Re: [Freesurfer] Fwd: LGI path problem

2013-10-23 Thread Linn Mittlestein
Hi, thank you. I am using Linux. I not sure where to change path, ie which
file this should be done in and where this file is located. This the error
message I recieve, and as I said It is launching the wrong matlab and I
don't know how change this.

 Launching Matlab7p13

Warning: Unable to open display 'iconic'. You will not be able to display
graphics on the screen.

  M A T L A B (R) 

Copyright 1984-2011 The MathWorks, Inc.

R2011b (7.13.0.564) 32-bit (glnx86)

August 13, 2011

  To get started, type one of these: helpwin, helpdesk, or demo.

For product information, visit www.mathworks.com.

  reading filled volume...

closing volume...

Undefined function 'fspecial' for input arguments of type 'char'.

 Error in make_outer_surface (line 31)

Gaussian = fspecial('gaussian',[2 2],1);

 

ERROR: make_outer_surface did not create output file
'/x/x/x/x/2/x/x/x/surf/tmp-mris_compute_lgi-lh.pial/lh.pial-outer'!

Linux 2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 12 14:18:09 CDT 2013 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

 recon-all -s subj exited with ERRORS at Wed Oct 23 08:20:58 BST 2013


Thank you very much for your time and help,


Kind Regards,Linn




On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Marie Schaer marie.sch...@unige.chwrote:


  Hi Linn,

  Sorry for the delay in answering. The path has to be set directly in
 your environment variable (the variable $PATH has to point to the correct
 version). I need a few more details about what you tried and which OS you
 are using to be able to help you.

  If you are using mac, here is an example on how you can set the path in
 the .shrc file:
  setenv PATH $PATH:/Applications/MATLAB_R2013b.app/bin

  You can also have a look at the following posts:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg07283.html
 http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg25017.html
 http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg26909.html
 http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg27290.html

  Let me know how it goes,

  Marie


  On Oct 22, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Linn Mittlestein linnmit...@gmail.com
  wrote:

   Hi,

  I am trying to compute lgi measures, and I think my problem lies in the
 fact that the matlab path is not set correctly; it is calling an older
 version of matlab however I need it to point to matlab2013b. I have tried
 numerous things like changing the startup.m file, the .bashrc file and
 exporting the matlab path, however It keeps calling another version of
 Matlab. Can someone please tell me how exactly the path is set and where?

  Best Wishes and thank you,

 Linn

 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Linn Mittlestein linnmit...@gmail.com
 Date: Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:33 AM
 Subject: Fwd: LGI path problem
 To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu



 From: Linn Mittlestein linnmit...@gmail.comDate: Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at
 1:30 PM
 Subject: LGI path problem
 To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu



  Hi,

  I am trying to compute lgi measures, and I think my problem lies in the
 fact that the matlab path is not set correctly; it is calling an older
 version of matlab however I need it to point to matlab2013b. I have tried
 numerous things like changing the startup.m file, the .bashrc file and
 exporting the matlab path, however It keeps calling another version of
 Matlab. Can someone please tell me how exactly the path is set and where?

  Best Wishes and thank you,

 Linn


  ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
 is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
 HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
 error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] missing eTIV in asegstats2table

2013-10-23 Thread Daniel Ferreira
Dear Douglas,

Please, find attached aseg.stats files for subj1 and subj2.

Thanks

Daniel


aseg.stats_subj2
Description: Binary data


aseg.stats_suj1
Description: Binary data
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA statistics

2013-10-23 Thread Lucia Billeci
Dear Anastasia,

I tried the command you suggested me and i obtained the output I attach to the 
mail.

I would like to ask you if I understood well shot it means. In this case left 
uncinatus connects the following cortex areas:

ctx-lh-fusiform  
ctx-lh-inferiortemporal 
ctx-lh-lateralorbitofrontal
ctx-lh-medialorbitofrontal
ctx-lh-middletemporal
ctx-lh-rostralanteriorcingulate
ctx-lh-superiortemporal 
ctx-lh-temporalpole  
ctx-lh-insula  

and for each area I have the volume of the path. Is it correct? 

Thanks
Lucia

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Dr. Lucia Billeci, PhD
Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC)
National Research Council (CNR)
via Moruzzi 1, 56124, Pisa
ITALY
Tel: +39-0506213204
e-mail: lucia.bill...@ifc.cnr.it
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 




Il giorno 18/ott/2013, alle ore 17:32, Anastasia Yendiki ha scritto:

 
 Hi Lucia - You can probably do that with mri_segstats. Try something like:
 
 mri_segstats --seg dlabel/diff/aparc+aseg.bbr.nii.gz --ctab 
 $FREESURFER_HOME/FreeSurferColorLUT.txt --excludeid 0 --sum output.txt --i 
 dpath/lh.unc_AS_avg32_mni_flt/path.pd.nii.gz
 
 And similarly for any other pathway. See the mri_segstats help for more usage 
 info. Let me know if this gives you what you need.
 
 a.y
 
 On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Lucia Billeci wrote:
 
 Thanks Anastasia, this is useful for visualization. But to construct a table
 with for each tracts the parcellation regions that it connects do I need to
 look at the image?
 Lucia
 On Oct 18, 2013, at 3:48 PM, Anastasia Yendiki wrote:
 
  Hi Lucia - You can look at the tracula output over the cortical
  parcellation and subcortical segmentation in the individual's
  diffusion space like this:
 
  freeview dmri/dtifit_FA.nii.gz
  dlabel/diff/aparc+aseg.bbr.nii.gz:colormap=lut:opacity=.5 -tv
  dpath/merged_avg33_mni_bbr.mgz
 
  Hope this helps,
  a.y
 
  On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Lucia Billeci wrote:
 
Dear Anastasia and all,
 
how can I understand which are the region of the
brain in which the brain
 
base been parecellated that each tract generated by
TRACULA connect?
 
For example  if I look at the left uncinate
fascicles how can I know which
 
are the ROIs of the statistical output from the
cortical parcellation that
 
it connects?
 
Thanks
 
Lucia
 
On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Lucia Billeci wrote:
 
 Hi Anastasia,
 
thanks for you answer. Now I have understood the
meaning of that
 
parameter.
 
Best regards
 
Lucia
 
On Oct 14, 2013, at 10:58 PM, Anastasia Yendiki
wrote:
 
 Hi Lucia - It's how many sample paths were
drawn to
 
 produce the probability distribution of the
path
 
 (path.pd.nii.gz). It depends on the
configuration
 
 parameters (nsample, nkeep), so it'll be the
same if these
 
 configuration parameters are the same.
 
 Hope this helps,
 
 a.y
 
 On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Lucia Billeci wrote:
 
   Dear all,
 
   I noticed that in the TRACULA statistics
 
   output files (pathstats.overall.txt) the
 
   variable Count that
 
   should indicate the number of sample
paths in
 
   the WM tract is the same for all the
computed
 
   tract. Could
 
   anyone tell me why this happen?
 
   Thanks a lot
 
   Regards
 
   Lucia
 
   _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
 
   Dr. Lucia Billeci, PhD
 
   Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC)
 
   National Research Council (CNR)
 
   via Moruzzi 1, 56124, Pisa
 
   ITALY
 
   Tel: +39-0506213204
 
   e-mail: lucia.bill...@ifc.cnr.it
 
   _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ 
 
 The information in this e-mail is intended only
for the
 
 person to whom it is
 
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent
to you in
 
 error and the e-mail
 
 contains patient information, please contact
the Partners
 
 Compliance HelpLine at
 
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the
e-mail was
 
 sent to you in error
 
 but does not contain patient information,
 

Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA statistics

2013-10-23 Thread Lucia Billeci
Dear Anastasia,I tried the command you suggested me and i obtained the output I attach to the mail.I would like to ask you if I understood well shot it means. In this case left uncinatus connects the following cortex areas:ctx-lh-fusiform ctx-lh-inferiortemporalctx-lh-lateralorbitofrontalctx-lh-medialorbitofrontalctx-lh-middletemporalctx-lh-rostralanteriorcingulatectx-lh-superiortemporalctx-lh-temporalpole ctx-lh-insula and for each area I have the volume of the path. Is it correct?ThanksLucia# Title Segmentation Statistics 
# 
# generating_program mri_segstats
# cvs_version $Id: mri_segstats.c,v 1.75.2.9 2013/02/16 00:09:33 greve Exp $
# cmdline mri_segstats --seg dlabel/diff/aparc+aseg.bbr.nii.gz --ctab 
/Applications/freesurfer/FreeSurferColorLUT.txt --excludeid 0 --sum leftunc.txt 
--i dpath/lh.unc_AS_avg33_mni_bbr/path.pd.nii.gz 
# sysname  Darwin
# hostname Lucia-MAC.area.pi.cnr.it.
# machine  x86_64
# user luciabilleci
# anatomy_type volume
# 
# SegVolFile dlabel/diff/aparc+aseg.bbr.nii.gz 
# SegVolFileTimeStamp  2013/10/03 10:24:56 
# ColorTable /Applications/freesurfer/FreeSurferColorLUT.txt 
# ColorTableTimeStamp 2013/05/14 16:36:03 
# InVolFile  dpath/lh.unc_AS_avg33_mni_bbr/path.pd.nii.gz 
# InVolFileTimeStamp  2013/10/03 14:40:09 
# InVolFrame 0 
# ExcludeSegId 0 
# Only reporting non-empty segmentations
# VoxelVolume_mm3 27 
# TableCol  1 ColHeader Index 
# TableCol  1 FieldName Index 
# TableCol  1 Units NA 
# TableCol  2 ColHeader SegId 
# TableCol  2 FieldName Segmentation Id
# TableCol  2 Units NA
# TableCol  3 ColHeader NVoxels 
# TableCol  3 FieldName Number of Voxels
# TableCol  3 Units unitless
# TableCol  4 ColHeader Volume_mm3
# TableCol  4 FieldName Volume
# TableCol  4 Units mm^3
# TableCol  5 ColHeader StructName
# TableCol  5 FieldName Structure Name
# TableCol  5 Units NA
# TableCol  6 ColHeader Mean 
# TableCol  6 FieldName Intensity Mean
# TableCol  6 Units unknown
# TableCol  7 ColHeader StdDev
# TableCol  7 FieldName Itensity StdDev
# TableCol  7 Units unknown
# TableCol  8 ColHeader Min
# TableCol  8 FieldName Intensity Min
# TableCol  8 Units unknown
# TableCol  9 ColHeader Max
# TableCol  9 FieldName Intensity Max
# TableCol  9 Units unknown
# TableCol 10 ColHeader Range
# TableCol 10 FieldName Intensity Range
# TableCol 10 Units unknown
# NRows 110 
# NTableCols 10 
# ColHeaders  Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName Mean StdDev Min Max 
Range  
  1   2  7198   194346.0  Left-Cerebral-White-Matter 4.5893
26.8066 0.   632.   632. 
  2   4   100 2700.0  Left-Lateral-Ventricle 0.1200 
0.6077 0. 4. 4. 
  3   515  405.0  Left-Inf-Lat-Vent  2.8667 
5.5789 0.19.19. 
  4   7   38010260.0  Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter   0. 
0. 0. 0. 0. 
  5   8  160643362.0  Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 0. 
0. 0. 0. 0. 
  6  10   229 6183.0  Left-Thalamus-Proper   0.1004 
0.4986 0. 5. 5. 
  7  11   117 3159.0  Left-Caudate   1.0855 
2.5917 0.21.21. 
  8  12   206 5562.0  Left-Putamen   5.2913
12.7529 0.   152.   152. 
  9  1354 1458.0  Left-Pallidum  1.8519 
2.1754 0. 8. 8. 
 10  1431  837.0  3rd-Ventricle  0. 
0. 0. 0. 0. 
 11  1566 1782.0  4th-Ventricle  0. 
0. 0. 0. 0. 
 12  16   55815066.0  Brain-Stem 0. 
0. 0. 0. 0. 
 13  17   116 3132.0  Left-Hippocampus   0.1983 
1.1589 0. 9. 9. 
 14  1867 1809.0  Left-Amygdala  0.8209 
2.1315 0.10.10. 
 15  2418  486.0  CSF0. 
0. 0. 0. 0. 
 16  2627  729.0  Left-Accumbens-area4.2593 
6.8027 0.23.23. 
 17  28   130 3510.0  Left-VentralDC 0. 
0. 0. 0. 0. 
 18  30 3   81.0  Left-vessel9.6667 
9.5044 0.19.19. 
 19  3158 1566.0  Left-choroid-plexus0.0345 
0.2626 0. 2. 2. 
 20  41  7404   199908.0  Right-Cerebral-White-Matter0.0011 
0.0930 0. 8. 8. 
 21  4396 2592.0  Right-Lateral-Ventricle0.0312 
0.3062 0. 3. 3. 
 22  44 6  162.0  

Re: [Freesurfer] Extremely intense grey matter being omitted

2013-10-23 Thread Jon Holt
No, you mean anatomically speaking? If it's unfixable then that's OK, was just 
wondering if it was possible. 

 On Oct 22, 2013, at 10:14 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
 
 I'm not sure it's fixable then. Any idea what they are?
 Bruce
 
 
 
 On Oct 22, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Jonathan Holt whats...@umich.edu wrote:
 
 They are bright in orig.mgz. You can see in the pictured attachments 
 
 
 On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 wrote:
 why are they so bright? Are they that way before intensity normalization 
 (e.g. in the orig.mgz)?
 
 On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Jonathan Holt wrote:
 
 FS experts,
 Freesurfer has been omitting extremely bright/intense white and grey 
 matter voxels (avg intensity ~150).
 Mostly this happens in areas that should be encompassed by the surfaces. 
 Is there a way to tell recon-all
 to include these areas?
 
 I fear it may believe they are dura because of the similar intensity 
 values.
 
 jon 
 
 
 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the 
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance 
 HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
 error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.
 
 Screen Shot 2013-10-21 at 2.01.00 PM.png
 Screen Shot 2013-10-21 at 2.00.45 PM.png
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Subject processing difference between computers

2013-10-23 Thread Ed Gronenschild

see http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038234


On 22 Oct 2013, at 18:18, freesurfer-requ...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:


Message: 2
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:15:44 +
From: West, John D. jdw...@iupui.edu
Subject: [Freesurfer] Subject processing difference between computers
To: freesurfer  freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Message-ID:
793d43fe7976404cb5e172709ab1f4081123f...@iu-mssg-mbx102.ads.iu.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hello.

We are moving our processing from an older super computer to a new  
one here at Indiana University.  Preliminary testing is showing a  
significant difference between final summary stats results between  
subjects processed on the old system versus the new.  The version  
of freesurfer on both systems is identical.  Comparing the logs of  
the same subject run on both systems, I've found that the  
differences seem to start with the mri_watershed function  
specifically the main basin size.  For the same subject we find:


Old computer:
  main basin size=22667431830 voxels, voxel volume =1.000
 = 22667431830 mmm3 = 22667431.936 cm3

New computer:
  main basin size=22208239350 voxels, voxel volume =1.000
 = 22208239350 mmm3 = 22208239.616 cm3

As you can see they are very different.  My theory is this is  
propagating through the rest of the process and giving us different  
summary stats at the end.  I should note that both aseg and aparc  
stats are affected.


I am also enclosing the logs for both runs as well as the  
differences found through the diff command (this is a lot parse  
through as even time stamp differences are picked up).  Essentially  
what I am trying to find out is if these differences we are  
noticing are typical when changing computers and if not what could  
be causing these differences that I may not be picking up on.


Thanks for the help.
-John
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: recon-all.new.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 451586 bytes
Desc: recon-all.new.log
Url : http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/ 
attachments/20131022/fe052ee6/attachment.obj

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: recon-all.old.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 450567 bytes
Desc: recon-all.old.log
Url : http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/ 
attachments/20131022/fe052ee6/attachment-0001.obj

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: recon-all.diff.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 319424 bytes
Desc: recon-all.diff.log
Url : http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/ 
attachments/20131022/fe052ee6/attachment-0002.obj


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] reconall error

2013-10-23 Thread Bruce Fischl

Hi Rashmi

what version are you running? If 5.3, upload the subject and I'll take a 
look

Bruce
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Rashmi Singh wrote:


Hello FreeSurfer experts,
I am trying to run recon all on my data set, but I got following error message.
Please help me understand the message and suggest solution.
Thanks,
Rashmi

#@# Skull Stripping Tue Oct 22 13:57:00 CDT 2013
/home/rsingh/storage/labs/pbellgowan/MTBI/RASHMIANALYSIS/ANAL2013/CombT1T2Practice/FreeSurfer/AA470-2prac/
mri

 mri_em_register -skull nu.mgz 
/opt/freesurfer/average/RB_all_withskull_2008-03-26.gca
transforms/talairach_with_skull.lta 

aligning to atlas containing skull, setting unknown_nbr_spacing = 5
reading 1 input volumes...
logging results to talairach_with_skull.log
reading '/opt/freesurfer/average/RB_all_withskull_2008-03-26.gca'...
gcaAllocMax: node dims 64 64 64
gcaAllocMax: prior dims 128 128 128
gcaAllocMax: max_labels 0
average std = 23.1   using min determinant for regularization = 53.4
0 singular and 5702 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized
reading 'nu.mgz'...
freeing gibbs priors...done.
bounding unknown intensity as  20.2 or  943.7 
total sample mean = 92.0 (1443 zeros)

spacing=8, using 3481 sample points, tol=1.00e-05...

register_mri: find_optimal_transform
find_optimal_transform: nsamples 3481, passno 0, spacing 8
GCAhistoScaleImageIntensities: could not find wm peak
resetting wm mean[0]: 117 -- 126
resetting gm mean[0]: 74 -- 74
input volume #1 is the most T1-like
using real data threshold=6.0
skull bounding box = (130, 148, 130) -- (130, 148, 130)
using (130, 148, 130) as brain centroid...
mean wm in atlas = 126, using box (130,148,130) -- (129, 147,129) to find MRI 
wm
WARNING: gca.c::GCAhistoScaleImageIntensities: h_mri-nbins=255, mri_peak=-1
before smoothing, mri peak at 0
WARNING2: gca.c::GCAhistoScaleImageIntensities: h_mri-nbins=255, mri_peak=-1
after smoothing, mri peak at 0, scaling input intensities by inf
Linux enders 2.6.32-52-server #114-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 11 19:06:34 UTC 2013 
x86_64 GNU/Linux

recon-all -s AA470-2prac exited with ERRORS at Tue Oct 22 13:57:26 CDT 2013

To report a problem, see http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Extremely intense grey matter being omitted

2013-10-23 Thread Bruce Fischl

yes, anatomically. And I would guess it's unfixable without tons of work
On 
Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Jon Holt wrote:



No, you mean anatomically speaking? If it's unfixable then that's OK, was just 
wondering if it was
possible. 

On Oct 22, 2013, at 10:14 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

  I'm not sure it's fixable then. Any idea what they are?
Bruce



On Oct 22, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Jonathan Holt whats...@umich.edu wrote:

  They are bright in orig.mgz. You can see in the pictured attachments 


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
wrote:
  why are they so bright? Are they that way before intensity normalization 
(e.g. in
  the orig.mgz)?
  On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Jonathan Holt wrote:

FS experts,
Freesurfer has been omitting extremely bright/intense white and grey
matter voxels (avg intensity ~150).
Mostly this happens in areas that should be encompassed by the
surfaces. Is there a way to tell recon-all
to include these areas?

I fear it may believe they are dura because of the similar intensity
values.

jon 




The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


  Screen Shot 2013-10-21 at 2.01.00 PM.png

  Screen Shot 2013-10-21 at 2.00.45 PM.png

  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] missing eTIV in asegstats2table

2013-10-23 Thread Douglas Greve


Hi Daniel, what is this in reference to? If this is a follow up on a 
previous thread, please include the rest of the thread and the file in 
the same email. I go through way too many emails to keep track of who's 
doing what. thanks!

doug



On 10/23/13 4:13 AM, Daniel Ferreira wrote:

Dear Douglas,

Please, find attached aseg.stats files for subj1 and subj2.

Thanks

Daniel



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Fwd: LGI path problem

2013-10-23 Thread Marie Schaer

Hi Linn,

If you are using tcsh, you have to edit the file $HOME/.cshrc (.shrc should 
work as well) to add the following line:

setenv PATH $PATH:/YOUR_PATH_TO_MATLAB_BIN_DIRECTORY

Then close the terminal and open a new one. Use the env command to be sure that 
your path has been modified, then the getmatlab command from FreeSurfer should 
give you the correct location.

Best,

Marie


On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Linn Mittlestein 
linnmit...@gmail.commailto:linnmit...@gmail.com
 wrote:

Hi, thank you. I am using Linux. I not sure where to change path, ie which file 
this should be done in and where this file is located. This the error message I 
recieve, and as I said It is launching the wrong matlab and I don't know how 
change this.


Launching Matlab7p13

Warning: Unable to open display 'iconic'. You will not be able to display 
graphics on the screen.


 M A T L A B (R) 

Copyright 1984-2011 The MathWorks, Inc.

R2011b (7.13.0.564) 32-bit (glnx86)

August 13, 2011



To get started, type one of these: helpwin, helpdesk, or demo.

For product information, visit www.mathworks.comhttp://www.mathworks.com/.


 reading filled volume...

closing volume...

Undefined function 'fspecial' for input arguments of type 'char'.


Error in make_outer_surface (line 31)

Gaussian = fspecial('gaussian',[2 2],1);




ERROR: make_outer_surface did not create output file 
'/x/x/x/x/2/x/x/x/surf/tmp-mris_compute_lgi-lh.pial/lh.pial-outer'!

Linux 2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 12 14:18:09 CDT 2013 x86_64 
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux


recon-all -s subj exited with ERRORS at Wed Oct 23 08:20:58 BST 2013


Thank you very much for your time and help,


Kind Regards,Linn




On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Marie Schaer 
marie.sch...@unige.chmailto:marie.sch...@unige.ch wrote:

Hi Linn,

Sorry for the delay in answering. The path has to be set directly in your 
environment variable (the variable $PATH has to point to the correct version). 
I need a few more details about what you tried and which OS you are using to be 
able to help you.

If you are using mac, here is an example on how you can set the path in the 
.shrc file:
setenv PATH $PATH:/Applications/MATLAB_R2013b.app/bin

You can also have a look at the following posts:
http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg07283.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg25017.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg26909.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg27290.html

Let me know how it goes,

Marie


On Oct 22, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Linn Mittlestein 
linnmit...@gmail.commailto:linnmit...@gmail.com
 wrote:

Hi,

I am trying to compute lgi measures, and I think my problem lies in the fact 
that the matlab path is not set correctly; it is calling an older version of 
matlab however I need it to point to matlab2013b. I have tried numerous things 
like changing the startup.m file, the .bashrc file and exporting the matlab 
path, however It keeps calling another version of Matlab. Can someone please 
tell me how exactly the path is set and where?

Best Wishes and thank you,

Linn

-- Forwarded message --
From: Linn Mittlestein linnmit...@gmail.commailto:linnmit...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:33 AM
Subject: Fwd: LGI path problem
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu



From: Linn Mittlestein linnmit...@gmail.commailto:linnmit...@gmail.comDate: 
Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM
Subject: LGI path problem
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu



Hi,

I am trying to compute lgi measures, and I think my problem lies in the fact 
that the matlab path is not set correctly; it is calling an older version of 
matlab however I need it to point to matlab2013b. I have tried numerous things 
like changing the startup.m file, the .bashrc file and exporting the matlab 
path, however It keeps calling another version of Matlab. Can someone please 
tell me how exactly the path is set and where?

Best Wishes and thank you,

Linn


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you 

[Freesurfer] fast_selxavg3.m - ERROR: design is ill-conditioned

2013-10-23 Thread preciado
I have two sets of identical blocks within each fMRI run, so conditions
{1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5}, and there are three separate runs of the two blocks.

If I run the analysis treating each with the contrasts set up with this
numbering scheme (e.g. 3 vs 1 has two occurrences) , I get the following
output from  /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/fsfast/toolbox/fast_selxavg3.m

...
ntptot = 687, nX = 136, DOF = 551
Saving X matrix to
/autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/fs-fast/subj008/bold/improv.sm05.lh/Xtmp.mat
XCond = 2926.01 (normalized)

However, if I want to treat the two sets of blocks separately, i.e.,
{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}
so I can look at contrasts such as 3 vs 1 as well as 8 vs 6 then
fast_selxavg3.m gives:

ntptot = 687, nX = 146, DOF = 541
Saving X matrix to
/autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/fs-fast/subj008_10block/bold/improv.10blocks.sm05.lh/Xtmp.mat
XCond = 4.33238e+08 (normalized)
ERROR: design is ill-conditioned

1) why does nX increase by 10 in the 2nd case?
2) why is fast_selxavg3.m unhappy and XCond so large? Can it not handle 10
separate blocks?

The entire log file in the 2nd case is attached.selxavg3-sess log file
/usr/local/freesurfer/dev/fsfast/bin/selxavg3-sess
-s subj008_10block -analysis improv.10blocks.sm05.lh
$Id: selxavg3-sess,v 1.60 2011/12/09 20:03:03 greve Exp $
uid=8240(preciado) gid=8240(preciado) groups=8240(preciado),160(fsdev),1071(birn),1107(fddev),1576(tbi)
/autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/fs-fast
Linux quito 2.6.32-279.22.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 6 03:10:46 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Wed Oct 23 11:37:06 EDT 2013
preproc-sess -s subj008_10block -d /autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/fs-fast -a improv.10blocks.sm05.lh -nolog
--
preproc-sess logfile is /dev/null
--
$Id: preproc-sess,v 1.50 2013/01/22 22:08:44 greve Exp $
preciado
setenv FREESURFER_HOME /usr/local/freesurfer/dev
setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/freesurfer/subjects
Linux quito 2.6.32-279.22.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 6 03:10:46 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
/autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/fs-fast
/usr/local/freesurfer/dev/fsfast/bin/preproc-sess
-s subj008_10block -d /autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/fs-fast -a improv.10blocks.sm05.lh -nolog
Wed Oct 23 11:37:06 EDT 2013
instem   f 
mc   1 f fmcpr 
stc  1fmcpr fmcpr.siemens
sm   0   
mask 1   brain
subj008_10block Template -
mktemplate-sess -s subj008_10block -d /autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/fs-fast -fsd bold -nolog -update
 
Session: /autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/fs-fast/subj008_10block 
Wed Oct 23 11:37:06 EDT 2013
Detected input format at nii
subj008_10block Update not needed
  Run: 014 
  Wed Oct 23 11:37:06 EDT 2013
  subj008_10block 014 Update not needed
  Run: 016 
  Wed Oct 23 11:37:06 EDT 2013
  subj008_10block 016 Update not needed
  Run: 018 
  Wed Oct 23 11:37:07 EDT 2013
  subj008_10block 018 Update not needed
Wed Oct 23 11:37:07 EDT 2013
mktemplate-sess completed 
subj008_10block Mask 
mkbrainmask-sess -maskstem brain -fsd bold -s subj008_10block -d /autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/fs-fast -nolog -update

/autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/fs-fast/subj008_10block 
Wed Oct 23 11:37:07 EDT 2013
subj008_10block Update not needed for session-level mask
subj008_10block Update not needed for run 014 mask
subj008_10block Update not needed for run 014 meanval
subj008_10block Update not needed for run 016 mask
subj008_10block Update not needed for run 016 meanval
subj008_10block Update not needed for run 018 mask
subj008_10block Update not needed for run 018 meanval
Wed Oct 23 11:37:07 EDT 2013
mkbrainmask-sess done
subj008_10block Registration -
register-sess -s subj008_10block -d /autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/fs-fast -fsd bold -dof 6 -per-run -nolog -update
--
register-sess logfile is /dev/null
--
Wed Oct 23 11:37:07 EDT 2013

setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/freesurfer/subjects
cd /autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/fs-fast
/usr/local/freesurfer/dev/fsfast/bin/register-sess -s subj008_10block -d /autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/fs-fast -fsd bold -dof 6 -per-run -nolog -update

freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20131015
Linux quito 2.6.32-279.22.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 6 03:10:46 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 
Session: /autofs/cluster/birn/users/helmer/fMRI_improv/fs-fast/subj008_10block 
Wed Oct 23 11:37:07 EDT 2013
  Run: 014 

Re: [Freesurfer] Projecting voxel intensities to a surface file

2013-10-23 Thread Arash Nazeri
Sorry. I meant to do that. 



 Original Message 
From: Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
To: Arash Nazeri arashnaz...@aol.com
Sent: Wed, Oct 23, 2013 8:25 am
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Projecting voxel intensities to a surface file


Hi Arash

can you cc the list on this type of email so that others can answer? 
Particularly Matt Glasser! I suspect that they have already run 
bbregister, but I'm not sure.

cheers
Bruce

On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Arash Nazeri wrote:

 Hi Bruce,
 Thanks for your response. I think this will do the trick generally, is it
 also possible to apply mri_vol2surf to the Human Connectome Project
 preprocessed files, or should I rerun the recon-all? In the HCP dataset, the
 surface files are in the gifti format and the diffusion images are already
 registered to the structural volumes. Based on the documentations it seems
 that mri_vol2surf is hard-wired for outputs generated from recon-all.
 
 Cheers,
 Arash
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 To: Arash Nazeri arashnaz...@aol.com
 Cc: freesurfer freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Sent: Tue, Oct 22, 2013 10:17 pm
 Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Projecting voxel intensities to a surface file
 
 Hi Arash
 Yes. Register the surface to the volume with bbregister, then use
 mri_vol2surf to do the sampling
 Cheers
 Bruce
 
 
 
 On Oct 22, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Arash Nazeri arashnaz...@aol.com wrote:

   Dear all,
 I'm new to the freesurfer. I want to project surrounding cortical
 voxel values (intensities) from a given map (e.g. mean diffusivity map
 in a nifti format) to a surface file (e.g. mid-cortical surface in a
 gifti fromat) to generate scalar maps like ?h.thickness for group-wise
 statistics. Can this be carried out using freesurfer commands?
 
 Cheers,
 Arash

   ___
   Freesurfer mailing list
   Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
 HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
 error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.
 


 

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] skull striping error question

2013-10-23 Thread Subhabrata Chaudhury
Hi Everyone,

I have some data where the skull striping hasnt worked properly and there are 
some skull remaining. However, upon looking at the white and pial surfaces, 
those look perfectly fine. My question is will the erroneous skullstriping 
affect the supratentorial volume estimation ? 
I will be highly obliged if someone can address this concern. 

Regards

Subha
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] skull striping error question

2013-10-23 Thread Maritza Ebling

Subha,

The erroneous skullstripping will not affect your volume estimates as 
long as the surfaces look good.


Maritza

On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Subhabrata 
Chaudhury wrote:



Hi Everyone,
 
I have some data where the skull striping hasnt worked properly and there are 
some skull remaining. However, upon looking at the white and pial surfaces, 
those
look perfectly fine. My question is will the erroneous skullstriping affect the 
supratentorial volume estimation ? 
I will be highly obliged if someone can address this concern. 
 
Regards
 
Subha

___

Freesurfer mailing list

Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] skull striping error question

2013-10-23 Thread Subhabrata Chaudhury
Even the Supratentorial volume ? Supratentorial volume includes some structures 
outside the surfaces ?

Thanks

Subha
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Fischl
Sent: 10/23/13 01:13 PM
To: Subhabrata Chaudhury
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] skull striping error question

You should be fine if the surfaces aren't affected by the remaining skull Bruce 
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Subhabrata Chaudhury wrote:  Hi Everyone,   I have some 
data where the skull striping hasnt worked properly and there are some skull 
remaining.  However, upon looking at the white and pial surfaces, those look 
perfectly fine. My question is will the  erroneous skullstriping affect the 
supratentorial volume estimation ?  I will be highly obliged if someone can 
address this concern.   Regards   Subha   The information in this e-mail 
is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this 
e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, 
please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at 
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error 
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
properly dispose of the e-mail.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] skull striping error question

2013-10-23 Thread Bruce Fischl

You should be fine if the surfaces aren't affected by the remaining skull
Bruce
On 
Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Subhabrata Chaudhury wrote:



Hi Everyone,
 
I have some data where the skull striping hasnt worked properly and there are 
some skull remaining.
However, upon looking at the white and pial surfaces, those look perfectly 
fine. My question is will the
erroneous skullstriping affect the supratentorial volume estimation ? 
I will be highly obliged if someone can address this concern. 
 
Regards
 
Subha

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA statistics

2013-10-23 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Lucia - The columns NVoxels Volume_mm3 in the mri_segstats output are 
the volumes of each of the structures in the aparc+aseg, so those columns 
have nothing to do with the path. The last few columns, Mean StdDev Min 
Max Range, are related to the values in path.pd.nii.gz.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Lucia Billeci wrote:

 Dear Anastasia,

 I tried the command you suggested me and i obtained the output I attach to 
 the mail.

 I would like to ask you if I understood well shot it means. In this case left 
 uncinatus connects the following cortex areas:

 ctx-lh-fusiform
 ctx-lh-inferiortemporal
 ctx-lh-lateralorbitofrontal
 ctx-lh-medialorbitofrontal
 ctx-lh-middletemporal
 ctx-lh-rostralanteriorcingulate
 ctx-lh-superiortemporal
 ctx-lh-temporalpole
 ctx-lh-insula

 and for each area I have the volume of the path. Is it correct?

 Thanks
 Lucia






 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

 Dr. Lucia Billeci, PhD
 Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC)
 National Research Council (CNR)
 via Moruzzi 1, 56124, Pisa
 ITALY
 Tel: +39-0506213204
 e-mail: lucia.bill...@ifc.cnr.it
 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _




 Il giorno 18/ott/2013, alle ore 17:32, Anastasia Yendiki ha scritto:


 Hi Lucia - You can probably do that with mri_segstats. Try something like:

 mri_segstats --seg dlabel/diff/aparc+aseg.bbr.nii.gz --ctab 
 $FREESURFER_HOME/FreeSurferColorLUT.txt --excludeid 0 --sum output.txt --i 
 dpath/lh.unc_AS_avg32_mni_flt/path.pd.nii.gz

 And similarly for any other pathway. See the mri_segstats help for more 
 usage info. Let me know if this gives you what you need.

 a.y

 On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Lucia Billeci wrote:

 Thanks Anastasia, this is useful for visualization. But to construct a table
 with for each tracts the parcellation regions that it connects do I need to
 look at the image?
 Lucia
 On Oct 18, 2013, at 3:48 PM, Anastasia Yendiki wrote:

  Hi Lucia - You can look at the tracula output over the cortical
  parcellation and subcortical segmentation in the individual's
  diffusion space like this:

  freeview dmri/dtifit_FA.nii.gz
  dlabel/diff/aparc+aseg.bbr.nii.gz:colormap=lut:opacity=.5 -tv
  dpath/merged_avg33_mni_bbr.mgz

  Hope this helps,
  a.y

  On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Lucia Billeci wrote:

Dear Anastasia and all,

how can I understand which are the region of the
brain in which the brain

base been parecellated that each tract generated by
TRACULA connect?

For example  if I look at the left uncinate
fascicles how can I know which

are the ROIs of the statistical output from the
cortical parcellation that

it connects?

Thanks

Lucia

On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Lucia Billeci wrote:

 Hi Anastasia,

thanks for you answer. Now I have understood the
meaning of that

parameter.

Best regards

Lucia

On Oct 14, 2013, at 10:58 PM, Anastasia Yendiki
wrote:

 Hi Lucia - It's how many sample paths were
drawn to

 produce the probability distribution of the
path

 (path.pd.nii.gz). It depends on the
configuration

 parameters (nsample, nkeep), so it'll be the
same if these

 configuration parameters are the same.

 Hope this helps,

 a.y

 On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Lucia Billeci wrote:

   Dear all,

   I noticed that in the TRACULA statistics

   output files (pathstats.overall.txt) the

   variable Count that

   should indicate the number of sample
paths in

   the WM tract is the same for all the
computed

   tract. Could

   anyone tell me why this happen?

   Thanks a lot

   Regards

   Lucia

   _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_

   Dr. Lucia Billeci, PhD

   Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC)

   National Research Council (CNR)

   via Moruzzi 1, 56124, Pisa

   ITALY

   Tel: +39-0506213204

   e-mail: lucia.bill...@ifc.cnr.it

   _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_

 The information in this e-mail is intended only
for the

 person to whom it is

 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent
to you in

 error and the e-mail

 

Re: [Freesurfer] Subject processing difference between computers

2013-10-23 Thread West, John D.
Thanks Ed.  This is consistent with the differences we are seeing as well.  The 
two super computers are very different platforms so it makes sense.

I think we'll have to reprocess all cases for ongoing studies on the newer 
super computer in this case.  Not the answer I was hoping for, but what I was 
expecting.  Thanks again for the information.

From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Gronenschild
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:55 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Subject processing difference between computers

see http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038234


On 22 Oct 2013, at 18:18, 
freesurfer-requ...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer-requ...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 wrote:



Message: 2

Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:15:44 +

From: West, John D. jdw...@iupui.edumailto:jdw...@iupui.edu

Subject: [Freesurfer] Subject processing difference between computers

To: freesurfer  
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

Message-ID:


793d43fe7976404cb5e172709ab1f4081123f...@iu-mssg-mbx102.ads.iu.edumailto:793d43fe7976404cb5e172709ab1f4081123f...@iu-mssg-mbx102.ads.iu.edu

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii



Hello.



We are moving our processing from an older super computer to a new one here at 
Indiana University.  Preliminary testing is showing a significant difference 
between final summary stats results between subjects processed on the old 
system versus the new.  The version of freesurfer on both systems is identical. 
 Comparing the logs of the same subject run on both systems, I've found that 
the differences seem to start with the mri_watershed function specifically the 
main basin size.  For the same subject we find:



Old computer:

  main basin size=22667431830 voxels, voxel volume =1.000

 = 22667431830 mmm3 = 22667431.936 cm3



New computer:

  main basin size=22208239350 voxels, voxel volume =1.000

 = 22208239350 mmm3 = 22208239.616 cm3



As you can see they are very different.  My theory is this is propagating 
through the rest of the process and giving us different summary stats at the 
end.  I should note that both aseg and aparc stats are affected.



I am also enclosing the logs for both runs as well as the differences found 
through the diff command (this is a lot parse through as even time stamp 
differences are picked up).  Essentially what I am trying to find out is if 
these differences we are noticing are typical when changing computers and if 
not what could be causing these differences that I may not be picking up on.



Thanks for the help.

-John

-- next part --

A non-text attachment was scrubbed...

Name: recon-all.new.log

Type: application/octet-stream

Size: 451586 bytes

Desc: recon-all.new.log

Url : 
http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/attachments/20131022/fe052ee6/attachment.obj

-- next part --

A non-text attachment was scrubbed...

Name: recon-all.old.log

Type: application/octet-stream

Size: 450567 bytes

Desc: recon-all.old.log

Url : 
http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/attachments/20131022/fe052ee6/attachment-0001.obj

-- next part --

A non-text attachment was scrubbed...

Name: recon-all.diff.log

Type: application/octet-stream

Size: 319424 bytes

Desc: recon-all.diff.log

Url : 
http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/attachments/20131022/fe052ee6/attachment-0002.obj

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] mri_glmfit-sim with conjunction maps but without pre-cached data

2013-10-23 Thread Caspar M. Schwiedrzik
Hi,
I have a question regarding cluster size thresholding using mri_glmfit-sim.
Namely, I have a sig.nii conjunction map that I made with mri_concat.
The analyses that serve as input to the conjunction map are done on a
custom surface template.
If I want to run mri_glmfit-sim, how would that work? I obviously do not
have precached data.
Thanks, Caspar
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] mri_surf2surf error - 'could not determine type of...'

2013-10-23 Thread Paul Beach
Hello FS experts,

I'm attempting to transform the Yeo2011 annotations (lh  rh) from
fsaverage to individual subjects so as to then sample the cortical maps to
subject surfaces using mri_label2vol. However, I'm getting the error in the
subject line when I put in the following commands:

*mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage \*
*--srcsurfval lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot \*
*--trgsubject HS_001 --trgsurfval lh.Yeo_17Network_native.annot --hemi lh*

I suspected that I have to put a src_type and trg_type in there, but I
wasn't sure what type of types would be appropriate for use in
mri_label2vol. For the latter command I was planning on utilizing something
similar to a previous e-mailer's command (below):
*mri_label2vol --annot lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.HS_001.annot \*
*--o outfile.nii.gz --hemi lh --subject HS_001 \*
*--temp $SUBJECTS_DIR/HS_001/mri/orig.mgz --identity*

Any suggestions for getting past this error?

Thanks for your help,
Paul
-- 
Paul Beach
DO/PhD candidate - Year VI
Michigan State University
- College of Osteopathic Medicine
- Neuroscience Program
   - Bozoki Lab: Neurology/Radiology
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] mri_surf2surf error - 'could not determine type of...'

2013-10-23 Thread Douglas N Greve

The full error msg is not in the subject line. My guess is that the 
lh. in front of Yeo in the srcsurfval is causing the problem


On 10/23/2013 03:17 PM, Paul Beach wrote:
 Hello FS experts,

 I'm attempting to transform the Yeo2011 annotations (lh  rh) from 
 fsaverage to individual subjects so as to then sample the cortical 
 maps to subject surfaces using mri_label2vol. However, I'm getting the 
 error in the subject line when I put in the following commands:

 /mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage \/
 /--srcsurfval lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot \/
 /--trgsubject HS_001 --trgsurfval lh.Yeo_17Network_native.annot --hemi lh/

 I suspected that I have to put a src_type and trg_type in there, but I 
 wasn't sure what type of types would be appropriate for use in 
 mri_label2vol. For the latter command I was planning on utilizing 
 something similar to a previous e-mailer's command (below):
 /mri_label2vol --annot lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.HS_001.annot \/
 /--o outfile.nii.gz --hemi lh --subject HS_001 \/
 /--temp $SUBJECTS_DIR/HS_001/mri/orig.mgz --identity/

 Any suggestions for getting past this error?

 Thanks for your help,
 Paul
 -- 
 Paul Beach
 DO/PhD candidate - Year VI
 Michigan State University
 - College of Osteopathic Medicine
 - Neuroscience Program
- Bozoki Lab: Neurology/Radiology


 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



[Freesurfer] Problem generating volume stats with hippocampal segmentation script

2013-10-23 Thread Erin Walsh
Hi,

I'm experiencing a problem when running the automated hippocampal subfield
segmentation script. Unfortunately, I have been unable to determine the
cause of the error. After reconstructing all participant data with the
-hippo-subfields flag, I ran the
kvlQuantifyHippocampalSubfieldSegmentations.sh script. The script seems
to be working fine, generating subfield values for all participants until
the very end when it attempts to generate the stat tables (I think). At
this point, I receive the following error:

/Applications/freesurfer/bin/kvlQuantifyHippocampalSubfieldSegmentations.sh:
line 22: volumeStats_left.txt: Permission denied
failed to do kvlQuantifyPosteriorProbabilityImages
/Applications/freesurfer/data/GEMS/compressionLookupTable_left.txt

I've copied some output and the error message below, including the last
participant in our folder it runs through before attempting to generate
volume stats.

Thanks for any help you can offer!

Best

Erin

--
Erin Walsh, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Research Associate
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Department of Psychiatry: Abercrombie
Labhttp://www.psychiatry.wisc.edu/abercrombie/
6001 Research Park Blvd.
Madison, WI 53719
edubwa...@gmail.com



Relevant information:


FREESURFER_HOME: /Applications/freesurfer

Current working dir ran command:
/Applications/freesurfer/subjects/CORTMR/recon

Build stamp: freesurfer-Darwin-lion-stable-pub-v5.2.0

Kernel info: Darwin 12.4.0 x86_64

Command line ran: kvlQuantifyHippocampalSubfieldSegmentations.sh

Output/Error (after seemingly generating hippocampal subfield values for
all participants):

...
cd 228/
Quantifying subject 228/ left
Doing left side
cd mri
kvlQuantifyPosteriorProbabilityImages
/Applications/freesurfer/data/GEMS/compressionLookupTable_left.txt
posterior_Left-Hippocampus.mgz
posterior_left_presubiculum.mgz
posterior_left_CA1.mgz posterior_left_CA2_3.mgz
posterior_left_fimbria.mgz
posterior_left_subiculum.mgz
posterior_left_CA4_DG.mgz
posterior_left_hippocampal_fissure.mgz  volumeStats_left.txt
cd ..
Quantifying subject 228/ right
Doing right side
cd mri
kvlQuantifyPosteriorProbabilityImages
/Applications/freesurfer/data/GEMS/compressionLookupTable.txt
posterior_Right-Hippocampus.mgz
posterior_right_presubiculum.mgz
posterior_right_CA1.mgz posterior_right_CA2_3.mgz
posterior_right_fimbria.mgz
posterior_right_subiculum.mgz
posterior_right_CA4_DG.mgz
posterior_right_hippocampal_fissure.mgz  volumeStats_right.txt
cd ..
cd ..
cd fsaverage/
Quantifying subject fsaverage/ left
Doing left side
cd mri
kvlQuantifyPosteriorProbabilityImages
/Applications/freesurfer/data/GEMS/compressionLookupTable_left.txt
posterior_Left-Hippocampus.mgz
posterior_left_presubiculum.mgz
posterior_left_CA1.mgz posterior_left_CA2_3.mgz
posterior_left_fimbria.mgz
posterior_left_subiculum.mgz
posterior_left_CA4_DG.mgz
posterior_left_hippocampal_fissure.mgz  volumeStats_left.txt
/Applications/freesurfer/bin/kvlQuantifyHippocampalSubfieldSegmentations.sh:
line 22: volumeStats_left.txt: Permission denied
failed to do kvlQuantifyPosteriorProbabilityImages
/Applications/freesurfer/data/GEMS/compressionLookupTable_left.txt
posterior_Left-Hippocampus.mgz
posterior_left_presubiculum.mgz
posterior_left_CA1.mgz posterior_left_CA2_3.mgz
posterior_left_fimbria.mgz
posterior_left_subiculum.mgz
posterior_left_CA4_DG.mgz
posterior_left_hippocampal_fissure.mgz  volumeStats_left.txt
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] mri_surf2surf error - 'could not determine type of...'

2013-10-23 Thread Paul Beach
Apologies: the full error message was:
 '*could not determine type of lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot*'

I tried your suggestion of removing the hemispheric designation in front of
'Yeo' and I'm getting the same error - - the same occurs if I remove the
'.annot' at the end.
*mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage \*
*--srcsurfval Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot \*
*--trgsubject HS_001 --trgsurfval Yeo_17Network_native.annot --hemi lh*
*ERROR: could not determine type of Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000*


Thoughts?

Cheers,
Paul


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Douglas N Greve
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:


 The full error msg is not in the subject line. My guess is that the
 lh. in front of Yeo in the srcsurfval is causing the problem


 On 10/23/2013 03:17 PM, Paul Beach wrote:
  Hello FS experts,
 
  I'm attempting to transform the Yeo2011 annotations (lh  rh) from
  fsaverage to individual subjects so as to then sample the cortical
  maps to subject surfaces using mri_label2vol. However, I'm getting the
  error in the subject line when I put in the following commands:
 
  /mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage \/
  /--srcsurfval lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot \/
  /--trgsubject HS_001 --trgsurfval lh.Yeo_17Network_native.annot --hemi
 lh/
 
  I suspected that I have to put a src_type and trg_type in there, but I
  wasn't sure what type of types would be appropriate for use in
  mri_label2vol. For the latter command I was planning on utilizing
  something similar to a previous e-mailer's command (below):
  /mri_label2vol --annot lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.HS_001.annot \/
  /--o outfile.nii.gz --hemi lh --subject HS_001 \/
  /--temp $SUBJECTS_DIR/HS_001/mri/orig.mgz --identity/
 
  Any suggestions for getting past this error?
 
  Thanks for your help,
  Paul
  --
  Paul Beach
  DO/PhD candidate - Year VI
  Michigan State University
  - College of Osteopathic Medicine
  - Neuroscience Program
 - Bozoki Lab: Neurology/Radiology
 
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

 --
 Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
 MGH-NMR Center
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Phone Number: 617-724-2358
 Fax: 617-726-7422

 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
 FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
 Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
 is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
 HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
 error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.




-- 
Paul Beach
DO/PhD candidate - Year VI
Michigan State University
- College of Osteopathic Medicine
- Neuroscience Program
   - Bozoki Lab: Neurology/Radiology
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] mri_surf2surf error - 'could not determine type of...'

2013-10-23 Thread Bruce Fischl
try specifying --sval-annot  Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot instead of 
--srcsurfval


cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Paul Beach wrote:


Apologies: the full error message was: 'could not determine type of
lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot'
I tried your suggestion of removing the hemispheric designation in front of
'Yeo' and I'm getting the same error - - the same occurs if I remove the
'.annot' at the end.
mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage \
--srcsurfval Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot \
--trgsubject HS_001 --trgsurfval Yeo_17Network_native.annot --hemi lh
ERROR: could not determine type of Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000


Thoughts?

Cheers,
Paul


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
wrote:

  The full error msg is not in the subject line. My guess is that
  the
  lh. in front of Yeo in the srcsurfval is causing the problem


  On 10/23/2013 03:17 PM, Paul Beach wrote:
   Hello FS experts,
  
   I'm attempting to transform the Yeo2011 annotations (lh  rh)
  from
   fsaverage to individual subjects so as to then sample the
  cortical
   maps to subject surfaces using mri_label2vol. However, I'm
  getting the
   error in the subject line when I put in the following
  commands:
  
 /mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage \/
 /--srcsurfval lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot \/
 /--trgsubject HS_001 --trgsurfval lh.Yeo_17Network_native.annot
--hemi lh/

 I suspected that I have to put a src_type and trg_type in there, but
I
 wasn't sure what type of types would be appropriate for use in
 mri_label2vol. For the latter command I was planning on utilizing
 something similar to a previous e-mailer's command (below):
 /mri_label2vol --annot lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.HS_001.annot \/
 /--o outfile.nii.gz --hemi lh --subject HS_001 \/
 /--temp $SUBJECTS_DIR/HS_001/mri/orig.mgz --identity/

 Any suggestions for getting past this error?

 Thanks for your help,
 Paul
 --
 Paul Beach
 DO/PhD candidate - Year VI
 Michigan State University
 - College of Osteopathic Medicine
 - Neuroscience Program
    - Bozoki Lab: Neurology/Radiology


 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing:
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
and properly
dispose of the e-mail.




--
Paul Beach
DO/PhD candidate - Year VI
Michigan State University
- College of Osteopathic Medicine
- Neuroscience Program   - Bozoki Lab: Neurology/Radiology

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] mri_surf2surf error - 'could not determine type of...'

2013-10-23 Thread Paul Beach
That worked like a charm.

Thanks!


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:

 try specifying --sval-annot  Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot instead of
 --srcsurfval

 cheers
 Bruce

 On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Paul Beach wrote:

  Apologies: the full error message was: 'could not determine type of
 lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.**annot'
 I tried your suggestion of removing the hemispheric designation in front
 of
 'Yeo' and I'm getting the same error - - the same occurs if I remove the
 '.annot' at the end.
 mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage \
 --srcsurfval Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot \
 --trgsubject HS_001 --trgsurfval Yeo_17Network_native.annot --hemi lh
 ERROR: could not determine type of Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000


 Thoughts?

 Cheers,
 Paul


 On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Douglas N Greve 
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 wrote:

   The full error msg is not in the subject line. My guess is that
   the
   lh. in front of Yeo in the srcsurfval is causing the problem


   On 10/23/2013 03:17 PM, Paul Beach wrote:
Hello FS experts,
   
I'm attempting to transform the Yeo2011 annotations (lh  rh)
   from
fsaverage to individual subjects so as to then sample the
   cortical
maps to subject surfaces using mri_label2vol. However, I'm
   getting the
error in the subject line when I put in the following
   commands:
   
  /mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage \/
  /--srcsurfval lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.**annot \/
  /--trgsubject HS_001 --trgsurfval lh.Yeo_17Network_native.annot
 --hemi lh/
 
  I suspected that I have to put a src_type and trg_type in there, but
 I
  wasn't sure what type of types would be appropriate for use in
  mri_label2vol. For the latter command I was planning on utilizing
  something similar to a previous e-mailer's command (below):
  /mri_label2vol --annot lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.**HS_001.annot \/
  /--o outfile.nii.gz --hemi lh --subject HS_001 \/
  /--temp $SUBJECTS_DIR/HS_001/mri/orig.**mgz --identity/
 
  Any suggestions for getting past this error?
 
  Thanks for your help,
  Paul
  --
  Paul Beach
  DO/PhD candidate - Year VI
  Michigan State University
  - College of Osteopathic Medicine
  - Neuroscience Program
 - Bozoki Lab: Neurology/Radiology
 
 
  __**_
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/mailman/listinfo/**freesurferhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

 --
 Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
 MGH-NMR Center
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Phone Number: 617-724-2358
 Fax: 617-726-7422

 Bugs: 
 surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/**fswiki/BugReportinghttp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
 FileDrop: 
 https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/filedrop2https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/**facility/filedrop/index.htmlhttp://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
 Outgoing:
 ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/**greve/ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

 __**_
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/mailman/listinfo/**freesurferhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
 it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
 HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/**compliancelinehttp://www.partners.org/complianceline.
  If the e-mail was sent to you
 in error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
 and properly
 dispose of the e-mail.




 --
 Paul Beach
 DO/PhD candidate - Year VI
 Michigan State University
 - College of Osteopathic Medicine
 - Neuroscience Program   - Bozoki Lab: Neurology/Radiology




-- 
Paul Beach
DO/PhD candidate - Year VI
Michigan State University
- College of Osteopathic Medicine
- Neuroscience Program
   - Bozoki Lab: Neurology/Radiology
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] freeview invalid drawable

2013-10-23 Thread Elissa McIntosh
Hi, When trying freeview command (see below) from the “Testing your
freesurfer installation” page using my own data, freesurfer opened, but I
am concerned about the “invalid drawable” lines. The message happened when
I ran this command on the bert data too. What does invalid drawable mean?



[CoS-Psychology-Murphy-iMac-QAD:/Applications/freesurfer] cmurphy% freeview
-v $SUBJECTS_DIR/ABU/mri/norm.mgz -v
$SUBJECTS_DIR/ABU/mri/aseg.mgz:colormap=lut:opacity=0.2 -f
$SUBJECTS_DIR/ABU/surf/lh.white:edgecolor=yellow -f
$SUBJECTS_DIR/ABU/surf/rh.white:edgecolor=yellow -f
$SUBJECTS_DIR/ABU/surf/lh.pial:annot=aparc:edgecolor=red -f
$SUBJECTS_DIR/ABU/surf/rh.pial:annot=aparc:edgecolor=red

2013-10-22 12:47:02.811 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable

2013-10-22 12:47:02.812 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable

2013-10-22 12:47:02.826 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable

2013-10-22 12:47:02.826 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable

2013-10-22 12:47:02.839 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable

2013-10-22 12:47:02.840 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable

2013-10-22 12:47:02.853 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable

2013-10-22 12:47:02.853 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable

reading colortable from annotation file...
colortable with 36 entries read (originally
/autofs/space/terrier_001/users/nicks/freesurfer/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt)
colortable with 36 entries read (originally
/autofs/space/terrier_001/users/nicks/freesurfer/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt)
reading colortable from annotation file...
colortable with 36 entries read (originally
/autofs/space/terrier_001/users/nicks/freesurfer/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt)
colortable with 36 entries read (originally
/autofs/space/terrier_001/users/nicks/freesurfer/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt)

Thank you,
Elissa
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] freeview invalid drawable

2013-10-23 Thread Ruopeng Wang
You can just ignore this warning message on Mac. 

Best,
Ruopeng

On Oct 23, 2013, at 8:52 PM, Elissa McIntosh mcintosh.eli...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi, When trying freeview command (see below) from the “Testing your 
 freesurfer installation” page using my own data, freesurfer opened, but I am 
 concerned about the “invalid drawable” lines. The message happened when I ran 
 this command on the bert data too. What does invalid drawable mean? 
 
  
 [CoS-Psychology-Murphy-iMac-QAD:/Applications/freesurfer] cmurphy% freeview 
 -v $SUBJECTS_DIR/ABU/mri/norm.mgz -v 
 $SUBJECTS_DIR/ABU/mri/aseg.mgz:colormap=lut:opacity=0.2 -f 
 $SUBJECTS_DIR/ABU/surf/lh.white:edgecolor=yellow -f 
 $SUBJECTS_DIR/ABU/surf/rh.white:edgecolor=yellow -f 
 $SUBJECTS_DIR/ABU/surf/lh.pial:annot=aparc:edgecolor=red -f 
 $SUBJECTS_DIR/ABU/surf/rh.pial:annot=aparc:edgecolor=red
 
 2013-10-22 12:47:02.811 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable
 
 2013-10-22 12:47:02.812 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable
 
 2013-10-22 12:47:02.826 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable
 
 2013-10-22 12:47:02.826 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable
 
 2013-10-22 12:47:02.839 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable
 
 2013-10-22 12:47:02.840 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable
 
 2013-10-22 12:47:02.853 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable
 
 2013-10-22 12:47:02.853 Freeview[4214:703] invalid drawable
 
 reading colortable from annotation file...
 colortable with 36 entries read (originally 
 /autofs/space/terrier_001/users/nicks/freesurfer/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt)
 colortable with 36 entries read (originally 
 /autofs/space/terrier_001/users/nicks/freesurfer/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt)
 reading colortable from annotation file...
 colortable with 36 entries read (originally 
 /autofs/space/terrier_001/users/nicks/freesurfer/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt)
 colortable with 36 entries read (originally 
 /autofs/space/terrier_001/users/nicks/freesurfer/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt)
 
 
 Thank you,
 Elissa 
 
 
 
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.