Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-11 Thread Mike Rambo
James Sparenberg wrote:
 
 On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 03:37, Joerg Mertin wrote:
  Hi Folks,
 
  this request might be off-topic, but might not be.
  For years now - I have always used Mandrake for Desktop Usage - always
  bought the boxes, but RedHat for my home server - download edition.
 
  The reason I'm asking - is that I actually love the script based up2date
  package, and the 7.3rh version - however - every month filling out their
  questions etc. to get my demo-account active - is getting on my nervs. I
  would pay for it - but don't know if paying for that, they will make as M$
  - stop support for the old versions etc. letting me hanging in the rain.
 
  So - what I require - is a Server operating system that is not using any
  X-Interface for it's configuration. I would do everything by hand too -
  but don't care if a curses-based UI exists. I also require an automated
  Update system in place (I had written back in time one for automatically
  updating RPM's, similar to up2date from rh), but it would be nice to have
  that maintained by the distribution owner.
 

There are pros and cons to it (like in everything) but you could take a
look at the K12LTSP distro. As the name implies it is primarily built
for educational institutions and as such will have things in it you may
not want (like tux typing and the ltsp.org packages etc.). It is RedHat
based but is released more frequently (with the latest official patches
and updates) and has both apt-get (from debian but rpm based) and yum
(yellowdog update manager) packaged and preconfigured. The K12LTSP folks
manage package repositories for both managers.

I also use mandrake on desktop and redhat (now K12LTSP) on servers and
though I don't know your exact reasons, I may understand where you're
coming from. The apt-get and yum mangers do for redhat what urpmi does
for mandrake AFAICS - plus you have choice on which you prefer to use.

http://www.k12ltsp.org/


 I do this I create a cron job that runs every 24 hours doing
 urpmi.update -a   then urpmi --auto --auto-select.   This takes care of
 all of the updates auto-magically for me.  And, since it's a cron job it
 mails me the results.
 
 One note I also add main and contribs to my urpmi database and
 disable the cd's, this way if it needs anything new ... it can get it.
 I've been doing this for about 2 years now without a hitch, and my boxes
 are never more than a day out of date.  Beats the heck out of up2date.
 
 4 servers running MDK and 9 desktops (small office) all of them do this,
 all are kept up to date.  In two years I've had one problem and it was
 caused by backhoe vs fiber incident that cut my connection to a site in
 my urpmi database.
 
 Just for Fairness YAST in SuSe can do this as well although I haven't
 used it.  But out of all the distro's RH is the most troublesome to keep
 up to date.  (and the one with the most updates too.  Mostly self
 caused.)
 
 James
 
 
  Now - I do have a fairly well knowledge of Mandrakes capabilities, and for
  my Desktop - I have no problem using it. However - a Server means for me,
  that all my backups are going on it, it has to be reliable, needs to be
  secured - and the system needs to be supported for at least a year or 2.
  Mdk has gone the way of often updating the distribution - which is great
  as long as I don't use it for my server... but I don't know as of yet of
  an automated Security-fix installation option for mdk...
  I had done my own operating system back in time - and could do it again,
  but I'd first like to see if I can avoiding reinventing the wheel ...
 
  Anyone has a RPM based distribution to propose - that is up to date,
  stable, light and easy to maintain ?
  Preferably free, but I'm also willing to pay for it, if it's worth the
  money...
 
  I would like to keep the RPM based distribution, as I have a very long
  experience with RPM's (MD5 Checksums and PGP Signatures where actually
  contributed from me to RedHat by the time of RedHat 2 beta), and I usually
  also like doing RPM's, but don't like the way Debian packages are done
  (reason I staid with RPM)
 
 Thanks for those... they are tremendously underused IMHO.  Now if we can
 just get them to make boolean or available for dependencies I'd be in
 hog heaven.
 
 
  I'll have a new Server end of next-week, a Lex Light THIN Client 533 MHz
  860A-3R53 Fan-less with 3Lan 10/100MBits, 1WiFi port, 256MByte Ram and
  40GBytes Harddrive - barely bigger than an A5 format mini-computer - so
  I'll have something to play with...
 
  So - any hints/tips welcome ...
 
  Cheers
 
Joerg
 
   
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

-- 
Mike Rambo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-11 Thread Joerg Mertin

Hi Vincent,

Thx for your Input.
But - before I start doing a request - does the i586 also work on a VIA C3 
CPU ? Have to check that exactly ... Well - the kernel wouldn't be 
important, but the libraries etc. Any clue ?

On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Vincent Danen wrote:
 Well, you asked for a solution...
 
 Start making requests for a support-less version of CS2.1 for $200 or $250
 and maybe you'll get it.  You're paying that much for support included with
 the product.

yep. That makes sens. Guess I won't need support - as most of the time I 
do give support ;) on Linux :)

Cheers  Thx

Joerg
-- 

| Joerg Mertin  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED](Home)|
| in Neuchâtel/Schweiz  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work)| 
| Stardust's LiNUX System   :  |
| PGP 2.6.3in Key on Demand :  Voice  Fax: +41(0)32 / 725 52 54   |

Home-Page: http://www.solsys.org


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-11 Thread James Sparenberg
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 05:47, Joerg Mertin wrote:
 Hi Vincent,
 
 Thx for your Input.
 But - before I start doing a request - does the i586 also work on a VIA C3 
 CPU ? Have to check that exactly ... Well - the kernel wouldn't be 
 important, but the libraries etc. Any clue ?

Yes it does.. I've a VIA C3 running MDK 9.0 (soon to be 9.1) without a
problem.. Now in 9.0 you did have to do a small trick (it's in the 9.0
errata on the MDK site.) to make sure it didn't try to do i686 but
that's 2 seconds of work really.  Once this bit flip is done the
install goes smoothly and it runs reliably.  

James

 
 On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Vincent Danen wrote:
  Well, you asked for a solution...
  
  Start making requests for a support-less version of CS2.1 for $200 or $250
  and maybe you'll get it.  You're paying that much for support included with
  the product.
 
 yep. That makes sens. Guess I won't need support - as most of the time I 
 do give support ;) on Linux :)
 
 Cheers  Thx
 
   Joerg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-11 Thread Joerg Mertin
Hi James,

James Sparenberg wrote:
Hi Vincent,

Thx for your Input.
But - before I start doing a request - does the i586 also work on a VIA C3 
CPU ? Have to check that exactly ... Well - the kernel wouldn't be 
important, but the libraries etc. Any clue ?


Yes it does.. I've a VIA C3 running MDK 9.0 (soon to be 9.1) without a
problem.. Now in 9.0 you did have to do a small trick (it's in the 9.0
errata on the MDK site.) to make sure it didn't try to do i686 but
that's 2 seconds of work really.  Once this bit flip is done the
install goes smoothly and it runs reliably.  
Thx for the hint. I' ve found similar informations on the linitx.com 
forums... :) I' ll dig through that first to see how it goes ...
But It' ll be the first time I' ll try to boot from a CF card :) Could 
be fun though ...

Cheers  Thx

	Joerg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-10 Thread Joerg Mertin

Hi Folks,

there seems to be a Bug in the list-server. I have sent this message once 
only ;)

Cheers

Joerg

[...]
-- 

| Joerg Mertin  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED](Home)|
| in Neuchâtel/Schweiz  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work)| 
| Stardust's LiNUX System   :  |
| PGP 2.6.3in Key on Demand :  Voice  Fax: +41(0)32 / 725 52 54   |

Home-Page: http://www.solsys.org


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-10 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 06:37 am, Joerg Mertin wrote:


 So - any hints/tips welcome ...

I have my server running Mandrake 9.0.  It runs httpd, samba, nfs, print queu 
mgmt with cups and a few other things and it has been running for 155 days 
now without an issue.  I was gonna try and upgrade it to 9.1 last weekend, 
but I found out I had to do a presentation this week so I didn't want to risk 
it getting screwed up so I'll upgrade it after my presentation today.

You can set it to do automatic updates by creating an update source and using 
urpmi in a cron job to keep it up to date.  This is what I do.

I keep a local mirror of the update sources using fmirror.  If I see in the 
morning that there has been an update on the mirror, I check out the advisory 
at mandrakeSecure and then wait a few days to make sure there isn't an issue 
with the update.  If there isn't, I run the commands urpmi.update --update 
and then urpmi --auto-select --update  This updates the hdlist files for 
urpmi and then automatically updates anything that is installed.  If you want 
it to be automatic, you could set it all up in a cron job.  Set it and forget 
it.  You also don't need a local mirror, you could update directly from one 
of the mirrors.  I just like having it mirrored locally because it is easier 
to update more than one machine that way, plus I get notified via e-mail when 
the cron job pulls down a new update.

-- 
Greg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-10 Thread Joerg Mertin
Hi again,

On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Greg Meyer wrote:
 On Tuesday 10 June 2003 06:37 am, Joerg Mertin wrote:
  So - any hints/tips welcome ...
 
 I have my server running Mandrake 9.0.  It runs httpd, samba, nfs, print queu 
 mgmt with cups and a few other things and it has been running for 155 days 
 now without an issue.  I was gonna try and upgrade it to 9.1 last weekend, 
 but I found out I had to do a presentation this week so I didn't want to risk 
 it getting screwed up so I'll upgrade it after my presentation today.

 You can set it to do automatic updates by creating an update source and using 
 urpmi in a cron job to keep it up to date.  This is what I do.
 
 I keep a local mirror of the update sources using fmirror.  If I see in the 
 morning that there has been an update on the mirror, I check out the advisory 
 at mandrakeSecure and then wait a few days to make sure there isn't an issue 
 with the update.  If there isn't, I run the commands urpmi.update --update 
 and then urpmi --auto-select --update  This updates the hdlist files for 
 urpmi and then automatically updates anything that is installed.  If you want 
 it to be automatic, you could set it all up in a cron job.  Set it and forget 
 it.  You also don't need a local mirror, you could update directly from one 
 of the mirrors.  I just like having it mirrored locally because it is easier 
 to update more than one machine that way, plus I get notified via e-mail when 
 the cron job pulls down a new update.

What you did just put in here - is something I already do with the RedHat 
System. However - I do have the Security Update-System hooked to the 
rhn-advisory system, so that it triggers updates as soon as these are 
available. As you said - you wait couple of days before applying the 
patches, while I don't - and up to now - I have run pretty well with it 
(Only thing that happens form time to time, one of the servers not 
restrting correctly as Mysql or httpd - but that can be checked by 
cron-job.).

PS: I do keep Mirrors of several Distributions, notably, Mandrake-9.1 + 
updates, RedHat-7.3 + Updates, Knoppix, Texstar/Plf-RPM's - so I have 
fairly enough data here. However - what I want is a System that is able to 
intelligently and fast cope with Security issues, where I don't have 
to on a regular base look at it (actually - the way I do it right now 
using rh7.3) :(

Thx for your comments.

PS: I looked at the Mandrake Server-Packages... But I won't buy it - I 
just don't want to put 1500,- Bucks as a private person into it.

Cheers

Joerg

-- 

| Joerg Mertin  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED](Home)|
| in Neuchâtel/Schweiz  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work)| 
| Stardust's LiNUX System   :  |
| PGP 2.6.3in Key on Demand :  Voice  Fax: +41(0)32 / 725 52 54   |

Home-Page: http://www.solsys.org


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-10 Thread Jason Guidry
I apologize if this is not what you were asking about (my comprehension 
level is low this morning) but have you looked at mandrake update robot?

http://www.cyest.org/modules.php?name=Contentpa=showpagepid=5

I don't use it (I probably should) but for whatever reason, I know it 
exists.

good luck.

Joerg Mertin wrote:
The reason I'm asking - is that I actually love the script based up2date
package, and the 7.3rh version - however - every month filling out their
questions etc. to get my demo-account active - is getting on my nervs. I
would pay for it - but don't know if paying for that, they will make as M$
- stop support for the old versions etc. letting me hanging in the rain.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-10 Thread David Rankin
That's nothing Joerg,

I have sent several messages in the last few days and NOTHING has gotten
through.

Joerg Mertin wrote:

 Hi Folks,

 there seems to be a Bug in the list-server. I have sent this message once
 only ;)

 Cheers

 Joerg

 [...]
 --
 
 | Joerg Mertin  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED](Home)|
 | in Neuchâtel/Schweiz  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work)|
 | Stardust's LiNUX System   :  |
 | PGP 2.6.3in Key on Demand :  Voice  Fax: +41(0)32 / 725 52 54   |
 
 Home-Page: http://www.solsys.org

   --
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

--
David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E.
RANKIN * BERTIN, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
(936) 715-9333
(936) 715-9339 fax



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-10 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue Jun 10, 2003 at 12:37:20PM +0200, Joerg Mertin wrote:

[...]
 So - what I require - is a Server operating system that is not using any 
 X-Interface for it's configuration. I would do everything by hand too - 
 but don't care if a curses-based UI exists. I also require an automated 
 Update system in place (I had written back in time one for automatically 
 updating RPM's, similar to up2date from rh), but it would be nice to have 
 that maintained by the distribution owner.
 
 Now - I do have a fairly well knowledge of Mandrakes capabilities, and for
 my Desktop - I have no problem using it. However - a Server means for me,
 that all my backups are going on it, it has to be reliable, needs to be
 secured - and the system needs to be supported for at least a year or 2.  
 Mdk has gone the way of often updating the distribution - which is great
 as long as I don't use it for my server... but I don't know as of yet of
 an automated Security-fix installation option for mdk...
 I had done my own operating system back in time - and could do it again, 
 but I'd first like to see if I can avoiding reinventing the wheel ...

I use Corporate Server 2.1 on all my machines.  It's stable, secure, and
handles the load quite nicely.  You can automate updates with urpmi by
throwing it in a cronjob.

It's not free, but it works extremely well.  CS2.1 is based on Mandrake
9.0+updates.  It does the job very well here.

-- 
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
Online Security Resource Book; http://linsec.ca/
lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import
{FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-10 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 08:27 am, Joerg Mertin wrote:
 PS: I looked at the Mandrake Server-Packages... But I won't buy it - I
 just don't want to put 1500,- Bucks as a private person into it.

I should clarify that this server is running the download edition.  I agree 
with you.  $1,500 is too much for a provate server, so I joined the Club.
-- 
Greg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-10 Thread Joerg Mertin
Vincent Danen wrote:
On Tue Jun 10, 2003 at 12:37:20PM +0200, Joerg Mertin wrote:

[...]

I use Corporate Server 2.1 on all my machines.  It's stable, secure, and
handles the load quite nicely.  You can automate updates with urpmi by
throwing it in a cronjob.
It's not free, but it works extremely well.  CS2.1 is based on Mandrake
9.0+updates.  It does the job very well here.
Yep - I agree, but using CS2.1 for 750,- $ is a little bit too much for 
what I want to do with it. It's allways a compromise between price and 
what I'll get out of it. But - as I do only do some OS development I 
publish under GPL  for fun, I won't spend more than 200,- $ for the OS 
I'm working with. And if I don't find anything that suits, I'll most 
probably go to Debian - even if I don't like their packaging system.

I wonder if Mandrake has some program for external Admins/Developers to 
test their Server packages... I have quite a long experience with 
servers and weird setups running Linux, also security related that might 
help out (Check my homepage)... Anyone from Mandrake might want to comment ?

Cheers

Joerg
--

| Joerg Mertin  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED](Home)|
| in Neuchâtel/Schweiz  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work)|
| Stardust's LiNUX System   :  |
| PGP 2.6.3in Key on Demand :  Voice  Fax: +41(0)32 / 725 52 54   |

Home-Page: http://www.solsys.org

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-10 Thread Joerg Mertin
Heh,

jus found out that it's possible to get the Corporate Server 2.1 for 
750,- $... Cheaper, but not enough for me ;)

Cheers

	Joerg

Greg Meyer wrote:
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 08:27 am, Joerg Mertin wrote:

PS: I looked at the Mandrake Server-Packages... But I won't buy it - I
just don't want to put 1500,- Bucks as a private person into it.


I should clarify that this server is running the download edition.  I agree 
with you.  $1,500 is too much for a provate server, so I joined the Club.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


--

| Joerg Mertin  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED](Home)|
| in Neuchâtel/Schweiz  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work)|
| Stardust's LiNUX System   :  |
| PGP 2.6.3in Key on Demand :  Voice  Fax: +41(0)32 / 725 52 54   |

Home-Page: http://www.solsys.org

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-10 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 03:37, Joerg Mertin wrote:
 Hi Folks,
 
 this request might be off-topic, but might not be.
 For years now - I have always used Mandrake for Desktop Usage - always 
 bought the boxes, but RedHat for my home server - download edition.
 
 However - RedHat has become quite bad IMHO, especially the versions
 8.0/9.0 are quite ugly for an old Linux-user who started with kernel 0.9x, 
 and especially their company policy regarding customers  the OS movement.
 
 The reason I'm asking - is that I actually love the script based up2date
 package, and the 7.3rh version - however - every month filling out their
 questions etc. to get my demo-account active - is getting on my nervs. I
 would pay for it - but don't know if paying for that, they will make as M$
 - stop support for the old versions etc. letting me hanging in the rain.
 
 So - what I require - is a Server operating system that is not using any 
 X-Interface for it's configuration. I would do everything by hand too - 
 but don't care if a curses-based UI exists. I also require an automated 
 Update system in place (I had written back in time one for automatically 
 updating RPM's, similar to up2date from rh), but it would be nice to have 
 that maintained by the distribution owner.

I do this I create a cron job that runs every 24 hours doing
urpmi.update -a   then urpmi --auto --auto-select.   This takes care of
all of the updates auto-magically for me.  And, since it's a cron job it
mails me the results.  

One note I also add main and contribs to my urpmi database and
disable the cd's, this way if it needs anything new ... it can get it.  
I've been doing this for about 2 years now without a hitch, and my boxes
are never more than a day out of date.  Beats the heck out of up2date.

4 servers running MDK and 9 desktops (small office) all of them do this,
all are kept up to date.  In two years I've had one problem and it was
caused by backhoe vs fiber incident that cut my connection to a site in
my urpmi database.

Just for Fairness YAST in SuSe can do this as well although I haven't
used it.  But out of all the distro's RH is the most troublesome to keep
up to date.  (and the one with the most updates too.  Mostly self
caused.)

James

 
 Now - I do have a fairly well knowledge of Mandrakes capabilities, and for
 my Desktop - I have no problem using it. However - a Server means for me,
 that all my backups are going on it, it has to be reliable, needs to be
 secured - and the system needs to be supported for at least a year or 2.  
 Mdk has gone the way of often updating the distribution - which is great
 as long as I don't use it for my server... but I don't know as of yet of
 an automated Security-fix installation option for mdk...
 I had done my own operating system back in time - and could do it again, 
 but I'd first like to see if I can avoiding reinventing the wheel ...
 
 Anyone has a RPM based distribution to propose - that is up to date, 
 stable, light and easy to maintain ?
 Preferably free, but I'm also willing to pay for it, if it's worth the 
 money...
 
 I would like to keep the RPM based distribution, as I have a very long 
 experience with RPM's (MD5 Checksums and PGP Signatures where actually 
 contributed from me to RedHat by the time of RedHat 2 beta), and I usually 
 also like doing RPM's, but don't like the way Debian packages are done 
 (reason I staid with RPM)

Thanks for those... they are tremendously underused IMHO.  Now if we can
just get them to make boolean or available for dependencies I'd be in
hog heaven.

 
 I'll have a new Server end of next-week, a Lex Light THIN Client 533 MHz
 860A-3R53 Fan-less with 3Lan 10/100MBits, 1WiFi port, 256MByte Ram and
 40GBytes Harddrive - barely bigger than an A5 format mini-computer - so
 I'll have something to play with...
 
 So - any hints/tips welcome ...
 
 Cheers
 
   Joerg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-10 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 05:27, Joerg Mertin wrote:
 Hi again,
 
 On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Greg Meyer wrote:
  On Tuesday 10 June 2003 06:37 am, Joerg Mertin wrote:
   So - any hints/tips welcome ...
  
  I have my server running Mandrake 9.0.  It runs httpd, samba, nfs, print queu 
  mgmt with cups and a few other things and it has been running for 155 days 
  now without an issue.  I was gonna try and upgrade it to 9.1 last weekend, 
  but I found out I had to do a presentation this week so I didn't want to risk 
  it getting screwed up so I'll upgrade it after my presentation today.
 
  You can set it to do automatic updates by creating an update source and using 
  urpmi in a cron job to keep it up to date.  This is what I do.
  
  I keep a local mirror of the update sources using fmirror.  If I see in the 
  morning that there has been an update on the mirror, I check out the advisory 
  at mandrakeSecure and then wait a few days to make sure there isn't an issue 
  with the update.  If there isn't, I run the commands urpmi.update --update 
  and then urpmi --auto-select --update  This updates the hdlist files for 
  urpmi and then automatically updates anything that is installed.  If you want 
  it to be automatic, you could set it all up in a cron job.  Set it and forget 
  it.  You also don't need a local mirror, you could update directly from one 
  of the mirrors.  I just like having it mirrored locally because it is easier 
  to update more than one machine that way, plus I get notified via e-mail when 
  the cron job pulls down a new update.
 
 What you did just put in here - is something I already do with the RedHat 
 System. However - I do have the Security Update-System hooked to the 
 rhn-advisory system, so that it triggers updates as soon as these are 
 available. As you said - you wait couple of days before applying the 
 patches, while I don't - and up to now - I have run pretty well with it 
 (Only thing that happens form time to time, one of the servers not 
 restrting correctly as Mysql or httpd - but that can be checked by 
 cron-job.).

Actually it's not that out of date it runs every day at about 4am
local.  

cd /etc/cron.daily

vi updater

#!/bin/sh
urpmi.update -a
urpmi --auto --auto-select


then save it.  I then ran urpmi.setup to get urpmi running right.  

The in /etc/urpmi/   the file urpmi.cfg you'll see something like this.

Installation\ CD\ 1\ (x86)\ (cdrom1) removable://mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS
{
  hdlist: hdlist.Installation CD 1 (x86) (cdrom1).cz
  with_hdlist: ../base/hdlist1.cz
  removable: /dev/scd0
}

add the line ignore

Installation\ CD\ 1\ (x86)\ (cdrom1) removable://mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS
{
  hdlist: hdlist.Installation CD 1 (x86) (cdrom1).cz
  with_hdlist: ../base/hdlist1.cz
  removable: /dev/scd0
  ignore
}

This ignores the disks and forces it to the net for all rpms.  (make
sure you do this for all 3 cd's) 


I'm now updated daily..  IF there is something critical I manually run
the cron job.  

This does everything except kernels... this is good.  I prefer doing
kernels by hand anyway.

James

 
 PS: I do keep Mirrors of several Distributions, notably, Mandrake-9.1 + 
 updates, RedHat-7.3 + Updates, Knoppix, Texstar/Plf-RPM's - so I have 
 fairly enough data here. However - what I want is a System that is able to 
 intelligently and fast cope with Security issues, where I don't have 
 to on a regular base look at it (actually - the way I do it right now 
 using rh7.3) :(
 
 Thx for your comments.
 
 PS: I looked at the Mandrake Server-Packages... But I won't buy it - I 
 just don't want to put 1500,- Bucks as a private person into it.
 
 Cheers
 
   Joerg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-10 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue Jun 10, 2003 at 07:40:31PM +0200, Joerg Mertin wrote:

 [...]
 
 I use Corporate Server 2.1 on all my machines.  It's stable, secure, and
 handles the load quite nicely.  You can automate updates with urpmi by
 throwing it in a cronjob.
 
 It's not free, but it works extremely well.  CS2.1 is based on Mandrake
 9.0+updates.  It does the job very well here.
 
 Yep - I agree, but using CS2.1 for 750,- $ is a little bit too much for 
 what I want to do with it. It's allways a compromise between price and 
 what I'll get out of it. But - as I do only do some OS development I 
 publish under GPL  for fun, I won't spend more than 200,- $ for the OS 
 I'm working with. And if I don't find anything that suits, I'll most 
 probably go to Debian - even if I don't like their packaging system.

Well, you asked for a solution...

Start making requests for a support-less version of CS2.1 for $200 or $250
and maybe you'll get it.  You're paying that much for support included with
the product.

 I wonder if Mandrake has some program for external Admins/Developers to 
 test their Server packages... I have quite a long experience with 
 servers and weird setups running Linux, also security related that might 
 help out (Check my homepage)... Anyone from Mandrake might want to comment ?

AFAIK, there is no such program.  That kind of work is done in-house unless
you are certifying some external third party commercial app.

-- 
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
Online Security Resource Book; http://linsec.ca/
lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import
{FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-10 Thread PlugHead
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 04:54 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
 vi updater

 #!/bin/sh
 urpmi.update -a
 urpmi --auto --auto-select

I believe it is also possible to specify which media you want to use for the 
update--so, if you *only* want security updates applied automatically:

1) create a urpmi source called (e.g.) 'security' (pointing to a security 
site, obviously--using the Mandrake Control Center is probably the easiest 
way to do this.)

2) change the urpmi line to urpmi --media security --auto --auto-select

(I'd leave the urpmi.update -a as is--it's just too convenient...)

-Jason

=
Multiple exclamation marks, he went on, shaking his head, are a sure
sign of a diseased mind.
-- Something that Terry feels strongly about, because a similar
   quote also appears in Reaper Man
   (Terry Pratchett, Eric)


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mdk as Server OS ?

2003-06-10 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 18:07, PlugHead wrote:
 On Tuesday 10 June 2003 04:54 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
  vi updater
 
  #!/bin/sh
  urpmi.update -a
  urpmi --auto --auto-select
 
 I believe it is also possible to specify which media you want to use for the 
 update--so, if you *only* want security updates applied automatically:
 
 1) create a urpmi source called (e.g.) 'security' (pointing to a security 
 site, obviously--using the Mandrake Control Center is probably the easiest 
 way to do this.)
 
 2) change the urpmi line to urpmi --media security --auto --auto-select
 
 (I'd leave the urpmi.update -a as is--it's just too convenient...)
 
 -Jason

Only reason I did it wide instead of narrow is in case of dependency...
but yes. media will work.

James

 
 =
 Multiple exclamation marks, he went on, shaking his head, are a sure
 sign of a diseased mind.
 -- Something that Terry feels strongly about, because a similar
quote also appears in Reaper Man
(Terry Pratchett, Eric)
 
 
 
 __
 
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com