Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

2008-06-25 Thread Miller, Pat
To clear this up for the list archive, we opened an ETR with IBM.  Their take 
was that a bad copy of the original UO00396 had likely been applied.  They had 
me reorder that service, APPLY REDO, and add the following:

UO00446 
UO00458 
UO00497 
UO00573

Looks to have corrected the problem.  Thanks to all for the assistance and 
advice.



 -Original Message-
From:   IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Behalf Of 
Miller, Pat
Sent:   Thursday, June 05, 2008 3:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

UO00335.  Not in the PTS.

 -Original Message-
From:   IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Behalf Of 
Mark Zelden
Sent:   Thursday, June 05, 2008 2:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:57:52 -0500, Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Like I say, I was skeptical.  But I see no service in the CSI that hits it
that has been applied since the serverpac install.


What is the RMID of GIMLEVEL?   Is that PTF still in your SMPPTS?

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

2008-06-05 Thread Miller, Pat
You're going to love this.  Got this error?

GIM69208S ** RECEIVE PROCESSING HAS FAILED BECAUSE THE LEVEL OF PROGRAM
GIMJVCLT (34.09) IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE LEVEL OF THE SMP/E CALLING
PROGRAM GIMSMP (34.13).

(GIMVCLT is in the following path: /usr/lpp/smp/classes/com/ibm/smp/)


In the same path, there is a file named GIMJVLVL.properties with the following 
description: 

GIMJVLVL.properties contains the level indicator   
for the Java code contained in package com.ibm.smp.
This file must be updated each time the
SMP/E GIMLEVEL module is updated.  


And the following parameters:

GIMVER=3
GIMREL=4
GIMMOD=0
GIMPTF=09   


Change GIMPTF=09 to GIMPTF=13.  Problem goes away.

M-I-C, K-E-Y, Unix System Services 

Sorry, couldn't resist.



 -Original Message-
From:   IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Behalf Of 
Miller, Pat
Sent:   Monday, June 02, 2008 4:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: SMP/E Error

No JOBLIB, no STEPLIB.  Appears that the module in the HFS is back leveled for 
whatever reason.  I'm fairly certain we went to the 34.13 level with the z/OS 
ServerPac (or possibly with the toleration/compatibility maintenance), which 
means a couple years ago.  

The job has a DD statement (SMPCPATH) that points to the path.  I suspect the 
problem is that the upgraded module lies on a different path, owing to some 
maintenance bungle.  Now, I just have to find it, assuming it still exists.


 -Original Message-
From:   IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Behalf Of 
Mark Zelden
Sent:   Monday, June 02, 2008 3:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: SMP/E Error

On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:39:04 -0500, Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Anybody seen this before?  We're simply trying to do a RECEIVE FROMNETWORK.
 We've done it successfully numerous times in the last year:

GIM69208S ** RECEIVE PROCESSING HAS FAILED BECAUSE THE LEVEL OF PROGRAM
GIMJVCLT
 (34.09) IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE LEVEL OF THE SMP/E CALLING
 PROGRAM GIMSMP (34.13).

GIMVCLT is in the following path: /usr/lpp/smp/classes/com/ibm/smp/


Are you STEPLIBing to a higher level of SMP/E then the running system?  
Or did you not clone your UNIX root file the last time you applied 
maintenance along with your sysres?  

If you know where the proper level is, you can mount it at /service (or whatever
your service directory name is) and specify the path name in the SMPCPATH DD
or CLIENT parms:

//CLNTINFO DD *  
  CLIENT
  classpath=/service/usr/lpp/smp/classes/ 
  /CLIENT  
/*

   
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

2008-06-05 Thread Mark Zelden
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:14:54 -0500, Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

You're going to love this.  Got this error?

GIM69208S ** RECEIVE PROCESSING HAS FAILED BECAUSE THE LEVEL OF PROGRAM
GIMJVCLT (34.09) IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE LEVEL OF THE SMP/E CALLING
PROGRAM GIMSMP (34.13).

(GIMVCLT is in the following path: /usr/lpp/smp/classes/com/ibm/smp/)


In the same path, there is a file named GIMJVLVL.properties with the
following description:

GIMJVLVL.properties contains the level indicator
for the Java code contained in package com.ibm.smp.
This file must be updated each time the
SMP/E GIMLEVEL module is updated.


And the following parameters:

GIMVER=3
GIMREL=4
GIMMOD=0
GIMPTF=09


Change GIMPTF=09 to GIMPTF=13.  Problem goes away.


Well, you've forced a match of the check that is made to keep you from
shooting yourself in the foot.   This may or may not cause a problem 
later on.   As you already said the module in the HFS is back leveled 
for whatever reason ... due to some maintenance bungle.  

Are you sure you don't have a maintenance root or a copy of it with
the correct level?What does you DDDEFs tell you (if anything)? 

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

2008-06-05 Thread Miller, Pat
The last modified date on GIMJVCLT corresponds to the last service that 
touched it, which was on as shipped with the serverpac.  

I've gone back and looked at the original serverpac output.  The last changed 
date corresponds to the date the HFS was loaded during serverpac install.

To answer your question, I've searched the directory tree extensively to make 
sure there aren't updated copies of this somewhere.  There aren't.  I was 
skeptical at first, but it certainly looks to me as if it was shipped in this 
condition.


 -Original Message-
From:   IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Behalf Of 
Mark Zelden
Sent:   Thursday, June 05, 2008 11:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:14:54 -0500, Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

You're going to love this.  Got this error?

GIM69208S ** RECEIVE PROCESSING HAS FAILED BECAUSE THE LEVEL OF PROGRAM
GIMJVCLT (34.09) IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE LEVEL OF THE SMP/E CALLING
PROGRAM GIMSMP (34.13).

(GIMVCLT is in the following path: /usr/lpp/smp/classes/com/ibm/smp/)


In the same path, there is a file named GIMJVLVL.properties with the
following description:

GIMJVLVL.properties contains the level indicator
for the Java code contained in package com.ibm.smp.
This file must be updated each time the
SMP/E GIMLEVEL module is updated.


And the following parameters:

GIMVER=3
GIMREL=4
GIMMOD=0
GIMPTF=09


Change GIMPTF=09 to GIMPTF=13.  Problem goes away.


Well, you've forced a match of the check that is made to keep you from
shooting yourself in the foot.   This may or may not cause a problem 
later on.   As you already said the module in the HFS is back leveled 
for whatever reason ... due to some maintenance bungle.  

Are you sure you don't have a maintenance root or a copy of it with
the correct level?What does you DDDEFs tell you (if anything)? 

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

2008-06-05 Thread Mark Zelden
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:01:08 -0500, Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

The last modified date on GIMJVCLT corresponds to the last service that
touched it, which was on as shipped with the serverpac.

I've gone back and looked at the original serverpac output.  The last
changed date corresponds to the date the HFS was loaded during serverpac
install.

To answer your question, I've searched the directory tree extensively to
make sure there aren't updated copies of this somewhere.  There aren't.  I
was skeptical at first, but it certainly looks to me as if it was shipped in
this condition.


I *highly* doubt it was shipped that way.   I wouldn't expect it in the
directory
tree unless you updated your BPXPRMxx to mount the maintenance root
at IPL time.  If you look at your DDDEFs for unix directories, they probably
all point to a prefix like /service.   That is where the maintenance was
applied - to a copy of the live HFS mounted at /service (or whatever yours
is called).  The problem is you have to find that maintenance HFS (if it hasn't
been deleted), re-mount it at /service (or whatever) and see if the level 
matches.   If you can find it and it matches, you may want to clone a copy
to mount for your next IPL (even though it appears you have been running
out of sync for a long time).

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

2008-06-05 Thread Miller, Pat
Like I say, I was skeptical.  But I see no service in the CSI that hits it that 
has been applied since the serverpac install.

 -Original Message-
From:   IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Behalf Of 
Mark Zelden
Sent:   Thursday, June 05, 2008 12:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:01:08 -0500, Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

The last modified date on GIMJVCLT corresponds to the last service that
touched it, which was on as shipped with the serverpac.

I've gone back and looked at the original serverpac output.  The last
changed date corresponds to the date the HFS was loaded during serverpac
install.

To answer your question, I've searched the directory tree extensively to
make sure there aren't updated copies of this somewhere.  There aren't.  I
was skeptical at first, but it certainly looks to me as if it was shipped in
this condition.


I *highly* doubt it was shipped that way.   I wouldn't expect it in the
directory
tree unless you updated your BPXPRMxx to mount the maintenance root
at IPL time.  If you look at your DDDEFs for unix directories, they probably
all point to a prefix like /service.   That is where the maintenance was
applied - to a copy of the live HFS mounted at /service (or whatever yours
is called).  The problem is you have to find that maintenance HFS (if it hasn't
been deleted), re-mount it at /service (or whatever) and see if the level 
matches.   If you can find it and it matches, you may want to clone a copy
to mount for your next IPL (even though it appears you have been running
out of sync for a long time).

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

2008-06-05 Thread Mark Zelden
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:57:52 -0500, Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Like I say, I was skeptical.  But I see no service in the CSI that hits it
that has been applied since the serverpac install.


What is the RMID of GIMLEVEL?   Is that PTF still in your SMPPTS?

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

2008-06-05 Thread Miller, Pat
UO00335.  Not in the PTS.

 -Original Message-
From:   IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Behalf Of 
Mark Zelden
Sent:   Thursday, June 05, 2008 2:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:57:52 -0500, Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Like I say, I was skeptical.  But I see no service in the CSI that hits it
that has been applied since the serverpac install.


What is the RMID of GIMLEVEL?   Is that PTF still in your SMPPTS?

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

2008-06-05 Thread Mark Zelden
That is level 34.09.   So it isn't your HFS that is back leveled, it is your 
loadlib that is forward leveled.  Again... some sort of maintenance 
screw up, or a manual copy of a higher level into your loadlib that
GIMSMP is being picked up from.   Which brings up a point...  Since you
say there is no joblib/steplib, are you sure GIMSMP is being picked up
from the SYS1.MIGLIB that matches your system level?

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html




On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:21:12 -0500, Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

UO00335.  Not in the PTS.

 -Original Message-
From:  IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent:  Thursday, June 05, 2008 2:22 PM
To:IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:   Re: SMP/E Error - Resolved

On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:57:52 -0500, Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Like I say, I was skeptical.  But I see no service in the CSI that hits it
that has been applied since the serverpac install.


What is the RMID of GIMLEVEL?   Is that PTF still in your SMPPTS?

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: SMP/E Error

2008-06-02 Thread Michael Wickman
We got it when steplibing for newer linklib but using older uss mounts
(converting from z/os 1.7 to 1.9)  SMP wants both at the same level.


*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Mike Wickman
Technical Services
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Miller, Pat
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 3:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] SMP/E Error

Anybody seen this before?  We're simply trying to do a RECEIVE
FROMNETWORK.  We've done it successfully numerous times in the last
year:

GIM69208S ** RECEIVE PROCESSING HAS FAILED BECAUSE THE LEVEL OF PROGRAM
GIMJVCLT
 (34.09) IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE LEVEL OF THE SMP/E
CALLING  
 PROGRAM GIMSMP (34.13).


GIMVCLT is in the following path: /usr/lpp/smp/classes/com/ibm/smp/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html






font size=1
div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 
1.0pt 0in'
/div
This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
 and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
 any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
 and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
 return email and delete this email from your system.
/font

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: SMP/E Error

2008-06-02 Thread Mark Zelden
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:39:04 -0500, Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Anybody seen this before?  We're simply trying to do a RECEIVE FROMNETWORK.
 We've done it successfully numerous times in the last year:

GIM69208S ** RECEIVE PROCESSING HAS FAILED BECAUSE THE LEVEL OF PROGRAM
GIMJVCLT
 (34.09) IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE LEVEL OF THE SMP/E CALLING
 PROGRAM GIMSMP (34.13).

GIMVCLT is in the following path: /usr/lpp/smp/classes/com/ibm/smp/


Are you STEPLIBing to a higher level of SMP/E then the running system?  
Or did you not clone your UNIX root file the last time you applied 
maintenance along with your sysres?  

If you know where the proper level is, you can mount it at /service (or whatever
your service directory name is) and specify the path name in the SMPCPATH DD
or CLIENT parms:

//CLNTINFO DD *  
  CLIENT
  classpath=/service/usr/lpp/smp/classes/ 
  /CLIENT  
/*

   
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: SMP/E Error

2008-06-02 Thread Miller, Pat
No JOBLIB, no STEPLIB.  Appears that the module in the HFS is back leveled for 
whatever reason.  I'm fairly certain we went to the 34.13 level with the z/OS 
ServerPac (or possibly with the toleration/compatibility maintenance), which 
means a couple years ago.  

The job has a DD statement (SMPCPATH) that points to the path.  I suspect the 
problem is that the upgraded module lies on a different path, owing to some 
maintenance bungle.  Now, I just have to find it, assuming it still exists.


 -Original Message-
From:   IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Behalf Of 
Mark Zelden
Sent:   Monday, June 02, 2008 3:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: SMP/E Error

On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:39:04 -0500, Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Anybody seen this before?  We're simply trying to do a RECEIVE FROMNETWORK.
 We've done it successfully numerous times in the last year:

GIM69208S ** RECEIVE PROCESSING HAS FAILED BECAUSE THE LEVEL OF PROGRAM
GIMJVCLT
 (34.09) IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE LEVEL OF THE SMP/E CALLING
 PROGRAM GIMSMP (34.13).

GIMVCLT is in the following path: /usr/lpp/smp/classes/com/ibm/smp/


Are you STEPLIBing to a higher level of SMP/E then the running system?  
Or did you not clone your UNIX root file the last time you applied 
maintenance along with your sysres?  

If you know where the proper level is, you can mount it at /service (or whatever
your service directory name is) and specify the path name in the SMPCPATH DD
or CLIENT parms:

//CLNTINFO DD *  
  CLIENT
  classpath=/service/usr/lpp/smp/classes/ 
  /CLIENT  
/*

   
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: SMP/E Error

2008-06-02 Thread Lizette Koehler
However, my error was due to teh JOBLIB being the new SMPE maint but my steplib 
was pointing to the SCEERUN2 data set.  There was nothing that hit the SCEERUN2 
data set with my GIMUNZIP maint.  

But once I moved SCEERUN2 from the STEPLIB to my JOBLIB (no steplibs at all)  
everything ran good.

Lizette




We got it when steplibing for newer linklib but using older uss mounts
(converting from z/os 1.7 to 1.9)  SMP wants both at the same level.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: SMP/E Error

2008-06-02 Thread Lizette Koehler
I just got this error on my receive.  Check to see if you have a JOBLIB and 
STEPLIB in the JCL.  If so, more the STEPLIB to the JOBLIB.

The other thing that got me was some maintanence that went in on GIMUNZIP.  I 
had to move some JAVE USS entries to the production JAVA USS Paths.  But I 
forgot (did not have time) to move my maintanence into the production libraries.

Also check that your paths you will be using are mounted.

Lizette



Anybody seen this before?  We're simply trying to do a RECEIVE FROMNETWORK.  
We've done it successfully numerous times in the last year:

GIM69208S ** RECEIVE PROCESSING HAS FAILED BECAUSE THE LEVEL OF PROGRAM 
GIMJVCLT
 (34.09) IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE LEVEL OF THE SMP/E CALLING 
  
 PROGRAM GIMSMP (34.13).   
  

GIMVCLT is in the following path: /usr/lpp/smp/classes/com/ibm/smp/


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html