[fw-general] Zend_Search_Lucene searching by URL (field Keyword)
Hi all, I'm currently having problem with indexing my website with Zend_Search_Lucene. Hope someone could help me out. I am able to properly create an index and add all relevant documents. I add Keyword field that contains url of the document to be able to find it later for update. And this is the problem: when i fire up the query for url field ('url:http\://www.example.com') i get no hits. The index seems to be OK as I browse it using Luke (Java Lucene Index Toolbox), also the query works and I get wanted result. The code is following: $doc = Zend_Search_Lucene_Document_Html::loadHTML($response_html); $doc->addField(Zend_Search_Lucene_Field::Keyword('url', $url)); $doc->addField(Zend_Search_Lucene_Field::Text('md5', md5($response_html))); $index->addDocument($doc); ... ... Zend_Search_Lucene::setDefaultSearchField('url'); $q = 'url:http\://www.example.net/'; $hits = $index->find($q); foreach ($hits as $hit) { echo 'Hit! '.$hit->id."\n"; } Thanks for every idea. JB
[fw-general] Zend_form Action Redirect
Hi All, I have developed one form containing one text box and check box and submit button if i checked the check box and clicked on submit i want to redirect it on another action and when the checkbox remains unchecked and by clicking on submit button the value of text box should be accessed within isPost() of same action How can i do that? thanks in advance for your valuable answer Regards Rohit -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_form-Action-Redirect-tp19529644p19529644.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Figlet Letter F
Hi, Client complains about Figlet Letter F being unreadable. I edited it to: _# | ___|| # | ||_ # | _||# | || # `-` # ## The stalk is a little short looking, but much easier to read IMO than: __ # /_// # ` ` # /___// # `__ `# /_// # `-` ## Or was this F meant to look like the ZF logo ? ;-) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Figlet-Letter-F-tp19529662p19529662.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Lucene Utf8/Utf8_CaseInsensitive Question
Hi, i've a little question concerning queries. There are two files, one for the index creation and one for the search. I used the Utf8_CaseInsensitive-Analyzer in both files and tried to search something with the Query Parser and with the Query-API. I think i've build the same query with both ways, but got different results: // file1: create index: setlocale(LC_ALL,'de_AT.UTF-8'); ... Zend_Search_Lucene_Analysis_Analyzer::setDefault( new Zend_Search_Lucene_Analysis_Analyzer_Common_Utf8_CaseInsensitive()); ... $index = Zend_Search_Lucene::create('testindex/myindex'); ... // add doc $doc = new Zend_Search_Lucene_Document(); ... $doc->addField(Zend_Search_Lucene_Field::Text('afield', 'test Vienna Wien Βιέννη Беч Вена')); ... $index->addDocument($doc); ... $index->commit(); // file2: search setlocale(LC_ALL,'de_AT.UTF-8'); ... Zend_Search_Lucene_Analysis_Analyzer::setDefault( new Zend_Search_Lucene_Analysis_Analyzer_Common_Utf8_CaseInsensitive()); Zend_Search_Lucene_Search_QueryParser::setDefaultEncoding('utf-8'); ... $index = Zend_Search_Lucene::open('testindex/myindex'); // search with query parser: $query1 = Zend_Search_Lucene_Search_QueryParser::parse('afield:Vie*'); // < hit $query1 = Zend_Search_Lucene_Search_QueryParser::parse('afield:vie*'); // < hit $query2 = Zend_Search_Lucene_Search_QueryParser::parse('afield:Tes*'); // < hit ... $hits = $index->find($queryX); ... // search with query-api: $term = new Zend_Search_Lucene_Index_Term('Vie*', 'afield'); // < no hit $query1 = new Zend_Search_Lucene_Search_Query_Wildcard($term); $term = new Zend_Search_Lucene_Index_Term('vie*', 'afield'); // < hit $query1 = new Zend_Search_Lucene_Search_Query_Wildcard($term); $term = new Zend_Search_Lucene_Index_Term('Tes*', 'afield'); // < no hit $query1 = new Zend_Search_Lucene_Search_Query_Wildcard($term); ... $hits = $index->find($queryX); ... I think that the QueryParser uses strtolower and the API not. Of course if i use $term = new Zend_Search_Lucene_Index_Term(mb_strtolower('Vie*'), 'afield'); every query gets a hit. For me it would be logical if i need not to use strtolower and it will be done automatically (like with QueryParser), so for example i could change the analyzer to case-sensitive and it wouldn't make a difference. And my last question: Did i misunderstand something or did i use the Query-API wrong? ;) thx Stefan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-Utf8-Utf8_CaseInsensitive-Question-tp19532087p19532087.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form generated checkbox field
Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote: > > -- Aldemar Bernal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > (on Tuesday, 08 April 2008, 05:47 AM -0500): >> just curious, doesn't Zend_Form create a hidden element with value 0 for >> the >> checkbox field? > > No. The Checkbox element itself is "smart" enough to determine if the > value was set, and will return either the "checkedValue" or > "uncheckedValue" appropriately. > > These values are 1 and 0 by default, respectively, and you can set them > using the keys as specified above, or using their accessors > (setCheckedValue() and setUncheckedValue()). If no value is provided > for the checkbox, the value of the element will be the uncheckedValue; > if the value is the same as the checkedValue, that will be used. > Ok, this post is a little old (from April) but I've got a question, what's the whole point of this hidden element being added with a checkbox element? This is new to me all around and I was a little surprised and confused as to why this is being added. I'm just not sure why (INI config file): project.form.drivers.elements.businessinnov.type = "checkbox" produces (HTML): Thanks! Fozzy -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Form-generated-checkbox-field-tp16560973p19533820.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form generated checkbox field
Hi fozzyuw, That's because if the checkbox is not checked and no hidden has been added to the form, once you retrieve checkbox value it will give you an error, since when it is uncheck it just doesn't send that post value of the form. To 'fix' this, you must create a hidden element with the same name before the checkbox, that way, even if the checkbox is unchecked a value is passed to the form. Greetings, Aldemar - Original Message - From: "fozzyuw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 9:48 AM Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form generated checkbox field Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote: -- Aldemar Bernal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Tuesday, 08 April 2008, 05:47 AM -0500): just curious, doesn't Zend_Form create a hidden element with value 0 for the checkbox field? No. The Checkbox element itself is "smart" enough to determine if the value was set, and will return either the "checkedValue" or "uncheckedValue" appropriately. These values are 1 and 0 by default, respectively, and you can set them using the keys as specified above, or using their accessors (setCheckedValue() and setUncheckedValue()). If no value is provided for the checkbox, the value of the element will be the uncheckedValue; if the value is the same as the checkedValue, that will be used. Ok, this post is a little old (from April) but I've got a question, what's the whole point of this hidden element being added with a checkbox element? This is new to me all around and I was a little surprised and confused as to why this is being added. I'm just not sure why (INI config file): project.form.drivers.elements.businessinnov.type = "checkbox" produces (HTML): Thanks! Fozzy -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Form-generated-checkbox-field-tp16560973p19533820.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] zend dojo text area- how that work?
Thanks Themodem. Does anyone knows if Zend FW team will make some solution for this? Themodem wrote: > > Howdy, it appears to be a bug with Firefox 3 and the tag > > > http://dojotoolkit.org/forum/dijit-dijit-0-9/dijit-support/dijit-form-textarea-firefox3-enter-key-does-not-work > http://dojotoolkit.org/forum/dijit-dijit-0-9/dijit-support/dijit-form-textarea-firefox3-enter-key-does-not-work > > > > vladimirn wrote: >> >> I need just a simple text area where you can type : >> First row in text area (i would like to press Enter here and to type in >> next row) >> Next row here[Enter] >> And so on.. >> >> Well when i press Enter key within Zend Dojo textarea field, nothing >> happens, and you can type forever, no way to make a new row pressing >> Enter.. I cant find the way to have a simple textarea field. >> >> How to make this? >> >> Thanks, >> V >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/zend-dojo-text-area--how-that-work--tp19498776p19534258.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Checkbox and Dojo_foRM validation, please help if anyone know how
Anyone? :( vladimirn wrote: > > Hello all, > is anyone here able to help about form validation please? > After pressing submit button expected behaviour is stopping form > submission if checkbox is not checked. > > I have a bunch of stuffs in my form. > So far, checkbox validation wont work. > $agreements->addElement ( 'CheckBox', 'ages', array ('required' => true, > 'label' => 'I\'m Over 18 years old') ) > > Submit button: > $footer->addElement ( 'SubmitButton', 'submit', array ('label' => > 'Submit!','style'=>'clear:both' ) ); > > view script: > dojo()->javascriptCaptureStart() ?> > function validateForm() { > var form = dijit.byId("signup"); > if (!form.validate()) { > alert("Invalid form"); > return false; > } > return true; > } > dojo()->javascriptCaptureEnd() ?> > dojo()->onLoadCaptureStart() ?> > function () { > dojo.connect(dijit.byId("signup"), "onSubmit", "validateForm"); > } > dojo()->onLoadCaptureEnd() ?> > > > form ?> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Checkbox-and-Dojo_foRM-validation%2C-please-help-if-anyone-know-how-tp19512338p19534303.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] zend dojo text area- how that work?
The would depend on the problem. If its a ZF Problem then i would expect so. Id its a Dojo problem then we will have to wait for the next release of ZF and hope the updated dojo that is released with it will be fixed. If its a problem with Firefox then we will have to wait for a firefox update vladimirn wrote: > > Thanks Themodem. > Does anyone knows if Zend FW team will make some solution for this? > > > Themodem wrote: >> >> Howdy, it appears to be a bug with Firefox 3 and the tag >> >> >> http://dojotoolkit.org/forum/dijit-dijit-0-9/dijit-support/dijit-form-textarea-firefox3-enter-key-does-not-work >> http://dojotoolkit.org/forum/dijit-dijit-0-9/dijit-support/dijit-form-textarea-firefox3-enter-key-does-not-work >> >> >> >> vladimirn wrote: >>> >>> I need just a simple text area where you can type : >>> First row in text area (i would like to press Enter here and to type in >>> next row) >>> Next row here[Enter] >>> And so on.. >>> >>> Well when i press Enter key within Zend Dojo textarea field, nothing >>> happens, and you can type forever, no way to make a new row pressing >>> Enter.. I cant find the way to have a simple textarea field. >>> >>> How to make this? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> V >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/zend-dojo-text-area--how-that-work--tp19498776p19534360.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form generated checkbox field
Aldemar Bernal-2 wrote: > > Hi fozzyuw, > > That's because if the checkbox is not checked and no hidden has been added > to the form, once you retrieve checkbox value it will give you an error, > since when it is uncheck it just doesn't send that post value of the form. > To 'fix' this, you must create a hidden element with the same name before > the checkbox, that way, even if the checkbox is unchecked a value is > passed > to the form. > > Greetings, > > Aldemar Ah! Thanks very much Aldemar. That makes perfect sense now. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Form-generated-checkbox-field-tp16560973p19534466.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Question about Quickstart tutorial
Hi Ralph, Thank you very much for pointing me to the alternate option. It works great. I only have to change the autoincrement part to work with mysql. I do have a couple more questions: 1. Since I work in Plesk with very limited permission, I cannot change the web server's document root and I cannot add folder in the same level as the httpsdoc folder either, so for this tutorial I have my project setup as following: httpsdoc public library application views I also change the .htaccess to route requests to /public/index.php. It works for now, but as you points out in the tutorial, for security, I would like to have this settings for real application: private library application views httpsdoc- public Is the bootstrap.php is the place I need to change to accomodate this? Is there a way to couple the folder structure with the framework flexibly? 2. Will the tutorial contain authentication parts? Thanks, springgrass ps: The tutorial's code sample doesn't render well in ie7. Look great in firefox. Thank you for a wonderful tutorial. Ralph Schindler-2 wrote: > > While I have not tried it, you should be able to load the sql files > located > in the scripts directory into mysql via the phpmyadmin in the plesk > control > panel. > > You will also have to alter the config script to be able to connect to > this > database, and it would look something like this: > > database.adapter = "PDO_MYSQL" > database.params.dbname = "your_db_name" > database.params.username = "your_db_username" > database.params.password = "your_db_password" > > I will add some notes on this somewhere within the application by the end > of > the week. > > -ralph > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-Quickstart-tutorial-tp19286689p19534651.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: [fw-general] Zend_form Action Redirect
I may not be fully understanding your request, but it seems you could do something like the following in your action (the one the form's posting to): if ( $this->getRequest()->isPost() && 'valueOfChecboxWhenChecked' == $this->_request->getParam( 'nameOfCheckBox' ) ) { $this->_redirect( 'controllerWantToGoTo/actionWantToGoTo' ); } else { $data = $this->_request->getPost(); // or whatever else you want to do with the data } Jeremy Brown Senior Web Developer Spear One 972.661.6038 www.spearone.com -Original Message- From: Rohit83 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 6:16 AM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] Zend_form Action Redirect Hi All, I have developed one form containing one text box and check box and submit button if i checked the check box and clicked on submit i want to redirect it on another action and when the checkbox remains unchecked and by clicking on submit button the value of text box should be accessed within isPost() of same action How can i do that? thanks in advance for your valuable answer Regards Rohit -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_form-Action-Redirect-tp19529644p19529644.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???
-- mothmenace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Tuesday, 16 September 2008, 12:53 PM -0700): > > Just wanted to add another vote for jQuery, I started JS frameworks with > Prototype, found jQuery a little hard to get my head around at first but now > it's clearly the leading js-f. Not sure exactly how jQuery would be > integrated with zf, it's more a case of writing some specific jQuery plugins > I think, like giving js access to request / baseUrl. There is already a proposal that's been accepted, and you can see the code as it stands in the extras incubator. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???
-- S. Alexandre M. Lemaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Tuesday, 16 September 2008, 01:29 PM -0400): > When we last used Dojo, it would load things 'on demand'; meaning that if > you were to request a certain dojo.* package during usage, it would > dynamically load the package into the mix. The result was a LARGE number of > IO calls solely for loading, this caused great startup delays, and very a > high amount of overhead during routine instantiation (during the > initialization process). > > Does Dojo still behave this way? Does it offer any kind of 'roll your own' > like Ext does with JSBuilder so that you can foresee inclusions and reduce > during-operation IO overhead? As somebody else noted, Dojo has a custom build tool that you can use to compile, minify, and compress your JS requires into a single file. I've used this extensively, and the performance is incredible. If you use Dojo, this is the recommended practice when deploying your application. > Not that I would ever convert back to Dojo from ExtJS (which by all means, I > am a zealous fanatic of), but I am curious to read about Dojo's progress. > > How is CometD shaping up? Incredibly well. :) Stas Malyshev and I have done demos of it, creating a PHPUnit test runner. The (Bayeux) protocol is mature and the implementation in Dojo stellar. > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Weier O'Phinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:10 PM > To: fw-general@lists.zend.com > Subject: Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All??? > > -- valugi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > (on Tuesday, 16 September 2008, 02:41 AM -0700): > > Since now I was also using jQuery and decided to give a try to Dojo since > > it's part of the ZF. > > Doing simple things like an ajax request and fill some data into a table > are > > incredible complex in Dojo. > > I beg to differ here. dojo.data via Zend_Dojo_Data is two lines of code, > and the view script to handle it is approximately 10 lines of primarily > HTML using dojox.Grid. > > > Also the vocabulary changes pretty much. > > Which vocabulary? jquery vs Dojo? Of course -- they're different > frameworks. There will always be a learning curve when you switch > frameworks. > > > I guess with all this complexity come a lot of other goodies... or > > maybe I am wrong. But for now is experimenting time for me. > > Dojo can be as simple or as complex as you want. However, there were > many reasons we chose to use Dojo; for more information, please see > > http://framework.zend.com/announcements/2008-09-03-dojo > > for more details. Basically, when it comes down to all the points of > integration we wanted to be able to offer, Dojo was the only toolkit > that offerred benefits in all areas. The ability to have rapid modular > development, yet still have scalable approaches for production > environments, the breadth of offering in Dojo, the development process > and community surrounding Dojo, the support and driving of web > standards, etc. were simply unparalleled elsewhere. > > The fact of the matter is this is "a done deal." But we're also saying > that we realize that choice in JS toolkits is similar to choice in PHP > frameworks -- and we are encouraging contributors to provide additional > layers via the Extras repository. A jQuery component is already well > underway, and checked in to the Extras incubator. > > Let's stop these threads, please. > > -- > Matthew Weier O'Phinney > Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/ > -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Figlet Letter F
-- mothmenace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Wednesday, 17 September 2008, 04:42 AM -0700): > Client complains about Figlet Letter F being unreadable. I edited it to: > > _# > | ___|| # > | ||_ # > | _||# > | || # > `-` # > ## > > The stalk is a little short looking, but much easier to read IMO than: > > __ # > /_// # > ` ` # > /___// # > `__ `# > /_// # > `-` ## > > Or was this F meant to look like the ZF logo ? ;-) That was indeed the intention. ;) -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Checkbox and Dojo_foRM validation, please help if anyone know how
-- vladimirn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Wednesday, 17 September 2008, 08:11 AM -0700): > > Anyone? :( Sorry, a lot of us are at ZendCon this week. ;) > > > vladimirn wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > is anyone here able to help about form validation please? > > After pressing submit button expected behaviour is stopping form > > submission if checkbox is not checked. > > > > I have a bunch of stuffs in my form. > > So far, checkbox validation wont work. > > $agreements->addElement ( 'CheckBox', 'ages', array ('required' => true, > > 'label' => 'I\'m Over 18 years old') ) > > > > Submit button: > > $footer->addElement ( 'SubmitButton', 'submit', array ('label' => > > 'Submit!','style'=>'clear:both' ) ); > > > > view script: > > dojo()->javascriptCaptureStart() ?> > > function validateForm() { > > var form = dijit.byId("signup"); > > if (!form.validate()) { > > alert("Invalid form"); > > return false; > > } > > return true; > > } > > dojo()->javascriptCaptureEnd() ?> > > dojo()->onLoadCaptureStart() ?> > > function () { > > dojo.connect(dijit.byId("signup"), "onSubmit", "validateForm"); > > } > > dojo()->onLoadCaptureEnd() ?> > > > > > > form ?> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Checkbox-and-Dojo_foRM-validation%2C-please-help-if-anyone-know-how-tp19512338p19534303.html > Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Checkbox and Dojo_foRM validation, please help if anyone know how
Ah :) I would like i am there :) Have a nice time :) Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote: > > -- vladimirn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > (on Wednesday, 17 September 2008, 08:11 AM -0700): >> >> Anyone? :( > > Sorry, a lot of us are at ZendCon this week. ;) > >> >> >> vladimirn wrote: >> > >> > Hello all, >> > is anyone here able to help about form validation please? >> > After pressing submit button expected behaviour is stopping form >> > submission if checkbox is not checked. >> > >> > I have a bunch of stuffs in my form. >> > So far, checkbox validation wont work. >> > $agreements->addElement ( 'CheckBox', 'ages', array ('required' => >> true, >> > 'label' => 'I\'m Over 18 years old') ) >> > >> > Submit button: >> > $footer->addElement ( 'SubmitButton', 'submit', array ('label' => >> > 'Submit!','style'=>'clear:both' ) ); >> > >> > view script: >> > dojo()->javascriptCaptureStart() ?> >> > function validateForm() { >> > var form = dijit.byId("signup"); >> > if (!form.validate()) { >> > alert("Invalid form"); >> > return false; >> > } >> > return true; >> > } >> > dojo()->javascriptCaptureEnd() ?> >> > dojo()->onLoadCaptureStart() ?> >> > function () { >> > dojo.connect(dijit.byId("signup"), "onSubmit", "validateForm"); >> > } >> > dojo()->onLoadCaptureEnd() ?> >> > >> > >> > form ?> >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Checkbox-and-Dojo_foRM-validation%2C-please-help-if-anyone-know-how-tp19512338p19534303.html >> Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > -- > Matthew Weier O'Phinney > Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Checkbox-and-Dojo_foRM-validation%2C-please-help-if-anyone-know-how-tp19512338p19536978.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] gpc magic quotes & zend db
I was caught out by $row->save(); adding extra slashes to my db fields, due to magic_quotes_gpc being on. I understand the correct solution is to turn off gpc_quotes? (I chose: php_flag magic_quotes_gpc Off in an .htaccess) However, magic_quotes = on is the default setting for php ini I believe. Would it not be better for $row->save(); to automatically check the status of magic_quotes and add quotes only where necessary? Just a curious observation, I am only skimming the surface of ZF at this stage. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/gpc-magic-quotes---zend-db-tp19537109p19537109.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] gpc magic quotes & zend db
-- mothmenace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Wednesday, 17 September 2008, 10:22 AM -0700): > I was caught out by $row->save(); adding extra slashes to my db fields, due > to magic_quotes_gpc being on. I understand the correct solution is to turn > off gpc_quotes? (I chose: > php_flag magic_quotes_gpc Off > in an .htaccess) > > However, magic_quotes = on is the default setting for php ini I believe. Um... no, it hasn't been for a *long* time now. > Would it not be better for $row->save(); to automatically check the status > of magic_quotes and add quotes only where necessary? No. Use the recommended php.ini, which has magic quotes turned off, or turn it off in .htaccess. This is a PHP issue, not a ZF one. > Just a curious observation, I am only skimming the surface of ZF at this > stage. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
[fw-general] Zend Framework & Dojo
I have a really simple question. Since Zend integrates Dojo, do I still have to download Dojo and is there a good tutorial on how to use them together? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend-Framework---Dojo-tp19537547p19537547.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???
Hey Bart, they are up again. my webserver had an unexpected downtime yesterday. :-) On Tuesday 16 September 2008 23:27:05 Bart McLeod wrote: > Hello Benjamin, > > Thanks a lot for pointing this out - and Matthew, sorry for not stopping > the thread. It's just freaking hard to keep up with all the development > going on :-) . > > I will take a look at it for sure. However, the links you provide are dead: > > www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/ > www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/formdemo.php > > that is, right now they are offline. I would like to take a look at your > demo's before anything else! > > Regards, > > Bart McLeod > > Benjamin Eberlei schreef: > > Hello Bart, > > > > i have already put together two proposal concerning jQuery support, one > > for a generic helper that takes care of loading jQuery from CDN or local > > path and takes care of a document ready (on load) execution stack. > > > > http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery_View_Helper_JQ > >uery+-+Benjamin+Eberlei > > > > then a jQuery UI proposal, which allows integration of some of the jQuery > > UI widgets as part of view helpers and form elements into your ZF app. > > > > http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery+UI+Widgets+Ext > >ension+-+Benjamin+Eberlei > > > > personally i think, jQuery is frikking easy, so its probably good to just > > write the code yourself, but some of the helpers i put together really > > take some work from you and help you to build an application using jQuery > > fast. they also group all the jQuery code together so that you don't have > > little js snippets layign around your views everywhere. > > > > you might want to have a look at: > > www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/ > > www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/formdemo.php > > > > which shows two examples of how the jQuery view helpers work. > > > > any feedback is appreciated, although the components have reached final > > status and are finished and checked into zend framework extras incubator > > already: > > > > http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/extras/incubator/library/ZendX/ > > > > the documentation is also finished, if you want to get some hints at how > > it all works. > > > > greetings, > > Benjamin > > > > On Tuesday 16 September 2008 11:33:57 Bart McLeod wrote: > >> I have used jquery with Zend_Form, before Dojo was integrated and I > >> still use jquery. I would welcome integration of jquery too. However, I > >> must admit that I did not even try Dojo, because I found the interface > >> intimidating, the way it is described in the online reference guide. I > >> will try it though and then decide if I still want to use jquery. I do > >> not like the idea of having two different Ajax libraries in use in one > >> system and I do like the idea of out-of-the-box Ajax functionality. If I > >> read through jquery documentation, I understand it immediately. I think > >> it's idea of simplicity matches that of ZF, which cannot be said of the > >> list of functions available in Dojo. But there's no use crying over > >> spilled water, if any. Wil is right of course, if we like jquery that > >> much, let's put together a decent proposal. > >> > >> Bart McLeod > >> > >> Wil Sinclair schreef: > >>> There are lots of reasons that Zend chose to partner with the Dojo > >>> Foundation. But we realize that some developers prefer other JavaScript > >>> toolkits, and that's why we'd never force our users to work with any > >>> particular toolkit. Zend has chosen Dojo to contribute out-of-the-box > >>> AJAX functionality to Zend, while at the same time making it clear that > >>> we will welcome contributions from the community to support other > >>> toolkits. In fact, there are a couple of proposals for JQuery > >>> integration that are pretty far along now: > >>> > >>> http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery_View_Helper_ > >>>J Query+-+Benjamin+Eberlei > >>> http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery+UI+Widgets+E > >>>x tension+-+Benjamin+Eberlei > >>> > >>> If there is a JS Toolkit that you prefer to Dojo, I wholeheartedly and > >>> sincerely recommend that you look in to creating your own proposal. > >>> > >>> ,Wil > >>> > -Original Message- > From: zuhair.naqvi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 8:46 PM > To: fw-general@lists.zend.com > Subject: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All??? > > > Why dojo of all? Whats wrong with an MIT license? To be frank Dojo is > the > shittest JS framework i've ever worked with. Both its code and design > philosophy are no match for competition like jQuery or Prototype. > > I've moved from Symfony to ZF and prefer ZF even over ROR and was very > excited to hear about a client library integration but I am shocked to > see > Dojo instead of others which are miles ahead of it. > > Please explain... > -- > View this message in context: > >>> > >>> http://w
[fw-general] Server upgrade issue w/ public __construct
We are in the process of upgrading our web servers from 5.1.2 to 5.2.6 and we are getting odd string errors on all of the zend framework. Here is an example if you just go to the Zend loader directly: Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING, expecting T_OLD_FUNCTION or T_FUNCTION or T_VAR or '}' in /home/wwwl/library/Zend/Loader.php on line 40 In trying to figure out what could have changed I have noticed that If I change the constructor from public function __construct() to function _construct() it no longer produces the error for that file. I have no idea why this is or where to go next. Is there something new in PHP.ini or elsewhere that is causing this issue? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Server-upgrade-issue-w--public-__construct-tp19540238p19540238.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Server upgrade issue w/ public __construct
Hi Wade, interesting issue indeed. I saw this kind of parse error the last time when I tried to run a PHP 5 script unter PHP 4. Please, double check that you are indeed using a version of PHP 5 and not any ancient PHP 4 version. Best regards, Tobias 2008/9/17 wadearnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > We are in the process of upgrading our web servers from 5.1.2 to 5.2.6 and > we > are getting odd string errors on all of the zend framework. Here is an > example if you just go to the Zend loader directly: > > Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING, expecting T_OLD_FUNCTION or > T_FUNCTION or T_VAR or '}' in /home/wwwl/library/Zend/Loader.php on line 40 > > In trying to figure out what could have changed I have noticed that If I > change the constructor from > > public function __construct() > > to > > function _construct() > > it no longer produces the error for that file. I have no idea why this is > or > where to go next. Is there something new in PHP.ini or elsewhere that is > causing this issue? > > Thanks! > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Server-upgrade-issue-w--public-__construct-tp19540238p19540238.html > Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???
