Re: [H] corrupt codecs

2007-01-02 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 06:27 PM 01/01/2007, Winterlight wrote:
someway I have lost or corrupted my DVD codec. Removing and 
reinstalling Power DVD hasn't helped so I am thinking something is 
probably corrupt.
mpeg-1 is fine, wmv is fine but anything mpeg-2 only gets audio and 
it kind of locks up with the video.

Any ideas on how to fix this?


Not sure if this will help:
http://www.free-codecs.com/guides/How_to_install_uninstall_DLL_and_AX_files.htm

http://avicodec.duby.info/

http://www.headbands.com/gspot/

T 



Re: [H] Vidcard upgrade?

2007-01-02 Thread j maccraw
Well good luck finding one for < $300-400 (assuming
you can find one) 
which is almost double the cost of the AGP x850 or the
PCI-E x1950.

I'll "limp" along happily with the x850 @ ~$200 given
that upgrading to 
new mobo would mean dumping the card anyway.

JOEUSER wrote:
> Hello j,
> 
> Monday, January 1, 2007, 1:45:54 AM, you wrote:
> 
>> No, the x850 is a better deal for AGP.
> 
> The x1950 has (basically) twice the performance of
the x850.
> This is like the first real upgrade for AGP
interface users.
> 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


[H] Brother 2070N Laser

2007-01-02 Thread dhs

Well, my Canon S600 bubble-jet printer finally died! Looks like electrical, but 
can 
not be sure. Yes, using a refill black cart! But, the "hollowed out" text lines 
are 
very random. Doesn't look like plugged jets.  Will play with it later!

Went to Office Depot. Had the Brother b&w 2070N laser printer on sale for 
$99.99.
Has network built in. Nice gray scale and quiet. 1st print is much faster than 
the 
Canon BJ.  I'm happy, and, finally up to a laser!
20ppm, 250 sheet tray. TN-350 replacement cart was $62. UG says that I can 
replace just the toner cart and keep old drum, or, replace both in one shot. I 
do 
like this deal alot! Happy so far.

Sale at OD lasts until 06JAN2007.
Best,
Duncan




This email scanned for Viruses and Spam by ZCloud.net 



Re: [H] corrupt codecs

2007-01-02 Thread JRS

If you go to add/remove programs, does it give you a "repair"option for
that install?  That usually works for apps that have that option.

Sounds like that good ole Windows penchant for not overwriting a file that
it sees is already there during an install, even though that file may be
corrupt.  :(



>>someway I have lost or corrupted my DVD codec. Removing and 
>>reinstalling Power DVD hasn't helped so I am thinking something is 
>>probably corrupt.
>>
>>mpeg-1 is fine, wmv is fine but anything mpeg-2 only gets audio and 
>>it kind of locks up with the video.
>>
>>Any ideas on how to fix this?
-- 

JRS<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please remove  **X**  to reply...

...Cleverly Disguised As A Responsible Adult...


[H] virus bug, help

2007-01-02 Thread FORC5
Have a customer box with adware.purityscan. It basically is shut down and 
blocked and not running but the infected file keeps re appearing and I can not 
figure out how. Have checked all the usual suspects in the run and services and 
win.ini etc.
folder that the AV sw finds is in documents and settings/(user)application 
data/dobe~1/nopdb.exe

the end of that is not visible under explorer but every time I run a av scan it 
shows up and gets quarantined. Symantec says to use the purityscan unintsller 
but the AV sw says that is infected and seems ridicules to use a uninstall 
routine from the infector. Webroot supposedly removed the infection it is just 
this stupid file keeps reappearing according to symantec corporate. tempted to 
tell sace to ignore on next boot. 

other then fdisk, any clues ?
FWIW this box came in with a bad HD and it was a pain but I finally got it to 
ghost, wish I hadn't :'(
fp

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
What doesn't destroy me makes me stronger.




[H] Replacement for iTunes, MusicMatch, etc.

2007-01-02 Thread Anthony Q. Martin
What do y'all use to play mp3s on your PCs?  I have all of my CD 
collection ripped to Mp3 but I don't have a good player outside of 
iTunes and MusicMatch. MM is buggie and iTunes wants to install 
quicktime as memory resident.  It doesn't seem as if Nero has a decent 
player that will let you browse your collection in any meaningful way.  
I guess WMPlayer is an option, but it seems clunky too for browsing the 
collection. Is there anything that actually works well and isn't too 
much of a system hog?


Re: [H] Replacement for iTunes, MusicMatch, etc.

2007-01-02 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 12:55 PM 02/01/2007, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
What do y'all use to play mp3s on your PCs?  I have all of my CD 
collection ripped to Mp3 but I don't have a good player outside of 
iTunes and MusicMatch. MM is buggie and iTunes wants to install 
quicktime as memory resident.  It doesn't seem as if Nero has a 
decent player that will let you browse your collection in any meaningful way.
I guess WMPlayer is an option, but it seems clunky too for browsing 
the collection. Is there anything that actually works well and isn't 
too much of a system hog?


Brian recommended MediaMonkey (http://www.mediamonkey.com/) but I 
haven't tried it yet.


T 



Re: [H] Replacement for iTunes, MusicMatch, etc.

2007-01-02 Thread Ben Ruset
Winamp? I had to go back to it since iTunes 7 can't play mp3's without 
clicks & pops in the sound.


Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
What do y'all use to play mp3s on your PCs?  I have all of my CD 
collection ripped to Mp3 but I don't have a good player outside of 
iTunes and MusicMatch. MM is buggie and iTunes wants to install 
quicktime as memory resident.  It doesn't seem as if Nero has a decent 
player that will let you browse your collection in any meaningful way.  
I guess WMPlayer is an option, but it seems clunky too for browsing the 
collection. Is there anything that actually works well and isn't too 
much of a system hog?




RE: [H] Replacement for iTunes, MusicMatch, etc.

2007-01-02 Thread Tim Lider
Try the new WinAmp  its nice and has a library for your MP3's.

Regards,


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Q. Martin
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 8:55 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: [H] Replacement for iTunes, MusicMatch, etc.

What do y'all use to play mp3s on your PCs?  I have all of my CD collection
ripped to Mp3 but I don't have a good player outside of iTunes and
MusicMatch. MM is buggie and iTunes wants to install quicktime as memory
resident.  It doesn't seem as if Nero has a decent player that will let you
browse your collection in any meaningful way.
I guess WMPlayer is an option, but it seems clunky too for browsing the
collection. Is there anything that actually works well and isn't too much of
a system hog?





Re: [H] -N- -LO- ATI/AMD's next GPU..

2007-01-02 Thread dhs
CW,
Do you have a full link? This one goes nowhere!!
TNX,
Duncan


On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:02 , CW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:

>
>The RD600 benched.  So, now they just have to see how well it sells.
>
>http://level505.com/2006/12/30/the-full-ati-r600-test/1/





This email scanned for Viruses and Spam by ZCloud.net 



Re: [H] virus bug, help

2007-01-02 Thread Steve Tomporowski

Search for Trojans.  I got hit with some scumware once where the
infection was based on a trojan that keeps downloading the scumware
when it detects that it's been removed.

Steve

On 1/2/07, FORC5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Have a customer box with adware.purityscan. It basically is shut down and 
blocked and not running but the infected file keeps re appearing and I can not 
figure out how. Have checked all the usual suspects in the run and services and 
win.ini etc.
folder that the AV sw finds is in documents and settings/(user)application 
data/dobe~1/nopdb.exe

the end of that is not visible under explorer but every time I run a av scan it 
shows up and gets quarantined. Symantec says to use the purityscan unintsller 
but the AV sw says that is infected and seems ridicules to use a uninstall 
routine from the infector. Webroot supposedly removed the infection it is just 
this stupid file keeps reappearing according to symantec corporate. tempted to 
tell sace to ignore on next boot.

other then fdisk, any clues ?
FWIW this box came in with a bad HD and it was a pain but I finally got it to 
ghost, wish I hadn't :'(
fp

--
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
What doesn't destroy me makes me stronger.





[H] Power supplies and system requirements

2007-01-02 Thread Thane Sherrington
If I'm trying to spec out a power supply that has multiple 12V rails 
(I've seen up to five 12V rails) can I just add the rails together to 
see if it has enough power on the 12V rail or do I have to figure out 
which devices pull power on which of the 12V rails?  (Is there a way 
to figure out which rail is being used by each device?)


T



Re: [H] virus bug, help

2007-01-02 Thread FORC5
good idea, will disconnect from Internet and see if it returns.
fp
thanks

At 12:25 PM 1/2/2007, Steve Tomporowski Poked the stick with:
>Search for Trojans.  I got hit with some scumware once where the
>infection was based on a trojan that keeps downloading the scumware
>when it detects that it's been removed.
>
>Steve
>
>On 1/2/07, FORC5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Have a customer box with adware.purityscan. It basically is shut down and 
>>blocked and not running but the infected file keeps re appearing and I can 
>>not figure out how. Have checked all the usual suspects in the run and 
>>services and win.ini etc.
>>folder that the AV sw finds is in documents and settings/(user)application 
>>data/dobe~1/nopdb.exe
>>
>>the end of that is not visible under explorer but every time I run a av scan 
>>it shows up and gets quarantined. Symantec says to use the purityscan 
>>unintsller but the AV sw says that is infected and seems ridicules to use a 
>>uninstall routine from the infector. Webroot supposedly removed the infection 
>>it is just this stupid file keeps reappearing according to symantec 
>>corporate. tempted to tell sace to ignore on next boot.
>>
>>other then fdisk, any clues ?
>>FWIW this box came in with a bad HD and it was a pain but I finally got it to 
>>ghost, wish I hadn't :'(
>>fp
>>
>>--
>>Tallyho ! ]:8)
>>Taglines below !
>>--
>>What doesn't destroy me makes me stronger.
>>
>>

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
We will find no ancestor before his time.




Re: [H] Power supplies and system requirements

2007-01-02 Thread dhs
T,
No. Not w/o a print of the dist. wiring.  Would think that all 12v rails are
really in parallel to a common source unless specied otherwise (or the PSU 
has multiple 12v cards inside...jmho).
otoh, I suppose you could trace each 12v wire back to its' source point and 
determine a current path from that investigation.
I'm no expert. ymmv. I remain a pcp&c fan-boy. Still waiting to test/try 
a SeaSonic offering some time in 2007.  I expect my last Enermax to croak 
this year :)
Best,
Duncan


On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:56 , Thane Sherrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:

>
>If I'm trying to spec out a power supply that has multiple 12V rails 
>(I've seen up to five 12V rails) can I just add the rails together to 
>see if it has enough power on the 12V rail or do I have to figure out 
>which devices pull power on which of the 12V rails?  (Is there a way 
>to figure out which rail is being used by each device?)
>
>T
>





This email scanned for Viruses and Spam by ZCloud.net 



RE: [H] Free or Cheap AV Software

2007-01-02 Thread dhs
How about PAY for the $5 condom, put it on, AND put the FREE one 
over it?
If the result is protection, what's the harm?
Now, if you wish to move back to the "lack of feeling(freedom)" discussion, 
then I'm just gonna say Y(personal)MMV & JMHO!
Trojan and Me be good friends!
Best,
Duncan

On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:03 , Wayne Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:

>
>At 07:58 AM 12/28/2006, Thane Sherrington typed:
>>Maybe one can't prove a "best" solution (too many variables) but one 
>>can prove which AV gives the highest level of protection in 
>>testing.  The Avast for pay isn't as good as some of the other for 
>>pay AVs out there.  We can extrapolate from that the the free 
>>version is at best no better and at worst, worse than the for pay 
>>version.  My argument is that if there is a better level of 
>>protection, and it's cost is minimal, then there is no point in 
>>going with the free version.  As an example:  If I offer you two 
>>condoms - one is free, and it's 95% likely to protect protect you 
>>from VD.  The other cost $5 and is 98% likely to protect you from 
>>VD.  Which do you use if you know you are going into a brothel where 
>>VD in commonplace (I think the VD infested brother is analagous to 
>>the malware infested internet?)  Clearly there is still a chance 
>>that you get infected, and clearly the best approach is common sense 
>>(don't have sex in the brothel) but if one is taking the chance, 
>>then why not spend the money?  The downside clearly overcomes the cost.
>
>How about one not go to a brothel & wear the cheaper condom ?   With 
>my luck even with the paid condom I'd get infected, that's if I could 
>stand the inflection. 
>
>
>  ---+--
>I'm a geek that loves to tweak.
>





This email scanned for Viruses and Spam by ZCloud.net 



RE: [H] Free or Cheap AV Software

2007-01-02 Thread dhs

Since you two seem to be trying to cover/uncover/recover so much real estate 
here, I wish to add my commendation only to one small snippet that I have found 
useful and currently in force after 7 years of testing:

On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:34 , Thane Sherrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:

snip
>I'm not saying Avast is no good.  I'm saying that any AV is so cheap, 
>you might as well spend money on one and make sure you are getting 
>the best rather than trying to do it on the cheap and hoping.
>
I grow weary of trying to do everything "computer" ON THE CHEAP! 
Certainly this has merit in some areas. But please, folks, either let's 
quit this AV bickering, or, just,agree to disagree.  If you do not like 
your AV solution, GET A BETTER ONE! They do exist. ... :)
Best,
Duncan




This email scanned for Viruses and Spam by ZCloud.net 



[H] Consumer reports smokes crack

2007-01-02 Thread Thane Sherrington
In the latest Consumer Reports here in Canada, they have a blurb on 
"The hidden costs of a new laptop" - "Don't for get to add in the 
prices of a padded carrying case ($50 and up), extra battery 
($100-$200), spare power adapter ($80 and up) and usb mouse 
($30.)  Your laptop's price tag often does not include these essential extras."


Well of course it doesn't.  They aren't essential - other than 
possibly the case.  The extra battery could be useful in some unusual 
circumstances, and I guess one could use an spare power adapter if 
one lost the original, but a mouse?  Come on.  Plus a USB mouse can 
be had as cheaply as $20.


I've used a laptop as my primary computer for about three years and 
all I have from this list of "essentials" is a carrying case 
($30.)  I'm not trusting Consumer Reports anymore when it comes to 
making purchases.


T



RE: [H] PCIe video power requirements

2007-01-02 Thread dhs
Well maybe. But 150/12 is 12.5AMPS. Now maybe 12.5 amps is a bunch, but 
modern day vid cards do need a bunch of trons to work properly and provide 
all the eye candy we desire(require). 12.5A is still cake and well within the 
"bitching limits" I remember back in 1997! JMHO.
Best,
Duncan


On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:20 , Anthony Q. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:

>
>150W max still seems like a lot of juice to me.
>
>
snip



This email scanned for Viruses and Spam by ZCloud.net 



[H] another weird bug ?

2007-01-02 Thread FORC5
quick launch bar goes away on re boot ?
userinit is in the correct place the registry.

any suggestions ?
fp


-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
So many messages ... So little time left.




Re: [H] Consumer reports smokes crack

2007-01-02 Thread Anthony Q. Martin
I never trust them for anything computer or HT (electroncis) related. I 
trust them for lawnmovers, cars, and other housewhole stuff.


Thane Sherrington wrote:
In the latest Consumer Reports here in Canada, they have a blurb on 
"The hidden costs of a new laptop" - "Don't for get to add in the 
prices of a padded carrying case ($50 and up), extra battery 
($100-$200), spare power adapter ($80 and up) and usb mouse ($30.)  
Your laptop's price tag often does not include these essential extras."


Well of course it doesn't.  They aren't essential - other than 
possibly the case.  The extra battery could be useful in some unusual 
circumstances, and I guess one could use an spare power adapter if one 
lost the original, but a mouse?  Come on.  Plus a USB mouse can be had 
as cheaply as $20.


I've used a laptop as my primary computer for about three years and 
all I have from this list of "essentials" is a carrying case ($30.)  
I'm not trusting Consumer Reports anymore when it comes to making 
purchases.


T




RE: [H] PCIe video power requirements

2007-01-02 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 01:51 PM 02/01/2007, dhs wrote:

Well maybe. But 150/12 is 12.5AMPS. Now maybe 12.5 amps is a bunch, but


Don't the X2 CPUs pull around 7.5A on the 12V line?  Even if one 
factors in the RAM on the video card, 12.5 seems steep to me - 
especially since as far as I can tell, most power supplies would have 
a hard time putting that sort of power out.  So for most people their 
$500 video card also requires a $100 power supply.  Just to play a $60 game.


T 



Re: [H] Power supplies and system requirements

2007-01-02 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 12:43 PM 02/01/2007, dhs wrote:

T,
No. Not w/o a print of the dist. wiring.  Would think that all 12v rails are
really in parallel to a common source unless specied otherwise (or the PSU
has multiple 12v cards inside...jmho).


So how does one figure out if the power supply can handle the 12V 
requirements out there now?  I mean, if I have three 12V rails with 
24A each, and I'm pulling 15A for the video card, 4A for the hard 
drives, and 10A for the CPU, then I'm at 29A, so unless I'm splitting 
the rails, I'm going to end up with one overloaded rail and two rails 
doing nothing.  Or are you saying that in reality, I have one 12V 
rail with 68A?


T 



Re: [H] Consumer reports smokes crack

2007-01-02 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 07:03 PM 02/01/2007, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
I never trust them for anything computer or HT (electroncis) 
related. I trust them for lawnmovers, cars, and other housewhole stuff.


I've always used them for that too, but I'm starting to wonder.  If 
they don't know anything about computers, yet try to evaluate them, 
how can we be sure they aren't talking out their asses about everything else?


T 



Re: [H] Power supplies and system requirements

2007-01-02 Thread Anthony Q. Martin



Thane Sherrington wrote:

At 12:43 PM 02/01/2007, dhs wrote:

T,
No. Not w/o a print of the dist. wiring.  Would think that all 12v 
rails are
really in parallel to a common source unless specied otherwise (or 
the PSU

has multiple 12v cards inside...jmho).


So how does one figure out if the power supply can handle the 12V 
requirements out there now?  I mean, if I have three 12V rails with 
24A each, and I'm pulling 15A for the video card, 4A for the hard 
drives, and 10A for the CPU, then I'm at 29A, so unless I'm splitting 
the rails, I'm going to end up with one overloaded rail and two rails 
doing nothing.  Or are you saying that in reality, I have one 12V rail 
with 68A?




It's the latter, though I doubt designers considered one rail drawing 
all the current like that.




Re: [H] Consumer reports smokes crack

2007-01-02 Thread Anthony Q. Martin
I have found their evaluations of things computer related to be very 
weak in the past.  The need for a case is obvious. The spare power 
adapter comes in handy for me from making the load lighter and in case I 
forget.  I lot of people get buy just find without a mouse, but I prefer 
a wireless one myself.  Also, I won't buy the cheapest mouse can I can 
find because they really are cheap.  It depends on whose money i'm 
spending, too.


Wayne Johnson wrote:

At 05:41 PM 1/2/2007, Thane Sherrington typed:
In the latest Consumer Reports here in Canada, they have a blurb on 
"The hidden costs of a new laptop" - "Don't for get to add in the 
prices of a padded carrying case ($50 and up), extra battery 
($100-$200), spare power adapter ($80 and up) and usb mouse ($30.)  
Your laptop's price tag often does not include these essential extras."


Well of course it doesn't.  They aren't essential - other than 
possibly the case.  The extra battery could be useful in some unusual 
circumstances, and I guess one could use an spare power adapter if 
one lost the original, but a mouse?  Come on.  Plus a USB mouse can 
be had as cheaply as $20.


I've used a laptop as my primary computer for about three years and 
all I have from this list of "essentials" is a carrying case ($30.)  
I'm not trusting Consumer Reports anymore when it comes to making 
purchases.


Just because the recommend a little more? FWIW I use all these extras. 
I have a PS plugged into a port replicator at home & another for 
travel. The same applies for an extra battery as there is nothing 
worse than sitting in an airport when your battery dies right in the 
middle of a download. As for the USB mouse I prefer a wireless mini 
mouse. Because of health reasons I don't travel as much as I use to 
but when I did I was sure glad that I had that extra stuff plus media 
& extra other cables such as USB & 1394.  Now if I'm just using it 
around the house I could easily do without the extras so are they 
talking about for the Road Warrior or like my little brother that 
takes his to work so he can check out eBay when he's bored because he 
doesn't know diddly about computers.



 ---+--
I'm a geek that loves to tweak.




RE: [H] Consumer reports smokes crack

2007-01-02 Thread Neil Davidson

> Just because the recommend a little more? FWIW I use all 
> these extras. I have a PS plugged into a port replicator at 
> home & another for travel. The same applies for an extra 
> battery as there is nothing worse than sitting in an airport 
> when your battery dies right in the middle of a download. As 
> for the USB mouse I prefer a wireless mini mouse. Because of 
> health reasons I don't travel as much as I use to but when I 
> did I was sure glad that I had that extra stuff plus media & 
> extra other cables such as USB & 1394.  Now if I'm just using 
> it around the house I could easily do without the extras so 
> are they talking about for the Road Warrior or like my little 
> brother that takes his to work so he can check out eBay when 
> he's bored because he doesn't know diddly about computers.

Who are these consumer reports targeted at?

They don't sound like they are targeted at the tech savy road warrier that
is going to know about the battery, case, mouse and power brick. So that
means thay are targeted at regular consumers that are buying a laptop
because they are easier to hide away or move between home and work or
collage and home. If that's the case then they have got it really wrong as
these people don't usually need the extra battery and power adapter. Sure
the case is useful, but you don't need one if you are replacing an existing
unit, they aren't proprietary after all :) same goes for the mouse.

Over here in the UK we have the Which? Magazine which sounds quite similar.
It's not a publication I would use for advise to be honest. Whenever I've
seen them do group tests of anything like current technology, they are very
out of date and don't include all the options, just what you can get on the
high street. The populist items if you like.



Re: [H] Consumer reports smokes crack

2007-01-02 Thread Anthony Q. Martin

Where the tech changes quickly, they aren't that useful, IMO.

Thane Sherrington wrote:

At 07:03 PM 02/01/2007, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
I never trust them for anything computer or HT (electroncis) related. 
I trust them for lawnmovers, cars, and other housewhole stuff.


I've always used them for that too, but I'm starting to wonder.  If 
they don't know anything about computers, yet try to evaluate them, 
how can we be sure they aren't talking out their asses about 
everything else?


T



Re: [H] Replacement for iTunes, MusicMatch, etc.

2007-01-02 Thread Brian Weeden

Ok, that sentence just hurt my brain.  I must be getting old.

On 1/2/07, Wayne Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

FWIW it's JMHO & YMMV but probably not. ;-)



--
Brian


Re: [H] Consumer reports smokes crack

2007-01-02 Thread Veech
I count on CR for auto reviews, especially relating to repair history.  I 
also count on them for appliance reviews, as they can test the heck out of 
these things.  But for computers, sound systems, things that can be 
subjective (food, wine etc) I think there are other better sources.




- Original Message - 
From: "Anthony Q. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "The Hardware List" 
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: [H] Consumer reports smokes crack


I have found their evaluations of things computer related to be very weak 
in the past.  The need for a case is obvious. The spare power adapter comes 
in handy for me from making the load lighter and in case I forget.  I lot 
of people get buy just find without a mouse, but I prefer a wireless one 
myself.  Also, I won't buy the cheapest mouse can I can find because they 
really are cheap.  It depends on whose money i'm spending, too.


Wayne Johnson wrote:

At 05:41 PM 1/2/2007, Thane Sherrington typed:
In the latest Consumer Reports here in Canada, they have a blurb on "The 
hidden costs of a new laptop" - "Don't for get to add in the prices of a 
padded carrying case ($50 and up), extra battery ($100-$200), spare 
power adapter ($80 and up) and usb mouse ($30.)  Your laptop's price tag 
often does not include these essential extras."


Well of course it doesn't.  They aren't essential - other than possibly 
the case.  The extra battery could be useful in some unusual 
circumstances, and I guess one could use an spare power adapter if one 
lost the original, but a mouse?  Come on.  Plus a USB mouse can be had 
as cheaply as $20.


I've used a laptop as my primary computer for about three years and all 
I have from this list of "essentials" is a carrying case ($30.)  I'm not 
trusting Consumer Reports anymore when it comes to making purchases.


Just because the recommend a little more? FWIW I use all these extras. I 
have a PS plugged into a port replicator at home & another for travel. 
The same applies for an extra battery as there is nothing worse than 
sitting in an airport when your battery dies right in the middle of a 
download. As for the USB mouse I prefer a wireless mini mouse. Because of 
health reasons I don't travel as much as I use to but when I did I was 
sure glad that I had that extra stuff plus media & extra other cables 
such as USB & 1394.  Now if I'm just using it around the house I could 
easily do without the extras so are they talking about for the Road 
Warrior or like my little brother that takes his to work so he can check 
out eBay when he's bored because he doesn't know diddly about computers.



 ---+--
I'm a geek that loves to tweak.






RE: [H] virus bug, help

2007-01-02 Thread Mark Dodge
Also run hijackthis

Mark

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of FORC5
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 3:18 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] virus bug, help

good idea, will disconnect from Internet and see if it returns.
fp
thanks

At 12:25 PM 1/2/2007, Steve Tomporowski Poked the stick with:
>Search for Trojans.  I got hit with some scumware once where the
>infection was based on a trojan that keeps downloading the scumware
>when it detects that it's been removed.
>
>Steve
>
>On 1/2/07, FORC5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Have a customer box with adware.purityscan. It basically is shut down and
blocked and not running but the infected file keeps re appearing and I can
not figure out how. Have checked all the usual suspects in the run and
services and win.ini etc.
>>folder that the AV sw finds is in documents and settings/(user)application
data/dobe~1/nopdb.exe
>>
>>the end of that is not visible under explorer but every time I run a av
scan it shows up and gets quarantined. Symantec says to use the purityscan
unintsller but the AV sw says that is infected and seems ridicules to use a
uninstall routine from the infector. Webroot supposedly removed the
infection it is just this stupid file keeps reappearing according to
symantec corporate. tempted to tell sace to ignore on next boot.
>>
>>other then fdisk, any clues ?
>>FWIW this box came in with a bad HD and it was a pain but I finally got it
to ghost, wish I hadn't :'(
>>fp
>>
>>--
>>Tallyho ! ]:8)
>>Taglines below !
>>--
>>What doesn't destroy me makes me stronger.
>>
>>

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
We will find no ancestor before his time.


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.3/614 - Release Date: 1/2/2007
2:58 PM
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.3/614 - Release Date: 1/2/2007
2:58 PM
 



RE: [H] Replacement for iTunes, MusicMatch, etc.

2007-01-02 Thread Hayes Elkins

Winamp 2.93 and windows explorer.



From: "Anthony Q. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The Hardware List 
To: The Hardware List 
Subject: [H] Replacement for iTunes, MusicMatch, etc.
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 11:55:14 -0500

What do y'all use to play mp3s on your PCs?  I have all of my CD collection 
ripped to Mp3 but I don't have a good player outside of iTunes and 
MusicMatch. MM is buggie and iTunes wants to install quicktime as memory 
resident.  It doesn't seem as if Nero has a decent player that will let you 
browse your collection in any meaningful way.  I guess WMPlayer is an 
option, but it seems clunky too for browsing the collection. Is there 
anything that actually works well and isn't too much of a system hog?


_
Find sales, coupons, and free shipping, all in one place!  MSN Shopping 
Sales & Deals 
http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctid=198,ptnrid=176,ptnrdata=200639