RE: Change name?
Well, all the remarks so far are right on, but, what's with the name change anyway. I understand that people get married, but in the case of women, nearly all women that I know who have married since becoming a member of working society, want to keep their maiden names, mostly to prevent confusion. Of course, if a women wants to use her married name, then she had better get the word out to all her contacts to eliminate confusion. My daughter uses her maiden name for work and her married name for all other purposes. I'm aware of women who ultimately were divorced and then had issues because they wanted to resume their maiden name, and caused confusion. Then of course there are hypenated last names. Ah well, it's good to be a man, no name issues.unless there's a gender change!! LOL Murray -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Change name? Ok, we are about to go live with Exchange 2003 as our internet email server. The question came up today if a user gets married/divorced and changes their name how will they get their email. Since brenda.sm...@host.com will get changed to brenda.jo...@host.com the customer that sends brenda.sm...@host.com will get an NDR?? Correct??
Spoofed Email
Our domain name is alanet.org, and lately we are getting hammered by sp**m sent to alanet.org.support. It's obvious that the actual sender name in the email is a staff name, and the alanet.org.support is the display name. Does any one know of a filter or rule that can utilize the display name to do the filtering? Murray
RE: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters
BTW, has anyone notice a huge drop in the number of sp*m for the last week? Murray -Original Message- From: Steve Szabo [mailto:steve...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 10:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters I loaded it, but had to remove it. Although it comes highly recommended, it caused me all kinds of grief with Outlook. I have Outlook 2007 running on Windows XP and Exchange 2007 on SBS 2008. \\Steve// -Original Message- From: Robert Smith [mailto:exch...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters Has anyone had any experience with OutlookSpy, someone suggested that this utility would give the exact portion of an email that has been flagged. Thanks On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Robert Smith exch...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any way to determine which links in an email triggered the anti phishing filters in Outlook? We have had several emails coming in from consultants that have been flagged as suspicious therefore disabling all links. Being that there are multiple links in these emails, it would be nice to know which link(s) are triggering the filter. Thanks, Bob
RE: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters
Well, the volume is so low that most of the Viagra and other similar types are gone. As an example of volume, normally I receive somewhere between 300 and 500 items per day. But about 2 weeks ago, it was in the thousands per day. Then, this week, it's dropped to less than 100 per day. That's why I brought the subject up. Is it just mee or is it the World? Murray -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters It's not too surprising really; every site's spam, including sources of the spam, is different. I haven't heard of any major botnet takedowns, but you never know. I guess the real question is, have you noticed a particular type of spam that has dropped off? Lately we've been getting a lot more pharma spam from the freemail providers. ~JasonG -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:joe.poched...@fivesgroup.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 11:25 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: [M] [MARKETING] RE: [M] [MARKETING] RE: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters For some reason there's been a drop here... From about 70K - 80K per day (weekdays, weekends are always lower)...to 40K early this week. It's crept back to 55-60K the past day though. JP -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 9:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [M] [MARKETING] RE: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters Not really any spike here, but clearly an upward trend. http://i44.tinypic.com/u8005.png All the best, ~JasonG -Original Message- From: Reische Jay [mailto:reische...@johndeere.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 09:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: [M] [MARKETING] RE: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters I have seen a huge spike. cid:summary_chart cid:chart Jay Reische Enterprise Exchange Administrator Messaging, AD and DNS Phone: 309-748-9422 reische...@johndeere.com -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters BTW, has anyone notice a huge drop in the number of sp*m for the last week? Murray -Original Message- From: Steve Szabo [mailto:steve...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 10:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters I loaded it, but had to remove it. Although it comes highly recommended, it caused me all kinds of grief with Outlook. I have Outlook 2007 running on Windows XP and Exchange 2007 on SBS 2008. \\Steve// -Original Message- From: Robert Smith [mailto:exch...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters Has anyone had any experience with OutlookSpy, someone suggested that this utility would give the exact portion of an email that has been flagged. Thanks On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Robert Smith exch...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any way to determine which links in an email triggered the anti phishing filters in Outlook? We have had several emails coming in from consultants that have been flagged as suspicious therefore disabling all links. Being that there are multiple links in these emails, it would be nice to know which link(s) are triggering the filter. Thanks, Bob
RE: Question
Our installation is very similar to yours, but a little smaller in terms of users. We use Outlook 2K3 only and have for nearly 7 years. No real issues in that time, and all we do is backup nitely! We will be upgrading to Exchange 2K7 in a month, but just because it's about time to do so. Murray Freeman IT Manager Association of Legal Administrators 75 Tri-State International Suite 222 Lincolnshire, IL 60069-4435 847.267.1252 TEL 847.267.1329 FAX 847.267.1367 DIRECT mfree...@alanet.org www.alanet.org Your connection to knowledge, resources and networking From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Question Hello all, OK, I am what you would call a novice Exchange admin, I try to keep everything running and hope for the best. I am told that there are lots of 'utilities' and procedures I can run to make sure everything is really OK. So what I am hoping for is suggestions of daily, weekly, monthly and annual procedures I can run to keep think sane. As a little background, it is a single Exchange 2003 server and about 50 Outlook 2003/2007 users. 5 of the users actually use OWA. It is a pretty simple set-up. http://www.sonomatilemakers.com/ http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sonoma-Tilemakers/207157171190 image004.jpgimage003.jpg
RE: outlook signature issues
Exactly correct. I've found that when I send an email to someone outside of our company, when they reply, the script signature I use comes back as non script in a totally different font. It's obviously a question of what the receipient is using as a email client and the fonts available. Murray From: Eric Woodford [mailto:ericwoodf...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 12:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: outlook signature issues What James is getting at is often people use fancy script fonts in the signature, not realizing that they translate to something else if the recipient doesn't have the exact match. On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Jimmy Tran jt...@teachtci.com wrote: I'm not sure. The recipient is outside of our company and could be using webmail from the ISP. I think when the recipient initially reads the email, the signature is fine but when they reply it gets messed up. Jimmy From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 9:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: outlook signature issues Does the recipient have the same font installed? On 20 April 2010 17:20, Jimmy Tran jt...@teachtci.com wrote: Hello, I have a user who reported that her signature font was very large when the recipient replied back to her email. The signature in the original email that was sent looks fine but once the recipient replies back, the original signature is magnified many times. I've actually seen this happen before with replies on this message board. Does anyone have any idea's why Outlook is doing this? She is using Outlook 2007 with Exchange 2003. Thanks, Jimmy -- On two occasions..I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question
RE: test
Whaat test? I didn't receive it Murray From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: test EPIC FAIL! John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:chris.pohlschnei...@hollowayusa.com] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: test test Chris Pohlschneider Holloway Sportswear Network Administrator chris.pohlschnei...@hollowayusa.com 937-494-2559 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
OUTLOOK IS RETREIVING DATA MESSAGE
First, we're running Exchange Server 2K3 on Windows Server 2K3 and using Outlook 2K3 as the client. Several of my users are getting the Outlook is retreiving data message along with slowness and occassionally a white screen. Any ideas as to the cause? It hasn't happened to me, but it has happened to another administrator. The rest of our users are restricted users. Murray Freeman IT Manager Association of Legal Administrators 75 Tri-State International Suite 222 Lincolnshire, IL 60069-4435 847.267.1252 TEL 847.267.1329 FAX 847.267.1367 DIRECT mfree...@alanet.org www.alanet.org Your connection to knowledge, resources and networking
RE: OUTLOOK IS RETREIVING DATA MESSAGE
No, we're not using cached mode here. Murray From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 2:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OUTLOOK IS RETREIVING DATA MESSAGE Hi Murray Are the users in cached mode? On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Murray Freeman mfree...@alanet.org wrote: First, we're running Exchange Server 2K3 on Windows Server 2K3 and using Outlook 2K3 as the client. Several of my users are getting the Outlook is retreiving data message along with slowness and occassionally a white screen. Any ideas as to the cause? It hasn't happened to me, but it has happened to another administrator. The rest of our users are restricted users. Murray Freeman IT Manager Association of Legal Administrators 75 Tri-State International Suite 222 Lincolnshire, IL 60069-4435 847.267.1252 TEL 847.267.1329 FAX 847.267.1367 DIRECT mfree...@alanet.org www.alanet.org http://www.alanet.org/ Your connection to knowledge, resources and networking
SUING IPHONE TO CONNECT TO EXCHANGE SERVER 2003
We have a user that has an iPhone and wants to use it to access email from our Exchange Server 2003. We've done some research and followed the instructions, but still have trouble. Any ideas, or instructions would be appreciated. The iPhone is a 3G s. Murray
RE: SUING IPHONE TO CONNECT TO EXCHANGE SERVER 2003
OK, they pay me for my knowledge (or lack thereof), not for my typing ability! LOL Yes, the instructions for using ActiveSync. Murray From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 2:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: SUING IPHONE TO CONNECT TO EXCHANGE SERVER 2003 http://www.petri.co.il/problems_with_forms_based_authentication_and_ssl_ in_activesync.htm On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Richard Stovall richard.stov...@researchdata.com wrote: Seriously, what instructions did you follow? (Just the instructions for using ActiveSync, or IMAP, or whatever you've decided on. Not the instructions for suing your iPhone. I don't hate mine that much yet.) From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SUING IPHONE TO CONNECT TO EXCHANGE SERVER 2003 What instructions did you follow? :-) From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 2:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SUING IPHONE TO CONNECT TO EXCHANGE SERVER 2003 We have a user that has an iPhone and wants to use it to access email from our Exchange Server 2003. We've done some research and followed the instructions, but still have trouble. Any ideas, or instructions would be appreciated. The iPhone is a 3G s. Murray -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke
INTERMITTANT SEND ISSUE IN OUTLOOK 2003
We're using Server 2K3 along with Exchange 2K3 and Outlook 2K3 and this morning a staff member called me because he had tried to send an email, but got a message that it wasn't sent and to see an administrator. This has never happened here before. I suggested that we cut and paste the message into another email and that worked. When we went back to delete the original, we got the message that the email had been moved or previously deleted. He told me the problem occurred again a couple of times, and I assume that he used the cut and paste trick. We have a staff of 40 and no other staff member has complained of this issue. Any ideas as to what is happening here? Murray
RE: INTERMITTANT SEND ISSUE IN OUTLOOK 2003
He was in a big hurry prior to going out of town, so as soon as I helped him cut paste and resend, he packed up and left. I'm not sure this will occurr again soon, and no other staff member has reported this issue. Nevertheless, I did a search, and didn't come up with anything difinitive. Murray From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: INTERMITTANT SEND ISSUE IN OUTLOOK 2003 What was the exact message that he received that said it wasn't sent? - Original Message - From: Murray Freeman mailto:mfree...@alanet.org To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:04 AM Subject: INTERMITTANT SEND ISSUE IN OUTLOOK 2003 We're using Server 2K3 along with Exchange 2K3 and Outlook 2K3 and this morning a staff member called me because he had tried to send an email, but got a message that it wasn't sent and to see an administrator. This has never happened here before. I suggested that we cut and paste the message into another email and that worked. When we went back to delete the original, we got the message that the email had been moved or previously deleted. He told me the problem occurred again a couple of times, and I assume that he used the cut and paste trick. We have a staff of 40 and no other staff member has complained of this issue. Any ideas as to what is happening here? Murray
RE: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE
WOW! First, let me give some additional info. We are a not-for-profit association and only do blast email to our membership. Our plan is to do all our 'blasts at night when the email server is quiet. Finally, our blasts are in rather small numbers, as we only have 10,000 members and rarely blast to the entire membership. Typical blasts are less than 2000, and then only about 5 to 10 times per month. The reason for bringing the blasts in house is to save money and thus have more funding for IT stuff! With that in mind, any suggestions to the software I might need to provide stats? However, I do appreciate your warnings! Murray From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 8:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE +1 why would you want to risk your business continuity ( and viability ) by 'blast email' in-house ??? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 9:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE Indeed. It's not worth the disruption of your critical business email by having your company mail servers blacklisted and RBL'd. From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 7:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE I think you will find many of us who had it in house fought for ages to get it out. Consider yourself lucky and leave it out. From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 10:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE + a billion. From personal experience. Dont do it. -- ME2 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Martin Blackstone mblackst...@gmail.com wrote: Murray, Unless you want to end up on a bunch of RBL's and other fun things that go along with doing your own email blasts, I would keep doing things just the way you are doing them. Nothing good comes out of bringing this inhouse. From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE We currently outsource our blast email. I'd like to consider doing it internally. The outsource company reports on such things as who opened the email, who didn't, etc. Anyone here doing their own blast email and collecting statistics? Obviously I need to be able to provide much the same info if I'm to take over blast email activities. Murray ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. **
RE: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE
Hey, I thank everyone for their comments. I can tell you that we used to do all the blasts in house at night, and frankly never had any problems at all. Our marketing Dept, prompted by one former employee, decided that our blasts should go out during the daytime because in her words, people read their email between 10AM and 2PM. I didn't want to argue because it would be a waste of time. Frankly, the great majority of people read their email first thing in the morning and my feelings are that sending at nite guarantees that the email will be read early on before people get involved in other stuff like meetings. End result, Marketing went outside and spends enough money that would definitely allow us to redirect funds to better uses. We are not having a good year, and our CEO has mandated that we need to reduce expenses, and thus Marketing was told to start doing the blasts in house. We sent a large blast last evening, the full membership, and no problems, no slow down. Of course it was sent during the middle of the night! My thought was to continue to do the blasts in house, but marketing wants the stats and info provided by the outsource organization and thus I wanted to secure the software necessary. So, I appreciate the comments, but I don't agree with them. I suspect that for the rest of the year, the blasts will be in house with no stats reporting, so maybe they will continue after the first of the year without them. Murray From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:klu...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE +1. I worked for a firm that people PAID us to send them emails. Paid us a pretty good amount of money. Subscription based that they renewed monthly or yearly. They would still report us and cause us problems. I wouldn't bring it in house. If your current firm is costing so much that bringing in house frees up funding for other stuff, then put out an RFP and get competitive bids. Get the price down. If you bring it in house, plan on commiting a good portion of a techs time dealing with issues. Compare the service price to 1/4 to 1/3 of a tech's salary. On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: Another thing to keep in mind is that most people are idiots. If they get a message they don't want, they'll click the Spam button in their mail program. In many mail systems, that gets reported to a master list, and counts against you. It doesn't matter that the user asked for the subscription, that they confirmed the subscription, that they used to want it, that there is an unsubscribe link, that you're standing behind them telling them not to click Spam. To a luser, Spam means I don't want to read this email right this minute. (Later on, they will also complain that they're not getting the mail anymore.) -- Ben
BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE
We currently outsource our blast email. I'd like to consider doing it internally. The outsource company reports on such things as who opened the email, who didn't, etc. Anyone here doing their own blast email and collecting statistics? Obviously I need to be able to provide much the same info if I'm to take over blast email activities. Murray
PUSHING EMAIL TO CELL PHONES
We currently have a single user (our CEO) who we are pushing email to from our Exchanger Server 2K3. We are using Blackberry's client software installed on his workstation to accomplish this. But it is becomming obvious that we may need to provide this to more staff members. I'm aware that we can get the Blackberry Server version of their software, but I'm wondering if there is other software available that can push email to non-Blackberry devices. Also, will the Blackberry Server version push to non-Blackberry devices? Murray
BLOCKING SPOOFED INTERNAL EMAIL--FOLLOW UP!
I really appreciate the responses to my request for help blocking spoofed Internal email. I did some research and found that Exchange Server 2K3 has some potential to assist with this issue, but there is one problem. If we use the *...@alant.org in the SPF, we then create a problem with legitimate email coming from an external mail server, our website which is hosted by a third party. So, when we have registration for one of our conferences or meetings, those people who register thru the website will be blocked by our SPF. Is there any way to create an exception list. I haven't seen any documentation on this during my research. Murray
BLOCKING SPOOFED INTERNAL EMAIL
Lately we're getting a lot of sp*m that appear to be coming from our own staff. It's easy to spot, but our sp*m filter isn't catching them. The reason they are easy to spot is the FROM has the full address as oppossed to just the display name. Is it possible to create an Outlook rule to block these? Is it possible to create a rule at the Exchange Server level? And finally, if the rule works, will it impact email created in OWA. We're using Outlook 2K3, Exchange 2K3 and Windows Server 2K3. Murray
RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING
Well, my testing over the last 2 days confirms that the problem is caused by users trying to open Outlook following log on and thus the workstations are still busy doing housekeeping. If they wait about 5 minutes or so, the Outlook client opens within 10 seconds. Thanks for all the suggestions. Murray
RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING
Actually, it does open faster if I use all caps! Murray -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Typing email subjects in all caps isnt going to help that client-side performance issue. -- ME2 On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Murray Freemanmfree...@alanet.org wrote: I've done some research before posting this issue, and can't find any good suggestions, so I'm going to the Source. We have Exchange Server 2K3 running on a Windows Server 2K3 and use the Outlook 2K3 Client. Recently we are having significant slowness upon opening the client first thing in the morning after logging into the network. Later in the day, if opening the client after closing the client, the client loads very fast, within a few seconds. We'd surely like to determine the cause of the slowness or at least a fix. Since we have staggered start times here, it's not like everyone is opening the client at the very same time. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Murray
RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING
Running XP SP3 and yes, all our workstations are Dell! Murray From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 6:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Are you running Vista 64 bit? Is this a Dell PC? Bob Fronk P Please print only as needed. From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING I've done some research before posting this issue, and can't find any good suggestions, so I'm going to the Source. We have Exchange Server 2K3 running on a Windows Server 2K3 and use the Outlook 2K3 Client. Recently we are having significant slowness upon opening the client first thing in the morning after logging into the network. Later in the day, if opening the client after closing the client, the client loads very fast, within a few seconds. We'd surely like to determine the cause of the slowness or at least a fix. Since we have staggered start times here, it's not like everyone is opening the client at the very same time. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Murray
RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING
We are not using Cached Mode. Murray -Original Message- From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Cached mode? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Actually, it does open faster if I use all caps! Murray -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Typing email subjects in all caps isnt going to help that client-side performance issue. -- ME2 On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Murray Freemanmfree...@alanet.org wrote: I've done some research before posting this issue, and can't find any good suggestions, so I'm going to the Source. We have Exchange Server 2K3 running on a Windows Server 2K3 and use the Outlook 2K3 Client. Recently we are having significant slowness upon opening the client first thing in the morning after logging into the network. Later in the day, if opening the client after closing the client, the client loads very fast, within a few seconds. We'd surely like to determine the cause of the slowness or at least a fix. Since we have staggered start times here, it's not like everyone is opening the client at the very same time. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Murray This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING
I did, and no difference. MMF -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Try using it. -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 6:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING We are not using Cached Mode. Murray -Original Message- From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Cached mode? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Actually, it does open faster if I use all caps! Murray -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Typing email subjects in all caps isnt going to help that client-side performance issue. -- ME2 On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Murray Freemanmfree...@alanet.org wrote: I've done some research before posting this issue, and can't find any good suggestions, so I'm going to the Source. We have Exchange Server 2K3 running on a Windows Server 2K3 and use the Outlook 2K3 Client. Recently we are having significant slowness upon opening the client first thing in the morning after logging into the network. Later in the day, if opening the client after closing the client, the client loads very fast, within a few seconds. We'd surely like to determine the cause of the slowness or at least a fix. Since we have staggered start times here, it's not like everyone is opening the client at the very same time. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Murray This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING
We're using McAfee for A/V, but the interesting part is in the afternoon, when I tested, Outlook opened just fine. Murray -Original Message- From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING So if everyone is having an issue, what is the load on the server store? What do you have on the backend (AV product that may be scanning the store?) If everyone is experiencing this, I would start with the server / store and see what is occurring before I would point on the clients. If the store is ok, how about a switch? Bad port? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING It's not a single user, it's everyone. Murray -Original Message- From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Also, is the free / busy scheduler updating for this particular user? I just had an issue with a user and I had to break cached mode and reset cached mode and it started operating normally...strange but that was the issue... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Try using it. -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 6:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING We are not using Cached Mode. Murray -Original Message- From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Cached mode? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Actually, it does open faster if I use all caps! Murray -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Typing email subjects in all caps isnt going to help that client-side performance issue. -- ME2 On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Murray Freemanmfree...@alanet.org wrote: I've done some research before posting this issue, and can't find any good suggestions, so I'm going to the Source. We have Exchange Server 2K3 running on a Windows Server 2K3 and use the Outlook 2K3 Client. Recently we are having significant slowness upon opening the client first thing in the morning after logging into the network. Later in the day, if opening the client after closing the client, the client loads very fast, within a few seconds. We'd surely like to determine the cause of the slowness or at least a fix. Since we have staggered start times here, it's not like everyone is opening the client at the very same time. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Murray This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING
It's not a single user, it's everyone. Murray -Original Message- From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Also, is the free / busy scheduler updating for this particular user? I just had an issue with a user and I had to break cached mode and reset cached mode and it started operating normally...strange but that was the issue... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Try using it. -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 6:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING We are not using Cached Mode. Murray -Original Message- From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Cached mode? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Actually, it does open faster if I use all caps! Murray -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Typing email subjects in all caps isnt going to help that client-side performance issue. -- ME2 On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Murray Freemanmfree...@alanet.org wrote: I've done some research before posting this issue, and can't find any good suggestions, so I'm going to the Source. We have Exchange Server 2K3 running on a Windows Server 2K3 and use the Outlook 2K3 Client. Recently we are having significant slowness upon opening the client first thing in the morning after logging into the network. Later in the day, if opening the client after closing the client, the client loads very fast, within a few seconds. We'd surely like to determine the cause of the slowness or at least a fix. Since we have staggered start times here, it's not like everyone is opening the client at the very same time. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Murray This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING
Well, I tried opening Outlook in safe mode and what a difference. It takes 17 seconds in normal mode and 8 seconds in safe mode. Murray -Original Message- From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Murray, my guess would be that the AV maybe (possibly) scanning the store and causing a spike that would effect the client accessing the store. That would be my guess :) -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING We're using McAfee for A/V, but the interesting part is in the afternoon, when I tested, Outlook opened just fine. Murray -Original Message- From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING So if everyone is having an issue, what is the load on the server store? What do you have on the backend (AV product that may be scanning the store?) If everyone is experiencing this, I would start with the server / store and see what is occurring before I would point on the clients. If the store is ok, how about a switch? Bad port? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING It's not a single user, it's everyone. Murray -Original Message- From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Also, is the free / busy scheduler updating for this particular user? I just had an issue with a user and I had to break cached mode and reset cached mode and it started operating normally...strange but that was the issue... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Try using it. -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 6:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING We are not using Cached Mode. Murray -Original Message- From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Cached mode? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Actually, it does open faster if I use all caps! Murray -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Typing email subjects in all caps isnt going to help that client-side performance issue. -- ME2 On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Murray Freemanmfree...@alanet.org wrote: I've done some research before posting this issue, and can't find any good suggestions, so I'm going to the Source. We have Exchange Server 2K3 running on a Windows Server 2K3 and use the Outlook 2K3 Client. Recently we are having significant slowness upon opening the client first thing in the morning after logging into the network. Later in the day, if opening the client after closing the client, the client loads very fast, within a few seconds. We'd surely like to determine the cause of the slowness or at least a fix. Since we have staggered start times here, it's not like everyone is opening the client at the very same time. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Murray This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses
RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING
Thank you for all the suggestions. I tried opening in Safe Mode and shutting down all the Add-ins and then testing with each of our add-ins. End result, virtually the same speed in opening Outlook. Finally, I then logged out of our network, and then logged back in. I waited until it appeared that the login process was complete, and immediately opened Outlook in normal mode. It took 37 seconds. I then closed Outlook and reopened it after waiting a few seconds. It took 8 seconds. I believe the problem is related to the login process and not a problem with Outlook. I'll test again tomorrow morning but I suspect the results will be the same. Thanks again for the suggestions. Murray
RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING
Workstations and off line folders. Murray From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 1:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Laptops or workstations? Offline folders? From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Running XP SP3 and yes, all our workstations are Dell! Murray From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 6:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Are you running Vista 64 bit? Is this a Dell PC? Bob Fronk P Please print only as needed. From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING I've done some research before posting this issue, and can't find any good suggestions, so I'm going to the Source. We have Exchange Server 2K3 running on a Windows Server 2K3 and use the Outlook 2K3 Client. Recently we are having significant slowness upon opening the client first thing in the morning after logging into the network. Later in the day, if opening the client after closing the client, the client loads very fast, within a few seconds. We'd surely like to determine the cause of the slowness or at least a fix. Since we have staggered start times here, it's not like everyone is opening the client at the very same time. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Murray
RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING
I think I may have misunderstood the original question. My interpretation of offline meant that the folders are not stored on the Exchange Server, but are included in the Outlook folder list. We did this to reduce the amount of space neede on the Exchange Server. We refer to these files as offline here. Murray From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Why are you running offline folders on workstations? From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Workstations and off line folders. Murray From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 1:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Laptops or workstations? Offline folders? From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Running XP SP3 and yes, all our workstations are Dell! Murray From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 6:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Are you running Vista 64 bit? Is this a Dell PC? Bob Fronk P Please print only as needed. From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING I've done some research before posting this issue, and can't find any good suggestions, so I'm going to the Source. We have Exchange Server 2K3 running on a Windows Server 2K3 and use the Outlook 2K3 Client. Recently we are having significant slowness upon opening the client first thing in the morning after logging into the network. Later in the day, if opening the client after closing the client, the client loads very fast, within a few seconds. We'd surely like to determine the cause of the slowness or at least a fix. Since we have staggered start times here, it's not like everyone is opening the client at the very same time. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Murray
OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING
I've done some research before posting this issue, and can't find any good suggestions, so I'm going to the Source. We have Exchange Server 2K3 running on a Windows Server 2K3 and use the Outlook 2K3 Client. Recently we are having significant slowness upon opening the client first thing in the morning after logging into the network. Later in the day, if opening the client after closing the client, the client loads very fast, within a few seconds. We'd surely like to determine the cause of the slowness or at least a fix. Since we have staggered start times here, it's not like everyone is opening the client at the very same time. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Murray
RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING
It's usually immediately after logging in, but, I've tested in the afternoon, by logging out, and then logging in and immediately opening the client. It moves fast in the afternoon. Tomorrow morning, I'll log into my workstation and then wait about 10 minutes before opening the client. Murray From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING Is the slowness in opeing Outlook for the first time, or opening immediately after login? IOW - If you log in and wait for any group policy application, startup scritpts, etc to complete, is it still slow to open the first time, or is in only if you open it immediately after logging in? From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OUTLOOK 2003 VERY SLOW OPENING I've done some research before posting this issue, and can't find any good suggestions, so I'm going to the Source. We have Exchange Server 2K3 running on a Windows Server 2K3 and use the Outlook 2K3 Client. Recently we are having significant slowness upon opening the client first thing in the morning after logging into the network. Later in the day, if opening the client after closing the client, the client loads very fast, within a few seconds. We'd surely like to determine the cause of the slowness or at least a fix. Since we have staggered start times here, it's not like everyone is opening the client at the very same time. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Murray ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. **
RE: Very Important Swine Flu Tip
Actually, the so-called Swine flu is merely an attempt by the Obama Administration to take attention away from the really important things such as oh well, the economy! I think it's working because I just heard a radio report that some experts now believe our economy has turned the corner. In truth, Americans are not as well educated and as smart as was once believed, and tend to panic easily. I've travelled to China 6 times in the last four years with side trips to Singapore and Tokyo. It's amazing to see people wearing surgical masks on a regular basis even when there is no pandemic panic. The Japanese are easily the most panicky, and the Chinese second. My son and his family have lived in China for 4 years and so far haven't had any illness. My wife and I haven't had any problems either. People need to calm down! Murray From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 3:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Very Important Swine Flu Tip This is really getting out of hand, read the statistics folks, the yearly average of people in the United States that die from influenza is close to 36,000. That's thirty six thousand people, yet we don't hear pandemic fearmongering over that do we? No, this is blatant media manipulation to cause widespread panic IMO. Is it serious, sure it is, but no more serious than any other strain of influenza that happens every year in the US and around the world. Do the common sense things that we all should be doing any way and quit walking in fear over this. I'd like to know how many people die in a year from the flu in Tarrant County TX, and we never hear about it, nor do we close the entire school district for 7 school days because of one confirmed case at one school, that did not result in a death. (Ok, there are several other suspected cases in several other schools, but not yet confirmed). Ok, I'll quit my rant now, all the above is my personal opinion only. On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Jay Dale jd...@xpresstel.com wrote: All I know is, the stores here in Houston are running out of Anti-bacterial products left and right. So there may be more of a concern than one might think... Just be cautious people... Jay -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz +AFs-mailto:jasongurtz+AEA-npumail.com+AF0- mailto:jasongurtz%2BAEA-npumail.com%2BAF0- Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 2:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Very Important Swine Flu Tip +AD4- Don't do this... Pretty funny and I hope everyone is staying calm and not getting too wigged out over this whole thing. Ask yourself: what +ACU- of 6,000,000,000 is 257? Then, multiply that percentage ten-fold just to be safe. That 0.4283+ACU- is just about how worried I am. When we start creeping in to the mere tenths of a percent let me know. :) +AH4-JasonG, who will still be washing his hands often, just like he's done every other day for many years now. +AH4- Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam +AH4- +AH4- http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja +AH4- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
BLOCING PORN SITES
My boss has asked me to look into software that will block porn sites. The concern is a legal one, and I fully understand. So, is there software that wil just block porn sites in general? Is there software to monitor our staff workstations that access porn sites and report it to the administrator (me)? Also, is there software that monitors email for porn content? Murray ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: favorite phone
I've been looking at new cell phones for my personal use. Since I'm concerned with cost, I want to keep the monthly charges down. There are 2 types of phones, and that makes a difference in terms of monthly charges for unlimited Internet access. The true smart phones like the iPhone have an adder of from $35 a month or more, but you have full browser capabilities. I've been looking at the phones that do not use a full browser, but rather use Media Net. These phones have an adder of only $15 per month for unlimited Internet access. These phones apparently will have some issues accessing some Internet websites. The phone I'm considering is the LG VU, cheap to acquire, yet similar to iPhone with a large screen. You have 2 keyboards, a Qwerty and a numeric. The phone has voice commands dialing, but the phones without voice dialing can subscribe to ATT's voice dialing for about $5 per month. Since I haven't secured the phone yet, I'll be interested in other people's views and opinions. Murray From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: favorite phone What's wrong with the iPhone? From: Gene Giannamore [mailto:gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: favorite phone We are looking at iphone alternatives. I was just wondering what your favorite phone is, especially for accessing exchange email, contacts, calendar, and browsing the web. Also does the phone have voice dialing? Gene Giannamore Abide International Inc. Technical Support 561 1st Street West Sonoma,Ca.95476 (707) 935-1577Office (707) 935-9387Fax (707) 766-4185Cell gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Can some one remove me from this list?
I'm trying to figure out why he wanted to leave this list. You don't suppose it has anything to do with some of the poor excuses for humor, do you??? ROTFLMAO! Murray From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 4:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Can some one remove me from this list? When you are THAT broke, the fixin' takes a while... From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 3:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can some one remove me from this list? I can't believe that Shook hasn't been fixed yet. On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote: Hmmm, let's see, you're the one that got her in that condition, so maybe you should have timed it a little better ;);) On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote: I had to cancel a trip last year b\c my wife had to have a baby three weeks before opening dayI couldn't believe how selfish she was being. I mean she can crank out a kid any old time. Turkey season is only for 30 days once a freakin' year. Am I the only one being unreasonable here??? Shook From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can some one remove me from this list? That will make Shook curl up in the fetal position and whimper like a little baby. On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:14 PM, James Kerr cluster...@gmail.com wrote: Spring turkey season is cancelled! - Original Message - From: Andy Shook mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 2:00 PM Subject: RE: Can some one remove me from this list? I've never gotten an email that made me cry until now. Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 1:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Can some one remove me from this list? I can!!! From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can some one remove me from this list? It is the nature of the list that once you join you cannot leave. Well, you can't leave without great sacrafice. You'll miss out on Shook's banter, and who can live without that? On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Alex Rodriguez a...@ontimecomputing.com wrote: Alex Rodriguez, President On Time Technology Solutions, Inc. PO BOX 3285* 1206 S. Cedar St. Borger, TX 79007 * Office 806-274-9912* Fax 806-274-9596 www.ontimecomputing.com http://www.ontimecomputing.com/ www.ontimebdr.com http://www.borgerhasslefreeit.com/ Why is a trusted IT Partner better than Just a Guy? - Read More at http://www.wevegottaguy.com/ On Time Technology Solutions, Inc. will be your trusted IT Partner, we pride ourselves in providing the Texas Panhandle market with proven and best of breed technology solutions. This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Messages sent to and from us may be monitored. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions that are present in this message, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required,
RE: User wants to use their personal laptop.
One of the advantages of company owned equipment is that if staff uses company provided equipment, the company may exercise rules as owners of the equipment. With the staff member the owner, he/she would thus have administrator permissions and could install whatever they wanted. And, they could install software or allow malware because the control of the laptop would be there responsibility as oppossed to company responsibility. I would recommend against it. Murray From: Damien Solodow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: User wants to use their personal laptop. I've seen something recently that a number of companies are piloting something like this, Citrix being one that was mentioned. It probably depends on your setup and if any special or custom apps need to be loaded.. From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 1:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: User wants to use their personal laptop. I have a user who wants to use their own laptop for business use. He likes the way it's set up but I have always been the one who says it's better to have the company buy one and keep personal and business separate. I see this could be an issue of privacy and also an issue of control in that i have no real say on what is installed on his machine and what if any policies can be inforced. Your thoughts? I don't want to be paranoid and i see the cost savings in having him use his own computer but am i asking for trouble in the long run. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry, or something else?
I've been lurking on this discussion for a while because we are small and only now have a small number of BB users. We started a couple of years ago with one BB for our CEO, and we just push his email to his BB using the redirector from BB installed on his workstation rather than the BES. In the last month, 3 other staff members requested use of BB and we didn't even install the BB redirector software on their workstations. We told them to just use OWA. One of them decided to look into other ways to accomplish the same thing, and she is using a Rule in Outlook 2K3 to redirect here email from her inbox to her BB. The reason she did it was it is much more readable than using OWA. My question is, why even use the BES or even the BB redirector if the Outlook client can pretty much accomplish the same thing? Murray ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry, or something else?
Isn't this the very same thing as using the BB redirect client? Murray -Original Message- From: May, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 10:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry, or something else? Your user here would be forwarding to a personal account setup via BIS. So you have to ask yourself your security concerns, would you want email always going out to hotmail.com or what??? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 11:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry, or something else? I've been lurking on this discussion for a while because we are small and only now have a small number of BB users. We started a couple of years ago with one BB for our CEO, and we just push his email to his BB using the redirector from BB installed on his workstation rather than the BES. In the last month, 3 other staff members requested use of BB and we didn't even install the BB redirector software on their workstations. We told them to just use OWA. One of them decided to look into other ways to accomplish the same thing, and she is using a Rule in Outlook 2K3 to redirect here email from her inbox to her BB. The reason she did it was it is much more readable than using OWA. My question is, why even use the BES or even the BB redirector if the Outlook client can pretty much accomplish the same thing? Murray ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry, or something else?
Obviously we're not very concerned with the security for the BB users. But OWA gives them access to contacts, calendar etc, and is using security. But it's damn hard to read on a BB screen. Murray -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry, or something else? In a word, security. We never allow forwarding of all email to external mail accounts. Of course, we don't publish OWA either. BES gives lots more than simple push mail - like GAL access, contact and calendar sync, intranet access etc. -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 8:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry, or something else? I've been lurking on this discussion for a while because we are small and only now have a small number of BB users. We started a couple of years ago with one BB for our CEO, and we just push his email to his BB using the redirector from BB installed on his workstation rather than the BES. In the last month, 3 other staff members requested use of BB and we didn't even install the BB redirector software on their workstations. We told them to just use OWA. One of them decided to look into other ways to accomplish the same thing, and she is using a Rule in Outlook 2K3 to redirect here email from her inbox to her BB. The reason she did it was it is much more readable than using OWA. My question is, why even use the BES or even the BB redirector if the Outlook client can pretty much accomplish the same thing? Murray ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry, or something else?
Using OWA takes care of syncing issues and apparently most other issues. Murray From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 11:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Blackberry, or something else? Syncing contacts, calendar, notes...ability to remotely wipe...there is a long list. I've just implemented the BES...it drastically reduces my time spent on servicing handheld devices. On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Murray Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been lurking on this discussion for a while because we are small and only now have a small number of BB users. We started a couple of years ago with one BB for our CEO, and we just push his email to his BB using the redirector from BB installed on his workstation rather than the BES. In the last month, 3 other staff members requested use of BB and we didn't even install the BB redirector software on their workstations. We told them to just use OWA. One of them decided to look into other ways to accomplish the same thing, and she is using a Rule in Outlook 2K3 to redirect here email from her inbox to her BB. The reason she did it was it is much more readable than using OWA. My question is, why even use the BES or even the BB redirector if the Outlook client can pretty much accomplish the same thing? Murray ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RETREIVING A SINGLE MAILBOX
I am being asked to retreive a mailbox of a former employee. This employee terminated around the first week of July, and after a period of time, I deleted that mailbox as is our normal procedure. Now, there is some interest in reviewing some items from that mailbox. I know that I can do a restore from my backup tapes to a temporary email server, but is there an easier way to accomplish the retreival? We are using Exchange Server 2003 and Outlook 2003 as our client. Any help is greatly appreciated. Murray ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: HELP ON OUTLOOK ISSUE
Thanks for all the replies on this issue. I've checked out most of the suggestions, and I suspect that my next step is to run the Detect and Repair module to see if that fixes the problem. I've never run that module, so will it change the current settings of the individual profile? Is there anything I should do to save any profile settings? Murray -Original Message- From: TechInfo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 5:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: HELP ON OUTLOOK ISSUE If you forward the blank email from your problem user to you, can you read it? I had that same problem with a couple of people and after taking a closer look it really wasn't blank but a very faint yellow that you could hardly see. Look in Outlook, tools\options\mail format. Then check the stationary and fonts to see if the reply font color is set to yellow. Larry Didtel -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Apr 30, 2008 11:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: HELP ON OUTLOOK ISSUE I thought I sent this request for help last week, but perhaps it slipped my mind and I forgot to click Send. So, since I didn't receive a single response, perhaps just one more time. I have researched this and found nothing helpful using google, so I hope someone here can lead me in the right direction. I'm tempted to just run a Detect and Repair or a complete uninstall reinstall, but hopefully these may be a better solution. So here goes: We are using Exchange Server 2003 along with Outlook 2003 and OWA. I have one user who is having a problem with just one individual that she corresponds with on a regular basis. It seems that when she gets a REPLY (not an original email) from that one individual, it's always blank. Same thing if we open the reply in Outlook Web Access. Yet, if the individual responds to other members of our staff, the reply comes thru just fine. My user is using HTML. We also tried using cc, and when I was cc'd , the reply to me was also blank. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated Murray ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ This e-mail transmission and any accompanying documents contain information from the company, Stemilt Growers, Inc., which is confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named in this transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone immediately at 509-663-1451. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
HELP ON OUTLOOK ISSUE
I thought I sent this request for help last week, but perhaps it slipped my mind and I forgot to click Send. So, since I didn't receive a single response, perhaps just one more time. I have researched this and found nothing helpful using google, so I hope someone here can lead me in the right direction. I'm tempted to just run a Detect and Repair or a complete uninstall reinstall, but hopefully these may be a better solution. So here goes: We are using Exchange Server 2003 along with Outlook 2003 and OWA. I have one user who is having a problem with just one individual that she corresponds with on a regular basis. It seems that when she gets a REPLY (not an original email) from that one individual, it's always blank. Same thing if we open the reply in Outlook Web Access. Yet, if the individual responds to other members of our staff, the reply comes thru just fine. My user is using HTML. We also tried using cc, and when I was cc'd , the reply to me was also blank. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated Murray ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: HELP ON OUTLOOK ISSUE
Thanks for the replies. Let me add some additional info. My user is communicating with an individual with another company that uses Groupwise. If that person replies to a message from any other member of our staff, there is NO problem, the text is there. . When we look in OWA, same problem, blank. When I was cc'd on the original email from my staff user, on the reply to both of us, my reply was also blank. Yet if I originate the email, the reply is just fine. It appears the problem is in the profile of my one user. Murray -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 3:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: HELP ON OUTLOOK ISSUE corresponds with on a regular basis. It seems that when she gets a REPLY (not an original email) from that one individual, it's always blank. Same thing if we open the reply in Outlook Web Access. Sounds like it might be a case of aggressive content filtering. Just today, on another list, someone posted about a system that was altering style tags. In OWA you should be able to easily look at the message source and see if this is the case. Also, check out the headers and see if the MIME related ones are correct. ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
REPLIES TO MESSAGES COMING IN BLANK
First, we are using Exchange Server 2003 along with Outlook 2003 and OWA. I have one user who is having a problem with just one individual that she corresponds with on a regular basis. It seems that when she gets a REPLY (not an original email) from that one individual, it's always blank. Same thing if we open the reply in Outlook Web Access. Yet, if the individual responds to other members of our staff, the reply comes thru just fine. My user is using HTML. Any ideas would be appreciated. I've done some research on Google, and even tried a couple of suggestions, but still receiving blank replies. Murray ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
OUTLOOK 2003 CLIENT CLOSES WHEN AN EMAIL IS CLOSED!
Here are the details. Exchange Server 2003 SP1 Outlook 2003 SP1. One staff member just started having an intermittant problem whereby when she closes an email, outlook closes as well. She is definitely not clicking on the wrong red X as I checked that out. Any ideas would be appreciated. Murray ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
FORWARDING RULE NOT WORKING
A while back I set up a rule to forward certain email to another email account outside of our system. It worked for a while and then stopped working. I rewrote the rule, but I still cannot make it work. I'd appreciate any ideas anyone may have. Murray ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: an OOO record?
Is it time for the feats of strenght or the airing of the grievences? Murray From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 12:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: an OOO record? . A post to the patch-management list on the 26th has blessed me with 255 out of office messages (so far), which are amazingly still trickling in. It's a Festivus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Festivus miracle! -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: User DOH of the Day
You mean you can't? Murray -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: User DOH of the Day I was just telling someone yesterday how marketing types think you can just make up email addresses and they will magically work -Original Message- From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 7:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: User DOH of the Day I have already bought the domain and set up the e-mail, took less time than picking myself up off the floor after reading the e-mail. This from a management type who knows better - she really does. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 7:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: User DOH of the Day Depending on how important maybe a friendly call and a small check can accomplish this temporarily :) -Original Message- From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: User DOH of the Day A copy of an e-mail I just received, with just the names changed to protect the really stupid. ** I need some help here. We set up a new e-mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED] a couple of weeks ago and we just found out that we do not own the domain name of fredsworldoftravel.com. So my problem is this, we have in print for the Fred's tours that they are to e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] if they would like further brochure information. Is there a way that we can have those e-mails re-routed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a live e-mail address and I did a test from an outside source and it came directly into my mailbox. Is there a way to do the re-routing? Wilma Flintstone Special Events Manager The Wilma Club/Fred's World of Travel Dennis List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Flagged Items Not do not Bring Up Reminder
I've got one user who when she flags an email, does not get a reminder to follow up. The individual who receives the flagged item does get a reminder. I've used the repair option but she still does not get the reminder. My last hope is uninstall/reinstall. Before I do that, have I missed something as to activating this feature? MMF (:--) List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
PROBLEM WITH FLAGGING ITEMS
I've got a user who uses the follow up flag to remind her to follow up. (Is that redundant?) She says it stopped reminding her, yet her calendar reminders is working. I ran the repair option on Outlook 2000, but the problem persists. Any ideas would be welcome. Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: PROBLEM WITH FLAGGING ITEMS
Title: RE: PROBLEM WITH "FLAGGING" ITEMS My user tells me that the feature used to work fine. She merely creates an email, "flags" it and then sends it. Murray -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: PROBLEM WITH "FLAGGING" ITEMS Where is the flagged message stored? If it is in a .pst that is attached to Outlook the reminder flags do not work. Known issue from MS and no resolution other than not to put things w/reminders on them anywhere other than the mailbox. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PROBLEM WITH "FLAGGING" ITEMS No, it's not redundant AFAIK. You could always try starting outlook.exe with the /cleanreminders switch. Neil -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 15 July 2002 16:23 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: PROBLEM WITH "FLAGGING" ITEMS Subject: PROBLEM WITH "FLAGGING" ITEMS I've got a user who uses the follow up flag to remind her to follow up. (Is that redundant?) She says it stopped reminding her, yet her calendar reminders is working. I ran the "repair option on Outlook 2000, but the problem persists. Any ideas would be welcome. Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Dumb one
SP12, I'm only up to SP7!! Murray -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Dumb one I'd like Windows 3.1 with SP12 please... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Dumb one An OS and SP of your choice! -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Dumb one What do I win?!?!?!?! -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Dumb one Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM Subject: RE: Dumb one Do you use Outlook?!?!?!? :P Can you say the Organize feature? How about Filters? It's certainly not rocket science... -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Dumb one I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97. She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on that. Any ideas? TIA List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: RE : It's Friday!!
63, 2 grown children and 2 grandchildren. Murray -Original Message- From: Gérard Dumazet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE : It's Friday!! 63 and 6 children ! -Message d'origine- De : Bart Southworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : lundi 6 mai 2002 04:50 À : MS-Exchange Admin Issues Objet : Re: It's Friday!! 40. 7, 5, 2.5 Get over it. ;-) - Original Message - From: Wayne Hanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 8:50 PM Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 38 with 2 boys, 3 and 8months (try surviving for 3 years with very limited sleep, It makes you realise why people can go postal over the dummest things:-) ) -Original Message- From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 4 May 2002 5:32 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! I am 53, and have 2 boys 23 and 20, and a 19 year old daughter. The 23 year old got his Netware Admin Cert in HS. But I sure feel older than 53.. -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 48 and I'll see your 4 + 6 year old and raise you two daughters 15 + 18 and an 11 year old son. -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 4:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! How about 50 with a 4 and 6 year old boy. Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation Tel: 1-877-GO-AMICO http://www.amico.com/ www.amico.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 16:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Thank God, somebody on here is older than me! 44 (with a 16 and a 2 yr old boy) -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Byte me! 46 -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! I am so freaking old I'm thinking about arguing for early acceptance for Kroger's Seniors discount... 26 -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Has anyone noticed that most of the responses are from the 20 somethings? lol -Original Message- From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Ripe age of 22 :-) -Original Message- From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! i just turned 24 -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 14:26 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! i just turned 22 haha ;) -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:21 AM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: It's Friday!! Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Man how old are you guys??? Lol My daughter makes me feel old, but YOU guys keep me young! -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Hey Martin congrats, My two girls have grown and moved on but keep coming back with grandkids. Enjoy it really does go quick. I will have a beer in Vegas next for you. dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! Very Nice! You be the MAN! Cheerish the moments as they seem to go by so fast. MJ 3 sons, all gone. -Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! http://216.39.101.68/martin/index.htm http://216.39.101.68/martin/index.htm -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! I don't get it -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: It's Friday!! I have a baby -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem
Quote, and it's still catching the Klez and other viruses just fine. In the nearly 6 years that we've been running McAfee, this is the very first burp. But Martin, I want to sincerely thank you for the encouragement and assistance on this issue. I just knew that at some point one of your responses would be useful. Ofcourse I could be wrong about that!! Murray -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem Quote: Geez, my Mcafee is catching even the newest Klez and others, I think it's great! Murray -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: 'NTSYSADMIN List' Subject: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem Has anyone else seen this today. We use the McAfee Virusscan Console on one of our Servers to go out several times daily looking for the latest SUPERDAT update, and then we use the Console on the workstations (WIN 98SE) to go out randomly to our Server and apply the SUPERDAT Update. Today, the SUPERDAT failed to restart Virusscan after running the update and we all had to reboot in order for it to become active. After the reboot, all workstations had been updated and the Virusscan software started normally. MMF (:--) List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4
Geez, my Mcafee is catching even the newest Klez and others, I think it's great! Murray -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4 McCrappie it the nick name it's gotten at my place since it has let through almost every virus conceivable in. Outbreak protection is next to useless, support site sucks. Major virus warnings are announced on their site, with the added info that an update will be ready in a few days. Will tell you it cleaned a virus when it didn't. When it Quarantines a message it just quarantines the attachment, but sends a message on to the recipient, So I still get numerous calls from the users. Since it sends out a message to the intended recipient, and to the admin for each virus received it is almost worse than having nothing, because your server is twice as busy. Never has crashed the system, but that's about all I can say good about it. Go with Trend or Antigen, and go home early. Go with McAfee, and go with God. You'll need him. John Majetic -Original Message- From: Richardson, Roy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4 Any gotchas anyone one had with running McAfee GroupShield 5.0 on Exchange 5.5 SP4? Management has backed me into the corner and I am forced to finally install some type of anti-virus on the Email server. Any tips, tricks, hints, or allegations would be appreciated. Roy Richardson Webmaster/System Administrator Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
INTERESTING PUZZLEMENT
We are using Exchange Server 5.5 on an NT4 machine. We have a Win2K Server machine that we use for OWA. One of our people was working Friday nite from her home using OWA to access her email, and today she received an email from someone she works with outside our organization that they received the KLEZ Virus. We scanned her machine for viruses and found none. Yet, the individual claims she received the virus from us. We're trying to figure out how the virus seems to have come from our server, yet we can find no evidence that it was in fact sent from our server. Any ideas? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: cannot send to this email address
Title: Util for cleaning dups in Outlook Try sending to "anwan" from another email address. I mentioned this problem the other day, where I had a member who could write to me, but I couldn't get to him. It seems that his ISP was blocking all traffic from the server that my ISP was using, because it was known to be a spammer. When I contacted my ISP (a large well-known one) they said I was on the wrong server and they moved me to another one with success. I can now send and receive to this particular member. Murray -Original Message-From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:14 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: cannot send to this email address I have registered email address on www.mail.com When ever I send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it comes back with error message communication failure. However I can send email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am not sure how to trouble shoot it. Any advice welcome Anwar Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 4/10/2002 11:56 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 4/10/2002 11:57 AM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=ims;l=IMSMAIL-020410155602Z-4107List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: WLKMMAS
No degree guarantees anything either competency or a job. BUT, and that's a BIG but, most organizations looking for help in middle to upper level management not only require College Degrees, but they also want graduate degrees as well. And when I say middle management, I'm talking network system administrators. These are not entry level jobs. But even entry level jobs in current market conditions are requiring undergraduate degrees. Do I agree, NO! But, that's how they separate the wheat from the chaff BEFORE the interview. Murray -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: WLKMMAS Grow Up? Toga! Toga! -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: WLKMMAS I'd tell 'em to go to college. If for no other reason than to take the opportunity to learn things like philosophy and to grow up a bit. - Original Message - From: Ray Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:53 AM Subject: RE: WLKMMAS I'll agree that getting a college degree, or certs, does not guarantee competency. Not all doctors and lawyers are competent any more than all MCSE's are competent. You still have to prove yourself. The problem is somebody has to give you a chance. Unfortunately, having MCSE's on staff is part of the marketing hype used to sell services. You, and other MVPs, have kind of transcended the need for a MS cert, but you're probably more the exception rather than the rule. It does seem, though, that many of the MVPs do have MS Certs. I don't know what I'd tell a high school senior that wants to get into a technical career. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: WLKMMAS Re: b) I don't think that's true in most cases. Many of the great consultants I work with (or have had working for me when I was in a regular company) didn't have degrees. And I don't have a degree (or any certs, for that matter), and I certainly seem to have had zero problems finding a job with a large consultancy. BUT... I do think that college degrees are valuable things, and wouldn't mind having one. Finding time to go back and get one at this point is something I'd like to do, but other things keep cropping up and I haven't dedicated myself to doing it yet. Missy Koslosky Sr. Technology Consultant Compaq Global Services - Original Message - From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:16 AM Subject: RE: WLKMMAS a) You won't be able to get a job outside the US - most countries require a minimum academic qualification for immigration now (there are exceptions - Canada and Australia being the main ones) b) Simple fact is though you won't even get invited for interview at a lot of companies. Most large consultancies are like this. So to say you can choose your own career path is simply not true. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 April 2002 14:16 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: WLKMMAS I would have to disagree with you there... The certifications I hold are worth more than any outdated college degree and I'm moving right along in the ranks. If done correctly, one can choose their own career path. Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Lesaca, Wally R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: WLKMMAS It's good you know so many things. But always remember, you will always remain a handicapped when it comes to degree earned. Companies always look for candidates who are college/degree holders. Career paths are well defined. Much better if you will go back to college and prepare yourself for a brighter future. God bless! -Original Message- From: Mike Zatkalik [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: WLKMMAS LMFAO!! On a side note, just because I am interested in knowing a little about people before I start trying things people suggest, what is your background, ie MSCE, MCP, MBA, MD, no college/never graduated with a degree? The reason I ask is I went to college for 1 1/2 years, ran out of $$$ and left college, decided I didn't know what I wanted to do with my life, so I started working with computers and just kept with it. I have no certifications, all my knowledge is based on real world situations and reading through groups like this and playing on test machines. I have been
RE: Trying to send to an external email address.
Title: Message I had a situation similar and it turned out to be the fact that the server that our ISP was using was being blocked by the ISP of the addressee because it had been the source of SPAM in the past. My ISP moved us to a different server and problem solved. Murray -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:17 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Trying to send to an external email address. Sounds like a DNS issue. I had this happen once before, and it was a B***CH to fix. Our DNS was toast. If you can send from another account, then that may be the case. Verify your DNS set up -Original Message-From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Trying to send to an external email address. I can successfully send to this email address from my hotmail account but not from our Exchange server. -Original Message-From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Trying to send to an external email address. Yeah that's what I initially told the user but he is claiming that he is absolute certain that the email address is valid and not misspelled. That's why im a little confused. -Original Message-From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:42 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Trying to send to an external email address. Either the e-mail address is not active or it is misspelled. Get report of those all the time. -Original Message-From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 08:20To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Trying to send to an external email address. Hello, Im getting the following internally generated undeliverable report. I have confirmed that this is a valid email address. Any thoughts as to how to troubleshoot this issue? Thanks, Running exchange 5.5 sp4 on windows 2k sp2 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 4/4/2002 11:17 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 4/4/2002 11:17 AM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Raymond Karsan A;l=RKAWA1EX02-020404161705Z-92237 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Opening other user's inbox
This is a rights issue which can be turned on or off by the Administrator. Murray -Original Message- From: Nelson Aguillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Opening other user's inbox Hello everyone, How do I prevent users from using the option to open other user's Inbox (FILE, OPEN, OTHER USER'S FOLDER...)? Is this a default setting? The application section of the Event Viewer is reports that several individuals were logging on to other employee's mailbox when they were not the primary NT account users. Thanks in advance, Nelson List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Does anyone know
Title: RE: Does anyone know I don't mean to be argumentative, but we were previously using Outlook 98 before we upgraded to Office 2000, and we had absolutely no problems at all. Murray -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Does anyone know Hi All, Please.. Please.. Please.. Don't use Outlook 98, it is so bug ridden it's not funny. If you can't run Outlook 2K, then use the Outlook that comes with Exchange 5.0. Your going to have nothing but constant problem(s) with Outlook 98. Maybe not immediately.. But eventually you will. Not even MS recommends 98 anymore. For what's it's worth.. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Does anyone know Access Control Lists (permissions) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 8:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Does anyone know Kevin, what is acls? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Does anyone know ACLs - for that is what we are viewing with the Permissions tab are based on the server. If you aren't connected you won't see them. Kevin -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 March 2002 15:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Does anyone know Good morning, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4 Does anyone know how to turn on the permissions tab on for the calendar properties page? I cannot find that information anywhere. Thanks and have a wonderful weekend. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: What is the best methode of backing up Mailboxes?
Title: RE: What is the best methode of backing up Mailboxes? We have an older version of Arcserve purchased about 5 years ago. We've never updated because it works just fine for us. I have always been suspicious of software companies bring out "updated" versions of software that don't seem to have any real improvements. Since I haven't been watching Arcserve, when did it go down hill. As a not-for-profit, we can't afford to continually upgrade software just to be on the bleeding edge. Thus, when we find that new or upgraded software doesn't provide anything but more profits for the manufacturer, we don't upgrade. Murray -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:59 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: What is the best methode of backing up Mailboxes? Then go out and buy a real backup solution, like Veritas Backup Exec or some other brand so long as CA doesn't have ownership of the product. Opps.. Don't want to start that debate again.. Never mind.. Keep using ArcServe it will be very reliable for you, oh and I always try to use the words "trust me" will saying that, for those that know what that means. cheers Rick "grabbing my ankles" Ward -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: What is the best methode of backing up Mailboxes? I use ArcServe IT 6.61 and do not do brick level backups, only Directory and Info Store. Build a mailbox recovery server, then you can restore the Info store to it and recover email into a pst for a user in need. -Original Message- From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: What is the best methode of backing up Mailboxes? Hi Everyone, I heard it through the grapevine, that I am not backing up my Exchange Server the best possible way, and I was hoping that some of you can give me some advice. I am currently backing up the Exchange Server / individual mailboxes / Brick Level. The reason I am doing so was on suggestion by the ArcServeIT people. They said that ArcServeIT software worked best when you only do a brick level backup. But then a colleague said that Exchange doesn't Flush out certain files, unless it is backed up correctly. can someone please explain this to me, and possibly tell me the better way of backing up Exchange. Thank you all in advance for all of your help. Nick Symiakakis Noble Hospital [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: What is the best method of backing up Mailboxes?
We used to use Arcserve for brick backups and when we tried to do a restore from the bricks just once it did work fine. But, we have since chosen to use NT Backup for the IS and DIR. We also retain at least 3 weeks of deleted items on the hard drive. We plan to expand this when we install larger drives. Murray -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: What is the best methode of backing up Mailboxes? I use ArcServe IT 6.61 and do not do brick level backups, only Directory and Info Store. Build a mailbox recovery server, then you can restore the Info store to it and recover email into a pst for a user in need. -Original Message- From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: What is the best methode of backing up Mailboxes? Hi Everyone, I heard it through the grapevine, that I am not backing up my Exchange Server the best possible way, and I was hoping that some of you can give me some advice. I am currently backing up the Exchange Server / individual mailboxes / Brick Level. The reason I am doing so was on suggestion by the ArcServeIT people. They said that ArcServeIT software worked best when you only do a brick level backup. But then a colleague said that Exchange doesn't Flush out certain files, unless it is backed up correctly. can someone please explain this to me, and possibly tell me the better way of backing up Exchange. Thank you all in advance for all of your help. Nick Symiakakis Noble Hospital [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RULES WIZARD SCREWING UP
With the incredible amount of SPAM that we've been receiving lately, I have invoked the Rules Wizard to forward individuals and spam domains to a special folder where I can review them when I have time. Actually, I forward them to the special folder other than to the deleted items because the Rules Wizard was intermittently moving email from acceptable sources including internal email to the deleted items folder. The end result is I am still getting instances of both internal and external email that is getting diverted from the inbox to the special items folder. I've tried to analyze the addresses to see if there is a reason for this problem, but if there is one, I can't find it. Does anyone have any ideas what is going wrong with the Rules Wizard and how to fix this problem. Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Attachments Disappearing
I have one user who when she sends attachments to certain people outside our email system, the attachments do not reach the intended person. The email gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she sends the same attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in tact. If someone else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did NOT receive the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have any ideas where to start looking? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachments Disappearing
Title: RE: Attachments Disappearing No, we are using Outlook and it's set for rich text Murray -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Attachments Disappearing Yes if they are sending the attachments via Word, it may not arrive if the receiver does not use Word as their editor. It depends on how it is sent -Original Message- From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachments Disappearing Is she using Word as her e-mail editor? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:32 a.m. To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachments DisappearingI have one user who when she sends attachments to certain people outside our email system, the attachments do not reach the intended person. The email gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she sends the same attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in tact. If someone else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did NOT receive the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have any ideas where to start looking? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm # Notice of Confidential information The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal www.marshalsoftware.com # List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachments Disappearing
Title: RE: Attachments Disappearing You are absolutely correct, that was the problem. Thanks for the help! Murray -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Attachments Disappearing Settings on the external address in there contact list or Address Book is set wrong. They have set something in there Address book entry for the SMTP settings for encoding or format of the message/attachment. Check the settings between the 2 clients you speak of for the same address and I bet you find a difference. I'd be willing to put money that your client set them to "RICH TEXT only" and it's not an Exchange system and the gateway drops the encoded attachment because it doesn't know how RICH-TEXT works. On the other client they probably accepted all the default settings (best way usually) and it works just fine. You can also check your IMS to make sure you have it set correctly. I get around this problem (again, usually) by checking "MIME" and also "Plain Text" and "HTML" under the "Message Content" box on the "Internet Mail" tab. 99% of the time this corrects(read:override) any settings the client may have done. -Rick -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachments Disappearing I have one user who when she sends attachments to certain people outside our email system, the attachments do not reach the intended person. The email gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she sends the same attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in tact. If someone else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did NOT receive the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have any ideas where to start looking? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5
Here's a copy of the bat file that I use, you'll note that I'm creating a log. ntbackup backup ds \\servername is \\servername /t normal /l c:\winnt\profiles\administrator\desktop\ntbkup.log /e /hc:on Chapter 16 of the manual will explain the switches. Murray -Original Message- From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5 Running Exchange 5.5 on an NT4SP6 box. The GUI version of NTBACKUP recognizes the Exchange IS and DS and will back them up. However, I would like to put the proper commands in a batch file to run at a given time via the AT command. I've STFW'd and RTFM'd and haven't been abl;e to find how this is done. Could someone either show some examples of how they may have done it or point me to a source that shows. Thanks in advance. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5
Well, I used the commands that I found in the SYSTEM GUIDE for Windows NT Server. Chapter 16 covers BACKUP Murray -Original Message- From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5 Running Exchange 5.5 on an NT4SP6 box. The GUI version of NTBACKUP recognizes the Exchange IS and DS and will back them up. However, I would like to put the proper commands in a batch file to run at a given time via the AT command. I've STFW'd and RTFM'd and haven't been abl;e to find how this is done. Could someone either show some examples of how they may have done it or point me to a source that shows. Thanks in advance. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Hyperlinks
I know you can change this in Word. Are you using Word as your email processor? Murray -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Hyperlinks Ok whenever you enter a web address into a composed message in Outlook it automatically turns into a hyperlink. I know there is a way to keep it from doing this, but don't remember how. Would anyone be able to refresh my memory. Chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: new dat files where is it?
I have Securecast installed on my workstation so McAfee can push the dat files to me, but they have never pushed the extra.dat file to me. So, how did you get it? Murray -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: new dat files where is it? Gee, I got the extra.dat automatically (Tumbleweed's MMS w/McAfee engine) - 'course, I was already blocking .coms so we didn't get any. Martin Blackstone wrote: Yes, be sure YOU download the fixes, as NAI is too lazy to actually build a real DAT that would DL automatically. -Original Message- From: Kent, Larry SYNETICS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: new dat files where is it? download the Super Extradat and also block attachments with .com extensions. Not a one has gotten thru here. -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: new dat files where is it? NAI shows under Virus alerts the W32/Myparty.a@MM is a medium risk virus and that the update will be released 01/30/2002. Thats tommorrow!! this thing is getting thru now. anyone have any other info. dave List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 01/31/02 14:43:06 -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: new dat files where is it?
I'm able to find the file on McAfee's site. What I want to know is does McAfee push it using securecast or is there another method of getting the Extra.dat file without having to go out and search for it. Murray -Original Message- From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 4:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: new dat files where is it? extra.dat's are usually referenced in 'removal instructions' section of the AVERT page for the virus you're looking for, in this case W32/Myparty.a@MM http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_99332.htm#RemovalInstructions except now that page tells you to use the current dat (4184), but yesterday in had a link to the extra.dat. Jim Busick Database Network Analyst, MCSE Santee School District -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: new dat files where is it? I have Securecast installed on my workstation so McAfee can push the dat files to me, but they have never pushed the extra.dat file to me. So, how did you get it? Murray -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: new dat files where is it? Gee, I got the extra.dat automatically (Tumbleweed's MMS w/McAfee engine) - 'course, I was already blocking .coms so we didn't get any. Martin Blackstone wrote: Yes, be sure YOU download the fixes, as NAI is too lazy to actually build a real DAT that would DL automatically. -Original Message- From: Kent, Larry SYNETICS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: new dat files where is it? download the Super Extradat and also block attachments with .com extensions. Not a one has gotten thru here. -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: new dat files where is it? NAI shows under Virus alerts the W32/Myparty.a@MM is a medium risk virus and that the update will be released 01/30/2002. Thats tommorrow!! this thing is getting thru now. anyone have any other info. dave List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 01/31/02 14:43:06 -- -- -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == == == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA for 5.5
Hey, we're running Exchange Server on an NT4 machine, and our OWA on a W2K Server using IIS 5. Am I misunderstranding here. We're running just fine. Murray -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 When did that start? Did I miss a memo or service pack? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Baker, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 Well on a Win 2000 server Exch 5.5 OWA will not work with IIS 5. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 What does it matter? No, the OWA you install will have no impact on your Exch box. -Original Message- From: Baker, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 What kind of Server NT 4.0 or Win2000 ? -Original Message- From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA for 5.5 If you setup another server running nothing but IIS and OWA (for 5.5) does it make a connection with the Exchange server that you put in during the install and make any changes? I want to setup a separate test OWA server, but want to make sure that it will not effect the running setup. Thank you, John List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA for 5.5
Yes, I just went and checked again. We're running Version 5 of IIS on a W2K Server. And it works just fine interfacing with our Exchange Server Version 5.5. Murray -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 Are you sure you are?? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 Hey, we're running Exchange Server on an NT4 machine, and our OWA on a W2K Server using IIS 5. Am I misunderstranding here. We're running just fine. Murray -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 When did that start? Did I miss a memo or service pack? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Baker, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 Well on a Win 2000 server Exch 5.5 OWA will not work with IIS 5. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 What does it matter? No, the OWA you install will have no impact on your Exch box. -Original Message- From: Baker, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 What kind of Server NT 4.0 or Win2000 ? -Original Message- From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA for 5.5 If you setup another server running nothing but IIS and OWA (for 5.5) does it make a connection with the Exchange server that you put in during the install and make any changes? I want to setup a separate test OWA server, but want to make sure that it will not effect the running setup. Thank you, John List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA for 5.5
We're not running Exchange 2000. Just Exchange 5.5 on an NT4 Server. But we have our web server on a W2K Server and that's where we are running IIS version 5 with OWA. Murray -Original Message- From: Baker, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 Can you run Win2000 Server, Exch2000 OWA only (just OWA from Exch2000)in a Exch 5.5 environment? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 Yes, I just went and checked again. We're running Version 5 of IIS on a W2K Server. And it works just fine interfacing with our Exchange Server Version 5.5. Murray -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 Are you sure you are?? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 Hey, we're running Exchange Server on an NT4 machine, and our OWA on a W2K Server using IIS 5. Am I misunderstranding here. We're running just fine. Murray -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 When did that start? Did I miss a memo or service pack? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Baker, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 Well on a Win 2000 server Exch 5.5 OWA will not work with IIS 5. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 What does it matter? No, the OWA you install will have no impact on your Exch box. -Original Message- From: Baker, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 What kind of Server NT 4.0 or Win2000 ? -Original Message- From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA for 5.5 If you setup another server running nothing but IIS and OWA (for 5.5) does it make a connection with the Exchange server that you put in during the install and make any changes? I want to setup a separate test OWA server, but want to make sure that it will not effect the running setup. Thank you, John List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
BLOCKING SPAM AT THE SERVER
I t seems to me I saw a discussion of the ways of blocking spam at the server level without it ever getting to the workstation. I have need of being able to block some spam type email at the server, how is that done. Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD
Yes, and no. Murray -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD I'm assuming that you checked the rules to make sure that you didn't accidentally add someone. Do you have and stop processing rules as part of each rule? -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! I would sooner fail than not be among the greatest. John Keats -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD OK, Outlook 2000. There are rules set for junk and adult content which forward individual email from specific addresses or any email from a specific domain directly to the deleted items folder. An internal email from my CEO was dumped directly into the deleted items folder unread and I never saw it come in. Obviously, I do not have our domain or any of our staff members names included in the list of names and domains to be deleted. Murray -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD well, ok. First of all: Outlook..? www.slipstick.com Secondly, without showing us the rule, I don't see how we can help, really. Rules aren't SUPPOSED to do that sort of thing, but you haven't even told us the Outlook version number... Or the Exchange version number... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Freedom is the right to be wrong, not the right to do wrong. John G. Riefenbaker -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD As a result in the increase in junk mail and other unwanted email, I turned the Rules Wizard on to direct specific names and domains to send these emails directly to the deleted items folder. I have just determined that Internal email from our staff has managed to be intercepted by the Rules Wizard and dumped some internal email into the deleted items folder. I have no way of knowing why or how this happened. Is there a problem with the Rules Wizard that anyone knows about? I'm disabling the Rules Wizard until I can determine just what is happening. Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
EMAIL WITH NO DATE
One of my users has indicated to me that lately he is receiving email with no date at all. I was under the impression that Exchange dates the receive time and date for all email. Any ideas what could be causing this? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE
It's not doing it on all his email. Just a handful now and then. Most of it is from media sources. Murray -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE I don't think that is possible. Is it just a view setting? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: EMAIL WITH NO DATE One of my users has indicated to me that lately he is receiving email with no date at all. I was under the impression that Exchange dates the receive time and date for all email. Any ideas what could be causing this? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE
I don't have enough of the email details, not sure that there is any repeating going on. My user says some of it was spam as well. Murray -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE Ok. So it is consistent from specific senders, then? Like, a hotmail.com address would always have the appropriate date, but some 'media source' does not? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE It's not doing it on all his email. Just a handful now and then. Most of it is from media sources. Murray -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE I don't think that is possible. Is it just a view setting? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: EMAIL WITH NO DATE One of my users has indicated to me that lately he is receiving email with no date at all. I was under the impression that Exchange dates the receive time and date for all email. Any ideas what could be causing this? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD
As a result in the increase in junk mail and other unwanted email, I turned the Rules Wizard on to direct specific names and domains to send these emails directly to the deleted items folder. I have just determined that Internal email from our staff has managed to be intercepted by the Rules Wizard and dumped some internal email into the deleted items folder. I have no way of knowing why or how this happened. Is there a problem with the Rules Wizard that anyone knows about? I'm disabling the Rules Wizard until I can determine just what is happening. Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD
OK, Outlook 2000. There are rules set for junk and adult content which forward individual email from specific addresses or any email from a specific domain directly to the deleted items folder. An internal email from my CEO was dumped directly into the deleted items folder unread and I never saw it come in. Obviously, I do not have our domain or any of our staff members names included in the list of names and domains to be deleted. Murray -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD well, ok. First of all: Outlook..? www.slipstick.com Secondly, without showing us the rule, I don't see how we can help, really. Rules aren't SUPPOSED to do that sort of thing, but you haven't even told us the Outlook version number... Or the Exchange version number... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Freedom is the right to be wrong, not the right to do wrong. John G. Riefenbaker -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD As a result in the increase in junk mail and other unwanted email, I turned the Rules Wizard on to direct specific names and domains to send these emails directly to the deleted items folder. I have just determined that Internal email from our staff has managed to be intercepted by the Rules Wizard and dumped some internal email into the deleted items folder. I have no way of knowing why or how this happened. Is there a problem with the Rules Wizard that anyone knows about? I'm disabling the Rules Wizard until I can determine just what is happening. Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
INTERNAL EMAIL SLOWNESS
One of my users seems to be having a problem with slowness in Internal Email. We're all here in one building with one server, and she will intermittently receive internal email which is delayed between 15 minutes and a couple of hours. This morning she noticed something really strange. When she deleted one email, another would appear. We have no limits on email, yet it seemed that she could not have more than 10 items in her inbox at a time. Any ideas. Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: INTERNAL EMAIL SLOWNESS
Title: RE: INTERNAL EMAIL SLOWNESS No, we use smtp because we have our own server. Murray -Original Message-From: Sawatzke, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:10 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: INTERNAL EMAIL SLOWNESS Is she set up as a POP user? Did you try the send/receive button? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: INTERNAL EMAIL SLOWNESS One of my users seems to be having a problem with slowness in Internal Email. We're all here in one building with one server, and she will intermittently receive internal email which is delayed between 15 minutes and a couple of hours. This morning she noticed something really strange. When she deleted one email, another would appear. We have no limits on email, yet it seemed that she could not have more than 10 items in her inbox at a time. Any ideas. Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Blocking files extentions
McAfee virusscan will do it too! Murray -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blocking files extentions You need an antivirus software like these... www.antivirus.com www.sybari.com They are the top two favs among most of us... D The road to a friend's house is never long. -Danish proverb -Original Message- From: Brenda Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blocking files extentions Can anyone tell me how to block certain file extentions so Exchange rejects them? Example is the .scr extention. Thanks, Brenda List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Where to find a preview button in outlook ??
There is just one problem with using preview pane as opposed to autopreview, and that is that it in fact opens your email to accomplish this. If in fact a virus or worm has snuck thru without being caught, it's too late now. We have set up all our users to use autopreview and have outlawed the preview pane. Murray -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Where to find a preview button in outlook ?? The feature is called Preview Pane Under Outlook 2000 should appear under the View menu when Inbox is open - View/Preview Pane In Outlook 97 it is an add on. The file is called OL3Pane.exe - used to be downloadable from Microsoft, I have found it on various sites when doing an ftp search as well. Running the programme installs and switches on the Preview Pane. (I probably still have a copy tucked away somewhere if you get stuck) SB -Original Message- From: Freya Jongkind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Where to find a preview button in outlook ?? Hello, Does anyone know how to get a preview button in outlook, I don't mean the autopreviewbutton. The button looks like the folderlist button with an extra division of the right rectangle. This option should allow you to look to an e-mail without opening it, a kind of sneaking. I have a user in who has it it in his viewmenu and as a button is is outlookbar. This is not a standard button under outlook 97, nor under outlook 2000. The oulookhelp doesn't talk about this . Any ideas ?? Thanks for help. Freya Jongkind ICT Support Operations Engineer Sodexho Vouchers Cards Belgium List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Where to find a preview button in outlook ??
Yes, they do, but the problem is that these same fixes eliminate some of the features of Outlook. In our shop, we haven't applied some of the fixes in the name of flexibility, but we have banned the preview pane. It really gives you the best of both worlds. Murray -Original Message- From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Where to find a preview button in outlook ?? Microsoft has updates to Outlook that prevent the preview pane from launching viruses. You can find information about this on Microsoft's site or slipstick.com. The updates vary depending on what version of Outlook but you should be able to find what you need using one or both of these sites. Peter Dahl. -Original Message- From: Freya Jongkind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Where to find a preview button in outlook ?? THANKS A LOT !!! This was exactly what I was looking for. And it works, tomorrow I will be on an other site with Win2000 machine, and I willhave a look if it is really build in. If someone know how to add the customize option on the toolbars, it would be nice. For the moment I have : View Toolbars- Standard Remote For the ones that warned me about viruses comming in that way, thank too, i'll take into consideration. I won't give it to all my users, but if some of them have it, I like to know, how and why. Freya Jongkind ICT Support Operations Engineer Sodexho Vouchers Cards Belgium -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: mardi 23 octobre 2001 15:57 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Where to find a preview button in outlook ?? The feature is called Preview Pane Under Outlook 2000 should appear under the View menu when Inbox is open - View/Preview Pane In Outlook 97 it is an add on. The file is called OL3Pane.exe - used to be downloadable from Microsoft, I have found it on various sites when doing an ftp search as well. Running the programme installs and switches on the Preview Pane. (I probably still have a copy tucked away somewhere if you get stuck) SB -Original Message- From: Freya Jongkind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Where to find a preview button in outlook ?? Hello, Does anyone know how to get a preview button in outlook, I don't mean the autopreviewbutton. The button looks like the folderlist button with an extra division of the right rectangle. This option should allow you to look to an e-mail without opening it, a kind of sneaking. I have a user in who has it it in his viewmenu and as a button is is outlookbar. This is not a standard button under outlook 97, nor under outlook 2000. The oulookhelp doesn't talk about this . Any ideas ?? Thanks for help. Freya Jongkind ICT Support Operations Engineer Sodexho Vouchers Cards Belgium List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin
You should set up the deleted items recovery capability, or perhaps you already have it and don't know that you have it. I've got ours set to 21 days. That means that anyone can go back and recover an item within the last 3 weeks. Fortunately I have plenty of room on my server. I may expand it to a full month. anything to keep from having to use a tape b/u. If you need more info, let me know. Murray -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin One of the users at our firm deleted an email and then immediately emptied their deleted items folder (and before you ask have no idea why they would do this). is there anyway to get this back. We are running exchange 5.5 with outlook 2k client. I don't know of anyway to get it back but he claims that it has happened before and he got them back. I know we can restore messages from backup but he deleted it the same day so would not be on the nightly back up. Thanks James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin
It hasn't caused any problems since we enabled it several months ago. Murray -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin Does having the deleted item retention cause any problems... i.e. slow down the server or does it just take up space on the box? -Original Message- From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin You can get it back if you have deleted item retention set up on the exchange server. In the client highlight the deleted items folder. Go to tools and click on recover deleted items. JC -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin One of the users at our firm deleted an email and then immediately emptied their deleted items folder (and before you ask have no idea why they would do this). is there anyway to get this back. We are running exchange 5.5 with outlook 2k client. I don't know of anyway to get it back but he claims that it has happened before and he got them back. I know we can restore messages from backup but he deleted it the same day so would not be on the nightly back up. Thanks James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message and/or its attachments. This message and its attachments are intended only for use by the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), or responsible for delivery of the message to such person, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the company. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin
Title: RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin We backup nightly, but the point of the deleted items recovery is that you don't have to do a restore to a backup server to retrieve a single item. I would highly recommend not using that option, but rather just retain the deleted items for a period of time depending on space requirements. It's worked for us. Murray -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:39 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin In the Admin program highlight the Private Information Store and select Don't Permanently delete items until the store has been backed up and specify the amount of days. Once this is done he can click on Tools recover deleted items from the users Outlook program. Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence. -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin One of the users at our firm deleted an email and then immediately emptied their deleted items folder (and before you ask have no idea why they would do this). is there anyway to get this back. We are running exchange 5.5 with outlook 2k client. I don't know of anyway to get it back but he claims that it has happened before and he got them back. I know we can restore messages from backup but he deleted it the same day so would not be on the nightly back up. Thanks James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin
Hey, now I'm confused. I read the articles on DAO and I got the impression that Hard deleted items still go into the deleted items recovery folder. Did I misunderstand? Murray -Original Message- From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin Don, Um, that is the same article I sent, but thanks! Now I have it in my sent item view and inbox!! I did read it, perhaps I didn't explain my point well. Hard deleted items do not go to the deleted items folder, which in fact is the ONLY folder by default that is covered by deleted item retention. So without dumpsteralwayson, there is no option to recover items that do not touch the deleted items folder (ie hard delete). When you enable DAO, all folders are covered, not just deleted items folder. Then, with a nice deleted items retention policy set on server, you can recover items from all folders. My point was: 1) poster did not mention anything about hard delete, so this was not a concern for him. 2) thought that I would mention the hard delete while on the subject, since it seems that this comes up every time recover deleted items is mentioned anyway 3) this option should be mentioned so those who are not aware of it, get the whole picture of deleted item retention policy. 4) see #2 From the article you re forwarded me that I forwarded the list: By default, the ability to recover deleted items is only enabled on the Deleted Items folder in a user's private folders, so items that are hard deleted cannot be recovered. Or should I go read this article again ; ) After all it is Friday, and it has been a long week. Pat Don Ely dely@tripathim To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues aging.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: 10/19/2001Subject: RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin 10:14 AM Please respond to MS-Exchange Admin Issues EEXXXCCCUUUEEE ME I suggest you read this article... http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q178/6/30.ASP -Original Message- From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin Actually, hard deleted items cannot be recovered via recover deleted items. (original post does not mention hard delete though). Just FYI for future reference. See: By default, the ability to recover deleted items is only enabled on the Deleted Items folder in a user's private folders, so items that are hard deleted cannot be recovered. http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q178/6/30.ASP Pat Robin Lawrie Robin.Lawrie@FRM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Hedge.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: 10/19/2001 08:57Subject: RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin AM Please respond to MS-Exchange Admin Issues Items that have been shift-deleted can also be recovered in this way. -Original Message- From: Cardoza, Patricia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 16:38 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin If you have deleted item retention set up on the server then he can go into his deleted items folder, and then go to Tools, Recover Deleted Items. That will bring up a list of all the items that have been deleted (but not shift deleted I believe) within your deleted item retention period. Patricia -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Retrieval of deleted item from the recycle bin One of the users at our firm deleted an email and then immediately emptied their deleted items folder (and before you ask have no idea why they would do this). is there anyway to get this back. We are running exchange 5.5 with outlook 2k client. I don't know of anyway to get it back but he claims that it has happened before and
