Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues
Am 29.05.2012 23:37, schrieb Rafa Griman: On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:56:07 +0200 Rafa Griman rafagri...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Vaeth :) On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote: On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote: gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ Your gawk is broken. This happens if you emerged gawk with current gcc and aggressive FLAGS like -DNDEBUG or -flto. Not sure whether it is a bug of gawk or gcc. So it seems to be the CFLAGS :( As I said in my previous e-mail, I was experimenting a bit with them ... I'll be more conservative ;) Well, on the one hand the flags don;t seem to be too bad overall, but on the other hand there's the golden rule of Gentoo: Don't stuff around with CFLAGS Why not? Well, there's the ricer phenomenon where changed CFLAGS worsen performance and stability but the user's own bias convinces him/her that it's actually vastly improved. I know that rule and tried not to be too agressive but seems I was O:) Since it's not my min machine, I was going to experiment (nothing scientific, just curiosity) trying different options on different partitions and see how they work out. Out of curiosity: What flags do you run now? Do you know which flag exactly caused the problem? They didn't seem too experimental though -fno-inline looked odd. Regards, Florian Philipp signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote: Am 29.05.2012 23:37, schrieb Rafa Griman: On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:56:07 +0200 Rafa Griman rafagri...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Vaeth :) On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote: On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote: gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ Your gawk is broken. This happens if you emerged gawk with current gcc and aggressive FLAGS like -DNDEBUG or -flto. Not sure whether it is a bug of gawk or gcc. So it seems to be the CFLAGS :( As I said in my previous e-mail, I was experimenting a bit with them ... I'll be more conservative ;) Well, on the one hand the flags don;t seem to be too bad overall, but on the other hand there's the golden rule of Gentoo: Don't stuff around with CFLAGS Why not? Well, there's the ricer phenomenon where changed CFLAGS worsen performance and stability but the user's own bias convinces him/her that it's actually vastly improved. I know that rule and tried not to be too agressive but seems I was O:) Since it's not my min machine, I was going to experiment (nothing scientific, just curiosity) trying different options on different partitions and see how they work out. Out of curiosity: What flags do you run now? Do you know which flag exactly caused the problem? They didn't seem too experimental though -fno-inline looked odd. That one's it: -fno-inline. Removed it and now the error disappears. revdep-rebuild runs well now. Thanks all !!! Rafa
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues
On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:34:07 +0200 Rafa Griman rafagri...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all :) New to this mailing list. I'm installing Gentoo and when I run revdep-rebuild I get the following error # revdep-rebuild * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ * No search defined -- this is a bug. You have stumbled upon a heretofore unseen behaviour of revdep-rebuild :-) In other words we ain't never seen it do that before... Let's first establish where you are at in the installation. Are you following the Installation Guide at gentoo.org? If so, what point in the guide are you at? Are you still in the chroot environment, or have you completed that part and successfully rebooted at least once? Do you have any personal customizations in your shell environment? Is the shell bash? And some basic info: Post the entire content of /etc/make.conf and the output of emerge --info # I've been going through /usr/bin/revdep-rebuild.sh but can't quite fix the issue :( I've also been checking the Gentoo Forums and mailing list archive but didn't find anything (maybe I'm not searching correctly ;) If I've got it right, the issue is because of how gawk and the shell interpret the [ characters so I've been trying to escape them ... but I seem to be doing something wrong :( I also get a similar error when trying to emerge qca: Unpacking source... Unpacking qca-2.0.3.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/app-crypt/qca-2.0.3/work Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/app-crypt/qca-2.0.3/work Preparing source in /var/tmp/portage/app-crypt/qca-2.0.3/work/qca-2.0.3 ... * Applying qca-2.0.2-pcfilespath.patch ... * Applying qca-2.0.3+gcc-4.7.patch ... Source prepared. Configuring source in /var/tmp/portage/app-crypt/qca-2.0.3/work/qca-2.0.3 ... Configuring Qt Cryptographic Architecture (QCA) ... Verifying Qt 4 build environment ... ok Checking for Qt = 4.2 ... yes Checking for certstore ... /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt Good, your configure finished. Now run /usr/bin/gmake. * Running qmake ... awk: cmd. line:7: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /^[[:blank:]]*CONFIG[[:blank:]]*[\+\*]?=/ * - error while processing src/src.pro * ERROR: app-crypt/qca-2.0.3 failed (configure phase): * eqmake4 failed to process src/src.pro Any hints, ideas, links, ...I could read into? TIA Rafa -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues
Hi :) On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:34:07 +0200 Rafa Griman rafagri...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all :) New to this mailing list. I'm installing Gentoo and when I run revdep-rebuild I get the following error # revdep-rebuild * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ * No search defined -- this is a bug. You have stumbled upon a heretofore unseen behaviour of revdep-rebuild :-) In other words we ain't never seen it do that before... sigh ... Well I guess there's always a first time ;) Nah, seriously, first time I've seen it too. Let's first establish where you are at in the installation. Are you following the Installation Guide at gentoo.org? Yup, followed the guide. Just FYI, I have an Asus R2 system running Gentoo in which I haven't had this issue and now I just installed an MSI Wind netbook in which I'm having this issue :( If so, what point in the guide are you at? Are you still in the chroot environment, or have you completed that part and successfully rebooted at least once? Nope, not in the chroot environment, already rebooted. Everything (seems) to work OK, except for revdep-rebuild and the qca compilation. Right now I was going to install KDE and all the needed software to get a useful desktop up and running so it's a minimal system. Do you have any personal customizations in your shell environment? Nope. Is the shell bash? Yup. And some basic info: Post the entire content of /etc/make.conf and the output of emerge --info I'll send this as soon as I get home tonight since I don't have the netbook here with me. Thanks for your time !!! Rafa
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues
On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote: gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ Your gawk is broken. This happens if you emerged gawk with current gcc and aggressive FLAGS like -DNDEBUG or -flto. Not sure whether it is a bug of gawk or gcc.
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues
Hey !!
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
And some basic info:
Post the entire content of /etc/make.conf and the output of emerge
--info
OK, back again. Here goes:
# emerge --info
Portage 2.1.10.49 (default/linux/x86/10.0, gcc-4.5.3, glibc-2.14.1-r3,
3.2.12-gentoo-libre01 i686)
=
System uname:
Linux-3.2.12-gentoo-libre01-i686-Intel-R-_Atom-TM-_CPU_N270_@_1.60GHz-with-gentoo-2.1
Timestamp of tree: Tue, 29 May 2012 06:00:01 +
app-shells/bash: 4.2_p20
dev-lang/python: 2.7.3-r1, 3.2.3
dev-util/pkgconfig: 0.26
sys-apps/baselayout: 2.1-r1
sys-apps/openrc: 0.9.8.4
sys-apps/sandbox: 2.5
sys-devel/autoconf: 2.68
sys-devel/automake: 1.11.1
sys-devel/binutils: 2.21.1-r1
sys-devel/gcc:4.5.3-r2
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.5-r2
sys-devel/libtool:2.4-r1
sys-devel/make: 3.82-r1
sys-kernel/linux-headers: 3.1 (virtual/os-headers)
sys-libs/glibc: 2.14.1-r3
Repositories: gentoo
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=x86
ACCEPT_LICENSE=* -@EULA skype-eula
CBUILD=i686-pc-linux-gnu
CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-inline -march=atom
-mtune=atom -mmmx -msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -msse3 -mssse3
CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu
CONFIG_PROTECT=/etc /usr/share/config
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK=/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/env.d /etc/gconf
/etc/gentoo-release /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/sandbox.d /etc/terminfo
CXXFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-inline -march=atom
-mtune=atom -mmmx -msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -msse3 -mssse3
DISTDIR=/usr/portage/distfiles
FEATURES=assume-digests binpkg-logs distlocks ebuild-locks fixlafiles
news parallel-fetch protect-owned sandbox sfperms strict
unknown-features-warn unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans userfetch
FFLAGS=
GENTOO_MIRRORS=ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/gentoo
rsync://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/gentoo/
LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed
LINGUAS=en en_US
PKGDIR=/usr/portage/packages
PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT=/
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS=--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times
--compress --force --whole-file --delete --stats --human-readable
--timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local
--exclude=/packages
PORTAGE_TMPDIR=/var/tmp
PORTDIR=/usr/portage
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=
SYNC=rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage
USE=acl berkdb bzip2 cli cracklib crypt cups cxx dri gd gdbm graphite
iconv lzma modules mudflap ncurses nls nptl pam pcre pppd readline
session sse2 ssl tcpd unicode x86 xorg zlib ALSA_CARDS=hda-intel
loopback virmidi ALSA_PCM_PLUGINS=adpcm alaw asym copy dmix dshare
dsnoop empty extplug file hooks iec958 ioplug ladspa lfloat linear
meter mmap_emul mulaw multi null plug rate route share shm softvol
APACHE2_MODULES=actions alias auth_basic authn_alias authn_anon
authn_dbm authn_default authn_file authz_dbm authz_default
authz_groupfile authz_host authz_owner authz_user autoindex cache cgi
cgid dav dav_fs dav_lock deflate dir disk_cache env expires ext_filter
file_cache filter headers include info log_config logio mem_cache mime
mime_magic negotiation rewrite setenvif speling status unique_id
userdir usertrack vhost_alias CALLIGRA_FEATURES=kexi words flow plan
sheets stage tables krita karbon braindump CAMERAS=ptp2 canon
COLLECTD_PLUGINS=df interface irq load memory rrdtool swap syslog
ELIBC=glibc GPSD_PROTOCOLS=ashtech aivdm earthmate evermore fv18
garmin garmintxt gpsclock itrax mtk3301 nmea ntrip navcom oceanserver
oldstyle oncore rtcm104v2 rtcm104v3 sirf superstar2 timing tsip
tripmate tnt ubx INPUT_DEVICES=evdev keyboard mouse synaptics void
KERNEL=linux LCD_DEVICES=bayrad cfontz cfontz633 glk hd44780 lb216
lcdm001 mtxorb ncurses text LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS=presenter-console
presenter-minimizer LINGUAS=en en_US PHP_TARGETS=php5-3
PYTHON_TARGETS=python3_2 python2_7 RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19
SANE_BACKENDS=hp hp3500 hp3900 hp4200 hp5400 hp5590 hpljm1005 hpsj5s
USERLAND=GNU VIDEO_CARDS=intel XTABLES_ADDONS=quota2 psd pknock
lscan length2 ipv4options ipset ipp2p iface geoip fuzzy condition tee
tarpit sysrq steal rawnat logmark ipmark dhcpmac delude chaos account
Unset: CPPFLAGS, CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, LANG,
LC_ALL, MAKEOPTS, PORTAGE_BUNZIP2_COMMAND, PORTAGE_COMPRESS,
PORTAGE_COMPRESS_FLAGS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS, USE_PYTHON
And my make.conf file:
# These settings were set by the catalyst build script that automatically
# built this stage.
# Please consult /usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example for a more
# detailed example.
#CFLAGS=-O2 -march=i686 -pipe
CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-inline -march=atom
-mtune=atom -mmmx -msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -msse3 -mssse3
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
# WARNING: Changing your CHOST is not something that should be done lightly.
# Please consult http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml before changing.
CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu
#LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1,--as-needed
USE=-gtk -fortran -openmp -fortran -mono -mozilla -gtk3
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues
Hi Vaeth :) On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote: On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote: gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ Your gawk is broken. This happens if you emerged gawk with current gcc and aggressive FLAGS like -DNDEBUG or -flto. Not sure whether it is a bug of gawk or gcc. So it seems to be the CFLAGS :( As I said in my previous e-mail, I was experimenting a bit with them ... I'll be more conservative ;) Thanks !!! Rafa
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues
On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:56:07 +0200 Rafa Griman rafagri...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Vaeth :) On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote: On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote: gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ Your gawk is broken. This happens if you emerged gawk with current gcc and aggressive FLAGS like -DNDEBUG or -flto. Not sure whether it is a bug of gawk or gcc. So it seems to be the CFLAGS :( As I said in my previous e-mail, I was experimenting a bit with them ... I'll be more conservative ;) Well, on the one hand the flags don;t seem to be too bad overall, but on the other hand there's the golden rule of Gentoo: Don't stuff around with CFLAGS Why not? Well, there's the ricer phenomenon where changed CFLAGS worsen performance and stability but the user's own bias convinces him/her that it's actually vastly improved. Some tweaks are perfectly OK, like the multimedia and cpu-specific stuff (sse, mmx and all their related cousins). These are normally safe and can give huge gains with video playback. Likewise for the GPU tweaks once those hit mainline usage. One last tweak, if the code is built on the machine that will run it (the usual case, replace -march and -mtune with just -march=native. It has exactly the same effect but is easier to read, is self-documenting and allows the compiler to attempt it's best (the compiler usually does know much better what to do than you do) -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:56:07 +0200 Rafa Griman rafagri...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Vaeth :) On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote: On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote: gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ Your gawk is broken. This happens if you emerged gawk with current gcc and aggressive FLAGS like -DNDEBUG or -flto. Not sure whether it is a bug of gawk or gcc. So it seems to be the CFLAGS :( As I said in my previous e-mail, I was experimenting a bit with them ... I'll be more conservative ;) Well, on the one hand the flags don;t seem to be too bad overall, but on the other hand there's the golden rule of Gentoo: Don't stuff around with CFLAGS Why not? Well, there's the ricer phenomenon where changed CFLAGS worsen performance and stability but the user's own bias convinces him/her that it's actually vastly improved. I know that rule and tried not to be too agressive but seems I was O:) Since it's not my min machine, I was going to experiment (nothing scientific, just curiosity) trying different options on different partitions and see how they work out. Some tweaks are perfectly OK, like the multimedia and cpu-specific stuff (sse, mmx and all their related cousins). These are normally safe and can give huge gains with video playback. Likewise for the GPU tweaks once those hit mainline usage. That was mainly the reason: video playback and some other apps (scientific). But nothing serious. One last tweak, if the code is built on the machine that will run it (the usual case, replace -march and -mtune with just -march=native. It has exactly the same effect but is easier to read, is self-documenting and allows the compiler to attempt it's best (the compiler usually does know much better what to do than you do) I totally agree with you: the compiler knos better ;) TIA Rafa
