Error Messages In the Event Log

[Jeremiah Watson]

Hello,

We are planning on moving from Sendmail to Exchange Server 2000 this
weekend or next and I'm having trouble running down these last two error
messages in my Event Log on the Exchange Server.  The Server is Win2k Srv
SP2 and Exchange 2K SP2.  I've checked Technet and tried what they
recommended, IE Apply SP.  Still having the Same Problems

Single Domain 
Single Routing Group.  One SMTP Connector and Virtual Server.

These happen every hour
1. Event ID 8197
Error initializing session for virtual machine CE-MAIL-SRV. The error
number is 0x8004111.  Make sure Microsoft Exchange Store is running.

2.  Event ID 929
Failed in reading Connector's DS Info Process Id: 1008

Has anybody seen these errors?

Thanks

Jeremiah Watson
Composidie, Inc.






List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Future plans 2

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



You 
need the Earnhardt bandanna, and some country and western 
music.

  -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 
  12:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future 
  plans 2
  What 
  the hell do WalMart employees need mailboxes for? To let each other know that 
  the Dale Earnhardt bandanas are on sale this week?
  

-Original Message-From: William 
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
February 14, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2
You know the answer Mr B.  They both use 
Exchange.  WalMart, based in Arkansas, may well be the largest 
Exchange2000 deployment at around 300,000 mailboxes.
 
William

  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 
  14, 2002 9:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Future plans 2
  I'm the 
  same with KMart. I have never been in a WalMart and have on intention of 
  doing so.
  I'm a 
  Target kind of guy.
   
  Just to be 
  on topic, Do you think Kmart or Wal-Mart use Exchange? 

  

-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 
2002 9:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Future plans 2
He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, 
neither will I... 
-Original Message- From: 
Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 
AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 
you must not be married. 
-Original Message- From: 
William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 
I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you 
refer.  I don't think they exist.  Are you sure you have the 
name right?
-Original Message- From: 
Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 
The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because 
I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK.  They've got 
several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called 
WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA.  
Using SSL of course... :-)
Neil Hobson 
Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
Enterprise Systems For Collaborative 
Solutions   -Original Message- From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: 
Future plans 2 
That is the best answer I have received, and you are 
right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to 
nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the 
different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and 
we use OWA to use their domain 
there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as 
connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found 
another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise 
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 
PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 
I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your 
legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain 
doesn't mean squat in the legal world.  You are talking about 
basically interchanging internal company information.  That, plus 
you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this.  
The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like 
this, which may not even be possible.  In your given scenario 
below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as 
inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for 
their employees.  Otherwise, mail is going to bounce.  
Why?  Because the way that MX records work is that the server with 
the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it.  There will 
be some messages that get sent to the other server.  There isn't 
any way around this.  That means that you will be receiving mail 
for possibly ANY person working at the other company.  You

RE: e-mail arriving in batches

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: e-mail arriving in batches



Using 
Outlook 97 here with exchange 2000. Works great. (Not as good as Outlook 2k) but 
it works.

  -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:52 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: e-mail 
  arriving in batches
  
  Outlook 
  97 works fine with Exchange 5.5.  
  I have no idea about Exchange 2000 though.  And unfortunately I have no idea how 
  to help Angie out.
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: David N. 
  Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:50 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: e-mail 
  arriving in batches
   
  What did you reboot ? 
  the client or the server ?
  I didnt think Outlook 
  97 worked with Exchange
  -Original 
  Message-From: Angie 
  Sawyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 14:28 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: e-mail 
  arriving in batches
  Our clients are 
  not getting e-mail in Outlook unless they click on another folder within 
  Outlook.  Then the mail is sent/received in batches.  I don't 
  believe it's a udp port issue.  Any other ideas?  Last time a reboot 
  fixed the problem, but I'd rather not have to do that 
  again.
  Exchange 5.5 SP4 
  on Windows 2000 using Outlook 97, 2000, & 2002 
  Angie 
  Sawyer 
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Forward mail from Exchange to an Internet Email Address With Exchange 2000 Server

[Jeremiah Watson]

So for the life of me I can't figure out how to configure a mailbox to
forward mail from exchange to an external address on Exchange Server 2000
SP2.  From what I read in the archives it didn't seem that hard in
Exchange 5.5, Any Ideas on how to do this?  Do I need to create a user
account with the external Address that I want?

TIA

Jeremiah Watson
Composidie, Inc.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Forward mail from Exchange to an Internet Email Address With Exchange 2000 Server

[Jeremiah Watson]

Thanks,

Worked like a charm!

Jeremiah

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 4:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Forward mail from Exchange to an Internet Email Address
With Exchange 2000 Server


Create a 'mail-enabled contact' and use it as you would a custom recipient
in 5.5

William

-Original Message-----
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Forward mail from Exchange to an Internet Email Address With
Exchange 2000 Server


So for the life of me I can't figure out how to configure a mailbox to
forward mail from exchange to an external address on Exchange Server 2000
SP2.  From what I read in the archives it didn't seem that hard in
Exchange 5.5, Any Ideas on how to do this?  Do I need to create a user
account with the external Address that I want?

TIA

Jeremiah Watson
Composidie, Inc.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Event ID 1115

[Jeremiah Watson]

http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1115&source=

A: "The hotfix for this problem was available at some point from:
ftp://ftppss.microsoft.com/outgoing/mail/srx020117600843q316216engi386.zip 
If the file is no longer available, contact Microsoft for the hotfix or wait for the 
next service pack (the currently affected versions are MS Exchange 2000 SP2)." 



-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Event ID 1115


Has anyone seen this error before. I have been getting it on my e2k box and
have no idea what is causing it. Thanks.

Exchange 5.5 sp4
Exchange 2000 sp2

Event Type: Warning
Event Source:   MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store
Event Category: General 
Event ID:   1115
Date:   3/11/2002
Time:   8:12:05 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   EXCHANGE2
Description:
Error 0xfae2 returned from closing database table, called from function
JTAB_BASE::EcCloseTable on table 5-43E359. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 





Jonathan Crouthamel - MCSE/CNA
Technical Services Supervisor
Systems Administrator
Datavision-Prologix, Inc.
Phone: 215.442.7400 x1150
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message and/or
its attachments. This message and its attachments are intended only for use
by the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the
intended recipient(s), or responsible for delivery of the message to such
person, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution,
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given nor
endorsed by the company.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

hold

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: RE: E2K, New Sub-Domain in AD, How To?



hold
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Instant Messaging question FIXED but still some funnies

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



I have 
it running on Reg Server.  You just have to make sure the DNS is Right have 
the _srv record for Instant Messaging,  I believe you can find the Setup in 
TechNET

  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 8:33 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Instant 
  Messaging question FIXED but still some funnies
  I 
  did that bout .. oh.. 50 times.
  I 
  still think running it on Reg Server as opposed to Advanced Server is the 
  issue here.
  

-Original Message-From: Brent Hudson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 
7:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Instant Messaging question FIXED but still some funnies
Check your IM V server, maybe recreate like I 
did..
 
B

  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 08 April 2002 02:28To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Instant Messaging question 
  FIXED but still some funnies
  I still cant get mine going, the error tells me that the 
  service is not available. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 7:26 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Instant Messaging question FIXED but still some 
  funnies 
  OK.. 1) Lastest client software, 
  2) made sure that the server dns name and IIS settings were right, and 
  3)logged in as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Works fine but still a few errors in the IIS log: 
  
  2002-04-08 12:11:05 10.0.0.131 MOONLIGHTING\Martin 
  10.0.0.10 80 SUBSCRIBE /instmsg/aliases/martin - 200 - 2002-04-08 12:11:05 
  10.0.0.131  () 10.0.0.10 80 SUBSCRIPTIONS /instmsg/aliases/martin - 
  401 - 2002-04-08 12:11:05 10.0.0.131 MOONLIGHTING\Martin 10.0.0.10 80 
  SUBSCRIPTIONS /instmsg/aliases/martin - 200 - 2002-04-08 12:11:05 
  10.0.0.131  () 10.0.0.10 80 PROPPATCH /instmsg/aliases/martin - 401 - 
  2002-04-08 12:11:05 10.0.0.131 - 10.0.0.10 80 PROPFIND 
  /instmsg/aliases/martin - 207 - 2002-04-08 12:11:05 10.0.0.131 
  MOONLIGHTING\Martin 10.0.0.10 80 PROPPATCH /instmsg/aliases/martin - 207 - 
  2002-04-08 12:11:05 10.0.0.131  () 10.0.0.10 80 ACL 
  /instmsg/aliases/martin - 401 - 2002-04-08 12:11:05 10.0.0.131 
  MOONLIGHTING\Martin 10.0.0.10 80 ACL /instmsg/aliases/martin - 200 - 
  2002-04-08 12:11:05 10.0.0.131 - 10.0.0.10 80 SUBSCRIBE 
  /instmsg/aliases/martin - 207 - 2002-04-08 12:13:46 10.0.0.112 - 10.0.0.10 
  80 SUBSCRIBE /instmsg/aliases/martin - 207 -
  Can anyone explain the 401's?.. looks like errors 
  connecting to IP then reverts to the name of my IM virtual server 
  (moonlighting).. Later all B
  -Original Message- From: 
  Brent Hudson Sent: 08 April 2002 10:17 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Instant Messaging question 
  OK .. Installed the latest client and its 
  working..BUT!   very very slow and there are still some errors 
  in the www logs..
  B 
  -Original Message- From: 
  William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 08 April 2002 09:38 To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Instant 
  Messaging question 
  I didn't see anything there that wasn't in the Microsoft 
  docs. 
  Let us know what you find. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 12:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Instant Messaging question 
  Tried all.. I think my problem is somewhere in the setting 
  up.. I'm going through Will Schmied page.. I think the answer is there.. 
  This is currently a R&D project so other daily stuff is coming 
  first..
  *sigh* 
  B 
  -Original Message- From: 
  William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 08 April 2002 09:03 To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Instant 
  Messaging question 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  brent@imservername 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  No luck? 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 11:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Instant Messaging question 
  I'm a step closer.. I found THIS in my www logs: 
  
  2002-04-08 06:48:40 10.0.0.112  () 10.0.0.10 80 
  SUBSCRIBE /instmsg/aliases/brent - 401 - 2002-04-08 06:48:40 
  10.0.0.112  (MOONLIGHTING\Administrator) 10.0.0.10 80 SUBSCRIBE 
  /instmsg/aliases/brent - 401 - 2002-04-08 06:48:40 10.0.0.112  () 
  10.0.0.10 80 SUBSCRIBE /instmsg/aliases/brent - 401 -
  So.. lets see where we go from here? 
  I'll let ya'll know if I find something .. 
  B 
  -Original Message- From: 
  

RE: A little fine tuning help please...

[Jeremiah Watson]

Is it 
possible you don't have the MX record in DNS yet?
 
> 
set type=MX> scotiazone.com
 
scotiazone.com    
primary name server = main    
responsible mail addr = admin    
serial  = 12    refresh = 900 
(15 mins)    retry   = 600 
(10 mins)    expire  = 86400 (1 
day)    default TTL = 3600 (1 
hour)
 
Where 
is 
ltek.com    MX 
preference = 10, mail exchanger = ce-mail-srv.composidie.com
ce-mail-srv.composidie.com    
internet address = 199.234.24.7

  -Original Message- From: Michael 
  Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 
  2002 12:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: A 
  little fine tuning help please...
  So this is what I get when I send email to my 
  domain:
   
     - The following addresses had 
  permanent fatal errors - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    
  (reason: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED])
   
     - Transcript of session follows 
  -... while talking to scotiazone.com.:>>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]><<< 
  550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED]550 5.1.1 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User 
  unknown
  The funny thing is that this is a reply from 
  a  mail I sent out using the mail.scotiazone.com/exchange OWA. It mailed 
  it out fine, when I replied, I get this. Any ideas? The user exists, I logged 
  in through OWA no problem. 
   
  MichaelList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: A little fine tuning help please...

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Here 
is a question,
 
Doesn't he want the 
 
Host 
or Domain:
(same 
as parent folder)?
 
 

  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 
  2002 2:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: A 
  little fine tuning help please...
  That looks OK. 
  Unfortunately it isn't public yet.
  

-Original Message-From: Michael Reid 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 
10:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: A 
little fine tuning help please...
Well, isn't this a fine load of crap. Ok, If 
you ping mail.scotiazone.com it comes up fine, so the host portion has 
kicked in. The MX is filled in as follows:
 
Parent domain:
scotiazone.com
 
Host or domain:
mail
 
Mail server:
mail.scotiazone.com
 
Mail server priority:
10
 
How does that look?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Jeremiah Watson 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:58 
  PM
  Subject: RE: A little fine tuning 
  help please...
  
  Is it possible you don't have the MX record in 
  DNS yet?
   
  > set type=MX> 
  scotiazone.com
   
  scotiazone.com    
  primary name server = main    
  responsible mail addr = 
  admin    serial  = 
  12    refresh = 900 (15 
  mins)    retry   = 
  600 (10 mins)    expire  = 
  86400 (1 day)    default TTL = 
  3600 (1 hour)
   
  Where is 
  ltek.com    
  MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = 
  ce-mail-srv.composidie.com
  ce-mail-srv.composidie.com    
  internet address = 199.234.24.7
  
-Original Message- From: Michael Reid 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 
2002 12:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
A little fine tuning help please...
So this is what I get when I send email to 
my domain:
 
   - The following addresses 
had permanent fatal errors - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    
(reason: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 
   - Transcript of session 
follows -... while talking to scotiazone.com.:>>> 
RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]><<< 
550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED]550 5.1.1 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User 
unknown
The funny thing is that this is a reply 
from a  mail I sent out using the mail.scotiazone.com/exchange OWA. 
It mailed it out fine, when I replied, I get this. Any ideas? The user 
exists, I logged in through OWA no problem. 
 
MichaelList Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Narrowing down mail issue

[Jeremiah Watson]

Open System Manager in Exchange 2k.
Open Connectors
Right Click Properties on the Connector
Go Under Address Space tab click Add.  Value of *

That should be what you are looking for.


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Narrowing down mail issue


To be honest, I haven't got a clue what you're talking about.  Could you
rephrase this?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 18 April 2002 02:30
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Narrowing down mail issue
Subject: Narrowing down mail issue


E2K, SP2, W2K, SP2

Ok, so microsoft says to:

Correct or add an address space of type SMTP with asterisk (*) value to
one or more SMTP connectors

To help with the routing issue. Where is this, and does anyone know what
it's talking about by chance? 

*learning experience*

Michael
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Try to post

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: RE: Try to post



Are 
you succeeding?

  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:25 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Try to 
  post
  Ok, I'm trying. 
  -Original Message- From: mark 
  verschaeve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:22 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  Try to post 
  Try to post 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: E2K attributes not available in ad users and computers after installing E2K

[Jeremiah Watson]

I think you have to install the exchange ver of active directory users and groups snap 
in off of the cd.

-Original Message-
From: dave mcnulty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: E2K attributes not available in ad users and computers after
installing E2K


helo
I have a Windows 2000 domain with two DC's and an E2K box. All servers have
Win2k sp2 installed. After installing E2K the exchange attributes for users
such as exchange tasks and email etc are unavailable on the DC's in Active
irectory Users and Groups snap-in. I did not run forestprep and domainprep
as per
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodtechn
ol/exchange/maintain/featusability/preputil.asp which states that if you
install E2K as Enterprise and Schema admin the setup automatically does
this.

When I create a new user I am not even prompted to creat a new mailbox for
the user unless I do this locally on the Exchange box.

Questions:
Is this article correct?
What can I do to get make these attributes appear?

Thanks in advance

Dave McNulty MCSE, CCNA
Network Analyst
Select Appoinments
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_

  *** PLEASE BE ADVISED *** This email contains confidential information
that may also be legally privileged and which is intended only for the use
of the above-named addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please
be advised that any copy, dissemination or use of the information contained
on this email is strictly prohibited. If this email has been received in
error, please contact us immediately. Thank you.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: E2K attributes not available in ad users and computers after installing E2K

[Jeremiah Watson]

Finally!  Get one right today.  ;-)  Well sorta.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E2K attributes not available in ad users and computers
after installing E2K


is the right answer!  Well, you actually install the System Manager
components, which updates the ADUC snap-in.

Personally, I'd install the tools on my workstation.  Nothing worse than
standing in a cold server room adding users.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 18 April 2002 16:41
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: E2K attributes not available in ad users and computers
after installing E2K
Subject: RE: E2K attributes not available in ad users and computers
after installing E2K


I think you have to install the exchange ver of active directory users
and groups snap in off of the cd.

-Original Message-
From: dave mcnulty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: E2K attributes not available in ad users and computers after
installing E2K


helo
I have a Windows 2000 domain with two DC's and an E2K box. All servers
have Win2k sp2 installed. After installing E2K the exchange attributes
for users such as exchange tasks and email etc are unavailable on the
DC's in Active irectory Users and Groups snap-in. I did not run
forestprep and domainprep as per
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodt
echn
ol/exchange/maintain/featusability/preputil.asp which states that if you
install E2K as Enterprise and Schema admin the setup automatically does
this.

When I create a new user I am not even prompted to creat a new mailbox
for the user unless I do this locally on the Exchange box.

Questions:
Is this article correct?
What can I do to get make these attributes appear?

Thanks in advance

Dave McNulty MCSE, CCNA
Network Analyst
Select Appoinments
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_

  *** PLEASE BE ADVISED *** This email contains confidential information
that may also be legally privileged and which is intended only for the
use of the above-named addressee. If you are not the intended recipient,
please be advised that any copy, dissemination or use of the information
contained on this email is strictly prohibited. If this email has been
received in error, please contact us immediately. Thank you.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: AOL postmaster errors

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Yep,  I have a client whose email address was 
being spoofed used as the return address for spam.  He would average 
between 3/400 NDR's a day from Various Domains and I know he wasn't sending it 
out.
 
We had 
to change his Email Address to get it to stop.  

  -Original Message-From: Sethi, Ali 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:51 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: AOL postmaster 
  errors
  
  Has anyone seen this 
  before?  It looks like someone is 
  using a mailbox from one of our users and sending all kinds of emails 
  out.  We have NAV for Exchange 
  blocking all attachements that are suspect to be virus attachments.  The users is 
  complaining that she is getting a ton of these post master errors.  Any suggestions on 
  how to eliminate this?  We 
  are not setup as relaying.
  Exhange 5.5 
  sp4
  Windows 2k sp2 
  sr1
   
  Thanks,
   
   
  The original message was 
  received at Fri, 19 Apr 
  2002 15:04:36 -0400 (EDT) from 
  logs-wq.proxy.aol.com [205.188.200.132]
   
   
  *** ATTENTION 
  ***
   
  Your e-mail is being 
  returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery.  The address which was undeliverable is 
  listed in the section
  labeled: "- The following 
  addresses had permanent fatal errors -".
   
  The reason your mail is 
  being returned to you is listed in the section
  labeled: "- Transcript of 
  Session Follows -".
   
  The line beginning with 
  "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be 
  delivered.  The next line contains 
  a second error message which is a general translation for other e-mail 
  servers.
   
