Re: [fw-general] Best practices for managing ZF2 modules and dependencies
Hello, We tried exactly the same thing (same modules for different clients) but things got so complicated to manage that we stopped to build websites this way. Why it became so complicated : - Same code base for different clients doesn't allow you to customize them so when a client has a specific use case/need, you can't do it (and don't tell me that you will create a new module for this client which will override the first one for the parts you need to customize because you will have 2 modules doing the same thing and when you will have to do some changes, you will not remember in which one to look). - You MUST have one repository per module, it's easier to manage and see what your developers are doing. If you need to update only one module (i.e patch), you can then update your project easily with only the change you need (so you don't pull changes made on another module which can introduce bugs for a specific client or some merging headache). At this time, we have one repository per module. Each module for each client is forked from our module core codebase so when a change is made for a client and can be used by another (generic change), you update your client module, then make a pull request to the module core codebase which is then approved and incorporated. Then, when you need to work on another client which use the same module, you update your client's one by pulling the module core codebase, merge the changes with the customized one, test and voila. Regards, CAGGIARI Vincent.
[fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] New Unit Testing tutorial
Hi all, I think the doc is not up to date. The second part of Bootstrapping your tests is useless, the application bootstraping is make by Zend\Test\PHPUnit\AbstractControllerTestCase. I write this doc on unit tests, but i think there is a bad merge ? * Vincent BLANCHON Expert PHP Zend Framework Ausy pour Orange Portail https://github.com/blanchonvincent http://developpeur-zend-framework.fr * 2013/2/21 Robert Basic robertbasic@gmail.com Hi all! I got a couple of questions about this week, so here it is for everyone: The Unit Testing sections from the User Guide aka Akrabat's Album tutorial have been moved to a completely new tutorial on unit testing: http://www.framework.zend.com/manual/2.1/en/tutorials/unittesting.html Hope it's better than the previous version, I did my best with it. You can see my original reasoning for this here: https://github.com/zendframework/zf2-documentation/issues/348 And I would like to take this opportunity to bring attention to this issue on zf-web: https://github.com/zendframework/zf-web/issues/80 it took me a while to figure what is happening with the manual. And for those who don't know it, you can always reach the latest version of the documentation on http://zf2.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ I believe it still is automatically updated after pushes to master. Someone will correct me if this is not the case any more. Have a nice day! -- ~Robert Basic; http://robertbasic.com/
RE: [fw-general] [ZF2] Set default encoding to ISO in Zend Framework 2
- Database tables stay encoded using latin1
- The new ZF2 functionality uses completely utf-8
- Doctrine is initialized with utf-8:
$entityManager-getEventManager()-addEventSubscriber(new
\Doctrine\DBAL\Event\Listeners\MysqlSessionInit('utf8',
'utf8_unicode_ci'));
= the data, especially umlauts, seem to get correctly inserted and read
from the database. Hopefully I can follow this approach not needing to
write
data mappers.
This should indeed be the proper approach. As long as the data in the tables
is encoded properly, MySQL can and will convert the data back and forth
depending on the session character set. I'm not sure how a UTF-8 to Latin1
mismatch will be handled though.
See also: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/charset-connection.html
Regards,
Vincent de Lau
vinc...@delau.nl
--
List: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Info: http://framework.zend.com/archives
Unsubscribe: fw-general-unsubscr...@lists.zend.com
RE: [fw-general] ZFApp?
From your URL: http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/laboratory/Primitus/ Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Mike A [mailto:mik...@hotmail.co.uk] Verzonden: woensdag 24 november 2010 17:29 Aan: fw-general@lists.zend.com Onderwerp: [fw-general] ZFApp? Saw this released today: http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=vq=cache:852AJoQlyHoJ:framework.zend.com/sv n/framework/laboratory/Primitus/docs/ZFApp-preview-intro.ppt+zend+error+cont roller+parametershl=enpid=blsrcid=ADGEESjwuKIVWrhgEs_SEFJB6F2poaLjt_l3H-o 8tnv1_AaaVeDzuo7J7gYJgz97onrp-GFiL7e019bJ1B6xbA7cEQroYLhsG9g7ieUS1BHkKq3iyOk 0glLsIVXej2utrq0wB83XrPT5sig=AHIEtbTIb9e9Adqg98X_nu8Qxrei7Cadqw It seems to come from Zend labs but I do not see it listed in http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/laboratory/. Interesting stuff - is there more about it? Mike A.
RE: [fw-general] How can I render a Zend_Barcode inside a html page?
Van: Laurens van Vliet [mailto:laur...@herinneringenoplinnen.nl]
...
div
?php echo $this-action('barcode', 'label', null, array()); ?
/div
...
This is probably not what you want... The action helper (labeled as evil)
includes the output of another action inside the view.
You would want somthing like
img src=?php echo $this-action(array('controller' = 'barcode', 'action'
= 'label', 'default'); ? alt=barcode /
Vincent de Lau
vinc...@delau.nl
RE: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Poll: Should underscore prefixing of non-public elements be dropped?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Matthew Weier O'Phinney [mailto:matt...@zend.com] Verzonden: vrijdag 13 augustus 2010 18:27 Aan: fw-general@lists.zend.com; zf-contribut...@lists.zend.com Onderwerp: Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Poll: Should underscore prefixing of non-public elements be dropped? -- D. J. info...@gmail.com wrote (on Friday, 13 August 2010, 11:16 PM +0800): BTW, I would like to let you know that the vote link is blocked in my country in case you don't think votes from my country don't make difference. Can you try going to the canonical URL, then: https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dEZOTGpMdjhzZDlmZGNMZVF0WnFTV 2c6MQ If you cannot reach that, let me know. Vote by mail ;) Vincent
RE: [fw-general] Team Development
Van: Matthew Weier O'Phinney [mailto:matt...@zend.com] * On Zend Server on my ubuntu install, I had to do a few things to enable FastCGI: % cd /etc/apache2/mods-enabled % sudo ln -s ../mods-available/fastcgi.load . % sudo ln -s ../mods-available/fastcgi.conf . % sudo ln -s ../mods-available/actions.load . % sudo ln -s ../mods-available/actions.conf . There is a Debian/Ubuntu tool for this, a2enmod (accompanied by a2dismod, a2ensite and a2dissite) % sudo a2enmod fastcgi % sudo a2enmod actions % sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart It's quicker and more fool proof. Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl
RE: [fw-general] Help with development of high traffic application (replication / media management) with ZF
-Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: robert mena [mailto:robert.m...@gmail.com] a) database Should I use regular databases? In my case MySQL with the master - slave situation. Or should I try Mongo/Cassandra because of the auto-sharding features? This is something that I don't need right now but some sort future planning. I don't have enough experience to advice on this, however: MySQL also supports a cluster mode, NDB. It should work transparently but will spread the storage and query workload across multiple nodes. b) content management in my app I have to upload files (images) besides text. The text is stored in the database so If I stick with the database replication I'll be fine. But how about the other files? I think I need to control which files have been uploaded to the management node and if they were correctly replicated to all the client nodes. Since the database changes are small (in size) when compared with the media files I think that ideally I should wait until the files are replicated before the database is replicated (or at least that record). Is this reasonable? Should I try to do this (or any other approach) from ZF or use another tool? For the replication of the files I am considering some sort of queue to generate a list of files and call rsync to do the actual transfer. Do you need ZF when accessing the files or are they purely static? If they are completely static, I'd consider creating separate nodes for static content. Replication can be done using RSYNC, but maybe a network file system might be useful. Redundancy might become a problem however. Another solution might be to have a 404 handler that triggers an update somehow. For some systems we use, files are stored in the database and cached on the node on first access. I hope these few cents are helpful. Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl
RE: [fw-general] Question about SQL (not ZF related, sorry)
Hi Andrew, Just jumping in, here is another approach: SELECT P.product_id, P.product_name, P.price FROM products AS P INNER JOIN product_tags AS PT ON P.product_id = PT.product_id INNER JOIN tags AS T ON T.tag_id = PT.tag_id AND T.tag IN ( 'foo', 'bar', 'baz', 'floob', 'widget' ) GROUP BYP.product_id HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT T.tag_id) = 5 Theoretically, this should result in a smaller temporary table, since moving the IN check to the join condition will limit the records stored in a temporary table. Also, assuming that product_id is a primary key, you should be save in grouping on just P.product_id. Related to this, I recently had a curious issue. While rewriting a subquery into a join, performance dropped dramatically. My hypothesis was that the amount of columns MySQL had to store in the temporary table was so large, that creating a reduced set of columns with a subquery was actually beneficial. Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Andrew Ballard [mailto:aball...@gmail.com] Verzonden: donderdag 1 juli 2010 17:36 Aan: Bill Karwin CC: fw-general@lists.zend.com Onderwerp: Re: [fw-general] Question about SQL (not ZF related, sorry) On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Bill Karwin b...@karwin.com wrote: Common wisdom says that one join is always better than three or six, but this actually performs much *worse* (if you use MySQL), because virtually any query using GROUP BY uses a temporary table, which kills performance because disk I/O is expensive, and temporary tables usually write to disk. This might not be such a bad solution if you use some other brand of database that optimizes GROUP BY better than MySQL. So you should analyze queries with EXPLAIN (or equivalent) and profile carefully with sample data of realistic size. Regards, Bill Karwin Interesting. I'll defer to you on MySQL since you know it much better than I (and I don't have anything running on MySQL that I could test quickly right now anyway). Still, the idea left me somewhat curious, so I ran a test on one of our SQL Server databases to see how some different strategies compared. In the interest of disclosure, the actual tables I used (renamed in the examples below) are not very large as databases go. The products table has almost 54000 rows, the tags table has almost 350, and the product_tags table has about 132000 rows. (The nature of the real tables that I tested is that each row in the products table has at least one row in the product_tags table and only six distinct values from tags have been used so far in product_tags.) I compared three different query strategies (shown below). Of these, METHOD 1 had the lowest overall cost in resources, followed closely by METHOD 3 (although the total elapsed time for METHOD3 was slightly faster than that for METHOD 1). I did notice that METHOD 3 grew more expensive the more tags I included in the search since each tag requires additional self-joins. Given that the code for METHOD 1 was the least complex (and therefore the easiest to define using Zend_Db_Select, just to keep this somewhat on topic) and had the lowest cost and second lowest overall elapsed time, I would go that route on SQL Server. As I understand, you're saying this is not necessarily the case for MySQL. -- METHOD 1 SELECT P.product_id, P.product_name, P.price FROMproducts AS P INNER JOIN product_tags AS PT ON P.product_id = PT.product_id INNER JOIN tags AS T ON T.tag_id = PT.tag_id WHERE T.tag IN ( 'foo', 'bar', 'baz', 'floob', 'widget' ) GROUP BYP.product_id, P.product_name, P.price HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT T.tag_id) = 5 -- METHOD 2 SELECT products.product_id, products.product_name, products.price FROMproducts WHERE EXISTS ( SELECT product_tags.product_id FROMproduct_tags INNER JOIN tags ON tags.tag_id = product_tags.tag_id WHERE tags.tag IN ( 'foo', 'bar', 'baz', 'floob', 'widget' ) AND product_tags.product_id = products.product_id GROUP BYproduct_tags.product_id HAVING COUNT(*) = 5 ) -- METHOD 3 SELECT P.product_id, P.product_name, P.price FROMproducts AS P INNER JOIN product_tags AS PT1 ON PT1.product_id = P.product_id INNER JOIN tags AS T1 ON T1.tag_id = PT1.tag_id AND T1.tag = 'foo' INNER JOIN product_tags AS PT2 ON PT2.product_id = P.product_id INNER JOIN tags AS T2 ON T2.tag_id = PT2.tag_id AND T2.tag = 'bar' INNER JOIN product_tags AS PT3 ON PT3.product_id = P.product_id INNER JOIN tags
RE: [fw-general] .htaccess and Download Route Problem
You may try this:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule
.*\.(js|ico|gif|jpg|jpeg|png|css|txt|rtf|pdf|doc|docx|xls|xlsx|ppt|pptx
|mov|mpg|mp3|mp4|mpeg|avi|wmv|wmx|xml)$
index.php
If you want all non-existent file requests to be redirected to ZF, then
use this:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteRule .* index.php
ZF command line tool creates this file:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -s [OR]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -l [OR]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -d
RewriteRule ^.*$ - [NC,L]
RewriteRule ^.*$ index.php [NC,L]
What this does:
Turn on the rewrite engine.
If the requested file is a file (with size0) OR
If the requested file is a symlink OR
If the requested file is a directory
Rewrite to itself (no rewrite) and stop rewriting ([L] = last)
Rewrite all to index.php
Vincent de Lau
vinc...@delau.nl
RE: [fw-general] Unable to load under models from subdirectories
or infra - Infra The models directory is being used as the base for Application_Model_, but all files and folder after that should match casing with the classname. Be aware that Application_Model_Mapper_ uses models/mappers as a base dir. It cost me an hour to figure that one out... Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Paul [mailto:z...@zooluserver.com] Verzonden: vrijdag 4 juni 2010 16:04 Aan: fw-general@lists.zend.com Onderwerp: Re: [fw-general] Unable to load under models from subdirectories Shouldn't the class be (captial T) Admin_Model_Infra_SomeThing. On 6/3/2010 6:30 PM, Mike Fuller wrote: Hi, Here's my situation I have files such as application/modules/admin/models/infra/SomeThing.php The class for SomeThing.php is Admin_Model_Infra_Something. I have an application/modules/Bootstrap.php file whose class is: Admin_Bootstrap extends Zend_Application_Module_Bootstrap In my controller I'll have $s = new Admin_Model_Infra_Something(); On one server (PHP 5.2.5) everything works great. On another server (PHP 5.2.9) I get Fatal error: Class 'Admin_Model_Infra_Something' not found . Obviously , to get a specific answer I would need to present a lot of information regarding the different environments. So for now I'm wondering if there are any common things to look at. Thanks a lot.
[fw-general] Issue with preg in Zend_Db_Statement
Hi all, With this mail I want to ask your attention for an issue in Zend_Db_Statement (ZF-5063 [1]). The function _stripQuoted is used with parameter substitution in statements. The current implementation is relying on a regular expression that is not optimal to say the least. People building their own queries might run into problems when their query becomes large. In this case, the preg library will segfault and kill the Apache worker. I've submitted a patch to reduce the chance of segfaulting by reducing the number of items put on the stack. This issue is duplicated twice already, probably because this is not a ZF nor a PHP issue, but a libpreg issue. When I ran into the problem, I also noticed that the _stripQuoted function is not complete and even broken. Databases that support multiple quoting styles will fail to properly strip all instances. I've created an issue for this (ZF-7911 [2]), together with a patch. My problem is that I can't provide unit tests to prove my patches work and that I don't know all the specifics of every DBMS. I'd love to see someone spending some time on this issue, either by creating test cases or providing feedback. Thanks! Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl [1] http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-5063 (Segmentaion fault on preg_replace in Zend_Db_Statement) [2] http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-7911 (Zend_Db_Statement::_stripQuoted seems not to be complete)
RE: [fw-general] Re: PDO or Mysqli?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: ulf.wen...@sun.com [mailto:ulf.wen...@sun.com] Verzonden: woensdag 24 februari 2010 18:23 That blog posting is puzzling me, if not to say, I believe it is misleading. Hector Virgen schrieb: Not the most scientific analysis but this guy seems to get better performance out of PDO: Any of the PHP APIs are just tiny wrappers on top of the underlying C libraries. Mapping from the C call to a PHP call is always about about equally fast no matter how you do the mapping - in ext/mysql, ext/mysqli or PDO_MYSQL. If you compare equivalent PHP API calls with each other they should be very, very close together in performance. I assume the blog posting is comparing apples and oranges, likely without the blog author being aware of it. For example, PDO is using a prepared statement emulation by default for MySQL. It could well be that the blog posting compares a native prepared statement and a non-prepared statement. Or, the blog posting has been written in 2009, it could be that for PDO persistent connections had been used whereas for ext/mysqli non-persistent connections had been used. Moral is, forget about API performance. There's not much to squeeze out of how you map the very same underlying C library calls into PHP API calls. But it can help a lot to use proper API calls for the task. One thing I think you should keep in mind with this, is that there is a layer in between which is Zend_Db. Although the bare PHP speed might be equal, it might well be that the PDO_MYSQL aligns better with the Zend_Db architecture then ext/mysqli. I would welcome a proper benchmark to test this. If the difference is as big as in the article, it might be a good idea to repeat the test with a profiler attached to see what causes the problem. Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl
RE: [fw-general] observe controller action
Consume basically means 'one object using another object'. Basically what it boils down to, is that you should move the code from the controller to an object in the Model layer (a Service is suggested). Both controllers can than consume/use this service to get their work done. Controllers should be thin and use Models to do the work. I can suggest reading http://www.survivethedeepend.com/ for more information on the subject. Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl -Original Message- From: tonystamp [mailto:tonyst...@hotmail.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 12:34 PM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: Re: [fw-general] observe controller action Thanks for the reply, but could you elaborate a bit more- what do you mean by consume?
Re: [fw-general] application.ini adaptation for php 5.3
Hi, Removing the 2 signs made the PHP errors disapear but the routes don't work at all (they are just ignored which I think is normal bacause the regexp is false then). It is said that the INI support is improved in PHP 5.3, I just find it more obscure. Discouraged, I finally swapped from ini to xml and everything is working fine again. If someone is interested I can send key excerpts from the application.xml (imho the doc shall be updated with more xml examples). With best wishes, V weierophinney wrote: I see one problem here already. It may or may not affect usage, but remove the leading '^' and trailing '$' -- the router adds those for you. Let me know what happens when you do that. If it works, great, if not, we then have a test case for the 5.3 test cases. - Vincent -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/application.ini-adaptation-for-php-5.3-tp25993786p26063920.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] application.ini adaptation for php 5.3
Hi, I have a website running fine with php 5.2 (Sarge) and I'm trying to get working copy on a pre production server which runs php 5.3 (CentOs). After setting up the database and apache, uploading all the php scripts I had to make a few changes in the application.ini as I was getting syntax errors (typically replace the by some '). I also had to specify a few require_once for my custom classes (althrough the library folder is in the include_path) So I finally came up with a working website except for the pages using routes. This is how the routes are defined: PHP 5.2 version (working): resources.router.routes.news.type = Zend_Controller_Router_Route_Regex resources.router.routes.news.abstract = true resources.router.routes.news.route = ^news/(\d+)/(.*)\.html$ resources.router.routes.news.defaults.module = frontend resources.router.routes.news.defaults.controller = news resources.router.routes.news.defaults.action = read resources.router.routes.news.map.news_id = 1 PHP 5.3 version (not working): resources.router.routes.news.type = 'Zend_Controller_Router_Route_Regex' resources.router.routes.news.abstract = true resources.router.routes.news.route = '^news/(\d+)/(.*)\.html$' resources.router.routes.news.defaults.module = 'frontend' resources.router.routes.news.defaults.controller = 'news' resources.router.routes.news.defaults.action = 'read' resources.router.routes.news.map.news_id = 1 I can't get it work and can't find any helpful document about my problem. I'm not sure about all the changes needed when using php 5.3, could anyone tell me more ? Best wishes, Vincent - Vincent -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/application.ini-adaptation-for-php-5.3-tp25993786p25993786.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] application.ini adaptation for php 5.3
Dear Matthew,
Well, I'm not sure about anything.
After search on Internet about the error messages it seems to be an issue
with PHP 5.3 as other people had the same kind of problem (it may have
something to do with the ending $).
In my case, the pre production server uses PHP 5.3.0, Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS)
and mysql 5.1.39 the ZF version is the 1.9.4
This is what I get :
1 - Single quotes:
resources.router.routes.news.route = '^news/(\d+)/(.*)\.html$'
= no php error but for any reason the route doesn't work
---
2 - Double quotes:
resources.router.routes.news.route = ^news/(\d+)/(.*)\.html$
Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Config_Exception' with message
'syntax error, unexpected $end, expecting TC_DOLLAR_CURLY or
TC_QUOTED_STRING or 'quot;' in
/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/application/configs/application.ini on line 51
' in /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/library/Zend/Config/Ini.php:184
Stack trace:
#0 /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/library/Zend/Config/Ini.php(125):
Zend_Config_Ini-_loadIniFile('/var/www/vhosts...')
#1 /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/library/Zend/Application.php(375):
Zend_Config_Ini-__construct('/var/www/vhosts...', 'development')
#2 /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/library/Zend/Application.php(85):
Zend_Application-_loadConfig('/var/www/vhosts...')
#3 /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/httpdocs/index.php(30):
Zend_Application-gt;__construct('development', '/var/www/vhosts...')
#4 {main}
thrown in /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/library/Zend/Config/Ini.php on line
184
---
3 - No quotes:
resources.router.routes.news.route = ^news/(\d+)/(.*)\.html$
Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Config_Exception' with message
'syntax error, unexpected '(' in
/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/application/configs/application.ini on line 51
' in /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/library/Zend/Config/Ini.php:184
Stack trace:
#0 /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/library/Zend/Config/Ini.php(125):
Zend_Config_Ini-gt;_loadIniFile('/var/www/vhosts...')
#1 /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/library/Zend/Application.php(375):
Zend_Config_Ini-__construct('/var/www/vhosts...', 'development')
#2 /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/library/Zend/Application.php(85):
Zend_Application-_loadConfig('/var/www/vhosts...')
#3 /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/httpdocs/index.php(30):
Zend_Application-__construct('development', '/var/www/vhosts...')
#4 {main}
thrown in /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/library/Zend/Config/Ini.php on line
184
---
I'd be glad to know how to get rid of that problem otherwise I'll have to
remove the Route_Regex...
Best,
After setting up the database and apache, uploading all the php scripts I
had to make a few changes in the application.ini as I was getting syntax
errors (typically replace the by some ').
Are you sure about this? Traditionally, the parse_ini_string|file
functions have preferred double-quotes over single-quotes when parsing
files for string values. If this is no longer the case, then it's a huge
BC break in PHP 5.3, and I need to notify upstream.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Project Lead| matt...@zend.com
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
-
Vincent
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/application.ini-adaptation-for-php-5.3-tp25993786p26001421.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: [fw-general] Turn PHP errors/warnings/notices into exceptions
What i did was writing a function that simply throws an exception and
passing that function to set_error_handler, something like this:
error_reporting(E_ALL);
function exceptionThrower($type, $errMsg, $errFile, $errLine) {
throw new Exception($errMsg);
}
set_error_handler('exceptionThrower');
You should check out: http://php.net/ErrorException
It is an Exception type tailored to PHP's errors.
Vincent de Lau
vinc...@delau.nl
RE: [fw-general] mod_rewrite and Zend Framework
If it was using the rewritten URI, it would use be using index.php. I think you should add a custom route or use: RewriteRule ^/bar/echo /foo/echo [N] I'm not sure it would work though, you should try for yourself. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/en/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewriterule Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl -Original Message- From: howard chen [mailto:howac...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 3:18 PM To: Zend Framework General Subject: [fw-general] mod_rewrite and Zend Framework Hello, I have a zend framework which has the following path: http://www.example.com/foo/echo But in the apache mod_rewrite, I want to rewrite something like http://www.example.com/bar/echo RewriteRule ^/bar/echo /foo/echo ... other ZFW rewrite rule ... ZFW keep saying bar is not a valid controller. It seems that ZFW is using Apache REQUEST_URI for routing, not the rewritten uri, isn't? If yes, how to solve? Thanks.
[fw-general] Issues with Zend_Db_Statement::_stripQuoted
Hi all, Last week I ran into a couple of issues with Zend_Db_Statement::_stripQuoted(). I've created an issue in the tracker: http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-7911 and mailed the problem to the database list, but got no response yet. The issues to address: - a segfault within preg_match when a query with long (4KB+) values is run - prior patch applied wrong, resulting in a possible issue with quoted identifiers - possible issue with RDBMS's that allow more than one quoting style. I'd like to complete a patch for this before the next release, but I need some feedback on the issue. Thanks, Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl
RE: [fw-general] Chain default route
I think that the default route is a Zend_Controller_Router_Route_Module
route. It does some checking if a module exists. You use that as your
$plainPathRoute. I suppose you can leave the constructor for this route
empty.
Vincent de Lau
vinc...@delau.nl
From: Sergio Rinaudo [mailto:kaiohken1...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 1:46 PM
To: sayusi.a...@gmail.com
Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Subject: RE: [fw-general] Chain default route
Yes,
I'll explain my problem better.
For my project I've created an hostname chained route, this one
$hostnameRoute = new Zend_Controller_Router_Route_Hostname(
':myvar.mysite.com',
array()
);
$plainPathRoute = new Zend_Controller_Router_Route(
':controller/:action/*',
array(
'module'='default',
'controller'='index',
'action' = 'index'
)
);
$router-addRoute('myRoute', $hostnameRoute-chain($plainPathRoute));
$front-setRouter($router);
That works pretty well when we talk about the default module, but if I want
to get my admin module,
by request 'www.mysite.com/admin', I get an error that says there is no
controller 'Admin' ( in fact there is not, I have an admin module ).
Then I tried to comment the hostname route and I can get again inside the
admin module, so I think the problem is that 'www.mysite.com/admin'
match the hostname route, and a good solution could be use the default
module route as $plainPathRoute.
Actually, I temporarily solved the problem creating another route, this one
$hostnameRoute = new Zend_Controller_Router_Route_Hostname(
':myvar.mysite.com',
array()
);
$plainPathRoute = new Zend_Controller_Router_Route(
'admin/:controller/:action/*',
array(
'module'='admin',
'controller'='index',
'action' = 'index'
)
);
$router-addRoute('admin', $hostnameRoute-chain($plainPathRoute));
that matches the admin module requests.
Hope it is clear, advices are welcome :)
Sergio Rinaudo
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:29:01 +0200
From: sayusi.a...@gmail.com
To: kaiohken1...@hotmail.com
CC: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Chain default route
2009/8/14 Sergio Rinaudo kaiohken1...@hotmail.com:
Hi,
it is possible to do an hostname route chain with the default module
route?
If yes, how?
I want to do this in the bootstrap.
Thanks
May I ask what do you want exactly? With an example would be better.
András
--
- -
-- Csanyi Andras -- http://sayusi.hu -- Sayusi Ando
-- Bízzál Istenben és tartsd szárazon a puskaport!.-- Cromwell
_
Musica, Cinema, Sport, News... Accendi
http://messengertv.msn.com/mkt/it-it/default.htm la Messenger TV!
RE: [fw-general] Zend Framework 2.0
Van: Ralf Eggert [mailto:r.egg...@travello.de] mi...@onshore.com schrieb am 11.08.2009 20:20: I think it would be great if we can take advantage of the functionality of PHP 5.3 in ZF 2.0. From my point of view, ZF 2.0 does not make any sense if it doesn't depend on the new features of PHP 5.3. If it really doesn't support PHP 5.3 then we already need to think about ZF 3.0 already. Because supporting 5.3 will definitely break backwards compatibility. And this is only aloud in major releases. Correct me if I'm wrong. I couldn't agree more. If there is still a huge demand for a pre 5.3 version of Zend, I think we need to extend the lifetime of ZF 1.x, by allowing mini and maybe minor releases to be made. At our shop, we run into minor issues even when upgrading to a new minor release. I'm not looking forward to refactor all of our custom extensions etcetera twice within a small amount of time. I'd probably decide to skip 2.0 if it doesn't contain PHP 5.3 support. Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl
RE: [fw-general] Zend Framework 2.0
I think it is saver to assume that 2.0 will break existing stuff. There are some major changes planned, like renaming classes. I wouldnt be surprised if ZF 2.0 is PHP 5.3 only (namespaces). There used to be a roadmap on the website (page still exists but doesnt seem to be linked to). Maybe it would be a good idea to reinstate this page and add (preliminary) information about 2.0? Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl From: Pádraic Brady [mailto:padraic.br...@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 3:53 PM To: admirau Cc: Zend Framework General Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend Framework 2.0 According to Matthew planning is underway. Backwards compatibility will be retained, I'm sure, for many components but many others will break compatibility since this is a major revision giving everyone the opportunity to replace/fix components, APIs, and other behaviour. Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.survivethedeepend.com OpenID Europe Foundation http://www.openideurope.eu/ Irish Representative _ From: admirau admi...@gmail.com To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2009 2:48:03 PM Subject: [fw-general] Zend Framework 2.0 Are there any known plans for ZF 2.0? It will be an 'regular' release? Are planned any 'breaktrough' features (e.g. application backend like in Symfony, ORM)? I'm sure, it will be backwards compatilble, but what can we expect? I've found only this roadmap for Zend_Controller: http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Zend_Controller+2.0 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend-Framework-2.0-tp24887311p24887311.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: [fw-general] Force full URL names
I'm not sure if there isn't something in ZF that does this automatically, but you could create a plug-in to check and redirect. The plug-in would run after routing. You could use the assemble function on the route to create the preferred link and check that against the requested URL. If they don't match, you could redirect to the assembled URL. Kind regards, Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl -Original Message- From: fozzyuw [mailto:jmbertu...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 4:06 PM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] Force full URL names This seems like it would be simple enough, but I'm wondering if there's a way to force full URL's? If I have a M/C/A URL like this... /accounts/login/index then that's always shown or redirect too, even if someone types in /accounts/login. Meaning if someone doesn't type out the whole URL, the site will auto-redirect to the proper full URL. So, I type /accounts/login/ and the site will auto-redirect to /accounts/login/index. Or I type in /accounts and I'll be redirected to /accounts/index/index, assuming index is the default name. Cheers! Fozzy -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Force-full-URL- names-tp22621762p22621762.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: [fw-general] routeShutdown firing before action stack ...?
I've had a similar discussion a couple of weeks ago with similar arguments presented. For our company I wanted to create a system where non-technical staff can control how a website is composited. For that reason, I created a system where navigation, ACL, URL's and pages (components/widgets and layout) are all database driven. The system now operates as follows: - bootstrap loads ACL and site structure (navigation/pages) from database (not directly, but through managers) - a plugin is used that: - creates routes (routeStartup) using the structure manager - checks access to the requested page after routing - after (successful) dispatch of the 'main' component: - selects the proper layout - fills some placeholders with data from the database (title tag, meta stuff) - loads all other components (allowed by the ACL) using Zend_View_Helper_Action and puts the content in the layout The database stores parameters to pass into the components and resource names for each component. Management of the whole system is now web based. I've noticed the perfomance hit on using Zend_View_Helper_Action, but don't know what a better approach would be. When asked, the only answer I get is: Use view helpers! but without further explanation or any argument aside from the performance hit. What I described above seems to me to be to large/complex for what a view helper is intended to. Sure, parts of this system could be done in helpers, but controlling what goes on a page? If performance is the major issue, that might weigh up against the flexibility of such a system. It would be just a design choice and effort should be taken to improve the dispatcher or create a lighter dispatcher for 'secondary' content. Thanks for reading this anyway! Kind regards, Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl -Original Message- From: keith Pope [mailto:mute.p...@googlemail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 11:31 AM To: Dan Ballance Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: Re: [fw-general] routeShutdown firing before action stack ...? You may want to read this blog http://www.rmauger.co.uk/2009/03/why-the-zend-framework-actionstack-is- evil/ and the performance guide in the manual, generally it is suggested to use the placeholder view helper which gives you control over placement or your own view helper. Hope that helps :) 2009/3/14 Dan Ballance tzewang.do...@googlemail.com: Hi folks, I am trying to build a flexible 'widgetised' layout where the data for which blocks go in which segments is held in the database. My current logic is to: read layout from the database and then load action stack with a controller/action for each block in my front controller plugin, on routeStartup, 'open bookend' each segment with required markup loop through the blocks found in the database and write each block output to the correct segment with action stack in my front controller plugin, on routeShutdown, 'close bookend' each segment with necessary markup. layout is finally renderred from the segments (top, left, default, right, bottom) - where default is the output from the original controller/action combo in the url The block data in the database tells me not just which controller/action combo, but also the segment to write to. This is passed to action stack as a param. I have created my own action controller which gets the segment param which was passed to action stack and sets the segment to write the block to in pre-dispatch. It's working reasonably well - except the end result is, for example with the top segment: opening bookend, closing bookend, block 1, block 2, block 3 What I want is: opening bookend, block 1, block 2, block 3, closing bookend I realise I haven't posted code yet ( can do that next, but didn't want to post a huge message). At this stage i'm wondering if anyone can see a flaw in my logic, am I misunderstanding the dispatch sequence? Any help / clues VERY gratefully received - i'm stuck! cheers, dan -- -- [MuTe] --
RE: [fw-general] routeShutdown firing before action stack ...?
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Weier O'Phinney [mailto:matt...@zend.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 3:30 PM
-- Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl wrote
(on Saturday, 14 March 2009, 12:52 PM +0100):
The mantra of use view helpers stems from the fact that in MVC, views
are allowed to communicate with models in order to fetch content to
render. The goal, then, is to move all your business logic into models,
and then write view helpers that access these models (and, optionally,
format the information for rendering).
First of all, thank you for your answer, I think it clarifies a lot. Maybe
this and parts of the article mentioned earlier should be made into a white
paper or BCP document?
Also, thanks for your patience. I might sound a bit like somebody who just
doesn't want to get it, but I think it is far from that. I want to produce
quality code and systems and I want to learn (and know I have to). I also
want to build something that does what I require.
As an example, consider this view helper:
class My_View_Helper_RecentEntries extends
Zend_View_Helper_Abstract
{
public $entryTemplate = 'lia href=%s%s/a/li';
public function recentEntries()
{
$model = $this-view-entriesModel;
$recent = $model-fetchRecent();
snip
In this case, we're pulling from a model we've injected into the view,
and then creating an unordered list which we return. In your view
script, you then simply echo the results:
?php echo $this-recentEnties() ?
And that is where the catch is in my case. I don't want a viewscript to
decide what content to display; I want that to be dynamic. How do I get my
models in the view when I don't know beforehand what helpers are going to be
called and what model access they need? I would argue that that is a
controller task, but you lose that part when using sole helpers.
Part of the problem could be handled by adding a view helper that calls
other helpers (the dynamic part) and passes parameters to them, but I
suppose that doesn't solve the problem of which model to access.
I also find it a problem that for large parts of my system, I would not be
using view scripts for output, making such components harder to reuse. The
current controllers that I'm building, can be used on other sites without
modification. I only need to change my view scripts if required. Some
controllers even made it into our library, leaving only an empty extending
class in the application. (For instance: class ErrorController extends
My_Error_ActionController {} )
and that's it. This tactic provides better encapsulation, provides
behavior that is easily testable, and is much more performant as there
is no need to lookup the controller and dispatch it.
Your suggestion that if performance is an issue with action(), effort
might go into improving the dispatcher or creating a lightweight
version
makes sense in theory... but to do so actually exposes an important
point: modifying how the dispatch sequence works would actually
potentially break action().
Ironically, the method of using view helpers instead of action() makes
it *easier* to replace elements of Zend_Controller with your own
implementations, as you no longer need to worry that changing the
implementation will break the functionality.
I totally understand your point and would never suggest to alter the
behavior of the current dispatcher or action(). I specifically mentioned
'secondary' content because it might warrant a far less complex way of
'dispatching'. Wrapping all my earlier comments and experience up, I can see
a helper that can load other 'helpers' or 'mini-controllers'. Those
'helpers' might even use view scripts to control their output.
However, I could also understand that this would part to far from the
(traditional) MVC pattern. That would however get me thinking if MVC is
really the way to do this type of web applications.
Anyway, I would love more input and opinions on the subject.
Kind regards,
Vincent de Lau
vinc...@delau.nl
RE: [fw-general] how to write such route
You could use a regular expression route, a custom route or you could a route that just catches /manage. Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl From: Jacky Chen [mailto:jacky...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 5:30 PM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] how to write such route hi guys, i want to add a router that match any characters but not match the word manage,for example,it would match /home , /news , /blog , but /manage should not be matched. how to write such a route? thanks. Greetings, Jacky
RE: [fw-general] Validating a person's name with Zend Validate
If you really want to accept international visitors, be very careful what you do with names... My family name for instance is 'de Lau'. The 'de' part in the Netherlands is called a 'tussenvoegsel'.[1] It is considered part of the family name. I would suggest that if a visitor entered any upppercase character in their input, they probably did a better job than you would be doing and you better leave it alone. Exception might be ALL UPPERCASE input or even cAPS LOCK. Kind regards, Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tussenvoegsel From: guice...@gmail.com [mailto:guice...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Philip G Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 12:20 AM To: Michael Tramontano Cc: Jake McGraw; fw-general Subject: Re: [fw-general] Validating a person's name with Zend Validate On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Michael Tramontano mtramont...@efashionsolutions.com wrote: Well if you're using ucwords() or ucfirst() for the o'reilly issue, perhaps you should just uppercase the first letter and ignore the other characters. That way you get Beth AND O'Reilly. McCain. ;) --- Philip g...@gpcentre.net http://www.gpcentre.net/
RE: [fw-general] Project Structure / Public directory
It seems to me as a lot of overhead. I created a structure like:
/application/
/library/
/index.php
/ .htaccess
/(all other files that would otherwise go in /public/)
The .htaccess file disables access to /application/ and /library/ and
redirects nonexistent URLs to index.php. Paths in index.php are modified to
find /application/ and /library/.
I could see a justification for your solution, when you want your
application to be able to be installed the recommended way.
Kind regards,
Vincent de Lau
mailto:vinc...@delau.nl
http://vincent.delau.nl
From: Luiz A Brandao Jr [mailto:fromv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 7:08 PM
To: Pádraic Brady
Cc: Alan Wagstaff; Zend Framework General
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Project Structure / Public directory
My problem is like you previously described. When using plesk one usually
can't access files outside the httpdocs folder due to open_basedir
configuration. So I have to put all application files in the web directory.
So if I have a guestbook application I would put all files inside
httpdocs/guestbook and follow the standard directory structure from there,
what means that I will have httpdocs/guestbook/public,
httpdocs/guestbook/application etc
Then with the following .htaccess I would check if a request match a file in
the public folder and allow it, otherwise rewrite to index.php Just to
exemplify: if a request like http://mysite/guestbook/images/someimage.jpg
match a image in httpdocs/guestbook/public/images/someimage.jpg it will
rewrite to that image, if not, it will rewrite to index.php
The only difference is that that index.php stays outside of the public
foder. But I'm sure this can be changed with additional rewrite rules. I
think this way we can follow the default folder structure even inside the
web root folder and organize multiple applications into their own folders.
What do you think of this aproach? Do you think the .htaccess can be
improved?
RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /myapp
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -s [OR]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -l [OR]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -d
RewriteRule ^.*$ - [NC,L]
RewriteCond %{DOCUMENT_ROOT}/myapp/public/$1 -s [OR]
RewriteCond %{DOCUMENT_ROOT}/myapp/public/$1 -l [OR]
RewriteCond %{DOCUMENT_ROOT}/myapp/public/$1 -d
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ public/$1 [NC,L]
RewriteRule ^.*$ index.php [NC,L]
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Pádraic Brady padraic.br...@yahoo.com
wrote:
One possible solution is setting a .htaccess file for the other root
directories setting the deny from all directive to forbid access.
Pádraic Brady
http://blog.astrumfutura.com
http://www.survivethedeepend.com
OpenID Europe Foundation http://www.openideurope.eu/ Irish Representative
_
From: Alan Wagstaff awagst...@gmail.com
To: Zend Framework General fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Monday, January 5, 2009 10:44:37 PM
Subject: [fw-general] Project Structure / Public directory
Hi all,
In most of the ZF tutorials I have read (ZF Quickstart, Rob's one, ZF Book),
they all recommend setting your Apache's webroot to your /zfapp/public/
directory for security reasons.
I can understand the logic, putting the application / library directory
outside of the webroot is a good thing but I'm thinking ahead to
distribution and struggling to understand. Take for example, vBulletin - a
popular forum software. When you download vBulletin, you unzip it, grab the
/forum directory and dump it in your webroot. Then visit
http://www.example.com/forum and there's your forum. You could also put it
in /community/forum and it would work just as well.
I don't really understand how I could do that with ZF using the recommend
project structure. How would I go about setting up my project structure /
.htaccess so the end user could put my app in whatever sub-folder they
wanted on their website, and not just in the webroot?
Thanks in advance :)
Alan.
RE: [fw-general] Project Structure / Public directory
The only 'framework' file in public in you index.php which loads your bootstrap. You could move it up a level and adjust the include paths accordingly. I've done this as well, since I'm running some sites on Plesk systems where we don't have write access to the level containing the webroot. Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl From: Alan Wagstaff [mailto:awagst...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 11:45 PM To: Zend Framework General Subject: [fw-general] Project Structure / Public directory Hi all, In most of the ZF tutorials I have read (ZF Quickstart, Rob's one, ZF Book), they all recommend setting your Apache's webroot to your /zfapp/public/ directory for security reasons. I can understand the logic, putting the application / library directory outside of the webroot is a good thing but I'm thinking ahead to distribution and struggling to understand. Take for example, vBulletin - a popular forum software. When you download vBulletin, you unzip it, grab the /forum directory and dump it in your webroot. Then visit http://www.example.com/forum and there's your forum. You could also put it in /community/forum and it would work just as well. I don't really understand how I could do that with ZF using the recommend project structure. How would I go about setting up my project structure / .htaccess so the end user could put my app in whatever sub-folder they wanted on their website, and not just in the webroot? Thanks in advance :) Alan.
RE: [fw-general] Zend Framework 1.7.2 is now available!
Some days rest might be in place, releasing 1.7.1 again... ;) I suppose the message was announcing 1.7.2 as the subject suggests. Vincent de Lau vinc...@delau.nl -Original Message- From: Josh Team [mailto:josht...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 8:46 PM To: Wil Sinclair Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com; fw-annou...@lists.zend.com Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend Framework 1.7.2 is now available! Wil! What are you doing releasing stuff?! Go enjoy the holidays! :) I'm sure I speak for the entire community when we thank you and everyone else at zend for their hard work! Thanks, Josh Team On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Wil Sinclair w...@zend.com wrote: Hi all, It is my pleasure to announce the release of Zend Framework 1.7.1! You can download this new mini release from the ZF download site: http://framework.zend.com/download/latest/ A list of all issues resolved in this release can be found at: http://framework.zend.com/issues/secure/views/IssueNavigator.jspa?reque s tId=10923 We'd like to once again thank our generous Zend Framework contributors for all the effort they have put in to this release and the project as a whole. Enjoy! ,Wil
[fw-general] Zend_Form
Hi, on which mailing list are Zend_Form issues discussed? -- Cheers,\\|// Vince (o o) ooO-(_)-Ooo- ''' (o)_(o)[ ][0][ ] ô¿ô (=°o°=) World Domination by Copy and Paste [ ][ ][0] -()_()[0][0][0] () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments Ooo. ---.ooO( )- ( )(_/ \_)
[fw-general] Thoughts about Zend_Workflow
Hi all, For a custom bug/issue/task tracker I was thinking about how to manage workflow. After some thinking I came to the solution to create a custom workflow engines based on state machines. Below is a summary of what I'm thinking about: The main concepts are Object, State and Action. Objects have a State. Actions can change the State of an object. Rules determine which Actions are available for an Object in a certain state. Rules can also be subject to an ACL. The Statemanager is responsible for managing rules and state changes for a certain object. After initializing the Statemanager with the Object and Rules, an Action can be performed resulting in a state change. A more advanced version of the Statemanager could also dispatch Actions automatically. When there is only one possible Action and that Action doesn't require interaction, it could be performed. A similar concept might be a Trigger. Trigger are fired after a state change. Triggers don't have impact on the State of an Object. Further integration with the Zend Framework is possible. Actions that require user interaction should be able to communicate with Zend Controller. A special Workflow Controller could provide a kind of scaffolding access to the Statemanager. Another field of integration is on the Object side of things. Integration with models is almost a must. Integration with Zend_Db_Table, ActiveRecord and other automated model paterns would make sense. Does this sound a good plan to make a proposal? Anybody has a major issue to address before starting a proposal? Kind regards, Vincent de Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Thoughts-about-Zend_Workflow-tp19279619p19279619.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: [fw-general] IP calculations
-Original Message- From: Bill Karwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I would guess that most people who need to do range matching, subnets, etc. simply convert an IP address string to its packed binary equivalent, and then use PHP bitwise operators. No need to have an OO interface for something this simple. Why not? As everything with ZF: You don't have to use it. Having a 'wrapper' makes this stuff more accessible. Last night I also thought of IPv6. I suppose similar calculations and formatting stuff might be necessary and they are more complex than IPv4. Wrapping this and maybe some other stuff (MAC, IPX) into Zend_Network_Adressing might be useful. Vincent de Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [fw-general] capture STDERR with Zend_Log
I've created a custom error handler for this. See http:// php.net/set_error_handler and http://php.net/set_exception_handler Also note the stuff about @ error suppression, which is used in Zend_Loader if (error_reporting() == 0) return; at the start of the error handler should do the trick. Vincent de Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: sgrobins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 8:38 PM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] capture STDERR with Zend_Log Hello, I am using Zend_Log for all my output in a script that is run from cron. Everything works great. I have it writing to a log file each night. The problem is if the script encounters a Fatal Error or a PHP Warning, those are not put into the log file, since that output didn't go through Zend_Log. Is there a way to redirect the STDERR to my Zend_Log object, so it becomes something like this: $logger-err( whatever php error produced ); Then each day I can look at my log file and see exactly where these php warnings or errors are happening in my script. Thanks, Shawn -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/capture-STDERR- with-Zend_Log-tp18739880p18739880.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: [fw-general] capture STDERR with Zend_Log
-Original Message-
From: Vincent de Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 8:49 PM
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Subject: RE: [fw-general] capture STDERR with Zend_Log
I've created a custom error handler for this. See http://
php.net/set_error_handler and http://php.net/set_exception_handler
And here it is. Sorry for the lack off documentation, but it shouldn't be
that hard.
Usage: Zend_Error_Handler::register();
Vincent de Lau
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
?php
class Zend_Error_Handler {
/** cannot create a Zend_Error_Handler object, static functions only */
private function __construct() {}
public static function register() {
set_exception_handler(array('Zend_Error_Handler','exceptionHandler'));
set_error_handler(array('Zend_Error_Handler','errorHandler'));
}
public static function errorHandler( $errno, $errstr, $errfile,
$errline, $errcontext ) {
// this is to bypass @ error suppression
if (error_reporting() == 0) return;
switch($errno) {
case E_ERROR:
case E_CORE_ERROR:
case E_COMPILE_ERROR:
case E_USER_ERROR:
case E_PARSE:
case E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR:
Zend_Registry::get('log')-err(An error occured in
{$errfile} (line: {$errline}): [{$errno}] {$errstr});
echo pAn error occured in {$errfile} (line: {$errline}):
[{$errno}] {$errstr}/phr /\n;
echo preBacktrace:\n;
debug_print_backtrace();
echo /prehr /preContext:\n;
var_dump($errcontext);
echo /pre;
die();
break;
case E_WARNING:
case E_CORE_WARNING:
case E_COMPILE_WARNING:
case E_USER_WARNING:
Zend_Registry::get('log')-warn(An error occured in
{$errfile} (line: {$errline}): [{$errno}] {$errstr});
if(Zend_Registry::get('debug') error_reporting() != 0) {
echo \n!-- Warning: {$errfile} ({$errline}): {$errstr}
--;
}
break;
case E_NOTICE:
case E_USER_NOTICE:
case E_STRICT:
default:
Zend_Registry::get('log')-notice(An error occured in
{$errfile} (line: {$errline}): [{$errno}] {$errstr});
if(Zend_Registry::get('debug') error_reporting() != 0) {
echo \n!-- Notice: {$errfile} ({$errline}): {$errstr}
--;
}
break;
}
}
public static function exceptionHandler( $exception ){
Zend_Registry::get('log')-err(An error occured in
{$exception-getFile()} (line: {$exception-getCode()}):
[{$exception-getCode()}] {$exception-getMessage()});
echo pAn error occured in {$exception-getFile()} (line:
{$exception-getCode()}): [{$exception-getCode()}]
{$exception-getMessage()}/phr /\n;
echo preBacktrace:\n;
echo $exception-getTraceAsString();
echo /prehr /preException:\n;
var_dump($exception);
echo /pre;
die();
}
}
RE: [fw-general] The how-to / what to do upgrading 1.5.2 to 1.6.0
The new Zend_View stream wrapper might have something to do with this, although
I'm not sure it is included in 1.6RC1.
See
http://www.nabble.com/Zend_View-and-the-View-Stream-Wrapper-tc17607130ef15440.html#a17607130
Vincent de Lau
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Friedmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:18 AM
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Subject: Re: [fw-general] The how-to / what to do upgrading 1.5.2 to
1.6.0
Bruno Friedmann wrote:
till wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Bruno Friedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm just downloaded the 1.6 RC1 release to give it a try.
I've just one trouble : no projects are running now.
The worst there's no errors just a blank page.
(All demo previously used have the same symptom )
I could imagine there's some changes, but there's no documentation
about what a dev
need to adapt inside projects to have them running.
Or did I miss it ( there's could be a improvement like a update.txt
file at the root of library ) ?
PS : In documentation there chapter missing in the index ( 18
doesn't have title GDATA, 23 is not write and so ... )
You probably want to enable:
log_errors = On
error_log = /path/to/a/writable/log/file
Or maybe it is already enabled and you just need to check it out. To
find out, do a phpinfo() and look for the above options.
Till
wouah ...
As I've declare
error_reporting(E_ALL E_STRICT);
ini_set('display_startup_errors', 1);
ini_set('display_errors', 1);
in my bootstrap I has forgotten to see my php_error.log ...
What I've found sound strange to me ... sorry
never see this before ... :-)
[error] [client 127.0.0.1] ALERT - Include filename
('zend.view:///home/bruno/workspace/socketfinder/sf/application/modules
/default/views/scripts/index/index.phtml') is an URL that
is not allowed (attacker '127.0.0.1', file '/ioda/data/web-
include/ZF/library/Zend/View.php', line 105)
Ok found this is when suoshin module is loaded ...
What strange is that with 1.5.2 ZF there's no trouble ...
Can someone confirm ...
--
Bruno Friedmann
Ioda-Net Sàrl - www.ioda-net.ch
2830 Vellerat - Switzerland
Tél : ++41 32 435 7171
Fax : ++41 32 435 7172
gsm : ++41 78 802 6760
C'est Facile et Cool d'Évoluer en ligne : www.cfcel.com
Re: [fw-general] descriptive urls using zend
Quoting uppaluri [EMAIL PROTECTED]: how do I get the url to look like this ? mydomain.com/controllername/sports/golf-balls I am not very good with zend, but can find my way given a starting point. Look in the manual for Zend_Controller_Router [1]. Basically the /:controller/:action/* is the default route, but you van define an alternate route like /:controller/:param1/:param2. I hope this gets you underway. Kind regards, Vincent de Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.controller.router.html This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Re: [fw-general] Default Decorators ----- disable
On 6/12/08, Rohit83 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi , For some specific reason i want default decorators should be disabled and i should able to render form elements in html that i have written.I tried for that but getting the dd and dt tags so applying css will be difficult for me,Any Help on this!!! Regards Rohit See Matthew's article: http://devzone.zend.com/article/3450-Decorators-with-Zend_Form -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Any thoughts about Zend View Filters for Zend layout?
On 6/11/08, patrick veach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola!
Since we are routing output through the response object, it makes zend view
filters feasible.
The idea is to attach a filter(s) to a named segment of the response object
and then, when the
response object renders to the view, it first runs the contents of the
named segments through a filter.
or possibly a filter chain on its way to the view object.
$view-myFilter('response_segment');
or maybe filters could be set by a viewHelper:
$view--setFilter('response_segment', 'filter_name');
It may be possible to do this without changing the response object
by using a view helper to set the filters and plugins to render the named
segments.
Or, perhaps a more integrated method may be used. We already have
/views/filters directory.
Anybody have thoughts on this issue?
So... You first add some stuff to the view to filter it out later on? Why
not make sure it doesn't end up there immediately?
Adios.
*quetzequatl*
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Any thoughts about Zend View Filters for Zend layout?
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:49 PM, patrick veach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ciao Vincent, I was using the word filter somewhat loosely. An example would be GIMP blur filters. They take an input image, modify it and pass it back, not merely filter out It might also function as a decorator. The response object is a choke point, almost every thing passes through the response object on its way to the layout, making it a good place to put a filter. The idea is to modify 'filter/decorate based on the named response segment rather than the content i.e. where its going rather than what it is. Also, we already have a filters directory in our modular directory layout but alas, no filters. Hmm, what would be an example use case? ciao, *quetz* . -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Re: ZF reference guide or how to use a single component
On 6/10/08, Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Robin Skoglund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Tuesday, 10 June 2008, 03:57 PM +0200): On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Tuesday, 10 June 2008, 03:25 PM +0200): I just added a new reference table to the documentation where people can see which ZF component depends on which other ZF component. Where is this? Do you have it built anywhere? So if anyone is in need of just one component like Zend_Log he can just look into this table and see which other components he has also to provide that all works properly. Does this take into consideration optional dependencies? For instance, Zend_Db can be used _without_ Zend_Config, but can also consume it. Isn't that a requirement nonetheless? At some point there is a check like 'if ($config instance of Zend_Config)', which means the class requires Zend_Config to do the check. Actually, in recent PHP versions (I'm not sure when it started exactly; somebody will chime in, I'm sure), the class does not need to be loaded for instanceof checks to succeed, so this is still a soft dependency. http://nl2.php.net/instanceof There are a few pitfalls to be aware of. Before PHP version 5.1.0, * instanceof* would call __autoload()http://nl2.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.autoload.phpif the class name did not exist. In addition, if the class was not loaded, a fatal error would occur. This can be worked around by using a *dynamic class reference*, or a string variable containing the class name: :) -- Vincent
[fw-general] Adding styles to labels using Zend_Form
Hi, I want to hide a form element using inline CSS. Now, I can add a style attribute to the input element, but is it also possible to manipulate attributes in the Label decorator? (Either in the label or the surrounding dt) Thanks, -- Vincent
RE: [fw-general] About the css issue
Using / implies that you are looking for a resource off the root of your domain. If your site lives in a subdirectory of your doc root, you'll run into some problems. In order to ensure cross site/installation compatibility, you may want to look into using a simple View Helper to get the base URL of your site for resource links, href's, etc. Another good practice to work around this issue, it to set a base-tag, maybe even using the following line in your layout/template: base href=?php echo(Zend_Controller_Front::getInstance()-getBaseUrl()); ? / There should be only one base-tag in a document, and it should be in head. Regards, Vincent de Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [fw-general] Best practice for validation
On 6/5/08, Josh Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew,I googled, Jani H Zend Framework Blog to no avail. Do you have a link to his blog(s)? See http://codeutopia.net/blog/2008/06/02/autogenerating-forms-from-doctrine-models/and http://codeutopia.net/blog/2008/06/04/zend_forms-from-doctrine-models-part-2/ Thanks, Josh Team -- Vincent
[fw-general] Best caching strategy?
Hi, In my application, there are several modules that cache several different things. I don't have much experience with caching (can you overdo caching?), so I was wondering what the best caching strategy was. Currently, most modules use the same cache directory using different prefixes. Is it perhaps better to create separate cache directories for separate modules or should I leave it as is? Thanks, -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Using FlashMessenger to display a message when there was an error processing a form
On 6/3/08, Bart McLeod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you submit the form and validate it, your post data will still be in the form, while the page has been refreshed (there has been a round trip to the server upon form submission). I did never use flashmessenger, but I do not see why it would not display its message when the user submits the form and thus refreshes the page? FlashMessenger stores the message in the session. When I said refresh, I didn't mean the page request when the form is submitted, but another request *after* the form has been processed ;-) Bart -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Re: Using FlashMessenger to display a message when there was an error processing a form
On 6/3/08, Jake McGraw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My goal with this helper was to be able to leverage a similar interface to FlashMessenger for a generic message storage that would persist messages across redirects _and_ make them available if a redirect did _not_ occur. This is a solution we came up with at company, I'd highly suggest people take this route. And that's what I'm going for now that I now of getCurrentMessages(). Shouldn't require too much editing, so thanks for the help everybody! - jake -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Using FlashMessenger to display a message when there was an error processing a form
On 6/3/08, Jeffrey Sambells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to provide a method to retrieve the messages
regardless of which page load it is in so that the flashMessanger could be
the generic message container for either case?
Exactly!
However, while I've read through the source in the past, I don't know why
I've never noticed getCurrentMessages(). That should solve my problem for
now, thanks!
For example, if I do:
$this-_flashMessenger-addMessage('My Message');
$messages = $this-_flashMessenger-getMessages();
I would assume that $message should contain 'My Message' since I just added
it in the previous line, but it doesn't. The addMessage() method stores the
message in the session, while getMessage() retrieves from the $_message
property of the object. The $_message property is populated only from the
previous request but not updated when new messages are added.
In some cases the part of the application that needs to indicate a message
won't know yet if the page will re-direct or not at the end so it seems
silly to use two different models for the basically the same purpose
(message storage). Could the flashMessanger provide a getAllMessages()
method that would remove like messages from the session if they're retrieved
on the same call so you get all message without repeating them in the next
request?
I guess this could be accomplished by manually merging getMessages() and
getCurrentMessages() but then you have to manually clear the current
messages too which is something else to remember. It would be nice to have
something like this in the FlashMessenger:
function getAllMessages( $clear = true ) {
$all = array_merge( $this-getMessages(),
$this-getCurrentMessages() );
if ( true === $clear) {
$this-clearMessages();
}
return $all;
}
- Jeff
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Using FlashMessenger to display a message when there was an error processing a form
On 6/3/08, Jake McGraw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FlashMessenger is meant for displaying messages only after receiving a second request, like a redirect: Is there a specific reason for this? Are there any plans to implement displaying messages in the same request or is it unwise for me subclass the FlashMessenger for this? FIRST REQUEST Client to Server - POST form values Server - Process form values Server - Form values will cause a redirect, record all messages FlashMessenger Server to Client - Send redirect SECOND REQUEST Client to Server - GET redirect page Server - Check FlashMessenger queue for messages Server to Client - Print out messages In order to solve your problem, record messages to an internal message queue (say an array on Zend_Registry) when you aren't redirecting, otherwise use FlashMessenger. - jake -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Form Validator: Empty Element Error Message Customization
On 5/22/08, Pádraic Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip By the way I agree - the default messages are horrendous and border on bad English. If I were not English speaking I'd suspect they were incomprehensible. There is a lot to be said for having defaults that are as simple and plain spoken as possible using natural English. Take Zend_Validate_Alpha. If an empty string is input you get the error message: '%value%' is an empty string That's brilliant. The user now knows they input an empty string. We even print the empty string, just to clarify that the space between the single quotes is indeedzero. When I saw this the first time I spent a few mintues trying to figure out if the joke was on me ;). What we haven't clarified is that it's not allowed to be an empty string. There's a subtle difference - one is a statement of fact, the other is advising of a problem. The single quotes may even be confusing by themselves. I ended up going off topic on this one ;). Maybe I'll tackle the default messages again as something for ZF 2.0 to consider. Let alone the fact that, if I didn't do any scripting, as a non-native speaker I wouldn't know what a string is... :) Paddy -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] ZF and Ohloh
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Wil, I have been using Ohloh since one year and I have to say it's a really amazing project. I've been using it since 26 Feb according to Ohloh, I think I only really got into it a little bit later but when I did, one of the first thing I did was stack ZF ;-) They also expose a RESTful API. If I'm right there's a ZF component proposal for a Ohloh client somewhere in the wiki page. Apparently a placeholder that's been removed: http://framework.zend.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=42444 Such a component would be very welcome to me, though ;-) Simone On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Wil Sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I took a look at Ohloh (http://www.ohloh.net/) this weekend for the first time. It's a relatively interesting tool to track open source projects, and I find it particular useful for tracking relationships among them. Zend Framework's Ohloh project can be found here: http://www.ohloh.net/projects/zend_framework. Two reasons I mention this: 1) I would be nice to see all our users and contributors associated with the Zend Framework project on Ohloh. 2) It would be *particularly* nice to see all projects that use Zend Framework associated with the project on Ohloh. ,Wil -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Controller actions/ distinguishing between GETs and POSTs
On 5/18/08, Stephan Stapel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
this is probably a simple question but unfortunately I couldn't find the
answer in the docs.
I'd like to use a different handling within my action methods for POST and
GET requests to implement PRG behaviour. Is there an easy way to find out
'how' the action method was invoked (e.g. through the _request member
variable?).
Currently, I distinguish like this:
function myAction()
{
if (sizeof($_POST) 0)
{
}
else
{
}
}
but this is really ugly since a POST might occur that doesn't send any
variables for some reason. If you have a could hint how to achieve this,
it'd be great to read it :)
regs,
Stephan
I use $this-_request-isPost() and $this-_request-isGet(), see
http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.controller.request.html#zend.controller.request.http.method
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Help with Zend_View
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doing so means that I'll have to call render() in every action, instead of just letting ZF catch it automatically right? Currently, I only have a single action that needs to call a different template, so that's not an ideal solution. How about $this-_helper-viewRenderer-setScriptAction()? http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.controller.actionhelpers.html#zend.controller.actionhelper.viewrenderer.api -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] noob problem - ZF works on localhost but not on webserver
On 5/16/08, vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jacob, thank you :)
I will try to explain.
I have admin part of site. In administration i added new functionality-
adding new banners.
I made a BannerController.php(controller), Banner.php(model), and following
the example of guy who made whole application i made admin-index.phtml and
admin-update.phtml in scripts/banner folder.
When you click on link i made in administration- Manage index banner, on my
localhost i am getting a page with form for new banner. And it is working.
Also there is an index,phtml page where i am calling
?=$this-getActiveBanner()? at some point. And this works fine too on my
localhost.
But when i upload all on live site, clicking on Manage index banner not
showing new form, but redirecting out of administration page, and display
Error 500: Internal server error, please try again ... or some. :)
If no ideas so far, i can post my methods, so you can take a look into it.
I am most confusing about that its work on localhost and same files doesn't
work on live server :)
Has it worked before on the live server? If not, are you sure the rewrite
rules are correct?
Second question is:
I used existing file which have very similar functionality. It displays
data
from other mysql table, but same methods are used. So i just copied
existing
files, and made a new one.
Eg. file Popular.php and PopularController.php i renamed to Banner.php and
BannerController.php, and changed protected _name='popular' to
_name='banners'.
Also changed some html code and when click on Manage index banner i was
getting error: No cuch metod updateBanner. Code for that was:
if($this-Banner-update()).. and then did: require_once('Banner.php');
if(Banner::update()) and then works :)
Sorry, I can't follow this. Where are you calling updateBanner?
So i am so confused and dont have any clues about all this :)
Thank you one more time,
Vladimir
Cheers,
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] noob problem - ZF works on localhost but not on webserver
On 5/16/08, vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Vincent :)
Web site is live and working on web server.
if($this-Banner-update()) is called in BannerController.php
(currently on webserver is: require_once('Banner.php');
if(Banner::update()))
But you said PHP said:
no such method updateBanner
updateBanner() is a different method than update().
.htaccess is identical on localhost and web server. I got it from web server
when got this project. And it is working on my localhost.
also i noticed that when i am calling method like: $this-update('some sql
statement') - which is in original file(popular.php - model) i remake for
banners, i am getting error 500. If i use $this-db-update('some sql
statement') it works fine.
Sorry, I don't use Zend_Db so I can't help you here...
Is there a possibility that problem is caused by version of FW? i am not
sure what version i have on my computer. It could be ZF1.5, but not sure
and
dont know how to check. On web server i think that this is ZF 1.01.
Using different versions of ZF will very likely cause differences in
behaviour, best to develop using the same version. The version can be
checked by opening the file Zend/Version.php, the VERSION contant contains
the version number.
Also, there is a folder inside every subfolder on web site which is called
.svn. I dont know what is this for. :)
The .svn folders are metadata for Subversion, a Version Control System.
Apparently this website is managed using Subversion, so it's a little bit
odd that you're not using it yourself.
Sorry if i am bothering with my problem, just i dont know from where to
start to solve it .
@Jacob- i already read acrabat and all tutorial from acrabat web site, but
couldnt figure it out.. :(
Vincent-20 wrote:
On 5/16/08, vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jacob, thank you :)
I will try to explain.
I have admin part of site. In administration i added new functionality-
adding new banners.
I made a BannerController.php(controller), Banner.php(model), and
following
the example of guy who made whole application i made admin-index.phtml
and
admin-update.phtml in scripts/banner folder.
When you click on link i made in administration- Manage index banner, on
my
localhost i am getting a page with form for new banner. And it is
working.
Also there is an index,phtml page where i am calling
?=$this-getActiveBanner()? at some point. And this works fine too on
my
localhost.
But when i upload all on live site, clicking on Manage index banner not
showing new form, but redirecting out of administration page, and
display
Error 500: Internal server error, please try again ... or some. :)
If no ideas so far, i can post my methods, so you can take a look into
it.
I am most confusing about that its work on localhost and same files
doesn't
work on live server :)
Has it worked before on the live server? If not, are you sure the rewrite
rules are correct?
Second question is:
I used existing file which have very similar functionality. It displays
data
from other mysql table, but same methods are used. So i just copied
existing
files, and made a new one.
Eg. file Popular.php and PopularController.php i renamed to Banner.php
and
BannerController.php, and changed protected _name='popular' to
_name='banners'.
Also changed some html code and when click on Manage index banner i was
getting error: No cuch metod updateBanner. Code for that was:
if($this-Banner-update()).. and then did: require_once('Banner.php');
if(Banner::update()) and then works :)
Sorry, I can't follow this. Where are you calling updateBanner?
So i am so confused and dont have any clues about all this :)
Thank you one more time,
Vladimir
Cheers,
--
Vincent
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/noob-problem---ZF-works-on-localhost-but-not-on-webserver-tp17272058p17272949.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] noob problem - ZF works on localhost but not on webserver
On 5/16/08, vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I misstyped what php said :) actually PHP said that method does not exist, and i know that method exist. But when i include file Banner.php which contain that method, and change in code from $this-Banner-update to Banner::update() then works fine. Original file(which i remake to make banner part) works fine with $this-Popular-update()... Also after changes i made, i moved completly folder structure from my localhost back to web, changing only database data in config.php and everything working but banners :) I like zend framework and what ZF offer, but it is so confusing sometimes :) I am not using SVn cause i cant figure it out how to use it. I read on svn web site but still dont get it. And it was already on web site i got to adjust. Thank you very much for your reply :) So what does get_class($this-Banner) say? -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Route with variable parameters
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Cristian Bichis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have some problems:
1. How can i write the route to allow a potential unlimited number of
parameters
IIRC this would be /:text/:page/:lang/*
Thanks,
What kind of Route is this ? Regex or Static ?
Just the standard Zend_Controller_Router_Route, see
http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.controller.router.html#zend.controller.router.routes.standard
Route definition can contain one more special character - a wildcard -
represented by '*' symbol. It is used to gather parameters similarly to the
default Module route (var = value pairs defined in the URI). The following
route more-or-less mimics the Module route behavior:
?php
$route = new Zend_Controller_Router_Route(
':module/:controller/:action/*',
array('module' = 'default')
);
$router-addRoute('default', $route);
Cristian
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] noob problem - ZF works on localhost but not on webserver
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:21 PM, vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BannersController.php - my version of existing method
[code]
public function adminIndexAction()
{
if (!$this-is_admin()) $this-_redirect(/admin/login);
$this-view-status_list = array('1' = 'online', '0'= 'offline');
$this-view-data = Banners::getBanners();
$this-view-messages = $this-_flashMessenger-getMessages();
}
[/code]
if i use $this-view-data = $this-Banners-getBanners(); i am getting:
Fatal error: Call to a member function getBanners() on a non-object in
C:\wamp\www\dev\application\controllers\BannersController.php on line 30
So $this-Banners is not an object. Perhaps in the PopularController's
init() method $this-Populars is defined? You'll probably need to do
something similar in the BannersController, i.e. $this-Banners = new
Banners().
This works just fine on $this-Populars-getPopulars
Existing method i got from Populars.php
[code]
public function adminIndexAction()
{
if (!$this-is_admin()) $this-_redirect(/admin/login);
$this-view-status_list = array('1' = 'online', '0'= 'offline');
$this-view-data = $this-Populars-getPopulars(false);
$this-view-messages = $this-_flashMessenger-getMessages();
}
[/code]
This is how i remake original method
public function getBanners()
{ $where = null;
if ($online_only) $where = 'status = 1';
$rowset = $this-db-fetchAll('select * from banners');
if (is_null($rowset)) return array();
$idx = 0;
foreach ($rowset as $row){
$ar_res[$idx]['Banners'] = $row;
$idx++;
}
return $ar_res;
}
Original method was:
public function getPopulars($online_only = true)
{
$where = null;
if ($online_only) $where = 'status = 1';
$rowset = $this-fetchAll($where, $this-getOrder());
if (is_null($rowset)) return array();
$idx = 0;
foreach ($rowset as $row){
$ar_res[$idx]['Populars'] = $row-toArray();
$idx++;
}
return $ar_res;
}
On my local mashine:
When i am using original method, i am redirected to public area of site and
getting this:
Internal server error
Error
An error occurred, please try again later.
if i am using first method i rewrote, everything is working on local
machine, but not on the live site.
Could you post your .htaccess?
Vincent-20 wrote:
On 5/16/08, vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I misstyped what php said :) actually PHP said that method does not
exist,
and i know that method exist. But when i include file Banner.php which
contain that method, and change in code from $this-Banner-update to
Banner::update() then works fine.
Original file(which i remake to make banner part) works fine with
$this-Popular-update()...
Also after changes i made, i moved completly folder structure from my
localhost back to web, changing only database data in config.php and
everything working but banners :)
I like zend framework and what ZF offer, but it is so confusing
sometimes
:)
I am not using SVn cause i cant figure it out how to use it. I read on
svn
web site but still dont get it. And it was already on web site i got to
adjust.
Thank you very much for your reply :)
So what does get_class($this-Banner) say?
--
Vincent
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/noob-problem---ZF-works-on-localhost-but-not-on-webserver-tp17272058p17277324.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] noob problem - ZF works on localhost but not on webserver
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:08 PM, vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is what i tought :)
but BannersController and PopularController have same methods. This is
init()
public function init()
{
parent::init();
require_once 'Zend/Filter.php';
// load filters
require_once 'Zend/Filter/StripTags.php';
//require_once 'Zend/Filter/HtmlEntities.php';
require_once 'lib/Zend/Filter/StripSlashes.php';
$this-filters = new Zend_Filter();
//$this-filters-addFilter(new Zend_Filter_StripTags())
//-addFilter(new Zend_Filter_HtmlEntities())
$this-filters-addFilter(new Zend_Filter_StripSlashes());
}
So where does the PopularController define $this-Populars? And what does
var_dump($this-Banners) in BannerController say?
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] MVC - where can I learn more about the model?
On 5/13/08, Rishi Daryanani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm a total newbie, but I am reading up on the Zend framework and trying out some tutorials, very useful.. However everything I've read/tried involves the application/views and application/controllers directories to create views and controllers. I have not yet come across any mention of the models subdirectory. Where can I learn more about this and what it's used for? Am I right in assuming that I can build my own functionality (e.g. user login form, CMS) entirely with the concept of a controller and view? (but not a model) The model is just a representation of data, which more often than not means a class with which you retrieve data from the database, i.e. take a look at Zend_Db. Many thanks -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Amateur question re: Zend_Layout (sans MVC)
On 5/5/08, David Di Biase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Eric, As a matter of fact right after e-mailing my last response, I figured it out. It now seems easy enough and I've gone ahead and implemented a VERY basic MVC model yet not fully-fledged ZF MVC. I setup a bootstrap and am currently funneling requests to scripts, then breaking off the code (on my own) into separate actions and OO classes. I feel very comfortable with this and am quite happy with the direction. It was just that initial hump of understanding what was going on with the view and layout class that got be stumped, but it's coming along nicely. I'm actually quite excited with what I've come up with - it's *extremely* flexible now that I've got it setup properly. I would like to add however that I find an almost paradoxical notion in ZF. It's claimed that the parts can be split-off and re-used in any way to remain flexible, but in reality what I found in my initial testing/learning phase was that people just kept telling me that proper MVC was easier. The paradox is that there are claims that they can be used as standalone but ultimately you are driven to just using MVC - which for developers who are trying to take baby-steps into DRYing up their current sites, requires a complete re-code - which seems unavoidable. Basically it seems very biased towards MVC; perhaps a natural or even intended effect! Either way now I'm on a roll but before. I think the community would be better served by producing a manual for standalone use of each module. This would increase the frameworks use by allowing people to become familiar with the modules on their current projects (which are most likely NOT MVC). Basically, I'm hoping to push for better support for standalone use - that's all. David :-) Basically, I think the idea is that it is recommended to use the ZF MVC, but the advanced developers that explicitly want their own setup can do so. Besides, the loose coupling means that a project can very easily just use Zend_Search_Lucene, for example. So if you're going to use the whole framework, it's recommended to use the ZF MVC unless you *really* do not want to, while if you're interested in a particular component, it is possible to use just that (e.g. if you prefer CodeIgniter or whatever). Cheers, -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Amateur question re: Zend_Layout (sans MVC)
On 5/5/08, David Di Biase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for that clarification. I see what you both mean. I apologise if I think I sound like I know what I'm talking about - I did admit I'm merely an amateur. Nor have I studied computer science (just a hobbyist with his own ... dynamic PHP websites). Well, perhaps I should add that I'm still in high school, so don't just take what I say for granted either :) (Yes, I should add that disclaimer more often...) -- Vincent
[fw-general] Should I use Zend_OpenId's URL manipulation methods?
Hi, I want the absolute URL to the current website, however, the getBaseUrl() method of the request object returns a relative URL. So, I've found that Zend_OpenId, among other useful methods, includes the absoluteUrl() method. However, of course Zend_OpenId isn't meant as a URL manipulation class. Thus, my question is: what would be considered best practice in this case? Thanks, -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] instantiate an object with a variable name for the class
On 4/25/08, Aldemar Bernal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Denis,
I understand what you are trying to do, unfortunely get_class(self) will
not work if self is an extended class (as Zend_Db tables are), the only
workaround (until 5.3 is out where will be possible to do this) is to create
a method, this is how I do it:
create an interface
interface My_Interface
{
public static function init();
}
then create your class
class My_Class extends Zend_Db_Table implements My_Interface
{
...
public static function init()
{
return new self;
}
}
then, when you need the class you must use $myClass::init() instead of new
$myclass
Hope it helps,
Ah, thank you, that was indeed the issue I had before and which I confused
with this one.
Aldemar
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] instantiate an object with a variable name for the class
On 4/24/08, Denis Fohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
sorry i forgot the subject in my previous post :
i'm trying to implement a class to manage manytomany relationships in
backoffice, i'd like to standardize it for reusability.
I would like to pass to the constructor of my class the name of the tables
involved (destination table, origin table, intersection table) and that it
instantiate correspondings Zend_Db_Table objects.
So now is the question : how can i instantiate an object (Zend_Db_Table
here) with a variable classname :
function __construct ($originTable, $destinationTable) {
$table1 = new $originTable();
...
}
i can't find what i want on google (tried call_user_func but that's not
it).
This sounds similar to something I've been trying to do a while ago. After
reading a *lot* about this, I found out this was not possible before PHP
5.3. I'm not sure exactly where I found that, but a good starting point
would be the comments on http://nl3.php.net/get-class .
Thanks.
Denis.
Best of luck,
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] instantiate an object with a variable name for the class
On 4/24/08, Denis Fohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for your response Vincent, for now, i have no other solution than instantiate the object before calling my constructor and pass the Zend_Db_Table objects to it instead of passing strings with their names... but it's not exactly what i wanted to do. It's very unfortunate indeed, but that's life I guess... cheers -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] instantiate an object with a variable name for the class
On 4/24/08, Pete Spicer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello It is possible to instantiate a class from a variable name - before PHP 5.3 even. I've been doing this with 5.2 in a project I'm working on. I think the key thing is the syntax: $table1 = new $originClass; // note no brackets Hopefully that'll help! It that's true, then sorry for the wrong information on my part. It's a while ago that I tried to do something similar, and I'll probably have mixed up a few things. Good to know your use case will work :) Pete -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Zend Layout doctype at bootstrap question
On 4/16/08, Denis Fohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
in comments to this tutorial :
http://codeutopia.net/blog/2008/03/17/introduction-to-zend_layout-updated-for-zf-15/
Matthew said : I'd recommend calling the doctype() helper with the
doctype you want from your bootstrap.
how to do that ?
I currently do it like this:
$viewRenderer =
Zend_Controller_Action_HelperBroker::getStaticHelper('ViewRenderer');
$view = new Zend_View(array('encoding' = 'utf-8'));
$view-doctype('XHTML1_STRICT');
$viewRenderer-setView($view);
Thanks.
--
Denis
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Simplicity Meets Power and not Simplicity, Meets Power
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:40 PM, David Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 16, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Wil Sinclair wrote: Please feel free to throw out ideas here. I would like to suggest you try to aggregate all your suggestions in one mail, however, so that we don't create too much non-technical traffic. And, of course, if we were to use a slogan suggested by a member of the community, we'd have to make sure Zend held the copyright and could trademark it if necessary. It Doesn't Suck. (:D) Agile AND Flexible. ...and it doesn't suck. :D It doesn't suck implies that other frameworks do suck, and even though one might argue that to be the case ( ;-) ), I think it'd be more appropriate to promote ZF's own benefits. David -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Simplicity Meets Power and not Simplicity, Meets Power
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:26 PM, David Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hopefully everyone else found this more funny than serious. The Agile AND Flexible motto was my serious suggestion. Come on, V, get hip, man...! ;) Hehe, sorry :) (It's not that I've got no humour, just that I've used up all my humour points today because I enjoy laughing so much ;-) -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Config_Ini - keys as an array
On 4/15/08, Paul Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been using Zend_Config_Ini successfully in a number of applications.
I'm wondering if the following is the correct way to configure arrays? My
concern is that I don't see it documented anywhere to add brackets to the
end of keys, like plugin[]. I just happened on a comment at [
http://us.php.net/manual/en/function.parse-ini-file.php#75983] saying it
can be done. Does anybody else use 'key[]' to configure arrays? Thanks, Paul
Set config.php
---
[Production]
; plugins
plugin[] = Init
plugin[] = Authenticate
plugin[] = Access
plugin[] = Wrapper
Get array
---
$conf = new Zend_Config_Ini('config.php','Production');
$plugins = $conf-plugin-toArray();
Dump $plugins
---
array (
0 = 'Init',
1 = 'Authenticate',
2 = 'Access',
3 = 'Wrapper',
)
I think you're supposed to do it like this:
Set config.php
---
[Production]
; plugins
plugin.0 = Init
plugin.1 = Authenticate
plugin.2 = Access
plugin.3 = Wrapper
Get array
---
$conf = new Zend_Config_Ini('config.php','Production');
// Now you can access them like:
echo $conf-plugin-0; // Displays 'Init'
// Or you could convert it to an array which would return the array
described
$plugins = $conf-plugin-toArray();
Dump $plugins
---
array (
0 = 'Init',
1 = 'Authenticate',
2 = 'Access',
3 = 'Wrapper',
)
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Config_Ini - keys as an array
On 4/15/08, Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Tuesday, 15 April 2008, 06:22 PM +0200):
On 4/15/08, Paul Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been using Zend_Config_Ini successfully in a number of
applications.
I'm wondering if the following is the correct way to configure
arrays? My
concern is that I don't see it documented anywhere to add brackets
to the
end of keys, like plugin[]. I just happened on a comment at [http://
us.php.net/manual/en/function.parse-ini-file.php#75983] saying it
can be
done. Does anybody else use 'key[]' to configure arrays? Thanks,
Paul
Set config.php
---
[Production]
; plugins
plugin[] = Init
plugin[] = Authenticate
plugin[] = Access
plugin[] = Wrapper
Get array
---
$conf = new Zend_Config_Ini('config.php','Production');
$plugins = $conf-plugin-toArray();
Dump $plugins
---
array (
0 = 'Init',
1 = 'Authenticate',
2 = 'Access',
3 = 'Wrapper',
)
I think you're supposed to do it like this:
Set config.php
---
[Production]
; plugins
plugin.0 = Init
plugin.1 = Authenticate
plugin.2 = Access
plugin.3 = Wrapper
No, you can't do this...
Get array
---
$conf = new Zend_Config_Ini('config.php',
'Production');
// Now you can access them like:
echo $conf-plugin-0; // Displays 'Init'
... because the above is invalid PHP. (Try it; you'll get an unexpected
T_LNUMBER parse error.)
Ah, of course, stupid. I knew I was missing something, thanks for
correcting...
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Search_Lucene and 2.4
On 3/24/08, reto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, I'm just trying some stuff out to build a simple search engine for documents with lucene. Because this is a performance critic thing, I was comparing searching and indexing with Lucene 2.1 and 2.4 format. With a small Java reference-implementation the observed speed-difference was impressive. Time needed to build an index of 1.8Mio items: 18secs (2.4) or 30mins (2.1 ). Time needed to search the index wasn't that different. But the query with the new format still needed about half the time. Since Zend_Search_Lucene only supports 2.2 lucene-format (which as I see is the same as 2.1), I would like to ask, whether support for the 2.4-format might come to ZF in the near future? Since I have no deeper understanding of the index-formats I cannot estimate anything... Or might it be more reasonable to write a search and indexing application in java and then make a php-wrapper for this application? Thanks for any insights or hints! Not sure if this is of any help since I haven't tried it myself, but I read this post the other day: http://www.ibuildings.nl/blog/archives/701-Implementing-Sphinx-search.html Sincerely, Reto -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form: submit and reset decorators
On 3/23/08, LaggyLuke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the simplest and correct way of rendering Submit and Reset buttons on a single row of the form, not one below the other? I've played with decorators and fieldsets for awhile, but ended up with quite messy code. I assume that such an easy task should have some simple solution I'm missing. As this has to do with the looks of your website, you should do this in CSS, by e.g. setting display: inline; . Best, -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form: submit and reset decorators
On 3/23/08, LaggyLuke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vincent-20 wrote: On 3/23/08, LaggyLuke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the simplest and correct way of rendering Submit and Reset buttons on a single row of the form, not one below the other? I've played with decorators and fieldsets for awhile, but ended up with quite messy code. I assume that such an easy task should have some simple solution I'm missing. As this has to do with the looks of your website, you should do this in CSS, by e.g. setting display: inline; . Best, -- Vincent Thanks for the tip - this solution is simple, but not completely correct. You're right that the look of a website should be specified by CSS, but HTML part should still be semantically correct. With default decorators it looks like this (whitespaces changed for readability): dt/dt ddinput type=submit name=submit id=submit value=Save/dd dt/dt ddinput type=reset name=reset id=reset value=Reset //dd What I want is to move these buttons from dl altogether, or at least put them in a single dd. Sure thing, I'll use CSS to style them as soon as I get semantically correct markup in HTML. Ah, then you'll need to replace the standard decorators [1] with your own [2], IIRC. [1] http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.form.standardDecorators.html [2] http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.form.decorators.html -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Website fonts size too large?
On 3/22/08, Amr Mostafa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Wil, I would say that throughout the whole site, reducing the fonts size made it a better (usual) experience for me. (usual as when compared to other websites I'm browsing). I have to say that, even on my 1280x1024 screen, the doc fonts look much, much better when decreased in size one step. Cheers, - Amr -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Zend Framework 1.5 has landed!
On 3/17/08, Wil Sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, folks, we made it. Zend Framework 1.5 GA is now released and available at the framework site: http://framework.zend.com/download And just to remind you once again of all the new features in 1.5: * New Zend_Form component with support for AJAX-enabled form elements * New action and view helpers for automating and facilitating AJAX requests and alternate response formats * Infocard, OpenID, and LDAP authentication adapters * Support for complex Lucene searches, including fuzzy, date-range, and wildcard queries * Support for Lucene 2.1 index file format * Partial, Placeholder, Action, and Header view helpers for advanced view composition and rendering * New Zend_Layout component for automating and facilitating site layouts * UTF-8 support for PDF documents * New Nirvanix, Technorati, and SlideShare web services There are a lot of people to thank, since there are a lot of people who worked hard to make this happen. First of all, thanks to all the Zend Framework contributors who helped in all kinds of ways to make this a truly great, high-quality release. I would personally like to thank the Zend Framework team here at Zend for working the long hours this weekend to make sure everything came together on Monday morning. There were also some very selfless souls in marketing who stayed up late over the last few days to make sure the site was at its best in both style and substance for the big day. Finally we'd like to thank all the ZF users out there who inspire us to continue improving Zend Framework and who never fail to keep us on our toes. :) We hope this release not only lives up to your high expectations but goes beyond them. Now we can finally say that we wholeheartedly recommend the 1.5 release for production use. Enjoy ZF 1.5! ,Wil Love the new site, too bad there's http://framework.zend.com/docs/quickstart http://framework.zend.com/sIFR/caecilial_roman.swfError! An error occurred with this request: Action quickstart does not exist and was not trapped in __call(). -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Library for writing config (INI) files to disk?
On 3/11/08, Julien Pauli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please, visit that improvement : http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-2849 Feel free to contact both Rob or me for making a proposal of refactoring + adding implementations (such as the save() one ) for Zend_Config. Hmm... I haven't sign the CLA or anything, and in fact, don't think I'm experienced enough to be really contributing to ZF yet. I'll first make sure my class works, publish it so people can at least take a look at it, and see how it could be refactored. I'm really not confident enough yet to be making serious contributions ;-) regards Julien.P -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Library for writing config (INI) files to disk?
On 3/11/08, Julien Pauli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't worry = just write tests and tests again, with use cases. I will be enought ;-) Hehe, the problem is: I don't know PHPUnit :) I've been learning PHPSpec (great work Padraic :), but unfortunately, PHPMock has still not released any beta with documentation whatsoever, so I can't use mock objects yet. Julien.P -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Library for writing config (INI) files to disk?
OK, I've written specifications and they passed, so you can take a look at my code here: http://gitorious.org/projects/vogel/repos/mainline/blob/master/project/library/Vogel/Config/Ini.php If you have git installed you can checkout using git clone git://gitorious.org/vogel/mainline.git Any comments are welcome, as I've mentioned, I'm not too confident in my own code yet, so there's probably lots to improve. Also note that unsetting (deleting) of values is not possible yet; since Zend_Config_Ini saves all subvalues as instances of Zend_Config, I could not override the __unset() method. Perhaps I'll save the original values and let it check which values were removed when save()ing, but for now, you'll have to do with this :) On 3/10/08, Julien Pauli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'am :-) Julien.P Thanks, -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Library for writing config (INI) files to disk?
On 3/10/08, Julien Pauli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'am :-) Then you'll be happy to note that I've progressed quite far :) Currently, the only things left on the TODO list are allowing for unsetting of values (i.e. deleting them) and to write specifications (unit tests). I'll post a final message once it's complete :) Julien.P -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] RSS Component
On 3/7/08, Kevin McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Before I go and reinvent the wheel, has anyone proposed or developed a RSS feed _creator_ for the framework? Zend_Feed does an excellent job of parsing feeds but I don't see any documented way to create RSS feeds in a similar way to how zend_feed parses them. Kevin See http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.feed.importing.html#zend.feed.importing.customfor creating custom feeds from arrays. Best, -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Library for writing config (INI) files to disk?
On 3/5/08, dinok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have a look at http://www.zfforum.de/showthread.php?t=1453 It's a german page, but you should be able to copy some source :-D Best regards Thanks. Problem with this is that the licensing is unclear and that it cannot update existing configuration files. However, I've started my own class that extends Zend_Config_Ini and adds a save() method. Is anyone interested in getting notifief once it's done? -- Vincent
[fw-general] Library for writing config (INI) files to disk?
Hi, For my project, I'd like to be able to update INI files. Since Zend_Config_Ini does not have the ability to write to files, I was looking for a different library that is open source and able to write INI files to disk, preferable working with Zend_Config_Ini (if it can take an array of configuration data that'd be great). I have already looked at the eZ Components configuration class ( http://ezcomponents.org/docs/tutorials/Configuration) but found that it doesn't quite fit my needs as 1) it also has to read the configuration files itself, but more importantly 2) doesn't use real INI files (e.g. comments are marked with a #, not a ;). Highly preferred would be a class that can update existing files so comments in those files do not get lost. Thanks, -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Class 'Zend_Form' not found
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:42 PM, zend_newbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI
I am using the zend framework and getting the following error.
Fatal error: Class 'Zend_Form' not found in ../public_html/form1.php on
line 45
Heres my code
?php
require_once 'Zend/Db.php';
function start_form()
{
$form = new Zend_Form;
$form-setAction('second.php()') -setMethod('post');
I would really apprecite if anybody can guide me where i am making the
mistake.
Perhaps
require_once 'Zend/Form.php'
?
Vaibhav
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Class 'Zend_Form' not found
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:15 PM, zend_newbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HI Thanks for all your help and i m still trying to configure zend and it seems that theres some configuration issues that i m having. When i include the file require_once 'Zend/Form.php' it gives me a different error Warning: require_once(Zend/Form.php) [function.require-once]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in public_html/form1.php on line 4 Fatal error: require_once() [function.require]: Failed opening required 'Zend/Form.php' I searched for the file Form.php and i dont have this on my system, i m using red hat. Do u know what i need to install to fix this. Are you sure you fully downloaded and extracted the Zend Framework? It's really supposed to be right there in the Zend folder. Have you also added the library directory to the include_path? Vaibhav Fatal error: require_once() [function.require]: Failed opening required 'Zend/Form.php' -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Make Default Router get 1 param from /some/list/1
You might be interested in http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.controller.router.html#zend.controller.router.routes.regex On 29/02/2008, Nicolae Namolovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, but I want to do one rewrite route for all actions.. I mean change the default router. For example, very often I need just one paramater, so it doesn't make too much sense to pass param name too.. I'd like to get one_param from /controller/action/one_param.. Any way to do that with getParam() ? And how I must rewrite the route to leave the /key/value behavior and just add /value behavior.. On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:07 PM, James Dempster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You might find that this is more what you are looking for? http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.controller.router.html#zend.controller.router.basic On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Nicolae Namolovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to do a default router with same characteristics as current one: Module + controller + action + params: But also with Module + controller + action + 1param: Example: /some/list/1 And getParam(0) should return 1.. ? -- Sincerely, Nicolae Namolovan. -- /James -- Sincerely, Nicolae Namolovan. -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] ZF and SEO issues
(Sorry debussy007 for sending this to you personally) On 12/02/2008, Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/02/2008, debussy007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Some of my content can have more than one Url, e.g. : * http://www.example.com/read_inbox/mail/15 * http://www.example.com/read-inbox/mail/15 * http://www.example.com/readInbox/mail/15 * etc. This is wrong regarding SEO. You will probably reply me that I should just use one type of url in my application, but what if someone links a different url to my site ? Also maybe someone that doesn't want your site to get well ranked can use this trick. This article also explains this problem: http://www.mindloop.be/nieuws/nieuwe-ontwikkelingen/seo-warning--zend-framework-and-duplicate-content Thank you for any reply It is highly unlikely that a visitor would go switching around those URLs by himself (probably doesn't even know it's possible). If a competitor wants to like to such URLs to harm you he'll probably only help you because he adds another link back to your site. Best, -- Vincent -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Layout - images and css not loading
On 01/02/2008, Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Peter Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Friday, 01 February 2008, 12:17 PM -0800): I apologize that was my typo html head meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 / titleHome/title link href=/css/lib.css media=screen rel=stylesheet type=text/css //head body img src=images/order.gif div id=header!-- base/header -- brbr/div . I wish that was it... I do see the following two errors: HP Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Controller_Dispatcher_Exception' with message 'Invalid controller specified (css)'... PHP Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Controller_Dispatcher_Exception' with message 'Invalid controller specified (images)' Okay, this sounds like one of two things: * Either the css and image files are not under your public directory, OR * You've got a bad rewrite rule, and *all* files are getting routed to the front controller instead of omitting static content What does your rewrite rule look like? Is it the one from the documentation: RewriteRule !\.(js|ico|gif|jpg|png|css)$ index.php Also, what happens when you visit the file linked to in the source of your generated HTML page? Best, -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Proposal for a user agent component
On 31/01/2008, Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Wednesday, 30 January 2008, 11:19 PM +0100): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Generic Additionally, you should consider I already talked with my friend about the idea of a PHP porting and he was more than happy. I guess license or permission is not really a problem. Excellent -- I'll have somebody on the Zend team verify that this is a compatable license; I'm not sure what our policy is on attribution. Wouldn't the NonCommercial part be a problem? (As in: IIRC the New BSD license allows commercial usage) -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] ZF1.5 and Zend_Form
On 29/01/2008, Xavier Vidal Piera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Yes, technically it's not a critical thing, but IMHO showing a popup The page you're trying to see contains POSTDATA... is a technical message and should not appear to the user, who is not interested to know about this tech things. For us is something clear and we know how to manage it but there are people who doesn't know what the word POST stands for. The user doesn't know either if clicking again will be harmful for his data or not, so avoiding these kind of decisions it's better for the user experience. It sounds a bit perfectionist, but as i don't want to show any thrown exception from the application, i don't want to show popups like these either. Thanks for your comments ;) While I agree that this practice is user-unfriendly, I see it as a problem of the browser. In fact, I recall reading plans for Firefox to remove that dialog (which I take it means automatically reloading it, but a re-wording would already be a huge improvement). Best, -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form from config file
On 22/01/2008, Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip If so how we gonna handle multilanguage (site been in multiple languages) case ? With multiple sections of same config file, inherited ([general], [en], [de], aso) ? Right now, I've got the following setup for i18n: * With labels, if a Zend_Translate_Adapter has been registered with the form, the label provided to the element will be passed to translate(). So, you can specify a translation messageid for the label, and as long as you have a translation in the current locale, it will provide the translation. Sorry to chime in, but this made me wonder: will this method still allow e.g. PoEdit to generate translation files containing those strings? snip -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/ Thanks, -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] ZFW Modular Structure Question
On 14/01/2008, Juan Felipe Alavarez Saldarriaga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey :).
I got a question, I have this modular structure, the default one:
modules/
article/
controllers/
AdminController.php
IndexController.php
models
SmartArticle.php
views/
scripts/
article/
*.phtml
I have an issue, when I try to load the model named SmartArticle.php:
/**
* Browse.
*
*/
public function browseAction()
{
// Load News module.
$objSmartArticle = new SmartArticle();
}
I got a fatal error:
Fatal error: Class 'SmartArticle' not found in
/home/jfalvarez/php5/test/site/modules/article/controllers/AdminController.php
on line 99
I'm using the Zend_Loader::registerAutoload(); method into the bootstrap,
the model name should be equal than the module name ? I mean, SmartArticle
should be Article ?
Thx for any help.
Have you added /modules/article/models to the include path?
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Pages/subpaces routes
On 07/01/2008, Stuardo -StR- Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The framework website is using ZF, right? How do you create the route they use for pages/subpages like this one http://framework.zend.com/whyzf/casestudies/ You might want to check out http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.controller.router.html#zend.controller.router.usage and http://naneau.nl/2007/04/26/a-zend-framework-tutorial-part-three/ . -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Layout now in core!
On 12/12/2007, Daniel Freudenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: for everbody who's not able to build the docs, i've put the documentation (including zend_layout) to http://zfdoc.bwler.org/ Awesome, thanks! Best regards, Daniel -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] has zend_db_table some kind of getPage() method ?
On 20/10/2007, Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Truppe Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Saturday, 20 October 2007, 04:19 AM +0200): is there some method to fetch an interval of zend_db_rowset objects from an zend_db_table for pagination ? or do i need to write it on my own ? so i can for example fetch all items with id from 1 to 10 or 10 to 20 and so on. The fetchAll() method allows you to pass a $count a $offset parameter: fetchAll($where = null, $order = null, $count = null, $offset = null) Use those parameters when you want to do paging. Also see http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/riskle/Pagination_Component -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/ -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Best practices for controller and model methods
On 09/10/2007, Noé Froidevaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I make my work diploma with zend framework. So, I would like to do the best practices. I use the MVC model. When you make a function which is called by an action, where do you write this function? directlly in the controller? Do you make your own library? See http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.controller.actionhelpers.html And when you make a custom sql request, where you write this request? In function in a model? Do you make a new model for that? Do you make a function in a class of your own library? You can just write that in your controller, and it should interact with a model. I think you should see http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.db.statement.html but perhaps someone more skilled than me should answer it. Noe -- Vincent
Re: [fw-general] Can't delete my index entries with Zend_Search_Lucene
On 08/10/2007, Alexander Veremyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Commit should be applied automatically when $index variable goes out of
scope… So, something is wrong. Could you prepare an example of code to
reproduce problem?
Well, I don't really want to be reproducing it now because it would mess up
all my files and db tables again, but here's the code that's run inside
AdminController::verwijderenAction() :
$config = new Zend_Config_Ini('./application/config.ini',
'search');
$index = Zend_Search_Lucene::open($config-index-path);
$query = new Zend_Search_Lucene_Search_Query_MultiTerm();
$query-addTerm(new
Zend_Search_Lucene_Index_Term($this-_request-getParam('id'),
'comment_id'), true);
$query-addTerm(new Zend_Search_Lucene_Index_Term('comment',
'type'), true);
$hits = $index-find($query);
foreach($hits as $hit)
{
$index-delete($hit-id);
}
$index-commit();
Which did not work when I did not perform $index-commit();
PS TermDocs() should work faster for this purpose (
http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.search.lucene.best-practice.html#zend.search.lucene.best-practice.unique-id
):
Thanks, I'm reading it through right now. I also read that an alternative to
$index-commit() is to unsert($index), is that what you meant?
$config = new Zend_Config_Ini('./application/config.ini', 'search');
$index = Zend_Search_Lucene::open($config-index-path);
$idTerm = new
Zend_Search_Lucene_Index_Term($this-_request-getParam('id'),
'comment_id');
$docIds = $index-termDocs($term);
foreach ($docIds as $id) {
$doc = $index-getDocument($idTerm);
if ($doc-type == 'comment') {
$index-delete($id);
}
}
With best regards,
Alexander Veremyev.
--
*From:* Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Saturday, October 06, 2007 9:35 AM
*To:* Rob Allen
*Cc**:* fw-general@lists.zend.com
*Subject:* Re: [fw-general] Can't delete my index entries with
Zend_Search_Lucene
On 05/10/2007, *Rob Allen* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did you commit() after loop?
You see? I said so it would be a stupid mistake... Thanks!
Regards,
Rob...
Vincent wrote:
Hello,
I am currently working on this website where users can add comments to
messages. At the moment I am trying to allow the admin to delete these
comments. However, the code I use can't seem to delete this comment from
my search index. I've been struggling with it for a while now and just
can't seem to find the answer, so I was hoping to find help here.
This is my current code:
$config = new
Zend_Config_Ini('./application/config.ini', 'search');
$index = Zend_Search_Lucene::open($config-index-path);
$query = new
Zend_Search_Lucene_Search_Query_MultiTerm();
$query-addTerm(new
Zend_Search_Lucene_Index_Term($this-_request-getParam('id'),
'comment_id'), true);
$query-addTerm(new
Zend_Search_Lucene_Index_Term('comment', 'type'), true);
$hits = $index-find($query);
foreach($hits as $hit)
{
$index-delete($hit-id);
}
The opening of the index works as it should, and it even is able to find
my comments (I'm able to do an echo $hit-comment_id within the foreach
loop, however, $index-delete($hit-id) doesn't delete the entry. I'm
probably doing something incredibly stupid here, so I hope that you will
be able to help me.
Thanks in advance,
--
Vincent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHBgxz421+qn4cITwRAuz5AJ4nDMELOebWMPWRUDR8YjdoySVdLQCeN6mi
e3KCrQkYaHtOTAquoK/2KO8=
=vSHY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Vincent
--
Vincent
Re: [fw-general] re: .net or zend framework?
On 06/10/2007, rogeson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alex Netkachov wrote: BTW: MS will make .NET source code available to debug in next version of Visual Studio: http://www.alexatnet.com/node/87 I didn't know that - great move on Microsofts part! Not as great as it sounds: it can only be viewed for debugging purposes. You are not allowed to use the code in your own projects, and it does not bring you the freedom most *real* open source licenses bring you. See http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=1493 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/.Net-or-Zend-Framework--tf4580976s16154.html#a13077572 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Vincent
