Re: [Finale] OT - New toys (I mean, productivity aids!)

2004-08-26 Thread dhbailey
Howard Begun wrote:
David Bailey wrote:

Are there any Windows users with wireless networks on this list who
also use cordless keyboards and/or mice?  I am very interested in
it, but not if it eats batteries every few hours.

I use an MS Wireless Desktop Elite which includes an Intellimouse
Explorer 2.0. I have a D-Link 802.11g wireless router sitting about 3
feet from the mouse/keyboard receiver. I've had no interference
problems and I get about 2-3 months on the mouse batteries and 5-6 on
the keyboard. This is with daily (8-10 hours) use. Earlier MS mice
did go through batteries pretty quickly (weeks, not hours) but the
latest generation is supposed to have much better power management
and my own experience seems to back this up. More importantly, I find
no difference in response or precision than with corded mice.
[snip]
Howard,
Thanks for your reply.  I will continue to consider cordless mouse and 
keyboard, based on your experience.

David
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Arrangement, Orchestration or Transcription?

2004-08-26 Thread dhbailey
Richard Yates wrote:
The term bandstration has been in widespread use for over 40 years.
And you're advocating the use of such a monstrosity?
I've never heard it, myself, and think it is ridiculous.
--
David W. Fenton

Googling bandstration (a common method of judging frequency of usage that
is used in alt.english.usage)  turns up only 18 hits. This is a remarkably
low total for a 40 year old term. (for comparison David W. Fenton turns up
4,950)
Googling orchestration turned up 385,000 hits!
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Tabbed Browsing

2004-08-26 Thread Javier Ruiz
Don´t you have the feeling that new listers are appearing lately?

Mmmm...
I wonder if they are tabbed-browsing-oriented or not?

Are they simple-entry or speedy-entry oriented?

Mac or PC?

Page view or scroll view?

Enjoying,
Javier.

 And while all the debate has been furiously raging (well, squalling at least)
 I downloaded Firefox to see what the fuss was all about.
 
 I've since been having a great time tabbing.  C'est très frais!Thanks for
 passing on the word...
 
 Best, 
 
 Les


___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] Tabbed Browsing

2004-08-26 Thread Fisher, Allen
Another thing that every tabbed browser I've tried has a feature called
groups. These are essentially folders of bookmarks (nothing new here),
that show up in your links bar. When you click on one of these folders,
it lists all the links in that group and at the bottom of the list is an
item called Open All In Tabs (this is the different part...) I find
this particularly handy because I have a list of things I visit on
different days of the week, so I have a group for each day of the week,
and then I have a group of websites I visit daily. I open up the Daily
group in tabs. It loads all the pages at once, and then as I go through
each one I close the tab. There's the next site I want to hit all loaded
up. Quite handy.

Just my use of tabs...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark D Lew
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 4:52 PM
To: Finale-List 3
Subject: Re: [Finale] Tabbed Browsing



On Aug 25, 2004, at 12:06 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:

 I actually first started seeing the need for tabs with regard to 
 Google searches. With tabs, you can open an interesting link from the 
 results page in a new tab, then surf around the site for a while if 
 you want, and just close the tab when you're done to get back to the 
 search results. You don't have to hit back a bunch of times, or 
 search Google again.

This actually sounds mildly useful.  It's the first thing anyone here 
has described that sounds like something I might do.  Except that I 
don't hit back a bunch of times.  When I'm done chasing down one 
Google lead, I go to the History menu and go to the last Google entry 
and it puts me back at my original search.

___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Arrangement, Orchestration or Transcription?

2004-08-26 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Aug 25, 2004, at 3:42 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Bandstration?
?
Someone please tell me WHAT the classical music world has against the 
word arrangement.  What's wrong with saying Arranged for band?  
Arranged for string quartet?  Arranged for wind octet?

- Darcy
The word bandstration was originally coined to designate what it is 
that a composer does  with the various instruments when writing an 
original piece for band. This is not arrangement.

Later, the term became used  more broadly to designate an arrangement 
for band; but it should be noted that AFAIK there is no verb to 
bandstrate.

For good examples of how the word is used in practice, take a look at 
what comes up when you Google it.

Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Re: OT Meanings of words

2004-08-26 Thread Harold Owen
Dear folks,
I think most of us are interested in how the meaning of words change 
over time. One of my favorite examples is the word nice. Its 
original meaning was naughty. I wonder how and when its meaning was 
completely turned around.

Hal
--
Harold Owen
2830 Emerald St., Eugene, OR 97403
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit my web site at:
http://uoregon.edu/~hjowen
FAX: (509) 461-3608
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: OT Meanings of words was: [Finale] Arrangement, Orchestration or Transcription?

2004-08-26 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Aug 25, 2004, at 5:34 PM, James Bailey wrote:
 Words have meanings, but if, as you say (and I agree)
the English meaning doesn't match the Italian meaning, what is the 
English
meaning? That's the whole point, as far as I'm concerned. We have all 
the
musical terms that we've changed the meaning of. My composition 
teacher in
college was a stickler for the absolute accurate literal translation of
musical terms, where many of the other professors were not.

In my observation, performers use what they *think* the word means, and
don't frequently consult musical dictionaries to discover the actual,
literal translation of a word.
There's a fundamental misunderstanding here of the  way language works. 
Words mean what they do by concensus, not because some dictionary or 
expert says so. If the meaning of a word is vague, then it is vague and 
you either put up with it, or use another word, or use the vague word 
only in one particular way and hope that everybody catches on 
eventually.

To take any common  musical term as if it were now-and-forever an 
ordinary Italian word is simply silly. By that standard, poco allegro 
would mean unhappy--but it doesn't, and in music it never did. It 
means a bit fast, and any musician--even an Italian musician--w. any 
sense, knows so. These common musical terms of Italian origin continue 
to be used precisely because they are completely international. Why 
write fast (which only English speakers will understand) when you can 
write allegro which means the same thing and will be instantly 
understood by any musician in the world?

Now comes the advanced part: words change. Even technical terms. In the 
early 19th century, andante was faster than moderato. Now it is slower. 
There's nothing to be done about it, you just have to deal. Just like 
you have  to deal with modern trills starting on the main note while 
17th-18th c. trills start on the auxiliary note. Things happen.

Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Re: OT Meanings of words

2004-08-26 Thread James Bailey
See, that would be interesting. I'd love to know how that came about.  My
new favourite is tawdry. From Merriam-Webster's word of the day:

 In the 7th century, Etheldreda, the queen of Northumbria, renounced her
husband and her royal position for the veil of a nun. She was renowned for
her saintliness and is traditionally said to have died of a swelling in her
throat, which she took as a judgment upon her fondness for wearing necklaces
in her youth. Her shrine became a principal site of pilgrimage in England.
An annual fair was held in her honour on October 17th, and her name became
simplified to St. Audrey. At these fairs various kinds of cheap knickknacks
were sold, along with a type of necklace called St. Audrey's lace, which
by the 17th century had become altered to tawdry lace. Eventually,
tawdry came to be used to describe anything cheap and gaudy that might be
found at these fairs or anywhere else.

Is that not wonderful. Poor woman!

On 26.08.2004 9:07 Uhr, Harold Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dear folks,
 
 I think most of us are interested in how the meaning of words change
 over time. One of my favorite examples is the word nice. Its
 original meaning was naughty. I wonder how and when its meaning was
 completely turned around.
 
 Hal


___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Arrangement, Orchestration or Transcription?

2004-08-26 Thread Klaas de Jong
indeed, something is lost in castration...
klaas.
Op 26-aug-04 om 17:49 heeft Andrew Stiller het volgende geschreven:
On Aug 25, 2004, at 3:31 PM, Carlberg Jones wrote:
At 3:21 PM -0400 8/25/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 25 Aug 2004 at 11:41, Andrew Stiller wrote:
What about piano to concert band? What would you call that (other
than the generic arrangement?
--
The term bandstration has been in widespread use for over 40 
years.

What would you call something going from piano to castanets?
Since most of the content of the original must necessarily be lost in 
the transfer, the castanet version is clearly a new piece.

Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Re: OT Meanings of words

2004-08-26 Thread Mark D Lew
On Aug 26, 2004, at 9:07 AM, Harold Owen wrote:
I think most of us are interested in how the meaning of words change 
over time. One of my favorite examples is the word nice. Its 
original meaning was naughty. I wonder how and when its meaning was 
completely turned around.
Nice has had many connotations over the centuries, including many 
which are not complimentary, but there are none which are synonymous 
with naughty, unless it's by some stretch of the imagination that I'm 
not grasping.

The word was born in English from Latin nescius.  Ne- means not.  
Scire at that time was to know (descended from an earlier root 
meaning to cut).  Modern Latinate languages have since moved on to 
other words for to know, but scire still has numerous descendants 
(eg, science).

Nice thus originally meant ignorant. Its meaning wandered along a 
path of related meanings including timid, fussy, careful, etc, and on 
to today's meaning.  But I don't think any of these are equivalent to 
naughty.  Unless it is naughty to be ignorant.

mdl
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Tabbed Browsing

2004-08-26 Thread Mariposa Symphony Orchestra



Javier -- As at least one of those newbiesto 
whom you allude, I'll respond:

 Tabbed, as a result of this 
list. And diggin' it. BUT...*

 Simple; entry AND mind. 
Have been since my first foray into the lovely world of CODA tech 5 - 6 years 
ago.

 PC; XPPro, two 512-MB memsticks and 
a partitioned 250gig hard drive. Athlon XP 2500+ 
processor.

 Scroll, hand's-down. 
Even with 1,400 - 1,600 measure works, it's my way to go.

*But I've noticed since switching to Firefox that downloads 
do take much longer than with IE - new, old, any URL; also: every time 
I try to hit a desktop link I had previously made during the IE regime 
Igetthat charmingbig ol' "THWOMMMPPP" and theerror 
message 'windows cannot find (and then the URL)' despite the fact that it 
actually is opening (slowly) under Firefox. I did importeverything I 
possibly couldduring my browser changeover and wonder why the 
changeovercontinues to beodd.

Best and greetings to all,

Les


Les MarsdenFounding Music Director and Conductor, 
The Mariposa Symphony OrchestraMusic and Mariposa? Ah, 
Paradise!!!

http://www.sierratel.com/mcf/nprc/mso.htm
http://www.geocities.com/~jbenz/lesbio.html 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Javier 
  Ruiz 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 5:45 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Finale] Tabbed 
  Browsing
  Don´t you have the feeling that new listers are appearing 
  lately?Mmmm...I wonder if they are tabbed-browsing-oriented or 
  not?Are they simple-entry or speedy-entry oriented?Mac or 
  PC?Page view or scroll view?Enjoying,Javier. 
  And while all the debate has been furiously raging (well, squalling at 
  least) I downloaded Firefox to see what the fuss was all 
  about.  I've since been having a great time tabbing. 
  C'est très frais! Thanks for passing on the 
  word...  Best,   
  Les___Finale 
  mailing list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Tempo Adjustment

2004-08-26 Thread Eisenbeil


Hello,

I currently use Finale 2004. Recently the tempo on the playback of a piece has fluctuated. It's usually just one or 2 measures inside of say 32 bars that has a problem. I can't seem to re-adust those 2 measures with theTEMPO TOOL. Those 2 measures don't respond to a new tempo adjustment.

I would apreciate any assistance in helping to learn how to correct this.

Thanks in advance.

BE
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Re: OT Meanings of words

2004-08-26 Thread Harold Owen
Naughty could mean of no account. I remember hearing in an old 
play a woman saying She has nice manners meaning she had no manners 
at all, which some would construe as naughty.

Hal
On Aug 26, 2004, at 9:07 AM, Harold Owen wrote:
I think most of us are interested in how the meaning of words 
change over time. One of my favorite examples is the word nice. 
Its original meaning was naughty. I wonder how and when its 
meaning was completely turned around.
Nice has had many connotations over the centuries, including many 
which are not complimentary, but there are none which are synonymous 
with naughty, unless it's by some stretch of the imagination that 
I'm not grasping.

The word was born in English from Latin nescius.  Ne- means not. 
Scire at that time was to know (descended from an earlier root 
meaning to cut).  Modern Latinate languages have since moved on to 
other words for to know, but scire still has numerous descendants 
(eg, science).

Nice thus originally meant ignorant. Its meaning wandered along a 
path of related meanings including timid, fussy, careful, etc, and 
on to today's meaning.  But I don't think any of these are 
equivalent to naughty.  Unless it is naughty to be ignorant.

mdl
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

--
Harold Owen
2830 Emerald St., Eugene, OR 97403
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit my web site at:
http://uoregon.edu/~hjowen
FAX: (509) 461-3608
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Arrangement, Orchestration or Transcription?

2004-08-26 Thread David W. Fenton
On 26 Aug 2004 at 11:47, Andrew Stiller wrote:

 On Aug 25, 2004, at 3:21 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
 
  The term bandstration has been in widespread use for over 40
  years.
 
  And you're advocating the use of such a monstrosity?
 
 It's not up to me to advocate. I'm not in charge of the English 
 language.

I beg to differ, Andrew. You're the author of a widely used and 
widely  respected text on a closely related subject. Your voice 
*does* have some authority.

You seem to me to be someone who admires precision of language and 
integrity of usage. Bandstration may be used (it seems very 
narrowly used), but that doesn't make it good. People do all sorts of 
things in daily usage that are basically wrong or confusing.

In short, I'd expect you to fall more in a prescriptivist camp in 
regard to usage than in the descriptivist camp.

And, actually, it's not the nominative form that's a problem. We have 
arrangement, a perfectly good term, for the nominative case. What 
we lack is a verb. Was it it that one does to make the conversion? I 
would say one orchestrates the piece for band. I see no real 
alternative to that. Arranges does not mean precisely the same 
thing to me, which has been the point of this very long discussion). 
Nor does transcribes.

I simply see no problem with this metaphorical usage.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Tempo Adjustment

2004-08-26 Thread Harold Owen
BE Writes:
Hello,
I currently use Finale 2004.  Recently the tempo on the playback of 
a piece  has fluctuated.   It's usually just one or 2 measures 
inside of say 32 bars that has a problem.   I can't seem to re-adust 
those 2 measures with the TEMPO TOOL.  Those 2 measures don't 
respond to a new tempo adjustment.

I would apreciate any assistance in helping to learn how to correct this.
Thanks in advance.
When that has happened to me, I go to Measure 1 and set up the Tempo 
Tool with zero from there to the end of the piece. Then I set the 
tempo with a text expression. It usually does the trick.

Hal
--
Harold Owen
2830 Emerald St., Eugene, OR 97403
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit my web site at:
http://uoregon.edu/~hjowen
FAX: (509) 461-3608
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] feature request

2004-08-26 Thread Andrew Stiller
To MacSupport:
Please pass along the following feature request to the development team:
In the Measure tool, double-clicking a multimeasure rest should bring 
up the Multimeasure Rest dialog box. (Rationale: double-clicking a 
measure allows you to edit that measure, so doing the same for a MM 
rest should allow you to edit that rest.)

Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Re: OT Meanings of words

2004-08-26 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Aug 26, 2004, at 12:24 PM, James Bailey wrote:
See, that would be interesting. I'd love to know how that came about.  
My
new favourite is tawdry.
My longtime favorite is marzipan, mangled from the Arabic for a seated 
king, whence the name of a N. African mediaeval coin showing a king on 
a box-like throne, from wh. it came (in Italy)  to designate a box 
containing anything valuable--such as these nifty almond candies 
here--and then of course it became the name of the candy. Now *that's* 
a long, strange trip.

Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] WinFin2005: Tile Windows doesn't seem to work

2004-08-26 Thread dhbailey
Can somebody else verify this for me:
I have 4 files open at once.
If I click Tile Windows Horizontally, I get 4 rectangles in a 2x2 pattern.
If I click Tile Windows Vertically, I get 4 rectangles in a 2x2 pattern.
They both do the same thing, neither of which does what it says.
I just did the same thing with 5 files opened, and get 2 in a column on 
the left with 3 in a column on the right.

Same result no matter which Tile Windows I select.
Thanks for checking it out.
I did send in a message to winsupport.
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] [OT] Color Laserprinters Duplex Experiences

2004-08-26 Thread Kurt Gnos
I finally decided my search - I bought a Xerox Phaser 6250 DP - and this 
machine ROCKS... 26 pages per minute, extreme fast and crisp postscript and 
pdf printout, 2400 photo mode, duplex printing and more

cheers
Kurt
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] OT Cleave [was: Meanings of words]

2004-08-26 Thread Ken Moore
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Hughes
writes:

How about the word cleave?

Two verbs with the same present tense.

It can be used as To cleave together 

Past tense and past participle cleaved.

or To cleave apart

Past tense clove or cleft, past participle cloven or cleft.

-- 
Ken Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web site: http://www.mooremusic.org.uk/
I reject emails  100k automatically: warn me beforehand if you want to send one
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Re: OT Nice [was Meanings of words]

2004-08-26 Thread Ken Moore
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Harold Owen
writes:

I think most of us are interested in how the meaning of words change 
over time. One of my favorite examples is the word nice. Its 
original meaning was naughty. 

OED says that it meant wanton or lascivious in 1325, but an earlier
meaning (1290) was foolish.

I wonder how and when its meaning was 
completely turned around.

Requiring or involving great precision is as early as 1513 and is
still with us (as in nice judgement) though less common than in the
19th C. (A nice dilemma from Trial by Jury c. 1870).  Agreeable,
delightful, 1769; dainty, appetizing (of food), 1713.  Many other
meanings, mostly obsolete.

-- 
Ken Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web site: http://www.mooremusic.org.uk/
I reject emails  100k automatically: warn me beforehand if you want to send one
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] WinFin2005: Tile Windows doesn't seem to work

2004-08-26 Thread Jari Williamsson
dhbailey writes:

 Can somebody else verify this for me:
 
 I have 4 files open at once.
 
 If I click Tile Windows Horizontally, I get 4 rectangles in a 2x2 pattern.
 
 If I click Tile Windows Vertically, I get 4 rectangles in a 2x2 pattern.
 
 They both do the same thing, neither of which does what it says.
 
 I just did the same thing with 5 files opened, and get 2 in a column on 
 the left with 3 in a column on the right.
 
 Same result no matter which Tile Windows I select.

I never use that function, but perhaps they have changed algorithm? 
2 and 3 opened windows works as expected, doesn't it?

Best regards,

Jari Williamsson

___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] feature request

2004-08-26 Thread Jan Melaerts
Op 26-aug-04 om 22:10 heeft Andrew Stiller het volgende geschreven:
To MacSupport:
Please pass along the following feature request to the development 
team:

In the Measure tool, double-clicking a multimeasure rest should bring 
up the Multimeasure Rest dialog box. (Rationale: double-clicking a 
measure allows you to edit that measure, so doing the same for a MM 
rest should allow you to edit that rest.)

Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Brilliant !
I've also sent this feature Request to MacSupport !
It would be a real time saver !
Thanks,
Jan Melaerts
(using FinMac since 1990)
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale