[FairfieldLife] Re: For Card

[card]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
>
> In the survey not specifically cited but hinted at, Finland provided the
> best education in the world, followed by several Asian nations and the
> Netherlands in 7th place. The United States was 17th.
> 

I guess Finland has Christianity to thank for the fact, that
almost 100 percents of its population are literate. Have no idea
when exactly, but certainly quite early on, it became obligatory
to be able to read the Bible. It was translated into Finnish
first time by Mikael Agricola in the 16th century.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikael_Agricola

Mikael Agricola ( pronunciation (help·info)) (c. 1510 – 9 April 1557) was a 
clergyman who became the de facto founder of written Finnish and a prominent 
proponent of the Protestant Reformation in Sweden (including Finland). He is 
often called the "father of the Finnish written language". Agricola was 
consecrated as the bishop of Turku (Åbo) in 1554, without papal approval. As a 
result, he began a reform of the Finnish church (then a part of the Church of 
Sweden) along Lutheran lines. He translated the New Testament into Finnish and 
also produced the prayer book and hymns used in Finland's new, Lutheran Church. 
This work set the rules of orthography that are the basis of modern Finnish 
spelling. His thoroughgoing work is particularly remarkable in that he 
accomplished it in only three years. He died suddenly while returning from a 
trip during which he negotiated a treaty with the Russians.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Video: First Place All Around

[Emily Reyn]

Thanks Raunchy.  I think this is the most important post of the week.  I second 
Judy on this.  And the coach in the Santa cap was pretty cute.  

Share, sorry to post my limit today; I'm a bit impulsive I'm discovering and 
I'm also heading to the beach for a few days.  What do you say we allow our 
communication to evolve organically?  Such a meaningful word, "organic", or 
not, as the case may be.  Tee Hee. 

Ya'll have a nice rest of the week and really, thanks for the opera.  



 From: authfriend 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:45 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Video: First Place All Around
 

  
Atta GIRL!!! Boy, she's impressive.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"  wrote:
>
> Juliette scored 30.35 for 1st Place in the Gymnastics Intra-Team Competition 
> at Fairfield Parks & Rec. She placed in all events: Trampoline 2nd; Floor 
> Exercise 2nd; Balance Beam 3rd; Parallel Bars 3rd; Vault 1st. 
> http://youtu.be/-B8go70Z4H0
>


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Billionaires Club

[Bill Coop]

On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:08 AM, mjackson74  wrote:

> I have heard that MMY said in the 1990's that the TM folks should only be
> teaching TM to the wealthy of the world. Does anyone know when and under
> what circumstances he said that and exactly what he said?


My recollection is that he believed rich people are an influential elite,
and that if they adopted TM then the rest of society would follow their
lead. It's a reasonable conclusion and is the basis for a lot of modern
marketing. Similarly, he forbade teachers from initiating their friends for
free because he believed that people don't value anything properly unless
they pay for it. But I think he said those things earlier than the 1990s.

[FairfieldLife] Re: More Opera 12.04.12

[authfriend]

Three Netrebko videos...

"Quando m'en vo" ("Musetta's Waltz") from Puccini's La Boheme
(Not such a great aria for a concert performance; you really
need the staging for it to come across, but she sings it 
nicely.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWnWivspwRE


"Sempre libera" from Verdi's Traviata
(From the new Met modern-dress production--a rather outre interpretation of 
Violetta, but it shows off her acting
ability.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFJJ1zFBWgY&feature=endscreen&NR=1


"Mad Scene" from Donizetti's Lucia di Lammermoor
(Lucia has just killed her bridegroom. A conventional
production, but the staging of this scene is excellent,
and her performance is blood-chilling. It's a long
scene, over 10 minutes.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZX2r8ps9pUg



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill"  wrote:
>
> 
> Hah! Yeah … she's like napalm.
> 
> But image living with someone with such talent and charisma.
> 
> Might easily end up like the performance by Dmitri Hvorostovsky and
> Renee Fleming in post #328213.
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"  wrote:
> >
> > Hotter than hot! There definitely was some cleavage, btw. You must
> have nodded off before they got it, you poor old bastard.
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Oh yeah?
> > >
> > > Here is an Anna Netrebko interview where she shows no cleavage but
> ...
> > > it also is "so hot".
> > >
> > > No wonder that video with Dmitri stopped before their actual kiss.
> But
> > > it was on the other video that I saw ... And the audience loved it.
> > >
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=UgpVoMPGbUA
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nice, but not enough cleavage, which is an essential part of a
> female
> > > opera singer’s repertoire, don’t you think? In this
> > > regard, the divine Cecilia does not disappoint in the following
> clip,
> > > especially given the tantalizing possibility of a wardrobe
> malfunction,
> > > which unfortunately not quite happen (but watch the shoulder strap):
> > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaKX21earkk (Oh, yes, the aria is
> good
> > > too.)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > My favorite Cecilia is this:
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2IeGgk_06I
> > > > It’s an aria from a Vivaldi opera and she uses it as an
> encore.
> > > It’s breathtaking, sensational. I defy anyone to keep still
> while
> > > they watch it. It’s Baroque rock.  And just look at her face
> when
> > > she is finished.
> > > >
> > > > Cecilia is the sort of voluptuous Italian woman that men would
> love to
> > > have in the kitchen and bedroom. She might be a bit of a handful
> though.
> > > >
> > > > Elina G made a great Sesto in the live Met telecast of Clemenza di
> > > Tito at the weekend. She is so hot.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Two of the best mezzo-sopranos, Elina Garanca and Anna Netrebko,
> > > sing
> > > > > the famous Flower duet (Lakm� Delibes). Doesn't hurt that
> > > > > they're both as beautiful as the blossoms to which they give
> song.
> > > > > No wonder men are so easily spellbound.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vf42IP__ipw
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > > Also,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Dmitri Hvorostovsky and Renee Fleming in a fabulous performance
> in
> > > the
> > > > > palace at St. Petersburg
> > > > > (a duet from Verdi's Il Travatore).
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GV9rE61kodw&feature=related
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[Emily Reyn]

Ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.  Excellent.  Post 49.  I'm going to do like Judy 
and save the last one for something *REALLY* important.  Judy, this cat is for 
you (assuming it makes it through).  Share, if you are reading this, do you see 
how I butter Judy up after I say something teasingly antagonistic?   This is an 
important tactic to learn when attempting communication.  I do respond to 
flattery, just fyi.  


^---^ |\ 
>’.’< -| | 
|___ / U U UU 




 From: "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:22 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
 

  
ZEPP! As in,"let's go fly a zepp...", Loved them, along with Procol Harum, 
Jethro Tull, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, Traffic, Jimi Hendrix, Cream, Yes, 
Steppenwolf, The Beatles, The Rolling Stones (while they were still alive-lol), 
Little Feat, Fleetwood Mac, Joan Baez, Bobbie D., The Doors, Herbie Hancock, 
Stevie Wonder, The Byrds, CSN&Y, David Crosby, G. Dead, David Bowie, Talking 
Heads, The Pretenders, B52s, The Police, Funkadelic, The Mahavishnu Orchestra, 
John Fogerty, James Taylor, and so many more - 60's, 70's and 80's - what a 
great time for music. 
>
> It means nothing of course - except that Led Zeppelin was rock and roll at 
> its best for me, absolutely enlightening back in the day.  Ha.  
> 
> Re:  The Banner:  I wish, but it's the closest thing to what I think I 
> looked like back then - although I was a tiny bit cuter and I'm not a blond, 
> unless I want to be.  I have very few pictures of myself.  
> 
> 
> 
>  From: emptybill 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 5:15 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> 
> 
>   
> What does that mean. 
> Was that you with the banner? 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
> >
> > The age of enlightenment has come and passed.  Sorry you missed it.  
> > 
> > Here I am at the beginning:
> > 
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luDgb5vVHuA
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 4:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:20 PM, emptybill emptybill@ wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > >  
> > >Oh Raving Yogi
> > >
> > >I love it when you talk dirty to me but why such a harsh tongue?
> > >
> > 
> > Dirty? - stop it you creep !!!
> >  
> > Did you get bitch-slapped again by your Devi?
> > >
> > 
> > It's a pleasure to be bitch-slapped by Devi. But I'm sick and tired of a 
> > naive, innocent person like me being manipulated by crooked people like you 
> > - unfortunately the evils of Kali Yuga. I eagerly wait for the ascended 
> > Masters & Maitreya to bring the age of enlightenment so I don't have deal 
> > with your bullshit - it's too stressful. 
> > 
> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
> > >
> > >chivukula.ravi@ wrote:
> > >>
> > >> "I used to also but I'm an old bastard now"
> > >>
> > >> So why are you lusting for me you sick pervert. Just because I enjoy
> > >the
> > >> attention doesn't make it right empty baby OK? You, Barry, feste -
> > >what the
> > >> hell is wrong with you guys - enough's enough I'm sick and fucking
> > >tired of
> > >> this bullshit. LEAVE ME ALONE PLEASE !!!
> > >>
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:49 PM, emptybill emptybill@ wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > **
> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Oh ... no problem. I understand.
> > >> > You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
> > >> > I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
> > >> > now more important than a phalloid.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > >
> > >> > j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous
> > >> > taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who
> > >ever
> > >> > lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So
> > >> > many mysteries, so little time...
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Take us out, Psy!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
> > >wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts
> > >such
> > >
> > > > beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. ÃÆ'‚ P.S. 
> > > > ÃÆ'‚
> > >Are you
> > >> > British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence." ÃÆ'‚
> > >
> > >Alright,
> > >> > the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it should
> > >be a
> > >
> > > > good time. ÃÆ'‚ Please redeem yourself by posting more opera.
> > >ÃÆ'‚
> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > _

[FairfieldLife] Re: New Video: First Place All Around

[authfriend]

Atta GIRL!!! Boy, she's impressive.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"  wrote:
>
> Juliette scored 30.35 for 1st Place in the Gymnastics Intra-Team Competition 
> at Fairfield Parks & Rec. She placed in all events: Trampoline 2nd; Floor 
> Exercise 2nd; Balance Beam 3rd; Parallel Bars 3rd; Vault 1st. 
> http://youtu.be/-B8go70Z4H0
>

[FairfieldLife] New Video: First Place All Around

[raunchydog]

Juliette scored 30.35 for 1st Place in the Gymnastics Intra-Team Competition at 
Fairfield Parks & Rec. She placed in all events: Trampoline 2nd; Floor Exercise 
2nd; Balance Beam 3rd; Parallel Bars 3rd; Vault 1st. http://youtu.be/-B8go70Z4H0

[FairfieldLife] Re: More Opera 12.04.12

[emptybill]

Hah! Yeah … she's like napalm.

But image living with someone with such talent and charisma.

Might easily end up like the performance by Dmitri Hvorostovsky and
Renee Fleming in post #328213.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"  wrote:
>
> Hotter than hot! There definitely was some cleavage, btw. You must
have nodded off before they got it, you poor old bastard.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > Oh yeah?
> >
> > Here is an Anna Netrebko interview where she shows no cleavage but
...
> > it also is "so hot".
> >
> > No wonder that video with Dmitri stopped before their actual kiss.
But
> > it was on the other video that I saw ... And the audience loved it.
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=UgpVoMPGbUA
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"  wrote:
> > >
> > > Nice, but not enough cleavage, which is an essential part of a
female
> > opera singer’s repertoire, don’t you think? In this
> > regard, the divine Cecilia does not disappoint in the following
clip,
> > especially given the tantalizing possibility of a wardrobe
malfunction,
> > which unfortunately not quite happen (but watch the shoulder strap):
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaKX21earkk (Oh, yes, the aria is
good
> > too.)
> > >
> > >
> > > My favorite Cecilia is this:
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2IeGgk_06I
> > > It’s an aria from a Vivaldi opera and she uses it as an
encore.
> > It’s breathtaking, sensational. I defy anyone to keep still
while
> > they watch it. It’s Baroque rock.  And just look at her face
when
> > she is finished.
> > >
> > > Cecilia is the sort of voluptuous Italian woman that men would
love to
> > have in the kitchen and bedroom. She might be a bit of a handful
though.
> > >
> > > Elina G made a great Sesto in the live Met telecast of Clemenza di
> > Tito at the weekend. She is so hot.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Two of the best mezzo-sopranos, Elina Garanca and Anna Netrebko,
> > sing
> > > > the famous Flower duet (Lakm� Delibes). Doesn't hurt that
> > > > they're both as beautiful as the blossoms to which they give
song.
> > > > No wonder men are so easily spellbound.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vf42IP__ipw
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > > Also,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dmitri Hvorostovsky and Renee Fleming in a fabulous performance
in
> > the
> > > > palace at St. Petersburg
> > > > (a duet from Verdi's Il Travatore).
> > > >
> > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GV9rE61kodw&feature=related
> > > > 
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[doctordumbass]

ZEPP! As in,"let's go fly a zepp...", Loved them, along with Procol Harum, 
Jethro Tull, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, Traffic, Jimi Hendrix, Cream, Yes, 
Steppenwolf, The Beatles, The Rolling Stones (while they were still alive-lol), 
Little Feat, Fleetwood Mac, Joan Baez, Bobbie D., The Doors, Herbie Hancock, 
Stevie Wonder, The Byrds, CSN&Y, David Crosby, G. Dead, David Bowie, Talking 
Heads, The Pretenders, B52s, The Police, Funkadelic, The Mahavishnu Orchestra, 
John Fogerty, James Taylor, and so many more - 60's, 70's and 80's - what a 
great time for music.  
>
> It means nothing of course - except that Led Zeppelin was rock and roll at 
> its best for me, absolutely enlightening back in the day.  Ha.  
> 
> Re:  The Banner:  I wish, but it's the closest thing to what I think I 
> looked like back then - although I was a tiny bit cuter and I'm not a blond, 
> unless I want to be.  I have very few pictures of myself.  
> 
> 
> 
>  From: emptybill 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 5:15 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
>  
> 
>   
> What does that mean. 
> Was that you with the banner? 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
> >
> > The age of enlightenment has come and passed.  Sorry you missed it.  
> > 
> > Here I am at the beginning:
> > 
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luDgb5vVHuA
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 4:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:20 PM, emptybill emptybill@ wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > >  
> > >Oh Raving Yogi
> > >
> > >I love it when you talk dirty to me but why such a harsh tongue?
> > >
> > 
> > Dirty? - stop it you creep !!!
> >  
> > Did you get bitch-slapped again by your Devi?
> > >
> > 
> > It's a pleasure to be bitch-slapped by Devi. But I'm sick and tired of a 
> > naive, innocent person like me being manipulated by crooked people like you 
> > - unfortunately the evils of Kali Yuga. I eagerly wait for the ascended 
> > Masters & Maitreya to bring the age of enlightenment so I don't have deal 
> > with your bullshit - it's too stressful. 
> > 
> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
> > >
> > >chivukula.ravi@ wrote:
> > >>
> > >> "I used to also but I'm an old bastard now"
> > >>
> > >> So why are you lusting for me you sick pervert. Just because I enjoy
> > >the
> > >> attention doesn't make it right empty baby OK? You, Barry, feste -
> > >what the
> > >> hell is wrong with you guys - enough's enough I'm sick and fucking
> > >tired of
> > >> this bullshit. LEAVE ME ALONE PLEASE !!!
> > >>
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:49 PM, emptybill emptybill@ wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > **
> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Oh ... no problem. I understand.
> > >> > You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
> > >> > I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
> > >> > now more important than a phalloid.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > >
> > >> > j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous
> > >> > taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who
> > >ever
> > >> > lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So
> > >> > many mysteries, so little time...
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Take us out, Psy!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
> > >wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts
> > >such
> > >
> > > > beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. ÃÆ'‚ P.S. 
> > > > ÃÆ'‚
> > >Are you
> > >> > British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence." ÃÆ'‚
> > >
> > >Alright,
> > >> > the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it should
> > >be a
> > >
> > > > good time. ÃÆ'‚ Please redeem yourself by posting more opera.
> > >ÃÆ'‚
> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 
> > >> > > > From: emptybill emptybill@
> > >> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > >> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> > >> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >
> > > > > > ÃÆ'‚
> > >
> > >> > > > More like trap!
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Skeet shooting!
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Share
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Pt ... this is an pub

[FairfieldLife] Re: More Opera 12.04.12

[feste37]

Hotter than hot! There definitely was some cleavage, btw. You must have nodded 
off before they got it, you poor old bastard. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill"  wrote:
>
> 
> Oh yeah?
> 
> Here is an Anna Netrebko interview where she shows no cleavage but ...
> it also is "so hot".
> 
> No wonder that video with Dmitri stopped before their actual kiss. But
> it was on the other video that I saw ... And the audience loved it.
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=UgpVoMPGbUA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"  wrote:
> >
> > Nice, but not enough cleavage, which is an essential part of a female
> opera singer’s repertoire, don’t you think? In this
> regard, the divine Cecilia does not disappoint in the following clip,
> especially given the tantalizing possibility of a wardrobe malfunction,
> which unfortunately not quite happen (but watch the shoulder strap):
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaKX21earkk (Oh, yes, the aria is good
> too.)
> >
> >
> > My favorite Cecilia is this:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2IeGgk_06I
> > It’s an aria from a Vivaldi opera and she uses it as an encore.
> It’s breathtaking, sensational. I defy anyone to keep still while
> they watch it. It’s Baroque rock.  And just look at her face when
> she is finished.
> >
> > Cecilia is the sort of voluptuous Italian woman that men would love to
> have in the kitchen and bedroom. She might be a bit of a handful though.
> >
> > Elina G made a great Sesto in the live Met telecast of Clemenza di
> Tito at the weekend. She is so hot.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Two of the best mezzo-sopranos, Elina Garanca and Anna Netrebko,
> sing
> > > the famous Flower duet (Lakm� Delibes). Doesn't hurt that
> > > they're both as beautiful as the blossoms to which they give song.
> > > No wonder men are so easily spellbound.
> > >
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vf42IP__ipw
> > > 
> > >
> > > Also,
> > >
> > >
> > > Dmitri Hvorostovsky and Renee Fleming in a fabulous performance in
> the
> > > palace at St. Petersburg
> > > (a duet from Verdi's Il Travatore).
> > >
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GV9rE61kodw&feature=related
> > > 
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: More Opera 12.04.12

[authfriend]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill"  wrote:
> 
> Two of the best mezzo-sopranos, Elina Garanca and Anna Netrebko, 
> sing the famous Flower duet (Lakmé Delibes). Doesn't hurt that
> they're both as beautiful as the blossoms to which they give song.
> No wonder men are so easily spellbound.
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vf42IP__ipw
> 
>
>
> 
> Also,
> 
> Dmitri Hvorostovsky and Renee Fleming in a fabulous 
> performance in the palace at St. Petersburg (a duet from
> Verdi's Il Travatore).

YEOW!!

Have the smelling salts handy. This really packs a wallop.

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GV9rE61kodw&feature=related
> 

[FairfieldLife] Re: A Second Open Letter to Bill Howell, author of CULT

[authfriend]

Couple of comments below, Robin.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen"  wrote:
>
> Dear Bill,
> 
> The essence of the Ten Years was this: when I came down from that mountain I 
> found myself able to see the ultimate weakness or falseness in each human 
> being. *I never saw this before*. So what this mean was that each person I 
> met after being enlightened--other than Maharishi himself--demonstrated in 
> their behaviour a certain awareness of what was untrue or insincere in 
> themselves. It seemed--from the point of view of Unity Consciousness--that 
> each person had this final and definitive flaw, a flaw which was the secret 
> theme of all that they did--but which was hidden from everyone else. And 
> perhaps had not even surfaced completely in the consciousness of that person.
> 
> No matter: what happened inside my enlightenment was that in seeing the 
> evidence of this contradiction in their very beingness, I was led to believe 
> (by what was creating the context of my enlightenment) that my being able to 
> perceive this infirmity in that person, that in making this known to that 
> person, they could, through their own free will, make use simply of the grace 
> of truth (of that very revelation) to acquire the means to challenge and 
> eventually overcome that flaw. And each person had a signature flaw.
> 
> Indeed the process through which this weakness was exposed seemed to bring 
> with it a context of prescriptive existential potential whereby that person 
> could begin to take responsibility for this weakness or falseness and begin 
> to overcome it. That is what confrontation was, after all: revelation of the 
> problem, and then, evidently, a context within which to do something about 
> that problem.
> 
> The means to uncovering and exposing that flaw--*so that every person in the 
> room or theatre could see it for themselves*, see it inside the context of 
> reality, and thus making it seem to be a kind of 'demonically' supported 
> weakness--was through a 'tracking' process, which entailed going through 
> layers and layers of deceit, phoniness, dishonesty, fear, falseness, 
> escapism, avoidance--and then revealing this weakness as essentially the 
> responsibility of that person--inside the drama of creation--to face and 
> conquer. To conquer that distinctive and inimitable weakness would be the 
> qualification to become enlightened.
> 
> Therefore this was becoming enlightened through a means other than the East 
> only. Even though that continued, as each and every one of us was devoted to 
> Maharishi, and were under the assumption that Maharishi had made me 
> enlightened. Ergo, what I was doing must, somehow have the blessing of my 
> Master, Guru Dev, and the Holy Tradition. Emphatically this was the 
> understanding that every person who was closest to me held as unassailable, 
> inviolable.

> Now since my enlightenment was a mystical hallucination, it
> meant that *the context which it gave birth to inside myself*,
> that too somewhere, no matter how true the process of
> confrontation and individuation appeared to be (and that
> process recreated reality, drove everyone into the deepest
> place one could ever go--and had ever gone), was untrue. **And
> what this meant--in the perspective after The Context was
> busted by a greater reality--was that this weakness in each
> person was simply what innocently each person had to do in
> order to survive as a human being inside the universe given
> that they were not perfect--and fallen. In other words, this 
> salient and ultimate weakness was not to be confronted--not
> even to be revealed.**

JS: These last two sentences are so illuminating of what you had
been trying to do. Your having the power to see these ultimate 
weaknesses in people was like bait, for you and for them, an 
ingenious--and, apparently, evil--temptation to meddle with
what should have been left strictly alone.

> RC: I believe this because in not one case (other than perhaps my own!) did 
> this process of 'tracking' ever do anyone any good. The violence, the 
> intelligence, the power, the energy, the drama: that certainly did strengthen 
> all of us; but in terms of what was the objective: 1. overcoming, vanquishing 
> one's signature weakness 2. becoming enlightened--the Ten Years was a fiasco. 
> Each person, as far as I know, remained just what they were before I came 
> down from that mountain about Arosa. Only a much stronger and wiser character.
> 
> Now where things really went wrong was when the powers which had created my 
> enlightenment--and The Context of the Ten Years--began to make it seem to be 
> as if I were actually seeing individual persons as entities of evil--rather 
> than seeing the person in the context of their problem, their unique 
> infirmity. This is the proof of the evil of The Context and my enlightenment: 
> that the hallucinatory reality of the Ten Years began--after about eight 
> years--to become

[FairfieldLife] Re: More Opera 12.04.12

[emptybill]

Oh yeah?

Here is an Anna Netrebko interview where she shows no cleavage but ...
it also is "so hot".

No wonder that video with Dmitri stopped before their actual kiss. But
it was on the other video that I saw ... And the audience loved it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=UgpVoMPGbUA





--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"  wrote:
>
> Nice, but not enough cleavage, which is an essential part of a female
opera singer’s repertoire, don’t you think? In this
regard, the divine Cecilia does not disappoint in the following clip,
especially given the tantalizing possibility of a wardrobe malfunction,
which unfortunately not quite happen (but watch the shoulder strap):
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaKX21earkk (Oh, yes, the aria is good
too.)
>
>
> My favorite Cecilia is this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2IeGgk_06I
> It’s an aria from a Vivaldi opera and she uses it as an encore.
It’s breathtaking, sensational. I defy anyone to keep still while
they watch it. It’s Baroque rock.  And just look at her face when
she is finished.
>
> Cecilia is the sort of voluptuous Italian woman that men would love to
have in the kitchen and bedroom. She might be a bit of a handful though.
>
> Elina G made a great Sesto in the live Met telecast of Clemenza di
Tito at the weekend. She is so hot.
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > Two of the best mezzo-sopranos, Elina Garanca and Anna Netrebko,
sing
> > the famous Flower duet (Lakm� Delibes). Doesn't hurt that
> > they're both as beautiful as the blossoms to which they give song.
> > No wonder men are so easily spellbound.
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vf42IP__ipw
> > 
> >
> > Also,
> >
> >
> > Dmitri Hvorostovsky and Renee Fleming in a fabulous performance in
the
> > palace at St. Petersburg
> > (a duet from Verdi's Il Travatore).
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GV9rE61kodw&feature=related
> > 
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[feste37]

Thanks, Empty, that’s really good to know. My current status is “dirty old 
man,” a category that has fitted me like a glove for about 45 years, but I 
have recently been getting a little restless with it. I may transition to 
“old bastard” since you make it sound so attractive. I rather like the idea 
of being greeted in the coffee shop with “hey feste, you old bastard” --  
there’s kind of a warmth to it. Dirty old men need that kind of thing. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill"  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > No problem. If you just wait you'll get the "old" for free. What a deal.
> > 
> > The bastard part comes when you realize for good that everything people
> > think about you and say to you is just based upon a passing emotion and
> > has no substance. The emotions they feel have no lasting significance
> > and their minds will change in some other way into something else in
> > another two hours.
> > 
> > Give no credence to the shallow minded. Why spend time concerned about
> > someone's opinion or even your own, since over time they'll change
> > anyway � maybe by 180 degrees.
> > 
> > Your precious life will dissolve before your eyes whether you try to
> > hold it or not. Therefore, why believe it has to "mean
> > something". Love those close to you with your whole heart - before
> > it's too late. The rest is bullshit.
> > 
> > That's pretty much the gist of being an "old bastard". Hope
> > that soliloquy ain't too sentimental.
> 
> No, but I'm crying anyway.
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"  wrote:
> > >
> > > What's it like being an old bastard, Empty? Would you recommend it?
> > > I have been thinking of giving it a try.
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Oh ... no problem. I understand.
> > > > You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
> > > > I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
> > > > now more important than a phalloid.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous
> > > > taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who
> > ever
> > > > lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So
> > > > many mysteries, so little time...
> > > > >
> > > > > Take us out, Psy!
> > > > >
> > > > > http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts
> > such
> > > > beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. � P.S. �
> > Are you
> > > > British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence." �
> > Alright,
> > > > the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it should
> > be a
> > > > good time. � Please redeem yourself by posting more opera.
> > �
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  From: emptybill emptybill@
> > > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > �
> > > > > > More like trap!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Skeet shooting!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Share
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > > > > > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > > > > > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > > > > > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > > > > > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hah! ...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Man needs more data for your
> > > > > > > > profile.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Got Drone?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
> > 
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I received this yesterday.  For several years I've
> > > > thought it
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > true.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis
> > > > Reply to sender  Reply to group  Start a New Topic Messages in this
> > > > topic (6)
> > > > > > Recent Activity:
> > > > > > Visit Your Group
> > > > > > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > > > > > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or go to:
> > > > > > http://

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[Emily Reyn]

It means nothing of course - except that Led Zeppelin was rock and roll at its 
best for me, absolutely enlightening back in the day.  Ha.  

Re:  The Banner:  I wish, but it's the closest thing to what I think I looked 
like back then - although I was a tiny bit cuter and I'm not a blond, unless I 
want to be.  I have very few pictures of myself.  



 From: emptybill 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 5:15 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
 

  
What does that mean. 
Was that you with the banner? 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
>
> The age of enlightenment has come and passed.  Sorry you missed it.  
> 
> Here I am at the beginning:
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luDgb5vVHuA
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@...
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 4:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:20 PM, emptybill emptybill@... wrote:
> 
> 
> >  
> >Oh Raving Yogi
> >
> >I love it when you talk dirty to me but why such a harsh tongue?
> >
> 
> Dirty? - stop it you creep !!!
>  
> Did you get bitch-slapped again by your Devi?
> >
> 
> It's a pleasure to be bitch-slapped by Devi. But I'm sick and tired of a 
> naive, innocent person like me being manipulated by crooked people like you - 
> unfortunately the evils of Kali Yuga. I eagerly wait for the ascended Masters 
> & Maitreya to bring the age of enlightenment so I don't have deal with your 
> bullshit - it's too stressful. 
> 
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
> >
> >chivukula.ravi@ wrote:
> >>
> >> "I used to also but I'm an old bastard now"
> >>
> >> So why are you lusting for me you sick pervert. Just because I enjoy
> >the
> >> attention doesn't make it right empty baby OK? You, Barry, feste -
> >what the
> >> hell is wrong with you guys - enough's enough I'm sick and fucking
> >tired of
> >> this bullshit. LEAVE ME ALONE PLEASE !!!
> >>
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:49 PM, emptybill emptybill@ wrote:
> >>
> >> > **
> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Oh ... no problem. I understand.
> >> > You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
> >> > I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
> >> > now more important than a phalloid.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> >
> >> > j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous
> >> > taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who
> >ever
> >> > lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So
> >> > many mysteries, so little time...
> >> > >
> >> > > Take us out, Psy!
> >> > >
> >> > > http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> >> > >
> >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
> >wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts
> >such
> >
> > > beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. Â P.S. Â
> >Are you
> >> > British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence." Â
> >
> >Alright,
> >> > the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it should
> >be a
> >
> > > good time. Â Please redeem yourself by posting more opera.
> >Â
> >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > From: emptybill emptybill@
> >> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> >> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> >> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >
> > > > > Â
> >
> >> > > > More like trap!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Skeet shooting!
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Share
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> >> > > > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> >> > > > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> >> > > > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> >> > > > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hah! ...
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > The Man needs more data for your
> >> > > > > > profile.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Got Drone?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
> >
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > I received this yesterday.ÃÆ'‚ For several years
> >
> >I've
> >> > thought it
> >> > > > is
> >> > > > > > true.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[awoelflebater]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill"  wrote:
>
> 
> No problem. If you just wait you'll get the "old" for free. What a deal.
> 
> The bastard part comes when you realize for good that everything people
> think about you and say to you is just based upon a passing emotion and
> has no substance. The emotions they feel have no lasting significance
> and their minds will change in some other way into something else in
> another two hours.
> 
> Give no credence to the shallow minded. Why spend time concerned about
> someone's opinion or even your own, since over time they'll change
> anyway … maybe by 180 degrees.
> 
> Your precious life will dissolve before your eyes whether you try to
> hold it or not. Therefore, why believe it has to "mean
> something". Love those close to you with your whole heart - before
> it's too late. The rest is bullshit.
> 
> That's pretty much the gist of being an "old bastard". Hope
> that soliloquy ain't too sentimental.

No, but I'm crying anyway.
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"  wrote:
> >
> > What's it like being an old bastard, Empty? Would you recommend it?
> > I have been thinking of giving it a try.
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh ... no problem. I understand.
> > > You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
> > > I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
> > > now more important than a phalloid.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > >  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous
> > > taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who
> ever
> > > lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So
> > > many mysteries, so little time...
> > > >
> > > > Take us out, Psy!
> > > >
> > > > http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts
> such
> > > beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. � P.S. �
> Are you
> > > British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence." �
> Alright,
> > > the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it should
> be a
> > > good time. � Please redeem yourself by posting more opera.
> �
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > >  From: emptybill emptybill@
> > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > �
> > > > > More like trap!
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Skeet shooting!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Share
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > > > > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > > > > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > > > > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > > > > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hah! ...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Man needs more data for your
> > > > > > > profile.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Got Drone?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I received this yesterday.  For several years I've
> > > thought it
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > true.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis
> > > Reply to sender  Reply to group  Start a New Topic Messages in this
> > > topic (6)
> > > > > Recent Activity:
> > > > > Visit Your Group
> > > > > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > > > > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Or go to:
> > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > > > > and click 'Join This Group!'
> > > > >
> > > > > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe •
> Terms
> > > of Use • Send us Feedback
> > > > > .
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: The End of the World as we Know It

[Susan]

Emily - just catching up on the last day or so on FFL.  Most scientists agree 
that we humans have made climate change happen much faster than it would have 
otherwise -  at the very least we have a big part in the process. Whether we 
would be going thru some cyclical, natural climate change without humans on the 
planet is a question that, from what I understand, no one can answer. But it is 
not the rigth question - because there is no doubt from scientists that our 
actions, greenhouse gas release etc are making this happen more intensely and 
faster.  Whether we are the sole cause or simply making it all happen faster 
and bigger, does not matter any more. We have to slow this down or things will 
be very bad for us all.

At this point, the question is can we slow this down, and if so, how?

If we as a planet changed how we live, things would be much better than they 
are going to be if we don't.  But it requires major major changes in lifestyle 
to make much of a difference. That will not happen.

So some genius science invention is the answer.  Even if we change our 
lifestyles now the changes will continue for some time (not sure for how long). 
The stuff is in the air already and it is hard to "go backward."  There is the 
concept of a "tipping point" beyond which the changes will be inevitable and 
happen very very fast indeed.  That tipping point is considered to be when the 
methane gases that are stored in tundra and underneath the seabeds is released 
in huge bubbles and bursts.  There is tons and tons and tons of that stored.  
The warming of the seas will cause it to be released in vast quantities.  Then 
things will change very very fast indeed and be unstoppable. Like a landslide. 
I don't mean to sound negative, but this is my understanding from what I have 
read.  The melting of the ice at the polar caps that is happening and allowing 
shipping in once frozen waters - that's what is the first stage of the release 
of the methane stored  in the tundra up there.

So, we need brilliant scientists to work on how to counteract greenhouse gases 
that already are in the air and those that will be released, or to develop ways 
to take the heat out of the atmosphere (seeding clouds with tiny mirrors to 
reflect sunlight away from earth is one such project).  There are people 
researching these things, but they worry that their solutions may affect our 
climate in other, unforseen ways that could also wreak havoc.  This is THE 
issue for the planet and unless it is somehow corrected, not much else is going 
to be important. Life will change dramatically.  I hold great hope for the 
scientists, but it is a race against time.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@  wrote:
> >
> > Dear Buck, 
> > 
> > Please note that the grass is NOT greener on the other side of the fence. 
> > It just appears that way.
> > 
> > Sincerely,
> > The grass on the other side of the fence
> >
> 
> We done this to ourselves burning fossil fuels.  Look at the 70 unit coal 
> trains per day roaring through Fairfield to points east and coming back again 
> empty every day.  That black coal is carbon, beautiful nearly pure carbon.  
> Where do you think it goes at that rate of 70 trains full a day?  It is kind 
> of elementary science.  There should not even be a debate.  The question now 
> is what are we going to do about it?  Plant wheat or soybeans?  Which one is 
> more drought resistant and provides more food?  I got 50 acres I need to 
> plant.  It is a real question.  Would seeding hay pasture and alfalfa even 
> take in a dry hot year like last year again?  The ground subsoil water is not 
> re-charging.  The People who have driven big cars and lived in mac-mansions 
> and just go off and vacation in London and exotic places have done this to us.
> -Buck, out standing in his fields.  
>  
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Wow Susan, let us not change the topic.  Curiously, do you think that 
> > > > we are just contributors to a planetary cycle already in process or do 
> > > > you think we, as humans, are the reason this process is happening?  I 
> > > > am posing the simplistic main question I hear when out and about. 
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Great Question.  Shows the utter failure of our public schools to teach 
> > > elementary earth sciences that we should doubt what is going on.  The 
> > > trace of less than 'One third of one percent' of the air we breath is 
> > > most all that protects and regulates our atmosphere and allows us to even 
> > > live on this planet.  That we increase that trace now by 50 percent and 
> > > there would not be a change in climate?  That is shear ignorance showing. 
> > >  It is idiocy to contend that it is not anthropocentric.  You can't take 
> > > the trace of less than 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[emptybill]

No problem. If you just wait you'll get the "old" for free. What a deal.

The bastard part comes when you realize for good that everything people
think about you and say to you is just based upon a passing emotion and
has no substance. The emotions they feel have no lasting significance
and their minds will change in some other way into something else in
another two hours.

Give no credence to the shallow minded. Why spend time concerned about
someone's opinion or even your own, since over time they'll change
anyway … maybe by 180 degrees.

Your precious life will dissolve before your eyes whether you try to
hold it or not. Therefore, why believe it has to "mean
something". Love those close to you with your whole heart - before
it's too late. The rest is bullshit.

That's pretty much the gist of being an "old bastard". Hope
that soliloquy ain't too sentimental.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"  wrote:
>
> What's it like being an old bastard, Empty? Would you recommend it?
> I have been thinking of giving it a try.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> >
> > Oh ... no problem. I understand.
> > You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
> > I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
> > now more important than a phalloid.
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous
> > taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who
ever
> > lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So
> > many mysteries, so little time...
> > >
> > > Take us out, Psy!
> > >
> > > http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts
such
> > beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. � P.S. �
Are you
> > British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence." �
Alright,
> > the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it should
be a
> > good time. � Please redeem yourself by posting more opera.
�
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > >  From: emptybill emptybill@
> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > �
> > > > More like trap!
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Skeet shooting!
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Share
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > > > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > > > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > > > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > > > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hah! ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Man needs more data for your
> > > > > > profile.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Got Drone?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long

> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I received this yesterday.  For several years I've
> > thought it
> > > > is
> > > > > > true.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis
> > Reply to sender  Reply to group  Start a New Topic Messages in this
> > topic (6)
> > > > Recent Activity:
> > > > Visit Your Group
> > > > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > > > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Or go to:
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > > > and click 'Join This Group!'
> > > >
> > > > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe •
Terms
> > of Use • Send us Feedback
> > > > .
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone naval or nasal

[Share Long]

When I visit my family for Christmas I'll stay with my Mom who lives in 
Annapolis home of USNA.  So I may do some naval gazing but since midshipmen are 
young enough to be my grandsons I probably won't do any naval navel gazing.  
sigh  


http://www.mostwatchedtoday.com/us-naval-academy-gangnam-style/

PS  I'll leave the naval nasal gazing to Raunchy (-:



 From: authfriend 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 4:22 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to 
Judy
 

  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater  wrote:
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:

> > Should I therefore be considering my navel as my fourth eye?
> 
> No, not your fourth eye. Have you ever heard of navel gazing?

Um, different significance of "navel" than in my formulation,
Ann: one doesn't gaze into it, one gazes out of it.


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[Robin Carlsen]

Jesus Christ I loved this, Emily, And I love you too.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
>
> The age of enlightenment has come and passed.  Sorry you missed it.  
> 
> Here I am at the beginning:
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luDgb5vVHuA
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  From: Ravi Chivukula 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 4:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
>  
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:20 PM, emptybill  wrote:
> 
>  
> >  
> >Oh Raving Yogi
> >
> >I love it when you talk dirty to me but why such a harsh tongue?
> >
> 
> Dirty? - stop it you creep !!!
>  
> Did you get bitch-slapped again by your Devi?
> >
> 
> It's a pleasure to be bitch-slapped by Devi. But I'm sick and tired of a 
> naive, innocent person like me being manipulated by crooked people like you - 
> unfortunately the evils of Kali Yuga. I eagerly wait for the ascended Masters 
> & Maitreya to bring the age of enlightenment so I don't have deal with your 
> bullshit - it's too stressful. 
> 
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> "I used to also but I'm an old bastard now"
> >>
> >> So why are you lusting for me you sick pervert. Just because I enjoy
> >the
> >> attention doesn't make it right empty baby OK? You, Barry, feste -
> >what the
> >> hell is wrong with you guys - enough's enough I'm sick and fucking
> >tired of
> >> this bullshit. LEAVE ME ALONE PLEASE !!!
> >>
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:49 PM, emptybill emptybill@ wrote:
> >>
> >> > **
> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Oh ... no problem. I understand.
> >> > You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
> >> > I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
> >> > now more important than a phalloid.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> >
> >> > j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous
> >> > taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who
> >ever
> >> > lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So
> >> > many mysteries, so little time...
> >> > >
> >> > > Take us out, Psy!
> >> > >
> >> > > http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> >> > >
> >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
> >wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts
> >such
> >
> > > beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. Â P.S. Â
> >Are you
> >> > British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence." Â
> >
> >Alright,
> >> > the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it should
> >be a
> >
> > > good time. Â Please redeem yourself by posting more opera.
> >Â
> >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > From: emptybill emptybill@
> >> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> >> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> >> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >
> > > > > Â
> >
> >> > > > More like trap!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Skeet shooting!
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Share
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> >> > > > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> >> > > > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> >> > > > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> >> > > > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hah! ...
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > The Man needs more data for your
> >> > > > > > profile.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Got Drone?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
> >
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > I received this yesterday.ÃÆ'‚ For several years
> >
> >I've
> >> > thought it
> >> > > > is
> >> > > > > > true.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis
> >> > Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this
> >> > topic (6)
> >> > > > Recent Activity:
> >> > > > Visit Your Group
> >> > > > To subscribe, send a message to:
> >> > > > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Or go to:
> >> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> >> > > > and click 'Join This Group!'
> >> > > >
> >
> > > > > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe
> >• Terms
> >> > of Use • Send us Feedback
> >> > > > .
> >> > 

[FairfieldLife] Drought May Have Killed Sumerian Language

[John]

This goes to show how climate change affect all cultures throughout history.  
The Mayan culture also was supposedly a victim of such change.  Who will be the 
next?

http://news.yahoo.com/drought-may-killed-sumerian-language-165436243.html

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[Ravi Chivukula]

Ha - I had the same question - first time empty & I stand together.

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:15 PM, emptybill  wrote:

> **
>
>
> What does *that *mean.
> Was that you with the banner?
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn 
> wrote:
> >
> > The age of enlightenment has come and passed. Â Sorry you missed it. Â
>
> >
> > Here I am at the beginning:
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luDgb5vVHuA
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@...
>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 4:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> >
> >
> > Â
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:20 PM, emptybill emptybill@... wrote:
> >
> >
> > >Â
> > >Oh Raving Yogi
> > >
> > >I love it when you talk dirty to me but why such a harsh tongue?
> > >
> >
> > Dirty? - stop it you creep !!!
> > Â
>
> > Did you get bitch-slapped again by your Devi?
> > >
> >
> > It's a pleasure to be bitch-slapped by Devi. But I'm sick and tired of a
> naive, innocent person like me being manipulated by crooked people like you
> - unfortunately the evils of Kali Yuga. I eagerly wait for the ascended
> Masters & Maitreya to bring the age of enlightenment so I don't have deal
> with your bullshit - it's too stressful.Â
>
> >
> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
> > >
> > >chivukula.ravi@ wrote:
> > >>
> > >> "I used to also but I'm an old bastard now"
> > >>
> > >> So why are you lusting for me you sick pervert. Just because I enjoy
> > >the
> > >> attention doesn't make it right empty baby OK? You, Barry, feste -
> > >what the
> > >> hell is wrong with you guys - enough's enough I'm sick and fucking
> > >tired of
> > >> this bullshit. LEAVE ME ALONE PLEASE !!!
> > >>
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:49 PM, emptybill emptybill@ wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > **
> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Oh ... no problem. I understand.
> > >> > You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
> > >> > I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
> > >> > now more important than a phalloid.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > >
> > >> > j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous
> > >> > taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who
> > >ever
> > >> > lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So
> > >> > many mysteries, so little time...
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Take us out, Psy!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
> > >wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts
> > >such
> > >
> > > > beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. Â P.S. Â
> > >Are you
> > >> > British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence." Â
>
> > >
> > >Alright,
> > >> > the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it should
> > >be a
> > >
> > > > good time. Â Please redeem yourself by posting more opera.
> > >Â
>
> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 
> > >> > > > From: emptybill emptybill@
> > >> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > >> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> > >> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >
> > > > > > Â
>
> > >
> > >> > > > More like trap!
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@  >
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Skeet shooting!
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Share
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > >> > > > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > >> > > > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > >> > > > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > >> > > > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Hah! ...
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > The Man needs more data for your
> > >> > > > > > profile.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Got Drone?
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
> > >
> > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > I received this yesterday.ÃÆ'‚ For several years
>
> > >
> > >I've
> > >> > thought it
> > >> > > > is
> > >> > > > > > true.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> >
> > >
> http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis
> > >> > Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[emptybill]

What does that mean.
Was that you with the banner?


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn 
wrote:
>
> The age of enlightenment has come and passed. Â Sorry you missed
it. Â
>
> Here I am at the beginning:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luDgb5vVHuA
>
>
>
> 
>  From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@...
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 4:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
>
>
> Â
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:20 PM, emptybill emptybill@... wrote:
>
>
> >Â
> >Oh Raving Yogi
> >
> >I love it when you talk dirty to me but why such a harsh tongue?
> >
>
> Dirty? - stop it you creep !!!
> Â
> Did you get bitch-slapped again by your Devi?
> >
>
> It's a pleasure to be bitch-slapped by Devi. But I'm sick and tired of
a naive, innocent person like me being manipulated by crooked people
like you - unfortunately the evils of Kali Yuga. I eagerly wait for the
ascended Masters & Maitreya to bring the age of enlightenment so I don't
have deal with your bullshit - it's too stressful.Â
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
> >
> >chivukula.ravi@ wrote:
> >>
> >> "I used to also but I'm an old bastard now"
> >>
> >> So why are you lusting for me you sick pervert. Just because I
enjoy
> >the
> >> attention doesn't make it right empty baby OK? You, Barry, feste -
> >what the
> >> hell is wrong with you guys - enough's enough I'm sick and fucking
> >tired of
> >> this bullshit. LEAVE ME ALONE PLEASE !!!
> >>
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:49 PM, emptybill emptybill@ wrote:
> >>
> >> > **
> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Oh ... no problem. I understand.
> >> > You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
> >> > I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
> >> > now more important than a phalloid.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> >
> >> > j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such
fabulous
> >> > taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru
who
> >ever
> >> > lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style?
So
> >> > many mysteries, so little time...
> >> > >
> >> > > Take us out, Psy!
> >> > >
> >> > > http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> >> > >
> >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
> >wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts
> >such
> >
> > > beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. Â P.S.
Â
> >Are you
> >> > British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence."
Â
> >
> >Alright,
> >> > the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it
should
> >be a
> >
> > > good time. Â Please redeem yourself by posting more
opera.
> >Â
> >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > From: emptybill emptybill@
> >> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> >> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> >> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >
> > > > > Â
> >
> >> > > > More like trap!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@

> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Skeet shooting!
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill"
emptybill@
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Share
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> >> > > > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> >> > > > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> >> > > > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> >> > > > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hah! ...
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > The Man needs more data for your
> >> > > > > > profile.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Got Drone?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
> >
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > I received this yesterday.ÃÆ'‚ For several
years
> >
> >I've
> >> > thought it
> >> > > > is
> >> > > > > > true.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
>
>http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whi\
s
> >> > Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this
> >> > topic (6)
> >> > > > Recent Activity:
> >> > > > Visit Your Group
> >> > > > To subscribe, send a message to:
> >> > > > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Or go to:
> >> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> >> > > > and click 'Join This Group!'
> >> > > >
> >
> > > > > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest •
Unsubscribe
> >• Terms
> >> > of Use • Send us Feedback
> >> > > > 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[feste37]

What's it like being an old bastard, Empty? Would you recommend it?
I have been thinking of giving it a try. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill"  wrote:
>
> Oh ... no problem. I understand.
> You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
> I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
> now more important than a phalloid.
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
>  wrote:
> >
> > Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous
> taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who ever
> lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So
> many mysteries, so little time...
> >
> > Take us out, Psy!
> >
> > http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts such
> beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. � P.S. � Are you
> British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence." � Alright,
> the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it should be a
> good time. � Please redeem yourself by posting more opera. �
> > >
> > > 
> > >  From: emptybill emptybill@
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> > >
> > >
> > > �
> > > More like trap!
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Skeet shooting!
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Share
> > > > >
> > > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hah! ...
> > > > >
> > > > > The Man needs more data for your
> > > > > profile.
> > > > >
> > > > > Got Drone?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I received this yesterday.  For several years I've
> thought it
> > > is
> > > > > true.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis
> Reply to sender  Reply to group  Start a New Topic Messages in this
> topic (6)
> > > Recent Activity:
> > > Visit Your Group
> > > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > Or go to:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > > and click 'Join This Group!'
> > >
> > > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms
> of Use • Send us Feedback
> > > .
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to Judy

[raunchydog]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"  
wrote:
>
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Yes! Healing Puppy Therapy! I can not agree more heartily. RD needs a
> puppy!
>

Puppy Therapy for *complete* healing! Yes! http://youtu.be/qfDRXkBHsEM

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[Emily Reyn]

The age of enlightenment has come and passed.  Sorry you missed it.  

Here I am at the beginning:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luDgb5vVHuA




 From: Ravi Chivukula 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
 

  



On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:20 PM, emptybill  wrote:

 
>  
>Oh Raving Yogi
>
>I love it when you talk dirty to me but why such a harsh tongue?
>

Dirty? - stop it you creep !!!
 
Did you get bitch-slapped again by your Devi?
>

It's a pleasure to be bitch-slapped by Devi. But I'm sick and tired of a naive, 
innocent person like me being manipulated by crooked people like you - 
unfortunately the evils of Kali Yuga. I eagerly wait for the ascended Masters & 
Maitreya to bring the age of enlightenment so I don't have deal with your 
bullshit - it's too stressful. 

>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
>
> wrote:
>>
>> "I used to also but I'm an old bastard now"
>>
>> So why are you lusting for me you sick pervert. Just because I enjoy
>the
>> attention doesn't make it right empty baby OK? You, Barry, feste -
>what the
>> hell is wrong with you guys - enough's enough I'm sick and fucking
>tired of
>> this bullshit. LEAVE ME ALONE PLEASE !!!
>>
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:49 PM, emptybill emptybill@... wrote:
>>
>> > **
>
>> >
>> >
>> > Oh ... no problem. I understand.
>> > You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
>> > I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
>> > now more important than a phalloid.
>> >
>> >
>> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
>
>> > j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous
>> > taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who
>ever
>> > lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So
>> > many mysteries, so little time...
>> > >
>> > > Take us out, Psy!
>> > >
>> > > http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
>> > >
>> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
>wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts
>such
>
> > beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. Â P.S. Â
>Are you
>> > British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence." Â
>
>Alright,
>> > the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it should
>be a
>
> > good time. Â Please redeem yourself by posting more opera.
>Â
>
>> > > >
>> > > > 
>> > > > From: emptybill emptybill@
>> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
>> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
>> > > >
>> > > >
>
> > > > Â
>
>> > > > More like trap!
>> > > >
>> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Skeet shooting!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
>> > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Share
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
>> > > > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
>> > > > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
>> > > > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
>> > > > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Hah! ...
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The Man needs more data for your
>> > > > > > profile.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Got Drone?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > I received this yesterday. For several years
>
>I've
>> > thought it
>> > > > is
>> > > > > > true.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis
>> > Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this
>> > topic (6)
>> > > > Recent Activity:
>> > > > Visit Your Group
>> > > > To subscribe, send a message to:
>> > > > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
>> > > >
>> > > > Or go to:
>> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
>> > > > and click 'Join This Group!'
>> > > >
>
> > > > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe
>• Terms
>> > of Use • Send us Feedback
>> > > > .
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:20 PM, emptybill  wrote:

> **
>
>
> Oh Raving Yogi
>
> I love it when you talk dirty to me but why such a harsh tongue?
>

Dirty? - stop it you creep !!!


> Did you get bitch-slapped again by your Devi?
>

It's a pleasure to be bitch-slapped by Devi. But I'm sick and tired of a
naive, innocent person like me being manipulated by crooked people like you
- unfortunately the evils of Kali Yuga. I eagerly wait for the ascended
Masters & Maitreya to bring the age of enlightenment so I don't have deal
with your bullshit - it's too stressful.

>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
>
>  wrote:
> >
> > "I used to also but I'm an old bastard now"
> >
> > So why are you lusting for me you sick pervert. Just because I enjoy
> the
> > attention doesn't make it right empty baby OK? You, Barry, feste -
> what the
> > hell is wrong with you guys - enough's enough I'm sick and fucking
> tired of
> > this bullshit. LEAVE ME ALONE PLEASE !!!
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:49 PM, emptybill emptybill@... wrote:
> >
> > > **
>
> > >
> > >
> > > Oh ... no problem. I understand.
> > > You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
> > > I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
> > > now more important than a phalloid.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > > j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous
> > > taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who
> ever
> > > lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So
> > > many mysteries, so little time...
> > > >
> > > > Take us out, Psy!
> > > >
> > > > http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts
> such
> > > beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. Â P.S. Â
> Are you
> > > British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence." Â
>
> Alright,
> > > the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it should
> be a
> > > good time. Â Please redeem yourself by posting more opera.
> Â
>
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > From: emptybill emptybill@
> > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Â
>
> > > > > More like trap!
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Skeet shooting!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Share
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > > > > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > > > > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > > > > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > > > > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hah! ...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Man needs more data for your
> > > > > > > profile.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Got Drone?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I received this yesterday. For several years
>
> I've
> > > thought it
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > true.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis
> > > Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this
> > > topic (6)
> > > > > Recent Activity:
> > > > > Visit Your Group
> > > > > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > > > > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Or go to:
> > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > > > > and click 'Join This Group!'
> > > > >
> > > > > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe
> • Terms
> > > of Use • Send us Feedback
> > > > > .
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>  
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[Emily Reyn]

OMG.  Make it stop.  I know, I know, it's almost 2013 and I got excited for a 
full several minutes on this with my daughterbut make it stop.  I must 
combat this with a little real music..the best rock-n-roll band of all time 
and interviewed on David Letterman last night.  I'm in love all over again.  
Thank god it's the holiday season.  If there was ever a concert I should have 
gone to it was the reunion concert.  

"Rare" acoustic version of Black Dog - nice

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LrEFebVgas


And one of my personal favorites:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3HemKGDavw








 From: Alex Stanley 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 12:42 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
 

  
Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous taste in 
shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who ever lived, be sorta 
'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So many mysteries, so little 
time...

Take us out, Psy!

http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
>
> Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts such beautiful 
> opera could say such idiotic things.  P.S.  Are you British? (I say this 
> given the way you spelled "defence."  Alright, the little dog needs a long 
> walk - a storm is pending, so it should be a good time.  Please redeem 
> yourself by posting more opera.  
> 
> 
>  From: emptybill 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> 
> 
>   
> More like trap!
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> wrote:
> >
> > Skeet shooting!
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Share
> > >
> > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> > >
> > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> > >
> > > Hah! ...
> > >
> > > The Man needs more data for your
> > > profile.
> > >
> > > Got Drone?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I received this yesterday.  For several years I've thought it
> is
> > > true.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis 
> Reply to sender  Reply to group  Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (6) 
> Recent Activity: 
> Visit Your Group 
> To subscribe, send a message to:
> fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> 
> Or go to: 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> and click 'Join This Group!' 
> 
> Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • Send 
> us Feedback 
> .
>


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[emptybill]

Oh Raving Yogi

I love it when you talk dirty to me but why such a harsh tongue?
Did you get bitch-slapped again by your Devi?



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
 wrote:
>
> "I used to also but I'm an old bastard now"
>
> So why are you lusting for me you sick pervert. Just because I enjoy
the
> attention doesn't make it right empty baby OK? You, Barry, feste -
what the
> hell is wrong with you guys - enough's enough I'm sick and fucking
tired of
> this bullshit. LEAVE ME ALONE PLEASE !!!
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:49 PM, emptybill emptybill@... wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > Oh ... no problem. I understand.
> > You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
> > I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
> > now more important than a phalloid.
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous
> > taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who
ever
> > lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So
> > many mysteries, so little time...
> > >
> > > Take us out, Psy!
> > >
> > > http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts
such
> > beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. Â P.S. Â
Are you
> > British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence." Â
Alright,
> > the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it should
be a
> > good time. Â Please redeem yourself by posting more opera.
Â
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > From: emptybill emptybill@
> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Â
> > > > More like trap!
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Skeet shooting!
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Share
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > > > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > > > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > > > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > > > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hah! ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Man needs more data for your
> > > > > > profile.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Got Drone?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long

> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I received this yesterday. For several years
I've
> > thought it
> > > > is
> > > > > > true.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis
> > Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this
> > topic (6)
> > > > Recent Activity:
> > > > Visit Your Group
> > > > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > > > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Or go to:
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > > > and click 'Join This Group!'
> > > >
> > > > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe
• Terms
> > of Use • Send us Feedback
> > > > .
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Post Count

[FFL PostCount]

Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): Sat Dec 01 00:00:00 2012
End Date (UTC): Sat Dec 08 00:00:00 2012
515 messages as of (UTC) Wed Dec 05 00:07:22 2012

39 Emily Reyn 
38 emptybill 
37 Buck 
35 nablusoss1008 
32 authfriend 
31 awoelflebater 
30 Ravi Chivukula 
29 Share Long 
22 seventhray1 
22 Michael Jackson 
20 turquoiseb 
20 Alex Stanley 
18 Bhairitu 
15 raunchydog 
15 laughinggull108 
15 John 
13 doctordumb...@rocketmail.com, UNEXPECTED_DATA_AFTER_ADDRESS@".SYNTAX-ERROR.
12 card 
11 Robin Carlsen 
10 Xenophaneros Anartaxius 
 6 Duveyoung 
 6 "emilymae.reyn" 
 5 salyavin808 
 4 merlin 
 4 feste37 
 3 mjackson74 
 3 PaliGap 
 3 Mike Dixon 
 2 sparaig 
 2 seekliberation 
 2 merudanda 
 2 Susan 
 2 "Richard J. Williams" 
 1 wgm4u 
 1 mainstream20016 
 1 Yifu 
 1 Rick Archer 
 1 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 1 Dick Mays 
 1 "martin.quickman" 

Posters: 40
Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
=
Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
Standard Time (Winter):
US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com 

[FairfieldLife] La Boheme snapshots

[emptybill]

This is why Pavarotti is so celebrated and why Puccini's La Boheme
is so famous.

Here he performs with the heart-touching Fiamma Izzo d'Amico as
Mimi:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkHGUaB1Bs8


More:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzPW8mXX3bg&feature=endscreen&NR=1


With the quartet aria:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZGDmpduIHE


And the tragic ending:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuJFTJCUtpY



  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[Ravi Chivukula]

"I used to also but I'm an old bastard now"

So why are you lusting for me you sick pervert. Just because I enjoy the
attention doesn't make it right empty baby OK? You, Barry, feste - what the
hell is wrong with you guys - enough's enough I'm sick and fucking tired of
this bullshit. LEAVE ME ALONE PLEASE !!!

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:49 PM, emptybill  wrote:

> **
>
>
> Oh ... no problem. I understand.
> You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
> I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
> now more important than a phalloid.
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
>  wrote:
> >
> > Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous
> taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who ever
> lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So
> many mysteries, so little time...
> >
> > Take us out, Psy!
> >
> > http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts such
> beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. Â P.S. Â Are you
> British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence." Â Alright,
> the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it should be a
> good time. Â Please redeem yourself by posting more opera. Â
> > >
> > > 
> > > From: emptybill emptybill@
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> > >
> > >
> > > Â
> > > More like trap!
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Skeet shooting!
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Share
> > > > >
> > > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hah! ...
> > > > >
> > > > > The Man needs more data for your
> > > > > profile.
> > > > >
> > > > > Got Drone?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I received this yesterday. For several years I've
> thought it
> > > is
> > > > > true.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis
> Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this
> topic (6)
> > > Recent Activity:
> > > Visit Your Group
> > > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > Or go to:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > > and click 'Join This Group!'
> > >
> > > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms
> of Use • Send us Feedback
> > > .
> > >
> >
>
>  
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: More Opera 12.04.12

[emptybill]

Thanks for that. It was hilarious.
But did "she" have breast reduction surgery?

What these divas will do to stay competitive.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" feste37@ wrote:
> 
> > My favorite Cecilia is this:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2IeGgk_06I
> > Its an aria from a Vivaldi opera and she uses it as an encore.
> > Its breathtaking, sensational. I defy anyone to keep still
> > while they watch it. Its Baroque rock.  And just look at her
> > face when she is finished.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdQU-N8b3HA
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[emptybill]

Oh ... no problem. I understand.
You listen to music with your genitals on the way to your heart.
I used to also but I'm an old bastard now ... the heart is
now more important than a phalloid.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
 wrote:
>
> Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous
taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who ever
lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So
many mysteries, so little time...
>
> Take us out, Psy!
>
> http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote:
> >
> > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts such
beautiful opera could say such idiotic things. Â P.S. Â Are you
British? (I say this given the way you spelled "defence." Â Alright,
the little dog needs a long walk - a storm is pending, so it should be a
good time. Â Please redeem yourself by posting more opera. Â
> >
> > 
> >  From: emptybill emptybill@
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> >
> >
> > Â
> > More like trap!
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Skeet shooting!
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Share
> > > >
> > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> > > >
> > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> > > >
> > > > Hah! ...
> > > >
> > > > The Man needs more data for your
> > > > profile.
> > > >
> > > > Got Drone?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I received this yesterday.  For several years I've
thought it
> > is
> > > > true.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis
Reply to sender  Reply to group  Start a New Topic Messages in this
topic (6)
> > Recent Activity:
> > Visit Your Group
> > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Or go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > and click 'Join This Group!'
> >
> > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms
of Use • Send us Feedback
> > .
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to Judy

[Alex Stanley]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater 
wrote:
>
>
>
>

Yes! Healing Puppy Therapy! I can not agree more heartily. RD needs a
puppy!

[FairfieldLife] Re: The End of the World as we Know It

[Buck]

>
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The BBC:
> > > > > "We need a radical plan."
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Direct action.  I am surprized that the sustainable living
movement has not taken more vigorous social action on this.  Like, back
in the Vietnam War days we closed interstates and threw bricks through
General Motors auto showrooms and smashed the glass out of entire lots
of new cars to end the war and bring our brothers home.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yep, the old way was tilting at windmills but I'd be in favor of a
sabre charge at railway workers and their locomotives now who haul the
coal to the coal-fired utility electric generators.  They are the
problem along with non-meditation and non-meditators.
> > >
> >
> > Just ending the train horns blown as the trains pass through
Fairfield sounds positively effeminate compared to sitting down in front
of trains or derailing them to stop the endless flow of coal through
town that powers our destruction.  Yep, coal-train railway workers and
locomotives are all our enemy now.
> >
> >
https://www.google.com/search?q=gas+powered+chop+saw&hl=en&tbo=u&biw=136\
6&bih=635&source=univ&tbm=shop&sa=X&ei=YFy9UO2lIKfi2gXCr4Bw&sqi=2&ved=0C\
E4Qsxg
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "..it's as if no-one is listening to the scientific
community," said Corinne Le Quere, director of the Tyndall Centre for
Climate Change Research at the University of East Anglia.
> > > > > >
>
> Yep, and what on earth are they teaching in the sustainable living
programs around the country?  Any teaching of the history of direct
action?Is there even a SDS movement anymore?  Teach-ins on how to
lobby change with sit-ins?  Any seminars or hands-on workshops yet at
the college level on how to derail coal trains?  When is the indolent
youth going to wake up and demand that we all make the Earth First! ?
>
>
> > > > > > "I am worried that the risks of dangerous climate change are
too high on our current emissions trajectory," Prof Le Quere said.
>
  [Train derailed]
The rusting remains of a train derailed using Garland's explosive
techniquesContinue reading the main story
 Related
Stories
* Lawrence of Arabia letter found

* Lawrence of Arabia 'finest epic'


The overlooked scientist whose expertise helped Lawrence of Arabia's
desert campaign during World War I is going to be remembered in a bid to
rewrite the Lawrence movie legend.

The chemist Herbert Garland used his scientific knowledge to teach
Thomas Lawrence how to blow up railway lines.

The Royal Society of Chemistry wants the behind-the-line heroism of the
scientist to be remembered.

The Lawrence of Arabia movie is marking its 50th anniversary next week.

The military and political achievements of Thomas Lawrence - remembered
as TE Lawrence or Lawrence of Arabia - were depicted in David Lean's
iconic movie, first screened on 10 December 1962.
Moving trainsBut the Royal Society of Chemistry says there was a key
element missing from the plot - the role of scientist Herbert Garland,
who helped to develop techniques for blowing up rail lines to disrupt
enemy troop movements and supplies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Recently, the World Meteorological Organization
(WMO) reported that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere hit a new record
high in 2011.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Data show that global CO2 emissions in 2012 hit
35.6bn tonnes, a 2.6% increase from 2011 and 58% above 1990 levels.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In its annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin, the
organisation said that carbon dioxide levels reached 391 parts per
million in 2011.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The report estimated that carbon dioxide (CO2) accounted
for 85% of the "radiative forcing" that led to global temperature rises.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Other potent greenhouse gases such as methane also
recorded new highs, according to the WMO report.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Non-meditators are the real carbon polluters behind
the destruction of the global climate. Well you know a positive
scientific case could be made that spiritual people who are regular
meditators and especially meditating on the Invincible American course
are much less responsible for global climate change than the average
non-meditating American or any other first world or developing nation
peoples.  Simply on a materialistic level of gross consumption, that
anyone who is on the full schedule of meditation in the Domes
contributing to world peace otherwise in fact cr

[FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to Judy

[awoelflebater]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" 
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater no_reply@ wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you think what we are doing now is communicating with or at
each other?  And if I'm doing the latter, can you show me an example
of where I am and how it could be changed to being communicating with
you?
> > >
> > > Should I therefore be considering my navel as my fourth eye?
> >
> > No, not your fourth eye. Have you ever heard of navel gazing?
> > If not, here are a couple of Urban Dictionary definitions:
> >
> > 1.  navel-gazing
> >
> > Engaging in self-absorbed behavior, often to the point of being
narcissistic.
> > If she would stop navel-gazing, she would realize the light had
turned green.
> >
> > 2.  navel-gazing
> >
> > Negative or excessive self-contemplation, often the focus is on you
and not others, when making a point or offering an opinion.
> >
> > Or another definition from Merrian Webster online dictionary:
> >
> > navel–gaz·ing
> > noun \ˈnā-vəl-ˈgā-ziŋ\
> > Definition of NAVEL-GAZING
> > : useless or excessive self-contemplation
>
> Hi Ann, just me RD, taking note of the post nasal drip snark leaking
from the snotty nose of the Sharester and butting in on a public forum
to heartily pile on. God help me, Ann, I've succumbed to the wts Borg
and I'm in need of John Knapp style cult-exit therapy for *complete*
healing. Last I heard he might be going to jail, so no luck there. Any
suggestions for *complete* healing? Share has lots of suggestions but
since she thinks Lord Knows and the Howells, who still have a
25-year-old bone to pick with Robin, are mature and you are immature,
I'm not sure I trust her judgement for getting me a healer that would
cure me of my piling-on disease or even piles for that matter. Anyway,
no one, not even Lotus Born Brahma, born from the navel of Vishnu has
done as much to advance the art of navel gazing as the consummate belly
dancer, adorned in all her glory.
>
http://images.tribe.net/tribe/upload/photo/42d/6f1/42d6f1ba-206b-4d3a-ae\
db-60b1bfa30c8e
>




> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > >  From: authfriend 
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 10:46 AM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else
interested to Judy
> > >
> > >
> > > Â
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Judy, what do you mean by actual communication?
> > >
> > > I mean the same thing as Emily meant when she said in her
> > > response that you and she weren't communicating *with*
> > > each other but *at* each other.
> > >
> > > As to using Windex on your navel, it's a metaphor. You're
> > > likely to stumble if you take steps without being able to
> > > see where you're going.
> > >
> > >   Why is my original post not an example of actual
communication?  I don't think Windex on my navel is the "...next
single thing for me to do or know for me to be in a state of Divine
Grace."  But I could be wrong (-:
> > > >
> > > > PS  Thanks for replying.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > >  From: authfriend 
> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 5:10 PM
> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else
interested
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ÂÂ
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1.  Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy
Share
> > > > > and Emily continuing to communicate with each other?
> > > >
> > > > Well, Share doesn't engage in communication with Emily and
> > > > Judy, so there's no such thing as "continuing to communicate"
> > > > in the first place.
> > > >
> > > > > 2.  If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can
come of it?
> > > >
> > > > There's no point in speculating about benefits unless Share
> > > > becomes willing to engage in actual communication.
> > > >
> > > > > 3.  What do you think would be a viable next step to
move
> > > > > closer to those benefits with a minimum of what's not
> > > > > beneficial?
> > > >
> > > > Again, the first thing that has to happen is for Share to
> > > > be willing to engage in actual communication.
> > > >
> > > > The post I'm responding to, just for the record, is not an
> > > > example.
> > > >
> > > > > I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome
this evening.  I have not discussed them with anyone.
> > > > > I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and
3.ÂÂ
> > > > >
> > > > > In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters.
> > > > >
> > > > > My answers:
> > > > > 2.  I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on
FFL would come of it.
> > > > > 3.  This post IS my viable next step!
> > > > > 1.  I'm not sure.  But I'm open to the
possibility of yes.

[FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to Judy

[raunchydog]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > Do you think what we are doing now is communicating with or at each 
> > other?  And if I'm doing the latter, can you show me an example of where I 
> > am and how it could be changed to being communicating with you?
> > 
> > Should I therefore be considering my navel as my fourth eye?
> 
> No, not your fourth eye. Have you ever heard of navel gazing?
> If not, here are a couple of Urban Dictionary definitions:
> 
> 1.navel-gazing
>   
> Engaging in self-absorbed behavior, often to the point of being narcissistic.
> If she would stop navel-gazing, she would realize the light had turned green.
> 
> 2.navel-gazing
>   
> Negative or excessive self-contemplation, often the focus is on you and not 
> others, when making a point or offering an opinion.
> 
> Or another definition from Merrian Webster online dictionary:
> 
> navel–gaz·ing
> noun \ˈnā-vəl-ˈgā-ziŋ\
> Definition of NAVEL-GAZING
> : useless or excessive self-contemplation 

Hi Ann, just me RD, taking note of the post nasal drip snark leaking from the 
snotty nose of the Sharester and butting in on a public forum to heartily pile 
on. God help me, Ann, I've succumbed to the wts Borg and I'm in need of John 
Knapp style cult-exit therapy for *complete* healing. Last I heard he might be 
going to jail, so no luck there. Any suggestions for *complete* healing? Share 
has lots of suggestions but since she thinks Lord Knows and the Howells, who 
still have a 25-year-old bone to pick with Robin, are mature and you are 
immature, I'm not sure I trust her judgement for getting me a healer that would 
cure me of my piling-on disease or even piles for that matter. Anyway, no one, 
not even Lotus Born Brahma, born from the navel of Vishnu has done as much to 
advance the art of navel gazing as the consummate belly dancer, adorned in all 
her glory.  
http://images.tribe.net/tribe/upload/photo/42d/6f1/42d6f1ba-206b-4d3a-aedb-60b1bfa30c8e

> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  From: authfriend 
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 10:46 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested 
> > to Judy
> >  
> > 
> >   
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> > >
> > > Judy, what do you mean by actual communication?
> > 
> > I mean the same thing as Emily meant when she said in her
> > response that you and she weren't communicating *with*
> > each other but *at* each other.
> > 
> > As to using Windex on your navel, it's a metaphor. You're
> > likely to stumble if you take steps without being able to
> > see where you're going.
> > 
> >   Why is my original post not an example of actual communication?  I 
> > don't think Windex on my navel is the "...next single thing for me to do or 
> > know for me to be in a state of Divine Grace."  But I could be wrong (-:
> > > 
> > > PS  Thanks for replying.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  From: authfriend 
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 5:10 PM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 1.  Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share
> > > > and Emily continuing to communicate with each other?
> > > 
> > > Well, Share doesn't engage in communication with Emily and
> > > Judy, so there's no such thing as "continuing to communicate"
> > > in the first place.
> > > 
> > > > 2.  If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it?
> > > 
> > > There's no point in speculating about benefits unless Share
> > > becomes willing to engage in actual communication.
> > > 
> > > > 3.  What do you think would be a viable next step to move 
> > > > closer to those benefits with a minimum of what's not
> > > > beneficial?
> > > 
> > > Again, the first thing that has to happen is for Share to
> > > be willing to engage in actual communication.
> > > 
> > > The post I'm responding to, just for the record, is not an
> > > example.
> > > 
> > > > I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this 
> > > > evening.  I have not discussed them with anyone.
> > > > I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3.  
> > > > 
> > > > In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters.
> > > > 
> > > > My answers:
> > > > 2.  I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come 
> > > > of it.
> > > > 3.  This post IS my viable next step!
> > > > 1.  I'm not sure.  But I'm open to the possibility of yes.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-:
> > > 
> > > Before you take a next step, use some Windex on your
> > > navel. How's that?
> > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to Judy

[Robin Carlsen]

This is poetry. A beautiful human being wrote this.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
>
> Can't resist again. My bad. Mea culpa.
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater  wrote:
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> > 
> > > > Should I therefore be considering my navel as my fourth eye?
> > > 
> > > No, not your fourth eye. Have you ever heard of navel gazing?
> > 
> > Um, different significance of "navel" than in my formulation,
> > Ann: one doesn't gaze into it, one gazes out of it.
> 
> There's that Crohn's Disease chronically upset
> stomach thang again. What's up with that?
> 
> :-)
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to Judy

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:34 PM, turquoiseb  wrote:

> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> > 
> > > > Should I therefore be considering my navel as my fourth eye?
> > >
> > > No, not your fourth eye. Have you ever heard of navel gazing?
> >
> > Um, different significance of "navel" than in my formulation,
> > Ann: one doesn't gaze into it, one gazes out of it.
>
> There's that Crohn's Disease chronically upset
> stomach thang again. What's up with that?
>
> :-)
>

Oh so cute to watch Barry baby's antics. Ravi, all teary eyed, to a
stranger - "Isn't Barry like baby Krishna"? Stranger - "No - Barry is mean
and paranoid, he is not even supposed to be reading Judy and Ann". Ravi -
"Fuck you stranger".

[FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to Judy

[authfriend]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:

> There's that Crohn's Disease chronically upset
> stomach thang again. What's up with that?

Barry dear, if it turns you on to fantasize that I have an
upset stomach, go for it. Kinda weird, but whatever gets
you through the night.

[FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to Judy

[turquoiseb]

Can't resist again. My bad. Mea culpa.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater  wrote:
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> 
> > > Should I therefore be considering my navel as my fourth eye?
> > 
> > No, not your fourth eye. Have you ever heard of navel gazing?
> 
> Um, different significance of "navel" than in my formulation,
> Ann: one doesn't gaze into it, one gazes out of it.

There's that Crohn's Disease chronically upset
stomach thang again. What's up with that?

:-)

[FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to Judy

[authfriend]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater  wrote:
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:

> > Should I therefore be considering my navel as my fourth eye?
> 
> No, not your fourth eye. Have you ever heard of navel gazing?

Um, different significance of "navel" than in my formulation,
Ann: one doesn't gaze into it, one gazes out of it.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: to Judy

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:11 AM, turquoiseb  wrote:

> Dear Ravi,
>
> How fortunate for you that you have found such a
> perfect set of peers to hang with here on FFL. After
> all, it is not every Internet forum on which you can
> find a bunch of "girls" whose emotional maturity
> stopped at the same level yours did, in high school.
>
> I fully understand how guys such as yourself would
> feel most comfortable around women most guys would
> consider petty, vindictive uberbitches; that is,
> after all, one of the reasons the universe in its
> infinite wisdom evolved the concept of "fag hag."
>
> If you ever feel that you've evolved enough to hang
> with actual adult women who have things to say other
> than sniping at other women, might I suggest that you
> converse occasionally with Susan, Sal, Ruth, or others
> who aren't emotionally and intellectually stuck in the
> halcyon days of their teens. They won't stroke you and
> pretend that you're actually a real guy like the fag
> hags do, but you might learn something new, and that
> would be a change for you.
>

Oh Barry baby that's so sweet, I knew you had a crush on me. The haters
will take your post literally but I won't, I only see your yearning finally
articulating itself in this post. OMG - Barry called me "dear Ravi" !!!
Barry doesn't address anyone as dear - OMG he loves me - Yaay !!!.

I was going to trash the year 2012 as "disappointing" but now with your
"dear Ravi" post, even if it's coming at the fag end of the year - I'm
going to move 2012 to the "remarkable" column. No - Barry - I love you too
baby.

[FairfieldLife] Re: More Opera 12.04.12

[authfriend]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"  wrote:

> My favorite Cecilia is this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2IeGgk_06I
> Its an aria from a Vivaldi opera and she uses it as an encore.
> Its breathtaking, sensational. I defy anyone to keep still
> while they watch it. Its Baroque rock.  And just look at her
> face when she is finished. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdQU-N8b3HA

[FairfieldLife] Shocking! The real purpose of your life!

[turquoiseb]

The guys behind "South Park" done good, making a 
very lovely little video with a snap at the end.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwmbUzMViiU

[FairfieldLife] For Card

[turquoiseb]

In the survey not specifically cited but hinted at, Finland provided the
best education in the world, followed by several Asian nations and the
Netherlands in 7th place. The United States was 17th.

 
[https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/25041_1015116404\
0141275_1577882576_n.jpg]

https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/25041_10151164040\
141275_1577882576_n.jpg

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism to EB

[Share Long]

Maybe if I'm a really good girl, Santa will bring me Drone for Christmas (-:




 From: emptybill 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 1:03 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
 

  
Share

Pt ... this is an public forum. 
They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
You're already in their cross-hairs.

Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you 
always on defence playing their posting game?
You thinks it's your pretty face?

Hah! ... 

The Man needs more data for your
profile. 

Got Drone?
 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> I received this yesterday.  For several years I've thought it is true.
> 
> 
> 
> http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whistleblower-all-americans-under-constant-surveillance
> 
> 
> 
>  From: emptybill emptybill@...
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:01 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fly-By Journalism
> 
> 
>   
> Forget drive-by Journalism. This new development is journalist-tracking
> by mini-drone. Coming to your neighborhood soon.
> 
> Itwill make it easier for the Rajas to know it you are naughty or nice.
> 
> Anyone got some spare change to buy one?  Maybe we should track them.
>

 

[FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to Judy

[awoelflebater]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> Do you think what we are doing now is communicating with or at each other?  
> And if I'm doing the latter, can you show me an example of where I am and how 
> it could be changed to being communicating with you?
> 
> Should I therefore be considering my navel as my fourth eye?

No, not your fourth eye. Have you ever heard of navel gazing?
If not, here are a couple of Urban Dictionary definitions:

1.  navel-gazing

Engaging in self-absorbed behavior, often to the point of being narcissistic.
If she would stop navel-gazing, she would realize the light had turned green.

2.  navel-gazing

Negative or excessive self-contemplation, often the focus is on you and not 
others, when making a point or offering an opinion.

Or another definition from Merrian Webster online dictionary:

navel–gaz·ing
noun \ˈnā-vəl-ˈgā-ziŋ\
Definition of NAVEL-GAZING
: useless or excessive self-contemplation 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  From: authfriend 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 10:46 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to 
> Judy
>  
> 
>   
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > Judy, what do you mean by actual communication?
> 
> I mean the same thing as Emily meant when she said in her
> response that you and she weren't communicating *with*
> each other but *at* each other.
> 
> As to using Windex on your navel, it's a metaphor. You're
> likely to stumble if you take steps without being able to
> see where you're going.
> 
>   Why is my original post not an example of actual communication?  I 
> don't think Windex on my navel is the "...next single thing for me to do or 
> know for me to be in a state of Divine Grace."  But I could be wrong (-:
> > 
> > PS  Thanks for replying.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  From: authfriend 
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 5:10 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> > >
> > > 1.  Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share
> > > and Emily continuing to communicate with each other?
> > 
> > Well, Share doesn't engage in communication with Emily and
> > Judy, so there's no such thing as "continuing to communicate"
> > in the first place.
> > 
> > > 2.  If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it?
> > 
> > There's no point in speculating about benefits unless Share
> > becomes willing to engage in actual communication.
> > 
> > > 3.  What do you think would be a viable next step to move 
> > > closer to those benefits with a minimum of what's not
> > > beneficial?
> > 
> > Again, the first thing that has to happen is for Share to
> > be willing to engage in actual communication.
> > 
> > The post I'm responding to, just for the record, is not an
> > example.
> > 
> > > I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this 
> > > evening.  I have not discussed them with anyone.
> > > I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3.  
> > > 
> > > In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters.
> > > 
> > > My answers:
> > > 2.  I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come 
> > > of it.
> > > 3.  This post IS my viable next step!
> > > 1.  I'm not sure.  But I'm open to the possibility of yes.
> > > 
> > > I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-:
> > 
> > Before you take a next step, use some Windex on your
> > navel. How's that?
> > 
> > > Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring.
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: More Opera 12.04.12

[merudanda]

Elina G ..

G?G-Effect...G-Force?
from G-Factor.. to G-Spot? [:D]

decide yourself


during recording

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQR9d8Y96hY

during concert
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aE0HXHirY7U


  Clemenza di Tito
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMX-s0L2wLo

Clemenza di Tito
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhJjY-ohBSk


the great B
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roo34ysqc4Y



  
all without "wardrobe malfunction" I think-I hope- oh feste,feste37 why
oh why you mentioned?


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"  wrote:
>
> Nice, but not enough cleavage, which is an essential part of a female
opera singer’s repertoire, don’t you think? In this
regard, the divine Cecilia does not disappoint in the following clip,
especially given the tantalizing possibility of a wardrobe malfunction,
which unfortunately not quite happen (but watch the shoulder strap):
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaKX21earkk (Oh, yes, the aria is good
too.)
>
>
> My favorite Cecilia is this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2IeGgk_06I
> It’s an aria from a Vivaldi opera and she uses it as an encore.
It’s breathtaking, sensational. I defy anyone to keep still while
they watch it. It’s Baroque rock.  And just look at her face when
she is finished.
>
> Cecilia is the sort of voluptuous Italian woman that men would love to
have in the kitchen and bedroom. She might be a bit of a handful though.
>
> Elina G made a great Sesto in the live Met telecast of Clemenza di
Tito at the weekend. She is so hot.
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > Two of the best mezzo-sopranos, Elina Garanca and Anna Netrebko,
sing
> > the famous Flower duet (Lakm� Delibes). Doesn't hurt that
> > they're both as beautiful as the blossoms to which they give song.
> > No wonder men are so easily spellbound.
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vf42IP__ipw
> > 
> >
> > Also,
> >
> >
> > Dmitri Hvorostovsky and Renee Fleming in a fabulous performance in
the
> > palace at St. Petersburg
> > (a duet from Verdi's Il Travatore).
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GV9rE61kodw&feature=related
> > 
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[awoelflebater]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"  
wrote:
>
> Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous taste in 
> shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who ever lived, be 
> sorta 'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So many mysteries, so 
> little time...

T Funny Alex. I have to admit I am on the same page as you. I'll just chalk 
it up to my lack of refined sensibility with regard to the human voice as an 
actual instrument. I'll take crazy dancing and a primal beat any day. Thank God 
there are some people with taste and sophistication though.
> 
> Take us out, Psy!
> 
> http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
> >
> > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts such beautiful 
> > opera could say such idiotic things.  P.S.  Are you British? (I say this 
> > given the way you spelled "defence."  Alright, the little dog needs a long 
> > walk - a storm is pending, so it should be a good time.  Please redeem 
> > yourself by posting more opera.  
> > 
> > 
> >  From: emptybill 
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> >  
> > 
> >   
> > More like trap!
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Skeet shooting!
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Share
> > > >
> > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> > > >
> > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> > > >
> > > > Hah! ...
> > > >
> > > > The Man needs more data for your
> > > > profile.
> > > >
> > > > Got Drone?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I received this yesterday.  For several years I've thought it
> > is
> > > > true.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis 
> > Reply to sender  Reply to group  Start a New Topic Messages in this topic 
> > (6) 
> > Recent Activity: 
> > Visit Your Group 
> > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> > 
> > Or go to: 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > and click 'Join This Group!' 
> >  
> > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • 
> > Send us Feedback 
> > .
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[Alex Stanley]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
>
> P.S. I like you funny, Alex. I like you crafting a
> perfect putdown and being Fair And Balanced as 
> moderator, too. But I really like you funny. 
> 
 
Thanks! With the place going downhill and Salvatore Del Sole busting my 
kneecaps behind the scenes, I figured I'd put a little attention on being the 
change people probably want to see.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[Bhairitu]

On 12/04/2012 01:12 PM, turquoiseb wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" 
>  wrote:
>> Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such
>> fabulous taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the
>> greatest guru who ever lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera
>> but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So many mysteries, so little
>> time...
> My guess is that you've managed to walk that fine
> line between having an alter ego and turning it into
> an altar ego. It's when one starts worshiping it
> that the chit hits the fan. :-)
>
> As for shoes, while I can appreciate the occasional
> pair of Louboutins on a woman with shapely legs, I
> must admit that the allure of shoes as adornment is
> almost completely lost on me. I am built with feet
> that turn me into a complete functionalist when it
> comes to shoes.
>
> I have very high arches, which require equally high
> arch support. Put me in a pair of normal, flat-soled
> shoes -- no matter how Designer Stylish they may be
> -- and when I walk on them my feet start cramping up
> within 20 minutes. But put me in a pair of classic
> Ecco shoes, which were famous for their high arch,
> and I can walk all day. What shoes do I wear? No
> brainer.
>
> But alas. Ecco stopped making them. I'm down to my
> last brown and black pairs before I have make the
> switch to high-arch inserts to other shoes. I have
> already repaired the soles of my remaining pairs
> once with Shoe Goo, and may again before I succumb
> to lesser, possibly more attractive but far less
> functional shoes.
>
> Gawd. I'm like a low-rent guy version of Carrie
> from "Sex and the City." Can't you just see her
> clinging with nigh-adharmic attachment to her last
> pairs of Louboutins or Manolo Blahniks or Jimmy
> Choos if those designers succumbed to the Really
> Great Depression and went belly up?
>
> :-)
>
> P.S. I like you funny, Alex. I like you crafting a
> perfect putdown and being Fair And Balanced as
> moderator, too. But I really like you funny.
>
>
>

I had a pair of those Ecco shoes and the tread deteriorated.  They made 
hard to remove goop spots on the carpet.   I didn't get much wear out of 
them either.  I also have "fallen arches" and forgot that I had been 
sidelined in high school PE because of them but once the draft physical 
doctor spotted them I was out.  I could have avoided that whole event if 
I had just remembered and had a foot doctor write a note.

[FairfieldLife] Re: to Judy

[PaliGap]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" 
 wrote:

> Logic is about form, about structure, not content. To quote one
> of the men who demonstrated that mathematics and logic were the
> same, Bertrand Russell:

He demonstrated that? I rather think not. In fact he played a 
significant role in knocking the stuffing out of that reductionist
project:

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/philosophy-mathematics/#Log

Or, Wiki:
"Russell and Alfred North Whitehead wrote their three-volume
Principia Mathematica (PM) hoping to achieve what Frege had
been unable to do. They sought to banish the paradoxes of
naive set theory by employing a theory of types they devised
for this purpose. While they succeeded in grounding arithmetic
in a fashion, it is not at all evident that they did so by
purely logical means. While PM avoided the known paradoxes
and allows the derivation of a great deal of mathematics,
its system gave rise to new problems.

In any event, Kurt Gödel in 1930–31 proved that while the
logic of much of PM, now known as first-order logic, is 
complete, Peano arithmetic is necessarily incomplete if it
is consistent. This is very widely – though not universally
– regarded as having shown the logicist program of Frege
to be impossible to complete"

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[turquoiseb]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"  
wrote:
>
> Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such 
> fabulous taste in shoes, and with an alter ego who is the 
> greatest guru who ever lived, be sorta 'meh' on the opera 
> but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So many mysteries, so little 
> time...

My guess is that you've managed to walk that fine
line between having an alter ego and turning it into
an altar ego. It's when one starts worshiping it 
that the chit hits the fan. :-)

As for shoes, while I can appreciate the occasional
pair of Louboutins on a woman with shapely legs, I 
must admit that the allure of shoes as adornment is
almost completely lost on me. I am built with feet
that turn me into a complete functionalist when it
comes to shoes. 

I have very high arches, which require equally high
arch support. Put me in a pair of normal, flat-soled
shoes -- no matter how Designer Stylish they may be 
-- and when I walk on them my feet start cramping up
within 20 minutes. But put me in a pair of classic
Ecco shoes, which were famous for their high arch,
and I can walk all day. What shoes do I wear? No
brainer. 

But alas. Ecco stopped making them. I'm down to my
last brown and black pairs before I have make the 
switch to high-arch inserts to other shoes. I have 
already repaired the soles of my remaining pairs 
once with Shoe Goo, and may again before I succumb 
to lesser, possibly more attractive but far less
functional shoes. 

Gawd. I'm like a low-rent guy version of Carrie 
from "Sex and the City." Can't you just see her 
clinging with nigh-adharmic attachment to her last
pairs of Louboutins or Manolo Blahniks or Jimmy 
Choos if those designers succumbed to the Really 
Great Depression and went belly up? 

:-)

P.S. I like you funny, Alex. I like you crafting a
perfect putdown and being Fair And Balanced as 
moderator, too. But I really like you funny. 



> Take us out, Psy!
> 
> http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
> >
> > Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts such beautiful 
> > opera could say such idiotic things.  P.S.  Are you British? (I say this 
> > given the way you spelled "defence."  Alright, the little dog needs a long 
> > walk - a storm is pending, so it should be a good time.  Please redeem 
> > yourself by posting more opera.  
> > 
> > 
> >  From: emptybill 
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
> >  
> > 
> >   
> > More like trap!
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Skeet shooting!
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Share
> > > >
> > > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> > > >
> > > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> > > >
> > > > Hah! ...
> > > >
> > > > The Man needs more data for your
> > > > profile.
> > > >
> > > > Got Drone?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I received this yesterday.  For several years I've thought it
> > is
> > > > true.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis 
> > Reply to sender  Reply to group  Start a New Topic Messages in this topic 
> > (6) 
> > Recent Activity: 
> > Visit Your Group 
> > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> > 
> > Or go to: 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > and click 'Join This Group!' 
> >  
> > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • 
> > Send us Feedback 
> > .
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: More Opera

[raunchydog]

You're an amazing poet, merudanda. I love you. Thanks for gracing us with your 
beauty.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, merudanda  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCPufE8AeMg
> 
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6hKiM1zT2Y
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Bravissimo "empty one "now a dream cast away in bitter winds, a
> hope slaughtered in dark, a heart punctured upon itself with ancient
> works of Muse long lost to time.
> 
> Yes
> 
> And when all the opera's end, and all
> All FFL's crowd has dimmed,
> 
> When Golden Dome's wings are left to
> Be empty, and our stories are all done,
> We may sing a last eulogy and force it on
> Robin's raven wing, so that to the night, the
> Shining moon would cry with a wolf. The tears of a
> Rose would douse a flame which could not be quenched.
> The rotting of words, it too bicuspid
> Opulence could streak a frown across the
> Horizon with its somber, dismal inks
> 
> Drowning all passion thick, all zeal
> Tore and cast to the wind of all prudence-
> 
> Thorns of roses piercing our dreadful heart
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> So throughout the night the stars will sing to
> Our emptybill's praises with more fervor than the now
> Closed opus: Yet a light will creep over us,
> 
>   Opened ways within us, we weep more
> Recognizing our solitude in our partners.
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill"  wrote:
> >
> >
> > Robin
> >
> > Don't despair. You can keep your precious first person ontology.
> > However, when you get to heaven, Judy will be waiting to show why you
> > won't need it. I have seen this and it will indeed be her
> > transformed presence showing you what now awaits you. Out of an excess
> > of secret humility, she won't admit this on a public forum but the
> > Dakini-s have shown me the reality.
> >
> > This is the truth of real Tantra (anuttara yoga-tantra) where sacred
> > vision reveals sacred world.
> >
> > This is why the Neo-platonists (pagan and christian) knew that the
> > intelligences dancing this cosmos were not your supposed Vedic demons
> > (nor Zorastrian-Semitic either) but theophanic celestials pointing out
> > the Way.
> >
> > Here's the real Judy and paraphrasing St. Anthony …"I have seen
> > Her".
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J67vh5DRURY&feature=watch-vrec
> > 
> >
> >
> > As for Hvorostovsky:
> >
> > Here he is (before he later became the grey Lion) singing with the
> great
> > Parvarotti.
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgwWQyGioz8
> > 
> >
> > And here he is with the exquisite Anna Netrebko:
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36vm2VoXuXA
> > 
> >
> > Also … Think these people can only sing with trilled r's? Here
> > he is in a video that became a YouTube sensation … (It is also a
> > remembrance of the era of Stalin's terror)
> >
> > Kak molody my byli (How young we were)
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GU1jUiXOJpo
> > 
> >
> > Turn around unknown stranger
> >
> > Your uncompromising look is familiar
> >
> > Maybe that is me … when I was younger
> >
> > We don't always recognize ourselves but
> >
> > Nothing on Earth passes without leaving a trace
> >
> > And this youth, which has passed, is after all undying ...
> >
> > How young we were, how truly young we were
> >
> > How we loved without doubt, believed in ourselves
> >
> > Everyone welcomed us with our sincere belief
> >
> > We forgave our friends when they were wrong
> >
> > But their treachery we couldn't forgive
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" maskedzebra@
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Emptybill,
> > >
> > > Dmitri is the first voice I will listen to in the morning. What he
> is
> > making happen here (in this aria) is my aesthetic ideal. I want to be
> > where he is to sing like this.
> > >
> > > Fabulous post, emptybill.
> > >
> > > I am switching from first person ontology to opera.
> > >
> > > Robin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Emily,
> > > >
> > > > Here's the famous aria Largo al factotum from Rossini's The
> > > > Barber of Seville (Il Barbiere desiviglia). You'll understand why
> > > > you'llnever see this on American Idol or Britain's Got talent.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKDXr_fimQ8&feature=related
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > > Enjoy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[Alex Stanley]

Similarly, how can someone as brilliant as me, with such fabulous taste in 
shoes, and with an alter ego who is the greatest guru who ever lived, be sorta 
'meh' on the opera but goo-goo for Gangnam Style? So many mysteries, so little 
time...

Take us out, Psy!

http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
>
> Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts such beautiful 
> opera could say such idiotic things.  P.S.  Are you British? (I say this 
> given the way you spelled "defence."  Alright, the little dog needs a long 
> walk - a storm is pending, so it should be a good time.  Please redeem 
> yourself by posting more opera.  
> 
> 
>  From: emptybill 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
>  
> 
>   
> More like trap!
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ 
> wrote:
> >
> > Skeet shooting!
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Share
> > >
> > > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> > >
> > > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> > >
> > > Hah! ...
> > >
> > > The Man needs more data for your
> > > profile.
> > >
> > > Got Drone?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I received this yesterday.  For several years I've thought it
> is
> > > true.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis 
> Reply to sender  Reply to group  Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (6) 
> Recent Activity: 
> Visit Your Group 
> To subscribe, send a message to:
> fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> 
> Or go to: 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> and click 'Join This Group!' 
>  
> Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • Send 
> us Feedback 
> .
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[Bhairitu]

"The Man" needs serious mental treatment for "his" paranoid 
schizophrenia.  We need to re-open the mental health hospitals so we can 
have some place to put them.  And also we could add rehab centers for 
money junkies.


On 12/04/2012 11:03 AM, emptybill wrote:


Share

Pt ... this is an public forum.
They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
You're /already /in their cross-hairs.

Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
always on defence playing their posting game?
You thinks it's your pretty face?

Hah! ...

The Man needs more data for your
profile.

Got Drone?



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> I received this yesterday.  For several years I've thought it is true.
>
>
>
> 
http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whistleblower-all-americans-under-constant-surveillance

>
>
> 
> From: emptybill emptybill@...
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:01 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fly-By Journalism
>
>
> Â
> Forget drive-by Journalism. This new development is journalist-tracking
> by mini-drone. Coming to your neighborhood soon.
>
> Itwill make it easier for the Rajas to know it you are naughty or nice.
>
> Anyone got some spare change to buy one? Maybe we should track them.
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: More Opera

[Robin Carlsen]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill"  wrote:
>
> 
> Robin
> 
> Don't despair. You can keep your precious first person ontology.
> However, when you get to heaven, Judy will be waiting to show why you
> won't need it. I have seen this and it will indeed be her
> transformed presence showing you what now awaits you. Out of an excess
> of secret humility, she won't admit this on a public forum but the
> Dakini-s have shown me the reality.
> 
> This is the truth of real Tantra (anuttara yoga-tantra) where sacred
> vision reveals sacred world.
> 
> This is why the Neo-platonists (pagan and christian) knew that the
> intelligences dancing this cosmos were not your supposed Vedic demons
> (nor Zorastrian-Semitic either) but theophanic celestials pointing out
> the Way.
> 
> Here's the real Judy and paraphrasing St. Anthony …"I have seen
> Her".
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J67vh5DRURY&feature=watch-vrec
> 
> 
> 
> As for Hvorostovsky:
> 
> Here he is (before he later became the grey Lion) singing with the great
> Parvarotti.
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgwWQyGioz8
> 
> 
> And here he is with the exquisite Anna Netrebko:
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36vm2VoXuXA
> 
> 
> Also … Think these people can only sing with trilled r's? Here
> he is in a video that became a YouTube sensation … (It is also a
> remembrance of the era of Stalin's terror)
> 
> Kak molody my byli (How young we were)
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GU1jUiXOJpo
> 
> 
> Turn around unknown stranger
> 
> Your uncompromising look is familiar
> 
> Maybe that is me … when I was younger
> 
> We don't always recognize ourselves but
> 
> Nothing on Earth passes without leaving a trace
> 
> And this youth, which has passed, is after all undying ...
> 
> How young we were, how truly young we were
> 
> How we loved without doubt, believed in ourselves
> 
> Everyone welcomed us with our sincere belief
> 
> We forgave our friends when they were wrong
> 
> But their treachery we couldn't forgive

Dear Emptybill,

Wonderful.  All of it. I envy your knowledge of opera--no longer do I envy your 
love of it, for Dmitri Hvorostovsky has made me realize how beautiful opera is. 
I have a multitude of reactions, but the way Anna Netrebka looked into the eyes 
of Dmitri Hvorostovsky--as she sang to him--was the realization of an objective 
intimacy which, for me, represents about as personally intense as first person 
ontology can get! She was confronting him with the beauty of her character, 
held inside the extreme discipline of the aesthetic of opera. That was better 
than a WTS--but I certainly recognized the tremendous influx of what is most 
real (in its stillness)--although taking place within the artifice of the art 
form of opera. Thank you for so much for this, emptybill--Had I known you were 
so aware of this world I would have tried to find something more in our 
dialogues than I was able to find without this knowledge (and 
initiation)--Beginning with the aria: Largo al factotum from Rossini's Il 
Barbiere Desviglia (The Barber of Seville) I knew I had missed out on some 
important dimension of emptybill. And what has come afterwards: well, now I 
have to go through your posts with authfriend--which I will do before the day 
is finished. Magnificent. Dmitri, well he is better than Elvis. If first-person 
ontology had various state of consciousness, one would be DHC--when he is 
performing, that is. Dimitri Hvorostovsky is more disciplined than any athlete, 
more devoted to his art than any monk is to God (nowadays), and he has the 
supreme experience of that sensation of egotism which comes from having 
attained all the individual grace that was possible in making his voice sing 
those notes.

Robin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" 
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Emptybill,
> >
> > Dmitri is the first voice I will listen to in the morning. What he is
> making happen here (in this aria) is my aesthetic ideal. I want to be
> where he is to sing like this.
> >
> > Fabulous post, emptybill.
> >
> > I am switching from first person ontology to opera.
> >
> > Robin
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Emily,
> > >
> > > Here's the famous aria Largo al factotum from Rossini's The
> > > Barber of Seville (Il Barbiere desiviglia). You'll understand why
> > > you'llnever see this on American Idol or Britain's Got talent.
> > >
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKDXr_fimQ8&feature=related
> > > 
> > >
> > > Enjoy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: More Opera 12.04.12

[feste37]

Nice, but not enough cleavage, which is an essential part of a female opera 
singer’s repertoire, don’t you think? In this regard, the divine Cecilia 
does not disappoint in the following clip, especially given the tantalizing 
possibility of a wardrobe malfunction, which unfortunately not quite happen 
(but watch the shoulder strap): 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaKX21earkk (Oh, yes, the aria is good too.) 


My favorite Cecilia is this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2IeGgk_06I
It’s an aria from a Vivaldi opera and she uses it as an encore. It’s 
breathtaking, sensational. I defy anyone to keep still while they watch it. 
It’s Baroque rock.  And just look at her face when she is finished. 

Cecilia is the sort of voluptuous Italian woman that men would love to have in 
the kitchen and bedroom. She might be a bit of a handful though. 

Elina G made a great Sesto in the live Met telecast of Clemenza di Tito at the 
weekend. She is so hot.




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill"  wrote:
>
> 
> Two of the best mezzo-sopranos, Elina Garanca and Anna Netrebko, sing
> the famous Flower duet (Lakm� Delibes). Doesn't hurt that
> they're both as beautiful as the blossoms to which they give song.
> No wonder men are so easily spellbound.
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vf42IP__ipw
> 
> 
> Also,
> 
> 
> Dmitri Hvorostovsky and Renee Fleming in a fabulous performance in the
> palace at St. Petersburg
> (a duet from Verdi's Il Travatore).
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GV9rE61kodw&feature=related
> 
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[Emily Reyn]

Dear Emptybill, before I go I must ask how someone who posts such beautiful 
opera could say such idiotic things.  P.S.  Are you British? (I say this given 
the way you spelled "defence."  Alright, the little dog needs a long walk - a 
storm is pending, so it should be a good time.  Please redeem yourself by 
posting more opera.  


 From: emptybill 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:17 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism
 

  
More like trap!

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... 
wrote:
>
> Skeet shooting!
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> >
> > Share
> >
> > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> >
> > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> >
> > Hah! ...
> >
> > The Man needs more data for your
> > profile.
> >
> > Got Drone?
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I received this yesterday.  For several years I've thought it
is
> > true.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis Reply 
to sender  Reply to group  Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (6) 
Recent Activity: 
Visit Your Group 
To subscribe, send a message to:
fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
 
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • Send us 
Feedback 
. 

 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The End of the World as we Know It

[Buck]

> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > The BBC:
> > > > "We need a radical plan."
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Direct action.  I am surprized that the sustainable living movement has 
> > > not taken more vigorous social action on this.  Like, back in the Vietnam 
> > > War days we closed interstates and threw bricks through General Motors 
> > > auto showrooms and smashed the glass out of entire lots of new cars to 
> > > end the war and bring our brothers home.  
> > >
> > 
> > Yep, the old way was tilting at windmills but I'd be in favor of a sabre 
> > charge at railway workers and their locomotives now who haul the coal to 
> > the coal-fired utility electric generators.  They are the problem along 
> > with non-meditation and non-meditators.  
> >
> 
> Just ending the train horns blown as the trains pass through Fairfield sounds 
> positively effeminate compared to sitting down in front of trains or 
> derailing them to stop the endless flow of coal through town that powers our 
> destruction.  Yep, coal-train railway workers and locomotives are all our 
> enemy now. 
> 
> https://www.google.com/search?q=gas+powered+chop+saw&hl=en&tbo=u&biw=1366&bih=635&source=univ&tbm=shop&sa=X&ei=YFy9UO2lIKfi2gXCr4Bw&sqi=2&ved=0CE4Qsxg
>
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > "..it's as if no-one is listening to the scientific community," said 
> > > > > Corinne Le Quere, director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change 
> > > > > Research at the University of East Anglia.
> > > > >

Yep, and what on earth are they teaching in the sustainable living programs 
around the country?  Any teaching of the history of direct action?Is there 
even a SDS movement anymore?  Teach-ins on how to lobby change with sit-ins?  
Any seminars or hands-on workshops yet at the college level on how to derail 
coal trains?  When is the indolent youth going to wake up and demand that we 
all make the Earth First! ?

 
> > > > > "I am worried that the risks of dangerous climate change are too high 
> > > > > on our current emissions trajectory," Prof Le Quere said.

> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Recently, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 
> > > > > > > > > > reported that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere hit a new 
> > > > > > > > > > record high in 2011.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Data show that global CO2 emissions in 2012 hit 35.6bn 
> > > > > > > > > > > tonnes, a 2.6% increase from 2011 and 58% above 1990 
> > > > > > > > > > > levels.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > In its annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin, the organisation said 
> > > > > > > > that carbon dioxide levels reached 391 parts per million in 
> > > > > > > > 2011.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The report estimated that carbon dioxide (CO2) accounted for 85% of 
> > > > > > the "radiative forcing" that led to global temperature rises.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Other potent greenhouse gases such as methane also recorded new 
> > > > > > highs, according to the WMO report.
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Non-meditators are the real carbon polluters behind the 
> > > > > > > > > destruction of the global climate. Well you know a positive 
> > > > > > > > > scientific case could be made that spiritual people who are 
> > > > > > > > > regular meditators and especially meditating on the 
> > > > > > > > > Invincible American course are much less responsible for 
> > > > > > > > > global climate change than the average non-meditating 
> > > > > > > > > American or any other first world or developing nation 
> > > > > > > > > peoples.  Simply on a materialistic level of gross 
> > > > > > > > > consumption, that anyone who is on the full schedule of 
> > > > > > > > > meditation in the Domes contributing to world peace otherwise 
> > > > > > > > > in fact creates much less carbon damage to the atmosphere and 
> > > > > > > > > global climate than the average CO2 emitting consuming 
> > > > > > > > > American.  At a minimum, people on the Invincible America 
> > > > > > > > > course simply do not have the time to consume materially like 
> > > > > > > > > non-meditaters do.
> > > > > > > > > -Buck
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Once again it is evident that the problem with society is, 
> > > > > > > 'non-meditation'.  Even just stopping and taking a quiet time 
> > > > > > > meditation twice a day would be good for the global climate.  In 
> > > > > > > prudent public policy taking quiet time meditation breaks at 
> > > > > > > least twice a day should probably be required for everyone's 
> > > > > > > well-being and safety.
> > > > > > > -Buck
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[emptybill]

More like trap!



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... 
wrote:
>
> Skeet shooting!
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> >
> > Share
> >
> > Pt ... this is an public forum.
> > They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> > You're already in their cross-hairs.
> >
> > Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> > always on defence playing their posting game?
> > You thinks it's your pretty face?
> >
> > Hah! ...
> >
> > The Man needs more data for your
> > profile.
> >
> > Got Drone?
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I received this yesterday.  For several years I've thought it
is
> > true.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis\
\
> > tleblower-all-americans-under-constant-surveillance
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > >  From: emptybill emptybill@
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:01 AM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fly-By Journalism
> > >
> > >
> > > Â
> > > Forget drive-by Journalism. This new development is
> > journalist-tracking
> > > by mini-drone. Coming to your neighborhood soon.
> > >
> > > Itwill make it easier for the Rajas to know it you are naughty or
> > nice.
> > >
> > > Anyone got some spare change to buy one?  Maybe we should track
them.
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[doctordumbass]

Skeet shooting!

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill"  wrote:
>
> Share
> 
> Pt ... this is an public forum.
> They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
> You're already in their cross-hairs.
> 
> Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
> always on defence playing their posting game?
> You thinks it's your pretty face?
> 
> Hah! ...
> 
> The Man needs more data for your
> profile.
> 
> Got Drone?
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
> wrote:
> >
> > I received this yesterday.  For several years I've thought it is
> true.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis\
> tleblower-all-americans-under-constant-surveillance
> >
> >
> > 
> >  From: emptybill emptybill@
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:01 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fly-By Journalism
> >
> >
> > Â
> > Forget drive-by Journalism. This new development is
> journalist-tracking
> > by mini-drone. Coming to your neighborhood soon.
> >
> > Itwill make it easier for the Rajas to know it you are naughty or
> nice.
> >
> > Anyone got some spare change to buy one?  Maybe we should track them.
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[emptybill]

Share

Pt ... this is an public forum.
They don't need a warrant to search your posts.
You're already in their cross-hairs.

Why do you think the girl-pack keeps you
always on defence playing their posting game?
You thinks it's your pretty face?

Hah! ...

The Man needs more data for your
profile.

Got Drone?



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
wrote:
>
> I received this yesterday.  For several years I've thought it is
true.
>
>
>
>
http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whis\
tleblower-all-americans-under-constant-surveillance
>
>
> 
>  From: emptybill emptybill@...
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:01 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fly-By Journalism
>
>
> Â
> Forget drive-by Journalism. This new development is
journalist-tracking
> by mini-drone. Coming to your neighborhood soon.
>
> Itwill make it easier for the Rajas to know it you are naughty or
nice.
>
> Anyone got some spare change to buy one?  Maybe we should track them.
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Curiosity: No Surprise in Soil Test

[John]

It appears that NASA wants to hold its share of the news.  So, it periodically 
releases these science tidbits to stay connected with the public.  In the 
meantime, we'll be awaiting what else Curiosity will find.





--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"  wrote:
>
> 
> I don't think they'll be invading us any  time soon:
> 
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/dec/03/mars-rover-detects-complex-substances
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John"  wrote:
> >
> > Xeno,
> > 
> > This will end the speculation for now.  And we'll have wait for the other 
> > findings that the rover most likely will have in the near future.
> > 
> > JR
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" 
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John"  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So far, NASA is not revealing or saying they've found microbes on Mars. 
> > > >  We will be awaiting for the next findings by the rover.
> > > > 
> > > > http://news.yahoo.com/mars-rover-curiosity-no-surprise-1st-soil-test-175738039.html
> > > 
> > > November 29, 2012 from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory:
> > > "Rumors and speculation that there are major new findings from the 
> > > mission at this early stage are incorrect. The news conference will be an 
> > > update about first use of the rover's full array of analytical 
> > > instruments to investigate a drift of sandy soil. One class of substances 
> > > Curiosity is checking for is organic compounds -- carbon-containing 
> > > chemicals that can be ingredients for life. At this point in the mission, 
> > > the instruments on the rover have not detected any definitive evidence of 
> > > Martian organics."
> > > 
> > > And as of today (Dec 3, 2012):
> > > "We have no definitive detection of Martian organics at this point, but 
> > > we will keep looking in the diverse environments of Gale Crater," said 
> > > SAM Principal Investigator Paul Mahaffy of NASA's Goddard Space Flight 
> > > Center in Greenbelt, Md.
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Robots for Mars Colonization

[John]

Share,

Here's Hefner's western chart.
 
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Hefner,_Hugh

In jyotish, he was born with a Virgo ascendant.  His Venus is placed in the 6th 
house, which contributes to his many love affairs and marriages.

The same Venus is the yogakaraka planet in his navamsha chart and placed in the 
first house.  Thus, he is successful in working with the arts or field relating 
with women.  In this particular case, he is well known for publishing magazines 
with naked pictures of women.

JR


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> John it looks like Mars goes into Cap on Dec 17 or 18.  Yay!
> 
> What I don't understand is why a young woman would want to be with a man 
> SIXTY years older than her!  Ok, maybe if it was only 20.  But SIXTY?!  
> 
> Is it possible to post  Hef's chart?  Is it Western or jyotish? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  From: John 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 10:32 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Robots for Mars Colonization
>  
> 
>   
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > John, I was thinking that it will be very cool to see how the exploration 
> > on Mars proceeds when according to jyotish Mars becomes exalted.  
> > Looking forward to that as I'm currently in Mars mahadasa. 
> 
> Share,
> 
> Mars will be exalted in Capricorn later this month.  IMO, there will be more 
> revelations of discoveries of the Curiosity rover on Mars.  Here in San 
> Francisco, CA, NASA will reveal today what they found recently which has been 
> a subject of speculation for the past few weeks.  Stay tuned.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > About Hugh Hefner and intended, it would probably be fairly easy to find 
> > his birth info or even a chart already done, though probably a Western one 
> > rather than a jyotish one.Â
> 
> I already have Hefner's chart.
>   
> > 
> > 
> > Sorry, I wasn't being literal when I said I would love to see their charts 
> > and the compatibility.  I was expressing surprise at a 26 year old woman 
> > being engaged to an 86 year old man.
> > 
> 
> To tell you the truth, many old men like to fantasize of having younger 
> girlfriends or fiancee.  :)
> 
> JR
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  From: John 
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2012 7:18 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Robots for Mars Colonization
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > These robots can colonize Mars and perform work to terraform the planet.  
> > When Mars is habitable, humans can be sent centuries later.
> > 
> > Sending humans there at this time would be too dangerous.
> > 
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_m56irWKeI
> >
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Emily just tell me to butt out

[Emily Reyn]

Thank you Share:  You are not stepping over a line here and I appreciate the 
thought.  I used to journal in free association and should get back to it.  I 
spent time too afraid to put anything in writing for a long while and then of 
course there were the many months I was experiencing brain fog.  (Now, when I 
write, I tend to make lists and only lists.  Ha.)  FFL has helped cured me of 
this, but I often include more personal information here than I personally 
think wise (although I continue to do it).  It's a form of me saying to myself 
that I exist.  So, luckily, most people here ignore it, which I like.  Ann does 
have a way of stating my experiences back to me better than I do myself.  She's 
good like that.  

I don't know anything about Natalie Goldberg, but I will look her up.  



 From: Share Long 
To: "fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:54 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Emily just tell me to butt out
 

  
 if I'm stepping over a line here, and I don't know all the circumstances of 
your life, but I was just thinking about the womens writing group I participate 
in every Monday afternoon.  It was started by one of my best friends who I've 
known since 1980 when I was Director of Housing at MIU and she was Director of 
Housekeeping.  Oh what fun we had!  And yes we've had our ups and downs over 
the 32 years.  She's one of the old friends I saw Breaking Dawn with.


Anyway about 10 or 15 years ago she started organizing writing groups for 
women.  And she charges money for them!  We do free writing as delineated by 
Natalie Goldberg which means one keeps the pen or pencil moving no matter 
what.  Or fingers if one is on a computer.

It is a very incredible process and I think you'd be a natural at leading such 
groups.  I can say more if you want.  

 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fly-By Journalism

[doctordumbass]

Of Course We Are...'legal wiretapping' is so analog. Everything is available 
for sniffing now.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> I received this yesterday.  For several years I've thought it is true.
> 
> 
> 
> http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whistleblower-all-americans-under-constant-surveillance
> 
> 
> 
>  From: emptybill 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:01 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fly-By Journalism
>  
> 
>   
> Forget drive-by Journalism. This new development is journalist-tracking
> by mini-drone. Coming to your neighborhood soon.
> 
> Itwill make it easier for the Rajas to know it you are naughty or nice.
> 
> Anyone got some spare change to buy one?  Maybe we should track them.
>

[FairfieldLife] More Opera 12.04.12

[emptybill]

Two of the best mezzo-sopranos, Elina Garanca and Anna Netrebko, sing
the famous Flower duet (Lakmé Delibes). Doesn't hurt that
they're both as beautiful as the blossoms to which they give song.
No wonder men are so easily spellbound.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vf42IP__ipw


Also,


Dmitri Hvorostovsky and Renee Fleming in a fabulous performance in the
palace at St. Petersburg
(a duet from Verdi's Il Travatore).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GV9rE61kodw&feature=related

Re: [FairfieldLife] having read several recent posts from Emily

[Emily Reyn]

Dear Share:

Thank you for this email and for reading the posts I sent you.  First, the name 
"Sharester" does not bring up negative connotations for me.  I  have been 
playing with names, of late.  I even played with Judy's last night.  
Unfortunately, I miss-spelled it.  I wanted to write "JudyLily" because she 
reminds me of the lily flower.  I love lilies and they have huge range across 
the globe.  I find Judy one of most interesting, intelligent people on this 
forum and I am always surprised by how she replies to posts.  I am never able 
to predict how she will address (and I don't mean style) any particular post.  
I thought her opera posts with Emptybill the other day were sublime.  

Now, where was I.  Oh yes.  The name "Sharester."  While I originally realized 
it reminded me of "shyster," I looked that up and thought to myself "that's not 
a very nice term" so I re-defined in my head as a name addressing the feisty 
side of yourself.  All in  my own head, Share, all in my own head.  I do try to 
keep myself amused.  In January, I must start looking for work full-time, so am 
just taking some liberty during these trying holiday months (for me) to revel 
in the absurdity of my existence and to try and keep my head above water.  If I 
had my druthers and the money (and I've told the kids this), I would simply 
book us on a flight to anywhere that isn't damp and wet and cold and obligatory 
family get-togethers.  I could care less.  They want to maintain the illusion 
of the "close family" but *are*, after this last joyful time at Thanksgiving, 
starting to come around.   Notice here, how I am willing to discuss your 
comment that you
 thought I was being mean.  I wasn't, but if it comes across to you that way, I 
will toss the nickname for you in the trash.  

Now, I note below that the way you have characterized my posts to you is by 
changing the context of what I said and ignoring the main or even side purposes 
of all of what I was trying to get you to communicate with me about.  This is 
your MO, and I will just let it rest for now.  You have keyed in and 
characterized in the negative and are intimating that I was addressing you in 
an abusive and irresponsible form.  This is not inherently true.  

Because I feel like I always take the lead, why don't you respond to your own 
questions first.  I parroted the email that you sent on this back to you, with 
the exception of providing an answer to No. 1, with your responses because I 
couldn't understand what, in the way of any substantive content, was included.  
So, before we get to me, could you do me the favor of answering these questions 
honestly and clearly for me, yourself.  You posted the questions - you must 
have thought about the answers.  

I am spending today away from FFL but if you choose to reply, I will get back 
to you tomorrow.  





 From: Share Long 
To: "fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:16 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] having read several recent posts from Emily
 

  
Emily this is to let you know that I've read several recent posts of yours 
including but not limited to:
from the thread called to Judy to Barry PS:
1 your longer post to me that begins Sharester
2 a reply to feste where you call yourself an armchair psychologist
3 a reply to feste where you begin by saying that you're not mature 
4 a reply to Ann where you say you've crossed the line in the Sharester post
5 a reply to Ann where you say you're going to the coast

from the thread with the word bitch in it
1 a reply to emptybill in which you wish him good day at the end

Emily when you send me several posts in a row and each post has several points, 
there is no way I'm going to be able to reply to everything.  That was part of 
the reason for my writing the post with the 3 questions to you and Judy.  

>From that post I would like to know:
What do you think we can do to communicate WITH each other?  You said we were 
communicating AT each other.
What benefits do you think there would be if we were communicating with each 
other?  You
 mentioned the general benefits of FFL posting but I still don't know what 
those are for you.
Thanks
Share




 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A reminder for the FFL posters: Stressed ? Then meditate !

[Mike Dixon]

I thought he was being facetious... but then, you never know.

 


 From: Bhairitu 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A reminder for the FFL posters: Stressed ? 
Then meditate !
   
   
 
On 12/04/2012 05:55 AM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
> --- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  
> wrote:
>> Nablusoss, I never heard of this person.
> Try this to refresh your memory:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5ouOa9k0gE
>
>Really there should have been a warning about the photo picture.  Like, I 
> know better now than to just open Turq's posts here that have pictures.  It 
> would have been more spiritually appropriate if you would have had a more 
> modest picture of her to publish here. You know, like paste a shawl over her 
> exposed parts next time.
>
> Less is more Buck :-)
>
>

Buck wants to take us back to the Victorian Age and use horses and 
buggies to get people to the dome and back.  Maybe Buck is looking to 
make some money on the latter.

   
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A reminder for the FFL posters: Stressed ? Then meditate !

[Bhairitu]

On 12/04/2012 05:55 AM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
>> Nablusoss, I never heard of this person.
> Try this to refresh your memory:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5ouOa9k0gE
>
>Really there should have been a warning about the photo picture.  Like, I 
> know better now than to just open Turq's posts here that have pictures.  It 
> would have been more spiritually appropriate if you would have had a more 
> modest picture of her to publish here. You know, like paste a shawl over her 
> exposed parts next time.
>
> Less is more Buck :-)
>
>

Buck wants to take us back to the Victorian Age and use horses and 
buggies to get people to the dome and back.  Maybe Buck is looking to 
make some money on the latter.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Fly-By Journalism

[Share Long]

I received this yesterday.  For several years I've thought it is true.



http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/14843-focus-nsa-whistleblower-all-americans-under-constant-surveillance



 From: emptybill 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:01 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fly-By Journalism
 

  
Forget drive-by Journalism. This new development is journalist-tracking
by mini-drone. Coming to your neighborhood soon.

Itwill make it easier for the Rajas to know it you are naughty or nice.

Anyone got some spare change to buy one?  Maybe we should track them.


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to Judy

[Share Long]

Do you think what we are doing now is communicating with or at each other?  And 
if I'm doing the latter, can you show me an example of where I am and how it 
could be changed to being communicating with you?

Should I therefore be considering my navel as my fourth eye?




 From: authfriend 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 10:46 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to 
Judy
 

  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> Judy, what do you mean by actual communication?

I mean the same thing as Emily meant when she said in her
response that you and she weren't communicating *with*
each other but *at* each other.

As to using Windex on your navel, it's a metaphor. You're
likely to stumble if you take steps without being able to
see where you're going.

  Why is my original post not an example of actual communication?  I don't 
think Windex on my navel is the "...next single thing for me to do or know for 
me to be in a state of Divine Grace."  But I could be wrong (-:
> 
> PS  Thanks for replying.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  From: authfriend 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 5:10 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested
> 
> 
>   
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > 1.  Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share
> > and Emily continuing to communicate with each other?
> 
> Well, Share doesn't engage in communication with Emily and
> Judy, so there's no such thing as "continuing to communicate"
> in the first place.
> 
> > 2.  If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it?
> 
> There's no point in speculating about benefits unless Share
> becomes willing to engage in actual communication.
> 
> > 3.  What do you think would be a viable next step to move 
> > closer to those benefits with a minimum of what's not
> > beneficial?
> 
> Again, the first thing that has to happen is for Share to
> be willing to engage in actual communication.
> 
> The post I'm responding to, just for the record, is not an
> example.
> 
> > I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this 
> > evening.  I have not discussed them with anyone.
> > I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3.  
> > 
> > In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters.
> > 
> > My answers:
> > 2.  I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come of it.
> > 3.  This post IS my viable next step!
> > 1.  I'm not sure.  But I'm open to the possibility of yes.
> > 
> > I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-:
> 
> Before you take a next step, use some Windex on your
> navel. How's that?
> 
> > Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring.
> >
>


 

[FairfieldLife] Emily just tell me to butt out

[Share Long]

 if I'm stepping over a line here, and I don't know all the circumstances of 
your life, but I was just thinking about the womens writing group I participate 
in every Monday afternoon.  It was started by one of my best friends who I've 
known since 1980 when I was Director of Housing at MIU and she was Director of 
Housekeeping.  Oh what fun we had!  And yes we've had our ups and downs over 
the 32 years.  She's one of the old friends I saw Breaking Dawn with.


Anyway about 10 or 15 years ago she started organizing writing groups for 
women.  And she charges money for them!  We do free writing as delineated by 
Natalie Goldberg which means one keeps the pen or pencil moving no matter 
what.  Or fingers if one is on a computer.

It is a very incredible process and I think you'd be a natural at leading such 
groups.  I can say more if you want.  

[FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to Judy

[authfriend]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> Judy, what do you mean by actual communication?

I mean the same thing as Emily meant when she said in her
response that you and she weren't communicating *with*
each other but *at* each other.

As to using Windex on your navel, it's a metaphor. You're
likely to stumble if you take steps without being able to
see where you're going.





  Why is my original post not an example of actual communication?  I don't 
think Windex on my navel is the "...next single thing for me to do or know for 
me to be in a state of Divine Grace."  But I could be wrong (-:
> 
> PS  Thanks for replying.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  From: authfriend 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 5:10 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested
>  
> 
>   
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > 1.  Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share
> > and Emily continuing to communicate with each other?
> 
> Well, Share doesn't engage in communication with Emily and
> Judy, so there's no such thing as "continuing to communicate"
> in the first place.
> 
> > 2.  If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it?
> 
> There's no point in speculating about benefits unless Share
> becomes willing to engage in actual communication.
> 
> > 3.  What do you think would be a viable next step to move 
> > closer to those benefits with a minimum of what's not
> > beneficial?
> 
> Again, the first thing that has to happen is for Share to
> be willing to engage in actual communication.
> 
> The post I'm responding to, just for the record, is not an
> example.
> 
> > I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this 
> > evening.  I have not discussed them with anyone.
> > I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3.  
> > 
> > In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters.
> > 
> > My answers:
> > 2.  I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come of it.
> > 3.  This post IS my viable next step!
> > 1.  I'm not sure.  But I'm open to the possibility of yes.
> > 
> > I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-:
> 
> Before you take a next step, use some Windex on your
> navel. How's that?
> 
> > Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring.
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: A physical basis of the ritum level -- fourth state of water

[Duveyoung]

Thanks Card, a righteous citation!

Here's the Bible's:  

Genesis 1

King James Version (KJV)

1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of 
the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "card"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> FWIW,
> 
>   apraketaM sarvaM salilam aa idam. Rgveda X 129, 4 b (Hymn of Creation)
> 
> Macdonell:
> 
>   indistinguishable (apraketam) this (idam) all (sarvam)
>   was (aa; pada-paaTha: aaH) water (salilam)
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Robots for Mars Colonization

[Share Long]

John it looks like Mars goes into Cap on Dec 17 or 18.  Yay!

What I don't understand is why a young woman would want to be with a man SIXTY 
years older than her!  Ok, maybe if it was only 20.  But SIXTY?!  

Is it possible to post  Hef's chart?  Is it Western or jyotish? 




 From: John 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 10:32 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Robots for Mars Colonization
 

  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> John, I was thinking that it will be very cool to see how the exploration on 
> Mars proceeds when according to jyotish Mars becomes exalted.  Looking 
> forward to that as I'm currently in Mars mahadasa. 

Share,

Mars will be exalted in Capricorn later this month.  IMO, there will be more 
revelations of discoveries of the Curiosity rover on Mars.  Here in San 
Francisco, CA, NASA will reveal today what they found recently which has been a 
subject of speculation for the past few weeks.  Stay tuned.

> 
> 
> About Hugh Hefner and intended, it would probably be fairly easy to find his 
> birth info or even a chart already done, though probably a Western one rather 
> than a jyotish one.Â

I already have Hefner's chart.
  
> 
> 
> Sorry, I wasn't being literal when I said I would love to see their charts 
> and the compatibility.  I was expressing surprise at a 26 year old woman 
> being engaged to an 86 year old man.
> 

To tell you the truth, many old men like to fantasize of having younger 
girlfriends or fiancee.  :)

JR

> 
> 
> 
>  From: John 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2012 7:18 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Robots for Mars Colonization
> 
> 
>   
> These robots can colonize Mars and perform work to terraform the planet.  
> When Mars is habitable, humans can be sent centuries later.
> 
> Sending humans there at this time would be too dangerous.
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_m56irWKeI
>


 

[FairfieldLife] having read several recent posts from Emily

[Share Long]

Emily this is to let you know that I've read several recent posts of yours 
including but not limited to:
from the thread called to Judy to Barry PS:
1 your longer post to me that begins Sharester
2 a reply to feste where you call yourself an armchair psychologist
3 a reply to feste where you begin by saying that you're not mature 
4 a reply to Ann where you say you've crossed the line in the Sharester post
5 a reply to Ann where you say you're going to the coast

from the thread with the word bitch in it
1 a reply to emptybill in which you wish him good day at the end

Emily when you send me several posts in a row and each post has several points, 
there is no way I'm going to be able to reply to everything.  That was part of 
the reason for my writing the post with the 3 questions to you and Judy.  

>From that post I would like to know:
What do you think we can do to communicate WITH each other?  You said we were 
communicating AT each other.
What benefits do you think there would be if we were communicating with each 
other?  You mentioned the general benefits of FFL posting but I still don't 
know what those are for you.
Thanks
Share

[FairfieldLife] Re: The End of the World as we Know It

[Buck]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@...  wrote:
>
> Dear Buck, 
> 
> Please note that the grass is NOT greener on the other side of the fence. It 
> just appears that way.
> 
> Sincerely,
> The grass on the other side of the fence
>

We done this to ourselves burning fossil fuels.  Look at the 70 unit coal 
trains per day roaring through Fairfield to points east and coming back again 
empty every day.  That black coal is carbon, beautiful nearly pure carbon.  
Where do you think it goes at that rate of 70 trains full a day?  It is kind of 
elementary science.  There should not even be a debate.  The question now is 
what are we going to do about it?  Plant wheat or soybeans?  Which one is more 
drought resistant and provides more food?  I got 50 acres I need to plant.  It 
is a real question.  Would seeding hay pasture and alfalfa even take in a dry 
hot year like last year again?  The ground subsoil water is not re-charging.  
The People who have driven big cars and lived in mac-mansions and just go off 
and vacation in London and exotic places have done this to us.
-Buck, out standing in his fields.  
 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
> > >
> > > Wow Susan, let us not change the topic.  Curiously, do you think that we 
> > > are just contributors to a planetary cycle already in process or do you 
> > > think we, as humans, are the reason this process is happening?  I am 
> > > posing the simplistic main question I hear when out and about. 
> > >
> > 
> > Great Question.  Shows the utter failure of our public schools to teach 
> > elementary earth sciences that we should doubt what is going on.  The trace 
> > of less than 'One third of one percent' of the air we breath is most all 
> > that protects and regulates our atmosphere and allows us to even live on 
> > this planet.  That we increase that trace now by 50 percent and there would 
> > not be a change in climate?  That is shear ignorance showing.  It is idiocy 
> > to contend that it is not anthropocentric.  You can't take the trace of 
> > less than 'one third of one percent' and double it and not expect that 
> > there will be climate change along the way.  
> > That is the simple answer.
> > -Buck
> >   
> >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  From: Susan 
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 6:29 PM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The End of the World as we Know It
> > >  
> > > 
> > >   
> > > There has been lots of regularly reported info out for at least 8 years 
> > > now.  No one reads it, or has taken it seriously, even though there is 
> > > plenty of scientific data behind it and has been. This is the most 
> > > significant problem of all for humanity and for this planet, but people 
> > > have focused on other s..t all these years. 
> > > 
> > > The only real change in the last decade is that the whole process of 
> > > global warming is happening EVEN FASTER than the direst predictions of a 
> > > decade ago.  The only reason people are now paying attention is that is 
> > > is costing them money or might do so. And by the time that happens, it is 
> > > too late.  Actually, unless science comes up with a way to undo or 
> > > mitigate drastically what has ALREADY happened, it is too late.  Some 
> > > people will probably survive in the end. But it will get mighty ugly 
> > > along the way.If they can find a way to change this scenario, that 
> > > would be the age of enlightenment, really and truly a miracle.  The bulk 
> > > of our resources should go to that - a planetary race, a competition, to 
> > > figure this out.  That is where we are at, whether the public gets this 
> > > or not.  Living off the grid, buying a Prius, recycling, driving less - 
> > > all are nice and helpful but don't make a dent in the catastrophe that is 
> > > going on right now.
> > > 
> > > Let's change the topic - I spent nearly half a year in a real funk about 
> > > this in 2006.  I had to make a decision to not read more about it or 
> > > think too much on it.
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > "..it's as if no-one is listening to the scientific community," said 
> > > > Corinne Le Quere, director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change 
> > > > Research at the University of East Anglia.
> > > > 
> > > > "I am worried that the risks of dangerous climate change are too high 
> > > > on our current emissions trajectory," Prof Le Quere said.
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Recently, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 
> > > > > > > > > reported that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere hit a

[FairfieldLife] Re: The End of the World as we Know It

[doctordumbass]

Dear Buck, 

Please note that the grass is NOT greener on the other side of the fence. It 
just appears that way.

Sincerely,
The grass on the other side of the fence


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
> >
> > Wow Susan, let us not change the topic.  Curiously, do you think that we 
> > are just contributors to a planetary cycle already in process or do you 
> > think we, as humans, are the reason this process is happening?  I am 
> > posing the simplistic main question I hear when out and about. 
> >
> 
> Great Question.  Shows the utter failure of our public schools to teach 
> elementary earth sciences that we should doubt what is going on.  The trace 
> of less than 'One third of one percent' of the air we breath is most all that 
> protects and regulates our atmosphere and allows us to even live on this 
> planet.  That we increase that trace now by 50 percent and there would not be 
> a change in climate?  That is shear ignorance showing.  It is idiocy to 
> contend that it is not anthropocentric.  You can't take the trace of less 
> than 'one third of one percent' and double it and not expect that there will 
> be climate change along the way.  
> That is the simple answer.
> -Buck
>   
>  
> > 
> > 
> >  From: Susan 
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 6:29 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The End of the World as we Know It
> >  
> > 
> >   
> > There has been lots of regularly reported info out for at least 8 years 
> > now.  No one reads it, or has taken it seriously, even though there is 
> > plenty of scientific data behind it and has been. This is the most 
> > significant problem of all for humanity and for this planet, but people 
> > have focused on other s..t all these years. 
> > 
> > The only real change in the last decade is that the whole process of global 
> > warming is happening EVEN FASTER than the direst predictions of a decade 
> > ago.  The only reason people are now paying attention is that is is costing 
> > them money or might do so. And by the time that happens, it is too late.  
> > Actually, unless science comes up with a way to undo or mitigate 
> > drastically what has ALREADY happened, it is too late.  Some people will 
> > probably survive in the end. But it will get mighty ugly along the way.
> > If they can find a way to change this scenario, that would be the age of 
> > enlightenment, really and truly a miracle.  The bulk of our resources 
> > should go to that - a planetary race, a competition, to figure this out.  
> > That is where we are at, whether the public gets this or not.  Living off 
> > the grid, buying a Prius, recycling, driving less - all are nice and 
> > helpful but don't make a dent in the catastrophe that is going on right now.
> > 
> > Let's change the topic - I spent nearly half a year in a real funk about 
> > this in 2006.  I had to make a decision to not read more about it or think 
> > too much on it.
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > "..it's as if no-one is listening to the scientific community," said 
> > > Corinne Le Quere, director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change 
> > > Research at the University of East Anglia.
> > > 
> > > "I am worried that the risks of dangerous climate change are too high on 
> > > our current emissions trajectory," Prof Le Quere said.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Recently, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) reported 
> > > > > > > > that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere hit a new record high 
> > > > > > > > in 2011.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Data show that global CO2 emissions in 2012 hit 35.6bn 
> > > > > > > > > tonnes, a 2.6% increase from 2011 and 58% above 1990 levels.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > In its annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin, the organisation said that 
> > > > > > carbon dioxide levels reached 391 parts per million in 2011.
> > > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > The report estimated that carbon dioxide (CO2) accounted for 85% of the 
> > > > "radiative forcing" that led to global temperature rises.
> > > > 
> > > > Other potent greenhouse gases such as methane also recorded new highs, 
> > > > according to the WMO report.
> > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Non-meditators are the real carbon polluters behind the 
> > > > > > > destruction of the global climate. Well you know a positive 
> > > > > > > scientific case could be made that spiritual people who are 
> > > > > > > regular meditators and especially meditating on the Invincible 
> > > > > > > American course are much less responsible for global climate 
> > > > > > > change than the average non-

[FairfieldLife] Re: A reminder for the FFL posters: Stressed ? Then meditate !

[nablusoss1008]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"  
wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> > >
> > > Nablusoss, I never heard of this person.
> > 
> > Try this to refresh your memory:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5ouOa9k0gE
> > 
> >   Really there should have been a warning about the photo picture.  Like, I 
> > know better now than to just open Turq's posts here that have pictures.  It 
> > would have been more spiritually appropriate if you would have had a more 
> > modest picture of her to publish here. You know, like paste a shawl over 
> > her exposed parts next time.  
> > 
> > Less is more Buck :-)
> >
> 
> Naturally, as spiritually advanced as I am, the pictures of her have no 
> effect at all on my lower chakras, but that's truly a great song.


To me, those lips certainly do something to All the chakras !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5ouOa9k0gE

[FairfieldLife] Re: More Opera

[card]

Yep, but preferably not French, Russian, or (drum roll.),
African! Too stochastic for me! ;-)



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
>
> Whatever...what a great songisn't it great to have rhythm, card?  
> 
> 

[FairfieldLife] Re: to Judy

[awoelflebater]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
>
> Can't resist... :-)

Of course you can't. You don't need to tell us, you could have eliminated this 
sentence.
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 6:55 AM, awoelflebater 
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > I read this post of yours after "piling on" to Barry just 
> > > now but I followed your advice, only before I actually 
> > > read the advice. Just goes to show the synchronicity in 
> > > the Universe, great minds and all that. (There always 
> > > were those special guys who were able to hang with the 
> > > girls in school and fit in perfectly. In fact, my husband 
> > > is one of them. He likes fraternizing with the women more 
> > > than men most of the time.)
> > 
> > Thank you dear Ann - I'm indeed like your husband, I have 
> > always preferred the company of women. I was very introverted, 
> > self-absorbed when young only reverting to extroverted, playful 
> > mood around women - it was fun to playfully tease them and get 
> > teased back. My guy friends would pick on me for hanging with 
> > girls but I would tell them that boys were boring in
> > comparison to girls.
> 
> Dear Ravi, 
> 
> How fortunate for you that you have found such a 
> perfect set of peers to hang with here on FFL.

Yes, I would agree. All of us (that you are thinking of here) are smart, 
interesting, versatile, reasonably wise and never dull.

> After all, it is not every Internet forum on which you can
> find a bunch of "girls" whose emotional maturity 
> stopped at the same level yours did, in high school.

This is true. But it doesn't apply to this situation.
> 
> I fully understand how guys such as yourself would
> feel most comfortable around women most guys would
> consider petty, vindictive uberbitches;

Explain what you mean by "guys such as yourself" with relation to Ravi.  Ravi 
does not, for example, appear to be anything like you Barry. He is neither 
misogynistic, weak minded, or repetitive in the way that is so predictable and, 
frankly, uninteresting. That is a good start to 'qualify' to hang out with me.

>that is, after all, one of the reasons the universe in its
> infinite wisdom evolved the concept of "fag hag." 

Interesting theory of how the universe works and/or how smart that universe is 
and in what way that 'infinite wisdom' manifests itself.
> 
> If you ever feel that you've evolved enough to hang
> with actual adult women who have things to say other
> than sniping at other women, might I suggest that you 
> converse occasionally with Susan, Sal, Ruth,

Oh dear, oh dear. I think Ravi probably has conversed with all of these people 
already Barry. Just because you get along with certain members of this little 
place we call FFL doesn't mean they are innately more mature, it just means 
they don't give you a hard time.

> or others who aren't emotionally and intellectually stuck in the 
> halcyon days of their teens. 

I'm not sure anyone on this planet had 'halcyon days' as a teen.

>They won't stroke you and 
> pretend that you're actually a real guy like the fag 
> hags do, but you might learn something new, and that 
> would be a change for you.

So let's see, you are demeaning gays and women at the same time. Can we call 
you a redneck, small minded or bigoted? Maybe just Dr Barry, closet shrink and 
psychological hit man prescribing what is best for others.

This was fun as an exercise, thank you for the opportunity to rebut you. Next 
time, try to make some points that are a bit more challenging though, okay?
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: to Judy

[doctordumbass]

What's with your fear of uber-bitches, bitch?

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
>
> Can't resist... :-)
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 6:55 AM, awoelflebater 
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > I read this post of yours after "piling on" to Barry just 
> > > now but I followed your advice, only before I actually 
> > > read the advice. Just goes to show the synchronicity in 
> > > the Universe, great minds and all that. (There always 
> > > were those special guys who were able to hang with the 
> > > girls in school and fit in perfectly. In fact, my husband 
> > > is one of them. He likes fraternizing with the women more 
> > > than men most of the time.)
> > 
> > Thank you dear Ann - I'm indeed like your husband, I have 
> > always preferred the company of women. I was very introverted, 
> > self-absorbed when young only reverting to extroverted, playful 
> > mood around women - it was fun to playfully tease them and get 
> > teased back. My guy friends would pick on me for hanging with 
> > girls but I would tell them that boys were boring in
> > comparison to girls.
> 
> Dear Ravi, 
> 
> How fortunate for you that you have found such a 
> perfect set of peers to hang with here on FFL. After
> all, it is not every Internet forum on which you can
> find a bunch of "girls" whose emotional maturity 
> stopped at the same level yours did, in high school.
> 
> I fully understand how guys such as yourself would
> feel most comfortable around women most guys would
> consider petty, vindictive uberbitches; that is, 
> after all, one of the reasons the universe in its
> infinite wisdom evolved the concept of "fag hag." 
> 
> If you ever feel that you've evolved enough to hang
> with actual adult women who have things to say other
> than sniping at other women, might I suggest that you 
> converse occasionally with Susan, Sal, Ruth, or others
> who aren't emotionally and intellectually stuck in the 
> halcyon days of their teens. They won't stroke you and 
> pretend that you're actually a real guy like the fag 
> hags do, but you might learn something new, and that 
> would be a change for you.
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: A reminder for the FFL posters: Stressed ? Then meditate !

[Alex Stanley]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> >
> > Nablusoss, I never heard of this person.
> 
> Try this to refresh your memory:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5ouOa9k0gE
> 
>   Really there should have been a warning about the photo picture.  Like, I 
> know better now than to just open Turq's posts here that have pictures.  It 
> would have been more spiritually appropriate if you would have had a more 
> modest picture of her to publish here. You know, like paste a shawl over her 
> exposed parts next time.  
> 
> Less is more Buck :-)
>

Naturally, as spiritually advanced as I am, the pictures of her have no effect 
at all on my lower chakras, but that's truly a great song.

[FairfieldLife] Re: a practical mystic

[doctordumbass]

LOL!

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"  wrote:
>
> I remember hearing bj on a visit to Fairfield some 20 or so years ago, when 
> she informed us all that there was a spaceship stationed over Ottumwa at that 
> very moment. I think she had noticed it on her way in. It was of course news 
> to a lot of people there, as you can imagine, but I kind of accepted it 
> because, hell, Ottumwa needs all the help it can get. 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@  wrote:
> >
> > A perfect example of someone exploiting their immature talents, for money, 
> > fame and attention - very much OJT (On the Job Training) - lol. When this 
> > happens, the person's gifts may be valid, though with these bizarre 
> > statements as you have quoted from 'bj king' (what a name...), it is clear 
> > that this person needs to integrate themselves more before truly providing 
> > service, unless they enjoy intentionally hiding behind this esoteric 
> > mumbo-jumbo.
> >  
> > Some are smart enough to accept an explanation of even uncommon events, if 
> > the purpose is to communicate, vs. simply attempt to impress. Unfortunately 
> > for most, we as a human race have managed to divorce ourselves en mass from 
> > our core, leaving us so vulnerable to anyone who appears to have the merest 
> > insights into the ordinarily unseen world.
> > 
> > Not a "bad" thing, overall, but caveat emptor applies, always; sole 
> > responsibility.   
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater  wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > from bj King:  what is the next single thing for me to do or know for 
> > > > me to be in a state of Divine Grace?
> > > > On Saturday night, bj distributed this on plastic encased slips of 
> > > > paper and I've now got it in front of my computer.
> > > > Thank you, bj
> > > 
> > > Just to clarify, bj is someone who believes in and does the following:
> > > 
> > > "The readings or accomplished by bj communicating with her soul and her 
> > > soul having a conference call with the soul of the client." (via cell 
> > > phone if necessary).
> > > 
> > > "At the talk the group that attends will participate with the Hierarchy 
> > > and Federation to anchor a City of Light over Iowa."
> > > 
> > > "In certain cases where the client is bringing spiritual secrets from 
> > > other lifetimes it is important to activate the information stored in 
> > > their knees."
> > > 
> > > Holy God in Heaven, need I say more?
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: A reminder for the FFL posters: Stressed ? Then meditate !

[nablusoss1008]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
>
> Nablusoss, I never heard of this person.

Try this to refresh your memory:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5ouOa9k0gE

  Really there should have been a warning about the photo picture.  Like, I 
know better now than to just open Turq's posts here that have pictures.  It 
would have been more spiritually appropriate if you would have had a more 
modest picture of her to publish here. You know, like paste a shawl over her 
exposed parts next time.  

Less is more Buck :-)

[FairfieldLife] Re: The End of the World as we Know It

[emptybill]

Buck

Your ideology is destined for the "New Millennium" just like all those
19th Century utopians.


  [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b7/DramaQueen.jpg]

Go fly to Bejing and tell the Communistas they've got to stop. I'm sure
they will greet you with flowers.
  [http://blog.iaee.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Coal-Emissions.jpg]



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The BBC:
> > > > "We need a radical plan."
> > > >
> > >
> > > Direct action.  I am surprized that the sustainable living
movement has not taken more vigorous social action on this.  Like, back
in the Vietnam War days we closed interstates and threw bricks through
General Motors auto showrooms and smashed the glass out of entire lots
of new cars to end the war and bring our brothers home.
> > >
> >
> > Yep, the old way was tilting at windmills but I'd be in favor of a
sabre charge at railway workers and their locomotives now who haul the
coal to the coal-fired utility electric generators.  They are the
problem along with non-meditation and non-meditators.
> >
>
> Just ending the train horns blown as the trains pass through Fairfield
sounds positively effeminate compared to sitting down in front of trains
or derailing them to stop the endless flow of coal through town that
powers our destruction.  Yep, coal-train railway workers and locomotives
are all our enemy now.
>
>
https://www.google.com/search?q=gas+powered+chop+saw&hl=en&tbo=u&biw=136\
6&bih=635&source=univ&tbm=shop&sa=X&ei=YFy9UO2lIKfi2gXCr4Bw&sqi=2&ved=0C\
E4Qsxg
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "..it's as if no-one is listening to the scientific
community," said Corinne Le Quere, director of the Tyndall Centre for
Climate Change Research at the University of East Anglia.
> > > > >
> > > > > "I am worried that the risks of dangerous climate change are
too high on our current emissions trajectory," Prof Le Quere said.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Recently, the World Meteorological Organization
(WMO) reported that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere hit a new record
high in 2011.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Data show that global CO2 emissions in 2012 hit
35.6bn tonnes, a 2.6% increase from 2011 and 58% above 1990 levels.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In its annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin, the organisation
said that carbon dioxide levels reached 391 parts per million in 2011.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The report estimated that carbon dioxide (CO2) accounted for
85% of the "radiative forcing" that led to global temperature rises.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Other potent greenhouse gases such as methane also recorded
new highs, according to the WMO report.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Non-meditators are the real carbon polluters behind
the destruction of the global climate. Well you know a positive
scientific case could be made that spiritual people who are regular
meditators and especially meditating on the Invincible American course
are much less responsible for global climate change than the average
non-meditating American or any other first world or developing nation
peoples.  Simply on a materialistic level of gross consumption, that
anyone who is on the full schedule of meditation in the Domes
contributing to world peace otherwise in fact creates much less carbon
damage to the atmosphere and global climate than the average CO2
emitting consuming American.  At a minimum, people on the Invincible
America course simply do not have the time to consume materially like
non-meditaters do.
> > > > > > > > > -Buck
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Once again it is evident that the problem with society is,
'non-meditation'.  Even just stopping and taking a quiet time meditation
twice a day would be good for the global climate.  In prudent public
policy taking quiet time meditation breaks at least twice a day should
probably be required for everyone's well-being and safety.
> > > > > > > -Buck
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Cheer up...

[Alex Stanley]

There are people having a worse day than you:

http://www.buzzfeed.com/daves4/people-who-are-having-a-worse-day-than-you

[FairfieldLife] Re: Seven Line Prayer to Guru Rinpoche

[emptybill]

Sorry Yifu

Without receiving an anointment (abhisheka) or having real faith, this
stuff doesn't connect ... doesn't work.
On this forum it's a wasted post.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Yifu"  wrote:

>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaHHp6Wk4G4
>

[FairfieldLife] Fly-By Journalism

[emptybill]

Forget drive-by Journalism. This new development is journalist-tracking
by mini-drone. Coming to your neighborhood soon.

Itwill make it easier for the Rajas to know it you are naughty or nice.

Anyone got some spare change to buy one?  Maybe we should track them.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to Judy

[Share Long]

Judy, what do you mean by actual communication?  Why is my original post not an 
example of actual communication?  I don't think Windex on my navel is the 
"...next single thing for me to do or know for me to be in a state of Divine 
Grace."  But I could be wrong (-:

PS  Thanks for replying.




 From: authfriend 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 5:10 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested
 

  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> 1.  Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share
> and Emily continuing to communicate with each other?

Well, Share doesn't engage in communication with Emily and
Judy, so there's no such thing as "continuing to communicate"
in the first place.

> 2.  If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it?

There's no point in speculating about benefits unless Share
becomes willing to engage in actual communication.

> 3.  What do you think would be a viable next step to move 
> closer to those benefits with a minimum of what's not
> beneficial?

Again, the first thing that has to happen is for Share to
be willing to engage in actual communication.

The post I'm responding to, just for the record, is not an
example.

> I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this evening.  
> I have not discussed them with anyone.
> I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3.  
> 
> In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters.
> 
> My answers:
> 2.  I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come of it.
> 3.  This post IS my viable next step!
> 1.  I'm not sure.  But I'm open to the possibility of yes.
> 
> I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-:

Before you take a next step, use some Windex on your
navel. How's that?

> Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring.
>


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: A reminder for the FFL posters: Stressed ? Then meditate !

[Buck]

Nablusoss, I never heard of this person.  Really there should have been a 
warning about the photo picture.  Like, I know better now than to just open 
Turq's posts here that have pictures.  It would have been more spiritually 
appropriate if you would have had a more modest picture of her to publish here. 
You know, like paste a shawl over her exposed parts next time.  Like think of 
the men on the Invincible America program, the pandits up in their compound by 
Vedic City, and the Maharishi school children who lurk here.  We should strive 
to protect them as best we can, 
-Buck in the Dome

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008  wrote:
>
>  Stressed? Then meditate  [Stressed? Then meditate]   IT ROCKS: Sheryl
> Crow says TM works for her. Picture AFP 19 171 [print] 
>   Print
>   
> [divider]   [mail]  Mail  [divider]   [Bookmarkl and Share] Share
>    [divider]
> [share]  Rate this Article
> 
> Rate This Story close   [http://www.thenewage.co.za/images/SL1.gif]
> [http://www.thenewage.co.za/images/SL2.gif]  
> [http://www.thenewage.co.za/images/SL2.gif]  
> [http://www.thenewage.co.za/images/SL2.gif]  
> [http://www.thenewage.co.za/images/SL2.gif]|
> Clayton Swanepoel
> 
> A GOOD friend of mine first brought Transcendental Meditation (TM) to my
> attention early last year. Having learnt that the modern wave of use of
> the technique started in the 1950s, I did feel like I'd been living
> under a rock for the better part of my 27 years on earth.
> 
> TM is a meditation technique that has its roots in India some 5000 years
> ago.
> 
> Transcendental Meditation – South Africa describes the technique as
> "the most simple, natural and effective of all meditation
> techniques.
> 
> "It dissolves stress and tension, improves health and energy, and
> increases the conscious capacity of the mind, leading to increased
> creativity, intelligence, and learning ability."
> 
> A massive promise for what you'll find is a truly simple technique.
> 
> Thanks to my spiritual mother, I've always had an interest in
> meditation and have tried to get into a meditation routines over the
> years. None of my attempts lasted very long and even guided meditation
> often delivered less than favourable results because it required serious
> focus.
> 
> TM was from the onset completely different. First of all, you actually
> do a course to learn the technique. There are no tapes or books with
> pictures telling you what to do, or advice from people with similar or
> less knowledge than you. Plus, about six million people across the
> globe, including 6 in South Africa, who practice TM can't all be
> wrong.
> 
> It's a proper course with actual teachers. I must admit that,
> despite my openness and willingness to learn, I was a little sceptical
> at first. I mean, how could something as simple as they claim it is be
> so transformative?
> 
> I went along for the ride anyway and from my very first meditation was
> blown away at how TM made me feel.
> 
> The technique is even simpler than you may expect. Described as
> effortless and natural, it really is as simple as thinking a thought.
> 
> TM involves repeating a mantra in your mind and has a miraculous way of
> aiding relaxation and helping still the mind. Each meditation consists
> of a 20-minute meditation, followed by three minutes of relaxation and a
> slow emergence from your inner psyche.
> 
> In order to obtain the maximum benefits of TM it is recommended that you
> practice the meditation twice a day; first thing in the morning and
> sometime in the afternoon.
> 
> For the busy people out there in the rat race, 40 minutes of your day
> seems like a long time to sacrifice. But once you start feeling the
> benefits and appreciating the higher states of consciousness the
> technique gives you access to, it seems an insignificant amount of time
> really.
> 
> The benefits of the technique are well researched and as your meditation
> progresses it can be felt more and more.
> 
> Regular TM practice could be just what you need to achieve your maximum
> potential.
> 
> The most important thing that TM provides is much needed rest and
> relaxation on a physical and mental level.
> 
> This rest and relaxation is, in turn, responsible for a host of benefits
> including, among others, stress reduction, reduced blood pressure, peace
> of mind, calmness, better sleep and reduced insomnia, lowered
> cholesterol, better concentration, reduced depression and improved
> creativity.
> 
> Many people are concerned that this is some sort of cult or religion. TM
> isn't either. TM is simply a technique that will help ensure that
> you operate at your optimal in every aspect of your life. This includes
> religio

[FairfieldLife] Re: Everlasting love?

[Buck]

Fintle,
Regulating 'Hedonic adaptation' is another good explanation and reason for for 
a public's interest in licensing marriage to qualifying applicants.
-Buck  

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"  wrote:
>
> Or, did love evolve as a way of blinding you to what someone is really
> like long enough to have kids?
> New Love: A Short Shelf Life [0]
> By SONJA LYUBOMIRSKYPublished: December 1, 2012
> IN fairy tales, marriages last happily ever after. Science, however,
> tells us that wedded bliss has but a limited shelf life.
> American and European researchers tracked 1,761 people who got married
> and stayed married over the course of 15 years. The findings were clear:
> newlyweds enjoy a big happiness boost that lasts, on average, for just
> two years. Then the special joy wears off and they are back where they
> started, at least in terms of happiness. The findings, from a 2003
> study, have been confirmed by several recent studies.
> 
> The good news for the holiday season when families gather in various
> configurations is that if couples get past that two-year slump and hang
> on — for another couple of decades — they may well recover the
> excitement of the honeymoon period 18 to 20 years later, when children
> are gone. Then, in the freedom of the so-called empty nest, partners are
> left to discover one another — and often their early bliss —
> once again.
> 
> When love is new, we have the rare capacity to experience great
> happiness while being stuck in traffic or getting our teeth cleaned. We
> are in the throes of what researchers call passionate love, a state of
> intense longing, desire and attraction. In time, this love generally
> morphs into companionate love, a less impassioned blend of deep
> affection and connection. The reason is that human beings are, as more
> than a hundred studies show, prone to hedonic adaptation, a measurable
> and innate capacity to become habituated or inured to most life changes.
> 
> With all due respect to poets and pop radio songwriters, new love seems
> nearly as vulnerable to hedonic adaptation as a new job, a new home, a
> new coat and other novel sources of pleasure and well-being. (Though the
> thrill of a new material acquisition generally fades faster.)
> 
> Hedonic adaptation is most likely when positive experiences are
> involved. It's cruel but true: We're inclined —
> psychologically and physiologically — to take positive experiences
> for granted. We move into a beautiful loft. Marry a wonderful partner.
> Earn our way to the top of our profession. How thrilling! For a time.
> Then, as if propelled by autonomic forces, our expectations change,
> multiply or expand and, as they do, we begin to take the new, improved
> circumstances for granted.
> 
> Sexual passion and arousal are particularly prone to hedonic adaptation.
> Laboratory studies in places as far-flung as Melbourne, Australia, and
> Stony Brook, N.Y., are persuasive: both men and women are less aroused
> after they have repeatedly viewed the same erotic pictures or engaged in
> similar sexual fantasies. Familiarity may or may not breed contempt; but
> research suggests that it breeds indifference. Or, as Raymond Chandler
> wrote: "The first kiss is magic. The second is intimate. The third
> is routine."
> 
> There are evolutionary, physiological and practical reasons passionate
> love is unlikely to endure for long. If we obsessed, endlessly, about
> our partners and had sex with them multiple times a day — every day
> — we would not be very productive at work or attentive to our
> children, our friends or our health. (To quote a line from the 2004 film
> "Before Sunset," about two former lovers who chance to meet
> again after a decade, if passion did not fade, "we would end up
> doing nothing at all with our lives." ) Indeed, the condition of
> being in love has a lot in common with the state of addiction and
> narcissism; if unabated, it will eventually exact a toll.
> 
> WHY, then, is the natural shift from passionate to companionate love
> often such a letdown? Because, although we may not realize it, we are
> biologically hard-wired to crave variety. Variety and novelty affect the
> brain in much the same way that drugs do — that is, they trigger
> activity that involves the neurotransmitter dopamine, as do
> pharmacological highs.
> 
> Evolutionary biologists believe that sexual variety is adaptive, and
> that it evolved to prevent incest and inbreeding in ancestral
> environments. The idea is that when our spouse becomes as familiar to us
> as a sibling — when we've become family — we cease to be
> sexually attracted to each other.
> There's more:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/02/opinion/sunday/new-love-a-short-shelf-\
> life.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&
>

[FairfieldLife] A reminder for the FFL posters: Stressed ? Then meditate !

[nablusoss1008]

 Stressed? Then meditate  [Stressed? Then meditate]   IT ROCKS: Sheryl
Crow says TM works for her. Picture AFP 19 171 [print] 
  Print
  
[divider]   [mail]  Mail  [divider]   [Bookmarkl and Share] Share
   [divider]
[share]  Rate this Article

Rate This Story close   [http://www.thenewage.co.za/images/SL1.gif]
[http://www.thenewage.co.za/images/SL2.gif]  
[http://www.thenewage.co.za/images/SL2.gif]  
[http://www.thenewage.co.za/images/SL2.gif]  
[http://www.thenewage.co.za/images/SL2.gif]|
Clayton Swanepoel

A GOOD friend of mine first brought Transcendental Meditation (TM) to my
attention early last year. Having learnt that the modern wave of use of
the technique started in the 1950s, I did feel like I'd been living
under a rock for the better part of my 27 years on earth.

TM is a meditation technique that has its roots in India some 5000 years
ago.

Transcendental Meditation – South Africa describes the technique as
"the most simple, natural and effective of all meditation
techniques.

"It dissolves stress and tension, improves health and energy, and
increases the conscious capacity of the mind, leading to increased
creativity, intelligence, and learning ability."

A massive promise for what you'll find is a truly simple technique.

Thanks to my spiritual mother, I've always had an interest in
meditation and have tried to get into a meditation routines over the
years. None of my attempts lasted very long and even guided meditation
often delivered less than favourable results because it required serious
focus.

TM was from the onset completely different. First of all, you actually
do a course to learn the technique. There are no tapes or books with
pictures telling you what to do, or advice from people with similar or
less knowledge than you. Plus, about six million people across the
globe, including 6 in South Africa, who practice TM can't all be
wrong.

It's a proper course with actual teachers. I must admit that,
despite my openness and willingness to learn, I was a little sceptical
at first. I mean, how could something as simple as they claim it is be
so transformative?

I went along for the ride anyway and from my very first meditation was
blown away at how TM made me feel.

The technique is even simpler than you may expect. Described as
effortless and natural, it really is as simple as thinking a thought.

TM involves repeating a mantra in your mind and has a miraculous way of
aiding relaxation and helping still the mind. Each meditation consists
of a 20-minute meditation, followed by three minutes of relaxation and a
slow emergence from your inner psyche.

In order to obtain the maximum benefits of TM it is recommended that you
practice the meditation twice a day; first thing in the morning and
sometime in the afternoon.

For the busy people out there in the rat race, 40 minutes of your day
seems like a long time to sacrifice. But once you start feeling the
benefits and appreciating the higher states of consciousness the
technique gives you access to, it seems an insignificant amount of time
really.

The benefits of the technique are well researched and as your meditation
progresses it can be felt more and more.

Regular TM practice could be just what you need to achieve your maximum
potential.

The most important thing that TM provides is much needed rest and
relaxation on a physical and mental level.

This rest and relaxation is, in turn, responsible for a host of benefits
including, among others, stress reduction, reduced blood pressure, peace
of mind, calmness, better sleep and reduced insomnia, lowered
cholesterol, better concentration, reduced depression and improved
creativity.

Many people are concerned that this is some sort of cult or religion. TM
isn't either. TM is simply a technique that will help ensure that
you operate at your optimal in every aspect of your life. This includes
religion, and most people report that their faith is restored and
improved once they begin to practice TM.

Personally, the one overwhelming benefit I found from TM is the mental
clarity and creativity.

Some of my best ideas at work have come directly from a meditation. I
feel more confident, creative and empowered as a result of TM.

What I love about the technique is that it will be with me for life. If
for any reason my TM becomes irregular or I stop completely, I can
always find a quiet moment and start again.

Of all the spiritual courses I've been on, this one has provided the
quickest route to calmness and the most heightened states of awareness
and bliss.

clayt...@thenewage.co.za

Twitter @clayton_js

• Visit Transcendental Meditation – South Africa at tm.org.za or
give Vicki Broome a call on 011 483 0684.

[FairfieldLife] Re: The End of the World as we Know It

[Buck]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
>
> Wow Susan, let us not change the topic.  Curiously, do you think that we are 
> just contributors to a planetary cycle already in process or do you think we, 
> as humans, are the reason this process is happening?  I am posing the 
> simplistic main question I hear when out and about. 
>

Great Question.  Shows the utter failure of our public schools to teach 
elementary earth sciences that we should doubt what is going on.  The trace of 
less than 'One third of one percent' of the air we breath is most all that 
protects and regulates our atmosphere and allows us to even live on this 
planet.  That we increase that trace now by 50 percent and there would not be a 
change in climate?  That is shear ignorance showing.  It is idiocy to contend 
that it is not anthropocentric.  You can't take the trace of less than 'one 
third of one percent' and double it and not expect that there will be climate 
change along the way.  
That is the simple answer.
-Buck
  
 
> 
> 
>  From: Susan 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 6:29 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The End of the World as we Know It
>  
> 
>   
> There has been lots of regularly reported info out for at least 8 years now.  
> No one reads it, or has taken it seriously, even though there is plenty of 
> scientific data behind it and has been. This is the most significant problem 
> of all for humanity and for this planet, but people have focused on other 
> s..t all these years. 
> 
> The only real change in the last decade is that the whole process of global 
> warming is happening EVEN FASTER than the direst predictions of a decade ago. 
>  The only reason people are now paying attention is that is is costing them 
> money or might do so. And by the time that happens, it is too late.  
> Actually, unless science comes up with a way to undo or mitigate drastically 
> what has ALREADY happened, it is too late.  Some people will probably survive 
> in the end. But it will get mighty ugly along the way.If they can find a 
> way to change this scenario, that would be the age of enlightenment, really 
> and truly a miracle.  The bulk of our resources should go to that - a 
> planetary race, a competition, to figure this out.  That is where we are at, 
> whether the public gets this or not.  Living off the grid, buying a Prius, 
> recycling, driving less - all are nice and helpful but don't make a dent in 
> the catastrophe that is going on right now.
> 
> Let's change the topic - I spent nearly half a year in a real funk about this 
> in 2006.  I had to make a decision to not read more about it or think too 
> much on it.
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > "..it's as if no-one is listening to the scientific community," said 
> > Corinne Le Quere, director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change 
> > Research at the University of East Anglia.
> > 
> > "I am worried that the risks of dangerous climate change are too high on 
> > our current emissions trajectory," Prof Le Quere said.
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Recently, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) reported 
> > > > > > > that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere hit a new record high in 
> > > > > > > 2011.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Data show that global CO2 emissions in 2012 hit 35.6bn tonnes, 
> > > > > > > > a 2.6% increase from 2011 and 58% above 1990 levels.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > In its annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin, the organisation said that 
> > > > > carbon dioxide levels reached 391 parts per million in 2011.
> > > > >
> > > 
> > > The report estimated that carbon dioxide (CO2) accounted for 85% of the 
> > > "radiative forcing" that led to global temperature rises.
> > > 
> > > Other potent greenhouse gases such as methane also recorded new highs, 
> > > according to the WMO report.
> > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Non-meditators are the real carbon polluters behind the destruction 
> > > > > > of the global climate. Well you know a positive scientific case 
> > > > > > could be made that spiritual people who are regular meditators and 
> > > > > > especially meditating on the Invincible American course are much 
> > > > > > less responsible for global climate change than the average 
> > > > > > non-meditating American or any other first world or developing 
> > > > > > nation peoples.  Simply on a materialistic level of gross 
> > > > > > consumption, that anyone who is on the full schedule of meditation 
> > > > > > in the Domes contributing to world peace otherwise in fact creates 
> > > > > > much less carbon damage to the atmosphere and global climate than 
> > > > > > the average CO2 emitting consuming American.  At

[FairfieldLife] Re: India: Where Hitler is a hero and Gandhi is a coward and traitor

[sparaig]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> I know from someone who was in the room in Europe when the TV was on for the 
> Watergate hearings.  Maharishi reportedly said that that was no way to treat 
> the man who prevented WW III.  When asked why he said that about Nixon 
> Maharishi explained that Nixon prevented WW III by establishing ties with 
> China again.  
> 
>

There's a saying on Vulcan: Only Nixon can go to China.




l

[FairfieldLife] Everlasting love?

[salyavin808]

Or, did love evolve as a way of blinding you to what someone is really
like long enough to have kids?
New Love: A Short Shelf Life [0]
By SONJA LYUBOMIRSKYPublished: December 1, 2012
IN fairy tales, marriages last happily ever after. Science, however,
tells us that wedded bliss has but a limited shelf life.
American and European researchers tracked 1,761 people who got married
and stayed married over the course of 15 years. The findings were clear:
newlyweds enjoy a big happiness boost that lasts, on average, for just
two years. Then the special joy wears off and they are back where they
started, at least in terms of happiness. The findings, from a 2003
study, have been confirmed by several recent studies.

The good news for the holiday season when families gather in various
configurations is that if couples get past that two-year slump and hang
on — for another couple of decades — they may well recover the
excitement of the honeymoon period 18 to 20 years later, when children
are gone. Then, in the freedom of the so-called empty nest, partners are
left to discover one another — and often their early bliss —
once again.

When love is new, we have the rare capacity to experience great
happiness while being stuck in traffic or getting our teeth cleaned. We
are in the throes of what researchers call passionate love, a state of
intense longing, desire and attraction. In time, this love generally
morphs into companionate love, a less impassioned blend of deep
affection and connection. The reason is that human beings are, as more
than a hundred studies show, prone to hedonic adaptation, a measurable
and innate capacity to become habituated or inured to most life changes.

With all due respect to poets and pop radio songwriters, new love seems
nearly as vulnerable to hedonic adaptation as a new job, a new home, a
new coat and other novel sources of pleasure and well-being. (Though the
thrill of a new material acquisition generally fades faster.)

Hedonic adaptation is most likely when positive experiences are
involved. It's cruel but true: We're inclined —
psychologically and physiologically — to take positive experiences
for granted. We move into a beautiful loft. Marry a wonderful partner.
Earn our way to the top of our profession. How thrilling! For a time.
Then, as if propelled by autonomic forces, our expectations change,
multiply or expand and, as they do, we begin to take the new, improved
circumstances for granted.

Sexual passion and arousal are particularly prone to hedonic adaptation.
Laboratory studies in places as far-flung as Melbourne, Australia, and
Stony Brook, N.Y., are persuasive: both men and women are less aroused
after they have repeatedly viewed the same erotic pictures or engaged in
similar sexual fantasies. Familiarity may or may not breed contempt; but
research suggests that it breeds indifference. Or, as Raymond Chandler
wrote: "The first kiss is magic. The second is intimate. The third
is routine."

There are evolutionary, physiological and practical reasons passionate
love is unlikely to endure for long. If we obsessed, endlessly, about
our partners and had sex with them multiple times a day — every day
— we would not be very productive at work or attentive to our
children, our friends or our health. (To quote a line from the 2004 film
"Before Sunset," about two former lovers who chance to meet
again after a decade, if passion did not fade, "we would end up
doing nothing at all with our lives." ) Indeed, the condition of
being in love has a lot in common with the state of addiction and
narcissism; if unabated, it will eventually exact a toll.

WHY, then, is the natural shift from passionate to companionate love
often such a letdown? Because, although we may not realize it, we are
biologically hard-wired to crave variety. Variety and novelty affect the
brain in much the same way that drugs do — that is, they trigger
activity that involves the neurotransmitter dopamine, as do
pharmacological highs.

Evolutionary biologists believe that sexual variety is adaptive, and
that it evolved to prevent incest and inbreeding in ancestral
environments. The idea is that when our spouse becomes as familiar to us
as a sibling — when we've become family — we cease to be
sexually attracted to each other.
There's more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/02/opinion/sunday/new-love-a-short-shelf-\
life.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&