  Please direct further 
  questions regarding this message to your e-mail 
  administrator.
   
  --AOL 
  Postmaster
   
   
   
     - The following addresses 
  had permanent fatal errors - 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   
     - Transcript of session 
  follows -
  550 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Host unknown (Name server: 
  sabertooth.victim.net: host not found)List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: AOL postmaster errors

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



LOL,  Yeah As the bosses Home email ceases to come 
into the company.  :-P  He'd love that one.

  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:56 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: AOL 
  postmaster errors
  Just 
  block *@aol.com in the message filtering section of IMS properties.  
  :o)
   
  
-Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:51 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: AOL 
postmaster errors
Yep,  I have a client whose email address was 
being spoofed used as the return address for spam.  He would average 
between 3/400 NDR's a day from Various Domains and I know he wasn't sending 
it out.
 
We 
had to change his Email Address to get it to stop.  


  -Original Message-From: Sethi, Ali 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:51 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: AOL 
  postmaster errors
  
  Has anyone seen this 
  before?  It looks like someone 
  is using a mailbox from one of our users and sending all kinds of emails 
  out.  We have NAV for Exchange 
  blocking all attachements that are suspect to be virus attachments.  The users 
  is complaining that she is getting a ton of these post master 
  errors.  Any 
  suggestions on how to eliminate this?  We are not setup as 
  relaying.
  Exhange 5.5 
  sp4
  Windows 2k sp2 
  sr1
   
  Thanks,
   
   
  The original message 
  was received at Fri, 19 Apr 
  2002 
  15:04:36 -0400 (EDT) from 
  logs-wq.proxy.aol.com [205.188.200.132]
   
   
  *** ATTENTION 
  ***
   
  Your e-mail is being 
  returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery.  The address which was 
  undeliverable is listed in the section
  labeled: "- The following 
  addresses had permanent fatal errors -".
   
  The reason your mail 
  is being returned to you is listed in the 
  section
  labeled: "- Transcript of 
  Session Follows -".
   
  The line beginning 
  with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be 
  delivered.  The next line 
  contains a second error message which is a general translation for other 
  e-mail servers.
   
  Please direct further 
  questions regarding this message to your e-mail 
  administrator.
   
  --AOL 
  Postmaster
   
   
   
     - The following 
  addresses had permanent fatal errors - 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   
     - Transcript of session 
  follows -
  550 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Host unknown (Name server: 
  sabertooth.victim.net: host not 
  found)List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: AOL postmaster errors

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message




  You got that right.   we love em' jpg's on 
  Antigen.    
   
  -Original Message-From: Sethi, Ali 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:06 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: AOL 
  postmaster errors
  
  Actually the bosses wife has an aol 
  account.  Or is it the bosses mistress...  
  Well one of them does.  
  He'll be pissed if cant receive his booty call 
  emails.
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Jeremiah 
  Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 
  2002 3:58 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: AOL postmaster 
  errors
   
  
  LOL,  Yeah As 
  the bosses Home email ceases to come into the company.  :-P  He'd 
  love that one.
  
-Original 
Message-From: William 
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:56 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: AOL 
postmaster errors

Just 
block *@aol.com in the message filtering section of IMS properties.  
:o)

 

  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:51 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: AOL 
  postmaster errors
  
  Yep,  I have 
  a client whose email address was being spoofed used as the return address 
  for spam.  He would average between 3/400 NDR's a day from Various 
  Domains and I know he wasn't sending it 
  out.
  
   
  
  We 
  had to change his Email Address to get it to stop.  
  
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:51 
PMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: 
AOL postmaster errors
Has anyone seen this 
before?  It looks like 
someone is using a mailbox from one of our users and sending all kinds 
of emails out.  We have NAV 
for Exchange blocking all attachements that are suspect to be virus 
attachments.  The users is 
complaining that she is getting a ton of these post master errors.  Any suggestions on how to 
eliminate this?  We are not 
setup as relaying.
Exhange 5.5 
sp4
Windows 2k sp2 
sr1
 
Thanks,
 
 
The original message 
was received at Fri, 19 Apr 
2002 
15:04:36 -0400 (EDT) from 
logs-wq.proxy.aol.com [205.188.200.132]
 
 
*** ATTENTION 
***
 
Your e-mail is being 
returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery.  The address which was 
undeliverable is listed in the section
labeled: "- The 
following addresses had permanent fatal errors 
-".
 
The reason your mail 
is being returned to you is listed in the 
section
labeled: "- 
Transcript of Session Follows -".
 
The line beginning 
with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could not 
be delivered.  The next line 
contains a second error message which is a general translation for other 
e-mail servers.
 
Please direct 
further questions regarding this message to your e-mail 
administrator.
 
--AOL 
Postmaster
 
 
 
   - The following 
addresses had permanent fatal errors - 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 
   - Transcript of 
session follows -
550 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Host unknown (Name server: 
sabertooth.victim.net: host not found)
List Charter 
and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: AOL postmaster errors

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



no 
jpg's for you. One Year.  :-)~

  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:20 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: AOL 
  postmaster errors
  You 
  block jpg's?
   
  You 
  email nazi.
   
  
-Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:10 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: AOL 
postmaster errors

  You got that right.   we love em' jpg's 
  on Antigen.    
   
  -Original Message-From: Sethi, Ali 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:06 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: AOL 
  postmaster errors
  
  Actually the 
  bosses wife has an aol 
  account.  Or is it the bosses mistress...  Well one of them does.  He'll be pissed if cant receive 
  his booty call emails.
   
  -Original 
  Message-----From: 
  Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 
  2002 3:58 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: AOL 
  postmaster errors
   
  
  LOL,  Yeah 
  As the bosses Home email ceases to come into the company.  :-P  
  He'd love that one.
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:56 
PMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: AOL postmaster errors

Just block 
*@aol.com in the message filtering section of IMS properties.  
:o)

 

  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 
  12:51 PMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: AOL postmaster 
  errors
  
  Yep,  I 
  have a client whose email address was being spoofed used as the return 
  address for spam.  He would average between 3/400 NDR's a day 
  from Various Domains and I know he wasn't sending it 
  out.
  
   
  
  We had to 
  change his Email Address to get it to stop.  
  
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 
3:51 PMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: AOL postmaster 
errors
Has anyone seen 
this before?  It looks 
like someone is using a mailbox from one of our users and sending 
all kinds of emails out.  
We have NAV for Exchange blocking all attachements that are 
suspect to be virus attachments.  The users is complaining 
that she is getting a ton of these post master errors.  Any suggestions on how to 
eliminate this?  We are 
not setup as relaying.
Exhange 5.5 
sp4
Windows 2k sp2 
sr1
 
Thanks,
 
 
The original 
message was received at Fri, 19 Apr 
2002 
15:04:36 -0400 (EDT) 
from logs-wq.proxy.aol.com 
[205.188.200.132]
 
 
*** ATTENTION 
***
 
Your e-mail is 
being returned to you because there was a problem with its 
delivery.  The address 
which was undeliverable is listed in the 
section
labeled: "- 
The following addresses had permanent fatal errors 
-".
 
The reason your 
mail is being returned to you is listed in the 
section
labeled: "- 
Transcript of Session Follows -".
 
The line 
beginning with "<<<" describes the specific reason your 
e-mail could not be delivered.  
The next line contains a second error message which is a 
general translation for other e-mail 
servers.
 
Please direct 
further questions regarding this message to your e-mail 
administrator.
 
--AOL 
Postmaster
 
 
 
   - The following 
addresses had permanent fatal errors - 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 
   - Transcript of 
session follows -
550 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Host unknown (Name server: 
sabertooth.victim.net: host not found)
  

RE: AOL postmaster errors

[Jeremiah Watson]

almost time.  25min and counting.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


What time zone are you in :P

-Original Message-
From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 19, 2002 4:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


Ya they squirm til they figure out how to copy it all to a pst and fill up
your file sever or blow up the poor little disk on their PC.

sigh... is it time for a beer yet?

-Original Message-
From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


I have 10 as a default.  Let the huddled masses squirm

> -Original Message-
> From: Sethi, Ali [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:29 PM
> To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: AOL postmaster errors
> 
> Whose that guy on this list that has the 8mb mailbox limits.  Now he's an
> email Nazi.  
>  
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:20 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>  
> You block jpg's?
>  
> You email nazi.
>  
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:10 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   You got that right.   we love em' jpg's on Antigen.
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:06 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   Actually the bosses wife has an aol account.  Or is it the
> bosses mistress...  Well one of them does.  He'll be pissed if cant
> receive his booty call emails.
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:58 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>
>   LOL,  Yeah As the bosses Home email ceases to come into the
> company.  :-P  He'd love that one.
>   -Original Message-
>   From: William Lefkovics
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:56 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   Just block *@aol.com in the message filtering
> section of IMS properties.  :o)
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Jeremiah Watson
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:51 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   Yep,  I have a client whose email address was being
> spoofed used as the return address for spam.  He would average between
> 3/400 NDR's a day from Various Domains and I know he wasn't sending it
> out.
>
>   We had to change his Email Address to get it to
> stop.  
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:51 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: AOL postmaster errors
>   Has anyone seen this before?  It looks like someone
> is using a mailbox from one of our users and sending all kinds of emails
> out.  We have NAV for Exchange blocking all attachements that are suspect
> to be virus attachments.  The users is complaining that she is getting a
> ton of these post master errors.  Any suggestions on how to eliminate
> this?  We are not setup as relaying.
> 
>   Exhange 5.5 sp4
>   Windows 2k sp2 sr1
>
>   Thanks,
>
>
>   The original message was received at Fri, 19 Apr
> 2002 15:04:36 -0400 (EDT) from logs-wq.proxy.aol.com [205.188.200.132]
>
>
>   *** AT

RE: AOL postmaster errors

[Jeremiah Watson]

Contact AOL Or change the Email address?

I wussed and changed the email address on the client site.

-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


So wait.
The answer to my original question about how the hell can I get rid of these
damn AOL post master errors is beer?  

Why didn't I think of that!  

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors

Yes, golden nectar mate, breakfast of chumpiuns

-Original Message-
From: JFadigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 19, 2002 4:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


beer?  

-Original Message-
From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


Ya they squirm til they figure out how to copy it all to a pst and fill up
your file sever or blow up the poor little disk on their PC.

sigh... is it time for a beer yet?

-Original Message-
From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


I have 10 as a default.  Let the huddled masses squirm

> -Original Message-
> From: Sethi, Ali [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:29 PM
> To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: AOL postmaster errors
> 
> Whose that guy on this list that has the 8mb mailbox limits.  Now he's an
> email Nazi.  
>  
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:20 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>  
> You block jpg's?
>  
> You email nazi.
>  
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:10 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   You got that right.   we love em' jpg's on Antigen.
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:06 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   Actually the bosses wife has an aol account.  Or is it the
> bosses mistress...  Well one of them does.  He'll be pissed if cant
> receive his booty call emails.
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:58 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>
>   LOL,  Yeah As the bosses Home email ceases to come into the
> company.  :-P  He'd love that one.
>   -Original Message-
>   From: William Lefkovics
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:56 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   Just block *@aol.com in the message filtering
> section of IMS properties.  :o)
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Jeremiah Watson
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:51 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   Yep,  I have a client whose email address was being
> spoofed used as the return address for spam.  He would average between
> 3/400 NDR's a day from Various Domains and I know he wasn't sending it
> out.
>
>   We had to change his Email Address to get it to
> stop.  
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:51 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: AOL postmaster errors
>   Has anyone seen this before?  It looks like someone
> is using a mailbox from one of our users and sending all kinds of emails
> out.  We have NAV for Exchange blocking all attachements that are suspect
> to be virus attachments.  The users is complaining that she

RE: AOL postmaster errors

[Jeremiah Watson]

Lemme know if you get anywhere with AOL.

-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


I just wussed to. I changed the user's address for now.  Ill contact aol on
Monday.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors

Contact AOL Or change the Email address?

I wussed and changed the email address on the client site.

-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


So wait.
The answer to my original question about how the hell can I get rid of these
damn AOL post master errors is beer?  

Why didn't I think of that!  

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors

Yes, golden nectar mate, breakfast of chumpiuns

-Original Message-
From: JFadigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 19, 2002 4:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


beer?  

-Original Message-
From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


Ya they squirm til they figure out how to copy it all to a pst and fill up
your file sever or blow up the poor little disk on their PC.

sigh... is it time for a beer yet?

-Original Message-
From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


I have 10 as a default.  Let the huddled masses squirm

> -Original Message-
> From: Sethi, Ali [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:29 PM
> To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: AOL postmaster errors
> 
> Whose that guy on this list that has the 8mb mailbox limits.  Now he's an
> email Nazi.  
>  
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:20 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>  
> You block jpg's?
>  
> You email nazi.
>  
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:10 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   You got that right.   we love em' jpg's on Antigen.
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:06 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   Actually the bosses wife has an aol account.  Or is it the
> bosses mistress...  Well one of them does.  He'll be pissed if cant
> receive his booty call emails.
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:58 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>
>   LOL,  Yeah As the bosses Home email ceases to come into the
> company.  :-P  He'd love that one.
>   -Original Message-
>   From: William Lefkovics
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:56 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   Just block *@aol.com in the message filtering
> section of IMS properties.  :o)
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Jeremiah Watson
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:51 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   Yep,  I have a client whose email address was being
> spoofed used as the return address for spam.  He would average between
> 3/400 NDR's a day from Various Domains and I know he wasn't sending it
> out.
>
>   We had to change his Email Address to get it to
> stop.  
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: AOL postmaster errors

[Jeremiah Watson]

LOL  thanks martin,  I meant with the postmaster. :-P  

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


Still trying to get it installed huh? Are you on version 7.0?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


Lemme know if you get anywhere with AOL.

-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


I just wussed to. I changed the user's address for now.  Ill contact aol on
Monday.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors

Contact AOL Or change the Email address?

I wussed and changed the email address on the client site.

-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


So wait.
The answer to my original question about how the hell can I get rid of these
damn AOL post master errors is beer?  

Why didn't I think of that!  

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors

Yes, golden nectar mate, breakfast of chumpiuns

-Original Message-
From: JFadigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 19, 2002 4:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


beer?  

-Original Message-
From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


Ya they squirm til they figure out how to copy it all to a pst and fill up
your file sever or blow up the poor little disk on their PC.

sigh... is it time for a beer yet?

-Original Message-
From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors


I have 10 as a default.  Let the huddled masses squirm

> -Original Message-
> From: Sethi, Ali [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:29 PM
> To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: AOL postmaster errors
> 
> Whose that guy on this list that has the 8mb mailbox limits.  Now he's 
> an email Nazi.
>  
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:20 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>  
> You block jpg's?
>  
> You email nazi.
>  
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:10 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   You got that right.   we love em' jpg's on Antigen.
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:06 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   Actually the bosses wife has an aol account.  Or is it the
bosses 
> mistress...  Well one of them does.  He'll be pissed if cant receive 
> his booty call emails.
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:58 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>
>   LOL,  Yeah As the bosses Home email ceases to come into the
company.  
> :-P  He'd love that one.
>   -Original Message-
>   From: William Lefkovics
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:56 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors
>   Just block *@aol.com in the message filtering
> section of IMS properties.  :o)
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Jeremiah Watson
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:51 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: AOL postmaster error

RE: Backup Server

[Jeremiah Watson]

Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare &
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store & not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server & I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one & leave it as a hot spare. I've searched & searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

RE: Backup Server

[Jeremiah Watson]

PA, Near Pittsburgh,

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Where are you?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare &
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store & not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server & I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one & leave it as a hot spare. I've searched & searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_li

RE: Backup Server

[Jeremiah Watson]

I'm surprised there wasn't a 

"Neaner, Neaner, Neaner"  After that :-P

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, here in NC it works great.  :P

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


PA, Near Pittsburgh,

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Where are you?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare &
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store & not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server & I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one & leave it as a hot spare. I've searched & searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is ad

RE: Backup Server

[Jeremiah Watson]

Hey,  While your at it,  Can you send me some new

Bf Goodrich's  265/75/r15(Free of charge) of Course.  :-)  

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Really. We have several store in PA. I will have to look into why you can't view our 
site. Thanks for the heads up

-Original Message-----
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


PA, Near Pittsburgh,

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Where are you?

-Original Message-----
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare &
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store & not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server & I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one & leave it as a hot spare. I've searched & searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any f

RE: Backup Server

[Jeremiah Watson]

I can't check the Website. :P

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


I wish I could get free tires. Sorry but we probably have them on sale. Check the web 
site.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Hey,  While your at it,  Can you send me some new

Bf Goodrich's  265/75/r15(Free of charge) of Course.  :-)  

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Really. We have several store in PA. I will have to look into why you can't view our 
site. Thanks for the heads up

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


PA, Near Pittsburgh,

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Where are you?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare &
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store & not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server & I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchan

RE: Dumb one

[Jeremiah Watson]

Isn't that WinME?

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


I'd like Windows 3.1 with SP12 please...

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


An OS and SP of your choice!


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


What do I win?!?!?!?!

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Dumb one


Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck

- Original Message -
From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the "Organize" feature?  How about "Filters"?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!

[Jeremiah Watson]

Isn't the operative words there "Trying To Relay?"

-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!



Look at the 4031 error messages, which indicate SOMEONE is trying to relay
through the server, and since unauthorized relaying is prohibited that tells
me someone has hacked in.

>-Original Message-
>From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 1:03 AM
>To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
>
>
>Then it's sorta in production then, yes?
>
>Was there a concern other than the 4318's?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:55 PM
>To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
>
>
>
>   Yes, it's connected, and the DNS servers have been pointed at it
>for about a week...
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
>>
>>
>>Is it connected to the internet?
>>
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:10 PM
>>To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>>Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
>>
>>
>>
>>  The server is not in production yet: There should be NO SMTP
>traffic on it.
>>
>>  [The business owner is returning from vacation tomorrow
>(Tuesday), and that's when I roll out the Outlook clients.]
>
>   [Balance cut]
>

>
>


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox Backup

[Jeremiah Watson]

BLB's 
Are Bad.  Check out
 
The Ed 
Crowley Never Restore Method.  That should do you a lot 
better.
 
www.swinc.com
 
Jeremiah

  -Original Message-From: Garry Whitson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:58 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Mailbox 
  Backup
  
  I am looking for a backup where I 
  can restore individual mailboxes, We are running Exchange 5.5 
  SP3
   
  Thanks
  Garry 
  Whitson
  Microcomputer Support Specialist
  Lincoln Land Community College
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox Backup

[Jeremiah Watson]

I am inigo montoya, you killed my BLB,  Thank You.  :-)~

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mailbox Backup


Good word for it Jim.

Have you noticed how William, Don, Martin, etc don't even bother with these
anymore?

I wonder if this is similar to the "Dread Pirate Roberts" effect. It just
gets passed on to the new generation...


- Original Message -
From: "Hall, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:35 AM
Subject: RE: Mailbox Backup


Search the archives.  This has been discussed ad-nauseum.

Jim Hall
PC/Networking Services Manager
Midwestern State University
3410 Taft Boulevard
Wichita Falls, TX 76308
Voice (940) 397-4680
FAX (940) 397-4509

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox Backup


Did you /click/ the URLs?


Sometimes it's good to explain WHY rather than to just say "Don't do
that because some guy that has a roadrunner account in San Antonio says
so."

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mailbox Backup


Either this is another bored troll, or it has been 2 weeks already.

Do NOT do BLBs.


- Original Message -
From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:12 AM
Subject: RE: Mailbox Backup


http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm  (seems to be down, see
mirror at http://www.exchangefaq.org/mailbox/0009.php3)

http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/55/sp4.asp


-Original Message-
From: Garry Whitson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 8:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mailbox Backup


I am looking for a backup where I can restore individual mailboxes, We
are running Exchange 5.5 SP3

Thanks
Garry Whitson
Microcomputer Support Specialist
Lincoln Land Community College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Information Store Maintenance

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



I 
think we all did at one point.  :-)  But they've gotten smaller over 
time.  I think its down to what 3.5 now?

  -Original Message-From: Neil Hobson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 
  11:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Information Store Maintenance
  I've got an 8-incher too.
  

-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S 
(ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 July 
2002 16:38Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange 
ListConversation: Information Store 
MaintenanceSubject: RE: Information Store 
Maintenance
He 
uses the latest in magnetic flux-induced replication. They come in 
3.5, 5.25 and 8 inch varieties.

  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 16 July 2002 
  15:53To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Information Store Maintenance
  You backup your Exchange Server at 1GB per 
  hour?
   
  

-Original Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 
July 16, 2002 7:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Information Store 
Maintenance
i was able to shave 5 GB off my DB and save 5 hours in backup 
time.

  
  -Original Message-From: William 
  Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Information Store 
  Maintenance
  Amazing.
   
  1) that you know enough about his server to 
  assess such a time.
  2) that you would stop email service for 2-3 
  hours to gain a mere 2GB.
   
  Whatever works for you, I 
  guess.
  

-Original Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:14 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Information Store 
Maintenance
It should take you about 2-3 hours. Our database is 27 GB in size and im going to defrag it this 
weekend. I should be able to shrink it to 
about 25 GB 
-Original Message- From: Jay Personette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:11 
PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance 

Think he may be worried about bumping the 16 gig 
limit for non enterprise??? 
Jay Personette [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mavtech.com/ (281) 455-3993 
-Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:54 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance 
You don't need to run this utility. Exchange 
maintains itself - are you having problems that you believe will be 
resolved?
Steve Clark Clark Systems 
Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member 
"Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com   
301-610-9584 voice   
240-465-0323 Efax 
The data furnished in connection with this document 
is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and 
privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the 
benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark 
Systems Support, LLC.
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:52 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Information Store Maintenance 
Greetings Knowledgeable Exchange Admins 
Our Exch5.5/SP4 WNT4.0/SP6 information store is 
beefed up to 15.5GB.  I was planning to run the ESEUTIL to 
clean up the database.  I suspect there is a lot of space that 
can be reclaimed and by defragging the store things
*should* run more smoothly.  I have never done 
this so bravely I go forward, but not before asking for the sage 
advise of the list.
A couple of things I would like to know are: 

1.  Approximately how 
long will it take?  The box is a Dell PE2400 dual 
PIII-600 1GB-RAM.  I'm just looking for a 
ballpark so I can schedule the time. 
2.  Are there any 
precautions, other than backups, I should take? 
3.  Are there any known 
problems with the utility 
Thanks in advance. 
Dan Munley 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://

RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!

[Jeremiah Watson]

That is Insolence. We have all come to respect each other and abuse is part of that.  
Ask the Foof Queen from yesterday. ;-)

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!


Why would I do that?  I'd like you to use your knowledge to assist new
users, rather than call them trolls or put in a cryptic message about
"it's been two weeks".  I don't care whether you're happy or sad about
it.  I'm new here, and I didn't know that part of the list charter was
to denigrate less-experienced admins rather than answer their question.



> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:46 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> 
> 
> That is not nice Don.
> 
> If he is trying to make me feel badhe failed.
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:21 AM
> Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> 
> 
> Figures!
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:22 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> 
> 
> Sorry, I don't get it
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:11 AM
> Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> 
> 
> This is a FAQ, and I'm afraid to post the link for fear that 
> Matthew will flame me, and then say "How about [repost of the 
> FAQ link that I had just posted]?".
> 
> I'll look at your logs, since that's NOT a FAQ.  
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 09:55 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > OK, does anyone have a list of the ports Exchange 5.5
> > uses, besides 25 & 110?
> > 
> > Also, if anyone wants to look at the Event Logs, simply
> > click on:
> >  > ntlog.zip>
> > [This is a new link & new file from the one previously 
> posted by me.]
> > 
> > Cheers!
> > Dan
> > 
> > "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: 
> LSD and UNIX.
> >   We don't believe this to be a coincidence." (Jeremy S. Anderson)
> > 
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:36 AM
> > >Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> > >
> > >
> > >U...  Telneting to the server alone does NOT mean the
> > server is an
> > >open relay...  I can telnet port 25 to any server in the 
> world, that 
> > >doesn't mean I can relay mail...
> > >
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:38 AM
> > >Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> > >
> > >
> > >Actually, no.. if you can telnet to the mail server you can
> > relay. No
> > >hacking needed. This is by the very nature of exchange. I would 
> > >recommend looking at not allowing characters like %$! Through your 
> > >firewall. Here's a link to check to see if you have an open relay..
> > >
> > >http://www.abuse.net/relay.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >
> > >Joe Irvine
> > > -Original Message-
> > >From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:30 AM
> > >To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > >Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> > >Importance: Low
> > >
> > >
> > > Look at the 4031 error messages, which indicate SOMEONE
> > is trying to
> > >relay through the server, and since unauthorized relaying is
> > prohibited
> > >that tells me someone has hacked in.
> > >
> > >>-Original Message-
> > >>From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >>Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 1:03 AM
> > >>To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > >>Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Then it's sorta in production then, yes?
> > >>
> > >>Was there a concern other than the 4318's?
> > >>
> > >>-Original Message-
> > >>From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >>Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:55 PM
> > >>Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Yes, it's connected, and the DNS servers have been
> > pointed at it for
> > >about a week...
> > >>
> > 
> > ---
> > This attachment has been scanned for hostile code:
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/2002
> > 
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-> software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-> software.

RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]

[Jeremiah Watson]

Cabal

(kebal´) , inner group of advisers to Charles II of England. Their initials form the 
word (which is, however, of older origin)Clifford of Chudleigh, Ashley (Lord 
Shaftesbury), Buckingham (George Villiers), Arlington (Henry Bennet), and Lauderdale 
(John Maitland). Although they were never a working ministry, one or more of this 
group dominated court policy from 1667 through 1673. 

OR if You Prefer

 the artifices and intrigues of a group of persons secretly united to bring about an 
overturn or usurpation especially in public affairs; also : a group engaged in such 
artifices and intrigues


-Original Message-
From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 1:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server
HACKED!]


is cabal a character in street fighter?!

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:28 AM
Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server
Conversation: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server
HACKED!]
Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server
HACKED!]


If you don't know then you aren't savvy enough to work on Exchange servers
nor offer assistance on these lists...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 1:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]


WTH is a cabal? Is that anything like a caBOWL? heh

- Original Message - 
From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]


I know "nothing" of the cabal which does not exist!

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]


There is however the secret cabal which does not exist

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]


The moderator here is the same as the other lists as far as I know and that
would be Stu...

-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]



Actually, all 3 Sunbelt lists (Exchange Admin, Mac-NT & AlphaNT) have a
similar charter.

By the way, who *is* the moderator over here, anyway?

>-Original Message-
>From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Subject: Re: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server
>HACKED!]
>
>
>Sorry, I didn't know this was the Mac-NT & AlphaNT list. I must have
>misposted.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Dan Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:31 AM
>Subject: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]
>
>
>
>Guys,
>
>We have a rule over in the Mac-NT & AlphaNT lists here on the Sunbelt
>site: When going off topic, change the SUBJECT line.
>
>It makes life easier for those of us who actually NEED the info!
>
>Cheers!
>Dan
>Mac-NT & AlphaNT list moderator
>


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/2002
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/2002
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Sherry,  
 
I've 
wondered how much thrust does it require?

  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:03 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 
  server HACKED!
  I'm 
  always thinking of others so, here's a little reason for you to wear your 
  sunglasses ;)
  
  Sherry 
  Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information 
  Technology "With 
  sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 
  -Original Message-From: 
  Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 
  17, 2002 9:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
  
Now I don't have an excuse to wear my sunglasses when I read my 
email.

  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:43 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  5.5 server HACKED!
  :)  I even changed the colorsI didn't 
  want to continue to blind others..;)
  
  Sherry 
  Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration 
  Team Information Technology 
  "With sufficient thrust, 
  pigs fly just fine." 
  

-Original Message-From: Eldridge, 
Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 
2002 9:17 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
LOL!!! great foof.

  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 
  8:04 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
  Okay, I'll have to accept the label of "Foof 
  Queen".  Well at least I have some "official" letters to put 
  behind my name now...  
  Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data 
  Center Administration Team Information 
  Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly 
  just fine." 
  -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:54 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! 
  That is Insolence. We have all come to respect each 
  other and abuse is part of that.  Ask the Foof Queen from 
  yesterday. ;-)
  -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:51 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! 
  Why would I do that?  I'd like you to use your 
  knowledge to assist new users, rather than call them trolls or put in 
  a cryptic message about "it's been two weeks".  I don't care 
  whether you're happy or sad about it.  I'm new here, and I didn't 
  know that part of the list charter was to denigrate less-experienced 
  admins rather than answer their question.
  > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:46 AM 
  > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! > > > 
  That is not nice Don. > > If he is trying to make me feel badhe failed. 
  > > - Original 
  Message - > From: "Ely, Don" 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 
  "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" > 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:21 AM > Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! > > > 
  Figures! > > 
  -Original Message- > From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:22 AM 
  > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! > > > 
  Sorry, I don't get it > > - Original Message - > 
  From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:11 AM 
  > Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! 
  > > > This is a FAQ, and I'm afraid to post the link for fear 
  that > Matthew will flame me, and then say 
  "How about [repost of the > FAQ link that I 
  had just posted]?". > > I'll look at your logs, since that's NOT a FAQ. 
  > > > -Original 
  Message- > > From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 

RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise

[Jeremiah Watson]

It comes as its own cd as part of the media pack of E2K.

Jeremiah

(Sorry Don Couldn't help myself)

-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise


Don would you please clarify. Does 5.5 Enterprise come on its own CD as part
of the media pack of E2K or are you stating that you can still purchase 5.5
Enterprise independently of E2K. Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise


5.5 Enterprise comes on a CD of its own...  :P

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise


I believe that is fiction.

5.5 Enterprise comes on the E2K Enterprise CD, though.



-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise


I'm trying to get a straight answer on this one. My MS reseller seems to be
confused on this. Currently have Exchange 5.5 Standard and would like to
move to 5.5 Enterprise. I've searched the list archives. I thought I read
here that 5.5 Enterprise comes on the E2K Standard CD. Is this fact or
fiction? Thanks.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise

[Jeremiah Watson]

I believe and I know everyone will clarify,

You Can go from 

5.5 standard to E2K standard
5.5 Standard to E2k Enterprise
5.5 Enterprise to E2k standard is a no no
5.5 Enterprise to E2k Enterprise is ok

Jeremiah


> Sorry, i still need clarifaction on my other question.
> 
> Can one upgrade EITHER 5.5 to E2K or does one have to go 5.5(standard) to
> 5.5(Enterprise) to E2k?
> 
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 14:14
> >To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
> >
> >
> >Quite alright...  I'm actually working today and don't have 
> >that much time
> >to pay attention...
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:20 PM
> >To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
> >
> >
> >It comes as its own cd as part of the media pack of E2K.
> >
> >Jeremiah
> >
> >(Sorry Don Couldn't help myself)
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:20 PM
> >To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
> >
> >
> >Don would you please clarify. Does 5.5 Enterprise come on its 
> >own CD as part
> >of the media pack of E2K or are you stating that you can still 
> >purchase 5.5
> >Enterprise independently of E2K. Thanks.
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:03 PM
> >To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
> >
> >
> >5.5 Enterprise comes on a CD of its own...  :P
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 1:20 PM
> >To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
> >
> >
> >I believe that is fiction.
> >
> >5.5 Enterprise comes on the E2K Enterprise CD, though.
> >
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:15 AM
> >To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >Subject: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
> >
> >
> >I'm trying to get a straight answer on this one. My MS 
> >reseller seems to be
> >confused on this. Currently have Exchange 5.5 Standard and 
> >would like to
> >move to 5.5 Enterprise. I've searched the list archives. I 
> >thought I read
> >here that 5.5 Enterprise comes on the E2K Standard CD. Is this fact or
> >fiction? Thanks.
> >
> >List Charter and FAQ at:
> >http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> >
> >
> >List Charter and FAQ at:
> >http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> >List Charter and FAQ at:
> >http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> >List Charter and FAQ at:
> >http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> >
> >List Charter and FAQ at:
> >http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> >List Charter and FAQ at:
> >http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: malbox not created

[Jeremiah Watson]

DB Corruption Perhaps?

Jeremiah

-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 4:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: malbox not created


when I try to move the "susposedly created" mailbox to a different container I get the 
message that:

Task Summary: Move Mailbox

Started: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 4:41:12 PM
Finished: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 4:41:50 PM

Results:

Error: Opening source mailbox.
CN=Wayne Miller,OU=PennColor,DC=penncolor,DC=com:
The information store could not be opened.
The MAPI provider failed.
MAPI 1.0
ID no: 8004011d-0289-

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 4:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: malbox not created


I'm shooting at straws in the wind here.

When you check the box to create a new mailbox, it shows as successful
in the task summary?
When you rightclick on one of these users, in the Exchange Task wizard,
are the options there that exist when a mailbox is present (ie move
mailbox, delete mailbox)?


-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: malbox not created


The RUS points to the one and only DC that we have.  Nothing has been
changed that I can see.  

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 4:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: malbox not created


Have you changed the DC at all?  Does the RUS point to the correct DC?


-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: malbox not created


I've tried create as many as 10 different users...all with the same
outcome



-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 3:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: malbox not created


Well that is not a good thing. 

Have other new users been successful in this time?


-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: malbox not created


just to rule out any misconception.  I create this account at 8:30 this
morning and I have given ample time for my environment size to allow for
replication.  It is now 3:25pm est and the mailbox still does not show.

-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey 
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 3:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: malbox not created


I've been down that route already WilliamI did a rebuild as well

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 3:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: malbox not created


Let's try forcing the RUS.

In Exchange System Manager, navigate to Recipients | Recipient Update
Service In the right pane, right click and update now.

-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: malbox not created


never before have I had to wait.  only one server that Im dealing with
here and, infact, I created the mailbox from the ad users and computers
on the exchange server.  Also, can't send messages to the susposed new
mailbox...the mailbox doesn't show in the gal...I can't resolve the name
when I click check name for outlook either...add to this, I can't open
the mailbox through OWA.

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 3:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: malbox not created


Patience is the order of the day for the Exchange2000 admin.

1) The mailbox is not actually visibly created until either activity in
the mailbox is initiated (like an inbound email) or the user logs into
email
2) AD replication and Exchange Recipient Update Service.  You have to
wait for this information to be processed.  You can force both of those
services as well if you want to expedite the process.

W

-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: malbox not created


I have a wierd issue here that I never before had happen to me.  I am
running Exchange 2000 SP2 in an all Windows 2000 Domain.  This is a one
server, one site setup.  Exchange and DC are on different machines but
on the same network segment and in the same room.

When I create a new account in active directory users and computers and
check the box to create an exchange mailbox the process is carried out
seemingly.  When I refresh the screen and look at the properties of the
newly created account there are no e-mail address (either smtp or x400)
l

RE: Spam Question

[Jeremiah Watson]

Check this out.

http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamassassin/

Jeremiah



> Thank you.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:34 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Spam Question
> 
> 
> It's free.  Apparently the site is experiencing problems.  If it doesn't
> respond by the eod, email me directly and I'll send you the tar bits.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:24 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Spam Question
> 
> 
> is this free? If not around how much is it
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:13 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Spam Question
> 
> 
> LOL =
>  sin>
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 9:09 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Spam Question
> 
> 
> do you have a link to this
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:05 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Spam Question
> 
> 
> Spam assassin.
> Disclaimer: Antispam software will block or mark a small percentage of
> legitimate mail.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 5:33 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Spam Question
> 
> 
> We are using sendmail as our front end server to an E2k server. It seems
> someone has found a hole in our sendmail server & are able to spam us. I
> received 4300 e-mails over the weekend. My question: Anyone using =
> sendmail
> as their front end server & if so what spam software are you using. Is =
> their
> any free downloads that work good. Thanks=20
> Brien
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: I need feedback

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



LOL 

 
I was 
7 years old,  and yes I remember it. 
 
Number 
5 is alive!

  -Original Message-From: Brent Hudson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:32 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need 
  feedback
  1986...mmm let me see.. I was bustin my butt in the armed forces.. no 
  wonder I don't remember it..
  B
  
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 23 July 2002 15:29To: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need 
feedback
Thanks Les, I'm glad someone remembers that movie 
:)

Sherry 
Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration 
Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs 
fly just fine." 

-Original 
Message-From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:22 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I need feedback


  "Not disassemble!"
  

-Original Message-From: 
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 July 
2002 14:06To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
I need feedback
Do you remember the 1986 movie "Short Circuit"?  "#5 is 
alive, need input, more input." etc
 
Sherry Abercrombie - FQ 
Data Center 
Administration Team Information 
Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just 
fine." 

-Original 
Message-From: Micheal Espinola Jr 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 
2002 7:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Re: I need feedback

  What's a Christian girl like yourself 
  doing talking about more than 1 input?
   
  
"Abercrombie, Sherry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in 
message news:273544@exchangelist...
Or would that be input #5?
Sherry 
Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team 
Information 
Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just 
fine." 

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 
  10:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  I need feedback
  Please..
   
   
  Anyone 
  here ever use Max Compression's Compression server for thier 
  exchange serversList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmThis 
e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star 
  Internet.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  The information in this communication and any 
  attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended 
  solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, 
  review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is 
  strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error 
  please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original 
  message and any copies of it. 
  Any opinions, conclusions or other information 
  in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson 
  Townend & Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. 
  This 
  e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. Theservice 
  is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a 
  proactiveanti-virus service working around the clock, around the 
  globe, visit:http://www.star.net.ukList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: test

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



pebkac
 
Problem exists between keyboard and chair.  :-)   I know I 
have that problem from time to time.

  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 8:57 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  test
  Seems to me that they are.I've seen you on the NT SysAdmin list 
  w/email that was sent @7:32AM this morning.  
  
  Sherry Abercrombie 
  - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information 
  Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just 
  fine." 
  
  -Original Message-From: 
  David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Wednesday, July 24, 2002 7:44 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sunbelt Software 
  WebmasterSubject: RE: test
  
  
Contact the ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
or Sunbelt Software Webmaster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) with 
issues.  

  
  -Original Message-From: mark 
  verschaeve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  July 24, 2002 08:36To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: test
  My mails aren't coming through 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA on Exchange Server or Stand Alone?

[Jeremiah Watson]

Unless I am mistaken,  You can't install OWA Seperate from Exchange 2000 unless you 
have then enterprise version.

Jeremiah

-Original Message-
From: Brad Metzler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA on Exchange Server or Stand Alone?


It has been suggested to me that I should install OWA on a stand alone server, rather 
than run it from my Exchange boxes. Under 5.5 this was relatively easy to configure, 
however under Exchange 2000, I am not seeing a method by which you can install just 
OWA on a server. 

1) Should I run OWA from the exchange servers or from a separate web server(s)?
2) How do you install just OWA on a box without installing exchange?


Thanks

Brad

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 2000 SP3

[Jeremiah Watson]

Why 
did you install SP3? 
 
Its 
not ready yet.

  -Original Message-From: Charles 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:25 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 2000 
  SP3Importance: High
  
  I have an Exchange 2000 server 
  w/SP2. This morning I installed SP3 and restarted.
  The STORE.EXE is now taking 99% of 
  the CPU. 
  I tried restarting all Exchange 
  services but still have the same result.
  I also looked for the 
  BkExpandDontRun enabled in the 
  following registry key: 
  HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\ExCDO\Parameters
  It is not there.
  I did not have this with 
  SP2.
  Any idea what’s causing 
  this?
   
  PLEASE 
HELP..
  Thank you,
  Charles J. Laut
   
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Jeremiah Watson

[Jeremiah Watson]

LOL  Man you guys I'm flattered that I made a subject line tonight.  :-)

Jeremiah,

For the record we're still on SP2.  After reading Don and Will for the 6
months I know better than that.



> You're comapring a consolidation of fixes in a single executible
> software update from Microsoft to a bottle of mystery liquid in the
> gutter?
> 
> You are?
> 
> Ok.
> 
> Well, carry on then.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:15 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Jeremiah Watson
> 
> 
> So what?  You find a bottle of mystery liquid in the gutter, do you
> drink it?  What fixes did SP3 have that you needed?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Charlie Laut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 04:09 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Jeremiah Watson
> > 
> > 
> > I found it on the Microsoft web site, and installed it
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Content filtering - Symantec Style

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



All 
Crap Aside.  :p
 
http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/products/products.cfm?ProductID=66

  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 
  4:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Content 
  filtering - Symantec Style
  Crap
  

-Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 1:17 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Content 
filtering - Symantec Style

Does anyone know what the hell 
Symantec calls their content filter?
 
Thanks.
 
Garland Mac 
Neill
Systems 
Administrator
Solbourne 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF

[Jeremiah Watson]

I've seen it, after 6 Guinness everything's aflame.  


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 9:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF


You've had this experience???

AB burns any britches he can get his hands on...

D



-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF


AB Only burns his own britches. :-)  

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 9:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF


I thought only Martin burned your britches.


-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 9:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF


No kidding!

James,

Don't be afraid to be flamed. I've gotten my britches burned quite badly a
number of times. Every time I have, I go back and look at why I got flamed.
Was I doing something stupid? Did I just miss something in my
troubleshooting process? Did I post something that makes no sense? I've
learned from being slapped around (by some of the best). The other thing you
should remember is, who the heck cares what someone else thinks about you.
They don't pay your salary. Post away and if you get flamed, then go back
and learn.

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 9:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF


I agree.  I am still learning.  I never said I had stopped and that I knew
EVERYTHING there is to know

-Original Message-
From: Frey, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 19:25
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die - PISSED OFF


You know, some of you are a bunch of f**king hang-lows.  So sorry not to be
born the apparent microsoft technical expert that you apparently were, but
some of us are still learning.  You know, the up curve?  You do understand
that a domain is a grouping of network resources and not your backyard run
that you need to piss along the borders of right?  I'm afraid to ask a damn
question for fear I'll get flamed like half these people do.  So I guess
I'll spend four times as long hunting and researching the answers I came to
find quickly, by joining this list in the first place.
 
A**holes.

-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 12:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE make my server die


LEAVE IT THE HELL ALONE THEN!  Has your server performance degraded?  Or are
you just worried that your server is using the memory that you put in it?
And another note, go read the damn FAQ's!  If you had read them before
posting, chances are you wouldn't have posted because your question would
have already been answered.  Here is the link just so you don't have to ask
for it.
 
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
<http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm> 

Ben Winzenz 
Network/Systems Administrator 
Peregrine Systems 

-Original Message-
From: Joupin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: STORE.EXE make my server die


I have the same problem and I don`t know what the hell is doing that
STORE.exe which is getting around 300 MB of my memory , yes , its eating
memory not CPU like your system
 
Somebody Helppp

- Original Message - 
From: Charles <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
To: MS-Exchange Admin  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Issues 
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 12:55 AM
Subject: Exchange 2000 SP3


I have an Exchange 2000 server w/SP2. This morning I installed SP3 and
restarted.

The STORE.EXE is now taking 99% of the CPU. 

I tried restarting all Exchange services but still have the same result.

I also looked for the BkExpandDontRun enabled in the following registry
key: 

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\ExCDO\Parameters

It is not there.

I did not have this with SP2.

Any idea what's causing this?

 

PLEASE HELP..

Thank you,

Charles J. Laut

 

 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter

Re: Exchange Standard vs Enterprise

[Jeremiah Watson]

Check this out Captain,

http://www.msexchange.org/pages/faqs.asp?art=6

And the saucer section only seperates when the Captain is ready.  :-P

Jeremiah


> I hate to even ask this, but I cannot find my answer in the archives:
> 
> How do I determine what version an Exchange server is running (Standard vs
> Enterprise) WITHOUT a 1216 or 1217 entry in the Event logs?  
> 
> I have a mystery server that has not been rebooted in quite a while, and the
> event logs have been overwritten from the last reboot, so I cannot determine
> the version by this method.  I'd rather not reboot the machine, unless I
> have no other option.
> 
> I seem to recall someone mentioning a specific version of a DLL file that
> would tell you, but I cannot find any reference to it in the archives.
> 
> p.s - Please spare me the "does the saucer section separate?" answers.  ;-)
> 
> 
> Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network Engineer
> Advertising.com
> 
> We bring innovation to interactive communication.
> Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.
> 
> 
> 
> ***
> The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
> the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
> contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
> retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
> any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
> If you received this email in error, please contact the
> sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: How to remove Exchange 5.5 from E2K site

[Jeremiah Watson]

Nahhh,  They usually fly over and drop it off.  ;-P

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 4:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to remove Exchange 5.5 from E2K site


Do I have to get my own food then?


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to remove Exchange 5.5 from E2K site


I love it when all the servers migrate south every fall and they form
that big V in the sky.


-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 4:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to remove Exchange 5.5 from E2K site


Is it not in the migration whitepapers?

It is mentioned in the KB:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q316886

William


-Original Message-
From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How to remove Exchange 5.5 from E2K site


I couldnot find any KB article which will tell exact steps of moving
connectors, public folders etc from Ex 5.5 to Ex 2000 server. I have
moved all mailboxes from Ex 5.5 to Ex 2000 and now wants to decommission
Ex 5.5

Anwar

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.380 / Virus Database: 213 - Release Date: 7/24/2002
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.380 / Virus Database: 213 - Release Date: 7/24/2002
 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.380 / Virus Database: 213 - Release Date: 7/24/2002
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.380 / Virus Database: 213 - Release Date: 7/24/2002
 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: RE: OWA



Not if 
the Clients are Win2K,  You just need to setup a Terminal Services License 
Server before 90 days are up( or it quits working, been there done 
that).

  -Original Message-From: Lynn Karen 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:15 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  OWA
  But isn't the bundled TS on the server only for 2 (or 3?) 
  concurrent connections for administrative purposes?  If you need more 
  than that number of concurrent TS sessions you need to buy the full TS 
  licence.
  Karen 
  > -Original Message- > 
  From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: 26 April 2002 12:53 > 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: 
  OWA > > > Uh, no.  TS in W2k server comes bundled with it.  
  Provided > the TS clients > are W2K pro or XP pro, to TS CAL is needed... > > 
   > Don 
  Ely > Network Engineer > 
  Tripath Imaging, Inc. > (336) 290-8293 - 
  Direct > (336) 516-4519 - Mobile > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email > http://www.tripathimaging.com > 
  > > > > -Original Message- 
  > From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 > 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:39 PM 
  > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: OWA > > > However, if more than two users 
  connect via TS at one time, > you need to 
  buy > an expensive TS license. > > -- > Matt 
  Lathrum > General Dynamics Decision 
  Systems    >  
  When cryptography is outlawed, >  
  bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. > >  -Original Message- > 
  From:     Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:35 PM > To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject:  Re: OWA > > Terminal Services & Outlook, 
  faster, fully functional... > > > Hello All, > > > > I have a couple of questions about OWA. > > > > 1) When will spell check be 
  available? > 
  >    > 
  > 2) Is there a way to create a rule on the server side to > block certain > > people from 
  sending mail to my users.  ie.  spam and other > mail to be > > blocked. 
  > > > > 3) How does one 
  create a signature in owa? > > > > 4) In present our present use of Outlook, if you type the 
  > name of the > > 
  person you are sending email to, their email address pops > up in the To > > box.  Possible 
  in web version? > > > 
  > TIA, any information is greatly appreciated. > 
  > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  > > List Charter and FAQ 
  at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  > > List Charter and FAQ 
  at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  > List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Word as your E-mail editor (OL98)

[Jeremiah Watson]

The question you need to ask is if anybody hasn't had some sort of problem with Word 
as the Email Editor.  I had a user who frequently had the same problem you did.  As 
soon as we told them to use the default email editor all was better.

-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Word as your E-mail editor (OL98)


Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a, OL98.

Has anybody had problems using Word as your E-mail editor?  I've got a user
that frequently has Word
freeze up when she has one document open, and then tries to open another one
via an attachment 
through E-mail.  I'm pretty sure I had documentation on this at one time,
but I can't seem to find it
in Technet.

Thanks.

Robert

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Sloooowww delivery of e-mail

[Jeremiah Watson]

Well,  If it is one particular domain and it works everywhere else,  I think you 
already absolved yourself of any  wrongdoing.  

besides [EMAIL PROTECTED] is always easier anyway.

just my 2c.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slwww delivery of e-mail


I'm seeing a rather strange problem here.  When users attempt to send mail to 1 
particular domain... it's taking hours for the mail to get there.  I have seen this 
once before.  Here's what I see happening:

Users on my side are attempting to email people at another domain.  The e-mail 
addresses published for this domain are  [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of the typical 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a mx record.  They do have a mx record... and if you email the 
remote site @domain.com the mail arrives in a matter of seconds.  However if you 
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] it takes hours.

So, the simple answer is to just tell people to e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]  However, I 
need an answer as to why this is happening so that I can clear our side of any wrong 
doing.

Preston

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Sloooowww delivery of e-mail

[Jeremiah Watson]

Did you try telneting  mail.domain.com 25 and then do a helo and try to send a message?
This will connect on the smtp port and shouldn't take but a cpl seconds for most 
sites.  


-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail


Well I just tried to circumvent the error by just emailing domain.com and got a 550... 
relaying prohibited.

-Original Message-
From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail


Are there any differences in the MX records for mail.domain.com and
domain.com? The DNS zones for these domains are hosted on the same server?
If you try to send some mail manually, via telnet, do you see any suspicious
looking errors?

Cheers,
Marty

> -Original Message-
> From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:39 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Slwww delivery of e-mail
>
>
> I'm seeing a rather strange problem here.  When users attempt
> to send mail to 1 particular domain... it's taking hours for
> the mail to get there.  I have seen this once before.  Here's
> what I see happening:
>
> Users on my side are attempting to email people at another
> domain.  The e-mail addresses published for this domain are
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of the typical [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a mx record.  They do have a mx record... and if you
> email the remote site @domain.com the mail arrives in a
> matter of seconds.  However if you e-mail
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] it takes hours.
>
> So, the simple answer is to just tell people to e-mail
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  However, I need an answer as to why this is
> happening so that I can clear our side of any wrong doing.
>
> Preston
>
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Sloooowww delivery of e-mail

[Jeremiah Watson]

I just sent a mail to myself from hotmail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  and I got an NDR,  
I also do not have an MX record for mail.domain.com but i do have one for domain.com 
and that mail arrives instantly..  

This might be your answer, sir.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail


Hrm... do you think exchange is freaking out because they don't have an mx record for 
mail.opb.state.ga.us?  They have one for opb.state.ga.us ... which gives us the 
relaying error... but not for mail.opb.state.ga.us.

opb.state.ga.us 86400   IN  MX  10 mail.opb.state.ga.us
opb.state.ga.us 86400   IN  NS  statens2.state.ga.us
opb.state.ga.us 86400   IN  NS  statens1.state.ga.us
opb.state.ga.us 86400   IN  SOA statens2.state.ga.us 
hostmaster.state.ga.us (
2001010301  ;serial (version)
43200   ;refresh period (12 hours)
300 ;retry interval (5 minutes)
864000  ;expire time (1 week, 3 days)
86400   ;default ttl (1 day)
)
Authority information:
opb.state.ga.us 86400   IN  NS  statens2.state.ga.us
opb.state.ga.us 86400   IN  NS  statens1.state.ga.us
Additional information:
mail.opb.state.ga.us86400   IN  A   167.193.134.136
statens2.state.ga.us86400   IN  A   198.176.174.189
statens1.state.ga.us86400   IN  A   198.176.174.181

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares 
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail


O.K. wierdness continues.  I went over to our SMTP relay (Ex 5.5 sp4) to see what was 
going on.  In the queue I've got a message I sent to opb about 30 min ago... if you 
look at it's details it says "network error during host resolution."  If I telnet to 
port 25 on mail.domain.com from the dmz relay, I connect immediately and can send a 
msg using helo, etc.  Once again... only seeing problems with this domain... in 
particular this addressing format of this domain.

-Original Message-----
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail


Did you try telneting  mail.domain.com 25 and then do a helo and try to send a message?
This will connect on the smtp port and shouldn't take but a cpl seconds for most 
sites.  


-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail


Well I just tried to circumvent the error by just emailing domain.com and got a 550... 
relaying prohibited.

-Original Message-
From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail


Are there any differences in the MX records for mail.domain.com and
domain.com? The DNS zones for these domains are hosted on the same server?
If you try to send some mail manually, via telnet, do you see any suspicious
looking errors?

Cheers,
Marty

> -Original Message-
> From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:39 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Slwww delivery of e-mail
>
>
> I'm seeing a rather strange problem here.  When users attempt
> to send mail to 1 particular domain... it's taking hours for
> the mail to get there.  I have seen this once before.  Here's
> what I see happening:
>
> Users on my side are attempting to email people at another
> domain.  The e-mail addresses published for this domain are
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of the typical [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a mx record.  They do have a mx record... and if you
> email the remote site @domain.com the mail arrives in a
> matter of seconds.  However if you e-mail
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] it takes hours.
>
> So, the simple answer is to just tell people to e-mail
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  However, I need an answer as to why this is
> happening so that I can clear our side of any wrong doing.
>
> Preston
>
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Sloooowww delivery of e-mail

[Jeremiah Watson]

Well, I guess you got me there.  :-)  Was just clicking and grinning this morning.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail


What kind of NDR did you get?  It could have been that your mail server wasn't set up 
to route mail.domain.com as inbound.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail


I just sent a mail to myself from hotmail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  and I got an NDR,  
I also do not have an MX record for mail.domain.com but i do have one for domain.com 
and that mail arrives instantly..  

This might be your answer, sir.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail


Hrm... do you think exchange is freaking out because they don't have an mx record for 
mail.opb.state.ga.us?  They have one for opb.state.ga.us ... which gives us the 
relaying error... but not for mail.opb.state.ga.us.

opb.state.ga.us 86400   IN  MX  10 mail.opb.state.ga.us
opb.state.ga.us 86400   IN  NS  statens2.state.ga.us
opb.state.ga.us 86400   IN  NS  statens1.state.ga.us
opb.state.ga.us 86400   IN  SOA statens2.state.ga.us 
hostmaster.state.ga.us (
2001010301  ;serial (version)
43200   ;refresh period (12 hours)
300 ;retry interval (5 minutes)
864000  ;expire time (1 week, 3 days)
86400   ;default ttl (1 day)
)
Authority information:
opb.state.ga.us 86400   IN  NS  statens2.state.ga.us
opb.state.ga.us 86400   IN  NS  statens1.state.ga.us
Additional information:
mail.opb.state.ga.us86400   IN  A   167.193.134.136
statens2.state.ga.us86400   IN  A   198.176.174.189
statens1.state.ga.us86400   IN  A   198.176.174.181

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares 
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail


O.K. wierdness continues.  I went over to our SMTP relay (Ex 5.5 sp4) to see what was 
going on.  In the queue I've got a message I sent to opb about 30 min ago... if you 
look at it's details it says "network error during host resolution."  If I telnet to 
port 25 on mail.domain.com from the dmz relay, I connect immediately and can send a 
msg using helo, etc.  Once again... only seeing problems with this domain... in 
particular this addressing format of this domain.

-----Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail


Did you try telneting  mail.domain.com 25 and then do a helo and try to send a message?
This will connect on the smtp port and shouldn't take but a cpl seconds for most 
sites.  


-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail


Well I just tried to circumvent the error by just emailing domain.com and got a 550... 
relaying prohibited.

-Original Message-
X-Sybari-Trust: bedea4d3 696275fc 659a338b 003d
From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail


Are there any differences in the MX records for mail.domain.com and
domain.com? The DNS zones for these domains are hosted on the same server?
If you try to send some mail manually, via telnet, do you see any suspicious
looking errors?

Cheers,
Marty

> -Original Message-
> From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:39 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Slwww delivery of e-mail
>
>
> I'm seeing a rather strange problem here.  When users attempt
> to send mail to 1 particular domain... it's taking hours for
> the mail to get there.  I have seen this once before.  Here's
> what I see happening:
>
> Users on my side are attempting to email people at another
> domain.  The e-mail addresses published for this domain are
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of the typical [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a mx record.  They do have a mx record... and if you
> email the remote site @domain.com the mail arrives in a
> matter of seconds.  However if you e-mail
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] it takes hours.
>
> So, the simple answer is to just tell people to e-mail
> 

RE: 16 GB Limit?

[Jeremiah Watson]

LOL? 

laughing out loud. 

PS

RTM  on Acronyms.  :-)

-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


Ok take back my cookie from Friday, but what does LOL mean? Sorry to be such
an inDUHvidual, but I have to know.
 
John Majetic

-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


LOL.

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 6:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


We could hold Weight Watcher meetings there after hours, too.
 
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 12:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


We think a great franchise combo that would make lots of $$$ would be a
StarBucks/Krispy Kreme Donuts

-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


You had to mention that... I could really go for a KKreme right about now...
B*tch of a week.
 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message.

