Re: iTunes and iPod 4 Touch registration

2010-12-26 Thread EiMacDVSE
ipod(s) version 4 onwards require 10.5 , so there is no way round the
registration, also the ipods software will not be up-to-date to use
with 10.4 and cannot be updated manually. You will need 10.5 on the ac
to complete n use  or try in find a older ipod  say on eBay to use
it.  There are specs in the literture for the ipod and it will day
10.5 or greater

On Dec 26, 1:21 am, Jim McGee orb...@dslextreme.com wrote:
 Hi All -

 I recently turned over a Quicksilver867running10.4.11, all updates  
 installed, to my step daughter She has purchased an iPod4Touch  
 and is trying to get the registration completed. While  following  
 registration instructions the system is telling her she needs iTunes  
 10.1which I gather doesn't work in Tiger (She can't complete the  
 registration). Is there a way around this ? I don't suppose she could  
 install the latest iTunes version in10.4.11(I think we're talking  v7.3) ?

 Since I don't have a clue on most of the high tech stuff out there, I  
 would appreciate some advice or info that will get her down the  
 road...

 Thanks,

 Jim McGee (aka: mudbro)

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: iTunes and iPod 4 Touch registration

2010-12-26 Thread Kris Tilford

On Dec 26, 2010, at 6:24 AM, EiMacDVSE wrote:


ipod(s) version 4 onwards require 10.5


You're right. I just looked it up and it says it requires 10.5.8 or  
newer. Damn, Apple really presses peoples buttons hard, don't they?  
Apple supports Windows computers running XP (released August 2001),  
but requires 10.5.8 (released August 2009) for Apple computers!?!?!


--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Browser Benchmarks

2010-12-26 Thread Dan

At 3:28 PM -0600 12/25/2010, Kris Tilford wrote:
Saw this browser benchmark and thought I'd test out my browsers on 
my PPC dual 2.3 GHz G5 w/10.5.8.:


Browser Family: safari (Safari 5.0.3 5533.19.4)
Browser Version: 533.19.4
Score: 383/5 rwb points


I need to dig deeper... Safari 4 on my 933-MHz QuickSilver (Tiger) 
got over 400.  It would seem to me that a benchmark should show your 
G5 as being faster than my G4.


- Dan.
--
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: PM G5 DVD Drive Problem

2010-12-26 Thread Dan

At 9:00 AM -0600 12/25/2010, Eric Volker wrote:
I've got a bit of a strange problem with my G5 tower. It's a dual 
CPU 1.8GHz model with 10.5.8 installed. Recently, my DVD drive 
stopped being able to eject the tray. When pressing the eject 
button, the drive would buzz and click, but wouldn't eject. However, 
I was able to manually force the chassis door open and eject the 
drive tray using the paper clip option. Thinking that the drive 
motor had somehow lost power, or a belt was slipping, I replaced the 
drive - and had the same problem with the new drive.


Time for a little background. Two years ago I bought this G5 used 
off eBay. Somebody at UPS drop kicked the thing, and bent the rear 
legs on the computer. When I got it, it seemed to work fine. Instead 
of going through the hassle of returning it, the seller gave me a 
$100 refund on the unit and I went about happily using it for a 
couple of years.


Could the problem I'm experiencing now be because the frame is bent 
out of shape?


Sounds like it.


If so, are there any remedies that don't involve replacing the chassis?


A comealong and a pick-up truck?

If you hold the door open, can the drive eject normally?

Um... Remove the drive and see if you can make that door move freely? 
Perhaps the skew is just holding it a tiny bit, and that can be delt 
with by shaving off a bit of metal or something?  Or maybe just 
remove the door altogether?  It's just a flap - there to keep dust 
out.  A piece of duct tape can do that too!


Another solution would be to put the drive in an external case.

I've also got a splitter on the power cable providing juice to a 
video card. Could the drive somehow not be getting enough power to 
eject? Doesn't seem plausible, but who knows.


If the drive works otherwise, then doubtful.   Some drives are very 
emotional - if they detect any drawer interference at all, they stop 
the eject and pull their tongue back in.  heh.  I've got a DVD 
Recorder sittin on my TV - if you barely brush the tray with your 
fingers while putting in a disc, the tray closes and leaves you 
standing there with the disc still in your hand! :\


- Dan.
--
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Browser Benchmarks

2010-12-26 Thread Vic


On Dec 25, 2:28 pm, Kris Tilford ktilfo...@cox.net wrote:
 https://clubcompy.com/rwBench.jsp

 Saw this browser benchmark and thought I'd test out my browsers on my  
 PPC dual 2.3 GHz G5 w/10.5.8.:

 Browser Family: safari (Safari 5.0.3 5533.19.4)
 Browser Version: 533.19.4
 Score: 383/5 rwb points

 Browser Family: mozilla (rv:1.9.2.13 Gecko/20101203 Firefox 3.6.13)
 Browser Version: 1.9.2.13
 Score: 3720/5 rwb points

 Browser Family: opera (Opera 10.63 build 8450)
 Browser Version: 10.63
 Score: 3821/5 rwb points

 In comparison, Intel Google Chrome on a 1.8 GHz Core 2 Duo laptop w/
 10.6.5:

 Browser Family: safari (Google Chrome 10.0.612.3 dev)
 Browser Version: 534.15
 Score: 10922/5 rwb points

On MacBook Pro; 1.83, 2 GB RAM:

Firefox 3.6.13   4760/5 rwb points
Safari 5.0.2  8218/5 rwb points
Opera 10.63 6395/5 rwb points
Chrome 8.0.552.231 7888/5 rwb points

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: New internal hard drive for Power Mac G4

2010-12-26 Thread Sean Carroll

Thanks, Dan.

Before I even realized there'd been a response to my post (Wayne  
Stewart's) (I viewed it at Google Groups first, having not seen it in  
my email at that point), I ordered a Seagate 7200.10 Barracuda 160 MB  
Ultra ATA/100 HD. (The 40 GB drives I'm afraid are failing are also  
Seagate Barracudas, Ultra ATA/100, 7200 RPM.) I could send it back,  
if I have to, though I suspect I won't have to.


First, go everymac.com and *positively* identify exactly which  
Power Mac you gots.  Then check its HD bus specs to see if it  
supports the bigger drives.  There are hacks available to support  
those larger drives, but IMO they're just a PITA - at that point  
it's better to get a PCI card to make a new bus (SATA).


Went to everymac.com - this new old computer of mine is the Sawtooth,  
the model M7825LL/B. (System Profiler shows the graphics card as  
ATY[Rage128Pro] for some reason, though.)


So... does not natively supported (128 GB+ hard drives) mean won't  
work at all without mystery voodoo or maybe even with it?


Here's something from the Seagate 7200.10 Barracuda description notes:

This hard drive operates at SATA 1.5Gb/s by default, you must change  
the jumper settings for the hard drive to operate at SATA 3.0Gb/s.  
Before doing so please make sure your motherboard can support SATA  
3.0Gb/s.


I saw that to begin with. Aside from the question of whether all 160  
GB would be recognized, I reasoned that the new Seagate is supposed  
to be an Ultra ATA/100 HD, like my existing HDs, so it oughta work  
somehow. OK, I'm over my head again. IF I don't decide to return the  
new HD and opt for external as the stopgap (I DO intend to keep this  
old Power Mac G4 even after my probable move to a new Mac mini, and  
I'd only give it up willingly in a swap for some other old Mac), I'll  
probably have some follow-up questions on the PCI card and making a  
new SATA bus. No, make that definitely have some questions. As  
simple as it might be, I'll find something in it to confuse me, left  
on my own.


Aside - never a good idea to use an internal drive as a backup.   
The point of a backup is to make sure your data *survives* a  
catastrophe. An internal drive is 1) always electrically connected  
to the computer and 2) always accessable - corruptable.


Good advice, as Clark also mentioned. The 2-HD idea was originally  
for the purpose of keeping OS 9.2.2 around when I moved to (my first)  
Mac OS X, 10.3 Panther. When OS 9 fell into disuse, at some point I  
hit upon the idea of using the spare as an entire HD backup, which  
seemed ingenious to me at the time. The smart thing to do in that  
case would be to keep the HD anywhere but in the same computer, of  
course. Not as smart as an external HD, but that always seemed so  
extravagant to me, as I was never anywhere close to using up the 40  
GB I had until recently.


Open the PowerMac and stick your ear in there, to verify that the  
sounds are coming from the drives.


I did and I have - I have just distrusted my ears (being a musician  
teaches you to, ironically). I am as satisfied as I can be that the  
noise is from the drives. It occurs to me a little belatedly that a  
test that would absolutely determine whether it was the hard drives  
would be to disconnect the power from them and start up. Unless  
that's a no-no for some reason. The only possible source of noise in  
this situation would be the fan, yes? An optical drive is silent  
unless it's reading something, no?


Venues like LEM Swap, sites like Other World Computing  
(macsales.com), Meritline, etc, all have good deals on drives these  
days.  Office Despot has some good sales this week also!  In  
general, a good target is 10 to 30c per GB.


I got the HD I mentioned above for $44.

Ok.  Back-up.  Punt - the work of replacing that internal HDs isn't  
necessary at this point.  Forget all of the above.  Just get an  
*external* firewire hard drive.  Plug it in.  Use Disk Utility to  
set it up.  Use CarbonCopyCloner to clone (backup) the stuff from  
your internal drives into it.  Then BOOT on it.  From that point  
on, use that external drive!  Use the internals as scratch space or  
something.


NOW you tell me. Where were you 4 days ago? (I'm kidding.) When the  
idea that I might be hearing a failing HD first confronted me, a easy  
way out that flashed before me was putting my system on an external  
HD. It might be an outdated notion or one that was never true to  
begin with, but I thought booting from an external HD would make  
everything noticeably and maybe intolerably slower, even the  
relatively basic stuff I'm doing with the computer now (I'm such an  
under-utilizer). Not true? What about this here computer having a  
FireWire 400 bus? Would that need/ought to be remedied?


Sean

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list 

Re: New internal hard drive for Power Mac G4

2010-12-26 Thread peterhaas

 So... does not natively supported (128 GB+ hard drives) mean won't
 work at all without mystery voodoo or maybe even with it?

Many G4 Macs can have the 48-bit LBA Property added persistently (that
is, semi-permanently) to their PRAMs.

Sure, once the PRAM is cleared, the property reverts to 24-bit mode.

However, as long as the PRAM is NOT cleared, perhaps for many years, the
property is available, and this means that ANY sized drive can be
supported, even for booting.

However, it is ALWAYS better to play safe and partition each drive into a
partition which is 131,072 MB, with the remainder being partitioned as
desired.

The 131,072 MB partition may also be sub-partitioned, just so no
sub-partition straddles the 131,072 MB line.



-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: New internal hard drive for Power Mac G4

2010-12-26 Thread Sean Carroll

Thank you, Clark.

They can work with drives larger than 128Gb but only up to a size  
of 128Gb (without patches).


So a 160 GB hard drive compatible in other respects would at least  
work (and be seen as a 128 GB HD) in a Sawtooth Power Mac G4?


Or get a (somewhat) newer PowerMac that does support the larger  
drives (2002 QuickSilver, MDD or a G5).


Circumstances dictate that any serious money I spend now (or I should  
say 6 months or so from now) be spent on a new Mac for the sake of  
getting with the Intel program at last. I wish I could afford an  
array of older Macs - heck, I wish I still had the 7100 I started out  
using (sorry, can't remember the prefix - Power Macintosh?) - but for  
me to move to a newer old Power Mac would have to involve trade  
somehow, and it's hard to arrange trading what you've got when it's  
all you have and you need it every day.


And it's [an internal HD as a backup drive] always physically with  
the computer which means if the computer is stolen or crushed by a  
tree the drive gets the same treatment.


True. My backup plan wasn't very well thought out.

Sean

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: New internal hard drive for Power Mac G4

2010-12-26 Thread Dale Hoffman


On Dec 22, 2010, at 5:38 PM, Sean Carroll wrote:


About time I discovered Low End Mac and this group, after 10+ years of
owning a G4.

My question: What are my limitations in terms of selecting a new hard
drive that I can install without any additional upgrades/replacement
as far as ATA, Ultra ATA/100, SATA and all that (giving myself away
here) goes?


Sean,

I have two Sawtooths which I equipped with Sonnet Tempo ATA 133 PCI  
cards.

They support drives larger than 128GB. No Voodoo.
The cards extended the usefulness of these G4s.

Dale Hoffman
Louisville, KY

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: New internal hard drive for Power Mac G4

2010-12-26 Thread Dan

At 6:26 PM -0600 12/26/2010, Sean Carroll wrote:
Before I even realized there'd been a response to my post (Wayne 
Stewart's) (I viewed it at Google Groups first, having not seen it 
in my email at that point), I ordered a Seagate 7200.10 Barracuda 
160 MB Ultra ATA/100 HD.


But later in your reply you talk about SATA settings - that's 
contrary to it being ATA.

(see below)

First, go everymac.com and *positively* identify exactly which 
Power Mac you gots.  Then check its HD bus specs to see if it 
supports the bigger drives.  There are hacks available to support 
those larger drives, but IMO they're just a PITA - at that point 
it's better to get a PCI card to make a new bus (SATA).


Went to everymac.com - this new old computer of mine is the 
Sawtooth, the model M7825LL/B. (System Profiler shows the graphics 
card as ATY[Rage128Pro] for some reason, though.)


http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/powermac_g4/stats/powermac_g4_450.html

So... does not natively supported (128 GB+ hard drives) mean 
won't work at all without mystery voodoo or maybe even with it?


Correct - as is, on that bus, the system will only see the first 128 
GB of the drive.  You'd have to install the hacks to make it support 
the larger drives to see the whole thing.



Here's something from the Seagate 7200.10 Barracuda description notes:

This hard drive operates at SATA 1.5Gb/s by default, you must 
change the jumper settings for the hard drive to operate at SATA 
3.0Gb/s. Before doing so please make sure your motherboard can 
support SATA 3.0Gb/s.


*Exactly* which model Seagate drive did you buy?

SATA (Serial ATA) is NOT the same as PATA (Parallel ATA), aka ATA or IDE.

You CANNOT connect a SATA drive to your Mac's built-in IDE (PATA) buses.

I saw that to begin with. Aside from the question of whether all 160 
GB would be recognized, I reasoned that the new Seagate is supposed 
to be an Ultra ATA/100 HD, like my existing HDs, so it oughta work 
somehow.


Double check that you're getting the ATA version, NOT the SATA version.

Look *carefully* at the model number.

ST3160215A is the ATA version.
ST3160215AS is the SATA version.

http://www.seagate.com/docs/pdf/datasheet/disc/ds_barracuda_7200_10.pdf


Open the PowerMac and stick your ear in there, to verify that the 
sounds are coming from the drives.


I did and I have - I have just distrusted my ears (being a musician 
teaches you to, ironically). I am as satisfied as I can be that the 
noise is from the drives. It occurs to me a little belatedly that a 
test that would absolutely determine whether it was the hard drives 
would be to disconnect the power from them and start up. Unless 
that's a no-no for some reason.


That's fine.  We do that all the time to quickly disable one bit of 
hardware or another, to reduce variables in the problem etc.


The only possible source of noise in this situation would be the 
fan, yes? An optical drive is silent unless it's reading something, 
no?


Correct*2.

Ok.  Back-up.  Punt - the work of replacing that internal HDs isn't 
necessary at this point.  Forget all of the above.  Just get an 
*external* firewire hard drive.  Plug it in.  Use Disk Utility to 
set it up.  Use CarbonCopyCloner to clone (backup) the stuff from 
your internal drives into it.  Then BOOT on it.  From that point 
on, use that external drive!  Use the internals as scratch space or 
something.


NOW you tell me. Where were you 4 days ago? (I'm kidding.) When the 
idea that I might be hearing a failing HD first confronted me, a 
easy way out that flashed before me was putting my system on an 
external HD. It might be an outdated notion or one that was never 
true to begin with, but I thought booting from an external HD would 
make everything noticeably and maybe intolerably slower, even the 
relatively basic stuff I'm doing with the computer now (I'm such an 
under-utilizer). Not true? What about this here computer having a 
FireWire 400 bus? Would that need/ought to be remedied?


The Mac's ATA/66 bus maxes out at 66.7 MB/sec, actual throughput is 
around 80% of that.  That's faster than Firewire's 400 Mbps.  But... 
most drives only do half that anyway.  Add to that the fact that your 
Mac is only 450 MHz, in practice booting on a firewire drive 
shouldn't feel slow at all, IMO.


