[expert] changing default editor..

2001-12-10 Thread Franki

Hi all,

vi has been my nemesis for a long time now, I never get the time to learn
it, as there are other easier editors and I don't have the time to worry
about it..

I need to edit my contab and don't wish to do it with vi..

I'd prefer pico or mcedit (both of which are installed.)

I know there is a way to export the default editor but I can't remember what
it is...

Can anyone enlighten me? I had an email with the details in it, but can't
find it when I need it most..

any help,,, much appreciated.


rgds

Frank




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] changing default editor..

2001-12-10 Thread David Guntner

Franki grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
 
 vi has been my nemesis for a long time now, I never get the time to learn
 it, as there are other easier editors and I don't have the time to worry
 about it..
 
 I need to edit my contab and don't wish to do it with vi..
 
 I'd prefer pico or mcedit (both of which are installed.)

In your .bash_login or .profile file (which-ever you use):

export EDITOR=pico(or mcedit, which-ever you prefer)
export VISUAL=$EDITOR

Putting both thos lines in will make sure that you get it while in your 
shell, no matter which variable is looked at by the program that's calling 
your editor of choice (some look for $EDITOR, some look for $VISUAL).  Log 
out, log back in, and you're set from then on.

   --Dave
-- 
  David Guntner  GEnie: Just say NO!
 http://www.akaMail.com/pgpkey/davidg or key server
 for PGP Public key




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Boot Floppy Created During 8.1 Installation

2001-12-10 Thread Felix Miata

Andrew George wrote:

 On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:46, Felix Miata wrote:

  Maybe I'm misunderstanding it's purpose. When chosing Grub as boot
  loader during install, the last menu choice is to boot from floppy. I
  set the BIOS boot order to C,A,SCSI on a SCSI-less system. When the boot
  floppy is inserted into the drive and boot brings up the Grub menu from
  HD and I choose to boot from floppy, an error message comes up: Could
  not find ramdisk image: initrd.img. If I change the BIOS to boot order
  A,C,SCSI, I still get the same error message. Doesn't 8.1 know how to
  make a usable boot floppy? What am I doing wrong that I can't initiate
  boot from the floppy?

 Can you boot at all?

Of course, just not from the supposed rescue floppy that I was trying to
test before needing it to rescue something messed up by windoze.

 What filesystem are you using for your /boot or / partitions (some just don't
 work)
 
/boot /dev/hda1 ext2  / /dev/hda5 ext2
-- 
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://mrmazda.members.atlantic.net/




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Evolution 1.0 vs Cups kmail import

2001-12-10 Thread Mitch Thompson

I replace lpr with xpp whenever a requester has lpr in it.  There's
always an extra click after that, but xpp has always worked.

On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 11:17, Jose Luis Vazquez Gonzalez wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I would like to move from kmail to evolution but first I would like to be 
 able to print directly from evolution as I can do with kmail. 
 
 I tried saying 'cupsdoprint -P Epson' as the print command instead of lpr, 
 that works on the command line but not from evolution. For the moment I am 
 forced to print to a PS or PDF file and then send the jobs to CUPs.
 
 How can I print directly to a CUPs printer from evolution?
 How can I set evolution so the DEFAULT printer command is that of the CUPs 
 printer and not 'lpr'?
 
 Another question I have is how to automate migration of my kmail folders to 
 evolution. It is just too painful to do it one by one manually. Is there a 
 command line that I can use within a shell script?
 
 Thanks very much for your help!
 
 Jose
 
 
 

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
Mitch Thompson, San Antonio TX
Key fingerprint = BBDA 3A2A 4483 BD0D 7CED  B8A9 D183 C8F6 B0AF 66AE
--
Steve Balmer, CEO of Microsoft®, recently referred to Linux as a cancer.
Unsuprisingly, this is incorrect - Linux was released on August 25th,
1991,
and is therefore a virgo.



msg45894/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] iptables is nutz!

2001-12-10 Thread Mark Weaver

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 14:24:14 +1100
Tarragon Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 14:27, Mark Weaver wrote:
  Hi List
 
  It was my understanding that with the latest version of Iptables --dport
  which is an alias for --destination-port is a legal argument. However,
  when i attempt to add the below into the ruleset of iptables,
 
  iptables -A INPUT -s 199.224.86.15 --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
 
  ...this is what is returned.
 
  iptables v1.2.4: Unknown arg `--dport'
  Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
 
 Try:
 
 iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 199.224.86.15 --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
 
 or
 
 iptables -A INPUT -s 199.224.86.15 -d any --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
 
 or
 
 iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 199.224.86.15 -d any --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
 
 One of those should work.  I think the first one will ; you need to specify 
 the protocol (tcp/udp) when defining ports.
 
 t
 
 
 -- 
 PGP key : http://n12turbo.com/tarragon/public.key
 
 

t,

adding the -p (protocol) was the missing link. why in the world didn't iptables just 
say that's what it was missing instead of the generic error message it was giving me?

thanks so much. firewall happy now. user is too!  :)

just wish someone would respond to my post about postfix...
-- 
daRcmaTTeR
=/\=???
  |%C++
Registered Linux User # 186492

We love and desire the things most that will kill us!



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] broadcast 2000

2001-12-10 Thread hardcorepush

was broadcast 2000 included in the download version of 8.1 or only the boxed version? 
Can it be fouind for download anywhere on the web? The home pages is it no longer open 
source?
whats up?
rob
http://linuxlaunchpad.net


msg45896/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: [expert] LM 8.1 can not write to othet HD

2001-12-10 Thread Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SICN

Have you tried adding umask=0.

Brian D. Klar - CVE
OTS
WPAFB

-Original Message-
From: skidley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 10:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] LM 8.1 can not write to othet HD


On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, Michael Viron wrote:

 HI,
 
 I use LM 8.1 on my box. I have 2 SCSI HD, 1 IDE HD and 2 removable jaz 1
 GB.
 I install Win XP on sda and LM 8.1 on hda, using LILO to boot the system.
 the problem is I can read/ mount to other HD using LM 8.1 but I can not
 write them.
 anybody can help me?
 
 Thanks
 

What command are using to mount XP? mount -t vfat /dev/hdaX /mnt/windows
as root?(X being the number of the partition)
-- 
  .-.   .-.
  oo|  Give Microsoft The Bird  oo|
 /`'\  Use Linux!!!/`'\
(\_;/)(\_;/)

Chad Young
Registered Linux User #195191 @ http://counter.li.org






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] DNS problems

2001-12-10 Thread Dave Sherman

On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 23:13, NDPTAL85 wrote:
 And here's the contents of my resolv.conf:
 
 search earthlink.net
 nameserver 207.217.126.82
 nameserver 207.217.77.81
 nameserver 207.217.120.83
 
 The original problem is this. When the box is set to use DHCP, it can 
 resolve domains and surf the web just fine. When I manually assign it an 
 IP and DNS servers it can't. It used to work just fine manually but 
 sometime this week it just stopped working for some reason. The manual 
 IP I use for this box is 192.168.0.2. I have already put my other comps 
 on this IP and they can use it just fine.

I deleted the previous messages, so forgive me if you already answered
this. Can you ping the other PCs on your network? What is the output of
'route -n'?

Also, you might want to remove the line 'search earthlink.net'. All this
does is slow down domain resolution, unless you actually deal with
earthlink network systems on a regular basis.

How are you connected to earthlink? Dial-up through a gateway? DSL?
Something else?

Dave
-- 
There are three things men can do with women: love them, suffer for
them,
or turn them into literature.
-- Stephen Stills




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] remote syslog

2001-12-10 Thread Pierre Fortin

Greg Sarsons wrote:
 
   Is anyone using or has used mdk 8.1 as remote syslog?  I'm trying to
   figure out why there seems to be gaps in the logs on the 8.1 machine.
 
 It logs all the packets I'm seeing which is good but it looks like the
 router is not logging properly :(

The router must have a sequence number on each log entry for you to notice this,
or is there some other means...?

Ways for a router to fail to log remotely include:
- the path over which to send the log data is temporarily down
- logging packets may be dropped by intermediate nodes

Logging is done blindly AFAIK -- send and hope the logger got it...  so if
another router is in the path next to the logging host, that local router can
time out its ARP cache which will cause an incoming log message to be converted
to an ARP request to repopulate the ARP cache...  the problem being that the log
entry is not retried; hence lost...   If logging from a particular router is
critical, then the logging host should be local to avoid this situation.

HTH,
Pierre



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] changing default editor..

2001-12-10 Thread Ron Marriage

If you are using bash as your default shell, insert the
following line into 
/etc/bashrc

export EDITOR=pico

Just put it near the bottom of the file, be sure to save as
text.
You must be root to change this file so type
su  then enter
enter root password and enter.
cd /etc
pico bashrc


Ron

Franki wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 vi has been my nemesis for a long time now, I never get the time to learn
 it, as there are other easier editors and I don't have the time to worry
 about it..
 
 I need to edit my contab and don't wish to do it with vi..
 
 I'd prefer pico or mcedit (both of which are installed.)
 
 I know there is a way to export the default editor but I can't remember what
 it is...
 
 Can anyone enlighten me? I had an email with the details in it, but can't
 find it when I need it most..
 
 any help,,, much appreciated.
 
 rgds
 
 Frank
 
   
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

-- 
Ron Marriage
Homepage http://www.seidata.com/~marriage/
Email  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux User Group http://www.seidata.com/~seilug/
Blind Links  http://www.seidata.com/~marriage/rblind.html



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] remote syslog

2001-12-10 Thread Greg Sarsons

On Mon, 2001-12-10 at 09:23, Pierre Fortin wrote:
 Greg Sarsons wrote:
  
Is anyone using or has used mdk 8.1 as remote syslog?  I'm trying to
figure out why there seems to be gaps in the logs on the 8.1 machine.
  
  It logs all the packets I'm seeing which is good but it looks like the
  router is not logging properly :(
 
 The router must have a sequence number on each log entry for you to notice this,
 or is there some other means...?
 
 Ways for a router to fail to log remotely include:
 - the path over which to send the log data is temporarily down
 - logging packets may be dropped by intermediate nodes
 
 Logging is done blindly AFAIK -- send and hope the logger got it...  so if
 another router is in the path next to the logging host, that local router can
 time out its ARP cache which will cause an incoming log message to be converted
 to an ARP request to repopulate the ARP cache...  the problem being that the log
 entry is not retried; hence lost...   If logging from a particular router is
 critical, then the logging host should be local to avoid this situation.
 
 HTH,
 Pierre
 

Well I hope my firewall is not dropping any packets.  It is one hop
away, 15 feet of twisted pair, through the firewall to the syslog
machine.  Firewall has no indication that it is dropping packets.

Actually, I'm thinking this am that the router depending on the load
does not log to syslog right away. 

Greg




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] DNS problems

2001-12-10 Thread Carroll Grigsby

On Monday 10 December 2001 09:13 am, Dave Sherman wrote:
 On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 23:13, NDPTAL85 wrote:
  And here's the contents of my resolv.conf:
 
  search earthlink.net
  nameserver 207.217.126.82
  nameserver 207.217.77.81
  nameserver 207.217.120.83
 
 snip

Excuse me for butting in here, but you may have an error in the Earthlink 
nameserver numbers. I show
207.217.126.81 (primary)
207.217.77.82 (secondary)
207.217.120.83 (secondary)

HTH,
-- cmg



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] login screen color

2001-12-10 Thread Greg Sarsons

I'd like to change the background of the login screen.  A image would be
nice instead of the blue solid.  Looking into it I see that, well I
think this is what I see, this used to be done via 

/usr/bin/X11/xsetroot -solid #00777 but this is remmed out and says
now handled by gdmgreeter

Doing a searh for gdmgreeter didn't produce anything.  Can someone
enlighten me.

Greg 






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-10 Thread Pierre Fortin

Mark Weaver wrote:
 
 Hi List,
 
 I've been thinking about something for a little while now and I was wondering if 
anyone here on the list has Postfix installed and doing reverse lookups as a method 
of controling the amount of SPAM coming into their mailservers.

Yes.  There are problems though in that I have to allow certain hosts to send me
mail regardless because some legit sites either don't have a reverse mapping, or
have it wrong...  It appears that Mandrake may have fixed their DNS entries so
that 216.71.84.35 returns only mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com instead of 3
hostnames of which only one was mapped back.  This was causing postfix to reject
about 2/3's of the messages sent to me.

Even with this feature enabled, I find that some spam is still getting through
because the intermediate hosts can be reverse looked up.  I have to add these
spammers to my header_checks file...  I plan to have a look at
http://www.spambouncer.org for other options.  

I have also enabled recipient_delimiter = + and am changing my IDs at the
various sites I use to clearly identify which sites are either selling or
leaking my address...

HTH,
Pierre



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Evolution 1.0 and LM 8.1

2001-12-10 Thread David ..


Use the PackageManger that comes with LM. I did it and all works just fine. 
And I do believe it does SPA


From: Eduardo M. A. M. Mendes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] Evolution 1.0 and LM 8.1
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 13:35:44 -0600

Hello

I would like to install evolution 1.0 on LM 8.1. Redcarpet won't recognize
8.1 as a supported distro.   Could you someone tell me which are necessary
files and from where I can download them?

Does evolution 1.0 allow retrieving emails from POP3 server with SPA 
(Secure
Password Authetication)?

Thanks

Ed





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] remote syslog

2001-12-10 Thread Pierre Fortin

Greg Sarsons wrote:
 
 On Mon, 2001-12-10 at 09:23, Pierre Fortin wrote:
  Greg Sarsons wrote:
  
 Is anyone using or has used mdk 8.1 as remote syslog?  I'm trying to
 figure out why there seems to be gaps in the logs on the 8.1 machine.
  
   It logs all the packets I'm seeing which is good but it looks like the
   router is not logging properly :(
 
  The router must have a sequence number on each log entry for you to notice this,
  or is there some other means...?
 
  Ways for a router to fail to log remotely include:
  - the path over which to send the log data is temporarily down
  - logging packets may be dropped by intermediate nodes
 
  Logging is done blindly AFAIK -- send and hope the logger got it...  so if
  another router is in the path next to the logging host, that local router can
  time out its ARP cache which will cause an incoming log message to be converted
  to an ARP request to repopulate the ARP cache...  the problem being that the log
  entry is not retried; hence lost...   If logging from a particular router is
  critical, then the logging host should be local to avoid this situation.
 
  HTH,
  Pierre
 
 
 Well I hope my firewall is not dropping any packets.  It is one hop
 away, 15 feet of twisted pair, through the firewall to the syslog
 machine.  Firewall has no indication that it is dropping packets.
 
 Actually, I'm thinking this am that the router depending on the load
 does not log to syslog right away.
 
 Greg

router---firewallsysloghost

log_msg-
 ARPentry?
 yes: forward-  log_msg_OK
 no: convert_to_ARP-
   (log_msg lost)
   -ARPreply

The firewall may be dropping the packets if it expires its ARP cache and
converts any new packets (syslog) to an ARP to repopulate the cache.  If so, you
should see ARP request/reply exchanges with no other traffic immediately
following.  Unfortunately, this convert packet to an ARP and wait for the
sender to retransmit was a [Cisco] implementation detail way back to avoid
maintaining any state for any traffic stream, and allowing the end-system to
recover; and there is no requirement to indicate the number of such packets lost
-- part of networking overhead...

Delayed logging by the router is possible; but that usually comes at the cost of
losing visibility during problem states...  so not sure that would be a wise
thing to do.

Pierre



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] WordPerfect 8 Install on MDK 8.1

2001-12-10 Thread complaw

This is becomming an age old problem, but a recurring one nonetheless...

I'm trying to install WordPefect 8 on Mandrake 8.1.  There is a problem in that
WordPerfect 8 was compiled using the libc 5 libraries, not glibc6. 
Consequently, WordPerfect 8 will not install properly.  There was, at some time,
an rpm that included the libc 5 dynamic libraries so that WordPerfect would be
passified.

Problem is, I can't find that rpm for Mdk 8.1

Does anyone know where that rpm could be found?

Thanks in advance, 

Ron




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] DNS problems

2001-12-10 Thread J. Craig Woods

You ought to run a dig command to see if name server info is right. You 
ought to run netstat -rn to see if your routing table is right. You ought 
to run a ifconfig -a to see if mask is right.

etcetcetc

j. c. woods,
UNIX SA


At 06:09 PM 12/10/2001 +1100, Andrew George wrote:

  And here's the contents of my resolv.conf:
 
  search earthlink.net
  nameserver 207.217.126.82
  nameserver 207.217.77.81
  nameserver 207.217.120.83
 
  The original problem is this. When the box is set to use DHCP, it can
  resolve domains and surf the web just fine. When I manually assign it an
  IP and DNS servers it can't. It used to work just fine manually but
  sometime this week it just stopped working for some reason. The manual
  IP I use for this box is 192.168.0.2. I have already put my other comps
  on this IP and they can use it just fine.
 

OK
Sounds to me like its picking some info up off dhcp that is wrong in the
static set-up
try running ifconfig as both static connection and dhcp and see what the
differences are

Andrew

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] vh_mp3.sh / create audio CD easier w/ this script

2001-12-10 Thread J. Craig Woods

Hey, Nguyen,

It looks to be a nice little script but I have one question: why convert 
the .mp3 to .wav? Why not to format for playing on regular CD stereo?

j. c. woods
UNIX SA

At 02:27 PM 12/10/2001 +0900, you wrote:
Hi all,

I wrote this script. This will help you create audio Cd from mp3's easier.

It is still under development so feedbacks and comments are welcome:






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] LM 8.1/Win2k dual boot clock issue

2001-12-10 Thread avalancheresearch

Hello,

I have an HP Omnibook DBoot w/ win2k (for work - we use exchange :( ) and LM
8.1 (for me).  I made a mistake when installing LM.

When asked by the installer weither my system clock was set to GMT I said
yes (it's not).   Soo every time I go back and forth between OS's, i chokes
my clock and neither one stays correct.

I am wondering how to fix this...I went into the clock setting in LM, but
did not see a way to change the system clock offset.

Any help would be appreciated,

Thanks,

Greg


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] DNS problems

2001-12-10 Thread NDPTAL85

On Monday, December 10, 2001, at 11:08 AM, J. Craig Woods wrote:

 You ought to run a dig command to see if name server info is right. 
 You ought to run netstat -rn to see if your routing table is right. 
 You ought to run a ifconfig -a to see if mask is right.

 etcetcetc

 j. c. woods,
 UNIX SA


 At 06:09 PM 12/10/2001 +1100, Andrew George wrote:

  And here's the contents of my resolv.conf:
 
  search earthlink.net
  nameserver 207.217.126.82
  nameserver 207.217.77.81
  nameserver 207.217.120.83
 
  The original problem is this. When the box is set to use DHCP, it can
  resolve domains and surf the web just fine. When I manually assign 
 it an
  IP and DNS servers it can't. It used to work just fine manually but
  sometime this week it just stopped working for some reason. The 
 manual
  IP I use for this box is 192.168.0.2. I have already put my other 
 comps
  on this IP and they can use it just fine.
 

 OK
 Sounds to me like its picking some info up off dhcp that is wrong in 
 the
 static set-up
 try running ifconfig as both static connection and dhcp and see what 
 the
 differences are

 Andrew

All of that info is correct. It was working before, and the other 
machines on my network are still working fine using the same settings. 
I've had this ISP for years and this info has never changed.







--
Computers come in two styles - prototype and obsolete!
--




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Tildeless user accounts

2001-12-10 Thread Kathy Montgomery


I am not an expert on Apache, but I found your question interesting and
I poked around. Rather than move files around to accomodate your
URL, you might be able to tell Apache to use a desired URL format to point
to the user's web directory. See:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/urlmapping.html#user
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_rewrite.html (more advanced, I
think)
A knowledge of regular expressions is desirable. :)
- Kathy
Expert wrote:
Hello list, just wondering if it is possible
to set up tildeless user accounts, like
for example instead of www.domain.com/~user/index.html
it would be www.domain.com/user/index.html
Is there a way to configure apache to do this?
No rush.
Thanks

--
For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love
and of a sound mind. - 2 Timothy 1:7



[expert] autoresponder program

2001-12-10 Thread Brian Henerey

Can anyone give tell me what they use with Mandrake to generate Out-of-office 
messages? Kmail and NS don't seem to have this capability.

Thanks,
Brian



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] LM8.1 Boot fails due to mount error (bad partitiontable ?)

2001-12-10 Thread Charles Darcy

On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 10:30, D. R. Evans wrote:
 Did you try the program that Asheesh suggested and, if so, was it any 
 help.

Yes, but I had no luck with gpart. I tried to use it to repair the
partition table, but the changes did not seem to be applied. Probably
still worth a try though.

I ended up using a program called Partition Manager, which runs
under DOS. This brought my partition table to a stable/usable state, and
I then re-installed LM8.1 with no problems. I was unable to recover my
existing partitions, but that seems not to be a concern in your case.

I came across some other partition table programs which you might
try, if Partition Manager is not suitable. I think these run under
linux: rescuept, fixdisktable.


Good luck.




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] DNS problems

2001-12-10 Thread Thomas Sourmail


I've deleted the email, but I think I remember there was no 'default'
entry in the output of 'route'. Sorry if I remember wrong.

Thomas.




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] DNS problems

2001-12-10 Thread Larry Sword

NDPTAL85 wrote:
 
 Here is the results of route -n
 
 [root@Dreadnaught root]# route -n
 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
 Iface
 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
 eth0
 127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  00
 lo
 
 I dialup to Earthlink thru a Netgear 4 port 56k router (model RM356). It
 has 4 machines connected to it of which one is the Mandrake box. The
 others are Mac OS X, FreeBSD and Windows XP. They are working fine.

When using a static address on the Linux machine it 

Sounds like you need to add a gateway address to your
/etc/sysconfig/nerwork file:

GATEWAY=the address of your router gateway


Larry
-- 
Sword'sEdge
VoiceMail/Fax: (858) 860-6406 x1587



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] tetex update RPMs GPG signatures

2001-12-10 Thread Vincent Danen

On Sat Dec 08, 2001 at 12:34:15PM -0600, David Wollmann wrote:

   tetex-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: MD5 GPG NOT OK
   tetex-doc-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: MD5 GPG NOT OK
   
   
   I haven't checked these files on other servers.
   
   Any chance we can get someone to check this out and see what the problem 
   is?
  
  I assume you have the security team gpg keys installed?  (Of course
  you do, otherwise they would all fail).  I know the files are fine
  because:
  
  (vdanen@logan: /mnt/updates/BIG/updates/7.1/RPMS)$ rpm --checksig tetex*
  tetex-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK
  tetex-afm-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK
  tetex-doc-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK
  tetex-dvilj-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK
  tetex-dvips-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK
  tetex-latex-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK
  tetex-xdvi-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK
  (vdanen@logan: /mnt/updates/BIG/updates/7.1/RPMS)$
  
  Can you do a rpm --checksig -v on the two packages and see exactly
  what fails?  You may have had a bad download.
 
 I ran rpm with the verbose switch and the MD5 chksums are bad, _not_ 
 the signatures.

Try re-downloading the two files then.

 I'll have a go with a couple other download methods and see if I can get
 better results.

Yup.. likely a bad download (off by one byte or something maybe which
would still make the gpg sig valid).

-- 
OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
1024D/FE6F2AFD   88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD

Current Linux kernel 2.4.8-34.1mdk uptime: 20 days 20 hours 50 minutes.



msg45920/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] login screen color

2001-12-10 Thread Kelley Terry

On 10 Dec 2001 09:49:39 -0500
Greg Sarsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'd like to change the background of the login screen.  A image would be
 nice instead of the blue solid.  Looking into it I see that, well I
 think this is what I see, this used to be done via 
 
 /usr/bin/X11/xsetroot -solid #00777 but this is remmed out and says
 now handled by gdmgreeter
 
 Doing a searh for gdmgreeter didn't produce anything.  Can someone
 enlighten me.
 
 Greg 


Sorry, I didn't look close enough.  Since you're using gnome:
   middle click on screenprogramssystemGDM configuratorLogin
appearance

-- 
It said use windows 95 or better so I loaded linux!
In a world without walls and fences who needs windows and gates?
Kelley Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-10 Thread Vincent Danen

On Mon Dec 10, 2001 at 09:57:24AM -0500, Pierre Fortin wrote:

  I've been thinking about something for a little while now and I was wondering if 
anyone here on the list has Postfix installed and doing reverse lookups as a method 
of controling the amount of SPAM coming into their mailservers.
 
 Yes.  There are problems though in that I have to allow certain hosts to send me
 mail regardless because some legit sites either don't have a reverse mapping, or
 have it wrong...  It appears that Mandrake may have fixed their DNS entries so
 that 216.71.84.35 returns only mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com instead of 3
 hostnames of which only one was mapped back.  This was causing postfix to reject
 about 2/3's of the messages sent to me.
 
 Even with this feature enabled, I find that some spam is still getting through
 because the intermediate hosts can be reverse looked up.  I have to add these
 spammers to my header_checks file...  I plan to have a look at
 http://www.spambouncer.org for other options.  
 
 I have also enabled recipient_delimiter = + and am changing my IDs at the
 various sites I use to clearly identify which sites are either selling or
 leaking my address...

Funny that this is mentioned... there is an article about SPAM on
MandrakeSecure that discusses exactly what you're saying, Pierre... =)

http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/docs/spam.php

-- 
OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
1024D/FE6F2AFD   88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD

Current Linux kernel 2.4.8-34.1mdk uptime: 20 days 21 hours 0 minutes.



msg45922/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] login screen color

2001-12-10 Thread Kelley Terry

On 10 Dec 2001 09:49:39 -0500
Greg Sarsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'd like to change the background of the login screen.  A image would be
 nice instead of the blue solid.  Looking into it I see that, well I
 think this is what I see, this used to be done via 
 
 /usr/bin/X11/xsetroot -solid #00777 but this is remmed out and says
 now handled by gdmgreeter
 
 Doing a searh for gdmgreeter didn't produce anything.  Can someone
 enlighten me.
 
 Greg 
 

In mandrake 8.0 or 8.1 use kde:
   control centersystemlogin managerbackground


-- 
It said use windows 95 or better so I loaded linux!
In a world without walls and fences who needs windows and gates?
Kelley Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] iptables is nutz!

2001-12-10 Thread Kevin



On Monday 10 December 2001 03:06 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
 On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 14:24:14 +1100

 Tarragon Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 14:27, Mark Weaver wrote:
   Hi List
  
   It was my understanding that with the latest version of Iptables
   --dport which is an alias for --destination-port is a legal
   argument. However, when i attempt to add the below into the ruleset of
   iptables,
  
 iptables -A INPUT -s 199.224.86.15 --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
  
   ...this is what is returned.
  
   iptables v1.2.4: Unknown arg `--dport'
   Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
 
 adding the -p (protocol) was the missing link. why in the world didn't
 iptables just say that's what it was missing instead of the generic error
 message it was giving me?

 thanks so much. firewall happy now. user is too!  :)

 just wish someone would respond to my post about postfix...


As a side note, the man page for iptables is pretty clear that --dport is 
only effective when -p tcp,udp is given.  Try a look at the man page next 
time you get stuck.  :)

Kevin



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] DNS problems

2001-12-10 Thread NDPTAL85

On Monday, December 10, 2001, at 02:09 AM, Andrew George wrote:


 And here's the contents of my resolv.conf:

 search earthlink.net
 nameserver 207.217.126.82
 nameserver 207.217.77.81
 nameserver 207.217.120.83

 The original problem is this. When the box is set to use DHCP, it can
 resolve domains and surf the web just fine. When I manually assign it 
 an
 IP and DNS servers it can't. It used to work just fine manually but
 sometime this week it just stopped working for some reason. The manual
 IP I use for this box is 192.168.0.2. I have already put my other comps
 on this IP and they can use it just fine.


 OK
 Sounds to me like its picking some info up off dhcp that is wrong in the
 static set-up
 try running ifconfig as both static connection and dhcp and see what the
 differences are

Here is ifconfig on the manual IP:

[root@Dreadnaught root]# ifconfig -a
eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:C0:A8:F2:40:B1
   inet addr:192.168.0.2  Bcast:192.168.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
   UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
   RX packets:78 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
   TX packets:92 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
   collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
   RX bytes:8568 (8.3 Kb)  TX bytes:12311 (12.0 Kb)
   Interrupt:11 Base address:0xbc00

loLink encap:Local Loopback
   inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
   UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
   RX packets:138 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
   TX packets:138 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
   collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
   RX bytes:9660 (9.4 Kb)  TX bytes:9660 (9.4 Kb)

The only difference between that and when its on DHCP is the IP itself, 
on DHCP it chooses 192.168.0.6






-
Yoda's answering machine, this is. Leave a message, you might and call 
you back, he will.
-




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] DNS problems

2001-12-10 Thread C.H. Close

Hi,

I suspect that you may be suffering from dynamic modification of your
resolv.conf file.
Try the following: Start your internet connection: Start a terminal
session and su. Then less /etc/resolv.conf.
I wouldn't mind betting you find something there that wasn't there when
you were diconnected.
I've had this problem with my dial-up connection.
Anyway try it; it won't do any harm.

Regards,

Colin Close

NDPTAL85 wrote:
 
 
 After about a week of taking my Mandrake 8.1 box off of DHCP and giving
 it its own permanent IP it can no longer resolve domain names when using
 that IP. When I switch it back to DHCP it starts working fine again. I
 am using kernel 2.4.13-12mdk. Has anyone else come across this problem?
 
 --
 God created a universal solvent, but could not find anything to put it
 in.
 --
 
   
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] login screen color

2001-12-10 Thread Greg Sarsons

tks ... didn't know that was there.

Greg

On Mon, 2001-12-10 at 14:25, Kelley Terry wrote:
 On 10 Dec 2001 09:49:39 -0500
 Greg Sarsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I'd like to change the background of the login screen.  A image would be
  nice instead of the blue solid.  Looking into it I see that, well I
  think this is what I see, this used to be done via 
  
  /usr/bin/X11/xsetroot -solid #00777 but this is remmed out and says
  now handled by gdmgreeter
  
  Doing a searh for gdmgreeter didn't produce anything.  Can someone
  enlighten me.
  
  Greg 
 
 
 Sorry, I didn't look close enough.  Since you're using gnome:
middle click on screenprogramssystemGDM configuratorLogin
 appearance
 
 -- 
 It said use windows 95 or better so I loaded linux!
 In a world without walls and fences who needs windows and gates?
 Kelley Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] DNS problems

2001-12-10 Thread NDPTAL85

 On Monday 10 December 2001 09:13 am, Dave Sherman wrote:
 On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 23:13, NDPTAL85 wrote:
 And here's the contents of my resolv.conf:

 search earthlink.net
 nameserver 207.217.126.82
 nameserver 207.217.77.81
 nameserver 207.217.120.83

 snip

 Excuse me for butting in here, but you may have an error in the 
 Earthlink
 nameserver numbers. I show
 207.217.126.81 (primary)
 207.217.77.82 (secondary)
 207.217.120.83 (secondary)

 HTH,
 -- cmg

Good catch. My first and second entries were incorrect but the third was 
still correct so it should have been working. Anyway I corrected them 
and its still not working.






--
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.
--




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [expert] LM 8.1/Win2k dual boot clock issue

2001-12-10 Thread Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SICN

If your system has timeconfig, try man timeconfig.
Otherwise look at man hwclock


Brian D. Klar - CVE
OTS
WPAFB

-Original Message-
From: avalancheresearch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] LM 8.1/Win2k dual boot clock issue


Hello,

I have an HP Omnibook DBoot w/ win2k (for work - we use exchange :( ) and LM
8.1 (for me).  I made a mistake when installing LM.

When asked by the installer weither my system clock was set to GMT I said
yes (it's not).   Soo every time I go back and forth between OS's, i chokes
my clock and neither one stays correct.

I am wondering how to fix this...I went into the clock setting in LM, but
did not see a way to change the system clock offset.

Any help would be appreciated,

Thanks,

Greg


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] Updating kernel 2.4.3-20

2001-12-10 Thread mycal62

Howdy,

How can I update , or install a later Kernel, when doing a new install
of LM 8.0 from the 3cd box set? The default kernel is 2.4.3-20mdk.

I wish to update it enough to use a ext3fs if possible, without updating
to 8.1. ( sorry but it won't run on my setup , though I wish it did! )

anyway , do I have to update in stages to gain ext3 support? 
and can I use ext3 on all partitions including / ? 

If not someone please tell me if I have to stay with a Reiserfs instead?

If I need to compile a special kernel to do this , please direct me to a
tutorial on how to do it that is written in average user-speak. 

Not a novice but somethings I haven't tried to do yet. 
Like compiling a kernel from scratch. 

any and all help is very much appreciated! 

Thanks in advance

Mike McNeese
Springdale, AR. USA

Linux user 248955



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] DNS problems

2001-12-10 Thread NDPTAL85

On Monday, December 10, 2001, at 09:13 AM, Dave Sherman wrote:

 On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 23:13, NDPTAL85 wrote:
 And here's the contents of my resolv.conf:

 search earthlink.net
 nameserver 207.217.126.82
 nameserver 207.217.77.81
 nameserver 207.217.120.83

 The original problem is this. When the box is set to use DHCP, it can
 resolve domains and surf the web just fine. When I manually assign it 
 an
 IP and DNS servers it can't. It used to work just fine manually but
 sometime this week it just stopped working for some reason. The manual
 IP I use for this box is 192.168.0.2. I have already put my other comps
 on this IP and they can use it just fine.

 I deleted the previous messages, so forgive me if you already answered
 this. Can you ping the other PCs on your network? What is the output of
 'route -n'?

 Also, you might want to remove the line 'search earthlink.net'. All this
 does is slow down domain resolution, unless you actually deal with
 earthlink network systems on a regular basis.

 How are you connected to earthlink? Dial-up through a gateway? DSL?
 Something else?

Here is my ping from 192.168.0.2 (Mandrake) to 192.168.0.5 (Mac OS X)

[root@Dreadnaught root]# ping 192.168.0.5
PING 192.168.0.5 (192.168.0.5) from 192.168.0.2 : 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=508 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=572 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=522 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=426 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=448 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=525 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=534 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=536 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=539 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=477 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=469 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=11 ttl=255 time=534 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=12 ttl=255 time=542 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=13 ttl=255 time=541 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=14 ttl=255 time=471 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=15 ttl=255 time=537 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=16 ttl=255 time=540 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=17 ttl=255 time=537 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=18 ttl=255 time=529 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=19 ttl=255 time=543 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=20 ttl=255 time=454 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=21 ttl=255 time=535 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=22 ttl=255 time=530 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=23 ttl=255 time=522 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=24 ttl=255 time=461 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=25 ttl=255 time=536 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=26 ttl=255 time=538 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=27 ttl=255 time=536 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=28 ttl=255 time=469 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=29 ttl=255 time=550 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=30 ttl=255 time=540 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=31 ttl=255 time=528 usec
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=32 ttl=255 time=525 usec

--- 192.168.0.5 ping statistics ---
33 packets transmitted, 33 packets received, 0% packet loss

Here is the results of route -n

[root@Dreadnaught root]# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse 
Iface
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 
eth0
127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  00 
lo


I dialup to Earthlink thru a Netgear 4 port 56k router (model RM356). It 
has 4 machines connected to it of which one is the Mandrake box. The 
others are Mac OS X, FreeBSD and Windows XP. They are working fine.







--
If God is watching us, the least we can do is be entertaining.
--




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] g++ docs

2001-12-10 Thread D. R. Evans

Now that I have LM 8.1 installed, trying to build one of my programs, I 
see a zillion copies of the following form of warning:

Warning: pasting x and y does not give a valid preprocessing token.

gcc -v returns 2.96 as the version number, but I can find no 
documentation for 2.96 on the GNU site.

This warning did not appear with the compiler in 7.2; in fact, it seems 
a rather bizarre warning, since it seems to be telling me that after I 
have concatenated two strings I don't have a preprocessing token; which 
is fine, because I expect the concatentation to produce compilable 
code. 

Does anyone know where can I find out how to turn this warning off? 
There are so many that they look likely to bury any real warnings.

  Doc

PS Example:

#define test(x) int x##;
test(burble)

produces:
 warning pasting burble and ; does not give valid preprocessing 
token in LM 8.1; gives no warning in LM 7.2.





--
Phone:  +1 303 494 0394
Mobile: +1 720 839 8462
Fax:+1 781 240 0527
--



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Evolution 1.0 vs Cups kmail import

2001-12-10 Thread isaac

Hi,

I'm running evolution 1.0 under KDE, using CUPS, and in the print dialog
I just leave it lpr or maybe in your case try lpr -PEpson. I just
set up the CUPS printer as the default printer in the KDE control center
(System - Printing Manager) and now it just works ... no problems (at
least not with printing!) ... it prints quite nicely, in fact.

cups installs an lpr command in /usr/bin which is a link to a link that
points to lpr-cups (/usr/bin/lpr - /etc/alternatives/lpr -
/usr/bin/lpr-cups) ... which is compatible with the old-school lpr but
is actually cups nonetheless. 

hope that works for you, too!

--i

On Mon, 2001-12-10 at 11:51, Mitch Thompson wrote:
I replace lpr with xpp whenever a requester has lpr in it.  There's
always an extra click after that, but xpp has always worked.

On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 11:17, Jose Luis Vazquez Gonzalez wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I would like to move from kmail to evolution but first I would like to be 
 able to print directly from evolution as I can do with kmail. 
 
 I tried saying 'cupsdoprint -P Epson' as the print command instead of lpr, 
 that works on the command line but not from evolution. For the moment I am 
 forced to print to a PS or PDF file and then send the jobs to CUPs.
 
 How can I print directly to a CUPs printer from evolution?
 How can I set evolution so the DEFAULT printer command is that of the CUPs 
 printer and not 'lpr'?
 
 Another question I have is how to automate migration of my kmail folders to 
 evolution. It is just too painful to do it one by one manually. Is there a 
 command line that I can use within a shell script?
 
 Thanks very much for your help!
 
 Jose
 
 
 

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
Mitch Thompson, San Antonio TX
Key fingerprint = BBDA 3A2A 4483 BD0D 7CED  B8A9 D183 C8F6 B0AF 66AE
--
Steve Balmer, CEO of Microsoft®, recently referred to Linux as a cancer.
Unsuprisingly, this is incorrect - Linux was released on August 25th,
1991,
and is therefore a virgo.






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Playing DVD's

2001-12-10 Thread Svante Signell

There is also the VideoLan Client (and servers). rpms and debs are available.
http://www.videolan.org/

Tobias Marx writes:
  Larry Sword wrote:
  
   Ken Thompson wrote:
   
  What is the group opinion of the best program to play DVD's??
  I just got an older 5spd DVD to fool around with and now the Number 1 son
  wants to watch movies G.
  Any tips to make it work would also help a bunch
  --
  Ken Thompson, North West Antique Autos
  Payette, Idaho
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.nwaa.com
  ICQ 988809
  Sales and brokering of antique autos and parts.
  
   
 xine-0.4.3.d4d-1
  
  i've got better experiences with ogle (more stable). speed is about 95% 
  of windvd on (you guess it) windows. just install the rpms from here 
  (those for rh7.x work just fine on my mdk8.1 box): 
  http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/groups/dvd/
  
  you'll need:
  libdvdcss
  libdvdread
  liba52
  Ogle
  Ogle_gui
  
  have fun!
  
  -- 
  
  Free Dmitry Sklyarov, NOW! Fuck the DMCA!
  
  
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
  Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] LM 8.1/Win2k dual boot clock issue

2001-12-10 Thread Darwin Gottfried

On Monday 10 December 2001 10:12, you wrote:
 Hello,

 I have an HP Omnibook DBoot w/ win2k (for work - we use exchange :( ) and
 LM 8.1 (for me).  I made a mistake when installing LM.

 When asked by the installer weither my system clock was set to GMT I said
 yes (it's not).   Soo every time I go back and forth between OS's, i chokes
 my clock and neither one stays correct.

 I am wondering how to fix this...I went into the clock setting in LM, but
 did not see a way to change the system clock offset.

Mandrake Control Center in Mandrake. Go to date/time settings. Change time to 
correct time, make sure your time zone is correct.  When your done and click 
ok, it will again ask you about gmt. Select no at that point and you will be 
relying on the timezone (bios) rather than gmt or utc.

Cheers

 Any help would be appreciated,

 Thanks,

 Greg


 _
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

-- 
Cheers



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] Strange problem with the POP server

2001-12-10 Thread Robert Fargher

Hi folks, I've got a head scratcher here and I'd really like your help, 
please.

  The problem arose when we replaced a RedHat 6.2 server with a Mandrake 8.1 
server.  On the new Mandrake server, a few clients (out of about 400 or so) 
are now having difficultly POP'ing their mail where they didn't have before. 

  What happens is that they are experiencing an extended connection time, up 
to 60 seconds before the mail transfer starts after starting a mail run via 
pop.   In some cases, this is causing the client to time-out and report the 
server is unreachable.

  If I monitor /var/log/secure and /var/log/syslog while one of these users 
does a mail run, I see the POP3 connection made almost instantly in 
/var/log/secure (so it's not a net latency).  However, the pop service init 
login doesn't show up (in /var/log/syslog) until quite a while later; when it 
does, the user gets his mail. 

  Thus the delay is occurring between the pop connection and the pop login.

  I was at one client's machine this weekend, trying to figure out what is 
going on.  He has one of those  4 port Linksys home router/NAT firewall 
units.   If I bypass the Linksys router and connect the cable modem directly 
to his machine, the POP latency disappears and mail transfers are fast.  Put 
the Linksys router in the path and the long latency re-appears; the log 
entries in /var/log/secure and /var/log/syslog are almost simultaneous.  (I 
do not know whether all the clients having problems have such a router/NAT 
firewall or not). 

 So far, I've not found out what happens on a POP connection after the 
initial connection via xinetd and I have no idea what can be causing this 
delay. 

  Does anyone have anything to suggest?  Thanks!

-- 
Cheers,
Rob



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] DNS problems

2001-12-10 Thread Pierre Fortin

NDPTAL85 wrote:  [summarized]
 
 After about a week of taking my Mandrake 8.1 box off of DHCP and giving
 it its own permanent IP it can no longer resolve domain names when using
 that IP. When I switch it back to DHCP it starts working fine again. I
 am using kernel 2.4.13-12mdk. Has anyone else come across this problem?

 eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:C0:A8:F2:40:B1
inet addr:192.168.0.2  Bcast:192.168.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
RX packets:78 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:92 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:8568 (8.3 Kb)  TX bytes:12311 (12.0 Kb)
Interrupt:11 Base address:0xbc00

 [root@Dreadnaught root]# route -n
 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
 Iface
 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
 eth0
 127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  00
 lo

Missing default route.

 search earthlink.net
 nameserver 207.217.126.82
 nameserver 207.217.77.81
 nameserver 207.217.120.83

Someone pointed out dyslexia; but you have no route to 207...

 I have 3 other comps behind this router. I can still ssh into the
 Mandrake box when its on its permanent IP (192.168.0.2) but it cannot
 resolve anything from that IP. The router isn't set to block anything
 unusual. All other comps can connect to the next just fine. Its just the
 Mandrake box. I am going to switch one of my other comps to 192.168.0.2
 to rule out that specific IP as being a problem.

Which only means that the other comps have default routes and this one does not
as evidenced above.

 Alright I just put a WinXP box on 192.168.0.2 and it was able to resolve
 domains just fine. So its not the router thats blocking anything. I'm at
 a loss here to what just broke. I still don't know why it can resovle
 when its on DHCP but can't when I put it on 192.168.0.2 manually.

Unless you have a default route, the ONLY networks you can reach with the above
route table are:
192.168.0.*
127.*.*.*
Nothing else...  nada...  zip!  Not even the DNS hosts cuz they are all in
network 207.* which is NOT in your route table.  Without a default route, all
the other destinations won't even make it onto the wire to the router.  

Regardless of the destination: no route == no traffic.

See man route.

Troubleshooting tip:  when something works one way but not another, put all the
collected data side-by-side and compare...  betcha you have a default route in
the DHCP setup...  while we can see from above that there's none in the static
config.

Pierre



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Strange problem with the POP server

2001-12-10 Thread Pierre Fortin

Robert Fargher wrote:
 
   I was at one client's machine this weekend, trying to figure out what is
 going on.  He has one of those  4 port Linksys home router/NAT firewall
 units.   If I bypass the Linksys router and connect the cable modem directly
 to his machine, the POP latency disappears and mail transfers are fast.  Put
 the Linksys router in the path and the long latency re-appears; the log
 entries in /var/log/secure and /var/log/syslog are almost simultaneous.  (I
 do not know whether all the clients having problems have such a router/NAT
 firewall or not).

I have a LinkSys and it works fine with LM8.1...  to get more info as to what
might be happening with the router, upgrade its software to one that has logging
capabilities (I'm running 1.40.1) and set it up to log the connection attempts;
you don't actually need a logging server to see what the router might be
rejecting (see my web page at http://pfortin.com/Linux/LinkSys/), just watch
what the router is sending...  these logging packets are send and pray in that
they are sent only once each and do not expect a response.

Take a trace of the working traffic with ethereal and tcpdump; then again with
the router inline and watch for unexpected log entries.

HTH,
Pierre



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] DNS problems (Its FIXED! W00 H00!)

2001-12-10 Thread NDPTAL85

On Monday, December 10, 2001, at 02:01 PM, Larry Sword wrote:

 NDPTAL85 wrote:

 Here is the results of route -n

 [root@Dreadnaught root]# route -n
 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
 Use
 Iface
 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  
 00
 eth0
 127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  
 00
 lo

 I dialup to Earthlink thru a Netgear 4 port 56k router (model RM356). 
 It
 has 4 machines connected to it of which one is the Mandrake box. The
 others are Mac OS X, FreeBSD and Windows XP. They are working fine.

 When using a static address on the Linux machine it

 Sounds like you need to add a gateway address to your
 /etc/sysconfig/nerwork file:

 GATEWAY=the address of your router gateway


 Larry

 Larry, thanks! I added what you said to add and its working now. I 
 still don't know what caused it to stop working before but at least I 
 know its working now and I don't have to re-install. And thanks to 
 everyone else who helped too.

 (I'm cross-posting so everyone can see the solution)




 
-
 Yoda's answering machine, this is. Leave a message, you might and call 
 you back, he will.
 
-




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] vh_mp3.sh / create audio CD easier w/ this script

2001-12-10 Thread skidley

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, J. Craig Woods wrote:

 Hey, Nguyen,

 It looks to be a nice little script but I have one question: why convert
 the .mp3 to .wav? Why not to format for playing on regular CD stereo?

 j. c. woods
 UNIX SA

When .wav is burned to a CD in audio cd fomat it becomes a regular audio
CD.

-- 
  .-.   .-.
  oo|  Give Microsoft The Bird  oo|
 /`'\  Use Linux!!!/`'\
(\_;/)(\_;/)
-
Software is like sex: It's better when it's free.
   --- Linus Torvalds

Chad Young
Registered Linux User #195191 @ http://counter.li.org




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Strange problem with the POP server

2001-12-10 Thread Thumper

On the filter page in the Linksys DSL router UNCHECK Block Wan Request.

George
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Monday 10 December 2001 10:31 am, you wrote:
 Hi folks, I've got a head scratcher here and I'd really like your help,
 please.

   The problem arose when we replaced a RedHat 6.2 server with a Mandrake
 8.1 server.  On the new Mandrake server, a few clients (out of about 400 or
 so) are now having difficultly POP'ing their mail where they didn't have
 before.

   What happens is that they are experiencing an extended connection time,
 up to 60 seconds before the mail transfer starts after starting a mail run
 via pop.   In some cases, this is causing the client to time-out and report
 the server is unreachable.

   If I monitor /var/log/secure and /var/log/syslog while one of these users
 does a mail run, I see the POP3 connection made almost instantly in
 /var/log/secure (so it's not a net latency).  However, the pop service init
 login doesn't show up (in /var/log/syslog) until quite a while later; when
 it does, the user gets his mail.

   Thus the delay is occurring between the pop connection and the pop login.

   I was at one client's machine this weekend, trying to figure out what is
 going on.  He has one of those  4 port Linksys home router/NAT firewall
 units.   If I bypass the Linksys router and connect the cable modem
 directly to his machine, the POP latency disappears and mail transfers are
 fast.  Put the Linksys router in the path and the long latency re-appears;
 the log entries in /var/log/secure and /var/log/syslog are almost
 simultaneous.  (I do not know whether all the clients having problems have
 such a router/NAT firewall or not).

  So far, I've not found out what happens on a POP connection after the
 initial connection via xinetd and I have no idea what can be causing this
 delay.

   Does anyone have anything to suggest?  Thanks!



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] WordPerfect 8 Install on MDK 8.1

2001-12-10 Thread George Czerw


I'd suggest that you do a search on RPMfind and get the following 2
Mandrake RPMs:

libc-5.3.12-35mdk.i586.rpm

ld.so-1.9.11-4mdk.i586.rpm

Good luck!

George



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] DNS problems

2001-12-10 Thread Tarragon Allen

On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 04:59, NDPTAL85 wrote:
 Here is the results of route -n

 [root@Dreadnaught root]# route -n
 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
 Iface
 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
 eth0
 127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  00
 lo


 I dialup to Earthlink thru a Netgear 4 port 56k router (model RM356). It
 has 4 machines connected to it of which one is the Mandrake box. The
 others are Mac OS X, FreeBSD and Windows XP. They are working fine.

You have no default route, meaning your Mandrake box doesn't know how to get 
to any IP address outside of your local networks, including your DNS servers.

You could try something like :

# route add -net 0.0.0.0 gw 192.168.0.1

(assuming that your gateway is 192.168.0.1).

This will only fix it for this session, so if the machine reboots you'll need 
to set this line again.  To fix it permanently you'll need to add a GATEWAY 
line in /etc/sysconfig/network or /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/if-eth0.

t

-- 
PGP key : http://n12turbo.com/tarragon/public.key



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] iptables is nutz!

2001-12-10 Thread Tarragon Allen

On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 00:06, Mark Weaver wrote:
 t,

 adding the -p (protocol) was the missing link. why in the world didn't
 iptables just say that's what it was missing instead of the generic error
 message it was giving me?

I think the technical reason it gave the option unknown response is because 
those options (--dport, --sport) only become available to iptables when the 
specific protocol module (tcp, udp) gets loaded.  If you don't specify the 
protocol, the protocol module doesn't get loaded, and iptables doesn't even 
know the --dport option exists, thus the error.

 thanks so much. firewall happy now. user is too!  :)

Good stuff.

 just wish someone would respond to my post about postfix...

I think I missed that one ..

t

-- 
PGP key : http://n12turbo.com/tarragon/public.key



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-10 Thread Mark Weaver

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:57:24 -0500
Pierre Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mark Weaver wrote:
  
  Hi List,
  
  I've been thinking about something for a little while now and I was wondering if 
anyone here on the list has Postfix installed and doing reverse lookups as a method 
of controling the amount of SPAM coming into their mailservers.
 
 Yes.  There are problems though in that I have to allow certain hosts to send me
 mail regardless because some legit sites either don't have a reverse mapping, or
 have it wrong...  It appears that Mandrake may have fixed their DNS entries so
 that 216.71.84.35 returns only mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com instead of 3
 hostnames of which only one was mapped back.  This was causing postfix to reject
 about 2/3's of the messages sent to me.
 

Hi Pierre,

I've been doing the head_check thing now for about a week and while it's making a 
difference it's not doing the whole job. How does one start doing reverse lookups with 
Postfix? 

and thanks for the link. I'm going there now to check things out.

