Re: [Flexradio] Receiver dies 2 min after power-up, ideas?

2005-09-30 Thread Eric Wachsmann - FlexRadio
This is exactly what it looks like when/if the DDS quits running.
Contact us directly about getting the unit serviced.  You might look
through the various ECOs on the private downloadp age if your unit is
not up to date.


Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> radio.biz] On Behalf Of Wayne Roth
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 1:57 PM
> To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: [Flexradio] Receiver dies 2 min after power-up, ideas?
> 
> My SDR-1000 (an older rev box with RFE, no PA or tuner, parallel port
> interface) receives fine for the first couple of minutes then goes
deaf.
> Cycling the DC power restores the receiver for another couple minutes,
> then
> it dies again.  Just before it craps out, the baseline as viewed on
the
> spectral display raises from -130 to about -70 a couple times along
with
> an
> increase in the white noise, then drops to -140.  All frequencies
appear
> to
> be dead.  Restarting the software has no effect, so it's a hardware
issue.
> I have yet to open the enclosure and get the scope out, just wondering
if
> anyone has seen this, or has a suggestion on where to start looking.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Wayne
> WA2N / 5 Austin Tx
> 
> 
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz





Re: [Flexradio] Linux jDttSP

2005-09-30 Thread Frank Brickle

Edson --

Thanks for being patient :-)

I am in the process of implementing a stand-alone little machine based 
on the VIA EPIA mini-atx mother board and the control application I am 
implementing is the first piece of a remote controlled SDR-1000 + little 
DSP-dedicated computer.


Wonderful. This is very much what we were hoping would happen. Please 
keep us informed about how it's going.


One of the things we're eager to find out is whether running the system 
entirely from ram disk will iron out some of the glitches associated 
still with using jsdr on a totally vanilla OS configuration, that is, 
with no low-latency patches, not running jack as root, and so on.



Can you tell us a little about the new goodies in the new version?


Unfortunately there's not much that will be dramatically obvious from 
the outside, apart from better performance. A lot of it is simple 
clean-up of the source and overhaul of the source directories. A certain 
amount is making convenient at the user level some capabilities which 
have been unused so far, like multiple receivers and the aux signal buses.


There's a little bit of syntactic sugar on the update commands which 
makes them selectively recordable and replayable. Basically what it 
means is that you can get the radio to a desired state, save that, and 
restore it at will, without a console. An elementary facility, not meant 
to replace real memories or a database.


There are some new experimental features like wavelet noise mitigation 
and MIDI input to the keyer. Unfinished but there to play with. If Bob 
is comfortable with it, the new mode that implements a soft transponder.


Maybe the more interesting gadgets are outboard of jsdr, strictly 
speaking. There's a jack-to-python module, a test signal generator, and 
a couple of jack clients to assist in compressing the user-side audio 
streams and streaming them over LAN.


Basically it's window dressing on what amounts to a thorough course of 
software-engineering hygeine and regualar professional care, like a 
heavy dose of Listerine.


Ok. For TX, would the behavior be the same or would the LSB/USB mode 
change anything?


RX and TX are completely symmetrical, except for a small processing 
stage on TX which eliminates residual DC. This is separate from the DC 
blocker on TX audio input which is meant to compensate for crummy 
soundcards.


Very 73
Frank
AB2KT



Re: [Flexradio] Receiver dies 2 min after power-up, ideas?

2005-09-30 Thread Philip Covington
Hi Wayne,

I had this problem with my SDR-1000.  Every time I got out the probes
to see what was going on it would not do it (not that they would have
helped much since the it is a bear to get a probe into the board
stack).  Finally I isolated it to one of a handful of crappy looking
solder joints on the PIO board (bottom of the stack).  I just touched
up all the bad looking solder joints until the problem when away.  I
haven't had a problem since (3+ months).  It would do exactly what you
describe - display jumps up higher than baseline a few times, white
noise, and then nothing... with baseline below -140...

Have you tried rapping the case a few times?  Generally it would
restore mine for a few minutes before it did it again.

I think in my case the excessive heat generated by the regulator on
the PIO board aggravated any substandard solder joints by thermal
expansion and contraction over time.  At least it is something to look
at.

73 de Phil N8VB

On 9/30/05, Wayne Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My SDR-1000 (an older rev box with RFE, no PA or tuner, parallel port
> interface) receives fine for the first couple of minutes then goes deaf.
> Cycling the DC power restores the receiver for another couple minutes, then
> it dies again.  Just before it craps out, the baseline as viewed on the
> spectral display raises from -130 to about -70 a couple times along with an
> increase in the white noise, then drops to -140.  All frequencies appear to
> be dead.  Restarting the software has no effect, so it's a hardware issue.
> I have yet to open the enclosure and get the scope out, just wondering if
> anyone has seen this, or has a suggestion on where to start looking.
>
> Best Regards,
> Wayne
> WA2N / 5 Austin Tx
>
>
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
>


--
Philip A Covington
http://www.philcovington.com



Re: [Flexradio] Error reading bandinfo table

2005-09-30 Thread Joe - AB1DO



For those who can't wait until the next version of PowerSDR is 
available, I have corrected as per Eric's directions the band info of the 
PowerSDR.mdb database file for version 1.4.5. I have tested it here and it seems 
to work OK.
 
The zip file ( www.hamsdr.com/dnld.aspx?id=41 
) is available from the public download area at hamsdr.com. The file I 
uploaded has no stations memorized, so before trying this database, make sure 
you make a copy of your existing one first, just to be on the safe side.

Naturally there are absolutely no guarantees.
 
Enjoy, 
73 de Joe, AB1DO

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Eric Wachsmann 
  - FlexRadio 
  To: 'Ignacio Cembreros' ; flexradio@flex-radio.biz 
  Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 
  12:11
  Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Error reading 
  bandinfo table
  
  
  Further, you can 
  easily copy+paste the table data from Access into 
  Excel and use a formula to find problem areas (i.e. overlapping 
  frequencies).
   
   
  Eric 
  Wachsmann
  FlexRadio 
  Systems
   
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ignacio 
  CembrerosSent: Friday, 
  September 30, 2005 11:00 AMTo: flexradio@flex-radio.bizSubject: Re: [Flexradio] Error reading 
  bandinfo table
   
  I sent a previous response regarding the same subject. 
  This not applies to Art, mainly because he is asking how to manipulate the 
  database, so I assume he didn´t it before.But if somebody has modified 
  the default entries of a previous versión in the BandText table  (i.e.to 
  include a more detailed band plan) and you import this database in the current 
  version, it is more than posible that you get this alarm in several 
  places.   So if you import a modified table, check every register 
  and edit any inconsistency i.e. band segmrentes that are nested or overlapped 
  with others.  An alternbate method is to make a sweep of  the whole 
  HF, in 100Khz increments, and noting where the alarms appear and the edit the 
  table in those places.73 de Ignacio, EB4APLEric 
  Wachsmann - FlexRadio wrote:
  Art,
   
  I assume based on the 
  subject that you are talking about the database issue.  If you have 
  Microsoft Access, you can edit the file yourself fairly easily.  Open the 
  file and you will see a list of the Tables.  Double click on the one 
  calls “BandText.”  This will give you a list of the entries in that 
  table.  There are two entries that cause problems in 1.4.5 beta prev 
  1.  The first has a Low frequency of 1.999 and the other has a Low of 
  3.635.  Delete these two entries (highlight, right click, select Delete 
  Record, confirm) and everything will be 
  peachy.
   
  If you don’t have MS 
  Access, you could probably talk someone here on the reflector into doing this 
  for you if you email them the file (make sure to zip the database so virus 
  programs don’t strip the 
attachment).
   
   
  Eric 
  Wachsmann
  FlexRadio 
  Systems
   
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 10:19 PMTo: flexradio@flex-radio.bizSubject: [Flexradio] Error reading 
  bandinfo table
   
  
  How do I solve this problem with 1.4.5 beta prev 1 
  ?
  
   
  
  Thanks, 
  Art
  
  
  
   
   
  
  

  ___FlexRadio mailing 
  listFlexRadio@flex-radio.bizhttp://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz


Re: [Flexradio] Receiver dies 2 min after power-up, ideas?

2005-09-30 Thread Larry Loen

Wayne Roth wrote:

My SDR-1000 (an older rev box with RFE, no PA or tuner, parallel port 
interface) receives fine for the first couple of minutes then goes deaf. 
Cycling the DC power restores the receiver for another couple minutes, then 
it dies again.  Just before it craps out, the baseline as viewed on the 
spectral display raises from -130 to about -70 a couple times along with an 
increase in the white noise, then drops to -140.  All frequencies appear to 
be dead.  Restarting the software has no effect, so it's a hardware issue. 
I have yet to open the enclosure and get the scope out, just wondering if 
anyone has seen this, or has a suggestion on where to start looking.


Best Regards,
Wayne
WA2N / 5 Austin Tx 



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz

 

When I had problems like that, it related to problems with the sound 
card setup.  In the most extreme case, I had configured the wrong card. 
If you're receiving at all, that's not your problem.


However, to take another possibility I've seen, if you have your SDR 
sound card set as any of the Windows default sound devices, some very 
strange results can happen.  This can happen in ways mysterious.


Check all your sound card settings for the SDR and any nonSDR cards. 
Check that you don't have bad defaults and check that you have things 
like reverb turned off, the correct mixers and microphone et. al. 
settings set on or off.




Larry WO0Z





[Flexradio] Receiver dies 2 min after power-up, ideas?

2005-09-30 Thread Wayne Roth
My SDR-1000 (an older rev box with RFE, no PA or tuner, parallel port 
interface) receives fine for the first couple of minutes then goes deaf. 
Cycling the DC power restores the receiver for another couple minutes, then 
it dies again.  Just before it craps out, the baseline as viewed on the 
spectral display raises from -130 to about -70 a couple times along with an 
increase in the white noise, then drops to -140.  All frequencies appear to 
be dead.  Restarting the software has no effect, so it's a hardware issue. 
I have yet to open the enclosure and get the scope out, just wondering if 
anyone has seen this, or has a suggestion on where to start looking.


Best Regards,
Wayne
WA2N / 5 Austin Tx 





Re: [Flexradio] Error reading bandinfo table

2005-09-30 Thread Eric Wachsmann - FlexRadio









Further, you can easily copy+paste the table data from Access into Excel and use a
formula to find problem areas (i.e. overlapping frequencies).

 

 

Eric Wachsmann

FlexRadio Systems

 



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ignacio Cembreros
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005
11:00 AM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Error
reading bandinfo table

 

I sent a previous response regarding the same subject.
This not applies to Art, mainly because he is asking how to manipulate the
database, so I assume he didn´t it before.

But if somebody has modified the default entries of a previous versión in the
BandText table  (i.e.to include a more detailed band plan) and you import
this database in the current version, it is more than posible that you get this
alarm in several places.   So if you import a modified table, check
every register and edit any inconsistency i.e. band segmrentes that are nested
or overlapped with others.  An alternbate method is to make a sweep
of  the whole HF, in 100Khz increments, and noting where the alarms appear
and the edit the table in those places.

73 de Ignacio, EB4APL



Eric Wachsmann - FlexRadio wrote:



Art,

 

I assume based on the subject that you are
talking about the database issue.  If you have Microsoft Access, you can
edit the file yourself fairly easily.  Open the file and you will see a
list of the Tables.  Double click on the one calls
“BandText.”  This will give you a list of the entries in that
table.  There are two entries that cause problems in 1.4.5 beta prev
1.  The first has a Low frequency of 1.999 and the other has a Low of 3.635. 
Delete these two entries (highlight, right click, select Delete Record,
confirm) and everything will be peachy.

 

If you don’t have MS Access, you
could probably talk someone here on the reflector into doing this for you if
you email them the file (make sure to zip the database so virus programs
don’t strip the attachment).

 

 

Eric Wachsmann

FlexRadio Systems

 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
September 29, 2005 10:19 PM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] Error reading
bandinfo table

 



How do I solve this problem with 1.4.5 beta prev 1 ?





 





Thanks, Art









 



 










Re: [Flexradio] Error reading bandinfo table

2005-09-30 Thread Ignacio Cembreros




I sent a previous response regarding the same subject. This not applies
to Art, mainly because he is asking how to manipulate the database, so
I assume he didn´t it before.

But if somebody has modified the default entries of a previous versión
in the BandText table  (i.e.to include a more detailed band plan) and
you import this database in the current version, it is more than
posible that you get this alarm in several places.   So if you import a
modified table, check every register and edit any inconsistency i.e.
band segmrentes that are nested or overlapped with others.  An
alternbate method is to make a sweep of  the whole HF, in 100Khz
increments, and noting where the alarms appear and the edit the table
in those places.

73 de Ignacio, EB4APL



Eric Wachsmann - FlexRadio wrote:

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  
  
  Art,
   
  I assume
based on the subject that you are
talking about the database issue. 
  If you have Microsoft Access, you can edit the file yourself
fairly
easily.  Open the file and you will
see a list of the Tables.  Double
click on the one calls “BandText.”  This will give you a list of the entries
in that table.  There are two
entries that cause problems in 1.4.5 beta prev
1.  The first has a Low frequency of
1.999 and the other has a Low of 3.635. 
  Delete these two entries (highlight, right click, select
Delete Record,
confirm) and everything will be peachy.
   
  If you don’t
have MS Access, you
could probably talk someone here on the reflector into doing this for
you if
you email them the file (make sure to zip the database so virus
programs don’t
strip the attachment).
   
   
  Eric
Wachsmann
  FlexRadio
Systems
   
  
  -Original
Message-
  From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, September 29,
2005 10:19 PM
  To:
flexradio@flex-radio.biz
  Subject: [Flexradio]
Error reading
bandinfo table
   
  
  How do I solve this problem with 1.4.5 beta
prev 1 ?
  
  
   
  
  
  Thanks, Art
  
  
  
   
  
  






Re: [Flexradio] Error reading bandinfo table

2005-09-30 Thread Eric Wachsmann - FlexRadio








Art,

 

I assume based on the subject that you are
talking about the database issue. 
If you have Microsoft Access, you can edit the file yourself fairly
easily.  Open the file and you will
see a list of the Tables.  Double
click on the one calls “BandText.”  This will give you a list of the entries
in that table.  There are two
entries that cause problems in 1.4.5 beta prev
1.  The first has a Low frequency of
1.999 and the other has a Low of 3.635. 
Delete these two entries (highlight, right click, select Delete Record,
confirm) and everything will be peachy.

 

If you don’t have MS Access, you
could probably talk someone here on the reflector into doing this for you if
you email them the file (make sure to zip the database so virus programs don’t
strip the attachment).

 

 

Eric Wachsmann

FlexRadio Systems

 



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 10:19 PM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] Error reading
bandinfo table

 



How do I solve this problem with 1.4.5 beta prev 1 ?





 





Thanks, Art









 










Re: [Flexradio] Linux jDttSP

2005-09-30 Thread Edson Pereira


Hi Frank,

Thanks for the quick response.

Frank Brickle wrote:


Edson --

Yipes! I can't thank you enough for pointing this out. We've had a 
couple of other reports about problems with the spectum output and 
have been going nuts trying to figure out what was going on, because I 
have been unable to duplicate the problem.


There was a lengthy process of negotiation back and forth between Bob 
and myself concerning exactly what would go where in the spectrum 
computation, so that we'd have something that worked on both the Linux 
and Windows sides. It was my job ultimately to reconcile them in the 
codebase.  Just at the time this was happening there were big problems 
at SourceForge with updates to CVS that got dropped on the floor.




The problem actually pushed me to look into the code to find out how 
things work.


In short, the wrong version (half-corrected) was the one that got into 
CVS. It was pure sloppiness that I did not go back and test the CVS 
version that finally showed up. My sincerest apologies.




No need for apologies. On the contrary, I would like to thank you and 
Bob for the superb work you have done. It is quite fun to play with sdr 
under Linux.


I am in the process of implementing a stand-alone little machine based 
on the VIA EPIA mini-atx mother board and the control application I am 
implementing is the first piece of a remote controlled SDR-1000 + little 
DSP-dedicated computer.


I'm not going to correct the CVS at this time since, first, you've 
made the correct fix, and second, because there is a major new release 
coming out shortly. We're switching to FFTW3 and the code and data 
structures associated with all those computations are somewhat different.




That is very exciting! I am tempted, but am not going to ask for when 
the release will be! :-) I know how hard it is to get software releases 
out. Can you tell us a little about the new goodies in the new version?



Now, to your questions.

[1] *My* Linux version is correct, and yours isn't, because I screwed 
up. No surprise there.




No problem at all. I just wanted to confirm that I was not doing 
something stupid.


[2] The place to get the raw spectrum is not inside jDttSP but rather 
from the jack ports. If you need it inside jDttSP it can easily be 
provided, depending on what you're going to do with it.




The way it is now does work quite nicely. I was planing a large 
4096-pixels panadapter, but instead of scrolling the spectogram image, I 
can leverage jDttSP to do it for me.  I have some old code for a 
spectogram I wrote some time ago and will adapt it for working with jack.


[3] The USB/LSB behavior is exactly as you describe. Switching 
sidebands is actually accomplished above jDttSP merely by altering the 
filter settings as you have done.




Ok. For TX, would the behavior be the same or would the LSB/USB mode 
change anything?


Thanks again,

73,

-- Edson



[Flexradio] USB-to-parallel adapter power management update

2005-09-30 Thread Sami Aintila
If you're using the USB adapter, please download and install the
updated Sdr1kUsb-Installer.exe from the FlexRadio web site. The
installer will prompt you to replace three files on your computer.
Only the Sdr1kUsb.dll file has changed since the original release. It
doesn't make any difference whether or not you replace the other two
(sdr1k_ezusbfx.inf and ezusb.sys).

This update resolves the issue of the USB adapter not responding after
computer wakes up from standby or hibernation. It seems some computers
haven't had this problem, while on other systems it has been necessary
to un/replug the USB cable to reset the device driver after wakeup.

Apparently the Cypress EZ-USB driver that we're using is not fully
compatible with power management on all systems. The updated software
will use Windows device installation functions to restart the
unresponsive device driver. This could be described as the software
equivalent of un/replugging the USB cable. It seems to do the trick.

Please note that you should still close the PowerSDR application first
before putting your computer into standby or hibernation. This is a
valid recommendation for all users, not just a USB issue. Many
hardware devices sometimes seem to wake up in a slightly different
state than they were before standby. I have tested this with PowerSDR
and I often get a PortAudio error message "Device unavailable" after
standby.

You can send USB related bug reports, questions and comments either to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or the FlexRadio e-mail reflector.

73, Sami OH2BFO



Re: [Flexradio] Linux jDttSP

2005-09-30 Thread Frank Brickle

Edson --

Yipes! I can't thank you enough for pointing this out. We've had a 
couple of other reports about problems with the spectum output and have 
been going nuts trying to figure out what was going on, because I have 
been unable to duplicate the problem.


There was a lengthy process of negotiation back and forth between Bob 
and myself concerning exactly what would go where in the spectrum 
computation, so that we'd have something that worked on both the Linux 
and Windows sides. It was my job ultimately to reconcile them in the 
codebase.  Just at the time this was happening there were big problems 
at SourceForge with updates to CVS that got dropped on the floor.


In short, the wrong version (half-corrected) was the one that got into 
CVS. It was pure sloppiness that I did not go back and test the CVS 
version that finally showed up. My sincerest apologies.


I'm not going to correct the CVS at this time since, first, you've made 
the correct fix, and second, because there is a major new release coming 
out shortly. We're switching to FFTW3 and the code and data structures 
associated with all those computations are somewhat different.


Now, to your questions.

[1] *My* Linux version is correct, and yours isn't, because I screwed 
up. No surprise there.


[2] The place to get the raw spectrum is not inside jDttSP but rather 
from the jack ports. If you need it inside jDttSP it can easily be 
provided, depending on what you're going to do with it.


[3] The USB/LSB behavior is exactly as you describe. Switching sidebands 
is actually accomplished above jDttSP merely by altering the filter 
settings as you have done.


73, and again, many thanks.
Frank
AB2KT

Edson Pereira wrote:

Good Evening!

This is a question to Bob or Frank regarding jDttSP on Linux.

I am trying to get a Qt-based GUI implemented to control jDttSP and have 
noticed that the spectrum data was not being correctly written to the 
spectrum FIFO. After some tracing, I've found that the problem was due 
to the fact that the window[] function array for the spectrum FFT was 
not being initialized. For testing I've initialized the window[] in 
init_spectrum() for the moment. Later I may include it in update.c.


Now I have spectrum data coming out of the FIFO, but I've noticed that 
when setting the spectrum to PRE_FILT, the spectrum slides on the 
frequency axis following the setOsc setting. Trying SEMI_RAW does not 
work unless I set the mode to SPEC (setMode SPEC). But this changes the 
audio filtering and does not change the spectrum sliding behavior.


One more thing I have noticed is that there is no change in the 
demodulator when I set the mode to USB or LSB (setMode USB|LSB). The 
only way I can switch SSB sidebands is by modifying the filter passband 
to negative values.


My questions are:

1. Is the initialization of the window[] function left out in the Linux 
code?
2. Would there be a way to get a snapshot of the full 48 kHz raw complex 
spectrum without any interference from the tuning?

3. Is the USB/LSB behavior correct?

Many thanks,

-- Edson, pu1jte, n1vtn, 7n4ncl

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz







[Flexradio] Linux jDttSP

2005-09-30 Thread Edson Pereira


Good Evening!

This is a question to Bob or Frank regarding jDttSP on Linux.

I am trying to get a Qt-based GUI implemented to control jDttSP and have 
noticed that the spectrum data was not being correctly written to the 
spectrum FIFO. After some tracing, I've found that the problem was due 
to the fact that the window[] function array for the spectrum FFT was 
not being initialized. For testing I've initialized the window[] in 
init_spectrum() for the moment. Later I may include it in update.c.


Now I have spectrum data coming out of the FIFO, but I've noticed that 
when setting the spectrum to PRE_FILT, the spectrum slides on the 
frequency axis following the setOsc setting. Trying SEMI_RAW does not 
work unless I set the mode to SPEC (setMode SPEC). But this changes the 
audio filtering and does not change the spectrum sliding behavior.


One more thing I have noticed is that there is no change in the 
demodulator when I set the mode to USB or LSB (setMode USB|LSB). The 
only way I can switch SSB sidebands is by modifying the filter passband 
to negative values.


My questions are:

1. Is the initialization of the window[] function left out in the Linux 
code?
2. Would there be a way to get a snapshot of the full 48 kHz raw complex 
spectrum without any interference from the tuning?

3. Is the USB/LSB behavior correct?

Many thanks,

-- Edson, pu1jte, n1vtn, 7n4ncl