[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgray no_re...@... wrote: snip [I wrote:] Recent comments by azgray[sic] Calm down sweetie. Unclench your teeth. When you get hysterical like this your spelling goes to heck. Oooo, he really doesn't like having his spelling mistakes pointed out, especially by a woman. Bwahahaha You make me laff. Let me get this straight *I* point out to *you* YOUR spelling mistake in the very first line of *your* post. This somehow, in your fantasy world, means that I don't like having my spelling mistakes pointed out Oh, please forgive me. I didn't realize you were so seriously impaired. I don't want to make you feel bad about yourself, but see, hon, in my previous post I had pointed out two spelling errors on your part (as well as a repeated word). And since you echoed my use of [sic], I assumed you thought you were getting back at me. That's OK, you don't need to apologize. You just forgot, is all. (You *are* under a doctor's care for the memory problem, right?) , that my dislike is somehow exacerbated by your being a woman and that I must have castration anxiety and an irrational fear of vaginas containing teeth. Well, I'm all ears. If that's not why you have a fixation on teeth where women are concerned, what *is* the reason? Riight. You are a very very strange angry bird. Why you take such bizarre tacks on a spiritual message board I'll never know. It sullies the vibe, sucks the oxygen out of the room, and appeals to the basest of feelings. Shame on you. If I could just suggest, whatever you do, don't read back over your own posts here if you have trouble breathing when you read bizarre, vibe-sullying stuff on a spiritual board. And avoid Barry's posts as well. Heck, there are quite a few posters you should avoid reading if bizarreness leaves you short of breath. Do you think maybe your breathing problem is related to your memory problem? Perhaps there's just not enough oxygen getting to your brain. That's why it would be good to see a doctor; there may be some medications that could get this all under control. Maybe even, you know, back to normal.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , azgrey no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , azgrey no_reply@ wrote: Fail. Ad hominem. You lose Judy. Again. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@ wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? Recent comments by azgray[sic] Calm down sweetie. Unclench your teeth. When you get hysterical like this your spelling goes to heck. Oooo, he really doesn't like having his spelling mistakes pointed out, especially by a woman. Bwahahaha You make me laff. Let me get this straight *I* point out to *you* YOUR spelling mistake in the very first line of *your* post. This somehow, in your fantasy world, means that I don't like having my spelling mistakes pointed out, that my dislike is somehow exacerbated by your being a woman and that I must have castration anxiety and an irrational fear of vaginas containing teeth. Riight. You are a very very strange angry bird. Why you take such bizarre tacks on a spiritual message board I'll never know. It sullies the vibe, sucks the oxygen out of the room, and appeals to the basest of feelings. Shame on you. You lose. Again.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@ wrote: Fail. Ad hominem. You lose Judy. Again. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? Recent comments by azgray[sic] Calm down sweetie. Unclench your teeth. When you get hysterical like this your spelling goes to heck. g r ey Should I type more slowly? Maybe you could get somebody to proof read your posts before you hit send. a s s h o l e [http://imgur.com/TDWFt.jpg] Now *that* is funny. I believe it will be lost on the humor impaired Raunchy remora.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@ wrote: Fail. Ad hominem. You lose Judy. Again. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? Recent comments by azgray[sic] Calm down sweetie. Unclench your teeth. When you get hysterical like this your spelling goes to heck. g r ey Should I type more slowly? Maybe you could get somebody to proof read your posts before you hit send. a s s h o l e [http://imgur.com/TDWFt.jpg] Now *that* is funny. I believe it will be lost on the humor impaired Raunchy remora.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote: Ouch! Vagina Dentata What all you pseudofeminists wish for. :-) Only to cut the misogynists down to size. Men who really dig women have nothing to fear. Men who really dig women have an intuitive skill-in-action of never associating with women who fantasize about mythical forms of castration. You are a Jungian analyst's dream come true.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@ wrote: Fail. Ad hominem. You lose Judy. Again. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? Recent comments by azgray[sic] Calm down sweetie. Unclench your teeth. When you get hysterical like this your spelling goes to heck. g r ey Should I type more slowly? Maybe you could get somebody to proof read your posts before you hit send. a s s h o l e
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@ wrote: Fail. Ad hominem. You lose Judy. Again. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? Recent comments by azgray[sic] Calm down sweetie. Unclench your teeth. When you get hysterical like this your spelling goes to heck. g r ey Should I type more slowly? Maybe you could get somebody to proof read your posts before you hit send. a s s h o l e [http://imgur.com/TDWFt.jpg]
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , azgrey no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , azgrey no_reply@ wrote: Fail. Ad hominem. You lose Judy. Again. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@ wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? Recent comments by azgray[sic] Calm down sweetie. Unclench your teeth. When you get hysterical like this your spelling goes to heck. Oooo, he really doesn't like having his spelling mistakes pointed out, especially by a woman. Nice try Raunchy remora fish. Tis' [sic] a shame you have to keep your teeth cleaning skills sharp with the likes of WillieTex [sic]. And what's with his fixation on teeth? Castration anxiety? Central to the discussion of male cunt-hatred and womb-fear is the myth of the vagina dentata, 'a motif occurring in certain primitive mythologies, as well as in modern surrealist painting and neurotic dream, which is known to folklore as the toothed vagina - the vagina that castrates' (Joseph Campbell, 1976). The vagina dentata evokes the male castration complex, which in this instance is the fear that, once it has entered the vagina, the penis will be bitten off and consumed - the fear of 'witches stealing men's penises with their vaginal teeth', as Catherine Blackledge puts it (2003). The vagina dentata myth is the most potent symbol of male 'dread of the female genital' (HR Hays, 1964). http://www.matthewhunt.com/cunt/reappropriation.html http://www.matthewhunt.com/cunt/reappropriation.html Also see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina_dentata http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina_dentata
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
Ouch! Vagina Dentata http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aU8UT5E4eg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , azgrey no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , azgrey no_reply@ wrote: Fail. Ad hominem. You lose Judy. Again. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@ wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? Recent comments by azgray[sic] Calm down sweetie. Unclench your teeth. When you get hysterical like this your spelling goes to heck. Oooo, he really doesn't like having his spelling mistakes pointed out, especially by a woman. Nice try Raunchy remora fish. Tis' [sic] a shame you have to keep your teeth cleaning skills sharp with the likes of WillieTex [sic]. And what's with his fixation on teeth? Castration anxiety? Central to the discussion of male cunt-hatred and womb-fear is the myth of the vagina dentata, 'a motif occurring in certain primitive mythologies, as well as in modern surrealist painting and neurotic dream, which is known to folklore as the toothed vagina - the vagina that castrates' (Joseph Campbell, 1976). The vagina dentata evokes the male castration complex, which in this instance is the fear that, once it has entered the vagina, the penis will be bitten off and consumed - the fear of 'witches stealing men's penises with their vaginal teeth', as Catherine Blackledge puts it (2003). The vagina dentata myth is the most potent symbol of male 'dread of the female genital' (HR Hays, 1964). http://www.matthewhunt.com/cunt/reappropriation.html http://www.matthewhunt.com/cunt/reappropriation.html Also see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina_dentata http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina_dentata
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote: Ouch! Vagina Dentata What all you pseudofeminists wish for. :-) But you've got to watch out for wishes. Sometimes they come true: [http://www.swapmeetdave.com/Humor/BlondeWishingWell.jpg]
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote: Ouch! Vagina Dentata What all you pseudofeminists wish for. :-) Only to cut the misogynists down to size. Men who really dig women have nothing to fear.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
Ouch! Vagina Dentata What all you pseudofeminists wish for. Judy wrote: Only to cut the misogynists down to size. Men who really dig women have nothing to fear. I wish someone would help me. This is so much fun watching the sexists get cut down to size. I must be a sick bastard to enjoy this so much. I just love to see Wright and Manning get their ass whupped by the more intelligent women on the forum. Wright and Manning must really like it too, so they are even sicker than I am. Please give me a break, Barry, it's almost more than I can bear. Please help me get some help. I NEED SOME SPIRITUAL HELP, BARRY. Help me, for God's sake!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote: Ouch! Vagina Dentata What all you pseudofeminists wish for. :-) Only to cut the misogynists down to size. Men who really dig women have nothing to fear. Myth of Vagina Dentata Withering penis hard head Sexist blowhards cut down to size Don't pleasure women in bed
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex no_reply@ wrote: azgrey wrote: From what I've heard, that battle-ax can put it away. Sexism, a term coined in the mid-20th century, refers to the belief or attitude that one gender or sex is inferior to, less competent, or less valuable than the other... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism Sorry Willie. You once again are guilty of Ignoratio elenchi. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignoratio_elenchi Battle-ax could be considered a complimentary term when applied to Mrs. Clinton. Referring to her as a dried up old hack white broad would be sexist as well as ageist, racist, and weightist. Now I didn't do that did I? Gee WillyTex, are you saying azgrey is a sexist? Ya think? Nice try Raunchy remora fish. Tis' a shame you have to keep your teeth cleaning skills sharp with the likes of WillieTex. Perhaps the Jersey Junkyard Dog will swim by soon to attempt to cover up your dimwittedness. What I asked, restored to proper context, was: Vaj: Did anybody ever come clean and tell us how much Mrs. Clinton had to drink the morning she broke her elbow? Musta been plenty. From what I've heard, that battle-ax can put it away. I'd gladly expand the base of those questioned if you could inform me how much she had to drink that morning. Feminism 101 by Melissa McEwan McEwan is an oft discredited scribbler of gibberish who clearly has been abused more than than Adam Lambert's uvula. She rarely makes a lick of sense and almost never exhibits any ability to make any sense whatsoever. To call her homely is kind. With luck she will follow Andrea Dworkin's example and not sully the gene pool by reproducing. Hope this helps. Good luck and good bowling.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
Fail. Ad hominem. You lose Judy. Again. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: snip Also, could one of you feminists contact Ms. McEwan and teach her how to flip someone off?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
azgrey wrote: Nice try Raunchy remora fish... Sexism, a term coined in the mid-20th century, refers to the belief or attitude that one gender or sex is inferior to, less competent, or less valuable than the other... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote: Judy, Beautiful Barry take down. High five, sister! The above conjures a weird kinda feminist Borat image. High-five! shudder
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_re...@... wrote: Feminism 101 by Melissa McEwan McEwan is an oft discredited scribbler of gibberish who clearly has been abused more than than Adam Lambert's uvula. She rarely makes a lick of sense and almost never exhibits any ability to make any sense whatsoever. To call her homely is kind. With luck she will follow Andrea Dworkin's example and not sully the gene pool by reproducing. [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/blogs/gems/ethicalesq/CallahanBookStore.jp\ g]
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
Judy, Beautiful Barry take down. High five, sister! azgrey wrote: The above conjures a weird kinda feminist Borat image. Yeah, I must be real sick, because I just love to see you and the other guys get your ass whupped, almost every day, by the raunch and the author's friend. I know I've got a problem, but your problem is worse, because you guys seem to just love getting yourselves waxed, and you just keep coming back for more. Can't you please give me a break - it's almost too much to bear. Does it get any better than this? Where is Doctor Pete when I need him? Please, I NEED SOME SPIRITUAL HELP, for God's sake, please help me!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@ wrote: Feminism 101 by Melissa McEwan McEwan is an oft discredited scribbler of gibberish who clearly has been abused more than than Adam Lambert's uvula. She rarely makes a lick of sense and almost never exhibits any ability to make any sense whatsoever. To call her homely is kind. With luck she will follow Andrea Dworkin's example and not sully the gene pool by reproducing. [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/blogs/gems/ethicalesq/CallahanBookStore.jp\ g] I used to regularly walk by a radical feminist bookstore on Capital Hill in Seattle. The most prominent sign in the front window, facing a busy street, read: All men rape. Kill all rapists. Many a time I got wired on espresso and a bagel at a deli down the block, Matzo Mama's, and wandered in the bookstore. It distinctly lacked a sense of humor. I had a girlfriend at the time who enjoyed public, ah, displays of affection. It just never felt right to not let her express her feminine nature. She used to like to have me sit on the Metro bus stop bench directly in front of the bookstore's front door so she could straddle my lap and dry-hump me. Bad girl. I miss her sometimes. Yeah, I know. I got lottsa karma to workout.:-)~
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_re...@... wrote: Fail. Ad hominem. You lose Judy. Again. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? Recent comments by azgray: Did anybody ever come clean and tell us how much Mrs. Clinton had to drink the morning she broke her elbow? Musta been plenty. From what I've heard, that battle-ax can put it away. Nice try Raunchy remora fish. Tis' [sic] a shame you have to keep your teeth cleaning skills sharp with the likes of WillieTex [sic]. Perhaps the Jersey Junkyard Dog will swim by soon to attempt to cover up your dimwittedness. McEwan is an oft discredited scribbler of gibberish who clearly has been abused more than than [sic] Adam Lambert's uvula. She rarely makes a lick of sense and almost never exhibits any ability to make any sense whatsoever. To call her homely is kind. With luck she will follow Andrea Dworkin's example and not sully the gene pool by reproducing. If you're really here to try to help Barry save his sorry butt from the evil feminist monsters, it'd probably be a good idea not to commit the very same sins you accuse them of committing, only more so. Let's see now, my post was in reference to the one in which Barry erroneously identified a male right-winger's blog as that of McEwan, as I recall, claiming the posts therein all reflected McEwan's hatred of Obama, when in fact McEwan is a progressive and a supporter of Obama's. Barry even quoted a post by the right- winger, plainly signed by him, and attributed it to McEwan. Gosh, I wonder why you snipped all that. Speculating that Barry was drunk when he wrote the post wasn't ad hominem, it was giving him the benefit of the doubt.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@ wrote: Fail. Ad hominem. You lose Judy. Again. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? Recent comments by azgray[sic] Calm down sweetie. Unclench your teeth. When you get hysterical like this your spelling goes to heck. g r ey Should I type more slowly? Maybe you could get somebody to proof read your posts before you hit send.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex no_reply@ wrote: azgrey wrote: From what I've heard, that battle-ax can put it away. Sexism, a term coined in the mid-20th century, refers to the belief or attitude that one gender or sex is inferior to, less competent, or less valuable than the other... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism Gee WillyTex, are you saying azgrey is a sexist? Ya think? Feminism 101 by Melissa McEwan Correcting Raunchy's oversight in not providing a photo of the feminist being quoted as data for our ongoing study on whether or not the feminists in question are homely or not, I rectify the situation: [http://www.moonbattery.com/melissa-mcewan.jpg] That brings the data so far up to: Homely: 10 Not homely: 5 Also, could one of you feminists contact Ms. McEwan and teach her how to flip someone off? That's such a simple skill that not having learned it might be perceived by the public as reflecting badly on the angry, anti-Obama polemic on her blog site Moonbattery (example below, a rare one in which she actually uses Obama's name...usually she makes up names for him.) A quick scan of the site reveals hardly a single blogpost that doesn't denigrate Obama. I'm mentioning this to point out not only the quality of the experts that Raunchy trots out to support her obsession with being -- and remaining -- a victim, but where she finds them. Eurosnob: America Is Too Provincial for Nobel Lit Prize American moonbattery is sufficiently fulsome to produce Nobel Peace Prize winners like Jimmy Carter and Al Gore, but when it comes to Literature, our prize-winning days appear to be behind us for now. Sniffs Horace Engdahl http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080930/ap_on_re_eu/eu_nobel_literature_6 of the Swedish Academy: The U.S. is too isolated, too insular. They don't translate enough and don't really participate in the big dialogue of literature. That ignorance is restraining. Obscenity-laced doggerel comparing the USA to Nazi Germany might win you a Nobel Prize if you're Harold Pinter http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2005/10/more_nobel_nutt.html , but not if you're a measly American. On the bright side, if Barack Obama is elected, Europeans will like us more. Unfortunately, we'll like ourselves a lot less.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote: snip Also, could one of you feminists contact Ms. McEwan and teach her how to flip someone off? That's such a simple skill that not having learned it might be perceived by the public as reflecting badly on the angry, anti-Obama polemic on her blog site Moonbattery (example below, a rare one in which she actually uses Obama's name...usually she makes up names for him.) A quick scan of the site reveals hardly a single blogpost that doesn't denigrate Obama. Melissa McEwan's blog is the award-winning group blog called Shakesville. She's an Obama fan, with the standard lefty reservations. In her posts you'll find both praise and criticism of Obama. She always refers to him as Obama. Moonbattery is the blog of a right-winger by the name of Van Helsing. The post Barry goes on to quote as McEwan's is actually by Van Helsing, a thoroughgoing Obama hater. Barry Googled McEwan and found on Moonbattery the photo he reproduces here. It illustrates a post by Van Helsing excoriating McEwan for objecting to McCain's announcement of his choice of Sarah Palin too soon after Obama's official victory in the primaries. And somehow Barry figured that since there was a photo of McEwan on the blog, it must be McEwan's blog--even though the post with the photo is as clear as can be that the blogger is *quoting* McEwan from her blog, Shakesville, and that he's extremely unhappy with what he's quoting. Also, regarding that photo, Barry writes: Correcting Raunchy's oversight in not providing a photo of the feminist being quoted as data for our ongoing study on whether or not the feminists in question are homely or not, I rectify the situation: First, this is actually *Barry's* ongoing study. Raunchy has no interest in whether feminists are or are not homely. Second, Barry seems to have forgotten that the claim he is so hot to prove was made about feminist *scholars*, those who work in academia, not feminists in general. McEwan isn't an academic. Third, in Googling for a photo of McEwan, he deliberately picked the most unflattering one he could find. Here's her Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/melissa.mcewan Whatever one thinks of McEwan's appearance, unlike Barry, she's in a long-term relationship. Her partner is a Scotsman (she writes occasional hilarious posts about her conversations with him in which she reproduces his burr). McEwan writes about feminism and politics for a living, including columns for The Guardian. She's a *much* better and vastly more thoughtful (as well as funnier) writer than Barry, in terms both of style and of content. Other than the fact that she's a spit feminist, and that Barry finds no criticism whatsoever of Obama--especially from a spit woman--acceptable, McEwan ironically has a great deal in common with Barry politically (although she's vastly better informed, and, as noted, more thoughtful and wittier). Finally, Barry would probably be surprised to learn that McEwan didn't support Hillary in the primaries. She didn't support Obama, either. Her candidate was John Edwards (and thereby hangs quite a tale, which I won't go into here; if you're interested, Google McEwan AND Edwards). She *strongly* supported Obama in the general election. Bottom line, the post I'm commenting on is one of Barry's most spectacular mess-ups to date. As we've seen many times before, his rage and anxiety to find a way to diss Raunchy, me, and feminists (and TMers) in general (quite possibly with an assist from alcohol) disastrously impairs his reading comprehension. But he won't acknowledge the blunders in the post I'm responding to, of course. If he comments at all on what I've pointed out, he'll pick out something minor and make a smartass crack in hopes of distracting attention from how badly he came a-cropper. What a guy, huh?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
Judy, Beautiful Barry take down. High five, sister! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: snip Also, could one of you feminists contact Ms. McEwan and teach her how to flip someone off? That's such a simple skill that not having learned it might be perceived by the public as reflecting badly on the angry, anti-Obama polemic on her blog site Moonbattery (example below, a rare one in which she actually uses Obama's name...usually she makes up names for him.) A quick scan of the site reveals hardly a single blogpost that doesn't denigrate Obama. Melissa McEwan's blog is the award-winning group blog called Shakesville. She's an Obama fan, with the standard lefty reservations. In her posts you'll find both praise and criticism of Obama. She always refers to him as Obama. Moonbattery is the blog of a right-winger by the name of Van Helsing. The post Barry goes on to quote as McEwan's is actually by Van Helsing, a thoroughgoing Obama hater. Barry Googled McEwan and found on Moonbattery the photo he reproduces here. It illustrates a post by Van Helsing excoriating McEwan for objecting to McCain's announcement of his choice of Sarah Palin too soon after Obama's official victory in the primaries. And somehow Barry figured that since there was a photo of McEwan on the blog, it must be McEwan's blog--even though the post with the photo is as clear as can be that the blogger is *quoting* McEwan from her blog, Shakesville, and that he's extremely unhappy with what he's quoting. Also, regarding that photo, Barry writes: Correcting Raunchy's oversight in not providing a photo of the feminist being quoted as data for our ongoing study on whether or not the feminists in question are homely or not, I rectify the situation: First, this is actually *Barry's* ongoing study. Raunchy has no interest in whether feminists are or are not homely. Second, Barry seems to have forgotten that the claim he is so hot to prove was made about feminist *scholars*, those who work in academia, not feminists in general. McEwan isn't an academic. Third, in Googling for a photo of McEwan, he deliberately picked the most unflattering one he could find. Here's her Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/melissa.mcewan Whatever one thinks of McEwan's appearance, unlike Barry, she's in a long-term relationship. Her partner is a Scotsman (she writes occasional hilarious posts about her conversations with him in which she reproduces his burr). McEwan writes about feminism and politics for a living, including columns for The Guardian. She's a *much* better and vastly more thoughtful (as well as funnier) writer than Barry, in terms both of style and of content. Other than the fact that she's a spit feminist, and that Barry finds no criticism whatsoever of Obama--especially from a spit woman--acceptable, McEwan ironically has a great deal in common with Barry politically (although she's vastly better informed, and, as noted, more thoughtful and wittier). Finally, Barry would probably be surprised to learn that McEwan didn't support Hillary in the primaries. She didn't support Obama, either. Her candidate was John Edwards (and thereby hangs quite a tale, which I won't go into here; if you're interested, Google McEwan AND Edwards). She *strongly* supported Obama in the general election. Bottom line, the post I'm commenting on is one of Barry's most spectacular mess-ups to date. As we've seen many times before, his rage and anxiety to find a way to diss Raunchy, me, and feminists (and TMers) in general (quite possibly with an assist from alcohol) disastrously impairs his reading comprehension. But he won't acknowledge the blunders in the post I'm responding to, of course. If he comments at all on what I've pointed out, he'll pick out something minor and make a smartass crack in hopes of distracting attention from how badly he came a-cropper. What a guy, huh?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote: Judy, Beautiful Barry take down. High five, sister! Thanks, but... http://www.flickr.com/photos/tommylang/3432131488/ grin --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: snip Also, could one of you feminists contact Ms. McEwan and teach her how to flip someone off? That's such a simple skill that not having learned it might be perceived by the public as reflecting badly on the angry, anti-Obama polemic on her blog site Moonbattery (example below, a rare one in which she actually uses Obama's name...usually she makes up names for him.) A quick scan of the site reveals hardly a single blogpost that doesn't denigrate Obama. Melissa McEwan's blog is the award-winning group blog called Shakesville. She's an Obama fan, with the standard lefty reservations. In her posts you'll find both praise and criticism of Obama. She always refers to him as Obama. Moonbattery is the blog of a right-winger by the name of Van Helsing. The post Barry goes on to quote as McEwan's is actually by Van Helsing, a thoroughgoing Obama hater. Barry Googled McEwan and found on Moonbattery the photo he reproduces here. It illustrates a post by Van Helsing excoriating McEwan for objecting to McCain's announcement of his choice of Sarah Palin too soon after Obama's official victory in the primaries. And somehow Barry figured that since there was a photo of McEwan on the blog, it must be McEwan's blog--even though the post with the photo is as clear as can be that the blogger is *quoting* McEwan from her blog, Shakesville, and that he's extremely unhappy with what he's quoting. Also, regarding that photo, Barry writes: Correcting Raunchy's oversight in not providing a photo of the feminist being quoted as data for our ongoing study on whether or not the feminists in question are homely or not, I rectify the situation: First, this is actually *Barry's* ongoing study. Raunchy has no interest in whether feminists are or are not homely. Second, Barry seems to have forgotten that the claim he is so hot to prove was made about feminist *scholars*, those who work in academia, not feminists in general. McEwan isn't an academic. Third, in Googling for a photo of McEwan, he deliberately picked the most unflattering one he could find. Here's her Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/melissa.mcewan Whatever one thinks of McEwan's appearance, unlike Barry, she's in a long-term relationship. Her partner is a Scotsman (she writes occasional hilarious posts about her conversations with him in which she reproduces his burr). McEwan writes about feminism and politics for a living, including columns for The Guardian. She's a *much* better and vastly more thoughtful (as well as funnier) writer than Barry, in terms both of style and of content. Other than the fact that she's a spit feminist, and that Barry finds no criticism whatsoever of Obama--especially from a spit woman--acceptable, McEwan ironically has a great deal in common with Barry politically (although she's vastly better informed, and, as noted, more thoughtful and wittier). Finally, Barry would probably be surprised to learn that McEwan didn't support Hillary in the primaries. She didn't support Obama, either. Her candidate was John Edwards (and thereby hangs quite a tale, which I won't go into here; if you're interested, Google McEwan AND Edwards). She *strongly* supported Obama in the general election. Bottom line, the post I'm commenting on is one of Barry's most spectacular mess-ups to date. As we've seen many times before, his rage and anxiety to find a way to diss Raunchy, me, and feminists (and TMers) in general (quite possibly with an assist from alcohol) disastrously impairs his reading comprehension. But he won't acknowledge the blunders in the post I'm responding to, of course. If he comments at all on what I've pointed out, he'll pick out something minor and make a smartass crack in hopes of distracting attention from how badly he came a-cropper. What a guy, huh?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? In Spain many bars open at 9 am or earlier. In Paris they open at 6 am. Probably he got that habit when living there.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote: Judy, Beautiful Barry take down. High five, sister! Thanks, but... http://www.flickr.com/photos/tommylang/3432131488/ grin LOL. Barry should suck ice chips, good for the fever. http://tinyurl.com/klomp9 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qo6cNQwN6LQ --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: snip Also, could one of you feminists contact Ms. McEwan and teach her how to flip someone off? That's such a simple skill that not having learned it might be perceived by the public as reflecting badly on the angry, anti-Obama polemic on her blog site Moonbattery (example below, a rare one in which she actually uses Obama's name...usually she makes up names for him.) A quick scan of the site reveals hardly a single blogpost that doesn't denigrate Obama. Melissa McEwan's blog is the award-winning group blog called Shakesville. She's an Obama fan, with the standard lefty reservations. In her posts you'll find both praise and criticism of Obama. She always refers to him as Obama. Moonbattery is the blog of a right-winger by the name of Van Helsing. The post Barry goes on to quote as McEwan's is actually by Van Helsing, a thoroughgoing Obama hater. Barry Googled McEwan and found on Moonbattery the photo he reproduces here. It illustrates a post by Van Helsing excoriating McEwan for objecting to McCain's announcement of his choice of Sarah Palin too soon after Obama's official victory in the primaries. And somehow Barry figured that since there was a photo of McEwan on the blog, it must be McEwan's blog--even though the post with the photo is as clear as can be that the blogger is *quoting* McEwan from her blog, Shakesville, and that he's extremely unhappy with what he's quoting. Also, regarding that photo, Barry writes: Correcting Raunchy's oversight in not providing a photo of the feminist being quoted as data for our ongoing study on whether or not the feminists in question are homely or not, I rectify the situation: First, this is actually *Barry's* ongoing study. Raunchy has no interest in whether feminists are or are not homely. Second, Barry seems to have forgotten that the claim he is so hot to prove was made about feminist *scholars*, those who work in academia, not feminists in general. McEwan isn't an academic. Third, in Googling for a photo of McEwan, he deliberately picked the most unflattering one he could find. Here's her Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/melissa.mcewan Whatever one thinks of McEwan's appearance, unlike Barry, she's in a long-term relationship. Her partner is a Scotsman (she writes occasional hilarious posts about her conversations with him in which she reproduces his burr). McEwan writes about feminism and politics for a living, including columns for The Guardian. She's a *much* better and vastly more thoughtful (as well as funnier) writer than Barry, in terms both of style and of content. Other than the fact that she's a spit feminist, and that Barry finds no criticism whatsoever of Obama--especially from a spit woman--acceptable, McEwan ironically has a great deal in common with Barry politically (although she's vastly better informed, and, as noted, more thoughtful and wittier). Finally, Barry would probably be surprised to learn that McEwan didn't support Hillary in the primaries. She didn't support Obama, either. Her candidate was John Edwards (and thereby hangs quite a tale, which I won't go into here; if you're interested, Google McEwan AND Edwards). She *strongly* supported Obama in the general election. Bottom line, the post I'm commenting on is one of Barry's most spectacular mess-ups to date. As we've seen many times before, his rage and anxiety to find a way to diss Raunchy, me, and feminists (and TMers) in general (quite possibly with an assist from alcohol) disastrously impairs his reading comprehension. But he won't acknowledge the blunders in the post I'm responding to, of course. If he comments at all on what I've pointed out, he'll pick out something minor and make a smartass crack in hopes of distracting attention from how badly he came a-cropper. What a guy, huh?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? In Spain many bars open at 9 am or earlier. In Paris they open at 6 am. Probably he got that habit when living there. I'm sure he has plenty of booze around the house for when the bars are closed. But maybe it's not alcohol; maybe he's taking some kind of prescribed medication that's making him loopy. It's just that the mistakes he made in that post were so fantastically STPID, he had to have been impaired one way or another. He needs to realize he shouldn't post when he's in that condition.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Gee whiz, is Barry already drunk this early in the day? In Spain many bars open at 9 am or earlier. In Paris they open at 6 am. Probably he got that habit when living there. I'm sure he has plenty of booze around the house for when the bars are closed. But maybe it's not alcohol; maybe he's taking some kind of prescribed medication that's making him loopy. It's just that the mistakes he made in that post were so fantastically STPID, he had to have been impaired one way or another. He needs to realize he shouldn't post when he's in that condition. Whatever state the Turq or the Vaj are in, these infamous disciples of the Dolly Lama will post anyway.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote: [Grackle note: If you have to hold a press conference to loudly proclaim that you haven't been sidelined, then you have indeed been sidelined.] Except that, as Vaj knows, that isn't why she held the press conference. She held it with the Canadian and Mexican foreign ministers after a trilateral meeting--standard procedure for the State Department--and reporters took advantage of her availability to ask her about the rumors (standard procedure for the press corps). Clinton Derangement Syndrome continues to rage among its victims. More than a year after Hillary conceded to Obama, they're still telling lies (like the one Vaj tells above) in an attempt to discredit her. But, you see, it's *her* supporters who are holding a grudge.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
Vaj: Did anybody ever come clean and tell us how much Mrs. Clinton had to drink the morning she broke her elbow? Musta been plenty. From what I've heard, that battle-ax can put it away. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote: [Grackle note: If you have to hold a press conference to loudly proclaim that you haven't been sidelined, then you have indeed been sidelined.] U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Thursday rejected suggestions she had been sidelined by President Barack Obama, her rival for last year's Democratic presidential nomination. With media reports swirling that Clinton's influence has been usurped by the National Security Council, the top U.S. diplomat insisted she played an important role in crafting the foreign policy agenda. I really stay focused on the work that I do. I broke my elbow, not my larynx. I have been deeply involved in the shaping and implementation of our foreign policy, she told reporters. I don't really pay a lot of attention to what is said, Clinton said of several commentaries speculating she was being sidelined. Full story at: http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE56F6XM20090716? sp=true
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
azgrey wrote: From what I've heard, that battle-ax can put it away. Sexism, a term coined in the mid-20th century, refers to the belief or attitude that one gender or sex is inferior to, less competent, or less valuable than the other... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary sidelined?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex no_re...@... wrote: azgrey wrote: From what I've heard, that battle-ax can put it away. Sexism, a term coined in the mid-20th century, refers to the belief or attitude that one gender or sex is inferior to, less competent, or less valuable than the other... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism Gee WillyTex, are you saying azgrey is a sexist? Ya think? Feminism 101 by Melissa McEwan On Owning the Context: Ultimately, if you want to punch Hillary Clinton for being Hillary Clinton, or because of the sound of her voice, that's your prerogative, but you ought to at least have the integrity to own it wholly, which means owning the entire context: Irrespctive of whether it's specifically because she's a woman, the desire to punch a woman necessarily carries with it particular cultural baggage, including, for example, that women are disproportionately victimized by domestic violence and that women's voices and tones are routinely singled out as prohibitively unbearable. That's the context of womanhood. Read More: http://tinyurl.com/5yqouq http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2008/04/clinton-woman-vs-clinton-person.html Individual women don't have to earn a feminist's defense from sexist attacks; it is offered because a feminist recognizes how sexism works—against the collective. 1. Men not being sexist shouldn't be contingent upon women not being misogynist. They should stop being misogynist just because it's the right thing to do. 2. Men and women are misogynistic for different reasons: men to marginalize women, and women to ingratiate themselves with the men trying to marginalize them. Neither one is justifiable, but one is oppressive and the other is a (bad) strategy to deal with that oppression. 3. One thus sees that if the men who are misogynists weren't, the women who are misogynists wouldn't have any reason to be. Ergo, exhorting women to stop being misogynists so that men will stop gets it precisely backwards. Read More: http://tinyurl.com/5d5w4n http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2004/10/feminism-101.html
