Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M1-incubating (RC4a)
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's first milestone release (PhotArk M1-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval to publish the release. Please review and vote on approving the M1-incubating release artifacts of PhotArk. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M1-incubating-RC4a/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, and the Maven staging repository. The release tag is available at : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/photark/tags/M1-incubating-RC4a/ The vote thread from PhotArk dev list: http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00150.html Previous release candidate review in general list http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg21108.html Here is my +1 for the release. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Aries proposal for incubation
+1 Accept Aries for incubation -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Release PhotArk M1-incubating (RC4a)
The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's first milestone release (PhotArk M1-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval to publish the release. Please review and vote on approving the M1-incubating release artifacts of PhotArk. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M1-incubating-RC4a/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, and the Maven staging repository. The release tag is available at : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/photark/tags/M1-incubating-RC4a/ The vote thread from PhotArk dev list: http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00150.html Previous release candidate review in general list http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg21108.html -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Tim Williamswilliam...@gmail.com wrote: I have a need for something like this coming up and have been passively looking at PhotArk. I'd suggest that a project like this would do itself good by having a simple architecture diagram[1], some good screenshots[2], and an ounce of documentation[3]. Otherwise, it's tough for someone poking around to determine exactly *what* it is and, thus, there's not enough [on the website] to get excited about right now. I know, it's a small team now and sort of a catch-22. The blogging is good, btw, it's what reminded me of you:) Oddly enough, I suspect these things would be more likely to generate developer interest than a release would. Anyway, just an opinion... --tim Thanks for the feedback and for the pointers, I'll try to work on some of these necessary enhancements in the near future. [1] - Example: http://couchdb.apache.org/ [2] - Example: http://lenya.apache.org/index/screenshots.html [3] - http://incubator.apache.org/photark/documentation.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please see details below : Looks OK now - the issues I raised have been fixed, thanks. This is great news, thanks for all your effort help and reviewing the rc. BTW, would you be willing to give us a +1 on the podling mailing list as we are little short in mentors. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:33 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please see details below : Looks OK now - the issues I raised have been fixed, thanks. This is great news, thanks for all your effort help and reviewing the rc. BTW, would you be willing to give us a +1 on the podling mailing list as we are little short in mentors. Sorry, I am not a podling member, so my vote would not count anyway. Does the podling vote need mentors? Surely it just needs podling members to vote, though mentor votes would help. The vote is then brought to the IPMC via the general list; the release can only be made if the IPMC vote succeeds. Based on the current active members of the community, it's then going to be hard to get this release out !!! -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:59 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: Based on the current active members of the community, it's then going to be hard to get this release out !!! If by community you mean the IPMC, then the lack of response is perhaps because AFAICT there has not been a recent VOTE thread on the general incubator list. [This is not a VOTE thread] If you are referring to the Photark podling community, then the lack of activity has implications for graduation as well (there has been a VOTE thread there, which should have stirred some responses). It's more towards the latter, the PhotArk project is starting and his community is very small. While we have started some blogging/facebook advertisement for the podling, we are hoping to get a release out to get more people interested in the project. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release
A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please see details below : --- The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M1-incubating-RC4a/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, and the Maven staging repository. The release tag is available at : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/photark/tags/M1-incubating-RC4a/ --- The new vote thread is : http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00150.html -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:52 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: I did a cross-check to make sure only the used dependencies were mentioned in the LICENSE and got the notices sniptes from these required dependencies. Do you see a specific piece that should be removed ? The point is that dependencies that are used, but not actually included, should not be mentioned in the NOTICE file as they do not form part of the artifact. As it stands, the NOTICE file is confusing/misleading, and IMO should be fixed. I've not checked the NOTICE file entries in detail, but a quick check failed to find the Axion (not Axiom) jar anywhere. Likewise Howl, JDOM, DOM4j. Perhaps these are included in other libraries. The photark-webapp.war:/WEB-INF/lib contains the following axiom jars that are used by some Tuscany databindings used in photArk. axiom-api-1.2.7.jar axiom-impl-1.2.7.jar JDOM and DOM4j and Howl were mentioned in the Tuscany notices, but it seems we are not using the actual dependencies. I'm not sure if this is really a blocker for the release, but I'll be fixing it on the trunk to make sure we don't have this issue in teh future. The LICENSE file lists addressing-1.3.mar but there appears to be no such file. The following files in LICENSE don't agree with the contents of the lib directory in the war: cglib-nodep-2.1_3.jar geronimo-commonj_1.1_spec-1.0.jar The photark-webapp.war:/WEB-INF/lib contains the following cglib jar (note that there is a version mismatch only in this case) cglib-nodep-2.2.jar There are no NOTICE and LICENSE files in the META-INF directory in the war file; ideally these should be present - in this case they will be the same as the ones in the binary archive. There's some inconsistency between the NOTICE files. The top-level NOTICE file in the binary archive says: Copyright (c) 2008 - 2009 whereas the NOTICE file in the photoark-assets-M1-incubating.jar META-INF directory says: Copyright (c) 2005 - 2008 The Apache Software Foundation The parent pom says the inception year is 2008, so the latter file looks wrong. Seems to be an error in the NOTICE skeleton files. Fixed in trunk in the assets jar. These does not seem as release blockers to me. Do you agree ? These are all fixed in both release branch (svn #810595) and trunk (svn #810601). Do you really think we need another respin or having these fixed in SVN are enough to get a positive vote from you ? -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release
A new RC is now available, please see details below : --- Please review and vote on the M1-incubating release artifacts of PhotArk. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M1-incubating-RC4/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, and the Maven staging repository. The release tag is available at : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/photark/tags/M1-incubating-RC4/ --- The new vote thread is : http://markmail.org/thread/ccvvoece354b47bw -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:57 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/08/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for all the reviews and feedback for the PhotArk RC2. I have fixed all the severe and blocking issues and have produced a new RC... Please follow the link below for the new RC details : http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00145.html For the benefit of other reviewers, here are the details: quote The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M1-incubating-RC3/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, and the Maven staging repository. The release tag is available at : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/photark/tags/M1-incubating-RC3/ /quote Sigs and hashes OK. However no SHA hashes - only MD5 - are provided. tgz and zip archives agree with each other. Source archives agree with SVN tag. SVN has one incorrect setting: svn pd svn:executable photark-webapp/src/main/webapp/prev_on.gif [not a blocker] The binary NOTICE file has a lot of paragraphs which start: This product includes/uses ... The NOTICE file should only include required 3rd party notices; code that is used (but not included) should not be mentioned in the NOTICE file, so the /uses part and any non-included 3rd party dependencies need to be removed. I did a cross-check to make sure only the used dependencies were mentioned in the LICENSE and got the notices sniptes from these required dependencies. Do you see a specific piece that should be removed ? There are no NOTICE and LICENSE files in the META-INF directory in the war file; ideally these should be present - in this case they will be the same as the ones in the binary archive. There's some inconsistency between the NOTICE files. The top-level NOTICE file in the binary archive says: Copyright (c) 2008 - 2009 whereas the NOTICE file in the photoark-assets-M1-incubating.jar META-INF directory says: Copyright (c) 2005 - 2008 The Apache Software Foundation The parent pom says the inception year is 2008, so the latter file looks wrong. Seems to be an error in the NOTICE skeleton files. These does not seem as release blockers to me. Do you agree ? -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release
Thanks for all the reviews and feedback for the PhotArk RC2. I have fixed all the severe and blocking issues and have produced a new RC... Please follow the link below for the new RC details : http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00145.html Thanks -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:16 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: Sigs and hashes OK; tgz and zip agree with each other. However, the source archive does not agree with the SVN tag - the versions are different in various pom.xml files. Can you give me one example ? The verious pom.xml should have version id as versionM1-incubating/version. Also there is no DISCLAIMER in the source archive. Fixed. Would this require a new RC ? The distribution/src/main/release/bin/LICENSE file is also different between SVN and the source archive. But I would not expect to find a LICENSE file there anyway. The distribution/src/main/release/bin/LICENSE is used to generate the binary distribution, while the LICENSE in the root of the svn is the one used for the source distribution. I'm not sure what do you mean by But I would not expect to find a LICENSE file there anyway., as my understanding is that the the source release would have a Apache License there, and any other third party licenses appropriate for the source distribution. I'm not sure why there are additional copies of the NOTICE, LICENSE etc files in the subdirectories; there should only be copies in the top-level directory. Similar to above, the copies in the subdirectory are used in the binary distribution. There's no DISCLAIMER in the binary archive. Fixed Minor problems: Builds OK using M2/Java 1.5, but there don't appear to be any tests run. README and INSTALL mention April 2009 release. The INSTALL file does not really explain how to install anything. The POM file needs to specify the encoding to avoid warnings such as the following: [WARNING] File encoding has not been set, using platform encoding Cp1252, i.e. build is platform dependent! [WARNING] Using platform encoding (Cp1252 actually) to copy filtered resources, i.e. build is platform dependent! What is needed here ? I checked all the pom.xml and they all seem to have the necessary UTF-8 encoding ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? Note that, looking on the pom.xml from a browser, the encode information is not showed, but a view source or looking directly into the code does show the proper encoding there. If you have a specific pom.xml that has this info missing, please let me know. Not a release blocker, but worth fixing in SVN trunk: svn ps svn:eol-style native DISCLAIMER svn ps svn:eol-style native assets/DISCLAIMER svn ps svn:eol-style native assets/LICENSE svn ps svn:eol-style native assets/NOTICE svn ps svn:eol-style native photark/DISCLAIMER svn ps svn:eol-style native photark/LICENSE svn ps svn:eol-style native photark/NOTICE svn ps svn:eol-style native photark-webapp/DISCLAIMER svn ps svn:eol-style native photark-webapp/LICENSE svn ps svn:eol-style native photark-webapp/NOTICE svn pd svn:executable photark/src/main/resources/index.gif svn pd svn:executable photark/src/main/resources/index_on.gif svn pd svn:executable photark/src/main/resources/next.gif svn pd svn:executable photark/src/main/resources/next_disabled.gif svn pd svn:executable photark/src/main/resources/next_on.gif svn pd svn:executable photark/src/main/resources/prev.gif svn pd svn:executable photark/src/main/resources/prev_disabled.gif svn pd svn:executable photark/src/main/resources/prev_on.gif svn pd svn:executable photark/src/main/resources/styles.css svn pd svn:executable photark-webapp/src/main/webapp/index.gif svn pd svn:executable photark-webapp/src/main/webapp/index_on.gif svn pd svn:executable photark-webapp/src/main/webapp/next.gif svn pd svn:executable photark-webapp/src/main/webapp/next_disabled.gif svn pd svn:executable photark-webapp/src/main/webapp/next_on.gif svn pd svn:executable photark-webapp/src/main/webapp/prev.gif svn pd svn:executable photark-webapp/src/main/webapp/prev_disabled.gif svn pd svn:executable photark-webapp/src/main/webapp/prev_on.gif svn pd svn:executable photark-webapp/src/main/webapp/styles.css Fixed both in trunk and release branch. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00139.html -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Luciano Resendeluckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery application including a content repository for the images, a display piece, an access control layer, and upload capabilities. The idea is to have a rigid design for the content repository with a very flexible display piece. The images in the content repository will be protected with granular access control. We are getting a release vote out [1], aiming getting more exposure and attract more contributors to the community, and would appreciate if we could get some people helping us review the release artifacts as we are currently a very small community with only one mentor. We are looking for one more vote on the release, before we can request IPMC approval. Anyone willing to review it ??? [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00139.html -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Help reviewing PhotArk podling release
Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery application including a content repository for the images, a display piece, an access control layer, and upload capabilities. The idea is to have a rigid design for the content repository with a very flexible display piece. The images in the content repository will be protected with granular access control. We are getting a release vote out [1], aiming getting more exposure and attract more contributors to the community, and would appreciate if we could get some people helping us review the release artifacts as we are currently a very small community with only one mentor. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00139.html -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: SocialSite Podling status ?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Davesnoopd...@gmail.com wrote: We reported late one month, then missed a report last month. I just added a report for this month. Here's the part that deals with the missing code issue: The project has been incubating since April 30, 2009. The SVN space, mailing lists and initial user accounts have been created but we are still waiting for Sun to sign-off on the code grant. It's been about six months since Sun told us this would happen, we've been checking in with Sun every couple of weeks and apparently we're getting close. Thanks, - Dave Thanks for the update. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
SocialSite Podling status ?
Just curious to what happened to the SocialSite podling. I see they haven't been reporting (at lest they didn't last month, nor this month...) I also couldn't find any code at SVN. Did they actually enter incubation ? -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: photark project (was: Re: Stepping down as mentor for PhotArk)
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:08 AM, James Carmanja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: I wouldn't recommend using these tools for your community discussions, though. Totally agree, I don' t believe this was the idea. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: photark project (was: Re: Stepping down as mentor for PhotArk)
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Martin Coopermart...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Angela Cymbalak a.cymba...@nechtan.orgwrote: I've been spending more than my fair share of time on Facebook lately. Are we allowed to set up a Facebook page for the project? Just not sure since we are in incubation? What about a Twitter feed? Can we do those without breaking any of the incubation rules? I can do them if I know what my guidelines are... What would be the benefit of a Facebook page? I can see a Twitter feed might be useful assuming there's some project activity to twitter about, but I'm not sure I see a purpose to a Facebook page. I'm certainly open to hearing about how it might help, though. The idea would be to use the Facebook page to share some project announcements, such as releases, participation on conferences, etc I believe this is the same idea we are using for the main The Apache Software Foundation page in Facebook. This would really be another channel to reach for people while we still don' t have enough traffic on the PhotArk website. http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=2399716752ref=ts -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: photark project (was: Re: Stepping down as mentor for PhotArk)
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Martin Coopermart...@apache.org wrote: That Facebook page hasn't seen a wall post for five months, or a discussion since 2007... OK, so let's say we set up a Facebook page for PhotArk. Maybe we announce it by writing on the ASF page's wall. Don't people have to become a fan of the page to see updates to it without proactively going to the page? That's the part I don't get - how does this help us reach out? Surely people who don't already know about it are only going to hear about it if, for example, you or I say something about it in our 'status'. (I'm talking about Facebook here.) But we don't need a Facebook page before we can say something in our 'status'. So how does the page help? You are right, that we still need to get people interested in going and reading the content of the page (which is the hard part I guess for a lot of podlings)... but in the end, I guess this is one more place that could be reached by a search and provide some PhotArk related content. I'm sure I must be missing something here. ;-( :) I don't think so What I wanted to make sure is that there is no issues if a project member wants to start advertising or reaching out using these new social tools that are so popular these days... -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: photark project (was: Re: Stepping down as mentor for PhotArk)
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Angela Cymbalaka.cymba...@nechtan.org wrote: And my big question: if we are allowed to do this, I think I read somewhere that we aren't allowed to refer to the project as Apache PhotArk yet because we are still a podling. What is the proper way to refer to the podling? Angie My understanding is that we should be OK referring to the project as Apache PhotArk, but we should add a disclaimer somewhere on the page, similar to what we have on the bottom of our project page, in the releases, etc [1] http://incubator.apache.org/photark/ -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: photark project (was: Re: Stepping down as mentor for PhotArk)
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Angela Cymbalaka.cymba...@nechtan.org wrote: I've been spending more than my fair share of time on Facebook lately. Are we allowed to set up a Facebook page for the project? Just not sure since we are in incubation? What about a Twitter feed? Can we do those without breaking any of the incubation rules? I can do them if I know what my guidelines are... I don' t think there are specific guidelines/policies around Facebook/Twitter usage, but Apache have been using this for events advertisement and infrastructure notifications etc so it should be ok for us to use If you do this, please inform the PhotArk PPMC (via private list) of the credentials to manage the accounts. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: photark project (was: Re: Stepping down as mentor for PhotArk)
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Angela Cymbalaka.cymba...@nechtan.org wrote: Carsten - Sorry to see you go. Same feeling here Carsten... and Thanks for all the help so far All - I have been thinking a lot about the project and part of my problem is being unsure of what documentation needs to be included in the project so we can get a release out. Luciano has done a fabulous job so far and I would hate to see the project go any more dormant than it has. Are there any suggestions on how we can get the project back on track? Good to hear from you Angela I believe we are almost there with the release, and I'll try to get a release candidate in the next week or so (after I get freed up from work related tasks)... Once the release is out, we should try to advertise the project together with it's first release trough blogs, facebook, twitter, etc and a quick getting started article..., and also spend some time working on growing the community.. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Wookie - a W3C widget engine with Google Wave extension
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Gavinga...@16degrees.com.au wrote: Woohoo Wookie! All infra stuff is in place (wiki, jira, svn, mailing lists) Mentors, can you all please sign up for all the mailing lists (wookie-[user|dev|priva...@i.a.o or indicate an email address that I can add you in to manually. I'm subscribed to these lists now, feel free to add me as moderator if the lists are in need of help. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Wookie - a W3C widget engine with Google Wave extension
+1 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote: 2009/7/14 Gavin ga...@16degrees.com.au: +1 (minor edit made s/beehive-user/wookie-user , unlink surname McDonald - !McDonald) Well spotted Gavin - thank you. Ross Gav... -Original Message- From: ross.gard...@googlemail.com [mailto:ross.gard...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Ross Gardler Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2009 8:16 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Wookie - a W3C widget engine with Google Wave extension I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for Apache Wookie, a W3C widget engine with Google Wave extension The full proposal can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WookieProposal Vote will close in a little over 72 hours at mid day (BST, UTC + 1) Friday 17th July. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=7day=17year=2 009hour=12min=0sec=0p1=136 Ross -- Ross Gardler OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.387 / Virus Database: 270.13.10/2230 - Release Date: 07/14/09 05:56:00 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Ross Gardler OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Proposal for Wookie a W3C Widget/Google Wave widget engine
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote: I would like to submit the Wookie project proposal to the Incubator PMC. Our draft is appended to the end of this mail and is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WookieProposal A quick overview of Wookie is: Wookie is a Java server application that allows you to upload and deploy widgets for your applications. Wookie is based on the W3C Widgets specification, but widgets can also be included that use extended APIs such as Google Wave Gadgets and OpenSocial. I have agreed to champion and mentor this proposal, Gavin McDonald has also agreed to mentor, more mentors are being sought - let me know if you are interested. I'm willing to help Wookie as a mentor trough Incubation... feel free to add my name to the proposal. At this stage I am seeking feedback on or questions about the Wookie proposal. The project team are subscribed to this list and ready to respond to any queries. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Sanselan status page, was Fwd: [VOTE] Graduation for Sanselan
Could someone please update the news portion of the Sanselan incubator status page with the project news during incubation (e.g releases, committers addition, etc)... at least to be a reference for others voting. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sanselan.html [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sanselan/board/ -- Forwarded message -- From: Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com Date: Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 7:11 PM Subject: [VOTE] Graduation for Sanselan To: Incubator general@incubator.apache.org Hi, Sanselan has been in incubation since September 2007. Sanselan is a pure-java image library for reading and writing a variety of image formats. Monthly and then quarterly reports can be found at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sanselan/board/ The first official Apache Sanselan incubating release occurred on July 30th, 2008. A few months back we took a final look at Sanselan's status with regard to exiting the incubator. We concluded that while the code and the committer for Sanselan were ready to exit the incubator, community was an issue. We didn't see the prospect for getting enough of a community to graduate Sanselan as a TLP. But Apache Commons was eager to adopt Sanselan, and they voted to do so. Sanselan is now ready to graduate the incubator and assume its role as a subproject of Apache Commons. Please review the checklist at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sanselan.html and verify that Sanselan is ready. +1 graduate Sanselan into Apache Commons +-0 don't care -1 don't graduate because... Voting will remain open until Thursday June 25. Craig L Russell Incubator PMC, DB PMC, OpenJPA PMC c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Sling as Top Level Project
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@gmail.com wrote: [X] +1 to recommend Sling's graduation [X ] +1 to recommend Sling's graduation -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Wink proposal for incubation
- Original Message From: Nicholas L Gallardo nlgal...@us.ibm.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Bryant Luk b...@us.ibm.com; Christopher J Blythe cjbly...@us.ibm.com; Dustin Amrhein damr...@us.ibm.com; Baram, Eliezer eba...@hp.com; el...@hp.com; Greg Truty gtr...@us.ibm.com; Jesse A Ramos jra...@us.ibm.com; Snitkovsky, Martin martin.snitkov...@hp.com; Michael Rheinheimer r...@us.ibm.com; nadav.fisc...@hp.com; tali.alsaigh-co...@hp.com; tomer.sh...@hp.com Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 11:54:35 AM Subject: [VOTE] Accept Wink proposal for incubation Dear Incubator PMC Members, The Wink team would like to officially present the proposal for the Wink REST runtime for incubation in the Apache Incubator. This proposal has been surfaced previously and is also available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WinkProposal Please cast your votes: [ ] +1, Accept Wink for incubation [ ] +0, Indifferent to Wink incubation [ ] -1, Reject Wink for incubation (if so, please help us understand why) The formal proposal, included below, provides supporting details on why this proposal is coming forward and who is involved. Thanks and cheers on behalf of the team. +1, Accept Wink for incubation -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Incubating in version?
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote: Gang, Haven't we agreed that incubating projects made available as Maven artifacts must contain incubating in the 'version' property? http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/rat/apache-rat-core/0.6/apache-rat-core-0.6.jar Anyone knows anything about the above artifact? The Rat release artifacts for download seems to follow the correct pattern [1] [2] [3]. This seems to be a problem only related to the maven deployed artifacts ? [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/rat/ [2] http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/rat/binaries/ [3] http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/rat/sources/ -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Click graduation
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: 3 is the minimal number that is needed for a formal acceptance. So I see no problem with it. Click has been a successful open source project done the Apache way before entering Apache, so I think it is definitely ready to graduate now. While a possibility of a vote deadlock exists, it does exist for any other Apache project as well. One of the items about doing things The Apache Way is to build a meritocratic community around a project, which it does not seem to be what has happened with Click. As an example, see the activity in other podlings before they graduated [1], and then compare with what Click is showing [3] today. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tuscany.html [2] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/qpid.html [3] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/click.html On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: ...the project is fine, but should take a break with graduation to reevaluate its ranks and recruit willing and deserving individuals, and come back here maybe in 2-3 months if this endeavor is successful +1, I'd recommend to take this time on slowing down the heads down coding part and concentrate in mentoring new members to contribute and earn committer karma to the project and to expand the community in general (users, etc) ... -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Help reviewing PhotArk podling release
Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery application including a content repository for the images, a display piece, an access control layer, and upload capabilities. The idea is to have a rigid design for the content repository with a very flexible display piece. The images in the content repository will be protected with granular access control. We are getting a release vote out [1], aiming getting more exposure and attract more contributors to the community, and would appreciate if we could get some people helping us review the release artifacts as we are currently a very small community with only two mentors. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00116.html -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [Vote] Release Apache Pivot 1.1
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote: wtk/lib/plugin.jar : I don' t see this mentioned in notice or license This file is included in the JRE, which we list as a system requirement. We only include it in the source distribution because it's not in the classpath by default when you compile, so we had to put it in a known place. I think we are not allowed to distribute this dependency. This would make my +1 a -1 I think. Does Harmony have a plugin.jar? Martijn This is my understanding as well. I'm currently -1. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [Vote] Release Apache Pivot 1.1
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote: The Pivot community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Apache Pivot 1.1. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and with the endorsement of our mentors, we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the artifacts on the Pivot download page. Please vote by 6 PM UTC Friday, 4/10. [ ] +1 Publish [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 Don't publish Please note: one of our mentors, Niclas Hedhman, has had to take a small leave of absence due to personal circumstances and will not be able to vote or participate in any ensuing discussions, but he has given his blessing for us to call for a vote on this general@ list. Thanks -T Proposal: http://tinyurl.com/d3xzfo http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-pivot-dev/200904.mbox/168ef9ac0904030513ha06b13cra99eb0c3704c9...@mail.gmail.com Vote result: http://tinyurl.com/da6zyp http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-pivot-dev/200904.mbox/168ef9ac0904070930u5b0a3849yb603ddc8bd4de...@mail.gmail.com Release artifacts RAT reports: http://people.apache.org/~tvolkert/pivot/ Explanation of JSON files not containing license headers: http://tinyurl.com/ccck89 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-pivot-dev/200904.mbox/111846254285841469441126970441570632830-webm...@me.com Releases section of the Incubation Policy: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases Couple questions from the source distribution: (1) The source distribution seems to have the following binary jars : web/lib/servlet-api.jar : It looks like you mention this under your notice file but I don' t see details about it's license. wtk/lib/plugin.jar : I don' t see this mentioned in notice or license wtk/stax-api1.0-jar : There was some discussion about the license of this jar in legal-discuss recently (see. LEGAL-42 [1]), and looks like people have been recommending using the jar from Geronimo which is under Apache license (geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar) In general, the notice file in the distribution mention couple of other licenses (e.g CPL 1.0, Java EE Servlet specification, BSD, etc) which are not appended on the LICENSE file.See [2] for more detail. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-42 [2] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Apache PhotArk
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:24 PM, kusum kumar kusu...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Could anybody please comment on my GSOC Proposal of Apache PhotArk so that i can edit my proposal if required..? Please Kusum, let' s use photArk dev list for these discussions. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Opinion about new framework
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Andre Dantas Rocha andre.dantas.ro...@uol.com.br wrote: Hi Luciano, Thank you for your reply. My first idea is gathering some information from list before creating a proposal, so I'd be sure that Jeha is a viable project. I looked at the link you sent me, but the projects are not *so* close. Jeha is about facilitate exception handling usage by annotations and commons handlers, and Douglas is working on more sophisticate approach, including distributed and concurrent exceptions I guess this goes along lines the comments from Bertrand, trying to expand the scope to become more challenging, and more interesting for developers. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Opinion about new framework
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Andre Dantas Rocha andre.dantas.ro...@uol.com.br wrote: Hi all, I’m developing a framework called Jeha. The main idea of it is to provide easy exception handling using annotations in methods and classes. I believe that the idea is simple, but powerful. The start guide and initial code of framework are here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=242203package_id=294931release_id=650572 I’d like to hear from incubator community if Jeha is valuable for a possible incubation. Ola Andre You probably want to start creating a proposal detailing the idea if you want detailed comments (see archive of this list for examples of proposals and the type of feedback/questions you might get), but in the mean time, you might want to get in touch with Douglas Leite, he is a Tuscany committer and a student at University of Campinas who is proposing a Google Summer of Code project around the same area of exceptions [1]... you guys could probably collaborate on this. [1] http://markmail.org/thread/4ta7humbznoi2lss -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: monthly reporting: Bluesky, Kato, Stonehenge, ESME, Cassandra, Pivot
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote: On Apr 2, 2009, at 9:47 PM, David Crossley wrote: The http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule is out-of-date ... Monthly (first three months) * Bluesky (Currently on monthly reporting schedule as per board request) +1 BlueSky is making progress on open communication. I believe we should wait for them to file 1 or 2 scheduled reports without us having to request them and we could bring them back to quarterly reports. The only thing that worries me is when they are going to be able to get the source code to SVN, that should really help the community to attract more interested people and also help them learn the apache way. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Gsoc Applicant
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:05 PM, kusum kumar kusu...@gmail.com wrote: Can somebody brief on what work is intended on PhotArk project of Apache under GSOC 2009.? I am working on standalone application of a photo-viewer.I wanted to know details so that i can frame my gsoc proposal accordingly. Suggestions and advices will be highly appreciated. Please, let's have this discussion on the PhotArk dev list (mailto:photark-...@incubator.apache.org). As for a list of project ideas for the PhotArk podling, see [1] [1] http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2009#photark-project -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Getting Log4PHP going again.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: I also asked on the log4php list if there are interested people for the GSoC. If it is possible for an incubation project to participate, maybe somebody can help me to get this introduced in the apache way. Yes, Incubator Projects are able to participate in GSoC, feel free to add ideas to [1]. The only issue is that mentors, need to be Apache Members or Committers, but maybe you can get one of your mentors to become a mentor if students get interested in log4php project ideas. [1] http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2009 -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Podling traffic stats
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Does anyone know of a resource that shows traffic statistics for individual podling sites? The closest I found is http://people.apache.org/~vgritsenko/stats/projects/incubator.html, which gives such stats for incubator.apache.org as a whole. Podlings are not covered by that link. You could use Google Analytics to get these stats. Thanks, -T - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Suspending Projects -- XAP
+1 On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Yoav Shapira yo...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4 months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP, I am raising this as a vote. +1 Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1
Looks good to me +1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 9, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *four* +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. Just noting that the *four* +1 votes included two IPMC members (Matthias Wessendorf and myself). We'll require one more IPMC member vote, but, of course, all reviews/votes are much appreciated. --kevan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Etch?
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote: What ever happened to Etch? Live and well, although http://incubator.apache.org/etch has not been populated yet. ATM, stuff gets written to http://cwiki.apache.org/ETCH/ Pointing http://incubator.apache.org/etch to an auto exported version of the wiki should be easy, and there is some documentation embedded in the following page [1], please let me know if you need help. [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/#Index-HowdowerequestaCWIKISpace Was it something else in particular you were thinking of? Feel free to join the fun on etch-...@incubator.apache.org Cheers Niclas -- http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sanselan 0.96
Are you planning to upload the javadoc jars to maven (sanselan-0.96-incubator-javadoc.jar) ? if so the javadoc must have LICENSE. NOTICE, DISCLAIMER Minor comments - source and binary distribution are being extracted to same directory - can't find keys online, but after importing KEYS file from distribution signatures are ok. On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: Vote thread: http://incubator.markmail.org/message/etebbem2edy36cft Niall On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Charles Matthew Chen charlesmc...@gmail.com wrote: Apache Sanselan is a pure-Java image library which supports reading and writing image data and metadata from a variety of file formats. An new proposed incubator release is now ready. The proposed release can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~cmchen/dist/incubator/sanselan/0.96/ The RAT output for the bin and src distributions can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~cmchen/rat-src-0.96.txt http://people.apache.org/~cmchen/rat-bin-0.96.txt A summary of the changes, improvements and fixes in this release can be found here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sanselan/trunk/RELEASE_NOTES The release vote on the sanselan-dev mailing list resulted in 5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. More information about the project can be found here: * Wiki: http://cwiki.apache.org/SANSELAN/ * Incubation Status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sanselan.html * Mailing list archive: http://incubator.apache.org/mail/sanselan-dev/ Thanks, Charles. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Abdera Graduation to TLP
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Craig On Nov 13, 2008, at 5:59 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote: After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the long incubation process (started in May 2006!), but I think the Abdera community, while small, is now diverse enough that I have no question as to its ability to survive as its own Apache project. So please vote away. A +1 vote is for sending the following motion to the board for its approval. -garrett Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [REPORTS] missing: Abdera BlueSky Buildr Droids Hama JSecurity Lokahi Olio PDFBox PhotArk Tashi VCL WSRP4J XAP
I have updated the wiki with the PhotArk report [1] [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008#head-0e5d39e727acbdf47dc06f1dbb0fd2b00e109b86 On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Craig L Russell wrote: Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three month schedule. This reminder was generated from out-of-date info. The info has been updated since then. -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Qpid Graduation - for top level
Good job on the community work !!! +1 (non-binding) On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Over the past several months, I've watched the qpid community work together and I'm persuaded that the project is ready to graduate. +1 Craig On Nov 12, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote: It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list that Qpid would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC felt that the Qpid project should increase its diversity. Over the intervening months Qpid has added more independents to the project PPMC, bringing the diversity to 7 legally independent parties (not counting those mentors who will stay on to help advise), with the PPMC diversity at 5 legally independent parties (also not counting mentors). Qpid also continues to attract more contributors (both independents and large corporates), so the committer pool and diversity should continue to expand as contributors are voted in as committers. Qpid has also made an additional release since the last graduation attempt and is currently working through close down of the next release. Qpid was accepted into the incubator August 2006. Attached is the graduation resolution, Please consider your vote for our graduation. many thanks. Carl. Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Buildr as TLP
[X] +1 Approve graduation of Buildr as a Top-Level Project (non-binding) On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Niklas Gustavsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Alex Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 Approve graduation of Buildr as a Top-Level Project Non binding. /niklas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: accommodate non-native-English-writing developers
J Aaron's slides available at http://cubiclemuses.com/cm/blog/2007/open_source_china_presentation.html On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Jean T. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Crossley wrote: ... For example, some key parts of its puzzle are developed by Japanese people. Other parts by English-speaking people. Some of these people can read/write English, but others are not at all comfortable. ... Does anyone here have some tips for conducting an open development project that accommodates multi-lingual developer participation? -David I suspect the issues will be more than just linguistic. Last year at ApacheCon, Atlanta, J Aaron Farr gave an excellent talk titled Open Source in China. I didn't spot his presentation for download from the Apache site [1], but perhaps he might be able to make it available? cheers, -jean [1] http://www.us.apachecon.com/us2007/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: accommodate non-native-English-writing developers
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:16 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mail lists: Should people just partipipate on the podling's dev mail list in their own languages? Then expect that someone summarises the outcomes and decisions into English/Japanese. Or would it be better to have separate dev language lists, with the same summarising outcome. The former would enable replies to be threaded with the other language. i think one dev list is the right way to approach this problem. it's important for the development community to have a single forum for discussion and decision making. I agree that we should have one official dev list in english. i'm not so sure about the user lists (perhaps someone from tuscany could jump in and tell us about their chinese users forum) In Tuscany, our experience with having a non-English mailing list has been very interesting, the forum has been created just a month or two ago and the number of subscribers and the activity on it has been growing very rapidly, this makes me think that there is indeed a language barrier that would prevent some individuals to participate in the english discussion lists, although these members are very technically skilled and willing to consume and become a contributor of your project. In order to allow others to be aware of what's going on in this forum, we have Raymond, our Chinese speaking community member, watching the forum, and communicating issues back to our official English list. We also found it very useful to use Google infrastructure to perform automatic-translation of the forum [1], this allows anyone to lurk around and have a feeling of what's being discussed. [1] http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http:%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fgroup%2Ftuscany-sca-chinesehl=enie=UTF8sl=zh-CNtl=en - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Graduation Checklist , was Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pig Developers and Mentors, Pig has been incubating for over a year now. In this period of time, we had extended our community with 2 new committers, Has this list been updated recently ? Does it reflect the current list of committers ? [1] http://incubator.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html As of now, we have completed graduation requirements as described in http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. Have you guys looked at the Creating an Open and Diverse community section on the graduation checklist ? -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Vote] accept Droids into incubation
+1 (non-binding) On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Ross Gardler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: Please vote on accepting Droids into incubation. The proposal can be found at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DroidsProposal +1 Ross - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn commit: r691545
Making the podling RTC will help protect the podling and ASF, but I think we should also try to guide the community to better understand and work the Apache way. One way or another, I'd suggest couple of other items to the Blue Sky community : - Community members should be more responsive - Community members should act quickly when there are license related concerns - Mentors should help community members to get more familiar with working the apache way, a good start could be [1], and then a little about Apache License [2][3] If the community needs basic how to work with open source, some materials also available in [4] [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/contributors.html [2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/ [3] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html [4] http://tuscany.apache.org/working-in-open-source.html On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Bernd Fondermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...I'd like to propose that bluesky changes to Review-Then-Commit, instead of Commit-Then-Review because of apparent lack of eyeballs/mentor oversight Given the recent events, I support this request. What do the Bluesky mentors think? -Bertrand -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PhotArk Podling Creation
The podling creation guide [1] mentions that it's creation should be initiated by the mentor. Is there any issue on having other podling members (such myself) helping on getting the project created ? [1] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Creation+of+Podling -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Publishing a podling website
PDFBox should have it's own website content place under : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/pdfbox/ Below is uima website that uses the same pattern you mentioned, altough the folder names are docs and xdocs. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/site/trunk/uima-website/ It's also good to mention that currently couple podlings are starting to use wiki as the source for the website, and in the case of confluence, using the html-export plugin to export the wiki contents to html. On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Under http://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html I can read that the preferred mechanism is to update the podling websites is via SVN. I'm currently preparing the PDFBox website and was surprised to see that not a single podling has put their generated website in a subdirectory under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/ So my question: Is it ok to put the generated PDFBox website in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/pdfbox ??? Thanks, Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jörn Kottmann wrote: please vote again to release the Cas Editor. The first vote was rejected, because the ICU license and notice was missing, this is now fixed, see UIMA-1115. +1 -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ Millennium hand and shrimp! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multiple concerns reviewing BlueSky podling website
While reviewing the BlueSky podling website, I noticed the following issues : - The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing to non-apache bluesky released artifacts. I think this is at least very confusing, as it can allude users to think this is a endorsed ASF release. Is this OK ? - The BluSky website is based on the Tuscany design and styles, and during the page content copy, some tuscany specific code were also copied. See patch below with necessary changes. [3] - Why we have urchin.js [1], a Google Copyrighted js used by Google analytics checked in to Apache SVN ? Is this OK legal wise ? If the file is really needed, I'd recommend pointing to the online version as below ? See patch below with suggested change [3]. SCRIPT src=http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js; type=text/javascript/SCRIPT Noticed that I have created a patch [3] that address the last two issues. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/bluesky/files/html/Bluesky%20Downloads%20%20Documentations%20%20Apache%20Bluesky.htm [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bluesky/webpage/files/images/urchin.js [3] http://people.apache.org/~lresende/bluesky/bluesky-website.patch -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Luciano Resende wrote: The binary distributions, both windows and linux, have the com.ibm.icu_3.6.1.v20070906.jar in the plugins directory and the about_files/license.html from the ICU jar mention the following : ICU License - ICU 1.8.1 and later COPYRIGHT AND PERMISSION NOTICE Copyright (c) 1995-2007 International Business Machines Corporation and others All rights reserved. . But I haven't found any attribution on License/Notice files. Argh, you're right, we missed ICU. Everything else ok, or did you stop looking when you found this issue? --Thilo That's the only think I could find. On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:46 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 ...ant On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Jörn Kottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, the Cas Editor is a text annotation tool which supports manual and automatic annotation of CAS files. It is now ready for its first release. Please review and vote for releasing the Apache Uima Cas Editor-2.2.2-02. The release artifacts and the rat reports can be found at: http://people.apache.org/~joern/CasEditor-2.2.2-02/http://people.apache.org/%7Ejoern/CasEditor-2.2.2-02/ On the uima-dev list there were 5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes to release it. The Cas Editor originally came to Apache under a software grant. Thanks, Jörn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: photo gallery software (previously called Caitrin)
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:50 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Angela Cymbalak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't labs for something already inside of Apache and the Incubator for things outside of Apache? labs is for existing Apache committers, and labs are not allowed to release software. More at http://labs.apache.org/ And since currently this software project is merely an idea (along with some previously tinkered with codebases), I'd say it's a perfect candidate for a lab. It doesn't sound like it's ready for a release just yet. :) As bertrand mentioned, Labs are for existing committers only, and Angela, who is proposing the project isn't a committer. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: photo gallery software (previously called Caitrin)
With regards to process, what is still missing that is preventing Angela to call a vote to get the project accepted into Incubation ? I just want to make sure we are not waiting for the suggestions from Sling and Tuscany, as I see these discussions and/or contributions as something that can happen during incubation in a much structured way. On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: since currently this software project is merely an idea (along with some previously tinkered with codebases), I'd say it's a perfect candidate for a lab. It doesn't sound like it's ready for a release just yet. :) When were either of those two things criteria for Incubation? And there is code, but to give credit, the project is prepared to discard all of it in order to build community. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: photo gallery software (previously called Caitrin)
I have started some discussions on getting a prototype based on Tuscany + Sling [1]. The code will be available at [2] [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40tuscany.apache.org/msg00442.html [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/java/sca/samples/photo-gallery/ On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Angela Cymbalak wrote: Is there somewhere that I can take a look at the code? Would you mind if it were drawn from for a new project? No, the code is not yet available - but I hope to commit it around the weekend. I'll you know. Feel free to use it, or withdraw the idea after looking at it :) Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: photo gallery software (previously called Caitrin)
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:10 AM, Angela Cymbalak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There has been a lot of going back and forth. Originally there seemed to be little interest at the Incubator so I was talking to the Roller folks. There is some interest over there but a disagreement on how to write the code. At the same time there started to be interest at the Incubator again and the idea is starting to take hold. Then I got really busy... Now I need to start re-working on the proposal since other discussions have taken place and the idea is becoming more formed. As for the front end, the current idea is to expose the data held in the repository as a Web service. I would be more than happy to see a Flex front end built that is a client to the Web service. Personally, I would like to see an AJAX front end, but I know that some people dislike the lack of security around AJAX. In simplistic words, by using Apache Tuscany and SCA to define your your photo gallery component, you can decouple the business logic from the transport infrastructure specific APIs; and then expose your services trough multiple bindings such as webservices, web 2.0, etc and although we don't have a flex binding today, one could easily create a new binding in Tuscany to support it. This should simplify the framework and make the task of supporting a new type of client (flex versus ajax, etc) much easier. I like Hans' suggestions for the name as well. If there are other ideas for a name, feel free to throw them out there. I would like to find something that is interesting, yet allows someone to easily determine what the project is. That is proving to be a big challenge. photoGallery stillGallery imageGallery Niépce NiépceGallery Angie At 01:33 AM 6/27/2008, you wrote: I'm a little confused, because the wiki says that the proposal is being put on hold and that the goal is to work with the Roller community. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CaitrinProposal Nevertheless, if there's interest in building a Flex front end, let me know... -- Martin Cooper On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Angela Cymbalak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I haven't forgotten about wanting to create an open source Photo Gallery and there has been some sporadic interest as I have discussed it. A quick update as to where we are at for anyone who is interested. 1. Name change No one but me knows where the name Caitrin came from and it isn't obvious what the software would do. A proposed solution (thanks Noel for the path suggestion) would be PhosLibrarius 2. Code Bases There are 2 code bases that we can draw from and discard that I have heard of. Always a good start 3. Design Right now thought is being put into the high level design to improve the Proposal. The current proposal is bad. I take credit for that because I haven't done the Apache thing before and I am tripping all over while trying to stay on the right path. The current thought is to defiantly write the application in Java. Its secure, it scales well, we like it. The thought is to look into Sling and the JCR as well as different databases. I have to do reading on Sling to figure out how it all fits together. Pretty much, we are focusing on the back end first with the possibility of a Web service for the front end to start. This lets anyone out there write nice pretty display pieces. I like AJAX as a front end but others who I have talked to don't. We can agree on the Web service for right now. If anyone has anything that they would like to contribute or if you have comments/suggestions about this proposal please let me know. The interest seems to be lurking out there, we just need to get it organized. Thanks, Angie -- Angela Cymbalak Nechtan Design http://www.nechtandesign.com/ 412.931.4663 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)
+1 (non-binding) On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Jean T. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 -jean Craig L Russell wrote: While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that there has been no recent action on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72 An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which currently confuses the role of the PPMC and the incubator PMC. The patch simply removes the text and only the PPMC member votes are binding. Index: site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml === --- site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml(revision 618386) +++ site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml(working copy) @@ -457,9 +457,8 @@ the Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At least three +1 votes are required (see the a href=http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html;Apache Voting Process/a -page), -and only the PPMC member -votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling +page). +If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's a href=howtoparticipate.html#Mailing+listsgeneral/a This vote will conclude on Monday June 30. Here's my +1. Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 72-hour lazy consensus for podling committer + PPMC member votes (was: INCUBATOR-57 aka IPMC votes...)
+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Martijn Dashorst wrote: | +1 | | On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz | [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Hi, | | I'd like to ask for a vote on Justin's proposal below, to change the | Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list.. paragraph at | http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html . | | There were lots of +1s in the original thread, and a minor concern | that this does not explicitely that 3 +1 votes from Incubator PMC | members are required. | | That concern is addressed by the text that follows this paragraph on | http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html: | | Only votes cast by Incubator PMC members are binding, but votes by the PPMC are | very important. The entire PPMC should show support for the nominee. If the vote is | positive (three or more binding +1 votes and no binding -1 votes), the proposer... | So I think Justin's proposal is good to go - please cast your votes, | so that we can clarify this and move on. | | -Bertrand | | On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz | [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have: | --- | Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the | Incubator private list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the | vote email with a cover statement that this vote is underway on the | podling's private list. Many consider this approach to be best | practice. After completing the vote on the PPMC list, the proposer | calls a vote on the Incubator PMC private list, summarizing the | discussion and vote, with a reference to the archived discussion and | vote threads by the PPMC. The Incubator vote is done even if there are | three +1 votes from Incubator PMC members during the PPMC vote, in | order to give all Incubator PMC members a chance to express their | support or disapproval after seeing the PPMC discussion and vote | results. Note that only the Incubator PMC members can see the | Incubator private discussion, and the podling's Mentors should review | all Incubator PMC feedback with the PPMC. Moreover, only Apache | members may review the private PPMC list (this is normally not an | issue since most Incubator PMC members are Apache members). | --- | | I'd like to make the suggestion that we alter this to: | --- | Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the | Incubator private list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the | vote email with a cover statement that this vote is underway on the | podling's private list. Many consider this approach to be best | practice. After completing the vote on the PPMC list, the proposer | *sends a note to* the Incubator PMC private list, summarizing the | discussion and vote, with a reference to the archived discussion and | vote threads by the PPMC. *Any member of the Incubator PMC can ACK | the receipt of the vote. This starts a 72-hour window for lazy | consensus. After 72 hours and no requests by any Incubator PMC member | for a full vote by the Incubator PMC, the committer request is | approved by the Incubator PMC and the PPMC can start the committer | invitation process.* | --- | | This intentionally follows the procedure for adding a PMC member wrt | full ASF board. I like the concept of expanding this for committers | as well for Incubation, so there. I don't like needless 'dual | voting', but I do want the IPMC to have the chance to execute | oversight. | | WDYT?-- justin | - | To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | | | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) iD8DBQFIX4W5gNg6eWEDv1kRAgR6AJ44JfQm/Fw4tLlcziLNMiQUIZRatwCfU2H7 2hhRwZXv1mUmsnfd6y6vAWw= =xfO0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Publish Apache Sling
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 from me as well. - -- dims Paul Fremantle wrote: | I know you don't need it, but here is my +1. | | Paul | | On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz | [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Hi, | | On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | The vote on the release of Apache Sling passed successfully with twelve +1 | votes... | Of those, the following 3 people are Incubator PMC members: | | Carsten Ziegeler (*) | Bertrand Delacretaz (*) | Jukka Zitting (*) | So, according to the recent policy clarifications [1], I think we only | need to keep this vote open for 72 hours, more +1s in this thread are | not required to release (although they're obviously welcome if people | want to have a look). | | -Bertrand | | [1] http://markmail.org/message/6hn3crqqhywfzbsr | | - | To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | | | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) iD8DBQFIW6S+gNg6eWEDv1kRAj7yAJ9f7YdJ6siG04QoA1vQ7FUdgNQqjwCcDArn jDtkzZIehcVD0XHVADBskZc= =f5vm -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Podling status files
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see a trend in podlings not filling in their status files. Shindig and Pig both have the bare template as their status file. Can someone (e.g. the mentors of said projects) update the status files please? I'm hoping for a completely checked status file, but in the very least I'd expect a list of initial committers augmented with the committers that were added after incubation started. A list of actual mentors is also welcomed. Martijn +1 I'd probably expect some information from releases as well. I'd also recommend that mentors help the Podlign PMC to get familiar with the process, rather then doing it themselves. -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Incubate JSecurity Project
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:23 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Relevant information can be found in: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JSecurityProposal Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL] Incubate JSecurity Project
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMHO, the decision on build tools belongs to the community. I've signed on to mentor this project. Maybe there is a fast track through the incubator, and this is a good project to try it out. Can JSecurity get graduated in six months? This would probably depends on the podling being able to demonstrate to IPMC that they are ready and they have met the requirements in [1]. Having said that, I have seen podlings that are very active, lots of users, but having difficulty to really get the Apache Way. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Graduating+from+the+Incubator Craig On May 30, 2008, at 9:08 AM, Jeremy Haile wrote: Ant+Ivy vs Maven =) On May 30, 2008, at 12:06 PM, James Carman wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maven vs Ant vs Buildr ? Who uses Ant or Buildr? ;) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: draft proposal for Caitrin (Photo Gallery Software)
Wearing my more ametur photographer heat, I have interest on this project, and would like to contribute to it. In the past couple weeks, I've been planning to do a simple photo gallery application that would demo the Tuscany/SCA Web 2.0 capabilities, but looks like I could apply some of my ideas to Caitrin as well. On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Angela Cymbalak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Noel, Would you be willing to Champion the proposal? There is interest at Roller to write a plugin for the software and I am working on writing the proposal for that as well. I think that this software is best as its own project though because it could get very big. Angie At 08:59 AM 5/19/2008, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Roland Weber wrote: I doubt that a podling without three committers would even be accepted. Sure it would, were there interest. And a photo gallery does happen to have my own interest, as I have written software for the same problem domain, as well as being an avid nature photographer and past President of the Carolinas Nature Photographers Association (www.cnpa.org). Any other photographers out there? --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mentor needed for NMaven
I can help with what I have learned from my involvement with Tuscany and couple other podlings, but I'm not part of IPMC. On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, One of the mentors for NMaven recently resigned due to time contraints. Are there any other members that have some cycles to spare and would be able to volunteer to join in? Thanks, Brett -- Brett Porter Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ANNOUNCE] Apache Tuscany SCA Java 1.2 released
The Apache Tuscany team are delighted to announce the 1.2 release of the Java SCA project. Apache Tuscany provides a runtime environment based on the Service Component Architecture (SCA). SCA is a set of specifications aimed at simplifying SOA application development. These specifications are being standardized by OASIS as part of the Open Composite Services Architecture (Open CSA). The Tuscany SCA Java 1.2 release adds a number of features including: * An improved SCA distributed domain support with an SCA Domain Manager application * Support for running Tuscany in a OSGI runtime using Apache Felix * Support for JAXWS annotations * improved and simplified JMS binding * Improved support for SCA Policies and a new Policy provider SPI * Support for 'native' Groovy component implementation classes * Atom binding now using Apache Abdera * A new Eclipse plugin providing a Tuscany runtime Library and Tuscany launcher in Eclipse environment. For full details about the release and to download the distributions please go to: http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-releases.html To find out more about OASIS Open CSA go to: http://www.oasis-opencsa.org Apache Tuscany welcomes your help. Any contribution, including code, testing, contributions to the documentation, or bug reporting is always appreciated. For more information on how to get involved in Apache Tuscany visit the website at: http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany Thank you for your interest in Apache Tuscany! The Apache Tuscany Team. --- Tuscany is an effort undergoing incubation at the Apache Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Web services PMC. Incubation is required of all newly accepted projects until a further review indicates that the infrastructure, communications, and decision making process have stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RESULT][VOTE] Approve the release of Tuscany Java SCA 1.2-incubating
This vote has passed with 3 +1 and no 0s or -1s. +1 votes received from : Ant Elder, Matthieu Riou Paul Fremantle. On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Paul On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java SCA 1.2-incubating. The vote thread is here ... http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg30405.html The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC4/http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC4/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, and the Maven staging repository. The eclipse updatesite for the Tuscany Eclipse plugins is available at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC4/updatesite/http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC4/updatesite/ The release tag is available at : http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.2-RC4/ +1 Matthieu -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Paul Fremantle Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2 Apache Synapse PMC Chair OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oxygenating the Web Service Platform, www.wso2.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Approve the release of Tuscany Java SCA 1.2-incubating
The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java SCA 1.2-incubating. The vote thread is here ... http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg30405.html The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC4/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, and the Maven staging repository. The eclipse updatesite for the Tuscany Eclipse plugins is available at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC4/updatesite/ The release tag is available at : http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.2-RC4/ -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Requesting proper karma for Tuscany Committers to access repo/private/committers
Thanks Santiago. On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Santiago Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El mar, 15-04-2008 a las 16:24 -0700, Luciano Resende escribió: Could someone on the IPMC please help us get the proper karma to some Tuscany committers that does not have access to repo/private/committers. From a thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] the following committers does not have proper access : agrove ajborley amita edwardsmj frankb fuhwei gwinn isilval jmarino jsdelfino kelvingoodson kwilliams slaws svkrish BTW, I'm asking this here, per infra@ request. done. jsdelfino was already added by joes at r648453 Regards Santiago Thanks -- Santiago Gala http://memojo.com/~sgala/blog/ http://memojo.com/%7Esgala/blog/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Santiago for sorting us out so quickly. Just tried it and I can report it now works for me. Regards Simon -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requesting proper karma for Tuscany Committers to access repo/private/committers
Could someone on the IPMC please help us get the proper karma to some Tuscany committers that does not have access to repo/private/committers. From a thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] the following committers does not have proper access : agrove ajborley amita edwardsmj frankb fuhwei gwinn isilval jmarino jsdelfino kelvingoodson kwilliams slaws svkrish BTW, I'm asking this here, per infra@ request. Thanks -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An update on Apache Tuscany
I'd like to take this opportunity to share information about how Apache Tuscany project has positively moved forward to build a larger community that is more integrated within the Apache ecosystem. I would make the following bullets so they stand out - We have welcomed 3 new committers, and have a new one being voted. - And added new PPMC members. - We have also experienced an increase in the number of user generated patches, from an average of 4 in the last months of 2007 to 7 in March, and other 7 only on the first days of current month. - We have welcomed many new community members who are beginning to learn Tuscany or are at a point of wanting to contribute - We also noticed traction from China and would like to thank the Tuscany contributors who have been instrumental for creating that awareness. This effort includes contribution of a Chinese version of the Tuscany website. - Actively participated in GSOC and mentored students and we have 8 good proposals being evaluated at the moment. - We have enhanced our website and user documentation, and this has paid off with great feedback from the community [1], here is what J Aaron Farr posted in his blog : ... One interesting observation was that the Tuscany team got started faster thanks to good project documentation and fewer software prerequisites - And some of the Tuscany Users have also been providing us with great feedback of their success using Tuscany in their first try [2]. The Tuscany community also spent great amount of time extending Tuscany to integrate with other Apache projects: - Apache Abdera for our Atom binding support - Apache ActiveMQ - Apache Axis2 for WebServices biding - Apache Derby - Apache Felix for OSGI runtime support - Apache Geronimo as a first-class integrated hosting platform for Tuscany - Apache ODE for BPEL engine integration - Apache OpenJPA - Apache Tomcat as hosting platform - etc And we have also noticed interest from other open source projects: - Eclipse STP for SCA Tooling is available for Tuscany SCA release 1.1 [3] - Also the Eclipse ELIF project has been integrating with Tuscany SCA [4] Tuscany community participated in many conferences and wrote journal articles to create awareness around Tuscany and help expand the community: - ApacheCon - JavaOne 2007 and 2008 - OASIS Symposium - SOA World - Asia Open Source Symposium Asia Open Source Symposium Code Fest - Presentations at Universities in (China, US, UK, Brazil) - Articles in Brazilian Magazines, Java Developer Journal and Chinese technical magazine - PyCon Italia Due Conference (Italy) And also, we have continued to deliver various Tuscany releases. We would like to thank our mentors and the community as a whole for the tremendous effort that has been put into creating the open and growing community that we are experiencing today. Further information is also available in the Tuscany Incubator Status page [5] [1] http://cubiclemuses.com/cm/blog/2008/codefest.html [2] http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/projects-using-tuscany.html [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg29815.html [4] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user%40ws.apache.org/msg02643.html [5] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tuscany.html -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO
The files that have this license are listed in the LICENSE [1] file (search for Apache Tuscany SDO for Java Subcomponents) and I also see a mention of osoa.org in the NOTICE [2]. Is this what you were looking for ? [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1-RC3/LICENSE [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1-RC3/NOTICE On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Ant, Apologies for the slow review. Can you comment on the src files that don't have src license headers? I also note that the commonj src files contain the following copyright statement. I would expect to find it in the base NOTICE file as well as any jar files containing commonj classes... === ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/sdo-api/src/main/java/commonj/sdo/ChangeSummary.java === /** * copyright * * Service Data Objects * Version 2.1.0 * Licensed Materials * * (c) Copyright BEA Systems, Inc., International Business Machines Corporation, * Oracle Corporation, Primeton Technologies Ltd., Rogue Wave Software, SAP AG., * Software AG., Sun Microsystems, Sybase Inc., Xcalia, Zend Technologies, * 2005, 2006. All rights reserved. * * /copyright * */ Everything else looked good to me. --kevan On Apr 6, 2008, at 7:10 PM, ant elder wrote: Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO. This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging repository, and RAT report are at: http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a The tag for the release is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1/ KEYS file is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS The tuscany-dev list vote thread is at: http://apache.markmail.org/message/xgaeb7klnsfdkrmx Many thanks, ...ant -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Abdera 0.4.0-incubating Take 7
Good job!!! great improvement !!! +1 (non-binding) On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:10 PM, James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, we've updated the release candidate... please review Take 7 of the vote to release Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating. The following things have changed: - All necessary files now include ASL headers - LICENSE file now includes pointers to non-ASL licenses and Mark Pilgrim's license - NOTICE files in the jars are much cleaner thanks to the new maven-remote-resource plugin. - Information about a jar's dependencies and their licenses are now included in META-INF/DEPENDENCIES instead of the NOTICE file. - The NOTICE file in the distributions contains all the stuff not in lib/*-LICENSE.txt and provides a pointer to the lib directory for the additional stuff. - Everything is signed Binary distributions: http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take7/org/apache/abdera/apache-abdera/0.4.0-incubating/apache-abdera-0.4.0-incubating.zip http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take7/org/apache/abdera/apache-abdera/0.4.0-incubating/apache-abdera-0.4.0-incubating.tar.gz Source distributions: http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take7/org/apache/abdera/apache-abdera/0.4.0-incubating/apache-abdera-0.4.0-incubating-src.zip http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take7/org/apache/abdera/apache-abdera/0.4.0-incubating/apache-abdera-0.4.0-incubating-src.tar.gz Maven Repository: http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take7/ +1 -garrett - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating (updated)
://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] Community diversity (again)
Another point that needs discussion and more clarification is related to who should be counted towards diversity of a project. From [1], it states that a podling need at least 3 legally independent committers, but from recent comments on the QPid graduation thread [2], it seems that only PMC members are being considered. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Graduating+from+the+Incubator [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40incubator.apache.org/msg17111.html On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Robert Greig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this is an important topic for future incubator project groups to have clarified. The project is not highly dependent on any single contributor (there are at least 3 legally independent committers and there is no single company or entity that is vital to the success of the project) Perhaps the word legally needs to be removed since from the Qpid discussion it would appear that several people do not think a strict legal interpretation should apply? However, given that the intent (as I understand it) is to avoid the case where a project dies because one entity withdraws funding, perhaps some definition along the lines of for people who are paid to contribute to the project, no single entity remunerates more than 50% of the committers? Robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Confluence Based Website Access Control
From what you said, we are on the same page, and this is how it happened. Thanks On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Luciano Resende wrote: Based on previous discussion [1], the Tuscany PPMC has voted to grant some some community members, with proper CLA on file, to have write access to the Confluence wiki website. Is this NOT acceptable anymore? PMC must vote, so let's be clear on this: minimum of 3 binding votes, like everything else. But with the vote AND the CLA, they *are* Committers. You just don't have them committing code. This is not new; there are non-coders who are HTTP Server Project Committers. They commit docs. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Confluence Based Website Access Control
Based on previous discussion [1], the Tuscany PPMC has voted to grant some some community members, with proper CLA on file, to have write access to the Confluence wiki website. Is this NOT acceptable anymore ? [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg14390.html On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a reminder to all PMC Members and podlings: no one is to have write access to a Confluence-backed web site who is not a Committer on the project. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating
Have you guys run RAT over the release ? I tried it over the source distribution and various source files are missing ASF license header. [1] http://people.apache.org/~lresende/abdera/rat.log On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Dan Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Apache Abdera project has voted to release the 0.4.0-incubating release [1]. The vote passed with 7 +1s. Two of these were IPMC votes, Garrett Rooney and Davanum Srinivas. Binary distributions: http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take4/org/apache/abdera/apache-abdera/0.4.0-incubating/apache-abdera-0.4.0-incubating.zip http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take4/org/apache/abdera/apache-abdera/0.4.0-incubating/apache-abdera-0.4.0-incubating.tar.gz Source distributions: http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take4/org/apache/abdera/apache-abdera/0.4.0-incubating/apache-abdera-0.4.0-incubating-src.zip http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take4/org/apache/abdera/apache-abdera/0.4.0-incubating/apache-abdera-0.4.0-incubating-src.tar.gz Maven Repository: http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take4/ Please take a look and cast your vote! - Abdera Team 1. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-abdera-dev/200803.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Diephouse MuleSource http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How can i start the election?
You should start by looking at A guide to proposal creation [1]. Once you are done, and looks like you might be, you should probably start a [discussion] e-mail about your proposal here on the list. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:07 PM, edward yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, incubator. I made a Hama Proposal. So, I wonder how can i start the election? Thanks. -- B. Regards, Edward yoon @ NHN, corp. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qpid Status page, was Re: Graduation resolution feedback - Qpid as TLP
Shouldn't Qpid Status page (news section) have information regarding releases, voting new committers, etc These information help others to have an idea of the project dynamics ? See example [1]. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tuscany.html On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Luciano Resende wrote: Have you guys been following the Graduation Guide [1][2], I was checking the status page [3] for getting information around QPid and it seems outdated. yes, I used the guide and we completed a process to clean up Karma and updated the status page a few weeks ago. Cliff had worked with us on most of the items on the status page early on, thus the dates a while back. We however did not rush to graduate so that we could get the apache processes down and benefit from the great input we have had from out mentors. Also, just out of curiosity, how are you guys doing regarding diversity, there was some discussion in the past suggesting that podlings should start disclosing members affiliation when entering and exiting incubation. There was a thread on this, which if you like I can did up -- problem is that it might have been miss-titled so it will take me a bit of digging to find it. The summary is as follows, we have added quite a large number of commiters throughout the project, just prior to graduation our Mentors suggested we use a community process to clean -up our Karma before graduating. This has been done and removed some 10+ inactive names off the list, which brings the committer count to 20. These are employed by multiple organizations. It should also be noted that we have received substantial contributions from 6 other people that are credited at http://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/people.html [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html [2] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-status We have completed all the step at the bottom of the page on: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/qpid.html Is it required to edit in comments on the no date items at the bottom of that page? -- If so we can do so. Carl. [3] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/qpid.html On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yoav Shapira wrote: On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Santiago Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: less awareness of their activity in both directions. The worse part of it is that the lack of awareness will probably reduce the probability of any of the PMC members to be nominated for ASF membership... perpetuating the disconnect. Ahh, good one! Makes sense. Qpid PPMC, assuming no one objects, please add me to your TLP resolution as a PMC member. If someone objects, let's talk on qpid-private. Yoav Fantastic, glad to have you. Will add you when we send out an update or the vote. Carl. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Graduation resolution feedback - Qpid as TLP
Have you guys been following the Graduation Guide [1][2], I was checking the status page [3] for getting information around QPid and it seems outdated. Also, just out of curiosity, how are you guys doing regarding diversity, there was some discussion in the past suggesting that podlings should start disclosing members affiliation when entering and exiting incubation. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html [2] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-status [3] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/qpid.html On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yoav Shapira wrote: On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Santiago Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: less awareness of their activity in both directions. The worse part of it is that the lack of awareness will probably reduce the probability of any of the PMC members to be nominated for ASF membership... perpetuating the disconnect. Ahh, good one! Makes sense. Qpid PPMC, assuming no one objects, please add me to your TLP resolution as a PMC member. If someone objects, let's talk on qpid-private. Yoav Fantastic, glad to have you. Will add you when we send out an update or the vote. Carl. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache Shindig Board Reports ?
Just trying to help with the Apache way of doing things for new podlings. I was looking for Board Reports from Shindig and could not find it, are they available somewhere ? Also, looks like the Board Report Schedule [1] is still not listing Shindig. [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule [2] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release NMaven 0.15-incubating
Simple answer is yes. Here is what the Release Management Guide [1] says. All source capable of copyright should contain license header. Easiest way to comply is to ensure that every human readable file has the header. Note that source includes not just the source code compiled into the final product but also all other resources such as style sheets, test code and resources, build files and documentation source. When in doubt, add a header. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-license-headers On Feb 18, 2008 2:12 PM, Shane Isbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Sebb, Thanks for checking over the staging release. The only missing license headers that I could find are in the unit test and integration test source files. Do test class files also need the license header? Thanks, Shane On Feb 18, 2008 10:59 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18/02/2008, Shane Isbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the NMaven dev list, we have passed a vote for our first release. We request approval of the release by the IPMC. The 0.15-incubating version supports: 1) Compiling C# projects (2.0 framework) 2) Strong Naming 3) Generation of assembly info based on pom metadata 4) Support for Microsoft and Novell/Mono platforms Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~sisbell/staging_repo/ The NOTICE files in the jars don't agree with NOTICE.txt in SVN, in that the Copyright says 2002-2008, whereas NOTICE.txt says just 2007. Did the project really start in 2002? Also, the NOTICE file is only supposed to include details of code that is included in the distribution - not any external dependencies. The proper heading is: This product includes software developed by 'etc' There is no need to itemise the individual projects within ASF. See http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice for details. The individual jars seem to have individual NOTICE file headings, e.g. in maven-archetype-windows-application-0.15-incubating-sources.jar the heading reads: maven-archetype-dotnet-windows-application Copyright 2002-2008 The Apache Software Foundation Surely the official name of the project is Apache NMaven ? Unless there is some non-ASF code included in the distribution, then the NOTICE.txt file currently at the root of SVN is all that is needed for the NOTICE in the jar files. == The Manifest.mf files in binary jars should ideally contain the Java compiler source and target versions. There's no need for the .asc.mdf and .asc.sha1 files - an .asc file is only needed to verify the file sig, and if the .asc file is mangled it won't agree with the file it is protecting. Vote Thread: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-NMaven-0.15-incubating-td15447003.html 4 +1 binding (PPMC), 1 +1 non-binding 0 0/-1 Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/nmaven/tags/maven-dotnet-parent-0.15-incubating/ NOTICE.txt says: Copyright 2007 The Apache Software Foundation That should be Copyright 2007-2008 The Apache Software Foundation - assuming that the project started in 2007. There should ideally be a LICENSE file alongside the NOTICE file. Some of the source files are missing the standard ASF header. Thanks, Shane - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation
+1 (non-binding) and Welcome !!! On Feb 9, 2008 4:22 PM, Eddie O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 -- am excited to have CouchDB starting incubation. On Feb 9, 2008 11:51 AM, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Craig L Russell wrote: | +1 | | Craig | | On Feb 9, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: | | Project Name: CouchDB | - | | == Proposal == | The goal is to create either an Apache top level project around the | existing CouchDB open source project. | | Craig Russell | Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo | 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) iD8DBQFHrfYngNg6eWEDv1kRAkgcAKDhhXYB2PXMn1bm5toWjAH0EyQ4FwCgyACt piOKzJ2YTrjMXCSdnaqGu7Q= =YDts -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Proposal] NoNameYet - Pluto
On Feb 2, 2008 6:08 AM, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, much more importantly, proposals should be evaluated on their own merits, not based on what happened to some other unrelated project 4 years ago. +1 -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] CouchDB incubator project
Sounds very interesting. I'd certainly watch this project and contribute to it if time permits. On Jan 31, 2008 8:10 AM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Jan 31, 2008 5:40 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The goal is to create either an Apache top level project, or a db subproject, around the existing CouchDB open source project. Brilliant, I knew it! (see comment #3 in [1] :-) It's good so see more semi-structured storage solutions coming to Apache. I'd be interested in mentoring, but with PDFBox and potentially something about WebDAV coming up I'm afraid I probably won't have enough cycles for CouchDB. [1] http://dev.day.com/microsling/content/blogs/main/yourdataisyourserver.html BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: reviving a failed incubation project (was: moving a failed incubation project)
On Jan 26, 2008 8:29 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 25, 2008 9:18 PM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: Normally, I would suggest that if we have people wanting to work on a project, that we bring it back to life here. +1 +1, I had this question in mind since the beginning of the discussion. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tuscany 1.1 build failure
:0.9.0-SNAPSHOT 2) org.apache.felix:org.apache.felix.log:jar:0.9.0-incubator-SNAPSHOT 3) org.apache.felix:org.apache.felix.scr:jar:0.9.0-SNAPSHOT S/// - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hit counters for incubating web sites
I'm also very interested in this subject. Untill now I was parsing the apache http logs for the download statistics information for Incubator projects, but now that the distributions are starting to get mirrored, I guess I'll need to find a new way. Maybe Vadim Gritsenko would track incubator projects, now that they are all working the same way as the TLP ? Or if the problem is free cycles, I'm willing to give some help here to get things done for Incubator projects as well. On Jan 15, 2008 8:27 AM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Various posts in the past have expressed interest in collecting statistics on usage, or downloads. Previous replies have pointed out that counting downloads is inaccurate, because Apache licensed components can be redistributed by others, and the Apache mirroring system means that most downloads occur from non-Apache machines. We would like to get some statistical information about downloads, and are thinking that counting clicks on the download button(s) would be a good way (it would avoid the problem of missing mirroring). Although not perfect (it would miss repackaging/redistribution, and other sites which link to a download page other than our own), we think it would be somewhat useful, at least as a lower bound of interest. Vadim Gritsenko has a stats site on people.a.o, looking at downloads by extracting data from web server logs. He has said, however, that he won't track individual incubator projects, just TLP. See http://people.apache.org/~vgritsenko/stats/index.html and http://people.apache.org/~vgritsenko/faq.html . Most of the hit counters out there seem to be snippets of html you add to your web page, which go off to someone else's server, where the counting happens. Is there a service running on an apache server (e.g., people.a.o), which we can use for hit-counting? If so, can someone post the html needed to use it? -Marshall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: freedom to do sane release management (was: Approve release Apache UIMA...)
I guess, from the Incubator release management guide, the requirement is that the release can be built from a tag, in a later point in time... All releases should be built from a tag. It is occasionally necessary to rebuild releases many years later. Tagging is cheap and easy when using subversion. So, every release and candidate should be tagged. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-source On Dec 18, 2007 4:25 AM, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 16, 2007, at 5:24 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: We've put the LICENSE, NOTICES, and DISCLAIMERs into the top directory of the source (and binary) distribution(s), but didn't realize this also needs to be in the top level of the SVN tag, because we didn't know that was considered part of the distribution. This should be fine. SVN tags are *not* distributions. Can you please confirm this is the case? In which case, we'll of course comply. Nope, that can't really be confirmed. Apologies for any confusion. Your distribution must correspond to subversion And for the record, I'm also against making this a rule in the future. I can think of many good reasons why there is some disconnect. otherwise it's very hard to track (...) I can think of many good ways to track exactly what goes into a distribution and how, that do not require satisfying this rule. I think you are confusing requirements with a particular approach to satisfying those requirements. We should not dictate every detail of how projects do release management or build engineering. The best way to do those things depends on the project. (And nobody likes being dictated how to do things, either.) cheers! - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Projects in trouble or otherwise needing help
My 0.02$ as well... Gilles's suggestion is a good one to try. In addition to that, I took a quick look at the XAP mailing list, and I guess that, Instead of creating tons of JIRAS, the committers could start sending a short e-mail describing the problem, or describing a new feature ? As a user, a descriptive e-mail would probably catch my attention much easier then a JIRA, and after you have the user attention, it's much easier to have the user engage on the discussion. Also, advertise, advertise, advertise... with blog, articles, posts on sites like serverside, infoQ, etc It would help me if someone could help me understand how to make XAP more appealing and interesting to the Apache community. Is the problem that there are no good samples and demos? The website isn't good? Nobody understands what the point is? Well, from a quick look, website, samples, etc looks good and interesting. On Nov 15, 2007 2:31 AM, Gilles Scokart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/11/15, James Margaris [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It would help me if someone could help me understand how to make XAP more appealing and interesting to the Apache community. Is the problem that there are no good samples and demos? The website isn't good? Nobody understands what the point is? Did you have enought users? I know, it is a chicken eggs problem. But you can maybe try to initiate the loop by devellopping some features/plugin/extension for an existing product that has a wide community. Propose patches using XAP to a popular project. If the community of this project like it (and if it was the right community) they will start to use it in their project and in other project. My 0.02$ -- Gilles SCOKART -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: November Incubator Reports ARE LATE!
Yes, Noel sent an e-mail [1] about a week ago... [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40incubator.apache.org/msg15800.html On Nov 11, 2007 5:16 PM, Lawrence Mandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Noel, Has the November board report deadline changed? The top of the November 2007 board report page [1] states that the reports are due to the Incubator PMC by 14 November 2007 . [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2007 Lawrence Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/11/2007 03:45 PM Please respond to general@incubator.apache.org To general@incubator.apache.org cc Subject RE: November Incubator Reports ARE LATE! ... from: Abdera Lokahi NMaven ServiceMix Woden WSRP4J XAP Yoko They must be submitted IMMEDIATELY. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: November Incubator Reports
Hi Noel Could you please clarify THIS WEEKEND, is it TODAY ? Or Nov 11? On 11/4/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's that time again ... :-) The Board is meeting at ApacheCon, so we're going to need to be a bit earlier this month. Please have your reports completed by THIS WEEKEND at the latest. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
[x] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation (non-binding) On 10/22/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, [x] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
