Re: [Finale] repeat?

2010-05-30 Thread David W. Fenton
On 30 May 2010 at 14:09, John Howell wrote:

> Well, it's certainly something I've never seen.  (David Fenton?) 

I don't have anything to say that hasn't already been said. It 
confuses me greatly, in fact, as the obvious interpretation (repeat 
the 2 bars) seems musically less than satisfactory.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates   http://dfenton.com/DFA/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Rondeau layout

2010-05-30 Thread John Howell

At 10:07 AM +0200 5/30/10, dc wrote:

John Howell écrit:
Well, if you have the last Da Capo written out 
(which is what your outline shows), it's no 
longer a Da Capo, right?  You might want to put 
a rubric like "Keep playing to the end" just to 
be perfectly clear for sightreading.


This is assuming everyone reads English, which 
is not the case. Nor is English the standard 
language in the musical world. The only rubric I 
could imagine putting would be... volti subito.


Correct, of course.  But V.S. would work for me. 
Or whatever the Italian is for "don't repeat."


John


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts & Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

"We never play anything the same way once."  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] repeat?

2010-05-30 Thread John Howell

At 10:03 AM +0200 5/30/10, dc wrote:

www.collins.lautre.net/files/brace.jpg

How do you interpret this sign? It comes at the end of a chaconne 
where the theme is 2x8 measures (D to A, A back to D). As a repeat?


Thanks,

Dennis


Well, it's certainly something I've never seen.  (David Fenton?)  But 
what it outlines is a perfectly clear hemiola shift--although perhaps 
not entirely clear in the eyes of the composer?)  Certainly a repeat 
would be possible, but there are cleaner ways to indicate that.  And 
it doesn't seems to suggest a petite reprise.  I suppose it COULD 
indicate a 1st ending, and that would retain the 8-bar period.  And 
that works harmonically, so I would probably give that a try.


As to the double bar at the end without dots, I've come to think that 
repeat patterns were considered optional rather than ruled by rules, 
and I've read suggestions that as late as Haydn and CPE Bach, and 
perhaps as late as Mozart and Beethoven, the double bars with dots 
were simply conventional and were NOT necessarily a call for a 
repeat.  (This is discussed every once in a while on the 
OrchestraList, in relation to repeat marks in symphonies.)


John


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts & Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

"We never play anything the same way once."  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] indication of hands in keyboard music

2010-05-30 Thread Guy Hayden
This morning I played Bach's "Toccata and Fugue in D minor" for postlude.  I
do not play this more than once a year so I read it from the score.  I was
very glad that the editors at Edition Peters chose to divide the beams to
reflect the division of the hands.  The notes go past much too quickly to
read fingerings or hand indications.

I mention this to reaffirm my vote for version No. 1.

Guy Hayden

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] disappearing clef

2010-05-30 Thread Aaron Rabushka

Hey Daniel!

Thanks for the tip--unfortunately I do not see the SET TO CLEF option under 
STAFF ATTRIBUTES--must be something added post-2003.


Aaron J. Rabushka
arabus...@austin.rr.com

- Original Message - 
From: "DANIEL CARNO" 

To: 
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 10:59 PM
Subject: RE: [Finale] disappearing clef



Hi Aaron,

This is a long shot, but do you have "Set to Clef" turned on in Staff 
Attributes?  If so, that could be the problem.


Dan Carno

Daniel J. Carno
Music Engraving Services
Quality work in Sibelius, Finale and Score
4514 Makyes Road
Syracuse, New York 13215
315-492-2987
dcar...@twcny.rr.com

-Original Message-
From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf 
Of arabus...@austin.rr.com

Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 10:05 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: [Finale] disappearing clef


In the score I'm working on now there is one passage where I contiually 
have to
re-mark a bass clef in the right-hand staff of one of the piano 
parts--very
often this clef disappears, and the notes appear correctly and awkwardly 
in the
treble clef. Has anyone else had this problem? Could it possibly have 
something

to do with optimizing scores?

Aaron J. Rabushka
Finale 2003 on a PC
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
signature database 5154 (20100528) __


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com




__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
signature database 5154 (20100528) __


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] indication of hands in keyboard music

2010-05-30 Thread Chris Bell

As a pianist/keyboardist I would feel confused by both of them.

1 I don't like the broken 16ths
2 I really don't like being told which hand to use, if you really  
need to put any insication in I would go for fingering . . . but then  
again . .


/ Cb



On May 29, 2010, at 3:01 PM, Ray Horton wrote:

This bad keyboardist votes for #1.  #2 is difficult to decipher  
without repeated looks.



RBH







On May 28, 2010, at 7:47 AM, dc wrote:


I didn't get many (or any) replies to my first message on this  
subject, so I thought I'd try again with an example to make my  
question clear.


This is a question mainly for keyboard players.

Which of these two notations do you prefer?

www.collins.lautre.net/files/hands.jpg

1 makes the hands more apparent, but 2 makes the beats clearer,  
of course.


Amusingly, the preface to these pieces says that the composer has  
made things easier by using 1, though in the music itself he  
generally uses 2.


Thanks,

Dennis




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




 
---
The market should accommodate art, but art should not accommodate the  
market.




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] iMac i7 issues?

2010-05-30 Thread Eric Dannewitz
No gotchas. Just good stuff.

As for MakeMusic testing stuff.who knows


On May 30, 2010, at 1:45 AM, Eric Fiedler wrote:

> Hi Chuck and Eric D.,
> Thanks for the input.
> Chuck: it's good to hear that your core i5 is doing the job for you. We've 
> been looking at i5s too, and will probably go that route, as they are easier 
> to get over here and are a little less expensive than the i7s.
> Eric D.: My concerns were based less on the new iMacs in general, which are 
> quite probably as "insanely great" as (almost) everything from Apple. My 
> worry was about the (usually) unforeseeable "gotchas" that my Mac experience 
> tells me sometimes appear when a new generation of processors meets up with a 
> new (or old) app. Have the good people at MM tested their products on the new 
> machines? Who knows. But there's always someone in the blogosphere who's sure 
> to know, so thanks for the "all clear" ... and for the tip about the RAM.
> Eric F.


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] iMac i7 issues?

2010-05-30 Thread Eric Fiedler

Hi Chuck and Eric D.,
Thanks for the input.
Chuck: it's good to hear that your core i5 is doing the job for you.  
We've been looking at i5s too, and will probably go that route, as  
they are easier to get over here and are a little less expensive than  
the i7s.
Eric D.: My concerns were based less on the new iMacs in general,  
which are quite probably as "insanely great" as (almost) everything  
from Apple. My worry was about the (usually) unforeseeable "gotchas"  
that my Mac experience tells me sometimes appear when a new  
generation of processors meets up with a new (or old) app. Have the  
good people at MM tested their products on the new machines? Who  
knows. But there's always someone in the blogosphere who's sure to  
know, so thanks for the "all clear" ... and for the tip about the RAM.

Eric F.




On May 29, 2010, at 2:04 PM, Eric Fiedler online.de> wrote:



Hello all,
Is there anyone out there with one of the new Core i7 iMacs who  
has been having any serious "issues" with Finale 2010? We are  
seriously thinking about biting the bullet and retiring our  
ancient trio of 10-year-old (!) G5 towers and replacing them with  
something from the 21st century, and the latest iMacs have been  
getting a pretty good press ... and are a lot cheaper than the Mac  
Pros.

Any words of wisdom from the FinMac community would be most welcome.
Eric


Habsburger Verlag Frankfurt (Dr. Fiedler)
www.habsburgerverlag.de
eric.f.fied...@t-online.de
e.fied...@em.uni-frankfurt.de



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



Habsburger Verlag Frankfurt (Dr. Fiedler)
www.habsburgerverlag.de
eric.f.fied...@t-online.de
e.fied...@em.uni-frankfurt.de



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] repeat?

2010-05-30 Thread Ryan Beard
I think it means that those two bars are repeated. I've seen this  
marking before, though I don't recall in which pieces, but I'm fairly  
certain they were keyboard works.


Since it's a chaconne, would repeating those bars greatly distrupt the  
ground, or does it serve to prolong the cadence so the listener knows  
the work is coming to an end?


On May 30, 2010, at 1:03 AM, dc  wrote:


www.collins.lautre.net/files/brace.jpg

How do you interpret this sign? It comes at the end of a chaconne  
where the theme is 2x8 measures (D to A, A back to D). As a repeat?


Thanks,

Dennis



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale