Dumps when starting Started Tasks

2014-04-15 Thread Ferran Perxas
Good morning,

Yesterday we had an issue I'd like to share just in case someone has
experienced it before.

Sometime in the morning this piece of log appeared on syslog

IEE501I CONSOLE UC4CN000 FAILED, REASON=ABTERM.  ALL ALTERNATES UNAVAILABLE
, CONSOLE IS NOT SWITCHED
IEA631I  OPERATOR UC4CN000 NOW INACTIVE, SYSTEM=CPUA, LU=UC4TR000

IEE828E SOME MESSAGES NOW SENT TO HARDCOPY ONLY

Please notice this is not a "standard" console, it is somehow related to
the product UC4 which is a Batch scheduler. We are still talking to support
in order to know how this exactly works.

The real problem was that from this moment no started tasks could be
started, all of them crashed on start:

START MVTASA.ST8005
$HASP100 MVTASA   ON STCINRDR
OMS9612I PROCESSING INIT (STC09784)
IEF695I START MVTASA   WITH JOBNAME MVTASA   IS ASSIGNED TO USER STCSYS
 , GROUP STCGRP
$HASP373 MVTASA   STARTED
IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 893
SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=602  REASON CODE=
 TIME=08.32.24  SEQ=09184  CPU=0041  ASID=008F
 PSW AT TIME OF ERROR  070C1000   80FEB316  ILC 2  INTC 0D
   NO ACTIVE MODULE FOUND
   NAME=UNKNOWN
   DATA AT PSW  00FEB310 - 00181610  0A0D  00FF6258
   AR/GR 0: /8400   1: /84602000
 2: 0181001D/   3: /00F61100
 4: /008FFBF8   5: /000AB76C
 6: /89494736   7: /00FB8D00
 8: /00FEA621   9: /
 A: /   B: /008FECA8
 C: /0041   D: /0BF00E78
 E: /00FF0280   F: /
 END OF SYMPTOM DUMP
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME=*UNAVAIL, ASID=008F.
$HASP310 MVTASA   TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY

We arrived a few minutes later. At this point some critical tasks in this
shop required to be started as a started task so we had to stop and IPL the
whole LPAR before major incidents appeared. With the fresh IPL the whole
system worked fine.

The last few lines of log (stopping JES2) during the stop showed us these
lines.

IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME=*UNAVAIL, ASID=0024.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME=*UNAVAIL, ASID=002D.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY

Has anyone experienced something similar?

Regards,
Ferran

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


The Register discovers IBM Hursley

2014-04-15 Thread David Boyes
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/04/10/geeks_guide_visits_ibm_hursley/

Located just off the A3090. How cool is that? 8-)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Accessing DASD areas that have no DSCB (UNCLASSIFIED)

2014-04-15 Thread retired mainframer
:>: -Original Message-
:>: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:>: Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
:>: Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 8:51 PM
:>: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:>: Subject: Re: Accessing DASD areas that have no DSCB (UNCLASSIFIED)
:>:
:>: On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:27:28 +, Storr, Lon A CTR USARMY HRC (US)
:>: wrote:
:>: >
:>: >When a dataset is deleted, it is scratched and its DSCB in the VTOC is
:>: freed. Hence, as far as I know, the dataset's data can only be accessed
:>: in one of two ways:
:>: >
:>: Pedantry:  "have no DSCB"?  Is there not in fact a DSCB describing such
:>: an extent?  Perhaps a Format 5, or thereabouts?

Only for non-indexed volumes.  If the volume is indexed, the free space
details are kept in the index, not the VTOC.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

2014-04-15 Thread Rob Scott
Only a guess, however this is what my first suspicion would be :

(1) You have an ISV product that is detecting a new address or jobstep - (maybe 
via the IEFUJI or IEFUSI).
(2) The ISV product exit is attempting to notify its associated server via a 
cross-memory post using an ASCB address stored somewhere in common storage.
(3) It is possible your ISV product has terminated without cleaning up, leaving 
behind the exit and the common storage control block.
(3a) It is also possible that the common storage block has been overlaid 
somehow without the ISV server terminating.
(4) The exit is attempting to cross-memory post using bad (or out of date) 
information from the common storage control block.

This would explain the S602 abends that you are seeing.

Capture a dump and you should be able to find the address of the POST-issuing 
program.   

Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Ferran Perxas
Sent: 15 April 2014 08:29
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

Good morning,

Yesterday we had an issue I'd like to share just in case someone has 
experienced it before.

Sometime in the morning this piece of log appeared on syslog

IEE501I CONSOLE UC4CN000 FAILED, REASON=ABTERM.  ALL ALTERNATES UNAVAILABLE , 
CONSOLE IS NOT SWITCHED
IEA631I  OPERATOR UC4CN000 NOW INACTIVE, SYSTEM=CPUA, LU=UC4TR000

IEE828E SOME MESSAGES NOW SENT TO HARDCOPY ONLY

Please notice this is not a "standard" console, it is somehow related to the 
product UC4 which is a Batch scheduler. We are still talking to support in 
order to know how this exactly works.

The real problem was that from this moment no started tasks could be started, 
all of them crashed on start:

START MVTASA.ST8005
$HASP100 MVTASA   ON STCINRDR
OMS9612I PROCESSING INIT (STC09784)
IEF695I START MVTASA   WITH JOBNAME MVTASA   IS ASSIGNED TO USER STCSYS
 , GROUP STCGRP
$HASP373 MVTASA   STARTED
IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 893
SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=602  REASON CODE=
 TIME=08.32.24  SEQ=09184  CPU=0041  ASID=008F
 PSW AT TIME OF ERROR  070C1000   80FEB316  ILC 2  INTC 0D
   NO ACTIVE MODULE FOUND
   NAME=UNKNOWN
   DATA AT PSW  00FEB310 - 00181610  0A0D  00FF6258
   AR/GR 0: /8400   1: /84602000
 2: 0181001D/   3: /00F61100
 4: /008FFBF8   5: /000AB76C
 6: /89494736   7: /00FB8D00
 8: /00FEA621   9: /
 A: /   B: /008FECA8
 C: /0041   D: /0BF00E78
 E: /00FF0280   F: /
 END OF SYMPTOM DUMP
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME=*UNAVAIL, ASID=008F.
$HASP310 MVTASA   TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY

We arrived a few minutes later. At this point some critical tasks in this shop 
required to be started as a started task so we had to stop and IPL the whole 
LPAR before major incidents appeared. With the fresh IPL the whole system 
worked fine.

The last few lines of log (stopping JES2) during the stop showed us these lines.

IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME=*UNAVAIL, ASID=0024.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME=*UNAVAIL, ASID=002D.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY

Has anyone experienced something similar?

Regards,
Ferran

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Accessing DASD areas that have no DSCB (UNCLASSIFIED)

2014-04-15 Thread R.S.

W dniu 2014-04-15 11:11, retired mainframer pisze:

:>: -Original Message-
:>: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:>: Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
:>: Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 8:51 PM
:>: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:>: Subject: Re: Accessing DASD areas that have no DSCB (UNCLASSIFIED)
:>:
:>: On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:27:28 +, Storr, Lon A CTR USARMY HRC (US)
:>: wrote:
:>: >
:>: >When a dataset is deleted, it is scratched and its DSCB in the VTOC is
:>: freed. Hence, as far as I know, the dataset's data can only be accessed
:>: in one of two ways:
:>: >
:>: Pedantry:  "have no DSCB"?  Is there not in fact a DSCB describing such
:>: an extent?  Perhaps a Format 5, or thereabouts?

Only for non-indexed volumes.  If the volume is indexed, the free space
details are kept in the index, not the VTOC.
Nevermind, the question was about free space, regardless of the wording 
used to descirbe it.


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






--
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być jedynie 
jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i może być 
karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, prosimy niezwłocznie 
zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale usunąć tę wiadomość 
włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you 
are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorized to 
forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, 
distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be 
punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender 
immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete 
permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to 
hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl 
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2014 r. kapitał zakładowy mBanku S.A. (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 168.696.052 złote.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

2014-04-15 Thread Shane Ginnane
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:19:30 +, Rob Scott wrote:

> Capture a dump and you should be able to find the address of the POST-issuing 
> program.

If it were my shop I'd be mighty cranky if a Stand Alone Dump wasn't taken - 
big likelihood this is a "one-off" and not something where a dump can be 
captured at will.

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

2014-04-15 Thread Rob Scott
Of course, the first line should be :

"(1) You have an ISV product that is detecting a new address space or jobstep - 
(maybe via the IEFUJI or IEFUSI)." 

Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Rob Scott
Sent: 15 April 2014 10:20
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

Only a guess, however this is what my first suspicion would be :

(1) You have an ISV product that is detecting a new address or jobstep - (maybe 
via the IEFUJI or IEFUSI).
(2) The ISV product exit is attempting to notify its associated server via a 
cross-memory post using an ASCB address stored somewhere in common storage.
(3) It is possible your ISV product has terminated without cleaning up, leaving 
behind the exit and the common storage control block.
(3a) It is also possible that the common storage block has been overlaid 
somehow without the ISV server terminating.
(4) The exit is attempting to cross-memory post using bad (or out of date) 
information from the common storage control block.

This would explain the S602 abends that you are seeing.

Capture a dump and you should be able to find the address of the POST-issuing 
program.   

Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Ferran Perxas
Sent: 15 April 2014 08:29
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

Good morning,

Yesterday we had an issue I'd like to share just in case someone has 
experienced it before.

Sometime in the morning this piece of log appeared on syslog

IEE501I CONSOLE UC4CN000 FAILED, REASON=ABTERM.  ALL ALTERNATES UNAVAILABLE , 
CONSOLE IS NOT SWITCHED
IEA631I  OPERATOR UC4CN000 NOW INACTIVE, SYSTEM=CPUA, LU=UC4TR000

IEE828E SOME MESSAGES NOW SENT TO HARDCOPY ONLY

Please notice this is not a "standard" console, it is somehow related to the 
product UC4 which is a Batch scheduler. We are still talking to support in 
order to know how this exactly works.

The real problem was that from this moment no started tasks could be started, 
all of them crashed on start:

START MVTASA.ST8005
$HASP100 MVTASA   ON STCINRDR
OMS9612I PROCESSING INIT (STC09784)
IEF695I START MVTASA   WITH JOBNAME MVTASA   IS ASSIGNED TO USER STCSYS
 , GROUP STCGRP
$HASP373 MVTASA   STARTED
IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 893
SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=602  REASON CODE=
 TIME=08.32.24  SEQ=09184  CPU=0041  ASID=008F
 PSW AT TIME OF ERROR  070C1000   80FEB316  ILC 2  INTC 0D
   NO ACTIVE MODULE FOUND
   NAME=UNKNOWN
   DATA AT PSW  00FEB310 - 00181610  0A0D  00FF6258
   AR/GR 0: /8400   1: /84602000
 2: 0181001D/   3: /00F61100
 4: /008FFBF8   5: /000AB76C
 6: /89494736   7: /00FB8D00
 8: /00FEA621   9: /
 A: /   B: /008FECA8
 C: /0041   D: /0BF00E78
 E: /00FF0280   F: /
 END OF SYMPTOM DUMP
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME=*UNAVAIL, ASID=008F.
$HASP310 MVTASA   TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY

We arrived a few minutes later. At this point some critical tasks in this shop 
required to be started as a started task so we had to stop and IPL the whole 
LPAR before major incidents appeared. With the fresh IPL the whole system 
worked fine.

The last few lines of log (stopping JES2) during the stop showed us these lines.

IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME=*UNAVAIL, ASID=0024.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME=*UNAVAIL, ASID=002D.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
$HASP310 INIT TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY

Has anyone experienced something similar?

Regards,
Ferran


Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

2014-04-15 Thread Ferran Perxas
Hi Rob and Shane,

Yes this is a "one-off" at least we hope it. In this shop they have some
sort of policy in capturing dumps vs DASD space that I do not like to
comment. Far beyond cranky feels more appropriate.

Thanks Rob, that's such a nice first guess (I did understand your (1) )

But then, if they're not able to patch the program in order to clean all
the mess and do not leave exits behind, is there something we can do to
clean the Address ourselves. I can't think about anything "not dangerous".

Regards,

Ferran


On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Rob Scott wrote:

> Of course, the first line should be :
>
> "(1) You have an ISV product that is detecting a new address space or
> jobstep - (maybe via the IEFUJI or IEFUSI)."
>
> Rob Scott
> Lead Developer
> Rocket Software
> 77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
> Tel: +1.781.684.2305
> Email: rsc...@rs.com
> Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Rob Scott
> Sent: 15 April 2014 10:20
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks
>
> Only a guess, however this is what my first suspicion would be :
>
> (1) You have an ISV product that is detecting a new address or jobstep -
> (maybe via the IEFUJI or IEFUSI).
> (2) The ISV product exit is attempting to notify its associated server via
> a cross-memory post using an ASCB address stored somewhere in common
> storage.
> (3) It is possible your ISV product has terminated without cleaning up,
> leaving behind the exit and the common storage control block.
> (3a) It is also possible that the common storage block has been overlaid
> somehow without the ISV server terminating.
> (4) The exit is attempting to cross-memory post using bad (or out of date)
> information from the common storage control block.
>
> This would explain the S602 abends that you are seeing.
>
> Capture a dump and you should be able to find the address of the
> POST-issuing program.
>
> Rob Scott
> Lead Developer
> Rocket Software
> 77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
> Tel: +1.781.684.2305
> Email: rsc...@rs.com
> Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Ferran Perxas
> Sent: 15 April 2014 08:29
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Dumps when starting Started Tasks
>
> Good morning,
>
> Yesterday we had an issue I'd like to share just in case someone has
> experienced it before.
>
> Sometime in the morning this piece of log appeared on syslog
>
> IEE501I CONSOLE UC4CN000 FAILED, REASON=ABTERM.  ALL ALTERNATES
> UNAVAILABLE , CONSOLE IS NOT SWITCHED
> IEA631I  OPERATOR UC4CN000 NOW INACTIVE, SYSTEM=CPUA, LU=UC4TR000
>
> IEE828E SOME MESSAGES NOW SENT TO HARDCOPY ONLY
>
> Please notice this is not a "standard" console, it is somehow related to
> the product UC4 which is a Batch scheduler. We are still talking to support
> in order to know how this exactly works.
>
> The real problem was that from this moment no started tasks could be
> started, all of them crashed on start:
>
> START MVTASA.ST8005
> $HASP100 MVTASA   ON STCINRDR
> OMS9612I PROCESSING INIT (STC09784)
> IEF695I START MVTASA   WITH JOBNAME MVTASA   IS ASSIGNED TO USER STCSYS
>  , GROUP STCGRP
> $HASP373 MVTASA   STARTED
> IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 893
> SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=602  REASON CODE=
>  TIME=08.32.24  SEQ=09184  CPU=0041  ASID=008F
>  PSW AT TIME OF ERROR  070C1000   80FEB316  ILC 2  INTC 0D
>NO ACTIVE MODULE FOUND
>NAME=UNKNOWN
>DATA AT PSW  00FEB310 - 00181610  0A0D  00FF6258
>AR/GR 0: /8400   1: /84602000
>  2: 0181001D/   3: /00F61100
>  4: /008FFBF8   5: /000AB76C
>  6: /89494736   7: /00FB8D00
>  8: /00FEA621   9: /
>  A: /   B: /008FECA8
>  C: /0041   D: /0BF00E78
>  E: /00FF0280   F: /
>  END OF SYMPTOM DUMP
> IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME=*UNAVAIL, ASID=008F.
> $HASP310 MVTASA   TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
>
> We arrived a few minutes later. At this point some critical tasks in this
> shop required to be started as a started task so we had to stop and IPL the
> whole LPAR before major incidents appeared. With the fresh IPL the whole
> system worked fine.
>
> The last few lines of log (stopping JES2) during the stop showed us these
> lines.
>
> IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME=*UNAVAIL, ASID=0024.
> IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME=*UNAVAIL, ASID=002D.
> IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
> IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
> IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME/ASID NOT AVAILABLE.
> IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.

Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

2014-04-15 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Ferran Perxas wrote:

>Yes this is a "one-off" at least we hope it. 

Something must have changed. I would sit down and review all and every changes 
on the whole SysPlex just to be sure. Everything like, parmlib changes, exit 
assembly, version change, etc.

>But then, if they're not able to patch the program in order to clean all the 
>mess and do not leave exits behind, is there something we can do to clean the 
>Address ourselves. I can't think about anything "not dangerous".

Perhaps IPL after setting up your SLIPs? I believe some residual memory areas 
are still sitting eating up precious bits and bytes. On what z/OS version are 
you?

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

2014-04-15 Thread Rob Scott
You can remove dynamic exits (of which IEFUJI and IEFUSI are part) using the 
SETPROG EXIT command.

But the above assumes that the product is, in fact, using them.

Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Ferran Perxas
Sent: 15 April 2014 10:54
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

Hi Rob and Shane,

Yes this is a "one-off" at least we hope it. In this shop they have some sort 
of policy in capturing dumps vs DASD space that I do not like to comment. Far 
beyond cranky feels more appropriate.

Thanks Rob, that's such a nice first guess (I did understand your (1) )

But then, if they're not able to patch the program in order to clean all the 
mess and do not leave exits behind, is there something we can do to clean the 
Address ourselves. I can't think about anything "not dangerous".

Regards,

Ferran


On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Rob Scott wrote:

> Of course, the first line should be :
>
> "(1) You have an ISV product that is detecting a new address space or 
> jobstep - (maybe via the IEFUJI or IEFUSI)."
>
> Rob Scott
> Lead Developer
> Rocket Software
> 77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
> Tel: +1.781.684.2305
> Email: rsc...@rs.com
> Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] 
> On Behalf Of Rob Scott
> Sent: 15 April 2014 10:20
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks
>
> Only a guess, however this is what my first suspicion would be :
>
> (1) You have an ISV product that is detecting a new address or jobstep 
> - (maybe via the IEFUJI or IEFUSI).
> (2) The ISV product exit is attempting to notify its associated server 
> via a cross-memory post using an ASCB address stored somewhere in 
> common storage.
> (3) It is possible your ISV product has terminated without cleaning 
> up, leaving behind the exit and the common storage control block.
> (3a) It is also possible that the common storage block has been 
> overlaid somehow without the ISV server terminating.
> (4) The exit is attempting to cross-memory post using bad (or out of 
> date) information from the common storage control block.
>
> This would explain the S602 abends that you are seeing.
>
> Capture a dump and you should be able to find the address of the 
> POST-issuing program.
>
> Rob Scott
> Lead Developer
> Rocket Software
> 77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
> Tel: +1.781.684.2305
> Email: rsc...@rs.com
> Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] 
> On Behalf Of Ferran Perxas
> Sent: 15 April 2014 08:29
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Dumps when starting Started Tasks
>
> Good morning,
>
> Yesterday we had an issue I'd like to share just in case someone has 
> experienced it before.
>
> Sometime in the morning this piece of log appeared on syslog
>
> IEE501I CONSOLE UC4CN000 FAILED, REASON=ABTERM.  ALL ALTERNATES 
> UNAVAILABLE , CONSOLE IS NOT SWITCHED
> IEA631I  OPERATOR UC4CN000 NOW INACTIVE, SYSTEM=CPUA, LU=UC4TR000
>
> IEE828E SOME MESSAGES NOW SENT TO HARDCOPY ONLY
>
> Please notice this is not a "standard" console, it is somehow related 
> to the product UC4 which is a Batch scheduler. We are still talking to 
> support in order to know how this exactly works.
>
> The real problem was that from this moment no started tasks could be 
> started, all of them crashed on start:
>
> START MVTASA.ST8005
> $HASP100 MVTASA   ON STCINRDR
> OMS9612I PROCESSING INIT (STC09784)
> IEF695I START MVTASA   WITH JOBNAME MVTASA   IS ASSIGNED TO USER STCSYS
>  , GROUP STCGRP
> $HASP373 MVTASA   STARTED
> IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 893
> SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=602  REASON CODE=
>  TIME=08.32.24  SEQ=09184  CPU=0041  ASID=008F
>  PSW AT TIME OF ERROR  070C1000   80FEB316  ILC 2  INTC 0D
>NO ACTIVE MODULE FOUND
>NAME=UNKNOWN
>DATA AT PSW  00FEB310 - 00181610  0A0D  00FF6258
>AR/GR 0: /8400   1: /84602000
>  2: 0181001D/   3: /00F61100
>  4: /008FFBF8   5: /000AB76C
>  6: /89494736   7: /00FB8D00
>  8: /00FEA621   9: /
>  A: /   B: /008FECA8
>  C: /0041   D: /0BF00E78
>  E: /00FF0280   F: /
>  END OF SYMPTOM DUMP
> IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X33E MATCHED.  JOBNAME=*UNAVAIL, ASID=008F.
> $HASP310 MVTASA   TERMINATED AT END OF MEMORY
>
> We arrived a few minutes later. At this point some critical tasks in 
> this shop required to be started as a started t

Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

2014-04-15 Thread Ferran Perxas
Hi Elardus,

A new version of the ISV program was installed about 6 months ago. We've
just find out what made it crash (this time) and it won't happen again. No
other changes were made, this is a very old shop, a z/os 1.4.

What we are trying to do is (just in case some other thing makes it ABEND
again and it leaves some garbage behind) have some kind of workaround
before having to stop and IPL the LPAR.

Thanks Rob, I'll chat with the product manager to see if your theory is
possible and then study the SETPROG possibility.

Regards,

Ferran



On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Rob Scott wrote:

> You can remove dynamic exits (of which IEFUJI and IEFUSI are part) using
> the SETPROG EXIT command.
>
> But the above assumes that the product is, in fact, using them.
>
> Rob Scott
> Lead Developer
> Rocket Software
> 77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
> Tel: +1.781.684.2305
> Email: rsc...@rs.com
> Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Ferran Perxas
> Sent: 15 April 2014 10:54
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks
>
> Hi Rob and Shane,
>
> Yes this is a "one-off" at least we hope it. In this shop they have some
> sort of policy in capturing dumps vs DASD space that I do not like to
> comment. Far beyond cranky feels more appropriate.
>
> Thanks Rob, that's such a nice first guess (I did understand your (1) )
>
> But then, if they're not able to patch the program in order to clean all
> the mess and do not leave exits behind, is there something we can do to
> clean the Address ourselves. I can't think about anything "not dangerous".
>
> Regards,
>
> Ferran
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Rob Scott  >wrote:
>
> > Of course, the first line should be :
> >
> > "(1) You have an ISV product that is detecting a new address space or
> > jobstep - (maybe via the IEFUJI or IEFUSI)."
> >
> > Rob Scott
> > Lead Developer
> > Rocket Software
> > 77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
> > Tel: +1.781.684.2305
> > Email: rsc...@rs.com
> > Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> > On Behalf Of Rob Scott
> > Sent: 15 April 2014 10:20
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks
> >
> > Only a guess, however this is what my first suspicion would be :
> >
> > (1) You have an ISV product that is detecting a new address or jobstep
> > - (maybe via the IEFUJI or IEFUSI).
> > (2) The ISV product exit is attempting to notify its associated server
> > via a cross-memory post using an ASCB address stored somewhere in
> > common storage.
> > (3) It is possible your ISV product has terminated without cleaning
> > up, leaving behind the exit and the common storage control block.
> > (3a) It is also possible that the common storage block has been
> > overlaid somehow without the ISV server terminating.
> > (4) The exit is attempting to cross-memory post using bad (or out of
> > date) information from the common storage control block.
> >
> > This would explain the S602 abends that you are seeing.
> >
> > Capture a dump and you should be able to find the address of the
> > POST-issuing program.
> >
> > Rob Scott
> > Lead Developer
> > Rocket Software
> > 77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
> > Tel: +1.781.684.2305
> > Email: rsc...@rs.com
> > Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> > On Behalf Of Ferran Perxas
> > Sent: 15 April 2014 08:29
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Dumps when starting Started Tasks
> >
> > Good morning,
> >
> > Yesterday we had an issue I'd like to share just in case someone has
> > experienced it before.
> >
> > Sometime in the morning this piece of log appeared on syslog
> >
> > IEE501I CONSOLE UC4CN000 FAILED, REASON=ABTERM.  ALL ALTERNATES
> > UNAVAILABLE , CONSOLE IS NOT SWITCHED
> > IEA631I  OPERATOR UC4CN000 NOW INACTIVE, SYSTEM=CPUA, LU=UC4TR000
> >
> > IEE828E SOME MESSAGES NOW SENT TO HARDCOPY ONLY
> >
> > Please notice this is not a "standard" console, it is somehow related
> > to the product UC4 which is a Batch scheduler. We are still talking to
> > support in order to know how this exactly works.
> >
> > The real problem was that from this moment no started tasks could be
> > started, all of them crashed on start:
> >
> > START MVTASA.ST8005
> > $HASP100 MVTASA   ON STCINRDR
> > OMS9612I PROCESSING INIT (STC09784)
> > IEF695I START MVTASA   WITH JOBNAME MVTASA   IS ASSIGNED TO USER STCSYS
> >  , GROUP STCGRP
> > $HASP373 MVTASA   STARTED
> > IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 893
> > SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=602  REASON CODE=
> >  TIME=08.32.24  SEQ=09184  CPU=0041  ASID=008F
> >  PSW AT TIME OF ERROR  070C1000   80FEB316 

Re: Enterprise COBOL v5.1 and RDz v9.x

2014-04-15 Thread Govind Chettiar
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:24:05 +, Chase, John  wrote:

>Hi All,
>
>I learned via PMR that Rational Developer for System z ("RDz") v9.x ("latest & 
>greatest") does not "officially" support Enterprise COBOL v5.1.  The 
>workaround suggested by RDz Support was to specify COBOL v4.2 and 
>XMLPARSE(XMLSS) in the RDz wizard, because COBOL v5.1 does not support 
>XMLPARSE(COMPAT).  We did that, and the resulting program source generated by 
>RDz compiled "clean" with COBOL v5.1, but ABENDs when invoked in CICS.  The 
>same source compiled with the COBOL v4.2 compiler runs fine in CICS.
>
>At the suggestion of the IBMer handling the RDz PMR I've opened a Request for 
>Enhancement (RFE) on Developerworks. You may view the RFE at:
>
>http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=50856
>
>An "IBM ID" is required to view it, and to vote on it.  If you have access to 
>IBMLink, you have an "IBM ID".
>
>Please consider voting in favor of this RFE.
>
>Thanks,
>
>-jc-
>
>**
>Information contained in this e-mail message and in any attachments thereto is 
>confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this 
>message, delete any copies held on your systems, notify the sender 
>immediately, and refrain from using or disclosing all or any part of its 
>content to any other person.
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


When an upgrade to zOS 2.1 is performed is one automatically at Cobol 5.1 as 
well?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Enterprise COBOL v5.1 and RDz v9.x

2014-04-15 Thread R.S.

W dniu 2014-04-15 13:24, Govind Chettiar pisze:

[...]
When an upgrade to zOS 2.1 is performed is one automatically at Cobol 5.1 as 
well?


Well, IT DEPENDS.
AFAIK you cannot order downlevel COBOL. So, when you order z/OS 2.1 now 
and you also order COBOL - you will get 5.1 version.
In general you can order only current versions of the products and 
system. Current at the time of order.
Note, there is limited time window of "version coexistence" - time when 
you can order two versions of the software.

Note GA (premiere) date of z/OS and COBOL need not to be synchronized.

So, when did you make the order?

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






--
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być jedynie 
jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i może być 
karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, prosimy niezwłocznie 
zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale usunąć tę wiadomość 
włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you 
are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorized to 
forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, 
distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be 
punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender 
immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete 
permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to 
hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl 
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2014 r. kapitał zakładowy mBanku S.A. (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 168.696.052 złote.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Emulator Screen Size with Attachmate Extra X-treme 9.3

2014-04-15 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
> 
> From years of experience the x'02' is the query. If that's not on, you gets 
> what's dealt so to speak.
> As one of the local auto dealers says 'irregardless'.

Actually, it's the x'80' that contains the "query bit".  The x'02' specifies 
LUTYPE2.

-jc-

> 
> 
> In a message dated 4/14/2014 4:55:19 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
> edja...@phoenixsoftware.com writes:
> 
> PSERVIC=X'02804450448E7F00'
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> lists...@listserv.ua.edu
> with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

**
Information contained in this e-mail message and in any attachments thereto is 
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this 
message, delete any copies held on your systems, notify the sender immediately, 
and refrain from using or disclosing all or any part of its content to any 
other person.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Enterprise COBOL v5.1 and RDz v9.x

2014-04-15 Thread Peter X. DeFabritus
This is not true.  I ordered a ServerPac for z/OS 2.1 a couple of months ago 
and I had no problem ordering Enterprise COBOL 4.2 along with it - there was no 
requirement to upgrade to 5.1.  Anyway, we can't upgrade to 5.1 until we 
migrate to a sysplex across our 3 LPARs.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Enterprise COBOL v5.1 and RDz v9.x

2014-04-15 Thread R.S.

W dniu 2014-04-15 13:52, Peter X. DeFabritus pisze:

This is not true.  I ordered a ServerPac for z/OS 2.1 a couple of months ago 
and I had no problem ordering Enterprise COBOL 4.2 along with it - there was no 
requirement to upgrade to 5.1.  Anyway, we can't upgrade to 5.1 until we 
migrate to a sysplex across our 3 LPARs.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


 Can you order COBOL v3 or z/OS 1.12 ?
However, you are right: COBOL 4.2 is still orderable.

One more remark: IBM policy is when they show new product, it is usually 
compatible with all *current* co-requisities.



Regards

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






--
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być jedynie 
jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i może być 
karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, prosimy niezwłocznie 
zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale usunąć tę wiadomość 
włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you 
are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorized to 
forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, 
distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be 
punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender 
immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete 
permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to 
hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl 
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2014 r. kapitał zakładowy mBanku S.A. (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 168.696.052 złote.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

2014-04-15 Thread Robert A. Rosenberg
At 11:54 +0200 on 04/15/2014, Ferran Perxas wrote about Re: Dumps 
when starting Started Tasks:



Yes this is a "one-off" at least we hope it. In this shop they have some
sort of policy in capturing dumps vs DASD space that I do not like to
comment. Far beyond cranky feels more appropriate.


If they will not allow you to use DASD for storing the dump, why not 
use a tape as the target device?


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

2014-04-15 Thread Ferran Perxas
Thanks Robert, it's a nice suggestion, we have already asked for it.

Thank you all, I'm talking with the ISV support I'll let you know if there
are any updates.


Regards



On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:

> At 11:54 +0200 on 04/15/2014, Ferran Perxas wrote about Re: Dumps when
> starting Started Tasks:
>
>
>  Yes this is a "one-off" at least we hope it. In this shop they have some
>> sort of policy in capturing dumps vs DASD space that I do not like to
>> comment. Far beyond cranky feels more appropriate.
>>
>
> If they will not allow you to use DASD for storing the dump, why not use a
> tape as the target device?
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Host on Demand and z/OS 1.13

2014-04-15 Thread Lopez, Sharon
We have just migrated our test lpar to z/OS 1.13 and we are having a problem 
with HOD.  We have a ticket opened with HOD support but it will probably be 
transferred to z/OS HTTP.  We set up a trace and it shows a handshake error and 
this error:
Thd-7 ERROR default_setsocketoptions(): setsockopt (TCP-NODELAY) failed for 
socket 11: 121 - EDC5121I Invalid argument.

Thd-7 ERROR gsk_secure_socket_init(): Default callback failed to restore socket 
options EDC5121I Invalid argument.

Has anyone else experienced this problem with HOD?  We are scheduled to go to 
production on April 27 and this might be a showstopper.

Thank you.







E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an 
authorized state official.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Accessing DASD areas that have no DSCB (UNCLASSIFIED)

2014-04-15 Thread Mike Schwab
If you deleted a dataset and the DASD is thin provisioned, it will
recycle the tracks when the VTOC is updated, and the records are gone.
If you deleted a dataset and RACF has Secure erase, the tracks are
erased before the VTOC is updated.
If you deleted a dataset and another dataset has allocated and written
on those tracks, the data is destroyed when overwritten.
If you deleted a dataset, and the three ways to destroy the data have
not occurred, then you use Absolute Track allocation to re-allocate
those tracks and read them.  The DCB must match, along with directory
entries.


On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Paul Gilmartin  wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:27:28 +, Storr, Lon A CTR USARMY HRC (US) wrote:
>>
>>When a dataset is deleted, it is scratched and its DSCB in the VTOC is freed. 
>>Hence, as far as I know, the dataset's data can only be accessed in one of 
>>two ways:
>>
> Pedantry:  "have no DSCB"?  Is there not in fact a DSCB describing such
> an extent?  Perhaps a Format 5, or thereabouts?
>
> -- gil
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Accessing DASD areas that have no DSCB (UNCLASSIFIED)

2014-04-15 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 11:33:39 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:
>
>If you deleted a dataset, and the three ways to destroy the data have
>not occurred, then you use Absolute Track allocation to re-allocate
>those tracks and read them.  The DCB must match, along with directory
>entries.
> 
FSVO "match".  Nearly anything ought to be readable with RECFM=U.
Keys make it more complicated, but there are (used to be?) CCWs
for this (backup utilites need them).  An assembler program can read 
beyond end-of-file (to wit the utilities for recovering deleted PDS
members).  PDSE, HFS, and zFS are harder yet, in part because of
ab$ence of documentation.

I thought no DCB information as such is retained for a deleted data set.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

2014-04-15 Thread Shane Ginnane
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 16:31:00 +0200, Ferran Perxas wrote:

>Thanks Robert, it's a nice suggestion, we have already asked for it.
>
>>
>> If they will not allow you to use DASD for storing the dump, why not use a
>> tape as the target device?

Be aware that this might be *VERY* slow. - was last time I tested it, but that 
was on 3590   (:
In production outages time is usually a more prized commodity than DASD space - 
educate your operations people. Much has been done to allow disk dumps to run 
pretty quickly - none of that probably helps on tape.

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Dumps when starting Started Tasks

2014-04-15 Thread Ed Finnell
Sometimes  EREP data can provide enough to distinguish the  stomper from 
the stompees. Active PSW REGs and a few lines of failing module can  be enough 
to see where it started. If it's vendor code they might have seen it  
before or know under what conditions it can be caused. The DB/2 folks were  
particularly adept
in my opinion. Had one where all but the last few dumps had been purged for 
 space, but the offender was the first one. Turns out a table had been 
dropped  and  recreated. When tried to reload it failed. REG 6? Oh, it had been 
 
extended on the fly. Just recreate the table, extend and then do the 
reload. Oh,  OK-it worked.  
 
 
In a message dated 4/15/2014 2:59:41 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
ibm-m...@tpg.com.au writes:

In  production outages time is usually a more prized commodity than DASD 
space -  educate your operations people. Much has been done to allow disk 
dumps to run  pretty quickly - none of that probably helps on  tape.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Emulator Screen Size with Attachmate Extra X-treme 9.3

2014-04-15 Thread Ed Finnell
Good catch, My old yellow notes just had PSERVIC starting with x'0280' as  
queryable. The next page describes the entries... 
 
 
In a message dated 4/15/2014 6:41:52 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
jch...@ussco.com writes:

Actually, it's the x'80' that contains the "query bit".  The  x'02' 
specifies LUTYPE2

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Fileaid Error

2014-04-15 Thread Ron Thomas
Hello.

I am running File aid job and getting the errored out, could someone please let 
me know what is the issue in the card?

//STEP03   EXEC PGM=FILEAID
//DD01 DD DSN=P01.MPLTD.D0415.NEW,DISP=SHR  
//SYSLIST  DD DSN=RKKUDE.S1ANCOPY.LIBR,DISP=(,CATLG,CATLG),   
//RECFM=FB,LRECL=132,  
//SPACE=(CYL,(50,20),RLSE) 
//**&&  ADD $$DD CARDS 
//SYSINDD *
$$DD01 LIST IF=(1,0,C'BAIS_LIMIT'),   
   ORIF=(1,0,C'CALC_ETHOD_CODE'), 
   ORIF=(1,0,C'COMENT_TEXT'),OUT=0
   ORIF=(1,0,C'C1MENT_TEXT'),OUT=0
   ORIF=(1,0,C'C2MMENT_TEXT'),OUT=0
   ORIF=(1,0,C'C3MMENT_TEXT'),OUT=0
/* 
 

Here I am getting the below error.

   $$DD01 LIST IF=(1,0,C'BASIS_LIMIT'), 
  
   ORIF=(1,0,C'CALC_METHOD_CODE'), 
   ORIF=(1,0,C'COMMENT_TEXT'),OUT=0
ABOVE FUNCTION ENDED ON DIRECTORY ENDRC=0  
 
  MEMBERS-READ=23,SELECTED=23,RECORDS-READ=25449   
   ORIF=(1,0,C'C1MMENT_TEXT'),OUT=0
CONTROL CARD DOES NOT BEGIN WITH $$DD  
.SKIPPING TO NEXT $$DD CARD  RC=4  


Thanks
Rajeev V


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Fileaid Error

2014-04-15 Thread Robert Galambos

you will need to put comma at the end of every out (except the last)

On 2014-04-15, 20:20, Ron Thomas wrote:

Hello.

I am running File aid job and getting the errored out, could someone please let 
me know what is the issue in the card?

//STEP03   EXEC PGM=FILEAID
//DD01 DD DSN=P01.MPLTD.D0415.NEW,DISP=SHR
//SYSLIST  DD DSN=RKKUDE.S1ANCOPY.LIBR,DISP=(,CATLG,CATLG),
//RECFM=FB,LRECL=132,
//SPACE=(CYL,(50,20),RLSE)
//**&&  ADD $$DD CARDS
//SYSINDD *
$$DD01 LIST IF=(1,0,C'BAIS_LIMIT'),
ORIF=(1,0,C'CALC_ETHOD_CODE'),
ORIF=(1,0,C'COMENT_TEXT'),OUT=0
ORIF=(1,0,C'C1MENT_TEXT'),OUT=0
ORIF=(1,0,C'C2MMENT_TEXT'),OUT=0
ORIF=(1,0,C'C3MMENT_TEXT'),OUT=0
/*
  


Here I am getting the below error.

$$DD01 LIST IF=(1,0,C'BASIS_LIMIT'),
ORIF=(1,0,C'CALC_METHOD_CODE'),
ORIF=(1,0,C'COMMENT_TEXT'),OUT=0
ABOVE FUNCTION ENDED ON DIRECTORY ENDRC=0
  
   MEMBERS-READ=23,SELECTED=23,RECORDS-READ=25449

ORIF=(1,0,C'C1MMENT_TEXT'),OUT=0
CONTROL CARD DOES NOT BEGIN WITH $$DD
.SKIPPING TO NEXT $$DD CARD  RC=4


Thanks
Rajeev V
  


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN