Re: DFDSS copy

2011-03-02 Thread Richard Marchant
Matan, 

Might be worth trying DATASET(INCLUDE(**) EXCLUDE(SYS1.**))

Richard Marchant
Johannesburg



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Matan Cohen
Sent: 02 March 2011 09:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: DFDSS copy

Hi,

for some reason I needed to empty a DASD disk from its content (All files
are DB2 VSAMS) .
i noticed there is a multivolume DSNs so i added the 'SPHERE' 
'SELECTMULTI' .

so after backing up the disk i run this JCL :
//ADB2CPY JOB ,,CLASS=A,REGION=0M,MSGCLASS=X,
//MSGLEVEL=(1,1)
//BFFDBB29  EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU
//SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//DASDDD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=OLDDISK,DISP=SHR
//OUTDSK  DD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=NEWDISK,DISP=SHR
//SYSINDD *
 COPY DATASET( -
 INCLUDE(  DBP.**, -
 DBT.**,-
   DB29.**,  -
 ))-
 LOGINDDNAME(DASD)-
 OUTDDNAM(OUTDSK) -
 SPHERE-
 SELECTMULTI(ANY)  -
 CAT -
 DELETE
 /*

for some reason half of the Files (not necessarliy multivolume) were not
copied  the job ended with RC 0 it seems DFDSS didn't select them  ,
 from the literature:
For VSAM data sets, the volume list is affected by the use of the
SPHERE keyword as follows:
v Specify SPHERE and you only need to list any part of the base
cluster in the volume list.

should I run this job again but without : 'SPHERE','SELECTMULTI' ?
is there somthing I forgetten ?


-- 
best regards,
matan cohen
MF System Administrator.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DFDSS copy

2011-03-02 Thread Matan Cohen
 but all the files in the DISK are named as I specify in the INCLUDE so i
don't see how this will solve it.

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Richard Marchant 
richard.march...@shoden.co.za wrote:

 Matan,

 Might be worth trying DATASET(INCLUDE(**) EXCLUDE(SYS1.**))

 Richard Marchant
 Johannesburg



 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
 Behalf Of Matan Cohen
 Sent: 02 March 2011 09:51 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Subject: DFDSS copy

 Hi,

 for some reason I needed to empty a DASD disk from its content (All files
 are DB2 VSAMS) .
 i noticed there is a multivolume DSNs so i added the 'SPHERE' 
 'SELECTMULTI' .

 so after backing up the disk i run this JCL :
 //ADB2CPY JOB ,,CLASS=A,REGION=0M,MSGCLASS=X,
 //MSGLEVEL=(1,1)
 //BFFDBB29  EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU
 //SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*
 //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
 //DASDDD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=OLDDISK,DISP=SHR
 //OUTDSK  DD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=NEWDISK,DISP=SHR
 //SYSINDD *
  COPY DATASET( -
  INCLUDE(  DBP.**, -
 DBT.**,-
   DB29.**,  -
  ))-
  LOGINDDNAME(DASD)-
  OUTDDNAM(OUTDSK) -
  SPHERE-
  SELECTMULTI(ANY)  -
  CAT -
  DELETE
  /*

 for some reason half of the Files (not necessarliy multivolume) were not
 copied  the job ended with RC 0 it seems DFDSS didn't select them  ,
  from the literature:
 For VSAM data sets, the volume list is affected by the use of the
 SPHERE keyword as follows:
 v Specify SPHERE and you only need to list any part of the base
 cluster in the volume list.

 should I run this job again but without : 'SPHERE','SELECTMULTI' ?
 is there somthing I forgetten ?

 
 --
 best regards,
 matan cohen
 MF System Administrator.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




-- 
best regards,
matan cohen
MF System Administrator.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DFDSS copy

2011-03-02 Thread Cobe Xu
Why don't try DUMP/RESTORE process...?

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 for some reason I needed to empty a DASD disk from its content (All files
 are DB2 VSAMS) .
 i noticed there is a multivolume DSNs so i added the 'SPHERE' 
 'SELECTMULTI' .

 so after backing up the disk i run this JCL :
 //ADB2CPY JOB ,,CLASS=A,REGION=0M,MSGCLASS=X,
 //MSGLEVEL=(1,1)
 //BFFDBB29  EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU
 //SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*
 //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
 //DASDDD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=OLDDISK,DISP=SHR
 //OUTDSK  DD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=NEWDISK,DISP=SHR
 //SYSINDD *
  COPY DATASET( -
  INCLUDE(  DBP.**, -
 DBT.**,-
   DB29.**,  -
  ))-
  LOGINDDNAME(DASD)-
  OUTDDNAM(OUTDSK) -
  SPHERE-
  SELECTMULTI(ANY)  -
  CAT -
  DELETE
  /*

 for some reason half of the Files (not necessarliy multivolume) were not
 copied  the job ended with RC 0 it seems DFDSS didn't select them  ,
  from the literature:
 For VSAM data sets, the volume list is affected by the use of the
 SPHERE keyword as follows:
 v Specify SPHERE and you only need to list any part of the base
 cluster in the volume list.

 should I run this job again but without : 'SPHERE','SELECTMULTI' ?
 is there somthing I forgetten ?

 
 --
 best regards,
 matan cohen
 MF System Administrator.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




-- 
Cobe Xu

Best Regards
---
z/OS Performance  Capacity Analyst
z/OS System Programmer
Email: cob...@gmail.com
---
*Impart fishing is much better than just donate fishes*

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DFDSS copy

2011-03-02 Thread Matan Cohen
i had a bad expirence in the past when trying to do a similar action with
DUMP\RESTORE.
so I prefered to avoid this option.

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Cobe Xu cob...@gmail.com wrote:

 Why don't try DUMP/RESTORE process...?

 On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Hi,
 
  for some reason I needed to empty a DASD disk from its content (All files
  are DB2 VSAMS) .
  i noticed there is a multivolume DSNs so i added the 'SPHERE' 
  'SELECTMULTI' .
 
  so after backing up the disk i run this JCL :
  //ADB2CPY JOB ,,CLASS=A,REGION=0M,MSGCLASS=X,
  //MSGLEVEL=(1,1)
  //BFFDBB29  EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU
  //SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*
  //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
  //DASDDD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=OLDDISK,DISP=SHR
  //OUTDSK  DD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=NEWDISK,DISP=SHR
  //SYSINDD *
   COPY DATASET( -
   INCLUDE(  DBP.**, -
  DBT.**,-
DB29.**,  -
   ))-
   LOGINDDNAME(DASD)-
   OUTDDNAM(OUTDSK) -
   SPHERE-
   SELECTMULTI(ANY)  -
   CAT -
   DELETE
   /*
 
  for some reason half of the Files (not necessarliy multivolume) were not
  copied  the job ended with RC 0 it seems DFDSS didn't select them  ,
   from the literature:
  For VSAM data sets, the volume list is affected by the use of the
  SPHERE keyword as follows:
  v Specify SPHERE and you only need to list any part of the base
  cluster in the volume list.
 
  should I run this job again but without : 'SPHERE','SELECTMULTI' ?
  is there somthing I forgetten ?
 
  
  --
  best regards,
  matan cohen
  MF System Administrator.
 
  --
  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
  send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
  Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
 



 --
 Cobe Xu

 Best Regards
 ---
 z/OS Performance  Capacity Analyst
 z/OS System Programmer
 Email: cob...@gmail.com
 ---
 *Impart fishing is much better than just donate fishes*

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




-- 
best regards,
matan cohen
MF System Administrator.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TRX Replacement

2011-03-02 Thread Ray Overby

Barry,

Here is Dennis's original post.

Ray

On 2/28/2011 11:56 AM, Dennis Schaffer wrote:

Hi,

We're running TRX from OES Inc., and we're looking for alternatives.

TRX provides allocation and i/o services for the TSO/ISPF environment. TRX 
allows us to
avoid maintaining logon procs with hard-coded dataset names or clists/execs to
dynamically allocate TSO/ISPF datasets, by providing a dialogue/database to 
describe
individual user/application dataset requirements.  TRX also provides 
performance benefits
by dynamically caching frequently-used member and streamlined i/o processing 
for ISPF
datasets.

Is anyone aware of a potential replacement for TRX?  I'm aware of ALTLIB/LIBDEF 
but (1
it's not compatible with our existing infrastructure, (2 it's going to require 
coding exec's
for each of our vendor and internal products and (3 it won't provide the 
performance
benefits of TRX.

Thanks,

Dennis Schaffer

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DFDSS copy

2011-03-02 Thread Lizette Koehler
 Hi,
 
 for some reason I needed to empty a DASD disk from its content (All files
are DB2
 VSAMS) .
 i noticed there is a multivolume DSNs so i added the 'SPHERE' 
'SELECTMULTI' .
 
 so after backing up the disk i run this JCL :
 //ADB2CPY JOB ,,CLASS=A,REGION=0M,MSGCLASS=X,
 //MSGLEVEL=(1,1)
 //BFFDBB29  EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU
 //SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*
 //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
 //DASDDD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=OLDDISK,DISP=SHR
 //OUTDSK  DD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=NEWDISK,DISP=SHR
 //SYSINDD *
  COPY DATASET( -
  INCLUDE(  DBP.**, -
  DBT.**,-
DB29.**,  -
  ))-
  LOGINDDNAME(DASD)-
  OUTDDNAM(OUTDSK) -
  SPHERE-
  SELECTMULTI(ANY)  -
  CAT -
  DELETE
  /*
 
 for some reason half of the Files (not necessarliy multivolume) were not
copied  the
 job ended with RC 0 it seems DFDSS didn't select them  ,  from the
literature:
 For VSAM data sets, the volume list is affected by the use of the SPHERE
keyword as
 follows:
 v Specify SPHERE and you only need to list any part of the base cluster in
the volume
 list.
 
 should I run this job again but without : 'SPHERE','SELECTMULTI' ?
 is there somthing I forgetten ?


You could go to ISMF Option 1 (dataset) and see what it generates to do this
for you.

I use this method to see what DFDSS control cards ISMF would generate to
move datasets from one volume to another.  I always use SPHERE whenever VSAM
is involved.  The use of sphere will not impact copying non-vsam datasets.

Could you let us know what files were not deleted and left on the original
volume?  We would need to  have more specific information to try and help.
Or if you could provide the output from the DFDSS job along with a vtoc
print, that would be very helpful. 

How many datasets are on the original volume.  How many were copied.  How
many were deleted?  How many were left? 

I have always seen DFDSS provide W type messages whenever it could not do
something.  That you are not seeing messages is very strange.  You may
need to turn on a DFDSS trace in the job stream.  

But I would look for ADRW messages in the output.  They may have an RC0
but a warning message is provided.

I had to write a REXX to filter the output of my DFDSS jobs so I could find
the W/E/S messages.  Otherwise they were easily over looked.



Lizette

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Removing DFSMShsm ML1

2011-03-02 Thread Jonathan Miller
Thank you all for your responses.  That is the conclusion I came to, but 
wanted to make sure I was correct.  Hopefully in the future it would be nice 
to remove ML1 completely and set some kind of VTOC backup up manually, 
but for now I will HSM handle that.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DB2 Performance

2011-03-02 Thread Scott Chapman
As others have pointed out, the DB2 governor will let you kill threads 
that have exceeded some arbitrary amount of CPU time.  There's 
obviously pluses and minuses to that.  

Using WLM you can age those long-running queries so they drop to a 
low enough importance that they don't substantially get in the way of 
anybody else.  (Well, depending on how you set it up and how much 
you're willing to penalize those queries.)  

However, even discretionary work that is running because nothing else 
needs the CPU right now can drive up your R4H and may impact either 
your software costs and/or how quickly you reach your caps.  If that 
work was unnecessary because the user gave up on the query after 5 
minutes, then that was a shame and it maybe would have been nice 
for the governor to have killed that thread before it ran for 2 hours.  
But I'm not sure that you can readily do so without impacting other 
threads that maybe really do need to run that long.  

Be aware that the recent IBM PTF that allowed for 60% DDF offload 
really changes the way DDF work runs on the zIIP and GCP.  Previously 
the generosity factor for the DDF threads was set to 55% and SRM 
moved the enclave back and forth between the GCP and the zIIP.  
After that PTF, DB2 marks 3 of every 5 (or maybe 6 of every 10) DDF 
enclaves as being 100% offloaded and the remainder 0%.  (Effectively, 
I'm not exactly sure exactly what they're doing under the covers.)

While this might average out to 60% of the CPU work offloaded over 
time, the less homogeneous your workload is the more likely that any 
particular interval will show a signifcant variation from that value.  So if 
you have large user queries coming in that use significant amounts of 
CPU time, there's a 40% chance that that will now run entirely on the 
GCP instead of running 45% on the GCP resulting in a possibly 
significant increase in the CPU utilization during that interval.

Finally, if you're running knee-capped GCPs (less than full speed), your 
users will likely perceive a noticable variation in run times between 
executions of the same query--because sometimes they run on the 
slower GCP and sometimes they run on the faster zIIP.  The bigger the 
discrepency between the GCP and zIIP speed the bigger this potential 
runtime difference.  

As you might tell, we're not real happy with that PTF.  It works well for 
homogeneous workloads, but where you have a mixture of large and 
small queries, how lucky or unlucky you are with the large queries in 
any given period will determine how happy you are in that period.  My 
guess is that having a mixture of transaction sizes is more normal and 
where you have adhoc user queries, likely some of those are large to 
very large.

But if you just recently started having problems with your DDF, and if 
you believe the queries haven't changed you might look to see if you 
just recently applied that PTF (PM12256 I think?).  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Removing DFSMShsm ML1

2011-03-02 Thread Darth Keller
So if you're not actually dumping volumes with HSM  would not recover 
them with HSM, what good are the VTOC Copies?

ddk

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may
contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended
solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding or
other use of this message or its attachments is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately and delete this message and all
copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DFDSS copy

2011-03-02 Thread Matan Cohen

 Hi Lizette
 You could go to ISMF Option 1 (dataset) and see what it generates to do
 this
 for you.

*Did it now. but I can check it  only tommorow .*
*I review the message several times and there is nothing spacial in it
beside the regular messages there is the:*
*ADR431I (001)-XVSAM(01),*
* ADR711I (001)-NEWDS(01), *
* messages .*
*
ADR115W (R/I)-RI01 (07),  this is the only W\E messgae in the log .
*
*Here is a listcat of one of the file not copied:*
**1IDCAMS  SYSTEM SERVICES   TIME:
15:09:3203/02/11 PAGE  1
0
  LISTCAT ENT(DB29.DSNDBC.TVABSAD3.IXSDBCST.I0001.A001) ALL
0CLUSTER --- DB29.DSNDBC.TVABSAD3.IXSDBCST.I0001.A001
  IN-CAT --- CATALOG.PANDAF.DB29
  HISTORY
DATASET-OWNER---TAKI CREATION2011.060
RELEASE2 EXPIRATION--.000
  SMSDATA
STORAGECLASS --SCALL MANAGEMENTCLASS---(NULL)
DATACLASS (NULL) LBACKUP ---.000.
BWO STATUS-- BWO TIMESTAMP---0 00:00:00.0
BWO---(NULL)
  RLSDATA
LOG (NULL)   RECOVERY REQUIRED --(NO) FRLOG
(NULL)
VSAM QUIESCED ---(NO)RLS IN USE -(NO)
0   LOGSTREAMID-(NULL)
RECOVERY TIMESTAMP LOCAL-X''
RECOVERY TIMESTAMP GMT---X''
  PROTECTION-PSWD-(NULL) RACF(NO)
  ASSOCIATIONS
DATA-DB29.DSNDBD.TVABSAD3.IXSDBCST.I0001.A001
0   DATA --- DB29.DSNDBD.TVABSAD3.IXSDBCST.I0001.A001
  IN-CAT --- CATALOG.PANDAF.DB29
  HISTORY
DATASET-OWNER---TAKI CREATION2011.060
RELEASE2 EXPIRATION--.000
ACCOUNT-INFO---(NULL)
  PROTECTION-PSWD-(NULL) RACF(NO)
  ASSOCIATIONS
CLUSTER--DB29.DSNDBC.TVABSAD3.IXSDBCST.I0001.A001
  ATTRIBUTES
KEYLEN-0 AVGLRECL---0
BUFSPACE8192 CISIZE--4096
RKP0 MAXLRECL---0
EXCPEXIT--(NULL) CI/CA-12
SHROPTNS(3,3)  SPEED UNIQUE   NOERASE LINEAR
   NOWRITECHK NOIMBED   NOREPLICAT
UNORDERED  REUSE NONSPANNED
  STATISTICS
REC-TOTAL--0 SPLITS-CI--0
EXCPS--0
REC-DELETED0 SPLITS-CA--0
EXTENTS2
REC-INSERTED---0 FREESPACE-%CI--0
SYSTEM-TIMESTAMP:
REC-UPDATED0 FREESPACE-%CA--0
 X''
REC-RETRIEVED--0 FREESPC0
  ALLOCATION
SPACE-TYPE-TRACK HI-A-RBA-6684672
SPACE-PRI--1 HI-U-RBA-4415488
SPACE-SEC-15
  VOLUME
VOLSERFDBB29 PHYREC-SIZE-4096
HI-A-RBA-6684672 EXTENT-NUMBER--2
DEVTYPE--X'3010200F' PHYRECS/TRK---12
HI-U-RBA-4415488 EXTENT-TYPEX'40'
1IDCAMS  SYSTEM SERVICES   TIME:
15:09:3203/02/11 PAGE  2
0   VOLFLAGPRIME TRACKS/CA--1
EXTENTS:
LOW-CCHH-X'00B5000E' LOW-RBA0
TRACKS-1
HIGH-CCHHX'00B5000E' HIGH-RBA---49151
LOW-CCHH-X'024A' LOW-RBA49152
TRACKS---135
HIGH-CCHHX'0252000E' HIGH-RBA-6684671
1IDCAMS  SYSTEM SERVICES   TIME:
15:09:3203/02/11 PAGE  3
0 THE NUMBER OF ENTRIES PROCESSED WAS:
AIX ---0
ALIAS -0
CLUSTER ---1
DATA --1
GDG ---0
INDEX -0
NONVSAM ---0
PAGESPACE -0
PATH --0
SPACE -0
USERCATALOG ---0
TAPELIBRARY ---0
TAPEVOLUME 0
TOTAL -2
0 THE NUMBER OF PROTECTED ENTRIES SUPPRESSED WAS 0
0IDC0001I FUNCTION COMPLETED, HIGHEST CONDITION CODE WAS 0
0
0IDC0002I IDCAMS PROCESSING COMPLETE. MAXIMUM CONDITION CODE WAS 0


*approximatle 5700, 2700 left . mean that 3000 was copied sucessfully (and
were deleted from the drive) .*

 .

*
 *





 best regards,
matan cohen
MF System Administrator.

--
For IBM-MAIN 

Re: SYS1 Datasets and it associated product names

2011-03-02 Thread Staller, Allan
snip

In order to try to be more precise about the S, I waded into water
that 
caused me to get rather out of my depth. That'll teach me to try to
provide 
comprehensive answers when I know only half or so of the story!
/snip

In SMP/E parlance, HLQ.Sxxx is  generally a SMP/E target.
HLQ.Axxx is generally a SMP/E DLIB (Distribution Library).

SMP/E itself imposes no such restrictions. This is a convention
established by the IBMers in charge of packaging the products.

HTH,

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Removing DFSMShsm ML1

2011-03-02 Thread Staller, Allan
My previous response:
snip
AFAIK, the last ML1 cannot be deleted unless you turn off volume dump. 
The VTOC copies are used for Volume Recovery and Incremental Backup
application.
/snip

You can still back up datasets without volume dump.

HTH,

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ZCIOWAIT message

2011-03-02 Thread 李朝鹏
 The ZCIOWAIT Resource Name is not given in Tmon, so I am not sure what is kind 
of resource the task waiting. 
The task is shipping record to another CICS region. So I guess first maybe the 
cics setting have some problem, second  the program in another region response 
slowly. Is it possible CICS setting problem?
 

At 2011-03-02 04:05:24,Pearce, Colin E colin.pea...@baml.com wrote:

Hi,

ZCIOWAIT defines the type of Resource the task is waiting on.  There is a 
Resource Name which defines what this type of Resource is.   For example if 
the transaction is in Conversation mode and waiting for a response from the 
User, then the Resource Type will be ZCIOWAIT and Resource Name will be 
DFHZARQ1  which is CICS VTAM Terminal Control Application Request handler.  
Effectively the User has issued an E C SEND WAIT

If the Resource Type is ZCIOWAIT and the Resource Name is DFHZARR1 this is a 
Receive within LU6.2 protocol, a Receive is waiting on more data to be sent.  

If the Resource Type is ZCIOWAIT and the Resource Name is DFHZERH1 this is 
when there is a need to handle the sending and receiving of FMH7s (Function 
Management Headers) and negative responses within LU6.2. This may have 
something to do with a Security failure.

There are other ZCIOWAIT reasons.  The Resource Names are given in Omegamon 
and Tmon.  They can also be found in a CICS Trace as well as a dump.

The CICS/TS Problem Determination Guide has all the Wait reasons for ZCIOWAIT
The CICS/TS Diagnostic Guide lists the Resource Types and Resource Names and 
the modules that get invoked when these conditions occur.  They will give you 
more information about where you are and why your waiting.


Colin Pearce

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
???
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 7:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ZCIOWAIT message

Thomas

Your advice is very useful for me, thanks a lot.


At 2011-02-28 21:04:15,Thomas Dunlap thomas.dun...@att.net wrote:

Eric,

ZCIOWAIT indicates VTAM terminal control wait.  My first guess is that 
you are function shipping to another CICS region using VTAM connections 
between the regions and you are looking at the front-end transaction.
In this case this is a normal situation.  As for optimizing, it is 
really dependent upon the function the back-end region.  Improve the 
task in the back-end region and you will shorten the wait in the front-end.

--

Regards,
Thomas DunlapChief Technology Officert...@themisinc.com
Themis,  Inc.http://www.themisinc.com1 (800) 756-3000


On 2/28/2011 5:52 AM, Eric JL wrote:
 When I run a CICS trans, it is use for DB2 select update, found it 
 spend a lot of time on ZCIOWAIT. Is this a problem? How can I optimize it.

 The trans dump
 DATE TIME   JOBNAME  TRANID TASK# TERMID RESP CPU  PAGING  ILEIO
 02/24 00:00:01 CICSA TR68  85748111.097   0.2186   0 727
 02/24 00:00:02 CICSA TR68  87201 0.0346   0.0074   0  17
 02/24 00:00:29 CICSA TR68  87583 1.1215   0.1548   0 473
 02/24 00:00:51 CICSA TR68  8574850.6486   0.3856   0   1,162


 TR68 #85748

 RES TYPE  RES NAME   WT CNT  WT TIME   % OF RESPONSE
 CHANGEPRIOPRITY   60  0.00860.00
 SWITCHTCB1,454  0.03320  0.29
 WAIT   W/O ID3   0.0039 0.00
 WAIT FOR  REDSPTCH  1,578  0.3363 0.30
 ZCIOWAIT  63 1:50.1226 99.12
 1ST  DISPATCH   1   0.0001 0.00

 -
 - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN 
 INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO 
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of the 
intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, 
confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please 
notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and 
attachments, and be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the taking 
of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or attached to this 
message is prohibited. 
Unless specifically indicated, this message is not an offer to sell or a 
solicitation of any investment products or other financial product or service, 
an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of 
Sender. Subject to applicable law, Sender may 

Re: ZCIOWAIT message

2011-03-02 Thread Thomas Dunlap
From the sound of it you are doing function shipping of File Control 
requests. If this is common then there could be an issue with the number 
of Sessions between the two CICS regions. This can be more of a concern 
if the files are being updated. Could you include the Connection and 
Session definitions from both CICS regions for a look at the attributes?


--
Regards,
Thomas DunlapChief Technology Officert...@themisinc.com
Themis,  Inc.http://www.themisinc.com1 (800) 756-3000


On 3/2/2011 8:27 AM, ?? wrote:

  The ZCIOWAIT Resource Name is not given in Tmon, so I am not sure what is 
kind of resource the task waiting.
The task is shipping record to another CICS region. So I guess first maybe the 
cics setting have some problem, second  the program in another region response 
slowly. Is it possible CICS setting problem?


At 2011-03-02 04:05:24??Pearce, Colin Ecolin.pea...@baml.com  wrote:


Hi,

ZCIOWAIT defines the type of Resource the task is waiting on.  There is a 
Resource Name which defines what this type of Resource is.   For example if the 
transaction is in Conversation mode and waiting for a response from the User, 
then the Resource Type will be ZCIOWAIT and Resource Name will be DFHZARQ1  
which is CICS VTAM Terminal Control Application Request handler.  Effectively 
the User has issued an E C SEND WAIT

If the Resource Type is ZCIOWAIT and the Resource Name is DFHZARR1 this is a 
Receive within LU6.2 protocol, a Receive is waiting on more data to be sent.

If the Resource Type is ZCIOWAIT and the Resource Name is DFHZERH1 this is when 
there is a need to handle the sending and receiving of FMH7s (Function 
Management Headers) and negative responses within LU6.2. This may have 
something to do with a Security failure.

There are other ZCIOWAIT reasons.  The Resource Names are given in Omegamon and 
Tmon.  They can also be found in a CICS Trace as well as a dump.

The CICS/TS Problem Determination Guide has all the Wait reasons for ZCIOWAIT
The CICS/TS Diagnostic Guide lists the Resource Types and Resource Names and 
the modules that get invoked when these conditions occur.  They will give you 
more information about where you are and why your waiting.


Colin Pearce

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
???
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 7:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ZCIOWAIT message

Thomas

Your advice is very useful for me, thanks a lot.


At 2011-02-28 21:04:15??Thomas Dunlapthomas.dun...@att.net  wrote:


Eric,

ZCIOWAIT indicates VTAM terminal control wait.  My first guess is that
you are function shipping to another CICS region using VTAM connections
between the regions and you are looking at the front-end transaction.
In this case this is a normal situation.  As for optimizing, it is
really dependent upon the function the back-end region.  Improve the
task in the back-end region and you will shorten the wait in the front-end.

--

Regards,
Thomas DunlapChief Technology Officert...@themisinc.com
Themis,  Inc.http://www.themisinc.com1 (800) 756-3000


On 2/28/2011 5:52 AM, Eric JL wrote:

When I run a CICS trans, it is use for DB2 select update, found it
spend a lot of time on ZCIOWAIT. Is this a problem? How can I optimize it.

The trans dump
DATE TIME   JOBNAME  TRANID TASK# TERMID RESP CPU  PAGING  ILEIO
02/24 00:00:01 CICSA TR68  85748111.097   0.2186   0 727
02/24 00:00:02 CICSA TR68  87201 0.0346   0.0074   0  17
02/24 00:00:29 CICSA TR68  87583 1.1215   0.1548   0 473
02/24 00:00:51 CICSA TR68  8574850.6486   0.3856   0   1,162


TR68 #85748

RES TYPE  RES NAME   WT CNT  WT TIME   % OF RESPONSE
CHANGEPRIOPRITY   60  0.00860.00
SWITCHTCB1,454  0.03320  0.29
WAIT   W/O ID3   0.0039 0.00
WAIT FOR  REDSPTCH  1,578  0.3363 0.30
ZCIOWAIT  63 1:50.1226 99.12
1ST  DISPATCH   1   0.0001 0.00



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DFDSS copy

2011-03-02 Thread chen lucky
Do these left DataSets being used by DB2 or any other program? Just
reminder

2011/3/2 Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.com

 
  Hi Lizette
  You could go to ISMF Option 1 (dataset) and see what it generates to do
  this
  for you.

 *Did it now. but I can check it  only tommorow .*
 *I review the message several times and there is nothing spacial in it
 beside the regular messages there is the:*
 *ADR431I (001)-XVSAM(01),*
 * ADR711I (001)-NEWDS(01), *
 * messages .*
 *
 ADR115W (R/I)-RI01 (07),  this is the only W\E messgae in the log .
 *
 *Here is a listcat of one of the file not copied:*
 **1IDCAMS  SYSTEM SERVICES   TIME:
 15:09:3203/02/11 PAGE  1
 0
  LISTCAT ENT(DB29.DSNDBC.TVABSAD3.IXSDBCST.I0001.A001) ALL
 0CLUSTER --- DB29.DSNDBC.TVABSAD3.IXSDBCST.I0001.A001
  IN-CAT --- CATALOG.PANDAF.DB29
  HISTORY
DATASET-OWNER---TAKI CREATION2011.060
RELEASE2 EXPIRATION--.000
  SMSDATA
STORAGECLASS --SCALL MANAGEMENTCLASS---(NULL)
DATACLASS (NULL) LBACKUP ---.000.
BWO STATUS-- BWO TIMESTAMP---0 00:00:00.0
BWO---(NULL)
  RLSDATA
LOG (NULL)   RECOVERY REQUIRED --(NO) FRLOG
 (NULL)
VSAM QUIESCED ---(NO)RLS IN USE -(NO)
 0   LOGSTREAMID-(NULL)
RECOVERY TIMESTAMP LOCAL-X''
RECOVERY TIMESTAMP GMT---X''
  PROTECTION-PSWD-(NULL) RACF(NO)
  ASSOCIATIONS
DATA-DB29.DSNDBD.TVABSAD3.IXSDBCST.I0001.A001
 0   DATA --- DB29.DSNDBD.TVABSAD3.IXSDBCST.I0001.A001
  IN-CAT --- CATALOG.PANDAF.DB29
  HISTORY
DATASET-OWNER---TAKI CREATION2011.060
RELEASE2 EXPIRATION--.000
ACCOUNT-INFO---(NULL)
  PROTECTION-PSWD-(NULL) RACF(NO)
  ASSOCIATIONS
CLUSTER--DB29.DSNDBC.TVABSAD3.IXSDBCST.I0001.A001
  ATTRIBUTES
KEYLEN-0 AVGLRECL---0
 BUFSPACE8192 CISIZE--4096
RKP0 MAXLRECL---0
 EXCPEXIT--(NULL) CI/CA-12
SHROPTNS(3,3)  SPEED UNIQUE   NOERASE LINEAR
   NOWRITECHK NOIMBED   NOREPLICAT
UNORDERED  REUSE NONSPANNED
  STATISTICS
REC-TOTAL--0 SPLITS-CI--0
 EXCPS--0
REC-DELETED0 SPLITS-CA--0
 EXTENTS2
REC-INSERTED---0 FREESPACE-%CI--0
 SYSTEM-TIMESTAMP:
REC-UPDATED0 FREESPACE-%CA--0
  X''
REC-RETRIEVED--0 FREESPC0
  ALLOCATION
SPACE-TYPE-TRACK HI-A-RBA-6684672
SPACE-PRI--1 HI-U-RBA-4415488
SPACE-SEC-15
  VOLUME
VOLSERFDBB29 PHYREC-SIZE-4096
 HI-A-RBA-6684672 EXTENT-NUMBER--2
DEVTYPE--X'3010200F' PHYRECS/TRK---12
 HI-U-RBA-4415488 EXTENT-TYPEX'40'
 1IDCAMS  SYSTEM SERVICES   TIME:
 15:09:3203/02/11 PAGE  2
 0   VOLFLAGPRIME TRACKS/CA--1
EXTENTS:
LOW-CCHH-X'00B5000E' LOW-RBA0
 TRACKS-1
HIGH-CCHHX'00B5000E' HIGH-RBA---49151
LOW-CCHH-X'024A' LOW-RBA49152
 TRACKS---135
HIGH-CCHHX'0252000E' HIGH-RBA-6684671
 1IDCAMS  SYSTEM SERVICES   TIME:
 15:09:3203/02/11 PAGE  3
 0 THE NUMBER OF ENTRIES PROCESSED WAS:
AIX ---0
ALIAS -0
CLUSTER ---1
DATA --1
GDG ---0
INDEX -0
NONVSAM ---0
PAGESPACE -0
PATH --0
SPACE -0
USERCATALOG ---0
TAPELIBRARY ---0
TAPEVOLUME 0
TOTAL -2
 0 THE NUMBER OF PROTECTED ENTRIES SUPPRESSED WAS 0
 0IDC0001I FUNCTION COMPLETED, HIGHEST CONDITION CODE WAS 0
 0
 0IDC0002I IDCAMS PROCESSING COMPLETE. MAXIMUM CONDITION CODE WAS 0


 *approximatle 5700, 2700 left . mean that 3000 was copied sucessfully (and
 were 

Re: Removing DFSMShsm ML1

2011-03-02 Thread Jonathan Miller
We are dumping volumes, which is why I can't remove the VTOC copies from 
ML1.  Thanks again for all the replies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DFDSS copy

2011-03-02 Thread Dick de Groot
Perhaps the same volumes were selected in the copy operation ? Are you using
SMS how do the ACS routines look like

2011/3/2 Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 for some reason I needed to empty a DASD disk from its content (All files
 are DB2 VSAMS) .
 i noticed there is a multivolume DSNs so i added the 'SPHERE' 
 'SELECTMULTI' .

 so after backing up the disk i run this JCL :
 //ADB2CPY JOB ,,CLASS=A,REGION=0M,MSGCLASS=X,
 //MSGLEVEL=(1,1)
 //BFFDBB29  EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU
 //SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*
 //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
 //DASDDD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=OLDDISK,DISP=SHR
 //OUTDSK  DD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=NEWDISK,DISP=SHR
 //SYSINDD *
  COPY DATASET( -
  INCLUDE(  DBP.**, -
 DBT.**,-
   DB29.**,  -
  ))-
  LOGINDDNAME(DASD)-
  OUTDDNAM(OUTDSK) -
  SPHERE-
  SELECTMULTI(ANY)  -
  CAT -
  DELETE
  /*

 for some reason half of the Files (not necessarliy multivolume) were not
 copied  the job ended with RC 0 it seems DFDSS didn't select them  ,
  from the literature:
 For VSAM data sets, the volume list is affected by the use of the
 SPHERE keyword as follows:
 v Specify SPHERE and you only need to list any part of the base
 cluster in the volume list.

 should I run this job again but without : 'SPHERE','SELECTMULTI' ?
 is there somthing I forgetten ?

 
 --
 best regards,
 matan cohen
 MF System Administrator.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten/With kind regards

Dick de Groot

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: BLKSIZE=10

2011-03-02 Thread Dick de Groot
What programm is involved  is the dcb changed for sysut2 by the programm ?

2011/3/1 John P. Baker hfdte...@comporium.net

 Lucy,

 If you use the same DD statement with IEFBR14, what blocksize is
 calculated?

 John P. Baker
 Chief Software Architect
 HFD Technologies

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
 Behalf
 Of Lucy Arnold
 Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 12:31 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Subject: BLKSIZE=10

 Hello,

 I have a programmer who insists the following JCL has always calculated a
 valid blksize:

 //SYSUT2   DD  DSN=DAPJPQ.TEST.NEW,
 // DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE),SPACE=(TRK,(22430,0)),
 // DCB=(C.SYUNIV.MODEL,RECFM=U,LRECL=6184),
 // UNIT=SYSDA

 Now (since Friday he says)  this JCL is calculating a blksize of 10 and of
 course the resulting dataset is not usable.  I have CA:Allocate here, and I
 tried the JCL without Allocate and it still gets a blksize of 0 - so
 Allocate is not involved.

 Has anybody else had this issue?

 Thanks!

 Lucy Arnold
 Storage Manager
 U.C. Davis Medical Center
 916-734-5498


 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
 to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the
 archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten/With kind regards

Dick de Groot

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ZCIOWAIT message

2011-03-02 Thread Pearce, Colin E
Hi,

While I don’t have access to Tmon, I am amazed that it doesn’t display the 
Dispatcher Task Summary Table the same as Omegamon does.  This display is 
fundamental to any CICS monitor as this gives a list of all the tasks that are 
currently dispatched. This table displays all the Tasks currently dispatched in 
CICS (both System and User) and both the Resource type and Resource name for 
each task.  These two 8 byte fields are taken from each Tasks DTA 
(Dispatcher Task Area) and these live in the Dispatcher Domain.

I would consider that when you get your problem, issue a CEMT PERFORM DUMP.  
Then load the dump into IPCS and issue a VERBX command of DS=1

This should give you the Dispatcher Task Summary Table and from there you can 
see what your tasks are waiting on.

Colin Pearce

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
???
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 9:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ZCIOWAIT message

 The ZCIOWAIT Resource Name is not given in Tmon, so I am not sure what is kind 
of resource the task waiting. 
The task is shipping record to another CICS region. So I guess first maybe the 
cics setting have some problem, second  the program in another region response 
slowly. Is it possible CICS setting problem?
 

At 2011-03-02 04:05:24,Pearce, Colin E colin.pea...@baml.com wrote:

Hi,

ZCIOWAIT defines the type of Resource the task is waiting on.  There is a 
Resource Name which defines what this type of Resource is.   For example if 
the transaction is in Conversation mode and waiting for a response from the 
User, then the Resource Type will be ZCIOWAIT and Resource Name will be 
DFHZARQ1  which is CICS VTAM Terminal Control Application Request handler.  
Effectively the User has issued an E C SEND WAIT

If the Resource Type is ZCIOWAIT and the Resource Name is DFHZARR1 this is a 
Receive within LU6.2 protocol, a Receive is waiting on more data to be sent.  

If the Resource Type is ZCIOWAIT and the Resource Name is DFHZERH1 this is 
when there is a need to handle the sending and receiving of FMH7s (Function 
Management Headers) and negative responses within LU6.2. This may have 
something to do with a Security failure.

