Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Islamization of America in 2013
On 1/12/2014 4:54 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: You are absol ... fuckin.. uutaaly right. I was never initiated into Willy-ism. Go finger ... So, this is what resulted from from you learning the mahârudrâbhishekam, but your guru failed to teach you the rudiments of spiritual discourse. Go figure.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Islamization of America in 2013
As you know, I had a ritvikâcharya teach me mahârudrâbhishekam. Over a period of 5-6 years Ann. Well, whatever it is you have been taught or think you know, what good is it if you continue to take yourself so seriously? I mean, really, all this teaching you have subjected yourself to has done nothing for your ability to lighten up or drop the pride. Still, it could be worse - I guess. Good point, Ann. So, for what purpose I wonder, would anyone need to learn how to perform the mahârudrâbhishekam? In TM practice you get only one single mantra to meditate on. This one single syllable contains the secret of the universe, if there is one. All you need is one mantra to meditate on and you will get as much enlightenment as you are going to get. If one mantra is not enough for anyone to experience PC, how would a whole gaggle of nonsense syllables, plus some some arm waving and finger-snapping, increase their odds of obtaining a sustained mental equipoise Go figure. On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:02 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote: Actually, you have no idea what you are talking about . As you know, I had a ritvikâcharya teach me mahârudrâbhishekam. Over a period of 5-6 years he also imparted much of the Vedika view of values. According to him, the Tantrika view was that the universe was actualized by limitless shakti-s that structured its being, patterns and interactions. The only thing he wouldn't yield about was teaching me the mechanics of agni-hotra (although he performed one for me at the installation of my shiva-lingam). I believe he considered me too far from being a renouncer and therefore prone to get into trouble with an agni-hotra ... all because if done properly, the yajñamana receives the results quickly and decisively. You also forget that I have a Vajrayana Tantric and Dzogchen teacher. Certainly different practices but when he first saw my altar he pointed to the traditionally carved shiva lingam and commented “original Tantra”. All this means that your evaluation is a parody of a Willy-ism - which is as much value as I can give it. Well, whatever it is you have been taught or think you know, what good is it if you continue to take yourself so seriously? I mean, really, all this teaching you have subjected yourself to has done nothing for your ability to lighten up or drop the pride. Still, it could be worse - I guess.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Islamization of America in 2013
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: On 1/12/2014 4:54 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: You are absol ... fuckin.. uutaaly right. I was never initiated into Willy-ism. Go finger ... So, this is what resulted from from you learning the mahârudrâbhishekam, but your guru failed to teach you the rudiments of spiritual discourse. Go figure. Oh, I think he has the rude-i-ments down alright.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Islamization of America in 2013
emptybill wrote: he also imparted much of the Vedika view of values. According to him, the Tantrika view was that the universe was actualized by limitless shakti-s that structured its being, patterns and interactions. Your teacher may have been confused. As a Buddhist tantric you would be knowing that there's no shakti mentioned in Tibetan Buddhism. According to my guru, The Lama, there is wisdom and means; male - female polarity, but the female is the wisdom aspect and the male aspect is means, represented by the Tibetan vajra and bell respectively. The vajra is representative of upaya (skilful means) whereas its companion tool, the bell which is a female symbol, denotes prajna (wisdom). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vajra On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 3:11 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: Actually, you have no idea what you are talking about . As you know, I had a ritvikâcharya teach me mahârudrâbhishekam. Over a period of 5-6 years he also imparted much of the Vedika view of values. According to him, the Tantrika view was that the universe was actualized by limitless shakti-s that structured its being, patterns and interactions. The only thing he wouldn't yield about was teaching me the mechanics of agni-hotra (although he performed one for me at the installation of my shiva-lingam). I believe he considered me too far from being a renouncer and therefore prone to get into trouble with an agni-hotra ... all because if done properly, the yajñamana receives the results quickly and decisively. You also forget that I have a Vajrayana Tantric and Dzogchen teacher. Certainly different practices but when he first saw my altar he pointed to the traditionally carved shiva lingam and commented “original Tantra”. All this means that your evaluation is a parody of a Willy-ism - which is as much value as I can give it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Islamization of America in 2013
You also forget that I have a Vajrayana Tantric and Dzogchen teacher. Certainly different practices but when he first saw my altar he pointed to the traditionally carved shiva lingam and commented “original Tantra”. You two are comparing apples to oranges, but I'm practicing tantra with a real live shakti. There's nothing wrong with self-starting but it doesn't compare to the real deal. All this means that your evaluation is a parody of a Willy-ism - which is as much value as I can give it. I've tried to dumb it down as much as I could. Let's see if you can understand this: 1.3 jus b reg 2 x y med, ne alt sans 3 guns, seps abs, n' eyes-wide shut; nodoze, no bear down, u enjoy. ( Wallah Sutra 1.3) According to MY, most people are born in a state of mental equipoise but quickly loose it, either through karma, bad diet, bad treatment, extreme stress, or moving away from the physical location most conducive to their natural constitution and temperament. Everyone is recommended to discover for themselves what the optimum conditions for them might be and to try to keep themselves on an even keel. The primary method for returning and maintaining a state of mental equipoise is meditation that is transcendental, and as a supplementary practice, the siddhis, in which stress is replaced with bubbling bliss. On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 3:11 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: Actually, you have no idea what you are talking about . As you know, I had a ritvikâcharya teach me mahârudrâbhishekam. Over a period of 5-6 years he also imparted much of the Vedika view of values. According to him, the Tantrika view was that the universe was actualized by limitless shakti-s that structured its being, patterns and interactions. The only thing he wouldn't yield about was teaching me the mechanics of agni-hotra (although he performed one for me at the installation of my shiva-lingam). I believe he considered me too far from being a renouncer and therefore prone to get into trouble with an agni-hotra ... all because if done properly, the yajñamana receives the results quickly and decisively. You also forget that I have a Vajrayana Tantric and Dzogchen teacher. Certainly different practices but when he first saw my altar he pointed to the traditionally carved shiva lingam and commented “original Tantra”. All this means that your evaluation is a parody of a Willy-ism - which is as much value as I can give it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Islamization of America in 2013
Nice, Richard. I'm just old enough to realize the value of staying on an even keel and doing what helps that in terms of diet, sleep, exercise, etc. I also like that the good doctor said: moderation in everything. But don't miss anything. OTOH I have missed a few things like LSD and don't mind that I have! On Monday, January 13, 2014 10:45 AM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: You also forget that I have a Vajrayana Tantric and Dzogchen teacher. Certainly different practices but when he first saw my altar he pointed to the traditionally carved shiva lingam and commented “original Tantra”. You two are comparing apples to oranges, but I'm practicing tantra with a real live shakti. There's nothing wrong with self-starting but it doesn't compare to the real deal. All this means that your evaluation is a parody of a Willy-ism - which is as much value as I can give it. I've tried to dumb it down as much as I could. Let's see if you can understand this: 1.3 jus b reg 2 x y med, ne alt sans 3 guns, seps abs, n' eyes-wide shut; nodoze, no bear down, u enjoy. ( Wallah Sutra 1.3) According to MY, most people are born in a state of mental equipoise but quickly loose it, either through karma, bad diet, bad treatment, extreme stress, or moving away from the physical location most conducive to their natural constitution and temperament. Everyone is recommended to discover for themselves what the optimum conditions for them might be and to try to keep themselves on an even keel. The primary method for returning and maintaining a state of mental equipoise is meditation that is transcendental, and as a supplementary practice, the siddhis, in which stress is replaced with bubbling bliss. On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 3:11 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: Actually, you have no idea what you are talking about . As you know, I had a ritvikâcharya teach me mahârudrâbhishekam. Over a period of 5-6 years he also imparted much of the Vedika view of values. According to him, the Tantrika view was that the universe was actualized by limitless shakti-s that structured its being, patterns and interactions. The only thing he wouldn't yield about was teaching me the mechanics of agni-hotra (although he performed one for me at the installation of my shiva-lingam). I believe he considered me too far from being a renouncer and therefore prone to get into trouble with an agni-hotra ... all because if done properly, the yajñamana receives the results quickly and decisively. You also forget that I have a Vajrayana Tantric and Dzogchen teacher. Certainly different practices but when he first saw my altar he pointed to the traditionally carved shiva lingam and commented “original Tantra”. All this means that your evaluation is a parody of a Willy-ism - which is as much value as I can give it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Islamization of America in 2013
Get up on the wrong side of the bed this morning or meditate facing south? ;-) On 01/12/2014 09:30 AM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: Typical clap-trap appeasement.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Islamization of America in 2013
So says the book learned tantric. And you criticize Willy. Go figure. On 01/12/2014 11:08 AM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: After death, bodies are turned with the head facing South to signal the yama-dhutas to come and lead the soul to Lord Yama. Which is why Jñana Dakshinamurti Shiva sits in meditation facing South. He is the preceptor residing in unborn-undying awareness (jñana-chaitanyam) - marking death as just an idea in the mind of the deluded. So thank you for the compliment. I'll try and remind the jihadi-s that you are a KINO - a kafir in name only.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Islamization of America in 2013
Well it's Breitbart, what do you think? They'd love to cut off the heads of everyone who isn't conservative. :-D On 01/12/2014 11:59 AM, jr_...@yahoo.com wrote: Empty, The article is overly fearful of Muslims here in the USA. As of date, Muslims represent only about one percent of the population according to Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_the_United_States
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Islamization of America in 2013
But you were never initiated into the practice. You obviously didn't get the humor siddhi either. :-D On 01/12/2014 01:11 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: Actually, you have no idea what you are talking about . As you know, I had a ritvikâcharya teach me mahârudrâbhishekam. Over a period of 5-6 years he also imparted much of the Vedika view of values. According to him, the Tantrika view was that the universe was actualized by limitless shakti-s that structured its being, patterns and interactions. The only thing he wouldn't yield about was teaching me the mechanics of agni-hotra (although he performed one for me at the installation of my shiva-lingam). I believe he considered me too far from being a renouncer and therefore prone to get into trouble with an agni-hotra ... all because if done properly, the yajñamana receives the results quickly and decisively. You also forget that I have a Vajrayana Tantric and Dzogchen teacher. Certainly different practices but when he first saw my altar he pointed to the traditionally carved shiva lingam and commented “original Tantra”. All this means that your evaluation is a parody of a Willy-ism - which is as much value as I can give it.
