GWT Incubator: table example broken link
On this page: http://code.google.com/docreader/#p=google-web-toolkit-incubators=google-web-toolkit-incubatort=ScrollTable the link Example: http://google-web-toolkit-incubator.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/demo/ScrollTable/index.html is broken (404) Would someone fix it and report? Thanks Fred --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
Waiting for quite sometime, and I'm targeting 1.6 to build my GDE project for quite some time, and finally, got a milestone release ready. :) Great News! On Feb 6, 11:26 pm, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote: Greetings GWT developers, The GWT team is happy to announce the availability of 1.6 Milestone 1! Binary distributions are available for download directly from GWT's Google Code project. http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=1q=1.6.0 As always, milestone builds like this are use-at-your-own-risk. There are known bugs, and it definitely isn't ready for production use. Please expect some trial and error getting everything to work. The javadoc that comes bundled with the distribution should be up-to-date, but the online Developer Guide (http://code.google.com/docreader/#p=google-web-toolkit-doc-1-6) is still very much a work in progress. We will be updating it over the next several weeks. In lieu of an up-to-date Developer Guide and release notes, below are the major highlights relative to GWT 1.5.3. *** New Project Structure in GWT 1.6 *** One of the biggest changes to GWT 1.6 is a new project structure. The old output format has been replaced by the standard Java web app expanded war format, and the actual directory name does default to /war. Note that the war directory is not only for compiler output; it is also intended to contain handwritten static resources that you want to be included in your webapp alongside GWT modules (that is, things you'd want to version control). Please also note that the GWTShell and GWTCompiler tools will maintain their legacy behavior, but they have been deprecated in favor of new HostedMode and Compiler tools which use the new war output. When 1.6 is officially released, we will be encouraging existing projects to update to the new directory format and to use the new tools to take advantage of new features and for compatibility with future GWT releases. The sample projects provided in the GWT distribution provide an example of correct new project configurations. For more details on the specifics of the new project format, please see GWT 1.6 WAR design document (http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/WAR_Design_1_6). A couple of important changes we should highlight here: - Projects with server-side code (GWT RPC) must configure a web.xml file at /war/WEB-INF/web.xml. This web.xml file must define and publish any servlets associated with the web application. See the included DynaTable sample. Additionally, server-side library dependencies must be copied into /war/WEB-INF/lib. For example, any GWT RPC servlets must have a copy of gwt-servlet.jar in this folder. - HTML host pages will no longer typically be located in a GWT module's public path. Instead, we'll be recommending that people take advantage of the natural web app behavior for serving static files by placing host pages anywhere in the war structure that makes sense. For exmaple, you might want to load a GWT module from a JSP page located in the root of your web app. To keep such handwritten static files separate from those produced by the GWT compiler, the latter will be placed into module-specific subdirectories. Any page that wishes to include a GWT module can do so via a script tag by referencing the GWT-produced module.nocache.js script within that module's subdirectory. As of 1.6, we'll be recommending that only module-specific resources used directly by GWT code, such as image files needed by widgets, should remain on the public path. See the included Showcase sample for some examples of this distinction. - When you do need to load resources from a module's public path, always construct an absolute URL by prepending GWT.getModuleBaseURL(). For example, 'GWT.getModuleBaseURL() + dir/file.ext'. This advice has not changed, but in the past it was easy to be sloppy with this, because the host page and GWT module typically lived in the same directory, so using a relative URL would usually do the right thing. Now that GWT modules live in a subdirectory, you must reference public resources through GWT.getModuleBaseURL(). *** Hosted Mode Enhancements *** Although the legacy GWTShell still uses an embedded Tomcat server, the new HostedMode runs Jetty instead. There is also a new Restart Server button on the main hosted mode window. Clicking this button restarts the internal Jetty server, which allows Java code changes to take effect on the server without having to completely exit and restart hosted mode. This is useful when making code changes to RPC servlets, or when serializable RPC types are modified and the server and client are out of sync. *** New EventHandler System *** Event handlers have been added to replace the old event listeners used by Widgets, History, and various other classes. The new system has a few differences from the old system: - EventHandler methods always take a
Re: Servlets and web.xml
Hi,
Thanks again for the help.
GWT.getModuleBaseURL() returns http://localhost:8080/com.tergwt.Main/
so i guess the path is correct...
I tried to put the hardcoded path to my app folder (/home/jon/
GWTDeploy/webapps/com.tergwt.Main + /FileServlet) and i still get this
404.
I even tried to point it to the classes folder ...
I'm not sure to understand very well in what involves this setAction
line. It should point to my FileServlet.class file ?
Or something else ?
This servlet/form works fine in the embedded tomcat in hosted browser.
So i guess something between the two config is missing (in my jetty
server)
But i can't find what ! It's quite annoying :)
Thanks in advance...
Regards
On 7 fév, 01:59, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey i just saw this before your message.
But even with that, it stills not working.
I still get this message 404pRequestURI=/com.tergwt.Main//
FileServlet/ppismall...
And i changed my formAction to form.setAction(/FileServlet); instead
of form.setAction(GWT.getModuleBaseURL() + /FileServlet);
So now, no more idea on my side ...
Cheers
On 7 fév, 01:50, Shawn Brown big.coffee.lo...@gmail.com wrote: Well you
have to specify a valid url.
You are configuring /fileServlet to go to your servlet and then asking
requesting a url of /FileServlet.
Aren't you? I am not sure but think capitalization is significant.
Best,
Shawn
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow, i'm almost happy !
I finally managed to get rid of the HTTP ERROR 503.
I misplaced the bin files (.classes), they need to be under yourapp/
web-inf/classes/...
So i took the time to copy libs here too (in lib folder).
OK this done, i don't success to upload my file.
I browse it correctly, but when i click submit i get : h2HTTP ERROR:
404/h2preNOT_FOUND/pre
pRequestURI=/com.tergwt.Main//FileServlet/ppismalla
href=http://jetty.mortbay.org/;Powered by
Jetty:///a/small/i/pbr
as a response of the server.
My web.xml updated :
servlet
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
servlet-classcom.tergwt.server.FileServlet/servlet-class
/servlet
servlet-mapping
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
url-pattern/fileServlet/url-pattern
/servlet-mapping
My entrypoint if needed:
onModuleLoad() {
final FormPanel form = new FormPanel();
form.setAction(GWT.getModuleBaseURL() + /FileServlet);
...
}
If someone could tell me what's wrong, it could be nice :)
Thanks in advance,
Regards.
On 6 fév, 21:05, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi to all,
I'm under linux and I follow this
tutorialhttp://jeff.ourexchange.net/2008/03/01/deploying-gwt-applications-wit
I have a simple gwt application that browses for a file and upload it
using a servlet (class FileServlet extends HttpServlet).
In hosted mode (with tomcat) with the hosted browser of gwt, all works
as expected, my servlet runs fine.
I try to deploy application to a Jetty embedded server and i get a
HTTP ERROR: 503 SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE if i enable my servlet in web.xml
(under WEB-INF). Also when i run the Jetty server (in console), i get
two exceptions like Failed startup of context
org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.webappcont...@1b9ce4b{/com.tergwt.Main,file:/
home/jon/GWTDeploy/webapps/com.tergwt.Main/}
java.lang.NullPointerException
I don't see the form of the upload.
If i disable the servlet declaration in the xml file, the server runs
without exceptions but it doesnt upload and i get h2HTTP ERROR:
404/h2preNOT_FOUND/prepRequestURI=/com.tergwt.Main//
FileServlet/p if i try...
So i guess it has something to do with the web.xml file.
Unfortunately, i don't success with it.
Here is the content of my web.xml file without the web-app marks.
servlet
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
servlet-classcom.tergwt.server.FileServlet/servlet-class
/servlet
servlet-mapping
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
url-pattern/files/*/url-pattern
/servlet-mapping
I don't know what else i can do to fix this problem as i'm not an
expert with these things.
My main.java contains the upload form and it uses the FileServlet to
make the doPost().
Here is the full tree of my webapp deployed folder with the embed
Jetty server :http://filebin.ca/cjgvj/tree.txt.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards.
Jonathan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
Re: Servlets and web.xml
Why don't you try opening a separated browser window and point to
http://localhost:/FileServlet
It should give you a HTTP Status 500 error meaning it is listening
there in hosted mode
On Feb 7, 8:05 am, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks again for the help.
GWT.getModuleBaseURL() returnshttp://localhost:8080/com.tergwt.Main/
so i guess the path is correct...
I tried to put the hardcoded path to my app folder (/home/jon/
GWTDeploy/webapps/com.tergwt.Main + /FileServlet) and i still get this
404.
I even tried to point it to the classes folder ...
I'm not sure to understand very well in what involves this setAction
line. It should point to my FileServlet.class file ?
Or something else ?
This servlet/form works fine in the embedded tomcat in hosted browser.
So i guess something between the two config is missing (in my jetty
server)
But i can't find what ! It's quite annoying :)
Thanks in advance...
Regards
On 7 fév, 01:59, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey i just saw this before your message.
But even with that, it stills not working.
I still get this message 404pRequestURI=/com.tergwt.Main//
FileServlet/ppismall...
And i changed my formAction to form.setAction(/FileServlet); instead
of form.setAction(GWT.getModuleBaseURL() + /FileServlet);
So now, no more idea on my side ...
Cheers
On 7 fév, 01:50, Shawn Brown big.coffee.lo...@gmail.com wrote: Well you
have to specify a valid url.
You are configuring /fileServlet to go to your servlet and then asking
requesting a url of /FileServlet.
Aren't you? I am not sure but think capitalization is significant.
Best,
Shawn
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wow, i'm almost happy !
I finally managed to get rid of the HTTP ERROR 503.
I misplaced the bin files (.classes), they need to be under yourapp/
web-inf/classes/...
So i took the time to copy libs here too (in lib folder).
OK this done, i don't success to upload my file.
I browse it correctly, but when i click submit i get : h2HTTP ERROR:
404/h2preNOT_FOUND/pre
pRequestURI=/com.tergwt.Main//FileServlet/ppismalla
href=http://jetty.mortbay.org/;Powered by
Jetty:///a/small/i/pbr
as a response of the server.
My web.xml updated :
servlet
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
servlet-classcom.tergwt.server.FileServlet/servlet-class
/servlet
servlet-mapping
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
url-pattern/fileServlet/url-pattern
/servlet-mapping
My entrypoint if needed:
onModuleLoad() {
final FormPanel form = new FormPanel();
form.setAction(GWT.getModuleBaseURL() + /FileServlet);
...
