Re: [classlib] Der Plan

2006-04-10 Thread bootjvm

I would rather see a harmony-wiki mailing list
for those interested in that area.  There is already
too much coming in the harmony-commits list.

Dan Lydick

> [Original Message]
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Date: 4/10/06 7:24:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [classlib] Der Plan
>
>
>
> Nathan Beyer wrote:
> > I've found the Wiki to be much more useful since I subscribed to the
change
> > notifications. I get an email for all updates to the Wiki in a nice
> > pseudo-diff format. Perhaps the 'commits' mailing list could be added to
> > this notification mechanism.
>
> I don't understand what you are asking for...
>
> geir
>
... snip ...




-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [classlib] Der Plan

2006-04-10 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr



Nathan Beyer wrote:

I've found the Wiki to be much more useful since I subscribed to the change
notifications. I get an email for all updates to the Wiki in a nice
pseudo-diff format. Perhaps the 'commits' mailing list could be added to
this notification mechanism.


I don't understand what you are asking for...

geir



-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 9:37 AM

To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib] Der Plan

One more thing - keeping a record on a wiki is good, but I'd like to see 
people talking about what they are doing on the mail list, and then 
noting it on the Wiki


Tim Ellison wrote:

Looking at our wiki pages[1], people have written a description of the
_current_ state of play for a number of class library modules.

However, with our new committers eager to get going, a growing number of
contributors, and people lurking and wondering where they can help, may
I suggest that we try and form a plan for what we want to do over the
next, say, six weeks; over and above the usual bug fixing tasks.

Like all good plans we'll probably get it wrong in a number of ways ;-)
but the idea is that we all agree upon a few themes and goals to ensure
we are all working together on subgoals of the project.  At regular
intervals we should come together with a coherent working system, rather
than always having something broken!

I expect that some of the themes/goals will be relevant across the whole
classlib, and others will be module-specific.  I've created a wiki page
[2] with a suggestion of how it may look -- but the content comes from
everyone so it's not complete.

Thoughts?
Tim

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibrary
[2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibraryPlan



-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [classlib] Der Plan

2006-04-04 Thread Paulex Yang

Avtamonov,

Agree with you that we need to mail notification/discussions before 
publishing, In fact, yesterday I've trigged discussion on java.util 
upgrade in another thread. But I keep my opinion about the Wiki using. 
However, I'm fine to comply with majority opinions to move things 
forward, so I don't mind to roll back the Wiki before get agreement in 
mailing list. Hopefully we can get some agreement on the regular 
snapshot/milestone, I consider it is really helpful to Harmony.


Anton Avtamonov wrote:

On 4/4/06, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  

Tim,

I've rolled back the page, and I'm sorry if it made someone
uncomfortable. I thought Wiki should not be something final, or
official, and it just used as record for sth. in progress, say,
discussion, code status, or volunteer, so that everyone can see and
involve if interest, and IMHO Wiki is easier to summary and read
(otherwise the new comers may need to search in mailing list archive, or
just ask questions have been discussed before), especially considering
Wiki modification can be subscribed.



Hi Paulex,
I agree with you: we definitely need some sort of summaries on Wiki.
Harmony mailing has lots of threads which one can hardly track not
being full time there. However information published on Wiki should be
"agreed" with others who affected. Otherwise it can even mislead
someone, right? Therefore we need mailing notifications/discussions
before publishing I think.

Wishes,
--
Anton Avtamonov,
Intel Middleware Products Division

-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  



--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Lab
IBM



-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [classlib] Der Plan

2006-04-04 Thread Tim Ellison
Anton Avtamonov wrote:
> On 4/4/06, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Tim,
>>
>> I've rolled back the page, and I'm sorry if it made someone
>> uncomfortable. I thought Wiki should not be something final, or
>> official, and it just used as record for sth. in progress, say,
>> discussion, code status, or volunteer, so that everyone can see and
>> involve if interest, and IMHO Wiki is easier to summary and read
>> (otherwise the new comers may need to search in mailing list archive, or
>> just ask questions have been discussed before), especially considering
>> Wiki modification can be subscribed.
> 
> Hi Paulex,
> I agree with you: we definitely need some sort of summaries on Wiki.
> Harmony mailing has lots of threads which one can hardly track not
> being full time there. However information published on Wiki should be
> "agreed" with others who affected. Otherwise it can even mislead
> someone, right? Therefore we need mailing notifications/discussions
> before publishing I think.

Yes, that is my mental model for how this works too -- and when the plan
is stable we can move it onto the website to ensure it is fixed.

Regards.
Tim

-- 

Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [classlib] Der Plan

2006-04-04 Thread Anton Avtamonov
On 4/4/06, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim,
>
> I've rolled back the page, and I'm sorry if it made someone
> uncomfortable. I thought Wiki should not be something final, or
> official, and it just used as record for sth. in progress, say,
> discussion, code status, or volunteer, so that everyone can see and
> involve if interest, and IMHO Wiki is easier to summary and read
> (otherwise the new comers may need to search in mailing list archive, or
> just ask questions have been discussed before), especially considering
> Wiki modification can be subscribed.

Hi Paulex,
I agree with you: we definitely need some sort of summaries on Wiki.
Harmony mailing has lots of threads which one can hardly track not
being full time there. However information published on Wiki should be
"agreed" with others who affected. Otherwise it can even mislead
someone, right? Therefore we need mailing notifications/discussions
before publishing I think.

Wishes,
--
Anton Avtamonov,
Intel Middleware Products Division

-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [classlib] Der Plan

2006-04-03 Thread Paulex Yang

Tim,

I've rolled back the page, and I'm sorry if it made someone 
uncomfortable. I thought Wiki should not be something final, or 
official, and it just used as record for sth. in progress, say, 
discussion, code status, or volunteer, so that everyone can see and 
involve if interest, and IMHO Wiki is easier to summary and read 
(otherwise the new comers may need to search in mailing list archive, or 
just ask questions have been discussed before), especially considering 
Wiki modification can be subscribed.


And I highlight java.io package, just because most API difference 
related JIRA/patches(JIRA230-232) for this package have been 
raised/attached for committers to review(except one pending on 
java.util), similar case to java.net, so I just consider it as a summary 
for component status page.


So I guess I missed sth. here, pls. correct me. Thank you.

Tim Ellison wrote:

Tim Ellison wrote:
  

Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:



  

What's so special about April 21st?
  

I've no idea, why did you mention it?



Ah, sorry -- just went back to the wiki and saw the update that Paulex
made.  That's not what I expected...

Paulex: Can you discuss the plan on the dev list first rather than edit
it directly on the wiki?  Once you get some agreement you can add it to
the plan.  Plus I don't think we need to set goals within the goals :-)

Perhaps this should evolve directly on the website rather than the wiki?

Regards,
Tim

  



--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Lab
IBM



-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [classlib] Der Plan

2006-04-03 Thread Tim Ellison
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:

>> What's so special about April 21st?
> 
> I've no idea, why did you mention it?

Ah, sorry -- just went back to the wiki and saw the update that Paulex
made.  That's not what I expected...

Paulex: Can you discuss the plan on the dev list first rather than edit
it directly on the wiki?  Once you get some agreement you can add it to
the plan.  Plus I don't think we need to set goals within the goals :-)

Perhaps this should evolve directly on the website rather than the wiki?

Regards,
Tim

-- 

Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [classlib] Der Plan

2006-04-03 Thread Tim Ellison
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> Looking at our wiki pages[1], people have written a description of the
>> _current_ state of play for a number of class library modules.
>>
>> However, with our new committers eager to get going, a growing number of
>> contributors, and people lurking and wondering where they can help, may
>> I suggest that we try and form a plan for what we want to do over the
>> next, say, six weeks; over and above the usual bug fixing tasks.
>>
>> Like all good plans we'll probably get it wrong in a number of ways ;-)
>> but the idea is that we all agree upon a few themes and goals to ensure
>> we are all working together on subgoals of the project.  At regular
>> intervals we should come together with a coherent working system, rather
>> than always having something broken!
> 
> Like every day.

The build system and regression tests ensure our code works everyday
(every hour actually!).  Rather than inch forward across the whole of
JSE simultaneously it is helpful to identify subgoals along the way.

>> I expect that some of the themes/goals will be relevant across the whole
>> classlib, and others will be module-specific.  I've created a wiki page
>> [2] with a suggestion of how it may look -- but the content comes from
>> everyone so it's not complete.
>>
>> Thoughts?
> 
> What's so special about April 21st?

I've no idea, why did you mention it?

Six weeks from now is May 16th.  I chose the interval rather than the
date, since we need long enough to contain some meaty tasks, but not too
long to loose sight of what we are doing.  It also happens to be the
start of JavaOne -- but that's a coincidence.

Regards,
Tim

>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibrary
>> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibraryPlan

-- 

Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [classlib] Der Plan

2006-04-03 Thread Tim Ellison
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> One more thing - keeping a record on a wiki is good, but I'd like to see
> people talking about what they are doing on the mail list, and then
> noting it on the Wiki

Agreed -- let's use it as a location to record the current view of
consensus building (conducted here); and then when it is stable copy it
onto the website.

Regards,
Tim


> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> Looking at our wiki pages[1], people have written a description of the
>> _current_ state of play for a number of class library modules.
>>
>> However, with our new committers eager to get going, a growing number of
>> contributors, and people lurking and wondering where they can help, may
>> I suggest that we try and form a plan for what we want to do over the
>> next, say, six weeks; over and above the usual bug fixing tasks.
>>
>> Like all good plans we'll probably get it wrong in a number of ways ;-)
>> but the idea is that we all agree upon a few themes and goals to ensure
>> we are all working together on subgoals of the project.  At regular
>> intervals we should come together with a coherent working system, rather
>> than always having something broken!
>>
>> I expect that some of the themes/goals will be relevant across the whole
>> classlib, and others will be module-specific.  I've created a wiki page
>> [2] with a suggestion of how it may look -- but the content comes from
>> everyone so it's not complete.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> Tim
>>
>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibrary
>> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibraryPlan
>>
> 
> -
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

-- 

Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [classlib] Der Plan

2006-04-03 Thread Nathan Beyer
I've found the Wiki to be much more useful since I subscribed to the change
notifications. I get an email for all updates to the Wiki in a nice
pseudo-diff format. Perhaps the 'commits' mailing list could be added to
this notification mechanism.

-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 9:37 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib] Der Plan

One more thing - keeping a record on a wiki is good, but I'd like to see 
people talking about what they are doing on the mail list, and then 
noting it on the Wiki

Tim Ellison wrote:
> Looking at our wiki pages[1], people have written a description of the
> _current_ state of play for a number of class library modules.
> 
> However, with our new committers eager to get going, a growing number of
> contributors, and people lurking and wondering where they can help, may
> I suggest that we try and form a plan for what we want to do over the
> next, say, six weeks; over and above the usual bug fixing tasks.
> 
> Like all good plans we'll probably get it wrong in a number of ways ;-)
> but the idea is that we all agree upon a few themes and goals to ensure
> we are all working together on subgoals of the project.  At regular
> intervals we should come together with a coherent working system, rather
> than always having something broken!
> 
> I expect that some of the themes/goals will be relevant across the whole
> classlib, and others will be module-specific.  I've created a wiki page
> [2] with a suggestion of how it may look -- but the content comes from
> everyone so it's not complete.
> 
> Thoughts?
> Tim
> 
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibrary
> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibraryPlan
> 

-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [classlib] Der Plan

2006-04-03 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
One more thing - keeping a record on a wiki is good, but I'd like to see 
people talking about what they are doing on the mail list, and then 
noting it on the Wiki


Tim Ellison wrote:

Looking at our wiki pages[1], people have written a description of the
_current_ state of play for a number of class library modules.

However, with our new committers eager to get going, a growing number of
contributors, and people lurking and wondering where they can help, may
I suggest that we try and form a plan for what we want to do over the
next, say, six weeks; over and above the usual bug fixing tasks.

Like all good plans we'll probably get it wrong in a number of ways ;-)
but the idea is that we all agree upon a few themes and goals to ensure
we are all working together on subgoals of the project.  At regular
intervals we should come together with a coherent working system, rather
than always having something broken!

I expect that some of the themes/goals will be relevant across the whole
classlib, and others will be module-specific.  I've created a wiki page
[2] with a suggestion of how it may look -- but the content comes from
everyone so it's not complete.

Thoughts?
Tim

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibrary
[2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibraryPlan



-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [classlib] Der Plan

2006-04-03 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr



Tim Ellison wrote:

Looking at our wiki pages[1], people have written a description of the
_current_ state of play for a number of class library modules.

However, with our new committers eager to get going, a growing number of
contributors, and people lurking and wondering where they can help, may
I suggest that we try and form a plan for what we want to do over the
next, say, six weeks; over and above the usual bug fixing tasks.

Like all good plans we'll probably get it wrong in a number of ways ;-)
but the idea is that we all agree upon a few themes and goals to ensure
we are all working together on subgoals of the project.  At regular
intervals we should come together with a coherent working system, rather
than always having something broken!


Like every day.



I expect that some of the themes/goals will be relevant across the whole
classlib, and others will be module-specific.  I've created a wiki page
[2] with a suggestion of how it may look -- but the content comes from
everyone so it's not complete.

Thoughts?


What's so special about April 21st?

geir


Tim

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibrary
[2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibraryPlan



-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [classlib] Der Plan

2006-04-03 Thread Paulex Yang

Nathan Beyer wrote:

I think a more formal project plan (release plan?) would be great. It would
be nice to have a regular snapshot/milestone build to be pushing towards.
The Xerces-J project does something similar with their releases [1].
Although not quite the same, the intent is similar and the communication to
the community is very helpful.
  
Totally agree. A heartbeat milestone plan will be very helpful, and 
maybe I am too aggressive, but IMHO, it is also good time start to 
discuss a little long-term roadmap(as what the Harmony website says;-) 
), especially considering we have got two VMs and a dozen of classlib 
components in SVN. What I mean about roadmap may be like: when can 
Harmony binaries can support Tomcat, or Geronimo, etc, when to meet 30%, 
50%, 80%, 100% JSE 5 API coverage, when to open Java 6 development 
branch (if we shall), etc.

The items that are out on the Wiki now look good to me. I think enabling
Java 5 syntax, establishing a test architecture and a general focus on
getting a repeatable build system are good initial steps.
  
Agree. A stable infrastructure like build system/code layout/test 
framework/etc is very important to development. Hopefully we can get the 
consensus asap.

The next obvious major focus for the class library is attaining Java 5
compliance, especially since Java 6 is quickly coming down the pipe. Perhaps
the later iterations can have a module-specific focus for closing the gaps.
  
Should we have some priority on the classlib components? After all, the 
whole classlib is too big to be created in a couple of weeks(even a 
couple of months or years). That's also why I think a little long term 
roadmap is helpful, which can be the balance to weigh the components.

[1]
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/xerces/java/trunk/Xerces2.8.0-R
EL_PLAN.html

-Nathan

-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 4:01 PM

To: harmony-dev
Subject: [classlib] Der Plan

Looking at our wiki pages[1], people have written a description of the
_current_ state of play for a number of class library modules.

However, with our new committers eager to get going, a growing number of
contributors, and people lurking and wondering where they can help, may
I suggest that we try and form a plan for what we want to do over the
next, say, six weeks; over and above the usual bug fixing tasks.

Like all good plans we'll probably get it wrong in a number of ways ;-)
but the idea is that we all agree upon a few themes and goals to ensure
we are all working together on subgoals of the project.  At regular
intervals we should come together with a coherent working system, rather
than always having something broken!

I expect that some of the themes/goals will be relevant across the whole
classlib, and others will be module-specific.  I've created a wiki page
[2] with a suggestion of how it may look -- but the content comes from
everyone so it's not complete.

Thoughts?
Tim

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibrary
[2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibraryPlan

  



--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Lab
IBM



-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [classlib] Der Plan

2006-04-02 Thread Nathan Beyer
I think a more formal project plan (release plan?) would be great. It would
be nice to have a regular snapshot/milestone build to be pushing towards.
The Xerces-J project does something similar with their releases [1].
Although not quite the same, the intent is similar and the communication to
the community is very helpful.

The items that are out on the Wiki now look good to me. I think enabling
Java 5 syntax, establishing a test architecture and a general focus on
getting a repeatable build system are good initial steps.

The next obvious major focus for the class library is attaining Java 5
compliance, especially since Java 6 is quickly coming down the pipe. Perhaps
the later iterations can have a module-specific focus for closing the gaps.

[1]
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/xerces/java/trunk/Xerces2.8.0-R
EL_PLAN.html

-Nathan

-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 4:01 PM
To: harmony-dev
Subject: [classlib] Der Plan

Looking at our wiki pages[1], people have written a description of the
_current_ state of play for a number of class library modules.

However, with our new committers eager to get going, a growing number of
contributors, and people lurking and wondering where they can help, may
I suggest that we try and form a plan for what we want to do over the
next, say, six weeks; over and above the usual bug fixing tasks.

Like all good plans we'll probably get it wrong in a number of ways ;-)
but the idea is that we all agree upon a few themes and goals to ensure
we are all working together on subgoals of the project.  At regular
intervals we should come together with a coherent working system, rather
than always having something broken!

I expect that some of the themes/goals will be relevant across the whole
classlib, and others will be module-specific.  I've created a wiki page
[2] with a suggestion of how it may look -- but the content comes from
everyone so it's not complete.

Thoughts?
Tim

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibrary
[2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibraryPlan

-- 

Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.


-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]