[expert] CNET modem -- Gone!

2000-01-14 Thread Benjamin Sher

Dear friends:

Thanks to Ramon's wonderful analysis of modems, I was able to quickly
figure out what my problem is: My CNET faxmodem is a cheapie that has
the dreaded Cirrus Logic chip that Ramon talks about. He says that the
Cirrus Logic chip is even worse than Rockwell's crap. Boy, that really
hurt! :-) So, it's out with the old, and in with the new. I am returning
my CNET modem and have just ordered a U. S. Robotics ext. 56k faxmodem
from Egghead ($117 includes free UPS). 

All my thanks, Ramon.

Benjamin
-- 
Benjamin and Anna Sher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sher's Russian Web
http://www.websher.net



Re: [expert] commands at tartup

2000-01-14 Thread Michael George

On Jan 14, Randy Smith wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to run some commands at startup automatically, like autoexec.bat
> > in dos? thanks
> 
> have a look at man init

Do you mean at system startup, or user login?

/etc/rc.d/rc.local for the former, "man {shell you use}" to find out the
latter.

-- 
No, my friend, the way to have good and safe government, is not to trust it
all to one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to every one exactly
the functions he is competent to.  It is by dividing and subdividing these
republics from the national one down through all its subordinations, until it
ends in the administration of every man's farm by himself; by placing under
every one what his own eye may superintend, that all will be done for the
best.
-- Thomas Jefferson, to Joseph Cabell, 1816



Re: [expert] ISP choice

2000-01-14 Thread Bug Hunter


  the satellite service works in conjunction with your current ISP.
requests are sent via the current isp connection to the satellite
provider's main computers.  they obtain the information and spool it over
the satellite link.  This can take a few seconds to get started. on small
pages, this introduces more delay than a slow isp.


On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Guillermo Belli wrote:

> Hello:
> 
> My actual ISP does not offer 56k connections, and I'm tired of this turtle slow
> internet service. I was offered a satelite internet service, with a $30 monthly
> fee and free installation (I wont pay a cent for the hardware). Does this kind
> of service work with linux? Or do you think I should wait until cable is
> available some months from now? There will be ADSL, too, but this option is even
> more distant than cable (6-8 months or so). What do you recommend me?
> 
> thaks.



[expert] CNET -- bad chip

2000-01-14 Thread Benjamin Sher

Dear friends:

Just checked the CNET box. Alas, the chipset is Cirrus Logic, which,
according to Ramon, makes the worst chips around.

Well, those are the breaks. 

Benjamin
-- 
Benjamin and Anna Sher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sher's Russian Web
http://www.websher.net



[expert] CNET Modem woes -- footnote

2000-01-14 Thread Benjamin Sher

Dear friends:

There is no question that my CNET is a real faxmodem. I have used it as
a faxmodem (EIA Class 1) on our Compaq 486. Works great.

Benjamin


-- 
Benjamin and Anna Sher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sher's Russian Web
http://www.websher.net



[expert] ISP choice

2000-01-14 Thread Guillermo Belli

Hello:

My actual ISP does not offer 56k connections, and I'm tired of this turtle slow
internet service. I was offered a satelite internet service, with a $30 monthly
fee and free installation (I wont pay a cent for the hardware). Does this kind
of service work with linux? Or do you think I should wait until cable is
available some months from now? There will be ADSL, too, but this option is even
more distant than cable (6-8 months or so). What do you recommend me?

thaks.

-- 
Guillermo Belli - Linux User #131340
ICQ #38321312
http://sites.netscape.net/memo81 (under construction)



[expert] commands at tartup

2000-01-14 Thread Guillermo Belli

Hi:

Is there a way to run some commands at startup automatically, like autoexec.bat
in dos? thanks
 -- 
Guillermo Belli - Linux User #131340
ICQ #38321312
http://sites.netscape.net/memo81 (under construction)



[expert] How do I install Linux from my current drive, or from another hard drive?

2000-01-14 Thread timothylewis

Are there any instructions out there describing how to install Mandrake
7.0 from my drive with 6.1 on it, or from another drive on my system?
I don't have a CD burner.

Thanks,
Tim


--
To reply to me, please remove __DIE_SPAMMERS__ from my reply-to address.





Re: [expert] Re: Netscape

2000-01-14 Thread ibi

Thank you all so very much for the advice.

Pj
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [expert] Programs Compiled under Mandrake 6.0 Seg Faulting underRH5.2

2000-01-14 Thread Jean-Michel Dault


Mandrake uses a later version of glibc... That might be the problem. =(

If you compile your program under RH5.2 it should work in Mandrake,
because it has both the newer lib and the compat one.

Jean-Michel Dault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Christopher Cox wrote:

> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 15:45:03 -0500
> From: Christopher Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [expert] Programs Compiled under Mandrake 6.0 Seg Faulting under
RH5.2
> 
> eiks...
> 
> I thought I understood that if you stuck to the rules, standard Unix like
> calls, that binaries from one machine would run on another.
> 
> Well, I compiled my product on a Mandrake 6.0 machine and it segmentation
> faults on RH5.2. What is worse is that gdb under RH5.2 cannot even make
> enough sense out of the backtrace so that I might figure out what happened.
> 
> 
> Bummer. Is there a compatibility mode now in Linux that I might have
> missed? 
> 
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Christopher Cox
> Cobox
> 



Re: [expert] ISP choice

2000-01-14 Thread Civileme

D HOPP wrote:

> On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Guillermo Belli wrote:
>
> I don't know about the satellite working but I defiantly recommend waiting
> for cable and if you can wait and are eligible get DSL.  Both connections
> are quick and a lot better then dialup.
>
> Dennis
>
> > Hello:
> >
> > My actual ISP does not offer 56k connections, and I'm tired of this turtle slow
> > internet service. I was offered a satelite internet service, with a $30 monthly
> > fee and free installation (I wont pay a cent for the hardware). Does this kind
> > of service work with linux? Or do you think I should wait until cable is
> > available some months from now? There will be ADSL, too, but this option is even
> > more distant than cable (6-8 months or so). What do you recommend me?
> >
> > thaks.
> >
> > --
> > Guillermo Belli - Linux User #131340
> > ICQ #38321312
> > http://sites.netscape.net/memo81 (under construction)
> >

Satellite can give you up to 400K download, so they advertise.

But most satellite transponders peak out at about 70K so the 400K would likely have
to be multi-threaded in some way

And you STILL need your ISP to dialup to at 33.6 for the upload side.  Satellite is
strictly one-way unless you have an 8-foot dish and some fancy transmission equipment
and a few dozen licenses and  (OR an iridium phone)

Wait for cable or ADSL.  And your ISP is probably smart to not offer 56K service.
With all the software modems running round that have considerable problems at that
speed, he's keeping his costs (and probably yours as well) down.

And 33.6 isn't that different from 48 which is what I feel lucky to achieve when I
can get it.  Mostly, my ISP lets me have about 20-25K on the 56K lines and just about
the same on his 33.6 lines.  And I'll likely never see ADSL or Cable here because we
have no hard line to the internet or even to other phone companies.  We go through
some lightly loaded communications satellites.

Civileme




Re: [expert] Modems (long)

2000-01-14 Thread Civileme

Ramon Gandia wrote:

> Dennis Veatch wrote:
> >
> > I having problems with modems. It started out with an Amquest 56K internal and
> > also happens with the USR 56K external. These problems occur in Windows98 and
> > L-M 6.1.
> >
> > Problem 1; The modem goes off hook, there is the dial tone, the number is
> > dialed, the dial tone comes back. Sometimes the modem resets itself, most times
> > not. I have verified the modem settings that are software related and used a
> > terminal program to verify individually the settings of the modem profiles and
> > S registers, all are at factory defaults.
>
> This is an indication of a bad phone line or a defective modem.
> It
> means that your modem is not putting enough of a load on the
>



Ummm, any chance of setting up a db of Ramon's rants?  It seems to be the best of
info.

Civileme


>
>
> Good luck!
>
> --
> Ramon Gandia = Sysadmin == Nook Net
> http://www.nook.net[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 285 West First Avenue tel. 907-443-7575
> P.O. Box 970  fax. 907-443-2487
> Nome, Alaska 99762-0970  Alaska Toll Free. 888-443-7525



Re: [expert] commands at tartup

2000-01-14 Thread Charles Curley

On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 08:55:13AM -0600, Guillermo Belli wrote:
-> Hi:
-> 
-> Is there a way to run some commands at startup automatically, like autoexec.bat
-> in dos? thanks

Depends on what you want to do.

Autoexec.bat sets up fundamental, global stuff on boot. In Linux, a lot of
rather fundamental stuff, like activating swap space, is set up in
/etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit. Activating daemons like inetd or httpd is done in
the mess of files below /etc/rc.d/rc.init. After those all run,
/etc/rc.d/rc.local is run. You can place commands that have global effect
in any of those. E.g: I use rc.local to install the driver for a ZIP disk
and tell the IDE drive to spin down after 20 minutes.

However, autoexec.bat also sets up user preferences like the
environment. In Linux, that is also more distributed. Any individual user
has a shell specified (in /etc/passwd, I believe), and that shell will run
one or more startup scripts, like ~/bashrc. Some are run at login, others
are run each time a shell is launched. Those are the places to put
individual user preferences.


-- 

-- C^2

No windows were crashed in the making of this email.

Looking for fine software and/or web pages?
http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley



Re: [expert] Modems

2000-01-14 Thread Dennis Veatch

Umm, now that you mention irqtune, that rings a bell. I will try it.

I received a suggestion turning off VJ compression, no change.

> 
> It is likely that supposedly identical models of those modems with slightly 
>different firmware revisions
> would not show the same problems.  I know of at least 150 different firmwares on a 
>single model of
> "sportster" modems with nothing to tell them apart for the consumer.
> 
> What you probably want is irqtune to move the serial ports up in the priority stack 
>for interrupt
> handling.  If you search the archives with the keywords "Civileme" and "www.best"  
>you will likely find
> the URL explaining the principle and providing the download.
> 
> Civileme



Re: [expert] ISP choice

2000-01-14 Thread John Aldrich

On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, you wrote:
> Hello:
> 
> My actual ISP does not offer 56k connections, and I'm tired of this turtle slow
> internet service. I was offered a satelite internet service, with a $30 monthly
> fee and free installation (I wont pay a cent for the hardware). Does this kind
> of service work with linux? Or do you think I should wait until cable is
> available some months from now? There will be ADSL, too, but this option is even
> more distant than cable (6-8 months or so). What do you recommend me?
> 
You'll still need an "upstream" connection via land-line
(phone.) I'd wait for cable, or, if cost-effective, get
ISDN.
John



[expert] Programs Compiled under Mandrake 6.0 Seg Faulting under RH5.2

2000-01-14 Thread Christopher Cox

eiks...

I thought I understood that if you stuck to the rules, standard Unix like
calls, that binaries from one machine would run on another.

Well, I compiled my product on a Mandrake 6.0 machine and it segmentation
faults on RH5.2. What is worse is that gdb under RH5.2 cannot even make
enough sense out of the backtrace so that I might figure out what happened.


Bummer. Is there a compatibility mode now in Linux that I might have
missed? 


Thanks in advance!

Christopher Cox
Cobox



Re: [expert] Re: Netscape

2000-01-14 Thread John Aldrich

On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, you wrote:
> I saw a message (error?) that my Netscape has a lock in place that
> prohibits access to cache and other files with an explanation that
> another user might be using my password. This is not possible. 
> 
> It looked something like this: /netscape/ibi.lock/ local host process ID
> 566. KPPP has the lock enabled. 
> 
> What happened and can I get rid of it? 
> 
in your ~/ directory, go to .netscape and type "rm lock"
John



[expert] CNET Ext Modem Woes

2000-01-14 Thread Benjamin Sher

Dear friends:

I am lucky enough to have Bellsouth ADSL service. However, I have gotten
pretty tired of the frequent down times for ADSL either because of
server breakdowns or the regular early morning (4 a.m. to 6 a.m.)
maintenatce and upgrade downtime. They like to say that you are always
online with ADSL. This is absolutely correct, so long as you are of
course online.

So, I decided to add an external modem to my Linux box as a backup. I
use it for two purposes: a) to connect to Bellsouth with a modem and b)
to connect to our local Unix-run FreeNet if Bellsouth's ADSL AND dial-up
services are down (which is not rare).

I have an external CNET v.90 56k voice/fax/data modem, which I got from
TigerDirect.

Specs:

System requirements:

IBM486 or Higher, 8MB of RAM, Win3.1, 95/98
Supported Standards
ITZU -T V. 90

Supported Protocols

V.90, V.34, V.32bis, V.32, etc.

Data Compression:

V. 42bis, MNP5

Error Correction
 V.42 LAPM, MNP 2,3,4

I have used this modem with success on our Compaq 486 Win 3.1. Works
great and connects everytime.

When using my ext CNET 56k with Linux, I have connected with both
Bellsouth as well as with my FreeNET. However, I am having problems
connecting on a regular basis with Bellsouth. Here is what happens. I
configured my modem with kppp. I checked with Bellsouth. The settings
are all correct. I have, after all, connected several times with
Bellsouth and used Netscape, my RealPlayer, etc with success. 


I begin by making sure that my ADSL is OFF. So, I turn my ADSL modem off
and reboot to localhost@sher, go into KDE, and click on kppp.

Now when I first click on kppp I get a strange message:

"Your kernel does not support kppp either directly or by means of a
kernel module."

The message disappears and my dial-up dialogue screen appears. I type in
my user name and password and click OK. My log shows the following:


ATH
OK
- ATZ
OK
ATM0L0
OK
ATDT525-3398
OK
ATH
OK

etc.

[At the ATDT525-3398 stage above you see at the bottom of the log screen
"Expecting CONNECT". When it does connect, you see on the log screen
CONNECT 56700]

I let this process repeat itself several times in case Bellsouth is
busy. Is it possible that that's all it is?

Another funny thing: Sometimes I get the strange message "Setting
speaker volume". I guess this has something to do with the fact that
CNET supports voice communication. Sometimes the message appears and
sometimes no. 

Another thing: Sometimes you can hear the modem dialing out and
connecting and sometimes it will dial out silently and still connect.

One more funny thing: One night when I dialed out I got a completely
blank log screen: no data at all. Just a blank screen as the modem
dialed out.

I do understand the problem with the lock file, and when this happens I
just delete the lock file from /var/lock.

I have also tested my modem with Minicom, a communications program I use
to connect to my New Orleans FreeNet Unix shell. Sometimes I have the
same problems and sometimes not.


Well, those are the symptoms.


Do you think my modem is in fact Linux compatible and that my problems
are not related to Linux issues as such? 

Any idea what might be preventing me from connecting on a regular basis?

Would appreciate any expert advice from our list members.

Thank you so very much.

Benjamin

-- 
Benjamin and Anna Sher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sher's Russian Web
http://www.websher.net



[expert] Floppy drive mount problem

2000-01-14 Thread Payne Stanifer

I am trying out Red Hat 6.0 and everything is greta except when I use the 
mount drive icon or the terminal to get to a floopy disk it tells me "mount 
/mnt/floppy 2>&1" reported: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock 
on /dev/fd0, or too many mounted file systems. Any suggestions on how to fix 
this or maybe get a floppy and cd icon on the desk? Thanks.
Payne
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



[expert] never mind the floppy, now to sound

2000-01-14 Thread Payne Stanifer

I fixed that floppy mounting problem, but I still don't have any sound. I 
have turned it on in everywhere I know, but I still don't have sound. What 
needs to be compiled into my kernel for me to have sound? I am positive my 
card is supported, so any suggestions are welcomed. Thanks.
Payne
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



Re: [expert] Modems (long)

2000-01-14 Thread ibi

Ramon, 

You are a jewel!!! I knew some of the stuph about modems but not nearly
as much. I suspect if I was on the server end I'd be alot smarter about
a lot of related things. Thank you, thank you, thank you. 

When you have a little time, I'd like to pose a question about modems
and connections. When I lived in Ok I bought a new 56k v.90 which had a
decent connect (48-51) rate. And d/l was good too. Then I moved to
Missouri. I tried 3 different ISP's and the best local connection I
could get was 26.6. I resolved it by buying a USR external and have been
happy as a clam ever since. I suspect the internal was a winmodem that
was having trouble with the router but the ISP couldn't/wouldn't
confirm or deny it. I'm curious what you think. I've never gotten a
sensible answer.   

Indentally I moved from tornado alley and a rural electric company. WE
had surges, brownouts and outages all the time. After the first outage
during a bright, calm sunny day which fried the modem, I bought a UPS. 
It alerted me several times a day so I knew there were problems in the
area somewhere. Now I am in town with an outstanding power company. UPS
has alerted twice and both times it was storm related. They are great!
I have a screwy set up. I run everything including modem thru a MAX
surge protector before it goes to the UPS. One plug disconnects it all
instantly. Hopefully the USR will die of old age. LOL I'd lock my sys
down tighter if I knew how. 

What amazes me the most is that computer savvy people do not have UPS
and then complain when they lose equipment. Of course these are the same
experts who run IE with Java and DirectX and use Outlook. :-) 

Thanks again for the education. You guys are great!

Pj



[expert] ...der Mandrake 6.0 Seg Faulting under RH5.2 NEVER MIND!

2000-01-14 Thread Christopher Cox

Ugh


Mandrakes kernel Allows for writable strings.

I had to 'gcc -fwritable-strings'  for RH5.2

Later.

Christopher Cox
Cobox



Re: [expert] ISP choice

2000-01-14 Thread Guillermo Belli

El vie, 14 ene 2000, escribiste:

As far as I know there is no trick here, the satellite internet service is just
being introduced and they have this limited time offer: one free month with no
installation fee. The cable company has to finish upgrading their wiring to
optic fiber for the service to be available. Satellite internet service is the
only high speed internet acces for now...

> What kind of connection speed do you get compared to cable modem?
> 
> Do you have to sign up for a minimum period of time?
> 
> How soon till you can get cable modem?
>  Kevin

I'm in Nicaragua, where do u live? The company is called InterBeeper (used to
be a pager service company)

>Who offers the satelitte service?  Cable or ASDL are not  going to be
>available where I live.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks for the URL, I'll check

>There is a commercial Linux driver available at www.helius.com.
>Jean-Michel Dault

-- 
Guillermo Belli - Linux User #131340
ICQ #38321312
http://sites.netscape.net/memo81 (under construction)



Re: [expert] ISP choice

2000-01-14 Thread Frank Arnold


Direct PC is one.
They are related to Direct TV, the Satelite TV people.
They should have an 800 number if no retail in your local area.
BYW, it's satelite download only. Upload is by phone.
Still, in many cases, download is where the speed is needed.
Frank Arnold
==
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Who offers the satelitte service?  Cable or ASDL are not  going to be
> available where I live.
> 
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Alan Shoemaker wrote:
> 
> > Guillermopersonally, I'd wait for the adsl.  Actually I am
> > waiting for it :-)
> > 
> > Alan
> > 
> > 
> > Guillermo Belli wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hello:
> > > 
> > > My actual ISP does not offer 56k connections, and I'm tired of this turtle slow
> > > internet service. I was offered a satelite internet service, with a $30 monthly
> > > fee and free installation (I wont pay a cent for the hardware). Does this kind
> > > of service work with linux? Or do you think I should wait until cable is
> > > available some months from now? There will be ADSL, too, but this option is even
> > > more distant than cable (6-8 months or so). What do you recommend me?
> > > 
> > > thaks.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Guillermo Belli - Linux User #131340
> > > ICQ #38321312
> > > http://sites.netscape.net/memo81 (under construction)
> > 
> 
> 



Re: [expert] ISP choice

2000-01-14 Thread Jean-Michel Dault


Hello,

What kind of Satellite Service is available in your area? I have lots of
experience with the DirecPC Service. It offers 400 kbps download, and the
upload is done by modem at your standard speed. It's 95% stable, and for
the 5%, you have to connect using straight dial-up. But it's here NOW, and
it's wayy faster than 33.6.

There is a commercial Linux driver available at www.helius.com.

Jean-Michel Dault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Guillermo Belli wrote:

> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 08:47:46 -0600
> From: Guillermo Belli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [expert] ISP choice
> 
> Hello:
> 
> My actual ISP does not offer 56k connections, and I'm tired of this turtle slow
> internet service. I was offered a satelite internet service, with a $30 monthly
> fee and free installation (I wont pay a cent for the hardware). Does this kind
> of service work with linux? Or do you think I should wait until cable is
> available some months from now? There will be ADSL, too, but this option is even
> more distant than cable (6-8 months or so). What do you recommend me?
> 
> thaks.
> 
> -- 
> Guillermo Belli - Linux User #131340
> ICQ #38321312
> http://sites.netscape.net/memo81 (under construction)
> 



Re: [expert] ISP choice

2000-01-14 Thread Riyad Kalla

>From what I've heard about satellite ( Speedchoice I believe ) the following
things occure:

1) During big storms or just windy days the connection will go out
2) Encryption isn't all that good and can be hacked easily ( I don't know
anything about encryption, this is just what I heard )
3) Get interference from other devices using similar wave lengths I
believe...

Over all it seemed like a good idea, but from the people that have it, I
haven't heard wonderful comments.

Riyad Kalla
General Partner, Multimedia & Design
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.transitivesys.com


- Original Message -
From: "D HOPP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] ISP choice


> On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Guillermo Belli wrote:
>
> I don't know about the satellite working but I defiantly recommend waiting
> for cable and if you can wait and are eligible get DSL.  Both connections
> are quick and a lot better then dialup.
>
> Dennis
>
>
> > Hello:
> >
> > My actual ISP does not offer 56k connections, and I'm tired of this
turtle slow
> > internet service. I was offered a satelite internet service, with a $30
monthly
> > fee and free installation (I wont pay a cent for the hardware). Does
this kind
> > of service work with linux? Or do you think I should wait until cable is
> > available some months from now? There will be ADSL, too, but this option
is even
> > more distant than cable (6-8 months or so). What do you recommend me?
> >
> > thaks.
> >
> > --
> > Guillermo Belli - Linux User #131340
> > ICQ #38321312
> > http://sites.netscape.net/memo81 (under construction)
> >
>
>



Re: [expert] Modems (long)

2000-01-14 Thread Ramon Gandia

Dennis Veatch wrote:
> 
> I having problems with modems. It started out with an Amquest 56K internal and
> also happens with the USR 56K external. These problems occur in Windows98 and
> L-M 6.1.
> 
> Problem 1; The modem goes off hook, there is the dial tone, the number is
> dialed, the dial tone comes back. Sometimes the modem resets itself, most times
> not. I have verified the modem settings that are software related and used a
> terminal program to verify individually the settings of the modem profiles and
> S registers, all are at factory defaults.

This is an indication of a bad phone line or a defective modem. 
It
means that your modem is not putting enough of a load on the
phone company switch to hold the voltage below a certain threshold
(at the phone company).  This could happen, for instance, in the
modem if it had a bad relay (switch contact, the thingy that goes
click inside), or in the phone line if there are bad/rusty/high
resistance connection.

With house wiring, it could well affect the wiring going the the
jack in the computer room but not elsewhere in the house.

Most phone companies provide an outdoor box with a modular test
jack.  When the box is opened with a wrench, there is a swingout
protector that disconnects the house's wiring and exposes a
conventional modular plug for that line.  You can plug in a
regular phone cord there for testing.  Get yourself a brand new
50 or 100 ft phone cord and run it thru a window to your modem
and see if the problem disappears.

The US Robotics 56K external does not have the Rockwell Chip Set.
It has a US Robotics/3Com chipset that is manufactured for them by
Texas Instruments.  The Rockwell is a piece of junk, but the
USR/3Com/TI is a very_good chipset.  In fact, it is the best.

However your dial tone irregularity indicates a phone line problem
or a defect in the modem itself.  In modems I have seen those
after
surges like a powerline falling across phone wires, or lightning
strikes.  These can happen miles from your house and can fry
wiring, modems, etc.  

You can borrow a modem from someone to eliminate the possibility
of
a bad modem.  If the problem persists with the new modem, then you
use the long cord to eliminate the possibility of a bad house
wiring.  If you have two phone lines in the house (two separate
numbers), try temporarily using the ohter line and see if the
problem goes away.  If you determine it is at the phone company's,
a call is in order.

In Alaska, lightning is rare, but is very common out there.  You
get a lightning strike a few miles away.  The spike travels on the
phone wire and fries your modem, indoor wiring or the phone
company
wiring or outdoors protector on your house.  If the failure is not
total, you get intermittent problems like you are reporting.

Another thing to check is your login procedure.  Your successful
log in indicates that you are using a Script.  Many ISP's, myself
included, do not require a script and in fact will reject your
call
after authentication.  Just hang up on you after verifying
username
and password.  This is a function of several things at the ISP,
and
different terminal servers can behave differently.  Thus one call
may succeed, while others do not.  This is because when you dial
the ISP's phone number the call may at random be assigned to
different
terminal servers.

If in Windows 98 you do not need a Script file or a Terminal
Screen,
then how come you are using one in Linux?  

The fact that the ISP requested a hangup or termination seems to
me
to indicate that this is the problem.  

Also, be careful who you talk to at the ISP.  ISP's are flooded by
tech support calls.  Ask me:  I am an ISP and I can tell you that
clueless users can take up a lot of time.  We get calls blaming
Nook Net for being out of service, and the message on their screen
is "No Dial Tone".  Really.

What this means is that ISP's tend to employ minimum-wage young
techno-geeks in their support department.  This is an entry level
position.  It is a tedious job relating mostly to real_dumb
questions.  Most of these kids are really not electronic
technicians
nor are they versed at all in the workings of their Terminal
Servers,
modems, etc.  The fact that the kid that spoke to you told you
that
your USR External modem used a Rockwell Chipset is an indication 
that he is clueless himself and he is just posturing as an expert
when in fact he is a dumbkopf himself.

What you need to do is to get past this first layer of ISP
technical
support and see if you can speak to the head honcho over there. 
Most
ISP's, like myself, have literally seen -and fixed- everything you
can imagine.  I am not down there to help you, and some of the
troubleshooting that you may need can only be provided on-site or
by interactively asking questions.

Both Linux client machines and Windows 98/95 have different tools
and procedures which can answer some of the questions.  The PPP
logfile of Linux is unique; but there are corresponding log f

Re: [expert] ISP choice

2000-01-14 Thread minnrp01

Who offers the satelitte service?  Cable or ASDL are not  going to be
available where I live.

On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Alan Shoemaker wrote:

> Guillermopersonally, I'd wait for the adsl.  Actually I am
> waiting for it :-)
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
> Guillermo Belli wrote:
> > 
> > Hello:
> > 
> > My actual ISP does not offer 56k connections, and I'm tired of this turtle slow
> > internet service. I was offered a satelite internet service, with a $30 monthly
> > fee and free installation (I wont pay a cent for the hardware). Does this kind
> > of service work with linux? Or do you think I should wait until cable is
> > available some months from now? There will be ADSL, too, but this option is even
> > more distant than cable (6-8 months or so). What do you recommend me?
> > 
> > thaks.
> > 
> > --
> > Guillermo Belli - Linux User #131340
> > ICQ #38321312
> > http://sites.netscape.net/memo81 (under construction)
> 



Re: [expert] ISP choice

2000-01-14 Thread Kevin Boylan

Friday, January 14, 2000, 9:47:46 AM, you wrote:

GB> My actual ISP does not offer 56k connections, and I'm tired of this turtle slow
GB> internet service. I was offered a satelite internet service, with a $30 monthly
GB> fee and free installation (I wont pay a cent for the hardware). Does this kind
GB> of service work with linux? Or do you think I should wait until cable is
GB> available some months from now? There will be ADSL, too, but this option is even
GB> more distant than cable (6-8 months or so). What do you recommend me?

What kind of connection speed do you get compared to cable modem?

Do you have to sign up for a minimum period of time?

How soon till you can get cable modem?


-- 
Best regards,
 Kevin




Re: [expert] commands at tartup

2000-01-14 Thread Davor Cengija

On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Guillermo Belli wrote:

>Hi:
>
>Is there a way to run some commands at startup automatically, like autoexec.bat
>in dos? thanks

/etc/rc.d/rc.local
-- 
  v
Davor Cengija
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
"Please allow 30 days for delivery"



[expert] Postfix times out to internet

2000-01-14 Thread Devin Vo

My postfix mail won't deliver to any destination that is not local.  Local
user to user is fine.
 I'm getting a "(connect to smtp2.infotechsys.com: Connection timed out)" on
all outbound mail.
I check the FAQ and it said to disable MTU but the only thing close that I
can see in the kernel was
"net.ipv4.ip_no_pmtu_disc"  it was originally set for 0 and I set it to 1
with no luck.   What am I doing wrong?  Configuration is the standard setup
that comes in the RPM.
Also how do I allow relaying from specific addresses in postfix?

Thanks
6.1



Re: [expert] Modems

2000-01-14 Thread ibi

You might look at http://www.56k.com . They have layers of useful
infomation that relate to connectivity. 

Pj 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [expert] commands at tartup

2000-01-14 Thread Randy Smith

Guillermo Belli wrote:

> Hi:
>
> Is there a way to run some commands at startup automatically, like autoexec.bat
> in dos? thanks
>  --
> Guillermo Belli - Linux User #131340
> ICQ #38321312
> http://sites.netscape.net/memo81 (under construction)

have a look at man init



Re: [expert] ISP choice

2000-01-14 Thread D HOPP

On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Guillermo Belli wrote:

I don't know about the satellite working but I defiantly recommend waiting
for cable and if you can wait and are eligible get DSL.  Both connections
are quick and a lot better then dialup.

Dennis


> Hello:
> 
> My actual ISP does not offer 56k connections, and I'm tired of this turtle slow
> internet service. I was offered a satelite internet service, with a $30 monthly
> fee and free installation (I wont pay a cent for the hardware). Does this kind
> of service work with linux? Or do you think I should wait until cable is
> available some months from now? There will be ADSL, too, but this option is even
> more distant than cable (6-8 months or so). What do you recommend me?
> 
> thaks.
> 
> -- 
> Guillermo Belli - Linux User #131340
> ICQ #38321312
> http://sites.netscape.net/memo81 (under construction)
> 



Re: [expert] Modems

2000-01-14 Thread Civileme

Dennis Veatch wrote:

> I having problems with modems. It started out with an Amquest 56K internal and
> also happens with the USR 56K external. These problems occur in Windows98 and
> L-M 6.1.
>
> Problem 1; The modem goes off hook, there is the dial tone, the number is
> dialed, the dial tone comes back. Sometimes the modem resets itself, most times
> not. I have verified the modem settings that are software related and used a
> terminal program to verify individually the settings of the modem profiles and
> S registers, all are at factory defaults.
>
> Problem 2; The dial up procedure goes fine, but the modem hangs up. This always
> occurs when the two machines are settling on the ppp parameters. In particular
> here is a snipit of my ppplog:
>
> Jan 14 08:38:17 paula ifup-ppp: pppd started for ppp0 on /dev/ttyS0 at 115200
> Jan 14 08:38:17 paula pppd[2597]: pppd 2.3.8 started by root, uid 0
> Jan 14 08:38:46 paula pppd[2597]: Serial connection established.
> Jan 14 08:38:46 paula pppd[2597]: Using interface ppp0
> Jan 14 08:38:46 paula pppd[2597]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
> Jan 14 08:38:47 paula pppd[2597]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 
>   ]
> Jan 14 08:38:47 paula pppd[2597]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x6b 
>  ]
> Jan 14 08:38:47 paula pppd[2597]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x6b ]
> Jan 14 08:38:47 paula pppd[2597]: rcvd [LCP ConfNak id=0x1]
> Jan 14 08:38:47 paula pppd[2597]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 
>   ]
> Jan 14 08:38:47 paula pppd[2597]: rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0x6c]
> Jan 14 08:38:47 paula pppd[2597]: sent [LCP TermAck id=0x6c]
> Jan 14 08:38:48 paula pppd[2597]: Modem hangup
> Jan 14 08:38:48 paula pppd[2597]: Connection terminated.
> Jan 14 08:38:49 paula pppd[2597]: Exit.
>
> Repeated dialing attempts results in the following:
>
> Jan 14 08:45:31 paula ifup-ppp: pppd started for ppp0 on /dev/ttyS0 at 115200
> Jan 14 08:45:31 paula pppd[2668]: pppd 2.3.8 started by root, uid 0
> Jan 14 08:46:05 paula pppd[2668]: Serial connection established.
> Jan 14 08:46:05 paula pppd[2668]: Using interface ppp0
> Jan 14 08:46:05 paula pppd[2668]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 
>   ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x5 
>  ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x5 ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 
>  ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x6  ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x6  ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x2 ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1  
>]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1  
> ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x7 ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x7 ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [IPCP ConfRej id=0x1 ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [LCP ProtRej id=0x8 80 fd ff 03 80 fd 01 01
> 00 0f 1a 04 78 00 18 04 78 00 15 03 2f]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x2 ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x3 ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x3 ]
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: local  IP address 209.143.42.136
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: remote IP address 209.143.42.104
> Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: Script /etc/ppp/ip-up started (pid 2671)
> Jan 14 08:46:07 paula pppd[2668]: Script /etc/ppp/ip-up finished (pid 2671), status 
>= 0x0
>
> Of particular note you'll see on an unsuccessful attempt I recevie what I take
> to be a termination request from my ISP's host resulting in a modem hangup.
> What I don't understand is why this happens as nothing has changed when a logon
> is successful.
>
> I have talked with my ISP and they say it has to do with some irregularity in
> the Rockwell chipset used on the Amquest and USR modems. Anyone aware of this
> issue?
>
> My last problem is with frame errors during a session. They are not escessive
> but Netscape stalls a lot and throughput is noticably slow. I remember seeing a
> docuemnet somewher on the net what causes this but I cannot not find it. Can
> anyone point me to it?
>
> TIA
> Dennis Veatch

It is likely that supposedly identical models of those modems with slightly different 
firmware revisions
would not show the same problems.  I know of at least 150 different firmwares on a 
single model of
"sportster" modems with nothing to tell them apart for the consumer.

What you probably want is irqtune to move the serial ports up in the priority stack 
for interrupt
handling.  If you search the archives with the keywords "Civileme" and "www.best"  you 
will likely find
the URL explaining the principle and providing the download.

Civileme



Re: [expert] ISP choice

2000-01-14 Thread Alan Shoemaker

Guillermopersonally, I'd wait for the adsl.  Actually I am
waiting for it :-)

Alan


Guillermo Belli wrote:
> 
> Hello:
> 
> My actual ISP does not offer 56k connections, and I'm tired of this turtle slow
> internet service. I was offered a satelite internet service, with a $30 monthly
> fee and free installation (I wont pay a cent for the hardware). Does this kind
> of service work with linux? Or do you think I should wait until cable is
> available some months from now? There will be ADSL, too, but this option is even
> more distant than cable (6-8 months or so). What do you recommend me?
> 
> thaks.
> 
> --
> Guillermo Belli - Linux User #131340
> ICQ #38321312
> http://sites.netscape.net/memo81 (under construction)



Re: [expert] commands at tartup

2000-01-14 Thread Alan Shoemaker

GuillermoI add those kinds of things to the
/etc/rc.d/rc.local file.  It is a shell script and executes last
after all the other init scripts.  You can just tack your
commands on the end of the script.  

Alan


Guillermo Belli wrote:
> 
> Hi:
> 
> Is there a way to run some commands at startup automatically, like autoexec.bat
> in dos? thanks
>  --
> Guillermo Belli - Linux User #131340
> ICQ #38321312
> http://sites.netscape.net/memo81 (under construction)



Re: [expert] Need to stop X from starting at boot.

2000-01-14 Thread Denis Havlik

:>> How can I stop X from starting when I see the login?
:>>
:>Reboot and type "linux 3" at the LILO prompt. This will put
:>you at a console log-in rather than the GUI log-in you're
:>used to.

Just for completenes - there is another way to do it: 

If you wait long enough after a "normal" power-up, you will see
"raspawning too fast, disabled for 5 minutes" message, when your computer
gives up starting X. Then you have 5 minutes to log-in on a virtual
console, and type "telinit 3" to get in the 3-rd runlevel (no X).

While you are at it, edit the /etc/inittab and set "default runlevel" to
3, until you are done with setting up X again...

cu
Denis 

---
Denis Havlik  |||   http://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik
 (@ @)  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
-oOO--(_)--OOo-



[expert] commands at tartup

2000-01-14 Thread Mike Fieschko

>>> "Guillermo" == Guillermo Belli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Guillermo> Hi: Is there a way to run some commands at startup
Guillermo> automatically, like autoexec.bat in dos? thanks --

Put them in /etc/rc.d/rc.local

-- 
Mike Fieschko, West Orange, NJ, USA
X-Mailer: XEmacs 21.1, VM 6.75 and random-sig.el
Kernel 2.2.14-15mdk
http://www.viconet.com/fieschko/home.htm
Jan 14 St Hilary or St Felix
"It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged." -
[G.K. Chesterton, in The Cleveland Press, 3/1/21]



Re: [expert] commands at tartup

2000-01-14 Thread Riyad Kalla

Yep, put your commands in /etc/rc.d/rc.local, that is the last startup file
to run, a bit like an autoexec.bat file.

Riyad Kalla
General Partner, Multimedia & Design
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.transitivesys.com


- Original Message -
From: "Guillermo Belli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 7:55 AM
Subject: [expert] commands at tartup


> Hi:
>
> Is there a way to run some commands at startup automatically, like
autoexec.bat
> in dos? thanks
>  --
> Guillermo Belli - Linux User #131340
> ICQ #38321312
> http://sites.netscape.net/memo81 (under construction)
>



Re: [expert] Re: Netscape

2000-01-14 Thread WeiQuan Tian


 I had this problem, just remove it, then should work.


 Wei Quan Tian


On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, ibi wrote:

> I saw a message (error?) that my Netscape has a lock in place that
> prohibits access to cache and other files with an explanation that
> another user might be using my password. This is not possible. 
> 
> It looked something like this: /netscape/ibi.lock/ local host process ID
> 566. KPPP has the lock enabled. 
> 
> What happened and can I get rid of it? 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Pj
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



Re: [expert] 336 Supra Express

2000-01-14 Thread John E Connell

Bit off subject here, but just wanted to tell you Brian that my father
(who is no longer with us) worked at WPAFB for 35 years prior to
retirement. 
John Connell


> Brian D. Klar - CVE
> OTS
> WPAFB
> 937-257-5773
> 937-973-3125 (Pager)
>



[expert] Modems

2000-01-14 Thread Dennis Veatch

I having problems with modems. It started out with an Amquest 56K internal and
also happens with the USR 56K external. These problems occur in Windows98 and
L-M 6.1. 

Problem 1; The modem goes off hook, there is the dial tone, the number is
dialed, the dial tone comes back. Sometimes the modem resets itself, most times
not. I have verified the modem settings that are software related and used a
terminal program to verify individually the settings of the modem profiles and
S registers, all are at factory defaults.

Problem 2; The dial up procedure goes fine, but the modem hangs up. This always
occurs when the two machines are settling on the ppp parameters. In particular
here is a snipit of my ppplog:

Jan 14 08:38:17 paula ifup-ppp: pppd started for ppp0 on /dev/ttyS0 at 115200
Jan 14 08:38:17 paula pppd[2597]: pppd 2.3.8 started by root, uid 0
Jan 14 08:38:46 paula pppd[2597]: Serial connection established.
Jan 14 08:38:46 paula pppd[2597]: Using interface ppp0
Jan 14 08:38:46 paula pppd[2597]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
Jan 14 08:38:47 paula pppd[2597]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1  
  ]
Jan 14 08:38:47 paula pppd[2597]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x6b  
 ]
Jan 14 08:38:47 paula pppd[2597]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x6b ]
Jan 14 08:38:47 paula pppd[2597]: rcvd [LCP ConfNak id=0x1]
Jan 14 08:38:47 paula pppd[2597]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2  
  ]
Jan 14 08:38:47 paula pppd[2597]: rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0x6c]
Jan 14 08:38:47 paula pppd[2597]: sent [LCP TermAck id=0x6c]
Jan 14 08:38:48 paula pppd[2597]: Modem hangup
Jan 14 08:38:48 paula pppd[2597]: Connection terminated.
Jan 14 08:38:49 paula pppd[2597]: Exit. 

Repeated dialing attempts results in the following:

Jan 14 08:45:31 paula ifup-ppp: pppd started for ppp0 on /dev/ttyS0 at 115200
Jan 14 08:45:31 paula pppd[2668]: pppd 2.3.8 started by root, uid 0
Jan 14 08:46:05 paula pppd[2668]: Serial connection established.
Jan 14 08:46:05 paula pppd[2668]: Using interface ppp0
Jan 14 08:46:05 paula pppd[2668]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1  
  ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x5  
 ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x5 ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [LCP ConfRej id=0x1  
 ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x6  ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x6  ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x2 ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1  
]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1   ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x7 ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x7 ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [IPCP ConfRej id=0x1 ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [LCP ProtRej id=0x8 80 fd ff 03 80 fd 01 01 
00 0f 1a 04 78 00 18 04 78 00 15 03 2f]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x2 ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x3 ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x3 ]
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: local  IP address 209.143.42.136
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: remote IP address 209.143.42.104
Jan 14 08:46:06 paula pppd[2668]: Script /etc/ppp/ip-up started (pid 2671)
Jan 14 08:46:07 paula pppd[2668]: Script /etc/ppp/ip-up finished (pid 2671), status = 
0x0

Of particular note you'll see on an unsuccessful attempt I recevie what I take
to be a termination request from my ISP's host resulting in a modem hangup.
What I don't understand is why this happens as nothing has changed when a logon
is successful.

I have talked with my ISP and they say it has to do with some irregularity in
the Rockwell chipset used on the Amquest and USR modems. Anyone aware of this
issue?

My last problem is with frame errors during a session. They are not escessive
but Netscape stalls a lot and throughput is noticably slow. I remember seeing a
docuemnet somewher on the net what causes this but I cannot not find it. Can
anyone point me to it?

TIA
Dennis Veatch



RE: [expert] 336 Supra Express

2000-01-14 Thread Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS

I have a Supra ISA Diamond Express 56K internal modem. It is PNP. It never
just "worked" in Redhat nor MD6 or 6.1.
I kept getting an eight byte overlap conflict with me soundcard. The only
way I got it to work was to remove both the soundcard and modem, boot up
Linux and then shutdown Linux. Install the soundcard, boot, and shutdown
(Soundcard worked at this point).
configure the modem (yes, it has jumpers on it) for a forced IRQ, think I
used com 2.Installed the modem and booted up MD, and all was fine then, and
has been since. I just make sure that I keep a copy of isapnp config file on
floppy to ease re-installations


Brian D. Klar - CVE
OTS
WPAFB
937-257-5773
937-973-3125 (Pager)


-Original Message-
From: Ramon Gandia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 12:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] 336 Supra Express


D HOPP wrote:
> 
> I have an ISA Diamon Supra Express 336 PNP Voice modem. 

They do not have such a model.  They have models like
Supra Express 336i V+  and so on.  You have to be a bit
careful.  Supras come in both WinModems and Non-Win.  However,
looking at all the variants of the 336's did not show any of
them to be WinModems.  However, some could be RPI's which are
just as bad.  

> I',m running
> Mandrake 7.0 and trying to get this modem to work (I didn't get it working
> under 6.1 either).  This isn't a winmodem (to my knowledge) but Lothar
> doesn't detect it (I know it's in beta).  I'm wondering how I can get this
> working if Lothar doesn't think it's there.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dennis

Most, if not all Diamond Supra modems are PnP.  Often when you
exit windows or reset the computer, the PnP settings are set back
to default mode.  this may be non-functional in your computer.
Most Diamonds do NOT have Jumpers.  This makes them tough to set
up.  There is such a thing as PnPTools, but I have never gotten
the thing to work for me.  Sometimes you can do this:

fire up the computer in Windows95 and take a look at the modem
settings in Control Panel, System, Device Manager.  IN particular
look at the resources, such as the IO Port and the IRQ it uses.
>From there you can determine if that is a normal port, and which
one (cua0, cua1 etc).  YOu can then plug those settings into Linux
and see if the modem shows up.

ISA PnP was a kludge that never worked well, even for Windows.  I
have serveral modems in here that are ISA PnP and my computer
would never pick up from Windows 95.  Usually because there was
a serial port or other already on the computer that was "blocking"
the modem, so PnP would not alert Win95.  Ergo, no modem
recognized.

My feeling is that you will get this thing working, but you may be
in for a rough road for a bit.


-- 
Ramon Gandia = Sysadmin == Nook Net
http://www.nook.net[EMAIL PROTECTED]
285 West First Avenue tel. 907-443-7575
P.O. Box 970  fax. 907-443-2487
Nome, Alaska 99762-0970  Alaska Toll Free. 888-443-7525



Re: [expert] mmv in contribs

2000-01-14 Thread Marco Ciampa

On gio, 13 gen 2000, WH Bouterse wrote:
>This may be oldnews
>but mmv is in Mandrake/Contribs
>http://rpmfind.net/linux/MandrakeCooker/contrib/RPMS/
yep! You're right! I've made a search with google but found the Suse version
only...

Many thanks
-- 
Marco Ciampa



RE: [expert] Need to stop X from starting at boot.

2000-01-14 Thread erskine, michael

telinit may be used to switch runlevels without reboot.

Also...
ctrl-alt-backspace may kill a misbehaving X.
ctrl-alt-F1 may switch to console from X.

;o) -Original Message-
;o) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
;o) Sent: 14 January 2000 01:25
;o) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;o) Subject: Re: [expert] Need to stop X from starting at boot.
;o) 
;o) 
;o) "james.fogg" wrote:
;o) 
;o) > I screwed up my x-windows configuration and now when X 
;o) boots it locks up
;o) > (video driver experiments.. ooops).
;o) >
;o) > My problem now is that I cannot change my settings from X 
;o) (cause it wont
;o) > run) and yet it runs X on boot. I see the penguin and a 
;o) command line login
;o) > for about 2 seconds then X server starts.
;o) >
;o) > How can I stop X from starting when I see the login?
;o) 
;o) login as linux1 and edit file: inittab.
;o) 
;o) # Default runlevel. The runlevels used by RHS are:
;o) #   0 - halt (Do NOT set initdefault to this)
;o) #   1 - Single user mode
;o) #   2 - Multiuser, without NFS (The same as 3, if you do 
;o) not have networking)
;o) 
;o) #   3 - Full multiuser mode
;o) #   4 - unused
;o) #   5 - X11
;o) #   6 - reboot (Do NOT set initdefault to this)
;o) #
;o) id:5:initdefault:
;o) 
;o) change thius final line to:
;o) 
;o) id:3:initdefault:
;o) 
;o) Sergio Korlowsky
;o) 



Re: [expert] Networking

2000-01-14 Thread Jean-Louis Debert

Michael Doyle wrote:
> Is it possible and how (where do I look) to network serial port -->> serial
> port (direct connect) as in Winblows

No particular problem, you just have to connect the serial ports with
an inverter cable (Rx connected to Tx at the other end, and vice
versa).

Then you use ordinary ppp just as you would over a modem (use 115200
as 
speed, because it's likely the limit for your serial ports).

When the ppp connection is up (ifconfig reports new interface pppn,
e.g. 
"ppp0", on both machines) you just use ifconfig and route to set the
IP
addresses and routes for both machines. Really easy ...

-- 
Jean-Louis Debert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
74 Annemasse  France
old Linux fan