}
If someone could tell me what's wrong, it could be nice :)
Thanks in advance,
Regards.
On 6 fév, 21:05, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi to all,
I'm under linux and I follow this
tutorialhttp://jeff.ourexchange.net/2008/03/01/deploying-gwt-applications-wit
I have a simple gwt application that browses for a file and upload it
using a servlet (class FileServlet extends HttpServlet).
In hosted mode (with tomcat) with the hosted browser of gwt, all works
as expected, my servlet runs fine.
I try to deploy application to a Jetty embedded server and i get a
HTTP ERROR: 503 SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE if i enable my servlet in web.xml
(under WEB-INF). Also when i run the Jetty server (in console), i get
two exceptions like Failed startup of context
org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.webappcont...@1b9ce4b{/com.tergwt.Main,file:/
home/jon/GWTDeploy/webapps/com.tergwt.Main/}
java.lang.NullPointerException
I don't see the form of the upload.
If i disable the servlet declaration in the xml file, the server runs
without exceptions but it doesnt upload and i get h2HTTP ERROR:
404/h2preNOT_FOUND/prepRequestURI=/com.tergwt.Main//
FileServlet/p if i try...
So i guess it has something to do with the web.xml file.
Unfortunately, i don't success with it.
Here is the content of my web.xml file without the web-app marks.
servlet
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
servlet-classcom.tergwt.server.FileServlet/servlet-class
/servlet
servlet-mapping
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
url-pattern/files/*/url-pattern
/servlet-mapping
I don't know what else i can do to fix this problem as i'm not an
expert with these things.
My main.java contains the upload form and it uses the FileServlet to
make the doPost().
Here is the full tree of my webapp deployed folder with the embed
Jetty server :http://filebin.ca/cjgvj/tree.txt.
Thanks in advance.
Re: Servlets and web.xml
Pointing to http://localhost:8080/com.tergwt.Main/FileServlet shows me
HTTP 405 (HTTP method GET is not supported by this URL).
http://localhost:8080/FileServlet shows 404 (normal it's not in my
webapp folder).
So, the FileServlet is here, but it stills can't be found by the form
action ?
I'm not using the GWT hosted browser with the tomcat integrated server
(I'm using Jetty).
Here is my web.xml file :
servlet
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
servlet-classcom.tergwt.server.FileServlet/servlet-class
/servlet
servlet-mapping
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
url-pattern/FileServlet/url-pattern
/servlet-mapping
Thanks,
Regards
On 7 fév, 15:23, jmpeace jmpe...@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't you try opening a separated browser window and point
tohttp://localhost:/FileServlet
It should give you a HTTP Status 500 error meaning it is listening
there in hosted mode
On Feb 7, 8:05 am, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks again for the help.
GWT.getModuleBaseURL() returnshttp://localhost:8080/com.tergwt.Main/
so i guess the path is correct...
I tried to put the hardcoded path to my app folder (/home/jon/
GWTDeploy/webapps/com.tergwt.Main + /FileServlet) and i still get this
404.
I even tried to point it to the classes folder ...
I'm not sure to understand very well in what involves this setAction
line. It should point to my FileServlet.class file ?
Or something else ?
This servlet/form works fine in the embedded tomcat in hosted browser.
So i guess something between the two config is missing (in my jetty
server)
But i can't find what ! It's quite annoying :)
Thanks in advance...
Regards
On 7 fév, 01:59, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey i just saw this before your message.
But even with that, it stills not working.
I still get this message 404pRequestURI=/com.tergwt.Main//
FileServlet/ppismall...
And i changed my formAction to form.setAction(/FileServlet); instead
of form.setAction(GWT.getModuleBaseURL() + /FileServlet);
So now, no more idea on my side ...
Cheers
On 7 fév, 01:50, Shawn Brown big.coffee.lo...@gmail.com wrote: Well
you have to specify a valid url.
You are configuring /fileServlet to go to your servlet and then asking
requesting a url of /FileServlet.
Aren't you? I am not sure but think capitalization is significant.
Best,
Shawn
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wow, i'm almost happy !
I finally managed to get rid of the HTTP ERROR 503.
I misplaced the bin files (.classes), they need to be under yourapp/
web-inf/classes/...
So i took the time to copy libs here too (in lib folder).
OK this done, i don't success to upload my file.
I browse it correctly, but when i click submit i get : h2HTTP ERROR:
404/h2preNOT_FOUND/pre
pRequestURI=/com.tergwt.Main//FileServlet/ppismalla
href=http://jetty.mortbay.org/;Powered by
Jetty:///a/small/i/pbr
as a response of the server.
My web.xml updated :
servlet
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
servlet-classcom.tergwt.server.FileServlet/servlet-class
/servlet
servlet-mapping
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
url-pattern/fileServlet/url-pattern
/servlet-mapping
My entrypoint if needed:
onModuleLoad() {
final FormPanel form = new FormPanel();
form.setAction(GWT.getModuleBaseURL() + /FileServlet);
...
}
If someone could tell me what's wrong, it could be nice :)
Thanks in advance,
Regards.
On 6 fév, 21:05, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi to all,
I'm under linux and I follow this
tutorialhttp://jeff.ourexchange.net/2008/03/01/deploying-gwt-applications-wit
I have a simple gwt application that browses for a file and upload it
using a servlet (class FileServlet extends HttpServlet).
