[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB  wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert"  wrote:
> >
[I wrote:]
> >  (snip)
> > > One might also ask what *Barry* has ever done that
> > > "deserves" our attention  
> >  (snip)
> 
> Before asking that, one might ask why (other than
> projection of their own desires) Barry might WANT
> your attention, let alone think he "deserves" it.
> 
> Barry has said many times here that he's writing
> for himself, for the sheer pleasure of writing and
> for the occasional entertainment value of seeing
> how people react *or* not react to that writing.

Barry: NOBODY IS FOOLED.

(Well, maybe except for Robert. Ain't that a proud
accomplishment!)

Even Barry's *toadies* know this is bullshit. Saying
it "many times here" is just another of the many ways
Barry begs for attention.

> But again it comes down to "Don't believe what I
> say...just watch." PAY ATTENTION to who on this
> forum complains and bitches and moans when they
> post something and no one replies, or they reply
> in a way that takes the original post off on a 
> tangent. I think you'll find that that isn't me.
> I think you'll find, in fact, that it's the
> complainant above.

NOBODY IS FOOLED. They know I don't do this.


> Good perception. Take the little exercise that the
> complainant above fell for yesterday. I didn't know
> exactly how many posts she made during that period 
> of time that were *not* expressing her pleasure at 
> someone else's humiliation or misfortune, and I 
> didn't care. I started checking, found none in the
> first 20 posts or so, and got bored with it.

NOBODY IS FOOLED. They know Barry *lied*.

They know--as I've pointed out--that he assumed I
would *not* go through 270 pages of the Yahoo message
list, so he thought he was safe in denouncing me as
lacking the "self-honesty" to check.

But he miscalculated badly, because he forgot about
the other archive.

And then when his lies were exposed, he fell back
on this new lie:

 My
> only purpose in suggesting the whole "bet" was to
> see whether I could get *HER* to do it. And that
> was interesting *only* because of your insightful
> sentence above, Robert.
> 
> I wanted to see whether -- having been suckered 
> into going through all of her posts for the last
> month or so and *realizing* how many of them were
> all about her gloating over someone else's humili-
> ation or misfortune, and how few involved her
> expressing pleasure at anything human and real --
> she would LEARN anything from this.

I learned exactly what I suspected, that Barry had
lied. Not exactly breaking news, to me or anybody
else here.

I know what proportion of my posts I spend doing
what. It isn't accidental.

But let's look at the *additional* lies in Barry's
paragraph above:

First, he omits the category of posts I make that
involve straightforward discussion. I make far more
of those than he does.

Second, I don't gloat over anyone's misfortune.

Third, the *vast* majority of posts I make in which
I do anything remotely like "gloating over someone's
humiliation" are in response to Barry's posts. He's
the person I humiliate most often, by exposing his
lies, his hypocrisy, his sloppy thinking, his self-
exaltation, and his overall fraudulence. That's why
he hates me.

And that reveals yet another lie: that he Doesn't Give
a Shit what people think of him. If he really didn't
give a shit, how could he possibly be humiliated?

And along those lines, look at how much of the rest
of his post is devoted to attempting to polish his
image and defend himself from criticism.

NOBODY IS FOOLED.

> She did not. All she saw in the exercise was yet
> another attempt to scream "I won," and "Gotcha."

Didn't scream either one, of course. What happened
was that once again, Barry *LOST*. He was
humiliated. He thought he had a sure bet; he didn't
think he was risking having his lies exposed.

> That's pretty pathetic. 

Says Barry, the inveterate hypocrite, trying to make
readers believe he has something to gloat over (it's
*fine* when he does it, you see), thinking if he
screams "I won" and "Gotcha" loudly enough, folks will
think he humiliated me, when they know it was exactly
the reverse.

NOBODY IS FOOLED.

> By contrast, look at Bob Brigante's posts today.
> Having been once again placed on a "Watch List"
> of 30-year meditators and pointed at as what he
> is --

Notice how carefully Barry phrases the above to
disguise the fact that *the* "Watch List" is his own
conceit, and that Barry is the only one doing any
pointing.

 an EXAMPLE of what TM produces -- he seems
> to have LEARNED something. He has posted a bunch
> of positive stuff.

No, he hasn't. He's posted the same type of stuff he
usually does, some positive, some negative.

But Barry, controlled by his desperate need *to*
control, spins Bob's posting as the result of Barry's
own actions.

NOBODY IS FOOLED.






[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-15 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert"  wrote:
>
>  (snip)
> > One might also ask what *Barry* has ever done that
> > "deserves" our attention  
>  (snip)

Before asking that, one might ask why (other than
projection of their own desires) Barry might WANT
your attention, let alone think he "deserves" it.

Barry has said many times here that he's writing
for himself, for the sheer pleasure of writing and
for the occasional entertainment value of seeing
how people react *or* not react to that writing.

But again it comes down to "Don't believe what I
say...just watch." PAY ATTENTION to who on this
forum complains and bitches and moans when they
post something and no one replies, or they reply
in a way that takes the original post off on a 
tangent. I think you'll find that that isn't me.
I think you'll find, in fact, that it's the
complainant above.

> Turk(Barry) is an excellent movie reviewer, and also, 
> gives a sense of what is like in Europe...

A very warped, highly subjective sense of what it
is like in Europe *for me*. If anyone happens to
enjoy that very warped, highly subjective snapshot,
that's their business. 

> He also, is excellent at pushing people's buttons, to 
> have them, perhaps, think or feel more deeply, on why 
> they might feel so challenged by his comments...

Good perception. Take the little exercise that the
complainant above fell for yesterday. I didn't know
exactly how many posts she made during that period 
of time that were *not* expressing her pleasure at 
someone else's humiliation or misfortune, and I 
didn't care. I started checking, found none in the
first 20 posts or so, and got bored with it. My
only purpose in suggesting the whole "bet" was to
see whether I could get *HER* to do it. And that
was interesting *only* because of your insightful
sentence above, Robert.

I wanted to see whether -- having been suckered 
into going through all of her posts for the last
month or so and *realizing* how many of them were
all about her gloating over someone else's humili-
ation or misfortune, and how few involved her
expressing pleasure at anything human and real --
she would LEARN anything from this.

She did not. All she saw in the exercise was yet
another attempt to scream "I won," and "Gotcha."

That's pretty pathetic. 

By contrast, look at Bob Brigante's posts today.
Having been once again placed on a "Watch List"
of 30-year meditators and pointed at as what he
is -- an EXAMPLE of what TM produces -- he seems
to have LEARNED something. He has posted a bunch
of positive stuff. Personally, I happen to believe
that much of it is positive propaganda, but I am
not going to rag on it because I appreciate his
gesture. Having been pointed out as an example
of what TM produces, he posted some *positive*
things. Good for him.

What has the complainant above done?

Only attacked more, and continued to play "Gotcha."

She has learned NOTHING from this whole exercise.
Having gone through it, she will probably spend 
*all 50** of her posts this week playing "Gotcha," 
while thinking she's "winning." And she'll do the
same thing next week, and the next. As I said, 
pathetic.

> He is certainly a dedicated writer, of this rag-tag 
> group, and I wouldn't underestimate his ability, to 
> come up with some pretty wild spins, and observations 
> of everyday occurrences...

I don't know about "dedicated." "Chained to the
computer" is more like it. :-)

I work mainly at home, writing XML and code that
demands long compile and publication times. It 
is not unusual for me to spend 10 minutes sitting
and waiting for every hour I spend writing. So 
during those "down time" periods I catch up on
FFL and several other forums I participate in. I
do this for fun, and the way that my French co-
workers take cigarette breaks. ( My boss has no
problem with this, because he smokes and knows
that his cigarette breaks constitute far more
"down time" than my "Internet breaks." )

During these "Internet breaks" yes, I *delight*
in putting "wild spins" on things. Where's the 
fun in seeing stuff the way that others see it?
What's to be LEARNED from seeing or describing
things the way that others see them?

> He is also, one of the only people in the world, who 
> has actually witnessed someone levitating!

Actually, to clarify, I am one of thousands who
have witnessed someone levitating, and that's
speaking only of Frederick Lenz - Rama. 

> Turqs bag of tricks is almost unlimited!
> And his subtle removal of masks...

One of the benefits of studying with Frederick
Lenz - Rama is that he was the polar opposite
of Maharishi. Maharishi was all about heaping
praise on students to get them to do things.
Tell them they're great and they'll give him
money. Tell them they're the most important
people on the planet and they won't notice that
none of them are enlightened yet. There was no
pressure to ever CHANGE around Maharishi. You
could stay stuck in the same ruts for decades,
and as evidenced here, many did.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-14 Thread Robert
 (snip)
> One might also ask what *Barry* has ever done that
> "deserves" our attention  
 (snip)
Turk(Barry) is an excellent movie reviewer, and also, gives a sense of what is 
like in Europe...
He also, is excellent at pushing people's buttons, to have them, perhaps, think 
or feel more deeply, on why they might feel so challenged by his comments...
He is certainly a dedicated writer, of this rag-tag group, and I wouldn't 
underestimate his ability, to come up with some pretty wild spins, and 
observations of  everyday occurrences...
He is also, one of the only people in the world, who has actually witnessed 
someone levitating!
Turqs bag of tricks is almost unlimited!
And his subtle removal of masks...
As M.J. would exclaim, 'Who's Bad?!'

r.g.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-14 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB  wrote:

> "Fill in the blanks" for us a little, Raunch.
> Give us one reason WHY we should pay any attention
> to you, as you seem so desperate for us to do. What
> have you ever DONE that "deserves" our attention
> but whine?

One might also ask what *Barry* has ever done that
"deserves" our attention besides whining about
TM and MMY and the TMO and TMers and any spiritual
group or ideas he doesn't like. 

And why should we pay any attention to that whining
when so much of it is knowingly factually dishonest
and almost all the rest of it deliberately unfair?

How many genuinely spiritual people do we know who
wouldn't have to take a shower after reading Barry's
output here?

How's that novel about the Cathars coming along,
Barry? Got a publisher for it yet? When's it coming
out?




[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-14 Thread raunchydog
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon  wrote:
>
> I got a little past 30 seconds and it just gets worse  the further it goes. 
> Absolutely dispicable and the people that laugh at this *humor* are just as 
> bad. This is pure evil.

Thank you.

> 
> --- On Tue, 7/14/09, raunchydog  wrote:
> 
> 
> From: raunchydog 
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 4:03 AM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, "Rick Archer"  wrote:
> >
> > From: FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. 
> > com]
> > On Behalf Of raunchydog
> > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 9:18 PM
> > To: FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin
> > 
> > Is this comedian funny? What say you?
> > http://tinyurl. com/lbouj8
> > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=KdFJ-hFFdI8
> > <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=KdFJ-hFFdI8& feature=email> &feature=email
> > About 30 seconds of him offended me enough to hit the stop button.
> >
> 
> Thank you.
>




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-14 Thread Mike Dixon
I got a little past 30 seconds and it just gets worse  the further it goes. 
Absolutely dispicable and the people that laugh at this *humor* are just as 
bad. This is pure evil.

--- On Tue, 7/14/09, raunchydog  wrote:


From: raunchydog 
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 4:03 AM








--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, "Rick Archer"  wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com]
> On Behalf Of raunchydog
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 9:18 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin
> 
> Is this comedian funny? What say you?
> http://tinyurl. com/lbouj8
> http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=KdFJ-hFFdI8
> <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=KdFJ-hFFdI8& feature=email> &feature=email
> About 30 seconds of him offended me enough to hit the stop button.
>

Thank you.

















  

[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-14 Thread raunchydog
Oy.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert"  wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert"  wrote:
> > >
> > >  (snip)
> > > Screw, that Nasty Nazi Whore, Sarah Palin!...
> > > 
> > > What really concerns me, is the racist feces, that some reich wing blogs, 
> > > and other racist, sexist sites, are spewing towards Malia Obama, because 
> > > she was where a 'Peace Shirt' in Italy...
> > > What a bunch of Nazi Ass-holes...
> > > What a bunch of ignorant animals...
> > > This is what the Obama's have to govern, these morans?
> > > Pitiful, country we live in, with this scum, really sickening to me.
> > > 
> > > r.g.
> > >
> > 
> > Robert, You have no moral standing to denounce hatred  
>  (snip)
> When, I feel someone, is stirring up the flames of racism and using her sex, 
> to marginalize her competition...
> When she stirs up fear and hatred, to the crowds she is speaking to...
> When I feel someone is a narcissistic megalomaniac...
> 
> Then I feel it is my obligation, with my history, and intuition...
> To point that out, so that it may lose the power to manipulate, which it 
> seeks to do...
> 
> Sarah Palin reminds me of Fascism, in seed form!
> I need to remind people of the reality, of who is behind her curtain...
> When I see the right wing in this country turning to fascism, then I need to 
> make people aware of how this fearful propaganda works...
> And, right now...those forces are rearing their ugly head(s) again...
> r.g.
>




[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-14 Thread raunchydog
Raunchy: Hey Barry! Get your fingers out of your ears.
Barry: Lalalalalalalalala
Judy: He gets this way when anyone brings up the topic of sexism.
Barry: Lalalalalalalalala
Raunchy: He's starting to froth at the mouth.
Barry: (Spits up on himself and wets his pants.)
Judy: Hold him down while I put this sock in his mouth.
Barry: Umumumumumumumum
Raunchy: There that's better, not so noisy.
Barry: (Writhing on the floor)
Raunchy: Geez, He's he's moving so violently he's going to hurt himself.
Judy: Hold onto his legs while I hogtie him.
Raunchy: Hogtie! Very funny.
Judy: High five, sister.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB  wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"  wrote:
> >
> > Robert, You have no moral standing to denounce hatred 
> > toward Malia as long as you stoke the fires of hatred 
> > toward Sarah Palin or any other woman for that matter. 
> 
> This from the sad old woman whose "moral
> standing" is based on cruising PUMA sites for
> articles to repost to stoke the fires of sad
> old woman hatred towards Barack Obama.
> 
> That's **OK**, you see, because Obama *deserves*
> to be vilified.  :-)
> 
> > Don't you see that a sexist, or racist attack whether 
> > it is from the left or the right on any female, Malia, 
> > Sarah, Hillary, Michelle, any woman, comes from a place 
> > of deep hatred of women? 
> 
> Whereas her ONGOING reposting of hate articles
> about the guy who did nothing more damning than
> to point out that her preferred candidate didn't
> have the "right stuff" to be considered a real
> candidate for President is just FINE. That's OK.
> 
> Plus, it's **OK** for sad old wommen to
> hate men, because they've been *victimized*,
> donchaknow? That makes it **OK** for them to 
> whine non-stop about the victimization of women
> instead of doing anything productive with their
> lives. Accomplishing something would be counter-
> productive, because the image of a successful
> woman undercuts their constant whines that they
> are being *victimized*. Better to be a whiny
> victim than to succeed...that's their motto.  :-)
> 
> Raunchy, the day you can find some accomplishment
> to list in one of your anonymous Internet profiles
> other than your sex and age, you have the right to
> expect someone to listen to your whines as if you
> mattered. Until then, you are just a sad old woman 
> with a grudge she can't let go of.
> 
> I repeat the thing I've said before, and that you
> know to be true. If Hillary Clinton or any *real*
> feminist ever met you and felt your whiny "I am
> victim, hear me roar" aura, they'd have to take
> a shower afterwards. Real feminists **DO** things.
> They have no time for whining. You seem to have
> nothing but. 
> 
> Do you even WORK? Do you even HAVE goals in life,
> other than to try to get everyone to focus on
> victimhood the way you do? 
> 
> "Fill in the blanks" for us a little, Raunch.
> Give us one reason WHY we should pay any attention
> to you, as you seem so desperate for us to do. What
> have you ever DONE that "deserves" our attention
> but whine? 
> 
> The feminists I know are CEOs of companies. They
> have won medals at the Olympics. They are light
> and comfortable with their sex and their sexuality
> and light and comfortable in the company of men.
> They perceive no "threat" from the men around them. 
> They perceive no "hatred" from the men around them.
> 
> My feminist friends deserve to be listened to when
> they speak about what a woman can accomplish. You
> do not, because as far as I can tell, you have
> never accomplished anything. Neither has your 
> sister-in-whining Judy. You just want to rant 
> and whine and have people listen to you AS IF
> you had accomplished things.
> 
> Life doesn't work that way. You are anonymous
> whiners on the Internet, while the women who are
> working to change the way that wommen are perceived
> and treated in the world are busy out in the world
> actually doing things. You'll never measure up to
> the least of them...
>




[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-14 Thread Robert
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"  wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert"  wrote:
> >
> >  (snip)
> > Screw, that Nasty Nazi Whore, Sarah Palin!...
> > 
> > What really concerns me, is the racist feces, that some reich wing blogs, 
> > and other racist, sexist sites, are spewing towards Malia Obama, because 
> > she was where a 'Peace Shirt' in Italy...
> > What a bunch of Nazi Ass-holes...
> > What a bunch of ignorant animals...
> > This is what the Obama's have to govern, these morans?
> > Pitiful, country we live in, with this scum, really sickening to me.
> > 
> > r.g.
> >
> 
> Robert, You have no moral standing to denounce hatred  
 (snip)
When, I feel someone, is stirring up the flames of racism and using her sex, to 
marginalize her competition...
When she stirs up fear and hatred, to the crowds she is speaking to...
When I feel someone is a narcissistic megalomaniac...

Then I feel it is my obligation, with my history, and intuition...
To point that out, so that it may lose the power to manipulate, which it seeks 
to do...

Sarah Palin reminds me of Fascism, in seed form!
I need to remind people of the reality, of who is behind her curtain...
When I see the right wing in this country turning to fascism, then I need to 
make people aware of how this fearful propaganda works...
And, right now...those forces are rearing their ugly head(s) again...
r.g.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-14 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"  wrote:
>
> Is this comedian funny? What say you?
> http://tinyurl.com/lbouj8
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdFJ-hFFdI8&feature=email
>

Interesting comment:

"get your facts straight shithead. Stanhope's followers are libertarians. But I 
honestly hope Palin does well in the 2012 primaries just for the sheer 
entertainment value of the campaign. (Dont forget, she was an empty vessel put 
in the spotlight by McCain simply to try to pick up Clinton supporters in 2008 
after Obama won the dem. nomination and nothing moreOne of the most 
obvious, sad moves in modern politics)



[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-14 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"  wrote:
>
> Robert, You have no moral standing to denounce hatred 
> toward Malia as long as you stoke the fires of hatred 
> toward Sarah Palin or any other woman for that matter. 

This from the sad old woman whose "moral
standing" is based on cruising PUMA sites for
articles to repost to stoke the fires of sad
old woman hatred towards Barack Obama.

That's **OK**, you see, because Obama *deserves*
to be vilified.  :-)

> Don't you see that a sexist, or racist attack whether 
> it is from the left or the right on any female, Malia, 
> Sarah, Hillary, Michelle, any woman, comes from a place 
> of deep hatred of women? 

Whereas her ONGOING reposting of hate articles
about the guy who did nothing more damning than
to point out that her preferred candidate didn't
have the "right stuff" to be considered a real
candidate for President is just FINE. That's OK.

Plus, it's **OK** for sad old wommen to
hate men, because they've been *victimized*,
donchaknow? That makes it **OK** for them to 
whine non-stop about the victimization of women
instead of doing anything productive with their
lives. Accomplishing something would be counter-
productive, because the image of a successful
woman undercuts their constant whines that they
are being *victimized*. Better to be a whiny
victim than to succeed...that's their motto.  :-)

Raunchy, the day you can find some accomplishment
to list in one of your anonymous Internet profiles
other than your sex and age, you have the right to
expect someone to listen to your whines as if you
mattered. Until then, you are just a sad old woman 
with a grudge she can't let go of.

I repeat the thing I've said before, and that you
know to be true. If Hillary Clinton or any *real*
feminist ever met you and felt your whiny "I am
victim, hear me roar" aura, they'd have to take
a shower afterwards. Real feminists **DO** things.
They have no time for whining. You seem to have
nothing but. 

Do you even WORK? Do you even HAVE goals in life,
other than to try to get everyone to focus on
victimhood the way you do? 

"Fill in the blanks" for us a little, Raunch.
Give us one reason WHY we should pay any attention
to you, as you seem so desperate for us to do. What
have you ever DONE that "deserves" our attention
but whine? 

The feminists I know are CEOs of companies. They
have won medals at the Olympics. They are light
and comfortable with their sex and their sexuality
and light and comfortable in the company of men.
They perceive no "threat" from the men around them. 
They perceive no "hatred" from the men around them.

My feminist friends deserve to be listened to when
they speak about what a woman can accomplish. You
do not, because as far as I can tell, you have
never accomplished anything. Neither has your 
sister-in-whining Judy. You just want to rant 
and whine and have people listen to you AS IF
you had accomplished things.

Life doesn't work that way. You are anonymous
whiners on the Internet, while the women who are
working to change the way that wommen are perceived
and treated in the world are busy out in the world
actually doing things. You'll never measure up to
the least of them...




[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-13 Thread raunchydog
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert"  wrote:
>
>  (snip)
> Screw, that Nasty Nazi Whore, Sarah Palin!...
> 
> What really concerns me, is the racist feces, that some reich wing blogs, and 
> other racist, sexist sites, are spewing towards Malia Obama, because she was 
> where a 'Peace Shirt' in Italy...
> What a bunch of Nazi Ass-holes...
> What a bunch of ignorant animals...
> This is what the Obama's have to govern, these morans?
> Pitiful, country we live in, with this scum, really sickening to me.
> 
> r.g.
>

Robert, You have no moral standing to denounce hatred toward Malia as long as 
you stoke the fires of hatred toward Sarah Palin or any other woman for that 
matter. Do you think Sarah would approve of horrible attacks on Malia when she 
has fought against vicious attacks on her own children? Of course, she would 
not. Watch the video link of people laughing at a comedian attacking Sarah and 
her Downs Syndrome son, Trig. Tell me if you think it's funny and let that be a 
measure of your compassion for others.

Don't you see that a sexist, or racist attack whether it is from the left or 
the right on any female, Malia, Sarah, Hillary, Michelle, any woman, comes from 
a place of deep hatred of women? It is sick and shameful that anyone would 
attack Malia for her race, her sex, or politics. The stupidity of sexism and 
racism has long been with us. Let it stop with you.

http://tinyurl.com/lbouj8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdFJ-hFFdI8&feature=email



[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-13 Thread off_world_beings

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 , "Robert" 
wrote:
>
>  (snip)
> Screw, that Nasty Nazi Whore, Sarah Palin!...
>
> What really concerns me, is the racist feces, that some reich wing
blogs, and other racist, sexist sites, are spewing towards Malia Obama,
because she was where a 'Peace Shirt' in Italy...
> What a bunch of Nazi Ass-holes...
> What a bunch of ignorant animals...
> This is what the Obama's have to govern, these morons?
> Pitiful, country we live in, with this scum, really sickening to me.>>

Well said Robert. Right on.

OffWorld



[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-13 Thread off_world_beings


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer"  wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of raunchydog
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 9:18 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin
>
> Is this comedian funny? What say you?
> http://tinyurl.com/lbouj8
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdFJ-hFFdI8
> 
&feature=email
> About 30 seconds of him offended me enough to hit the stop button.>

Its only funny if you are enlightened.

OffWorld



[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-13 Thread off_world_beings

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 , "raunchydog" 
wrote:
>
> Is this comedian funny? What say you?
> http://tinyurl.com/lbouj8 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdFJ-hFFdI8&feature=email

>

Is "raunchydog" the "lowdowndoggie" from Youtube?

OffWorld



[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-13 Thread raunchydog
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer"  wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of raunchydog
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 9:18 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin
>  
> Is this comedian funny? What say you?
> http://tinyurl.com/lbouj8
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdFJ-hFFdI8
>  &feature=email
> About 30 seconds of him offended me enough to hit the stop button.
>

Thank you.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Misogynistic attack on Sarah Palin

2009-07-13 Thread Robert
 (snip)
Screw, that Nasty Nazi Whore, Sarah Palin!...

What really concerns me, is the racist feces, that some reich wing blogs, and 
other racist, sexist sites, are spewing towards Malia Obama, because she was 
where a 'Peace Shirt' in Italy...
What a bunch of Nazi Ass-holes...
What a bunch of ignorant animals...
This is what the Obama's have to govern, these morans?
Pitiful, country we live in, with this scum, really sickening to me.

r.g.