Re: [Flexradio] Preamp issue - Results

2007-03-05 Thread Jim Lux
At 01:15 PM 3/4/2007, Mark Mumaw wrote:
I get about -130dBm when I use this method. Is this what was is
expected???


Converting that to an receiver noise figure: 500 Hz = 27 dBHz so 
-130-27 = -157 dBm/Hz, compared to a kTB thermal noise floor of -174 
dBm/Hz, about 17 dB NF, which is pretty typical for a HF receiver.

You could also check what noise floor you get with the SDR1000 
disconnected and the input to the A/D shorted. The difference is the 
noise added by the SDR1000 (which is probably quite small).

For the SDR1000, the noise floor would be set by a combination of 
things.. The preamp, if you have it on. The noise in the 
instrumentation amps after the QSD. Reciprocal mixing from phase 
noise on the LO.


Mark NU6X


Jim, W6RMK 



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/


Re: [Flexradio] Preamp issue - Results

2007-03-04 Thread Mark Mumaw
I get about -130dBm when I use this method. Is this what was is
expected???

Mark NU6X



This is just not possible with the way we do calibration.  Something 
else is amiss.   After calibration against a known source,  BOTH of
your 
radios should read -90 dBm if you present -90 dBm at the antenna 
terminals.  That is because the calibration process removes all of the 
system differences at the calibration frequency.

NOW,  you can have a higher NOISE FLOOR than Joe.  That is entirely 
possible.



Calibrate your radio so that BOTH OF YOU read the exact same meter 
readings given the same source (and the peak on the display shows up at

the same level on the display).  Set your filter to 500 Hz.   Read the 
METER in Signal Avg setting.  TURN THE TONE OFF.


The meter reading will be of the average cumulative noise power in the 
500 Hz filter.  THIS IS the definition of MDS as measured in the ARRL 
labs.  It is mathematically equivalent to what they do.


Good luck,
Bob
N4HY





___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/


Re: [Flexradio] Preamp issue - Results

2007-03-04 Thread Robert McGwier
Mark Mumaw wrote:
 I get about -130dBm when I use this method. Is this what was is
 expected???

Exactly what mine gets.


 
 Mark NU6X
 
 
 

Bob
N4HY


-- 
AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL,
TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR WG Chair
Taking fun as simply fun and earnestness in earnest shows
how thoroughly thou none of the two discernest. - Piet Hine

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/


Re: [Flexradio] Preamp issue - Results

2007-03-03 Thread Ahti Aintila
Dana,

it looks to me that you may have a problem with the filter switches
either on the BPF or the RFE boards. Due to bit errors and/or
unreliable connections wrong filter(s) get selected. That has happened
to me.

73, Ahti OH2RZ


On 03/03/07, N1OFZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 When we calibrated with the XG1 both radios (SDR-1000s) showed the
 received signal at S9 after calibration.  The 10 dBm difference was
 on a signal we tuned to on the air.  I think it was on 20m.  I have
 not yet had a chance to get the radio back on the air at my home to
 compare to the Yaesu.  Hopefully this afternoon when the kiddie and
 XYL take a nap!

 Thanks,
 Dana  N1OFZ
 ___
 FlexRadio mailing list
 FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
 http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
 Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
 FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

 FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/


Re: [Flexradio] Preamp issue - Results

2007-03-02 Thread N1OFZ
Hi all,

I spent some time last night pouring over the ECO's and determining  
which ones were done to my radio.  I did end up taking off the BPF  
board to get a better look at the RFE.  Also during this process I  
reviewed the block diagrams that Peter sent (thanks!).

Today with the help of Joe (AB1DO) I was able to test my radio  
against his radio.  When we hooked up the XG1 my radio was showing  
the XG1's signal at about S3.  It was also quite a bit off frequency  
and suffered from some serious image issues.  After a few runs at  
calibrating it and tweaking it back on frequency we ran it against  
Joe's SDR.  The result were that the calibrating (with a good signal  
source) seems to help significantly.  My radio still seems to be  
about 10 dBm down from his but I believe it to be because his radio  
has the newer preamp (ECO025).  We listened to a signal that was  
showing around -90 dBm on my radio vs. his which was showing about  
-80 dBm.

I guess the lesson learned is that if you own a SDR-1000 you best get  
a XG1 or similar signal source.  Maybe future Flex Radio models can  
incorporate a similar circuit?  Unfortunately, I had to go back to  
work but I'm looking forward to getting it hooked back up in the  
shack tonight.

Thank everyone who responded with suggestions and comments.  And a  
big thanks to Joe for making time today to help me sort out the  
problems.  It's great to have a local fellow Flexer!

'73
Dana  N1OFZ

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/


Re: [Flexradio] Preamp issue - Results

2007-03-02 Thread Tom Thompson
Dana,

The question of sensitivity still remains as far as I can tell.  Can you 
borrow an attenuator and bring the XG1 down to the noise floor on both 
yours and Joe's radio.  The 10 dbm  difference may be a calibration 
issue rather than a sensitivity issue unless you can still hear signals 
on your Yaesu that you cannot hear on your SDR.

73   Tom   W0IVJ


N1OFZ wrote:

Hi all,

I spent some time last night pouring over the ECO's and determining  
which ones were done to my radio.  I did end up taking off the BPF  
board to get a better look at the RFE.  Also during this process I  
reviewed the block diagrams that Peter sent (thanks!).

Today with the help of Joe (AB1DO) I was able to test my radio  
against his radio.  When we hooked up the XG1 my radio was showing  
the XG1's signal at about S3.  It was also quite a bit off frequency  
and suffered from some serious image issues.  After a few runs at  
calibrating it and tweaking it back on frequency we ran it against  
Joe's SDR.  The result were that the calibrating (with a good signal  
source) seems to help significantly.  My radio still seems to be  
about 10 dBm down from his but I believe it to be because his radio  
has the newer preamp (ECO025).  We listened to a signal that was  
showing around -90 dBm on my radio vs. his which was showing about  
-80 dBm.

I guess the lesson learned is that if you own a SDR-1000 you best get  
a XG1 or similar signal source.  Maybe future Flex Radio models can  
incorporate a similar circuit?  Unfortunately, I had to go back to  
work but I'm looking forward to getting it hooked back up in the  
shack tonight.

Thank everyone who responded with suggestions and comments.  And a  
big thanks to Joe for making time today to help me sort out the  
problems.  It's great to have a local fellow Flexer!

'73
Dana  N1OFZ

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/



  




___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/


Re: [Flexradio] Preamp issue - Results

2007-03-02 Thread Jeff Anderson
Hi Dana,

Are you saying that, with the same signal input (from
a test generator, for example), your radio, after
calibration, shows roughly a 10 dB difference in its
s-meter reading compared to the other radio?

My experience with several Flex radios is that, if
they're both calibrated with the same signal source,
they'll both have the same s-meter reading
(irrespective of whether the preamp IC is the new one
or the old one).

For example, if I calibrate with a -50 dBm source, the
final result will be an s-meter that reads -50 dBm
when I drive my radio with that source, and it does
not depend upon the preamp IC that's been installed.

If both your radio and Joe's radio were calibrated
using the same signal source (your XG1, for example)
then I'd expect you both to have the exact same
reading for it (and for any other signals, too).  The
fact that you don't implies that the calibration of
one of the radios might be incorrect.

Of course, there might be other issues, too. 

- Jeff, K6JCA


--- N1OFZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 I spent some time last night pouring over the ECO's
 and determining  
 which ones were done to my radio.  I did end up
 taking off the BPF  
 board to get a better look at the RFE.  Also during
 this process I  
 reviewed the block diagrams that Peter sent
 (thanks!).
 
 Today with the help of Joe (AB1DO) I was able to
 test my radio  
 against his radio.  When we hooked up the XG1 my
 radio was showing  
 the XG1's signal at about S3.  It was also quite a
 bit off frequency  
 and suffered from some serious image issues.  After
 a few runs at  
 calibrating it and tweaking it back on frequency we
 ran it against  
 Joe's SDR.  The result were that the calibrating
 (with a good signal  
 source) seems to help significantly.  My radio still
 seems to be  
 about 10 dBm down from his but I believe it to be
 because his radio  
 has the newer preamp (ECO025).  We listened to a
 signal that was  
 showing around -90 dBm on my radio vs. his which was
 showing about  
 -80 dBm.
 
 I guess the lesson learned is that if you own a
 SDR-1000 you best get  
 a XG1 or similar signal source.  Maybe future Flex
 Radio models can  
 incorporate a similar circuit?  Unfortunately, I had
 to go back to  
 work but I'm looking forward to getting it hooked
 back up in the  
 shack tonight.
 
 Thank everyone who responded with suggestions and
 comments.  And a  
 big thanks to Joe for making time today to help me
 sort out the  
 problems.  It's great to have a local fellow Flexer!
 
 '73
 Dana  N1OFZ
 
 ___
 FlexRadio mailing list
 FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz

http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
 Archive Link:

http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
 FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
 
 FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
 


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/


Re: [Flexradio] Preamp issue - Results

2007-03-02 Thread ah6jr
are both s-meters calibrated to the same point? 

for example

50uv for s9?

I had to adjust my Kenwood to the same S9 50uv I believe and they read almost 
the same all the time.

I didnt see that mentioned anywhere, but if I missed it sorry

I am missing some emails for some reason

ignore me if it was mentioned.

Stan
AH6JR

On Friday 02 March 2007 10:24 am, Jeff Anderson wrote:
 Hi Dana,

 Are you saying that, with the same signal input (from
 a test generator, for example), your radio, after
 calibration, shows roughly a 10 dB difference in its
 s-meter reading compared to the other radio?

 My experience with several Flex radios is that, if
 they're both calibrated with the same signal source,
 they'll both have the same s-meter reading
 (irrespective of whether the preamp IC is the new one
 or the old one).

 For example, if I calibrate with a -50 dBm source, the
 final result will be an s-meter that reads -50 dBm
 when I drive my radio with that source, and it does
 not depend upon the preamp IC that's been installed.

 If both your radio and Joe's radio were calibrated
 using the same signal source (your XG1, for example)
 then I'd expect you both to have the exact same
 reading for it (and for any other signals, too).  The
 fact that you don't implies that the calibration of
 one of the radios might be incorrect.

 Of course, there might be other issues, too.

 - Jeff, K6JCA

 --- N1OFZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  I spent some time last night pouring over the ECO's
  and determining
  which ones were done to my radio.  I did end up
  taking off the BPF
  board to get a better look at the RFE.  Also during
  this process I
  reviewed the block diagrams that Peter sent
  (thanks!).
 
  Today with the help of Joe (AB1DO) I was able to
  test my radio
  against his radio.  When we hooked up the XG1 my
  radio was showing
  the XG1's signal at about S3.  It was also quite a
  bit off frequency
  and suffered from some serious image issues.  After
  a few runs at
  calibrating it and tweaking it back on frequency we
  ran it against
  Joe's SDR.  The result were that the calibrating
  (with a good signal
  source) seems to help significantly.  My radio still
  seems to be
  about 10 dBm down from his but I believe it to be
  because his radio
  has the newer preamp (ECO025).  We listened to a
  signal that was
  showing around -90 dBm on my radio vs. his which was
  showing about
  -80 dBm.
 
  I guess the lesson learned is that if you own a
  SDR-1000 you best get
  a XG1 or similar signal source.  Maybe future Flex
  Radio models can
  incorporate a similar circuit?  Unfortunately, I had
  to go back to
  work but I'm looking forward to getting it hooked
  back up in the
  shack tonight.
 
  Thank everyone who responded with suggestions and
  comments.  And a
  big thanks to Joe for making time today to help me
  sort out the
  problems.  It's great to have a local fellow Flexer!
 
  '73
  Dana  N1OFZ
 
  ___
  FlexRadio mailing list
  FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz

 http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz

  Archive Link:

 http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/

  FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
 
  FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/

 ___
 FlexRadio mailing list
 FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
 http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
 Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
 FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

 FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/