Re: [Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
yeah, but it is still silly. i have to apply one style in the SC for cues and a different one for PT, then in some cases have to also add clef change styles, which of course have to be made in different transpositions... Ooh, I've never had to do that with different transpositions. It's hard for me to grasp, actually, where one would need to do that. But I freely admit your experience is much wider than mine! horns. i could also see it being used for passages that should be in the tenor clef in the parts (vc/bsn) but may be preferable in treble in C scores. ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
On Fri Dec 18, at FridayDec 18 8:13 AM, SN jef chippewa wrote: Staff Styles, which is what I use for different clef changes, isn't as ridiculous as some other workarounds. yeah, but it is still silly. i have to apply one style in the SC for cues and a different one for PT, then in some cases have to also add clef change styles, which of course have to be made in different transpositions... Ooh, I've never had to do that with different transpositions. It's hard for me to grasp, actually, where one would need to do that. But I freely admit your experience is much wider than mine! Your other points stand. I am really enjoying, however, the different measure numbers available in score and parts now, since the 2010 update. yes, this is major, but once again, alas, only teasing us. we know they CAN fix these things... but won't do it completely/properly. Heh, heh! Tease, indeed! Christopher ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
Staff Styles, which is what I use for different clef changes, isn't as ridiculous as some other workarounds. yeah, but it is still silly. i have to apply one style in the SC for cues and a different one for PT, then in some cases have to also add clef change styles, which of course have to be made in different transpositions... Your other points stand. I am really enjoying, however, the different measure numbers available in score and parts now, since the 2010 update. yes, this is major, but once again, alas, only teasing us. we know they CAN fix these things... but won't do it completely/properly. ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
On Thu Dec 17, at ThursdayDec 17 8:30 PM, SN jef chippewa wrote: It is high time that MAKE MUSIC sorted this bug. amen, babycakes! however, we all know that here, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE send your comments to makemusic support as well. the linked parts are yet another otherwise terribly important feature that was incompletely implemented and has had only oblique and insignificant corrrections to fundamental errors in its functionality. It is the only thing that really holds up the linked parts facility the only thing, really? don't you think a feature of this sort should by default allow (off the top of my head): - independent SC/PT adjustments to smart shape start/end adjustments - independent SC/PT adjustments to stem and beam positioning - cue notes to be hidden in the score only without ridiculous workarounds - different clef changes in SC/PT without ridiculous workarounds Staff Styles, which is what I use for different clef changes, isn't as ridiculous as some other workarounds. - umm, some accidental issue that others have had but i haven't run into (because mainly transposed scores) - enclosures to appear identically in SC/PT on expressions using fixed font sizes for grace notes, in some circumstances i have been able to cheat using tuplets in another layer (surrouding notes/rests hidden) reduced to the same size as the grace notes, but i think this solution is more suited to new music than traditional notation. I could barely imagine this last one! Holy manual spacing, Batman! Your other points stand. I am really enjoying, however, the different measure numbers available in score and parts now, since the 2010 update. Christopher ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
It is high time that MAKE MUSIC sorted this bug. amen, babycakes! however, we all know that here, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE send your comments to makemusic support as well. the linked parts are yet another otherwise terribly important feature that was incompletely implemented and has had only oblique and insignificant corrrections to fundamental errors in its functionality. It is the only thing that really holds up the linked parts facility the only thing, really? don't you think a feature of this sort should by default allow (off the top of my head): - independent SC/PT adjustments to smart shape start/end adjustments - independent SC/PT adjustments to stem and beam positioning - cue notes to be hidden in the score only without ridiculous workarounds - different clef changes in SC/PT without ridiculous workarounds - umm, some accidental issue that others have had but i haven't run into (because mainly transposed scores) - enclosures to appear identically in SC/PT on expressions using fixed font sizes for grace notes, in some circumstances i have been able to cheat using tuplets in another layer (surrouding notes/rests hidden) reduced to the same size as the grace notes, but i think this solution is more suited to new music than traditional notation. With small scores one can afford... i think it is unacceptable that any user who paid for the 2007 upgrade (where linked parts were introduced) even dares to think such things. ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
In case you missed it, here is my kludge (but it IS a kludge!) The best kludge for linked, voiced parts with grace notes in them is to have a different copy of the file with the default grace note spacing changed just for those parts. All the other parts (non- voiced, or those without grace notes) still reside in the same file with the score. People who make changes to the score can just copy the entire score over to the other "grace note" file, as the only thing different is the default grace note setting. Should be relatively painless (well, considering the gravity of the bug!). Easier than extracting the parts, especially if there are many of them and you make edits a lot. Christopher On Thu Dec 17, at ThursdayDec 17 2:48 AM, Jonathan Smith wrote: I agree! It is high time that MAKE MUSIC sorted this bug. It is the only thing that really holds up the linked parts facility, which I think is a huge time saver. I just couldn't imagine going back to the old slog of extracting parts in every score! You've only got to get you head around the section in the manual and just learn how it all works, after that it's a breeze. With small scores one can afford separate staves for each instrument, so the grace note bug is not so much of a problem (but still a bug all the same), but with orchestral, orch & choir, wind orchestras etc., having individual staves for each instrument means a reduction in the overall layout percentages making the score too small to read comfortably unless you blow it up onto A3 size. It is also much easier for conductors when similar instrument parts are grouped onto one stave (Horns, Clts, Tpts, etc.) - as was traditionally engraved. If anyone knows of a work around for the grace note bug I'd be very grateful to know. I have tried all kinds of things - altering the grace note parameters under Doc. options, dragging notes, changing spacing defaults, even inserting hidden notes between the grace note and the main note, although this can work to a degree, but it plays havoc with spacing in other parts and the playback will never be the same. I'm still on 2009 so I can't speak for any improvement they might have made in the upgrades, if any. Jonathan Yes, using voicing rules. Unless you have any grace notes. (There is an annoying bug with voiced linked parts + grace notes.) Cheers, - DJA ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
I agree! It is high time that MAKE MUSIC sorted this bug. It is the only thing that really holds up the linked parts facility, which I think is a huge time saver. I just couldn't imagine going back to the old slog of extracting parts in every score! You've only got to get you head around the section in the manual and just learn how it all works, after that it's a breeze. With small scores one can afford separate staves for each instrument, so the grace note bug is not so much of a problem (but still a bug all the same), but with orchestral, orch & choir, wind orchestras etc., having individual staves for each instrument means a reduction in the overall layout percentages making the score too small to read comfortably unless you blow it up onto A3 size. It is also much easier for conductors when similar instrument parts are grouped onto one stave (Horns, Clts, Tpts, etc.) - as was traditionally engraved. If anyone knows of a work around for the grace note bug I'd be very grateful to know. I have tried all kinds of things - altering the grace note parameters under Doc. options, dragging notes, changing spacing defaults, even inserting hidden notes between the grace note and the main note, although this can work to a degree, but it plays havoc with spacing in other parts and the playback will never be the same. I'm still on 2009 so I can't speak for any improvement they might have made in the upgrades, if any. Jonathan Yes, using voicing rules. Unless you have any grace notes. (There is an annoying bug with voiced linked parts + grace notes.) Cheers, - DJA ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
The best kludge for linked, voiced parts with grace notes in them is to have a different copy of the file with the default grace note spacing changed just for those parts. All the other parts (non- voiced, or those without grace notes) can still reside in the same file with the score. Christopher On Tue Dec 15, at TuesdayDec 15 5:31 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote: Yes, using voicing rules. Unless you have any grace notes. (There is an annoying bug with voiced linked parts + grace notes.) Cheers, - DJA - WEB: http://secretsociety.typepad.com On Dec 15, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Ryan wrote: Thanks for the clarification. I guess my question wasn't clear. For parts that share a staff in the score, for example Horns 1 & 2, can you create a part for horn 1 and a separate part for horn 2 and have them both be linked? ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
Actually, it does more than just "make the number of measures in each system the same from one part to another" -- or it can, depending on the options you choose. It also (optionally) preserves forced system and page breaks, distances between systems, etc. Cheers, - DJA - WEB: http://secretsociety.typepad.com On Dec 15, 2009, at 4:01 PM, Christopher Smith wrote: Yes, all it does is make the number of measures in each system the same from one part to another. It isn't exactly the same as the old technique of copying the contents of horn 2 into the horn 1 part, then saving under a new name, because you don't get all the nudges and things you did to the horn 1 in the horn 2 part. But it saves you having to re-jig titles, and some items can be moved so that they get nudged in ALL parts at the same time, so it is a net savings in time as far as I am concerned. Christopher On Tue Dec 15, at TuesdayDec 15 3:07 PM, Ryan wrote: Are these parts still linked to the original score, or are they separate files now? I haven't used linked parts in a large ensemble, so I'm curious how people are getting the results they want. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Chuck Israels wrote: On Dec 15, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Paul Hayden wrote: I completely forgot about "Transfer Layout" in TGTools. It did the trick! Thanks, Chuck. Paul Hayden You're welcome, Paul. 2010 users are still waiting. Tobias? Chuck Chuck Israels wrote: There is a tool in the complete version of TGTools that will do what you need (for v.2009 and earlier). It is called "Transfer Layout" and it works beautifully. If you do not have the full set of Tobias' plugins, this function alone is worth the price. ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
Yes, but it gets fussy. Chuck On Dec 15, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Ryan wrote: Thanks for the clarification. I guess my question wasn't clear. For parts that share a staff in the score, for example Horns 1 & 2, can you create a part for horn 1 and a separate part for horn 2 and have them both be linked? On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Chuck Israels wrote: They are still linked to the original score. Tobias' plugin does nothing to extract them, or unlink them in any way. It only copies the layout from a part you have worked on and sets up another part the same way - the same measure layout, distances between systems, etc. This is a convenience when dealing with parts that contain similar music. Even when there are some differences from part to part, starting with a generally good layout, copied from another part, can save a good deal of time. Chuck On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Ryan wrote: Are these parts still linked to the original score, or are they separate files now? I haven't used linked parts in a large ensemble, so I'm curious how people are getting the results they want. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Chuck Israels wrote: On Dec 15, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Paul Hayden wrote: I completely forgot about "Transfer Layout" in TGTools. It did the trick! Thanks, Chuck. Paul Hayden You're welcome, Paul. 2010 users are still waiting. Tobias? Chuck Chuck Israels wrote: There is a tool in the complete version of TGTools that will do what you need (for v.2009 and earlier). It is called "Transfer Layout" and it works beautifully. If you do not have the full set of Tobias' plugins, this function alone is worth the price. Magnolia Music Press Voice & Pre-arranged fax: 225-769-9604 ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale Chuck Israels 230 North Garden Terrace Bellingham, WA 98225-5836 phone (360) 671-3402 fax (360) 676-6055 www.chuckisraels.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale Chuck Israels 230 North Garden Terrace Bellingham, WA 98225-5836 phone (360) 671-3402 fax (360) 676-6055 www.chuckisraels.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale Chuck Israels 230 North Garden Terrace Bellingham, WA 98225-5836 phone (360) 671-3402 fax (360) 676-6055 www.chuckisraels.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
Yes, using voicing rules. Unless you have any grace notes. (There is an annoying bug with voiced linked parts + grace notes.) Cheers, - DJA - WEB: http://secretsociety.typepad.com On Dec 15, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Ryan wrote: Thanks for the clarification. I guess my question wasn't clear. For parts that share a staff in the score, for example Horns 1 & 2, can you create a part for horn 1 and a separate part for horn 2 and have them both be linked? On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Chuck Israels wrote: They are still linked to the original score. Tobias' plugin does nothing to extract them, or unlink them in any way. It only copies the layout from a part you have worked on and sets up another part the same way - the same measure layout, distances between systems, etc. This is a convenience when dealing with parts that contain similar music. Even when there are some differences from part to part, starting with a generally good layout, copied from another part, can save a good deal of time. Chuck On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Ryan wrote: Are these parts still linked to the original score, or are they separate files now? I haven't used linked parts in a large ensemble, so I'm curious how people are getting the results they want. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Chuck Israels wrote: On Dec 15, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Paul Hayden wrote: I completely forgot about "Transfer Layout" in TGTools. It did the trick! Thanks, Chuck. Paul Hayden You're welcome, Paul. 2010 users are still waiting. Tobias? Chuck Chuck Israels wrote: There is a tool in the complete version of TGTools that will do what you need (for v.2009 and earlier). It is called "Transfer Layout" and it works beautifully. If you do not have the full set of Tobias' plugins, this function alone is worth the price. Magnolia Music Press Voice & Pre-arranged fax: 225-769-9604 ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale Chuck Israels 230 North Garden Terrace Bellingham, WA 98225-5836 phone (360) 671-3402 fax (360) 676-6055 www.chuckisraels.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale Chuck Israels 230 North Garden Terrace Bellingham, WA 98225-5836 phone (360) 671-3402 fax (360) 676-6055 www.chuckisraels.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
Thanks for the clarification. I guess my question wasn't clear. For parts that share a staff in the score, for example Horns 1 & 2, can you create a part for horn 1 and a separate part for horn 2 and have them both be linked? On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Chuck Israels wrote: > They are still linked to the original score. Tobias' plugin does nothing > to extract them, or unlink them in any way. It only copies the layout from > a part you have worked on and sets up another part the same way - the same > measure layout, distances between systems, etc. This is a convenience when > dealing with parts that contain similar music. Even when there are some > differences from part to part, starting with a generally good layout, copied > from another part, can save a good deal of time. > > Chuck > > > > On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Ryan wrote: > > Are these parts still linked to the original score, or are they separate >> files now? I haven't used linked parts in a large ensemble, so I'm curious >> how people are getting the results they want. >> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Chuck Israels > >wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 15, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Paul Hayden wrote: >>> >>> I completely forgot about "Transfer Layout" in TGTools. It did the trick! >>> Thanks, Chuck. Paul Hayden You're welcome, Paul. 2010 users are still waiting. Tobias? >>> >>> Chuck >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Chuck Israels wrote: There is a tool in the complete version of TGTools that will do what you need (for v.2009 and earlier). It is called "Transfer Layout" and it works beautifully. If you do not have the full set of Tobias' plugins, this function alone is worth the price. Magnolia Music Press Voice & Pre-arranged fax: 225-769-9604 ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale >>> Chuck Israels >>> 230 North Garden Terrace >>> Bellingham, WA 98225-5836 >>> phone (360) 671-3402 >>> fax (360) 676-6055 >>> www.chuckisraels.com >>> >>> ___ >>> Finale mailing list >>> Finale@shsu.edu >>> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale >>> >>> ___ >> Finale mailing list >> Finale@shsu.edu >> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale >> > > Chuck Israels > 230 North Garden Terrace > Bellingham, WA 98225-5836 > phone (360) 671-3402 > fax (360) 676-6055 > www.chuckisraels.com > > ___ > Finale mailing list > Finale@shsu.edu > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
They are still linked to the original score. Tobias' plugin does nothing to extract them, or unlink them in any way. It only copies the layout from a part you have worked on and sets up another part the same way - the same measure layout, distances between systems, etc. This is a convenience when dealing with parts that contain similar music. Even when there are some differences from part to part, starting with a generally good layout, copied from another part, can save a good deal of time. Chuck On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Ryan wrote: Are these parts still linked to the original score, or are they separate files now? I haven't used linked parts in a large ensemble, so I'm curious how people are getting the results they want. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Chuck Israels wrote: On Dec 15, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Paul Hayden wrote: I completely forgot about "Transfer Layout" in TGTools. It did the trick! Thanks, Chuck. Paul Hayden You're welcome, Paul. 2010 users are still waiting. Tobias? Chuck Chuck Israels wrote: There is a tool in the complete version of TGTools that will do what you need (for v.2009 and earlier). It is called "Transfer Layout" and it works beautifully. If you do not have the full set of Tobias' plugins, this function alone is worth the price. Magnolia Music Press Voice & Pre-arranged fax: 225-769-9604 ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale Chuck Israels 230 North Garden Terrace Bellingham, WA 98225-5836 phone (360) 671-3402 fax (360) 676-6055 www.chuckisraels.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale Chuck Israels 230 North Garden Terrace Bellingham, WA 98225-5836 phone (360) 671-3402 fax (360) 676-6055 www.chuckisraels.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
Yes, all it does is make the number of measures in each system the same from one part to another. It isn't exactly the same as the old technique of copying the contents of horn 2 into the horn 1 part, then saving under a new name, because you don't get all the nudges and things you did to the horn 1 in the horn 2 part. But it saves you having to re-jig titles, and some items can be moved so that they get nudged in ALL parts at the same time, so it is a net savings in time as far as I am concerned. Christopher On Tue Dec 15, at TuesdayDec 15 3:07 PM, Ryan wrote: Are these parts still linked to the original score, or are they separate files now? I haven't used linked parts in a large ensemble, so I'm curious how people are getting the results they want. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Chuck Israels wrote: On Dec 15, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Paul Hayden wrote: I completely forgot about "Transfer Layout" in TGTools. It did the trick! Thanks, Chuck. Paul Hayden You're welcome, Paul. 2010 users are still waiting. Tobias? Chuck Chuck Israels wrote: There is a tool in the complete version of TGTools that will do what you need (for v.2009 and earlier). It is called "Transfer Layout" and it works beautifully. If you do not have the full set of Tobias' plugins, this function alone is worth the price. ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
Are these parts still linked to the original score, or are they separate files now? I haven't used linked parts in a large ensemble, so I'm curious how people are getting the results they want. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Chuck Israels wrote: > > On Dec 15, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Paul Hayden wrote: > > I completely forgot about "Transfer Layout" in TGTools. It did the trick! >> >> Thanks, Chuck. >> >> Paul Hayden >> >> > You're welcome, Paul. 2010 users are still waiting. Tobias? > > Chuck > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> Chuck Israels wrote: >> >> There is a tool in the complete version of TGTools that will do what >> you need (for v.2009 and earlier). It is called "Transfer Layout" and >> it works beautifully. If you do not have the full set of Tobias' >> plugins, this function alone is worth the price. >> >> >> >> >> Magnolia Music Press >> >> Voice & Pre-arranged fax: 225-769-9604 >> >> ___ >> Finale mailing list >> Finale@shsu.edu >> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale >> > > Chuck Israels > 230 North Garden Terrace > Bellingham, WA 98225-5836 > phone (360) 671-3402 > fax (360) 676-6055 > www.chuckisraels.com > > ___ > Finale mailing list > Finale@shsu.edu > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
On Dec 15, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Paul Hayden wrote: I completely forgot about "Transfer Layout" in TGTools. It did the trick! Thanks, Chuck. Paul Hayden You're welcome, Paul. 2010 users are still waiting. Tobias? Chuck Chuck Israels wrote: There is a tool in the complete version of TGTools that will do what you need (for v.2009 and earlier). It is called "Transfer Layout" and it works beautifully. If you do not have the full set of Tobias' plugins, this function alone is worth the price. Magnolia Music Press Voice & Pre-arranged fax: 225-769-9604 ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale Chuck Israels 230 North Garden Terrace Bellingham, WA 98225-5836 phone (360) 671-3402 fax (360) 676-6055 www.chuckisraels.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] Re: Duplicating linked parts for similar instruments
I completely forgot about "Transfer Layout" in TGTools. It did the trick! Thanks, Chuck. Paul Hayden Chuck Israel wrote: There is a tool in the complete version of TGTools that will do what you need (for v.2009 and earlier). It is called "Transfer Layout" and it works beautifully. If you do not have the full set of Tobias' plugins, this function alone is worth the price. Magnolia Music Press Voice & Pre-arranged fax: 225-769-9604 ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
