SPEEDLOTTO AWARD WINNER
SPEEDLOTTO AWARD WINNER SL001QCMAJ2008 AUTHORIZATION NOTE SUBJECT: Guaranteed* Cash Notification £1,000,000.00 Pounds Unclaimed This is £1,000,000.00 GBP(One Million Great Britain Pounds)that was accredited to your e-mail address.You have been chosen as one of our Monthly Lucky winners. Do send the following informations to enable us process your claims Full Names: Contact/Mailing Address: Tel/ Fax Numbers: Nationality: Age / Sex DRAW DATE:Saturday, June 14,2008 Contact Agent; Matilda Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel:+44 701 114 9680 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E- MAIL TICKET NUMBER 212005600545188 YOU ARE A WINNER!!!
Wilfred Alberto (Lottery Director) wrote: INTERNATIONAL PROMOTION/PRIZE AWARD DEPT. CALLE GRANVIA 32N 1C MADRID SPAIN REF: RSSL/61-ILGI0509/45 BATCH:RSSL/15/096/WRCS DATE:20/09/2006 Dear Winner, AWARD NOTIFICATION FINAL NOTICE This is to inform you of the release of the Royal Spainish Sweepstake Lottery Email Promotional Program held on the 7st September 2006, this result was initially delayed due to mix up of email addresses, the results were finally released on the 18th September 2006, and your e-mail attached to Ticket number: 212005600545 188 with Serial number: 4888/02, which drew the Lucky numbers: 41-6-76-13-45-8, which consequently won the lottery in the Second category of the year 2006. You are therefore approved. for a lump sum payout of 1,000,000.00 (ONE MILLION EUROS ONLY) in cash accredited to file reference number: KPC/908008/03 this is from a total cash prize of 19,000,000.00 (NINTEEN MILLION EUROS ONLY) Shared among the nineteen international winners in this category. Your fund is now deposited in a security company with your prize money insured in your e-mail.Due to mix up of some email addresses, we ask that you keep this award from public notice until your claim has been processed and money remitted to your account as this is part of our security protocol to avoid double claiming or unwarranted abuse of this program by participants as it has happened in the past. All participants were selected randomly from World Wide Web site through computer draw system and extracted from over 100,000 companies,this promotion takes place annually. We hope your lucky email address will draw a bigger cash prize in the next high stake promotion agenda of 30,000,000.00 (THIRTY MILLION EUROS) To begin your lottery claim, please contact your claim agent, AGRO CONSULTANCY AND SECURITIES S.L. MADRID SPAIN DR.RICHARD ANTONIO ( Remittance/foreign operations manager) Tel:+34-619-693-930 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For due processing and remittance of your winning prize money to designated account of your choice. Remember, all prize money must be claimed. (not later than 15st October 2006. After this date, this fund will be returned to the MINISTERIO DE ECONOMIA Y HACIENDA as unclaimed fund. NOTE: In order to avoid unnecessary delay and complication, please remember to quote your reference and batch numbers in every correspondence with your agent or us. Furthermore, should there be any change of your contact email address, do inform your claim agent as soon as possible. Congratulation once again from all members of our staff and thank you for being part of our International promotion program. We wish you continued good fortunes. Yours Sincerely, Wilfred Alberto (Lottery Director) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] just incase anyones tempted http://www.hoax-slayer.com/royal-spanish-sweepstake-lottery.html -- *Alistair Prestidge* TECHNICAL CONSULTANT Global Media (UK) 3rd Floor Maclaren House Talbot Road Manchester M32 0FP T +44 (0) 161 249 F +44 (0) 161 877 1050 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.globalmedia-webmarketing.com globalmedia webmarketing http://www.globalmedia-webmarketing.com/emailnews/mailredirect.php?img=1lang=uk globalmedia webmarketing http://www.globalmedia-webmarketing.com/emailnews/mailredirect.php?img=2lang=uk ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Logo Contest Winner
can someone send me his e-mail? thanks in advance __ ×ñçóéìïðïéåßôå Yahoo!; ÂáñåèÞêáôå ôá åíï÷ëçôéêÜ ìçíýìáôá (spam); Ôï Yahoo! Mail äéáèÝôåé ôçí êáëýôåñç äõíáôÞ ðñïóôáóßá êáôÜ ôùí åíï÷ëçôéêþí ìçíõìÜôùí http://mail.yahoo.gr ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: and the winner is...
a. I am hoping to see this fixed in 6.x b. This I agree with. As a desktop client FreeBSD still needs work. c. sysutils/portaudit -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott W Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 11:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: and the winner is... Mario Carugno wrote: I there, i was trying freebsd for a while, and comparing it against debian/linux. The winner was Debian by far... Freebsd could be stable, but it is not faster... and Debian is far much more 'usable'. Freebsd package installation is very laborious compared with Debian's apt system. I have to search in each CD, know dependences,... X configuration is hard too when the autodetected configuration doesn't works... I think fbsd is good, but needs some user facilities. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lame. Care to actually _back up_ your statement with something substantial? cvsup and ports is the best package management system I've seen yet in it generally 'just works right.' That statement is made with 12 years of Linux experience, as well as Solaris and other *nixes. For a server system, FreeBSD is really hard to beat. The closest might be Gentoo, but their portage (based on BSD ports) system isn't as consistently stable as BSD ports (meaning things break more often). As it's not a _great_ idea IMO to even have build tools (gcc and toolchain) on a production server, it's not a bad idea to have a seperate build host somewhere, but that applies equally to any system, and you also have the option to go with binary packages. Let me know how the following goes for you with Deb or other Linux distro besides gentoo- install PHP or apache with _only_ the options that you want/need. Oh rightyou can't, without compiling from source, at which point you've lost your 'package management.' Oops? Read the Handbook, try to get enough of a clue to understand it, use it for a month, and then come back with a statement you can back up. Otherwisepiss off. The only 'real' gripes I've got with FreeBSD are: a. thread performance - from what I've seen, still lags behind Linux (mysql benchmarks show this to be true at leat for 5-STABLE). b. desktop BSD 'out of box experience'- mixed, as BSD is primarily a server OS, but with 'roll your own' capabilities...oh, and there are now two 'desktop BSD' type projects. So not really a gripe, but can see someone complaining about it a bit, if they don't find the Dekstop BSD project. c. security patch notification system (may exist now?). Yes, you can get emails from the security ML, but now quite the same as for example, 'smpatch analyze' on Solaris 9/10. This could be argued that's _exactly_ what rel-STABLE is, however, so again, not a real issue, although a user friendly (for people using as a desktop OS) tool would be of benefit. Geeze, compared to my gripes against Linux and *nix distros. these are really pretty damned trivial. If thread performance comes up to par with Linux, FreeBSD has a very good chance of becoming my choice for 'personal *nix' (ie, my primary workstation, laptops, etc) over Gentoo. Scott ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: and the winner is...
Mario Carugno wrote: I there, i was trying freebsd for a while, and comparing it against debian/linux. The winner was Debian by far... Freebsd could be stable, but it is not faster... and Debian is far much more 'usable'. Freebsd package installation is very laborious compared with Debian's apt system. I have to search in each CD, know dependences,... X configuration is hard too when the autodetected configuration doesn't works... I think fbsd is good, but needs some user facilities. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lame. Care to actually _back up_ your statement with something substantial? cvsup and ports is the best package management system I've seen yet in it generally 'just works right.' That statement is made with 12 years of Linux experience, as well as Solaris and other *nixes. For a server system, FreeBSD is really hard to beat. The closest might be Gentoo, but their portage (based on BSD ports) system isn't as consistently stable as BSD ports (meaning things break more often). As it's not a _great_ idea IMO to even have build tools (gcc and toolchain) on a production server, it's not a bad idea to have a seperate build host somewhere, but that applies equally to any system, and you also have the option to go with binary packages. Let me know how the following goes for you with Deb or other Linux distro besides gentoo- install PHP or apache with _only_ the options that you want/need. Oh rightyou can't, without compiling from source, at which point you've lost your 'package management.' Oops? Read the Handbook, try to get enough of a clue to understand it, use it for a month, and then come back with a statement you can back up. Otherwisepiss off. The only 'real' gripes I've got with FreeBSD are: a. thread performance - from what I've seen, still lags behind Linux (mysql benchmarks show this to be true at leat for 5-STABLE). b. desktop BSD 'out of box experience'- mixed, as BSD is primarily a server OS, but with 'roll your own' capabilities...oh, and there are now two 'desktop BSD' type projects. So not really a gripe, but can see someone complaining about it a bit, if they don't find the Dekstop BSD project. c. security patch notification system (may exist now?). Yes, you can get emails from the security ML, but now quite the same as for example, 'smpatch analyze' on Solaris 9/10. This could be argued that's _exactly_ what rel-STABLE is, however, so again, not a real issue, although a user friendly (for people using as a desktop OS) tool would be of benefit. Geeze, compared to my gripes against Linux and *nix distros. these are really pretty damned trivial. If thread performance comes up to par with Linux, FreeBSD has a very good chance of becoming my choice for 'personal *nix' (ie, my primary workstation, laptops, etc) over Gentoo. Scott ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: and the winner is...
Mario Carugno ha scritto: I there, i was trying freebsd for a while, and comparing it against debian/linux. The winner was Debian by far... Freebsd could be stable, but it is not faster... and Debian is far much more 'usable'. Freebsd package installation is very laborious compared with Debian's apt system. I have to search in each CD, know dependences,... X configuration is hard too when the autodetected configuration doesn't works... I think fbsd is good, but needs some user facilities. Maybe do you like the flame but this is really bad place for it. Enjoy what you like. Simone ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and the winner is...
I there, i was trying freebsd for a while, and comparing it against debian/linux. The winner was Debian by far... Freebsd could be stable, but it is not faster... and Debian is far much more 'usable'. Freebsd package installation is very laborious compared with Debian's apt system. I have to search in each CD, know dependences,... X configuration is hard too when the autodetected configuration doesn't works... I think fbsd is good, but needs some user facilities. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: and the winner is...
Mario Carugno wrote: I there, i was trying freebsd for a while, and comparing it against debian/linux. The winner was Debian by far... Freebsd could be stable, but it is not faster... and Debian is far much more 'usable'. Freebsd package installation is very laborious compared with Debian's apt system. I have to search in each CD, know dependences,... X configuration is hard too when the autodetected configuration doesn't works... I think fbsd is good, but needs some user facilities. Depends on what you need. Iv. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: and the winner is...
In the last episode (Sep 01), Mario Carugno said: I there, i was trying freebsd for a while, and comparing it against debian/linux. The winner was Debian by far... Freebsd could be stable, but it is not faster... and Debian is far much more 'usable'. Freebsd package installation is very laborious compared with Debian's apt system. I have to search in each CD, know dependences,... Have you never used pkg_add -r ? You shouldn't need to touch a cd after the base system is installed. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: and the winner is...
Mario Carugno wrote: I there, i was trying freebsd for a while, and comparing it against debian/linux. The winner was Debian by far... Freebsd could be stable, but it is not faster... and Debian is far much more 'usable'. Freebsd package installation is very laborious compared with Debian's apt system. I have to search in each CD, know dependences,... X configuration is hard too when the autodetected configuration doesn't works... I think fbsd is good, but needs some user facilities. i have never used a cd after a freesbd install?? and debian has an 8 disc download, i found myself changing cds for an hour, only to see X fail on my flat pannel.(sarge) had to configure manually i like apt-get as well, but ports/pkg_* are nearly identical, when it comes to dependency handling, usability why do i have the feeling you chose 'Expert Install' oh, well, enjoy... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: and the winner is...
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 18:19:15 -0300 Mario Carugno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I there, i was trying freebsd for a while, and comparing it against debian/linux. The winner was Debian by far... Freebsd could be stable, but it is not faster... and Debian is far much more 'usable'. Freebsd package installation is very laborious compared with Debian's apt system. I have to search in each CD, know dependences,... X configuration is hard too when the autodetected configuration doesn't works... I think fbsd is good, but needs some user facilities. I am bored, so I bite ^_^ Use pkg_add -r. Make cvsup and portupgrade the first installed, use them. I only ever grab the boot only CD. The autodetected one does not work? Odd, out side of crappy hardware I've not seen this before. X -configure has all ways worked nicely for me except for one system with a weird video chip. As far as speed goes, I've honestly have never had a problem with it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: and the winner is...
I there, i was trying freebsd for a while, and comparing it against debian/linux. The winner was Debian by far... Freebsd could be stable, but it is not faster... and Debian is far much more 'usable'. Freebsd package installation is very laborious compared with Debian's apt system. I have to search in each CD, know dependences,... X configuration is hard too when the autodetected configuration doesn't works... I think fbsd is good, but needs some user facilities. You are going to need a stronger arguement against FreeBSD than ..needs some user facilities. It appears to me that you haven't used either for very long and therefore do not have much of a right to say which is better or worse, no offense. If you went into more detail with your reasoning then I believe you would be taken more seriously, but you fail to show me an legitimate reason that I should install debian over BSD on my next box. As far as installation being too difficult, I downloaded the debian distro and installed it on my laptop. I had more difficulty trying to get it to work than I ever had using FreeBSD. Also, lets not forget that easier doesn't always mean better. I know several people that use Linux over FreeBSD due to how they claim it is easier configure and setup, however I don't find FreeBSD that difficult to setup, especially in comparison to Linux. I believe that once you have become familiar with the process and worked with it, setting up and securing BSD is not all that difficult and is well worth the effort (in my opinion). Bow Sineath Class of 2006, the Citadel [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: and the winner is...
On 9/1/05, Mario Carugno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The winner was Debian by far... I believe you should say that the winner was debian FOR ME IN MY SITUATION. My use for freebsd is for a low-maintenance i'net gateway for my small office, which can range anywhere from four to ten machines of various OSs. I need only a CLI, accessible through SSH, NAT and firewalling capabilities. Yes, you can get this with other OSs, but security was primarily my intent. So...the winner was FreeBSD by far. =) -- Isaac Grover, Owner Quality Computer Services of River Falls, Wisconsin Computer Consulting, Networking, Maintenance, and more. Commercial and Residential Inquiries Welcomed. Web: http://www.qcs-rf.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: and the winner is...
On Sep 2, 2005, at 11:12 AM, Isaac Grover wrote: On 9/1/05, Mario Carugno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The winner was Debian by far... I believe you should say that the winner was debian FOR ME IN MY SITUATION. My use for freebsd is for a low-maintenance i'net gateway for my small office, which can range anywhere from four to ten machines of various OSs. I need only a CLI, accessible through SSH, NAT and firewalling capabilities. Yes, you can get this with other OSs, but security was primarily my intent. So...the winner was FreeBSD by far. =) Who cares about what is the best in any situation? This type of talk is for flamers and n00bs, and as adults I would hope that we have progressed on from this behavior. One should realize that given any situation there is a set tool which best helps for solving each situation, so regardless of which OS, depending on the situation and what needs to be solved/ accomplished the proper tool should be used as the proper solution to any problem. End of story. -Garrett ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: and the winner is...
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 06:19:15PM -0300, Mario Carugno wrote:
I there, i was trying freebsd for a while, and comparing it
against debian/linux. The winner was Debian by far... Freebsd
could be stable, but it is not faster... and Debian is far much
more 'usable'. Freebsd package installation is very laborious
compared with Debian's apt system. I have to search in each CD,
know dependences,... X configuration is hard too when the
autodetected configuration doesn't works... I think fbsd is good,
but needs some user facilities.
Uhh, interesting. Doesn't seem appropriate for freebsd-*questions*,
though, as you don't seem to really ask anything at all.
Could we move this thread to one of the lists better suited for it?
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks...
--
o--{ Will Maier }--o
| jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
*--[ BSD Unix: Live Free or Die ]--*
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Priority Notification - Potential UK Lottery Winner
Congratulations! This Special Notice confirms that you have been pre-selected to apply for membership of a brand new Worldwide way of playing the UK National Lottery. The UK Lotto Game has one of the World's biggest tax free, lump sum jackpots. The draws are made twice a week on Wednesdays and Saturdays. Jackpots can often reach £20,000,000 with total prize funds topping £40,000,000 Camelot Official statistics show that two thirds of all major wins are claimed by syndicates. This is an important key factor to improving your chances, but we wanted to improve the odds even more. Choosing to play the UK National Lottery with a Worldwide Syndicate, you not only improve your chances to win the BIG prizes, you also win MORE money for 2 ball (unique new way to win), 3 ball, 4 ball, 4 ball plus bonus ball (unique new way to win) and 5 ball wins. Your own personal multi-win Worldwide syndicate card has already been pre-selected and will offer you the following seven benefits: Here is the first benefit... If you personally had 44 single line entries in the UK National Lotto on Wednesday and Saturday the cost per week would be £88.00, but with this little card, you receive 88 single line entries in a multi-win Worldwide syndicate for just £5.00. Here's the second benefit... you win a new unique Worldwide syndicate prize by matching just two main lotto draw numbers. Heres the third benefit... you win more than the usual £10.00 when you match three main lotto draw numbers. Heres the fourth benefit... you win lots more than playing on your own when you match four main lotto draw numbers. Heres the fifth benefit... when you match four main lotto draw numbers plus the bonus ball the difference in winnings is enormous. Heres the sixth benefit... You can play from ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD! If you were playing on your own in the UK National Lotto and matched four numbers and the bonus ball you would have won the four-ball prize of £56.00. Playing the same numbers in our winning multi-win Worldwide syndicate EACH member received £2,843.67! (Based on actual syndicate win) I guess by now you must be ready to get your card! Okay, here is the seventh benefit... Just 5 balls scoops the jackpot! To get the ball rolling (if you pardon the pun!) simply send a blank e mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and we'll show you how to get more from the UK National Lotto. UK Lotto players must be 16 or over to play. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