In hosted mode (with tomcat) with the hosted browser of gwt, all
works
as expected, my servlet runs fine.
I try to deploy application to a Jetty embedded server and i get a
HTTP ERROR: 503 SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE if i enable my servlet in web.xml
(under WEB-INF). Also when i run the Jetty server (in console), i get
two exceptions like Failed startup of context
org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.webappcont...@1b9ce4b{/com.tergwt.Main,file:/
home/jon/GWTDeploy/webapps/com.tergwt.Main/}
java.lang.NullPointerException
I don't see the form of the upload.
If i disable the servlet declaration in the xml file, the server runs
without exceptions but it doesnt upload and i get h2HTTP ERROR:
404/h2preNOT_FOUND/prepRequestURI=/com.tergwt.Main//
FileServlet/p if i try...
So i
GWT with webservices
Hi All, I didn't find yet a clean way to use webservices and GWT. I am using axis and it generates many Axis objects which aren't recognized by GWT as they are not POJOs. So, I am manually creating a new set of POJOs from those axis objects in the GWT client package. Is there any straight forward way to use the webservices without using Axis so that GWT(server code) can make webservice calls? Thanks in Advance, Chandrajeet --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Servlets and web.xml
Wow i don't know what happened but i put
form.setAction(GWT.getHostPageBaseURL() + FileServlet);
using this web.xml and all finally works fine...
Thanks you very much for the help, i can now go forward !
Thanks again !
Best regards,
Jonathan
On 7 fév, 15:48, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com wrote:
Pointing tohttp://localhost:8080/com.tergwt.Main/FileServletshows me
HTTP 405 (HTTP method GET is not supported by this
URL).http://localhost:8080/FileServletshows 404 (normal it's not in my
webapp folder).
So, the FileServlet is here, but it stills can't be found by the form
action ?
I'm not using the GWT hosted browser with the tomcat integrated server
(I'm using Jetty).
Here is my web.xml file :
servlet
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
servlet-classcom.tergwt.server.FileServlet/servlet-class
/servlet
servlet-mapping
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
url-pattern/FileServlet/url-pattern
/servlet-mapping
Thanks,
Regards
On 7 fév, 15:23, jmpeace jmpe...@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't you try opening a separated browser window and point
tohttp://localhost:/FileServlet
It should give you a HTTP Status 500 error meaning it is listening
there in hosted mode
On Feb 7, 8:05 am, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks again for the help.
GWT.getModuleBaseURL() returnshttp://localhost:8080/com.tergwt.Main/
so i guess the path is correct...
I tried to put the hardcoded path to my app folder (/home/jon/
GWTDeploy/webapps/com.tergwt.Main + /FileServlet) and i still get this
404.
I even tried to point it to the classes folder ...
I'm not sure to understand very well in what involves this setAction
line. It should point to my FileServlet.class file ?
Or something else ?
This servlet/form works fine in the embedded tomcat in hosted browser.
So i guess something between the two config is missing (in my jetty
server)
But i can't find what ! It's quite annoying :)
Thanks in advance...
Regards
On 7 fév, 01:59, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey i just saw this before your message.
But even with that, it stills not working.
I still get this message 404pRequestURI=/com.tergwt.Main//
FileServlet/ppismall...
And i changed my formAction to form.setAction(/FileServlet); instead
of form.setAction(GWT.getModuleBaseURL() + /FileServlet);
So now, no more idea on my side ...
Cheers
On 7 fév, 01:50, Shawn Brown big.coffee.lo...@gmail.com wrote: Well
you have to specify a valid url.
You are configuring /fileServlet to go to your servlet and then asking
requesting a url of /FileServlet.
Aren't you? I am not sure but think capitalization is significant.
Best,
Shawn
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wow, i'm almost happy !
I finally managed to get rid of the HTTP ERROR 503.
I misplaced the bin files (.classes), they need to be under yourapp/
web-inf/classes/...
So i took the time to copy libs here too (in lib folder).
OK this done, i don't success to upload my file.
I browse it correctly, but when i click submit i get : h2HTTP
ERROR:
404/h2preNOT_FOUND/pre
pRequestURI=/com.tergwt.Main//FileServlet/ppismalla
href=http://jetty.mortbay.org/;Powered by
Jetty:///a/small/i/pbr
as a response of the server.
My web.xml updated :
servlet
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
servlet-classcom.tergwt.server.FileServlet/servlet-class
/servlet
servlet-mapping
servlet-namefileServlet/servlet-name
url-pattern/fileServlet/url-pattern
/servlet-mapping
My entrypoint if needed:
onModuleLoad() {
final FormPanel form = new FormPanel();
form.setAction(GWT.getModuleBaseURL() + /FileServlet);
...
}
If someone could tell me what's wrong, it could be nice :)
Thanks in advance,
Regards.
On 6 fév, 21:05, Jonathan jonathan.delf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi to all,
I'm under linux and I follow this
tutorialhttp://jeff.ourexchange.net/2008/03/01/deploying-gwt-applications-wit
I have a simple gwt application that browses for a file and upload
it
using a servlet (class FileServlet extends HttpServlet).
In hosted mode (with tomcat) with the hosted browser of gwt, all
works
as expected, my servlet runs fine.
I try to deploy application to a Jetty embedded server and i get a
HTTP ERROR: 503 SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE if i enable my servlet in
web.xml
(under WEB-INF). Also when i run the Jetty server (in console), i
get
two exceptions like Failed startup of context
Tab bar styles are not working..
Hi,
i have added styles to tab-bar, but they are not reflecting ( are in
the default style).
below are my CSS code..
can you please help me here why it is not getting reflected to the tab panle..
.gwt-TabBar .gwt-TabBarFirst {
height: 100%;
border-bottom: 1px solid #87b3ff;
}
.gwt-TabBar .gwt-TabBarRest {
border-bottom: 1px solid #87b3ff;
vertical-align: bottom;
}
.gwt-TabBar .gwt-TabBarItem {
background-image: url(home.gif);
cursor: hand;
}
.gwt-TabBar .gwt-TabBarItem-selected {
width : 193px;
color: Black;
margin-left: -20px;
border-right: 2px solid Black;
font-family: Tahoma;
font-size: 15px;
font-weight: bold;
white-space: nowrap;
background-color: white;
background-image: url(Tab01.png);
cursor: default;
}
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Setting Google Map Icon Style
Is there anyway to set the style of an marker's image? I use Icon to create the image for each marker but I would like to be able to set a style so I can use CSS to create borders around each marker's image. Any help would be greatly appreciated. jean --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Parsing http GWT command line
Here are two classes that can be used to get at the values in the
command line:
import com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptObject;
/**
* Thanks to Robert Hanson and Adam Tacy for GWT in Action.
*/
public class CommandLine extends JavaScriptObject {
private static CommandLineImpl impl = new CommandLineImpl();
protected CommandLine() {
}
public static final String getArg(String key) {
return impl.getArg(key);
}
}
//+
public class CommandLineImpl {
/**
* Javascriptcode thanks to Scott Burton and lobo235
*/
public native String getArg(String name) /*-{
name = name.replace(/[\[]/,\\\[).replace(/[\]]/,\\\]);
var regexS = [\\?]+name+=([^#]*);
var regex = new RegExp( regexS );
var results = regex.exec( $wnd.location.href );
if(results == null)
{
return ;
}
else
{
return results[1];
}
}-*/;
}
Then in your entry point you have a call like this:
String value1 = CommandLine.getArg(key1);
On Feb 6, 12:02 pm, OffTheWall move-o...@comcast.net wrote:
I would like my GWT application to parse the url that it was called
with. Something like this:
http://mymachine.com/myapp?key1=value1
And be able to grab the key values pairs from within my application.
The key may be a fixed value, and the value of course will change with
invocation of my application. Can anybody help me with this?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
Great news Félicitations ! We don't need to build from the source now ! I'm goint to test this M1 next week ! Regards, On 6 fév, 16:26, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote: Greetings GWT developers, The GWT team is happy to announce the availability of 1.6 Milestone 1! Binary distributions are available for download directly from GWT's Google Code project. http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=1q=1.6.0 As always, milestone builds like this are use-at-your-own-risk. There are known bugs, and it definitely isn't ready for production use. Please expect some trial and error getting everything to work. The javadoc that comes bundled with the distribution should be up-to-date, but the online Developer Guide (http://code.google.com/docreader/#p=google-web-toolkit-doc-1-6) is still very much a work in progress. We will be updating it over the next several weeks. In lieu of an up-to-date Developer Guide and release notes, below are the major highlights relative to GWT 1.5.3. *** New Project Structure in GWT 1.6 *** One of the biggest changes to GWT 1.6 is a new project structure. The old output format has been replaced by the standard Java web app expanded war format, and the actual directory name does default to /war. Note that the war directory is not only for compiler output; it is also intended to contain handwritten static resources that you want to be included in your webapp alongside GWT modules (that is, things you'd want to version control). Please also note that the GWTShell and GWTCompiler tools will maintain their legacy behavior, but they have been deprecated in favor of new HostedMode and Compiler tools which use the new war output. When 1.6 is officially released, we will be encouraging existing projects to update to the new directory format and to use the new tools to take advantage of new features and for compatibility with future GWT releases. The sample projects provided in the GWT distribution provide an example of correct new project configurations. For more details on the specifics of the new project format, please see GWT 1.6 WAR design document (http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/WAR_Design_1_6). A couple of important changes we should highlight here: - Projects with server-side code (GWT RPC) must configure a web.xml file at /war/WEB-INF/web.xml. This web.xml file must define and publish any servlets associated with the web application. See the included DynaTable sample. Additionally, server-side library dependencies must be copied into /war/WEB-INF/lib. For example, any GWT RPC servlets must have a copy of gwt-servlet.jar in this folder. - HTML host pages will no longer typically be located in a GWT module's public path. Instead, we'll be recommending that people take advantage of the natural web app behavior for serving static files by placing host pages anywhere in the war structure that makes sense. For exmaple, you might want to load a GWT module from a JSP page located in the root of your web app. To keep such handwritten static files separate from those produced by the GWT compiler, the latter will be placed into module-specific subdirectories. Any page that wishes to include a GWT module can do so via a script tag by referencing the GWT-produced module.nocache.js script within that module's subdirectory. As of 1.6, we'll be recommending that only module-specific resources used directly by GWT code, such as image files needed by widgets, should remain on the public path. See the included Showcase sample for some examples of this distinction. - When you do need to load resources from a module's public path, always construct an absolute URL by prepending GWT.getModuleBaseURL(). For example, 'GWT.getModuleBaseURL() + dir/file.ext'. This advice has not changed, but in the past it was easy to be sloppy with this, because the host page and GWT module typically lived in the same directory, so using a relative URL would usually do the right thing. Now that GWT modules live in a subdirectory, you must reference public resources through GWT.getModuleBaseURL(). *** Hosted Mode Enhancements *** Although the legacy GWTShell still uses an embedded Tomcat server, the new HostedMode runs Jetty instead. There is also a new Restart Server button on the main hosted mode window. Clicking this button restarts the internal Jetty server, which allows Java code changes to take effect on the server without having to completely exit and restart hosted mode. This is useful when making code changes to RPC servlets, or when serializable RPC types are modified and the server and client are out of sync. *** New EventHandler System *** Event handlers have been added to replace the old event listeners used by Widgets, History, and various other classes. The new system has a few differences from the old system: - EventHandler methods always take a single parameter: the GwtEvent that
Re: GWT with webservices
JAX-WS can be used. If you've been using Axis you'll probably find it a lot easier. 2009/2/7 chandrajeet chandraj...@gmail.com Hi All, I didn't find yet a clean way to use webservices and GWT. I am using axis and it generates many Axis objects which aren't recognized by GWT as they are not POJOs. So, I am manually creating a new set of POJOs from those axis objects in the GWT client package. Is there any straight forward way to use the webservices without using Axis so that GWT(server code) can make webservice calls? Thanks in Advance, Chandrajeet --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: gwt site interface
hey gwt community, first post here. I m checking this new tool and i will really want to make a site , using this menu , can anyone help me?? jake did u find anything? i would be grateful if someone help me!! ty a lot. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Anyone configure GWTShell to listen on a network interface?
You don't really have to dig into it to make it listen on a different port. It supports a -port option to tell it to listen on any port you want. As far as which interface it listens on, that's different, but in my experience (and on my machine right now, Linux, GWT 1.5.3), it doesn't bind just to loopback, it binds to * local - so it is available from a non loopback address, and you can set the port. (That said, if you really want to test it and use different os/browser combinations, it might be a better idea to just compile it and deploy and then test it, that way you are testing the real deal anyway.) process: ccollins 6602 6601 5 17:23 pts/000:00:14 /opt/jdk1.6.0_10/jre/ bin/java -Xmx512m -cp [CLASSPATHHERE. . . .] com.google.gwt.dev.GWTShell -logLevel INFO -style DETAILED -port com.totsp.sample.Application/Application.html network status: Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name tcp6 0 0 ::: :::* LISTEN 6602/java shell options: http://code.google.com/docreader/#p=google-web-toolkit-doc-1-5s=google-web-toolkit-doc-1-5t=DevGuideModuleHostedModeScript On Feb 5, 9:57 pm, Transplant transplant...@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone dug into GWTShell's tomcat configuration to figure out how to make it listen on a real network port? I'd like to make it listen on a real network interface (instead of loopback) so that I can connect and test multiple clients with different OS/version combinations. Anyone? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Servlets and web.xml
Hi, So what is the value for GWT.getHostPageBaseURL()? What is your app called? By that I mean under Jetty_home/webapps/, in what dir is your app. Probably it's not com.tergwt.Main, but that is what you were asking in http://localhost:8080/com.tergwt.Main/FileServlet http://localhost:8080/dir_of_your_app/FileServlet should work. This means that your web.xml file is at /dir_of_your_app/WEB-INF/web.xml Wow i don't know what happened but i put form.setAction(GWT.getHostPageBaseURL() + FileServlet); well that is different than... of form.setAction(GWT.getModuleBaseURL() + /FileServlet); Glad it works! Shawn --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
store xml
how can i store XML that created by gwt library into local disk --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Parsing http GWT command line
On 6 fév, 20:02, OffTheWall move-o...@comcast.net wrote: I would like my GWT application to parse the url that it was called with. Something like this: http://mymachine.com/myapp?key1=value1 And be able to grab the key values pairs from within my application. The key may be a fixed value, and the value of course will change with invocation of my application. Can anybody help me with this? http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/1.5/com/google/gwt/user/client/Window.Location.html#getParameter(java.lang.String) ? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
StackPanel headers as Hyperlink
I was wondering if anyone knew of an easy way to use a StackPanel
header as a hyperlink. I'm trying to make a navigation menu using
StackPanel and vertical panels. However, there are one or two menu
items that have no submenu (thus no VerticalPanel).
Currently, my VerticalPanel consists of Hyperlink widgets because when
clicked those modify that history token and thus I could change the
content area of the app accordingly. But because there is no
VerticalPanel (and thus no Hyperlink) for certain menu items where
only the Header should be the link, I do not know what to do.
The only way I have been able to accomplish this was using
StackPanel navigation = new StackPanel();
SimplePanel content_wrapper = new SimplePanel();
navigation.add(new HTML(), a href='#welcomeWidget'Home/
a,true);
and then in
onHistoryChanged(String historyToken) {
if (historyToken.equals(welcomeWidget)
content_wrapper.setWidget(welcomeWidget);
}
I'm not sure if this is the best way to change the content region
(using onHistoryChanged and looking at the name of historyToken and
setting widget accordingly), but it works. However, when clicking the
new 'Home' tab, the whole application must reload, rather than just
changing out the widget. I assume this is because I am treating the
header as HTML.
Is there a better way to accomplish this?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: store xml
Hi, I think you could do that by two ways : - Send XML to the server, and invite the user to download it from the server to local. This solution needs the user to be done. or - Use Google Gears (needs plugin) to store directly on local disk. Regards, Damien Picard 2009/2/8 taha taha...@gmail.com how can i store XML that created by gwt library into local disk --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[gwt-contrib] Re: default GWT version in Maven central repo wrong
Please note 1.5.x history at http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=4q=colspec=Filename+Summary+Uploaded+Size+DownloadCount 1.5.0 was RC1 1.5.1 was RC2 GWT-1.5 final is 1.5.2 ! On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:50 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote: I'm not responsible of the way google guys name there jars !Anyway I'm not sure you can publish same jar name at googlecode. On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.comwrote: Yes, but when M2, M3, RC1, etc are released, all with version 1.6.0, it will make it hard for someone to discern just which version is actually in the repo unless one makes assumptions about timestamps in the repo. It just seems like it'll be a future problem to me. -Ray On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:32 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: This is the version number used by gwt guys themself : http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=1q=1.6.0 On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote: Should probably use -Dversion=1.6-M1 for that rather than -Dversion=1.6.0 -Ray On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:03 PM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: Allready there : http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/com/google/gwt/gwt-dev/1.6.0/ On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Arthur Kalmenson arthur.k...@gmail.com wrote: Yep, that's what I meant, so if you don't include a version and let Maven pick up the latest version, it'll pick up 1.5-RC1. You can also see from the size graph that 1.5-RC1 is considered newer then 1.5.3. This might be a problem for some people. P.S. Will 1.6-M1 hit central or will it be just the final release? -- Arthur Kalmenson On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:57 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: AFAIK, mvnrepository latest is based on textual version comparison, so 1.5-RC* 1.5.3 On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:54 PM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: What make you say ths is the default one ? Index of /maven2/com/google/gwt/gwt-user/ ../ 1.4.60/17-Sep-2007 17:57 - 1.4.62/23-Mar-2008 09:10 - 1.5-M1/01-Apr-2008 10:29 - 1.5-M2/13-May-2008 13:20 - 1.5-RC1/ 29-May-2008 10:40 - 1.5.1/ 11-Aug-2008 08:35 - 1.5.2/ 01-Sep-2008 11:59 - 1.5.3/ 20-Oct-2008 14:19 - As there is no metadata.xml file, there is no default ! PS : I'm the guy who uploads those artifacts On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Arthur Kalmenson arthur.k...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I'm not sure who rsyncs GWT releases to Maven central, but if you look at: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.gwt/gwt-useryou can see that the default GWT version is 1.5-RC1 and not 1.5.3. -- Arthur Kalmenson --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[gwt-contrib] Re: default GWT version in Maven central repo wrong
Well, maybe the GWT guys can offer some guidance on how they plan to number 1.6 milestone releases. My only further comment is that there is no reason why maven repo versions have to match GWT versions. I've seen GWT artifacts named -rc1 in some maven repos. The GWT team doesn't officially support maven, so the maven community is really free to choose their own conventions. If future 1.6 releases have different versions, great, but if future 1.6 builds remain 1.6.0 I think they'll be trouble. Certainly, if you look at the final versions of GWT 1.3 and 1.4 there's room for hope, since the minor version on those went quite high before release. -Ray On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:53 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: Please note 1.5.x history at http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=4q=colspec=Filename+Summary+Uploaded+Size+DownloadCount 1.5.0 was RC1 1.5.1 was RC2 GWT-1.5 final is 1.5.2 ! On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:50 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not responsible of the way google guys name there jars ! Anyway I'm not sure you can publish same jar name at googlecode. On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, but when M2, M3, RC1, etc are released, all with version 1.6.0, it will make it hard for someone to discern just which version is actually in the repo unless one makes assumptions about timestamps in the repo. It just seems like it'll be a future problem to me. -Ray On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:32 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: This is the version number used by gwt guys themself : http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=1q=1.6.0 On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote: Should probably use -Dversion=1.6-M1 for that rather than -Dversion=1.6.0 -Ray On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:03 PM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: Allready there : http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/com/google/gwt/gwt-dev/1.6.0/ On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Arthur Kalmenson arthur.k...@gmail.com wrote: Yep, that's what I meant, so if you don't include a version and let Maven pick up the latest version, it'll pick up 1.5-RC1. You can also see from the size graph that 1.5-RC1 is considered newer then 1.5.3. This might be a problem for some people. P.S. Will 1.6-M1 hit central or will it be just the final release? -- Arthur Kalmenson On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:57 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: AFAIK, mvnrepository latest is based on textual version comparison, so 1.5-RC* 1.5.3 On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:54 PM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: What make you say ths is the default one ? Index of /maven2/com/google/gwt/gwt-user/ ../ 1.4.60/17-Sep-2007 17:57 - 1.4.62/23-Mar-2008 09:10 - 1.5-M1/01-Apr-2008 10:29 - 1.5-M2/13-May-2008 13:20 - 1.5-RC1/ 29-May-2008 10:40 - 1.5.1/ 11-Aug-2008 08:35 - 1.5.2/ 01-Sep-2008 11:59 - 1.5.3/ 20-Oct-2008 14:19 - As there is no metadata.xml file, there is no default ! PS : I'm the guy who uploads those artifacts On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Arthur Kalmenson arthur.k...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I'm not sure who rsyncs GWT releases to Maven central, but if you look at: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.gwt/gwt-user you can see that the default GWT version is 1.5-RC1 and not 1.5.3. -- Arthur Kalmenson --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[gwt-contrib] Re: default GWT version in Maven central repo wrong
That's right, and you can be sure I'll check the next version number. Anyway, we still can use Jboss-like versionning : 1.6.0.final or 1.6.0.GA On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote: Well, maybe the GWT guys can offer some guidance on how they plan to number 1.6 milestone releases. My only further comment is that there is no reason why maven repo versions have to match GWT versions. I've seen GWT artifacts named -rc1 in some maven repos. The GWT team doesn't officially support maven, so the maven community is really free to choose their own conventions. If future 1.6 releases have different versions, great, but if future 1.6 builds remain 1.6.0 I think they'll be trouble. Certainly, if you look at the final versions of GWT 1.3 and 1.4 there's room for hope, since the minor version on those went quite high before release. -Ray On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:53 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: Please note 1.5.x history at http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=4q=colspec=Filename+Summary+Uploaded+Size+DownloadCount 1.5.0 was RC1 1.5.1 was RC2 GWT-1.5 final is 1.5.2 ! On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:50 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not responsible of the way google guys name there jars ! Anyway I'm not sure you can publish same jar name at googlecode. On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, but when M2, M3, RC1, etc are released, all with version 1.6.0, it will make it hard for someone to discern just which version is actually in the repo unless one makes assumptions about timestamps in the repo. It just seems like it'll be a future problem to me. -Ray On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:32 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: This is the version number used by gwt guys themself : http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=1q=1.6.0 On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote: Should probably use -Dversion=1.6-M1 for that rather than -Dversion=1.6.0 -Ray On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:03 PM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: Allready there : http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/com/google/gwt/gwt-dev/1.6.0/ On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Arthur Kalmenson arthur.k...@gmail.com wrote: Yep, that's what I meant, so if you don't include a version and let Maven pick up the latest version, it'll pick up 1.5-RC1. You can also see from the size graph that 1.5-RC1 is considered newer then 1.5.3. This might be a problem for some people. P.S. Will 1.6-M1 hit central or will it be just the final release? -- Arthur Kalmenson On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:57 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: AFAIK, mvnrepository latest is based on textual version comparison, so 1.5-RC* 1.5.3 On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:54 PM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: What make you say ths is the default one ? Index of /maven2/com/google/gwt/gwt-user/ ../ 1.4.60/17-Sep-2007 17:57 - 1.4.62/23-Mar-2008 09:10 - 1.5-M1/01-Apr-2008 10:29 - 1.5-M2/13-May-2008 13:20 - 1.5-RC1/ 29-May-2008 10:40 - 1.5.1/ 11-Aug-2008 08:35 - 1.5.2/ 01-Sep-2008 11:59 - 1.5.3/ 20-Oct-2008 14:19 - As there is no metadata.xml file, there is no default ! PS : I'm the guy who uploads those artifacts On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Arthur Kalmenson arthur.k...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I'm not sure who rsyncs GWT releases to Maven central, but if you look at: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.gwt/gwt-user you can see that the default GWT version is 1.5-RC1 and not 1.5.3. -- Arthur Kalmenson --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[gwt-contrib] Re: default GWT version in Maven central repo wrong
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, but when M2, M3, RC1, etc are released, all with version 1.6.0, it will make it hard for someone to discern just which version is actually in the repo unless one makes assumptions about timestamps in the repo. It just seems like it'll be a future problem to me. They aren't all named the same -- the third number is a build number, so they will all be unique. When an RC proves to be worthy, that version will just be declared the released 1.6 version. I would suggest using the actual version available from About.GWT_VERSION_NUM, or About.properties depending on whether it is easier to load a class or read a properties file. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[gwt-contrib] Re: RR : Declassifying RPC / Removing all type names from compilation
Do you have any numbers of how much this shrinks compiled output, as this seems like a terrific change! Thanks for doing it :-). Cheers, Emily On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:21 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:28 AM, BobV b...@google.com wrote: http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/changes/bobv/elide_rpc_type_names_r4602 Future changes: - A compiler flag or optional module to neuter Class.getName(). I've added an -XdisableClassMetadata flag to this branch. This disables: - Class.getName() - returns Class$hashCode() - Class.getSuperclass() - returns null - Class.toString() - returns Object.toString() You can still use class.getName() as an equality comparison, but not for anything that requires semantic meaning; the relationships between the strings will be constant throughout the lifetime of the module. A.class == A.class != B.class A.class.getName() == A.class.getName() != B.class.getName() With this flag enabled, class literal setup for non-enum types is a simple JS new operation. It reduces the total amount of code generated in a showcase compile by 10% based on find war -name '*.cache.html' -o -name '*.cache.js' | xargs wc. -- Bob Vawter Google Web Toolkit Team -- There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
