Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-04 Thread R.S.

Timothy Sipples wrote:
[...] 

Also, if you're in the European Union, and maybe one or two other European
countries, you already cannot order a factory new mainframe prior to a z9
BC or EC model.  That's due to some EU materials regulations way beyond
IBM's control.  I believe it's also not possible to import even a used
pre-z9 into the EU.


Isn't it something we call FUD ?
The most happy of RoHS was ...IBM (and other suppliers). IBM is proud to claim, 
only newest model are RoHS complaint. Another method to fight with older 
generations. Primary and IMHO the most effective method is pricing. Usually it 
is simply cheaper to change machine instead of upgrading '-1' generation.
However it is perfectly possible to buy second-hand machine, even 9672 if one 
wants.

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland


--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl

Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy 
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, 
nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237

NIP: 526-021-50-88
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2007 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci 
opacony) wynosi 118.064.140 z. W zwizku z realizacj warunkowego 
podwyszenia kapitau zakadowego, na podstawie uchwa XVI WZ z dnia 21.05.2003 
r., kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA moe ulec podwyszeniu do kwoty 118.760.528 
z. Akcje w podwyszonym kapitale zakadowym bd w caoci opacone.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-04 Thread Birger Heede
You may call it FUD - I assume you are implying that the machine 
withdrawn live up to the EU ROHS Directive?


Considering the lead time to develop, manufacture and ship a new line of 
machines I think it is a reasonable guess that the materials used in 
z990 and z890 were selected before IBM had the consequences of the EU 
Directive nailed down.

But then, who am I to know.

The z990 was withdrawn from marketing in EU by June 30th, 2006 and still 
marketed in the US as far as I know.


Birger Heede
IBM Denmark


R.S. wrote:

Timothy Sipples wrote:
[...]
Also, if you're in the European Union, and maybe one or two other 
European

countries, you already cannot order a factory new mainframe prior to a z9
BC or EC model.  That's due to some EU materials regulations way beyond
IBM's control.  I believe it's also not possible to import even a used
pre-z9 into the EU.


Isn't it something we call FUD ?
The most happy of RoHS was ...IBM (and other suppliers). IBM is proud to 
claim, only newest model are RoHS complaint. Another method to fight 
with older generations. Primary and IMHO the most effective method is 
pricing. Usually it is simply cheaper to change machine instead of 
upgrading '-1' generation.
However it is perfectly possible to buy second-hand machine, even 9672 
if one wants.




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-04 Thread R.S.

Birger Heede wrote:
You may call it FUD - I assume you are implying that the machine 
withdrawn live up to the EU ROHS Directive?
Clarification: I meant second-hand purchase possibilities. 

Regarding to IBM - some companies decided to modify their products to conform RoHS directive. Possibly they have no newer models. IBM has newer models and is not interested in any investment in older ones - that obvious. 
just my observation
Less obvious, IBM is actively fighting with their older machine models. 
/just my observation

Is it bad? I'm not sure.


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland


--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl

Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy 
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, 
nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237

NIP: 526-021-50-88
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2007 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci 
opacony) wynosi 118.064.140 z. W zwizku z realizacj warunkowego 
podwyszenia kapitau zakadowego, na podstawie uchwa XVI WZ z dnia 21.05.2003 
r., kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA moe ulec podwyszeniu do kwoty 118.760.528 
z. Akcje w podwyszonym kapitale zakadowym bd w caoci opacone.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-03 Thread Timothy Sipples
Like Edward, I'm puzzled by some of the reaction to this
withdrawal-in-the-future announcement.

Some people beat up IBM for *not* withdrawing older models soon enough,
because they begin to think IBM isn't busy designing the next model!  This
announcement is simply 6+/12+ months' advance notice, for your planning and
procurement purposes, that new z890 machines won't be orderable from the
factory.  There are new z890s (for now), z890s (and even z800s) on the
secondary market, and new z9 BCs.

It's a familiar pattern now stretching into its 43rd year and counting.
New model is announced which is faster, more flexible, lower cost, and
downright better.  Less and less demand for new examples of the older
model.  Over a year (!) later, IBM gives lots of advance warning that the
older model will no longer be available new from the factory.  Maintenance
services, software support, and secondary market availability for the older
model continue for a long, long, long time.  Loop, repeat.

I don't get it.  Does someone here have the factory cargo shipping contract
but only for the z890? :-)

Thank goodness for redoubled innovation, I say.

- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
Specializing in Software Architectures Related to System z
Based in Tokyo, Serving IBM Japan and IBM Asia-Pacific
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-03 Thread Tom Marchant
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:31:27 +0900, Timothy Sipples wrote:

Some people beat up IBM for *not* withdrawing older models soon enough,

Really?  I can't say that I've ever heard that before.

-- 
Tom Marchant

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-03 Thread Richards.Bob
Tom,

Think bleeding-edge large shops, which is where I have worked a fair
amount of my career. I certainly have heard it before.

Bob Richards 


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 9:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:31:27 +0900, Timothy Sipples wrote:

Some people beat up IBM for *not* withdrawing older models soon enough,

Really?  I can't say that I've ever heard that before.

-- 
Tom Marchant 
  
  
  
LEGAL DISCLAIMER 
The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. 
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in 
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please 
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. 
  
SunTrust and Seeing beyond money are federally registered service marks of 
SunTrust Banks, Inc. 
[ST:XCL]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-03 Thread Eric Bielefeld
If you're in the market for a new or upgraded CPU, for whatever reason, why 
would you not want to get the latest - in this case a z9.  Why would you go 
with the z890?  I don't know whether the CPU costs more or less, but the MSU 
rating of the z9 and subsequent lower software costs make the z9 a better 
deal.  The only thing I could see working to get a z890 is if on the used 
market the price is so much cheaper that even with the lower software cost 
of the z9, the total package would be cheaper.


Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
414-475-7434

- Original Message - 
From: Timothy Sipples [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Like Edward, I'm puzzled by some of the reaction to this
withdrawal-in-the-future announcement.

Some people beat up IBM for *not* withdrawing older models soon enough,
because they begin to think IBM isn't busy designing the next model!  This
announcement is simply 6+/12+ months' advance notice, for your planning and
procurement purposes, that new z890 machines won't be orderable from the
factory.  There are new z890s (for now), z890s (and even z800s) on the
secondary market, and new z9 BCs.Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
Specializing in Software Architectures Related to System z
Based in Tokyo, Serving IBM Japan and IBM Asia-Pacific
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-03 Thread Itschak Mugzach
This makes z900/z890 perfect solutions for a DRP site. A low MSU rate
machine with 1-15 CBUs. Best deal for a five years deal. 

Itschak   

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Eric Bielefeld
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 4:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

If you're in the market for a new or upgraded CPU, for whatever reason, why
would you not want to get the latest - in this case a z9.  Why would you go
with the z890?  I don't know whether the CPU costs more or less, but the MSU
rating of the z9 and subsequent lower software costs make the z9 a better
deal.  The only thing I could see working to get a z890 is if on the used
market the price is so much cheaper that even with the lower software cost
of the z9, the total package would be cheaper.

Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
414-475-7434

- Original Message -
From: Timothy Sipples [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Like Edward, I'm puzzled by some of the reaction to this
withdrawal-in-the-future announcement.

Some people beat up IBM for *not* withdrawing older models soon enough,
because they begin to think IBM isn't busy designing the next model!  This
announcement is simply 6+/12+ months' advance notice, for your planning and
procurement purposes, that new z890 machines won't be orderable from the
factory.  There are new z890s (for now), z890s (and even z800s) on the
secondary market, and new z9 BCs.Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
Specializing in Software Architectures Related to System z
Based in Tokyo, Serving IBM Japan and IBM Asia-Pacific
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/884 - Release Date: 02/07/2007
15:35
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/884 - Release Date: 02/07/2007
15:35

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-03 Thread McKown, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld
 Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 9:06 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!
 
 
 If you're in the market for a new or upgraded CPU, for 
 whatever reason, why 
 would you not want to get the latest - in this case a z9.  
 Why would you go 
 with the z890?  I don't know whether the CPU costs more or 
 less, but the MSU 
 rating of the z9 and subsequent lower software costs make the 
 z9 a better 
 deal.  The only thing I could see working to get a z890 is if 
 on the used 
 market the price is so much cheaper that even with the lower 
 software cost 
 of the z9, the total package would be cheaper.
 
 Eric Bielefeld
 Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer

Or you wanted a cheap z890 to be dedicated to running Linux only with
no z/VM, just LPARs. There are 100% free (as in beer) versions of Linux
which will run on the z890. Then hardware costs are the only costs. Of
course, such software is not supported, but that may be OK to some
people. Just mentioning it, for completeness.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential.  It is for intended addressee(s) only.  If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is
strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal
offense.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing
it.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-03 Thread Blaicher, Chris
I would look at history and see that machines are withdrawn as new
machines come on line.  My guess is that a new one will be announced
before fall.  I would also look to other product lines of IBM to see
what might be coming.  They have done some amazing things with the
P-Series.  It would not surprise me that some of what they learned there
doesn't rub off on the z-Series.  Do a google for IBM P6.

A doubling of the processor speed, greater bandwidth, greater
parallelism.  Gee, that all sounds like goodness to me.  The only
question is price/performance, but history says that will get better
too.  


Christopher Y. Blaicher
BMC Software, Inc.
Austin Development Labs
(512) 340-6154
The comments made are my personal opinions. BMC Software, Inc. makes no
representations or promises regarding the reliability, completeness, or
accuracy of the information provided in this discussion; all readers
agree not to rely on this information or take any action against BMC
Software in response to this information.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Itschak Mugzach

This makes z900/z890 perfect solutions for a DRP site. A low MSU rate
machine with 1-15 CBUs. Best deal for a five years deal. 

Itschak   

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Eric Bielefeld

If you're in the market for a new or upgraded CPU, for whatever reason,
why
would you not want to get the latest - in this case a z9.  Why would you
go
with the z890?  I don't know whether the CPU costs more or less, but the
MSU
rating of the z9 and subsequent lower software costs make the z9 a
better
deal.  The only thing I could see working to get a z890 is if on the
used
market the price is so much cheaper that even with the lower software
cost
of the z9, the total package would be cheaper.

Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
414-475-7434

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-03 Thread McKown, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blaicher, Chris
 Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 10:05 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!
 
 
 I would look at history and see that machines are withdrawn as new
 machines come on line.  My guess is that a new one will be announced
 before fall.  I would also look to other product lines of IBM to see
 what might be coming.  They have done some amazing things with the
 P-Series.  It would not surprise me that some of what they 
 learned there
 doesn't rub off on the z-Series.  Do a google for IBM P6.
 
 A doubling of the processor speed, greater bandwidth, greater
 parallelism.  Gee, that all sounds like goodness to me.  The only
 question is price/performance, but history says that will get better
 too.  
 
 
 Christopher Y. Blaicher

And, just so that we don't think that MSU pricing is a System z only
phenomenon, the AIX (pSeries) people are getting hit with PVU pricing
(Processor Value Units). The new P6 cores cost 1.2 PVUs per core more
than the previous P5 cores. And, again, IBM is saying that the user is
getting more power per PVU because a P6 core is more than 1.2 times a
powerful as a P5 core.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/07/02/ibm_pvu_power6/

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential.  It is for intended addressee(s) only.  If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is
strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal
offense.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing
it.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-03 Thread Walt Farrell

On 7/3/2007 10:10 AM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:

This makes z900/z890 perfect solutions for a DRP site. A low MSU rate
machine with 1-15 CBUs. Best deal for a five years deal. 


Don't you run the risk, when using an older generation of hardware for 
disaster backup, that it might not support some of the newer hardware 
functions your workload may come to depend on?


Walt

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-03 Thread Ed Gould

On Jul 3, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Timothy Sipples wrote:


Like Edward, I'm puzzled by some of the reaction to this
withdrawal-in-the-future announcement.

Some people beat up IBM for *not* withdrawing older models soon  
enough,
because they begin to think IBM isn't busy designing the next  
model!  This
announcement is simply 6+/12+ months' advance notice, for your  
planning and
procurement purposes, that new z890 machines won't be orderable  
from the

factory.  There are new z890s (for now), z890s (and even z800s) on the
secondary market, and new z9 BCs.

It's a familiar pattern now stretching into its 43rd year and  
counting.

New model is announced which is faster, more flexible, lower cost, and
downright better.  Less and less demand for new examples of the older
model.  Over a year (!) later, IBM gives lots of advance warning  
that the
older model will no longer be available new from the factory.   
Maintenance
services, software support, and secondary market availability for  
the older

model continue for a long, long, long time.  Loop, repeat.

I don't get it.  Does someone here have the factory cargo shipping  
contract

but only for the z890? :-)

Thank goodness for redoubled innovation, I say.

Timothy,

Probably INTEL.

Ed

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-03 Thread Timothy Sipples
Timothy Sipples says:
Some people beat up IBM for *not* withdrawing older models soon enough,

Tom Marchant remarks:
Really?  I can't say that I've ever heard that before.

Bob Richards responds:
Think bleeding-edge large shops, which is where I have worked a fair
amount of my career. I certainly have heard it before.

Yes, I was thinking of that same situation as Bob.

Another situation I've run into is government, of any size.  I remember one
county or city that has what's probably a fairly common procurement policy:
If the product is new from the factory, a formal procurement process is
required which stretches to a year or more.  If the product is available
new from the factory, it has to be bought new from the factory.  If the
product is used and no longer available new from the factory, the
procurement process is relatively simple and quick.

More generally, taxes and depreciation can vary dramatically depending on
who and where you are, and new versus used.

Also, if you're in the European Union, and maybe one or two other European
countries, you already cannot order a factory new mainframe prior to a z9
BC or EC model.  That's due to some EU materials regulations way beyond
IBM's control.  I believe it's also not possible to import even a used
pre-z9 into the EU.

I have no inside information here, but one would think the EU regulations
would have some bearing on the rest of the world.  The EU is a very big
market.

- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
Specializing in Software Architectures Related to System z
Based in Tokyo, Serving IBM Japan and IBM Asia-Pacific
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-03 Thread Timothy Sipples
John McKown observes:
Or you wanted a cheap z890 to be dedicated to running Linux only with
no z/VM, just LPARs. There are 100% free (as in beer) versions of Linux
which will run on the z890. Then hardware costs are the only costs. Of
course, such software is not supported, but that may be OK to some
people. Just mentioning it, for completeness.

This might make sense if you already own a z890.  It might also make sense
used.  For a new z890 order from the factory?

The z9 BC still has the exact same software option you describe, but you
get to run it on lower priced IFLs that are substantially faster, more
numerous (up to 7 instead of up to 4, or more generous sparing if you have
fewer), and with more memory expansion available (maximum 64 GB physical
per frame versus 32 GB).  And with lower cost two-port I/O cards, faster
I/O, improved crypto, program directed Linux re-IPL  Well, you get the
idea.

Your mileage may vary.

- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
Specializing in Software Architectures Related to System z
Based in Tokyo, Serving IBM Japan and IBM Asia-Pacific
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-02 Thread Marvin Lukasik
Sorry to veer this discussion away from the frustrated English teachers who
would rather discuss pendatics rather than IBM-Main in this thread but ...

Edward E Jaffe wrote:

I haven't seen this announcement. But, even if they've stopped selling 
zSeries processors. So what? System z is all the rage now!

---

OK, I'll explain so what. It's the politics of the situation that's important.

With all the anti-mainframe forces circling like vultures looking for the
slightest excuse to get rid of it, something like this could be the proverbial
straw that breaks the camel's back. Systems like this are sold as being good
for x years. This is done with a mid-life upgrade in mind to make it so.
If it doesn't last that long, management will ask Why not?.

Yes, I see we have a little time left to order an upgrade  we will probably
do so just to get it in. Getting a used box in for an upgrade is a poor 
alternative to having IBM bump the current one for several reasons:

(1) This means having a seperate, new box in the computer room with it's
additional requirements for cooling, UPS,  floor space.
(2) An upgrade like that requires re-cabling all controllers when doing the
upgrade, not a pretty thought.
(3) Messy software licensing upgrade since the serial # changes - a real pain.
(4) Again, politics  budgeting may require a different path for a different
box as opposed to upgrading the one that's already in.

It seems like IBM keeps shooting itself in the foot when they do stuff like 
this.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-02 Thread Edward Jaffe

Marvin Lukasik wrote:

Sorry to veer this discussion away from the frustrated English teachers who
would rather discuss pendatics rather than IBM-Main in this thread but ...

Edward E Jaffe wrote:

  
I haven't seen this announcement. But, even if they've stopped selling 
zSeries processors. So what? System z is all the rage now!



---

OK, I'll explain so what. It's the politics of the situation that's important.

With all the anti-mainframe forces circling like vultures looking for the
slightest excuse to get rid of it, something like this could be the proverbial
straw that breaks the camel's back. Systems like this are sold as being good
for x years. This is done with a mid-life upgrade in mind to make it so.
If it doesn't last that long, management will ask Why not?.
  


But, the announcement letter to which Tom referred (that I still haven't 
seen -- does anyone have an announcement number? Or is this just rumor 
and speculation?) supposedly indicates that zSeries processors are being 
withdrawn from marketing, which says nothing about end of service. 
System z9 processors scale lower/higher/better and are most cost 
effective than zSeries anyway. So, I don't understand the problem.


It would be like me trying to buy last year's DELL PC and finding out 
only this year's model is available for sale. That says nothing about 
how long last year's model is supposed to last (MTBF and all that). It 
merely says the older ones are no longer for sale as they have been 
replaced by newer, better machines. It happens every day. There's 
nothing political about it ...


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-02 Thread Marian Gasparovic

http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/fcgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=cainfotype=anappname=iSourcesupplier=877letternum=ENUSZG07-0310

On 7/2/07, Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Marvin Lukasik wrote:
 Sorry to veer this discussion away from the frustrated English teachers who
 would rather discuss pendatics rather than IBM-Main in this thread but ...

 Edward E Jaffe wrote:


 I haven't seen this announcement. But, even if they've stopped selling
 zSeries processors. So what? System z is all the rage now!


 ---

 OK, I'll explain so what. It's the politics of the situation that's 
important.

 With all the anti-mainframe forces circling like vultures looking for the
 slightest excuse to get rid of it, something like this could be the proverbial
 straw that breaks the camel's back. Systems like this are sold as being good
 for x years. This is done with a mid-life upgrade in mind to make it so.
 If it doesn't last that long, management will ask Why not?.


But, the announcement letter to which Tom referred (that I still haven't
seen -- does anyone have an announcement number? Or is this just rumor
and speculation?) supposedly indicates that zSeries processors are being
withdrawn from marketing, which says nothing about end of service.
System z9 processors scale lower/higher/better and are most cost
effective than zSeries anyway. So, I don't understand the problem.

It would be like me trying to buy last year's DELL PC and finding out
only this year's model is available for sale. That says nothing about
how long last year's model is supposed to last (MTBF and all that). It
merely says the older ones are no longer for sale as they have been
replaced by newer, better machines. It happens every day. There's
nothing political about it ...

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-02 Thread Chase, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
 
 Marvin Lukasik wrote:
 
  Edward E Jaffe wrote:

  I haven't seen this announcement. But, even if they've stopped 
  selling zSeries processors. So what? System z is all the rage now!
 
  OK, I'll explain so what. It's the politics of the 
  situation that's important.
 
  With all the anti-mainframe forces circling like vultures looking
for 
  the slightest excuse to get rid of it, something like this could be 
  the proverbial straw that breaks the camel's back. Systems like this

  are sold as being good for x years. This is done with a 
  mid-life upgrade in mind to make it so.
  If it doesn't last that long, management will ask Why not?.
 
 But, the announcement letter to which Tom referred (that I 
 still haven't seen -- does anyone have an announcement 
 number? Or is this just rumor and speculation?) supposedly 
 indicates that zSeries processors are being withdrawn from 
 marketing, which says nothing about end of service. 
 System z9 processors scale lower/higher/better and are most 
 cost effective than zSeries anyway. So, I don't understand 
 the problem.

IBM United States Announcement
907-134, dated June 26, 2007
Hardware withdrawal: IBM eServer zSeries 890 (z890) systems,
features and upgrades - Replacement available

-jc-

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-02 Thread Edward Jaffe

Chase, John wrote:

IBM United States Announcement
907-134, dated June 26, 2007
Hardware withdrawal: IBM eServer zSeries 890 (z890) systems,
features and upgrades - Replacement available
  


Thanks for the pointer. I missed it in my (brief) search because I 
misread/misunderstood the post and thought this marketing withdrawal 
applied to all zSeries processors ... not just z890.


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-02 Thread Alan Scott
I have to agree with Marvin on this one. IBM is forcing an upgrade on clients 
that may not have any need for one. This is just one more reason for the mid 
sized shops to dump thier mainframe and move on.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-02 Thread Edward Jaffe

Alan Scott wrote:
I have to agree with Marvin on this one. IBM is forcing an upgrade on clients 
that may not have any need for one. This is just one more reason for the mid 
sized shops to dump thier mainframe and move on.
  


If I understand the announcement correctly, customers are not required 
to change processors unless they wish to upgrade the capacity of their 
existing z890. In this type of situation, I'll be willing to bet that 
IBM is offering some sweet trade-ins on existing z890s. (When we 
traded in our z800 for a z9BC last year, they gave us *full* credit for 
*all* of the z800's MIPS!)


I seriously doubt _any_ mid-size z890 shops will dump their 
mainframe(s) due to this announcement. Customers running on z890 have 
already demonstrated their commitment to the platform by upgrading to 
such a nice machine in the first place. In my experience, customers 
that leave have almost always been stuck on really old 
hardware/software levels for many years before doing so. And, if IBM 
handles things right by making them offers they can't refuse, these 
customers might actually be happier after the upgrade than they were before.


We'll have to see how it plays out...

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-02 Thread McKown, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
 Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 1:34 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!
 
 
 Alan Scott wrote:
  I have to agree with Marvin on this one. IBM is forcing an 
 upgrade on clients 
  that may not have any need for one. This is just one more 
 reason for the mid 
  sized shops to dump thier mainframe and move on.

 
 If I understand the announcement correctly, customers are not 
 required 
 to change processors unless they wish to upgrade the capacity 
 of their 
 existing z890. In this type of situation, I'll be willing to bet that 
 IBM is offering some sweet trade-ins on existing z890s. (When we 
 traded in our z800 for a z9BC last year, they gave us *full* 
 credit for 
 *all* of the z800's MIPS!)
 
 I seriously doubt _any_ mid-size z890 shops will dump their 
 mainframe(s) due to this announcement. Customers running on z890 have 
 already demonstrated their commitment to the platform by upgrading to 
 such a nice machine in the first place. In my experience, customers 
 that leave have almost always been stuck on really old 
 hardware/software levels for many years before doing so. And, if IBM 
 handles things right by making them offers they can't refuse, these 
 customers might actually be happier after the upgrade than 
 they were before.
 
 We'll have to see how it plays out...
 
 -- 
 Edward E Jaffe

We saved a TON of hard cash by upgrading our z890-250 to a more powerful
z9BC-T02. Lower hardware costs, lower software costs, more processor
MIPS.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential.  It is for intended addressee(s) only.  If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is
strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal
offense.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing
it.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-07-02 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:51:46 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:

Thanks for the pointer. I missed it in my (brief) search because I
misread/misunderstood the post and thought this marketing withdrawal
applied to all zSeries processors ... not just z890.


I think the z890 is the last of the zSeries though. Aren't the z800/900 and 
z890/990 all withdrawn from marketing now  The only boxes left are z9 
BC/EC, correct ???

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-06-29 Thread Marvin Lukasik
Is this a fact? We just installed ours 18 months ago!!
I searched IBM.com to no avail concerning this.
Can someone point me to a URL or announcement letter?
TIA

-
Tom Conley wrote:

IBM would help tremendously if it did not obsolete its mainframes every 5 
years.  In my client's case, they bought their 9672 in 1997, and it was 
effectively dead-ended in 2001 when they installed OS/390 V2R10.  IBM just 
withdrew the z890, and we're due for the next levelset to take out the z800 
and z900 series.  Companies who used to get 10 years out of a mainframe 
can 
do so no longer because IBM won't permit it.

Regards,
Tom Conley

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-06-29 Thread Rich Smrcina
This just means it was withdrawn from marketing, it is still a supported 
hardware platform.


Marvin Lukasik wrote:

Is this a fact? We just installed ours 18 months ago!!
I searched IBM.com to no avail concerning this.
Can someone point me to a URL or announcement letter?
TIA




--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: 414-491-6001
Ans Service:  360-715-2467
rich.smrcina at vmassist.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina

Catch the WAVV!  http://www.wavv.org
WAVV 2008 - Chattanooga - April 18-22, 2008

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-06-29 Thread Marian Gasparovic

Marvin,
it is withdrawal of upgrades, both real and microcode.
Here is the letter

http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/fcgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=cainfotype=anappname=iSourcesupplier=877letternum=ENUSZG07-0310

On 6/29/07, Marvin Lukasik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Is this a fact? We just installed ours 18 months ago!!
I searched IBM.com to no avail concerning this.
Can someone point me to a URL or announcement letter?
TIA

-
Tom Conley wrote:

IBM would help tremendously if it did not obsolete its mainframes every 5
years.  In my client's case, they bought their 9672 in 1997, and it was
effectively dead-ended in 2001 when they installed OS/390 V2R10.  IBM just
withdrew the z890, and we're due for the next levelset to take out the z800
and z900 series.  Companies who used to get 10 years out of a mainframe
can
do so no longer because IBM won't permit it.

Regards,
Tom Conley

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-06-29 Thread Edward Jaffe

Marvin Lukasik wrote:

Is this a fact? We just installed ours 18 months ago!!
I searched IBM.com to no avail concerning this.
Can someone point me to a URL or announcement letter?
  


I haven't seen this announcement. But, even if they've stopped selling 
zSeries processors. So what? System z is all the rage now!


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-06-29 Thread Walt Farrell

On 6/29/2007 11:08 AM, Edward Jaffe wrote:

Marvin Lukasik wrote:

Is this a fact? We just installed ours 18 months ago!!
I searched IBM.com to no avail concerning this.
Can someone point me to a URL or announcement letter?
  


I haven't seen this announcement. But, even if they've stopped selling 
zSeries processors. So what? System z is all the rage now!




Hopefully not too pedantic, but I feel I should comment that the System 
z term encompasses both the IBM System z9 family and the IBM zSeries 
family of processors.


So you might want to say System z9 processors are all the rage now.

That also uses the term properly, since (as a trademarked term) it is an 
adjective, not a noun.  (But that may be getting too pedantic :-)


Walt

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-06-29 Thread Jon Brock
After a few years' experience, I have come to wonder whether it's even
possible to be too pedantic for this list.

Jon



snip
That also uses the term properly, since (as a trademarked term) it is an

adjective, not a noun.  (But that may be getting too pedantic :-)
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM withdraws Z890 ?!?!?!

2007-06-29 Thread Shane
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 14:43 -0400, Jon Brock wrote:

 After a few years' experience, I have come to wonder whether it's even
 possible to be too pedantic for this list.

 snip
 That also uses the term properly, since (as a trademarked term) it is an
 adjective, not a noun.  (But that may be getting too pedantic :-)
 /snip

Yep generally agree, but you'd have to say that Walt is sailing pretty
darn close with that ...

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html