Re: [fw-general] About improving ZF doc translation
But translators should consider waiting a little while before applying these formatting changes : it's what I think :-) . For the consistency of the documentation, following the example of the code of the ZF, we can add a light script of tests to check: line length, presence of a \n at the good place, respect of code conventions... Mickael. Wil Sinclair a écrit : I kept it right around 70 columns, mainly because the code started moving off the printable page and it would have been hard to read in a smaller font. But translators should consider waiting a little while before applying these formatting changes, unless you'd like to render your docs in PDF now, that is. I will be looking through all the docs and making them consistent style-wise very soon after 1.6, and I will have to make changes to the code listings at that time as well. I apologize for all the changes. As some of you may have noticed, while the content is typically good and consistently thorough, the writing styles, code conventions, and formatting can differ widely from one section to the next on the master English document. It has been livable up to now, but really comes out when you render the ref guide in a single document. The changes I have been making and plan to make were chosen in part because they shouldn't impact translations that much. I think we should talk about methods by which we can start sharing examples and figures as a partial solution to this problem if the translators feel that they have to be consistent even with code formatting in the translations. ,Wil
AW: [fw-general] Zend_Acl - How to model large ACL?
Hi Aldemar, thanks for your reply. I had a closer look on your proposal and the articles and it's quite useful but does not really fit into my problem (due to design issues). I already came to a solution and I'm now dynamically building selective ACLs for every user instead of building one large complete ACL. Thanks again and best regards Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Aldemar Bernal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 29. August 2008 17:00 An: fw-general@lists.zend.com Betreff: Re: [fw-general] Zend_Acl - How to model large ACL? Hi, maybe these article can give you a light, this proposal code is avalible in the svn laboratory http://devzone.zend.com/article/3509-Zend_Acl-and-MVC-Integration-Part-I-Bas ic-Use http://devzone.zend.com/article/3510-Zend_Acl-and-MVC-Integration-Part-II-Ad vanced-Use hope it helps, Aldemar - Original Message - From: Stefan Gehrig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'David Toniolo' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 9:26 AM Subject: AW: [fw-general] Zend_Acl - How to model large ACL? Hi David, thanks a lot for your reply. I'll answer you in a separate email in German ;-) Best regards Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: David Toniolo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 29. August 2008 13:58 An: fw-general@lists.zend.com Betreff: Re: [fw-general] Zend_Acl - How to model large ACL? hi stefan, your name sounds German, so maybe you want to post your topic on zfforum.de, too. I think you have too much roles, maybe it is possible to reduce them to round about 100 roles, with inheritance and some optimization on the structure. To say more about this, i have to know the concrete role names, etc. Your requirements are ok to use Zend_Acl, except the roles. You need some Assertions, for example to implement only editing own entities and stuff like that. So far so good. In German i could write pretty much more, but my English is too bad so i better stop here. ;) greets david Stefan Gehrig wrote: Dear all, I'm working on a organization-wide address management system based on the Zend Framework. Currently I'm struggling with implementing an access-control-system that satisfies our needs. One option would be to model the whole ACL with Zend_Acl, but I have no experience with Zend_Acl and I do not know if Zend_Acl is intended to manage ACLs of this size and type. Please let me explain what I'm talking about: We'll have the following model entities: - organizations (120+) each with - organizational roles (5 - 10 per organization) - organizational persons (5 - 10 per organization) That's about 1800 entities. Each person can have multiple roles, so we have a 1:n relationship between persons and roles. Simultaneously we have about 18 regional authorities with 1 to 3 user each and the federal authority with about 20 users, of with 5 are super-users and 15 have limited access rights to the respective organizations they manage. The access-control-system must ensure that - everyone (including guests) may view everything - each organizational person must be able to edit his own entity. He/she must not be able to delete his entity or create new entities. - the special organizational role Office must be able to edit all entities of its organization, it also can create and delete entities from within its organization. It must not however create new organizations or delete its organization. - the members of our regional authorities shall be able to edit organizations within their scope, they may also create and delete entities within these organizations. They may also delete organizations in their scope and create new organizations within their scope. The scope is determined by an attribute of the organization model class. - the 15 clerks within the federal authority must be able to edit organizations and their entities within their scope. They can create and delete entities from within these organizations but they cannot create or delete whole organizations. The scope is determined by an attribute of the organization model class. - the 5 super-user of the federal authority must be able to do everything. So far so good... If I try to model this with Zend_Acl I'd identify the following elements: - 4 privileges (view, edit, delete, create) - 1800 resources (120+ organizations with 5-10 persons and roles each. - 1834 roles (900 organizational roles, 900 organizational persons (membership can be modeled by using Zend_Acl's multiple role inheritance), 18 regional authorities, 1 federal authority super-user-role, 15 federal authority scopes) Has anybody built a ACL that big yet? Is this actually a big ACL? It seems pretty big to me ;-) What about speed? Sure, I can use caching to speed things up, but each operation on the model itself (create, edit, delete) will force an update as the ACL is effectively the model. How would you manage these
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Test_PHPUnit_ControllerTestCase with bootstrap php file
-- Peter Wansch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Sunday, 31 August 2008, 10:17 PM -0700):
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the explanation. I ensured that GGV_DISPATCH_CONTROLLER is set to
false:
public function setUp()
{
// Execute any startup code here
defined('GOGOVERDE_DISPATCH_FRONT_CONTROLLER') or
define('GOGOVERDE_DISPATCH_FRONT_CONTROLLER', false);
parent::setUp();
}
right where you suggested I should define it. I still get the same error.
Here is the output from phpunit:
1) testValidLoginShouldGoToIndexPage(Ggv_LoginTest)
Zend_Controller_Exception: No default module defined for this application
/Library/WebServer/ZendFramework-1.6.0RC3/library/Zend/Controller/Dispatcher/Standard.php:211
/Library/WebServer/ZendFramework-1.6.0RC3/library/Zend/Controller/Dispatcher/Standard.php:245
/Library/WebServer/ZendFramework-1.6.0RC3/library/Zend/Controller/Front.php:946
/Library/WebServer/ZendFramework-1.6.0RC3/library/Zend/Test/PHPUnit/ControllerTestCase.php:172
Any ideas what the reason for that could be?
Is GGV_PATH_ROOT defined? I noticed that you're setting the controller
directory based on that information.
Also, can you do this as the first action in your test:
$this-fail(var_export($this-frontController-getControllerDirectory(),
1));
This will let you know if the front controller has set controller
directories for you prior to dispatching.
Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote:
-- Peter Wansch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Sunday, 31 August 2008, 04:19 PM -0700):
I wrote the following unit test case:
class Ggv_LoginTest extends Zend_Test_PHPUnit_ControllerTestCase
{
public $bootstrap = '/Library/WebServer/Documents/GGV/www/index.php';
public function testCallWithoutActionShouldPullFromIndexAction()
{
$this-dispatch('/');
$this-assertResponseCode(200);
}
public function testValidLoginShouldGoToIndexPage()
{
$this-request-setMethod('POST')
-setPost(array(
'user_name' = TESTS_LOGIN_NAME,
'user_password' = TESTS_LOGIN_PASSWORD
));
$this-dispatch('/GGV/www/user/login/');
$this-assertResponseCode(200);
}
}
The first test case that dispatches to '/' works. The second test case
that
dispatches to throws Zend_Controller_Exception: No default module defined
for this application. I use the same index.php bootstrap file for running
the application and testing the application. Here is a relevant excerpt:
defined('GGV_DISPATCH_FRONT_CONTROLLER') or
define('GGV_DISPATCH_FRONT_CONTROLLER', true);
// Set the session into the registry
Zend_Registry::set('session', $session);
// Set up the front controller and dispatch
$front = Zend_Controller_Front::getInstance();
$front-registerPlugin(new LoggerPlugin());
$front-throwExceptions(false);
$front-setControllerDirectory(GGV_PATH_ROOT .
'/application/controllers');
$front-setBaseUrl($config-www-baseurl);
if (GGV_DISPATCH_FRONT_CONTROLLER)
{
$front-dispatch();
}
the only difference is that in my test case I require_once a test
configuration PHP file that defines GGV_DISPATCH_FRONT_CONTROLLER to
false
as per the documentation the bootstrap file must not dispatch the front
controller. Unlike all the samples given, I don't use a Bootstrap class
or
callback in my testcase. It appears that Zend_Test does not use the
$front
controller I setup in my index.php but creates it's own which isn't
initialized and throws the error.
Well, Zend_Controller_Front is a singleton, so any instance of it is
going to be the same instance, regardless of where it is executed.
I have also experimented with adding a setUp
public function setUp()
{
// Execute any startup code here
I would define GGV_DISPATCH_FRONT_CONTROLLER right here, before calling
parent::setUp() to ensure that you don't accidently dispatch the
controller during bootstrapping.
parent::setUp();
}
method into my testcase and trying to set the
$this-frontController=$front
but the global variable that gets set in index.php is not available. What
am
I doing wrong here? Any help is appreciated.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Test_PHPUnit_ControllerTestCase-with-bootstrap-php-file-tp19247111p19249003.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] About improving ZF doc translation
Hi, Can you rapidly explain, the rules of the changes made? For example: - 80 columns - ... Because it's sometimes easier to make the changes directly in our language without comparing with english files. It's what I applied with the recent modifications (cutting rows after ![CDATA[ and before ]]). Mickael. Wil Sinclair a écrit : Do you mean the changes I'm making to the programlisting sections? If so, the formatting here is a bit more significant than the formatting in any other section. This is because no renderer (HTML, PDF, etc.) wraps this text- and they shouldn't either since that would just make the code unreadable. All the changes I'm making to the code are specifically so that it doesn't run off the page when rendered in a printable format like PDF. Going forward, if documentors were stricter about applying the '80 column' rule in the coding standards for docs, this would be less of an issue. On solution that we could consider is having all translations share code examples. This is somewhat tricky, since there is documentation in the code comments that is usually translated, too. I think we might be able to refactor some of these examples to move the documentation that is current in code comments out to the normal text, but there are certain cases where this can be very unwieldy and make the docs potentially more confusing. I don't won't to make translators jobs harder than they are already. :) Does anyone have any other suggestions? Does anyone think there is enough value in sharing examples across translations that we should try this? If so, I'd still have to figure out the means of doing this, but docbook has a simple include mechanism that should make it pretty easy if we decided to go in this direction. ,Wil Original Message- From: Jason Qi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 1:21 PM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] About improving ZF doc translation Hi All, Recently, we are experiencing a huge modification on the document formatting. Can we separate the formatting stuff from the documents(like what CSS does)? Thus, formatting stuffs are kept in one place and can apply to all languages, let our translators only focus on the translating job. Thanks. Jason.
[fw-general] Zend_Form_Element_File, file transfer and request.
Hi.
I have some form. in controller i have:
$form = new App_Form_UserDetails();
if ($this-_request-isPost()) {
if ($form-isValid($values)) {
$user-setUserBasic($values);
}
} else {
$form-populate($user-toForm($id));
}
$this-view-form = $form;
Where $user is my model. and $values = $this-_request-getPost();
$values = Array
(
[id] = 1
[name] = Paweł Chuchmała
)
I want to add some Zend_Form_Element_File, for example 'photo',
'pet_photo', 'some_other_photo', and get $vallueas like this:
$values = Array
(
[id] = 1
[name] = Paweł Chuchmała
[photo] = myphoto.jpg
[pet_photo] = mypet.png
[some_other_photo] = mysailingteam.jpg
)
How I can do this? Subclassing Zend_File_Transfer_Adapter_Http?
regards,
--
Paweł Chuchmała
pawel.chuchmala at gmail dot com
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Test_PHPUnit_ControllerTestCase with bootstrap php file
Problem solved thanks to you! So I added that first line as requested to both
testcases:
public function testCallWithoutActionShouldPullFromIndexAction()
{
$this-fail(var_export($this-frontController-getControllerDirectory(),
1));
$this-dispatch('/');
$this-assertResponseCode(200);
$this-assertAction('index');
$this-assertController('index');
}
public function testValidLoginShouldGoToIndexPage()
{
$this-fail(var_export($this-frontController-getControllerDirectory(),
1));
$this-request-setMethod('POST')
-setPost(array(
'user_name' = TESTS_LOGIN_NAME,
'user_password' = TESTS_LOGIN_PASSWORD
));
$this-dispatch('/GoGoVerde/www/user/login/');
$this-assertResponseCode(200);
$this-assertAction('index');
$this-assertController('index');
}
with this result:
There were 2 failures:
1) testCallWithoutActionShouldPullFromIndexAction(Ggv_LoginTest)
array (
'default' = '/Library/WebServer/Documents/GGV/application/controllers',
)
2) testValidLoginShouldGoToIndexPage(Ggv_LoginTest)
array (
)
for the second test case the controller directory was not defined as you
said. What had happened was
that most of my index.php is in a try catch:
try
{
$configEnv = new Zend_Config_Ini(GGV_PATH_ROOT . '/config/main.ini',
'bootstrap');
$config = new Zend_Config_Ini(GGV_PATH_ROOT . '/config/main.ini',
$configEnv-env);
Zend_Registry::set('config', $config);
defined('GGV_SCHEMA') or define('GGV_SCHEMA', $config-db-schema);
$db = Zend_Db::factory($config-db);
Zend_Db_Table_Abstract::setDefaultAdapter($db);
Zend_Registry::set('db', $db);
$configSession = new Zend_Config_Ini(GGV_PATH_ROOT .
'/config/session.ini', $configEnv-env);
Zend_Session::setOptions($configSession-toArray());
Zend_Session::start();
$session = new Zend_Session_Namespace('GoGoVerde');
Zend_Session::regenerateId();
if ($session-user_authenticated)
{
$session-setExpirationSeconds($config-session-expire);
}
Zend_Registry::set('session', $session);
$front = Zend_Controller_Front::getInstance();
$front-registerPlugin(new LoggerPlugin());
$front-throwExceptions(false);
$front-setControllerDirectory(GGV_PATH_ROOT .
'/application/controllers');
$front-setBaseUrl($config-www-baseurl);
if (GGV_DISPATCH_FRONT_CONTROLLER)
{
$front-dispatch();
}
}
to bring up an under maintenance page e.g. when the database is down and
an exception is thrown. The problem was that when the bootstrap ran for the
second test case the define('GGV_SCHEMA') had not been wrapped in a defined
or so it threw an exception. Once I changed that the testcase ran fine.
Thanks!!
Peter
Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote:
-- Peter Wansch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Sunday, 31 August 2008, 10:17 PM -0700):
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the explanation. I ensured that GGV_DISPATCH_CONTROLLER is set
to
false:
public function setUp()
{
// Execute any startup code here
defined('GOGOVERDE_DISPATCH_FRONT_CONTROLLER') or
define('GOGOVERDE_DISPATCH_FRONT_CONTROLLER', false);
parent::setUp();
}
right where you suggested I should define it. I still get the same error.
Here is the output from phpunit:
1) testValidLoginShouldGoToIndexPage(Ggv_LoginTest)
Zend_Controller_Exception: No default module defined for this application
/Library/WebServer/ZendFramework-1.6.0RC3/library/Zend/Controller/Dispatcher/Standard.php:211
/Library/WebServer/ZendFramework-1.6.0RC3/library/Zend/Controller/Dispatcher/Standard.php:245
/Library/WebServer/ZendFramework-1.6.0RC3/library/Zend/Controller/Front.php:946
/Library/WebServer/ZendFramework-1.6.0RC3/library/Zend/Test/PHPUnit/ControllerTestCase.php:172
Any ideas what the reason for that could be?
Is GGV_PATH_ROOT defined? I noticed that you're setting the controller
directory based on that information.
Also, can you do this as the first action in your test:
$this-fail(var_export($this-frontController-getControllerDirectory(),
1));
This will let you know if the front controller has set controller
directories for you prior to dispatching.
Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote:
-- Peter Wansch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Sunday, 31 August 2008, 04:19 PM -0700):
I wrote the following unit test case:
class Ggv_LoginTest extends Zend_Test_PHPUnit_ControllerTestCase
{
public $bootstrap =
'/Library/WebServer/Documents/GGV/www/index.php';
public function testCallWithoutActionShouldPullFromIndexAction()
{
$this-dispatch('/');
$this-assertResponseCode(200);
}
public function testValidLoginShouldGoToIndexPage()
{
$this-request-setMethod('POST')
-setPost(array(
'user_name' = TESTS_LOGIN_NAME,
[fw-general] Should Zend_Form::populate() accept $db-setFetchMode(Zend_Db::FETCH_OBJ) result?
version 1.6.0RC3
If you set the database adapter to return data as an array of objects and
then try to populate a form with a database result it will throw an error:
$db-setFetchMode(Zend_Db::FETCH_OBJ); // set fetch mode
$result = $db-fetchRow('...'); // get result
$form-populate($result); // populate
Catchable fatal error: Argument 1 passed to Zend_Form::populate() must be an
array, object given, ...
whereas, if you don't set the fetch mode to return objects it's fine.
I guess my question is, should the form be able to accept an array of
objects?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Should-Zend_Form%3A%3Apopulate%28%29-accept-%24db-%3EsetFetchMode%28Zend_Db%3A%3AFETCH_OBJ%29-result--tp19256956p19256956.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Paginator iterator how to handle 0 pages.
Hi,
I've created an issue for this:
http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-4151
This is a bug in the code. For now, unfortunately, checking the count prior
to entering the loop is the only solution.
Thanks,
-Matt
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Codiac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've been playing around with Zend_Paginator using the
Zend_Paginator_Adapter_Iterator. All went pretty good, until I passed
Zend_Paginator 0 items/pages. I get the following exception:
exception 'OutOfBoundsException' with message 'Seek position 0 is out of
range'
#0 [internal function]: ArrayIterator-seek(0)
Now this exception is not a suprise, after all..it's seeking 0. The
question I have is how to handle this exception? I use a foreach loop in my
view to iterate over each item in the paginator and that's what's causing
the exception:
foreach ($this-paginator as $item){}
Should I always check if there are 0 pages/items in the view and not start
the foreach loop? Doing so would require a check in each view to see if
there's 0 or more items/pages. I don't like that solution.
Are there better ways to handle this exception?
Regards, TJ.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Paginator-iterator-how-to-handle-0-pages.-tp19244562p19244562.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Paginator
Hi Simon, I agree with the last suggestion. However, with the first one, if you had default values set and then overrode them with specific values in the function call, there would be no way to get back to the default values unless you manually passed them in. Or am I interpreting what you said wrong? Thanks, -Matt On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 1:18 PM, SiCo007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just been using this for the first time today, can I suggest an improvement (subject to opinion obv!). When calling the view helper would it not be better to store the values passed to it for future use thus allowing you to echo the control again with the same settings without setting them again. If the attributes were set then it would over write those set and basically start again. I have extended the class to do this in my own framework and thought it might be useful, I like to have the paging controls at the top and the bottom. It would also be good if the view helper tried to detect the paginator instance in the view itself. The docs suggest calling it $view-paginator would it not make sense for the helper to use this by default unless another instance is supplied in the helper call? Therefore you get easy helper methods for reuse but retain the ability to use multiple instances with different displays. Otherwise it works very well. - Simon http://www.ajb007.co.uk/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Paginator-tp19245710p19245710.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Should Zend_Form::populate() accept $db-setFetchMode(Zend_Db::FETCH_OBJ) result?
-- gerardroche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Monday, 01 September 2008, 08:54 AM -0700):
version 1.6.0RC3
Actually, what you describe below is true of all released versions of
Zend_Form.
If you set the database adapter to return data as an array of objects and
then try to populate a form with a database result it will throw an error:
$db-setFetchMode(Zend_Db::FETCH_OBJ); // set fetch mode
$result = $db-fetchRow('...'); // get result
$form-populate($result); // populate
Catchable fatal error: Argument 1 passed to Zend_Form::populate() must be an
array, object given, ...
whereas, if you don't set the fetch mode to return objects it's fine.
I guess my question is, should the form be able to accept an array of
objects?
Right now, no; the current revisions only allow arrays. This simplifies
the interface and keeps it independent of object types. You can cast the
objects to arrays prior to passing them to populate() in the meantime.
However, feel free to file a feature request on the tracker.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Suggested code in documentation for Zend_Paginator partials - id to class.
That's completely valid. I've filed an issue for it. -Matt On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 7:50 AM, SiCo007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to suggest that in the documentation the code for the suggested paginaton techniques is changed slightly to make the id attribute in div id=paginationControl a class attribute instead... div class=paginationControl. Nothing major but people will be copying the code and it's best practice to have one id of said name per page, it's quite common however to display multiple paginators per page. Never sure whether to create an issue or post here as it's so trivial I figured I'd start here! - Simon http://www.ajb007.co.uk/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Suggested-code-in-documentation-for-Zend_Paginator-partials---id-to-class.-tp19255965p19255965.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Suggested code in documentation for Zend_Paginator partials - id to class.
Ah, I just realized that my statement could be misinterpreted. I meant that you raised a valid point. -Matt On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Matthew Ratzloff [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: That's completely valid. I've filed an issue for it. -Matt On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 7:50 AM, SiCo007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to suggest that in the documentation the code for the suggested paginaton techniques is changed slightly to make the id attribute in div id=paginationControl a class attribute instead... div class=paginationControl. Nothing major but people will be copying the code and it's best practice to have one id of said name per page, it's quite common however to display multiple paginators per page. Never sure whether to create an issue or post here as it's so trivial I figured I'd start here! - Simon http://www.ajb007.co.uk/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Suggested-code-in-documentation-for-Zend_Paginator-partials---id-to-class.-tp19255965p19255965.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form_Element_File, file transfer and request.
Hy Pawel,
Simply use multiple Form_Element_File's, one for each file, and assign the
returned filename to you custom array.
There is no need to subclass File_Transfer because it supports already
multiple files.
Greetings
Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader, Zend Framework
http://www.thomasweidner.com
- Original Message -
From: Paweł Chuchmała [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 4:41 PM
Subject: [fw-general] Zend_Form_Element_File, file transfer and request.
Hi.
I have some form. in controller i have:
$form = new App_Form_UserDetails();
if ($this-_request-isPost()) {
if ($form-isValid($values)) {
$user-setUserBasic($values);
}
} else {
$form-populate($user-toForm($id));
}
$this-view-form = $form;
Where $user is my model. and $values = $this-_request-getPost();
$values = Array
(
[id] = 1
[name] = Paweł Chuchmała
)
I want to add some Zend_Form_Element_File, for example 'photo',
'pet_photo', 'some_other_photo', and get $vallueas like this:
$values = Array
(
[id] = 1
[name] = Paweł Chuchmała
[photo] = myphoto.jpg
[pet_photo] = mypet.png
[some_other_photo] = mysailingteam.jpg
)
How I can do this? Subclassing Zend_File_Transfer_Adapter_Http?
regards,
--
Paweł Chuchmała
pawel.chuchmala at gmail dot com
[fw-general] FYI: new php framework benchmarks
Article: http://paul-m-jones.com/?p=315 For you lazies... framework | avg | rel --+--+ baseline-html | 2309.14 | 1.7487 baseline-php | 1320.47 | 1. cake-1.1.19 | 118.30 | 0.0896 cake-1.2.0-rc2| 46.42| 0.0352 solar-1.0.0alpha1 | 154.29 | 0.1168 symfony-1.0.17| 67.35| 0.0510 symfony-1.1.0 | 67.41| 0.0511 zend-1.0.1| 112.36 | 0.0851 zend-1.5.2| 86.23| 0.0653 zend-1.6.0-rc1| 77.85| 0.0590
Re: [fw-general] FYI: new php framework benchmarks
I wonder how ZF would perform stripped out of require_once. Anyone that did the stripping mind testing with the code hosted? On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Graham Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Article: http://paul-m-jones.com/?p=315 For you lazies... framework | avg | rel --+--+ baseline-html | 2309.14 | 1.7487 baseline-php | 1320.47 | 1. cake-1.1.19 | 118.30 | 0.0896 cake-1.2.0-rc2| 46.42| 0.0352 solar-1.0.0alpha1 | 154.29 | 0.1168 symfony-1.0.17| 67.35| 0.0510 symfony-1.1.0 | 67.41| 0.0511 zend-1.0.1| 112.36 | 0.0851 zend-1.5.2| 86.23| 0.0653 zend-1.6.0-rc1| 77.85| 0.0590
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Paginator
Matthew Ratzloff wrote:
However, with the first one, if you had default values set and then
overrode them with specific values in the function call, there would be
no way to get back to the default values unless you manually passed them
in. Or am I interpreting what you said wrong?
Good point, I hadn't considered that, maybe a way to set the default values
in the controller or statically into the paginator?
You can already do the following as per the docs:
Zend_Paginator::setDefaultScrollingStyle('Sliding');
Zend_View_Helper_PaginationControl::setDefaultViewPartial('my_pagination_control.phtml');
$paginator-setView($view);
But it's three different methods in two different classes to accomplish
something you could do in one place. Could the paginator not take the first
two options and any params you wish to send? Then the view helper can
retrieve these unless they are passed to the script and if nothing is passed
or set use the defaults?
This seems a better way round to my original idea anyway, but I think the
key would be the common interface into the paginator as from an ease of
learning point of view you don't want to have to put data in three different
places to activate one control.
$paginator-setScrollingStyle();
$paginator-setPartial();
$paginator-setView();
It's basically all there already anyway, both the paginator and the view
helper call each other from what I can see, so maybe I'm just being picky
but I won't back down ;)
In short a common interface to setup the pagination controls for the view
without having to actually remember the different bits to set in the
different classes.
Otherwise it's a brilliant addition to the framework and one of the easiest
to pick up and just use and so easy to implement custom adapters.
-
Simon
http://www.ajb007.co.uk/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Paginator-tp19245710p19258124.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Internationalization of Zend_Form
Hi, May be a stupid question ... but in the documentation they said to use Zend_Translate for intertionalization ... but in Gettext mode ... How can I make my .po file without any marker in the ini files of my Zend_Forms ?? And same question for Zend_Validator... Could you give a quick tip for this point ? Thanks, -- Hervé Piedvache Elma Ingénierie Informatique Groupe Maximiles S.A. 3 rue d'Uzès F-75002 - Paris - France Pho. 33-144949901 Fax. 33-144882747
Re: [fw-general] Internationalization of Zend_Form
I don't quite understand your question. But why do you not simply use ini files as translation when your source is already in ini format ? Greetings Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader, Zend Framework http://www.thomasweidner.com - Original Message - From: Hervé Piedvache [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 7:30 PM Subject: [fw-general] Internationalization of Zend_Form Hi, May be a stupid question ... but in the documentation they said to use Zend_Translate for intertionalization ... but in Gettext mode ... How can I make my .po file without any marker in the ini files of my Zend_Forms ?? And same question for Zend_Validator... Could you give a quick tip for this point ? Thanks, -- Hervé Piedvache Elma Ingénierie Informatique Groupe Maximiles S.A. 3 rue d'Uzès F-75002 - Paris - France Pho. 33-144949901 Fax. 33-144882747
Re: [fw-general] FYI: new php framework benchmarks
On 1 Sep 2008, at 18:09, Christopher Östlund wrote: I wonder how ZF would perform stripped out of require_once. Anyone that did the stripping mind testing with the code hosted? Why would that make a difference? They fixed the require_once speed issue in 5.2.0, didn't they? Regards, Rob...
Re: [fw-general] Zend Framework Freelancers
Hello, I am bidding at GAF (www.getafreelancer.com) :) Thanks. Sam Davey wrote: Hi, I realise this probably isn't the right place to investigate freelancers but I just wanted to get the opinion of the community. I made the decision earlier this year (once v 1.5 was released) to re-write the frontend of our website using the framework. The main aim was to have something in place that is supported by online documentation, an online community and would enable me to outsouce small projects as they would be based on a more standard platform. This process is now complete... but looking on the likes of www.elance.com there a very few jobs that mention the framework. * Does anyone know of the best place to advertise these types of small jobs which are suitable for outsourcing? For example I'm having great difficulty getting Zend_Search_Lucene to produce good results for an ecommerce product search simply because many of the prodcuts we sell have oddly formatted names such as r09 or c 214. I'd MUCH rather have someone experienced with Zend_Search_Lucene complete the project rather than me tinker with it indefinatley to get the results I want. Does anyone have any suggestions/recommendations as to where best advertise this type of work? Cheers, Sam -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend-Framework-Freelancers-tp19219464p19259000.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Internationalization of Zend_Form
Hi,
If you are referring to translate error messages and stuff like that, all
you need to do is define a Zend_Translate instance in the Zend_Registry
Something like this
Zend_Registry::set('Zend_Translate', $translate);
Where $translate is the Zend_Translate instance
Regards,
Hervé Piedvache-2 wrote:
Hi,
May be a stupid question ... but in the documentation they said to use
Zend_Translate for intertionalization ... but in Gettext mode ... How can
I
make my .po file without any marker in the ini files of my Zend_Forms ??
And same question for Zend_Validator...
Could you give a quick tip for this point ?
Thanks,
--
Hervé Piedvache
Elma Ingénierie Informatique
Groupe Maximiles S.A.
3 rue d'Uzès
F-75002 - Paris - France
Pho. 33-144949901
Fax. 33-144882747
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Internationalization-of-Zend_Form-tp19258216p19259039.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] About improving ZF doc translation
Please see my comments inline. Regards, Jason. --- On Mon, 9/1/08, mikaelkael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: mikaelkael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [fw-general] About improving ZF doc translation To: Wil Sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED], fw-general@lists.zend.com Date: Monday, September 1, 2008, 1:48 AM But translators should consider waiting a little while before applying these formatting changes : it's what I think :-) ** How to schedule this kind of job? * . For the consistency of the documentation, following the example of the code of the ZF, we can add a light script of tests to check: line length, presence of a \n at the good place, respect of code conventions... *** I agree that we need some tools to do the documents check for some purposes (like fixing formatting probelm)as we human are more likely to forget some of them or to make some typos on that. *** Mickael. Wil Sinclair a écrit : I kept it right around 70 columns, mainly because the code started moving off the printable page and it would have been hard to read in a smaller font. But translators should consider waiting a little while before applying these formatting changes, unless you'd like to render your docs in PDF now, that is. I will be looking through all the docs and making them consistent style-wise very soon after 1.6, and I will have to make changes to the code listings at that time as well. I apologize for all the changes. As some of you may ** I am glad to see our documents has been greatly improved. Everybody should thank you for the changes.I did know some complaints on the examples within ZF documents long time ago. And also I think it should be a chance to let us to re think how to do the documents(and translating) more efficiently and accurately. I believe some similar changes will be happening somethings in the future. That's why I am thinking we provide Zend_Translate as a component of ZF to others to facilitate their development, why don't we make use of it? ** have noticed, while the content is typically good and consistently thorough, the writing styles, code conventions, and formatting can differ widely from one section to the next on the master English document. It has been livable up to now, but really comes out when you render the ref guide in a single document. The changes I have been making and plan to make were chosen in part because they shouldn't impact translations that much. I think we should talk about methods by which we can start sharing examples and figures as a partial solution to this problem if the translators feel that they have to be consistent even with code formatting in the translations. ,Wil
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Acl - How to model large ACL?