-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 16:25 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?



Actually, I'm going to eat the last Krispy Kreme donut & hit the road. 

-Original Message- 
From: Kevin Miller [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:10 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 


You are correct.. Have a cookie and take the rest of the day off. That is
where I am headed. 

--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/
  For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! 


-Original Message- 
From: Majetic, John RAME [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:56 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: 16 GB Limit? 


Ok everyone here is talking about the 16GB limit on regular 5.5, but all the
docs I can find from Microsoft don't seem to differencate between 5.5 and
5.5 enterprise. I was always under the impression that regualar 5.5 had the
16GB limit, and Eneterprise got rid of it. 

Am I right? 
If not what is the limit in regualr 5.5? 


John Majetic 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 16 GB Limit?

[Jeremiah Watson]

m dnuuttsss.  In the Homer Simpson Drool.

-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


Chocolate covered donuts.

Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
"Who's watching your network?" 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?

 

Okay, this discussion is really making me hungry for junk food and/or good
hot jalapeno bagels with a cup of caffeine thrown in for good
measure...Ohhh please make it stop, lunch isn't for another 1 & 45
minutes..I hear the snack machine calling my name.

-Original Message- 
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:36 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 

 

Coke and a lemon pie... hu 

  

Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
"Who's watching your network?" 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message- 
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:33 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 

  

Ewww 

  

Bagels are nasty. 

  

-Original Message- 
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:56 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 

  

But bagels are somewhat good for you.well, the ones I like aren't that
healthy, jalapeño bagel w/jalapeño crème cheese

-Original Message- 
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:47 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 

 www.acronymfinder.com  > 

www.netlingo.com  > 

W 

Throw away the Krappy Kremes and have a bagel instead.  

  

 -Original Message- 
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 > ] 
Sent: Tuesday, 30 April 2002 21:13 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 

  

Ok take back my cookie from Friday, but what does LOL mean? Sorry to be such


an inDUHvidual, but I have to know. 
  
John Majetic 

-Original Message- 
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 > ] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:01 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 

  

LOL. 

-Original Message- 
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   > ] 
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 6:54 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 

  

We could hold Weight Watcher meetings there after hours, too. 
  
  
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message- 
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 > ] 
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 12:44 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 

  

We think a great franchise combo that would make lots of $$$ would be a 
StarBucks/Krispy Kreme Donuts 

-Original Message- 
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   > ] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:15 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 

  

You had to mention that... I could really go for a KKreme right about now...


B*tch of a week. 
  

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is 
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain co

RE: 16 GB Limit?

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



They're a famous donut company in the US.  I believe they started 
down south and migrating up north..

  -Original Message-From: Stuart Tonge 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 
  7:24 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB 
  Limit?
  okay, i have to ask... what or who is 'Krispy Kreme' 
  ?
   
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
  Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 
  11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB 
  Limit?
  Man 
  (woman) does not live by e-mail alone.  On the 7th day, God rested and 
  looked back on what he (she) had done and saw that the world was almost 
  perfect.  Then Krispy Kreme sprang up next door to Starbucks and the 
  world was perfect.
   
   
  
  mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
  Steve Ropiak  ZF Group NAO 
  CERT, 
  Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
  (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
  cell 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

-Original Message-From: Rose, Adrian 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 
12:37 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB 
Limit?

Have I joined the wrong 
list or something??
Is this an MS Exchange 
Issues list or what?
What's all this Krispy 
Kreme business?
 
:@/
 List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
This message and its attachments may 
contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended 
solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in 
this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), 
you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. 
Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and 
kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and 
its attachments which does not relate to the official business of News 
Limited or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed 
by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are 
free from computer virus or other defect.List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmThis 
  email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScanservice. 
  For more information on a proactive anti-virus service workingaround the 
  clock, around the globe, visit 
  http://www.messagelabs.com**Website 
  - 
  WWW.COOP.CO.UKThis 
  document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed and is 
  not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent written 
  confirmation of its contents. Accordingly, United Co-op disclaims all 
  responsibility and accept no liability (including in negligence) for the 
  consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such 
  information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written 
  confirmation.If you have received this E-mail message in error, please 
  notify us immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the message 
  from your computer.Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, 
  disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail 
  message is strictly prohibited.United Coop has the right lawfully to 
  record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees and any third 
  party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as United 
  Coop deem necessary in order to protect its information, its interest and 
  its reputation.United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent its 
  information systems from being used to view, store or forward sexually 
  explicit, racist, sexist, sectarian, violent or otherwise offensive or 
  discriminatory material. If this message contains such material please 
  report it to 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]**List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmThis 
  email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScanservice. 
  For more information on a proactive anti-virus service workingaround the 
  clock, around the globe, visit 
  http://www.messagelabs.comList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: It's Friday!!

[Jeremiah Watson]

Never bothered me.  I just showed them my pistol.  :-)

Jeremiah Watson
Composide, Inc.


-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: It's Friday!!


Don't have to actually use it, just take it and clean it. That get s the
point across very quickly.

Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
"Who's watching your network?" 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: It's Friday!!

True, Martin, learn to use that shotgun now.I'm glad I have boys!! 
-Original Message- 
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:03 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 

Yes, we definitely don't want to discuss how she will meet someone JUST LIKE
HIM some day. 
LOL - - - - 
Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
"Who's watching your network?" 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
-Original Message- 
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:01 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
OK, Martin's got a lovely new daughter who will be dating before he knows
it.  Let's not add to his stress level here ;-)
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message- 
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:59 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 

Good thing she looks like your wife. 
Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
"Who's watching your network?" 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:49 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
http://216.39.101.68/martin/index.htm 
-Original Message- 
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:27 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
I don't get it 
  
-Original Message- 
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:23 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
  
I have a baby 
-Original Message- 
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:55 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: It's Friday!! 
Whoo Hoo, it's Friday, I have lots of Krispy Kreme doughnuts (including a
few crullers), Kona Special Blend coffee, and I have Monday off.  Three day
weekend, yippee!  
It's going to be a GOOD day!! 
Sherry Abercrombie 
Data Center Administration Team 
Information Technology 
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Print message without mailbox name

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Shoot, 
Cut it Off, Throw it on the Copier BAM  You're back to 8.5X11 and Nobody's 
the Wiser.

  -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:09 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Print message 
  without mailbox name
  Cutting it would make it invalid, wouldn't it? If such a piece of 
  evidence was presented in a trial against me, I'd hope my lawyer would scream 
  about "mutilated evidence", and how no one could be sure exactly what was cut 
  off. That's why medical records have to be pristine - you can't annotate them 
  later, you have to use the original, unalterated source.
   
  --
  
  Michael Leone, Systems Administrator
  Philadelphia Contributionship
  210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA  
  19106
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  V: 215-627-1752 x1282
  F: 215-627-5354
  
-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 
12:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Print 
message without mailbox name
The attorney actually suggested the 
scissors option. :-)  Not that you think like a lawyer...or 
that it would be a bad thing if you did.

  -Original Message-From: Lynn Karen 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 
  12:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Print message without mailbox name
  A pair of scissors to cut it off ... or are sharp 
  implements not allowed?
   
  Or create a mailbox and profile with a "neutral" 
  name e.g MS Exchange 5.5/2000 or something similar and print from 
  there.
   
  Karen
  
-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 10 May 2002 
17:02To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Print message without mailbox name
The email may be presented as 
evidence in court and should not have someone's name at the top who 
is not connected to the message.

  -Original Message-From: Precht, David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 
  2002 11:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Print message without mailbox 
  name
  Do they have an issue with the preson printing it out 
  ?
   -Original 
  Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 
  2002 10:26 To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Print message without mailbox name
  
One of our Attorneys has come to 
me with a problem.  He needs to print email that he has on a cd 
from a client.  When the message is opened and printed it puts 
Mailbox Name at the top of printed message.  I've searched 
Slipstick and MS and the only option I can find is to save the .msg 
as an .rtf, open in Word and then print.
 
Anyone know of an easier 
way?
 
Thanks
 
Pete HotchkissList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This 
electronic mail transmission is intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected 
by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the 
contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
message.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic 
mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information 
belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client 
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of 
any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
message.List Charter and FAQ 

RE: Print message without mailbox name

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Hmmm,  Isn't Email the First Generation?  So When you Print it, 
that becomes the Second Generation, Does that make it still 
valid?   
 
Seriously, though,  why not Highlight the Entire Email Copy and 
Paste it into word?  Wouldn't it maintain 90-100% of the Formatting that it 
had in the email?
 

  -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:17 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Print message 
  without mailbox name
  Nope; then it's still suspect, since it's a copy of a mutilated 
  evidence. It'll look like a copy of a cut-off piece of paper. If it was really 
  that easy to get around, do you think the courts would bother insisting on 
  first-generation medical notes? :-)
   
  It 
  may be different for non-medical cases, however.
   
  --
  
  Michael Leone, Systems Administrator
  Philadelphia Contributionship
  210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA  
  19106
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  V: 215-627-1752 x1282
  F: 215-627-5354
  
-Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:15 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Print 
message without mailbox name
Shoot, Cut it Off, Throw it on the Copier BAM  You're back to 
8.5X11 and Nobody's the Wiser.

  -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 
  1:09 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Print message without mailbox name
  Cutting it would make it invalid, wouldn't it? If such a piece of 
  evidence was presented in a trial against me, I'd hope my lawyer would 
  scream about "mutilated evidence", and how no one could be sure exactly 
  what was cut off. That's why medical records have to be pristine - you 
  can't annotate them later, you have to use the original, unalterated 
  source.
   
  --
  
  Michael Leone, Systems 
  Administrator
  Philadelphia Contributionship
  210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA  
  19106
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  V: 215-627-1752 x1282
  F: 215-627-5354
  
-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 
2002 12:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Print message without mailbox name
The attorney actually suggested the 
scissors option. :-)  Not that you think like a lawyer...or 
that it would be a bad thing if you did.

  -Original Message-From: Lynn Karen 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 
  12:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Print message without mailbox name
  A pair of scissors to cut it off ... or are 
  sharp implements not allowed?
   
  Or create a mailbox and profile with a 
  "neutral" name e.g MS Exchange 5.5/2000 or something similar and print 
  from there.
   
  Karen
  
-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 10 May 2002 
17:02To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Print message without mailbox name
The email may be presented as 
evidence in court and should not have someone's name at the top 
who is not connected to the message.

  -Original Message-From: 
  Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Friday, May 10, 2002 11:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Print message without mailbox 
  name
  Do they have an issue with the preson printing it out 
  ?
   -Original 
  Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 
  10, 2002 10:26 To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Print message without mailbox 
  name
  
One of our Attorneys has 
come to me with a problem.  He needs to print email that he 
has on a cd from a client.  When the message is opened and 
printed it puts Mailbox Name at the top of printed 
message.  I've searched Slipstick and MS and the only 
option I can find is to save the .msg as an .rtf, open in Word 
and then print.
 
Anyone know of an easier 
way?
 
Thanks
 
Pete 

RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email

[Jeremiah Watson]

Son'  It looks like you done telnetted AOL>

Because I know I can't telnet your server either.

Jeremiah Watson
Composidie, Inc.

-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email


220 logs-wa.proxy.aol.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.10.0/8.10.0; Wed, 15 May 2002
11:08:34 -0400 (EDT)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: SPAM from this list???

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Yeah 
Me Too (As it where)
 
Keving 
Seems Pretty amazing too.
 
Excerpt from Page
 
"Having Kevin Bock 
as my mentor has changed my life in an amazingly positive way. I have stronger 
relationships with my clients, shortened my sales cycle and TRIPLED my 
income."

  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 
  2:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SPAM 
  from this list???
  Yep. I got 
  it
  

-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:04 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: SPAM from this 
list???
Has anyone had problems with the following??? 
I am curious whether there are kampers on this list, or if 
this list is being sold. I am not interested in gaining SPAM due to my list 
memberships
-Original Message- From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:44 PM To: Matthew Carpenter Subject: Ease Exchange 
Administration 
Hello Matthew, 
  My 
name is Tom Verde and I just wanted to contact you as I understand that you 
are the Exchange Administrator for Sarma.
    I know for a 
fact that you are fully competent in your position.  I just wanted to 
contact you and see if there's anything we can do to help ease your 
administrative duties and free up your time for other projects or even 
vacations.
  Our 
tool set is designed to handle the automation and simplification of: 
      - Account Provisioning and 
Maintenance     - Account Policy 
Management     - Group Management 
    - Responsibility 
Delegation     - Directory Migration and 
Deployment     - Synchronization with 
External Data Sources (ODBC Compliant, Excel, Flat Files   and 
LDAP)     - 
Global Changes to the Directory     - Distribution Group 
Management     - Information Store 
Processing     - Reporting 
    - Application 
Services (Moving Mailboxes with permissions, rules and DL's    
Preserved)     - Directory Integrity 
Agent runs any VB Script directly related to user account   
management 
  
Matthew, if any of the above are issues for either yourself or Sarma, please 
feel free to contact me and we can discuss how we may or may not be able to 
assist.  
  Some 
examples of companies that we have helped in the past are Verizon Wireless, 
The Hartford, Dun and Bradstreet and Merrill Lynch.  Thank you very 
much for your time and we will be in touch.
Sincerely,   Tom Verde Account Manager J2K Technology (Discus Data Partner) (516) 
488-7625 x3 List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: SPAM from this list???

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Martin,
 
Thats 
not the leopard print that we all got pictures of last year is 
it?

  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 
  2:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SPAM 
  from this list???
  Having Andy 
  David as my mentor has changed my life. I now wear a tighter thong and 
  quack like a duck better than I ever hoped too.
  

-Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:18 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SPAM from 
this list???
Yeah Me Too (As it where)
 
Keving Seems Pretty amazing too.
 
Excerpt from Page
 
"Having Kevin 
Bock as my mentor has changed my life in an amazingly positive way. I have 
stronger relationships with my clients, shortened my sales cycle and TRIPLED 
my income."

  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 17, 
  2002 2:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  SPAM from this list???
  Yep. I got 
  it
  

-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 
11:04 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: SPAM 
from this list???
Has anyone had problems with the following??? 

I am curious whether there are kampers on this list, or 
if this list is being sold. I am not interested in gaining SPAM due to 
my list memberships
-Original Message- From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:44 PM 
To: Matthew Carpenter Subject: 
Ease Exchange Administration 
Hello Matthew, 
  
My name is Tom Verde and I just wanted to contact you as I understand 
that you are the Exchange Administrator for Sarma.
    I know for 
a fact that you are fully competent in your position.  I just 
wanted to contact you and see if there's anything we can do to help ease 
your administrative duties and free up your time for other projects or 
even vacations.
  
Our tool set is designed to handle the automation and simplification 
of:       - Account Provisioning 
and Maintenance     - Account Policy 
Management     - Group 
Management     - Responsibility 
Delegation     - Directory Migration 
and Deployment     - Synchronization with 
External Data Sources (ODBC Compliant, Excel, Flat Files 
  and 
LDAP)     
- Global Changes to the Directory     - Distribution Group 
Management     - Information Store 
Processing     - Reporting 
    - 
Application Services (Moving Mailboxes with permissions, rules and DL's 
   
Preserved)     - Directory Integrity 
Agent runs any VB Script directly related to user account 
  
management 
  
Matthew, if any of the above are issues for either yourself or Sarma, 
please feel free to contact me and we can discuss how we may or may not 
be able to assist.  
  
Some examples of companies that we have helped in the past are Verizon 
Wireless, The Hartford, Dun and Bradstreet and Merrill Lynch.  
Thank you very much for your time and we will be in touch.
Sincerely,   
Tom Verde Account 
Manager J2K Technology (Discus Data 
Partner) (516) 488-7625 x3 List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: SPAM from this list???

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: SPAM from this list???



I wish 
I were "Kevin Bock"
 
NOT!

  -Original Message-From: John Allhiser 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:47 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SPAM from 
  this list???
  Only 
  if they're all the same person.
  
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:46 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SPAM from 
this list???

Dear gods this is 
sick...
 
"I have a Kevin Bock quote on my 
office wall, it reads..."In order to provide someone value in either their 
personal or professional life, you must first find out what they perceive to 
be valuable". Through Kevin's mentoring I have become not only a better 
sales professional but also a better husband, father, brother and 
friend."
 
-Original 
Message-From: John 
Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:05 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: SPAM 
from this list???
 

yeah.   
Look at www.j2ktechnology.com

 

"Kevin" is a master 
at sales...somewhere.

  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:04 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: SPAM from 
  this list???
  Has anyone had problems with the 
  following??? 
  I am curious whether there are kampers on this 
  list, or if this list is being sold. I am not interested in gaining SPAM 
  due to my list memberships
  -Original Message- From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, 
  May 17, 2002 12:44 PM To: Matthew Carpenter Subject: Ease Exchange 
  Administration 
  Hello Matthew, 
    
  My name is Tom Verde and I just wanted to contact you as I understand that 
  you are the Exchange Administrator for Sarma.
      
  I know for a fact that you are fully competent in your position.  I 
  just wanted to contact you and see if there's anything we can do to help 
  ease your administrative duties and free up your time for other projects 
  or even vacations.
    
  Our tool set is designed to handle the automation and simplification 
  of:       - 
  Account Provisioning and Maintenance     - 
  Account Policy Management     - Group 
  Management     - 
  Responsibility Delegation     - 
  Directory Migration and Deployment     - 
  Synchronization with External Data Sources (ODBC Compliant, Excel, Flat 
  Files   
  and LDAP)     - 
  Global Changes to the Directory     - 
  Distribution Group Management     - 
  Information Store Processing     - 
  Reporting     - 
  Application Services (Moving Mailboxes with permissions, rules and DL's 
     
  Preserved)     - 
  Directory Integrity Agent runs any VB Script directly related to user 
  account   
  management 
    
  Matthew, if any of the above are issues for either yourself or Sarma, 
  please feel free to contact me and we can discuss how we may or may not be 
  able to assist.  
    
  Some examples of companies that we have helped in the past are Verizon 
  Wireless, The Hartford, Dun and Bradstreet and Merrill Lynch.  Thank 
  you very much for your time and we will be in touch.
  Sincerely,   Tom Verde Account Manager J2K Technology (Discus Data 
  Partner) (516) 488-7625 x3 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Testing

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Did we 
pass?

  -Original Message-From: Jonathan K 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:38 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OT: 
  Testing
  Testing - please 
  ignoreList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 16 GB Limit?

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



You 
can beat that with a wooden stick though.
 
Check 
this out.
 
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2028951960
 

  -Original Message-From: Kent, Larry SYNETICS 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 
  11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB 
  Limit?
  I 
  wouldn't. It was merely a rhetorical remark to the statement "You absolutely cannot beat 
  this".
  
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 
10:04 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB 
Limit?
How would you get it for free?
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and 
WebDesign, GO here!

  
  -Original Message-From: Kent, Larry 
  SYNETICS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 
  June 04, 2002 5:02 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB Limit?
  I think free would easily beat that...
  
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 
5:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 
GB Limit?
You absolutely cannot beat 
this:
http://www.buycheapsoftware.com/details.asp?productID=280
 
William

  List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: a mistake was made

[Jeremiah Watson]

Yeah dude,

You're fd'

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: a mistake was made


Spank user.

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: a mistake was made


Outlook 98.  exchange 5.5 sp4

User sent out an eMAIL to a large distribution list by mistake.  The Recall
Message action feature did not work very well on this.
This was very sensitive eMAIL that went out and needs to be trapped before
too many people read it.  What can I do?

Thanks in advance.


Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OT Slightly Processor name deciphering

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: OT Slightly Processor name deciphering



check 
this out.
 
google 
search .0005 seconds.
 
http://infocenter.cramsession.com/techlibrary/gethtml.asp?ID=792

  -Original Message-From: Graeme Carstairs 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:49 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OT Slightly 
  Processor name deciphering
  Hi, 
  Does anyone know how to decipher processor type/speed from the 
  information given by Windows NT. 
  E.g. we have an oldish machine that claims to have an Intel 
  X86 Family 5 Model 8 Stepping22 processor, now what does that mean. 

  Any help would be appreciated. 
  Thanks 
  Graeme List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Replication

[Jeremiah Watson]

Is that

Dr.  Sam Beckett?

-Original Message-
From: Inigo Montoya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 4:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Replication


Are you related to Sam Beckett?


- Original Message -
From: "Preston Jeffares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: Replication


Well... it depends...  what kind of replication are you referring to?  And
which version of Exchange?

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 3:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Replication


Ok simple questionstop laughing.

What is the purpose for replication within exchange?


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: User Profiles/Template

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



He is 
always of High Importance.  But for the sake of it.
 
Create 
Config.POL Files for Win95's and Win98's.
Create 
NTConfig.pol files for NT4s
 
needs 
to go in %systemroot%\system32\Repl\import\scripts
 
This 
will do what you need to do.
 
Look 
for the Policy Editor.  and remember they don't cross over, 95/98 policy 
editor does not work on NT4 and vice-versa.  
 
PS 
Start Posting this stuff to the NT Admin list.
 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?join=ntsysadmin
 
It 
would be far more appropriate there.

  -Original Message-From: Precht, David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 
  10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
  how is this High Importance 
  ?
  

-Original Message-From: Martey, 
Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 
19, 2002 14:59To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
User Profiles/TemplateImportance: High
Hi folks, I 
would like to limit what my users can see and do on their desktop like; 
No My Computer, Cannot Run, or  
cannot run Explorer and not see the network neigbourhood on their 
desktop. They would log on to an NT 
Server 4.0 PDC domain. I would be glad 
for any input on creating a template or profile for this purpose. 
  
Thanks. 
Emmanuel 


__
Disclaimer and 
confidentiality note 
Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating 
to the official business of Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to 
the company. It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. 
Standard Bank does not own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions 
are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of Standard 
Bank. 
The person 
addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the 
sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, 
disclose or use the content in any way.
Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this communication has 
been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or 
interference.
 ___List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: User Profiles/Template

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Scary? 
Isn't It.
 
Can 
anyone say "I went to www.braindumps.com 
for my MCP"?

  -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:12 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
  
  Once 
  Again…..
   
  YOU ARE AN 
  MCP?!?!?!?!?!?
   
  Go to the book case, 
  pull down the down book on NT 4 Server and the one called Network 
  Essentials…..you know the ones you passed to get your MCP……and read the damn 
  things….
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Precht, 
  David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 8:13 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
   
  
  how is 
  this High Importance 
  ?
  
-Original 
Message-From: Martey, 
Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 
14:59To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: User 
Profiles/TemplateImportance: 
High
 
Hi folks, 
I would like to limit what my 
users can see and do on their desktop like; No My 
Computer, Cannot Run, or  cannot run Explorer and not see the network 
neigbourhood on their desktop. They would log on 
to an NT Server 4.0 PDC domain. I would be glad for 
any input on creating a template or profile for this purpose. 
  

Thanks. 

 
Emmanuel 



__
Disclaimer 
and confidentiality note 

Everything in this e-mail and 
any attachments relating to the official business of Standard Bank Group 
Limited is proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally 
privileged and protected by law. Standard Bank does not own and endorse any 
other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly 
stated as being that of Standard Bank. 
The person addressed in the 
e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the sender 
immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, disclose 
or use the content in any way.
Standard Bank can not assure 
that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that it is 
free of errors, virus, interception or 
interference.
 ___
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: User Profiles/Template

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Now 
That's SCARY!

  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 
  4:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
  Did 
  you know 50% of doctors graduated in the bottom half of their 
  class?
   
  

-Original Message-From: Jeremiah 
Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 
2002 9:29 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
User Profiles/Template
Scary? Isn't It.
 
Can anyone say "I went to www.braindumps.com for my 
MCP"?

  -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 
  12:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  User Profiles/Template
  
  Once 
  Again…..
   
  YOU ARE AN 
  MCP?!?!?!?!?!?
   
  Go to the book 
  case, pull down the down book on NT 4 Server and the one called Network 
  Essentials…..you know the ones you passed to get your MCP……and read the 
  damn things….
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 8:13 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
   
  
  how 
  is this High Importance 
  ?
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Martey, Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 
14:59To: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: 
User Profiles/TemplateImportance: 
High
 
Hi folks, 
I would like to limit what 
my users can see and do on their desktop like; No 
My Computer, Cannot Run, or  cannot run Explorer and not see the 
network neigbourhood on their desktop. They 
would log on to an NT Server 4.0 PDC domain. I 
would be glad for any input on creating a template or profile for this 
purpose.   

Thanks. 

 
Emmanuel 



__
Disclaimer 
and confidentiality note 

Everything in this e-mail 
and any attachments relating to the official business of Standard Bank 
Group Limited is proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally 
privileged and protected by law. Standard Bank does not own and endorse 
any other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless 
clearly stated as being that of Standard Bank. 

The person addressed in the 
e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the sender 
immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, 
disclose or use the content in any way.
Standard Bank can not assure 
that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that it 
is free of errors, virus, interception or 
interference.
 ___
List Charter 
and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: User Profiles/Template

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Thanks 
don,
 
Its 
been a very rough day,  My Maxtor Nas Device decided to die on me.  
thank god for tape drives.

  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 4:12 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
  Didn't get it did you?  DO the math on that again...  
  ;o)
  

-Original Message-From: Jeremiah 
Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 
2002 4:13 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
User Profiles/Template
Now That's SCARY!

  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 
  4:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
  Did you know 50% of doctors graduated in the 
  bottom half of their class?
   
  

-Original Message-From: Jeremiah 
Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 
20, 2002 9:29 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: User 
Profiles/Template
Scary? Isn't It.
 
Can anyone say "I went to www.braindumps.com for my 
MCP"?

  -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 
  2002 12:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
  
  Once 
  Again.
   
  YOU ARE AN 
  MCP?!?!?!?!?!?
   
  Go to the 
  book case, pull down the down book on NT 4 Server and the one called 
  Network Essentials.you know the ones you passed to get your 
  MCP..and read the damn things
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 
  8:13 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
   
  
  how is this 
  High 
  Importance ?
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Martey, Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 
14:59To: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: User 
Profiles/TemplateImportance: 
High
 
Hi folks, 
I would like to limit 
what my users can see and do on their desktop like; 
No My Computer, Cannot 
Run, or  cannot run Explorer and not see the network 
neigbourhood on their desktop. They would 
log on to an NT Server 4.0 PDC domain. I would be glad for any 
input on creating a template or profile for this 
purpose.   

Thanks. 

 
Emmanuel 



__
Disclaimer 
and confidentiality note 

Everything in this 
e-mail and any attachments relating to the official business of 
Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to the company. It is 
confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Standard Bank 
does not own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions are 
those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of Standard 
Bank. 
The person addressed in 
the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the 
sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not 
read, disclose or use the content in any 
way.
Standard Bank can not 
assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained 
nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or 
interference.
 ___
List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: User Profiles/Template

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Yep 
Especially when I put it under a heavy load.  They told me to patch with 
this file on the website.
 
Still 
exhibits the same behavior..  I'm going to find a better 
solution.
 
Did 
you find a better fix than that?  

  -Original Message-From: Chris Pohlschneider 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 
  2002 4:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  User Profiles/Template
  was 
  the NAS device rebooting itself all of the time? just curious because i ran 
  into a situation with a maxtor NAS device
  
-Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 4:22 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User 
Profiles/Template
Thanks don,
 
Its been a very rough day,  My Maxtor Nas Device decided to die 
on me.  thank god for tape drives.

  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 
  4:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
  Didn't get it did you?  DO the math on that again...  
  ;o)
  

-Original Message-From: Jeremiah 
Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 
20, 2002 4:13 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: User 
Profiles/Template
Now That's SCARY!

  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 
  2002 4:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: User Profiles/Template
  Did you know 50% of doctors graduated in the 
  bottom half of their class?
   
  

-Original Message-From: 
    Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:29 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: User 
Profiles/Template
Scary? Isn't It.
 
Can anyone say "I went to www.braindumps.com for my 
MCP"?

  -Original Message-From: 
  Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
  
  Once 
  Again.
   
  YOU ARE 
  AN MCP?!?!?!?!?!?
   
  Go to the 
  book case, pull down the down book on NT 4 Server and the one 
  called Network Essentials.you know the ones you passed to get 
  your MCP..and read the damn 
  things
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Precht, David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 
  8:13 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
   
  
  how is 
  this High 
  Importance ?
  
-Original 
Message-From: Martey, Emmanuel E 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 
2002 14:59To: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: User 
Profiles/TemplateImportance: 
High
 
Hi 
folks, I would like to 
limit what my users can see and do on their desktop like; 
No My Computer, 
Cannot Run, or  cannot run Explorer and not see the network 
neigbourhood on their desktop. They would log on to 
an NT Server 4.0 PDC domain. I would 
be glad for any input on creating a template or profile for this 
purpose.   

Thanks. 

 
Emmanuel 



__
Disclaimer 
and confidentiality note 

Everything in this 
e-mail and any attachments relating to the official business of 
Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to the company. It is 
confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Standard 
Bank does not own and endorse any other content. Views and 
opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being 
that of Standard Bank. 
The person addressed 
in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify 
the sender immediately if it has u

RE: User Profiles/Template

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Yes, 
it did.  Did that fix it for you?
 
Ok 
Guys "DISCLAIMER" OFF TOPIC  Don and Kevin,  You aren't allowed to 
post because its off topic.  (just kidding guys.)
 
Has 
anybody found a good NAS Device for Backups?
 
 
 
 

  -Original Message-From: Chris Pohlschneider 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 
  2002 4:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  User Profiles/Template
  did 
  the patch have to do with the vmdisp.sys and vmautodelim.exe 
  files?
  
-Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 4:27 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User 
Profiles/Template
Yep Especially when I put it under a heavy load.  They told me 
to patch with this file on the website.
 
Still exhibits the same behavior..  I'm going to find a better 
solution.
 
Did you find a better fix than that?  

  -Original Message-From: Chris Pohlschneider 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 
  20, 2002 4:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: User Profiles/Template
  was the NAS device rebooting itself all of the time? just curious 
  because i ran into a situation with a maxtor NAS 
device
  
-Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 
4:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
User Profiles/Template
Thanks don,
 
Its been a very rough day,  My Maxtor Nas Device decided to 
die on me.  thank god for tape drives.

  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 
  2002 4:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: User Profiles/Template
  Didn't get it did you?  DO the math on that again...  
  ;o)
  

-Original Message-From: 
    Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Thursday, June 20, 2002 4:13 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: User 
Profiles/Template
Now That's SCARY!

  -Original Message-From: 
  William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 
  20, 2002 4:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
  Did you know 50% of doctors graduated in 
  the bottom half of their class?
   
  

-Original 
    Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 
20, 2002 9:29 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: User 
Profiles/Template
Scary? Isn't It.
 
Can anyone say "I went to www.braindumps.com for my 
MCP"?

  -Original Message-From: 
  Garland Mac Neill 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 
  20, 2002 12:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
  
  Once 
  Again.
   
  YOU 
  ARE AN MCP?!?!?!?!?!?
   
  Go to 
  the book case, pull down the down book on NT 4 Server and the 
  one called Network Essentials.you know the ones you passed 
  to get your MCP..and read the damn 
  things
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Precht, David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 
  2002 8:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
   
  
  how 
  is this High 
  Importance ?
  
-Original 
Message-From: Martey, Emmanuel 
E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 
19, 2002 14:59To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: User 
Profiles/TemplateImportance: 
High
 
Hi 
folks, I would like to 
limit what my users can see and do on their desktop like; 
No My Computer, 
Cannot Run, or  cannot run Explorer and not see the 

RE: User Profiles/Template

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Yeah, 
send them off  list please,  I'll give them a whirl again.  
Might've been massive brain failure, shoot I couldn't even tell 
that
 
50% of 
doctors graduate in the last half of their class.  ;-)

  -Original Message-From: Chris Pohlschneider 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 
  2002 4:38 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  User Profiles/Template
  actually it did fix it for me. it happened over a month ago and it has 
  been running strong since. it was a real pain in the butt because it would 
  just reboot and then it would rebuild the raid 5 array. doing these steps it 
  seemed to fix it. i have the documents with the steps on it for the fix. would 
  you like to check them out?
  
-Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 4:36 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User 
Profiles/Template
Yes, it did.  Did that fix it for you?
 
Ok 
Guys "DISCLAIMER" OFF TOPIC  Don and Kevin,  You aren't allowed to 
post because its off topic.  (just kidding guys.)
 
Has anybody found a good NAS Device for Backups?
 
 
 
 

  -Original Message-From: Chris Pohlschneider 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 
  20, 2002 4:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: User Profiles/Template
  did the patch have to do with the vmdisp.sys and vmautodelim.exe 
  files?
  
-----Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 
4:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
User Profiles/Template
Yep Especially when I put it under a heavy load.  They told 
me to patch with this file on the website.
 
Still exhibits the same behavior..  I'm going to find a 
better solution.
 
Did you find a better fix than that?  

  -Original Message-From: Chris Pohlschneider 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 
  June 20, 2002 4:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
  was the NAS device rebooting itself all of the time? just 
  curious because i ran into a situation with a maxtor NAS 
  device
  
    -Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 
2002 4:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: User 
Profiles/Template
Thanks don,
 
Its been a very rough day,  My Maxtor Nas Device decided 
to die on me.  thank god for tape drives.

  -Original Message-From: Ely, 
  Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 
  June 20, 2002 4:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
  Didn't get it did you?  DO the math on that 
  again...  ;o)
  

-Original 
        Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 
20, 2002 4:13 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: User 
Profiles/Template
Now That's SCARY!

  -Original Message-From: 
  William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 
  June 20, 2002 4:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
  Did you know 50% of doctors graduated 
  in the bottom half of their class?
   
  

-Original 
    Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
June 20, 2002 9:29 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: User 
Profiles/Template
Scary? Isn't It.
 
Can anyone say "I went to www.braindumps.com for 
my MCP"?

  -Original 
  Message-From: Garland Mac Neill 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 
  June 20, 2002 12:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: User 
  Profiles/Template
  
  Once 
  Again.
   

RE: Error 1104 in app log

[Jeremiah Watson]

You shall be flogged and beaten for the rest of today. (And part of tomorrow too) for 
your insolence.

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


And you will be...

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


I said sorry. 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


>From now on, everyone should use both utils on a daily basis

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 7:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


And to think that once, someone on this list criticised me for recommending
that someone run eseutil.  Hell, I'm damned if I do and damned if I don't!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 24 June 2002 15:48
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Error 1104 in app log
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


Damn Neil, quit trying to help people out! :)


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


Pardon me?

Exactly what part of my message is giving you s**t?  Realise that some
people on this list are not happy with running serious utilities like
ISINTEG.  I responed a lot on this list (ok, a little less lately) but as
far as I'm concerned you could be a developer thrown into managing your
company's Exchange server, which I've seen on this list.  How am I supposed
to know your limitations in Exchange?  You may be a guru, you may not be.
I'm certainly not going to assume you know all about isinteg.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 24 June 2002 15:33
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Error 1104 in app log
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


Thanks for the help. 
Neil did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed or just like giving people
s**t. 

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log



I've seen the 'error in background cleanup' type messages in 5.5, caused by
a file-based AV scanner running on the databases.  An ISINTEG cleaned this
up, and this may be the solution to the problem below (equally, a call to
PSS may be a good idea if Brien's not confident with ISINTEG)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 24 June 2002 15:06
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Error 1104 in app log
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log



I have seen similar errors in 5.5 and have concluded that an attachment has
been deleted but a pointer to it still exists. Of course, I could be wrong
too ;-)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET

Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:52 AM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
INTERNET
Subject: Error 1104 in app log


Has anyone seen this error before?
Microsoft doesn't give much information about it. I get 17 of them everyday
around the same time 1:18-1:20pm. this is what shows up in my logs.

Error 0xf9bf occurred during a background cleanup on attachment 110707c
on database "first storage group\mailbox store

& this is what I found on Microsoft site. I'm not sure what they are
referring too. Any Ideas

Source(s): MSExchangeIS
MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store
MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event ID: 1104
Component: Information Store
Symbolic Name: msgidAttachCleanupError

Explanation
A problem occurred during an attempt to delete an attachment. A write
conflict may have occurred.

User Action
Verify that the appropriate permissions are set for folder and messages.


Brien Mayer
Senior Network Administrator
Merchant's Tire
(703)393-4416
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. 

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Error 1104 in app log

[Jeremiah Watson]

If you need pictures that means you contemplated wearing it.  (That is all we need to 
know).  <;-)

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


You didn't include a picture of the thong. 

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


Wear this thong and all will be forgiven.


-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


I said sorry. 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


>From now on, everyone should use both utils on a daily basis

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 7:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


And to think that once, someone on this list criticised me for recommending
that someone run eseutil.  Hell, I'm damned if I do and damned if I don't!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 24 June 2002 15:48
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Error 1104 in app log
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


Damn Neil, quit trying to help people out! :)


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


Pardon me?

Exactly what part of my message is giving you s**t?  Realise that some
people on this list are not happy with running serious utilities like
ISINTEG.  I responed a lot on this list (ok, a little less lately) but as
far as I'm concerned you could be a developer thrown into managing your
company's Exchange server, which I've seen on this list.  How am I supposed
to know your limitations in Exchange?  You may be a guru, you may not be.
I'm certainly not going to assume you know all about isinteg.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 24 June 2002 15:33
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Error 1104 in app log
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log


Thanks for the help. 
Neil did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed or just like giving people
s**t. 

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log



I've seen the 'error in background cleanup' type messages in 5.5, caused by
a file-based AV scanner running on the databases.  An ISINTEG cleaned this
up, and this may be the solution to the problem below (equally, a call to
PSS may be a good idea if Brien's not confident with ISINTEG)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 24 June 2002 15:06
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Error 1104 in app log
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log



I have seen similar errors in 5.5 and have concluded that an attachment has
been deleted but a pointer to it still exists. Of course, I could be wrong
too ;-)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET

Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:52 AM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
INTERNET
Subject: Error 1104 in app log


Has anyone seen this error before?
Microsoft doesn't give much information about it. I get 17 of them everyday
around the same time 1:18-1:20pm. this is what shows up in my logs.

Error 0xf9bf occurred during a background cleanup on attachment 110707c
on database "first storage group\mailbox store

& this is what I found on Microsoft site. I'm not sure what they are
referring too. Any Ideas

Source(s): MSExchangeIS
MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store
MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event ID: 1104
Component: Information Store
Symbolic Name: msgidAttachCleanupError

Explanation
A problem occurred during an attempt to delete an attachment. A write
conflict may have occurred.

User Action
Verify that the appropriate permissions are set for folder and messages.


Brien Mayer
Senior Network Administrator
Merchant's Tire
(703)393-4416
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. 

If you have received thi

RE: Compacting

[Jeremiah Watson]

6 months?  And you're an expert? "Thats it, He's my new hero, don and kevin, step 
aside."

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Compacting


Ive been an eXch admin for almost 6 months now, so I think I know what I am
doing.


-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Compacting


O crap. Are you nutz?

You are trying to defend running ESEUTIL AND BLBs??

Do you have a death wish? That has never been done successfully. Not
individually, nor collectively.

All hard core Exchange Admins who have been doing this for years have both
of those items on the black list. We have gone round and round here for
months on both issues.


- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: Compacting


thats why I do BLB.


-Original Message-
From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Compacting



Again, defragmentation happens daily when ese runs. I am assuming this
person
means don't compact the store. Running eseutil can be a dangerous thing.
Running
either of the utilities that will change the structure of the store, can be
a
dangerous thing and should only be done in extreme measures (like if the IS
wont
start and you don't have a decent-recent backup of the store, or if you have
a
huge priv.edb file are running out of diskspace and know that compacting
would
free up a lot of space an have cheap managers who wont spend money on either
more disk space or another server to offload folks to). As you will see,
many
folks in here are weary (with good reason) about running eseutil against the
store. About the only util people tend to run is isinteg just to check the
integrity of the store. Even if it needs to be fixed, most folks will just
build
another server and move mailboxes off of the server with a store that may
have a
lot of errors or is too big for its own good. Bottom line again, is to only
use
eseutil as a last ditch effort or isinteg -fix if the store is not
accessible.

FWIW - these are the reasons you keep impeccable backups of your stores and
transaction logs - just like Wilford Brimley says check your blood sugar and
check it often, exchange admins say check your backups and check them daily.
Once you have a good base of backups, a couple weeks to a month, you will
want
to test and document your disaster recovery methods 1) to make sure it works
and
b) to get it down packed so you can do it in a minimal amount of time. Also,
I
recommend never letting your stores (mostly the priv.edb) get out of hand
(getting too big) because it becomes harder to manage it (longer to back it
up,
longer to restore it, etc.) If it does get too big, either implement strict
or
more strict mailbox storage policies or simply build another exchange server
and
move users off of it - if it is e2k, of course, storage groups are a god
send
for thing like this.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET

Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:10 PM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Subject: RE: Compacting


Never?


-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Compacting


DON'T DEFRAG!!!


- Original Message -
From: "Bill Beckett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:33 PM
Subject: RE: Compacting


2000, 5.5, all versions?


-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Compacting

Has it been a month already?

Since it is a bright relational database, it runs an online
maintenance
process nightly by default that defrags the contents of the
databases.
It takes care of itself.

William


-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Compacting


Friends and astute members of the exchange list. Please forgive such
basic questions but I am new to exchange. (came from lotus notes)
Since
exchange is essentially a database, I would assume this database
gets
fragmented. Is there a tool that can be used to "unfragment"?


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


---

RE: exchnage query

[Jeremiah Watson]

WTF?
 
Free 
Email?  We Don't Need no Stinkin' Free Email!!

  -Original Message-From: naveen_ipx 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:00 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: exchnage 
  query
  
  Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at 
  http://email.indiatimes.comBuy Music, Video, CD-ROM, 
  Audio-Books and Music Accessories from http://www.planetm.co.in List Charter and 
  FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exchange Server 2000 Recovery

[Jeremiah Watson]

I hope you gentlemen and ladies can help me on this one.  I have an
Exchange 2000 Server that had 2 of the 3 disks crash that contained the
database files for Exchange.  IE priv.edb and pub.edb,  I have since
replaced the disks with new ones, Same drive letter, Same Config, ETC and
I am having a heckuva time getting exchange to mount the database after
the restore is complete.  It absolutely refuse and gives the error

An internal processing error has occurred. Try restarting the Exchange
System Manager or the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service, or
both.

ID no: c1041724 
Exchange System Manager 

I have tried what MS recommends VIA Q253931 and that doesn't help me
because ESEUTIL Refuses to Finish.  I am trying to restore it from the
Backup Set right now(Again) and will post the Error that ESEUTIL gives me
After it Finishes.

Any ideas, pushes, prods, in the Right Direction would be most appreciated
and should they let me go to MEC this year, The First Rnd of Beer is On
Me.

TIA

Jeremiah Watson
Composidie, Inc.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery

[Jeremiah Watson]

Yep,  It was checked when I went in there to look at it.  It is acting
like the hard recovery was not run on it.

After Running ESEUTIL /CC c:\temp which is supposed to run the hard
recovery I should be able to Mnt the DB.  After running ESEutil I get the
following Error MEssage

"Operation Terminated with error -939586631(Unknown Error, Unknown Error)
after 0.30 seconds.

Jeremiah


> Have you tried this:
> Right-click the public folder MAPI tree, and then click Properties.=20
> On the Security tab, click to select the Allow inheritable permissions =
> from
> parent to propagate to this object check box.=20
> After you complete this procedure, wait for Microsoft Active =
> Directory(tm)
> directory services to replicate the change to all of the domain =
> controllers.
> After the change has been replicated, you can remount the store.=20
> =A0
> Mark Smith
> =A0
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: July 9, 2002 7:57 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery
> 
> 
> I hope you gentlemen and ladies can help me on this one.  I have an
> Exchange 2000 Server that had 2 of the 3 disks crash that contained the
> database files for Exchange.  IE priv.edb and pub.edb,  I have since
> replaced the disks with new ones, Same drive letter, Same Config, ETC =
> and
> I am having a heckuva time getting exchange to mount the database after
> the restore is complete.  It absolutely refuse and gives the error
> 
> An internal processing error has occurred. Try restarting the Exchange
> System Manager or the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service, or
> both.
> 
> ID no: c1041724=20
> Exchange System Manager=20
> 
> I have tried what MS recommends VIA Q253931 and that doesn't help me
> because ESEUTIL Refuses to Finish.  I am trying to restore it from the
> Backup Set right now(Again) and will post the Error that ESEUTIL gives =
> me
> After it Finishes.
> 
> Any ideas, pushes, prods, in the Right Direction would be most =
> appreciated
> and should they let me go to MEC this year, The First Rnd of Beer is On
> Me.
> 
> TIA
> 
> Jeremiah Watson
> Composidie, Inc.
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery

[Jeremiah Watson]

You betcha, Lemme dig em out here.

9518 and 9519

Jeremiah


> Any event IDs with that ?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 08:49
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery
> 
> 
> Yep,  It was checked when I went in there to look at it.  It is acting
> like the hard recovery was not run on it.
> 
> After Running ESEUTIL /CC c:\temp which is supposed to run the hard
> recovery I should be able to Mnt the DB.  After running ESEutil I get
> the following Error MEssage
> 
> "Operation Terminated with error -939586631(Unknown Error, Unknown
> Error) after 0.30 seconds.
> 
> Jeremiah
> 
> 
> > Have you tried this:
> > Right-click the public folder MAPI tree, and then click Properties.=20
> 
> > On the Security tab, click to select the Allow inheritable permissions
> 
> > = from parent to propagate to this object check box.=20
> > After you complete this procedure, wait for Microsoft Active =
> > Directory(tm)
> > directory services to replicate the change to all of the domain =
> > controllers.
> > After the change has been replicated, you can remount the store.=20
> > =A0
> > Mark Smith
> > =A0
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: July 9, 2002 7:57 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery
> > 
> > 
> > I hope you gentlemen and ladies can help me on this one.  I have an 
> > Exchange 2000 Server that had 2 of the 3 disks crash that contained 
> > the database files for Exchange.  IE priv.edb and pub.edb,  I have 
> > since replaced the disks with new ones, Same drive letter, Same 
> > Config, ETC = and I am having a heckuva time getting exchange to mount
> 
> > the database after the restore is complete.  It absolutely refuse and
> > gives the error
> > 
> > An internal processing error has occurred. Try restarting the Exchange
> 
> > System Manager or the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service, or
> 
> > both.
> > 
> > ID no: c1041724=20
> > Exchange System Manager=20
> > 
> > I have tried what MS recommends VIA Q253931 and that doesn't help me 
> > because ESEUTIL Refuses to Finish.  I am trying to restore it from the
> 
> > Backup Set right now(Again) and will post the Error that ESEUTIL gives
> 
> > = me After it Finishes.
> > 
> > Any ideas, pushes, prods, in the Right Direction would be most = 
> > appreciated and should they let me go to MEC this year, The First Rnd
> > of Beer is On Me.
> > 
> > TIA
> > 
> > Jeremiah Watson
> > Composidie, Inc.
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at: 
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery

[Jeremiah Watson]

That's ok,  I wussed out and called PSS.  FIgured that was about the same
as the first rnd of drinks with you guys.  ;-)~

Jeremiah

> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q253931
> (same one that you found)
> 
> Sorry I could not be of more help.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:00
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery
> 
> 
> You betcha, Lemme dig em out here.
> 
> 9518 and 9519
> 
> Jeremiah
> 
> 
> > Any event IDs with that ?
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 08:49
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery
> > 
> > 
> > Yep,  It was checked when I went in there to look at it.  It is acting
> 
> > like the hard recovery was not run on it.
> > 
> > After Running ESEUTIL /CC c:\temp which is supposed to run the hard 
> > recovery I should be able to Mnt the DB.  After running ESEutil I get
> > the following Error MEssage
> > 
> > "Operation Terminated with error -939586631(Unknown Error, Unknown
> > Error) after 0.30 seconds.
> > 
> > Jeremiah
> > 
> > 
> > > Have you tried this:
> > > Right-click the public folder MAPI tree, and then click 
> > > Properties.=20
> > 
> > > On the Security tab, click to select the Allow inheritable 
> > > permissions
> > 
> > > = from parent to propagate to this object check box.=20 After you 
> > > complete this procedure, wait for Microsoft Active =
> > > Directory(tm)
> > > directory services to replicate the change to all of the domain = 
> > > controllers. After the change has been replicated, you can remount 
> > > the store.=20 =A0
> > > Mark Smith
> > > =A0
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: July 9, 2002 7:57 AM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I hope you gentlemen and ladies can help me on this one.  I have an
> > > Exchange 2000 Server that had 2 of the 3 disks crash that contained
> > > the database files for Exchange.  IE priv.edb and pub.edb,  I have 
> > > since replaced the disks with new ones, Same drive letter, Same 
> > > Config, ETC = and I am having a heckuva time getting exchange to
> mount
> > 
> > > the database after the restore is complete.  It absolutely refuse 
> > > and gives the error
> > > 
> > > An internal processing error has occurred. Try restarting the 
> > > Exchange
> > 
> > > System Manager or the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service,
> > > or
> > 
> > > both.
> > > 
> > > ID no: c1041724=20
> > > Exchange System Manager=20
> > > 
> > > I have tried what MS recommends VIA Q253931 and that doesn't help me
> > > because ESEUTIL Refuses to Finish.  I am trying to restore it from
> the
> > 
> > > Backup Set right now(Again) and will post the Error that ESEUTIL 
> > > gives
> > 
> > > = me After it Finishes.
> > > 
> > > Any ideas, pushes, prods, in the Right Direction would be most =
> > > appreciated and should they let me go to MEC this year, The First
> Rnd
> > > of Beer is On Me.
> > > 
> > > TIA
> > > 
> > > Jeremiah Watson
> > > Composidie, Inc.
> > > 
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at: 
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery

[Jeremiah Watson]

As from MS,  I would've responded sooner but a transformer outside decided
to blow up too. But anyways,
'
stop all services
rename mdbdata folder
start system attendant
start information store

Restore From Backup This recreates :\program files\exchsrvr\mdbdata

rename :\program files\exchsrvr\mdbdata\e00.log-> e00.old
rename :\program files\exchsrvr\mdbdata\e00.chk-> e00o.old

run ":\program files\exchsrvr\bin\eseutil" /cc ":\temp\first storage
group"

Mount The Priv1.edb Store
Mount The pub1.edb store

This is what they said and it worked out great.  Store mounted right up
and everything.

Worth every penny of 245.00US 

Jeremiah


> What did they have you do? 
> 
> --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
> http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 7:25 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery
> 
> 
> That's ok,  I wussed out and called PSS.  FIgured that was about the
> same as the first rnd of drinks with you guys.  ;-)~
> 
> Jeremiah
> 
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q253931
> > (same one that you found)
> > 
> > Sorry I could not be of more help.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:00
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery
> > 
> > 
> > You betcha, Lemme dig em out here.
> > 
> > 9518 and 9519
> > 
> > Jeremiah
> > 
> > 
> > > Any event IDs with that ?
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 08:49
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Yep,  It was checked when I went in there to look at it.  It is 
> > > acting
> > 
> > > like the hard recovery was not run on it.
> > > 
> > > After Running ESEUTIL /CC c:\temp which is supposed to run the hard
> > > recovery I should be able to Mnt the DB.  After running ESEutil I
> get
> > > the following Error MEssage
> > > 
> > > "Operation Terminated with error -939586631(Unknown Error, Unknown
> > > Error) after 0.30 seconds.
> > > 
> > > Jeremiah
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Have you tried this:
> > > > Right-click the public folder MAPI tree, and then click
> > > > Properties.=20
> > > 
> > > > On the Security tab, click to select the Allow inheritable
> > > > permissions
> > > 
> > > > = from parent to propagate to this object check box.=20 After you
> > > > complete this procedure, wait for Microsoft Active =
> > > > Directory(tm)
> > > > directory services to replicate the change to all of the domain =
> > > > controllers. After the change has been replicated, you can remount
> 
> > > > the store.=20 =A0
> > > > Mark Smith
> > > > =A0
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: July 9, 2002 7:57 AM
> > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I hope you gentlemen and ladies can help me on this one.  I have 
> > > > an Exchange 2000 Server that had 2 of the 3 disks crash that 
> > > > contained the database files for Exchange.  IE priv.edb and 
> > > > pub.edb,  I have since replaced the disks with new ones, Same 
> > > > drive letter, Same Config, ETC = and I am having a heckuva time 
> > > > getting exchange to
> > mount
> > > 
> > > > the database after the restore is complete.  It absolutely refuse
> > > > and gives the error
> > > > 
> > > > An internal processing error has occurred. Try restarting the
> > > > Exchange
> > > 
> > > > System Manager or the Microsoft Exchange Information Store 
> > > > service, or
> > > 
> > > > both.
> > > > 
> > > > ID no: c1041724=20
> > > > Exchange System Manager=20
> > > > 
> > > > I have tried what MS recommends VIA Q253931

RE: Exchange Conference

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: RE: Exchange Conference



Its 
Yunz over here in picksburg pennsylvania.  ;-)

  -Original Message-From: Whitby.Charles 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:53 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  Conference
  Isn't it really "Y'all"?
  ( At 
  least in Georgia it is...)
  
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:33 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
Conference
"Yall" is both singular and plural. 
Sherry Abercrombie Data Center 
Administration Team Information Technology 
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 

-Original Message- From: 
Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:24 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Conference 
I thought "Yall" was singular, and the plural was "All 
Yall". 
-Original Message- From: 
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:16 AM To: 
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 
Conference 
I've just about gotten my leadership convinced that I need 
to attend MEC2002 in Anaheim this Oct.  The question that I've been 
asked is to find out if there are any OTHER Exchange conferences that will 
be offered.  Other than some 1/2 day Tech Net briefings related to 
Exchange, I've found nothing searching on Microsoft's event site.  

Do yall know of any other Exchange conference going on in 
the next 6 - 9 months anywhere that would offer as much as or more 
information than MEC2002?  
Hey, my lead knows that I participate in this here list, so 
he'll want to know if you guys know of anything else.  (Actually, he 
wants me to go, it's our CTO that is asking if there's something else 
available.)
Thanks yall!  (Yall is Texan for you all, all of you, 
yous guys etc) 
Sherry Abercrombie Data Center 
Administration Team Information Technology 
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Conference

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Thats 
about a 4.5 hr drive for me.   Most make it in 3.0.  I live 
closer to Pittsburgh, PA

  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:15 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  Conference
  I've 
  got relatives in Hummelstown, PA :)
  Sherry Abercrombie 
  Data Center Administration 
  Team Information 
  Technology "With 
  sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 
  

-Original Message-From: Jeremiah 
Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 
2002 2:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange Conference
Its Yunz over here in picksburg pennsylvania.  
;-)

  -Original Message-From: Whitby.Charles 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 
  2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange Conference
  Isn't it really "Y'all"?
  ( At least in Georgia it is...)
  
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:33 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange Conference
"Yall" is both singular and plural. 
Sherry Abercrombie Data Center 
Administration Team Information 
Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly 
just fine." 
-Original Message- From: 
Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:24 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Conference 
I thought "Yall" was singular, and the plural was "All 
Yall". 
-Original Message- From: 
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
Exchange Conference 
I've just about gotten my leadership convinced that I 
need to attend MEC2002 in Anaheim this Oct.  The question that I've 
been asked is to find out if there are any OTHER Exchange conferences 
that will be offered.  Other than some 1/2 day Tech Net briefings 
related to Exchange, I've found nothing searching on Microsoft's event 
site.  
Do yall know of any other Exchange conference going on 
in the next 6 - 9 months anywhere that would offer as much as or more 
information than MEC2002?  
Hey, my lead knows that I participate in this here list, 
so he'll want to know if you guys know of anything else.  
(Actually, he wants me to go, it's our CTO that is asking if there's 
something else available.)
Thanks yall!  (Yall is Texan for you all, all of 
you, yous guys etc) 
Sherry Abercrombie Data Center 
Administration Team Information Technology 
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: My fav OO response today...

[Jeremiah Watson]

That ain't a wink,  thats a tongue.

;-)~ nyah nyah nyah nyah.

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...


Why are Don's winks coming out as P's?


-Original Message-
From:   TWU-Durham, Ryan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: My fav OO response today...

I'm sorry, I reread my post and it did sound harsh. I stand
corrected.  Word + e-mail editor = personal preference
 
Thanks,
 
Ryan
 
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...
 
This from someone who uses Word as their email editor...  :P
 
I love to answer questions when any proper amount of research has
been done and a nice detailed email is constructed asking for more help
because someone may or may not completely understand what information they
received from the research they've done.
 
As for stupid questions, sorry, never really asked one of those.
I'm just a little bit more than anal about finding the answer myself and
then asking for help if I didn't understand what I was researching.  I
suggest you check the archives for the last 5 years and see how many
questions I have posted to ANY list...  
 
 
-Original Message-
From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...
Hmmm, if you don't like answering questions then why are you
on this list? And don't start talking about stupid questions because I'm
sure at one time you did not know everything like you do now. :-)
 
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...
 
Great!  And that's nowhere to be found in the documentation,
TechNet, google or otherwise is it?
-Original Message-
From: Frey, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...
I believe he's asking how to disable internet ooo's
via 5.5.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...
How can you do what under Exchange 5.5?
 
And you all wonder why I snap the proverbial
gasket  Geez!
-Original Message-
From: Roger Wright
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...
How can I do this under Exchange 5.5?
 
 
Roger Wright
Southern Commerce Bank
___
 
Prior Planning Prevents Piss Poor
Performance. 
 
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...
I turn my OOO on whenever I go on vacation,
but of course, being the good Exchange Admin that I am, I have OOO's to the
internet disabled so that I, nor anyone in my Exchange organization, will
ever be the butt of someones frustration & tirades about those pesky
OOO's.
Sherry Abercrombie 
Data Center Administration Team 

RE: !!!!! group policy error in a sever with exchange

[Jeremiah Watson]

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q257435

check this out.  Hope it helps

Jeremiah

-Original Message-
From: Joupin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ! group policy error in a sever with exchange


Hi

I have the following server
-Windows 2000 Advanced with latest service pack and patches with active
directory installed
-Exchange server with sp2

I recently installed it , and all of the services are working pretty good
BUT a big BUT !

When ever I try to access Groupe policy throw Active directory users
program, it gave me an error like this

" The domain controler for group policy operation is not available, you may
cancel this operation for this session or retry one of the following domain
controller choices:
1. the one with the operation master token for the PDC emulator
2. the one used by active directory snap-in
3.use any available domain controler "

I tried each ot the options but I got an error again regarding access rights
but I logged in as administrator !


Any respond is highly appreciated
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.joupin.com

Joupin



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Conference

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



I 
have, its near clarion.  
 
Do you 
say it 
 
Du 
Bwa  or Du bois?
 
Jeremiah

  -Original Message-From: Kelsey, John 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:41 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  Conference
  I'm 
  in DuBois PA !  Probably never heard of it.
  
-Original Message-From: Jim Holmgren 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 
3:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange Conference
I 
live about 40 minutes south of there.  My college roommate was from 
Hummelstown. 
Small world.
 
-Jim
 

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com 
We bring innovation to interactive 
communication. Advertising.com -- 
Superior Technology. Superior Performance. 

  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:15 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  Conference
  I've got relatives in Hummelstown, PA :)
  Sherry Abercrombie 
  Data Center Administration 
  Team Information 
  Technology "With 
  sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 
  

-Original Message-From: Jeremiah 
Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 
09, 2002 2:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange Conference
Its Yunz over here in picksburg pennsylvania.  
;-)

  -Original Message-From: Whitby.Charles 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 
  2002 2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Exchange Conference
  Isn't it really "Y'all"?
  ( At least in Georgia it is...)
  
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 
2002 2:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
Conference
"Yall" is both singular and plural. 
Sherry Abercrombie Data 
Center Administration Team Information 
Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly 
just fine." 
-Original Message- From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:24 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Conference 
I thought "Yall" was singular, and the plural was 
"All Yall". 
-Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:16 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Conference 
I've just about gotten my leadership convinced that 
I need to attend MEC2002 in Anaheim this Oct.  The question 
that I've been asked is to find out if there are any OTHER Exchange 
conferences that will be offered.  Other than some 1/2 day Tech 
Net briefings related to Exchange, I've found nothing searching on 
Microsoft's event site.  
Do yall know of any other Exchange conference going 
on in the next 6 - 9 months anywhere that would offer as much as or 
more information than MEC2002?  
Hey, my lead knows that I participate in this here 
list, so he'll want to know if you guys know of anything else.  
(Actually, he wants me to go, it's our CTO that is asking if there's 
something else available.)
Thanks yall!  (Yall is Texan for you all, all 
of you, yous guys etc) 
Sherry Abercrombie Data 
Center Administration Team Information 
Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly 
just fine." 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
***The 
information transmitted in this email is intended only forthe person(s) 
or entity to which it is addressed and maycontain confidential and/or 
privileged material. Any review, 

RE: Exchange Conference

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Whoa, 
thats a little personal, but hey thanks for the clarification.  :-)  I 
had somebody who went to clarion U trying to tell me it was Du 
Bwa.

  -Original Message-From: Kelsey, John 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:51 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  Conference
  Its 
  definitely DuBois  (DooBoys)
  
-Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 
11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange Conference
I 
have, its near clarion.  
 
Do 
you say it 
 
Du 
Bwa  or Du bois?
 
Jeremiah

  -Original Message-From: Kelsey, John 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:41 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  Conference
  I'm in DuBois PA !  Probably never heard of 
  it.
  
-Original Message-From: Jim Holmgren 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 
2002 3:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Exchange Conference
I live about 40 minutes south of there.  My college roommate 
was from Hummelstown. 
Small world.
 
-Jim
 

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Network Engineer Advertising.com 
We bring innovation to interactive 
communication. Advertising.com 
-- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. 


  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:15 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange Conference
  I've got relatives in Hummelstown, PA :)
  Sherry 
  Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team 
  Information 
  Technology "With 
  sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 
  

-Original Message-From: 
    Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
Conference
Its Yunz over here in picksburg pennsylvania.  
;-)

  -Original Message-From: 
  Whitby.Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  Conference
  Isn't it really "Y'all"?
  ( At least in Georgia it is...)
  
-Original Message-From: 
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
Conference
"Yall" is both singular and plural. 
Sherry Abercrombie Data 
Center Administration Team Information 
Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs 
fly just fine." 
-Original Message- From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:24 
PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Exchange Conference 

I thought "Yall" was singular, and the plural 
was "All Yall". 
-Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:16 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Conference 
I've just about gotten my leadership convinced 
that I need to attend MEC2002 in Anaheim this Oct.  The 
question that I've been asked is to find out if there are any 
OTHER Exchange conferences that will be offered.  Other 
than some 1/2 day Tech Net briefings related to Exchange, I've 
found nothing searching on Microsoft's event site.  

Do yall know of any other Exchange conference 
going on in the next 6 - 9 months anywhere that would offer as 
much as or more information than MEC2002?  
Hey, my lead knows that I participate in this 
here list, so he'll want to know if you guys know of anything 
else.  (Actually, he wants me to go, it's our CTO that is 
asking if there's something else available.)
Thanks yall!  (Yall is Texan for you all, 
all of you, yous guys etc) 
Sherry Abercromb

RE: Exchange Conference

[Jeremiah Watson]

Title: Message



Yeah,  But us rednecks here in western pa call it DooBoys.  
;-)

  -Original Message-From: Steve Ens 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:19 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  Conference
  I 
  guess if you had any French blood in you, then it would be 
  d'bwa.
  

-Original Message-From: Jeremiah 
Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 
2002 12:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange Conference
Whoa, thats a little personal, but hey thanks for the 
clarification.  :-)  I had somebody who went to clarion U trying 
to tell me it was Du Bwa.

  -Original Message-From: Kelsey, John 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:51 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  Conference
  Its definitely DuBois  (DooBoys)
  
-Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 
11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange Conference
I have, its near clarion.  
 
Do you say it 
 
Du Bwa  or Du bois?
 
Jeremiah

  -Original Message-From: Kelsey, John 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 
  11:41 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange Conference
  I'm in DuBois PA !  Probably never heard of 
  it.
  
-Original Message-From: Jim Holmgren 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 
2002 3:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
Conference
I live about 40 minutes south of there.  My college 
roommate was from Hummelstown. 
Small world.
 
-Jim
 

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Network Engineer 
Advertising.com 
We bring innovation to interactive 
communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior 
Performance. 

  -Original Message-From: 
  Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  Conference
  I've got relatives in Hummelstown, PA 
:)
  Sherry 
  Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team 
  Information 
  Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just 
  fine." 
  

-Original 
    Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 
09, 2002 2:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
Conference
Its Yunz over here in picksburg 
pennsylvania.  ;-)

  -Original Message-From: 
  Whitby.Charles 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 
  09, 2002 2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  Conference
  Isn't it really 
  "Y'all"?
  ( At least in Georgia it 
  is...)
  
-Original 
Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 
2002 2:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
Conference
"Yall" is both singular and plural. 

Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With 
sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 
-Original Message- From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:24 
PM To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 
Conference 
I thought "Yall" was singular, and the 
plural was "All Yall". 
-Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:16 
AM To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues Subject: Exchange 
Conference 
I've just about gotten 

RE: My fav OO response today...

[Jeremiah Watson]

Amen Brother.

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...


Thank God

-Original Message-
From:   Ely, Don [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: My fav OO response today...

The page cannot be found...  :(

-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...


www.clarksupport.com/nakedpicturesofdon.htm ?

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by
Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged
information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the
prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...

I may have to update the little jpg of you that's been circulating.
;)

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...


Actually, I'm antagonizing William and you it would seem.  Thus far
I have
liked all the features/improvements of Office XP.  The integration
is
phenomenal...

D

-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...


I don't know what you think is missing or doesn't work but why not
tell
them? Now it's time to submit such things to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe they get rolled into Outlook 11...



> -Original Message-
> From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:46 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...
> 
> Barely...
>   -Original Message-
>   From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:38 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...
> 
> 
>   It has improved with OfficeXP.
> 
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:15 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...
> 
> 
>   Word + Email editor = Haven for Virus writers...
> 
>   And don't worry about "sounding harsh", takes a lot
more
than
> that to ruffle my feathers...  ;o)
>   -Original Message-
>   From: TWU-Durham, Ryan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:18 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...
> 
> 
>   I'm sorry, I reread my post and it did sound
harsh. I
> stand corrected.  Word + e-mail editor = personal preference
> 
>   Thanks,
> 
>   Ryan
> 
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:01 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: My fav OO response today...
> 
>   This from someone who uses Word as their
email
editor...
> :P
> 
>   I love to answer questions when any proper
amount of
> research has been done and a nice detailed email is constructed
asking
for
> more help because someone may or may not completely understand
what 
  

RE: Users Can't logon to OWA

[Jeremiah Watson]

lol

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 2:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Users Can't logon to OWA


Are they logging in with domainname\username?

-Original Message-
From: Ren Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Users Can't logon to OWA

Anyone have an idea about why users with the same first name can't logon to
OWA after upgrading to Exchange 2000?

I have a user "John Doe" and another user "John Deer" and John Deer can
access OWA, but John Doe, who has been in the system longer can't logon.  I
checked the alias' and the directories with no luck.  I need help on this
one. Can't figure it out.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Users Can't logon to OWA

[Jeremiah Watson]

I wish to retract my earlier statement.  I am now flogging myself for my insolence. 
and I apologize to the list.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 2:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Users Can't logon to OWA


lol

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 2:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Users Can't logon to OWA


Are they logging in with domainname\username?

-Original Message-
From: Ren Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Users Can't logon to OWA

Anyone have an idea about why users with the same first name can't logon to
OWA after upgrading to Exchange 2000?

I have a user "John Doe" and another user "John Deer" and John Deer can
access OWA, but John Doe, who has been in the system longer can't logon.  I
checked the alias' and the directories with no luck.  I need help on this
one. Can't figure it out.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.

[Jeremiah Watson]

Ok Gentleman and ladies here's another one for ya out there in
computerland.

I just go a full T1 circuit installed between us and a remote site and I
am currently trying to configure our CISCO 1720 routers with the Wic1 T1
DSU cards in them to talk to each other via transparent bridging, I know
there are better ways but this is what they want right now.  I think my
config looks good on both sides but I just can't seem to get them to talk.

Here is the config for the one side and the other side is identical with
the obvious changes of ip's.

service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
service password-encryption
service tcp-small-servers
service udp-small-servers
!
hostname 
!
!
ip name-server
!
ip subnet-zero
no ip domain-lookup
no ip routing
!
interface Serial 0
 no shutdown
 description connected to NB
 service-module t1 clock source line
 service-module t1 data-coding normal
 service-module t1 remote-loopback full
 service-module t1 framing esf
 service-module t1 linecode b8zs
 service-module t1 lbo none
 service-module t1 remote-alarm-enable
 ip address 192.20.53.163 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation hdlc
 bridge-group 1
 keepalive
 no ip-directed-broadcast
 no ip route-cache
!
interface FastEthernet 0
 no shutdown
 description connected to CE
 ip address 192.20.53.163 255.255.255.0
 no ip route-cache
 full-duplex
 bridge-group 1
!
ip classless
no ip http server
!
snmp-server community public RO
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
bridge 1 protocol ieee
!
line console 0
 transport input none 
 line aux 0
 line vty 0 4
 login
!
no scheduler allocate
end

Anybody have any ideas on it?  oh and should they both get their clock
from the line or should one get it from the other?  I'm so confused and
tired of fighting with it.

TIA

Jeremiah Watson
Composidie, Inc.

724 727 4622

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.

[Jeremiah Watson]

Won't they charge me an arm and a leg?  or they won't because they're new?

Jeremiah

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.


Best advice is to call Cisco. They will help you get configured right. 

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.

Ok Gentleman and ladies here's another one for ya out there in
computerland.

I just go a full T1 circuit installed between us and a remote site and I
am currently trying to configure our CISCO 1720 routers with the Wic1 T1
DSU cards in them to talk to each other via transparent bridging, I know
there are better ways but this is what they want right now.  I think my
config looks good on both sides but I just can't seem to get them to talk.

Here is the config for the one side and the other side is identical with
the obvious changes of ip's.

service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
service password-encryption
service tcp-small-servers
service udp-small-servers
!
hostname 
!
!
ip name-server
!
ip subnet-zero
no ip domain-lookup
no ip routing
!
interface Serial 0
 no shutdown
 description connected to NB
 service-module t1 clock source line
 service-module t1 data-coding normal
 service-module t1 remote-loopback full
 service-module t1 framing esf
 service-module t1 linecode b8zs
 service-module t1 lbo none
 service-module t1 remote-alarm-enable
 ip address 192.20.53.163 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation hdlc
 bridge-group 1
 keepalive
 no ip-directed-broadcast
 no ip route-cache
!
interface FastEthernet 0
 no shutdown
 description connected to CE
 ip address 192.20.53.163 255.255.255.0
 no ip route-cache
 full-duplex
 bridge-group 1
!
ip classless
no ip http server
!
snmp-server community public RO
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
bridge 1 protocol ieee
!
line console 0
 transport input none 
 line aux 0
 line vty 0 4
 login
!
no scheduler allocate
end

Anybody have any ideas on it?  oh and should they both get their clock
from the line or should one get it from the other?  I'm so confused and
tired of fighting with it.

TIA

Jeremiah Watson
Composidie, Inc.

724 727 4622

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.

[Jeremiah Watson]

That's excellent,  do you happen to have the number handy?

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.


They won't because they are new. Although, come to think of it, I don't
think Cisco has ever charged me.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.

Won't they charge me an arm and a leg?  or they won't because they're new?

Jeremiah

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.


Best advice is to call Cisco. They will help you get configured right. 

-----Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.

Ok Gentleman and ladies here's another one for ya out there in
computerland.

I just go a full T1 circuit installed between us and a remote site and I
am currently trying to configure our CISCO 1720 routers with the Wic1 T1
DSU cards in them to talk to each other via transparent bridging, I know
there are better ways but this is what they want right now.  I think my
config looks good on both sides but I just can't seem to get them to talk.

Here is the config for the one side and the other side is identical with
the obvious changes of ip's.

service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
service password-encryption
service tcp-small-servers
service udp-small-servers
!
hostname 
!
!
ip name-server
!
ip subnet-zero
no ip domain-lookup
no ip routing
!
interface Serial 0
 no shutdown
 description connected to NB
 service-module t1 clock source line
 service-module t1 data-coding normal
 service-module t1 remote-loopback full
 service-module t1 framing esf
 service-module t1 linecode b8zs
 service-module t1 lbo none
 service-module t1 remote-alarm-enable
 ip address 192.20.53.163 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation hdlc
 bridge-group 1
 keepalive
 no ip-directed-broadcast
 no ip route-cache
!
interface FastEthernet 0
 no shutdown
 description connected to CE
 ip address 192.20.53.163 255.255.255.0
 no ip route-cache
 full-duplex
 bridge-group 1
!
ip classless
no ip http server
!
snmp-server community public RO
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
bridge 1 protocol ieee
!
line console 0
 transport input none 
 line aux 0
 line vty 0 4
 login
!
no scheduler allocate
end

Anybody have any ideas on it?  oh and should they both get their clock
from the line or should one get it from the other?  I'm so confused and
tired of fighting with it.

TIA

Jeremiah Watson
Composidie, Inc.

724 727 4622

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.

[Jeremiah Watson]

Thanks a million.  :-0  we'll see if I can't get them things a workin now.  

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 4:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.


Yep..

800 553 2447 

-Original Message-----
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.

That's excellent,  do you happen to have the number handy?

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.


They won't because they are new. Although, come to think of it, I don't
think Cisco has ever charged me.

-Original Message-----
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.

Won't they charge me an arm and a leg?  or they won't because they're new?

Jeremiah

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.


Best advice is to call Cisco. They will help you get configured right. 

-----Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: A little OT but Cisco Routers are giving me Fits.

Ok Gentleman and ladies here's another one for ya out there in
computerland.

I just go a full T1 circuit installed between us and a remote site and I
am currently trying to configure our CISCO 1720 routers with the Wic1 T1
DSU cards in them to talk to each other via transparent bridging, I know
there are better ways but this is what they want right now.  I think my
config looks good on both sides but I just can't seem to get them to talk.

Here is the config for the one side and the other side is identical with
the obvious changes of ip's.

service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
service password-encryption
service tcp-small-servers
service udp-small-servers
!
hostname 
!
!
ip name-server
!
ip subnet-zero
no ip domain-lookup
no ip routing
!
interface Serial 0
 no shutdown
 description connected to NB
 service-module t1 clock source line
 service-module t1 data-coding normal
 service-module t1 remote-loopback full
 service-module t1 framing esf
 service-module t1 linecode b8zs
 service-module t1 lbo none
 service-module t1 remote-alarm-enable
 ip address 192.20.53.163 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation hdlc
 bridge-group 1
 keepalive
 no ip-directed-broadcast
 no ip route-cache
!
interface FastEthernet 0
 no shutdown
 description connected to CE
 ip address 192.20.53.163 255.255.255.0
 no ip route-cache
 full-duplex
 bridge-group 1
!
ip classless
no ip http server
!
snmp-server community public RO
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
bridge 1 protocol ieee
!
line console 0
 transport input none 
 line aux 0
 line vty 0 4
 login
!
no scheduler allocate
end

Anybody have any ideas on it?  oh and should they both get their clock
from the line or should one get it from the other?  I'm so confused and
tired of fighting with it.

TIA

Jeremiah Watson
Composidie, Inc.

724 727 4622

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm