Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-31 Thread dumusic
This is not encouraging news!
I installed the SP2 upgrade yesterday.  I have not yet ordered the Finale 
upgrade.

Based on what I have read here I am VERY hesitant to invest in a 
questionable product.  I have always upgraded Finale as soon as new versions 
were available.  Now I don't know what to do.

Has anyone had a successful installation of Finale 2005 after installing 
SP2?

Inquiring PC minds want to know!
Guy Hayden, Minister of Music
St. Stephen's Episcopal Church
372 Hiden Boulevard
Newport News, Virginia 23606 


___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-31 Thread dhbailey
I do not have SP2, but from what I've heard it is SP2 which is the 
questionable product, not Finale2005.

Without SP2, but with WinXPPro the installation went flawlessly.
From what I've read, SP2 doesn't really offer much if you keep your 
antivirus program up to date and use a firewall, so I'm holding off, 
based on Hal's experience, plus what I've read on several other lists.

But Finale2005 doesn't seem the least bit questionable to me.  The 
increased functionality of the repeat tool is a major plus!  It can now 
show you the road-map through your repeats, DS, DC, whatever, so you 
can make sure you got the measure assignments correct!

I do hope somebody with positive SP2/Finale experience will report in.
David H. Bailey

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not encouraging news!
I installed the SP2 upgrade yesterday.  I have not yet ordered the 
Finale upgrade.

Based on what I have read here I am VERY hesitant to invest in a 
questionable product.  I have always upgraded Finale as soon as new 
versions were available.  Now I don't know what to do.

Has anyone had a successful installation of Finale 2005 after installing 
SP2?

Inquiring PC minds want to know!
Guy Hayden, Minister of Music
St. Stephen's Episcopal Church
372 Hiden Boulevard
Newport News, Virginia 23606
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-31 Thread Eric Dannewitz
A Questionable product? Perhaps you shouldn't have installed a 
questionable Service Pack from Microsoft...

I'd imagine that the first service update to Finale will address Service 
Pack (or crap) 2 problems. You should always make sure software works 
with Microsoft Service packs BEFORE installing them. This last service 
pack broke a lot of programs, including (it seems) Finale 2004/2005


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not encouraging news!
I installed the SP2 upgrade yesterday.  I have not yet ordered the 
Finale upgrade.

Based on what I have read here I am VERY hesitant to invest in a 
questionable product.  I have always upgraded Finale as soon as new 
versions were available.  Now I don't know what to do.

Has anyone had a successful installation of Finale 2005 after 
installing SP2?

Inquiring PC minds want to know!
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-31 Thread Mariposa Symphony Orchestra



For what it's worth (probably nothing) I 
recently installed SP2 and have noticed absolutely no problems whatsoever with 
2004B or any other software -- I'm not defending Microsoft; in fact I'd really 
rather find the opportunity to eviscerate them, but unfortunately, this isn't 
it, at least for me

Best, 

Les

Les MarsdenFounding Music Director and Conductor, The Mariposa 
Symphony OrchestraMusic and Mariposa? Ah, Paradise!!!

http://arts-mariposa.org/symphony.htmlhttp://www.sierratel.com/mcf/nprc/mso.htm

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Eric 
  Dannewitz 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 10:44 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup 
  ever
  A Questionable product? Perhaps you shouldn't have installed a 
  "questionable" Service Pack from Microsoft...I'd imagine 
  that the first service update to Finale will address Service Pack (or 
  crap) 2 problems. You should always make sure software works with 
  Microsoft Service packs BEFORE installing them. This last service pack 
  broke a lot of programs, including (it seems) Finale 
  2004/2005[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is 
  not encouraging news! I installed the SP2 upgrade 
  yesterday. I have not yet ordered the  Finale 
  upgrade. Based on what I have read here I am VERY hesitant to 
  invest in a  questionable product. I have always upgraded Finale 
  as soon as new  versions were available. Now I don't know what 
  to do. Has anyone had a successful installation of Finale 2005 
  after  installing SP2? Inquiring PC minds want to 
  know!___Finale 
  mailing list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-31 Thread David W. Fenton
On 31 Aug 2004 at 10:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I installed the SP2 upgrade yesterday.  I have not yet ordered the
 Finale upgrade.
 
 Based on what I have read here I am VERY hesitant to invest in a
 questionable product.

The questionable product in this case is from Microsoft.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-31 Thread Richard Yates
  Based on what I have read here I am VERY hesitant to invest in a
  questionable product.

 The questionable product in this case is from Microsoft.
 David W. Fenton

David, with all of your contact  with Windows machines what has been your
experience so far with SP2?

Richard Yates

___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-31 Thread David W. Fenton
On 31 Aug 2004 at 16:21, Richard Yates wrote:

   Based on what I have read here I am VERY hesitant to invest in a
   questionable product.
 
  The questionable product in this case is from Microsoft.
  David W. Fenton
 
 David, with all of your contact  with Windows machines what has been
 your experience so far with SP2?

Well, first off, I have kept most of my clients from using WinXP, 
except when they are forced to do so. This is because many clients of 
mine have had terrible problems with WinXP (one of them downgraded 
their PC from WinXP to Win2K after a year of dreadful problems). So, 
my experience with WinXP is not as extensive as one would expect with 
a version of Windows that has been out this long.

None of my clients use Windows Update by default, because I think 
it's a disastrous choice to turn over control of your PC to MS, so 
none of my WinXP clients has actually updated to SP2.

Furthermore, all of my clients who have Internet access are already 
firewalled and protected from the kinds of security issues that SP2 
mostly addresses.

And, last of all, I don't recommend to anyone that they apply OS 
service packs until well after they have been widely tested by lots 
of other people. None of my clients has yet asked me about SP2, but 
if they were to do so, I'd tell them not to worry about it at all -- 
if it becomes a benefit to them to install it, I'll tell them at that 
point.

As of this point, I don't see why anyone should be applying SP2.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-31 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:37:00 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:

 As of this point, I don't see why anyone should be applying SP2.

Except the few unknowing guinea pigs we want to notify us of any
problems, eh? ;)

-- 
Brad Beyenhof
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://augmentedfourth.blogspot.com
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-31 Thread David W. Fenton
On 31 Aug 2004 at 16:41, Brad Beyenhof wrote:

 On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:37:00 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
 
  As of this point, I don't see why anyone should be applying SP2.
 
 Except the few unknowing guinea pigs we want to notify us of any
 problems, eh? ;)

There are enough corporate shops who should be testing and working 
with MS to report the problems that I don't think there's any reason 
for small businesses or individuals (my client base) to worry about 
it for another 6 months or so.

If it offered something they didn't already have, it might be more 
urgent, but all of my clients are all properly firewalled and running 
browsers that have offered popup blocking for 3 years.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-30 Thread Richard Yates


 I just put the SERVICE PACK 2 on my XP yesterday and tried to load
 2005.  Lots of problems, plus nothing (even after speaking to tech
 support) would load this part of the program.

I have been following the Microsoft newsgroups about SP2 and, although it is
a biased sample because people post there only when they have problems,
still there seem to be a very large number of headaches in the SP2 upgrade.
The best advice that I can glean from it is that if you have been diligent
about your security updates and have a firewall and antivirus software up to
date, there is nothing to be gained from SP2. Many people seem to be waiting
until the bugs are out of SP2.

Richard Yates



___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-27 Thread Henry Howey
I just put the SERVICE PACK 2 on my XP yesterday and tried to load 
2005.  Lots of problems, plus nothing (even after speaking to tech 
support) would load this part of the program.

The SMARTMUSIC synth choice gives no sound at all.
Also, the repeats plug-in is gone and bizarre events occur when 2004 
scores created with it are brought up.

Not too complicated scores (on a 1-Gig RAM setup) elicit RAM 
deficiency warnings on playback.

I never really had any problems with 2004. This one seems to be a 
backyard delight;-)
--
Henry Howey, D.M.A.
Professor of Music
Sam Houston State University
Box 2208
Huntsville, TX  77341
(936) 294-1364
http://www.shsu.edu/~music/faculty/howey.html
Owner of FINALE Discussion List



___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-27 Thread David W. Fenton
On 27 Aug 2004 at 13:24, Henry Howey wrote:

 I just put the SERVICE PACK 2 on my XP yesterday and tried to load
 2005.  Lots of problems, plus nothing (even after speaking to tech
 support) would load this part of the program.

May I ask why you installed SP2?

 The SMARTMUSIC synth choice gives no sound at all.
 
 Also, the repeats plug-in is gone and bizarre events occur when 2004
 scores created with it are brought up.
 
 Not too complicated scores (on a 1-Gig RAM setup) elicit RAM 
 deficiency warnings on playback.
 
 I never really had any problems with 2004. This one seems to be a
 backyard delight;-)

Have you tried re-installing Finale?

Or uninstalling and re-installing?

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-27 Thread Eric Dannewitz
So is this a Finale problem or a Windows XP Service Pack 2 problem? Did 
you try 2004 with it?

I've heard Service Pack 2 breaks a lot of software, so, I'll pass on it 
now. I don't think you should be pointing fingers at MakeMusic. Direct 
it at Microsoft.

Henry Howey wrote:
I just put the SERVICE PACK 2 on my XP yesterday and tried to load 
2005.  Lots of problems, plus nothing (even after speaking to tech 
support) would load this part of the program.

The SMARTMUSIC synth choice gives no sound at all.
Also, the repeats plug-in is gone and bizarre events occur when 2004 
scores created with it are brought up.

Not too complicated scores (on a 1-Gig RAM setup) elicit RAM 
deficiency warnings on playback.

I never really had any problems with 2004. This one seems to be a 
backyard delight;-)

___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-27 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 02:24 PM 08/27/2004, Henry Howey wrote:
I just put the SERVICE PACK 2 on my XP yesterday and tried to load
2005.  Lots of problems, plus nothing (even after speaking to tech
support) would load this part of the program.
This one is not (necessarily) Coda's fault. From what I've read, SP2 was 
widely expected to break many existing apps because of all of the 
differences from SP1. Most recommendations seem to be to hold off on SP2 
until the dust settles.

Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-27 Thread Williams, Jim
Henry...
XP SP2 is known to be very unfriendly to MIDI and audio software.
Hopefully you created a restore point and can roll yourself back to pre-SP2.
Jim

-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Henry Howey 
Sent: Fri 27-Aug-04 13:24 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: 
Subject: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever



I just put the SERVICE PACK 2 on my XP yesterday and tried to load
2005.  Lots of problems, plus nothing (even after speaking to tech
support) would load this part of the program.

The SMARTMUSIC synth choice gives no sound at all.

Also, the repeats plug-in is gone and bizarre events occur when 2004
scores created with it are brought up.

Not too complicated scores (on a 1-Gig RAM setup) elicit RAM
deficiency warnings on playback.

I never really had any problems with 2004. This one seems to be a
backyard delight;-)
--
Henry Howey, D.M.A.
Professor of Music
Sam Houston State University
Box 2208
Huntsville, TX  77341
(936) 294-1364
http://www.shsu.edu/~music/faculty/howey.html
Owner of FINALE Discussion List





___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


winmail.dat___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-27 Thread dhbailey
Henry Howey wrote:
I just put the SERVICE PACK 2 on my XP yesterday and tried to load 
2005.  Lots of problems, plus nothing (even after speaking to tech 
support) would load this part of the program.

The SMARTMUSIC synth choice gives no sound at all.
Also, the repeats plug-in is gone and bizarre events occur when 2004 
scores created with it are brought up.

Not too complicated scores (on a 1-Gig RAM setup) elicit RAM deficiency 
warnings on playback.

I never really had any problems with 2004. This one seems to be a 
backyard delight;-)
I just checked and the Repeats plugins aren't part of my installation 
either.  I simply copied the Repts32.fxt plugin from Finale2004 to 
Finale2005 and the repeat plug-ins work just fine.

Wonder how they overlooked them in the installation package?
I haven't had any problems with playback and RAM warnings.
I am definitely holding off on SP2, based on your experience and some 
warnings I received on another list of computers not booting after 
installing it.

The SmartMusic synth works fine on my installation.
Sorry to hear about your troubles!
I would definitely suggest either trying to turn off all the security 
enhancements in SP2 and seeing if that helps things for you.


--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-27 Thread dhbailey
And it has added some wonderful functionality that will make life with 
Finale much easier, with regards to repeats.

But I just used the old repeats plugins and they still are quick and 
easy also, so I may keep them in my plugins folder.

But the revamping of the Repeat Tool deserves a lot of praise, in my 
opinion.

David

Fisher, Allen wrote:
Yep. The functionality (and then some) of the repeats PI's has been
incorporated directly into the repeat tool.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Aaron Sherber
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 2:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever
At 03:48 PM 08/27/2004, dhbailey wrote:
 I just checked and the Repeats plugins aren't part of my installation
either.  I simply copied the Repts32.fxt plugin from Finale2004 to
Finale2005 and the repeat plug-ins work just fine.Wonder how they
overlooked them in the installation package?
I think they've been obsoleted -- when you click on the Repeat tool, 
there's now a whole Repeats menu.

Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-27 Thread Jari Williamsson
dhbailey write:

 You can select the Repeat tool and then highlight the measures you want 
 in the repeats, go to the Repeat menu and choose Simple Repeat or First 
 and Second Ending Repeats.  With the First and Second Ending, it will 
 turn whichever measure or measures you have selected into the first 
 ending and will create an open-ended second ending on the measure 
 following the selected ones.

I assume you selected the region with the mouse? If so, it might be 
faster to create the repeats using the contextual menu for the repeat 
region (using right-click) instead of pulling down the Repeat menu.

Best regards,

Jari Williamsson

___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2005 buggiest setup ever

2004-08-27 Thread Richard Yates
 I just put the SERVICE PACK 2 on my XP yesterday and tried to load
 2005.  Lots of problems, plus nothing (even after speaking to tech
 support) would load this part of the program.

I read on MS newsgroups that there are many problems with SP2, but that
there is a rollback feature in it.

Richard Yates
(Who is currently waiting for the labor pains to subside from both Fin2005
and SP2 before making any moves)


___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale