[Fink-users] xfree86-4.2.0-12 crash with Ctrl-Opt-Com-*
Anybody discovered the nifty shortcut to the darkside? It's referred to in System Preferences-Universal Access. Just press Ctrl-Opt-Command-* and the screen becomes black on white. Well, this seems to affect XDarwin when it's running. It seems okay to use this command when in the XDarwin app. However, if I'm in some other app at the time, say the Finder, then right after pressing the key combination XDarwin will crash in the background. Is this something to report to the xfree86 developers, or is this a fink thing and the maintainer should be notified, or is this a fink thing and the developers should be notified, or is this an Apple thing and they should be notified, or... or... well, I'm never sure who to tell when a bug like this pops up. Package manager version: 0.10.0 Distribution version: 0.4.0.cvs Mac OS X Version: 10.2 Developer Tools: July 2002 gcc version: cc (GCC) 3.1 20020420 (prerelease) make version: 3.79 -- Thom --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] man pages not working
On Monday, August 26, 2002, at 12:47 , Thom Peters II wrote: [Luna:~] thom% which man /sw/bin/man [Luna:~] thom% more /sw/bin/man #!/bin/sh exec /usr/bin/man -C /sw/etc/man.conf $* That's very odd indeed. My /sw/bin/man is a compiled executable, not a shell program: $ file /sw/bin/man /sw/bin/man: Mach-O executable ppc $ dpkg -S /sw/bin/man man: /sw/bin/man $ fink list man Information about 1400 packages read in 4 seconds. i man 1.5k-1 Man pager $ fink --version Package manager version: 0.10.0 Distribution version: 0.4.0.cvs (Yes, there was more output from fink list man) Where did your /sw/bin/man come from (i.e., what does dpkg -S /sw/bin/man say)? I'm running Mac OS 10.1.5, but that shouldn't make a difference w.r.t. fink's man package. HTH, Dan -- This email impairs your ability to operate heavy machinery. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] man pages not working
I am not using jaguar yet, but man does seem to be a shell script on
the stock fink distro.
Mon 1:46:32am ~{810} %fink --version
Package manager version: 0.9.12
Distribution version: 0.4.0
Mon 1:46:43am ~{811} %file /sw/bin/man
/sw/bin/man: Bourne shell script text
Mon 1:48:28am ~{812} %cat /sw/bin/man
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/bin/man -C /sw/etc/man.conf $*
Mon 1:48:33am ~{813} %dpkg -S /sw/bin/man
manconf: /sw/bin/man
BTW, I am using the stock Fink distro and 10.1.5 on this system
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, August 26, 2002, at 12:47 , Thom Peters II wrote:
[Luna:~] thom% which man
/sw/bin/man
[Luna:~] thom% more /sw/bin/man
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/bin/man -C /sw/etc/man.conf $*
That's very odd indeed. My /sw/bin/man is a compiled executable,
not a shell program:
$ file /sw/bin/man
/sw/bin/man: Mach-O executable ppc
$ dpkg -S /sw/bin/man
man: /sw/bin/man
$ fink list man
Information about 1400 packages read in 4 seconds.
i man 1.5k-1 Man pager
$ fink --version
Package manager version: 0.10.0
Distribution version: 0.4.0.cvs
(Yes, there was more output from fink list man)
Where did your /sw/bin/man come from (i.e., what does
dpkg -S /sw/bin/man say)?
I'm running Mac OS 10.1.5, but that shouldn't make a
difference w.r.t. fink's man package.
HTH,
Dan
--
This email impairs your ability to operate heavy machinery.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] man pages not working
Thom Peters II wrote: [] [Luna:~] thom% which man /sw/bin/man [Luna:~] thom% more /sw/bin/man #!/bin/sh exec /usr/bin/man -C /sw/etc/man.conf $* [Luna:~] thom% man man /usr/bin/man: illegal option -- C One of the more annoying changes in 10.2. Apple went back to an ancient crippled version of /usr/bin/man that doesn't understand man.conf. For a temporary fix, until the Jaguar stuff is completely sorted out, you can probably safely remove /sw/bin/man. Another possibility would be to install the 'man' package instead of the 'manconf' package, but this will probably force you to install a bunch of other packages you won't want. -- Martin --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] man pages not working
On Monday, August 26, 2002, at 04:52 , Scot Ballard wrote:
I am not using jaguar yet, but man does seem to be a shell script on
the stock fink distro.
Mon 1:46:32am ~{810} %fink --version
Package manager version: 0.9.12
Distribution version: 0.4.0
Mon 1:46:43am ~{811} %file /sw/bin/man
/sw/bin/man: Bourne shell script text
Mon 1:48:28am ~{812} %cat /sw/bin/man
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/bin/man -C /sw/etc/man.conf $*
Mon 1:48:33am ~{813} %dpkg -S /sw/bin/man
manconf: /sw/bin/man
This might be the difference. I get /sw/bin/man from man,
and you get it from manconf. In order to do its magic,
manconf replaces the usual /sw/bin/man with a wrapper around
/usr/bin/man.
I'm not running 10.2, but I'd guess that 10.2's /usr/bin/man
isn't quite compatible with 10.1's (specifically the -C
switch).
I'm pretty sure Jeffrey Whitaker (manconf's maintainer) reads
this list, but I've cc'd him personally just to make sure he
sees this.
HTH,
Dan
--
This email impairs your ability to operate heavy machinery.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] man pages not working
Fink has two packages providing alternative versions of /sw/bin/man:
Scot Ballard wrote:
I am not using jaguar yet, but man does seem to be a shell script on
the stock fink distro.
Mon 1:46:32am ~{810} %fink --version
Package manager version: 0.9.12
Distribution version: 0.4.0
Mon 1:46:43am ~{811} %file /sw/bin/man
/sw/bin/man: Bourne shell script text
This comes form the 'manconf' package.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[]
$ file /sw/bin/man
/sw/bin/man: Mach-O executable ppc
$ dpkg -S /sw/bin/man
man: /sw/bin/man
This is the 'man' package.
'manconf' was preferred by many (me, for instance), because 'man' pulls
in a whole bunch of dependencies, up to xfree86 and anacron. 'manconf'
is just a wrapper script for Apple's /usr/bin/man. Alas, 'manconf'
doesn't work on Jaguar any more (but is probably unnecessary, too).
--
Martin
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Readline on 10.2
On Monday, August 26, 2002, at 03:26 AM, Fernando Pereira wrote: On 8/26/02 2:54 AM, Andrew Hartung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After I installed 10.2 Bash broke and would not rebuild. I rebuilt readline and then rebuilt Bash again, which works fine now. I don't know if this is enough of an indicator that readline is ok. The issue is that the system curses library moved in 10.2. Anything, including readline, which was previously built with respect to that library will have unsatisfied dynamic loading references. The solution is to fink rebuild readline and any other package (for instance, ispell) that uses system curses directly. This will be handled automatically by the fink upgrade that we have in the works, if you can wait a little bit. -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Readline on 10.2
On 8/26/02 8:52 AM, Ben Hines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This will be handled automatically by the fink upgrade that we have in the works, if you can wait a little bit. Thanks! That'll be great. In the meanwhile, I've just been rebuilding anything that fails that way. -- F --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] CUPS
Alexander Strange wrote:
On Monday, August 19, 2002, at 11:22 AM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
Well, this is strange.
Actually I left my installation of cups obtained from Apple's site and
installed that through dselect. When I ran cupsd from /etc/cups or
from /sw/sbin I would get the following error:
localhost ./cupsd: Unable to read configuration file
'${prefix}/etc/cups/cupsd.conf' - exiting!
BTW, I did check my hosts file and cups.conf file. everything was fine.
So, I decided to uninstall both installations and then reinstall just
using dselect.
Nonetheless, I get the exact same error.
Any clues now?
The reason for that is that our cups package doesn't work :)
There's an updated version in experimental/jaguar under CVS that should
work better.
I have the cups package installed from Apple's site, but it doesn't seem
to work as well. Any suggestions out there?
Curtis
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] man pages not working
On Monday, August 26, 2002, at 05:01 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: For a temporary fix, until the Jaguar stuff is completely sorted out, you can probably safely remove /sw/bin/man. Another possibility would be to install the 'man' package instead of the 'manconf' package, but this will probably force you to install a bunch of other packages you won't want. Or rather, it should. The package is missing a dependency on groff. without which it dies as well. /usr/bin/man works fine for me, however (both in 10.1 and 10.2). Cheers, Derek --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] bad config in orrery
bad config in orrery from the console: Error in startup script: couldn't read file /sw/data/modules/orrery/orrery: no such file or directory I had to track it down but I found it... the misconfigured file is /sw/bin/geomview/.geomview-orrery config files (especially if they are invisible) should be installed in the user's home directory and not in bizarre arbitrary locations .geomview-orrery contains one line: (emodule-define Orrery wish $GEOMROOT/data/modules/orrery/orrery) which should be changed to (emodule-define Orrery wish $GEOMROOT/share/modules/orrery/orrery) beyond this... Why would the module be confusingly unmarked in the share folder? Currently it's in a subfolder innocuously-titled modules... Why wouldn't $GEOMROOT/share/geomview/modules/orrery/orrery make more sense? Certainly this is what every other fink package is doing. -- lenny bruceI am not a comedian, [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am Lenny Bruce. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-4.2.0-12 crash with Ctrl-Opt-Com-*
Thom Peters wrote: Anybody discovered the nifty shortcut to the darkside? It's referred to in System Preferences-Universal Access. Just press Ctrl-Opt-Command-* and the screen becomes black on white. Well, this seems to affect XDarwin when it's running. It seems okay to use this command when in the XDarwin app. However, if I'm in some other app at the time, say the Finder, then right after pressing the key combination XDarwin will crash in the background. The reverse video switch may be changing the screen's color depth, and XDarwin tends to crash when the color depth or screen size or screen arrangement changes. You should file a bug report at http://sf.net/projects/xonx/ . -- Greg Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] ncurses-5.2-6
dear finkers i have nuked my /sw today (on puropse, that is) to start all over again with a clean install of fink under 10.2. getting the source tarball, called fink-0.4.0-full (or something similar, i did that this morning) i ran ./bootstrap.sh to set up a new fink installation. unfortunately ncurses-5.2-6.info fails to compile with 10.2 (GCC version 1151, based on gcc version 3.1 20020420) and therefore the whole bootstrap fails. i know that deleting the whole fink installation is not the easiest nor the way you suggested to update but i just wanted a clean install after the gcc 2.95 and 3.1 (from the april tools) mix i had. putting a new tarball on the web (exchanging ncurses-5.2-6 with ncurses-5.2-7) could safe much trouble for everyone who wants to start with a new installation from source. i know that you're working on a new bindist, so i don't want to hassle you as you might update the tarball anyway shortly, just to report... besides that no problems with fink and 10.2 so far. not even compile failures after about a hundred packages - how boring... :-) thanx for the great work! mathias --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] ncurses-5.2-6
On Monday, August 26, 2002, at 03:24 PM, mathias meyer wrote: dear finkers i have nuked my /sw today (on puropse, that is) to start all over again with a clean install of fink under 10.2. getting the source tarball, called fink-0.4.0-full (or something similar, i did that this morning) i ran ./bootstrap.sh to set up a new fink installation. unfortunately ncurses-5.2-6.info fails to compile with 10.2 (GCC version 1151, based on gcc version 3.1 20020420) and therefore the whole bootstrap fails. Bootstrap from the fink 0-10-0 tarball, not the distribution,and it will work fine. -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] bitchx feedback
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, lenny bruce wrote: At 11:48 AM -0400 8/24/02, Chris Devers wrote: On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: hey, I put a new revision of bitchx into unstable. I can't even get it to download. Bizarrely, when I try it I get a malloc error from curl: curl -f -L -O http://us.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/fink/ircii-pana-1.0c19.repack.tar.gz % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Curr DloadUpload TotalCurrent LeftSpeed 0 00 00 0 0 0 --:--:-- 0:00:00 --:--:-- 0 curl: (22) The requested file was not found the file isn't there, go on the web and check. I realize that, through I found a ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz on the bitchx.org site (i.e. no -repack- bit near the end). This version seems to have built and installed properly, but it didn't match the MD5 hash that the package is looking for, so I wouldn't recommend duplicating the hack. The bigger problem from that mail was all the malloc() errors with curl. It had never done that before and it has never done that for anything else. Very weird... plus I'd like to point out that 1.0c19 has been reported backdoored on mirrors so I hope Chris Zubrzycki is getting it from bitchx.org and not irc.org IMO a patch revision is needed... :/ Chris? -- Chris Devers Have you ever seen Jack Valenti John Ashcroft at the same time? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] bitchx feedback
On Monday, August 26, 2002, at 05:18 PM, Chris Devers wrote: The bigger problem from that mail was all the malloc() errors with curl. It had never done that before and it has never done that for anything else. Very weird... It is actually not a problem at all. The problem is a 404 URL. The errors from curl are completely benign. -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] bitchx feedback
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Ben Hines wrote: On Monday, August 26, 2002, at 05:18 PM, Chris Devers wrote: The bigger problem from that mail was all the malloc() errors with curl. It had never done that before and it has never done that for anything else. Very weird... It is actually not a problem at all. The problem is a 404 URL. The errors from curl are completely benign. Oh really? Well nevermind then. I knew the 404 was the operative problem here, but thought the malloc might be a symptom of deeper headaches to come. Guess I stand corrected :) -- Chris Devers Have you ever seen Jack Valenti John Ashcroft at the same time? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] PHP not happy under Jaguar?
Hi... I've installed OS X 10.2, then rebuilt fink, apache and php, but my PHP pages don't appear to be being parsed by PHP (I just get the raw PHP source displayed). I've tried everything I can think of to rectify the situation, but no luck so far. fink -V Package manager version: 0.10.0 Distribution version: 0.4.0.cvs Server version: Apache/1.3.24 (Darwin) Server built: 08/26/02 17:19:13 i php 4.1.2-2 HTML-embedded server-side scripting language Any ideas? Thanks, Shay -- === Shay Telfer Perth, Western Australia TechnomancerIt must be bunnies! Opinions for hire [POQ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] fnord --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
