RE: [Finale] Help with English

2007-09-11 Thread Richard Yates
 
>I would say
>"Music digitally engraved by Johannes Gebauer"

It makes me think of VERY sharp fingernails. 

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] FinMac2008 hangs

2007-09-11 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Chuck Israels / 07.9.10 / 10:37 PM wrote:

>About the communication with MM  
>through the web system, make sure you go al the way through to the  
>last page and click the final "submit question" button, (easy to  
>miss) or it doesn't go through.  That happened to me twice before I  
>figured out that I wasn't getting responses because they were not  
>getting the questions.

Ahh, I now remember you have warned us about it.  You are right.  I
totally missed it.  I just resubmitted it.  Thanks for your kind help!

-- 

- Hiro

Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA
 


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] alto as tenor? now Brandenburg 2

2007-09-11 Thread Johannes Gebauer
Not knowing anything about the trumpet, the horn and Brandenburg 2, here 
is one more thing perhaps worth considering:


There is an instrument now referred to as the baroque clarinet. It is 
not the chalumaux, and sounds quite different. It plays in a pretty high 
register. This is the reason it is called clarinet, ie a small clarino, 
because the sound is almost trumpet like. Is there any indication that 
perhaps this might have been the instrument Bach thought of?


Probably completely off-track I am sure, just something which crossed my 
mind reading all these discussions on the too high trumpet part.


Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] disappearing lyrics

2007-09-11 Thread Barbara Touburg

No, that didn't work...

Christopher Smith wrote:

Heh, heh!

That WAS the idea! Use the Selection Tool to double click the lyric  
that won't show up in Edit Lyrics, and the correct verse is chosen  for 
you. Now when you open the Edit Lyrics window, it should be there.


Assuming that's what the problem was, that is.

Christopher]



On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:35 PM, Barbara Touburg wrote:


Well, what is it?  (please?)




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT A brief heads-up

2007-09-11 Thread Aaron Sherber

At 11:26 PM 9/10/2007, John Howell wrote:
>This may not affect many, but it might if part of your life is
>writing for publication.  The new Microsoft Office 2007 for Vista

Office 2007 runs on WinXP as well.

>produces Word files that are incompatible with any other version of
>Word.  Several prestigious journals have already announce that they
>will not accept submission in the .docx format that is the default
>for WinWord 2007.
-snip-
>And note that even when your file is saved in the older .doc format,
>equations and special symbols are messed up.

This is all true, though slightly incomplete. First, please note that 
DOCX is merely the default for Word 07, not the only format it can 
save in. You can change this default so that Word saves all its 
documents in DOC format. (The same thing happened, I believe, when 
Word 97 came out and was incompatible with Word 95.)


Second, your comment about equations and special symbols probably 
doesn't affect all that many people, as a proportion of Word users. 
(Although it's interesting in light of our frequent discussions here 
about backwards compatibility in Finale.)


Third, users of older Office versions on Windows can download a 
compatibility pack from Microsoft which will let them work with the 
new file version. That pack is available here:


http://sherber.com/url/18?office-pack

Finally, as the article you link to notes, there are third-party 
converters that will run on Mac, and I imagine they will do a good 
job converting non-complex Word documents.


Aaron.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Beaming over rests

2007-09-11 Thread ThomaStudios
Using FinMac 2K7, is there a way to have Finale beam over rests, NOT  
globally, but on a case by case basis.  This has been lacking in  
every version, and I've just accepted that.  Now a client want's a  
specific look and I don't see any options via the Document Options,  
Staff Styles, or even plug-ins, including Robert's.


Any suggestions?

J D  Thomas
ThomaStudios
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] FinMac2008 hangs

2007-09-11 Thread Darcy James Argue

Firewire audio, but okay, I see your point.

It's very strange, though. I've noticed that sometimes it just hangs  
indefinitely, and sometimes the hang prefigures a crash. But it is  
100% reproducible on my machine -- when waking from deep sleep,  
Finale 2008 looks fine at first, until you try to do something with  
the currently open file. Then it will reliably hang and/or crash on  
the first action.


I'll try it sometime without the peripherals, but that's not exactly  
a solution, since my FW Audiophile is also my MIDI interface.


Cheers,

- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY



On 10 Sep 2007, at 9:20 PM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:


Darcy James Argue / 07.9.10 / 5:53 PM wrote:


Yes, the computer goes to sleep. But I don't think the hang is
peripheral-related -- earlier versions don't have this problem, it
seems to be a Finale 2008 quirk. And Macs -- especially laptops --
don't normally seem to have the problems you describe wrt/ power-
saving mode.


Actually what David said makes sense.  Are you not using USB audio
interface?  The new version of Kontakt2 Player might not pinging as CA
spec dictate.  We already know it doesn't follow CA mono stream spec,
and this is new to Fin2008.

Since my main work is digital audio, I never let any of my machines
sleep, including MBP2.4.  I even don't let HD spin down.  I only turn
the monitor screen off.

If you can reproduce the problem without any peripheral attached, you
have a different case.

--

- Hiro

Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA
 


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Beaming over rests

2007-09-11 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz

ThomaStudios wrote, on 9/11/2007 10:57 AM:
Using FinMac 2K7, is there a way to have Finale beam over rests, NOT 
globally, but on a case by case basis.  This has been lacking in every 
version, and I've just accepted that. 


Unless I misunderstand your request, you can beam over rests by placing 
the Speedy cursor on the rest(s) and hitting "/" exactly as you would 
with notes.


If you want a partial extension over some rests, you can use the beam 
extension special tool.


Dennis



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] FinMac2008 hangs

2007-09-11 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Darcy James Argue / 07.9.11 / 11:16 AM wrote:

>Firewire audio, but okay, I see your point.
>
>It's very strange, though. I've noticed that sometimes it just hangs  
>indefinitely, and sometimes the hang prefigures a crash. But it is  
>100% reproducible on my machine -- when waking from deep sleep,  
>Finale 2008 looks fine at first, until you try to do something with  
>the currently open file. Then it will reliably hang and/or crash on  
>the first action.
>
>I'll try it sometime without the peripherals, but that's not exactly  
>a solution, since my FW Audiophile is also my MIDI interface.

There are too many variables.  My Metric Halo FW interfaces will
reconnect to CAServ in any event because its driver is written
efficiently, but this doesn't mean all the host apps can reconnect to
CAServ API after disconnect.  You have MIDI added to this.

Studios don't let CPU sleep so you can sleep better :-)

By the way, have you tried Cmd+Opt+S in Activity Monitor when SWOD?

-- 

- Hiro

Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA
 


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Beaming over rests

2007-09-11 Thread ThomaStudios
Yep, I wasn't completely clear.  Right now, I am able to beam over  
rests, but the secondary beams are broken in the global setting, and  
the client wants them solidly across the rests in some instances,  
along with stub stems to more clearly indicate the rhythm.  That's  
what I'm looking for specifically, and I'm trying to avoid a  
convoluted kludge via Shape Designer or similar.  Sorry I was a bit  
vague.


J D  Thomas
ThomaStudios

On Sep 11, 2007, at 8:26 AM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:


ThomaStudios wrote, on 9/11/2007 10:57 AM:
Using FinMac 2K7, is there a way to have Finale beam over rests,  
NOT globally, but on a case by case basis.  This has been lacking  
in every version, and I've just accepted that.


Unless I misunderstand your request, you can beam over rests by  
placing the Speedy cursor on the rest(s) and hitting "/" exactly as  
you would with notes.


If you want a partial extension over some rests, you can use the  
beam extension special tool.


Dennis



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Beaming over rests

2007-09-11 Thread Christopher Smith


On 11-Sep-07, at 12:36 PM, ThomaStudios wrote:

Yep, I wasn't completely clear.  Right now, I am able to beam over  
rests, but the secondary beams are broken in the global setting,  
and the client wants them solidly across the rests in some  
instances, along with stub stems to more clearly indicate the  
rhythm.  That's what I'm looking for specifically, and I'm trying  
to avoid a convoluted kludge via Shape Designer or similar.  Sorry  
I was a bit vague.


Hmm, this is a kludge, I'm afraid.

I have accomplished this in the past by entering a REAL note close to  
the beam where I wanted the rest, then changing the notehead to a  
blank character, changing the beam angle with Special Tools so that  
the missing notehead looks like it was a stem stub, and adding the  
rest back in another layer, hiding with "O" in Speedy the ones I  
don't need.


Big pain, I know.

But the good news is that you can copy this to other places where you  
have a similar rhythm, then change pitches.


Christopher

BTW, open a case and make a feature request. The more of us ask, the  
more likely it will be addressed. I would LOVE to see it as a Staff  
Style, for instance.


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Beaming over rests

2007-09-11 Thread JohnBlane

In a message dated 9/11/07 11:37:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The beam extention tool will do this where you want it.

> Yep, I wasn't completely clear.  Right now, I am able to beam over 
> rests, but the secondary beams are broken in the global setting, and 
> the client wants them solidly across the rests in some instances, 
> along with stub stems to more clearly indicate the rhythm.  That's 
> what I'm looking for specifically, and I'm trying to avoid a 
> convoluted kludge via Shape Designer or similar.  Sorry I was a bit 
> vague.
> 




**
 See what's new at http://www.aol.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Beaming over rests

2007-09-11 Thread Christopher Smith

The Beam Extension tool won't give stem stubs, though, will it?

Christopher


On 11-Sep-07, at 2:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



In a message dated 9/11/07 11:37:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The beam extention tool will do this where you want it.


Yep, I wasn't completely clear.  Right now, I am able to beam over
rests, but the secondary beams are broken in the global setting, and
the client wants them solidly across the rests in some instances,
along with stub stems to more clearly indicate the rhythm.  That's
what I'm looking for specifically, and I'm trying to avoid a
convoluted kludge via Shape Designer or similar.  Sorry I was a bit
vague.


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Beaming over rests

2007-09-11 Thread ThomaStudios
The Bean Extension Tool (under Special Tools) will ONLY extend the  
end of the beams.  Not the internal, secondary beams.


J D  Thomas
ThomaStudios

On Sep 11, 2007, at 11:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



In a message dated 9/11/07 11:37:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The beam extention tool will do this where you want it.


Yep, I wasn't completely clear.  Right now, I am able to beam over
rests, but the secondary beams are broken in the global setting, and
the client wants them solidly across the rests in some instances,
along with stub stems to more clearly indicate the rhythm.  That's
what I'm looking for specifically, and I'm trying to avoid a
convoluted kludge via Shape Designer or similar.  Sorry I was a bit
vague.






**
 See what's new at http://www.aol.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Beaming over rests

2007-09-11 Thread JohnBlane

In a message dated 9/11/07 1:59:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


> The Bean Extension Tool (under Special Tools) will ONLY extend the 
> end of the beams.  Not the internal, secondary beams.
> 
> 

Not so. When you dbl click the handle, select 16th NOT 8th.



**
 See what's new at http://www.aol.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Beaming over rests

2007-09-11 Thread JohnBlane

In a message dated 9/11/07 1:58:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


> The Beam Extension tool won't give stem stubs, though, will it?
> 
> 

The global settings will give you the stubs. You only need to adjust the 
places where you want the 16th beams over the rests.



**
 See what's new at http://www.aol.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Beaming over rests

2007-09-11 Thread arabushk
And how far back does the beaming tool have this feature. Was it there in
2003?

>
> In a message dated 9/11/07 11:37:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The beam extention tool will do this where you want it.
>
>> Yep, I wasn't completely clear.  Right now, I am able to beam over 
>> rests, but the secondary beams are broken in the global setting, and 
>> the client wants them solidly across the rests in some instances, 
>> along with stub stems to more clearly indicate the rhythm.  That's 
>> what I'm looking for specifically, and I'm trying to avoid a 
>> convoluted kludge via Shape Designer or similar.  Sorry I was a bit 
>> vague.
>>
>
>
>
>
> **
>  See what's new at http://www.aol.com
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT A brief heads-up

2007-09-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 10 Sep 2007 at 23:26, John Howell wrote:

> This may not affect many, but it might if part of your life is 
> writing for publication.  The new Microsoft Office 2007 for Vista 
> produces Word files that are incompatible with any other version of 
> Word.  Several prestigious journals have already announce that they 
> will not accept submission in the .docx format that is the default 
> for WinWord 2007.  (MacWord 2007 won't even be available until next 
> summer or fall.)  I ran into it when students started sending me 
> assignments that I couldn't open.  If anyone is interested, check out 
> http://blog.eogn.com/eastmans_online_genealogy/2007/06/alert_for_autho.html. 
> And note that even when your file is saved in the older .doc format, 
> equations and special symbols are messed up.

First off, Office 2007 is not just for Vista -- it also runs on WinXP 
(though no earlier versions of Windows). And there is an easily 
downloadable converter for reading and writing the new .docx files in 
older versions of Word (well, Office 2000, XP and 2003 -- Office 97 
users are out of luck, but, well, Office 97 was released in 1996!). 
It's called the Compatibility Pack and can be downloaded here (all on 
one line):

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=941B3470-
3AE9-4AEE-8F43-C6BB74CD1466&displaylang=en

I'm shocked that people are so ill-informed that they'd just reject 
these file formats when the converters are so easily available for so 
many different versions of Word.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates   http://dfenton.com/DFA/


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Help with English

2007-09-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 10 Sep 2007 at 23:08, John Howell wrote:

> printing music from movable type is exactly how 16th century 
> publishers did it, until the use of engraved copper plates came 
> along--sometime in the 17th century, I would think.

Well, Breitkopf's system developed in the mid-18th century was an 
effort to make a typesetting system that looked better and was 
cheaper than engraving. I don't know that I agree that it looks very 
good -- it's certainly inferior in comparison to the finest 
engraving, but not that much worse than some of the hack-work 
engraving that is seen in the late 18th century, especially in 
Vienna. Paris, on the other hand (and to a lesser extent, London), 
seemed to maintain higher engraving standards as a rule than the 
German engravers. I don't know why.

But type for music printing didn't die out until some time after 
1800.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates   http://dfenton.com/DFA/


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Beaming over rests

2007-09-11 Thread ThomaStudios
I know.  But if you can get it to extend an internal 16th beam stub,  
let me know how.  You can ONLY extend the beginning and end of a beam  
set.  Try this:  notate 8th note, 16th rest, 16th note, and try to  
extend the secondary beam from the last 16th note over the rest.   
Can't be done.


J D  Thomas
ThomaStudios

On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



In a message dated 9/11/07 1:59:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



The Bean Extension Tool (under Special Tools) will ONLY extend the
end of the beams.  Not the internal, secondary beams.




Not so. When you dbl click the handle, select 16th NOT 8th.



**
 See what's new at http://www.aol.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT A brief heads-up

2007-09-11 Thread Christopher Smith


On 11-Sep-07, at 1:22 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:



I'm shocked that people are so ill-informed that they'd just reject
these file formats when the converters are so easily available for so
many different versions of Word.


And for Mac users? Are we out of luck?

Christopher



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Beaming over rests

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Schaller
make sure to take OFF the general option: extend secondary beams over  
rests




of course it can be done - just do what John wrote before: ONLY  
select 16th note, NOT 8th...

good luck.

On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:55 PM, ThomaStudios wrote:

I know.  But if you can get it to extend an internal 16th beam  
stub, let me know how.  You can ONLY extend the beginning and end  
of a beam set.  Try this:  notate 8th note, 16th rest, 16th note,  
and try to extend the secondary beam from the last 16th note over  
the rest.  Can't be done.


J D  Thomas
ThomaStudios

On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



In a message dated 9/11/07 1:59:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



The Bean Extension Tool (under Special Tools) will ONLY extend the
end of the beams.  Not the internal, secondary beams.




Not so. When you dbl click the handle, select 16th NOT 8th.



**
 See what's new at http://www.aol.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT A brief heads-up

2007-09-11 Thread Aaron Sherber

At 04:01 PM 9/11/2007, Christopher Smith wrote:
>
>On 11-Sep-07, at 1:22 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm shocked that people are so ill-informed that they'd just reject
>> these file formats when the converters are so easily available for so
>> many different versions of Word.
>
>And for Mac users? Are we out of luck?

The official MS Mac converter seems to be lagging behind the Windows 
converter. But you can get a beta converter from MS here:


http://sherber.com/url/19?mac-docx

Also, as the original article which was linked to points out, there 
are third party solutions available as well.


Aaron.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT A brief heads-up

2007-09-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 11 Sep 2007 at 16:01, Christopher Smith wrote:

> On 11-Sep-07, at 1:22 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
> 
> >
> > I'm shocked that people are so ill-informed that they'd just reject
> > these file formats when the converters are so easily available for so
> > many different versions of Word.
> 
> And for Mac users? Are we out of luck?

Some minor Googling turned up:

http://blogs.msdn.com/macmojo/archive/2007/05/15/get-converted.aspx

http://www.tuaw.com/2007/05/15/microsoft-releases-word-2007-docx-file-
converter/

It does appear, however, that this beta expired on Aug. 15th, and 
it's not clear what's going on. I expect the Mac converter to be 
ready along with Office 2008, which is expected to be released at the 
beginning of next year.

If you need it, I'd complain to MS. It really ought to already be 
available for Mac, given that the current Windows version of Word 
uses the new format by default.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates   http://dfenton.com/DFA/


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT A brief heads-up

2007-09-11 Thread Aaron Sherber

At 04:24 PM 9/11/2007, David W. Fenton wrote:
>It does appear, however, that this beta expired on Aug. 15th, and
>it's not clear what's going on. 

There's a new beta 0.2 available from MS which expires at the end of 
the year. The link I posted before will take you there:


http://sherber.com/url/19?mac-docx

Aaron.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Beaming over rests

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Schaller
of course it can be done - just do what John wrote before: ONLY  
select 16th note, NOT 8th...

good luck.

On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:55 PM, ThomaStudios wrote:

I know.  But if you can get it to extend an internal 16th beam  
stub, let me know how.  You can ONLY extend the beginning and end  
of a beam set.  Try this:  notate 8th note, 16th rest, 16th note,  
and try to extend the secondary beam from the last 16th note over  
the rest.  Can't be done.


J D  Thomas
ThomaStudios

On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



In a message dated 9/11/07 1:59:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



The Bean Extension Tool (under Special Tools) will ONLY extend the
end of the beams.  Not the internal, secondary beams.




Not so. When you dbl click the handle, select 16th NOT 8th.



**
 See what's new at http://www.aol.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT A brief heads-up

2007-09-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 11 Sep 2007 at 16:35, Aaron Sherber wrote:

> At 04:24 PM 9/11/2007, David W. Fenton wrote:
>  >It does appear, however, that this beta expired on Aug. 15th, and
>  >it's not clear what's going on.  
> 
> There's a new beta 0.2 available from MS which expires at the end of 
> the year. The link I posted before will take you there:
> 
> http://sherber.com/url/19?mac-docx

It's really quite annoying how Microsoft managed to hide that -- I 
used the search tools on the Mac Office website, and for the main 
Knowledge Base and for the whole MS website, and for that blog, and 
none of them turned up this new beta.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates   http://dfenton.com/DFA/


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Help with English

2007-09-11 Thread Noel Stoutenburg

David W. Fenton wrote:
But type for music printing didn't die out until some time after 
1800.
  
And some types of publications, at least choral octavos and music books 
such as hymnals, were typeset using moveable music type considerably 
later than that. The latest choral octavo I have seen set with musical 
type is a Novello anthem dating from about 1964; the latest example of a 
songbook printed with moveable type was a hymnal printed in 1952.


ns.


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Finale GPO

2007-09-11 Thread Bruce Petherick

Hello all,
Ok. This has been frustrating me for weeks now, and I decided to try 
and get to the bottom of it. I have Finale 2007b (Win) and every time I 
boot the program I get a message telling me that my trial period is 
finished and I need to register using the app in application folder. The 
title bar for this dialog box is "Finale GPO".
I have searched the Makemusic site, and the only answer I can find is to 
download a new Kontakt player that doesn't need this registration (It is 
originally for 2006). I have downloaded same, but to no effect.
The complicating fact is that I own GPO (Full), Big Band (Full) _and_ 
the Strad package. I can't get these to work well together at all with 
the Kontakt 2.0 update, but that may be a problem for later.
What I want is to get my Finale GPO sounds back (Finale is used for 
scoring, Nuendo is for making with the pretty sounds!).

Has anyone had a similar problem, or can hint at a solution?

Thanks very much

Bruce Petherick
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Help with English

2007-09-11 Thread John Howell

At 5:20 PM -0600 9/11/07, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:

David W. Fenton wrote:

But type for music printing didn't die out until some time after 1800.

And some types of publications, at least choral octavos and music 
books such as hymnals, were typeset using moveable music type 
considerably later than that. The latest choral octavo I have seen 
set with musical type is a Novello anthem dating from about 1964; 
the latest example of a songbook printed with moveable type was a 
hymnal printed in 1952.


I find this hard to believe, although I can't say you're wrong.  The 
operative characteristic of 16th and 17th century music from movable 
type is that each piece of type has not only the musical character 
but the 5 staff lines on it, so as you look across the page the staff 
lines are a little bit wavy rather than being absolutely straight. 
(Not true of Petrucci's earlier publications, which used a 
triple-impression method.)  Are you referring to some different 
approach or modification of this technology?  I've certainly never 
seen a Novello publication with those wavy staff lines.


John


--
John R. Howell
Virginia Tech Department of Music
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Multimeasure rest breaks

2007-09-11 Thread Jeff Tanner

Hey everyone

I've got a part in the score that has 4 measures of rest, two are  
before a System Expression rehearsal mark, 2 measures after the  
rehearsal mark.  Finale was converting it into a 4 bar multimeasure  
rest, so I used the measure tool to put in a break in the  
multimeasure rest.  Now though, it makes it a multimeasure rest for 2  
bars, Rehearsal mark, then 2 bars of whole rests.  I've tried  
selecting the two bars and doing the "multimeasure, create" popup  
with the selection tool, updating the layout, and extracting the part  
but nothing makes a difference.  Any suggestions on this?  (Finale  
2008)  Thanks.


Jeff
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rest breaks

2007-09-11 Thread Bruce E. Clausen
Try Mass Edit>Clear Items on the mm. in question, then create the 
multimeasure rest.  I had the same problem last week.

Bruce Clausen


- Original Message - 
From: "Jeff Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 6:57 PM
Subject: [Finale] Multimeasure rest breaks



Hey everyone

I've got a part in the score that has 4 measures of rest, two are  before 
a System Expression rehearsal mark, 2 measures after the  rehearsal mark. 
Finale was converting it into a 4 bar multimeasure  rest, so I used the 
measure tool to put in a break in the  multimeasure rest.  Now though, it 
makes it a multimeasure rest for 2  bars, Rehearsal mark, then 2 bars of 
whole rests.  I've tried  selecting the two bars and doing the 
"multimeasure, create" popup  with the selection tool, updating the 
layout, and extracting the part  but nothing makes a difference.  Any 
suggestions on this?  (Finale  2008)  Thanks.


Jeff
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] temporarily unsubscribing

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Stiller
Hi, My husband, Andrew Stiller, is in the Hospital of the University of 
Pennsylvania again with heart trouble.  So many hospitalizations this 
year that I can't quite remember, 3 or 4.  He  wants me to temporarily 
suspend his Finale E mail.  I thought I remembered his password, but it 
seems I do not.  Please temporarily suspend his participation in the 
list until he returns home.


Sincerely, Ernestine Steiner (Andrew's wife)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://www.kallistimusic.com/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] temporarily unsubscribing

2007-09-11 Thread Bruce E. Clausen

Wish him the best from the List.
Bruce Clausen

- Original Message - 
From: "Andrew Stiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 9:24 PM
Subject: [Finale] temporarily unsubscribing


Hi, My husband, Andrew Stiller, is in the Hospital of the University of 
Pennsylvania again with heart trouble.  So many hospitalizations this 
year that I can't quite remember, 3 or 4.  He  wants me to temporarily 
suspend his Finale E mail.  I thought I remembered his password, but it 
seems I do not.  Please temporarily suspend his participation in the 
list until he returns home.


Sincerely, Ernestine Steiner (Andrew's wife)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://www.kallistimusic.com/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] temporarily unsubscribing

2007-09-11 Thread Carl Dershem

Andrew Stiller wrote:
Hi, My husband, Andrew Stiller, is in the Hospital of the University of 
Pennsylvania again with heart trouble.  So many hospitalizations this 
year that I can't quite remember, 3 or 4.  He  wants me to temporarily 
suspend his Finale E mail.  I thought I remembered his password, but it 
seems I do not.  Please temporarily suspend his participation in the 
list until he returns home.


We'll miss him.  Please send him our best wishes.

cd
--
http://www.livejournal.com/users/dershem/#
http://members.cox.net/dershem

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT A brief heads-up

2007-09-11 Thread Johannes Gebauer

On 11.09.2007 David W. Fenton wrote:
I'm shocked that people are so ill-informed that they'd just reject 
these file formats when the converters are so easily available for so 
many different versions of Word.


I thought the whole point was the maths formulas being uneditable if 
this kind of format conversion is used.


Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Beaming over rests

2007-09-11 Thread Johannes Gebauer

On 11.09.2007 ThomaStudios wrote:

The Bean Extension Tool (under Special Tools) will ONLY extend the end of the 
beams.  Not the internal, secondary beams.


And I always thought the Bean Extension tool was for extending your 
beans, green, white and red.


Johannes ;-)
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] alto as tenor? now Brandenburg 2

2007-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Not knowing anything about the trumpet, the horn and Brandenburg 2, here 
> is one more thing perhaps worth considering: 
> 
> There is an instrument now referred to as the baroque clarinet. It is 
> not the chalumaux, and sounds quite different. It plays in a pretty high 
> register. This is the reason it is called clarinet, ie a small clarino, 
> because the sound is almost trumpet like. Is there any indication that 
> perhaps this might have been the instrument Bach thought of? 
> 
> Probably completely off-track I am sure, just something which crossed my 
> mind reading all these discussions on the too high trumpet part. 
> 
> Johannes 

I presume you are referring to what is known in English as a Mock Trumpet,
which was not treated as a serious musical instrument.  It would be like a
chalumeau that could only overblow and therefore an instrument in F
(derived from a treble recorder) would produce the scale part of the
harmonic series of a trumpet in C (still not high enough to play in F a
fourth up).  This, however, misses the point I was making, which is that
the countepoint of Bach demands the line sound an octave lower.

Regards,
Michael Lawlor


mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale