Re: [Fink-users] xaw3d-shlibs

[Martin Costabel]

M.Brooks Clark wrote:
I've been having trouble updating the xaw3d package for a couple of 
weeks now. Any suggestions for getting it to compile?
[]
/usr/bin/cc -c -Os -Wall -Wpointer-arith -no-cpp-precomp -fno-common -I. 
-I/usr/X11R6/include - D__powerpc__ -D__DARWIN__ -DNO_ALLOCA 
-DCSRG_BASED -dynamic XawI18n.c
XawI18n.c: In function `_Xaw_atowc':
XawI18n.c:75: warning: implicit declaration of function `mbtowc'
rm -f libXaw3d.7.0.dylib~
/bin/sh: -c: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `$INSTALLNAME'
[]
Failed: phase compiling: xaw3d-1.5-11 failed
Please have a look at 
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.beginners/15285
and tell us if this helps.

--
Martin

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

[Fink-users] gimp 2.2

[Ersatz Sophist]

Hello everyone,
Boy, I really hope there is a quick solution to this. After compiling 
gimp2.2 for 1.5 hours, I get the following error when I try to execute 
gimp:

"Gimp requires FreeType version 2.1.7 or later. Installed version is 
0.10. Please upgrade to 2.1.7 or later"

So, I installed freetype 2.1.9, but the error persists. Do I have to 
recompile the package from scratch, or is there a quicker solution? Or 
is this something that needs to be addressed by the maintainer?

Thanks.
Payam
--
"...who search the reason of things
Are those who bring the most sorrow on themselves."
--Euripides, The Medea

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

[Alexander K. Hansen]

On Mar 7, 2005, at 4:09 PM, Ersatz Sophist wrote:
Hello everyone,
Boy, I really hope there is a quick solution to this. After compiling 
gimp2.2 for 1.5 hours, I get the following error when I try to execute 
gimp:

"Gimp requires FreeType version 2.1.7 or later. Installed version is 
0.10. Please upgrade to 2.1.7 or later"

So, I installed freetype 2.1.9, but the error persists. Do I have to 
recompile the package from scratch, or is there a quicker solution? Or 
is this something that needs to be addressed by the maintainer?

Thanks.
Payam
--
"...who search the reason of things
Are those who bring the most sorrow on themselves."
--Euripides, The Medea
There's a parallel thread on -beginners about this:  gimp2 is set up 
not to use _any_ fink freetype2 package you install, but rather that 
which comes with your X11 installation (check in /usr/X11R6/lib).

What flavor of X11 do you have?  If the package isn't working with 
Apple's X11 or with XFree86, then the maintainer may need to rework it 
to use an external freetype.

--
Alexander Hansen
Fink Documentarian
[Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

[Conrad Heiney]

For me this error occurs with Apple's X11.
On Mar 7, 2005, at 1:17 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
There's a parallel thread on -beginners about this:  gimp2 is set up 
not to use _any_ fink freetype2 package you install, but rather that 
which comes with your X11 installation (check in /usr/X11R6/lib).

What flavor of X11 do you have?  If the package isn't working with 
Apple's X11 or with XFree86, then the maintainer may need to rework it 
to use an external freetype.
--
Conrad Heiney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.contentgoeshere.com/
http://www.fringehead.org/
It's the heart's the crazy bus driver.

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

[Ersatz Sophist]

That is the case. I'm using Apple's X11. I have cc'd the maintainer 
(though I think he's on this list).

Thanks.
Payam
--
"...who search the reason of things
Are those who bring the most sorrow on themselves."
--Euripides, The Medea
On Mar 7, 2005, at 10:17 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Mar 7, 2005, at 4:09 PM, Ersatz Sophist wrote:
Hello everyone,
Boy, I really hope there is a quick solution to this. After compiling 
gimp2.2 for 1.5 hours, I get the following error when I try to 
execute gimp:

"Gimp requires FreeType version 2.1.7 or later. Installed version is 
0.10. Please upgrade to 2.1.7 or later"

So, I installed freetype 2.1.9, but the error persists. Do I have to 
recompile the package from scratch, or is there a quicker solution? 
Or is this something that needs to be addressed by the maintainer?

Thanks.
Payam
--
"...who search the reason of things
Are those who bring the most sorrow on themselves."
--Euripides, The Medea
There's a parallel thread on -beginners about this:  gimp2 is set up 
not to use _any_ fink freetype2 package you install, but rather that 
which comes with your X11 installation (check in /usr/X11R6/lib).

What flavor of X11 do you have?  If the package isn't working with 
Apple's X11 or with XFree86, then the maintainer may need to rework it 
to use an external freetype.

--
Alexander Hansen
Fink Documentarian
[Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX


---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

[Laine Lee]

I started the thread on the beginners list to which Alexander refers, and my
error is slightly different. Gimp complains that 2.1.4 of FreeType is
installed, which is corroborated by Fink.

I can run Apple's X11 by uncommenting this line in my .xinitrc.

exec quartz-wm

I can alternative run XDarwin or Apple's X11 by commenting that one and
uncommenting this one:

exec wmaker

The Gimp error is the same whether I'm using XDarwin or Apple's X11.


On 3/7/05 3:09 PM, "Ersatz Sophist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> "Gimp requires FreeType version 2.1.7 or later. Installed version is
> 0.10. Please upgrade to 2.1.7 or later"
> 

-- 
Laine Lee 
Visit the Mac Shack at http://moss.utsa.edu
My Homepage: http://lonestar.utsa.edu/llee



---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

[Alexander K. Hansen]

On Mar 7, 2005, at 4:57 PM, Laine Lee wrote:
I started the thread on the beginners list to which Alexander refers, 
and my
error is slightly different. Gimp complains that 2.1.4 of FreeType is
installed, which is corroborated by Fink.

I can run Apple's X11 by uncommenting this line in my .xinitrc.
exec quartz-wm
I can alternative run XDarwin or Apple's X11 by commenting that one and
uncommenting this one:
exec wmaker
The Gimp error is the same whether I'm using XDarwin or Apple's X11.
On 3/7/05 3:09 PM, "Ersatz Sophist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Gimp requires FreeType version 2.1.7 or later. Installed version is
0.10. Please upgrade to 2.1.7 or later"
--
Laine Lee
Visit the Mac Shack at http://moss.utsa.edu
My Homepage: http://lonestar.utsa.edu/llee

The display server is irrelevant--what's important is the underlying 
X11 library stuff.  I can run X11.app or XDarwin.app, too, but my X11 
guts are from Xorg (which means that gimp2 will run here, since it's 
got a late-model freetype)

--
Alexander Hansen
Fink Documentarian
[Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

[Martin Costabel]

Laine Lee wrote:
I started the thread on the beginners list to which Alexander refers, and my
error is slightly different. Gimp complains that 2.1.4 of FreeType is
installed, which is corroborated by Fink.
As Alexander said, gimp2-2.2.4 does not use Fink's freetype packages but 
takes whatever version of freetype is installed in /usr/X11R6. In your 
case this is freetype version 2.1.4, because you have xfree86-4.4.0 
installed. If you had Apple's X11 installed, it would be 2.1.0 
(misrepresented by gimp2 as "0.1.0").

It doesn't matter which X server or window manager you are running, what 
counts is which library sits in /usr/X11R6. In both cases, Apple's X11 
or xfree86-4.4.0, gimp2 refuses to run, because it wants version 2.1.7 
or higher. You would have this if you had the X11 from the xorg package 
installed. I assume that the maintainer of gimp2 has xorg installed, so 
that he didn't notice this problem.

This is definitely a bug in the gimp2 package and needs to be fixed by 
the maintainer. He needs to make it depend on Fink's freetype219 package 
instead of the freetype libraries inside /usr/X11.

--
Martin

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

[Fink-users] Xorg full-screen problem

[Viv Kendon]

Has anyone else on this list running Xorg and Xorg's XDarwin 
full screen experienced things get all confused over whether 
X or Aqua should have control?  The symptom is that mouse 
clicks start switching focus to whatever Aqua app is in that 
portion of the screen even when Xorg supposedly has control 
of the screen.  The screen redrawing gets all mixed up too, 
with X apps updating (like xclock when the time advances) 
coming through on the Aqua desktop when Aqua has focus. 
Nothing actually crashes, there are no error messages on the 
console. Focus still follows mouse when X has focus, and 
keyboard input then goes into the selected X window, it is 
just the mouse clicks that go to Aqua. With a little 
ingenuity it is possible to quit Xorg cleanly and restart 
it, whereupon things return to normal.

There is usually some trigger, like attaching an external 
hard drive over firewire, or a camera over USB, that 
precedes this effect, but it doesn't happen every time in a 
repeatable way.  I have this just often enough to be 
annoying on both my TiBook (running an older XDarwin from 
XFree86 over Xorg) and my dual G4 (with matching XDarwin), 
both installed through fink.

If this was on PC hardware I'd be thinking the system had 
somehow missed an interupt, but I don't know enough about 
Macs to know whether something equivalent could be behind 
this.  (Interupts are how the system responds to input from 
devices like mouse, keyboard, modem...each one gets its own 
interupt number, a bit like SCSI device numbers.)

This may be one of those "wait and see if it goes away under 
Tiger" problems, but if anyone has any suggestions 
(including try another list, file a bug), or just a "me too" 
I'd appreciate it.

thanks,
-- Viv

Dr Viv Kendon   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quantum Information   tel: 0113 343 3897
Physics & Astronomy  University of Leeds
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

[Laine Lee]

Sorry, I failed to make it clear in this thread that I was using XFree86 (I
think it is clear in my post on the beginners list). I attempted to compile
Xorg. I get what I'm assuming is a standard message about what to do to
convert from Xfree86 to Xorg. By all appearances it looks like it might be
about as simple as changing my citizenship, although I did something similar
to get XFree86 to work with Apple's X11. My remaining question is "Will I
need to jump through the hoops you described in your posting about Gimp 2.0
sent Saturday, September 11, 2004 4:35 PM, or is it simpler with the version
of xorg that's now available?" I'll worry about the maintainer another time.
Right now I'm interested in any workaround that will let Gimp 2.2 launch.
Thanks.


On 3/7/05 4:37 PM, "Martin Costabel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> It doesn't matter which X server or window manager you are running, what
> counts is which library sits in /usr/X11R6. In both cases, Apple's X11
> or xfree86-4.4.0, gimp2 refuses to run, because it wants version 2.1.7
> or higher. You would have this if you had the X11 from the xorg package
> installed. I assume that the maintainer of gimp2 has xorg installed, so
> that he didn't notice this problem.

-- 
Laine Lee 



---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

[Fink-users] Pango problem

[Erlend Aasland]

Hi all,

While trying to upgrade to lilypond-devel, pango
(pango1-xft2-ft219-1.6.0-2) fails to build libpangox-1.0.la with this
message:

creating libpangox-1.0.la
(cd .libs && rm -f libpangox-1.0.la && ln -s ../libpangox-1.0.la
libpangox-1.0.la)
ld: warning -L: directory name (/sw/lib/freetype2/lib) does not exist
ld: warning -dylib_install_name
/sw/lib/pango-ft219/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.0.dylib not found in segment
address table LD_SEG_ADDR_TABLE
/sw/var/lib/fink/prebound/seg_addr_table
ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _locale_charset
/sw/lib/libiconv.dylib(localcharset.o) definition of _locale_charset
/sw/lib/libintl.dylib(localcharset.lo) definition of _locale_charset
ld: warning prebinding disabled because of undefined symbols
ld: Undefined symbols:
_FT_Get_BDF_Property
/usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command failed
make[4]: *** [libpangoft2-1.0.la] Error 1
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2

It seems that the path /sw/lib/freetype2/lib should be
/sw/lib/freetype219/lib? The command "/sw/lib/freetype219/lib/*.*a |
grep -i _FT_Get_BDF_Property" returns "_FT_Get_BDF_Property"

Regards,
  Erlend Aasland


---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

[lele]

Michele D'Ascanio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The first time I run gimp was gimp1.2 with xfree86-4.3.99. After I've
tried to run gimp2.2 with XDarwin 1.3b4 with good results. Now I use
Photoshop because is better :-)


Laine Lee wrote:

>Sorry, I failed to make it clear in this thread that I was using XFree86 (I
>think it is clear in my post on the beginners list). I attempted to compile
>Xorg. I get what I'm assuming is a standard message about what to do to
>convert from Xfree86 to Xorg. By all appearances it looks like it might be
>about as simple as changing my citizenship, although I did something similar
>to get XFree86 to work with Apple's X11. My remaining question is "Will I
>need to jump through the hoops you described in your posting about Gimp 2.0
>sent Saturday, September 11, 2004 4:35 PM, or is it simpler with the version
>of xorg that's now available?" I'll worry about the maintainer another time.
>Right now I'm interested in any workaround that will let Gimp 2.2 launch.
>Thanks.
>
>
>On 3/7/05 4:37 PM, "Martin Costabel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>  
>
>>It doesn't matter which X server or window manager you are running, what
>>counts is which library sits in /usr/X11R6. In both cases, Apple's X11
>>or xfree86-4.4.0, gimp2 refuses to run, because it wants version 2.1.7
>>or higher. You would have this if you had the X11 from the xorg package
>>installed. I assume that the maintainer of gimp2 has xorg installed, so
>>that he didn't notice this problem.
>>
>>
>
>  
>



---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

[Fink-users] gnome-vfs2-ssl not working with sftp

[Kevin Horton]

I'm trying to edit remote files with bluefish.  The bluefish 
developers say that remote files should be able to be opened using 
URL like sftp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/path/to/file.  I tried such a URL, and it 
failed.  Looking in Console, I see:

(bluefish:815): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Cannot load module 
`/sw/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsftp.so' (dlcompat: file 
"/sw/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsftp.so" not found)

(bluefish:815): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Cannot load module 
`/sw/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsftp.so' (dlcompat: file 
"/sw/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsftp.so" not found)

(bluefish:815): libgnomevfs-CRITICAL **: file 
gnome-vfs-cancellable-ops.c: line 176 
(gnome_vfs_get_file_info_uri_cancellable): assertion `uri != NULL' 
failed

(bluefish:815): libgnomevfs-CRITICAL **: file gnome-vfs-uri.c: line 
916 (gnome_vfs_uri_unref): assertion `uri != NULL' failed

Looking in /sw/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/, I see no libsftp.* files. 
I rebuilt gnome-vfs-ssl, but the situation did not change.

I see sftp appears in 
/sw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/default-modules.conf, so I would assume 
that it is supposed to work. Should gnome-vfs2-ssl work with sftp?

I have the following gnome-vfs packages:
fink list gnome-vfs
Information about 4750 packages read in 2 seconds.
 p   gnome-vfs1.0.5-30   The GNOME virtual 
file-system libraries
 gnome-vfs-dev1.0.5-30   The GNOME virtual 
file-system libraries
 gnome-vfs-shlibs 1.0.5-30   The GNOME virtual 
file-system libraries
 i   gnome-vfs-ssl1.0.5-30   The GNOME virtual 
file-system libraries - SSL
 i   gnome-vfs-ssl-dev1.0.5-30   The GNOME virtual 
file-system libraries - SSL
 i   gnome-vfs-ssl-shlibs 1.0.5-30   The GNOME virtual 
file-system libraries - SSL
 p   gnome-vfs2   2.6.1.1-15 The GNOME virtual 
file-system libraries
 p   gnome-vfs2-dev   2.6.1.1-15 The GNOME virtual 
file-system libraries
 p   gnome-vfs2-shlibs2.6.1.1-15 The GNOME virtual 
file-system libraries
 i   gnome-vfs2-ssl   2.6.1.1-14 The GNOME virtual 
file-system libraries
 i   gnome-vfs2-ssl-dev   2.6.1.1-14 The GNOME virtual 
file-system libraries
 i   gnome-vfs2-ssl-shlibs2.6.1.1-14 The GNOME virtual 
file-system libraries

% fink -V
Package manager version: 0.24.1
Distribution version: 0.7.1.rsync
% sw_vers
ProductName:Mac OS X
ProductVersion: 10.3.8
BuildVersion:   7U16
--
Kevin Horton
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] gnome-vfs2-ssl not working with sftp

[Michèle Garoche]

Le 8 mars 2005, à 2:31, Kevin Horton a écrit :
I'm trying to edit remote files with bluefish.  The bluefish 
developers say that remote files should be able to be opened using URL 
like sftp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/path/to/file.  I tried such a URL, and it 
failed.  Looking in Console, I see:
Seems impossible as libsftp.la is deactivated either in gnome-vfs2 or 
gnome-vfs2-ssl (see the patch files).

Michèle



PGP.sig
Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=

Re: [Fink-users] Xorg full-screen problem

[Alexander K. Hansen]

On Mar 7, 2005, at 6:10 PM, Viv Kendon wrote:
Has anyone else on this list running Xorg and Xorg's XDarwin full 
screen experienced things get all confused over whether X or Aqua 
should have control?  The symptom is that mouse clicks start switching 
focus to whatever Aqua app is in that portion of the screen even when 
Xorg supposedly has control of the screen.  The screen redrawing gets 
all mixed up too, with X apps updating (like xclock when the time 
advances) coming through on the Aqua desktop when Aqua has focus. 
Nothing actually crashes, there are no error messages on the console. 
Focus still follows mouse when X has focus, and keyboard input then 
goes into the selected X window, it is just the mouse clicks that go 
to Aqua. With a little ingenuity it is possible to quit Xorg cleanly 
and restart it, whereupon things return to normal.

There is usually some trigger, like attaching an external hard drive 
over firewire, or a camera over USB, that precedes this effect, but it 
doesn't happen every time in a repeatable way.  I have this just often 
enough to be annoying on both my TiBook (running an older XDarwin from 
XFree86 over Xorg) and my dual G4 (with matching XDarwin), both 
installed through fink.

If this was on PC hardware I'd be thinking the system had somehow 
missed an interupt, but I don't know enough about Macs to know whether 
something equivalent could be behind this.  (Interupts are how the 
system responds to input from devices like mouse, keyboard, 
modem...each one gets its own interupt number, a bit like SCSI device 
numbers.)

This may be one of those "wait and see if it goes away under Tiger" 
problems, but if anyone has any suggestions (including try another 
list, file a bug), or just a "me too" I'd appreciate it.

thanks,
-- Viv

Dr Viv Kendon   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quantum Information   tel: 0113 343 3897
Physics & Astronomy  University of Leeds

Fullscreen or rootless?
There are some known issues with how XDarwin deals with windows that 
aren't under its control in rootless mode (e.g. running X11.app on 
DISPLAY 0 and XDarwin on DISPLAY 1.

On the other hand, I haven't had any problem similar to yours (I'm 
using the XDarwin that came with Xorg)--Aqua and X11 stay in their own 
worlds.

--AH

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

[Alexander K. Hansen]

On Mar 7, 2005, at 6:12 PM, Laine Lee wrote:
Sorry, I failed to make it clear in this thread that I was using 
XFree86 (I
think it is clear in my post on the beginners list). I attempted to 
compile
Xorg. I get what I'm assuming is a standard message about what to do to
convert from Xfree86 to Xorg. By all appearances it looks like it 
might be
about as simple as changing my citizenship, although I did something 
similar
to get XFree86 to work with Apple's X11. My remaining question is 
"Will I
need to jump through the hoops you described in your posting about 
Gimp 2.0
sent Saturday, September 11, 2004 4:35 PM, or is it simpler with the 
version
of xorg that's now available?" I'll worry about the maintainer another 
time.
Right now I'm interested in any workaround that will let Gimp 2.2 
launch.
Thanks.


In general a URL pointing at one of the several message archives would 
probably make the answer a little easier--that way people won't have to 
look up the message themselves.

In lieu of doing that, then, I can say that _if_ you install xorg (not 
being exactly sure about the nature of the "hoops") then gimp-2.2 
should run with no problems.

--AH

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

[Laine Lee]

Title: Gimp 2.2


	
		
		
		
On 3/7/05 9:03 PM, "Alexander K. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



> In general a URL pointing at one of the several message archives would 
> probably make the answer a little easier--that way people won't have to 
> look up the message themselves.

		Here's the URL for the message that Martin Costabel posted last
		September with instructions for installing Xorg so that it's possible 
		to switch back and forth between XFree86 and Xorg.
		
		
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.general/14793/match=xorg+package+solves+gimp2+problem
In this response, Dave Morrison suggests that permanent installation fo Xorg should suffice.



http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.general/14802/match=xorg+package+solves+gimp2+problem

>>   fink install xorg

>>  [wait 2 hours until this finishes]

>>   sudo cp /usr/X11R6_Apple/bin/quartz-wm /usr/X11R6/bin/

>>   sudo cp /etc/X11_Apple/xserver/Xquartz.plist /etc/X11/xserver/

>>   sudo cp /usr/X11R6_Apple/bin/Xquartz /usr/X11R6/bin/

>>


>As I understand it, these last three steps should be replaced by



 > fink install applex11tools

Does everything in Martin's message still apply?

Is there now any reason why I might want to switch back and forth between XFree86 and Xorg?

	





Laine Lee

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

[Laine Lee]

Title: Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2



(Sorry about that empty message.)

On 3/7/05 9:03 PM, "Alexander K. Hansen"  wrote:

 > In general a URL pointing at one of the several message archives would 
 > probably make the answer a little easier--that way people won't have to 
 > look up the message themselves.

 Here's the URL for the message that Martin Costabel posted last
 September with instructions for installing Xorg so that it's possible 
 to switch back and forth between XFree86 and Xorg.

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.general/14793/match=xorg+package+solves+gimp2+problem

In this response, Dave Morrison suggests that permanent installation fo Xorg should suffice. 

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.general/14802/match=xorg+package+solves+gimp2+problem

 >> fink install xorg
 >> [wait 2 hours until this finishes]
 >> sudo cp /usr/X11R6_Apple/bin/quartz-wm /usr/X11R6/bin/
 >> sudo cp /etc/X11_Apple/xserver/Xquartz.plist /etc/X11/xserver/
 >> sudo cp /usr/X11R6_Apple/bin/Xquartz /usr/X11R6/bin/
 >>
 >As I understand it, these last three steps should be replaced by

 > fink install applex11tool

Does everything in Martin's message still apply?

Is there now any reason why I might want to switch back and forth between XFree86 and Xorg?

-- 
Laine Lee 

Re: [Fink-users] Xorg full-screen problem

[Hisashi T Fujinaka]

On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Mar 7, 2005, at 6:10 PM, Viv Kendon wrote:
Has anyone else on this list running Xorg and Xorg's XDarwin full screen 
experienced things get all confused over whether X or Aqua should have 
control?
Fullscreen or rootless?
There are some known issues with how XDarwin deals with windows that aren't 
under its control in rootless mode (e.g. running X11.app on DISPLAY 0 and 
XDarwin on DISPLAY 1.

On the other hand, I haven't had any problem similar to yours (I'm using the 
XDarwin that came with Xorg)--Aqua and X11 stay in their own worlds.
xfce gets weird on me. Clicking on a Safari window underneath starts
popping up xfce menus until eventually Safari raises. I live with it
because it beats the heck out of using MS Windows and it's a minor
inconvenience.
--
Hisashi T Fujinaka - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

[Martin Costabel]

Laine Lee wrote:
[]
> Is there now any reason why I might want to switch back and forth
> between XFree86 and Xorg?
Xorg is not so bleeding edge any more, so there is no compelling reason 
to switch back and forth. And the freetype2-backward-incompatibility bug 
that is annoying some people (not the same that what we are discussing 
here) is common to both packages :-)

--
Martin

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

[Fink-users] Re: Pango problem

[Erlend Aasland]

Goodmorning everybody,

After applying the attached patch, pango1-xft2-ft29 builds fine.

On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 00:47:56 +0100, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> While trying to upgrade to lilypond-devel, pango
> (pango1-xft2-ft219-1.6.0-2) fails to build libpangox-1.0.la with this
> message:
> 
> creating libpangox-1.0.la
> (cd .libs && rm -f libpangox-1.0.la && ln -s ../libpangox-1.0.la
> libpangox-1.0.la)
> ld: warning -L: directory name (/sw/lib/freetype2/lib) does not exist
> ld: warning -dylib_install_name
> /sw/lib/pango-ft219/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.0.dylib not found in segment
> address table LD_SEG_ADDR_TABLE
> /sw/var/lib/fink/prebound/seg_addr_table
> ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _locale_charset
> /sw/lib/libiconv.dylib(localcharset.o) definition of _locale_charset
> /sw/lib/libintl.dylib(localcharset.lo) definition of _locale_charset
> ld: warning prebinding disabled because of undefined symbols
> ld: Undefined symbols:
> _FT_Get_BDF_Property
> /usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command failed
> make[4]: *** [libpangoft2-1.0.la] Error 1
> make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> 
> It seems that the path /sw/lib/freetype2/lib should be
> /sw/lib/freetype219/lib? The command "/sw/lib/freetype219/lib/*.*a |
> grep -i _FT_Get_BDF_Property" returns "_FT_Get_BDF_Property"
> 
> Regards,
>   Erlend Aasland
>


pango.patch
Description: Binary data

Re: [Fink-users] Pango problem

[Martin Costabel]

Erlend Aasland wrote:
Hi all,
While trying to upgrade to lilypond-devel, pango
(pango1-xft2-ft219-1.6.0-2) fails to build libpangox-1.0.la with this
[]
ld: warning -L: directory name (/sw/lib/freetype2/lib) does not exist
[]
ld: Undefined symbols:
_FT_Get_BDF_Property
[]
It seems that the path /sw/lib/freetype2/lib should be
/sw/lib/freetype219/lib? The command "/sw/lib/freetype219/lib/*.*a |
grep -i _FT_Get_BDF_Property" returns "_FT_Get_BDF_Property"
Yes, this is a bug. I fixed it in CVS. De-facto maintainer CCed.
--
Martin

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users