Re: [admin] Split the list (was RE: Split the list ?)
Nathan Beyer wrote: I'll add my vote to using the [topic] markers. This works well for other Apache projects like Jakarta Commons. I think they've split of some separate mailing lists, but this was based on the sheer volume for certain projects. +1. We could also give some common-used topic list. e.g., [classlib], [admin], etc. Maybe we already have them in place. ;-) I'd also add using the [topic] markers in subject line of JIRA issues too, but that may not be everyone's liking. -Nathan -Original Message- From: Etienne Gagnon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 8:51 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [admin] Split the list (was RE: Split the list ?) I agree with Geir. It's a good idea to keep classlib and vm people aware of what the others are doing. Sometimes, issues that might seem unrelated by classlib or vm people might actually affect the other group. I much prefer the suggested [topic] approach. Etienne Magnusson, Geir wrote: I've thought about it, but I think that it's a bit premature. Why? Because I think that once we fracture the list traffic, we lose a lot of the intermixing that's important. I think once we have a lot more VM traffic, it makes perfect sense. However, I think that as an intermediate step though we should all work very hard to tag our subject lines with a [topic] :) -- Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D.http://www.info2.uqam.ca/~egagnon/ SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/ SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/ - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Richard Liang China Software Development Lab, IBM
RE: [admin] Split the list (was RE: Split the list ?)
I'll add my vote to using the [topic] markers. This works well for other Apache projects like Jakarta Commons. I think they've split of some separate mailing lists, but this was based on the sheer volume for certain projects. I'd also add using the [topic] markers in subject line of JIRA issues too, but that may not be everyone's liking. -Nathan > -Original Message- > From: Etienne Gagnon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 8:51 AM > To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [admin] Split the list (was RE: Split the list ?) > > I agree with Geir. It's a good idea to keep classlib and vm people > aware of what the others are doing. Sometimes, issues that might seem > unrelated by classlib or vm people might actually affect the other > group. I much prefer the suggested [topic] approach. > > Etienne > > Magnusson, Geir wrote: > > I've thought about it, but I think that it's a bit premature. Why? > > Because I think that once we fracture the list traffic, we lose a lot of > > the intermixing that's important. > > > > I think once we have a lot more VM traffic, it makes perfect sense. > > > > However, I think that as an intermediate step though we should all work > > very hard to tag our subject lines with a [topic] :) > > -- > Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D.http://www.info2.uqam.ca/~egagnon/ > SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/ > SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/ - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [admin] Split the list (was RE: Split the list ?)
I agree with Geir. It's a good idea to keep classlib and vm people aware of what the others are doing. Sometimes, issues that might seem unrelated by classlib or vm people might actually affect the other group. I much prefer the suggested [topic] approach. Etienne Magnusson, Geir wrote: > I've thought about it, but I think that it's a bit premature. Why? > Because I think that once we fracture the list traffic, we lose a lot of > the intermixing that's important. > > I think once we have a lot more VM traffic, it makes perfect sense. > > However, I think that as an intermediate step though we should all work > very hard to tag our subject lines with a [topic] :) -- Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D.http://www.info2.uqam.ca/~egagnon/ SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/ SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[admin] Split the list (was RE: Split the list ?)
I've thought about it, but I think that it's a bit premature. Why? Because I think that once we fracture the list traffic, we lose a lot of the intermixing that's important. I think once we have a lot more VM traffic, it makes perfect sense. However, I think that as an intermediate step though we should all work very hard to tag our subject lines with a [topic] :) geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr SSG/MPD [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 203 665 6437 > -Original Message- > From: Robin Garner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 6:17 AM > To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Split the list ? > > Has anyone else considered the possibility of splitting the > harmony-dev > list ? As a memory manager/VM hacker, I'm interested to keep up with > the high level happenings in the harmony world, but not > necessarily with > the low-level details of bugs in the class library (and so forth). > > What do people thing about creating, say, a harmony-classlib > list, and > leaving the main harmony-dev list for less in-depth discussions ? > > cheers, > Robin > > - > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
