RE: Anti-spam choices in general?
Proofpoint has a great solution and includes the ability to define custom rules. -Scott -Original Message- From: Mike Benedict [mailto:benedic...@palmer.edu] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Anti-spam choices in general? Just wondering if there's anti-spam recommendations for either appliances or standalone server based software (we need it to front-end a mail router ahead of Exchange)? I currently use Barracuda and while I feel it represents a good value, I'm interested in a next-step solution that allows the customer a bit more flexibility to define custom rules. Thanks, Mike Benedict --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Anyone working for a Healthcare provider experienced this?
For our computers on wheels and other centrally located PC's, we only allow the use of OWA but do not allow the user to save any data (OWA or other applications) on the local machine. -Scott -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com] Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 3:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Anyone working for a Healthcare provider experienced this? So my boss was reviewing the CMS Readiness Checklist for 2010 (yeah, I know it is nearly 2011) and came across this: Ensure effective security of all beneficiary information, whether in paper or electronic format. Measures to protect the security and privacy of personally identifiable information (PII) that should be taken by organizations include, but are not limited to, ensuring that: * Data files are not saved on public or private computers when accessing corporate e$B!(Jmail through the internet. He is wondering if this means we need to come up with some clever way to prevent OWA from downloading/viewing attachments, or if he is misinterpreting it. To me, this does indeed mean that we should not be allowing our employees access to OWA, however I could take it one step further and say that this says I should not be able to access email attachments remotely at all. No VPN access, no Blackberry, no nothing - after all, this data travels over the Internet in one form or another. Just curious if anyone else on the list works for a healthcare company and has seen this. Here is a link to the official document: http://www.cms.gov/PrescriptionDrugCovContra/Downloads/MemoCY2010ReadinessChecklist_09.15.09.pdf Jim Jim Holmgren Manager of Server Engineering XLHealth Corporation The Warehouse at Camden Yards 351 West Camden Street, Suite 100 Baltimore, MD 21201 410.625.2200 (main) 443.524.8573 (direct) 443-506.2400 (cell) www.xlhealth.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, including attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or protected health information. Under the Federal Law (HIPAA), the intended recipient is obligated to keep this information secure and confidential. Any disclosure to third parties without authorization from the member of as permitted by law is prohibited and punishable under Federal Law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. NOTA DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este facs匇ile, incluyendo lo adjunto, es para el uso exclusivo del destinatario(s) y puede contener informaci confidencial y/o informaci protegida de salud. En virtud de la Ley Federal (HIPAA), el destinatario tiene la obligaci de mantener esta informaci segura y confidencial. Cualquier divulgaci a terceros sin la autorizaci de los miembros de lo permitido por la ley est・prohibido y penado en virtud de la Ley Federal. Si usted no es el destinatario, por favor, pgase en contacto con el remitente por tel馭ono y destruir todas las copias del mensaje original --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Exchange 2010 Recoverable items
With Exchange 2010, is there a way to extend the length of time a message is kept the Single Item Recovery folder? For instance, our standard Exchange 2007 deleted items retention is 30 days. Anything else beyond that and we have to go to tape. With Exchange 2010, I'd like to keep the user visible 30 day dumpster, but extend the Single Item Recovery option to roughly 400 days (13 months or so which is our tape scratch policy). Based on my reading here: (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee364755.aspx) it appears it may not be possible. The problem I'm trying to solve is eliminate our current tape backups with a DAG mixture of replicated db's (live between datacenters) and lagged databases, with the lagged db's only being used to fix corrupted db's. It appears the solution would be to extend the dumpster to 400 days if two unique values cannot be set. Thoughts? Thanks, Scott --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Exchange 2010 Recoverable items
My goal was to hide the additional 12 months (only give the user the ability to view the past 30 days) of dumpster data. Looks like we'll just need to set DIR to 13 months and have our users deal with it. Appreciate the feedback. It would be nice in a future version or SP to give an administrator the ability to set a user view within the dumpster. -Scott From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Recoverable items I don't understand. If you enable either Single Item Recovery (SIR) or Litigation Hold (LH) on a mailbox, then a mailbox moves from using Dumpster 1.0 to Dumpster 2.0. SIR _is_ Dumpster 2.0. Deleted Item Recovery (DIR) and LH control the length of SIR. LH wins, obviously. Just set DIR to 13 months. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Bolser, Scott [mailto:scott.bol...@childrens.harvard.edu] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 10:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 Recoverable items With Exchange 2010, is there a way to extend the length of time a message is kept the Single Item Recovery folder? For instance, our standard Exchange 2007 deleted items retention is 30 days. Anything else beyond that and we have to go to tape. With Exchange 2010, I'd like to keep the user visible 30 day dumpster, but extend the Single Item Recovery option to roughly 400 days (13 months or so which is our tape scratch policy). Based on my reading here: (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee364755.aspx) it appears it may not be possible. The problem I'm trying to solve is eliminate our current tape backups with a DAG mixture of replicated db's (live between datacenters) and lagged databases, with the lagged db's only being used to fix corrupted db's. It appears the solution would be to extend the dumpster to 400 days if two unique values cannot be set. Thoughts? Thanks, Scott --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Exchange 2010 Recoverable items
Thanks. The business driver in this case would be user productivity. If our advertised DIR to the user community is 30 days but for backup purposes, DIR is 13 months. If a user is attempting to recover an item, he/she will need to wade through 13 months of data instead 1 month. Without the ability for an end user to search DIR (other than sorting), it could be pretty painful to navigate 13 months' worth of data. It's certainly not a high priority in terms of a feature request, but rather a nice to have. Thanks, Scott From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Recoverable items I don't mind submitting the suggestion for v.next, but can you explain the reasoning behind it? That is, in Microsoft terms: what is the business driver for the feature request? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Bolser, Scott [mailto:scott.bol...@childrens.harvard.edu] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Recoverable items My goal was to hide the additional 12 months (only give the user the ability to view the past 30 days) of dumpster data. Looks like we'll just need to set DIR to 13 months and have our users deal with it. Appreciate the feedback. It would be nice in a future version or SP to give an administrator the ability to set a user view within the dumpster. -Scott From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Recoverable items I don't understand. If you enable either Single Item Recovery (SIR) or Litigation Hold (LH) on a mailbox, then a mailbox moves from using Dumpster 1.0 to Dumpster 2.0. SIR _is_ Dumpster 2.0. Deleted Item Recovery (DIR) and LH control the length of SIR. LH wins, obviously. Just set DIR to 13 months. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Bolser, Scott [mailto:scott.bol...@childrens.harvard.edu] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 10:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 Recoverable items With Exchange 2010, is there a way to extend the length of time a message is kept the Single Item Recovery folder? For instance, our standard Exchange 2007 deleted items retention is 30 days. Anything else beyond that and we have to go to tape. With Exchange 2010, I'd like to keep the user visible 30 day dumpster, but extend the Single Item Recovery option to roughly 400 days (13 months or so which is our tape scratch policy). Based on my reading here: (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee364755.aspx) it appears it may not be possible. The problem I'm trying to solve is eliminate our current tape backups with a DAG mixture of replicated db's (live between datacenters) and lagged databases, with the lagged db's only being used to fix corrupted db's. It appears the solution would be to extend the dumpster to 400 days if two unique values cannot be set. Thoughts? Thanks, Scott --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Alert and possibly throttle outbound email per user
Exchange 2010's alerting is over a 24 hour period it appears (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd351045.aspx new-throttlepolicy -RecipientRateLimit). It's a good start, so hopefully as administrators we'll be able to configure a set time limit window in a future service pack :) There is a module that will plug into postfix: http://www.policyd.org/tiki-index.php?page=Quotasstructure=Documentation, but unfortunately my Anti-Spam appliance is a turnkey solution (the appliance is built on Postfix) and completely locked down. I've already asked the vendor to add it as a feature request. -Scott -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 5:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Alert and possibly throttle outbound email per user Didn't think you meant difficult, but your suggestion that a 3rd party (or homegrown) app is why I suggested a centralised log collection/analysis tool - IMHO it's something that should be available in an IT environment of any size anyway, and it's just one more task for it to work on. Kurt On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 14:34, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Exchange 2010 can give you the instantaneous data, but doesn't provide any BI that comes out of the raw data. Didn't intend to imply that it was hard or difficult - just that it wasn't built-in. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 5:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Alert and possibly throttle outbound email per user On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:24, Bolser, Scott scott.bol...@childrens.harvard.edu wrote: I’ve been searching around for logical solution to monitor and throttle Exchange accounts if a user has unknowingly given up their username/password in a phishing attack. The typical attack utilizes OWA to start sending SPAM shortly afterwards. Environment is Exchange 2007 SP2. I’m attempting to find a solution that would trigger an alert if a user is sending ‘x’ number of messages in a 30 minute to 1 hour window. Has anyone found a simple solution? Thanks, Scott MBS says a third party app. I wonder if, for instance, nagios/syslog/MOM/OSSEC/OSSIM/whatever can monitor the logs and keep a count of SMTP transactions by IP address and if a threshold is exceeded raise an alarm. Kurt
Alert and possibly throttle outbound email per user
I've been searching around for logical solution to monitor and throttle Exchange accounts if a user has unknowingly given up their username/password in a phishing attack. The typical attack utilizes OWA to start sending SPAM shortly afterwards. Environment is Exchange 2007 SP2. I'm attempting to find a solution that would trigger an alert if a user is sending 'x' number of messages in a 30 minute to 1 hour window. Has anyone found a simple solution? Thanks, Scott
RE: Secure email/web portal
Tumbleweed/Axway's SecureMessenger product is one which I use. Proofpoint and Ironport are others. -Scott -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:cbusitl...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 5:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Secure email/web portal One of my clients wants some way to send and receive secure mesages with clients (HIPAA) There seems to be a ton of company's doing this. Anyone using a service like this that they can recomend? I'm guessing most services have a secure portal that allows two people to communicate through the site. Not sure how that would intagrate with email yet. Need to do some reading. On 6/15/09, Paul Cookman paul.cook...@selection.co.uk wrote: I used this command to give a user account access to all mailboxes, Get-MailboxDatabase -Server “ESS-Exch702″ | Add-ADPermission -User “Auditor” -ExtendedRights Receive-As what would the command be to remove this entry leaving the user with the same access as before I ran the command? Kind regards, Paul. Paul Cookman * Technical Account Manager [cid:image89adba.jpg@985300e5.54494fc2] +44(0) 844 874 1000 * [cid:image9748e6.jpg@93175135.24e84d59] +44(0) 844 874 1001 [cid:imagebd8934.jpg@f2e2156d.7b61420f] paul.cook...@selection.co.uk * www.selection.co.ukhttp://www.selection.co.uk/ [cid:image876684.jpg@04235f9e.dee94878] This e-mail is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee only. Selection Services Plc accepts no liability for personal views expressed. While every effort has been made to ensure the attachments are virus-free, they must be checked before further use, especially those containing encrypted data. If you have any problems with this e-mail, please contact our IT Manager on em...@selection.co.ukmailto:em...@selection.co.uk Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 2758710 Registered Office: Provident House, 122 High Street, Bromley, Kent BR1 1EZ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Sent from my mobile device ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Entourage Problems
Usually emptying the cache which forces a re-synchronization does the trick. -Scott From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Entourage Problems Any luck using a new profile in Entourage or trying to re-synch the database in Entourage...forget the exact terminology they use. Entourage just uses OWA so if that's working it should work, unless you are running the beta which uses EWS, but even then if you're not seeing errors it seems to me Entourage just needs a swift kick. I've seen many cases where that was necessary. On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Matthew Bullock mbull...@root9.commailto:mbull...@root9.com wrote: Thanks, I'll give it a try. -mb From: Glaman, Mark [mailto:mdgla...@bechtel.commailto:mdgla...@bechtel.com] Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Entourage Problems try this Microsoft group. I have had good luck. http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.mac.office.entouragecat=en_US_2ba2a279-4301-4979-8491-5dc3ada8f137lang=encr=US From: Matthew Bullock [mailto:mbull...@root9.commailto:mbull...@root9.com] Posted At: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 9:54 PM Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Entourage Problems Subject: Entourage Problems I've had an Exchange 2007 environment set up for a couple months now, and everything was working great - Outlook Anywhere, OWA, ActiveSync, and one guy (the boss) with a Mac and Entourage. Yesterday we had a power outage, and even though one of the CAS/HUB and one of the SCC mailbox nodes were powered down gracefully, the other two weren't. Everything came back up ok, DB's were fine, but Outlook Anywhere had some problems with the certificate, and the Entourage client stopped syncing. OWA and ActiveSync continued working fine though. I removed and re-imported the UCC certs on the CAS servers and Outlook Anywhere was happy again, but I still can't get Entourage working. Does anyone know any good docs on getting Entourage working properly with Exchange 2007, and the permission required on all the IIS virtual directories? All servers are on Windows 2008. Also, does anyone have any tips on troubleshooting in Entourage? It isn't giving me any errors, and depending on how the account settings are, will either say (not connected) or will do nothing at all. I have no idea what its having trouble with. Thanks, -mb ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselect (explains MS' lifecycle policy). -Scott From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventually dry up post 2010 release? 2009/4/15 KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.orgmailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.cahttp://www.hedonists.ca/ -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.commailto:clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
The one new feature that sounds promising is DAG (Database Availability Group). I'm running Win2K8 and Exchange 2007 with CCR across two data centers (separate subnets). DAG simplifies that setup by removing the complexity of clustering as E2010 requires Win2k8 enterprise, but does not require clustering. E2010 is using failover clustering's special sauce to simplify log shipping to another mailbox server (up to 16 replicas across 16 servers can be created). If a database fails, only that database is failed over to the replica server, not the entire mailbox server as is the case with CCR today. The CAS server will redirect the client to the new replica (within 30 secs according to MS). Exchange 2007 CCR with Windows 2008 to stretch a cluster across data centers was a great first setup. It's been painful at times, but well worth it currently as I have HA and DR using only MS technology with a two node cluster each with their own independent storage and no 3rd party software for replication or cluster management. E2010 allows organizations with limited bandwidth between data centers to create a solution that incorporates HA and DR without the complexity of configuring or dealing with clusters. There are additional features such as support for other browsers for the premium version of OWA which is huge. Archiving won't be ready for prime time in the RTM version. SP1 may be a different story, but only time will tell. The idea is great, but we'll need to wait for MS' offering to mature. -Scott -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Finally 2010
Swing method for 2007--2010. There is no option for an in-place upgrade. -Scott From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 1:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Any word on migration strategies from Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2007? I'm assuming a swing migration from 2003 to 2010 is the only way to go, but are there any additional requirements, caveats, etc. going straight from 2003 to 2010? Is there an upgrade path from 2007 to 2010? - Sean On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Randal, Phil pran...@herefordshire.gov.ukmailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk wrote: It's worth looking here for Microsoft's cureent take on public folders: http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2008/03/31/448537.aspx Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal | Networks Engineer Herefordshire Council | Deputy Chief Executive's Office | I.C.T. Services Division Thorn Office Centre, Rotherwas, Hereford, HR2 6JT Tel: 01432 260160 email: pran...@herefordshire.gov.ukmailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk Any opinion expressed in this e-mail or any attached files are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Herefordshire Council. This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. This communication may contain material protected by law from being passed on. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this e-mail in error, you are advised that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of it. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.commailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 April 2009 17:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Kewl. I will be checking it out whenever I finish my deployment of E2K7. Just getting my test network up and running for the E2K3 - E2K7 migration so that I have no surprises with the production migration. Then, I think I will try out the E2K10 beta... And we still have public folders eh? Interesting. On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.commailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com wrote: Oh, I'm sure it will be fixed. No worries there. I don't remember the exact concern as archiving is one thing I haven't played with, but I do remember being concerned when I saw the design. :) Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.orgmailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 I'm sure some lurking MVPs will express the importance of putting the archive on different storage. ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: Jeremy Phillips jere...@cohesivelogic.commailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 11:14:22 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Yeah, but honestly it's not going to be what people want at first. If I remember correctly you can't move the archive databases off to different storage so you really don't gain much storage wise. It will be nice to have it in the product though, that's for sure. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.orgmailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 And the prospect of built in archiving is huge! John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.orgmailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Apr 15 10:22:48 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 The DAG, The secondary mailbox thing. Calendaring federation, the cloud move stuff.. the more pretty OWA. The comical dictation of my voicemails. NO MORE CLUSTERING. Much hugely improved Jet Design. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.cahttp://www.hedonists.ca/ -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.commailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.orgmailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about
RE: Powershell command to remove /exchange and /exchweb virtual directories
This is what you are looking for: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/941201 The steps to remove and recreate the virtual directories are listed there. -Scott -Original Message- From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 12:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Powershell command to remove /exchange and /exchweb virtual directories Thanks Troy, However I knew that much, I just am unsure on how to properly assemble the full command and don't want to go just guessing, was hoping someone had done it before and would know. Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Powershell command to remove /exchange and /exchweb virtual directories Ehren, Using get-help *web* | fl name - returns: Name : Test-OutlookWebServices Name : Test-WebServicesConnectivity Name : New-WebServicesVirtualDirectory Name : Get-WebServicesVirtualDirectory Name : Set-WebServicesVirtualDirectory Name : Remove-WebServicesVirtualDirectory I am guessing you are looking for remove-webservicesvirtualdirectory and then you will probably use new-webservicesvirtualdirectory Never had to do it before, good luck ! -troy -Original Message- From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 7:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Powershell command to remove /exchange and /exchweb virtual directories Hi, There is something wrong with my /exchange and /exchweb virtual directories and I would like to remove them completely via powershell and recreate them. I did this once before but completely forgot the complete command that would do this. Can anyone assist? Thanks Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: A quesiton on redirction email
Have the user authenticate at the MFP. Most devices will allow for user authentication. -Scott From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 8:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A quesiton on redirction email I am not sure if it can be done but here is the scenario: I have copiers that can scan to a pdf and be sent out to email. Many have this not a new item. I tell my users to send to themselves and not directly to a customer from the copier because that person will most always send a reply and the copier is not a real user. Is there a way to have the return email from the copier find the user. This will help with another issue I have a program that notifies people or customers of automated updates. The customer is going to respond to that email how can do people handle these situation. Thank you David ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
