Re: IE8 getUserAgent returns Safari

2012-04-12 Thread skippy
This seems to work.

 if (Window.Navigator.getUserAgent().contains("Safari") && !
Window.Navigator.getUserAgent().contains("Chrome"))
{
setSafari(true);
}

On Apr 12, 1:34 pm, skippy  wrote:
> Yes I do, now what?
>
> On Apr 12, 1:23 pm, Jens  wrote:
>
>
>
> > Probably Chrome Frame installed in IE?
>
> >http://www.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/chrome-frame-getting-start...
>
> > -- J.
>
> > Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2012 20:13:49 UTC+2 schrieb skippy:
>
> > > I am trying to remove functions that don't work in Safari, but the IE8
> > > user agent comes back with the word Safari in it.
>
> > > Window.Navigator.getUserAgent().contains("Safari") in IE* its true.- Hide 
> > > quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: GWT UIBinder remember username password

2012-04-12 Thread Markandayarushi Pamu
Thx for the reply ..

Same things I am doing ...I put the hidden textboxes username and
password in my jsp page which is the first page of my application.

But still same problem I am facing .it is asking the
prompt to remember password, but when I type user name it is not
picking the remember password.

That is my exact problem ..

Rushi



On Mar 13, 9:24 pm, Joseph Lust  wrote:
> Markandayarushi Pamu,
>
> This is a common issue on dynamically generated webapp content. Basically,
> the browser looks for a form with name 'password', as a password input, and
> any other fields like 'email' or 'username.' If they are found, the browser
> offers to remember them when they are posted. However, to refill them, the
> browser checks *at load time* for the fields. Because technologies like
> ExtJs and GWT insert these items into the DOM dynamically, those fields are
> not found by the browser at the instant of loading.
>
> To correct this, I hardcode the form and fields into the header (hidden
> from the user). Then, when the login form initializes, it checks this
> hidden form and copies the values from it if finds any.
>
> You can see the login form of my site,http://www.runpartner.com, which
> uses this method to get the credentials remembered and prefilled.
>
> Sincerely,
> Joe

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: IE8 getUserAgent returns Safari

2012-04-12 Thread skippy
Yes I do, now what?

On Apr 12, 1:23 pm, Jens  wrote:
> Probably Chrome Frame installed in IE?
>
> http://www.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/chrome-frame-getting-start...
>
> -- J.
>
> Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2012 20:13:49 UTC+2 schrieb skippy:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I am trying to remove functions that don't work in Safari, but the IE8
> > user agent comes back with the word Safari in it.
>
> > Window.Navigator.getUserAgent().contains("Safari") in IE* its true.- Hide 
> > quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: GWT 2.5 and beyond

2012-04-12 Thread Handw
That's amazing!

On Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:07:49 AM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, March 31, 2012 4:00:56 PM UTC+2, supercobra wrote:
>>
>> The GWT PR machine has been offline for a year now. As it seems, the GWT 
>> engineers have been either working hard on a big and long project that is 
>> going to blow our socks off and hopefully they'll unveil it at Google IO 
>> 2012 or Google is winding down the project which would be a huge pity. The 
>> event that got me worried a lot is when their developer relation engineer 
>> David Chandler was moved to another group. David's blog: 
>> http://turbomanage.wordpress.com/
>> So far I have not heard of the name of his replacement.
>>
>> Google should we worry or get excited?
>>
>
> Let's get excited: 
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/110412141990454266397/posts/Nvr6Se6eAPh ! 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/cuR_RxRhTaIJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: IE8 getUserAgent returns Safari

2012-04-12 Thread Jens
Probably Chrome Frame installed in IE? 

http://www.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/chrome-frame-getting-started/understanding-chrome-frame-user-agent

-- J.

Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2012 20:13:49 UTC+2 schrieb skippy:
>
> I am trying to remove functions that don't work in Safari, but the IE8 
> user agent comes back with the word Safari in it. 
>
> Window.Navigator.getUserAgent().contains("Safari") in IE* its true. 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/pHkRT1O6pO0J.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: resize celltable column by user using mouse

2012-04-12 Thread Andrea Boscolo
It's not possible using the current API.
See http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6401 for a 
couple of useful workarounds.

On Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:17:41 AM UTC+2, tong123123 wrote:
>
>  how to allow user to just use the mouse to drag the column widths to a 
> desired size by grabbing an edge of the header with the mouse?
> in gwt 2.4 developer guide, it just tell set table layout to fixed and 
> then set the column width in code, but I want allow user can drag the 
> column width with mouse, it is very common property of gird like structure.
> Any method to do it in gwt 2.4?
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/ueH3XAkeE1AJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



IE8 getUserAgent returns Safari

2012-04-12 Thread skippy
I am trying to remove functions that don't work in Safari, but the IE8
user agent comes back with the word Safari in it.

Window.Navigator.getUserAgent().contains("Safari") in IE* its true.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Cloning EntityProxies

2012-04-12 Thread gwtomni gwtomni
try with this:


AutoBean oldBean = AutoBeanUtils.getAutoBean(oldProxy);
AutoBean newBean = AutoBeanUtils.getAutoBean(newProxy);
AutoBeanCodex.decodeInto(AutoBeanCodex.encode(oldBean),
newBean);
newProxy = newBean.as();
context.edit(newProxy);

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Call for action: Time to rethink a road-map and more frequent updates for GWT.

2012-04-12 Thread Jmscavaleiro
+1

On Apr 2, 4:19 pm, Joshua Kappon  wrote:
> With the rise of the new developers.google.com, and with Google trying to
> rally up developers using Google technologies and products, and the rise of
> Dart and unclear future of GWT, I think it's about time that Google will
> rethink the all "We don't and won't have a road map, and there are no
> release dates for new GWT versions" and embrace the GWT developers
> community.
>
> What do you guys think? (if you agree, +1 this)
>
> Best,
> Josh

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Mode hosted with another server than Jetty ?

2012-04-12 Thread Raphael André Bauer
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Celinio  wrote:
> Hi,
> does anyone know how to start an application in hosted mode (development)
> with another server than the embbeded one which is Jetty ?
> With the gwt-maven-plugin plugin,  there are several
> options/parameters/mojos to launch the goal gwt:run (-Dnoserver, -Dport ...)
> and there are probably some resources to copy to the server folders.
> The targeted server is Jonas by the way.


That configuration works eg:

org.codehaus.mojo
gwt-maven-plugin
${gwt-maven-plugin.version}



com.bricktop.app.client.common.resources.i18n.LocalMessages



${basedir}/target/generated-sources/gwt

INFO
OBF
${gwt.version}
http://localhost:9000/

${custom_project_root}/backend/public/gwt
false
true




Cheers,

Raphael

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Mode hosted with another server than Jetty ?

2012-04-12 Thread Celinio
Hi,
does anyone know how to start an application in hosted mode (development)
with another server than the embbeded one which is Jetty ?
With the gwt-maven-plugin plugin,  there are several
options/parameters/mojos to launch the goal gwt:run (-Dnoserver, -Dport
...) and there are probably some resources to copy to the server folders.
The targeted server is Jonas by the way.

Thanks in advance for helping.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Call for action: Time to rethink a road-map and more frequent updates for GWT.

2012-04-12 Thread massimo malvestio
In my opinion Dart is overstimated by Google, I can't see why competitors
like Microsoft and Mozilla should give a hand to Dart.. Just because Google
says it can be better than javascript? Chrome can be one of the best
browser on the market, and it can be the most used, but it will never be
the only one used. So what? You build plugin for others browser to enable
Dart? If I remember well, two years ago Microsoft blocked a plugin that
could replace Explorer native javascript engine.
What I always like of Gwt was the capability of hiding diffrerent
javascript implementations, without forcing developers to learn a new
language.
The current lack of Gwt in my opinion is the appereance of guis, they are
not so eye candy like other built using specific framework. Anyway in my
opionion Dart will follow Wave, just because is not a standard, and
competitors have no convenience on supporting it, if it wouldn't be so, we
would have just one implementation of javascript for all browsers.

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Frank  wrote:

> GWT will also not go away...
> If you have downloaded GWT on your computer you just can keep using it
> even years after Google has dropped GWT...
> Just like you still can program in QuickBasic or something.
>
> GWT doesn't need anything from Google on the web to operate.
>
> I will just keep using GWT if Google drops it, and see keep an eye on Dart.
>
> Op donderdag 12 april 2012 10:00:15 UTC+2 schreef dominikz het volgende:
>
>>
>> I've been for years with technologies like SAP or AS/400. Those are
>> really annoying when you try to do something modern. But the thing that is
>> good about them is that they never go away. I understand that Google needs
>> to try new things (dart). But turning away from such a big project like GWT
>> is stabbing yourself in the back.
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/TSws9XOf334J.
>
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Call for action: Time to rethink a road-map and more frequent updates for GWT.

2012-04-12 Thread Frank
GWT will also not go away...
If you have downloaded GWT on your computer you just can keep using it even 
years after Google has dropped GWT...
Just like you still can program in QuickBasic or something.

GWT doesn't need anything from Google on the web to operate.

I will just keep using GWT if Google drops it, and see keep an eye on Dart.

Op donderdag 12 april 2012 10:00:15 UTC+2 schreef dominikz het volgende:
>
>
> I've been for years with technologies like SAP or AS/400. Those are really 
> annoying when you try to do something modern. But the thing that is good 
> about them is that they never go away. I understand that Google needs to 
> try new things (dart). But turning away from such a big project like GWT is 
> stabbing yourself in the back.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/TSws9XOf334J.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: about table layout to "fixed"

2012-04-12 Thread tong123123
how about if four column, two column width is fixed and two column width is 
relative (each is 50%), if the content is longer than the relative width of 
these columns, the content will wrap to next line, but not truncate, is 
this possible?

On Thursday, April 12, 2012 6:15:40 PM UTC+8, tong123123 wrote:
>
> in gwt developer guide, it said
>
> In order to gain fine-grain control over the width of columns, you must 
>> set the table layout to "fixed" by passing true into 
>> CellTable.setWidth(String, 
>> boolean).
>>  
>>
>
> but I found that if table layout is fixed, then after setting the column 
> width, if the column content is too width for the column, the extra content 
> will be truncated, but not display in the next line.
>
> Assume I have three column, I want the width of two column is fixed, but 
> the remaining column width is relative (using 100%, for e.g.), and then I 
> want if the content of that column is too long, the content will display in 
> two line in that column, but not truncated, is this possible?
> I use TextCell, Column for the column of CellTable.
> the version of GWT is 2.4
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/n_XJTeGgaJIJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



about table layout to "fixed"

2012-04-12 Thread tong123123
in gwt developer guide, it said

In order to gain fine-grain control over the width of columns, you must set 
> the table layout to "fixed" by passing true into CellTable.setWidth(String, 
> boolean).
>  
>

but I found that if table layout is fixed, then after setting the column 
width, if the column content is too width for the column, the extra content 
will be truncated, but not display in the next line.

Assume I have three column, I want the width of two column is fixed, but 
the remaining column width is relative (using 100%, for e.g.), and then I 
want if the content of that column is too long, the content will display in 
two line in that column, but not truncated, is this possible?
I use TextCell, Column for the column of CellTable.
the version of GWT is 2.4



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/Ztu8WF7MaN4J.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



resize celltable column by user using mouse

2012-04-12 Thread tong123123
 how to allow user to just use the mouse to drag the column widths to a 
desired size by grabbing an edge of the header with the mouse?
in gwt 2.4 developer guide, it just tell set table layout to fixed and then 
set the column width in code, but I want allow user can drag the column 
width with mouse, it is very common property of gird like structure.
Any method to do it in gwt 2.4?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/0AODRVj_9ccJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: AutoBean encoding on server-side with overriden method causes duplicate key

2012-04-12 Thread Thomas Broyer
See http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5926
I had the issue with RequestFactory proxies but I suppose it applies to all 
autobeans (as on of the culprits was ProxyAutoBean).
I hope it'll make it into the upcoming GWT 2.5 release.

On Thursday, April 12, 2012 1:02:37 AM UTC+2, kjordan wrote:
>
> I'm trying to use the AutoBean encoding so I can pass and parse types over 
> a websocket connection I have.  However, there seem to be some bugs with 
> trying to encode AutoBeans on the server side.
>
> I had a structure like
>
>> public interface Foo {
>> }
>> public interface Bar {
>> }
>> public interface A {
>>T getFoo();
>>void setFoo(T foo);
>> }
>> public interface B extends A {
>>   @Override Bar getFoo();
>>   @Override void setFoo(Bar foo);
>> }
>
>
> but that ended up getting an exception when the setter is called:
>
>> java.lang.NullPointerException
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.vm.impl.MethodPropertyContext.traverse(MethodPropertyContext.java:102)
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.vm.impl.MethodPropertyContext.accept(MethodPropertyContext.java:75)
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AutoBeanCodexImpl$PropertyCoderCreator.maybeCreateCoder(AutoBeanCodexImpl.java:353)
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AutoBeanCodexImpl$PropertyCoderCreator.visitReferenceProperty(AutoBeanCodexImpl.java:341)
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.vm.impl.ProxyAutoBean.traverseProperties(ProxyAutoBean.java:324)
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AbstractAutoBean.traverse(AbstractAutoBean.java:166)
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AbstractAutoBean.accept(AbstractAutoBean.java:101)
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AutoBeanCodexImpl.doCoderFor(AutoBeanCodexImpl.java:521)
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AbstractAutoBean.setProperty(AbstractAutoBean.java:276)
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.vm.impl.ProxyAutoBean.setProperty(ProxyAutoBean.java:253)
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.vm.impl.BeanMethod$3.invoke(BeanMethod.java:103)
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.vm.impl.SimpleBeanHandler.invoke(SimpleBeanHandler.java:43)
>
>
> So I switched it to:
>
>> public interface A {
>>Foo getFoo();
>> }
>> public interface B extends A {
>>   @Override Bar getFoo();
>>   @Override void setFoo(Bar foo);
>> }
>
>
> but that gets me:
>
>> java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not parse payload
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.vm.impl.JsonSplittable.create(JsonSplittable.java:73)
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.StringQuoter.split(StringQuoter.java:73)
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.AutoBeanCodex.encode(AutoBeanCodex.java:84)
>> Caused by: org.json.JSONException: Duplicate key "foo"
>> at org.json.JSONObject.putOnce(JSONObject.java:1076)
>> at org.json.JSONObject.(JSONObject.java:205)
>> at org.json.JSONObject.(JSONObject.java:402)
>> at 
>> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.vm.impl.JsonSplittable.create(JsonSplittable.java:47)
>> ... 12 more
>
>
> I'm going to try it with just the super interfaces and no overriding, but 
> I'm not sure the client is going to reconstruct "foo" with the proper type.
>
> I can maybe understand the first one not working since I know 
> RequestFactory and such are always picky about the use of generics also and 
> I've learned to be careful about that.  But the second one seems to just be 
> it not paying attention to the override which seems like a problem that 
> should be fixed.  On the server-side, I'm using AutoBeanFactorySource to 
> create the AutoBeanFactory, which I see is supposedly "experimental".  I'm 
> then using AutoBeanCodex to do the encoding.  Has anyone had success 
> encoding AutoBeans on the server-side?
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/dJ9LES1-5F4J.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Call for action: Time to rethink a road-map and more frequent updates for GWT.

2012-04-12 Thread dominikz
For over a year I was trying to convince my customers (that I develop 
programs for) to use GWT with their SAP system. The technologies available 
over there are WebDynpro for ABAP or Business Server Pages, which do not 
even know what AJAX is.

In January I managed to do that. We just finished porting one of the tool 
to mobile phones with the use of GWT on SAP. We just started writing 
another tool that was simply impossible to write in Web Dynpro ABAP. 

It would really break my belief in Google, if now (after over a year of 
convincing my customers) I would need to go back and say - GWT is no longer 
available.

One thing that comes to my mind. I remember 2 years ago seeing all those 
great presentations of Google Wave on Google I/O. I managed to convince my 
customers to use it. We really loved it. It was great for communication. 
Look where we are now with that tool. Not only it just died, but there's 
also no decent export of the data from that system available (selecting at 
most 10 or 100 waves and putting them to PDFs is not enough for me - it 
will take me ages to select and download).
Also what was contributed by Google to the open source seems to have very 
little stability. I've tried to use the projects on Apache, but the server 
simply stops working after a couple of wave edits.

So what I am really affraid of, is that this lack of commits to GWT public 
repository is really a way of doing the same thing as was done with Wave. 
We will be left without decent source code.

I've been for years with technologies like SAP or AS/400. Those are really 
annoying when you try to do something modern. But the thing that is good 
about them is that they never go away. I understand that Google needs to 
try new things (dart). But turning away from such a big project like GWT is 
stabbing yourself in the back.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/7AzFOXodwtkJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.