Re: [H] Ram diagnostic?

2009-01-12 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 10:21 PM 08/01/2009, DHSinclair wrote:

Thane (et.al.),
I finished a 24hr cycle using the WinDiag Ram test.  No errors.  For 
now this is a good result.  I have some confidence in the remaining 
dimm I am using ATM.  But, as you say, not really conclusive!

By your metric, I'm not sure there will ever be a conclusive position.


Actually, I'm dealing with a system that appears to have bad 
RAM.  MemTest did catch it, after 84 passes (about three days) so 
perhaps MemTest is worth something to those with a lot of time. :)


T 





Re: [H] Ram diagnostic?

2009-01-12 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 01:20 AM 09/01/2009, Bryan Seitz wrote:

btw if it aint: http://www.memtest.org/

it sux :)


Of course, it doesn't work very well, except on really, really bad 
RAM.  But it's a start.  I'm still looking for something capable of 
quickly and definitively testing RAM.  I have a program that will 
cause errors to come up, but since it tests multiple components, is a 
slow option (but faster than MemTest.)


T 





Re: [H] Ram diagnostic?

2009-01-12 Thread Brian Weeden
Windows is a pretty reliable diagnostic tool for determining when you have
bad RAM.

Unfortunately, it's also a pretty good diagnostic tool for dozens of other
problems and always makes you guess which problem is causing which symptom
:)

---
Brian Weeden
Technical Consultant
Secure World Foundation http://www.secureworldfoundtion.org
+1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
+1 (202) 683-8534 US


On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Bryan Seitz se...@bsd-unix.net wrote:

 Doesn't exist :)

 On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:02:24AM -0400, Thane Sherrington wrote:
  At 01:20 AM 09/01/2009, Bryan Seitz wrote:
  btw if it aint: http://www.memtest.org/
 
  it sux :)
 
  Of course, it doesn't work very well, except on really, really bad RAM.
  But it's a start.  I'm still looking for something capable of quickly and
  definitively testing RAM.  I have a program that will cause errors to
  come up, but since it tests multiple components, is a slow option (but
  faster than MemTest.)
 
  T
 

 --

 Bryan G. Seitz



Re: [H] Ram diagnostic?

2009-01-12 Thread DHSinclair

Thane,
OK.  I did also run the dimm with memtest+ v2.11 for 24+ hours (~47 passes) 
w/o any errors.  I will now wind it up again and just let it run for the 
week.  :)

Thanks,
Duncan

At 08:00 01/12/2009 -0400, you wrote:

At 10:21 PM 08/01/2009, DHSinclair wrote:

Thane (et.al.),
I finished a 24hr cycle using the WinDiag Ram test.  No errors.  For now 
this is a good result.  I have some confidence in the remaining dimm I am 
using ATM.  But, as you say, not really conclusive!

By your metric, I'm not sure there will ever be a conclusive position.


Actually, I'm dealing with a system that appears to have bad RAM.  MemTest 
did catch it, after 84 passes (about three days) so perhaps MemTest is 
worth something to those with a lot of time. :)


T




Re: [H] Ram diagnostic?

2009-01-12 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 10:00 AM 12/01/2009, Bryan Seitz wrote:

Doesn't exist :)


Well, I think the hardware ones might do what I want, but I can't 
convince the powers that be that we should invest ~ $3500 US in a RAM 
tester. :)


T



On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:02:24AM -0400, Thane Sherrington wrote:
 At 01:20 AM 09/01/2009, Bryan Seitz wrote:
 btw if it aint: http://www.memtest.org/

 it sux :)

 Of course, it doesn't work very well, except on really, really bad RAM.
 But it's a start.  I'm still looking for something capable of quickly and
 definitively testing RAM.  I have a program that will cause errors to
 come up, but since it tests multiple components, is a slow option (but
 faster than MemTest.)

 T


--

Bryan G. Seitz

__ NOD32 3758 (20090112) Information __

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com





Re: [H] Ram diagnostic?

2009-01-12 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 10:10 AM 12/01/2009, Brian Weeden wrote:

Windows is a pretty reliable diagnostic tool for determining when you have
bad RAM.

Unfortunately, it's also a pretty good diagnostic tool for dozens of other
problems and always makes you guess which problem is causing which symptom
:)


Yeah, the joke here is that MS should get into writing hardware 
diagnostics since their software can find problems before anything 
else does. :)


T 





Re: [H] Ram diagnostic?

2009-01-12 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 12:07 PM 12/01/2009, Bryan Seitz wrote:
We have a few at work and they work so-so not gonna be much if 
at all better than memtestplus :(


Well that's unfortunate.  I guess I'm stuck running long tests.  Oh well.

T 





Re: [H] Ram diagnostic?

2009-01-12 Thread Christopher Fisk

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Thane Sherrington wrote:


At 12:07 PM 12/01/2009, Bryan Seitz wrote:
We have a few at work and they work so-so not gonna be much if at all 
better than memtestplus :(


Well that's unfortunate.  I guess I'm stuck running long tests.  Oh well.



Even beyond that, $3500 for a memory tester?  It would have to catch 100 
bad sticks of memory to even come close to just paying for itself, let 
alone make a profit.



Christopher Fisk
--
Joe Swanson:  [Joe is surprised to see fugitive Peter sumo wrestling] Oh, 
my God!

Bonnie Swanson:  [off-screen] Did you walk?

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



Re: [H] Ram diagnostic?

2009-01-12 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 01:00 PM 12/01/2009, Christopher Fisk wrote:

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Thane Sherrington wrote:


At 12:07 PM 12/01/2009, Bryan Seitz wrote:
We have a few at work and they work so-so not gonna be much if 
at all better than memtestplus :(


Well that's unfortunate.  I guess I'm stuck running long tests.  Oh well.


Even beyond that, $3500 for a memory tester?  It would have to catch 
100 bad sticks of memory to even come close to just paying for 
itself, let alone make a profit.


Well, if I could get a RAM tester that would test RAM reliably in an 
hour, that'd probably make it worth it to me.


T 





Re: [H] Ram diagnostic?

2009-01-12 Thread Christopher Fisk

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Thane Sherrington wrote:


At 01:00 PM 12/01/2009, Christopher Fisk wrote:

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Thane Sherrington wrote:

 At 12:07 PM 12/01/2009, Bryan Seitz wrote:
  We have a few at work and they work so-so not gonna be much if at 
  all better than memtestplus :(
 
 Well that's unfortunate.  I guess I'm stuck running long tests.  Oh well.


Even beyond that, $3500 for a memory tester?  It would have to catch 100 bad 
sticks of memory to even come close to just paying for itself, let alone 
make a profit.


Well, if I could get a RAM tester that would test RAM reliably in an hour, 
that'd probably make it worth it to me.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Cleo ?


=)


Christopher Fisk
--
Mal: So Shepard says to a Companion, Well, a good goat will do that. 
--Episode #5, Safe

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



Re: [H] Ram diagnostic?

2009-01-08 Thread DHSinclair

Thane (et.al.),
I finished a 24hr cycle using the WinDiag Ram test.  No errors.  For now 
this is a good result.  I have some confidence in the remaining dimm I am 
using ATM.  But, as you say, not really conclusive!

By your metric, I'm not sure there will ever be a conclusive position.
OK.
The best news is that I have finally learned (read: found some burner sw 
that a true lame-brain can work and use!) how to BURN CD's with :)
I used a proggy called CDBurnerXP. It just flat works. No magic switches 
yet. Just CD's that boot and run.  I suspect this may just be some 1st 
Grade stuff; but, it worked here well...and, that is what I wanted 
anyway... :)
[We need not discuss the many hours of grief trying to use some 'bundled' 
sw from Corel/ULead. Dumb fools did not even give me an uninstall 
path.  Clean-up was another trip through both the Explorer and the 
registry.  I do so love a challenge!  XP was most pliant here!  Many Grace 
Points!]

OK. {XP ru...@mycribnow!}

Next, burned a 2d CD with the dot-iso of memtest+2.11.It is now booted, 
and running for the next 24hrs!  I am so happy I almost can't stand this!


In any case, Burning just got really easy 4Me, finally. Not the sharpest 
knife in drawer!Not a problem!... :)

Thank you for your counsel. Appreciated!
Best,
Duncan



At 13:12 01/07/2009 -0400, you wrote:

At 01:02 PM 07/01/2009, DHSinclair wrote:

Thane,
Have you tried this RAM diagnostic tool from MS?

http://oca.microsoft.com/en/windiag.asp

Just wondering?  Finally got its' dot-iso burned to a CD-r/w, and it is 
now running.  I am trying to certify the remaining dimm in my suspect 
new PC.  So far, so good.


I've tried it and use it from time to time.  About the same as MemTest - 
if it finds a failure, then you can be pretty sure it's a bad DIMM.  If it 
doesn't find a problem, it doesn't prove a good DIMM.


T




Re: [H] Ram diagnostic?

2009-01-08 Thread Bryan Seitz
btw if it aint: http://www.memtest.org/

it sux :)

On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:21:22PM -0500, DHSinclair wrote:
 Thane (et.al.),
 I finished a 24hr cycle using the WinDiag Ram test.  No errors.  For now  
 this is a good result.  I have some confidence in the remaining dimm I am 
 using ATM.  But, as you say, not really conclusive!
 By your metric, I'm not sure there will ever be a conclusive position.
 OK.
 The best news is that I have finally learned (read: found some burner 
 sw that a true lame-brain can work and use!) how to BURN CD's 
 with :)
 I used a proggy called CDBurnerXP. It just flat works. No magic 
 switches yet. Just CD's that boot and run.  I suspect this may just be 
 some 1st Grade stuff; but, it worked here well...and, that is what I 
 wanted anyway... :)
 [We need not discuss the many hours of grief trying to use some 'bundled' 
 sw from Corel/ULead. Dumb fools did not even give me an uninstall  
 path.  Clean-up was another trip through both the Explorer and the  
 registry.  I do so love a challenge!  XP was most pliant here!  Many 
 Grace Points!]
 OK. {XP ru...@mycribnow!}

 Next, burned a 2d CD with the dot-iso of memtest+2.11.It is now 
 booted, and running for the next 24hrs!  I am so happy I almost can't 
 stand this!

 In any case, Burning just got really easy 4Me, finally. Not the 
 sharpest knife in drawer!Not a problem!... :)
 Thank you for your counsel. Appreciated!
 Best,
 Duncan



 At 13:12 01/07/2009 -0400, you wrote:
 At 01:02 PM 07/01/2009, DHSinclair wrote:
 Thane,
 Have you tried this RAM diagnostic tool from MS?

 http://oca.microsoft.com/en/windiag.asp

 Just wondering?  Finally got its' dot-iso burned to a CD-r/w, and it 
 is now running.  I am trying to certify the remaining dimm in my 
 suspect new PC.  So far, so good.

 I've tried it and use it from time to time.  About the same as MemTest 
 - if it finds a failure, then you can be pretty sure it's a bad DIMM.  
 If it doesn't find a problem, it doesn't prove a good DIMM.

 T

-- 
 
Bryan G. Seitz


Re: [H] Ram diagnostic?

2009-01-07 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 01:02 PM 07/01/2009, DHSinclair wrote:

Thane,
Have you tried this RAM diagnostic tool from MS?

http://oca.microsoft.com/en/windiag.asp

Just wondering?  Finally got its' dot-iso burned to a CD-r/w, and it 
is now running.  I am trying to certify the remaining dimm in my 
suspect new PC.  So far, so good.


I've tried it and use it from time to time.  About the same as 
MemTest - if it finds a failure, then you can be pretty sure it's a 
bad DIMM.  If it doesn't find a problem, it doesn't prove a good DIMM.


T 





Re: [H] Ram diagnostic?

2009-01-07 Thread DHSinclair

Thane,
Yes, proving a good dimm seems like proving a double-negative!!!  Not 
likely; well until we have a definitive standard's based diagnostic 
module.  But, the way thinks change so quickly, I now understand your 
frustration.. :)

Best,
Duncan

At 13:12 01/07/2009 -0400, you wrote:

At 01:02 PM 07/01/2009, DHSinclair wrote:

Thane,
Have you tried this RAM diagnostic tool from MS?

http://oca.microsoft.com/en/windiag.asp

Just wondering?  Finally got its' dot-iso burned to a CD-r/w, and it is 
now running.  I am trying to certify the remaining dimm in my suspect 
new PC.  So far, so good.


I've tried it and use it from time to time.  About the same as MemTest - 
if it finds a failure, then you can be pretty sure it's a bad DIMM.  If it 
doesn't find a problem, it doesn't prove a good DIMM.


T