-- 
daRcmaTTeR
=/\=???
  |%C++
Registered Linux User # 186492

We love and desire the things most that will kill us!



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-10 Thread Mark Weaver

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:30:29 -0700
Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Funny that this is mentioned... there is an article about SPAM on
 MandrakeSecure that discusses exactly what you're saying, Pierre... =)
 
 http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/docs/spam.php
 

that article appears to be pointed mostly at qmail. how does this apply to postfix? it 
left me scratching my head, and postfix is a fairly straightforward concept. Heck, 
iptables is easier then what i read in that article.

maybe i just hadn't had enough coffee yet...i don't know.

-- 
daRcmaTTeR
=/\=???
  |%C++
Registered Linux User # 186492

We love and desire the things most that will kill us!



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] changing default editor..

2001-12-10 Thread Mark Weaver

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 02:15:02 -0800
David Guntner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Franki grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
  
  vi has been my nemesis for a long time now, I never get the time to learn
  it, as there are other easier editors and I don't have the time to worry
  about it..
  
  I need to edit my contab and don't wish to do it with vi..
  
  I'd prefer pico or mcedit (both of which are installed.)
 
 In your .bash_login or .profile file (which-ever you use):
 
 export EDITOR=pico(or mcedit, which-ever you prefer)
 export VISUAL=$EDITOR
 
 Putting both thos lines in will make sure that you get it while in your 
 shell, no matter which variable is looked at by the program that's calling 
 your editor of choice (some look for $EDITOR, some look for $VISUAL).  Log 
 out, log back in, and you're set from then on.
 

ok, but out of curiosity how does this default editor get called while you're in the 
shell?

-- 
daRcmaTTeR
=/\=???
  |%C++
Registered Linux User # 186492

We love and desire the things most that will kill us!



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] iptables is nutz!

2001-12-10 Thread Mark Weaver

On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:12:13 +1100
Tarragon Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I think the technical reason it gave the option unknown response is because 
 those options (--dport, --sport) only become available to iptables when the 
 specific protocol module (tcp, udp) gets loaded.  If you don't specify the 
 protocol, the protocol module doesn't get loaded, and iptables doesn't even 
 know the --dport option exists, thus the error.

well...that certainly makes more sense. the more i get to know iptables the more i 
like it. LOTs O brain candy.
-- 
daRcmaTTeR
=/\=???
  |%C++
Registered Linux User # 186492

We love and desire the things most that will kill us!



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] fun with vi. search command

2001-12-10 Thread Mark Weaver

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 14:24:16 +0900
Nguyen H.Vu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Nguyen,

thanks for the quickie lesson on pattern search with VI. I hadn't known how to do that 
before, but I completely missed the point. what was it?

-- 
daRcmaTTeR
=/\=???
  |%C++
Registered Linux User # 186492

We love and desire the things most that will kill us!



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [expert] TV Card Reccomendations

2001-12-10 Thread Craig Williamson (ENZ)
Title: RE: [expert] TV Card Reccomendations





Hi There,


I've got a Dynalink TView TV capture card with FM. It uses the BT878 Brooktree chipset. It works under Linux but hasn't got cartified hardware status yet. But it's still good :-). Good Luck.

Craig


-Original Message-
From: Tom Badran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] TV Card Reccomendations



-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Im looking for a good quality pci TV card. The prime purpose for it will be 
to use to plug in my amiga system, and consoles so that i dont need a 
seperate TV. Could someone reccomend a good one (and i dont have windows so 
it must work under linux) that gives full frame rates, and preferably does 
everything in hardware. Ive seen one of those USB WinTV setups and it was 
pretty damn crap (~6 frames a second or so). Ive never had a TV card before 
so i have no idea what im looking for, and anything that is fairly cheap 
right now would be great.


Thanks Guys, im sure one of you can tell me what im after.


Tom


- -- 
Tom Tomahawk Badran
Department of Computing, Imperial College
- ---
PGP Key available from certserver.pgp.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org


iD8DBQE8FW6MXCpWOla2mCcRAm9WAJ9cckrU5GgZpldMzkFKJkLpScFd/wCfWXDK
rPSSTcw0ywna6V6zZsCPNDM=
=uYFZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-





Re: [expert] StarOffice

2001-12-10 Thread Lee Roberts

At 07:34 PM 12/9/2001 -0500, Hoyt Duff wrote:
On Sunday 09 December 2001 05:20 pm, you wrote:
 El dom, 09-12-2001 a las 20:22, Lee Roberts escribió:
  The /net option just made me more frustrated. Screw it! I don't have the
  time to spend trying to make this stuff work. Why can't it a
  straightforward install??? Thanks for everyone's help anyway.

 Then, just install it without the /net option, selecting your home
 directory for install (a.e. /home/lee/office52).

It can't do a straightforward install because Linux is a multi-user, 
networked OS. Star Office is appropriately designed for installation in such 
an environment. As a result, properly designed programs seem a little 
strange in a home desktop environment. However, many apps are not designed 
to live in a multi-user networked environment (like Netscape which needs to 
be heavily customized to behave well on a network) and present problems to 
the sysadmin like inappropriate permissions, wasted disk space for redundant 
files, unnecessary use of bandwidth for eye-candy, and so on.


According to what you guys told me, the sequence for installing StarOffice
for multiple users is as follows:

1. Install SO with the /net option
2. Change directory to where soffice is located
3. Execute soffice and follow the instructions
4. Done

That seems straightforward to me. But, when I executed soffice, I got an
error message that SO was already installed.

Anyway, I installed it in my home directory. Maybe I'll try the /net option
at some later date if someone knows what happened.




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] Re: g++ docs

2001-12-10 Thread D. R. Evans

Hmmm... this seems to be a widely reported problem with the gcc 3.x pre-
processor. They are only warnings so it shouldn't really matter, except 
that, as I mentioned, they might obscure some more important and 
unexpected warning.

There doesn't seem to be any way to turn off this warning :-(

  Doc

PS I did see a couple of references that suggest that as of 1999, this 
is in fact correct behaviour from the pre-processor. I find that 
difficult to believe, but I suppose that it's possible. Some way to 
turn off the warning would be nice, though.

On 10 Dec 01, at 14:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Now that I have LM 8.1 installed, trying to build one of my programs, I
 see a zillion copies of the following form of warning:
 
 Warning: pasting x and y does not give a valid preprocessing token.
 
 gcc -v returns 2.96 as the version number, but I can find no 
 documentation for 2.96 on the GNU site.
 
 This warning did not appear with the compiler in 7.2; in fact, it seems a
 rather bizarre warning, since it seems to be telling me that after I have
 concatenated two strings I don't have a preprocessing token; which is
 fine, because I expect the concatentation to produce compilable code. 
 
 Does anyone know where can I find out how to turn this warning off? 
 There are so many that they look likely to bury any real warnings.
 
   Doc
 
 PS Example:
 
 #define test(x) int x##;
 test(burble)
 
 produces:
  warning pasting burble and ; does not give valid preprocessing token
 in LM 8.1; gives no warning in LM 7.2.
 
 
 
 
 


--
Phone:  +1 303 494 0394
Mobile: +1 720 839 8462
Fax:+1 781 240 0527
--



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] TV Card Reccomendations

2001-12-10 Thread Ed Tharp

Almoxt any brooktree848 based card should work good, my cheap winTV card 
works great for mem and does good video capture to. I believe the difference 
would be to have the PCI based card (as opposed to the USB).  


On Monday 10 December 2001 21:25, you wrote:
 Im looking for a good quality pci TV card.  The prime purpose for it will
 be to use to plug in my amiga system, and consoles so that i dont need a
 seperate TV. Could someone reccomend a good one (and i dont have windows so
 it must work under linux) that gives full frame rates, and preferably does
 everything in hardware. Ive seen one of those USB WinTV setups and it was
 pretty damn crap (~6 frames a second or so). Ive never had a TV card before
 so i have no idea what im looking for, and anything that is fairly cheap
 right now would be great.

 Thanks Guys, im sure one of you can tell me what im after.

 Tom



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] autoresponder program

2001-12-10 Thread Bill Beauchemin

If your running your own email server there should be a config for vacation 
autoresponders. I know Postfix has that. If your not running your own server 
your isp or network admin can do this for you.

On Monday 10 December 2001 18:10, you wrote:

  Can anyone give tell me what they use with Mandrake to generate
 Out-of-office messages? Kmail and NS don't seem to have this capability.

 Thanks,
 Brian


Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; name=message.footer
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Description: 




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] StarOffice

2001-12-10 Thread Salvatore Enrico Indiogine

Greetings:

1. Install has to be done as root.  You can also use -net instead of
/net
2. Log out as root and login as _normal_ user and cd to
/opt/staroffice/program ( or wherever soffice is).
3. run it

 According to what you guys told me, the sequence for installing StarOffice
 for multiple users is as follows:
 
 1. Install SO with the /net option
 2. Change directory to where soffice is located
 3. Execute soffice and follow the instructions
 4. Done
 
 That seems straightforward to me. But, when I executed soffice, I got an
 error message that SO was already installed.
 
 Anyway, I installed it in my home directory. Maybe I'll try the /net option
 at some later date if someone knows what happened.

-- 
Salvatore Enrico Indiogine

505-627-0759

Registered Linux User #217339




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] Xserver question

2001-12-10 Thread Bill Beauchemin

Is thewre an easy way like an RPM to upgrade the xserver from 4.01 to 4.10 or 
even 4.03? Im using a Mtrox G400 and to use the mga desk to configure the two 
heads you must be running 4.03 or newer. Im currently runing 4.01. I tried 
following the directions at xfree86.org and downloaded all the files to 
install but it trashed the xserver. Any help?



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] autoresponder program

2001-12-10 Thread Mark Weaver

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:10:39 -0600
Brian Henerey [EMAIL PROTECTED] frantically pecked out this message:

 Can anyone give tell me what they use with Mandrake to generate Out-of-office 
 messages? Kmail and NS don't seem to have this capability.

Brian,

they're not coming from Mandrake, but rather someone subscribed to the list that is 
currently not at home right now to get their mail and thinking it's cool to send 
out-of-office messages to the list everytime a message goes to them from the list.

it's nice to let clients know that you're not there, but come on! for a mailing to 
have to put up with that it's just plain inconsiderate.

sorry...didn't mean to rant. just one of my pet peeves.
-- 
Mark

Registered Linux User 182496
Mandrake 8.1
-
 10:39pm  up 1 day, 35 min,  1 user,  load average: 1.04, 0.90, 0.76



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-10 Thread Vincent Danen

On Mon Dec 10, 2001 at 09:25:49PM -0500, Mark Weaver wrote:

  Funny that this is mentioned... there is an article about SPAM on
  MandrakeSecure that discusses exactly what you're saying, Pierre... =)
  
  http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/docs/spam.php
  
 
 that article appears to be pointed mostly at qmail. how does this apply to postfix? 
it left me scratching my head, and postfix is a fairly straightforward concept. Heck, 
iptables is easier then what i read in that article.

Not at all.  It's shared weight between postfix and qmail...  The
first part is about adding RBL support to both postfix and qmail.
What was confusing about it?  The second part deals with TMDA, an
anti-spam client program (not the RBL stuff, two very different
things)... that was the more complex of the two but, again, it was
described for both qmail and postfix.

I would have (and may yet) add sendmail to the RBL stuff once I play
around with it, but TMDA doesn't support sendmail so I can't add it to
part two.

 maybe i just hadn't had enough coffee yet...i don't know.

Would you mind taking another look at it?  It makes sense to me, but
then I wrote it.  It's not geared towards absolute newbies, but I
don't think you need a physics degree to read it.  Another look and
some idea as to what doesn't make sense would be appreciated so I can
maybe clarify some issues that require it (to avoid said physics
degree for readers).

Thanks, Mark.

-- 
OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
1024D/FE6F2AFD   88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD

Current Linux kernel 2.4.8-34.1mdk uptime: 21 days 5 hours 26 minutes.



msg45960/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-10 Thread Mark Weaver

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 20:58:17 -0700
Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] frantically pecked out this message:

 Not at all.  It's shared weight between postfix and qmail...  The
 first part is about adding RBL support to both postfix and qmail.
 What was confusing about it?  The second part deals with TMDA, an
 anti-spam client program (not the RBL stuff, two very different
 things)... that was the more complex of the two but, again, it was
 described for both qmail and postfix.
 
 I would have (and may yet) add sendmail to the RBL stuff once I play
 around with it, but TMDA doesn't support sendmail so I can't add it to
 part two.
 
  maybe i just hadn't had enough coffee yet...i don't know.
 
 Would you mind taking another look at it?  It makes sense to me, but
 then I wrote it.  It's not geared towards absolute newbies, but I
 don't think you need a physics degree to read it.  Another look and
 some idea as to what doesn't make sense would be appreciated so I can
 maybe clarify some issues that require it (to avoid said physics
 degree for readers).
 
 Thanks, Mark.

Vincent,

Acuatlly I think I will have another look at it, however this time I think I'll take 
that look first thing in the morning when i'm fresh and before I get fried feeding on 
Iptables. I was fairly toasted till I got to read your article.  :)

-- 
Mark

Registered Linux User 182496
Mandrake 8.1
-
 11:05pm  up 1 day,  1:00,  2 users,  load average: 0.71, 0.74, 0.78



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] StarOffice

2001-12-10 Thread Ricardo Castanho de O. Freitas

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Lee Roberts wrote:


Just one more word.

I have installed SO on many systems since v.5.0
I've always installed it into /opt as root!
As user I just start the binary (.../soffice)and SO asks me what kind of
installation I want giving me 3 options. I've always chosen the minimalist
installation as user.
It has *always* worked.
Never used the /net option or the /usr path installation.

Everything I install *out* of my distribution I install on /opt. It's
better for 'management'.

Ricardo Castanho

1. Install SO with the /net option
2. Change directory to where soffice is located
3. Execute soffice and follow the instructions
4. Done
That seems straightforward to me. But, when I executed soffice, I got an
error message that SO was already installed.
Anyway, I installed it in my home directory. Maybe I'll try the /net option
at some later date if someone knows what happened.

- -- 
Whenever possible mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
Linux user # 102240 = Machine # 96125 = Seti@home user
==
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iEUEARECAAYFAjwVhdoACgkQ9I0k95pf9XuGFACfQhTI9uJhQcTljRyxnkblbh1B
LzUAmKMpDXaHYCOdcXmnic2XYQ5eSbA=
=PXki
-END PGP SIGNATURE-





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] ftpmount - include?

2001-12-10 Thread J Grant

Hi

any chance of getting ftpmount included in the next mdk?
http://ftpfs.sourceforge.net/

JG



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [expert] changing default editor..

2001-12-10 Thread Franki

obviously you chose a console editor,, like vim, pico, mcedit,,

would be strange to only be able to edit crontab in the gui... (not even
sure that would work.)



rgds

Frank

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Weaver
Sent: Tuesday, 11 December 2001 10:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] changing default editor..


On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 02:15:02 -0800
David Guntner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Franki grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
 
  vi has been my nemesis for a long time now, I never get the time to
learn
  it, as there are other easier editors and I don't have the time to worry
  about it..
 
  I need to edit my contab and don't wish to do it with vi..
 
  I'd prefer pico or mcedit (both of which are installed.)

 In your .bash_login or .profile file (which-ever you use):

 export EDITOR=pico(or mcedit, which-ever you prefer)
 export VISUAL=$EDITOR

 Putting both thos lines in will make sure that you get it while in your
 shell, no matter which variable is looked at by the program that's calling
 your editor of choice (some look for $EDITOR, some look for $VISUAL).  Log
 out, log back in, and you're set from then on.


ok, but out of curiosity how does this default editor get called while
you're in the shell?

--
daRcmaTTeR
=/\=???
  |%C++
Registered Linux User # 186492

We love and desire the things most that will kill us!





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] MDK on Dell CPxJ

2001-12-10 Thread Chris Ashmore

I have been working now for about 3 days trying to get MDK 8.1 installed on a 
Dell Latitude CPxJ Bios rev. A13 (current). It started as a boot hang at 
starting console mouse service so I reinstalled and disabled 'gpm'. Now it 
hangs at 'Setting Backspace to send ?^'. I really want to get this working to 
show my boss that Linux works on Laptops and I know that Dell is a supporter 
of Linux. Help!
Hardware is 
PIII-650
256 RAM
1240x780 24 bit display
Alps touchpad
ATI Rage 8MB vidcard
3Com combo PCIMCA NIC / Modem



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] TV Card Reccomendations

2001-12-10 Thread Traci Collins

On Mon, 2001-12-10 at 19:58, Ed Tharp wrote:
 Almoxt any brooktree848 based card should work good, my cheap winTV card 
 works great for mem and does good video capture to. I believe the difference 
 would be to have the PCI based card (as opposed to the USB).  

Does anyone who has a WinTV card have any secrets to share about how
they cleaned up the picture? My card was recognized, and i am able to
display video through it, but, the picture is distorted with line noise.
The display is crawling with video worms. I can drive a TV set directly
off the same coax and get a perfectly beautiful picture but when i
display the signal through my WinTV card it looks really sloppy. I have
tried iron torroids on the coax as well as replacing my standard coax
with shielded, low noise coax, nothing seems to help. I am guessing that
the WinTV card is picking up RF from inside my box but I would have
thought that Hauppauge would have planned on that. Any assistance would
be appreciated. Thanks.

Traci




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com