Re: [HOT] Kindia Area - How to define an area with both habitat and proximity farming landuse ?

2015-02-19 Thread FOFANA BAZO BAGNOUMANA
 I also think that it would be important to define these activities, to
find tags to describe them. I confirm that we often see these proximity
farming activities around houses and it is hard to trace farming
independently of housing.

2015-02-19 18:37 GMT+00:00 Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr:

 In rural areas of Africa, we often see areas with a mix of habitat and
 farming landuse.
 See for example
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/10.40825/-12.15127

 For job OSM Tasking Manager - #892 - Épidémie d'Ebola, Guinée, Préfecture
 de Kindia, Réseau routier et zones résidentielles
 http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/892, creating polygons around the
 houses, we often trace only part of this area, ignoring the proximity
 farming activity.

 I am opening this discussion to see if we could find a way to take into
 account this proximity farming. For example, we could trace a larger
 polygon that include both activity and use two tags two refer to this
 landuse.
 1. landuse=residential
 2. ???=proximity_farming?

 Any comment, propositions?

 Pierre

 ___
 HOT mailing list
 HOT@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot




-- 
Fofana B. Bazo,
Géographe, contributeur OpenStreetMap, Membre fondateur de la Communauté
OSM_BF
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] Canaan Haiti Mapping

2015-02-19 Thread Dale Kunce
Thanks for updating the links Emir and Blake. I'm still not used to the
link structure of the new Task Manager.

The sky was very very blue during our time mapping. In the next few weeks
additional roads and paths will be completed and uploaded for Mapillary. We
plan to revisit, using mapillary, a large portion of Canaan every three
months or so and continue to improve the map.


On Thu Feb 19 2015 at 2:46:37 AM Rod Bera r...@goarem.org wrote:

  On 19/02/15 03:22, Dale Kunce wrote:

 using Mapillary
 http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/bbox/18.62802725546566/18.6841385903599/-72.32025146484375/-72.1966552734375

 apprently this is a blue sky project... ;-)

 The next step is to capture what's on the ground.

 More seriously, this is an excellent initiative we should consistently
 replicate so as to better know what we are mapping (e.g. the hut
 discussion).


 Rod

  ___
 HOT mailing list
 HOT@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


[HOT] leisure=common (Helipad)

2015-02-19 Thread john whelan
Project 892 task 23 is an example.  The following question got sent to me
probably because I've been validating merrily away.

What is the minimum diameter for a Helipad (leisure=common)?

Based on my own experience of visiting a remote Scottish Island the local
football pitch, being smooth, level and firm enough was the designated
helicopter landing place.

I'm not sure that you can tell enough from satellite imagery that a certain
bit of ground is smooth, level and firm enough to take the weight of a
helicopter.  However we seem to have a fair number of circular
leisure=common areas tagged near fairly small villages.

So can we flesh out a bit more of the requirements please and better
identify what we should be looking for and mapping.

Thanks John
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] leisure=common (Helipad)

2015-02-19 Thread Pierre Béland
Hi John,
Our role is to grab information, facilitate the logistic of the humanitarian 
organizations. 

But we are not specialists. Once we have identified the common leisures, the 
GIS specialists from the international organizations can easily extract this 
info and examine further.
 Pierre 

  De : john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com
 À : hot@openstreetmap.org hot@openstreetmap.org 
 Envoyé le : Jeudi 19 février 2015 6h31
 Objet : [HOT] leisure=common (Helipad)
   
Project 892 task 23 is an example.  The following question got sent to me 
probably because I've been validating merrily away.

What is the minimum diameter for a Helipad (leisure=common)?

Based on my own experience of visiting a remote Scottish Island the local 
football pitch, being smooth, level and firm enough was the designated 
helicopter landing place.

I'm not sure that you can tell enough from satellite imagery that a certain bit 
of ground is smooth, level and firm enough to take the weight of a helicopter.  
However we seem to have a fair number of circular leisure=common areas tagged 
near fairly small villages.

So can we flesh out a bit more of the requirements please and better identify 
what we should be looking for and mapping.

Thanks John

___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


  ___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] leisure=common (Helipad)

2015-02-19 Thread Mark Cupitt
Hi John,

It is actually a quite difficult thing to specify because the performance
of helicopters varies dramatically.

To explain ..

Temperature and altitude play a very large role, basically the higer you
are, the thinner the air, the less bite on the rotors.

There is a measure called density altitude, which is where the temperature
comes in, the hotter it is, the thinner the air = same issue as above

The combination of the two is one of the most important things a pilot
looks at

There are very few helicopters that routinely take off vertically,
generally they will rise to a hover then move forward in ground effect
(which is like a cushion of air between the rotors and the ground). This
actually allows heavier helicopters to take off without needing so much
power for a vertical climb out, and which many cannot do for performance
reasons and options if they have an engine failure.

Weight is another very critical factor, but that is an operational matter
we will never know anything about and is often driven by temperature and
altitude issues as well.

So the bottom line is not so much the actual space, it is the approach and
departure paths that are the most critical.

Some choppers can come right in and drop and depart vertically, say into a
foot ball field surrounded by a stadium.

However, I know the pilots would much prefer to have options for approach
and departure that gives them a way in and out without having to climb
vertically, and probably means that they can carry more in terms of
payload, people, etc.

Again, this is all very much dependent on the type of helicopter, some can
do it, others not depending on their performance envelopes.

If we map the buildings around any marked landing areas, then any pilot
will know immediately he is dealing with obstacles and can plan his flight
accordingly. Height of those building is a VERY useful piece of
information, but one we are unlikely to be able to provide from Sat images

The other thing we can do is map power lines, other buildings, and groups
of trees around the LZ's to show possible approach and departure paths,
this would be very useful information for mission planners and pilots

Hope that helps






Regards

Mark Cupitt

If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence

See me on Open StreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt


On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:31 PM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:

 Project 892 task 23 is an example.  The following question got sent to me
 probably because I've been validating merrily away.

 What is the minimum diameter for a Helipad (leisure=common)?

 Based on my own experience of visiting a remote Scottish Island the local
 football pitch, being smooth, level and firm enough was the designated
 helicopter landing place.

 I'm not sure that you can tell enough from satellite imagery that a
 certain bit of ground is smooth, level and firm enough to take the weight
 of a helicopter.  However we seem to have a fair number of circular
 leisure=common areas tagged near fairly small villages.

 So can we flesh out a bit more of the requirements please and better
 identify what we should be looking for and mapping.

 Thanks John

 ___
 HOT mailing list
 HOT@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] leisure=common (Helipad)

2015-02-19 Thread Andrew Buck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

As Pierre has noted we map what is on the ground, not what how we
think it should be mapped.  If there is a common area then we tag it
as such, if there is not then we should not 'invent' one that is close
by simply for the purpose of having one.

It is important to note, the reason I asked to have these mapped is
that they _might_ be used as helipads, not that they must be.  As Mark
noted, the criteria for what is an acceptable landing site is
something only a pilot can decide, and even then only for a specific
helicopter and specific load.  All we can do is tell them reasonable
places to start looking, but it is for them to decide if any of the
areas we marked are acceptable.  I expect that they would try to
review the area in imagery anyway or have someone confirm it on the
ground before dispatching a helicopter there.  Our data is not the
final word, just something so that they have a starting place.

As to the round areas, I have noticed several mappers doing this.  Not
sure if it is a newbie thing or what, but the area should not be
mapped as round unless it is actually round.  Otherwise we should be
mapping the proper shape.

- -AndrewBuck


On 02/19/2015 08:16 AM, john whelan wrote:
 So the advice back to the mapper?
 
 My opinion would be if its readily identifiable as landuse=common
 then map it, but refrain from arbitrarily adding a circle tagged
 landuse=common close to each small village perhaps?
 
 Personally when I'm mapping if something like this stands out then
 it gets mapped but its quite rare that I spot one.
 
 Thanks
 
 Cheerio John
 
 On 19 February 2015 at 08:59, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr
 wrote:
 
 Hi John,
 
 Our role is to grab information, facilitate the logistic of the 
 humanitarian organizations.
 
 But we are not specialists. Once we have identified the common
 leisures, the GIS specialists from the international
 organizations can easily extract this info and examine further.
 
 Pierre
 
 -- *De :* john whelan
 jwhelan0...@gmail.com *À :* hot@openstreetmap.org
 hot@openstreetmap.org *Envoyé le :* Jeudi 19 février 2015 6h31 
 *Objet :* [HOT] leisure=common (Helipad)
 
 Project 892 task 23 is an example.  The following question got
 sent to me probably because I've been validating merrily away.
 
 What is the minimum diameter for a Helipad (leisure=common)?
 
 Based on my own experience of visiting a remote Scottish Island
 the local football pitch, being smooth, level and firm enough was
 the designated helicopter landing place.
 
 I'm not sure that you can tell enough from satellite imagery that
 a certain bit of ground is smooth, level and firm enough to take
 the weight of a helicopter.  However we seem to have a fair
 number of circular leisure=common areas tagged near fairly small
 villages.
 
 So can we flesh out a bit more of the requirements please and
 better identify what we should be looking for and mapping.
 
 Thanks John
 
 ___ HOT mailing list 
 HOT@openstreetmap.org 
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___ HOT mailing list 
 HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=x08o
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] leisure=common (Helipad)

2015-02-19 Thread john whelan
So the advice back to the mapper?

My opinion would be if its readily identifiable as landuse=common then map
it, but refrain from arbitrarily adding a circle tagged landuse=common
close to each small village perhaps?

Personally when I'm mapping if something like this stands out then it gets
mapped but its quite rare that I spot one.

Thanks

Cheerio John

On 19 February 2015 at 08:59, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote:

 Hi John,

 Our role is to grab information, facilitate the logistic of the
 humanitarian organizations.

 But we are not specialists. Once we have identified the common leisures,
 the GIS specialists from the international organizations can easily extract
 this info and examine further.

 Pierre

   --
  *De :* john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com
 *À :* hot@openstreetmap.org hot@openstreetmap.org
 *Envoyé le :* Jeudi 19 février 2015 6h31
 *Objet :* [HOT] leisure=common (Helipad)

 Project 892 task 23 is an example.  The following question got sent to me
 probably because I've been validating merrily away.

 What is the minimum diameter for a Helipad (leisure=common)?

 Based on my own experience of visiting a remote Scottish Island the local
 football pitch, being smooth, level and firm enough was the designated
 helicopter landing place.

 I'm not sure that you can tell enough from satellite imagery that a
 certain bit of ground is smooth, level and firm enough to take the weight
 of a helicopter.  However we seem to have a fair number of circular
 leisure=common areas tagged near fairly small villages.

 So can we flesh out a bit more of the requirements please and better
 identify what we should be looking for and mapping.

 Thanks John

 ___
 HOT mailing list
 HOT@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot



___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] What is a hot activation?

2015-02-19 Thread Mikel Maron
Hi
There was some work a while back to put more definition around the stages of 
Activation, and differentiate from HOT related activities or projects. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HOT_activation. There's lots done in the HOT 
community which doesn't go through the activation process, including the 
original Gaza effort back in 2009, which led to the formalizing of HOT.

At the Board face to face in June, we made a priority to define a HOT 
project, broadly encompassing all kinds of activities taking place in the HOT 
community, even if not an official project or activation.
In any case, I think there's more work to be done to make this clear and useful 
for us. I think the Activators Training and HOT Summit will be a great time to 
work on these.
-Mikel   * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron 

 On Thursday, February 19, 2015 12:18 PM, Blake Girardot 
bgirar...@gmail.com wrote:
   
 

 Hi Fred,

My responses are in line below.

On 2/18/2015 10:25 AM, Frederic Moine wrote:
 What is ahot activation?

 I saw this slide presentation 16 17 on Gaza.
 I have activate this task this summer during my holiday as an OSM
 contributor. I posted the announcement on OSM lists include HOT.
 I was in direct contact with the shelter cluster responsible for the
 Middle east region, which has requested assistance for the pre buildings.

 Next time it could be somebody from an NGO, cluster or other who make a
 taks on the tasking manager.
 At the end it was not a request from UNOSAT.

 I contacted UNOSAT to know what image they were using (the July 6,
 2014). I have conducted a damage assessment with them in 2008 over gaza area
 We have digitized all buildings and the product was very useful.


 As said the head of Unosat on the HOT list it was the first time we used
 the exact same image with the same georeferencing. At the end their
 damage assessment point matched perfectly with our building.

 _The pending questions:
 _

 NB: I have no problem for HOT to communicate on GAZA, but still I have
 some pending questions:
 __

 When we know that is an Hot activiation. For gaza it wasn’t an HOT
 activation, as we didn’t decide it.

 It was just an initiative as an OSM and HOT members done in a short
 period of time.

This is a good question, I do not know the exact process for identifying 
and declaring an official activation. I think we are formalizing and 
finalizing the process for declaring an official activation and 
deciding what that means.


 Who can use this tasking manager : NGO, state, local OSM group, etc

It is my opinion that anyone who is doing mapping to help with disaster 
relief, prepare for disaster or help with economic development can use 
the official HOT Tasking Manager. But that is only _my opinion_ and we 
try to balance being open to groups running Projects in the official HOT 
Tasking manager and not making too many Projects so the official HOT 
activation and programs get lost to new mappers.

The Tasking Manager software is open source and easy to install, anyone 
can download and install it. We have step-by-step instructions for how 
to get it running on linux and we are available to help anyone get it 
running. We can also provide a virtual machine image so you can run it 
on windows or on Amazon AWS instances.

https://github.com/hotosm/osm-tasking-manager2

We have also talked about setting up a public instance of the Tasking 
Manager software that would be a lot more accessable to groups for 
running humanitarian mapping projects of all sorts and then there would 
be no issue with anyone (within reason) running projects on our public 
Tasking Manager server.

I am very much in favor of HOT running a more public Tasking Manager for 
several reasons.


 Of course a real HOT activation can improve the
 communication/mobilization. , but according to the news at that time we
 just digitized as fast as we could.

 And at the same time, it was the second phase of the hot activation for
 Ebola.

 So how many big activation could we handle at the same time?

 Juste few question that I have in mind today : ) sorry to share this
 like that, as I don't have the time to follow all those working groups
 and I apologize for that.


 All the best FredM



 ___
 HOT mailing list
 HOT@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


 
   ___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] What is a hot activation?

2015-02-19 Thread Dale Kunce
Accidentally only replied to Fred. Resending with everyone copied in.

As someone that uses HOT resources a variety of ways for American Red Cross
and Missing Maps I have a few opinions on your questions. First I really
love the work done by you and others in Gaza as it really showed the growth
of HOT and a reflection of lesson's learned from theHaiyan OSM Assessment
http://americanredcross.github.io/OSM-Assessment.

…

*When we know that is an Hot activiation. For gaza it wasn’t an HOT
activation,  as we didn’t decide it.*

Anytime you use the HOT Tasking Manager to organize volunteers and work the
project becomes a HOT project. Even if in the situation of Gaza or any
number of ARC or MSF or Missing Maps projects the requesting NGO supplies
the majority of the volunteers through mapathons or social media calls the
volunteers themselves are still HOT volunteers. In my opinion activations
are different in that they have a HOT lead, typically an activation lead,
shepherding the process as is the case for Ebola or Malawi floods or
similar type disasters. The idea that HOT 'activates' is still one of the
weirdest things about HOT. HOT has truly only 'activated' a few times over
the past five years. The vast majority of the work, from my perspective, is
similar to Gaza or the DRC or Dhaka.
…

*It was just an initiative as an OSM and HOT members done in a short period
of time.*

Whether the effort was short or long doesn't change the fact that the Gaza
effort used the Tasking Manager to marshall volunteers and organize the
work.
…

*Who can use this tasking manager : NGO, state, local OSM group, etc*

The TM has policies in place for establishing new tasks and folks capable
of creating tasks. I think the current system works pretty well of having
seasoned HOT folks guide and mentor newer TM folks like myself until we
gain enough experience to create our own tasks.
…

*Of course a real HOT activation can improve the
communication/mobilization. , but according to the news at that time we
just digitized as fast as we could. *

I've learned a very important lesson during my time at ARC; communication
about what you are doing and how you are doing it is almost as important as
the work. Communicating and bragging like Mikel was doing about the Gaza
mapping opens more doors, forms new partnerships, and validates the work
that so many of us do.

I suggest that when projects are complete that the creator of the project
should share the outcomes and their experience with the project/activation
through blog post on hotosm.org much like Pierre and Andrew do for
activations. This allows the community to be informed and be aware of
others activities.
…

*So how many big activation could we handle at the same time?*
Great question. As HOT has gotten better at its work and NGOs adopt it more
into our business process and workflows the frequency and expectations we
put on HOT are only going to grow. It is really important that HOT grow
with those expectations. This is one of the reasons you saw many
organizations come together to improve the tasking manager. Its also a
reason MSF and the Red Cross founded Missing Maps. It allows us to give
back and strengthen HOT as a true partner.

On Thu Feb 19 2015 at 1:17:45 PM Mikel Maron mikel.ma...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi

 There was some work a while back to put more definition around the stages
 of Activation, and differentiate from HOT related activities or
 projects. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HOT_activation. There's
 lots done in the HOT community which doesn't go through the activation
 process, including the original Gaza effort back in 2009, which led to the
 formalizing of HOT.

 At the Board face to face in June, we made a priority to define a HOT
 project, broadly encompassing all kinds of activities taking place in the
 HOT community, even if not an official project or activation.

 In any case, I think there's more work to be done to make this clear and
 useful for us. I think the Activators Training and HOT Summit will be a
 great time to work on these.

 -Mikel


 * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron


   On Thursday, February 19, 2015 12:18 PM, Blake Girardot 
 bgirar...@gmail.com wrote:



 Hi Fred,

 My responses are in line below.

 On 2/18/2015 10:25 AM, Frederic Moine wrote:
  What is ahot activation?
 
  I saw this slide presentation 16 17 on Gaza.
  I have activate this task this summer during my holiday as an OSM
  contributor. I posted the announcement on OSM lists include HOT.
  I was in direct contact with the shelter cluster responsible for the
  Middle east region, which has requested assistance for the pre buildings.
 
  Next time it could be somebody from an NGO, cluster or other who make a
  taks on the tasking manager.
  At the end it was not a request from UNOSAT.
 
  I contacted UNOSAT to know what image they were using (the July 6,
  2014). I have conducted a damage assessment with them in 2008 over gaza
 area
  We have digitized 

[HOT] Welcome New Members!

2015-02-19 Thread Russell Deffner
Greetings,

The Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team is pleased to announce the election of
twenty-five (25) new voting members to our organization. They are an
amazing group of coders, mappers, teachers, community organizers, project
and activation coordinators, liaisons to mission partners, leaders among
their respective local OpenStreetMap groups (representing at least a dozen
countries) and so much more that we have yet to learn about them. I could
not be more honored to ask you to join HOT in welcoming:

Mark Cupitt, Vivien Deparday, Blake Girardot, Taichi Furuhashi, Yantisa
Akhadi, Dražen Odobašić, Nama Budhathoki, Satoshi IIDA, Daniel Joseph, Nick
Allen, Pete Masters, Nuala Cowan, Vitor George, Vasanthi, Zacharia Muindi,
Orsolya Jenei, Ben Abelshausen, Shoaib Burq, Bitalé Boukpessi, Ismaila
Seye, Fofana Bazo, Delphine Bedu, Jean Marie Mancabou, Robillard Louino,
Felix Delattre to our now eighty-seven (87) strong voting member family.

More information about membership can be found in our Membership Code[1]
and the documentation of this new member election can be found in the 13
February 2015 Meeting Minutes[2].
[1]
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/2/2f/HOT_Membership_Code--proposal_for_annual_meeting_2014.pdf
[2]https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team/Meetings#2015

On behalf of the Membership, congratulations!
Russell Deffner

Chairperson for the Voting Members
russell.deff...@hotosm.org
Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT)
http://hot.openstreetmap.org/
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] What is a hot activation?

2015-02-19 Thread Blake Girardot

Hi Fred,

My responses are in line below.

On 2/18/2015 10:25 AM, Frederic Moine wrote:

What is ahot activation?

I saw this slide presentation 16 17 on Gaza.
I have activate this task this summer during my holiday as an OSM
contributor. I posted the announcement on OSM lists include HOT.
I was in direct contact with the shelter cluster responsible for the
Middle east region, which has requested assistance for the pre buildings.

Next time it could be somebody from an NGO, cluster or other who make a
taks on the tasking manager.
At the end it was not a request from UNOSAT.

I contacted UNOSAT to know what image they were using (the July 6,
2014). I have conducted a damage assessment with them in 2008 over gaza area
We have digitized all buildings and the product was very useful.


As said the head of Unosat on the HOT list it was the first time we used
the exact same image with the same georeferencing. At the end their
damage assessment point matched perfectly with our building.

_The pending questions:
_

NB: I have no problem for HOT to communicate on GAZA, but still I have
some pending questions:
__

When we know that is an Hot activiation. For gaza it wasn’t an HOT
activation, as we didn’t decide it.

It was just an initiative as an OSM and HOT members done in a short
period of time.


This is a good question, I do not know the exact process for identifying 
and declaring an official activation. I think we are formalizing and 
finalizing the process for declaring an official activation and 
deciding what that means.




Who can use this tasking manager : NGO, state, local OSM group, etc


It is my opinion that anyone who is doing mapping to help with disaster 
relief, prepare for disaster or help with economic development can use 
the official HOT Tasking Manager. But that is only _my opinion_ and we 
try to balance being open to groups running Projects in the official HOT 
Tasking manager and not making too many Projects so the official HOT 
activation and programs get lost to new mappers.


The Tasking Manager software is open source and easy to install, anyone 
can download and install it. We have step-by-step instructions for how 
to get it running on linux and we are available to help anyone get it 
running. We can also provide a virtual machine image so you can run it 
on windows or on Amazon AWS instances.


https://github.com/hotosm/osm-tasking-manager2

We have also talked about setting up a public instance of the Tasking 
Manager software that would be a lot more accessable to groups for 
running humanitarian mapping projects of all sorts and then there would 
be no issue with anyone (within reason) running projects on our public 
Tasking Manager server.


I am very much in favor of HOT running a more public Tasking Manager for 
several reasons.




Of course a real HOT activation can improve the
communication/mobilization. , but according to the news at that time we
just digitized as fast as we could.

And at the same time, it was the second phase of the hot activation for
Ebola.

So how many big activation could we handle at the same time?

Juste few question that I have in mind today : ) sorry to share this
like that, as I don't have the time to follow all those working groups
and I apologize for that.


All the best FredM



___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot



___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] leisure=common (Helipad)

2015-02-19 Thread Pierre Béland
Yes, we simply map what we can identify as leisure=common. And has Mark said, 
it will help if we trace the buildings close to the field.  Such data will be 
analyzed later by specialists. Our role is to provide them options that they 
will examine.
 Pierre 

  De : john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com
 À : Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr 
Cc : hot@openstreetmap.org hot@openstreetmap.org 
 Envoyé le : Jeudi 19 février 2015 9h16
 Objet : Re: [HOT] leisure=common (Helipad)
   
So the advice back to the mapper?

My opinion would be if its readily identifiable as landuse=common then map it, 
but refrain from arbitrarily adding a circle tagged landuse=common close to 
each small village perhaps? 

Personally when I'm mapping if something like this stands out then it gets 
mapped but its quite rare that I spot one.

Thanks

Cheerio John



On 19 February 2015 at 08:59, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote:

Hi John,
Our role is to grab information, facilitate the logistic of the humanitarian 
organizations. 

But we are not specialists. Once we have identified the common leisures, the 
GIS specialists from the international organizations can easily extract this 
info and examine further.
 Pierre 

  De : john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com
 À : hot@openstreetmap.org hot@openstreetmap.org 
 Envoyé le : Jeudi 19 février 2015 6h31
 Objet : [HOT] leisure=common (Helipad)
   
Project 892 task 23 is an example.  The following question got sent to me 
probably because I've been validating merrily away.

What is the minimum diameter for a Helipad (leisure=common)?

Based on my own experience of visiting a remote Scottish Island the local 
football pitch, being smooth, level and firm enough was the designated 
helicopter landing place.

I'm not sure that you can tell enough from satellite imagery that a certain bit 
of ground is smooth, level and firm enough to take the weight of a helicopter.  
However we seem to have a fair number of circular leisure=common areas tagged 
near fairly small villages.

So can we flesh out a bit more of the requirements please and better identify 
what we should be looking for and mapping.

Thanks John

___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


   



  ___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot