Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
Not to you Joe. I ignore people that ignore me. ;-) On Jan 30, 2008 2:29 PM, Joe Heaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry ME2, did you say something? > > Joe Heaton > > > -Original Message- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 1:11 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load > > And he wonders why people arent listing to him and doing what he tells > them. ;-) > > > On Jan 28, 2008 4:08 PM, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Gee a little testy are we Jason? > > > > As has been posted here innumerable times some mail admins don't have the > > luxury of configuring their Exchange servers not to do this, company policy > > has dictated it to them, so to say that they should be unsubscribed from the > > list is a little harsh. I am one of those admins that has been told by > > upper management to allow OOO's to the internet. An attempt by the Lyris > > List Admin a few weeks ago resulted in us not being able to see who the > > messages were from at all, the general consensus by the members of this list > > was that we'll take the OOO's in order to see who the messages are from. > > > > > > > > On Jan 28, 2008 2:56 PM, Jason Gurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Gee only 8 OOOs. > > > > > > It's been posted innumerable times in innumerable places how to correctly > > > configure one's MUA/MTA to NOT DO THIS and yet it continues due to > > > standard human behavior (which is don't change a thing until I'm forced to > > > because change is bad/uncomfortable and I might have to learn something). > > > How hard would it be to implement standard list behavior... i.e. Policy is > > > to unsubscribe anybody that does this? Ideally, this policy would be > > > communicated at the same time as signing up so people aren't like wtf when > > > they get unsubscribed. > > > > > > It's really quite ridiculous that everyone just puts up with this w/o > > > batting an eyelash when it's so easily taken care of. I volunteer to do > > > the unsubscribing if people will forward me the OOOs (as an attachment > > > preserving full headers please) and I can be given appropriate perms. I'm > > > at GMT -0500 so it would probably be good to get someone in Western > > > Asia/AU to also volunteer to provide near continuous "ooo moderation". > > > > > > Sending indiscriminant OOOs to a stranger is like taking a steaming crap > > > in someone's front yard, in broad daylight, while they are home, with > > > their young daughter watching, and then wondering why they think something > > > is wrong. > > > > > > Thanks for caring, > > > > > > ~JasonG > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > > > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ > > > > > > > > -- > > Sherry Abercrombie > > > > "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one." > > -Albert Einstein > > > > > > > > -- > ME2 > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.16/1251 - Release Date: 1/30/2008 > 9:29 AM > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.16/1251 - Release Date: 1/30/2008 > 9:29 AM > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ > -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
And as I have asked several times before, what's all the heartburn over a few OOO's? I get anywhere from 2 to 10 on average every time I post here. Some are rather funny to read. At worst, I get to bang on the delete key a bit to get rid of them. I still do not understand the vitriolic rage that some people here spew about having to deal with them. Get some help. Get in a primal scream therapy group. Take the red pill. Do something besides gripe about something you can't control. John H. Matteson, Jr. Systems Administrator/ITT Systems FOB Orgun-E Afghanistan DSN - 318 431 8000 VoSIP - (308) 431 - Iridium - 717.633.3823 "A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group in America has not yet become an American. And the man who goes among you to trade upon your nationality is no worthy son to live under the Stars and Stripes." Woodrow Wilson -Original Message- From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load Sorry ME2, did you say something? Joe Heaton -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 1:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load And he wonders why people arent listing to him and doing what he tells them. ;-) On Jan 28, 2008 4:08 PM, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gee a little testy are we Jason? > > As has been posted here innumerable times some mail admins don't have > the luxury of configuring their Exchange servers not to do this, > company policy has dictated it to them, so to say that they should be > unsubscribed from the list is a little harsh. I am one of those > admins that has been told by upper management to allow OOO's to the > internet. An attempt by the Lyris List Admin a few weeks ago resulted > in us not being able to see who the messages were from at all, the > general consensus by the members of this list was that we'll take the OOO's in order to see who the messages are from. > > > > On Jan 28, 2008 2:56 PM, Jason Gurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Gee only 8 OOOs. > > > > It's been posted innumerable times in innumerable places how to > > correctly configure one's MUA/MTA to NOT DO THIS and yet it > > continues due to standard human behavior (which is don't change a > > thing until I'm forced to because change is bad/uncomfortable and I might have to learn something). > > How hard would it be to implement standard list behavior... i.e. > > Policy is to unsubscribe anybody that does this? Ideally, this > > policy would be communicated at the same time as signing up so > > people aren't like wtf when they get unsubscribed. > > > > It's really quite ridiculous that everyone just puts up with this > > w/o batting an eyelash when it's so easily taken care of. I > > volunteer to do the unsubscribing if people will forward me the OOOs > > (as an attachment preserving full headers please) and I can be given > > appropriate perms. I'm at GMT -0500 so it would probably be good to > > get someone in Western Asia/AU to also volunteer to provide near continuous "ooo moderation". > > > > Sending indiscriminant OOOs to a stranger is like taking a steaming > > crap in someone's front yard, in broad daylight, while they are > > home, with their young daughter watching, and then wondering why > > they think something is wrong. > > > > Thanks for caring, > > > > ~JasonG > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ > > > > -- > Sherry Abercrombie > > "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one." > -Albert Einstein > > -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.16/1251 - Release Date: 1/30/2008 9:29 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.16/1251 - Release Date: 1/30/2008 9:29 AM ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
Sorry ME2, did you say something? Joe Heaton -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 1:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load And he wonders why people arent listing to him and doing what he tells them. ;-) On Jan 28, 2008 4:08 PM, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gee a little testy are we Jason? > > As has been posted here innumerable times some mail admins don't have the > luxury of configuring their Exchange servers not to do this, company policy > has dictated it to them, so to say that they should be unsubscribed from the > list is a little harsh. I am one of those admins that has been told by > upper management to allow OOO's to the internet. An attempt by the Lyris > List Admin a few weeks ago resulted in us not being able to see who the > messages were from at all, the general consensus by the members of this list > was that we'll take the OOO's in order to see who the messages are from. > > > > On Jan 28, 2008 2:56 PM, Jason Gurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Gee only 8 OOOs. > > > > It's been posted innumerable times in innumerable places how to correctly > > configure one's MUA/MTA to NOT DO THIS and yet it continues due to > > standard human behavior (which is don't change a thing until I'm forced to > > because change is bad/uncomfortable and I might have to learn something). > > How hard would it be to implement standard list behavior... i.e. Policy is > > to unsubscribe anybody that does this? Ideally, this policy would be > > communicated at the same time as signing up so people aren't like wtf when > > they get unsubscribed. > > > > It's really quite ridiculous that everyone just puts up with this w/o > > batting an eyelash when it's so easily taken care of. I volunteer to do > > the unsubscribing if people will forward me the OOOs (as an attachment > > preserving full headers please) and I can be given appropriate perms. I'm > > at GMT -0500 so it would probably be good to get someone in Western > > Asia/AU to also volunteer to provide near continuous "ooo moderation". > > > > Sending indiscriminant OOOs to a stranger is like taking a steaming crap > > in someone's front yard, in broad daylight, while they are home, with > > their young daughter watching, and then wondering why they think something > > is wrong. > > > > Thanks for caring, > > > > ~JasonG > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ > > > > -- > Sherry Abercrombie > > "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one." > -Albert Einstein > > -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.16/1251 - Release Date: 1/30/2008 9:29 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.16/1251 - Release Date: 1/30/2008 9:29 AM ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
Well, all I know is Jason needs to configure some rules to easily eliminate those pesky OOO's or he may not live much longer due to heart failure. Lighten up a little "J", one of the things I enjoy on this list is the camaraderie between all of us, especially when we pick on Shook and TVK, Oh and, Jason, you might want to spend more time watching what your daughter does. I would NEVER let MY daughter stare at the front yard that long. Sheesh! Gotta go take a dump now no not that kind, a data dump for Christs' sake. -Original Message- From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 5:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load On 1/28/08 12:56 PM, "Jason Gurtz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Gee only 8 OOOs. > > It's been posted innumerable times in innumerable places how to correctly > configure one's MUA/MTA to NOT DO THIS and yet it continues due to > standard human behavior (which is don't change a thing until I'm forced to > because change is bad/uncomfortable and I might have to learn something). > How hard would it be to implement standard list behavior... i.e. Policy is > to unsubscribe anybody that does this? Ideally, this policy would be > communicated at the same time as signing up so people aren't like wtf when > they get unsubscribed. > > It's really quite ridiculous that everyone just puts up with this w/o > batting an eyelash when it's so easily taken care of. I volunteer to do > the unsubscribing if people will forward me the OOOs (as an attachment > preserving full headers please) and I can be given appropriate perms. I'm > at GMT -0500 so it would probably be good to get someone in Western > Asia/AU to also volunteer to provide near continuous "ooo moderation". > > Sending indiscriminant OOOs to a stranger is like taking a steaming crap > in someone's front yard, in broad daylight, while they are home, with > their young daughter watching, and then wondering why they think something > is wrong. > > Thanks for caring, > > ~JasonG Tell us how you really feel, Jason, and this time don't hold back :) --- Salvador Manzo [ 620 W. 35th St - Los Angeles, CA 90089 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Auxiliary Services IT, Datacenter University of Southern California 818-612-5112 In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock. Thomas Jefferson ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
On 1/28/08 12:56 PM, "Jason Gurtz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Gee only 8 OOOs. > > It's been posted innumerable times in innumerable places how to correctly > configure one's MUA/MTA to NOT DO THIS and yet it continues due to > standard human behavior (which is don't change a thing until I'm forced to > because change is bad/uncomfortable and I might have to learn something). > How hard would it be to implement standard list behavior... i.e. Policy is > to unsubscribe anybody that does this? Ideally, this policy would be > communicated at the same time as signing up so people aren't like wtf when > they get unsubscribed. > > It's really quite ridiculous that everyone just puts up with this w/o > batting an eyelash when it's so easily taken care of. I volunteer to do > the unsubscribing if people will forward me the OOOs (as an attachment > preserving full headers please) and I can be given appropriate perms. I'm > at GMT -0500 so it would probably be good to get someone in Western > Asia/AU to also volunteer to provide near continuous "ooo moderation". > > Sending indiscriminant OOOs to a stranger is like taking a steaming crap > in someone's front yard, in broad daylight, while they are home, with > their young daughter watching, and then wondering why they think something > is wrong. > > Thanks for caring, > > ~JasonG Tell us how you really feel, Jason, and this time don't hold back :) --- Salvador Manzo [ 620 W. 35th St - Los Angeles, CA 90089 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Auxiliary Services IT, Datacenter University of Southern California 818-612-5112 In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock. Thomas Jefferson ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
> Just because you dont like OOO's doesn't mean something is broken or > out of spec. > > And I think the point of "unsolicited" could be argued in court that > it very well was solicited by posting to a very public list. I guess that's why searching for 'stopping "out of office" "mailing lists"' in google returns 20,200 pages that claim otherwise. Clicking I'm Feeling Lucky should be illuminating. ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
Hmm, good point (about solicited) - I don't like 'em either but can deal with them. -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 1:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load Just because you dont like OOO's doesn't mean something is broken or out of spec. And I think the point of "unsolicited" could be argued in court that it very well was solicited by posting to a very public list. On Jan 28, 2008 4:20 PM, Jason Gurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regardless, the individual still has the option of fixing their own MUA > configuration, and should. This configuration has also been posted. If > Co. policy dictates they can't change that, then they have to option of > using foo free web mail provider (which can be configured to forward to > private email!). If they are unwilling to do that, then read the archives > on the web. > > There is absolutely no excuse to send unsolicited OOOs. The fact that > others are so lax doesn't make it any less of a problem. > > > ~JasonG -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
Just because you dont like OOO's doesn't mean something is broken or out of spec. And I think the point of "unsolicited" could be argued in court that it very well was solicited by posting to a very public list. On Jan 28, 2008 4:20 PM, Jason Gurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regardless, the individual still has the option of fixing their own MUA > configuration, and should. This configuration has also been posted. If > Co. policy dictates they can't change that, then they have to option of > using foo free web mail provider (which can be configured to forward to > private email!). If they are unwilling to do that, then read the archives > on the web. > > There is absolutely no excuse to send unsolicited OOOs. The fact that > others are so lax doesn't make it any less of a problem. > > > ~JasonG -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
> Gee a little testy are we Jason? Sorry, I'm old school ;) For the love of all that is good, this is an administrators list not some AOL chatroom. I know it's MS related but still... > As has been posted here innumerable times some mail admins don't have > the luxury of configuring their Exchange servers not to do this Regardless, the individual still has the option of fixing their own MUA configuration, and should. This configuration has also been posted. If Co. policy dictates they can't change that, then they have to option of using foo free web mail provider (which can be configured to forward to private email!). If they are unwilling to do that, then read the archives on the web. There is absolutely no excuse to send unsolicited OOOs. The fact that others are so lax doesn't make it any less of a problem. ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
And he wonders why people arent listing to him and doing what he tells them. ;-) On Jan 28, 2008 4:08 PM, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gee a little testy are we Jason? > > As has been posted here innumerable times some mail admins don't have the > luxury of configuring their Exchange servers not to do this, company policy > has dictated it to them, so to say that they should be unsubscribed from the > list is a little harsh. I am one of those admins that has been told by > upper management to allow OOO's to the internet. An attempt by the Lyris > List Admin a few weeks ago resulted in us not being able to see who the > messages were from at all, the general consensus by the members of this list > was that we'll take the OOO's in order to see who the messages are from. > > > > On Jan 28, 2008 2:56 PM, Jason Gurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Gee only 8 OOOs. > > > > It's been posted innumerable times in innumerable places how to correctly > > configure one's MUA/MTA to NOT DO THIS and yet it continues due to > > standard human behavior (which is don't change a thing until I'm forced to > > because change is bad/uncomfortable and I might have to learn something). > > How hard would it be to implement standard list behavior... i.e. Policy is > > to unsubscribe anybody that does this? Ideally, this policy would be > > communicated at the same time as signing up so people aren't like wtf when > > they get unsubscribed. > > > > It's really quite ridiculous that everyone just puts up with this w/o > > batting an eyelash when it's so easily taken care of. I volunteer to do > > the unsubscribing if people will forward me the OOOs (as an attachment > > preserving full headers please) and I can be given appropriate perms. I'm > > at GMT -0500 so it would probably be good to get someone in Western > > Asia/AU to also volunteer to provide near continuous "ooo moderation". > > > > Sending indiscriminant OOOs to a stranger is like taking a steaming crap > > in someone's front yard, in broad daylight, while they are home, with > > their young daughter watching, and then wondering why they think something > > is wrong. > > > > Thanks for caring, > > > > ~JasonG > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ > > > > -- > Sherry Abercrombie > > "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one." > -Albert Einstein > > -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
Gee a little testy are we Jason? As has been posted here innumerable times some mail admins don't have the luxury of configuring their Exchange servers not to do this, company policy has dictated it to them, so to say that they should be unsubscribed from the list is a little harsh. I am one of those admins that has been told by upper management to allow OOO's to the internet. An attempt by the Lyris List Admin a few weeks ago resulted in us not being able to see who the messages were from at all, the general consensus by the members of this list was that we'll take the OOO's in order to see who the messages are from. On Jan 28, 2008 2:56 PM, Jason Gurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Gee only 8 OOOs. > > It's been posted innumerable times in innumerable places how to correctly > configure one's MUA/MTA to NOT DO THIS and yet it continues due to > standard human behavior (which is don't change a thing until I'm forced to > because change is bad/uncomfortable and I might have to learn something). > How hard would it be to implement standard list behavior... i.e. Policy is > to unsubscribe anybody that does this? Ideally, this policy would be > communicated at the same time as signing up so people aren't like wtf when > they get unsubscribed. > > It's really quite ridiculous that everyone just puts up with this w/o > batting an eyelash when it's so easily taken care of. I volunteer to do > the unsubscribing if people will forward me the OOOs (as an attachment > preserving full headers please) and I can be given appropriate perms. I'm > at GMT -0500 so it would probably be good to get someone in Western > Asia/AU to also volunteer to provide near continuous "ooo moderation". > > Sending indiscriminant OOOs to a stranger is like taking a steaming crap > in someone's front yard, in broad daylight, while they are home, with > their young daughter watching, and then wondering why they think something > is wrong. > > Thanks for caring, > > ~JasonG > > -- > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ > -- Sherry Abercrombie "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one." -Albert Einstein ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
> Gee only 8 OOOs. It's been posted innumerable times in innumerable places how to correctly configure one's MUA/MTA to NOT DO THIS and yet it continues due to standard human behavior (which is don't change a thing until I'm forced to because change is bad/uncomfortable and I might have to learn something). How hard would it be to implement standard list behavior... i.e. Policy is to unsubscribe anybody that does this? Ideally, this policy would be communicated at the same time as signing up so people aren't like wtf when they get unsubscribed. It's really quite ridiculous that everyone just puts up with this w/o batting an eyelash when it's so easily taken care of. I volunteer to do the unsubscribing if people will forward me the OOOs (as an attachment preserving full headers please) and I can be given appropriate perms. I'm at GMT -0500 so it would probably be good to get someone in Western Asia/AU to also volunteer to provide near continuous "ooo moderation". Sending indiscriminant OOOs to a stranger is like taking a steaming crap in someone's front yard, in broad daylight, while they are home, with their young daughter watching, and then wondering why they think something is wrong. Thanks for caring, ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
Gee only 8 OOOs. From: Stephan Barr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load Symantec has been heavy on the client and the server for quite a while. Avoid it if you can. It's particularly heinous on the server, IMHO. As far as policies, you build those so scheduling is up to you as to when etc. It's wise to disallow the user any actions against the client. Cheers. From: Boggis, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load Anyone have Symantec installed out on users PC's with the outlook plugin? I am concerned about the load put on the server if a user does a manual scan of all their email. In my mind this is going to pull down all their attachments and go through them one by one. If some default policy is set to run a manual scan of machines at the same time, this could means thousands of users pulling down their mail all at the same time. I'm looking for anyone who has had any experience with this or had any issues. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
Symantec has been heavy on the client and the server for quite a while. Avoid it if you can. It's particularly heinous on the server, IMHO. As far as policies, you build those so scheduling is up to you as to when etc. It's wise to disallow the user any actions against the client. Cheers. From: Boggis, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load Anyone have Symantec installed out on users PC's with the outlook plugin? I am concerned about the load put on the server if a user does a manual scan of all their email. In my mind this is going to pull down all their attachments and go through them one by one. If some default policy is set to run a manual scan of machines at the same time, this could means thousands of users pulling down their mail all at the same time. I'm looking for anyone who has had any experience with this or had any issues. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
I dont let users perform any type of manual scans. They could unexpectedly put a load on anything. On Jan 28, 2008 3:16 PM, Boggis, Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Anyone have Symantec installed out on users PC's with the outlook plugin? I > am concerned about the load put on the server if a user does a manual scan > of all their email. In my mind this is going to pull down all their > attachments and go through them one by one. If some default policy is set > to run a manual scan of machines at the same time, this could means > thousands of users pulling down their mail all at the same time. > > > > I'm looking for anyone who has had any experience with this or had any > issues. > > > > > > > > -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
