R: Finally 2010
So 2003 users should wait .2007 was a flop ! GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org] Inviato: mercoledì 15 aprile 2009 6.35 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: Finally 2010 We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 FamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca/ http://www.hedonists.ca ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
2007 was a great improvement over 2003. 2010 is an order of magnitude cooler than 2007. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: R: Finally 2010 So 2003 users should wait .2007 was a flop ! GuidoElia HELPPC Da: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org] Inviato: mercoledì 15 aprile 2009 6.35 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: Finally 2010 We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.cahttp://www.hedonists.ca/ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
R: Finally 2010
May be was a theoretical improvement, but so complicated and buggy GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com] Inviato: mercoledì 15 aprile 2009 8.24 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Finally 2010 2007 was a great improvement over 2003. 2010 is an order of magnitude cooler than 2007. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: R: Finally 2010 So 2003 users should wait .2007 was a flop ! GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org] Inviato: mercoledì 15 aprile 2009 6.35 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: Finally 2010 We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 FamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca http://www.hedonists.ca/ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Finally 2010
Very cool. I'm still on 2003. Since we're talking about it, what's the anticipated release date? Thanks. - Original Message - From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 12:34:53 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Finally 2010 We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselect (explains MS' lifecycle policy). -Scott From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventually dry up post 2010 release? 2009/4/15 KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.orgmailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.cahttp://www.hedonists.ca/ -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.commailto:clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Finally 2010
Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventually dry up post 2010 release? 2009/4/15 KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Finally 2010
Cool, thanks :-) 2009/4/15 Bolser, Scott scott.bol...@childrens.harvard.edu http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselect (explains MS’ lifecycle policy). -Scott *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:43 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Finally 2010 Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventually dry up post 2010 release? 2009/4/15 KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
I heard way back that 2007 was the last Exchange version to support Public Folders. Is that still accurate? Are the PFs in 2010? Craig Craig M. Sauvigne System Administrator Winthrop University Rock Hill, SC 29733 sauvig...@winthrop.edu SC143 From: chipsh...@comcast.net [mailto:chipsh...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 6:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Very cool. I'm still on 2003. Since we're talking about it, what's the anticipated release date? Thanks. - Original Message - From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 12:34:53 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Finally 2010 We can finally talk to yll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca http://www.hedonists.ca/ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Finally 2010
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 that is a Beta 2010 download that is now available. Some info on new stuff is available at http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124558(EXCHG.140).aspx and http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd298136(EXCHG.140).aspx Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:19:38 -0400 Subject: Re: Finally 2010 From: mailvor...@gmail.com To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ _ Rediscover Hotmail®: Get e-mail storage that grows with you. http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_Storage1_042009 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
Been browsing the docs. That header firewall looks like it will make life easier. It doesn't look like they've got the transport rules to use the .net regex library yet. -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
The one new feature that sounds promising is DAG (Database Availability Group). I'm running Win2K8 and Exchange 2007 with CCR across two data centers (separate subnets). DAG simplifies that setup by removing the complexity of clustering as E2010 requires Win2k8 enterprise, but does not require clustering. E2010 is using failover clustering's special sauce to simplify log shipping to another mailbox server (up to 16 replicas across 16 servers can be created). If a database fails, only that database is failed over to the replica server, not the entire mailbox server as is the case with CCR today. The CAS server will redirect the client to the new replica (within 30 secs according to MS). Exchange 2007 CCR with Windows 2008 to stretch a cluster across data centers was a great first setup. It's been painful at times, but well worth it currently as I have HA and DR using only MS technology with a two node cluster each with their own independent storage and no 3rd party software for replication or cluster management. E2010 allows organizations with limited bandwidth between data centers to create a solution that incorporates HA and DR without the complexity of configuring or dealing with clusters. There are additional features such as support for other browsers for the premium version of OWA which is huge. Archiving won't be ready for prime time in the RTM version. SP1 may be a different story, but only time will tell. The idea is great, but we'll need to wait for MS' offering to mature. -Scott -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
Public Folders are still alive and kicking on the Mailbox role of an Exchange 2010 server. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd351040(EXCHG.140).aspx From: Sauvigne, Craig M [mailto:sauvig...@winthrop.edu] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 I heard way back that 2007 was the last Exchange version to support Public Folders. Is that still accurate? Are the PFs in 2010? Craig Craig M. Sauvigne System Administrator Winthrop University Rock Hill, SC 29733 sauvig...@winthrop.edu SC143 From: chipsh...@comcast.net [mailto:chipsh...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 6:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Very cool. I'm still on 2003. Since we're talking about it, what's the anticipated release date? Thanks. - Original Message - From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 12:34:53 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Finally 2010 We can finally talk to ll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.cahttp://www.hedonists.ca/ This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
Anybody know what the heck cmdlet extension agents are? From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Finally 2010 We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.cahttp://www.hedonists.ca/ ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
I'm no expert on Exchange by any stretch of the imagination, but 2007 is working just peachy in our environment (~ 500 mailboxes). Complicated, yes-but not really more than 2003 was. Buggy? If it is, we're not seeing it. It has been humming along nicely here for a while. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 3:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: R: Finally 2010 May be was a theoretical improvement, but so complicated and buggy GuidoElia HELPPC Da: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com] Inviato: mercoledì 15 aprile 2009 8.24 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Finally 2010 2007 was a great improvement over 2003. 2010 is an order of magnitude cooler than 2007. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: R: Finally 2010 So 2003 users should wait .2007 was a flop ! GuidoElia HELPPC Da: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org] Inviato: mercoledì 15 aprile 2009 6.35 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: Finally 2010 We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.cahttp://www.hedonists.ca/ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Global Address List Changes
I am seeing this issue only on Outlook 2007 using Cached access. Outlook is updated with all the latest fixes and Exchange 2007 is also fully updated. Whenever we make any changes to an Exchange object, the changes are not reflected in Outlook until we delete the OAB files and let Outlook rebuild them. For example, today I am deleting an E-Mail contact, and creating a mailbox for the user under our domain. When I look up the user in the GAL, it still lists the person as a mail contact under the external domain, and any email sent to that contact fails. I did try running the commands to update the GAL and OAB on the Exchange server, but still no luck. (Update-GlobalAddressList Default Global Address List and Get-OfflineAddressBook | Update-OfflineAddressBook) I also setup a 2nd profile on my machine, pointing to the same mailbox, but didn't check the box for using Cached Mode. The changes to the address list were reflected immediately. I would rather not manually delete the OAB file on each laptop user. So I am hoping for some other fix. Thanks! ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
Well, aren't you going to talk about it? _ John Bowles 301.473.2260 From: KevinM [kev...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 12:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Finally 2010 We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.cahttp://www.hedonists.ca/ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Global Address List Changes
It's Working As Intended I'm afraid to say. The OAB is only updated server side every 24 hours or so and then the client has to fetch the changes and update its cached copy, which could be another 12-24 hours. That explanation is extremely simple, but the upshot is that you could be waiting up to 48 hours to see changes in the OAB. You can configure Outlook to always use an Online Address Book (my term, not Microsoft's) even if it's in Cached Exchange Mode, but when I had a play with that I didn't have much luck getting it working. I didn't spend too long on it anyway! Richard From: bounce-8490504-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8490504-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Chris Blair Sent: 15 April 2009 14:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Global Address List Changes I am seeing this issue only on Outlook 2007 using Cached access. Outlook is updated with all the latest fixes and Exchange 2007 is also fully updated. Whenever we make any changes to an Exchange object, the changes are not reflected in Outlook until we delete the OAB files and let Outlook rebuild them. For example, today I am deleting an E-Mail contact, and creating a mailbox for the user under our domain. When I look up the user in the GAL, it still lists the person as a mail contact under the external domain, and any email sent to that contact fails. I did try running the commands to update the GAL and OAB on the Exchange server, but still no luck. (Update-GlobalAddressList Default Global Address List and Get-OfflineAddressBook | Update-OfflineAddressBook) I also setup a 2nd profile on my machine, pointing to the same mailbox, but didn't check the box for using Cached Mode. The changes to the address list were reflected immediately. I would rather not manually delete the OAB file on each laptop user. So I am hoping for some other fix. Thanks! ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
I'm particularly intrigued by the size of the installer: 300MB! From: bounce-8490525-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8490525-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of John Bowles Sent: 15 April 2009 14:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Well, aren't you going to talk about it? _ John Bowles 301.473.2260 From: KevinM [kev...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 12:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Finally 2010 We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.cahttp://www.hedonists.ca/ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Sterling, etc...
Thought this would be interesting to those that watched the Forefront thread last week... http://redmondmag.com/news/article.asp?EditorialsID=10754 Bill Lambert Windows System Administrator Concuity A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc. Phone 847-941-9206 Fax 847-465-9147 NASDAQ: TTPA The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.gif
RE: Finally 2010
The DAG, The secondary mailbox thing. Calendaring federation, the cloud move stuff.. the more pretty OWA. The comical dictation of my voicemails. NO MORE CLUSTERING. Much hugely improved Jet Design. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Finally 2010
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Campbell, Rob rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net wrote: Anybody know what the heck “cmdlet extension agents” are? I would guess they're additional commands, or command options, for PowerShell. -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
2003 just entered extended support yesterday... Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 4:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventually dry up post 2010 release? 2009/4/15 KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.orgmailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.cahttp://www.hedonists.ca/ -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.commailto:clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
Maybe. From what little documentation there is, it appears they may be agents that run powershell scripts. -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 9:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Campbell, Rob rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net wrote: Anybody know what the heck cmdlet extension agents are? I would guess they're additional commands, or command options, for PowerShell. -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
You kind of lost me. I'm deployed over 300k seats on 2007 at over a hundred different organizations. While I've seen a few bugs (literally 3-4) 2007 is very stable and while it's slightly more complex than 2003 it's nothing particularly difficult to master. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 12:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: R: Finally 2010 May be was a theoretical improvement, but so complicated and buggy GuidoElia HELPPC Da: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com] Inviato: mercoledì 15 aprile 2009 8.24 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Finally 2010 2007 was a great improvement over 2003. 2010 is an order of magnitude cooler than 2007. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: R: Finally 2010 So 2003 users should wait .2007 was a flop ! GuidoElia HELPPC Da: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org] Inviato: mercoledì 15 aprile 2009 6.35 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: Finally 2010 We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.cahttp://www.hedonists.ca/ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
I like DAGs, it will be nice to deploy commodity servers with cheap disks and no RAID. :) Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 The DAG, The secondary mailbox thing. Calendaring federation, the cloud move stuff.. the more pretty OWA. The comical dictation of my voicemails. NO MORE CLUSTERING. Much hugely improved Jet Design. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Finally 2010
And the prospect of built in archiving is huge! John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 10:22:48 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 The DAG, The secondary mailbox thing. Calendaring federation, the cloud move stuff.. the more pretty OWA. The comical dictation of my voicemails. NO MORE CLUSTERING. Much hugely improved Jet Design. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
Yeah, but honestly it's not going to be what people want at first. If I remember correctly you can't move the archive databases off to different storage so you really don't gain much storage wise. It will be nice to have it in the product though, that's for sure. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 And the prospect of built in archiving is huge! John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 10:22:48 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 The DAG, The secondary mailbox thing. Calendaring federation, the cloud move stuff.. the more pretty OWA. The comical dictation of my voicemails. NO MORE CLUSTERING. Much hugely improved Jet Design. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
Oh, I'm sure it will be fixed. No worries there. I don't remember the exact concern as archiving is one thing I haven't played with, but I do remember being concerned when I saw the design. :) Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 I'm sure some lurking MVPs will express the importance of putting the archive on different storage. ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 11:14:22 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Yeah, but honestly it's not going to be what people want at first. If I remember correctly you can't move the archive databases off to different storage so you really don't gain much storage wise. It will be nice to have it in the product though, that's for sure. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 And the prospect of built in archiving is huge! John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 10:22:48 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 The DAG, The secondary mailbox thing. Calendaring federation, the cloud move stuff.. the more pretty OWA. The comical dictation of my voicemails. NO MORE CLUSTERING. Much hugely improved Jet Design. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with
RE: Finally 2010
It's worth looking here for Microsoft's cureent take on public folders: http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2008/03/31/448537.aspx Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal | Networks Engineer Herefordshire Council | Deputy Chief Executive's Office | I.C.T. Services Division Thorn Office Centre, Rotherwas, Hereford, HR2 6JT Tel: 01432 260160 email: pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk Any opinion expressed in this e-mail or any attached files are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Herefordshire Council. This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. This communication may contain material protected by law from being passed on. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this e-mail in error, you are advised that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of it. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 April 2009 17:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Kewl. I will be checking it out whenever I finish my deployment of E2K7. Just getting my test network up and running for the E2K3 - E2K7 migration so that I have no surprises with the production migration. Then, I think I will try out the E2K10 beta... And we still have public folders eh? Interesting. On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.com wrote: Oh, I'm sure it will be fixed. No worries there. I don't remember the exact concern as archiving is one thing I haven't played with, but I do remember being concerned when I saw the design. :) Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 I'm sure some lurking MVPs will express the importance of putting the archive on different storage. ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 11:14:22 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Yeah, but honestly it's not going to be what people want at first. If I remember correctly you can't move the archive databases off to different storage so you really don't gain much storage wise. It will be nice to have it in the product though, that's for sure. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 And the prospect of built in archiving is huge! John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 10:22:48 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 The DAG, The secondary mailbox thing. Calendaring federation, the cloud move stuff.. the more pretty OWA. The comical dictation of my voicemails. NO MORE CLUSTERING. Much hugely improved Jet Design. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
Re: Finally 2010
Kewl. I will be checking it out whenever I finish my deployment of E2K7. Just getting my test network up and running for the E2K3 - E2K7 migration so that I have no surprises with the production migration. Then, I think I will try out the E2K10 beta... And we still have public folders eh? Interesting. On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.com wrote: Oh, I'm sure it will be fixed. No worries there. I don't remember the exact concern as archiving is one thing I haven't played with, but I do remember being concerned when I saw the design. :) Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 I'm sure some lurking MVPs will express the importance of putting the archive on different storage. ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 11:14:22 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Yeah, but honestly it's not going to be what people want at first. If I remember correctly you can't move the archive databases off to different storage so you really don't gain much storage wise. It will be nice to have it in the product though, that's for sure. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 And the prospect of built in archiving is huge! John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 10:22:48 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 The DAG, The secondary mailbox thing. Calendaring federation, the cloud move stuff.. the more pretty OWA. The comical dictation of my voicemails. NO MORE CLUSTERING. Much hugely improved Jet Design. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health
Re: Finally 2010
Any word on migration strategies from Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2007? I'm assuming a swing migration from 2003 to 2010 is the only way to go, but are there any additional requirements, caveats, etc. going straight from 2003 to 2010? Is there an upgrade path from 2007 to 2010? - Sean On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Randal, Phil pran...@herefordshire.gov.ukwrote: It's worth looking here for Microsoft's cureent take on public folders: http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2008/03/31/448537.aspx Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal | Networks Engineer Herefordshire Council | Deputy Chief Executive's Office | I.C.T. Services Division Thorn Office Centre, Rotherwas, Hereford, HR2 6JT Tel: 01432 260160 email: pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk Any opinion expressed in this e-mail or any attached files are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Herefordshire Council. This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. This communication may contain material protected by law from being passed on. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this e-mail in error, you are advised that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of it. -- *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] *Sent:* 15 April 2009 17:21 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Finally 2010 Kewl. I will be checking it out whenever I finish my deployment of E2K7. Just getting my test network up and running for the E2K3 - E2K7 migration so that I have no surprises with the production migration. Then, I think I will try out the E2K10 beta... And we still have public folders eh? Interesting. On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.com wrote: Oh, I'm sure it will be fixed. No worries there. I don't remember the exact concern as archiving is one thing I haven't played with, but I do remember being concerned when I saw the design. :) Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 I'm sure some lurking MVPs will express the importance of putting the archive on different storage. ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 11:14:22 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Yeah, but honestly it's not going to be what people want at first. If I remember correctly you can't move the archive databases off to different storage so you really don't gain much storage wise. It will be nice to have it in the product though, that's for sure. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 And the prospect of built in archiving is huge! John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 10:22:48 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 The DAG, The secondary mailbox thing. Calendaring federation, the cloud move stuff.. the more pretty OWA. The comical dictation of my voicemails. NO MORE CLUSTERING. Much hugely improved Jet Design. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only
RE: Finally 2010
Swing method for 2007--2010. There is no option for an in-place upgrade. -Scott From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 1:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Any word on migration strategies from Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2007? I'm assuming a swing migration from 2003 to 2010 is the only way to go, but are there any additional requirements, caveats, etc. going straight from 2003 to 2010? Is there an upgrade path from 2007 to 2010? - Sean On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Randal, Phil pran...@herefordshire.gov.ukmailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk wrote: It's worth looking here for Microsoft's cureent take on public folders: http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2008/03/31/448537.aspx Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal | Networks Engineer Herefordshire Council | Deputy Chief Executive's Office | I.C.T. Services Division Thorn Office Centre, Rotherwas, Hereford, HR2 6JT Tel: 01432 260160 email: pran...@herefordshire.gov.ukmailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk Any opinion expressed in this e-mail or any attached files are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Herefordshire Council. This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. This communication may contain material protected by law from being passed on. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this e-mail in error, you are advised that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of it. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.commailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 April 2009 17:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Kewl. I will be checking it out whenever I finish my deployment of E2K7. Just getting my test network up and running for the E2K3 - E2K7 migration so that I have no surprises with the production migration. Then, I think I will try out the E2K10 beta... And we still have public folders eh? Interesting. On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.commailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com wrote: Oh, I'm sure it will be fixed. No worries there. I don't remember the exact concern as archiving is one thing I haven't played with, but I do remember being concerned when I saw the design. :) Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.orgmailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 I'm sure some lurking MVPs will express the importance of putting the archive on different storage. ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.commailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 11:14:22 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Yeah, but honestly it's not going to be what people want at first. If I remember correctly you can't move the archive databases off to different storage so you really don't gain much storage wise. It will be nice to have it in the product though, that's for sure. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.orgmailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 And the prospect of built in archiving is huge! John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.orgmailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 10:22:48 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 The DAG, The secondary mailbox thing. Calendaring federation, the cloud move stuff.. the more pretty OWA. The comical dictation of my voicemails. NO MORE CLUSTERING. Much hugely improved Jet Design. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.cahttp://www.hedonists.ca/ -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.commailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.orgmailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about
Re: Finally 2010
I would think a swing migration would not be needed between 03 and 10, but perhaps just install alongside (since it will be 64 bit only) and move mailboxes and public folders. On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.comwrote: Any word on migration strategies from Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2007? I'm assuming a swing migration from 2003 to 2010 is the only way to go, but are there any additional requirements, caveats, etc. going straight from 2003 to 2010? Is there an upgrade path from 2007 to 2010? - Sean On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Randal, Phil pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk wrote: It's worth looking here for Microsoft's cureent take on public folders: http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2008/03/31/448537.aspx Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal | Networks Engineer Herefordshire Council | Deputy Chief Executive's Office | I.C.T. Services Division Thorn Office Centre, Rotherwas, Hereford, HR2 6JT Tel: 01432 260160 email: pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk Any opinion expressed in this e-mail or any attached files are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Herefordshire Council. This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. This communication may contain material protected by law from being passed on. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this e-mail in error, you are advised that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of it. -- *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] *Sent:* 15 April 2009 17:21 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Finally 2010 Kewl. I will be checking it out whenever I finish my deployment of E2K7. Just getting my test network up and running for the E2K3 - E2K7 migration so that I have no surprises with the production migration. Then, I think I will try out the E2K10 beta... And we still have public folders eh? Interesting. On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.com wrote: Oh, I'm sure it will be fixed. No worries there. I don't remember the exact concern as archiving is one thing I haven't played with, but I do remember being concerned when I saw the design. :) Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 I'm sure some lurking MVPs will express the importance of putting the archive on different storage. ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 11:14:22 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Yeah, but honestly it's not going to be what people want at first. If I remember correctly you can't move the archive databases off to different storage so you really don't gain much storage wise. It will be nice to have it in the product though, that's for sure. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 And the prospect of built in archiving is huge! John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 10:22:48 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 The DAG, The secondary mailbox thing. Calendaring federation, the cloud move stuff.. the more pretty OWA. The comical dictation of my voicemails. NO MORE CLUSTERING. Much hugely improved Jet Design. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Outlook choosing CAS server
Hello all - I have a quick question about Outlook CAS servers - how does Outlook choose a Client Access server? - if the CAS role is installed where your mailbox is, will Outlook always use that CAS server? Is there any round-robin or load balancing involved? If your mailbox is NOT on a machine with a CAS role installed, what algorithm does Outlook use to find a CAS server? Thanks! ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Forefront?
We are using Exchange 2007 CCR, with two separate Hub Transports and two separate Edge Transports on our DMZ. We use Forefront on all servers for Anti-virus (currently running 4 engines) and we use Forefront on the Edge Transports to filter for SPAM using Microsoft's engine and various Blacklists. The anti-virus protection has been excellent. The only email related viruses we've gotten is when someone falls for a Phishing scheme and clicks on a link. Well, I shouldn't say we've gotten...our desktop software has prevented the installation of the virus at that point...so far. But that brings me to the weakness of Forefront. Seems like a lot of SPAM gets through: we get calls to the help desk several times a week...especially when users get an email from themselves to themselves. (No matter how many company wide emails we send telling users to just delete email they don't recognize they still call the Help Desk.) We could set the parameters a little higher, like 6 instead of 7, but we already get 3 or 4 false positives a month. We quarantine everything to a mailbox for 7 days, and get an average of about 700 messages a day sent there. This does not include SPAM bounced because of fake addresses (ADAM on the Edge Transport checks for legit addresses) or emails bounced due to Black Listing. If I had my preference I think I might look in to a dedicated device in the stream before the Edge server for handling SPAM. From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 8:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forefront? We've used Antigen from the Sybari days and use Forefront today. AFAIK, there's no spam prevention in Forefront and the anti-spam agents in Antigen were pretty weak. For AV and file filtering though, we love it. We haven't had an email born virus in the seven years since we first rolled it out. We also filter 20 or so file extensions that we really don't need. From: Matt Moore [mailto:mattmoore...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Forefront? We've been using it for about 2 months now. The jury is out. Mom bugs the crap out of me on a daily basis because pc's go to sleep and it takes too long for them to wake up and mom sends out a communication error and an update not done for that machine. If you're thinking green and you turn the PC's off at night it's a flood of warnings. It's huge pain for me because mom is tied into our helpdesk software and it generats a helpdesk ticket for each comm error mom has. Other than that it seems to work pretty good. Very good on the malware side. AV well I just don't see many viruses anymore with good AV and multiple scanners on incomming email so I'm guessing it working... Matt - Original Message - From: Bill Lambertmailto:blamb...@concuity.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issuesmailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 4:11 PM Subject: Forefront? Hello all... I'm tired of using multiple products to protect desktops and email from spam, viruses and spyware. I've taken a look at the MS Forefront product line and it looks like a pretty good solution. I have Exchange 2003 and XP clients. Can anyone comment on its effectiveness, installation, management and use both at the admin and user levels? Any other recommendations are welcome as well. Thanks. Bill Lambert Windows System Administrator Concuity A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc. Phone 847-941-9206 Fax 847-465-9147 [cid:image001.gif@01C9BDD4.4D5B3830] NASDAQ: TTPA The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~inline: image001.gif
RE: Global Address List Changes
Yeah...same thing goes for the GAL. If we add a new user or change an existing user, with Cached mode enabled the change doesn't show up until the next morning. Can be a royal pain... From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 10:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Global Address List Changes It's Working As Intended I'm afraid to say. The OAB is only updated server side every 24 hours or so and then the client has to fetch the changes and update its cached copy, which could be another 12-24 hours. That explanation is extremely simple, but the upshot is that you could be waiting up to 48 hours to see changes in the OAB. You can configure Outlook to always use an Online Address Book (my term, not Microsoft's) even if it's in Cached Exchange Mode, but when I had a play with that I didn't have much luck getting it working. I didn't spend too long on it anyway! Richard From: bounce-8490504-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8490504-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Chris Blair Sent: 15 April 2009 14:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Global Address List Changes I am seeing this issue only on Outlook 2007 using Cached access. Outlook is updated with all the latest fixes and Exchange 2007 is also fully updated. Whenever we make any changes to an Exchange object, the changes are not reflected in Outlook until we delete the OAB files and let Outlook rebuild them. For example, today I am deleting an E-Mail contact, and creating a mailbox for the user under our domain. When I look up the user in the GAL, it still lists the person as a mail contact under the external domain, and any email sent to that contact fails. I did try running the commands to update the GAL and OAB on the Exchange server, but still no luck. (Update-GlobalAddressList Default Global Address List and Get-OfflineAddressBook | Update-OfflineAddressBook) I also setup a 2nd profile on my machine, pointing to the same mailbox, but didn't check the box for using Cached Mode. The changes to the address list were reflected immediately. I would rather not manually delete the OAB file on each laptop user. So I am hoping for some other fix. Thanks! ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Outlook choosing CAS server
The SCP record for the server in the same site as the outlook 2007 client will be used or closest site if there is no CAS server or you have site affinity set In addition, outlook 2k7 will ALWAYS pick the oldest SCP record So if you have multiple CAS servers in a site, outlook will always use the first one installed if it is online There is no inherent load balancing so its a good idea to NLB your autodiscover and other web services urls (EWS,OAB,etc) On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Russ Patterson rus...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all - I have a quick question about Outlook CAS servers - how does Outlook choose a Client Access server? - if the CAS role is installed where your mailbox is, will Outlook always use that CAS server? Is there any round-robin or load balancing involved? If your mailbox is NOT on a machine with a CAS role installed, what algorithm does Outlook use to find a CAS server? Thanks! ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Forefront?
Forefront Security for Exchange doesn't do spam filtering -- only some content filtering and anti-malware. The Exchange Edge machine can do the spam filtering for you. However, the next version of Forefront for Exchange (F14) will have some nice anti-spam features. You can beta test F14 if you like. Tom TOM SHINDER | Sr. Consultant/Technical Writer 206.443.1117 | shin...@prowesscorp.com 5701 Sixth Avenue South | Seattle, WA 98108 PROWESS | WWW.PROWESSCORP.COM http://www.prowesscorp.com/ http://www.windows.com/ and a Forefront MVP From: Brown, Larry [mailto:larry.br...@dplinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forefront? We are using Exchange 2007 CCR, with two separate Hub Transports and two separate Edge Transports on our DMZ. We use Forefront on all servers for Anti-virus (currently running 4 engines) and we use Forefront on the Edge Transports to filter for SPAM using Microsoft's engine and various Blacklists. The anti-virus protection has been excellent. The only email related viruses we've gotten is when someone falls for a Phishing scheme and clicks on a link. Well, I shouldn't say we've gotten...our desktop software has prevented the installation of the virus at that point...so far. But that brings me to the weakness of Forefront. Seems like a lot of SPAM gets through: we get calls to the help desk several times a week...especially when users get an email from themselves to themselves. (No matter how many company wide emails we send telling users to just delete email they don't recognize they still call the Help Desk.) We could set the parameters a little higher, like 6 instead of 7, but we already get 3 or 4 false positives a month. We quarantine everything to a mailbox for 7 days, and get an average of about 700 messages a day sent there. This does not include SPAM bounced because of fake addresses (ADAM on the Edge Transport checks for legit addresses) or emails bounced due to Black Listing. If I had my preference I think I might look in to a dedicated device in the stream before the Edge server for handling SPAM. From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 8:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forefront? We've used Antigen from the Sybari days and use Forefront today. AFAIK, there's no spam prevention in Forefront and the anti-spam agents in Antigen were pretty weak. For AV and file filtering though, we love it. We haven't had an email born virus in the seven years since we first rolled it out. We also filter 20 or so file extensions that we really don't need. From: Matt Moore [mailto:mattmoore...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Forefront? We've been using it for about 2 months now. The jury is out. Mom bugs the crap out of me on a daily basis because pc's go to sleep and it takes too long for them to wake up and mom sends out a communication error and an update not done for that machine. If you're thinking green and you turn the PC's off at night it's a flood of warnings. It's huge pain for me because mom is tied into our helpdesk software and it generats a helpdesk ticket for each comm error mom has. Other than that it seems to work pretty good. Very good on the malware side. AV well I just don't see many viruses anymore with good AV and multiple scanners on incomming email so I'm guessing it working... Matt - Original Message - From: Bill Lambert mailto:blamb...@concuity.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 4:11 PM Subject: Forefront? Hello all... I'm tired of using multiple products to protect desktops and email from spam, viruses and spyware. I've taken a look at the MS Forefront product line and it looks like a pretty good solution. I have Exchange 2003 and XP clients. Can anyone comment on its effectiveness, installation, management and use both at the admin and user levels? Any other recommendations are welcome as well. Thanks. Bill Lambert Windows System Administrator Concuity A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc. Phone 847-941-9206 Fax 847-465-9147 NASDAQ: TTPA The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby
RE: Finally 2010
true... ~Kevinm WLKMMAS From: Steve Ens [stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 I would think a swing migration would not be needed between 03 and 10, but perhaps just install alongside (since it will be 64 bit only) and move mailboxes and public folders. On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.commailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Any word on migration strategies from Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2007? I'm assuming a swing migration from 2003 to 2010 is the only way to go, but are there any additional requirements, caveats, etc. going straight from 2003 to 2010? Is there an upgrade path from 2007 to 2010? - Sean On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Randal, Phil pran...@herefordshire.gov.ukmailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk wrote: It's worth looking here for Microsoft's cureent take on public folders: http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2008/03/31/448537.aspx Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal | Networks Engineer Herefordshire Council | Deputy Chief Executive's Office | I.C.T. Services Division Thorn Office Centre, Rotherwas, Hereford, HR2 6JT Tel: 01432 260160 email: pran...@herefordshire.gov.ukmailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk Any opinion expressed in this e-mail or any attached files are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Herefordshire Council. This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. This communication may contain material protected by law from being passed on. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this e-mail in error, you are advised that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of it. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.commailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 April 2009 17:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Kewl. I will be checking it out whenever I finish my deployment of E2K7. Just getting my test network up and running for the E2K3 - E2K7 migration so that I have no surprises with the production migration. Then, I think I will try out the E2K10 beta... And we still have public folders eh? Interesting. On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.commailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com wrote: Oh, I'm sure it will be fixed. No worries there. I don't remember the exact concern as archiving is one thing I haven't played with, but I do remember being concerned when I saw the design. :) Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.orgmailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 I'm sure some lurking MVPs will express the importance of putting the archive on different storage. ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.commailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 11:14:22 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Yeah, but honestly it's not going to be what people want at first. If I remember correctly you can't move the archive databases off to different storage so you really don't gain much storage wise. It will be nice to have it in the product though, that's for sure. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.orgmailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 And the prospect of built in archiving is huge! John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.orgmailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 10:22:48 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 The DAG, The secondary mailbox thing. Calendaring federation, the cloud move stuff.. the more pretty OWA. The comical dictation of my voicemails. NO MORE CLUSTERING. Much hugely improved Jet Design. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.cahttp://www.hedonists.ca/ -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.commailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:20 AM
RE: Finally 2010
Here are some shots of 2010 OWA: http://www.networkworld.com/slideshows/2009/041509-exchange-2010-test.html?n etht=rn_041509nladname=041509dailynewspmal TinyURL: http://tinyurl.com/c5rpjt \\Steve// -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
One of the more cool parts of OWA or Outlook Live in Exchange server 2010 is the ECP (Exchange Control Panel) that grants users the power to modify groups, users, and a limited subset of Exchange settings. In ECP the enabled user can manage passwords, create, and delete exchange accounts (includes AD) modify email addresses, modify Contact and general GAL information. In ECP the enabled user can Create, modify, and Delete email enabled groups. In ECP the enabled user can modify global rules, and a few other things. The another really cool part of OWA is the New and very much improved conversation view. Lastly I will toss out a few more improvements; multi browser full fidelity support ( Firefox, opera, IE all with the same user experience- not fully baked) IM integration (full web based Messenger client)The ability to view multiple calendars side by side from the start.. ETC.. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -Original Message- From: Steve Szabo [mailto:steve...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Here are some shots of 2010 OWA: http://www.networkworld.com/slideshows/2009/041509-exchange-2010-test.html?n etht=rn_041509nladname=041509dailynewspmal TinyURL: http://tinyurl.com/c5rpjt \\Steve// -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