- Dan.
--
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Can't mount remote HD's

2010-12-26 Thread Andrew Liu Anderson

Hello All,
I have an eMac (OS 10.4.11, 1 GB) with a large capacity external HD. It 
talks to my NetGear wireless router via Airport Extreme.


I had a G4 Sawtooth (OS 10.4.11, 1.5 GB, Sonnet 1.3GHz dual proc). It 
talks to my NetGear router via cat-5 cable.
Whenever I need files from the eMac's HD, I would connect to the remote 
server, mount the HD's on the G4's desktop  go from there...


Last week the G4's power supply gave out  I got another G4 to replace 
it. Swapped out the HD's, proc upgrade, video card, etc.
The first time I needed files from the eMac, the HD's mounted just fine, 
as they always did.


From the second time on, whenever I try mount drives from the eMac, I 
connect to the server, log in, select the drives to be mounted, click 
mount  the wee colour wheel spins, and spins, and spins, and spins... 
I can go shopping, come back, and the wee colour wheel is still spinning 
 the HD's never mount.


I also got a 867 GHz Quicksilver (OS 10.4.11, 1.5 GB) a couple days ago 
 put the Sawtooth's HD in it. Same thing! I get logged in to the remote 
server, select the drives to be mounted, click mount  the wee colour 
wheel spins  spins  spins, but no mount!


Any idea what's going on?

TIA,
Drew

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: New internal hard drive for Power Mac G4

2010-12-26 Thread Clark Martin

On Dec 26, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Sean Carroll wrote:

 
 Open the PowerMac and stick your ear in there, to verify that the sounds are 
 coming from the drives.
 
 I did and I have - I have just distrusted my ears (being a musician teaches 
 you to, ironically). I am as satisfied as I can be that the noise is from the 
 drives. It occurs to me a little belatedly that a test that would absolutely 
 determine whether it was the hard drives would be to disconnect the power 
 from them and start up. Unless that's a no-no for some reason. The only 
 possible source of noise in this situation would be the fan, yes? An optical 
 drive is silent unless it's reading something, no?
 
 
In addition to listening, try using your finger.  If you place your finger on 
the drive you can often feel some of the sounds and your finger is much better 
at localizing the source.  Plus it's a lot easier getting your finger in to 
touch the drive than your ear.

Clark Martin
Redwood City, CA, USA
Macintosh / Internet Consulting

I'm a designated driver on the Information Super Highway

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: New internal hard drive for Power Mac G4

2010-12-26 Thread Sean Carroll
(System Profiler shows the graphics card as ATY[Rage128Pro] for  
some reason, though.)


As an aside on an aside, I should clarify that this comment of mine  
was wonderment that my own system (by way of the app System Profiler)  
is misspelling what should be ATI. Unless there really such a thing  
as an ATY Rage128Pro card, perhaps a cheap and ancient Soviet knock- 
off of the ATI graphics card, miraculously predating the probable  
existence of ATI cards to begin with. I shouldn't joke. Maybe ATY  
exists and is well known, what do I know.


So... does not natively supported (128 GB+ hard drives) mean  
won't work at all without mystery voodoo or maybe even with it?


Correct - as is, on that bus, the system will only see the first  
128 GB of the drive.  You'd have to install the hacks to make it  
support the larger drives to see the whole thing.


But not seeing the whole thing doesn't mean that my Power Mac G4 will  
refuse to have anything to do with it, right?




Here's something from the Seagate 7200.10 Barracuda description  
notes:


This hard drive operates at SATA 1.5Gb/s by default, you must  
change the jumper settings for the hard drive to operate at SATA  
3.0Gb/s. Before doing so please make sure your motherboard can  
support SATA 3.0Gb/s.


This must be a case of the notes containing information for both  
versions, because...


Double check that you're getting the ATA version, NOT the SATA  
version.


Look *carefully* at the model number.

ST3160215A is the ATA version.
ST3160215AS is the SATA version.


... ST3160215A is the model number of the hard drive I ordered.

The Mac's ATA/66 bus maxes out at 66.7 MB/sec, actual throughput is  
around 80% of that.  That's faster than Firewire's 400 Mbps.   
But... most drives only do half that anyway.  Add to that the fact  
that your Mac is only 450 MHz, in practice booting on a firewire  
drive shouldn't feel slow at all, IMO.


So it's a choice between an external HD with no complications and an  
internal one with some complications. The possible advantage the  
former offers is obvious. The possible advantage of the latter - it  
seems to me - would be that I end up with (through the PCI card and  
SATA) with a better Power Mac G4 which becomes itself an external  
FireWire HD once I have a brand-new Mac, besides being useful for the  
older operating systems it could run. Practically, I like simple and  
relatively cheap better. But this older Mac isn't a throwaway to me,  
and beginning to learn something about tinkering with it, besides  
straightforward changing of the hard drives, wouldn't hurt. The only  
time pressure on deciding is how long the hard drives in it now are  
going to last. The first hard drive failure, of the originally  
installed one just inside of 2 years, came with no warning  
whatsoever. So the noise I'm hearing now probably doesn't tell me  
anything more than soon. I suppose that's warning enough. Most of  
the vital stuff is already backed up. Time to finish the job.


Thanks, Dan.

Sean

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: New internal hard drive for Power Mac G4

2010-12-26 Thread Clark Martin

On Dec 26, 2010, at 6:39 PM, Sean Carroll wrote:

 (System Profiler shows the graphics card as ATY[Rage128Pro] for some 
 reason, though.)
 
 As an aside on an aside, I should clarify that this comment of mine was 
 wonderment that my own system (by way of the app System Profiler) is 
 misspelling what should be ATI. Unless there really such a thing as an ATY 
 Rage128Pro card, perhaps a cheap and ancient Soviet knock-off of the ATI 
 graphics card, miraculously predating the probable existence of ATI cards to 
 begin with. I shouldn't joke. Maybe ATY exists and is well known, what do I 
 know.

ATY is how the card reports itself.  It is from ATI.  Nothing to worry about.

 
 So... does not natively supported (128 GB+ hard drives) mean won't work 
 at all without mystery voodoo or maybe even with it?
 
 Correct - as is, on that bus, the system will only see the first 128 GB of 
 the drive.  You'd have to install the hacks to make it support the larger 
 drives to see the whole thing.
 
 But not seeing the whole thing doesn't mean that my Power Mac G4 will refuse 
 to have anything to do with it, right?
 

Without a patch you can format / access up to 128Gb of it.  Disk Utility will 
show it as only 128Gb in size and format it accordingly.  I have used a couple 
of 160 Gb drives on G4s formatted to 128Gb.  They work just fine, you just have 
32Gb that is unusable.


Clark Martin
Redwood City, CA, USA
Macintosh / Internet Consulting

I'm a designated driver on the Information Super Highway

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: New internal hard drive for Power Mac G4

2010-12-26 Thread Dan

At 8:39 PM -0600 12/26/2010, Sean Carroll wrote:
The first hard drive failure, of the originally installed one just 
inside of 2 years, came with no warning whatsoever.  So the noise 
I'm hearing now probably doesn't tell me anything more than soon. 
I suppose that's warning enough. Most of the vital stuff is already 
backed up. Time to finish the job.


yea.  It's a bit Shakespearean, really.  Sometimes they take a stab 
to the gut and die quick, and sometimes they blither on forever 
announcing I die! repeatedly.


Just keep good backups.  Then you won't be upset when the drive 
finally bricks out.


- Dan.
--
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: iTunes and iPod 4 Touch registration

2010-12-26 Thread Jim McGee


On Dec 26, 2010, at 6:20 AM, Kris Tilford wrote:


On Dec 26, 2010, at 6:24 AM, EiMacDVSE wrote:


ipod(s) version 4 onwards require 10.5


You're right. I just looked it up and it says it requires 10.5.8 or  
newer. Damn, Apple really presses peoples buttons hard, don't they?  
Apple supports Windows computers running XP (released August 2001),  
but requires 10.5.8 (released August 2009) for Apple computers!?!?!


Hi again folks-

Well I didn't get a chance to try an update to the step daughter's  
iTunes. Instead, she came over with her iPod 4 and was able to get it  
registered via my MDD w/ Leopard.  Sooo the problem is solved (?).


My thanks to all your responses and wish all a GREAT year ahead 

Jim McGee (aka: mudbro) 


--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list