Hi Stefan, take a look to my other proposal, might help, http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend_Acl+dynamic+loading+-+Aldemar+Bernal Aldemar - Original Message - From: Stefan Gehrig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 7:30 AM Subject: AW: [fw-general] Zend_Acl - How to model large ACL? Hi Aldemar, thanks for your reply. I had a closer look on your proposal and the articles and it's quite useful but does not really fit into my problem (due to design issues). I already came to a solution and I'm now dynamically building selective ACLs for every user instead of building one large complete ACL. Thanks again and best regards Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Aldemar Bernal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 29. August 2008 17:00 An: fw-general@lists.zend.com Betreff: Re: [fw-general] Zend_Acl - How to model large ACL? Hi, maybe these article can give you a light, this proposal code is avalible in the svn laboratory http://devzone.zend.com/article/3509-Zend_Acl-and-MVC-Integration-Part-I-Bas ic-Use http://devzone.zend.com/article/3510-Zend_Acl-and-MVC-Integration-Part-II-Ad vanced-Use hope it helps, Aldemar - Original Message - From: Stefan Gehrig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'David Toniolo' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 9:26 AM Subject: AW: [fw-general] Zend_Acl - How to model large ACL? Hi David, thanks a lot for your reply. I'll answer you in a separate email in German ;-) Best regards Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: David Toniolo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 29. August 2008 13:58 An: fw-general@lists.zend.com Betreff: Re: [fw-general] Zend_Acl - How to model large ACL? hi stefan, your name sounds German, so maybe you want to post your topic on zfforum.de, too. I think you have too much roles, maybe it is possible to reduce them to round about 100 roles, with inheritance and some optimization on the structure. To say more about this, i have to know the concrete role names, etc. Your requirements are ok to use Zend_Acl, except the roles. You need some Assertions, for example to implement only editing own entities and stuff like that. So far so good. In German i could write pretty much more, but my English is too bad so i better stop here. ;) greets david Stefan Gehrig wrote: Dear all, I'm working on a organization-wide address management system based on the Zend Framework. Currently I'm struggling with implementing an access-control-system that satisfies our needs. One option would be to model the whole ACL with Zend_Acl, but I have no experience with Zend_Acl and I do not know if Zend_Acl is intended to manage ACLs of this size and type. Please let me explain what I'm talking about: We'll have the following model entities: - organizations (120+) each with - organizational roles (5 - 10 per organization) - organizational persons (5 - 10 per organization) That's about 1800 entities. Each person can have multiple roles, so we have a 1:n relationship between persons and roles. Simultaneously we have about 18 regional authorities with 1 to 3 user each and the federal authority with about 20 users, of with 5 are super-users and 15 have limited access rights to the respective organizations they manage. The access-control-system must ensure that - everyone (including guests) may view everything - each organizational person must be able to edit his own entity. He/she must not be able to delete his entity or create new entities. - the special organizational role Office must be able to edit all entities of its organization, it also can create and delete entities from within its organization. It must not however create new organizations or delete its organization. - the members of our regional authorities shall be able to edit organizations within their scope, they may also create and delete entities within these organizations. They may also delete organizations in their scope and create new organizations within their scope. The scope is determined by an attribute of the organization model class. - the 15 clerks within the federal authority must be able to edit organizations and their entities within their scope. They can create and delete entities from within these organizations but they cannot create or delete whole organizations. The scope is determined by an attribute of the organization model class. - the 5 super-user of the federal authority must be able to do everything. So far so good... If I try to model this with Zend_Acl I'd identify the following elements: - 4 privileges (view, edit, delete, create) - 1800 resources (120+ organizations with 5-10 persons and roles each. - 1834 roles (900 organizational roles, 900 organizational persons (membership can be modeled by using Zend_Acl's multiple role inheritance), 18 regional authorities, 1 federal authority super-user-role, 15 federal authority scopes) Has
[fw-general] Zend_Form and custom html code
Hello there,
I'm new on this list, and in Zend Framework.
I'm looking to the forms, here is what I want:
form ... action=/search/list
div class=formlabellabel for=lastname class=label
optionallastname/label/div
div class=formfieldinput type=text name=lastname
id=lastname value=Smith/div
div class=formsubmitinput type=submit name=searc id=searc
value=Search/div
/form
here is my code:
$form = new Zend_Form();
$form-setMethod('post');
$form-setAction('/search/list');
$lastname = new Zend_Form_Element_Text('lastname', array('label' =
'lastname', 'value' = 'Smith'));
$lastname-addDecorator('HtmlTag', array('tag' = 'div', 'class' =
'formfield'));
$lastname-addDecorator('Label', array('tag' = 'div', 'class' = 'formlabel'));
$submit = new Zend_Form_Element_Submit('search', array('label' =
'Search', 'value' = 'Search'));
$submit-addDecorator('HtmlTag', array('tag' = 'div', 'class' =
'formsubmit'));
$submit-removeDecorator('Label');
$form-addElements(array($lastname, $submit));
$form-submit-removeDecorator('Label');
$this-view-form = $form;
but I get this output:
form ... action=/search/listdl class=zend_form
divlabel for=lastname class=formlabel optionallastname/label/div
div class=formfield
input type=text name=lastname id=lastname value=Smith/div
div class=formfielddtnbsp;/dtdd
input type=submit name=search id=search
value=Search/dd/div/dl/form
so, I _do_ leave label tags, dt and dd tags (at submit element
too), and I want to put the submit button to _one_ html tag (at submit
element).
Please somebody point me what I miss? I'm confused...
Thanks:
airween
Re: [fw-general] FYI: new php framework benchmarks
-- Graham Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Monday, 01 September 2008, 07:06 PM +0200): Article: http://paul-m-jones.com/?p=315 For you lazies... framework | avg | rel --+--+ baseline-html | 2309.14 | 1.7487 baseline-php | 1320.47 | 1. cake-1.1.19 | 118.30 | 0.0896 cake-1.2.0-rc2| 46.42| 0.0352 solar-1.0.0alpha1 | 154.29 | 0.1168 symfony-1.0.17| 67.35| 0.0510 symfony-1.1.0 | 67.41| 0.0511 zend-1.0.1| 112.36 | 0.0851 zend-1.5.2| 86.23| 0.0653 zend-1.6.0-rc1| 77.85| 0.0590 Also, please remember that these are done without any caching -- opcode or content. They are meant as baseline comparisons only -- what is the base performance of each given framework. Just for those who aren't regulars on the list, we are planning a performance audit of ZF for 1.7.0, so hopefully the decreases seen over time will turn around for you. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] FYI: new php framework benchmarks
It would be good to get some DB table benchmarks in there. I found Zend_Db_Table_Abstract() to be the slowest piece of all the components I've used. So much so, I've pretty much vowed off it, using Zend_Db_Select(), until things can improve. --- Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gpcentre.net/ On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Graham Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Article: http://paul-m-jones.com/?p=315 For you lazies... framework | avg | rel --+--+ baseline-html | 2309.14 | 1.7487 baseline-php | 1320.47 | 1. cake-1.1.19 | 118.30 | 0.0896 cake-1.2.0-rc2| 46.42| 0.0352 solar-1.0.0alpha1 | 154.29 | 0.1168 symfony-1.0.17| 67.35| 0.0510 symfony-1.1.0 | 67.41| 0.0511 zend-1.0.1| 112.36 | 0.0851 zend-1.5.2| 86.23| 0.0653 zend-1.6.0-rc1| 77.85| 0.0590
Re: [fw-general] FYI: new php framework benchmarks
Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote: Also, please remember that these are done without any caching -- opcode or content. They are meant as baseline comparisons only -- what is the base performance of each given framework. Just for those who aren't regulars on the list, we are planning a performance audit of ZF for 1.7.0, so hopefully the decreases seen over time will turn around for you. IMO tests done without opcode caching are useless. Anyway, this only shows that some frameworks are better optimized to display hello world than others. Now all hello world developers can rejoice and switch to solar, we should be happy for them. Sarcasm aside, I'm sure most people here will agree that there's more to a framework than baseline performance and those benchmarks just give people the wrong ideas. There will be plenty of chances to improve ZF performance, but so far focus seemed to be on adding features. Just keep up the good work. Karol -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FYI%3A-new-php-framework-benchmarks-tp19257910p19262039.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] FYI: new php framework benchmarks
Wil Sinclair wrote: I agree with you entirely. One of the goals that we hope to accomplish with our performance audit is authoring a 'performance guide' as an appendix to the manual. We could add a section about performance testing that focuses PHP developers on how to properly test performance, what the numbers mean, and if they should be worrying about it in the first place. Maybe you could help us out with some of the content. :) ,Wil Another aspect should be used in perfs measurement. The learning curve, the quality of the docs ( speed to find explanation and good concrete samples of codes with their tests attached to them :-) Quality and constancy of the code. Tests coverage. I'm really enjoy about the review about perfs audit. Will keep my email, I'm really interested to help a bit with this part. -Original Message- From: Karol Grecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 4:19 PM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: Re: [fw-general] FYI: new php framework benchmarks Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote: Also, please remember that these are done without any caching -- opcode or content. They are meant as baseline comparisons only -- what is the base performance of each given framework. Just for those who aren't regulars on the list, we are planning a performance audit of ZF for 1.7.0, so hopefully the decreases seen over time will turn around for you. IMO tests done without opcode caching are useless. Anyway, this only shows that some frameworks are better optimized to display hello world than others. Now all hello world developers can rejoice and switch to solar, we should be happy for them. Sarcasm aside, I'm sure most people here will agree that there's more to a framework than baseline performance and those benchmarks just give people the wrong ideas. There will be plenty of chances to improve ZF performance, but so far focus seemed to be on adding features. Just keep up the good work. Karol -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FYI%3A-new-php- framework-benchmarks-tp19257910p19262039.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl 2830 Vellerat - Switzerland Tél : ++41 32 435 7171 Fax : ++41 32 435 7172 gsm : ++41 78 802 6760 www.ioda-net.ch Centre de Formation et de Coaching En Ligne www.cfcel.com
