Re: [gentoo-user] Sandbox error on Redhat-Artwork
Thanks for the suggestion. I did it two ways: adding the FEATURES from command line and editing make.conf and adding the line FEATURES="sandbox", I still get the same error! Ben Ricker Wellinx.com On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 09:32, Panard wrote: > Le Lundi 28 Juillet 2003 16:10, Ben Ricker a écrit : > > I keep getting the same error when emerging redhat-artwork-0.73: > > > > --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY > > --- LOG FILE = > > "/tmp/sandbox-redhat-artwork-0.73-6908.log" > > > > open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock > > open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock > > > > --- > >- > > > > I do not have sandbox setup in my make.conf. It is commented out: > > > > #FEATURES="sandbox buildpkg ccache distcc userpriv usersandbox notitles > > noclean noauto cvs keeptemp keepwork" > > try FEATURES="-sandbox" emerge , I've solve some problems like this with > this method -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] Sandbox error on Redhat-Artwork
I keep getting the same error when emerging redhat-artwork-0.73: --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY --- LOG FILE = "/tmp/sandbox-redhat-artwork-0.73-6908.log" open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock I do not have sandbox setup in my make.conf. It is commented out: #FEATURES="sandbox buildpkg ccache distcc userpriv usersandbox notitles noclean noauto cvs keeptemp keepwork" Any ideas? Should I submit a bug report? Ben Ricker Wellinx.com -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with blocked ebuilds
I forgot to mention that I had tried that and perl will not even update. It fails with the same error. Ben Ricker On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 11:12, Ian Truelsen wrote: > On 24 Jul 2003 10:38:18 -0500 > Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [blocks B] > dev-lang/perl-5.8.0-r12)[blocks B] > (from pkg dev-lang/perl-5.8.0-r12)[ebuildU ] > > dev-lang/perl-5.8.0-r12 [5.8.0-r11] > > You need to update perl first, then you can update ExtUtils and > File-Spec. After that, all should be well with updating mozilla. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] Problem with blocked ebuilds
All of a sudden, I get the following problem when tryin to upgrade anything (both world and mozilla): bash-2.05b$ sudo emerge -up mozilla These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuildU ] app-arch/unzip-5.50-r2 [5.50-r1] [ebuildU ] app-arch/zip-2.3-r2 [2.3-r1] [blocks B]
[gentoo-user] Compiling problem : "Too many errors"
I am running an 'emerge -u world' and I keep getting a failure on the ebuild app-text/docbook-sgml-utils-0.6.12. Here is the exception: jade:I: maximum number of errors (200) reached; change with -E option make[2]: *** [api.html] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/docbook-sgml-utils-0.6.12/work/docbook-utils-0.6.12/doc/HTML' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/docbook-sgml-utils-0.6.12/work/docbook-utils-0.6.12/doc' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 !!! ERROR: app-text/docbook-sgml-utils-0.6.12 failed. !!! Function src_compile, Line 32, Exitcode 2 !!! (no error message) How does one add the '-E' option to jade through emerge? Ben Ricker Wellinx, Inc. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Tomcat JAVA_HOME problem
Have you tried putting an echo in the tomcat script right after JAVA_HOME is set? Or running the script with 'sh -x' to see the content of the variables? Ben Ricker Wellinx.com On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 11:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Below is the error > > /etc/init.d/tomcat start > * Starting Tomcat... > The JAVA_HOME environment variable is not defined correctly! > This environment variable is needed to run this program. > [ !! ]/etc/conf.d/tomcat file for details. > > ACTUAL line from /etc/conf.d/tomcat > JAVA_HOME=`/bin/grep -e "JAVA_HOME" /etc/profile.env | /bin/sed -e > "s/^.*'\(.*\)'$/\1/"` > > which java > /opt/blackdown-jre-1.4.1/bin/java > > I just emerged tomcat, and verified the java is installed. I cannot figure > why tomcat is rejecting the JAVA_HOME variable. Any ideas? > > Thanks- > Ryan > > == > --- PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES DISCLAIMER --- > > This message originates from Presbyterian Healthcare Services or one of its > affiliated organizations. It contains information, which may be confidential > or privileged, and is intended only for the individual or entity named above. > It is prohibited for anyone else to disclose, copy, distribute or use the > contents of this message. All personal messages express views solely of the > sender, which are not to be attributed to Presbyterian Healthcare Services or > any of its affiliated organizations, and may not be distributed without this > disclaimer. If you received this message in error, please notify us > immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > == > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] Problems upgrading base-layout
See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21663 for the bug. Has anyone had this problem with upgrading base-layout? There has been no movement on a fix in a couple of days and I need to upgrade some software ASAP. Base-layout seems to be a dependency for every ebuild out there. Ben Ricker Wellinx.com -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Which java-sdk?
Richard is correct here. The listings in Top are inter-process threads, not processes. The memory trick is a way to tell; or the knowledge that Java is threaded tells you all you need to know. On the question: I wonder if there is something going on with Volano's app. For instance, there are a number of changes in 1.4 that are not in 1.3 and require new code to take advantage of them. For instance, we have an app that we run that cannot run in 1.3 because we use the 1.4 SDK. It may be that there app is optimized for 1.3; there are some changes to the networking IO. But this is a stab in the dark. I do not know exactly why that is the case. Ben Ricker Wellinx.com On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 11:01, Richard Kilgore wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 05:32:19PM +0200, Gwendolyn van der Linden wrote: > > > Has anyone ever heard why the JVMs out there always lose to their > > > Windows counterparts in performance figures? The latest study at > > > this site shows all the Linux JVMs failing the number of > > > concurrent connections test miserably, except for the Blackdown > > > 1.3.1 JVM which otherwise sucks in terms of performance. > > > > I haven't heard, but I guess that Windows JVMs take advantage of > > Windows native threads and the efficient use of CriticalSection (which > > is quite fast), while most Linux JVMs use multiple processes. Just do > > a 'ps aux' after you started some big app like Borland Enterpise > > Server... Linux is supposed to have much better threading in 2.6, and > > hopefully app's will start taking advantage of that. > > > > Gwendolyn. > > Actually, those are native threads, unless you have an old JVM. > Linux lists all threads in the output of ps aux. The only way I > know to tell when they are actually threads in the same process > is that a lot of the stats reported (memory size, resident > memory, etc.) are identical. I haven't looked carefully at the > ps man page in a while, though. > > - richard -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Which java-sdk?
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 11:32, Ing. Bernardo Lopez O. wrote: > Its a kind of chat server (not ircd... but kind of) its for a server whit > 1.4ghz 256ram Check out http://www.volano.com/benchmarks.html for benchmarks on different platforms. Ben Ricker Wellinx.com > On Thursday 05 June 2003 15:35, Gwendolyn van der Linden wrote: > > > Which java sdk should i use? > > > > What do you want to use it for? > > > > Gwendolyn. > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Error compiling ck r4 kernel source
I forgot to attach the .config. It is in this email. Ben Ricker On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 11:45, Ben Ricker wrote: > I keep getting an error when compiling the build ck-sources-2.4.20-r4. > The error is: > > In file included from sys.c:7: > /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/include/linux/module.h: In function `print_symbol': > /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/include/linux/module.h:434: `ESRCH' undeclared (first use > in this function) > /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/include/linux/module.h:434: (Each undeclared identifier is > reported only once > /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/include/linux/module.h:434: for each function it appears > in.) > sys.c: At top level: > sys.c:494: warning: static declaration for `set_user' follows non-static > make[2]: *** [sys.o] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/kernel' > make[1]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/kernel' > make: *** [_dir_kernel] Error 2 > > The full compile and the .config are attached. Any ideas? > > Ben Ricker -- Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wellinx.com # # Automatically generated by make menuconfig: don't edit # CONFIG_X86=y # CONFIG_SBUS is not set CONFIG_UID16=y # # Code maturity level options # CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y # # Loadable module support # # CONFIG_MODULES is not set # # Processor type and features # CONFIG_LOLAT=y # CONFIG_LOLAT_SYSCTL is not set # CONFIG_M386 is not set # CONFIG_M486 is not set # CONFIG_M586 is not set # CONFIG_M586TSC is not set # CONFIG_M586MMX is not set # CONFIG_M686 is not set CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII=y # CONFIG_MPENTIUM4 is not set # CONFIG_MK6 is not set # CONFIG_MK7 is not set # CONFIG_MELAN is not set # CONFIG_MCRUSOE is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIPC6 is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIP2 is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIP3D is not set # CONFIG_MCYRIXIII is not set CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=y CONFIG_X86_INVLPG=y CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG=y CONFIG_X86_XADD=y CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y CONFIG_X86_POPAD_OK=y # CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK is not set CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=5 CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC=y CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC=y CONFIG_X86_PGE=y CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM=y CONFIG_X86_F00F_WORKS_OK=y CONFIG_X86_MCE=y # CONFIG_TOSHIBA is not set # CONFIG_I8K is not set # CONFIG_MICROCODE is not set # CONFIG_X86_MSR is not set # CONFIG_X86_CPUID is not set CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM=y # CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G is not set # CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set # CONFIG_HIGHMEM is not set # CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION is not set # CONFIG_MTRR is not set CONFIG_SMP=y CONFIG_PREEMPT=y # CONFIG_MULTIQUAD is not set # CONFIG_X86_TSC_DISABLE is not set CONFIG_X86_TSC=y CONFIG_HAVE_DEC_LOCK=y # # General setup # CONFIG_NET=y CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC=y CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y CONFIG_PCI=y # CONFIG_PCI_GOBIOS is not set # CONFIG_PCI_GODIRECT is not set CONFIG_PCI_GOANY=y CONFIG_PCI_BIOS=y CONFIG_PCI_DIRECT=y # CONFIG_ISA is not set CONFIG_PCI_NAMES=y # CONFIG_EISA is not set # CONFIG_MCA is not set CONFIG_HOTPLUG=y # # PCMCIA/CardBus support # # CONFIG_PCMCIA is not set # # PCI Hotplug Support # # CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI is not set # CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_COMPAQ is not set # CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_COMPAQ_NVRAM is not set # CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_IBM is not set # CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI is not set CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y # CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT is not set CONFIG_SYSCTL=y CONFIG_KCORE_ELF=y # CONFIG_KCORE_AOUT is not set CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT=y CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC=y CONFIG_PM=y # CONFIG_APM is not set # # ACPI Support # # CONFIG_ACPI is not set # # Memory Technology Devices (MTD) # # CONFIG_MTD is not set # # Parallel port support # # CONFIG_PARPORT is not set # # Plug and Play configuration # CONFIG_PNP=y CONFIG_ISAPNP=y # # Block devices # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_FD=y # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_XD is not set # CONFIG_PARIDE is not set # CONFIG_BLK_CPQ_DA is not set # CONFIG_BLK_CPQ_CISS_DA is not set # CONFIG_CISS_SCSI_TAPE is not set # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DAC960 is not set # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UMEM is not set # CONFIG_CDROM_PKTCDVD is not set # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP is not set # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NBD is not set # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM is not set # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD is not set # CONFIG_BLK_STATS is not set # # Multi-device support (RAID and LVM) # # CONFIG_MD is not set # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD is not set # CONFIG_MD_LINEAR is not set # CONFIG_MD_RAID0 is not set # CONFIG_MD_RAID1 is not set # CONFIG_MD_RAID5 is not set # CONFIG_MD_MULTIPATH is not set # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LVM is not set # # Networking options # CONFIG_PACKET=y # CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP is not set # CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV is not set # CONFIG_NETFILTER is not set # CONFIG_FILTER is not set CONFIG_UNIX=y CONFIG_INET=y # CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST is not set # CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER is not set # CONFIG_IP_PNP is not set # CONFIG_NET_IPIP is not set # CONFIG_NET_IPGRE is not set # CONFIG_ARPD is not set # CONFIG_INET_ECN is not set # CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES is not set # CONFIG_IPV6 is not set # C
[gentoo-user] Error compiling ck r4 kernel source
I keep getting an error when compiling the build ck-sources-2.4.20-r4. The error is: In file included from sys.c:7: /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/include/linux/module.h: In function `print_symbol': /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/include/linux/module.h:434: `ESRCH' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/include/linux/module.h:434: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/include/linux/module.h:434: for each function it appears in.) sys.c: At top level: sys.c:494: warning: static declaration for `set_user' follows non-static make[2]: *** [sys.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/kernel' make[1]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/kernel' make: *** [_dir_kernel] Error 2 The full compile and the .config are attached. Any ideas? Ben Ricker -- Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wellinx.com compile.out Description: Binary data -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gnome 2.2 breaks Evolution 1.2.2?
I submitted a bug report: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17396 The problem was solved by rebuilding gtkhtml and evolution: 'emerge gtkhtml evolution' Ben Ricker On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 12:39, Spundun Bhatt wrote: > I had a similar problem but at that time I thought the culprit was > libbonoboui. > The thing with library is that the problem might propagate to subsequent > packages depending on that one. > So I did > emerge -ep evolution > and reemerged packages after libbonoboui. (I think I emerged only > libgnomeui,gnome-desktop,control-center,gnome-panel and gnome-pilot) > And then emerge evolution again. > It SHOULD work. > If this doesnt work could you please let me know the identified > problem and the resolution? > Thanx > Hope this helps > Spundun > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 09:59, Ben Ricker wrote: > > Kurt Bechstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > After I did the gtkhtml updates and gal updates I just did an emerge > > > evolution and now it works just fine. Have you tried that? > > > > Yes. Twice, actually. I had updated gtkhtml and gal with the Gnome > > update and then did the Evolution update (in a world update) afterwards. > > Today, I just recompiled Evolution. No joy. > > > > Ben Ricker <-- About to post a bug on bugs.gentoo.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 12:31, Ben Ricker wrote: > > >> Kurt Bechstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> > > >> > I had the same problem and just recompiled evolution against the new > > >> > version of gtkhtml, gal, and libgtkhtml and all was well once again. > > >> > > >> How exactly did you do this? I recompiled Evolution although I had > > >> updated Evolution AFTER updating Gnome. After the second recompile, it > > >> still cannot initialize gtkhtml, gal, libgtkhtml. Do I have to give some > > >> command line arguments? > > >> > > >> Ben Ricker > > >> Wellinx.com > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 10:45, Ben Ricker wrote: > > >> >> I upgrade to the latest Gnome 2 (2.2-r2) and the latest Evolution > > >> >> (1.2.2). The problem, it seems, is that the new Gnome updates gtkhtml to > > >> >> 1.1.7-r1 when Evolution 1.2.2 uses gtkhtml 1.04 (at least, that is the > > >> >> version it uses for Redhat; the actual gtkhtml version may be different > > >> >> dut to Redhats funky versioning). > > >> >> > > >> >> Anyway, I can no longer send emails because the gtkhtml component dies > > >> >> an ignominious death. Has anyone had this problem? Could I slot gtkhtml? > > >> >> I would doubt it. Anyway know a workaround? Shoudl I file a bug report? > > >> >> > > >> >> Ben Ricker > > >> >> Wellinx.com > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > > > > > > -- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wellinx.com -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Gnome 2.2 breaks Evolution 1.2.2?
Kurt Bechstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: After I did the gtkhtml updates and gal updates I just did an emerge evolution and now it works just fine. Have you tried that? Yes. Twice, actually. I had updated gtkhtml and gal with the Gnome update and then did the Evolution update (in a world update) afterwards. Today, I just recompiled Evolution. No joy. Ben Ricker <-- About to post a bug on bugs.gentoo.org On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 12:31, Ben Ricker wrote: Kurt Bechstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I had the same problem and just recompiled evolution against the new > version of gtkhtml, gal, and libgtkhtml and all was well once again. How exactly did you do this? I recompiled Evolution although I had updated Evolution AFTER updating Gnome. After the second recompile, it still cannot initialize gtkhtml, gal, libgtkhtml. Do I have to give some command line arguments? Ben Ricker Wellinx.com > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 10:45, Ben Ricker wrote: >> I upgrade to the latest Gnome 2 (2.2-r2) and the latest Evolution >> (1.2.2). The problem, it seems, is that the new Gnome updates gtkhtml to >> 1.1.7-r1 when Evolution 1.2.2 uses gtkhtml 1.04 (at least, that is the >> version it uses for Redhat; the actual gtkhtml version may be different >> dut to Redhats funky versioning). >> >> Anyway, I can no longer send emails because the gtkhtml component dies >> an ignominious death. Has anyone had this problem? Could I slot gtkhtml? >> I would doubt it. Anyway know a workaround? Shoudl I file a bug report? >> >> Ben Ricker >> Wellinx.com >> >> >> -- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Gnome 2.2 breaks Evolution 1.2.2?
Kurt Bechstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I had the same problem and just recompiled evolution against the new version of gtkhtml, gal, and libgtkhtml and all was well once again. How exactly did you do this? I recompiled Evolution although I had updated Evolution AFTER updating Gnome. After the second recompile, it still cannot initialize gtkhtml, gal, libgtkhtml. Do I have to give some command line arguments? Ben Ricker Wellinx.com On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 10:45, Ben Ricker wrote: I upgrade to the latest Gnome 2 (2.2-r2) and the latest Evolution (1.2.2). The problem, it seems, is that the new Gnome updates gtkhtml to 1.1.7-r1 when Evolution 1.2.2 uses gtkhtml 1.04 (at least, that is the version it uses for Redhat; the actual gtkhtml version may be different dut to Redhats funky versioning). Anyway, I can no longer send emails because the gtkhtml component dies an ignominious death. Has anyone had this problem? Could I slot gtkhtml? I would doubt it. Anyway know a workaround? Shoudl I file a bug report? Ben Ricker Wellinx.com -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] Gnome 2.2 breaks Evolution 1.2.2?
I upgrade to the latest Gnome 2 (2.2-r2) and the latest Evolution (1.2.2). The problem, it seems, is that the new Gnome updates gtkhtml to 1.1.7-r1 when Evolution 1.2.2 uses gtkhtml 1.04 (at least, that is the version it uses for Redhat; the actual gtkhtml version may be different dut to Redhats funky versioning). Anyway, I can no longer send emails because the gtkhtml component dies an ignominious death. Has anyone had this problem? Could I slot gtkhtml? I would doubt it. Anyway know a workaround? Shoudl I file a bug report? Ben Ricker Wellinx.com -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Opinion Poll: KDE Vs Gnome
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 12:35, Tyler Trafford wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:55:50AM -0500, Daniel Carrera wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 08:59:30PM +0530, Raghuram Rajagopal wrote: > > > >> And I think I have some reasons behind asking this question and not > >> just "ill-posed". > > > > The question is ill-posed in the sense that KDE and Gnome have nothing > > to do with threads. There is nothing they can do about threading. > > The kernel is encharged of that. You can make a GUI that hangs or one > > that doesn't hang just as easily in each. > > Not entirely true. The toolkits can be implemented to use threading > "well", "poorly", or not at all. Good point. However, I don't know about you, but I am not the guru who can judge the respective toolkits and I would expect that most users of gentoo are not initmately familiar with the threading implementations of the toolkits. At least, one would have to do much testing and profiling to judge such a request. Expecting users of gentoo to be intimately aware of threading implementation of such HUGE "apps" is, well, ill-posed (no to mention the fact that no one, as far as I can tell, has been able to answer the question). If there is a difference that tips the scale towards one or the other, I can say that, as an educated guess, it is most probably not in the threading implementation of the respective thread libraries. Others have brought up more important issues (i.e., ease-of-use, memory hogginess, etc.). Ben Ricker -- Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wellinx.com -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Opinion Poll: KDE Vs Gnome
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 19:08, Daniel Carrera wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 12:27:13PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote: > > > 3. Multithreaded application handling process > > > > No idea. > Me neither. > I think what he is asking is how the GUI affects application handling. The answer is that is does not make a difference. The OS does the multithreading, not the GUI. The question is just ill-posed. Ben Ricker -- Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wellinx.com -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] Gedit Compilation Problem
I keep getting the following error when compiling gedit-2.2.0.1. I have compiled other builds with no problems; I jus cannot get gedit to compile. Begin Error /plugins -module -avoid-version spell.lo gedit-spell-checker.lo gedit-spell-checker-dialog.lo gedit-spell-language-dialog.lo gedit-automatic-spell-checker.lo gedit-spell-checker-dialog-marshal.lo preload.lo -lpspell -lpopt mkdir .libs grep: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2/libstdc++.la: No such file or directory sed: can't read /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2/libstdc++.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2/libstdc++.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[3]: *** [libspell.la] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gedit-2.2.0.1/work/gedit-2.2.0.1/plugins/spell' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gedit-2.2.0.1/work/gedit-2.2.0.1/plugins' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gedit-2.2.0.1/work/gedit-2.2.0.1' make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 !!! ERROR: app-editors/gedit-2.2.0.1 failed. !!! Function gnome2_src_compile, Line 41, Exitcode 2 !!! compile failure ----End Error Thanks, Ben Ricker -- Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wellinx.com -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] suggession for gentoo, ~x86-nosystem
You probably want to post this to the Bug site, which has an enhancement request section. Go to: http://bugs.gentoo.org/ for more information. I think it is a good idea. I myself run ~x86 on my desktop and weekly update the system and world. I have had no issues. Of course, your mileage may vary 8> Ben Ricker On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 11:44, Spundun Bhatt wrote: > Hi Gentoo-user, > First of all thank you for all the good work, I tried both redhat-8 and > linux-from-scratch, but gentoo was the thing I was looking for. > > In last few days there was a discussion on the comparison of whether to > use ~x86 or not in the make.conf. > > It seemed like most people wouldnt want to play with the essential > system components too soon.. I feel the same. I was wondering if we > could add a keyword like ~x86-nosystem which would allow the ~x86 masked > packages from world which are not part of system. > > Does this sound practical? I cannot think of the problems that could > possiby occure due to this. > I would appreciate +ve/-ve feedback ideas/happiness/dissappointments > about this > Thanx > Spundun > ps: sorry for the bulk of spelling mistakes in my last mail. > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wellinx.com -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
