Re: [Freeciv-Dev] 2.1.5
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:47:35 +0900, Marko Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/6/6 Madeline Book: >> What might be nice is to release 2.1.5 so it can be used >> for the first 2.1.x longturn game (which will probably start in a week >> or two), > > Then I suggest that we postpone 2.1.5 one week, if that's possible > for Daniel. I should have time for looking into the gcc 4.3 problem > early next week. > I'm planning to tag 2.1.5 in about 12 h (when I wake up in the morning.) ~Daniel ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] 2.1.5
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:32:01 +0900, Marko Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel: Does it compile in your environment now? > > #40266 should go in before release (there's no risk of breaking > anything that currently works; civ1 ruleset is completely broken > without this patch anyway) but no other stuff. > > > - ML Yup, up and running. :) Thanks for debugging it, Marko! ~Daniel ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] 2.1.5
Daniel: Does it compile in your environment now? #40266 should go in before release (there's no risk of breaking anything that currently works; civ1 ruleset is completely broken without this patch anyway) but no other stuff. - ML ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] 2.1.5
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:47:35 +0900, Marko Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/6/6 Madeline Book: >> What might be nice is to release 2.1.5 so it can be used >> for the first 2.1.x longturn game (which will probably start in a week >> or two), > > Then I suggest that we postpone 2.1.5 one week, if that's possible > for Daniel. I should have time for looking into the gcc 4.3 problem > early next week. > I'm of course open to postponing any release in the case there are showstoppers. Is Jason's patch in PR#40258 taking care of all errors you've seen, Marko? >> I don't know much at all about the gcc bug (actually I had 4.3 installed >> a while ago, but since I had some problems not just with freeciv I am >> now using 3.4.6). > > I only noticed these problems when compiling Freeciv for Ubuntu > Intrepid (pre-alpha distribution), which uses gcc 4.3.1 release > candidate. > > See http://vcust127.louhi.net/freeciv/testing/compilation.php > >> >> Since I don't know how much hassle it is to make a full release for >> freeciv I would tend to support more releases more often. Since then >> the program can be advertised on various sites and users can have >> the feeling that progress is being made. ;) > > Major releases: I definitely agree. Currently new features > implemented immediately after branching live years in our svn before > they are in any release = really used. > Minor releases: S2_1 is already quite mature, just occasional minor > fixes go in. No point in making releases identical to previous one :-) > I believe that it's worth making maintenance releases as soon as there are any crash/memory leak/security fixes. > > > I'll be away until Monday. > > > > - ML BTW, I just remembered PR#40250 is a blocker for me making the release. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] 2.1.5
2008/6/6 Madeline Book: > What might be nice is to release 2.1.5 so it can be used > for the first 2.1.x longturn game (which will probably start in a week or > two), Then I suggest that we postpone 2.1.5 one week, if that's possible for Daniel. I should have time for looking into the gcc 4.3 problem early next week. > I don't know much at all about the gcc bug (actually I had 4.3 installed > a while ago, but since I had some problems not just with freeciv I am > now using 3.4.6). I only noticed these problems when compiling Freeciv for Ubuntu Intrepid (pre-alpha distribution), which uses gcc 4.3.1 release candidate. See http://vcust127.louhi.net/freeciv/testing/compilation.php > > Since I don't know how much hassle it is to make a full release for > freeciv I would tend to support more releases more often. Since then > the program can be advertised on various sites and users can have > the feeling that progress is being made. ;) Major releases: I definitely agree. Currently new features implemented immediately after branching live years in our svn before they are in any release = really used. Minor releases: S2_1 is already quite mature, just occasional minor fixes go in. No point in making releases identical to previous one :-) I'll be away until Monday. - ML ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] 2.1.5
On 6/6/08, Marko Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/6/6 Daniel Markstedt: > > > On 6/5/08, Marko Lindqvist wrote: > >> 2008/5/26 Daniel Markstedt: > >> > >> > One week later it is; Targeted release date June 8. > >> > >> Freeciv doesn't compile with current gcc 4.3 branch, and 4.3.1 will > >> be released any day now. > >> > > > > Is this reason enough to postpone the 2.1.5 in your opinion? > > > If we release 2.1.5 without fix for this, we need to release 2.1.6 > rather soon. I believe that otherwise there could be rather long time > between 2.1.5 and 2.1.6. So yes, I think we should postpone 2.1.5. > Of course, if someone else plans to make lot of fixes to S2_1, making > 2.1.6 release soon after 2.1.5 more sensible, situation is quite > different. > > Madeline? In my opinion the fixes for S2_1 that I have encountered recently are all rather minor and could wait for later; I am still more focused on working on the editor. What might be nice is to release 2.1.5 so it can be used for the first 2.1.x longturn game (which will probably start in a week or two), which will give some good testing data and should find more bugs. I don't know much at all about the gcc bug (actually I had 4.3 installed a while ago, but since I had some problems not just with freeciv I am now using 3.4.6). Since I don't know how much hassle it is to make a full release for freeciv I would tend to support more releases more often. Since then the program can be advertised on various sites and users can have the feeling that progress is being made. ;) - ファンのためにやりましょう！ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] 2.1.5
2008/6/6 Daniel Markstedt: > On 6/5/08, Marko Lindqvist wrote: >> 2008/5/26 Daniel Markstedt: >> >> > One week later it is; Targeted release date June 8. >> >> Freeciv doesn't compile with current gcc 4.3 branch, and 4.3.1 will >> be released any day now. >> > > Is this reason enough to postpone the 2.1.5 in your opinion? If we release 2.1.5 without fix for this, we need to release 2.1.6 rather soon. I believe that otherwise there could be rather long time between 2.1.5 and 2.1.6. So yes, I think we should postpone 2.1.5. Of course, if someone else plans to make lot of fixes to S2_1, making 2.1.6 release soon after 2.1.5 more sensible, situation is quite different. Madeline? - ML ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] 2.1.5
On 6/5/08, Marko Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/5/26 Daniel Markstedt: > > > > > One week later it is; Targeted release date June 8. > > > > > Freeciv doesn't compile with current gcc 4.3 branch, and 4.3.1 will > be released any day now. > Is this reason enough to postpone the 2.1.5 in your opinion? ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] 2.1.5
2008/5/26 Daniel Markstedt: > > One week later it is; Targeted release date June 8. > Freeciv doesn't compile with current gcc 4.3 branch, and 4.3.1 will be released any day now. -- btw I made my local metaserver installation available to anybody: http://vcust127.louhi.net/freeciv/metaserver/ - ML ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] 2.1.5
On Mon, 26 May 2008 07:00:07 +0900, Marko Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/5/24 Daniel Markstedt: >> There's been a month since 2.1.4 and I've seen a number of fixes >> since. I propose preparing a 2.1.5 maintenance release with ETA next >> weekend. >> >> What do you think? > > Well, if one tries to sync this with my personal timetable, it would > make sense to release 2.1.5 one week later. > > > - ML One week later it is; Targeted release date June 8. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] 2.1.5
2008/5/24 Daniel Markstedt: > There's been a month since 2.1.4 and I've seen a number of fixes > since. I propose preparing a 2.1.5 maintenance release with ETA next > weekend. > > What do you think? Well, if one tries to sync this with my personal timetable, it would make sense to release 2.1.5 one week later. - ML ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] 2.1.5
There's been a month since 2.1.4 and I've seen a number of fixes since. I propose preparing a 2.1.5 maintenance release with ETA next weekend. What do you think? Best ~Daniel ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
