Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Obama's life is in danger, according to Invincible America
On Feb 27, 2009, at 10:37 AM, Duveyoung wrote: This telephone company refusal to collect the fees is credited with killing the 900 industry. Weren't those mostly for pornographic stuff? Now, I don't think I have clarity, but from this kind of reporting, it could be concluded that the African American community has a stronger resonance with psychic offers than other groups -- on the other hand, maybe any group that's mostly under the poverty line will be tipped into grasping at straws in some manner. Yeah, maybe. I feel like I'm skating on thin ice to even broach this concept, but I wanted to share my business history with this phenomenon and then suggest that Obama might be far more likely to hire a psychic than you suspect -- Obama may have had many of his family and friends use the PFN, and maybe he was saturated with positive reports about such. And, as we all know here, despite our massive intellects, all of us too grasped at straws in just such a manner. And miss not that if Obama is to succeed, he'll definitely need a miracle. Let's write an open letter to Obama and suggest that he have consultations with Swami Beyondananda. Maybe on a 900 line. Sal
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Obama's life is in danger, according to Invincible America
Sex Chat Hotline? Actually, an offshoot derivative of that could be a winner. A 900 line/ or live video with cc account Tantric Sex Chat Hot Line. FF is a natural. (Feel the Universe within you as you become Shiva, your lignam becomes Shiva, and you and I are going to Unite in the primordial Fireworks of the Universe -- Shiva and Shakti however your account needs filling before we can continue onto the Ultimate Tantric Union Climax) -Headquarters in FF? That should provide some fine part time work for rounding sidhas. Can we shoot from the hip or must everyone follow a script which is religiously correct, or could someone say, request the 'Steaming Hot Jesus,' or the 'Sexy Little Cherubim?' We already know the 'Evil Succubi' would be the best seller. I know from experience they are devilish numbers. Where the the line of decency start or end? What if someone wants some weird New Age loving from their deceased partner? Yikes. I am staying away from that job. However, I do have one suggestion, unless of course it's part of the littany, and that is, if someone wants to feel sexy stay away from Sidha fashions which were specifically created to provide as little sexuality as humanly possible, while being materially as think as curtains. Sorry, just waxing on the Sidha fashion Brazilian bikini, replete with titanium lock set.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Obama's life is in danger, according to Invincible America
raunchydog wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote: Okay, so who would you suggest that would be better (this should be interesting)? Oh that's too easy. Hillary, of course. I don't think the privileged would prefer Clinton either. After all Bill did raise taxes on them back in the 1990s. And Hillary probably wouldn't do any better than Obama. Don't know how many times we have to say here that once someone gets into office they have the mandated come to Jesus meeting with the king makers and campaign promises disappear. Some day maybe we'll wise up and get rid of the king makers.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Obama's life is in danger, according to Invincible America
Because they're not that good. We can trip them up. There can be and probably are wealthy people who aren't part of their club who would back such an insurrection. I think that's why they tried to kill the tech boom because the billionaires coming out of it didn't want to play their game. Don't give up. Do you want to be a serf? Duveyoung wrote: Just between you and me, are you able to list the names of the king makers? I think the concept of the Illuminati is valid, but I struggle to see any proof that could be called catching them red-handed. OTOH, who are we kidding with this speculation about behind the Oz curtains when we have BushCo as our most recent example of power-lords marauding without the least reining-in of their abuse for secrecy's sake. So why even be a conspiracy nut about the Illuminati when what's easily seen is right there in our face and we can't do jack shit about it? Edg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote: raunchydog wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: Okay, so who would you suggest that would be better (this should be interesting)? Oh that's too easy. Hillary, of course. I don't think the privileged would prefer Clinton either. After all Bill did raise taxes on them back in the 1990s. And Hillary probably wouldn't do any better than Obama. Don't know how many times we have to say here that once someone gets into office they have the mandated come to Jesus meeting with the king makers and campaign promises disappear. Some day maybe we'll wise up and get rid of the king makers.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Obama's life is in danger, according to Invincible America
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Jan-Åke Ingvar Jönsson transcendentalcosmicbl...@yahoo.se wrote: Have a look at these Obama-facts and statements: Barack Obama: The Naked Emperor: www.davidicke.com/obama Obama-lies, which Obama did you vote for?: http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=5630 The Obama Deception: http://www.obamadeception.net/ Very good. Now if only I can get Gmail filters to make Bhairitu's posts invisible. A quick history of Obama. Ran unopposed for the Illinois legislature because of constant challenging of other candidate's legitimate claims to be on the ballot. Soon after ran for US Senator. Held no position of distinction in the US Senate during his single term. Quickly started running for US president. While campaigning, refused to reveal his birth certificate, resulting in many law suits around the country still pending which challenge the legality of his election to the presidency. Also refused to provide school, college, law school transcripts and work product. No evidence that Obama actually wrote any law opinions or did any publishable legal writing despite being head of the law review. No significant legislation proposed in the Senate. In short, no real experience in government. No details in his record to have to campaign in spite of. Spoke about redoing the NAFTA during his campaign. Of all the hundreds of things he's promised since becoming President, the only thing he's done about NAFTA was to go to Canada and tell the Canadians how much he loved them. Just the kind of man we needed as ink blotch that we can all project our malcontent with the current government on. Pretty much another JFK, who's only real contribution in politics was to get killed in office and therefore get people teary eyed about the hype that wasn't any more than that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Obama's life is in danger, according to Invincible America
Hope. Change. Believe. Sacrifice. Coming Together. wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Jan-Åke Ingvar Jönsson transcendentalcosmicbl...@yahoo.se wrote: Have a look at these Obama-facts and statements: Barack Obama: The Naked Emperor: www.davidicke.com/obama Obama-lies, which Obama did you vote for?: http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=5630 The Obama Deception: http://www.obamadeception.net/ Very good. Now if only I can get Gmail filters to make Bhairitu's posts invisible. You can't hide from me by changing your handle. :-P A quick history of Obama. Ran unopposed for the Illinois legislature because of constant challenging of other candidate's legitimate claims to be on the ballot. Soon after ran for US Senator. Held no position of distinction in the US Senate during his single term. Quickly started running for US president. While campaigning, refused to reveal his birth certificate, resulting in many law suits around the country still pending which challenge the legality of his election to the presidency. Also refused to provide school, college, law school transcripts and work product. No evidence that Obama actually wrote any law opinions or did any publishable legal writing despite being head of the law review. No significant legislation proposed in the Senate. In short, no real experience in government. No details in his record to have to campaign in spite of. Spoke about redoing the NAFTA during his campaign. Of all the hundreds of things he's promised since becoming President, the only thing he's done about NAFTA was to go to Canada and tell the Canadians how much he loved them. Just the kind of man we needed as ink blotch that we can all project our malcontent with the current government on. Pretty much another JFK, who's only real contribution in politics was to get killed in office and therefore get people teary eyed about the hype that wasn't any more than that. Okay, so who would you suggest that would be better (this should be interesting)?
