Re: [gentoo-user] /dev/sr0 has disappeared: big mystery

2009-05-16 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Samstag, 16. Mai 2009 01:11:53 schrieb Philip Webb:
 090515 Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
  Am Freitag, 15. Mai 2009 11:00:59 schrieb Philip Webb:
  For the 1st time in 2 months, I went to write a CD  discovered
  that  /dev/sr0  is not being created nor symlink  /dev/cdrom ;
  I looked at 'dmesg': no mention of 'sr' or 'cd' being found.
  I tested the drive: SystemRescue 1.1.0 (kernel 2.6.25.16) starts
  correctly  mounts  /dev/sr0  on  /mnt/cdrom ; its 'dmesg' says :
sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 16x/16x writer dvd-ram cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
  \ Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
 
  Please post your kernel config.

 The relevant lines are

No, the relevant lines are missing. Please post it completely, best together 
with output from lspci -v when booted into the LiveCD.

  What BIOS says is irrelevant.

 It does mention 'PATA'  'ATAPI', which mb relevant.

For Windows, maybe. Not for Linux.

Oh, just realised that you wanted to _write_ a CD (was too late yesterday to 
read more carefully ;) ). Then, the relevant line is of course:

 # CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG is not set

Bye...

Dirk


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] /dev/sr0 has disappeared: big mystery

2009-05-16 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Samstag, 16. Mai 2009 08:56:38 schrieb Dirk Heinrichs:
 Am Samstag, 16. Mai 2009 01:11:53 schrieb Philip Webb:
  090515 Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
   Am Freitag, 15. Mai 2009 11:00:59 schrieb Philip Webb:
   For the 1st time in 2 months, I went to write a CD  discovered
   that  /dev/sr0  is not being created nor symlink  /dev/cdrom ;
   I looked at 'dmesg': no mention of 'sr' or 'cd' being found.
   I tested the drive: SystemRescue 1.1.0 (kernel 2.6.25.16) starts
   correctly  mounts  /dev/sr0  on  /mnt/cdrom ; its 'dmesg' says :
 sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 16x/16x writer dvd-ram cd/rw xa/form2 cdda
   tray \ Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
  
   Please post your kernel config.
 
  The relevant lines are

 No, the relevant lines are missing. Please post it completely, best
 together with output from lspci -v when booted into the LiveCD.

   What BIOS says is irrelevant.
 
  It does mention 'PATA'  'ATAPI', which mb relevant.

 For Windows, maybe. Not for Linux.

 Oh, just realised that you wanted to _write_ a CD (was too late yesterday
 to

 read more carefully ;) ). Then, the relevant line is of course:
  # CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG is not set

However, since you don't even have the sr0 device, there may still be a 
different problem, so it won't hurt if you provide the requested information 
anyway, I guess.

Bye...

Dirk


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] help needed to connect wifi on eeeSTOKED!

2009-05-16 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 15 May 2009 20:28:02 -0700 (PDT), maxim wexler wrote:

 Yes, very much so. I understand there are issues with too many
 read/write cycles on the SSHD.

An SSD is not the same as a USB stick. They have wear levelling to avoid
this problem.

 Up to now I've re-jiggered the kernel at
 least a dozen times. I guess I should have put the OS on a card first
 *then* onto the hard-drive once everything was in order. 

I've been running mine for over a year, using ~x86 so updates are
frequent and no sign of any problems, and stll almost a year's warranty
left :)

I do have PORTAGE_TMPDIR on an SSDHCcard, but that's more for space
reasons.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

If you cannot fix it, feature it.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] * Boot (initramfs) .. does not continue

2009-05-16 Thread Maximilian Bräutigam
Hi all,

on my new computer i recently installed gentoo using a raid1
of /dev/sda6 and /dev/sdb6. i'm using genkernel with nearly standard
config (except the configs regarding raid and power management) and my
grub ist configured as u see below:

title   Gentoo Linux x86_64-2.6.28-5 (fb)
root(hd0,5)
kernel  /boot/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-2.6.28-gentoo-r5
root=/dev/ram0 init=/linuxrc ramdisk=8192 real_root=/dev/md1 udev
video=vesafb:mtrr:3,ywrap vga=838
initrd  /boot/initramfs-genkernel-x86_64-2.6.28-gentoo-r5
savedefault
boot

The framebuffer is working well, the scans that are made before booting
are working and then it tries to 
 * boot (initramfs) ..
and at this point he simply stops and does nothing anymore.

yesterday, everything was working fine, but i can't remember that i did
something wrong or extraordinary. for me it sounds like raid-support is
broken, but my config is ok. recompilation of kernel was no problem.

please, help me solving this weird problem, that is driving me crazy.

thank you very much in advance.

kind regards,
der Max




Re: [gentoo-user] * Boot (initramfs) .. does not continue

2009-05-16 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Samstag 16 Mai 2009, Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
 Hi all,

 on my new computer i recently installed gentoo using a raid1
 of /dev/sda6 and /dev/sdb6. i'm using genkernel with nearly standard
 config (except the configs regarding raid and power management) and my
 grub ist configured as u see below:

probably forgot something there.

 title   Gentoo Linux x86_64-2.6.28-5 (fb)
 root(hd0,5)
 kernel  /boot/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-2.6.28-gentoo-r5
 root=/dev/ram0 init=/linuxrc ramdisk=8192 real_root=/dev/md1 udev
 video=vesafb:mtrr:3,ywrap vga=838
 initrd  /boot/initramfs-genkernel-x86_64-2.6.28-gentoo-r5
 savedefault
 boot

ugh. You know that you don't need an initrd for raid1?


 The framebuffer is working well, the scans that are made before booting
 are working and then it tries to
  * boot (initramfs) ..
 and at this point he simply stops and does nothing anymore.

 yesterday, everything was working fine, but i can't remember that i did
 something wrong or extraordinary. for me it sounds like raid-support is
 broken, but my config is ok. recompilation of kernel was no problem.

 please, help me solving this weird problem, that is driving me crazy.

boot systemrescuecd
mount /dev/md1 /mnt/gentoo
cd /mnt/gentoo
mount --bind /proc proc
mount --bind /dev dev
mount --bind /sys sys
chroot ./. /bin/zsh
etc-update
exit
reboot




Re: [gentoo-user] /dev/sr0 has disappeared: kernel bug ?

2009-05-16 Thread Philip Webb
Further to my earlier report,
I have got 2.6.25 to work again after enabling 'evdev'
 have just successfully written System Rescue 1.2.0 using it.

I also compiled 2.6.29-r4 -- the latest in Gentoo testing --
 enabled the alternative IDE mode without anything changing.
I also recompiled Udev Dbus  Hal without any improvement.
Kernel 2.6.29 is simply not creating a device for the CD drive.
There is a thread on the Forum during the last few days,
but it's like a conversation in a high-school cafeteria (smile)
 nothing has been resolved: others don't get  /dev/sr0  either.

Comments still welcome (I've sent output to a helper off the list).

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca




Re: [gentoo-user] * Boot (initramfs) .. does not continue

2009-05-16 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Sat, 16 May 2009 12:11:59 +0200
Maximilian Bräutigam max-br...@gmx.de wrote:

 on my new computer i recently installed gentoo using a raid1
 of /dev/sda6 and /dev/sdb6. i'm using genkernel with nearly standard
 config (except the configs regarding raid and power management) and my
 grub ist configured as u see below:
...
 
 The framebuffer is working well, the scans that are made before booting
 are working and then it tries to 
  * boot (initramfs) ..
 and at this point he simply stops and does nothing anymore.

I've never had a chance to use genkernel, but unless you're using LVM
on top of the raid, kernel with mdraid and fs drivers compiled-in should
be able to see it, so you can try booting without initramfs line and
hope genkernel hasn't compiled rootfs and mdraid support as modules.

-- 
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Joerg Schilling
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:

 Grant wrote:
  I'd like to back up the files on my DVD-Audio discs.  The files are
  encrypted and I don't want to decrypt them, I just want to back them
  up.  I'm getting I/O errors when I try to cp the files, and I'm
  guessing it's because of the encryption.  Does anyone know of a method
  that would back these discs up in their encrypted form?

 That doesn't work that way.  What you get is actually garbage and is not 
 encrypted (otherwise you would be able to copy it to another DVD). 
 Creating a copy of an audio DVD which is itself encrypted would defeat 
 the purpose of a copy protection, since even though encrypted, it's 
 still a copy, and the protection wants to prevent that.  If you can copy 
 it, it wouldn't be protected :P

There is no copy protection on a DVD. There is however a region specific
_usage_ protection.

You should be able to copy the DVD using dvdbackup.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)  
   joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily



[gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

Joerg Schilling wrote:

Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:


Grant wrote:

I'd like to back up the files on my DVD-Audio discs.  The files are
encrypted and I don't want to decrypt them, I just want to back them
up.  I'm getting I/O errors when I try to cp the files, and I'm
guessing it's because of the encryption.  Does anyone know of a method
that would back these discs up in their encrypted form?
That doesn't work that way.  What you get is actually garbage and is not 
encrypted (otherwise you would be able to copy it to another DVD). 
Creating a copy of an audio DVD which is itself encrypted would defeat 
the purpose of a copy protection, since even though encrypted, it's 
still a copy, and the protection wants to prevent that.  If you can copy 
it, it wouldn't be protected :P


There is no copy protection on a DVD. There is however a region specific
_usage_ protection.


DVD-Audio works different, utilizing other forms of protection unrelated 
to video DVDs.  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD-Audio





Re: [gentoo-user] * Boot (initramfs) .. does not continue

2009-05-16 Thread Maximilian Bräutigam
Am Samstag, den 16.05.2009, 16:23 +0600 schrieb Mike Kazantsev:
 On Sat, 16 May 2009 12:11:59 +0200
 Maximilian Bräutigam max-br...@gmx.de wrote:
 
  on my new computer i recently installed gentoo using a raid1
  of /dev/sda6 and /dev/sdb6. i'm using genkernel with nearly standard
  config (except the configs regarding raid and power management) and my
  grub ist configured as u see below:
 ...
  
  The framebuffer is working well, the scans that are made before booting
  are working and then it tries to 
   * boot (initramfs) ..
  and at this point he simply stops and does nothing anymore.
 
 I've never had a chance to use genkernel, but unless you're using LVM
 on top of the raid, kernel with mdraid and fs drivers compiled-in should
 be able to see it, so you can try booting without initramfs line and
 hope genkernel hasn't compiled rootfs and mdraid support as modules.
 
hi Mike,

could you please tell me, where to find these options in menuconfig,
because if i'm compiling my kernel i use:
genkernel --menuconfig all

if you are thinking of the options in 
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86+raid+lvm2-quickinstall.xml
-- these are enabled.

by the way, if i'm booting w/o the initrd, i get a kernel panic because
he is not able to mount/find the raid system -- something with
superblock not found.

i'm despaired.
thank you very much.
der Max




[gentoo-user] Re: * Boot (initramfs) .. does not continue

2009-05-16 Thread Remy Blank
Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
 by the way, if i'm booting w/o the initrd, i get a kernel panic because
 he is not able to mount/find the raid system -- something with
 superblock not found.

I assume you have set the partition type of your RAID components to fd
(RAID autodetect)?

-- Remy



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: * Boot (initramfs) .. does not continue

2009-05-16 Thread Maximilian Bräutigam
Am Samstag, den 16.05.2009, 13:44 +0200 schrieb Remy Blank:
 Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
  by the way, if i'm booting w/o the initrd, i get a kernel panic because
  he is not able to mount/find the raid system -- something with
  superblock not found.
 
 I assume you have set the partition type of your RAID components to fd
 (RAID autodetect)?
 
 -- Remy
 

Hi Remy,

yes of course i did, because everything worked fine since today. but to
be sure, i looked at cfdisk: Linux raid autodetect.

kind regards,
der Max




Re: [gentoo-user] * Boot (initramfs) .. does not continue

2009-05-16 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Sat, 16 May 2009 13:33:04 +0200
Maximilian Bräutigam max-br...@gmx.de wrote:

 could you please tell me, where to find these options in menuconfig,
 because if i'm compiling my kernel i use:
 genkernel --menuconfig all
 
 if you are thinking of the options in 
 http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86+raid+lvm2-quickinstall.xml
 -- these are enabled.

Yes, I mean these options as well, but in recent kernels there's one
more flag in Multi-dev section that's missing in the guide:
Autodetect RAID arrays during kernel boot.
Obviously, it should be set if you want to boot from mdraid.

  Device Drivers  ---
[*] Multiple devices driver support (RAID and LVM)  ---
  *   RAID support
[*] Autodetect RAID arrays during kernel boot
* RAID-1 (mirroring) mode

But that's not all the prequesites, since you also need a device
and fs driver compiled in.

It might look like this (but the hardware and/or fs is probably
different in your case):

  Device Drivers  ---

SCSI device support  --- (RAID settings here is not for sw raid)
  -*- SCSI device support
  * SCSI disk support

* Serial ATA (prod) and Parallel ATA (experimental) drivers  ---
  *   AHCI SATA support
  [*]   ATA SFF support
* Intel ESB, ICH, PIIX3, PIIX4 PATA/SATA support

  File systems  ---
* The Extended 4 (ext4) filesystem


 by the way, if i'm booting w/o the initrd, i get a kernel panic because
 he is not able to mount/find the raid system -- something with
 superblock not found.

-- 
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Grant
 I'd like to back up the files on my DVD-Audio discs.  The files are
 encrypted and I don't want to decrypt them, I just want to back them
 up.  I'm getting I/O errors when I try to cp the files, and I'm
 guessing it's because of the encryption.  Does anyone know of a method
 that would back these discs up in their encrypted form?  Here are the
 errors I get:

 # cp -R /mnt/cdrom/AUDIO_TS DVD-A
 cp: reading `/mnt/cdrom/AUDIO_TS/ATS_01_1.AOB': Input/output error
 cp: reading `/mnt/cdrom/AUDIO_TS/ATS_01_2.AOB': Input/output error
 cp: reading `/mnt/cdrom/AUDIO_TS/ATS_01_3.AOB': Input/output error
 cp: reading `/mnt/cdrom/AUDIO_TS/ATS_01_4.AOB': Input/output error
 cp: reading `/mnt/cdrom/AUDIO_TS/AUDIO_SV.VOB': Input/output error
 cp: reading `/mnt/cdrom/AUDIO_TS/AUDIO_TS.VOB': Input/output error

 - Grant




 Why don't you use the (very old, but still effective) dd [1] command
 to create an ISO image?

 dd if=/dev/your-dvd-device of=some-path/bakup.iso bs=2048 
 conv=sync,notrunc

Unfortunately I get:

$ dd if=/dev/hda of=DVD-A/dvda.iso bs=2048 conv=sync,notruncdd:
reading `/dev/hda': Input/output error
1848+0 records in
1848+0 records out
3784704 bytes (3.8 MB) copied, 2.36347 s, 1.6 MB/s

I'm sure it's because of the encryption.  I'll have to back it up
unencrypted.  In case anyone is interested, DVDA-Explorer and DVDFab
will both do the job.  Both free, both easy to find, both work via
wine.

- Grant


 That will make an exact copy of your DVD into your hard disk.
 I don't know if this is what you want to do.



 Ricardo.

 [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dd_(Unix)



Re: [gentoo-user] * Boot (initramfs) .. does not continue

2009-05-16 Thread Maximilian Bräutigam
Am Samstag, den 16.05.2009, 18:09 +0600 schrieb Mike Kazantsev:
 On Sat, 16 May 2009 13:33:04 +0200
 Maximilian Bräutigam max-br...@gmx.de wrote:
 
  could you please tell me, where to find these options in menuconfig,
  because if i'm compiling my kernel i use:
  genkernel --menuconfig all
  
  if you are thinking of the options in 
  http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86+raid+lvm2-quickinstall.xml
  -- these are enabled.
 
 Yes, I mean these options as well, but in recent kernels there's one
 more flag in Multi-dev section that's missing in the guide:
 Autodetect RAID arrays during kernel boot.
 Obviously, it should be set if you want to boot from mdraid.
 
   Device Drivers  ---
 [*] Multiple devices driver support (RAID and LVM)  ---
   *   RAID support
 [*] Autodetect RAID arrays during kernel boot
 * RAID-1 (mirroring) mode
 
 But that's not all the prequesites, since you also need a device
 and fs driver compiled in.
 
 It might look like this (but the hardware and/or fs is probably
 different in your case):
 
   Device Drivers  ---
 
 SCSI device support  --- (RAID settings here is not for sw raid)
   -*- SCSI device support
   * SCSI disk support
 
 * Serial ATA (prod) and Parallel ATA (experimental) drivers  ---
   *   AHCI SATA support
   [*]   ATA SFF support
 * Intel ESB, ICH, PIIX3, PIIX4 PATA/SATA support
 
   File systems  ---
 * The Extended 4 (ext4) filesystem
 
 
  by the way, if i'm booting w/o the initrd, i get a kernel panic because
  he is not able to mount/find the raid system -- something with
  superblock not found.
 
Hi Mike and all other gentoos ;) 

all of your mentioned options are enabled (since genkernel and me did
it).

i copied all data to another partition /dev/sdb9 and disabled initrd. by
the way, i think that initrd was running, because all the scans after
executing the initrd ran without problems. despite, i disabled it and
got a kernel panic, like:


[md] scanned 0 and added 0
 ...
VFS: cannot open root device sdb9 or unknown block(0,0)
please append correct root=
 ...
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(0,0)


i don't know how to handel this error, since my grub entry is correct
(or not?):


title   Gentoo Linux x86_64-2.6.28-5 (no initrd) (on /dev/sdb9)
root(hd1,8)
kernel  /boot/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-2.6.28-gentoo-r5 root=/dev/sdb9


kind regards,
der Max





[gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2009-05-16, Ricardo Bevilacqua rus.s...@gmail.com wrote:

 Why don't you use the (very old, but still effective) dd [1]
 command to create an ISO image?

Because it won't work.

Have you tried it with an encrypted DVD?

 dd if=/dev/your-dvd-device of=some-path/bakup.iso bs=2048 
 conv=sync,notrunc

 That will make an exact copy of your DVD into your hard disk.

No, it won't.  Commercially sold audio and video DVDs are
encrypted so the DVD drive can't read them unless you load a
decryption key into the DVD drive.  DVD players have keys built
into them.  There are software packages like DeCSS and
libdvdcss that either have a built-in key or know how to figure
one out.

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_Scramble_System

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeCSS
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libdvdcss

Audio DVD uses a different scheme (that's also been broken):

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD-Audio

 I don't know if this is what you want to do.

Yes it is what he wants to do, but your suggestion is useless
(as could been seen from the OP's post which showed the
read-errors you get when you try to used tools like dd to read
encyrpted DVDs).

-- 
Grant





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Stroller


On 16 May 2009, at 15:56, Grant Edwards wrote:

On 2009-05-16, Ricardo Bevilacqua rus.s...@gmail.com wrote:


Why don't you use the (very old, but still effective) dd [1]
command to create an ISO image?


Because it won't work.

Have you tried it with an encrypted DVD?


It'll work fine  I do it all the time before I decrypt  rip DVDs.

dd if=/dev/your-dvd-device of=some-path/bakup.iso bs=2048  
conv=sync,notrunc


That will make an exact copy of your DVD into your hard disk.


No, it won't.  Commercially sold audio and video DVDs are
encrypted so the DVD drive can't read them unless you load a
decryption key into the DVD drive.  DVD players have keys built
into them.  There are software packages like DeCSS and
libdvdcss that either have a built-in key or know how to figure
one out.


It WILL make an exact copy of the DVD onto the drive (assuming DVD  
video, and no ARccOS [1]), it will just be an exact copy of the  
*encrypted* movie. It won't be playable without an additional  
decryption step (although mplayer can include this step  
automagically), but it will be an *exact* copy.


The OP is talking about DVD-audio, however. It is less clear to me  
whether this is playable under Linux [2]. If it is then I would be  
trying to rip it as some kind of playable audio - I agree with the  
other comments (a point you're also obviously trying to get at) that  
there's little point in storing an encrypted copy.


Stroller.




[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD-Video#Anti-ripping
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD-Audio#Copy_protection




[gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2009-05-16, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:

 On 16 May 2009, at 15:56, Grant Edwards wrote:
 On 2009-05-16, Ricardo Bevilacqua rus.s...@gmail.com wrote:

 Why don't you use the (very old, but still effective) dd [1]
 command to create an ISO image?

 Because it won't work.

 Have you tried it with an encrypted DVD?

 It'll work fine  I do it all the time before I decrypt  rip DVDs.

I've tried it numerous times, and it's never worked for me.

 It WILL make an exact copy of the DVD onto the drive (assuming DVD  
 video, and no ARccOS [1]), it will just be an exact copy of the  
 *encrypted* movie.

It's never worked for me.  I only get a fraction of the disk's
content followed by a lot of read/seek errors.

 It won't be playable without an additional decryption step
 (although mplayer can include this step automagically), but it
 will be an *exact* copy.

Not in my experience.

-- 
Grant





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Joerg Schilling
Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:


 On 16 May 2009, at 15:56, Grant Edwards wrote:
  On 2009-05-16, Ricardo Bevilacqua rus.s...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Why don't you use the (very old, but still effective) dd [1]
  command to create an ISO image?
 
  Because it won't work.
 
  Have you tried it with an encrypted DVD?

 It'll work fine  I do it all the time before I decrypt  rip DVDs.

  dd if=/dev/your-dvd-device of=some-path/bakup.iso bs=2048  
  conv=sync,notrunc
 
  That will make an exact copy of your DVD into your hard disk.
 
  No, it won't.  Commercially sold audio and video DVDs are
  encrypted so the DVD drive can't read them unless you load a
  decryption key into the DVD drive.  DVD players have keys built
  into them.  There are software packages like DeCSS and
  libdvdcss that either have a built-in key or know how to figure
  one out.

 It WILL make an exact copy of the DVD onto the drive (assuming DVD  
 video, and no ARccOS [1]), it will just be an exact copy of the  
 *encrypted* movie. It won't be playable without an additional  
 decryption step (although mplayer can include this step  
 automagically), but it will be an *exact* copy.

Even with a DVD-Video, you will not be able to make a copy of the DVD
using dd if the DVD is using CSS.

The sectors that are carrying content from VOB files will not be redable before
you unlock the drive using e.g. dvdbackup.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)  
   joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily



Re: [gentoo-user] help needed to connect wifi on eeeSTOKED!

2009-05-16 Thread maxim wexler

 I've been running mine for over a year, using ~x86 so

using ~x86? As a USE flag, in package.keywords, ACCEPT_KEYWORDS...?

mw


  __
Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your 
favourite sites. Download it now
http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com.



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Stroller


On 16 May 2009, at 16:56, Grant Edwards wrote:

On 2009-05-16, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:



Why don't you use the (very old, but still effective) dd [1]
command to create an ISO image?

...

I've tried it numerous times, and it's never worked for me.


It WILL make an exact copy of the DVD onto the drive (assuming DVD
video, and no ARccOS [1]), it will just be an exact copy of the
*encrypted* movie.


It's never worked for me.  I only get a fraction of the disk's
content followed by a lot of read/seek errors.


That tends to indicate that you're using newer ARccOS-protected DVDs.  
I have few of these  very many more that are more than 5 years old.  
In this case I think you may have some success ripping using a newer  
SVN of mplayer (and the newer versions of dvdread dvdlib (??) which  
have been patched by the mplayer developers).


Stroller.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: New xorg.conf with x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5

2009-05-16 Thread Mick
On Friday 15 May 2009, Tony Davison wrote:
 On Tuesday 07 April 2009 12:25:07 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
  On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
   Is so OBVIOUSLY the correct way to go, and so OBVIOUSLY much easier.
   Right? I mean, what kind of twit do you have to be to not understand
   the hal files?
  
   /tongue_in_cheek
 
  using xml is just the rotten icing on that shitcake.

 There was a building up the road from here that proudly proclaimed,
 Software AG The XML Company.

 Now the carpark is empty and the sign on the gate reads, Office To Let.

HA! HA! HA!  :))

-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] /dev/sr0 has disappeared: big mystery

2009-05-16 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Samstag, 16. Mai 2009 11:55:18 schrieb Philip Webb:
 090516 Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
  Please post your kernel config.  Please post it completely,
  best together with output from lspci -v when booted into the LiveCD.

 I have got 2.6.25 to work again after enabling 'evdev'

evdev is completely unrelated to CD writing.

  have just successfully written System Rescue 1.2.0 using it.
 I also compiled 2.6.29-r4 -- the latest in Gentoo testing --
  enabled the alternative IDE mode without anything changing.
 I also recompiled Udev Dbus  Hal without any improvement.
 Kernel 2.6.29 is simply not creating a device for the CD drive.

Because you're lacking the kernel support for it, see below.

 Thanks for your interest: it mb that this is a kernel bug.

No, it's not.

 Here is the output from 'lspci -v' when using 2.6.25 (when writing this),
 followed by .config for 2.6.29 :

OK, let's look at the interesting parts:

 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 82801IB (ICH9) 4 port SATA AHCI
   Kernel driver in use: ahci

So you need CONFIG_SATA_AHCI=y, which you have.

 03:00.0 IDE interface: JMicron Technologies, Inc. JMB368 IDE controller
   Kernel driver in use: pata_jmicron

For this you need CONFIG_PATA_JMICRON=y, which you don't have. This is where 
your CD drive is connected to, right?

Let's go through the kernel config:

 # CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS is not set

You really need to enable this (that is a PCI-Express machine, isn't it?).

 CONFIG_BLK_DEV_FD=y

Do you have a floppy drive, still?

 CONFIG_HAVE_IDE=y

Useless.

 # CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG is not set

As written before: No SG, no write (to CD).

 # CONFIG_ATA_SFF is not set

You need to enable this to make CONFIG_PATA_JMICRON visible.

HTH...

Dirk


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] How to IPSEC M$oft VPN client setup

2009-05-16 Thread Mick
On Monday 11 May 2009, Michael Higgins wrote:
 On Tue, 05 May 2009 17:49:06 +0100

 Graham Murray gra...@gmurray.org.uk wrote:
  Michael Higgins li...@evolone.org writes:
   Is there a useful Gentoo document anyone might suggest describing
   how one *connects to* a VPN device of the 'Microsoft' flavour with
   IPSEC?
 
  I do not know about a Gentoo document,

 I've been working on this for *way* too long, with no apparent success.
 I have racoon and l2tpt running, but no network addresses in the VPN.

 Does anyone understand the actual procedure(s) for making a VPN like, l2tp,
 IPSEC pre-shared secret connection, and wish to elaborate just a bit on
 the issues (config files, possible values) involved?

 I mean, the ebuild for ipsec-tools doesn't even put in half the config
 files... as if any of this could work at all without them?

 Any help appreciated. :(

Any progress with this guys?  I am also trying to get something running 
between a router and my laptop (using kvnc) but I am failing with this error:
=
info: Gateway hostname (my.remote_router.com) resolved to XX.XXX.XXX.XX.
error: [racoon helper 
err] /home/michael/.kde3.5/share/apps/kvpnc//setkey.ROUTER.sh: line 6: -f: 
command not found 
error: [racoon err] racoon: must be root to invoke this program. 
=

I am not sure that I want to run kvnc as root - after all it is a GUI 
application ...

Worth nothing that unlike the OP my remote router is not running MS l2tp, but 
IPSec with PSK.
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Stroller


On 16 May 2009, at 17:20, Joerg Schilling wrote:

...
It WILL make an exact copy of the DVD onto the drive (assuming DVD
video, and no ARccOS [1]), it will just be an exact copy of the
*encrypted* movie. It won't be playable without an additional
decryption step (although mplayer can include this step
automagically), but it will be an *exact* copy.


Even with a DVD-Video, you will not be able to make a copy of the DVD
using dd if the DVD is using CSS.

The sectors that are carrying content from VOB files will not be  
redable before

you unlock the drive using e.g. dvdbackup.


I'm assuming you're talking about cross-region copies here? I.E. a  
region 2 disk in a region 2 drive will still be clonable in this way?


Certainly I have copied disks using `dd` a number of times, PRIOR to  
decryption / ripping. However I cannot state the drives' status for  
sure - most of mine have region-free firmware applied as soon as I get  
them.


Stroller.

[gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2009-05-16, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:

 On 16 May 2009, at 16:56, Grant Edwards wrote:
 On 2009-05-16, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:

 Why don't you use the (very old, but still effective) dd [1]
 command to create an ISO image?
 ...
 I've tried it numerous times, and it's never worked for me.

 It WILL make an exact copy of the DVD onto the drive (assuming DVD
 video, and no ARccOS [1]), it will just be an exact copy of the
 *encrypted* movie.

 It's never worked for me.  I only get a fraction of the disk's
 content followed by a lot of read/seek errors.

 That tends to indicate that you're using newer
 ARccOS-protected DVDs.  I have few of these  very many more
 that are more than 5 years old.  In this case I think you may
 have some success ripping using a newer SVN of mplayer (and
 the newer versions of dvdread dvdlib (??) which have been
 patched by the mplayer developers).

Yup. They've always worked fine with k9copy and xine (which
use libdvdread/libdvdcss/?).

-- 
Grant





[gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2009-05-16, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:

 It WILL make an exact copy of the DVD onto the drive (assuming DVD  
 video, and no ARccOS [1]), it will just be an exact copy of the  
 *encrypted* movie. It won't be playable without an additional  
 decryption step (although mplayer can include this step  
 automagically), but it will be an *exact* copy.

 Even with a DVD-Video, you will not be able to make a copy of
 the DVD using dd if the DVD is using CSS.

That's always been my experience.

 The sectors that are carrying content from VOB files will not
 be redable before you unlock the drive using e.g. dvdbackup.

Again, that's what I've always seen.

-- 
Grant





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Joerg Schilling
Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:


 On 16 May 2009, at 17:20, Joerg Schilling wrote:
  ...
  It WILL make an exact copy of the DVD onto the drive (assuming DVD
  video, and no ARccOS [1]), it will just be an exact copy of the
  *encrypted* movie. It won't be playable without an additional
  decryption step (although mplayer can include this step
  automagically), but it will be an *exact* copy.
 
  Even with a DVD-Video, you will not be able to make a copy of the DVD
  using dd if the DVD is using CSS.
 
  The sectors that are carrying content from VOB files will not be  
  redable before
  you unlock the drive using e.g. dvdbackup.

 I'm assuming you're talking about cross-region copies here? I.E. a  
 region 2 disk in a region 2 drive will still be clonable in this way?

I cannot tell as I never set up a DVD-ROM drive for a CSS region.

 Certainly I have copied disks using `dd` a number of times, PRIOR to  
 decryption / ripping. However I cannot state the drives' status for  
 sure - most of mine have region-free firmware applied as soon as I get  
 them.

There are still a lot of DVD-Video media that don't use CSS.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)  
   joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily



Re: [gentoo-user] * Boot (initramfs) .. does not continue

2009-05-16 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Sat, 16 May 2009 16:01:10 +0200
Maximilian Bräutigam max-br...@gmx.de wrote:

 all of your mentioned options are enabled (since genkernel and me did
 it).
 
 i copied all data to another partition /dev/sdb9 and disabled initrd. by
 the way, i think that initrd was running, because all the scans after
 executing the initrd ran without problems. despite, i disabled it and
 got a kernel panic, like:
 
 
 [md] scanned 0 and added 0
  ...
 VFS: cannot open root device sdb9 or unknown block(0,0)
 please append correct root=
  ...
 Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: unable to mount root fs on
 unknown-block(0,0)
 

I think there should also be a list of detected partitions (if any).

 i don't know how to handel this error, since my grub entry is correct
 (or not?):
 
 
 title Gentoo Linux x86_64-2.6.28-5 (no initrd) (on /dev/sdb9)
 root  (hd1,8)
 kernel/boot/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-2.6.28-gentoo-r5 
 root=/dev/sdb9
 

Looks correct to me.
kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/md0 works fine in my case with RAID1 and
posted above settings, nearly all the other device drivers are modular.

Prehaps it's just some weird version-hardware compatibility issue or
build problem, although I believe it's quite rare with disk / fs
drivers, so you must be doing something wrong.

Try stopping the system boot as soon as possible using I key, exiting
to shell, and look at the output of lsmod.
It should list the stuff you have loaded as modules, which were probably
loaded from initrd (since the system won't boot w/o it), so you can try
either compiling the relevant ones in or dropping them from initrd to
see if the system can boot (yeah, sounds crazy, but it might be just
simplier ;)

With some luck, there might be something critical you've just managed
to miss, easily detectable at the first glance.

-- 
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] /dev/sr0 has disappeared: big mystery

2009-05-16 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Samstag, 16. Mai 2009 18:38:26 schrieb Dirk Heinrichs:
  CONFIG_HAVE_IDE=y

 Useless.

Hmm, seems to be selected automatically, thus not that useless ;) However, I 
can't even find it in menuconfig.

Bye...

Dirk


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] help needed to connect wifi on eeeSTOKED!

2009-05-16 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Sat, 16 May 2009 09:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
maxim wexler bliss...@yahoo.com wrote:

  I've been running mine for over a year, using ~x86 so
 
 using ~x86? As a USE flag, in package.keywords, ACCEPT_KEYWORDS...?

Must be ACCEPT_KEYWORDS for emerge since it's none too practical to set
it for every package in .keywords or mix ~ and stable builds much.

In fact, it can probably be considered some sort of a gentoo-specific
slang :)

-- 
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Stroller


On 16 May 2009, at 17:46, Joerg Schilling wrote:

...

Certainly I have copied disks using `dd` a number of times, PRIOR to
decryption / ripping. However I cannot state the drives' status for
sure - most of mine have region-free firmware applied as soon as I  
get

them.


There are still a lot of DVD-Video media that don't use CSS.


I have certainly cloned region-protected DVDs on a number of occasions  
using `dd`. These disks have given no read errors, and the subsequent  
encrypted .iso image has produced perfectly fine rips.


Stroller.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problem with compiling kernel

2009-05-16 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 12 May 2009, Marc Blumentritt wrote:
 Arnau Bria schrieb:
  hive linux # make  make modules_install  make
 
  just one question about your compiling command, why make  ...  make?
  I just do make all  make modules_install ...

 I used this command only to show the problem I have. I have a special
 setup, where I place nearly the complete root file system inside the
 kernel image (only /usr is added via a squashfs mount). I use for this
 the kernel option General setup - (/path/to/my/files) Initramfs source
 file(s). When I change the source files, I have to recompile the kernel
 (just running make) to include the changes inside the kernel. This has
 worked up until last week.

 Now I always get the error I reported in my first email.

Last time this happened to me (more than once), it was because I had selected 
something in the kernel that I shouldn't have.  I had to retrace my steps, 
removed the offending module and then it compiled and installed fine.
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] How to IPSEC M$oft VPN client setup

2009-05-16 Thread Graham Murray
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com writes:

 Any progress with this guys?  I am also trying to get something running 
 between a router and my laptop (using kvnc) but I am failing with this error:

Here are some samples.

/etc/racoon/racoon.conf
path pre_shared_key /etc/racoon/psk.txt;

remote anonymous
{
exchange_mode main;
proposal {
encryption_algorithm aes;
hash_algorithm sha1;
lifetime time 24 hour;
dh_group 2;
authentication_method pre_shared_key;
}
}

sainfo anonymous
{
encryption_algorithm aes, 3des;
authentication_algorithm hmac_sha256, hmac_sha1;
compression_algorithm deflate;
}

/etc/racoon/psk.txt
10.0.1.2This is the shared secret

/etc/ipsec.conf
flush;
spdflush;

spdadd 10.0.0.1/32 10.0.1.2/32 any -P out ipsec
esp/transport//require;

spdadd 10.0.1.2/32 10.0.0.1/32 any -P in ipsec
esp/transport//require;




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: New xorg.conf with x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5

2009-05-16 Thread pk
Alan McKinnon wrote:
 I'm not sure who's criticizing DeviceKit, but it isn't me :-)

I guess it was me... :-)

I find this thread interesting:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-May/045561.html

...especially this:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-May/045574.html

Which seems like a much more sane way... to me. I don't know what BSD
and other platforms use (instead of Udev) but I'm sure one could come up
with a common API.

Mvh

Peter K



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: New xorg.conf with x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5

2009-05-16 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 16 May 2009 19:14:17 pk wrote:
 Alan McKinnon wrote:
  I'm not sure who's criticizing DeviceKit, but it isn't me :-)

 I guess it was me... :-)

 I find this thread interesting:
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-May/045561.html

 ...especially this:
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-May/045574.html

 Which seems like a much more sane way... to me. I don't know what BSD
 and other platforms use (instead of Udev) but I'm sure one could come up
 with a common API.

Sometimes you have to make several horrendous errors to know what to not do 
and thereby deduce what you should do - the only version 3 rule of thumb :-)

From threads involving the hal maintainers I get the idea that the problem is 
not so much the idea of hal, but rather it's implementation. And then there's 
those fdi files...

As I see it, at the bottom of the stack you have a kernel and at the top a 
user space app (the X server will do for an example). Plug in a USB device 
that the app can use, and the kernel needs to make a node in /dev for it if 
it's not already there. The kernel should not be interrogating the device for 
all possible info - that is expensive - and doesn't need to. It only needs 
enough info to know what driver, major and minor numbers to use. X OTOH, can 
successfully use much more info. If you have a 19 button mouse, it would like 
to know and could even use it as a one-handed keyboard (extreme example). So 
the current model uses udev as the interface to the kernel's nodes and HAL as 
the interface to exactly what hardware you have. Seems pretty sane for the 
most usual use case. At some point in the stack you will need the OS-dependant 
part, my guess is the best place is between hal and udev. Only Linux uses 
udev, but all OSes use something in that spot. And if not, they have static 
nodes.

Meanwhile we have an acknowledged problem with hal - it's too complex, too 
many things have been shoved into it that were never catered for in the 
design, configuration is horrific - and the devs are having their usual 
spirited debate about how best to approach a solution. This is perfectly 
normal and perfectly healthy

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Joerg Schilling
Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:

 On 16 May 2009, at 17:46, Joerg Schilling wrote:
  ...
  Certainly I have copied disks using `dd` a number of times, PRIOR to
  decryption / ripping. However I cannot state the drives' status for
  sure - most of mine have region-free firmware applied as soon as I  
  get
  them.
 
  There are still a lot of DVD-Video media that don't use CSS.

 I have certainly cloned region-protected DVDs on a number of occasions  
 using `dd`. These disks have given no read errors, and the subsequent  
 encrypted .iso image has produced perfectly fine rips.

Most video DVDs are dual layer how did you write them?

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)  
   joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: New xorg.conf with x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5

2009-05-16 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote:
 On Saturday 16 May 2009 19:14:17 pk wrote:
   
 Alan McKinnon wrote:
 
 I'm not sure who's criticizing DeviceKit, but it isn't me :-)
   
 I guess it was me... :-)

 I find this thread interesting:
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-May/045561.html

 ...especially this:
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-May/045574.html

 Which seems like a much more sane way... to me. I don't know what BSD
 and other platforms use (instead of Udev) but I'm sure one could come up
 with a common API.
 

 Sometimes you have to make several horrendous errors to know what to not do 
 and thereby deduce what you should do - the only version 3 rule of thumb :-)

 From threads involving the hal maintainers I get the idea that the problem is 
 not so much the idea of hal, but rather it's implementation. And then there's 
 those fdi files...

 As I see it, at the bottom of the stack you have a kernel and at the top a 
 user space app (the X server will do for an example). Plug in a USB device 
 that the app can use, and the kernel needs to make a node in /dev for it if 
 it's not already there. The kernel should not be interrogating the device for 
 all possible info - that is expensive - and doesn't need to. It only needs 
 enough info to know what driver, major and minor numbers to use. X OTOH, can 
 successfully use much more info. If you have a 19 button mouse, it would like 
 to know and could even use it as a one-handed keyboard (extreme example). So 
 the current model uses udev as the interface to the kernel's nodes and HAL as 
 the interface to exactly what hardware you have. Seems pretty sane for the 
 most usual use case. At some point in the stack you will need the 
 OS-dependant 
 part, my guess is the best place is between hal and udev. Only Linux uses 
 udev, but all OSes use something in that spot. And if not, they have static 
 nodes.

 Meanwhile we have an acknowledged problem with hal - it's too complex, too 
 many things have been shoved into it that were never catered for in the 
 design, configuration is horrific - and the devs are having their usual 
 spirited debate about how best to approach a solution. This is perfectly 
 normal and perfectly healthy

   

I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be user
friendly.  I'm about to make a fresh backup and try this again.  I have
upgraded my kernel to a really new version, 2.6.25.  Sorry, nvidia won't
compile with anything newer that I have tried. 

If it don't work this time, this could end up a with permanent -hal for
xorg-server.  I quite happy with the way my box works now anyway.  ;-) 
Just trying to keep up with the times I guess. 

 Dale crosses fingers and toes to 

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Stroller


On 16 May 2009, at 19:00, Joerg Schilling wrote:

...
There are still a lot of DVD-Video media that don't use CSS.


I have certainly cloned region-protected DVDs on a number of  
occasions

using `dd`. These disks have given no read errors, and the subsequent
encrypted .iso image has produced perfectly fine rips.


Most video DVDs are dual layer how did you write them?


You can play the dvd.iso using mplayer - it will decrypt on the fly -  
or you decrypt them some other method before re-authoring. Usually I  
just convert them to mp4 using mplayer / mencoder.


Stroller.



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Copying encrypted files from a DVD

2009-05-16 Thread Joerg Schilling
Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:


 On 16 May 2009, at 19:00, Joerg Schilling wrote:
  ...
  There are still a lot of DVD-Video media that don't use CSS.
 
  I have certainly cloned region-protected DVDs on a number of  
  occasions
  using `dd`. These disks have given no read errors, and the subsequent
  encrypted .iso image has produced perfectly fine rips.
 
  Most video DVDs are dual layer how did you write them?

 You can play the dvd.iso using mplayer - it will decrypt on the fly -  
 or you decrypt them some other method before re-authoring. Usually I  
 just convert them to mp4 using mplayer / mencoder.

If you like to write it to DVD in a way that allows standalone players 
to read it, you need to retain the layer break. You read it out with cdrecord
and you set it with cdrecord driveropts=layerbreak=#

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)  
   joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily



Re: [gentoo-user] One of my cores sometimes sleeps

2009-05-16 Thread Alex Schuster
Roy Wright writes:

 Alex Schuster wrote:
[temporary freezes]
 I replaced my media lan's router the other day with a
 gentoo+dnsmasq+shorewall homebrew and hit this behavior.  My observation
 is that they freeze when you loose internet connection.  Two quick
 tests:  1) pull you internet cable and see if that duplicates the
 behavior you are experiencing; 2) try to ping an internet system while
 you are experiencing the problem.

Thaks, that looked promising - my internet connection _is_ quite unstable 
indeed. But at the moment it's working fine, I can ping while the problem 
happens, and pulling the cable does not trigger it.

Wonko



Re: [gentoo-user] How to IPSEC M$oft VPN client setup

2009-05-16 Thread Mick
Thanks Graham,

On Saturday 16 May 2009, Graham Murray wrote:

 Here are some samples.

 /etc/racoon/racoon.conf

 /etc/racoon/psk.txt

 /etc/ipsec.conf

Do I need a /etc/setkey.conf file?  How do I create it?

When I run '/etc/init.d/racoon start' this is what I get:
===
# /etc/init.d/racoon --verbose restart
 * Loading ipsec policies from /etc/ipsec.conf.
 * Starting racoon ...
/usr/sbin/racoon: invalid option -- '4'
usage: racoon [-BdFv] [-a (port)] [-f (file)] [-l (file)] [-p (port)]
   -B: install SA to the kernel from the file specified by the configuration 
file.
   -d: debug level, more -d will generate more debug message.
   -C: dump parsed config file.
   -L: include location in debug messages
   -F: run in foreground, do not become daemon.
   -v: be more verbose
   -a: port number for admin port.
   -f: pathname for configuration file.
   -l: pathname for log file.
   -p: port number for isakmp (default: 500).
   -P: port number for NAT-T (default: 4500).  [ !! ]
===

I am not sure I do this right.  The remote router's LAN is 10.10.10.0/24.  
This is the same like my local LAN's subnet.  My local LAN ip is 10.10.10.5.

The remote router is giving (or is it expecting?) addresses for clients in the 
172.16.1.0/24 subnet.  How should I configure the /etc/ipsec.conf file?
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: New xorg.conf with x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5

2009-05-16 Thread pk
Alan McKinnon wrote:

 As I see it, at the bottom of the stack you have a kernel and at the top a 
 user space app (the X server will do for an example). Plug in a USB device 
 that the app can use, and the kernel needs to make a node in /dev for it if 
 it's not already there. The kernel should not be interrogating the device for 
 all possible info - that is expensive - and doesn't need to. It only needs 
 enough info to know what driver, major and minor numbers to use. X OTOH, can 

I couldn't agree more. And this is what Udev, as a user space app, does.
The only thing it doesn't handle is communicating with other user space
apps; this is currently Hals job.

 the current model uses udev as the interface to the kernel's nodes and HAL as 
 the interface to exactly what hardware you have. Seems pretty sane for the 
 most usual use case. At some point in the stack you will need the 
 OS-dependant 
 part, my guess is the best place is between hal and udev. Only Linux uses 

Well, as I understand it this is what it looks like today:

kernel - udev (or equivalent for non-linux kernel/OS) - hal - dbus
- user apps

To me that seems a bit redundant...

What I would like to see:

kernel - udev - user apps

Or at the most:

kernel - udev - daemon - user apps.

 udev, but all OSes use something in that spot. And if not, they have static 
 nodes.

Yes, but if the developers could agree on a common API for the udev
daemon and it's equivalents on other platforms (what does BSD use?)...
Or if they could agree on using Hal v2 (rewritten from scratch with no
or a minimum of dependencies).

 Meanwhile we have an acknowledged problem with hal - it's too complex, too 
 many things have been shoved into it that were never catered for in the 
 design, configuration is horrific - and the devs are having their usual 
 spirited debate about how best to approach a solution. This is perfectly 
 normal and perfectly healthy

Yes, I guess so. Since I'm (currently) not in the position to help out
I'll have to live with whatever they come up with. But sometimes it's a
bit frustrating... Sorry for the ranting.

Best regards

Peter K