There are other ZCIOWAIT reasons.  The Resource Names are given in Omegamon 
and Tmon.  They can also be found in a CICS Trace as well as a dump.

The CICS/TS Problem Determination Guide has all the Wait reasons for 
ZCIOWAIT The CICS/TS Diagnostic Guide lists the Resource Types and Resource 
Names and the modules that get invoked when these conditions occur.  They will 
give you more information about where you are and why your waiting.


Colin Pearce

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
???
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 7:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ZCIOWAIT message

Thomas

Your advice is very useful for me, thanks a lot.


At 2011-02-28 21:04:15,Thomas Dunlap thomas.dun...@att.net wrote:

Eric,

ZCIOWAIT indicates VTAM terminal control wait.  My first guess is that 
you are function shipping to another CICS region using VTAM 
connections between the regions and you are looking at the front-end 
transaction.
In this case this is a normal situation.  As for optimizing, it is 
really dependent upon the function the back-end region.  Improve the 
task in the back-end region and you will shorten the wait in the front-end.

--

Regards,
Thomas DunlapChief Technology Officert...@themisinc.com
Themis,  Inc.http://www.themisinc.com1 (800) 756-3000


On 2/28/2011 5:52 AM, Eric JL wrote:
 When I run a CICS trans, it is use for DB2 select update, found it 
 spend a lot of time on ZCIOWAIT. Is this a problem? How can I optimize it.

 The trans dump
 DATE TIME   JOBNAME  TRANID TASK# TERMID RESP CPU  PAGING  ILEIO
 02/24 00:00:01 CICSA TR68  85748111.097   0.2186   0 727
 02/24 00:00:02 CICSA TR68  87201 0.0346   0.0074   0  17
 02/24 00:00:29 CICSA TR68  87583 1.1215   0.1548   0 473
 02/24 00:00:51 CICSA TR68  8574850.6486   0.3856   0   1,162


 TR68 #85748

 RES TYPE  RES NAME   WT CNT  WT TIME   % OF RESPONSE
 CHANGEPRIOPRITY   60  0.00860.00
 SWITCHTCB1,454  0.03320  0.29
 WAIT   W/O ID3   0.0039 0.00
 WAIT FOR  REDSPTCH  1,578  0.3363 0.30
 ZCIOWAIT  63 1:50.1226 99.12
 1ST  DISPATCH   1   0.0001 0.00

 
 -
 - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN 
 INFO Search the archives at 
 http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


--
For 

ETR sunsets on 26 Mar 2011?

2011-03-02 Thread Don Williams
Did IBM back off the ETR sunset date?


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ETR sunsets on 26 Mar 2011?

2011-03-02 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
My God! I hope so, SR is awful

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Don Williams
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 10:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: ETR sunsets on 26 Mar 2011?

Did IBM back off the ETR sunset date?


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the
sender by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.
Thank you. Aetna   

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ETR sunsets on 26 Mar 2011?

2011-03-02 Thread Mullen, Patrick
The ServiceLink page now says:

The date for the sunset of ETR will be determined after an evaluation
of the results of the initial phase of this transition.

It also requests feedback on the SR function and gives a link to a form
for that purpose.



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Veilleux, Jon L
Sent: March 2, 2011 10:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ETR sunsets on 26 Mar 2011?


My God! I hope so, SR is awful

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Don Williams
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 10:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: ETR sunsets on 26 Mar 2011?

Did IBM back off the ETR sunset date?


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search
the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender
by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.
Thank you. Aetna   

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search
the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ETR sunsets on 26 Mar 2011?

2011-03-02 Thread Norman Hollander
Yes. That is true. 
--Original Message--
From: Don Williams
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
ReplyTo: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: ETR sunsets on 26 Mar 2011?
Sent: Mar 2, 2011 7:55 AM

Did IBM back off the ETR sunset date?


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


2074 connection to two systems ...

2011-03-02 Thread Moussadak Mostafa
Hi,
Can a 2074 Model 2 (with 2 ESCON ADAPTER) be shared to 2 CPC (a z900 and z800) ?
We plan to use it to control consoles to a separate z900 and z800.
Thx.



**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.gbp.ma
**

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


strange RSH behaviour

2011-03-02 Thread Jim McAlpine
I'm running the RSH client on z/OS 1.11 and getting the following -

EZA5051E  The call to rcmd_af procedure failed:
EDC5112I Resource temporarily unavailable. rsn = 744C7246
EZA4994I  Foreign host aborted the connection.
I found the following apar for z/OS 1.5 -

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PQ92115

which describes a similar but not exactly the same problem.  The
circumvention which is to specify UNRESTRICTLOWRPORTS also works with my
problem.  However, whereas the problem in the above apar was caused by RSH
being linked AC(0), on z/OS 1.11 it is linked AC(1).  I'd rather not
specify  UNRESTRICTLOWRPORTS but that seems to be the only resolution.  I've
also tried to give the user read access to BPX.SUPERUSER but that does not
work either.  I can't find any other apars in this area.

Any ideas.

Jim McAlpine

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ZCIOWAIT message

2011-03-02 Thread Chase, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pearce, Colin E
 
 Hi,
 
 While I don't have access to Tmon, I am amazed that it doesn't display
the Dispatcher Task Summary
 Table the same as Omegamon does.  This display is fundamental to any
CICS monitor as this gives a list
 of all the tasks that are currently dispatched. This table displays
all the Tasks currently dispatched
 in CICS (both System and User) and both the Resource type and Resource
name for each task.  These two
 8 byte fields are taken from each Tasks DTA
 (Dispatcher Task Area) and these live in the Dispatcher Domain.

You mean something like this?

JOBNAME: CICSTESTACTIVE TASKS
RESOURCE(ALL TASKS) 
APPLID : CICSTEST H SYS: SYSA CSM: TMONCICS V=L

COMMAND:  CYCLE:
MMSS 
 

 _EVENT_WLM
_VNXT?  
_SORTKEYS  DISPLAY ORDER: SA  (2ND POS. A=ASCENDING
D=DESCENDING) 
  TRAN  TASK PAGE  TOTAL-CPU  TOT-IO   STG  CUR-WAIT  RES-TYPE RES-NAME
RSTA  
  *   **

_ CSNE 00075 8 .0863   0  4,960 1:20.434  ZC   DFHZNAC1
SUSP  
_ COIE 00079 0   10.2812   0 52,192  12.4911  USERWAIT EMSTATUS
MVS   
_ DTCN 00587 0 .0267 100 68,472  18.3439  ZCIOWAIT DFHZARQ1
SUSP  

This is from TMON/CICS option 1.1, Resource view.

-jc-

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: strange RSH behaviour

2011-03-02 Thread Mark Jacobs
Did you give access to the required port(port 222) for RSH to the user 
or TCPIP itself;


TCPIP
JRPortAccessAuth: User does not have authority to access this port.

Action: Specify a valid port.

Mark Jacobs

On 03/02/11 11:58, Jim McAlpine wrote:

I'm running the RSH client on z/OS 1.11 and getting the following -

EZA5051E  The call to rcmd_af procedure failed:
 EDC5112I Resource temporarily unavailable. rsn = 744C7246
EZA4994I  Foreign host aborted the connection.
I found the following apar for z/OS 1.5 -

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PQ92115

which describes a similar but not exactly the same problem.  The
circumvention which is to specify UNRESTRICTLOWRPORTS also works with my
problem.  However, whereas the problem in the above apar was caused by RSH
being linked AC(0), on z/OS 1.11 it is linked AC(1).  I'd rather not
specify  UNRESTRICTLOWRPORTS but that seems to be the only resolution.  I've
also tried to give the user read access to BPX.SUPERUSER but that does not
work either.  I can't find any other apars in this area.

Any ideas.

Jim McAlpine

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

   



--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL


Surrounding yourself with dwarfs does not make you a giant

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: 2074 connection to two systems ...

2011-03-02 Thread Craig Pace
Short Answer is yes.  You will have to have a separate configuration for 
each Adapter



Thanks,

Craig Pace
z/OS Systems Programmer
Fruit of the Loom, Inc.®

Office: (270) 781-6400 ext. 4397
Cell:   (270) 991-7452
Fax:(270) 438-4430
E-mail:  cp...@fruit.com

One Fruit of the Loom Drive
PO Box 90015
Bowling Green, KY 42102-9015





Moussadak Mostafa mmoussa...@cpm.co.ma 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
03/02/2011 10:52 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu


To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc

Subject
2074 connection to two systems ...






Hi,
Can a 2074 Model 2 (with 2 ESCON ADAPTER) be shared to 2 CPC (a z900 and 
z800) ?
We plan to use it to control consoles to a separate z900 and z800.
Thx.



**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.gbp.ma
**

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: strange RSH behaviour

2011-03-02 Thread Jim McAlpine
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Mark Jacobs mark.jac...@custserv.comwrote:

 Did you give access to the required port(port 222) for RSH to the user or
 TCPIP itself;

 TCPIP
 JRPortAccessAuth: User does not have authority to access this port.

 Action: Specify a valid port.

 Mark Jacobs





Where do you get port 222 from.  The only ref I can find regarding ports and
RSH is for the RSHD server port which is 514 by default.

Jim McAlpine

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: strange RSH behaviour

2011-03-02 Thread Mark Jacobs
I looked at /etc/services on my FreeBSD workstation. I'm making the 
assumption (maybe incorrectly) that network ports are pretty standard 
across all Un*x like environments.


grep rsh /etc/services

rsh-spx 222/tcp#Berkeley rshd with SPX auth
rsh-spx 222/udp#Berkeley rshd with SPX auth
ekshell 2106/tcp   #Kerberos (v4) encrypted rshell
ekshell 2106/udp   #Kerberos (v4) encrypted rshell
watershed-lm6143/tcp   #Watershed License Manager
watershed-lm6143/udp   #Watershed License Manager

Mark Jacobs

On 03/02/11 12:17, Jim McAlpine wrote:

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Mark Jacobsmark.jac...@custserv.comwrote:

   

Did you give access to the required port(port 222) for RSH to the user or
TCPIP itself;

TCPIP
JRPortAccessAuth: User does not have authority to access this port.

Action: Specify a valid port.

Mark Jacobs




 

Where do you get port 222 from.  The only ref I can find regarding ports and
RSH is for the RSHD server port which is 514 by default.

Jim McAlpine

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

   



--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL


Surrounding yourself with dwarfs does not make you a giant

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: strange RSH behaviour

2011-03-02 Thread Jim McAlpine
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mark Jacobs mark.jac...@custserv.comwrote:

 I looked at /etc/services on my FreeBSD workstation. I'm making the
 assumption (maybe incorrectly) that network ports are pretty standard across
 all Un*x like environments.

 grep rsh /etc/services

 rsh-spx 222/tcp#Berkeley rshd with SPX auth
 rsh-spx 222/udp#Berkeley rshd with SPX auth
 ekshell 2106/tcp   #Kerberos (v4) encrypted rshell
 ekshell 2106/udp   #Kerberos (v4) encrypted rshell
 watershed-lm6143/tcp   #Watershed License Manager
 watershed-lm6143/udp   #Watershed License Manager

 Mark Jacobs




Yes, but that is for the daemon.  I'm getting the problem with the client.

Jim McAlpine

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ZCIOWAIT message

2011-03-02 Thread Gene Hudders
Hi:
 
Resource Name = 16 bytes
Resource Type = 8 bytes
 
Regards,
Gene
 
 
In a message dated 3/2/2011 10:27:10 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
colin.pea...@baml.com writes:

Hi,

While I don’t have access to Tmon, I am amazed that it  doesn’t display 
the Dispatcher Task Summary Table the same as Omegamon  does.  This display is 
fundamental to any CICS monitor as this gives a  list of all the tasks that 
are currently dispatched. This table displays all  the Tasks currently 
dispatched in CICS (both System and User) and both the  Resource type and 
Resource name for each task.  These two 8 byte fields  are taken from each 
Tasks 
DTA 
(Dispatcher Task Area) and these live in the  Dispatcher Domain.

I would consider that when you get your problem,  issue a CEMT PERFORM 
DUMP.  Then load the dump into IPCS and issue a  VERBX command of DS=1

This should give you the Dispatcher Task Summary  Table and from there you 
can see what your tasks are waiting on.

Colin  Pearce

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion  List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On 
Behalf Of ???
Sent: Wednesday, March  02, 2011 9:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ZCIOWAIT  message

The ZCIOWAIT Resource Name is not given in Tmon, so I am not  sure what is 
kind of resource the task waiting. 
The task is shipping  record to another CICS region. So I guess first maybe 
the cics setting have  some problem, second  the program in another region 
response slowly. Is  it possible CICS setting problem?


At 2011-03-02 04:05:24,Pearce,  Colin E colin.pea...@baml.com  wrote:

Hi,

ZCIOWAIT defines the type of Resource the  task is waiting on.  There is a 
Resource Name which defines what this  type of Resource is.   For example 
if the transaction is in  Conversation mode and waiting for a response from 
the User, then the Resource  Type will be ZCIOWAIT and Resource Name will be 
DFHZARQ1  which is CICS  VTAM Terminal Control Application Request handler.  
Effectively the User  has issued an E C SEND WAIT

If the Resource Type is ZCIOWAIT  and the Resource Name is DFHZARR1 this 
is a Receive within LU6.2 protocol, a  Receive is waiting on more data to be 
sent.  

If the  Resource Type is ZCIOWAIT and the Resource Name is DFHZERH1 this 
is when there  is a need to handle the sending and receiving of FMH7s 
(Function Management  Headers) and negative responses within LU6.2. This may 
have 
something to do  with a Security failure.

There are other ZCIOWAIT  reasons.  The Resource Names are given in 
Omegamon and Tmon. They can  also be found in a CICS Trace as well as a dump.

The CICS/TS  Problem Determination Guide has all the Wait reasons for 
ZCIOWAIT The  CICS/TS Diagnostic Guide lists the Resource Types and 
Resource Names and the  modules that get invoked when these conditions occur.  
They will give you  more information about where you are and why your  waiting.


Colin Pearce

-Original  Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On 
Behalf Of ???
Sent: Tuesday, March 01,  2011 7:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ZCIOWAIT  message

Thomas

Your advice is very useful for  me, thanks a lot.


At 2011-02-28 21:04:15,Thomas  Dunlap thomas.dun...@att.net  wrote:

Eric,

ZCIOWAIT indicates VTAM  terminal control wait.  My first guess is that 
you are  function shipping to another CICS region using VTAM 
connections  between the regions and you are looking at the front-end  
transaction.
In this case this is a normal situation.  As for  optimizing, it is 
really dependent upon the function the back-end  region.  Improve the 
task in the back-end region and you will  shorten the wait in the  
front-end.

--

Regards,
Thomas  DunlapChief Technology Officer t...@themisinc.com
Themis,  Inc. http://www.themisinc.com1 (800)  756-3000


On 2/28/2011 5:52 AM, Eric JL  wrote:
 When I run a CICS trans, it is use for DB2 select  update, found it 
 spend a lot of time on ZCIOWAIT. Is this a  problem? How can I optimize 
it.

 The trans  dump
 DATE TIME   JOBNAME  TRANID TASK# TERMID  RESP CPU  PAGING  ILEIO
 02/24 00:00:01 CICSA   TR68  85748111.0970.2186   0 
727
  02/24 00:00:02 CICSA TR68  87201   0.0346   0.0074   0   17
 02/24 00:00:29 CICSA  TR68  87583 1.12150.1548   0  
   473
  02/24 00:00:51 CICSA TR68  85748   50.6486   0.3856   0
1,162


 TR68  #85748

 RES TYPE  RES NAME WT CNT  WT TIME   % OF RESPONSE
  CHANGEPRIOPRITY   60   0.00860.00
  SWITCHTCB 1,454  0.03320  0.29
  WAIT   W/O ID 3   0.0039   0.00
 WAIT FOR  REDSPTCH   1,578  0.3363  0.30
 ZCIOWAIT   63  1:50.1226 99.12
 1ST   DISPATCH   1 0.0001  0.00

  
  -
 - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access  

Re: DB2 Performance

2011-03-02 Thread Ed Finnell
 
In a message dated 3/2/2011 12:44:49 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
bernd.oppol...@t-online.de writes:

I'm working in the SQL training business from time to time, and I  saw
horrible SQLs which wasted machine time for hours, issued from  remote
 

Yeah Craig Mullin's DB/2 book says 70% of tuning  opportunities are SQL 
related.
It's a good asset. The CA DB/2 tools(formerly Platinum)  are robust in 
their abilities.
They're pricey but if you've got performance problems  they can justify 
themselves over the long  haul.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: strange RSH behaviour

2011-03-02 Thread Hal Merritt
My first suspicion is almost always a firewall issue, very rarely would I 
suspect z/os.  Some firewalls will step in and actively block by pretending to 
be the remote host. (Literally a man-in-the-middle exploit.)


HTH and good luck. 
 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Jim McAlpine
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 10:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: strange RSH behaviour

I'm running the RSH client on z/OS 1.11 and getting the following -

EZA5051E  The call to rcmd_af procedure failed:
EDC5112I Resource temporarily unavailable. rsn = 744C7246 EZA4994I  Foreign 
host aborted the connection.
I found the following apar for z/OS 1.5 -

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PQ92115

which describes a similar but not exactly the same problem.  The circumvention 
which is to specify UNRESTRICTLOWRPORTS also works with my problem.  However, 
whereas the problem in the above apar was caused by RSH being linked AC(0), on 
z/OS 1.11 it is linked AC(1).  I'd rather not specify  UNRESTRICTLOWRPORTS but 
that seems to be the only resolution.  I've also tried to give the user read 
access to BPX.SUPERUSER but that does not work either.  I can't find any other 
apars in this area.

Any ideas.

Jim McAlpine

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, 
together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information.
Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or 
distribution 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


SMP/E CSI record layout

2011-03-02 Thread Jürgen Kehr
Hello, does anybody out there have an idea where I can get a description 
of the SMP/E record layout within a CSI dataset. Especially I'm looking 
for a unique identifier which describes the TZONE entry records within a 
targetzone. Up to now I thought, that all these records have hex 010300 
on pos 5 just before the 7-char zonename, but now I found that 070300 is 
although possible and I would like to know why and if other setting are 
although possible.


Thanks in advance for any help.

--

Freundliche Gruesse / Kind regards

Dipl. Math. Juergen Kehr

ITSchulung  Beratung, IT Education + Consulting

RengershaeuserStr. 28

34132 Kassel

Germany

Tel. +49-561-9528788

Fax +49-561-9528789

Mobil +49-172-5129389

ICQ 292-318-696 (JKehr)

mailto:kehrjuer...@t-online.de

mailto:kehrjuer...@jkehr.de


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: 2074 connection to two systems ...

2011-03-02 Thread R.S.

W dniu 2011-03-02 17:51, Moussadak Mostafa pisze:

Hi,
Can a 2074 Model 2 (with 2 ESCON ADAPTER) be shared to 2 CPC (a z900 and z800) ?
We plan to use it to control consoles to a separate z900 and z800.


Yes.
You can even share it between three or four CPCs - using ESCON Director.

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland


--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl

Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy 
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, 
nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237

NIP: 526-021-50-88
Wedug stanu na dzie 16.07.2010 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci wpacony) wynosi 168.248.328 zotych. 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ETR sunsets on 26 Mar 2011?

2011-03-02 Thread Don Williams
To me, SR looked more like a student team project/demo than a mature full
function global business application. I'm glad that they seem to be
reevaluating it.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Veilleux, Jon L
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 11:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ETR sunsets on 26 Mar 2011?

My God! I hope so, SR is awful

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Don Williams
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 10:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: ETR sunsets on 26 Mar 2011?

Did IBM back off the ETR sunset date?


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the
archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the
sender by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.
Thank you. Aetna   

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ZCIOWAIT message

2011-03-02 Thread Pearce, Colin E
Yes exactly,  I thought Tmon would display this Resource Type and Resource Name.


Thanks  



Colin Pearce


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Chase, John
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 1:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ZCIOWAIT message

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pearce, Colin E
 
 Hi,
 
 While I don't have access to Tmon, I am amazed that it doesn't display
the Dispatcher Task Summary
 Table the same as Omegamon does.  This display is fundamental to any
CICS monitor as this gives a list
 of all the tasks that are currently dispatched. This table displays
all the Tasks currently dispatched
 in CICS (both System and User) and both the Resource type and Resource
name for each task.  These two
 8 byte fields are taken from each Tasks DTA (Dispatcher Task Area) and 
 these live in the Dispatcher Domain.

You mean something like this?

JOBNAME: CICSTESTACTIVE TASKS
RESOURCE(ALL TASKS) 
APPLID : CICSTEST H SYS: SYSA CSM: TMONCICS V=L

COMMAND:  CYCLE:
MMSS 
 

 _EVENT_WLM
_VNXT?  
_SORTKEYS  DISPLAY ORDER: SA  (2ND POS. A=ASCENDING
D=DESCENDING) 
  TRAN  TASK PAGE  TOTAL-CPU  TOT-IO   STG  CUR-WAIT  RES-TYPE RES-NAME
RSTA  
  *   **

_ CSNE 00075 8 .0863   0  4,960 1:20.434  ZC   DFHZNAC1
SUSP  
_ COIE 00079 0   10.2812   0 52,192  12.4911  USERWAIT EMSTATUS
MVS   
_ DTCN 00587 0 .0267 100 68,472  18.3439  ZCIOWAIT DFHZARQ1
SUSP  

This is from TMON/CICS option 1.1, Resource view.

-jc-

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of the 
intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, 
confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please 
notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and 
attachments, and be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the taking 
of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or attached to this 
message is prohibited. 
Unless specifically indicated, this message is not an offer to sell or a 
solicitation of any investment products or other financial product or service, 
an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of 
Sender. Subject to applicable law, Sender may intercept, monitor, review and 
retain e-communications (EC) traveling through its networks/systems and may 
produce any such EC to regulators, law enforcement, in litigation and as 
required by law. 
The laws of the country of each sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, 
and EC may be archived, supervised and produced in countries other than the 
country in which you are located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be 
secure or free of errors or viruses. 

References to Sender are references to any subsidiary of Bank of America 
Corporation. Securities and Insurance Products: * Are Not FDIC Insured * Are 
Not Bank Guaranteed * May Lose Value * Are Not a Bank Deposit * Are Not a 
Condition to Any Banking Service or Activity * Are Not Insured by Any Federal 
Government Agency. Attachments that are part of this EC may have additional 
important disclosures and disclaimers, which you should read. This message is 
subject to terms available at the following link: 
http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Sender you 
consent to the foregoing.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html