RE: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors

2002-06-01 Thread Boslough, Mark B


I am told that the Athean Graphics Hurricane has a dual-head PCI card that
works in the Dell Latitude docking station I am using.  I ordered one and
will give it a shot.  I will try it in my Dell tower as well.  And i will
buy another one if it works in both machines.

Mark

 -Original Message-
 From: Arnt Karlsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:09 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors
 
 
 On Thu, 30 May 2002 19:37:16 -0700 (PDT), 
 Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  
  If memory serves, it's a Radeon VE.  I'm using it with two 17 flat
  panels.  The machine is a Dell dual P4 running Win2k.
 
 ..hmmm.  Have you tried it under Linux?  Mandrake 8.2 or 
 Red Hat 7.3 may be a better choise to support the card,
 considering ATI's policy towards XFree86.org and Microsoft's 
 policy towards pro-open-source vendors.
 
 -- 
 ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
 ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
   Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
   best case, worst case, and just in case.
 
 
 ___
 Flightgear-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
 


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors

2002-05-31 Thread Arnt Karlsen

On Thu, 30 May 2002 19:37:16 -0700 (PDT), 
Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
 If memory serves, it's a Radeon VE.  I'm using it with two 17 flat
 panels.  The machine is a Dell dual P4 running Win2k.

..hmmm.  Have you tried it under Linux?  Mandrake 8.2 or 
Red Hat 7.3 may be a better choise to support the card,
considering ATI's policy towards XFree86.org and Microsoft's 
policy towards pro-open-source vendors.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors

2002-05-31 Thread Gene Buckle

  If memory serves, it's a Radeon VE.  I'm using it with two 17 flat
  panels.  The machine is a Dell dual P4 running Win2k.

 ..hmmm.  Have you tried it under Linux?  Mandrake 8.2 or
 Red Hat 7.3 may be a better choise to support the card,
 considering ATI's policy towards XFree86.org and Microsoft's
 policy towards pro-open-source vendors.

It's a work machine.  I need Win2k to do my job. :)  Besides, if it was my
personal machine, I'd never have spec'd an ATI _anything_ in there. :)

g.



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors

2002-05-30 Thread Jon S Berndt

On Thu, 30 May 2002 13:57:09 -0600
  Boslough, Mark B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I am attempting to run flightgear under Windows 2000 on a 
machine with 2
monitors.  My primary monitor is driven by a Geforce 3, 
and my second one is
 ...
MX, so I don't think it is a video driver problem.  Is 
there a way to run on
either monitor on a dual system (or even better, is there 
a way to span 2
monitors with one fgfs window)?  


I've got two monitors run off a single, dual-head GeForce 
2 MX/400. Twin view is enabled. I use the nVidia driver. 
When I crank up FlightGear I can maximize it and it spans 
both screens just fine. The only drawback is that the 
panel fills up pretty much the whole window - I get no out 
the window view above it.

Jon

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



RE: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors

2002-05-30 Thread Boslough, Mark B

Thanks Jon,

Mine are both single head, the Geforce 3 is AGP and the other
is PCI.  Maybe that's the problem.  I always run with the heads-up
display anyway so the panel problem probably would not be an issue
for me.  I'll see if I can find a duel head PCI card.

Mark

 -Original Message-
 From: Jon S Berndt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:05 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors
 
 
 On Thu, 30 May 2002 13:57:09 -0600
   Boslough, Mark B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I am attempting to run flightgear under Windows 2000 on a 
 machine with 2
 monitors.  My primary monitor is driven by a Geforce 3, 
 and my second one is
  ...
 MX, so I don't think it is a video driver problem.  Is 
 there a way to run on
 either monitor on a dual system (or even better, is there 
 a way to span 2
 monitors with one fgfs window)?  
 
 
 I've got two monitors run off a single, dual-head GeForce 
 2 MX/400. Twin view is enabled. I use the nVidia driver. 
 When I crank up FlightGear I can maximize it and it spans 
 both screens just fine. The only drawback is that the 
 panel fills up pretty much the whole window - I get no out 
 the window view above it.
 
 Jon
 
 ___
 Flightgear-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
 


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors

2002-05-30 Thread Jon S Berndt

On Thu, 30 May 2002 14:14:13 -0600
  Boslough, Mark B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Jon,

Mine are both single head, the Geforce 3 is AGP and the other
is PCI.  Maybe that's the problem.  I always run with the heads-up
display anyway so the panel problem probably would not be an issue
for me.  I'll see if I can find a duel head PCI card.

I'm not sure how things would work if you run with two 
video cards. That might screw things up - especially if 
one is dual head. I'd recommend going to the Amamax web 
site (www.amamax.com) and buying their Inno3D Dual Head 
AGP GeForce2 MX/400 card w/64 MB RAM and TV out. It should 
run about $100. If you want to run a second card, I think 
it ought to be the PCI card. That ought to get you three 
heads. I think that can be made to work, from what I've 
read on the Inno3D site, but don't quote me.

Jon


Jon

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors

2002-05-30 Thread Curtis L. Olson

Jon S Berndt writes:
 I'm not sure how things would work if you run with two 
 video cards.

Think about some of the implications ...

For instance, textures are stored on the card, so if you load a
texture into one card, it would some how need to be loaded into the
2nd card if a portion of the window overlaps onto the second display
... not impossible, but perhaps beyond the scope of current drivers.

If a window spans two cards, the drivers would some how have to draw
to both cards at the same time ... again this get's really complicated
really fast.

You say you have two different cards with perhaps different amounts of
texture ram, and each possibly supporting different extensions.

What if you fill up the texture ram of the card with less onboard ram
and not the other?

What if you start an application on one card, the app queries to see
what extension that card supports, and then you drag the window over
to a less capable card?

What if you have two card from different vendors with no cooperation
between the respective driver writers?

There are some really tough, complicated issues here so it doesn't
suprise me if the driver writers dropped 10 yards and punted on this.

Curt.


 That might screw things up - especially if 
 one is dual head. I'd recommend going to the Amamax web 
 site (www.amamax.com) and buying their Inno3D Dual Head 
 AGP GeForce2 MX/400 card w/64 MB RAM and TV out. It should 
 run about $100. If you want to run a second card, I think 
 it ought to be the PCI card. That ought to get you three 
 heads. I think that can be made to work, from what I've 
 read on the Inno3D site, but don't quote me.
 
 Jon
 
 
 Jon
 
 ___
 Flightgear-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

-- 
Curtis Olson   IVLab / HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota  http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



RE: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors

2002-05-30 Thread Boslough, Mark B

Does that mean that my GeForce 3 is overkill for fgfs?


 -Original Message-
 From: Jon S Berndt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:25 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors
 
 
 On Thu, 30 May 2002 14:14:13 -0600
   Boslough, Mark B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks Jon,
 
 Mine are both single head, the Geforce 3 is AGP and the other
 is PCI.  Maybe that's the problem.  I always run with the heads-up
 display anyway so the panel problem probably would not be an issue
 for me.  I'll see if I can find a duel head PCI card.
 
 I'm not sure how things would work if you run with two 
 video cards. That might screw things up - especially if 
 one is dual head. I'd recommend going to the Amamax web 
 site (www.amamax.com) and buying their Inno3D Dual Head 
 AGP GeForce2 MX/400 card w/64 MB RAM and TV out. It should 
 run about $100. If you want to run a second card, I think 
 it ought to be the PCI card. That ought to get you three 
 heads. I think that can be made to work, from what I've 
 read on the Inno3D site, but don't quote me.
 
 Jon
 
 
 Jon
 
 ___
 Flightgear-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
 


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



RE: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors

2002-05-30 Thread Curtis L. Olson

Boslough, Mark B writes:
 Does that mean that my GeForce 3 is overkill for fgfs?

As I understand it, the GeForce3 can run at higher resolutions than a
GeForce2 for the same frame rate.  The GeForce3 introduces workable
antialiasing.  The GeForce2 antialiasing is not generally useful
... i.e. it's not something you'd want to just turn on and forget
about it.  The GeForce3 probably supports additional opengl extension
and I'm sure has higher throughput throughout ...

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson   IVLab / HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota  http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors

2002-05-30 Thread Jon S Berndt

On Thu, 30 May 2002 13:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
  Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's generally accepted in the flight simulator community 
that trying to
get two out-the-cockpit views on the same computer is a 
Bad Idea(tm).

I might modify your statement to read: two individual 
video cards on the same computer is a bad idea.

A dual head card - at least in my case - works very good. 
The drawback is as I stated before, but that can be fixed 
by not displaying the panel. The HUD, however, is split 
between two monitors. Other than that, it's flawless and 
fast.

Jon

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



RE: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors

2002-05-30 Thread Norman Vine

Jon S Berndt writes:

A dual head card - at least in my case - works very good. 
The drawback is as I stated before, but that can be fixed 
by not displaying the panel. The HUD, however, is split 
between two monitors. Other than that, it's flawless and 
fast.

This is one of the arguments for using the ssgContext 
mechanism instead of one global GL context as we currently 
do in that then one could shift the individual contexts arround
through  sh..  the properties  /sh.. 

This is assuming of course that the HUD and Panel were had
their own ssgContext. 

Norman





___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors

2002-05-30 Thread Arnt Karlsen

On Thu, 30 May 2002 14:13:31 -0700 (PDT), 
Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 The only dual-head card I'v ever dealt with is this ATI peice of crap
 in my workstation here at work.  It *sucks* (for VERY large values of
 suck).  ATI couldn't write a driver properly if you held a gun to
 their collective heads and their lives depended on it.

..which ATI dual head card?  Product URL?  What OS etc?

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors

2002-05-30 Thread Gene Buckle

  The only dual-head card I'v ever dealt with is this ATI peice of crap
  in my workstation here at work.  It *sucks* (for VERY large values of
  suck).  ATI couldn't write a driver properly if you held a gun to
  their collective heads and their lives depended on it.

 ..which ATI dual head card?  Product URL?  What OS etc?

If memory serves, it's a Radeon VE.  I'm using it with two 17 flat
panels.  The machine is a Dell dual P4 running Win2k.

g.



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel