[google-appengine] Re: Deleting / Hoarding of Application Ids
Yes, I can and have done just that: http://www.yadayada.com goes to my GAE. BUT ... that only works for the non-secure, non-SSL http (no-s) protocol. If I want to do secure request/replies (to secure passwords, personal data, session-tokens, etc), I need to use the secure SSL https protocol. On GAE, I can only do this with a URL ending in appspot.com (because of SSL certificate issues); I cannot do https://www.yadayada.com. Ideally, I would've liked to have https://yadayada.appspot.com ... but yadayada has already been taken (probably by a gmail user who has no intent of using GAE or any idea what it is). On Oct 11, 10:11 pm, dennisM meade.den...@gmail.com wrote: If I understand the problem, you can point yadayada.com at your app engine application. You're not stuck with APPID.appspot.com. Look at: http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/domains.html On Oct 11, 4:30 pm, Donzo para...@gmail.com wrote: Andy, thanks, I didn't know about the AppEngine - Gmail id relationship. Helps explain why so many AppEngine ids seem to already be taken. BTW, I was able to reserve yada-yada.appspot.com and so might just live with that. On Oct 10, 11:08 am, Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net wrote: Note that the yadayada.appspot.com is reserved for the owner of yaday...@gmail.com. This association seems reasonable, but means that any name recycling/reclaiming for appengine must also address gmail and perhaps other google accounts. On Oct 8, 10:09 pm, Donzo para...@gmail.com wrote: Are there plans to enable deleting Application Ids? Are there plans to eventually expire (auto-delete) Application Ids reserved but unused??? I'm just getting into GAE and am extremely interested in using it for several web sites we now operate. One issue is that almost all the GAE application ids corresponding to domains we own are already taken ... but none have a live site running. For example, we own yadayada.com (not really), but I've found that yadayada.appspot.com is already reserved but doesn't have an active web site running. This is true for almost all of my domains, some of them rather unique so I wonder if appspot.com is not seeing a lot of hoarding of good names since it's free. This is important to me because of the current inability to use https (ssl) AND my domain name for a GAE hosted web site. I do need to direct my users to https for some pages ... and am willing to do so if I can get yadayada.appspot.com. But since that's already taken, I would have to use something else ... which will spook some of my users into thinking its an impostor web site (asking for id and password no less!!!). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Prettier values for reference keys?
Hi Can someone help with this consideration: When we're creating a ReferenceProperty on datastore objects the value stored in the model is the key for the referenced object (stating the obvious here, but please stay with me), but when the reference object has a key_name, which makes up a pretty name (understandable from the datastore viewer), it would be nice to use that key name instead. Is there an easy way to use that key_name instead? I could imaging subclassing ReferenceProperty, but looking at the API, I can't seem to find someplace to hook in. I could write my own ReferenceProperty from scratch, subclassing Property, but I would also like a simple solution where I didn't reinvent all ready existing functionality. Regards Tonny --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: How to Handle Spaces in static urls ...
Are you sure the images with spaces are uploaded by appcfg.py? Look at the --verbose and --noisy options of appcfg.py, to see if the files are uploaded. Create a new file with a space and see if it gets uploaded. An URL with a %20 should be handled correctly by the webserver. There are numerous tools out there that renames files, some of them are free. You can always write a small python script that traverses the directory and generates move commands. Save them in a file and run the batch file (Win) or source (Unix) the file. 2009/10/10 ramu rslet...@gmail.com: I have an static director with following handler .. - url: /image static_dir: image expiration: 1d Everything inside image directory works perfectly well except .. a subdirectory with Images having Space in their name.. ie ... /image/subdirectory/Image 345.png Now the browser sends the request in the form : /image/subdirectory/Image%20345.png Which fails with an 404 Error .Even when the image is there. How to handle this ... The other option to rename those 300 images one by one is rather .. :( --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Deleting / Hoarding of Application Ids
Hi Donzo, We're not aware of anyone 'hoarding' App IDs, and such a scenario seems unlikely, since users can only register 10 apps per verified account. -Nick Johnson On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Donzo para...@gmail.com wrote: Are there plans to enable deleting Application Ids? Are there plans to eventually expire (auto-delete) Application Ids reserved but unused??? I'm just getting into GAE and am extremely interested in using it for several web sites we now operate. One issue is that almost all the GAE application ids corresponding to domains we own are already taken ... but none have a live site running. For example, we own yadayada.com (not really), but I've found that yadayada.appspot.com is already reserved but doesn't have an active web site running. This is true for almost all of my domains, some of them rather unique so I wonder if appspot.com is not seeing a lot of hoarding of good names since it's free. This is important to me because of the current inability to use https (ssl) AND my domain name for a GAE hosted web site. I do need to direct my users to https for some pages ... and am willing to do so if I can get yadayada.appspot.com. But since that's already taken, I would have to use something else ... which will spook some of my users into thinking its an impostor web site (asking for id and password no less!!!). -- Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Prettier values for reference keys?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Tonny wrote: in. I could write my own ReferenceProperty from scratch, subclassing Property, but I would also like a simple solution where I didn't reinvent all ready existing functionality. use a StringProperty, and add some utility functions to set it from a referenced entity or to get a entity based on the stored key_name. -- rodrigo --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Prettier values for reference keys?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Tonny wrote:
in. I could write my own ReferenceProperty from scratch, subclassing
Property, but I would also like a simple
solution where I didn't reinvent all ready existing functionality.
ignore my previous post. here's a solution that does exactly what your
looking for. add this method to your model:
def get_key_name_from_reference_property(self, prop_name):
key = getattr(self.__class__, prop_name).get_value_for_datastore(self)
return db.Key(key).key_name()
then, you simply call it passing the ReferenceProperty name.
class MyModel(db.Model):
some_other_entity = db.ReferenceProperty()
entity = MyModel.get(...)
referenced_key_name =
entity.get_key_name_from_reference_property('some_other_entity')
that's it.
-- rodrigo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] warm instances on low traffic sites
hello I noticed in the Oct 7 chat that Google is considering(?) allowing developers paid-for warm instances of your app. If you're interested in being able to pay for at least one instance to be kept warm, even with sporadic bursts of traffic, let us know in the discussion group and issue tracker. I guess the main question on everyone's mind is how much? a single python instance has to be an order of magnitude less expensive then say a small EC2 VM so I'd be interested to hear what the daily/weekly/ monthly costs would be. cheers brian --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Heavy vs. Light entities
Hi, Shalien. I am also dealing with so-called schema optimization. I have a pretty simple Image model. It has a handful of metadata plus a blob of the image content. Requests to load and fetch these entities are what I would call pretty fast. Looking at a random example, a request for a 29KB image completed in 92ms 40cpu_ms 21api_cpu_ms. My understanding (someone correct me if I'm wrong) is that the main slowdown is ListProperties, since a ListProperty with 1,000 items is roughly like having a model with 1,000 properties. On Oct 11, 10:09 pm, Shailen shailen.t...@gmail.com wrote: Consider 2 classes: class Light(db.Model): location = db.StringProperty() class Heavy(db.Model): location = db.StringProperty() content = db.TextProperty() image1 = db.BlobProperty() image2 = db.BLobProperty() image3 = db.BlobProperty() ..., etc., etc. ... I have 2 choices when getting information from the datastore: I can either fetch just the keys, or I can fetch the entities themselves. There isn't any way to fetch only a part of an entity (say just the location property in entities of type Heavy). Assuming this is correct, I have a couple of questions: 1) If I want to access the location property in both Light and Heavy, is it fair to assume that accessing Light will be speedier than accessing Heavy, since Heavy has to fetch all sorts of data that I don't need but that is part of the entity? 2) Would it make sense to break down Heavy into more lightweight classes for more efficient lookup? This question is probably best clarified by discussing what's happening in my actual application where I allow an Author to create several WriteUps. The WriteUps have numerous properties: a heading, a sub-heading, a lot of text and, optionally, several images, and a few more properties. When displaying the contents of a WriteUp, I need to access all these properties. But sometimes, I need to access only 1 or 2 lightweight properties; for instance, on a page summarizing the WriteUps done by an author, I need to only list the heading and sub- heading; I do not need to access the text or Blob data. But there is no way to access *just* the heading or sub-heading, right? I end up fetching ALL of the entity, whether I need all of it or not. Is this correct? Or does the datastore have some way of optimizing this? Reading the In the documentation (in the Queries and Indexes section), we are told: # The query is not executed until results are accessed. results = q.fetch(5) for p in results: print %s %s, %d inches tall % (p.first_name, p.last_name, p.height) When are results 'accessed', when fetch() is called, or when p.first_name, p._last_name, etc. are used? I am assuming that when fetch(5) is called, all 5 entities (assuming they exist) are fetched, and if the entities contain properties other than first_name, last_name or height, they are loaded up too. Is that correct? So now I am thinking of breaking up the WriteUps class into several classes, putting all the lightweight data that I need to access frequently in one class and all the heavy data that I rarely need to access in another and using ancestor relationships and transactions to make sure everything stays together. Does this make any sense, or I am fundamentally misunderstanding how app engine fetches data? - Shailen --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Deleting / Hoarding of Application Ids
Donzo, Thanks for the explanation. I've never has to use SSLl, so didn't appreciate the problem. On Oct 12, 2:35 am, Donzo para...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I can and have done just that:http://www.yadayada.comgoes to my GAE. BUT ... that only works for the non-secure, non-SSL http (no-s) protocol. If I want to do secure request/replies (to secure passwords, personal data, session-tokens, etc), I need to use the secure SSL https protocol. On GAE, I can only do this with a URL ending in appspot.com (because of SSL certificate issues); I cannot dohttps://www.yadayada.com. Ideally, I would've liked to havehttps://yadayada.appspot.com... butyadayadahas already been taken (probably by a gmail user who has no intent of using GAE or any idea what it is). On Oct 11, 10:11 pm, dennisM meade.den...@gmail.com wrote: If I understand the problem, you can pointyadayada.com at your app engine application. You're not stuck with APPID.appspot.com. Look at: http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/domains.html On Oct 11, 4:30 pm, Donzo para...@gmail.com wrote: Andy, thanks, I didn't know about the AppEngine - Gmail id relationship. Helps explain why so many AppEngine ids seem to already be taken. BTW, I was able to reserve yada-yada.appspot.com and so might just live with that. On Oct 10, 11:08 am, Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net wrote: Note that theyadayada.appspot.com is reserved for the owner of yaday...@gmail.com. This association seems reasonable, but means that any name recycling/reclaiming for appengine must also address gmail and perhaps other google accounts. On Oct 8, 10:09 pm, Donzo para...@gmail.com wrote: Are there plans to enable deleting Application Ids? Are there plans to eventually expire (auto-delete) Application Ids reserved but unused??? I'm just getting into GAE and am extremely interested in using it for several web sites we now operate. One issue is that almost all the GAE application ids corresponding to domains we own are already taken ... but none have a live site running. For example, we own yadayada.com (not really), but I've found thatyadayada.appspot.com is already reserved but doesn't have an active web site running. This is true for almost all of my domains, some of them rather unique so I wonder if appspot.com is not seeing a lot of hoarding of good names since it's free. This is important to me because of the current inability to use https (ssl) AND my domain name for a GAE hosted web site. I do need to direct my users to https for some pages ... and am willing to do so if I can getyadayada.appspot.com. But since that's already taken, I would have to use something else ... which will spook some of my users into thinking its an impostor web site (asking for id and password no less!!!). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: warm instances on low traffic sites
Add my name to the list of people that would consider paying to always keep at least one instance warm. On Oct 12, 8:43 am, bFlood bflood...@gmail.com wrote: hello I noticed in the Oct 7 chat that Google is considering(?) allowing developers paid-for warm instances of your app. If you're interested in being able to pay for at least one instance to be kept warm, even with sporadic bursts of traffic, let us know in the discussion group and issue tracker. I guess the main question on everyone's mind is how much? a single python instance has to be an order of magnitude less expensive then say a small EC2 VM so I'd be interested to hear what the daily/weekly/ monthly costs would be. cheers brian --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] The development environment datastore is so slow
Hi, I would like to develope with the same data set as in production, like some tens of thousands of entities, but it's so slow, it needs a couple of minutes to start the dev_appserver and each query takes long time. Does anyone have a solution or workaround apart from working with a reduced data set ? Thanks in advance --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] djangoforms.ModelForm for PolyModel ??
Hey! While learning python + django + app engine + datastore, I started by desiging models and used extensicely PolyModel class. It's a great way to abstract common fields. However, it seems that a) PolyModel is datastore specific and b) djangoforms therein doesn't suppor it. Am I correct? Are there any plans (or newbie information) to get out here? No mention about Poly.* here: /usr/local/google_appengine_1.2.5/google/appengine/ext/db/ djangoforms.py I guess, in the meantime, I have to either re-design my models not to include any PolyModels or design forms myself. -- Janne --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Is there a different way to upload Web App ?
Hi, I have been testing Google Wave Robot App and wanted to upload my app from an envirement locked inside a firewall.Due to this AppCfg is not able to conect to AppEngine DataStore. I was wondering if it exist some otherway to upload my app (ftp or some sort). Thank you for your help ! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Second App. The phone number has been sent already been used to confirm an account.
I created one application milif123 and now I want to create a second. I press Create an Application, open page Verify Your Account by SMS, where I inter Mobile Number (same as when create first app), Send and get error The phone number has been sent too many messages or has already been used to confirm an account. How can I create a second application? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] one servlet stopped working
So I just noticed that one of my servlets has stopped working. I get att 500 error message. In the admin console, instead of a crash as I expected, I am getting this message below. What is it? 40 seconds and no CPU used. Is this temporary problems with google apps engine? It has been like this all evening. # 1. 10-12 09:55AM 03.698 /checklists 500 41115ms 120cpu_ms 120api_cpu_ms 0kb Apache-HttpClient/UNAVAILABLE (java 1.4),gzip(gfe) See details 83.248.35.150 - - [12/Oct/2009:09:55:44 -0700] POST /checklists HTTP/1.1 500 0 - Apache-HttpClient/UNAVAILABLE (java 1.4),gzip(gfe) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Search API Rate limiting - App Engine
Whitelisting of user accounts is only possible for REST API. The Search API is only able to whitelist IP addresses, not user accounts. Akshar On Oct 9, 10:27 pm, Kevin Pierce kpie...@vendasta.com wrote: From the linked to api It is possible to whitelist both accounts and IP addresses If your calls are made by signing with your account, it should result in an account based limit. Get your account whitelisted and you should be ok. At least this is what I am hoping to be able to do. On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Akshar akshar.d...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All- I have an app on the GAE using the twitter search API and it is getting heavily rate limited again this past couple of days. http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Rate-limitingstates that for cloud platforms like Google App Engine, applications without a static IP addresses cannot receive Search whitelisting. I am looking for any workarounds to avoid getting HTTP 503 response codes to twitter search requests from app engine? Twitter API thread about detailed discussion on the above problem (with no easy solution): http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/browse_thread... Akshar -- Kevin Pierce Software Architect VendAsta Technologies Inc. kpie...@vendasta.com (306)955.5512 ext 103www.vendasta.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Indexes building for 3 days
Apologies, I've move these indexes to the error state, so you'll need to re-vacuum. Thank you, Jeff On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:05 AM, visadm543 visadm...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you. I vacuumed the indexes and tried again, with a subset of 28 indexes. It has been 48 hours and they are still building. Any help is appreciated. On Oct 8, 4:04 pm, Jeff S (Google) j...@google.com wrote: I've reset your index count and moved the stuck indexes into the error state. I think the issue may have been related to the fact that this app had 100 indexes, which is the upper limit. Would it be possible to use fewer indexes? If not, we can discuss the possibility of allowing this app to have more. Thank you, Jeff On Oct 8, 1:51 pm, visadm543 visadm...@gmail.com wrote: The indexes for my app have been in the building state since the morning of 10/5. App ID is vispipe. Any help is appreciated. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: The development environment datastore is so slow
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 2:06 PM, (jpgerek) wrote: Does anyone have a solution or workaround apart from working with a reduced data set ? There's nothing to do with the current implementation which is indeed very simple and can't handle large data sets (everything is loaded into memory and there's no indexing at all, afaik). The alternative would be to set an environment with a real database. I'm afraid however that the current options are at a very early stage of development. One recently announced was TyphoonAE, which uses mongoDB for the database backend: http://code.google.com/p/typhoonae/ I never tested it myself, though. -- rodrigo --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Search API Rate limiting - App Engine
Thanks for the clarification.I overlooked that is Searching you are interested. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Akshar akshar.d...@gmail.com wrote: Whitelisting of user accounts is only possible for REST API. The Search API is only able to whitelist IP addresses, not user accounts. Akshar On Oct 9, 10:27 pm, Kevin Pierce kpie...@vendasta.com wrote: From the linked to api It is possible to whitelist both accounts and IP addresses If your calls are made by signing with your account, it should result in an account based limit. Get your account whitelisted and you should be ok. At least this is what I am hoping to be able to do. On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Akshar akshar.d...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All- I have an app on the GAE using the twitter search API and it is getting heavily rate limited again this past couple of days. http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Rate-limitingstates that for cloud platforms like Google App Engine, applications without a static IP addresses cannot receive Search whitelisting. I am looking for any workarounds to avoid getting HTTP 503 response codes to twitter search requests from app engine? Twitter API thread about detailed discussion on the above problem (with no easy solution): http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/browse_thread. .. Akshar -- Kevin Pierce Software Architect VendAsta Technologies Inc. kpie...@vendasta.com (306)955.5512 ext 103www.vendasta.com -- Kevin Pierce Software Architect VendAsta Technologies Inc. kpie...@vendasta.com (306)955.5512 ext 103 www.vendasta.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Is there a different way to upload Web App ?
Hey, Proxy wouldn't help you? http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/uploadinganapp.html#Using_an_HTTP_Proxy http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/tools/uploadinganapp.html#Using_an_HTTP_Proxy -- Janne On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:13 PM, assane assane...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have been testing Google Wave Robot App and wanted to upload my app from an envirement locked inside a firewall.Due to this AppCfg is not able to conect to AppEngine DataStore. I was wondering if it exist some otherway to upload my app (ftp or some sort). Thank you for your help ! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Will reducing model size improve performance?
There's no need to use a new model name: You can simply create new entities to replace the old ones, under the current model name. If you're using key names, you can construct a new entity with the same values as the old ones, and store that. Note the precise wording. You can't just put() the instance that you read from the datastore, the instance that doesn't have the properties that you've deleted, you have to get(), make a new db.Model instance with the same key, populate its properties from the instance that you got, and put the new instance. If you're not using key names, you can't create that new db.Model instance (as of 1.2.5) because you can't create an instance with a specified id. The problem is in db.Model._to_entity() (and maybe db.Expando._to_entity()). If the instance was created from a protocol buffer, put() tries to reuse said protocol buffer, and it still contains values for properties that you've deleted. These values are not deleted by _to_entity() so they end up being sent back to the datastore. I've filed http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2251 . On Oct 10, 1:29 pm, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Jason Smith j...@proven-corporation.comwrote: Thanks for the help guys. I think this is an important matter to have cleared up. It's bedtime here (GMT+7) however tomorrow I think I will do some benchmarks along the lines of the example I wrote up in the SO question. At this point I would think the safest thing would be to completely change the model name, thereby guaranteeing that you will be writing entities with fresh keys. However I suspect it's not necessary to go that far. I'm thinking that on the production datastore, changing the model definition and then re-put()ing the entity will be what's required to realize a speed benefit when reducing the number of properties on a model. But the facts will speak for themselves. There's no need to use a new model name: You can simply create new entities to replace the old ones, under the current model name. If you're using key names, you can construct a new entity with the same values as the old ones, and store that. You can also use the low-level API in google.appengine.api.datastore; this provides a dict-like interface from which you can delete unwanted fields. -Nick Johnson On Oct 11, 12:17 am, Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net wrote: In other words: if I want to reduce the size of my entities, is it necessary to migrate the old entities to ones with the new definition? I'm pretty sure that the answer to that is yes. If so, is it sufficient to re-put() the entity, or must I save under a wholly new key? I think that it should be sufficient re-put() but decided to test that hypothesis. It isn't sufficient in the SDK - the SDK admin console continues to show values for properties that you've deleted from the model definition after the re-put(). Yes, I checked to make sure that those properties didn't have values before the re-put(). I did the get and re-put() in a transaction, namely: def txn(key): obj = Model.get(key) obj.put() assert db.run_in_transaction(txn, key) I tried two things to get around this problem. The first was to add db.delete(obj.key()) right before obj.put(). (You can't do obj.delete because that trashes the obj.) The second was to add obj.old_property = None right before the obj.put() (old_property is the name of the property that I deleted from Model's definition.) Neither one worked. According to the SDK's datastore viewer, existing instances of Model continued to have values for old_property after I updated them with that transaction even with the two changes, together or separately. If this is also true of the production datastore, this is a big deal. On Oct 10, 4:44 am, Jason Smith j...@proven-corporation.com wrote: Hi, group. My app's main cost (in dollars and response time) is in the db.get([list, of, keys, here]) call in some very high-trafficked code. I want to pare down the size of that model to the bare minimum with the hope of reducing the time and CPU fee for this very common activity. Many users who are experiencing growth in the app popularity probably have this objective as well. I have two questions that hopefully others are thinking about too. 1. Can I expect the API time of a db.get() with several hundred keys to reduce roughly linearly as I reduce the size of the entity? Currently the entity has the following data attached: 9 String, 9 Boolean, 8 Integer, 1 GeoPt, 2 DateTime, 1 Text (avg size ~100 bytes FWIW), 1 Reference, 1 StringList (avg size 500 bytes). The goal is to move the vast majority of this data to related classes so that the core fetch of the main model will be quick.
[google-appengine] Re: djangoforms.ModelForm for PolyModel ??
Hi Janne, 2009/10/12 Janne Hukkinen h...@sci.fi: While learning python + django + app engine + datastore, I started by desiging models and used extensicely PolyModel class. It's a great way to abstract common fields. However, it seems that a) PolyModel is datastore specific and b) djangoforms therein doesn't suppor it. Am I correct? I have played with DjangoForms using PolyModels recently and yes, they are supported. It all works just as well as with normal Models. One gotcha I did find however was that at first I couldn't figure out how to tell Django not to output the 'class' hierarchy on the form (since that is set inside the PolyModel base class and not by the user). I tried to hide 'class' and '__class' but figured out it was just one underscore '_class'. The code I used was as follows: class MyPolyModelForm(djangoforms.ModelForm): class Meta: model = MyPolyModel exclude = ['_class'] Hope that helps. Note: See this article for more information about models and forms: http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/djangoforms.html Cheers, Andy -- contact: Andrew Chilton website: http://www.chilts.org/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Deleting / Hoarding of Application Ids
PROBLEM: Since you cannot use the same DNS name for both http https when using GAE, you need some way to assure your users customers that they are not being phished. SOLUTION IDEA: Some kind of 3rd party verification assurance of website owner/controller identity which can be displayed linked to that 3rd party, e.g. Verisign http://www.verisign.com/ssl/secured-seal/index.html My solution idea isn't a solution, but a category of potential solutions. The need is to assure visitors of authentic identity behind the website; the answer is to have a trusted partner (e.g. thawte? microsoft? joeplumber?) vouch for you. Anyone have a real product solution in this line of thinking? Monty @puresight --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Broadcasting real-time notifications using XMPP - possible?
Can I bounce an idea off anyone who's interested? I'm looking for an efficient way to get realtime updates to a large-ish number of client apps, and I'm wondering if using App Engine+Google's Talk servers might be the way to do it. I need to get timely messages to 100-5000 thousand clients, with reasonable (99%?) reliability. I know I can do this with Google Talk at a very small scale - if someone IMs me I'll get the message through Gmail on one computer, iChat on another and Google Talk on my iPhone, all at the same time. But that's just 3 clients on the same account. Could this work at scale? Let's say I create an account - clients-of-kris-12...@gmail.com - and have my all my client apps connect as that user. They're all coded to listen for updates from their buddy - server-of-kris-54...@gmail.com - which is part of my App Engine project. As far as I understand, they'll all hear everything the server is announcing, roughly at the same time. Does anyone know that this would/wouldn't work? And if it would work, does anyone know the billing implications? I'd rather the App Engine team billed me for 5000 messages and were happy to do so, than billed me for one but felt I was abusing the system. (Sorry - I realise this may be more of a Google Talk question than an App Engine question. If anyone wants to point me to a low-level GTalk forum instead, please do!) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] re-use phone number for SMS?
Hello, I have an app engine account for personal use. Now I want to create a new account for my company. However, when I try to verify my new account by SMS, it complains because my phone number has already been used to confirm an account (I only have one mobile phone for both personal and work.) Is there a workaround for this? Thanks Kiren --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: What are your top three issues in appengine?
1. Full-text search 2. Incoming email 3. HTTPS on Google Apps --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Cannot add more apps to account
I've been trying to create a second app on my GAE account (Dashboard - Show all applications - Create an application button). I get sent to the SMS page, which from what read on this forum will probably just say the phone number has already been used, since I already did that when I created the first app. (I have to drive half an hour to find out, so I'll take everybody else's word for it. Not everybody has cell phone service at home you know!) Here is what I think may be causing this problem. I started the GAE account with my own email address (the one I post from on here). Later I added a gmail address to my Google account, as part of trying to get the bulkloader to work. The gmail address took over the account and shouldered my poor email aside, so that now whenever I try to login with my own email the gmail account shows instead. There is evidently no way to *remove* the gmail beast either. My suspicion is that I can't add another app because it's looking for my *original* email link-up, which no longer works because of the gmail takeover. Help? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Second App. The phone number has been sent already been used to confirm an account.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Mihail milif...@gmail.com wrote: I created one application milif123 and now I want to create a second. I press Create an Application, open page Verify Your Account by SMS, where I inter Mobile Number (same as when create first app), Send and get error The phone number has been sent too many messages or has already been used to confirm an account. How can I create a second application? That method will create a new account. You can create new applications from within your accounts dashboard. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] GAE production error at this moment? : Class-key is a derived property and cannot be set.
E 10-12 03:02PM 22.599 Class-key is a derived property and cannot be set. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] What changed? Site is completely down.
datastore_types.py:641File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/ appengine/api/datastore_types.py, line 641, in __str__ if self._str is None: AttributeError: 'Key' object has no attribute '_str' I am getting this error across the site now. Nothing on my end has changed. I cannot convert the key object to a string. Barry --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] AttributeError: 'Key' object has no attribute '_str'
I am getting this error in my app right now. File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/loader_tags.py, line 111, in render return self.template.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 176, in render return self.nodelist.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 768, in render bits.append(self.render_node(node, context)) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 781, in render_node return node.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 802, in render output = force_unicode(self.filter_expression.resolve(context)) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/utils/encoding.py, line 52, in force_unicode s = unicode(str(s), encoding, errors) File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/ datastore_types.py, line 641, in __str__ if self._str is None: AttributeError: 'Key' object has no attribute '_str' --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: What changed? Site is completely down.
It's an issue in the 1.2.6 release we're pushing out to the backends today. If you tell me your app id (off-list is ok) I can move your app to a 1.2.5 appserver and that will fix this your app. And yes, we're working on a real fix too right now. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:47 PM, bvelasquez bvelasq...@gmail.com wrote: datastore_types.py:641 File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/ appengine/api/datastore_types.py, line 641, in __str__ if self._str is None: AttributeError: 'Key' object has no attribute '_str' I am getting this error across the site now. Nothing on my end has changed. I cannot convert the key object to a string. Barry --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: What changed? Site is completely down.
jacob-6 is the app-id. Thank you! On Oct 12, 3:49 pm, Jon McAlister jon...@google.com wrote: It's an issue in the 1.2.6 release we're pushing out to the backends today. If you tell me your app id (off-list is ok) I can move your app to a 1.2.5 appserver and that will fix this your app. And yes, we're working on a real fix too right now. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:47 PM, bvelasquez bvelasq...@gmail.com wrote: datastore_types.py:641 File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/ appengine/api/datastore_types.py, line 641, in __str__ if self._str is None: AttributeError: 'Key' object has no attribute '_str' I am getting this error across the site now. Nothing on my end has changed. I cannot convert the key object to a string. Barry --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: AttributeError: 'Key' object has no attribute '_str'
It's an issue in the 1.2.6 release we're pushing out to the backends today. I've moved your app to a 1.2.5 appserver to temporarily fix it. And yes, we're working on a real fix too right now. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:48 PM, nasim nasim.ha...@gmail.com wrote: I am getting this error in my app right now. File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/loader_tags.py, line 111, in render return self.template.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 176, in render return self.nodelist.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 768, in render bits.append(self.render_node(node, context)) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 781, in render_node return node.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 802, in render output = force_unicode(self.filter_expression.resolve(context)) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/utils/encoding.py, line 52, in force_unicode s = unicode(str(s), encoding, errors) File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/ datastore_types.py, line 641, in __str__ if self._str is None: AttributeError: 'Key' object has no attribute '_str' --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: AttributeError: 'Key' object has no attribute '_str'
My app is also affected; the app key is dnzo if you could also push me back to 1.2.5 for now I'd appreciate it. On Oct 12, 3:51 pm, Jon McAlister jon...@google.com wrote: It's an issue in the 1.2.6 release we're pushing out to the backends today. I've moved your app to a 1.2.5 appserver to temporarily fix it. And yes, we're working on a real fix too right now. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:48 PM, nasim nasim.ha...@gmail.com wrote: I am getting this error in my app right now. File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/loader_tags.py, line 111, in render return self.template.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 176, in render return self.nodelist.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 768, in render bits.append(self.render_node(node, context)) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 781, in render_node return node.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 802, in render output = force_unicode(self.filter_expression.resolve(context)) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/utils/encoding.py, line 52, in force_unicode s = unicode(str(s), encoding, errors) File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/ datastore_types.py, line 641, in __str__ if self._str is None: AttributeError: 'Key' object has no attribute '_str' --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: AttributeError: 'Key' object has no attribute '_str'
Moved dnzo. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Taylor Hughes tay...@taylorhugh.es wrote: My app is also affected; the app key is dnzo if you could also push me back to 1.2.5 for now I'd appreciate it. On Oct 12, 3:51 pm, Jon McAlister jon...@google.com wrote: It's an issue in the 1.2.6 release we're pushing out to the backends today. I've moved your app to a 1.2.5 appserver to temporarily fix it. And yes, we're working on a real fix too right now. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:48 PM, nasim nasim.ha...@gmail.com wrote: I am getting this error in my app right now. File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/loader_tags.py, line 111, in render return self.template.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 176, in render return self.nodelist.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 768, in render bits.append(self.render_node(node, context)) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 781, in render_node return node.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 802, in render output = force_unicode(self.filter_expression.resolve(context)) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/utils/encoding.py, line 52, in force_unicode s = unicode(str(s), encoding, errors) File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/ datastore_types.py, line 641, in __str__ if self._str is None: AttributeError: 'Key' object has no attribute '_str' --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: GAE production error at this moment? : Class-key is a derived property and cannot be set.
On Oct 12, 3:18 pm, Alan Xing alanx...@gmail.com wrote: E 10-12 03:02PM 22.599 Class-key is a derived property and cannot be set. What's your app id, please? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: AttributeError: 'Key' object has no attribute '_str'
Thanks! On Oct 12, 4:10 pm, Jon McAlister jon...@google.com wrote: Moved dnzo. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Taylor Hughes tay...@taylorhugh.es wrote: My app is also affected; the app key is dnzo if you could also push me back to 1.2.5 for now I'd appreciate it. On Oct 12, 3:51 pm, Jon McAlister jon...@google.com wrote: It's an issue in the 1.2.6 release we're pushing out to the backends today. I've moved your app to a 1.2.5 appserver to temporarily fix it. And yes, we're working on a real fix too right now. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:48 PM, nasim nasim.ha...@gmail.com wrote: I am getting this error in my app right now. File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/loader_tags.py, line 111, in render return self.template.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 176, in render return self.nodelist.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 768, in render bits.append(self.render_node(node, context)) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 781, in render_node return node.render(context) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/template/__init__.py, line 802, in render output = force_unicode(self.filter_expression.resolve(context)) File /base/data/home/apps/ubuntu-apps/1.331603182473664271/common/ django/utils/encoding.py, line 52, in force_unicode s = unicode(str(s), encoding, errors) File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/ datastore_types.py, line 641, in __str__ if self._str is None: AttributeError: 'Key' object has no attribute '_str' --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: GAE production error at this moment? : Class-key is a derived property and cannot be set.
It looks like you are trying to set a 'class' attribute on a PolyModel instance. Have you been doing anything like this (maybe created your own 'class' property) or is this something that started happening with the new API release? On Oct 12, 3:18 pm, Alan Xing alanx...@gmail.com wrote: E 10-12 03:02PM 22.599 Class-key is a derived property and cannot be set. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Copy a Document in GAE
Can anyone provide a step by step or point me in the direction on how
to do this?
In my GAE I want to programatically make a folder in Google Docs named
MyFolder.
Then I want to put a copy of a couple template files into MyFolder
and replace certain values inside those files with variables.
Example: copy template files into MyFolder
/template_files_directory
| - A_template.doc
| - B_template.doc
in A_template.doc replace {$foo} with string bar
I think I will need to use the DOCs API but I'm not sure how to do
it. Advice?
Joe...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Broadcasting real-time notifications using XMPP - possible?
XMPP multicast certainly is doable for instance via the official good gae xmpp project already achieving similar functions, broadcasting answers to questions when answers appear, is http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/using_xmpp.html and seems able to do what you want with small modification (to multicasting) just calling xmpp functions accordingly. I test it smallscale awaiting it's very scalable. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Heavy vs. Light entities
Hi Jason, Thanks for replying. Unfortunately, I do end with a ListProperty-like situation by allowing multiple images per entity. So, if a user decides to use, say, 15 images, with each image in the 100k (or more) range, the fetch costs could start to add up. Minimizing image sizes and capping he number of images would help, of course, but I think splitting the entity would be a good idea. - Shailen --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Newbie AppEngine Form problem
Watch for typos, as Python is case-sensitive (Textarea vs. TextArea): justification = forms.CharField(widget=forms.Textarea) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
