[gwt-contrib] gwt-incubator version compatible with GWT 2.1

2010-07-12 Thread Cameron Braid
Just curious when the gwt-incubator will become compatible with GWT 2.1?

Cameron

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix javadoc issues (issue681801)

2010-07-12 Thread Ray Ryan
LGTM

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:17 PM, r...@google.com wrote:

 Reviewers: Ray Ryan,

 Description:
 Fix javadoc issues


 Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/681801/show

 Affected files:
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/app/place/AbstractRecordListActivity.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/app/place/ActivityManager.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/app/place/RecordListView.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/cell/client/package.html
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/i18n/shared/BidiFormatter.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/i18n/shared/HasDirectionEstimator.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/shared/Id.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/shared/Version.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/client/UiField.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/client/package-info.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/AnimatedLayout.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/CustomButton.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/LayoutCommand.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/LayoutPanel.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/UIObject.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/ValueBoxBase.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/valuestore/client/DeltaValueStoreJsonImpl.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/valuestore/client/ValueStoreJsonImpl.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/valuestore/shared/DeltaValueStore.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/valuestore/shared/ValueStore.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/view/client/AbstractListViewAdapter.java




-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add support for creating Grid elements using UiBinder. (issue154810)

2010-07-12 Thread rjrjr

Nice. Just some error checking nits left.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/show

--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


[gwt-contrib] Re: Add support for creating Grid elements using UiBinder. (issue154810)

2010-07-12 Thread rjrjr


http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70001
File user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/elementparsers/GridParser.java
(right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70001#newcode86
user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/elementparsers/GridParser.java:86:
writer.getOracle().findType(Grid.class.getName()), 0, 0);
This line serves no purpose that I can see.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70001#newcode130
user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/elementparsers/GridParser.java:130:
writer.die(Grid's lt;g:row tag in %s may only contain %s or %s
element.,
No need for lt; here, and g: shouldn't be hard coded

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70001#newcode149
user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/elementparsers/GridParser.java:149:
throws UnableToCompleteException {
You're not enforcing that the child elements have the same prefix as the
parent. (Note that you should not hardcode g:, just make sure that
they all have the same value for XmlElement#getPrefix.)

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70001#newcode152
user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/elementparsers/GridParser.java:152:
String tagName = child.getLocalName();
Compare prefix too

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70001#newcode154
user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/elementparsers/GridParser.java:154:
writer.die(Invalid Grid child element:  + tagName);
%1$s:Grid elements must contain only %1$s:%2$s children, found
%3$s:%4$s, elem.getPrefix(), ROW_TAG, child.getPrefix(), tagName

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/show

--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix for issue 516 (issue612802)

2010-07-12 Thread rjrjr


http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/612802/diff/28001/29001
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/RootPanel.java (right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/612802/diff/28001/29001#newcode92
user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/RootPanel.java:92: }
There is no need to copy Panel#clear here. Just call clear();

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/612802/show

--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


Re: [gwt-contrib] UiBinder tweaks for GWT Designer

2010-07-12 Thread Ray Ryan
[Sorry for the spotty response time, it's vacation season.]

Okay, that's pretty cute. And completely isolated from the patch I pointed
you at, so don't worry about it.

I'm open to this. My only reservation at this point is the question of how
we'll ensure that it's only available at tool time.

On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Konstantin Scheglov 
konstantin.scheg...@gmail.com wrote:



 On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:


   This is absolutely not related to databinding, we just want to produce
 GUI builder for UiBinder.
   I think that tooling was specified as one of the reasons to use XML for
 GWT UI. So, this is on what I work now. :-)


 Well that makes a lot more sense. :-)

 It occurs to me that this could be a lot easier when we revive 
 r7816http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7816,
 which I had to roll back 
 (r7858http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?spec=svn8346r=7858)
 due to its naive handling of tables. If we make the paths the binder builds
 part of its public api, you could have your map and we wouldn't have to
 think as hard about hiding design time hooks from developers, or at least
 not all of them. Certainly, you shouldn't make your changes before that code
 comes back (and it really, really needs to come back).


   Sorry, but I don't understand on what to look in 
 r7816http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7816
 .
   Can you give hint how this can help in accessing widget objects and
 attribute values?



   If you speak about paths like 0/1/0, then I already have implementation
 for preparing/remembering them in XMLElement.

 
 public class XMLElement {
 //XXX Instantiations
 private static final WeakHashMapElement, String wbpElementPaths = new
 WeakHashMapElement, String();
 public static void rememberPathForElements(Document doc) {
 rememberPathForElements(doc.getDocumentElement(), 0);
 }
 private static void rememberPathForElements(Element element, String
 path) {
 wbpElementPaths.put(element, path);
 NodeList childNodes = element.getChildNodes();
 int elementIndex = 0;
 for (int i = 0; i  childNodes.getLength(); ++i) {
 Node childNode = childNodes.item(i);
 if (childNode.getNodeType() == Node.ELEMENT_NODE) {
 Element childElement = (Element) childNode;
 rememberPathForElements(childElement, path + / +
 elementIndex++);
 }
 }
 }
 public String getPath() {
 return wbpElementPaths.get(elem);
 }
 //XXX Instantiations
 

   This method is called from UiBinderGenerator.generateOnce()
 ---
 Document doc = getW3cDoc(logger, templatePath);

 //XXX Instantiations
 XMLElement.rememberPathForElements(doc);
 //XXX Instantiations

 uiBinderWriter.parseDocument(doc, binderPrintWriter);
 ---




 In your original note you suggested:

In method createAndBindUi() directly after creating each
 Widget instance (but before applying setX() methods) wbpObjectHandler
 is used to notify GWT Designer about new widget and its path in XML.
 GWT Designer bind Widget instance to model (using path) and also
 asks default values for all properties using getX() methods.


 Why do you need this notice before the set calls?


   We need default values for properties. This allows us to remove attribute
 (or method invocation in case of Java version of GWTD) when user tries to
 set for property same value as default. Easiest example - flipping enabled
 between true/false. Default value is true, so only enabled=false is
 written into XML.

   But if enabled=false already existed in XML, and we ask isEnabled()
 after set calls, then it is false and we can not know that default value
 is true. So, we need ask isEnabled() before setEnabled(false), i.e.
 directly after widget creation.

   Of course situation is trivial for enabled and standard GWT widgets and
 we could hardcode its default value. But we can not expect anything about
 custom widgets - some of them may be will use enabled false by default, or
 introduce new properties for which we also need to know value.


   At same time we need not only default values, but also actual values
 for properties/attributes. Not all setX() properties have corresponding
 getX() method. So, only reliable way for GWT Designer to know value is patch
 UiBinder generator to remember these values into map.







 4. To allow quick updates of design canvas as user changes properties,
 without reloading GWT context each time, we should:
 4.1. Generate Binder implementation class with new name each time, so
 be able to define each time new class in same ClassLoader. Right now
 we just add current time to the name of class.
//XXX Instantiations
// generate class with new name each time, to allow refresh in
 same ClassLoader
implName += _wbp + 

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add support for creating Grid elements using UiBinder. (issue154810)

2010-07-12 Thread markovuksanovic

Did the changes... Will post the patch a little later... I need to
convert it from git to svn format first...


http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70001
File user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/elementparsers/GridParser.java
(right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70001#newcode86
user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/elementparsers/GridParser.java:86:
writer.getOracle().findType(Grid.class.getName()), 0, 0);
You should be right about this

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70001#newcode86
user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/elementparsers/GridParser.java:86:
writer.getOracle().findType(Grid.class.getName()), 0, 0);
On 2010/07/12 17:07:40, Ray Ryan wrote:

This line serves no purpose that I can see.


Done.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70001#newcode130
user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/elementparsers/GridParser.java:130:
writer.die(Grid's lt;g:row tag in %s may only contain %s or %s
element.,
On 2010/07/12 17:07:40, Ray Ryan wrote:

No need for lt; here, and g: shouldn't be hard coded


Done.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70001#newcode149
user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/elementparsers/GridParser.java:149:
throws UnableToCompleteException {
Done. Also made sure that cells have the same prefix as parent.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70001#newcode152
user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/elementparsers/GridParser.java:152:
String tagName = child.getLocalName();
On 2010/07/12 17:07:40, Ray Ryan wrote:

Compare prefix too


Done.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70001#newcode154
user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/elementparsers/GridParser.java:154:
writer.die(Invalid Grid child element:  + tagName);
On 2010/07/12 17:07:40, Ray Ryan wrote:

%1$s:Grid elements must contain only %1$s:%2$s children, found

%3$s:%4$s,

elem.getPrefix(), ROW_TAG, child.getPrefix(), tagName


Done.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70003
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/Grid.java (right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/diff/63002/70003#newcode35
user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/Grid.java:35: * Grid widget
consists of lt;g:row elements. Each lt;g:row element
On 2010/07/03 20:46:51, markovuksanovic wrote:

One small typo - can contain on or more - should be - can contain

one or

more


Done.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/154810/show

--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


[gwt-contrib] Fix some bugs in symbol dumping. (issue685801)

2010-07-12 Thread scottb

Reviewers: fabbott,

Description:
Fix some bugs in symbol dumping.

1) Fixes an NPE when dumping symbols with -validateOnly.
2) Fixes unstable sort order being returned from TypeOracle.getTypes().

Review by: fabb...@google.com

Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801/show

Affected files:
  M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/TypeOracle.java
  M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java


Index: dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/TypeOracle.java
===
--- dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/TypeOracle.java	(revision  
8376)
+++ dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/TypeOracle.java	(working  
copy)

@@ -584,7 +584,14 @@
*/
   public JClassType[] getTypes() {
 CollectionJRealClassType values = allTypes.values();
-return values.toArray(new JClassType[values.size()]);
+JClassType[] result = values.toArray(new JClassType[values.size()]);
+Arrays.sort(result, new ComparatorJClassType() {
+  public int compare(JClassType o1, JClassType o2) {
+return o1.getQualifiedSourceName().compareTo(
+o2.getQualifiedSourceName());
+  }
+});
+return result;
   }

   public JWildcardType getWildcardType(JWildcardType.BoundType boundType,
@@ -617,7 +624,7 @@
* of the preceding.
* p
* Examples of types that can be parsed by this method.
-   * ul
+   *  
ulthird_party/java_src/gwt/svn/trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/TypeOracle.java

* licodeint/code/li
* licodejava.lang.Object/code/li
* licodejava.lang.String[]/code/li
Index: dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java
===
--- dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java (revision 8376)
+++ dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java (working copy)
@@ -472,11 +472,6 @@
   module.getActiveLinkerNames()), genDir);
   // Allow GC later.
   compilationState = null;
-  if (dumpSignatureFile != null) {
-// Dump early to avoid generated types.
-SignatureDumper.dumpSignatures(logger,
-compilationState.getTypeOracle(), dumpSignatureFile);
-  }
   // Never optimize on a validation run.
   jjsOptions.setOptimizePrecompile(false);
   getCompiler(module).precompile(logger, module, rpo, declEntryPts,


--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix some bugs in symbol dumping. (issue685801)

2010-07-12 Thread scottb

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801/show

--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix some bugs in symbol dumping. (issue685801)

2010-07-12 Thread scottb


http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801/diff/2002/3002
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java (left):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801/diff/2002/3002#oldcode478
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java:478:
compilationState.getTypeOracle(), dumpSignatureFile);
This was causing an NPE due to line 475.  But this whole section is a
duplicate anyway, signatures are already dumped on line 453.  Probably a
bad merge sometime in the past.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801/show

--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix some bugs in symbol dumping. (issue685801)

2010-07-12 Thread Scott Blum
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 4:54 PM, fabb...@google.com wrote:

 http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801/diff/1/2#newcode594
 dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/TypeOracle.java:594:
 return result;
 Cool, but is this better than stabilizing allTypes.values itself?


Yes... I thought about making allTypes a TreeSet, but the thing is,
TypeOracle.allTypes() has almost no callers.  It's just test code, and
symbol dumping.  Whereas, making it a TreeSet would have a performance
impact every time you build a TypeOracle, which is the 99% case.



 http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801/diff/1/3
 File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java (left):

 http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801/diff/1/3#oldcode479
 dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java:479: }
 but shouldn't we dump sometimes?  Or is this block full-up buggy, and
 the real dump is elsewhere?


See my in-flight note.

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Refactoring to one top level class per .java file, since some (issue686801)

2010-07-12 Thread fabbott

Reviewers: jat,

Description:
Refactoring to one top level class per .java file, since some
tools don't understand more than that.

Review by: jat


Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/686801/show

Affected files:
  M dev/core/super/com/google/gwt/lang/LongLibBase.java
  A user/src/com/google/gwt/i18n/tools/ArgHandlerValueChooser.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/i18n/tools/I18NSync.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/junit/BatchingStrategy.java
  A user/src/com/google/gwt/junit/ClassBatchingStrategy.java
  M user/src/com/google/gwt/junit/CompileStrategy.java
  A user/src/com/google/gwt/junit/ModuleBatchingStrategy.java
  A user/src/com/google/gwt/junit/NoBatchingStrategy.java
  A user/src/com/google/gwt/junit/ParallelCompileStrategy.java
  A user/src/com/google/gwt/junit/PreCompileStrategy.java
  A user/src/com/google/gwt/junit/SimpleCompileStrategy.java


--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix some bugs in symbol dumping. (issue685801)

2010-07-12 Thread Freeland Abbott
LGTM

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:

 On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 4:54 PM, fabb...@google.com wrote:

 http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801/diff/1/2#newcode594
 dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/TypeOracle.java:594:
 return result;
 Cool, but is this better than stabilizing allTypes.values itself?


 Yes... I thought about making allTypes a TreeSet, but the thing is,
 TypeOracle.allTypes() has almost no callers.  It's just test code, and
 symbol dumping.  Whereas, making it a TreeSet would have a performance
 impact every time you build a TypeOracle, which is the 99% case.



 http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801/diff/1/3
 File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java (left):

 http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801/diff/1/3#oldcode479
 dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java:479: }
 but shouldn't we dump sometimes?  Or is this block full-up buggy, and
 the real dump is elsewhere?


 See my in-flight note.


-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Refactoring to one top level class per .java file, since some (issue686801)

2010-07-12 Thread jat

LGTM, though do all the *Strategy ones need to be top-level classes
rather than static nested classes?


http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/686801/show

--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Refactoring to one top level class per .java file, since some (issue686801)

2010-07-12 Thread Scott Blum
+1.  Static nested FTW. :)

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:14 PM, j...@google.com wrote:

 LGTM, though do all the *Strategy ones need to be top-level classes
 rather than static nested classes?



 http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/686801/show

 --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r8377 committed - Fix some bugs in symbol dumping....

2010-07-12 Thread codesite-noreply

Revision: 8377
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Jul 12 14:25:43 2010
Log: Fix some bugs in symbol dumping.

1) Fixes an NPE when dumping symbols with -validateOnly.
2) Fixes unstable sort order being returned from TypeOracle.getTypes().

Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801

Review by: fabb...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8377

Modified:
 /trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/TypeOracle.java
 /trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java

===
--- /trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/TypeOracle.java	 
Tue Jun 22 10:07:56 2010
+++ /trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/TypeOracle.java	 
Mon Jul 12 11:20:44 2010

@@ -584,7 +584,14 @@
*/
   public JClassType[] getTypes() {
 CollectionJRealClassType values = allTypes.values();
-return values.toArray(new JClassType[values.size()]);
+JClassType[] result = values.toArray(new JClassType[values.size()]);
+Arrays.sort(result, new ComparatorJClassType() {
+  public int compare(JClassType o1, JClassType o2) {
+return o1.getQualifiedSourceName().compareTo(
+o2.getQualifiedSourceName());
+  }
+});
+return result;
   }

   public JWildcardType getWildcardType(JWildcardType.BoundType boundType,
===
--- /trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java	Fri Jun 18  
04:59:26 2010
+++ /trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java	Mon Jul 12  
11:20:44 2010

@@ -472,11 +472,6 @@
   module.getActiveLinkerNames()), genDir);
   // Allow GC later.
   compilationState = null;
-  if (dumpSignatureFile != null) {
-// Dump early to avoid generated types.
-SignatureDumper.dumpSignatures(logger,
-compilationState.getTypeOracle(), dumpSignatureFile);
-  }
   // Never optimize on a validation run.
   jjsOptions.setOptimizePrecompile(false);
   getCompiler(module).precompile(logger, module, rpo, declEntryPts,

--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors