Strange pair of events twice daily
Hi all, We have a dozen Exchange 2003 SP 2 servers, split across two domains, all in the same Administrative Group. On all of the Exchange servers in one of the Admin groups, we get the following pair of events logged : Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category:General Event ID: 9562 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category:Logons Event ID: 1022 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Logon Failure on database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (XYZABC) - Windows 2000 account stoop\Administrator; mailbox /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Error: -2147467259 They're logged at 4 minutes past minute, then 40 minutes past. They're logged again a 4 minutes past mid-day then 40 minutes past. Then again at midnight. I checked to see if the computer account XYZABC, had someone got a mail address, but it doesn't, and I don't see it listed in the list of mailboxes on the store under the server object in ESM. Saw a few pointers towards the RUS needing to be rebuilt - done that, and the same error's are still logged. Would I need to to the Enterprise RUS, and the domain RUS for the other domain as well? Thanks Rob ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Strange pair of events twice daily
D'oh, I meant all of the Exchange servers in one of the DOMAINS (not admin groups, as it's a single admin group). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 4 June, 2008 11:50:05 AM Subject: Strange pair of events twice daily Hi all, We have a dozen Exchange 2003 SP 2 servers, split across two domains, all in the same Administrative Group. On all of the Exchange servers in one of the Admin groups, we get the following pair of events logged : Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category:General Event ID: 9562 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category:Logons Event ID: 1022 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Logon Failure on database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (XYZABC) - Windows 2000 account stoop\Administrator; mailbox /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Error: -2147467259 They're logged at 4 minutes past minute, then 40 minutes past. They're logged again a 4 minutes past mid-day then 40 minutes past. Then again at midnight. I checked to see if the computer account XYZABC, had someone got a mail address, but it doesn't, and I don't see it listed in the list of mailboxes on the store under the server object in ESM. Saw a few pointers towards the RUS needing to be rebuilt - done that, and the same error's are still logged. Would I need to to the Enterprise RUS, and the domain RUS for the other domain as well? Thanks Rob ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Strange pair of events twice daily
I love generic errors. Not. That error is MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED. However, because of the “logon failure” – I would tend to wonder – how many disabled users do you have and do any of them have mailboxes associated with them? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Strange pair of events twice daily D'oh, I meant all of the Exchange servers in one of the DOMAINS (not admin groups, as it's a single admin group). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 4 June, 2008 11:50:05 AM Subject: Strange pair of events twice daily Hi all, We have a dozen Exchange 2003 SP 2 servers, split across two domains, all in the same Administrative Group. On all of the Exchange servers in one of the Admin groups, we get the following pair of events logged : Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category:General Event ID: 9562 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category:Logons Event ID: 1022 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Logon Failure on database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (XYZABC) - Windows 2000 account stoop\Administrator; mailbox /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Error: -2147467259 They're logged at 4 minutes past minute, then 40 minutes past. They're logged again a 4 minutes past mid-day then 40 minutes past. Then again at midnight. I checked to see if the computer account XYZABC, had someone got a mail address, but it doesn't, and I don't see it listed in the list of mailboxes on the store under the server object in ESM. Saw a few pointers towards the RUS needing to be rebuilt - done that, and the same error's are still logged. Would I need to to the Enterprise RUS, and the domain RUS for the other domain as well? Thanks Rob ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Strange pair of events twice daily
Hey Michael, seeing as you appear to have some inside track to Microsoft, can you enlighten us on why they can't put their errors in plain english? I mean, what's the point in being so darn cryptic? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily I love generic errors. Not. That error is MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED. However, because of the logon failure - I would tend to wonder - how many disabled users do you have and do any of them have mailboxes associated with them? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Strange pair of events twice daily D'oh, I meant all of the Exchange servers in one of the DOMAINS (not admin groups, as it's a single admin group). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 4 June, 2008 11:50:05 AM Subject: Strange pair of events twice daily Hi all, We have a dozen Exchange 2003 SP 2 servers, split across two domains, all in the same Administrative Group. On all of the Exchange servers in one of the Admin groups, we get the following pair of events logged : Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category:General Event ID: 9562 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category:Logons Event ID: 1022 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Logon Failure on database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (XYZABC) - Windows 2000 account stoop\Administrator; mailbox /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Error: -2147467259 They're logged at 4 minutes past minute, then 40 minutes past. They're logged again a 4 minutes past mid-day then 40 minutes past. Then again at midnight. I checked to see if the computer account XYZABC, had someone got a mail address, but it doesn't, and I don't see it listed in the list of mailboxes on the store under the server object in ESM. Saw a few pointers towards the RUS needing to be rebuilt - done that, and the same error's are still logged. Would I need to to the Enterprise RUS, and the domain RUS for the other domain as well? Thanks Rob ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Missing emails -- Outlook Sync Issues after server outage
I have a situation that I haven't seen before. Yesterday my exchange server bit the dust for an hour. Now all my users running outlook 2003 in cached mode are missing the emails sent to them during this period. The email it seems have been redirected to a folder in outlook called 'Sync Issues' - 'Server Failures'. Any idea what the deal is here? Is there an easy way to get every user in my companies email back to their inbox? Thanks in advance. . ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Restore a Public Folder
Something I've NEVER done before! PLEASE HELP ME L Exchange 2003 (patched) Windows 2003 R2 (patched). My top client just deleted their most important public folder - I wanted to ask for some advice for our group as to what the best process is to accomplish this. Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com http://www.networkblade.com/ Ask me why a Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist is best for your company ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpgimage002.pngimage003.jpg
Re: Restore a Public Folder
Hold on, do you have public folders deleted item retention set? On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:09 AM, ExchList [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something I've NEVER done before! PLEASE HELP ME L Exchange 2003 (patched) Windows 2003 R2 (patched). My top client just deleted their most important public folder – I wanted to ask for some advice for our group as to what the best process is to accomplish this. Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com Ask me why a *Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist* is best for your company [image: MCSA_msg_RGB] [image: SBS Logo][image: MCP-RGB] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image002.pngimage003.jpgimage001.jpg
RE: Restore a Public Folder
NO! L But I do now... Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com http://www.networkblade.com/ Ask me why a Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist is best for your company From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Restore a Public Folder Subject: Re: Restore a Public Folder Hold on, do you have public folders deleted item retention set? On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:09 AM, ExchList [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something I've NEVER done before! PLEASE HELP ME L Exchange 2003 (patched) Windows 2003 R2 (patched). My top client just deleted their most important public folder - I wanted to ask for some advice for our group as to what the best process is to accomplish this. Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com http://www.networkblade.com/ Ask me why a Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist is best for your company ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpgimage002.pngimage003.jpg
Re: Restore a Public Folder
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/924044 (for the future) Otherwise you'll have to restore from backup I would think. On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:19 AM, ExchList [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NO! L But I do now… Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com Ask me why a *Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist* is best for your company [image: MCSA_msg_RGB] [image: SBS Logo][image: MCP-RGB] *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Posted At:* Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:14 AM *Posted To:* Exchange *Conversation:* Restore a Public Folder *Subject:* Re: Restore a Public Folder Hold on, do you have public folders deleted item retention set? On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:09 AM, ExchList [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something I've NEVER done before! PLEASE HELP ME L Exchange 2003 (patched) Windows 2003 R2 (patched). My top client just deleted their most important public folder – I wanted to ask for some advice for our group as to what the best process is to accomplish this. Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com Ask me why a *Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist* is best for your company [image: MCSA_msg_RGB] [image: SBS Logo][image: MCP-RGB] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpgimage002.pngimage003.jpg
RE: Restore a Public Folder
If you didn't have deleted item retention set on your public folders, you're probably looking at a restoration for your most recent backup. Just for grins, you could check out http://support.microsoft.com/kb/924044 and see if it helps ...Tim From: ExchList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Restore a Public Folder NO! L But I do now... Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com http://www.networkblade.com/ Ask me why a Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist is best for your company From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Restore a Public Folder Subject: Re: Restore a Public Folder Hold on, do you have public folders deleted item retention set? On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:09 AM, ExchList [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something I've NEVER done before! PLEASE HELP ME L Exchange 2003 (patched) Windows 2003 R2 (patched). My top client just deleted their most important public folder - I wanted to ask for some advice for our group as to what the best process is to accomplish this. Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com http://www.networkblade.com/ Ask me why a Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist is best for your company ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpgimage002.pngimage003.jpg
RE: Restore a Public Folder
PFDAVADMIN is great for this. From: ExchList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Restore a Public Folder Something I've NEVER done before! PLEASE HELP ME L Exchange 2003 (patched) Windows 2003 R2 (patched). My top client just deleted their most important public folder - I wanted to ask for some advice for our group as to what the best process is to accomplish this. Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com http://www.networkblade.com/ Ask me why a Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist is best for your company ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpgimage002.pngimage003.jpg
RE: Hosting Multiple domains in Exchange 2003
Still having the same issue with shirevalleydesign.com and mail to bellsouth.net. The other 2 domains are moyersconstruction.com and sealcoatmydrive.com . Turns out in doing some more looking, we can't access the web sites internally either. Jonathan Gruber Network Administrator J.B. Long Inc. 610-944-8840 x.213 484-637-1978 direct -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Hosting Multiple domains in Exchange 2003 On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Jonathan Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok I've removed the 2 PTD DNS servers, but my DNS checks still show them listed and mail is still failing. I removed them Wednesday 5/28, I figured 24 hours the propagate but this morning their still showing up for me. For a change of registered name servers, you have to wait for: 1. The registrar reseller to process the change (if you're using a reseller (but many registration services are really just resllers)) 2. The registrar to process the change 3. The registry to process the change 4. TTL to expire on any cached records The TTL on the GTLD zones is 48 hours, so you're generally waiting at least two days. Some resellers/registrars can be slow, so 70 or 80 hours is not unheard of. In any event, the shirevalleydesign.com domain looks like it's okay right now. Both registered nameservers are responding properly, and both return the same zone information. Are you still having trouble sending mail to/from them? In addition I've just learned that email from our main company is failing to reach 2 other domains that are hosted on this exchange server. [...] DNS entries are correct for all of the domains. No offense, but you said that before and you were wrong then. :-) Post the domain names, and I or others can investigate. The more information you give people, the more likely someone will be able to help you. -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Restore a Public Folder
Thanks everyone - reading on now! Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com http://www.networkblade.com/ Ask me why a Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist is best for your company From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:32 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Restore a Public Folder Subject: RE: Restore a Public Folder PFDAVADMIN is great for this. From: ExchList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Restore a Public Folder Something I've NEVER done before! PLEASE HELP ME L Exchange 2003 (patched) Windows 2003 R2 (patched). My top client just deleted their most important public folder - I wanted to ask for some advice for our group as to what the best process is to accomplish this. Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com http://www.networkblade.com/ Ask me why a Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist is best for your company ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpgimage002.pngimage003.jpg
RE: Hosting Multiple domains in Exchange 2003
Jonathan, I've encountered numerous issues with sending mail to hellsouth.net and the solution every time, regardless of platform, was to create a separate SMTP VS dedicated to Bell. HTH, Shook -Original Message- From: Jonathan Gruber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Hosting Multiple domains in Exchange 2003 Still having the same issue with shirevalleydesign.com and mail to bellsouth.net. The other 2 domains are moyersconstruction.com and sealcoatmydrive.com . Turns out in doing some more looking, we can't access the web sites internally either. Jonathan Gruber Network Administrator J.B. Long Inc. 610-944-8840 x.213 484-637-1978 direct -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Hosting Multiple domains in Exchange 2003 On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Jonathan Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok I've removed the 2 PTD DNS servers, but my DNS checks still show them listed and mail is still failing. I removed them Wednesday 5/28, I figured 24 hours the propagate but this morning their still showing up for me. For a change of registered name servers, you have to wait for: 1. The registrar reseller to process the change (if you're using a reseller (but many registration services are really just resllers)) 2. The registrar to process the change 3. The registry to process the change 4. TTL to expire on any cached records The TTL on the GTLD zones is 48 hours, so you're generally waiting at least two days. Some resellers/registrars can be slow, so 70 or 80 hours is not unheard of. In any event, the shirevalleydesign.com domain looks like it's okay right now. Both registered nameservers are responding properly, and both return the same zone information. Are you still having trouble sending mail to/from them? In addition I've just learned that email from our main company is failing to reach 2 other domains that are hosted on this exchange server. [...] DNS entries are correct for all of the domains. No offense, but you said that before and you were wrong then. :-) Post the domain names, and I or others can investigate. The more information you give people, the more likely someone will be able to help you. -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender
I have solved the issue and thought I would reply back with the solution if anyone was curious. I got this solution directly from Microsoft. In adsiedit under : Configuration - Services - Microsoft Exchange - organization name - Administrative Groups - Exchange Administrative Group - Servers - Servername - Protocols - SMTP Receive Connectors - Client servername Right click and click properties, click the security tab and grant the Authenticated users group the Accept Authoritative Domain Sender allow permission. Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 3:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender Hi, I have several users that are getting this error when sending using our exchange 2007 server in outlook, thunderbird Eudora, windows mail etc. Ive done a lot of research on this and got the subject of this message from the receive logs on the server 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I see that a lot of sites have postings that suggest that the users do not have the ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Authoritative-Domain-Sender I also see that various postings have various different methods of granting the said permission so my questions are these 1) Does that make sense that adding that permission is what needs to be done? I don't feel so comfortable about running permission altering things when I don't fully understand the repercussions. 2) What is the proper way to grant this permission, I see one posting that has a syntax granting it to a particular user (-user 'domain\username') and another one that uses -user AU (which I have no idea what AU stands for, but implies that it grants it to everyone). Has anyone run into this and have a suggestion? Its worth noting that there are several accounts also that have no problem sending and seem to work fine. Also I am talking specifically about users using IMAP/SMTP and not MAPI. Thanks! Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender
Any idea why this was not checked? Do you have security inheritance turned on from this object up to the top? ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I have solved the issue and thought I would reply back with the solution if anyone was curious. I got this solution directly from Microsoft. In adsiedit under : Configuration - Services - Microsoft Exchange - organization name - Administrative Groups - Exchange Administrative Group - Servers - Servername - Protocols - SMTP Receive Connectors - Client servername Right click and click properties, click the security tab and grant the Authenticated users group the Accept Authoritative Domain Sender allow permission. Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 3:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender Hi, I have several users that are getting this error when sending using our exchange 2007 server in outlook, thunderbird Eudora, windows mail etc. Ive done a lot of research on this and got the subject of this message from the receive logs on the server 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I see that a lot of sites have postings that suggest that the users do not have the ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Authoritative-Domain-Sender I also see that various postings have various different methods of granting the said permission so my questions are these 1) Does that make sense that adding that permission is what needs to be done? I don't feel so comfortable about running permission altering things when I don't fully understand the repercussions. 2) What is the proper way to grant this permission, I see one posting that has a syntax granting it to a particular user (-user 'domain\username') and another one that uses -user AU (which I have no idea what AU stands for, but implies that it grants it to everyone). Has anyone run into this and have a suggestion? Its worth noting that there are several accounts also that have no problem sending and seem to work fine. Also I am talking specifically about users using IMAP/SMTP and not MAPI. Thanks! Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Restore a Public Folder
I believe so...I guess you could always try, you probably just won't find anything. On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:46 AM, ExchList [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it correct that PFDavAdmin can NOT be used if Deleted Items Retention was NOT set? Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com Ask me why a *Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist* is best for your company [image: MCSA_msg_RGB] [image: SBS Logo][image: MCP-RGB] *From:* ExchList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Posted At:* Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:37 AM *Posted To:* Exchange *Conversation:* Restore a Public Folder *Subject:* RE: Restore a Public Folder Thanks everyone – reading on now! Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com Ask me why a *Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist* is best for your company [image: MCSA_msg_RGB] [image: SBS Logo][image: MCP-RGB] *From:* Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Posted At:* Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:32 AM *Posted To:* Exchange *Conversation:* Restore a Public Folder *Subject:* RE: Restore a Public Folder PFDAVADMIN is great for this. -- *From:* ExchList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:10 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Restore a Public Folder Something I've NEVER done before! PLEASE HELP ME L Exchange 2003 (patched) Windows 2003 R2 (patched). My top client just deleted their most important public folder – I wanted to ask for some advice for our group as to what the best process is to accomplish this. Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com Ask me why a *Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist* is best for your company [image: MCSA_msg_RGB] [image: SBS Logo][image: MCP-RGB] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image003.jpgimage002.pngimage001.jpg
RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender
I'm seeing a lot of issues with fresh Exchange 2007 transition installations that inheritance has been disabled for some reason. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender Any idea why this was not checked? Do you have security inheritance turned on from this object up to the top? ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp http://www.3sharp.com/ , Always WLKMMAS http://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I have solved the issue and thought I would reply back with the solution if anyone was curious. I got this solution directly from Microsoft. In adsiedit under : Configuration - Services - Microsoft Exchange - organization name - Administrative Groups - Exchange Administrative Group - Servers - Servername - Protocols - SMTP Receive Connectors - Client servername Right click and click properties, click the security tab and grant the Authenticated users group the Accept Authoritative Domain Sender allow permission. Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 3:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender Hi, I have several users that are getting this error when sending using our exchange 2007 server in outlook, thunderbird Eudora, windows mail etc. Ive done a lot of research on this and got the subject of this message from the receive logs on the server 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I see that a lot of sites have postings that suggest that the users do not have the ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Authoritative-Domain-Sender I also see that various postings have various different methods of granting the said permission so my questions are these.. 1) Does that make sense that adding that permission is what needs to be done? I don't feel so comfortable about running permission altering things when I don't fully understand the repercussions. 2) What is the proper way to grant this permission, I see one posting that has a syntax granting it to a particular user (-user 'domain\username') and another one that uses -user AU (which I have no idea what AU stands for, but implies that it grants it to everyone). Has anyone run into this and have a suggestion? Its worth noting that there are several accounts also that have no problem sending and seem to work fine. Also I am talking specifically about users using IMAP/SMTP and not MAPI. Thanks! Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci [EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Strange pair of events twice daily
Inside track? HAH. J I just complain vociferously and often enough that I get responses - sometimes. Error messages are improving, but it's a slow process. They have come a LONG way from Exchange 5.x, when all you got was the MAPI error. All the new .Net-based code in Exchange 2007 has significantly improved error messages - in fact, sometimes you wish the product would just SHUT UP. But having too much is generally preferable to having too little, that's for certain. It sounds weird, but good error messages cause code bloat. The more localized text you have in a program, the bigger the program is, the more memory it takes, the longer reporting an error takes, the more code paths that have to be executed to check for errors, etc. etc. etc. It's a line that has to be tread carefully. As systems grow more capable, there are more/better errors. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Hey Michael, seeing as you appear to have some inside track to Microsoft, can you enlighten us on why they can't put their errors in plain english? I mean, what's the point in being so darn cryptic? _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily I love generic errors. Not. That error is MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED. However, because of the logon failure - I would tend to wonder - how many disabled users do you have and do any of them have mailboxes associated with them? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Strange pair of events twice daily D'oh, I meant all of the Exchange servers in one of the DOMAINS (not admin groups, as it's a single admin group). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 4 June, 2008 11:50:05 AM Subject: Strange pair of events twice daily Hi all, We have a dozen Exchange 2003 SP 2 servers, split across two domains, all in the same Administrative Group. On all of the Exchange servers in one of the Admin groups, we get the following pair of events logged : Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category:General Event ID: 9562 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category:Logons Event ID: 1022 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Logon Failure on database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (XYZABC) - Windows 2000 account stoop\Administrator; mailbox /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Error: -2147467259 They're logged at 4 minutes past minute, then 40 minutes past. They're logged again a 4 minutes past mid-day then 40 minutes past. Then again at midnight. I checked to see if the computer account XYZABC, had someone got a mail address, but it doesn't, and I don't see it listed in the list of mailboxes on the store under the server object in ESM. Saw a few pointers towards the RUS needing to be rebuilt - done that, and the same error's are still logged. Would I need to to the Enterprise RUS, and the domain RUS for the other domain as well? Thanks Rob ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Strange pair of events twice daily
I was, at one time, part of the team that wrote those errors [1]. The ones that I dealt with for E2K7 made sense to when I reviewed or wrote them, or when I wrote the articles that described how to fix them. The error has to be as small and informative as possible, and work from more than one point of view, and be localizable. They are getting better, but there is always room for improvement. To be better heard remember that for any topic or error that you can rate or comment on in the help on MSDN or on Technet comment it with your feedback. That feedback is automatically entered in to the bug tracking software at Microsoft and assigned to the person responsible for the document or area of the code base. If possible the documents are changed, if not the feedback is applied to future work. If you are really bold leave your email address in the comment and ask for a response. I made a point of always responding to those that gave me feedback, most others on the Exchange team are the same way. [1] I had a brilliant editor on my team who made sure that it sounded good when I was done with it. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Inside track? HAH. :) I just complain vociferously and often enough that I get responses - sometimes. Error messages are improving, but it's a slow process. They have come a LONG way from Exchange 5.x, when all you got was the MAPI error. All the new .Net-based code in Exchange 2007 has significantly improved error messages - in fact, sometimes you wish the product would just SHUT UP. But having too much is generally preferable to having too little, that's for certain. It sounds weird, but good error messages cause code bloat. The more localized text you have in a program, the bigger the program is, the more memory it takes, the longer reporting an error takes, the more code paths that have to be executed to check for errors, etc. etc. etc. It's a line that has to be tread carefully. As systems grow more capable, there are more/better errors. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Hey Michael, seeing as you appear to have some inside track to Microsoft, can you enlighten us on why they can't put their errors in plain english? I mean, what's the point in being so darn cryptic? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily I love generic errors. Not. That error is MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED. However, because of the logon failure - I would tend to wonder - how many disabled users do you have and do any of them have mailboxes associated with them? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Strange pair of events twice daily D'oh, I meant all of the Exchange servers in one of the DOMAINS (not admin groups, as it's a single admin group). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 4 June, 2008 11:50:05 AM Subject: Strange pair of events twice daily Hi all, We have a dozen Exchange 2003 SP 2 servers, split across two domains, all in the same Administrative Group. On all of the Exchange servers in one of the Admin groups, we get the following pair of events logged : Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category:General Event ID: 9562 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category:Logons Event ID: 1022 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Logon Failure on database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (XYZABC) - Windows 2000 account stoop\Administrator; mailbox /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Error: -2147467259 They're logged at 4 minutes past minute, then 40 minutes past. They're logged again a 4 minutes past mid-day then 40 minutes past. Then again at midnight. I checked to see
RE: Strange pair of events twice daily
This looks like a cool tool for error codes. Microsoft Exchange Server Error Code Look-up http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=be596899-7bb8-4208-b7fc-09e02a13696cdisplaylang=entm Overview Use the Error Code Lookup tool to determine error values from decimal and hexadecimal error codes in Microsoft Windows(r) operating systems. The tool can look up one or more values at a time. All values on the command line will be looked up in Exchange's internal tables and presented to you. If available, informational data associated with the value or values will also be shown. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Inside track? HAH. :) I just complain vociferously and often enough that I get responses - sometimes. Error messages are improving, but it's a slow process. They have come a LONG way from Exchange 5.x, when all you got was the MAPI error. All the new .Net-based code in Exchange 2007 has significantly improved error messages - in fact, sometimes you wish the product would just SHUT UP. But having too much is generally preferable to having too little, that's for certain. It sounds weird, but good error messages cause code bloat. The more localized text you have in a program, the bigger the program is, the more memory it takes, the longer reporting an error takes, the more code paths that have to be executed to check for errors, etc. etc. etc. It's a line that has to be tread carefully. As systems grow more capable, there are more/better errors. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Hey Michael, seeing as you appear to have some inside track to Microsoft, can you enlighten us on why they can't put their errors in plain english? I mean, what's the point in being so darn cryptic? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily I love generic errors. Not. That error is MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED. However, because of the logon failure - I would tend to wonder - how many disabled users do you have and do any of them have mailboxes associated with them? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Strange pair of events twice daily D'oh, I meant all of the Exchange servers in one of the DOMAINS (not admin groups, as it's a single admin group). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 4 June, 2008 11:50:05 AM Subject: Strange pair of events twice daily Hi all, We have a dozen Exchange 2003 SP 2 servers, split across two domains, all in the same Administrative Group. On all of the Exchange servers in one of the Admin groups, we get the following pair of events logged : Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category:General Event ID: 9562 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category:Logons Event ID: 1022 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Logon Failure on database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (XYZABC) - Windows 2000 account stoop\Administrator; mailbox /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Error: -2147467259 They're logged at 4 minutes past minute, then 40 minutes past. They're logged again a 4 minutes past mid-day then 40 minutes past. Then again at midnight. I checked to see if the computer account XYZABC, had someone got a mail address, but it doesn't, and I don't see it listed in the list of mailboxes on the store under the server object in ESM. Saw a few pointers towards the RUS needing to be rebuilt - done that, and the same error's are still logged. Would I need to to the Enterprise RUS, and the domain RUS for the other domain as well? Thanks Rob ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~
RE: Strange pair of events twice daily
Heck no, it ain't. it has the new date, but is the same version from 2004. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Hey! They finally made the new one public. That's great! Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily This looks like a cool tool for error codes. Microsoft Exchange Server Error Code Look-up http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=be596899-7bb8-4208- b7fc-09e02a13696c http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=be596899-7bb8-4208 -b7fc-09e02a13696cdisplaylang=entm displaylang=entm Overview Use the Error Code Lookup tool to determine error values from decimal and hexadecimal error codes in Microsoft WindowsR operating systems. The tool can look up one or more values at a time. All values on the command line will be looked up in Exchange's internal tables and presented to you. If available, informational data associated with the value or values will also be shown. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp http://www.3sharp.com/ , Always WLKMMAS http://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Inside track? HAH. J I just complain vociferously and often enough that I get responses - sometimes. Error messages are improving, but it's a slow process. They have come a LONG way from Exchange 5.x, when all you got was the MAPI error. All the new .Net-based code in Exchange 2007 has significantly improved error messages - in fact, sometimes you wish the product would just SHUT UP. But having too much is generally preferable to having too little, that's for certain. It sounds weird, but good error messages cause code bloat. The more localized text you have in a program, the bigger the program is, the more memory it takes, the longer reporting an error takes, the more code paths that have to be executed to check for errors, etc. etc. etc. It's a line that has to be tread carefully. As systems grow more capable, there are more/better errors. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Hey Michael, seeing as you appear to have some inside track to Microsoft, can you enlighten us on why they can't put their errors in plain english? I mean, what's the point in being so darn cryptic? _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily I love generic errors. Not. That error is MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED. However, because of the logon failure - I would tend to wonder - how many disabled users do you have and do any of them have mailboxes associated with them? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Strange pair of events twice daily D'oh, I meant all of the Exchange servers in one of the DOMAINS (not admin groups, as it's a single admin group). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 4 June, 2008 11:50:05 AM Subject: Strange pair of events twice daily Hi all, We have a dozen Exchange 2003 SP 2 servers, split across two domains, all in the same Administrative Group. On all of the Exchange servers in one of the Admin groups, we get the following pair of events logged : Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category:General Event ID: 9562 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category:Logons Event ID: 1022 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Logon Failure on database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (XYZABC) - Windows 2000 account stoop\Administrator; mailbox
RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender
AdminSDHolder? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I'm seeing a lot of issues with fresh Exchange 2007 transition installations that inheritance has been disabled for some reason. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender Any idea why this was not checked? Do you have security inheritance turned on from this object up to the top? ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp http://www.3sharp.com/ , Always WLKMMAS http://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I have solved the issue and thought I would reply back with the solution if anyone was curious. I got this solution directly from Microsoft. In adsiedit under : Configuration - Services - Microsoft Exchange - organization name - Administrative Groups - Exchange Administrative Group - Servers - Servername - Protocols - SMTP Receive Connectors - Client servername Right click and click properties, click the security tab and grant the Authenticated users group the Accept Authoritative Domain Sender allow permission. Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 3:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender Hi, I have several users that are getting this error when sending using our exchange 2007 server in outlook, thunderbird Eudora, windows mail etc. Ive done a lot of research on this and got the subject of this message from the receive logs on the server 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I see that a lot of sites have postings that suggest that the users do not have the ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Authoritative-Domain-Sender I also see that various postings have various different methods of granting the said permission so my questions are these 1) Does that make sense that adding that permission is what needs to be done? I don't feel so comfortable about running permission altering things when I don't fully understand the repercussions. 2) What is the proper way to grant this permission, I see one posting that has a syntax granting it to a particular user (-user 'domain\username') and another one that uses -user AU (which I have no idea what AU stands for, but implies that it grants it to everyone). Has anyone run into this and have a suggestion? Its worth noting that there are several accounts also that have no problem sending and seem to work fine. Also I am talking specifically about users using IMAP/SMTP and not MAPI. Thanks! Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci [EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Strange pair of events twice daily
Seriously?? ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Heck no, it ain't. it has the new date, but is the same version from 2004. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Hey! They finally made the new one public. That's great! Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily This looks like a cool tool for error codes. Microsoft Exchange Server Error Code Look-up http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=be596899-7bb8-4208-b7fc-09e02a13696cdisplaylang=entm Overview Use the Error Code Lookup tool to determine error values from decimal and hexadecimal error codes in Microsoft Windows(r) operating systems. The tool can look up one or more values at a time. All values on the command line will be looked up in Exchange's internal tables and presented to you. If available, informational data associated with the value or values will also be shown. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Inside track? HAH. :) I just complain vociferously and often enough that I get responses - sometimes. Error messages are improving, but it's a slow process. They have come a LONG way from Exchange 5.x, when all you got was the MAPI error. All the new .Net-based code in Exchange 2007 has significantly improved error messages - in fact, sometimes you wish the product would just SHUT UP. But having too much is generally preferable to having too little, that's for certain. It sounds weird, but good error messages cause code bloat. The more localized text you have in a program, the bigger the program is, the more memory it takes, the longer reporting an error takes, the more code paths that have to be executed to check for errors, etc. etc. etc. It's a line that has to be tread carefully. As systems grow more capable, there are more/better errors. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Hey Michael, seeing as you appear to have some inside track to Microsoft, can you enlighten us on why they can't put their errors in plain english? I mean, what's the point in being so darn cryptic? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily I love generic errors. Not. That error is MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED. However, because of the logon failure - I would tend to wonder - how many disabled users do you have and do any of them have mailboxes associated with them? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Strange pair of events twice daily D'oh, I meant all of the Exchange servers in one of the DOMAINS (not admin groups, as it's a single admin group). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 4 June, 2008 11:50:05 AM Subject: Strange pair of events twice daily Hi all, We have a dozen Exchange 2003 SP 2 servers, split across two domains, all in the same Administrative Group. On all of the Exchange servers in one of the Admin groups, we get the following pair of events logged : Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category:General Event ID: 9562 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category:Logons Event ID: 1022 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC
RE: Strange pair of events twice daily
Yep. Seriously. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Seriously?? ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp http://www.3sharp.com/ , Always WLKMMAS http://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Heck no, it ain't. it has the new date, but is the same version from 2004. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Hey! They finally made the new one public. That's great! Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily This looks like a cool tool for error codes. Microsoft Exchange Server Error Code Look-up http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=be596899-7bb8-4208- b7fc-09e02a13696c http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=be596899-7bb8-4208 -b7fc-09e02a13696cdisplaylang=entm displaylang=entm Overview Use the Error Code Lookup tool to determine error values from decimal and hexadecimal error codes in Microsoft WindowsR operating systems. The tool can look up one or more values at a time. All values on the command line will be looked up in Exchange's internal tables and presented to you. If available, informational data associated with the value or values will also be shown. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp http://www.3sharp.com/ , Always WLKMMAS http://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Inside track? HAH. J I just complain vociferously and often enough that I get responses - sometimes. Error messages are improving, but it's a slow process. They have come a LONG way from Exchange 5.x, when all you got was the MAPI error. All the new .Net-based code in Exchange 2007 has significantly improved error messages - in fact, sometimes you wish the product would just SHUT UP. But having too much is generally preferable to having too little, that's for certain. It sounds weird, but good error messages cause code bloat. The more localized text you have in a program, the bigger the program is, the more memory it takes, the longer reporting an error takes, the more code paths that have to be executed to check for errors, etc. etc. etc. It's a line that has to be tread carefully. As systems grow more capable, there are more/better errors. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Hey Michael, seeing as you appear to have some inside track to Microsoft, can you enlighten us on why they can't put their errors in plain english? I mean, what's the point in being so darn cryptic? _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily I love generic errors. Not. That error is MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED. However, because of the logon failure - I would tend to wonder - how many disabled users do you have and do any of them have mailboxes associated with them? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Strange pair of events twice daily D'oh, I meant all of the Exchange servers in one of the DOMAINS (not admin groups, as it's a single admin group). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 4 June, 2008 11:50:05 AM Subject: Strange pair of events twice daily Hi all, We have a dozen Exchange 2003 SP 2 servers, split across two domains, all in the same Administrative Group. On all of the Exchange servers in one of the Admin groups, we get the following pair of events logged : Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category:General Event ID: 9562 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM
RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender
Nope. just disabled inheritance on specific accounts. Of course, adminsdholder is a continual favorite too.especially in BES environments. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender AdminSDHolder? _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I'm seeing a lot of issues with fresh Exchange 2007 transition installations that inheritance has been disabled for some reason. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender Any idea why this was not checked? Do you have security inheritance turned on from this object up to the top? ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp http://www.3sharp.com/ , Always WLKMMAS http://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I have solved the issue and thought I would reply back with the solution if anyone was curious. I got this solution directly from Microsoft. In adsiedit under : Configuration - Services - Microsoft Exchange - organization name - Administrative Groups - Exchange Administrative Group - Servers - Servername - Protocols - SMTP Receive Connectors - Client servername Right click and click properties, click the security tab and grant the Authenticated users group the Accept Authoritative Domain Sender allow permission. Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 3:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender Hi, I have several users that are getting this error when sending using our exchange 2007 server in outlook, thunderbird Eudora, windows mail etc. Ive done a lot of research on this and got the subject of this message from the receive logs on the server 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I see that a lot of sites have postings that suggest that the users do not have the ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Authoritative-Domain-Sender I also see that various postings have various different methods of granting the said permission so my questions are these.. 1) Does that make sense that adding that permission is what needs to be done? I don't feel so comfortable about running permission altering things when I don't fully understand the repercussions. 2) What is the proper way to grant this permission, I see one posting that has a syntax granting it to a particular user (-user 'domain\username') and another one that uses -user AU (which I have no idea what AU stands for, but implies that it grants it to everyone). Has anyone run into this and have a suggestion? Its worth noting that there are several accounts also that have no problem sending and seem to work fine. Also I am talking specifically about users using IMAP/SMTP and not MAPI. Thanks! Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci [EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender
If it's just a simple inheritance flag being reset, then at least it should stay fixed once it's reset. AdminSDHolder will drive you crazy because it just keeps coming back until you figure out what's doing it. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender Nope. just disabled inheritance on specific accounts. Of course, adminsdholder is a continual favorite too...especially in BES environments. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender AdminSDHolder? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I'm seeing a lot of issues with fresh Exchange 2007 transition installations that inheritance has been disabled for some reason. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender Any idea why this was not checked? Do you have security inheritance turned on from this object up to the top? ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp http://www.3sharp.com/ , Always WLKMMAS http://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I have solved the issue and thought I would reply back with the solution if anyone was curious. I got this solution directly from Microsoft. In adsiedit under : Configuration - Services - Microsoft Exchange - organization name - Administrative Groups - Exchange Administrative Group - Servers - Servername - Protocols - SMTP Receive Connectors - Client servername Right click and click properties, click the security tab and grant the Authenticated users group the Accept Authoritative Domain Sender allow permission. Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 3:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender Hi, I have several users that are getting this error when sending using our exchange 2007 server in outlook, thunderbird Eudora, windows mail etc. Ive done a lot of research on this and got the subject of this message from the receive logs on the server 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I see that a lot of sites have postings that suggest that the users do not have the ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Authoritative-Domain-Sender I also see that various postings have various different methods of granting the said permission so my questions are these 1) Does that make sense that adding that permission is what needs to be done? I don't feel so comfortable about running permission altering things when I don't fully understand the repercussions. 2) What is the proper way to grant this permission, I see one posting that has a syntax granting it to a particular user (-user 'domain\username') and another one that uses -user AU (which I have no idea what AU stands for, but implies that it grants it to everyone). Has anyone run into this and have a suggestion? Its worth noting that there are several accounts also that have no problem sending and seem to work fine. Also I am talking specifically about users using IMAP/SMTP and not MAPI. Thanks! Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci [EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
Bad diagnostics (was: Strange pair of events twice daily)
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It sounds weird, but good error messages cause code bloat. Is that seriously the explanation Microsoft gives for having such consistently lousy diagnostics? I'm sorry, but I don't buy that. For one, Microsoft has never been one to worry about code bloat. With all the stuff they cram into their products, are you seriously suggesting that they had to sacrifice the error messages to make room? For another, the messages are often quite verbose, just uninformative and vague. The pattern I frequently see is generic error messages with dozens of words, explaining all the various things that *might* have gone wrong, rather than identifying the operation which actually failed. It seems like things break deep inside, and by the time the user interface reports it, all that's left is Something went wrong. I also find the localization argument unmoving. The result appears to be messages that are not useful even to native English speakers. What is more helpful, a useful diagnostic in a single language, or a useless diagnostic in multiple languages? It's like the old joke about a stopped clock vs a clock that's ten minutes slow. The stopped clock shows the correct time more often than the slow clock (twice a day vs never), so obviously the stopped clock must be better, right? -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Bad diagnostics (was: Strange pair of events twice daily)
I'm not presenting that as an official Microsoft position. I just know I've heard it discussed. Hey - don't take it out on me. Follow Kevin's advice. :-) Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 12:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Bad diagnostics (was: Strange pair of events twice daily) On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It sounds weird, but good error messages cause code bloat. Is that seriously the explanation Microsoft gives for having such consistently lousy diagnostics? I'm sorry, but I don't buy that. For one, Microsoft has never been one to worry about code bloat. With all the stuff they cram into their products, are you seriously suggesting that they had to sacrifice the error messages to make room? For another, the messages are often quite verbose, just uninformative and vague. The pattern I frequently see is generic error messages with dozens of words, explaining all the various things that *might* have gone wrong, rather than identifying the operation which actually failed. It seems like things break deep inside, and by the time the user interface reports it, all that's left is Something went wrong. I also find the localization argument unmoving. The result appears to be messages that are not useful even to native English speakers. What is more helpful, a useful diagnostic in a single language, or a useless diagnostic in multiple languages? It's like the old joke about a stopped clock vs a clock that's ten minutes slow. The stopped clock shows the correct time more often than the slow clock (twice a day vs never), so obviously the stopped clock must be better, right? -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Bad diagnostics (was: Strange pair of events twice daily)
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey - don't take it out on me. Sorry, I *was* venting there, but I didn't mean for you to get hit by the blast. :) Follow Kevin's advice. :-) Oh, I do provide detailed (and polite) feedback whenever I can. I consider that an essential duty of any customer. If we don't tell our supplier what we want, we shouldn't be surprised when we don't get it. Of course, I've been complaining to (and about) Microsoft for years now... :-/ -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
BES with X64
Hey does the BES work on x64? I'm trying to install it on a hyperV machine and it doesn't work ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Server 2008 Exchange Tools Anyone
Here is an interesting one, I am trying to install the Exchange 2007 SP1 x64 tools on a Windows 2008 x64 member server. The install completes just fine, but when I open the console or management shell I get this - An Active Directory error 0x8000 occurred when looking for global catalogs in forest x.local: Logon Failure: unknown user name or bad password. Obviously its having credential issues, but why? My account is a domain admin and I have no issues on other servers using these tools. Anyone running Exchange tools on a W2k8 x64 box? Did I miss something ? -Troy ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: BES with X64
AFAIK... BES isn't x64 compatible. From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: BES with X64 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Bad diagnostics (was: Strange pair of events twice daily)
Here! Hear! Marlin Borsick Coastalan, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 12:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Bad diagnostics (was: Strange pair of events twice daily) On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It sounds weird, but good error messages cause code bloat. Is that seriously the explanation Microsoft gives for having such consistently lousy diagnostics? I'm sorry, but I don't buy that. For one, Microsoft has never been one to worry about code bloat. With all the stuff they cram into their products, are you seriously suggesting that they had to sacrifice the error messages to make room? For another, the messages are often quite verbose, just uninformative and vague. The pattern I frequently see is generic error messages with dozens of words, explaining all the various things that *might* have gone wrong, rather than identifying the operation which actually failed. It seems like things break deep inside, and by the time the user interface reports it, all that's left is Something went wrong. I also find the localization argument unmoving. The result appears to be messages that are not useful even to native English speakers. What is more helpful, a useful diagnostic in a single language, or a useless diagnostic in multiple languages? It's like the old joke about a stopped clock vs a clock that's ten minutes slow. The stopped clock shows the correct time more often than the slow clock (twice a day vs never), so obviously the stopped clock must be better, right? -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: BES with X64
4.1 Service Pack 5 provides support for it. You'll probably have to contact RIM support to get the full/slipstreamed installation. Any particular reason why you are trying to deploy it on x64? From the installation guide: operating system Any of the following operating systems: * Microsoft(r) Windows(r) 2000 SP4 (Server edition or Advanced Server edition) * Microsoft(r) Windows Server(r) 2003 or later * Microsoft Windows Server 2003 (64-bit) * Microsoft(r) Windows(r) Small Business Server 2003 (Standard edition or Premium edition) From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: BES with X64 Hey does the BES work on x64? I'm trying to install it on a hyperV machine and it doesn't work ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: BES with X64
Correction: Needs to be BES 4.1 SP4 (or newer) http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKCdocType=kcextern alId=KB10764 From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: BES with X64 4.1 Service Pack 5 provides support for it. You'll probably have to contact RIM support to get the full/slipstreamed installation. Any particular reason why you are trying to deploy it on x64? From the installation guide: operating system Any of the following operating systems: * Microsoft(r) Windows(r) 2000 SP4 (Server edition or Advanced Server edition) * Microsoft(r) Windows Server(r) 2003 or later * Microsoft Windows Server 2003 (64-bit) * Microsoft(r) Windows(r) Small Business Server 2003 (Standard edition or Premium edition) From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: BES with X64 Hey does the BES work on x64? I'm trying to install it on a hyperV machine and it doesn't work ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: BES with X64
The main reason being I have a Win2008 hyperV box that is underutilized...it's begging to be used for testing purposes. On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4.1 Service Pack 5 provides support for it. You'll probably have to contact RIM support to get the full/slipstreamed installation. Any particular reason why you are trying to deploy it on x64? From the installation guide: operating system Any of the following operating systems: • Microsoft(R) Windows(R) 2000 SP4 (Server edition or Advanced Server edition) • Microsoft(R) Windows Server(R) 2003 or later • *Microsoft Windows Server 2003 (64-bit)* • Microsoft(R) Windows(R) Small Business Server 2003 (Standard edition or Premium edition) *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:41 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* BES with X64 Hey does the BES work on x64? I'm trying to install it on a hyperV machine and it doesn't work ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: BES with X64
I think I downloaded 4.1.5, yes that's what is here, maybe Windows 2008 is not supported yet. On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:16 PM, David Mazzaccaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Correction: Needs to be BES 4.1 SP4 (or newer) http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKCdocType=kcexternalId=KB10764 -- *From:* Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:06 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: BES with X64 4.1 Service Pack 5 provides support for it. You'll probably have to contact RIM support to get the full/slipstreamed installation. Any particular reason why you are trying to deploy it on x64? From the installation guide: operating system Any of the following operating systems: • Microsoft(R) Windows(R) 2000 SP4 (Server edition or Advanced Server edition) • Microsoft(R) Windows Server(R) 2003 or later • *Microsoft Windows Server 2003 (64-bit)* • Microsoft(R) Windows(R) Small Business Server 2003 (Standard edition or Premium edition) *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:41 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* BES with X64 Hey does the BES work on x64? I'm trying to install it on a hyperV machine and it doesn't work ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: BES with X64
Just to be cynical, you do realize that you can create 32 bit client VMs on a x64 HyperV install. :) -troy From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 1:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: BES with X64 The main reason being I have a Win2008 hyperV box that is underutilized...it's begging to be used for testing purposes. On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4.1 Service Pack 5 provides support for it. You'll probably have to contact RIM support to get the full/slipstreamed installation. Any particular reason why you are trying to deploy it on x64? From the installation guide: operating system Any of the following operating systems: * Microsoft(r) Windows(r) 2000 SP4 (Server edition or Advanced Server edition) * Microsoft(r) Windows Server(r) 2003 or later * Microsoft Windows Server 2003 (64-bit) * Microsoft(r) Windows(r) Small Business Server 2003 (Standard edition or Premium edition) From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: BES with X64 Hey does the BES work on x64? I'm trying to install it on a hyperV machine and it doesn't work ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
OT: blackberry and Microsoft CRM
Hello everyone Is anyone running flowfinity client for Microsoft CRM. We are unable to ping cure and pearl devices but older models are good. Firewall is disabled on device. Help is appreciated ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: BES with X64
Yessir. On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Troy Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to be cynical, you do realize that you can create 32 bit client VMs on a x64 HyperV install. J -troy *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 04, 2008 1:20 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: BES with X64 The main reason being I have a Win2008 hyperV box that is underutilized...it's begging to be used for testing purposes. On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4.1 Service Pack 5 provides support for it. You'll probably have to contact RIM support to get the full/slipstreamed installation. Any particular reason why you are trying to deploy it on x64? From the installation guide: operating system Any of the following operating systems: • Microsoft(R) Windows(R) 2000 SP4 (Server edition or Advanced Server edition) • Microsoft(R) Windows Server(R) 2003 or later • *Microsoft Windows Server 2003 (64-bit)* • Microsoft(R) Windows(R) Small Business Server 2003 (Standard edition or Premium edition) *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:41 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* BES with X64 Hey does the BES work on x64? I'm trying to install it on a hyperV machine and it doesn't work ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Appointment issue
I have an issue where a meeting organizer (actually his assistant) creates a meeting request but also includes the organizer as one of the attendees. They do this so the organizer is aware of the meeting. The problem is that when they receive this meeting request the calendar shows the appointment as tentative instead of busy after it has been processed by the outlook sniffer. The user then has to go into the calendar and resave the meeting as busy. I believe i can turn this feature off by deselecting the process requests and responses on arrival option but i believe this may affect other functions of the sniffer as well. What i have been told is that it has not always worked that way until recently but all the documentation says that's it has or at least it's supposed to work that way. Any feedback or experience or possible workaround would be great to hear. Thanks david ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Appointment issue
I may have missed something here, but isn't the meeting in the organizer's calendar therefore they would be aware - or reminded assuming that was set? With the current scenario, if the organizer accepts the meeting, does it not change to busy? From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Appointment issue I have an issue where a meeting organizer (actually his assistant) creates a meeting request but also includes the organizer as one of the attendees. They do this so the organizer is aware of the meeting. The problem is that when they receive this meeting request the calendar shows the appointment as tentative instead of busy after it has been processed by the outlook sniffer. The user then has to go into the calendar and resave the meeting as busy. I believe i can turn this feature off by deselecting the process requests and responses on arrival option but i believe this may affect other functions of the sniffer as well. What i have been told is that it has not always worked that way until recently but all the documentation says that's it has or at least it's supposed to work that way. Any feedback or experience or possible workaround would be great to hear. Thanks david ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Appointment issue
You didn't miss anything, I believe what we have here is the old pebkac issue... On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may have missed something here, but isn't the meeting in the organizer's calendar therefore they would be aware – or reminded assuming that was set? With the current scenario, if the organizer accepts the meeting, does it not change to busy? -- *From:* David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:04 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Appointment issue I have an issue where a meeting organizer (actually his assistant) creates a meeting request but also includes the organizer as one of the attendees. They do this so the organizer is aware of the meeting. The problem is that when they receive this meeting request the calendar shows the appointment as tentative instead of busy after it has been processed by the outlook sniffer. The user then has to go into the calendar and resave the meeting as busy. I believe i can turn this feature off by deselecting the process requests and responses on arrival option but i believe this may affect other functions of the sniffer as well. What i have been told is that it has not always worked that way until recently but all the documentation says that's it has or at least it's supposed to work that way. Any feedback or experience or possible workaround would be great to hear. Thanks david ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Appointment issue
Yes your first statement is correct. If the appointment is a month or two from now he wouldn't necessarily be aware of the appointment until the reminder. The issue being that the assistant would like to notify the User of the appointment prior to the appointment reminder in email format without having to write up another email. As far as i know you cannot accept an invite to your own meeting. Which logically makes sense but like i said this wasn't working logically a few months ago. - Original Message From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 3:49:35 PM Subject: Re: Appointment issue You didn't miss anything, I believe what we have here is the old pebkac issue... On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may have missed something here, but isn't the meeting in the organizer's calendar therefore they would be aware – or reminded assuming that was set? With the current scenario, if the organizer accepts the meeting, does it not change to busy? From:David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Appointment issue I have an issue where a meeting organizer (actually his assistant) creates a meeting request but also includes the organizer as one of the attendees. They do this so the organizer is aware of the meeting. The problem is that when they receive this meeting request the calendar shows the appointment as tentative instead of busy after it has been processed by the outlook sniffer. The user then has to go into the calendar and resave the meeting as busy. I believe i can turn this feature off by deselecting the process requests and responses on arrival option but i believe this may affect other functions of the sniffer as well. What i have been told is that it has not always worked that way until recently but all the documentation says that's it has or at least it's supposed to work that way. Any feedback or experience or possible workaround would be great to hear. Thanks david ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Appointment issue
(boy, that took a minute) - you could be right - something about sufficient promotions to require an assistant (wonder if his name is Peter?) From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Appointment issue You didn't miss anything, I believe what we have here is the old pebkac issue... On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may have missed something here, but isn't the meeting in the organizer's calendar therefore they would be aware - or reminded assuming that was set? With the current scenario, if the organizer accepts the meeting, does it not change to busy? From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Appointment issue I have an issue where a meeting organizer (actually his assistant) creates a meeting request but also includes the organizer as one of the attendees. They do this so the organizer is aware of the meeting. The problem is that when they receive this meeting request the calendar shows the appointment as tentative instead of busy after it has been processed by the outlook sniffer. The user then has to go into the calendar and resave the meeting as busy. I believe i can turn this feature off by deselecting the process requests and responses on arrival option but i believe this may affect other functions of the sniffer as well. What i have been told is that it has not always worked that way until recently but all the documentation says that's it has or at least it's supposed to work that way. Any feedback or experience or possible workaround would be great to hear. Thanks david ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Appointment issue
Perhaps the assistant could right-click the meeting and use the reply or forward to send a copy to him? - or just TALK to him? From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Appointment issue Yes your first statement is correct. If the appointment is a month or two from now he wouldn't necessarily be aware of the appointment until the reminder. The issue being that the assistant would like to notify the User of the appointment prior to the appointment reminder in email format without having to write up another email. As far as i know you cannot accept an invite to your own meeting. Which logically makes sense but like i said this wasn't working logically a few months ago. - Original Message From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 3:49:35 PM Subject: Re: Appointment issue You didn't miss anything, I believe what we have here is the old pebkac issue... On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may have missed something here, but isn't the meeting in the organizer's calendar therefore they would be aware - or reminded assuming that was set? With the current scenario, if the organizer accepts the meeting, does it not change to busy? From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Appointment issue I have an issue where a meeting organizer (actually his assistant) creates a meeting request but also includes the organizer as one of the attendees. They do this so the organizer is aware of the meeting. The problem is that when they receive this meeting request the calendar shows the appointment as tentative instead of busy after it has been processed by the outlook sniffer. The user then has to go into the calendar and resave the meeting as busy. I believe i can turn this feature off by deselecting the process requests and responses on arrival option but i believe this may affect other functions of the sniffer as well. What i have been told is that it has not always worked that way until recently but all the documentation says that's it has or at least it's supposed to work that way. Any feedback or experience or possible workaround would be great to hear. Thanks david ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Appointment issue
Other ideas include; Printing a daily calendar summary and putting it on his desk first thing in the morning? Configuring his Outlook to start in Outlook Today configured to show the day or week' events? (and train him to actually LOOK at it) (Getting close to miller time obviously) From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Appointment issue Perhaps the assistant could right-click the meeting and use the reply or forward to send a copy to him? - or just TALK to him? From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Appointment issue Yes your first statement is correct. If the appointment is a month or two from now he wouldn't necessarily be aware of the appointment until the reminder. The issue being that the assistant would like to notify the User of the appointment prior to the appointment reminder in email format without having to write up another email. As far as i know you cannot accept an invite to your own meeting. Which logically makes sense but like i said this wasn't working logically a few months ago. - Original Message From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 3:49:35 PM Subject: Re: Appointment issue You didn't miss anything, I believe what we have here is the old pebkac issue... On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may have missed something here, but isn't the meeting in the organizer's calendar therefore they would be aware - or reminded assuming that was set? With the current scenario, if the organizer accepts the meeting, does it not change to busy? From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Appointment issue I have an issue where a meeting organizer (actually his assistant) creates a meeting request but also includes the organizer as one of the attendees. They do this so the organizer is aware of the meeting. The problem is that when they receive this meeting request the calendar shows the appointment as tentative instead of busy after it has been processed by the outlook sniffer. The user then has to go into the calendar and resave the meeting as busy. I believe i can turn this feature off by deselecting the process requests and responses on arrival option but i believe this may affect other functions of the sniffer as well. What i have been told is that it has not always worked that way until recently but all the documentation says that's it has or at least it's supposed to work that way. Any feedback or experience or possible workaround would be great to hear. Thanks david ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Appointment issue
I was hoping for a reg setting or 'magic' check box. Looks like i will have to settle for a post it. - Original Message From: Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 4:11:18 PM Subject: RE: Appointment issue Perhaps the assistant could right-click the meeting and use the reply or forward to send a copy to him? – or just TALK to him? From:David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Appointment issue Yes your first statement is correct. If the appointment is a month or two from now he wouldn't necessarily be aware of the appointment until the reminder. The issue being that the assistant would like to notify the User of the appointment prior to the appointment reminder in email format without having to write up another email. As far as i know you cannot accept an invite to your own meeting. Which logically makes sense but like i said this wasn't working logically a few months ago. - Original Message From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 3:49:35 PM Subject: Re: Appointment issue You didn't miss anything, I believe what we have here is the old pebkac issue... On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may have missed something here, but isn't the meeting in the organizer's calendar therefore they would be aware – or reminded assuming that was set? With the current scenario, if the organizer accepts the meeting, does it not change to busy? From:David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Appointment issue I have an issue where a meeting organizer (actually his assistant) creates a meeting request but also includes the organizer as one of the attendees. They do this so the organizer is aware of the meeting. The problem is that when they receive this meeting request the calendar shows the appointment as tentative instead of busy after it has been processed by the outlook sniffer. The user then has to go into the calendar and resave the meeting as busy. I believe i can turn this feature off by deselecting the process requests and responses on arrival option but i believe this may affect other functions of the sniffer as well. What i have been told is that it has not always worked that way until recently but all the documentation says that's it has or at least it's supposed to work that way. Any feedback or experience or possible workaround would be great to hear. Thanks david ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Appointment issue
What was that wonderful quote - something like There are rarely technical solutions for behavioral problems. From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Appointment issue I was hoping for a reg setting or 'magic' check box.. Looks like i will have to settle for a post it. - Original Message From: Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 4:11:18 PM Subject: RE: Appointment issue Perhaps the assistant could right-click the meeting and use the reply or forward to send a copy to him? - or just TALK to him? From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Appointment issue Yes your first statement is correct. If the appointment is a month or two from now he wouldn't necessarily be aware of the appointment until the reminder. The issue being that the assistant would like to notify the User of the appointment prior to the appointment reminder in email format without having to write up another email. As far as i know you cannot accept an invite to your own meeting. Which logically makes sense but like i said this wasn't working logically a few months ago. - Original Message From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 3:49:35 PM Subject: Re: Appointment issue You didn't miss anything, I believe what we have here is the old pebkac issue... On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may have missed something here, but isn't the meeting in the organizer's calendar therefore they would be aware - or reminded assuming that was set? With the current scenario, if the organizer accepts the meeting, does it not change to busy? From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Appointment issue I have an issue where a meeting organizer (actually his assistant) creates a meeting request but also includes the organizer as one of the attendees. They do this so the organizer is aware of the meeting. The problem is that when they receive this meeting request the calendar shows the appointment as tentative instead of busy after it has been processed by the outlook sniffer. The user then has to go into the calendar and resave the meeting as busy. I believe i can turn this feature off by deselecting the process requests and responses on arrival option but i believe this may affect other functions of the sniffer as well. What i have been told is that it has not always worked that way until recently but all the documentation says that's it has or at least it's supposed to work that way. Any feedback or experience or possible workaround would be great to hear. Thanks david ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Appointment issue
PICNIC Problem In Chair Not In Computer On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What was that wonderful quote – something like There are rarely technical solutions for behavioral problems. From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Appointment issue I was hoping for a reg setting or 'magic' check box.. Looks like i will have to settle for a post it. - Original Message From: Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 4:11:18 PM Subject: RE: Appointment issue Perhaps the assistant could right-click the meeting and use the reply or forward to send a copy to him? – or just TALK to him? From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Appointment issue Yes your first statement is correct. If the appointment is a month or two from now he wouldn't necessarily be aware of the appointment until the reminder. The issue being that the assistant would like to notify the User of the appointment prior to the appointment reminder in email format without having to write up another email. As far as i know you cannot accept an invite to your own meeting. Which logically makes sense but like i said this wasn't working logically a few months ago. - Original Message From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 3:49:35 PM Subject: Re: Appointment issue You didn't miss anything, I believe what we have here is the old pebkac issue... On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may have missed something here, but isn't the meeting in the organizer's calendar therefore they would be aware – or reminded assuming that was set? With the current scenario, if the organizer accepts the meeting, does it not change to busy? From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Appointment issue I have an issue where a meeting organizer (actually his assistant) creates a meeting request but also includes the organizer as one of the attendees. They do this so the organizer is aware of the meeting. The problem is that when they receive this meeting request the calendar shows the appointment as tentative instead of busy after it has been processed by the outlook sniffer. The user then has to go into the calendar and resave the meeting as busy. I believe i can turn this feature off by deselecting the process requests and responses on arrival option but i believe this may affect other functions of the sniffer as well. What i have been told is that it has not always worked that way until recently but all the documentation says that's it has or at least it's supposed to work that way. Any feedback or experience or possible workaround would be great to hear. Thanks david ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Outbound Email Filtering
All- Question I have, more like a survey.. How many people filter outbound email to the internet? Thanks, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Outbound Email Filtering
Raises hand. - Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld - Original Message - From: JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Jun 04 18:05:35 2008 Subject: Outbound Email Filtering All- Question I have, more like a survey.. How many people filter outbound email to the internet? Thanks, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Outbound Email Filtering
I do. - Original Message - From: JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Jun 04 20:05:35 2008 Subject: Outbound Email Filtering All- Question I have, more like a survey.. How many people filter outbound email to the internet? Thanks, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Outbound Email Filtering
Can you guys state the reasons why you scan outbound email? Just curious on both sides of the fence the reasons why. Thanks, _ John Bowles - Original Message From: John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 8:18:29 PM Subject: Re: Outbound Email Filtering I do. - Original Message - From: JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Jun 04 20:05:35 2008 Subject: Outbound Email Filtering All- Question I have, more like a survey.. How many people filter outbound email to the internet? Thanks, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Outbound Email Filtering
I do it to prevent my users from sending out things they shouldn't as well as curb any file based spam that may originate from one of my mobile (ID10T) users laptops. - Original Message - From: JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Jun 04 20:44:20 2008 Subject: Re: Outbound Email Filtering Can you guys state the reasons why you scan outbound email? Just curious on both sides of the fence the reasons why. Thanks, _ John Bowles - Original Message From: John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 8:18:29 PM Subject: Re: Outbound Email Filtering I do. - Original Message - From: JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Jun 04 20:05:35 2008 Subject: Outbound Email Filtering All- Question I have, more like a survey.. How many people filter outbound email to the internet? Thanks, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Outbound Email Filtering
Why not just allow port 25 from only your smtp gateway servers and block all other port 25 traffic outbound? Thank you, _ John Bowles - Original Message From: John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 8:48:33 PM Subject: Re: Outbound Email Filtering I do it to prevent my users from sending out things they shouldn't as well as curb any file based spam that may originate from one of my mobile (ID10T) users laptops. - Original Message - From: JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Jun 04 20:44:20 2008 Subject: Re: Outbound Email Filtering Can you guys state the reasons why you scan outbound email? Just curious on both sides of the fence the reasons why. Thanks, _ John Bowles - Original Message From: John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 8:18:29 PM Subject: Re: Outbound Email Filtering I do. - Original Message - From: JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Jun 04 20:05:35 2008 Subject: Outbound Email Filtering All- Question I have, more like a survey.. How many people filter outbound email to the internet? Thanks, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Outbound Email Filtering
I don't control the routers :-( - Original Message - From: JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Jun 04 20:58:37 2008 Subject: Re: Outbound Email Filtering Why not just allow port 25 from only your smtp gateway servers and block all other port 25 traffic outbound? Thank you, _ John Bowles - Original Message From: John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 8:48:33 PM Subject: Re: Outbound Email Filtering I do it to prevent my users from sending out things they shouldn't as well as curb any file based spam that may originate from one of my mobile (ID10T) users laptops. - Original Message - From: JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Jun 04 20:44:20 2008 Subject: Re: Outbound Email Filtering Can you guys state the reasons why you scan outbound email? Just curious on both sides of the fence the reasons why. Thanks, _ John Bowles - Original Message From: John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 8:18:29 PM Subject: Re: Outbound Email Filtering I do. - Original Message - From: JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Jun 04 20:05:35 2008 Subject: Outbound Email Filtering All- Question I have, more like a survey.. How many people filter outbound email to the internet? Thanks, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Outbound Email Filtering
Define filter On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:05 PM, JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All- Question I have, more like a survey.. How many people filter outbound email to the internet? Thanks, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Outbound Email Filtering
Ah - I see what you mean. I don't at the moment, but I will be scanning soon for viruses. There may come a day when I scan for IP reasons, but that will require substantially more expensive arrangements than we have now. On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:44 PM, JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you guys state the reasons why you scan outbound email? Just curious on both sides of the fence the reasons why. Thanks, _ John Bowles - Original Message From: John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 8:18:29 PM Subject: Re: Outbound Email Filtering I do. - Original Message - From: JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Jun 04 20:05:35 2008 Subject: Outbound Email Filtering All- Question I have, more like a survey.. How many people filter outbound email to the internet? Thanks, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Outbound Email Filtering
scanning for SPAM, AV etc. _ John Bowles - Original Message From: Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 9:08:18 PM Subject: Re: Outbound Email Filtering Define filter On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:05 PM, JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All- Question I have, more like a survey.. How many people filter outbound email to the internet? Thanks, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Outbound Email Filtering
Forgot to add - I'm not terribly concerned about scanning for spam. Doesn't seem like too much of a threat, since I don't let anything out on port 25 except the mailservers. On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:12 PM, JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: scanning for SPAM, AV etc. _ John Bowles - Original Message From: Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 9:08:18 PM Subject: Re: Outbound Email Filtering Define filter On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:05 PM, JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All- Question I have, more like a survey.. How many people filter outbound email to the internet? Thanks, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Exchange Routing Question
All- Here is another one to chew on. I'm getting ready to redesign a company's mail routing that is a worldwide company. As of right now they have SMTP connectors on almost every site (36 sites) w/DNS routing the mail. My question to those who have worldwide deployements, what is the best way to have mail enter and leave the Exchange infrastructure? Btw, we plan on cutting those sites in half in the future when we get to the consolidation project. Right now we need to square away the routing. All E2K3 on W2K3 servers w/Barracudas accepting mail as the sole entry point into the network. Thank you, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Hosting Multiple domains in Exchange 2003
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Jonathan Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still having the same issue with shirevalleydesign.com and mail to
bellsouth.net.
Hmmm. I just tried running some test probes against the MXes for
bellsouth.net. From a real ISP feed, I connected no problem, and
got immediate OK responses to MAIL
FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. I tried multiple probes
against both listed MXes.
However, from my home Comcast feed, I get a hangup before HELO, with
the message that I'm blacklisted. It's a 550 code. I'm not sure if
Exchange will consider that a permanent failure or not. If not, and
you're blacklisted by them, that would explain the delay-then-failure
you're seeing. Try turning on SMTP protocol logging to record a
transcript of the SMTP session, and see if bellsouth is rejecting you.
If you're not familiar with SMTP protocol logging, this article
explains it pretty well:
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Exchange-Server-2003-Mailflow-Part-2.html
You may want to check the IP address your mail server will be
sending from to see if it is on any blacklists. I like the site
http://www.mxtoolbox.com/blacklists.aspx for doing that. FWIW, I did
run the address your list post came from (24.229.89.2) and the one
returned for mail.{shirevalleydesign,moyersconstruction,sealcoatmydrive}.com
(67.91.139.138), and both came out clean. Valid PTR records also
exist for both.
The other 2 domains are moyersconstruction.com and sealcoatmydrive.com .
DNS looks good to me. The delegation chain is valid, and I get
consistent answers from all nameservers. I also ran ZoneCheck
(http://www.zonecheck.fr) against them and it didn't find anything
serious. It warned that postmaster@ the domains isn't working, which
isn't good, but if BellSouth was rejecting on that they would
presumably do so all the time. (Still, you should probably fix your
postmaster mailbox.)
Turns out in doing some more looking, we can't access the
web sites internally either.
Not being able to access the web sites probably isn't good, but may
or may not be related to your mail problems. What happens when you
try the web sites? Name resolution fails, connection times out, HTTP
server error, something else...?
-- Ben
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Hosting Multiple domains in Exchange 2003
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... mail.{shirevalleydesign,moyersconstruction,sealcoatmydrive}.com
(67.91.139.138), and both came out clean. Valid PTR records also
exist ...
Postscript: I do notice that 67.91.139.138 reverses to
ip67-91-139-138.z139-91-67.customer.algx.net.. I've heard rumor
that some spam filters will consider suspicious any IP address with a
reverse DNS that looks like that. You may want to contact the
hosting provider and have them change the PTR record for 67.91.139.138
to something more unique, like mail.shirevalleydesign.com..
-- Ben
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