Hey Ben, Exactly the type of gadgets I use /Intend to use. Is it right that the color picker doesn't work in IE 7? I did not look at your code yet, for lack of time. I would like to use the accordeon container around collections of form elements. Is it available as a decorator in your setup? I mean so that one can say: put the start tags on this form element and the closing part on another? Regards, Bart Benjamin Eberlei schreef: Hey Bart, they are up again. my webserver had an unexpected downtime yesterday. :-) On Tuesday 16 September 2008 23:27:05 Bart McLeod wrote: Hello Benjamin, Thanks a lot for pointing this out - and Matthew, sorry for not stopping the thread. It's just freaking hard to keep up with all the development going on :-) . I will take a look at it for sure. However, the links you provide are dead: www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/ www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/formdemo.php that is, right now they are offline. I would like to take a look at your demo's before anything else! Regards, Bart McLeod Benjamin Eberlei schreef: Hello Bart, i have already put together two proposal concerning jQuery support, one for a generic helper that takes care of loading jQuery from CDN or local path and takes care of a document ready (on load) execution stack. http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery_View_Helper_JQ uery+-+Benjamin+Eberlei then a jQuery UI proposal, which allows integration of some of the jQuery UI widgets as part of view helpers and form elements into your ZF app. http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery+UI+Widgets+Ext ension+-+Benjamin+Eberlei personally i think, jQuery is frikking easy, so its probably good to just write the code yourself, but some of the helpers i put together really take some work from you and help you to build an application using jQuery fast. they also group all the jQuery code together so that you don't have little js snippets layign around your views everywhere. you might want to have a look at: www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/ www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/formdemo.php which shows two examples of how the jQuery view helpers work. any feedback is appreciated, although the components have reached final status and are finished and checked into zend framework extras incubator already: http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/extras/incubator/library/ZendX/ the documentation is also finished, if you want to get some hints at how it all works. greetings, Benjamin On Tuesday 16 September 2008 11:33:57 Bart McLeod wrote: I have used jquery with Zend_Form, before Dojo was integrated and I still use jquery. I would welcome integration of jquery too. However, I must admit that I did not even try Dojo, because I found the interface intimidating, the way it is described in the online reference guide. I will try it though and then decide if I still want to use jquery. I do not like the idea of having two different Ajax libraries in use in one system and I do like the idea of out-of-the-box Ajax functionality. If I read through jquery documentation, I understand it immediately. I think it's idea of simplicity matches that of ZF, which cannot be said of the list of functions available in Dojo. But there's no use crying over spilled water, if any. Wil is right of course, if we like jquery that much, let's put together a decent proposal. Bart McLeod Wil Sinclair schreef: There are lots of reasons that Zend chose to partner with the Dojo Foundation. But we realize that some developers prefer other JavaScript toolkits, and that's why we'd never force our users to work with any particular toolkit. Zend has chosen Dojo to contribute out-of-the-box AJAX functionality to Zend, while at the same time making it clear that we will welcome contributions from the community to support other toolkits. In fact, there are a couple of proposals for JQuery integration that are pretty far along now: http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery_View_Helper_ J Query+-+Benjamin+Eberlei http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery+UI+Widgets+E x tension+-+Benjamin+Eberlei If there is a JS Toolkit that you prefer to Dojo, I wholeheartedly and sincerely recommend that you look in to creating your own proposal. ,Wil -Original Message- From: zuhair.naqvi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 8:46 PM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All??? Why dojo of all? Whats wrong with an MIT license? To be frank Dojo is the shittest JS framework i've ever worked with. Both its code and design philosophy are no match for competition like jQuery or Prototype. I've moved from Symfony to ZF and prefer ZF even over ROR and was very excited to hear about a client library integration but I am shocked to see Dojo instead of others which are miles ahead of it. Please explain... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.co
Re: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All???
I addition: The color picker looks the same in IE 7, Chrome, Firefox. I suppose I just don't get that one... Bart Bart McLeod schreef: Hey Ben, Exactly the type of gadgets I use /Intend to use. Is it right that the color picker doesn't work in IE 7? I did not look at your code yet, for lack of time. I would like to use the accordeon container around collections of form elements. Is it available as a decorator in your setup? I mean so that one can say: put the start tags on this form element and the closing part on another? Regards, Bart Benjamin Eberlei schreef: Hey Bart, they are up again. my webserver had an unexpected downtime yesterday. :-) On Tuesday 16 September 2008 23:27:05 Bart McLeod wrote: Hello Benjamin, Thanks a lot for pointing this out - and Matthew, sorry for not stopping the thread. It's just freaking hard to keep up with all the development going on :-) . I will take a look at it for sure. However, the links you provide are dead: www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/ www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/formdemo.php that is, right now they are offline. I would like to take a look at your demo's before anything else! Regards, Bart McLeod Benjamin Eberlei schreef: Hello Bart, i have already put together two proposal concerning jQuery support, one for a generic helper that takes care of loading jQuery from CDN or local path and takes care of a document ready (on load) execution stack. http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery_View_Helper_JQ uery+-+Benjamin+Eberlei then a jQuery UI proposal, which allows integration of some of the jQuery UI widgets as part of view helpers and form elements into your ZF app. http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery+UI+Widgets+Ext ension+-+Benjamin+Eberlei personally i think, jQuery is frikking easy, so its probably good to just write the code yourself, but some of the helpers i put together really take some work from you and help you to build an application using jQuery fast. they also group all the jQuery code together so that you don't have little js snippets layign around your views everywhere. you might want to have a look at: www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/ www.beberlei.de/jquery/demo/formdemo.php which shows two examples of how the jQuery view helpers work. any feedback is appreciated, although the components have reached final status and are finished and checked into zend framework extras incubator already: http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/extras/incubator/library/ZendX/ the documentation is also finished, if you want to get some hints at how it all works. greetings, Benjamin On Tuesday 16 September 2008 11:33:57 Bart McLeod wrote: I have used jquery with Zend_Form, before Dojo was integrated and I still use jquery. I would welcome integration of jquery too. However, I must admit that I did not even try Dojo, because I found the interface intimidating, the way it is described in the online reference guide. I will try it though and then decide if I still want to use jquery. I do not like the idea of having two different Ajax libraries in use in one system and I do like the idea of out-of-the-box Ajax functionality. If I read through jquery documentation, I understand it immediately. I think it's idea of simplicity matches that of ZF, which cannot be said of the list of functions available in Dojo. But there's no use crying over spilled water, if any. Wil is right of course, if we like jquery that much, let's put together a decent proposal. Bart McLeod Wil Sinclair schreef: There are lots of reasons that Zend chose to partner with the Dojo Foundation. But we realize that some developers prefer other JavaScript toolkits, and that's why we'd never force our users to work with any particular toolkit. Zend has chosen Dojo to contribute out-of-the-box AJAX functionality to Zend, while at the same time making it clear that we will welcome contributions from the community to support other toolkits. In fact, there are a couple of proposals for JQuery integration that are pretty far along now: http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery_View_Helper_ J Query+-+Benjamin+Eberlei http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ZendX_JQuery+UI+Widgets+E x tension+-+Benjamin+Eberlei If there is a JS Toolkit that you prefer to Dojo, I wholeheartedly and sincerely recommend that you look in to creating your own proposal. ,Wil -Original Message- From: zuhair.naqvi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 8:46 PM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] Why Dojo of All??? Why dojo of all? Whats wrong with an MIT license? To be frank Dojo is the shittest JS framework i've ever worked with. Both its code and design philosophy are no match for competition like jQuery or Prototype. I've moved from Symfony to ZF and prefer ZF even over ROR and was very excited to hear about a client library integration but I am shocked to see
Re: [fw-general] Zend Framework & Dojo
-- 411161 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Wednesday, 17 September 2008, 11:05 AM -0700): > I have a really simple question. Since Zend integrates Dojo, do I still have > to download Dojo and is there a good tutorial on how to use them together? If you download the minimal ZF package, Dojo is not included -- but by default, Zend_Dojo will use a content delivery network, and is still completely usable. If you download the full ZF package, a source build of Dojo is installed in externals/dojo/. Simply symlink or copy this directory into your document root somewhere, and you can use it. As for tutorials on using Zend_Dojo, I suggest you checkout my webinar, available on: http://www.zend.com/webinars as well as my blog, where I've been blogging about ZF+Dojo periodically: http://weierophinney.net/matthew/ -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Server upgrade issue w/ public __construct
-- wadearnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Wednesday, 17 September 2008, 01:15 PM -0700): > We are in the process of upgrading our web servers from 5.1.2 to 5.2.6 and we > are getting odd string errors on all of the zend framework. Here is an > example if you just go to the Zend loader directly: > > Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING, expecting T_OLD_FUNCTION or > T_FUNCTION or T_VAR or '}' in /home/wwwl/library/Zend/Loader.php on line 40 > > In trying to figure out what could have changed I have noticed that If I > change the constructor from > > public function __construct() > > to > > function _construct() > > it no longer produces the error for that file. I have no idea why this is or > where to go next. Is there something new in PHP.ini or elsewhere that is > causing this issue? This sounds to me like your server is not using the PHP you think it is -- these errors smell of PHP 4 to me. Run a phpinfo() to verify. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Server upgrade issue w/ public __construct
Tobias Gies wrote: > > Hi Wade, > > interesting issue indeed. I saw this kind of parse error the last time > when > I tried to run a PHP 5 script unter PHP 4. Please, double check that you > are > indeed using a version of PHP 5 and not any ancient PHP 4 version. > > Best regards, > Tobias > Wow our deployment script had an old skelton htaccess file which was allowing it to still run PHP4 in the sub directories. PHPInfo on the document root said 5.2.6. Thanks for the sanity check all! Wade -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Server-upgrade-issue-w--public-__construct-tp19540238p19541234.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Best Practices :: Admin Module
I've seen several posts where people have talked about how they have their framework laid out. I see different locations for Admin functions... sometimes in the modules they are administering and sometimes in their own admin module. Is there an article or best practice about this topic? Good and bad points? Suggestions on how it should work? What functionality is considered admin and what functionality is just limited to those with login / permission access? This is my first stint into the framework and I would prefer to not develop any bad habits. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Best-Practices-%3A%3A-Admin-Module-tp19543405p19543405.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Adding JS to individual Radios in a group
Hi, I have a group of 2 radio buttons - I simply want to reveal a set of different fields dependent on which radio is clicked. I can add an onClick handler as below - but it appears on both radio buttons - how can I add different code to each? $payment = new Zend_Form_Element_Radio('cust_paym_type', array( 'multiOptions' => array( 'AC' => 'Account Number ', 'CC' => 'Credit Card'), 'onClick' => "show_cc()" )); thx -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Adding-JS-to-individual-Radios-in-a-group-tp19544563p19544563.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.