? Please do help. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords
Title: Message so I take you were not happy with your Watchguard box ;) Maybe you should look at setting up a Linux firewall. Then you can modify it to your heart's content. I understand that PIX has it's own set of idiosyncrasies when related to email. -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 3 May 2002 3:19To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords I have a theory on Watchguard firewalls. They SUCK! SUCK! SUCK!! SUCK I say! SUCK! I have gone to using the Filtered SMTP service for now instead of the Proxied SMTP service. You will notice other email problems down the road as well when using the SMTP proxy. Such as other internet providers being unable to send you mail. This is because the stupid a$$ SMTP proxy transforms the mail from 8bit to 7bit among other things. My new PIX's have arrived and I can't wait to get them into production and toss these POS Red boxes in the trash. Just my $.02 mind you, but the WG FW SUCKS!!! D -Original Message-From: Jonathan Schober [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords We use a watchguard firewall which, by default,removes all unkown SMTP headers and ESMTP keywords.The following is a list of 41 headers and keywordsthat have beenrejected by our firewall during the past week. I am consideringadding some of these to the firewall's list of known headers/keywords. I'm especially interested in the security ramifications of adding these (we use Exchange 2000). Does anyone know of a specific reasonTo/NotTo add these? Status Keyword/Header Number of Times Rejected removing unknown or denied header List-Unsubscribe 481 removing unknown or denied header Received 164 removing unknown or denied header content-class 139 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Index 138 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Topic 135 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-TNEF-Correlator 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-Has-Attach 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MimeOLE 63 removing unknown or denied header Reporting-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header Arrival-Date 57 removing unknown or denied header Received-From-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header X-DSNContext 56 removing unknown or denied header X-OriginalArrivalTime 56 removing unknown or denied header Return-Path 56 removing unknown or denied header X-Mailer 54 removing ESMTP keyword PIPELINING 53 removing ESMTP keyword OK 53 removing ESMTP keyword TURN 53 removing ESMTP keyword VRFY 53 removing ESMTP keyword XEXCH50 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-LINK2STATE 53 removing ESMTP keyword ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 53 removing ESMTP keyword ATRN 53 removing ESMTP keyword DSN 53 removing ESMTP keyword ETRN 53 removing ESMTP keyword CHUNKING 53 removing ESMTP keyword BINARYMIME 53 removing ESMTP keyword AUTH=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword AUTH 53 removing unknown or denied header Importance 50 removing unknown or denied header Disposition-Notification-To 10 removing unknown or denied header Organization 8 removing unknown or denied header Content-Location 3
RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords
Title: Message Linux? Wouldn't you want to deploy one on a remotely secure operating system? OpenBSD, baby! -Original Message-From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords so I take you were not happy with your Watchguard box ;) Maybe you should look at setting up a Linux firewall. Then you can modify it to your heart's content. I understand that PIX has it's own set of idiosyncrasies when related to email. -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 3 May 2002 3:19To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords I have a theory on Watchguard firewalls. They SUCK! SUCK! SUCK!! SUCK I say! SUCK! I have gone to using the Filtered SMTP service for now instead of the Proxied SMTP service. You will notice other email problems down the road as well when using the SMTP proxy. Such as other internet providers being unable to send you mail. This is because the stupid a$$ SMTP proxy transforms the mail from 8bit to 7bit among other things. My new PIX's have arrived and I can't wait to get them into production and toss these POS Red boxes in the trash. Just my $.02 mind you, but the WG FW SUCKS!!! D -Original Message-From: Jonathan Schober [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords We use a watchguard firewall which, by default,removes all unkown SMTP headers and ESMTP keywords.The following is a list of 41 headers and keywordsthat have beenrejected by our firewall during the past week. I am consideringadding some of these to the firewall's list of known headers/keywords. I'm especially interested in the security ramifications of adding these (we use Exchange 2000). Does anyone know of a specific reasonTo/NotTo add these? Status Keyword/Header Number of Times Rejected removing unknown or denied header List-Unsubscribe 481 removing unknown or denied header Received 164 removing unknown or denied header content-class 139 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Index 138 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Topic 135 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-TNEF-Correlator 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-Has-Attach 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MimeOLE 63 removing unknown or denied header Reporting-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header Arrival-Date 57 removing unknown or denied header Received-From-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header X-DSNContext 56 removing unknown or denied header X-OriginalArrivalTime 56 removing unknown or denied header Return-Path 56 removing unknown or denied header X-Mailer 54 removing ESMTP keyword PIPELINING 53 removing ESMTP keyword OK 53 removing ESMTP keyword TURN 53 removing ESMTP keyword VRFY 53 removing ESMTP keyword XEXCH50 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-LINK2STATE 53 removing ESMTP keyword ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 53 removing ESMTP keyword ATRN 53 removing ESMTP keyword DSN 53 removing ESMTP keyword ETRN 53 removing ESMTP keyword CHUNKING 53 removing ESMTP keyword BINARYMIME 53 removing ESMTP keyword AUTH=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword AUTH 53 removing unknown or denied header
RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords
Title: Message Linux should be secure, there are thousands of people coding and checking it ;) -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 3 May 2002 10:37To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords Linux? Wouldn't you want to deploy one on a remotely secure operating system? OpenBSD, baby! -Original Message-From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords so I take you were not happy with your Watchguard box ;) Maybe you should look at setting up a Linux firewall. Then you can modify it to your heart's content. I understand that PIX has it's own set of idiosyncrasies when related to email. -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 3 May 2002 3:19To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords I have a theory on Watchguard firewalls. They SUCK! SUCK! SUCK!! SUCK I say! SUCK! I have gone to using the Filtered SMTP service for now instead of the Proxied SMTP service. You will notice other email problems down the road as well when using the SMTP proxy. Such as other internet providers being unable to send you mail. This is because the stupid a$$ SMTP proxy transforms the mail from 8bit to 7bit among other things. My new PIX's have arrived and I can't wait to get them into production and toss these POS Red boxes in the trash. Just my $.02 mind you, but the WG FW SUCKS!!! D -Original Message-From: Jonathan Schober [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords We use a watchguard firewall which, by default,removes all unkown SMTP headers and ESMTP keywords.The following is a list of 41 headers and keywordsthat have beenrejected by our firewall during the past week. I am consideringadding some of these to the firewall's list of known headers/keywords. I'm especially interested in the security ramifications of adding these (we use Exchange 2000). Does anyone know of a specific reasonTo/NotTo add these? Status Keyword/Header Number of Times Rejected removing unknown or denied header List-Unsubscribe 481 removing unknown or denied header Received 164 removing unknown or denied header content-class 139 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Index 138 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Topic 135 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-TNEF-Correlator 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-Has-Attach 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MimeOLE 63 removing unknown or denied header Reporting-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header Arrival-Date 57 removing unknown or denied header Received-From-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header X-DSNContext 56 removing unknown or denied header X-OriginalArrivalTime 56 removing unknown or denied header Return-Path 56 removing unknown or denied header X-Mailer 54 removing ESMTP keyword PIPELINING 53 removing ESMTP keyword OK 53 removing ESMTP keyword TURN 53 removing ESMTP keyword VRFY 53 removing ESMTP keyword XEXCH50 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-EXPS=LOGIN 53 removing ESMTP keyword X-LINK2STATE 53 removing ESMTP keyword
RE: SMTP Error 550.5.7.1
I have seen this occur when a remote IMAP user access the exchange server through a PIX firewall. The PIX (by default) is configured to use "MailGuard", and this will prevent the remote user from sending email. (The error refers to "relaying denied" issue, as I recall.) Microsoft has posted a Q article on their Knowledge Base regarding this, but I cannot remember the particular article number. We resolved this issue by using the following command on our PIX: no fixup protocol smtp 25 There may be other issues at play here - I'm only relating what we discovered on our system. Cheers... Tom -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 1:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: SMTP Error 550.5.7.1 Does anyone know what error 550.5.7.1 is when sending an email? Garland Mac Neill Systems Administrator Solbourne Office 303-402-2704 Cell 303-641-7574 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords
Title: Message Mmm hmmm -Original Message-From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords Linux should be secure, there are thousands of people coding and checking it ;) -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 3 May 2002 10:37To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords Linux? Wouldn't you want to deploy one on a remotely secure operating system? OpenBSD, baby! -Original Message-From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords so I take you were not happy with your Watchguard box ;) Maybe you should look at setting up a Linux firewall. Then you can modify it to your heart's content. I understand that PIX has it's own set of idiosyncrasies when related to email. -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 3 May 2002 3:19To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords I have a theory on Watchguard firewalls. They SUCK! SUCK! SUCK!! SUCK I say! SUCK! I have gone to using the Filtered SMTP service for now instead of the Proxied SMTP service. You will notice other email problems down the road as well when using the SMTP proxy. Such as other internet providers being unable to send you mail. This is because the stupid a$$ SMTP proxy transforms the mail from 8bit to 7bit among other things. My new PIX's have arrived and I can't wait to get them into production and toss these POS Red boxes in the trash. Just my $.02 mind you, but the WG FW SUCKS!!! D -Original Message-From: Jonathan Schober [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords We use a watchguard firewall which, by default,removes all unkown SMTP headers and ESMTP keywords.The following is a list of 41 headers and keywordsthat have beenrejected by our firewall during the past week. I am consideringadding some of these to the firewall's list of known headers/keywords. I'm especially interested in the security ramifications of adding these (we use Exchange 2000). Does anyone know of a specific reasonTo/NotTo add these? Status Keyword/Header Number of Times Rejected removing unknown or denied header List-Unsubscribe 481 removing unknown or denied header Received 164 removing unknown or denied header content-class 139 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Index 138 removing unknown or denied header Thread-Topic 135 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-TNEF-Correlator 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MS-Has-Attach 63 removing unknown or denied header X-MimeOLE 63 removing unknown or denied header Reporting-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header Arrival-Date 57 removing unknown or denied header Received-From-MTA 57 removing unknown or denied header X-DSNContext 56 removing unknown or denied header X-OriginalArrivalTime 56 removing unknown or denied header Return-Path 56 removing unknown or denied header X-Mailer 54 removing ESMTP keyword PIPELINING 53 removing ESMTP keyword OK 53 removing
INbound IMC mail conversion processing SLOW
Hi, We have a dedicated IMC/MTA, top notch hardware etc.. NT 4 SP 6a Exchange 5.5 Sp4 CPU/MEM usage etc minimal however We seem to have a problem with inbound IMC traffic being converted to MSExchange format. Sometimes conversion can take over 40 mins! Once conversion has been completed and message is placed in the 'MTS-IN' it is processed real quick and delivered. Anybody had similar issues? Adge Rose Nationwide News News Limited. Tel: (02) 9288 2865 Fax: (02) 9288 3013 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of News Limited or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect.
