Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-13 Thread Peter

--- lurkernomore20002000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 george_deforest 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  a soul real close to enlightenment will probably
  come back to the earth plane right away,
  and now he gets to finish the job with a brand new
 body.
 
 Nice to know it works like clockwork iyo.  I mean
 he's probably like a 
 nice piece of wood.  Just needs to come back for
 some 400 grit sanding 
 and a coat of varnish.  Should be able to get it
 done by the time he's 
 a teenager.
 
 lurk

Unfathomable is the course of karma. 





 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



 

Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
Browse Top Cars by Green Rating at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-13 Thread Lsoma
 
In a message dated 2/12/2007 9:06:59 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 
 
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com) 
,  George_deforest 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 a  soul real close to enlightenment will probably
 come back to the earth  plane right away,
 and now he gets to finish the job with a brand new  body.

Nice to know it works like clockwork iyo. I mean he's probably  like a 
nice piece of wood. Just needs to come back for some 400 grit  sanding 
and a coat of varnish. Should be able to get it done by the time  he's 
a teenager.

lurk

How can you be so sure he will be  back? Maybe he has evolved to the point 
that his health issue needed to  release him from this planet. There are many 
in 
Fairfield-Hundreds who will  not be coming back as they have already outgrown 
this planet and  are volunteering. That means if they came from the fifth or 
sixth  dimension they will go back to the level that they came from. It is a  
saved space for them. I did not know Curtis but I have a feeling he will  not 
be back and is with his spiritual family and is very happy. God bless  him for 
all of his wonderful work here. I'm sure he was a very special  soul. Lou.

 


 


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-13 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Feb 13, 2007, at 7:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In a message dated 2/12/2007 9:06:59 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, George_deforest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 a soul real close to enlightenment will probably
 come back to the earth plane right away,
 and now he gets to finish the job with a brand new body.


Lou, congratulations, you finally figured out how to quote.

Now I know the ME effect is real.  Hallelujah.

Sal


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-13 Thread Lsoma
 
In a message dated 2/13/2007 9:39:17 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

On Feb  13, 2007, at 7:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In a message dated  2/12/2007 9:06:59 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 --- In  FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, George_deforest
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  a soul real close to  enlightenment will probably
  come back to the earth plane right  away,
  and now he gets to finish the job with a brand new  body.

Lou, congratulations, you finally figured out how to  quote.

Now I know the ME effect is real.   Hallelujah.

Sal





Thank you Sal. IT feels so good to have figured it out. Where you the one  
who sent me the instructions?
If not I want to thank whoever did. Lou


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-13 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Feb 13, 2007, at 8:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Thank you Sal. IT feels so good to have figured it out. Where you the 
one who sent me the instructions?

If not I want to thank whoever did. Lou


No it wasn't me, but I'm glad you finally got it figured out.  Makes 
your messages much easier to follow.


Sal


[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dr Robert Svoboda has commented that there is an increased danger of
 cancer of those close to Enlightenment because as the individual
 identifies less tightly with his own ahamkar the individual cells of
 his body can have an less close indentification with each other.  
 

And Dr. Robert Svoboda is enlightened?

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
  Bill Crist died today from brain cancer. He was on Purusha for decades.
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread Vaj


On Feb 12, 2007, at 1:27 AM, shukra69 wrote:


Dr Robert Svoboda has commented that there is an increased danger of
cancer of those close to Enlightenment because as the individual
identifies less tightly with his own ahamkar the individual cells of
his body can have an less close indentification with each other.


A quote please?

I studied under Robert and I'd never heard this. There IS a danger  
for people who don't know how to integrate or correctly work with a  
kundalini awakening, as such imbalances tend cause problems with  
identification rather than integration with an expanded consciousness.

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread llundrub
Yeah, this quote coming from a supposed ayurvedic technician doesn't inspire
much confidence. Lots of Svoboda stuff especially from the kundalini book is
stupid and patently fictitious except to someone who hasn't ever studied the
tantras. 

 

People who live by erroneous beliefs, only have themselves to blame for
never testing things out.

 

 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 7:00 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

 

 

On Feb 12, 2007, at 1:27 AM, shukra69 wrote:





Dr Robert Svoboda has commented that there is an increased danger of

cancer of those close to Enlightenment because as the individual

identifies less tightly with his own ahamkar the individual cells of

his body can have an less close indentification with each other.  

 

A quote please?

 

I studied under Robert and I'd never heard this. There IS a danger for
people who don't know how to integrate or correctly work with a kundalini
awakening, as such imbalances tend cause problems with identification rather
than integration with an expanded consciousness.

 



RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread Peter
Yeah, i agree. That is a really moronic statement.
Pseudo biology at its best.

--- llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yeah, this quote coming from a supposed ayurvedic
 technician doesn't inspire
 much confidence. Lots of Svoboda stuff especially
 from the kundalini book is
 stupid and patently fictitious except to someone who
 hasn't ever studied the
 tantras. 
 
  
 
 People who live by erroneous beliefs, only have
 themselves to blame for
 never testing things out.
 
  
 
  
 
 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Vaj
 Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 7:00 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist
 
  
 
  
 
 On Feb 12, 2007, at 1:27 AM, shukra69 wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 Dr Robert Svoboda has commented that there is an
 increased danger of
 
 cancer of those close to Enlightenment because as
 the individual
 
 identifies less tightly with his own ahamkar the
 individual cells of
 
 his body can have an less close indentification with
 each other.  
 
  
 
 A quote please?
 
  
 
 I studied under Robert and I'd never heard this.
 There IS a danger for
 people who don't know how to integrate or correctly
 work with a kundalini
 awakening, as such imbalances tend cause problems
 with identification rather
 than integration with an expanded consciousness.
 
  
 
 



 

Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel 
bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097


RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread llundrub
In fact, one of the most powerful transcendence practices is any Garuda
practice which is where one totally identifies with awakened power as
manifesting transcendence to all sentient beings, and it's main function is
that it eradicates cancers and other hard to cure illnesses. See the Palyul
website under practices for averting sickness and death. 


-Original Message-
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Peter
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 8:20 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

Yeah, i agree. That is a really moronic statement.
Pseudo biology at its best.

--- llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yeah, this quote coming from a supposed ayurvedic
 technician doesn't inspire
 much confidence. Lots of Svoboda stuff especially
 from the kundalini book is
 stupid and patently fictitious except to someone who
 hasn't ever studied the
 tantras. 
 
  
 
 People who live by erroneous beliefs, only have
 themselves to blame for
 never testing things out.
 
  
 
  
 
 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Vaj
 Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 7:00 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist
 
  
 
  
 
 On Feb 12, 2007, at 1:27 AM, shukra69 wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 Dr Robert Svoboda has commented that there is an
 increased danger of
 
 cancer of those close to Enlightenment because as
 the individual
 
 identifies less tightly with his own ahamkar the
 individual cells of
 
 his body can have an less close indentification with
 each other.  
 
  
 
 A quote please?
 
  
 
 I studied under Robert and I'd never heard this.
 There IS a danger for
 people who don't know how to integrate or correctly
 work with a kundalini
 awakening, as such imbalances tend cause problems
 with identification rather
 than integration with an expanded consciousness.
 
  
 
 



 


Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and
hotel bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links






[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread george_deforest
 Rick Archer wrote:
 Bill Crist died today from brain cancer. 
 He was on Purusha for decades.
 
 shukra69 wrote:
 Dr Robert Svoboda has commented that there is an increased danger
 of cancer of those close to Enlightenment because 
 as the individual identifies less tightly with his own ahamkar 
 the individual cells of his body can have an less close
 indentification with each other.  

this is not a bad thing, imo...

a soul real close to enlightenment will probably
come back to the earth plane right away,
and now he gets to finish the job with a brand new body.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread Vaj


On Feb 12, 2007, at 11:26 AM, george_deforest wrote:


Rick Archer wrote:
Bill Crist died today from brain cancer.
He was on Purusha for decades.


shukra69 wrote:
Dr Robert Svoboda has commented that there is an increased danger
of cancer of those close to Enlightenment because
as the individual identifies less tightly with his own ahamkar
the individual cells of his body can have an less close
indentification with each other.


this is not a bad thing, imo...

a soul real close to enlightenment will probably
come back to the earth plane right away,
and now he gets to finish the job with a brand new body.


But of course this depends on many many factors, one of which is if  
he had acquired the skills to navigate between life times or if he  
had the propensity for another type of incarnation (other than  
human). There's been a lively discussion offlist on the topic of  
kundalini disorders, blockages, imbalanced awakenings, the TM sidhi  
practices, etc. and just what this means for this life, enlightenment  
and dying/rebirth. It's not always a good picture. Given what I'd  
seen of purusha back in the late 80's, these were not healthy or  
spiritually vital looking guys, so I do have to wonder what their  
incarnational prospects are.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Bill Crist died today from brain cancer. He was on Purusha for decades.

Bill had neuroplasty (brain surgery) about a year ago, an attempt to remove the 
cancer.
He probably was one of the first members of Purusha.  Earlier, he was a very 
high-level MIU 
administrator, rather quiet and focused, yet very sharp when called upon by 
Bevan or Lennie
in public to give practical suggestions to respond to issues of concern brought 
to the 
attention of the leadership of MIU.
He was recently a regular visitor to the Annapurna Dining Hall.  I got to know 
him there. His 
personnae had mellowed considerably since his MIU Administrator days.  He 
seemed to be 
enjoying everyone around him.   I hope he died in peace.  Thanks, Rick,  for 
sharing  the 
news of his passing.   




[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Rick Archer wrote:
  Bill Crist died today from brain cancer. 
  He was on Purusha for decades.
  
  shukra69 wrote:
  Dr Robert Svoboda has commented that there is an increased danger
  of cancer of those close to Enlightenment because 
  as the individual identifies less tightly with his own ahamkar 
  the individual cells of his body can have an less close
  indentification with each other.  
 
 this is not a bad thing, imo...
 
 a soul real close to enlightenment will probably
 come back to the earth plane right away,
 and now he gets to finish the job with a brand new body.

Are you kidding me?? That it is OK to die of cancer when on the cusp 
of enlightenment? Finish the job, for God's sake, and begin enjoying 
life as a realized being NOW. Do the job in front of you.

And the doctor's explanation above is absurd. Cancer is the body 
attacking itself, not losing identification with its individual 
components. Enlightenment is about seeing others as more like 
ourselves. It is a unifying process, not an alienating one. Less 
identification on the way to enlightenment has to do with 
attachment, not attacking and alienating. 



RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of mainstream20016
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 11:09 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Bill Crist died today from brain cancer. He was on Purusha for decades.

Bill had neuroplasty (brain surgery) about a year ago, an attempt to remove
the cancer.
He probably was one of the first members of Purusha. Earlier, he was a very
high-level MIU 
administrator, rather quiet and focused, yet very sharp when called upon by
Bevan or Lennie
in public to give practical suggestions to respond to issues of concern
brought to the 
attention of the leadership of MIU.
He was recently a regular visitor to the Annapurna Dining Hall. I got to
know him there. His 
personnae had mellowed considerably since his MIU Administrator days. He
seemed to be 
enjoying everyone around him. I hope he died in peace. Thanks, Rick, for
sharing the 
news of his passing. 

LB Shriver told me yesterday that a few weeks ago, Bill approached him in
Revelations and expressed his appreciation for the contributions LB had made
to MIU as student body president. LB said that was when he began to leave
the TMO orbit, because he was such an iconoclast. Seems like Bill felt like
reaching closure with some people before he checked out.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
Jim Flanegin writes snipped:
Are you kidding me?? That it is OK to die of cancer when on the cusp 
of enlightenment? Finish the job, for God's sake, and begin enjoying 
life as a realized being NOW. Do the job in front of you.

TomT:
No way to know he was not finished and just living out the rest of his
time. Nisargadata and Ramana Maharishi both went out with cancer. Who
is to know either way and who cares, as Ramana would say. Who is it
that wants to know? Tom




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread Bhairitu
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote:
 Jim Flanegin writes snipped:
 Are you kidding me?? That it is OK to die of cancer when on the cusp 
 of enlightenment? Finish the job, for God's sake, and begin enjoying 
 life as a realized being NOW. Do the job in front of you.

 TomT:
 No way to know he was not finished and just living out the rest of his
 time. Nisargadata and Ramana Maharishi both went out with cancer. Who
 is to know either way and who cares, as Ramana would say. Who is it
 that wants to know? Tom
I think that is one problem when one becomes enlightened, they start 
neglecting the body because they experience no attachment to it.  I bet 
quite a few here who have been meditating for years and have some degree 
of enlightenment keep trying to remind themselves to look into some 
medical problem even if it is just a toothache because they only 
witness it and it is not as overwhelming as it would have been before 
they were meditating.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest 
 george.deforest@ wrote:
 
   Rick Archer wrote:
   Bill Crist died today from brain cancer. 
   He was on Purusha for decades.
   
   shukra69 wrote:
   Dr Robert Svoboda has commented that there is an increased danger
   of cancer of those close to Enlightenment because 
   as the individual identifies less tightly with his own ahamkar 
   the individual cells of his body can have an less close
   indentification with each other.  
  
  this is not a bad thing, imo...
  
  a soul real close to enlightenment will probably
  come back to the earth plane right away,
  and now he gets to finish the job with a brand new body.
 
 Are you kidding me?? That it is OK to die of cancer when on the cusp 
 of enlightenment? Finish the job, for God's sake, and begin enjoying 
 life as a realized being NOW. Do the job in front of you.
 
 And the doctor's explanation above is absurd. Cancer is the body 
 attacking itself, not losing identification with its individual 
 components. Enlightenment is about seeing others as more like 
 ourselves. It is a unifying process, not an alienating one. Less 
 identification on the way to enlightenment has to do with 
 attachment, not attacking and alienating.


Trying to make analogies is silly in this case. Cancer occurs when a normal 
cell goes 
haywire but the body's defenses do NOT recognize it as haywire, so it isn't 
destroyed as 
defective.

Two things happen at the same time: the cell malfunctions AND the immune system 
fucks 
up.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread markmeredith2002
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of mainstream20016
 Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 11:09 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist
 
  
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
  Bill Crist died today from brain cancer. He was on Purusha for
decades.
 
 Bill had neuroplasty (brain surgery) about a year ago, an attempt to
remove
 the cancer.
 He probably was one of the first members of Purusha. Earlier, he was
a very
 high-level MIU 
 administrator, rather quiet and focused, yet very sharp when called
upon by
 Bevan or Lennie
 in public to give practical suggestions to respond to issues of concern
 brought to the 
 attention of the leadership of MIU.
 He was recently a regular visitor to the Annapurna Dining Hall. I got to
 know him there. His 
 personnae had mellowed considerably since his MIU Administrator days. He
 seemed to be 
 enjoying everyone around him. I hope he died in peace. Thanks, Rick, for
 sharing the 
 news of his passing. 

I don't know about his final days, but not too long ago some friends
of his went by his trailer and found him unable to get out of bed,
lying in his urine, not having had food or any care for a few days. 
The friends apparently alerted MUM who started some sort of care for
him prior to his dying.  That's what I've been told.  Any other info
on this?  It's becoming a more common problem within the mov't. 
There's apparently a recert gov. in the field who's in the hospital
with cancer with no family or friends there to help take care of her. 

My wife has taken care of a couple MDs who got cancer and had to leave
the MD course.  IT's a huge hassle as they tend to have poor relations
if any with their biological family, no money and no insurance.

 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote:
  Jim Flanegin writes snipped:
  Are you kidding me?? That it is OK to die of cancer when on the cusp 
  of enlightenment? Finish the job, for God's sake, and begin enjoying 
  life as a realized being NOW. Do the job in front of you.
 
  TomT:
  No way to know he was not finished and just living out the rest of his
  time. Nisargadata and Ramana Maharishi both went out with cancer. Who
  is to know either way and who cares, as Ramana would say. Who is it
  that wants to know? Tom
 I think that is one problem when one becomes enlightened, they start 
 neglecting the body because they experience no attachment to it.  I bet 
 quite a few here who have been meditating for years and have some degree 
 of enlightenment keep trying to remind themselves to look into some 
 medical problem even if it is just a toothache because they only 
 witness it and it is not as overwhelming as it would have been before 
 they were meditating.


???SO much for integration of mind and body...





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread Bhairitu
sparaig wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote:
 
 Jim Flanegin writes snipped:
 Are you kidding me?? That it is OK to die of cancer when on the cusp 
 of enlightenment? Finish the job, for God's sake, and begin enjoying 
 life as a realized being NOW. Do the job in front of you.

 TomT:
 No way to know he was not finished and just living out the rest of his
 time. Nisargadata and Ramana Maharishi both went out with cancer. Who
 is to know either way and who cares, as Ramana would say. Who is it
 that wants to know? Tom
   
 I think that is one problem when one becomes enlightened, they start 
 neglecting the body because they experience no attachment to it.  I bet 
 quite a few here who have been meditating for years and have some degree 
 of enlightenment keep trying to remind themselves to look into some 
 medical problem even if it is just a toothache because they only 
 witness it and it is not as overwhelming as it would have been before 
 they were meditating.

 

 ???SO much for integration of mind and body...
And thus why you hear about gurus and such (including MMY) getting 
sick.  I think to propose that people will have perfect health just 
because they are enlightened is a bit ludicrous and probably displays a 
misunderstanding of what enlightenment is about.  I think that one may 
have an opportunity to keep their bodies in better shape with 
enlightenment like a fine tuned sports car but they may not put their 
attention there.  I think that would depend on the individual and what 
knowledge they already possess such as ayurveda would be a plus.  
However Robert Svoboda in one of this books on ayurveda tells a tale of 
a major ayurvedic instructor who came down with cancer and one would 
have thought that he would have caught it at its earliest symptoms.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 sparaig wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:

  tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote:
  
  Jim Flanegin writes snipped:
  Are you kidding me?? That it is OK to die of cancer when on the cusp 
  of enlightenment? Finish the job, for God's sake, and begin enjoying 
  life as a realized being NOW. Do the job in front of you.
 
  TomT:
  No way to know he was not finished and just living out the rest of his
  time. Nisargadata and Ramana Maharishi both went out with cancer. Who
  is to know either way and who cares, as Ramana would say. Who is it
  that wants to know? Tom

  I think that is one problem when one becomes enlightened, they start 
  neglecting the body because they experience no attachment to it.  I bet 
  quite a few here who have been meditating for years and have some degree 
  of enlightenment keep trying to remind themselves to look into some 
  medical problem even if it is just a toothache because they only 
  witness it and it is not as overwhelming as it would have been before 
  they were meditating.
 
  
 
  ???SO much for integration of mind and body...
 And thus why you hear about gurus and such (including MMY) getting 
 sick.  I think to propose that people will have perfect health just 
 because they are enlightened is a bit ludicrous and probably displays a 
 misunderstanding of what enlightenment is about.  I think that one may 
 have an opportunity to keep their bodies in better shape with 
 enlightenment like a fine tuned sports car but they may not put their 
 attention there.  I think that would depend on the individual and what 
 knowledge they already possess such as ayurveda would be a plus.  
 However Robert Svoboda in one of this books on ayurveda tells a tale of 
 a major ayurvedic instructor who came down with cancer and one would 
 have thought that he would have caught it at its earliest symptoms.


There's enlightenment and there's enlightenment. FULL enlightenment requires 
the ability 
to perform any and all sidhis perfectly.

I recall a lecture by Keith Wallace many years ago where MMY challanged people 
to come 
up with a clear sign of physical immortality. Keith's answer was the one MMY 
latched onto: 
the ability to float. If your Unity is at THAT level of integration, then all 
of your immediate 
environment naturally reflects this state. Immediate environment includes 
body and 
mind.






[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread curtisdeltablues
I think to propose that people will have perfect health just
because they are enlightened is a bit ludicrous and probably displays
a misunderstanding of what enlightenment is about.


Then you need to straighten MMY out on this point cuz he uses it in
his sales pitch all the time. Perfect health and immortality, or was
it perfect wealth and immorality?
 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 sparaig wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:

  tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote:
  
  Jim Flanegin writes snipped:
  Are you kidding me?? That it is OK to die of cancer when on the
cusp 
  of enlightenment? Finish the job, for God's sake, and begin
enjoying 
  life as a realized being NOW. Do the job in front of you.
 
  TomT:
  No way to know he was not finished and just living out the rest
of his
  time. Nisargadata and Ramana Maharishi both went out with
cancer. Who
  is to know either way and who cares, as Ramana would say. Who is it
  that wants to know? Tom

  I think that is one problem when one becomes enlightened, they start 
  neglecting the body because they experience no attachment to it.
 I bet 
  quite a few here who have been meditating for years and have some
degree 
  of enlightenment keep trying to remind themselves to look into some 
  medical problem even if it is just a toothache because they only 
  witness it and it is not as overwhelming as it would have been
before 
  they were meditating.
 
  
 
  ???SO much for integration of mind and body...
 And thus why you hear about gurus and such (including MMY) getting 
 sick.  I think to propose that people will have perfect health just 
 because they are enlightened is a bit ludicrous and probably displays a 
 misunderstanding of what enlightenment is about.  I think that one may 
 have an opportunity to keep their bodies in better shape with 
 enlightenment like a fine tuned sports car but they may not put their 
 attention there.  I think that would depend on the individual and what 
 knowledge they already possess such as ayurveda would be a plus.  
 However Robert Svoboda in one of this books on ayurveda tells a tale of 
 a major ayurvedic instructor who came down with cancer and one would 
 have thought that he would have caught it at its earliest symptoms.





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread Bhairitu
curtisdeltablues wrote:
 I think to propose that people will have perfect health just
 because they are enlightened is a bit ludicrous and probably displays
 a misunderstanding of what enlightenment is about.


 Then you need to straighten MMY out on this point cuz he uses it in
 his sales pitch all the time. Perfect health and immortality, or was
 it perfect wealth and immorality?
   
More likely the latter but then that really didn't work for folks 
either.  ;-)

  



 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 sparaig wrote:
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
   
   
 tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote:
 
 
 Jim Flanegin writes snipped:
 Are you kidding me?? That it is OK to die of cancer when on the
   
 cusp 
   
 of enlightenment? Finish the job, for God's sake, and begin
   
 enjoying 
   
 life as a realized being NOW. Do the job in front of you.

 TomT:
 No way to know he was not finished and just living out the rest
   
 of his
   
 time. Nisargadata and Ramana Maharishi both went out with
   
 cancer. Who
   
 is to know either way and who cares, as Ramana would say. Who is it
 that wants to know? Tom
   
   
 I think that is one problem when one becomes enlightened, they start 
 neglecting the body because they experience no attachment to it.
 
  I bet 
   
 quite a few here who have been meditating for years and have some
 
 degree 
   
 of enlightenment keep trying to remind themselves to look into some 
 medical problem even if it is just a toothache because they only 
 witness it and it is not as overwhelming as it would have been
 
 before 
   
 they were meditating.

 
 
 ???SO much for integration of mind and body...
   
 And thus why you hear about gurus and such (including MMY) getting 
 sick.  I think to propose that people will have perfect health just 
 because they are enlightened is a bit ludicrous and probably displays a 
 misunderstanding of what enlightenment is about.  I think that one may 
 have an opportunity to keep their bodies in better shape with 
 enlightenment like a fine tuned sports car but they may not put their 
 attention there.  I think that would depend on the individual and what 
 knowledge they already possess such as ayurveda would be a plus.  
 However Robert Svoboda in one of this books on ayurveda tells a tale of 
 a major ayurvedic instructor who came down with cancer and one would 
 have thought that he would have caught it at its earliest symptoms.

 



   



[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread Patrick Gillam
 --- markmeredith wrote:

 I don't know about his final days, 
 but not too long ago some friends
 of his went by his trailer and found 
 him unable to get out of bed,
 lying in his urine, not having had 
 food or any care for a few days. 
 The friends apparently alerted MUM 
 who started some sort of care for
 him prior to his dying.  That's 
 what I've been told.  

Surely Jefferson County has visiting 
nurses, and perhaps hospice care. As 
strapped for funds as those organizations 
are, they generally provide care regardless 
of the patient's ability to pay - which is 
one reason they're always strapped.

I'm sorry to hear Bill Crist may have had 
a difficult time of it at the end. My 
dealings with him were always at arm's 
length and in his official capacities, 
but he dealt with people with dignity.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread Jonathan Chadwick
Ramana Maharshi died from the big c, you know.  When Gurdjieff died doctors 
said his internal organs were so deteriorated that he should have been dead a 
long time ago.  When the ambulance finally carted him off to the hospital about 
a week before, he was wearing the most gaudy striped pajamas imaginable.  He 
then tipped his hat to the crowd and, with a fat cigarette hanging out of his 
mouth, cheered bravo!  

shukra69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Dr Robert Svoboda has commented 
that there is an increased danger of
cancer of those close to Enlightenment because as the individual
identifies less tightly with his own ahamkar the individual cells of
his body can have an less close indentification with each other. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Bill Crist died today from brain cancer. He was on Purusha for decades.




 

  
-
Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
 Browse Top Cars by Green Rating at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread Jonathan Chadwick
For us householders, as we get older its usually our kids and ESPECIALLY AN 
EMPATHICALLY CONFRONTATIONAL SPOUSE that force the issues on us.  Is that 
support of nature?

Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  sparaig wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote:
 
 Jim Flanegin writes snipped:
 Are you kidding me?? That it is OK to die of cancer when on the cusp 
 of enlightenment? Finish the job, for God's sake, and begin enjoying 
 life as a realized being NOW. Do the job in front of you.

 TomT:
 No way to know he was not finished and just living out the rest of his
 time. Nisargadata and Ramana Maharishi both went out with cancer. Who
 is to know either way and who cares, as Ramana would say. Who is it
 that wants to know? Tom
 
 I think that is one problem when one becomes enlightened, they start 
 neglecting the body because they experience no attachment to it. I bet 
 quite a few here who have been meditating for years and have some degree 
 of enlightenment keep trying to remind themselves to look into some 
 medical problem even if it is just a toothache because they only 
 witness it and it is not as overwhelming as it would have been before 
 they were meditating.

 

 ???SO much for integration of mind and body...
And thus why you hear about gurus and such (including MMY) getting 
sick. I think to propose that people will have perfect health just 
because they are enlightened is a bit ludicrous and probably displays a 
misunderstanding of what enlightenment is about. I think that one may 
have an opportunity to keep their bodies in better shape with 
enlightenment like a fine tuned sports car but they may not put their 
attention there. I think that would depend on the individual and what 
knowledge they already possess such as ayurveda would be a plus. 
However Robert Svoboda in one of this books on ayurveda tells a tale of 
a major ayurvedic instructor who came down with cancer and one would 
have thought that he would have caught it at its earliest symptoms.



 

 
-
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel 
bargains.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Jim Flanegin writes snipped:
 Are you kidding me?? That it is OK to die of cancer when on the cusp 
 of enlightenment? Finish the job, for God's sake, and begin enjoying 
 life as a realized being NOW. Do the job in front of you.
 
 TomT:
 No way to know he was not finished and just living out the rest of 
his
 time. Nisargadata and Ramana Maharishi both went out with cancer. Who
 is to know either way and who cares, as Ramana would say. Who is it
 that wants to know? Tom

Just to clarify my comment was directed towards the fellow that said 
if Bill C wasn't enlightened this was OK because he'd come back in 
with a new body. Which I thought was a wasteful rationalization, and 
my comment was directed at him. I have no idea whether or not Bill C 
was enlightened- I never met the man.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-12 Thread lurkernomore20002000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 a soul real close to enlightenment will probably
 come back to the earth plane right away,
 and now he gets to finish the job with a brand new body.

Nice to know it works like clockwork iyo.  I mean he's probably like a 
nice piece of wood.  Just needs to come back for some 400 grit sanding 
and a coat of varnish.  Should be able to get it done by the time he's 
a teenager.

lurk





[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-11 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Bill Crist died today from brain cancer. He was on Purusha for decades.


The name is extremely familiar, but as usualy, I can't picture a face.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Crist

2007-02-11 Thread shukra69
Dr Robert Svoboda has commented that there is an increased danger of
cancer of those close to Enlightenment because as the individual
identifies less tightly with his own ahamkar the individual cells of
his body can have an less close indentification with each other.  

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Bill Crist died today from brain cancer. He was on Purusha for decades.